ML24275A045
| ML24275A045 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/2024 |
| From: | Jeffrey Reed - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| EIP-ZZ-00201 Addendum C, Rev 41 | |
| Download: ML24275A045 (1) | |
Text
PROCEDURE REVIEW FORM (PRF) 10 Initiation Initiator: James Reed Date: ()5 2t),21)24 Procedure Dept:
EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-00201 Addendum C New Rev. #
041 (3 digits required,)
Title:
EOF Notification Package LeveI of Use:
flContinuous LReference Information Mu1tip1e EN/A 2.0 Reason for Change/Description of Change (Ltst commitments, CRs, eB Change Requests, OERs, Plant Mocis etc. anct record numbers here.)
CR 202401030-001 Added new box in chart for contacting ANI.
See SOC for more details.
Continued: LI 3.O Document Disposition LITemp Change ENew Document EMajor Revision Minor Revision flCancellation EAdministrative Correction
Head or DesignatedAprqyuired for Administrative Corrections (Signature/PEN/Date) no other signatures required 4.0 Interim Approval (Temp. Change Only)
Temp. Change #:
Expiration Date:
Cognizant Supervisor (Signature/PIN/Date)
SRO (Signature/PIN/Date)
5.0 Comments
Continued: LI 6.0 Reviews and Signatures (NOT requircdfor Administrative Corrections)
Revi; Required I)epr PIN Signature Date CA0139 Attached Preparer 0
1f46-?
ioLt(o51_c(
N/A Tecirnical Review ç 3
-\\ L-E Yes. No TechnicalReviewp
,ivci.
EYes No Addl Review
,1 Yes E No Addl Review El Yes LI No EAdditionaiReviews (See Attach CAOI39forms).
Number ofadditional CAO1 39s:
Type Coordittator - PIN Signature Date CA0139 Attached EVahdation L
n No 50.59 Review ECA25 10 ECA251 1 ECA25 12 / EN/A (per.4PA-ZZ-t)0143) 9:1e1?( I initial/PIN Reviever Initial/PIN (Dept. Head or Designated Approver) Is a Change Management Plan required? Eyes No (IF YES, attach CA2773 or CA2774)
Is a Cross-Disciplinary review reqtiired? Eves No 7.0 Approval (Either approval must he qualified as PAIAPVR or R4 I. G4P!? in Senior Director Nuclear operations Approval (per APA-Z/Mt3WIJ t)Rt is required in accordance with APA-ZZ-00091 I )e1)J.Fti1 eni, I I ad I mat Review and Approval ORC Meeting:
%9 1t?
/%_:
/Ijf
?2f-?f Dept. Head or Designated Approver Senior Director Nucear Operations
(Signature/PIN/Date)
(Signature/PIN/Date)
JV)tt tt!iL..? provides lnStitWtlt)flS to ct)rnplctc IhJY /L)IflI (10(1 !flfl i)C dISC an/cc!
A19().0001, 2, 5, 35
- A210.0062, 65, 69 MI9O.(t 1 Page 1 of2 CA0033 A 1) A 7! an I (1
) S
APPLICABiLITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for alt aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified procedures to that portion of the activity. Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 of the 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidance.
I, Activity/Document Number: EIP-ZZ-00201_Addendum C Revision Number:041
Title:
EOF NOTIFCIATION PACKAGE Brief Description of activity (what is being changed and why):
r All the changes listed below are based off CR#202401030-OO1.
1.
Deleted ANI from No box and created standalone box for contacting ANL IfYES, no further 50.59 (or 72.48) review beyond this Applicability Determination (AD) is required, but complete the remainder of this form.
IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-OO 108 and KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and related facility or procedure change programs.
APA-ZZ-OO 143 Page 1 CA2510 IL Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activity that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a 50.59/72.48 Screen or evaluation has already been performed?
(See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.)
iiDoes the proposedactivity involveachange tothe:
Response
I Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating License?
(See 10 CFR 50.9(L) 2.
Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.54(a).)
3.
Security Plan which also incltides the Cyber Security Plan?
NO (See 10 CFR 50.54(p).)
Response
Identify the applicable 50.59/72.48 NO YES Evaluation Log No., License Amendment No., or applicable I document number.
