ML23354A113
| ML23354A113 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/2023 |
| From: | Jeffrey Reed NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| EIP-ZZ-COO10 ADDENDUM F, Rev 17 | |
| Download: ML23354A113 (1) | |
Text
PROCEDURE REVIEW FORM (PRF)
LO Initiation Initiator: James Rç4 ___ Date: 10/26/2023 Procedure Dept EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-COO1O ADDENDUMFNew Rev. # 01 7 (3 digits required)
Title:
Off-Site Liaison Coordinator Checklist Level of Use: Continuous JReference Information lMultiple EN/A 2.0 Reason for Change/Description of Change (List commitments, CRs, eB Change Requests, OliRs, Plant Mods etc. and record numbers here.)
CR 202306515. Revised multiple steps and made minor formatting corrections.
Continued: 0
- 10. Document Disposition EITemp Change DNew Document ElMajor Revision Minor Revision Cance1Iation jAdministrative Correction .
Dept. head or Designated Approver required for Administrative Corrections {jiture/P1NfDate)no other signatures rçquired 4.0 Interim Approval (Temp. Change Only) Temp. Change #: Expiration Date:
çognint Supervisor (Signature/PIN/Date) SRO (Signature/PiN/Date)
5.0 Comments
Continued: E 6.0 ReviewsandSignatures (NOT requiredforAdrninLctrative Corrections)
JiL. PIN Siçnature _. CA0139 Attached Preparer _Q_
1Lot1If Techrca1 Review ft .. .
I 11 Yes No Technical Review p ii2 - - L.
Yes I No Addl Review i:i Yes LI No AddlReview LJYes No flAdditional Reviews (See Attached CA Ol39firrns). Number of additional CAO139s: .
Typ,ç I Coordinator - PIN Signahcre Date CA0139 Attached LlValidation Yes ENo
{
50.59 Review CA25 10 LICA251 1 ECA2512 I UN/A (perAPA-ZZ-00143) ., . .
Screener initial/PIN Reviewer Initial! PIN (Dept. Head or Designated Approver) Is a Change Management Plan required? ElYes No (If YES, attach CA2773 or CA2774)
Is a Cross-Disciplinary review required? LlYes No 7.0 Approval (Either approval must be qualfIed as PAT/APVR or PAT/GAP!? in QualMaster)
Senior Director Nuclear Operations Approval (per APA-ZZ-OO1O1) ORC is required in accordance with APA-ZZ-0009 1 Dep ment Head Final Review and Approval ORC Meeting:
( tfz 1&At1 /396 /7?J Dept. Ilead or Designated Approcr Senior Director Nuclear Operations (Signature/PIN/Date) (Signature/PIN/Date)
Wote: Page 2provides instructions to complete thisform and may be discarded A190.0001, 2, 5, 35 A210.0062, 65, 69; M190.0001
- Page 1 of 2 CA0033 APA-ZZ-OO1O 1 Rev. 002
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified procedures to that portion ofthe activity. Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 of the 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidance.
I. ActivitylDocument Number: EIP-ZZ-COO1O Addendum F Revision Number: 017
Title:
Off-SITE LIAISON COORDINATOR CHECKLIST BriefDescription of activity (what is being changed and why):
. Initiation Step 3- Deleted step 3 and renumbered the remaining steps and note ofthe initiation checklist.
. *Initiation Step 8- Revised to If SEMA, DHSS, and/or NRC are participating in the EOF, obtain and provide the amGUEST WIFI Password as follows.
. *Initiation Step 1 1- Revied to Ask the EOF Technical Rep to DISPATCH one (1) Tech Rep to each of the Counties that requested them, and two (2) to SEMA.
. *Attachment 1 Step 2, Bulleff 4- Revised to Radioactive Release Status ( Provide Dose Assessment Print out tURd) from DAC)
I If YES, no further 50.59 (or 7248) review beyond this Applicability II .
Determination (AD) is required, but Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activity Response complete the remainder ofthis form.
that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a .
50.59/72.48 Screen or evaluation has afready been performed? Identify the applicable 50.59172A8 (See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.) NO LI YES Evaluation Log No,, License Amendment No., or applicable document number.
Document#
11L Does the proposed activity involve a change tothe: Response See Section4.2.1 of the RM.
- 1. Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 NO YES License? (Sec 10 CfR 50.90.) ______
and fDP-ZZ-00 103.
IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 10$
and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related
- 2. Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CfR 50.54(a).) NO 11LJ YES facility or procedure change programs.
IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 3 . Security Plan which also includes the Cyber Security Plan? and SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security (See 10 CFR 50.54(p).) NO Q YES Plan and related facility or procedure change programs.
- 4. Radiological Emergency ResponsePlan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 50.54(q).)
Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXXJ, equipment and KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and NO YES identified as important to emergency response [refer to related facility or procedure change KDP-ZZ-00013], or could alter response time, staffing, or programs.
other items covered in the 16 Planning Standards or in Appendix F to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ-00400],
answer this question YES, APA-ZZ-OO 143 Page 1 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
IfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
- 5. 1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(f).) NO DYES If YES, process per EDP-ZZ-O 1003 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
- 6. 1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(g).) NO JYES See FP Screening questions in EDP
- 7. Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License ZZ-04044. Ifany ofthe screening Condition 2C(5).) NO YES questions are answered YES, a Fire Protection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.
