ML23354A111

Logistics Support Coordinator Checklist

ML23354A111
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	10/26/2023
From:	Jeffrey Reed NRC/RGN-III
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk
References
EIP-ZZ-COO1OADDENDUME, Rev 10
Download: ML23354A111 (1)

Text

PROCEDURE REVIEW FORM (PRF) 1.0 Initiation Initiator: Date: _iQaLaQ2i Procedure Dept: _EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-COO1OADDENDUME _New Rev. # 015 (3 digits required)

Title:

Logistics Support Coordinator Checklist Level ofUse: UContinuous UReference Information ElMultiple EN/A 2.0 Reason for Changefflescription of Change (List commitments, CRs, eB Change Requests, OE&, Plant Mods etc. and record numbers here.)

CR 2023065 1 5. Revised one step and deleted a note. Reformatted to align with Callaway Standards.

. Pg.5- Initiation step 5 Revised to Synchronize EOF clock to PPC time CR#202306515 S Pg.6- Initiation step 7 NOTE Deleted Note CR#2023065 15 fl 3.0. Document Disposition ElTemp Changc New Document flMajor Revision Minor Revision flCancellation ElAdministrative Correction Dept. Head or Designated Approver requfredfor Administrative Corrections (Signatur&PIN/Date)noothersignaturesrequred 4.0 Interim Approval (Temp. Change Only) Temp. Change #: Expiration Date:

Cognizant Supervisor (Sigliature/PIN/Date) SRO (Signature/PIN/I)ate)

5.0 Comments

6.0 Rcviews and Signatures (NOT requiredfor Administrative Corrections)

Reviews LL PL PIN S%nature Date CAOl39Attadwd Preparer 0 (â7 2L?1ta)

El 3çL3 l-OYes No Review ;?_  : IYes No Addl Review 1J Yes No Addl Review U Yes El No DAdditional Reviews (See Attached CAOl39forms). Number ofadditional CAO139s:

Tppe Coordinator - PIN Sigi;alure Date I CA0139 Attached DVa1ation L ] ------

1--- - JOYesUNo 50.59 Review CA25lO 1CA25l1 LJCA2512 I EIN/A (perAPA-ZZ-00143) .

Screener initial/FIN Reviewer Initial/PIN (Dept. Head or Designated Approver) Is a Change Management Plan required? LJYes No (If YES, attach CA2773 or CA2774)

Is a Cross-Disciplinary review required? LJYes No 7.0 Approval (Either approval must be qualIed as PAT/APVR or PAT/GAPR in QualMaster)

Senior Director Nuclear Operations Approval (per APA-ZZ-OO1Ol) ORC is required in accordance with APA-ZZ-00091 f)epartmenl Hetd Final Review and Approval ORC Meeting:

Dept. Head or Designated Apprer k:!i? . %4 i Senior Director Nuclear Operations (Signature/PIN/Date) (Signature/PIN/Date)

Note; Page 2provides instructions to coeqilete thisform and may be discarded A190.0001, 2, 5, 35 A210.0062, 65, 69; M190.000l

- Page 1 of 2 CA0033 APA-ZZ-OO1O1 Rev. 002

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified procedures to that portion of the activity. Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 of the 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidanceS L Activity/Document Number: EIP-ZZ-COO1O AddendumE Revision Number: 015

Title:

LOGISTICS SUPPORT COORDINATOR CHECKLIST Brief Description of activity (what is being changed and why):

0 Initiation Sp 5- Revised toSynchronize EOF clock to PPC time.

j

. Initiation Step 7- Deleted Note IfYES, no further 50.59 (or 72.48) review beyond this Applicability II. Determination (AD) is required, but Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activity Response complete the remainder ofthis form.

that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a 50.59/72.48 Screen or evaluation has already been performed? Identify the applicable 50.59/72.48 (See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.) NO 1 YES Evaluation Log No., License Amendment No., or applicable document number.

Document #

III. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the: Response See Section 4.2.1 ofthe RM.

1. Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating ici NO If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 License? (See1OCFR5O9O.) J YES  ; and FDP-ZZ-00 103.

If YES, process per APAZZ-00 108

2. Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.54(a).) and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related NO YES facility or procedure change programs.

IfYE$, process per APA-ZZ-00 10$

3, Security Plan which also includes the Cyber Security Plan? and SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security (See 10 CfR 50.54(p).) C YES Plan and related facility or procedure change programs.

4. Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 50.54(q).)

Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00108 implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXXJ, equipment QNO DYES and KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and identified as important to emergency response [refer to related facility or procedure change KDP-ZZ-00013J, or could alter response time, staffing, or programs.

other items covered in the 16 Planning Standards or in Appendix E to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ-00400J, answer this question YES.

APA-ZZ-OO 143 Page 1 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)

T IfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.

5. 1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CfR 50.55a(O.) NO YES I If YES, process per EDP-ZZ-O1 003 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.

6. ISI Program Plan? (See 10 CfR 50.55a(g).) NO fl YES SeeFP Screening questions in EDP

. . . . ZZ-04044. If any ofthe screening

7. Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License .

NO YES questions are answered YES, a fire Condition 2.C(5).)

Protection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.

8. Storage Cask Certificate of Compliance (CoC), including If YES, then contact Regulatory appendices? (See 10 CFR 72.244.) NO El YES Affairs/Licensing to determine next steps.

9. Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,

the ODCM) that are controlled by regulations, the Operating License (including Orders and License IfYBS, indicate the applicable Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section NO 11 YES program in Brief Description 4.2.1 ofthe RM.) Section.

Iv. Doestheproposedactivity involve: Response *See Section 4.2.2ofthe RM I Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original (as designed) condition? (See 10 CFR-50.65(a)(4).) IfYE$, process change per APAZZOO 101 for procedure NO YES Note: Ifthe maintenance is on 1SFSI or cask-related items, changes or APA-ZZ-00320/330/340 the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is  : for Maintenance activities.

subject to a 1 0 CfR 72.4$ Screen on a CA3 145.

IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-0010l for procedure changes or

2. A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes

. . . . or Procedurally Controlled supporting mamtenance (TASM) that will be m effect NO YES during at-power operations for 90 days or less?

Temporary Modifications or MDP-ZZ-FSOO1 for Freeze Seals.

Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-003 15, Appendix A L___

APA-ZZ-00143 . Page 2 .. CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)

y. Does theprsed activity involve a changetothe: Response See Section 4 2 3 ofthe RM

1. FSAR NO JYES Process the FSAR change per APA-ZZ-OOlO8 and FDP-ZZ-OO 103 If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response for revising License Documents.

column at right.

Note:

Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve an fSAR change that may be excluded from the A NO response in the Response requirement to perform a 50.59 ScreenlEvaluation by E: NO 1J YES column at left means that the NEI 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to FSARJTS Bases change is one that N/A requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is this question in the Response column at right.)

not excludable from further review).

Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria of RM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided if the fSAR change A YES response means that the requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to fSAR does NOT require further the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination 50.59 review.

form.)

2. Technical Specification Bases? Process the TS Bases change per NO Q YES APA-ZZ-00108 and FDP-ZZ-00 103 Ifthe above response is NO, check N/A in the Response for revising License Documents.

column at right.

Note:

If the above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a TS Bases change comparable to that which may be A NO response in the Response column at left means that the TS excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803 (as described n NO L1 YES Bases change is one that requires for an FSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to this further 50.59 review (i.e., is not N/A excludable from further review).

question in the Response column at right.)

Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a A YES response means that the TS YES response may also be provided ifthe TS Bases change , Bases Change does NOT require requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to further 50.59 review.

the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination form.)

VI. Does the proposed activity involve a change to: ____sp9_c SeeSection 4.2.4 1 4.2.6 ofthe P.M.

I . Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or activities (including software used oniy for the implementation of administrative procedures, controls, or ici NO 1 YES If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 101 activities) governing the conduct of facility operations or APA-ZZ-00 109.