Document #
See Section 4.2. 1 ofthe RM.
ic7i NO U
YFS If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 d FDP-ZZ-00103.
If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 r?1 NO E YES and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related facility or procedure change I
programs.
If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 I 08 U YES id SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security IPlan and related facility or procedure change programs.
ENO EYES 4.
Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 50.54(q).)
Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXX], equipment identified as important to emergency response [refer to KDP-ZZ-00013], or could alter response time, staffing, or other items covered in the 16 Planning Standards or in Appendix E to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ-00400J, question YES.
A170.OO1 0 Rev. 006
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued) 5.
1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(O.)
IfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
NO flYES 7.
Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License Condition 2.C(5).)
8.
Storage Cask Certificate ofCompliance (CoC), including appendices?
(See 10 CFR 72244.)
9.
Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,
the ODCM. PCP, State and local permitting. etc.) that are controlled by regulations. the Operating License (including Orders and License Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section 4.2.1 ofthe RM.)
Note: Ifthe maintenance is on ISFSI or cask-related items, the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is subject to a 10 CFR 72.48 Screen on a CA3 145.
Note: Ifthis Applicability Determination is being performed to satisfy the 60-day requirement of ODP-ZZ 00035 for a Plant Status Control tag(s) (e.g., for a component(s) placed in an out-of-normal position in support of maintenance), then the associated activity should no longer be considered a maintenance activity and the response to this AD question should be answered 2.
A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) supporting maintenance (TASM) that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
If YES, process per EDP-ZZ-0 I 003 for ASME code compliance and U YES related facility or procedure change programs.
See FP Screening questions in EDP
- ZZ-04044. Ifany ofthe screening L
- 1 YES questions are answered YES, a Fire Protection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.
IF YES, then contact Regulatory Affairs/Licensing to determine next SLC[)S.
IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-OOlOl
. for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes NO E YES ° Procedurally Controlled Temporary Modifications or MDP-ZZ-FSOOI for Freeze Seals.
Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-003 15, Appendix A.
APA-ZZ-OO I 43 Al 70.0010 6.
ISiProgramPlan? (See IOCFR5O.55a(g).)
NO NO 1NO EYES If YES, indicate the applicable NO LI YES program in Brief Description Section.
IV.Doesthe Piposed acti itv involve:
[
Response
See Section 4.2.2 ofthe RM 1. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original (as designed) condition?
(See 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4).)
If YES, process change per M NO YES APA-ZZ-00l01 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00320/330/340 for Maintenance activities.
Page 2 CA2510 Rev. 006
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
A YES response means that the IS Bases Change does NOT require further 50.59 review.
Response
SeeSection 4.2.4/46 ofthe RM.
rci YES
- IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-OO 101
-;J or APA-ZZ-00 109.
Does the proposed ictivit involveachange to:
1 Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or activities (including software used only for the implementation of administrative procedures, controls. or activities) governing the conduct of facility operations (subjecic.2!!1 control of IOCFR5O, Appeidx B)?
2.
Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation YFS If YES, process per based change process? (SCL NEI 9%C)4. )
APA-ZZOU54O.
If YES, perform a 72.48 Screen per APA-ZZ-00143 unless the change is completely covered by the response to Section 11.
El YES Note:
Editorial or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement to rform a72.48 Review.
V Does the piopo td ici tvmvo1veahing to the
Response
iSeSection 4 2 3 ofthe RM I
F$AR NO El YES Process the FSAR change per y
APA-ZZ-00 I 08 and FDP-ZZ-00 I 03 Ifthe above response is NO, check N/A in the Response for revising License Documents.
column at right.
Note:
Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve an FSAR change that may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided ifthe FSAR change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination form.)
2.
Technical Specification Bases?
NO El YES Ifthe above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
. A NO response in the Response El NO El YS column at left means that the FSAR/TS Bases change is one that N/A requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is not excludable from further review).
A YES response means that the FSAR does NOT require further 50.59 review.
lfthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a IS Bases change comparable to that which may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 El NO El YES Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803 (as described for an FSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to thIs N/A question in the Response column at right.)
Process the IS Bases change per APA-ZZ-00 1 08 and FDP-ZZ-00 103
- for revising License Documents.
Note:
A NO response in the Response column at left means that the IS Bases change is one that requires
- further 5059 review (i.e., is not excludable from further review).