(subject to the control oflOCfRSO Appendix B)9

2. Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation YES wocess per based chance process9 (See NEI 99 04 ) NO If YES, perform a 72.48 Screen per APA-ZZ-00143 unless the change is completely covered by the response Does the proposed activity potentially affect the design, to Section II.

VII .

operation. or maintenance ofthe 1SfSI facility as described in the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See FDP NO EYES ZZ-00105 and Attachment 1 ofAPA-ZZ-00143.) Note:

Editorial or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement o pfonpa 72.48 Review.

APA-ZZ-OO 143 Page 3 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)

VIII. Justification/explanation for Response(s) (as needed):

Revision ofthe RERP Implementing procedure is coveredsolely by 10CFR 50.54(q) and controlled by KDP-ZZ-00400.

Therefore, 10CFR5O.59 is not required.

Ix.

Conclusion:

Allaspects ofthe activity controlle4 by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen isnot required.

LI A portion ofthe activity jjt controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen j required.

x.

Preparer: :s:j:;rK Date: L J2J.%.

(Print name) - ($ign/PN)

Qualified Reviewer: Date: .JLiJI@+/-

(Printname) (SigniIN Ensure that once signed, this record is loaded into EB with the Activity/Document Number listed above or submit this form to either the Regulatory Affairs clerk or another member of Administration in accordance with APA-ZZ-00220.

APA-ZZ-00143 Page4 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005

50.54(q) Screening Form Document #, Rev #, &

Title:

EIP-ZZ-COO1O Addendum E, Rev 015, Logistics Support Coordinator Checklist.

EP Tracking #: 2O23O43 Activity Description and

References:

All the changes listed below are based off CR#202306515.

. Inftiation Step 5- Revised to Synchronize EOF clock to PPC time

. InitiationStep 7- Deleted Note

• Activity Scope: YES NO Does this activirevise the Radiological EmercncyResponse Plan (RER?) orlnIementrng Procedures?

Change Type: YES NO Is this activity editoria1ortypographica? .

.. U Previously Approved Change: YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activity? ........... I If YES, whatisthe previously approved activity? .

Planning Standard Determination:

Does this activity impact any ofthe 50.47(5) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix E: YES NO 50.47(bXl) Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control)?

U 50.47(bX2) Onsite Emergency Organization9 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response Support and Resources?

5O.47(bX4) Emergency Classification System?

LI 5O.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures?

LI 5047(b)(6) Emergency Communications7 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information9 50.47(b)(8) Emergency facility and Equipment?

50.47(b)(9) Accident Assessment?

50A7(b)(lO) Protective Response?

50.47(b)(l 1) Radiological Exposure Control) 50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support?

50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operations9 El 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises7 U

50A7(b)(15) Emergency Responder Training7 50.47(b)(16) Emergency Plan Maintenance?

Part5OAppendixE7 Commitment Impact Determination: YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element9 ED If Yes. record the Commitment number:

Explanation of Determination: (Enter an explanation to each determination-answer that needs clarjflcation.)

None ofthe changes made to EIP-ZZ-COOlO Addendum E, Rev 015, Logistics Support Coordinator Checklist affect the planning standards. Therefore, a 1O.CfR 50.54(q) evaluation is not required.

File # A210.0038 Page 1 of2 .

CAl 523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002

50.54(q) Screening Form Screening Evaluation Results:

Based on the results ofthe information above, can the activity be implemented without performing a YES NO full 50.54(q)Effectiveness Evaluation?

Review/Approval:

Preparer (Sign/PiN) Date Prep r must be quafl/ied E ge cy Response Coordinator.

Reviewer (Sign/PiN) .

Reviewer ni j

iIi,ed .

% 3O eaçj Response Coordinator.

Date Th13 203 Emergency Preparedness Ma get (Sign/PiN): j 3T1 Date: tzi file # A210.0038 Page 2 of2 CAl 523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002