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided ifthe TS Bases change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination form.)
VI.
VII
)oes the proposed activity potentially aThct the design.
. operation or mailitenance oithe ISfSI ticility as described in NO the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See FDP ZZ-00105 and Attachment 1 of APA-ZZ-00 143.)
APA-ZZ-OO I 43 A170.OO1O Page 3 CA2510 Rev. 006
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
VIII. Justification/explanatioii for Response(s) (as needed):
Revision ofthe RERP Implementing procedure is covered solely by IOCfR 5054(q) and controlled by KDP-ZZ-00400.
Therefore, 10CFR5O.59 is not required.
Ix.
Conclusion:
All aspects ofthe activity controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen jjçt required.
A pjrtion ofthe activity jjt controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen is required.
- x. Signoffs:
Qualified Preparer Date O //
(Print n(iie)
A (Sign/PIN)
Qualified Reviewer
- 1M Date 1
1/ 7tJ (Print name)
(Sign/PIN)
Ensure that once signed, this record is loaded into EB with the Activity/Document Number listed above or submit this form to either the Regulatory Affairs clerk or another member of Administration in accordance with APA-ZZ-00220.
APA-ZZ-00143 Page 4 CA2510 zl7O.OO1O Rev. 006
50.54(q) Screening Form Document #, Rev #, &
Title:
EIPZZ-OO2O1 Addendum C, Rev 041, EOF NOTIFICATION PACKAGE EP Tracking #:
2024025 Activity Description and
References:
All the changes listed below are based oft CR#202401030-OO1 I
. Deleted ANI from No box and created standalone box for contacting ANI.
Activity Scope:
YES NO this cwit> revise the R diologici1 iej.n Respons..P1an (RE RP)or lrnplernentin Procedures El Change Type:
YES NO Is this activity editorial or pogi iphieal9 El Previously Approved Change:
YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activity?
El TI IS what is the prvtously aptiocd aUivits Planning Standard Determination Does this activity impact any ofthe 50.47(b) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix E:
YES NO 50.47(b)(l)
- Assignment ofResponsibility (Organization Control)9 El 50.47(b)(2) - Onsite Emergency Organization9 El 50.47(b)(3)
- Emergency Response Support and Resources?
El 50.47(b)(4) - Emergency Classification System?
El 50.47(b)(5)
- Notification Methods and Procedures?
El 50A7(b)(6) - Emergency Communications9 El
[
50.47(b)(7)
- Public Education and Information?
El 50.47(b)(8) - Emergency facility and Equipment9 El 50.47(b)(9)
- Accident Assessment?
El 50.47(b)(1O)
- Protective Response?
El 50A7(b)(l 1) - Radiological Exposure Control7 El 50.47(b)(12) - Medical and Public Health Support?
El 50.47(b)(13)
- Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operations?
El 50.47(b)(14) - Drills and Exercises?
. El 50.47(b)(15) - Emergency Responder Training?
El 50A7(b)(16) - Emergency Plan Maintenance?
El Part5OAppendixE9
....El Commitment Impact Determination:
YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element?
El lfYes, record the Commitment number:
Explanation of Determination: (Enter an explanation to each determinationanswer that needs clarUication.)
By deleting ANI from NO box and adding a Standalone box to contact ANI s associated wfth pianning standard 10 CFR 50 54tb)t3) and 10 CFR 50 54(b)t13) bit does not impact either o the plannng standards The process still requires a phone call notification to the same number, the flow chart in ElPZ1.OO2O1 Addendum C was updated to reflect the current comrnuncaton requirements.
Based on the above an evaluation per 1O.CFR.50.54 (q) is not required.
File # A21OOO38 Page 1 of2 CA1523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002
5054(q) Screening Form Screening Evaluation Results:
Based on the results ofthe information above, can the activity be implemented without performing a YES NO full 5054(q) Effectiveness Evaluation9
- +/-
/
k%i :
Date C
PU 1? 4( hc quuf;fit%
ni cIt) Response Coordinator Reviewer (Sign/PN)
?
%C3O Date 9 1 Emergency Preparedness Mirng Sign,PJN Date Ffle#A210.0038 Page2of2 CA1523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002