- 8. Storage Cask Certificate ofCompliance (CoC), including If YES, then contact Regulatory appendices? (See 10 CFR 72.244.) NO 11 YES Affairs/Licensing to determine next steps.
- 9. Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,
the ODCM) that are controlled by regulations, the Operating License (including Orders and License If YES, indicate the applicable Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section NO YES program in Brief Description 4.2.1 ofthe RM.) Section.
IV.Does the proposed activity involye: _.!!R2! See Section 4.2.2 oftheRM*
- 1. Maintenance which restores $SCs to their original (as designed) condition? (See 10 CfR 50.65(a)(4).) If YES, process change per APA-ZZ-00 101 for procedure Note: If the maintenance is on ISFSI or cask-related items, NO EYES changes or APA-ZZ-00320/330/340 the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is for Maintenance activities.
subject to a 10 CFR 72.4$ Screen on a CA3 145.
IfYE$, process per APA-ZZ-O0l0 1 for procedure changes or
- 2. A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes
° Procedurally Controlled supporting maintenance (TASM) that will be in effect NO J YES during at-power operations for 90 days or less? Temporary Modifications or MDP-ZZ-FSOO1 for Freeze Seals.
Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-00315, Appendix A.
APA-ZZ-00143 Page 2 CA25 10 A170.OO1O Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
V Does the proposed activity involve a change Response See Section 4 2 3 ofthe RM I . FSAR ici NO
.-, YES Process the FSAR change per APA-ZZ-00108 and fDP-ZZ-OO 103 If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response for revising License Documents.
column at right.
Note Ifthe above response is YES does the proposed activity I mvolve an FSAR change that may be excluded from the A NO response m the Response Tfl vi requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by . column at left means that the NEI 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to FSAR/TS B h
- th t N/A requires further5O.S9review(i.e. is this question m the Response column at right.)
excludable from further review).
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria of RM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided if the fSAR change
, YES res onse means that the requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to FSAR doesNOT require further the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination s review form.)
- 2. Technical Specification Bases? Process the IS Bases change per NO U YES APA-ZZ-00108 and fDP-ZZ-O0 103 If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response for revising License Documents.
column at right.
Note:
Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a TS Bases change comparable to that which may be A NO response in the Response column at left means that the TS excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803 (as described n NO YES Bases change is one that requires for an fSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to this further 50.59 review (i.e., is not N/A excludable from further review).
question in the Response column at right.)
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a A YES response means that the T$
YES response may also be provided if the TS Bases change Bases Change does NOT require further 50.59 review.
requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II of this Applicability Determination form.)
VI. Does the proposed activityinvolve a change to: Response See Section 4 2 4 / 4 2 6 ofthe RM t Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or activities (including software used only for the implementation of administrative procedures, controls, or IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-001Ol NO Q YES activities) governing the conduct of facility operations or APA-ZZ-00109.
(subject tothe control of1OCFR5O4 Appendix 13)?
- 2. Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation r;i If YES, process per based change process9 (See NEI 99 04) NO 1J YES V.- APA-ZZ-00540.
IfYE$, perform a 72.48 Screen per fAPA-Zz-00143 unless the change is completely covered by the response Does the proposed activity potentially affect the design, to Section II.
VII .
operation, or maintenance ofthe iSf$l facility as described in the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See FDP NO flYES zz-00105 and Attachment 1 of APA-ZZ-00 143.) Note:
Editorial or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement jto perform a APA-ZZ-00 143 Page 3 CA2510 A170.0010 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
VIII. Justification/explanation for Response(s) (as needed):
Revision ofthe RERP Implementingprocedure is covered solely by 10CFR 50.54(q) and controlled by KDP-ZZ-00400.
Therefore, 1OCfR5O.59 is not required.
Ix.
Conclusion:
ADpects ofthe activity controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen isnot required.
0 A portion ofthe activity jt controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen required.
j x.
- Preparer: :fv:%...,
(Print name) v Date: JL/?1/1s1
__ (SignfPiN)
QualifiedReviewer 7T)& LPrv i(t Date ii i/3i3 (Print name) (SignJPlN)
Ensure that once signed, this record is loaded into EB with the Activity/Document Number listed above or submit this form to either the Regulatory Affairs clerk or another member ofAdministration in accordance with APA-ZZ-00220.
APA-ZZ-00143 Page 4 CA25 I 0 A170.O010 Rev. 005
50.54(q) Screening form Document #, Rev #, &
Title:
EIP-ZZ-COO1O Addendum F, RevOl7, Off-Site Liaison Coordinator Checklist EP Tracking #: 2023041 Activity Description and
References:
All the changes listed below are based off CR#202306515.
. Initiation Step 3- Deleted step 3 and renumbered the remaining steps and note of the initiation checklist.
. Initiation Step 8- Revised to IF SEMA, DHSS, and/or NRC are participating in the EOF, obtain and provide th amGUEST W1FI Password as follows.
I Initiation Step I I Revied to Ask the EOF Technical Rep to DISPATCH one (1) Tech Rep to each of the Counties that requested them, and two (2) to SEMA.
. Attachment I Step 2, Bullett 4- Revised to Radioactive Release Status ( Provide Dose Assessment Print out (URI) from DAC) .
Activity Scope: YES NO Does this activity revise the RadiologicalEmergency ResppnsePlan (RERP) or Impleinentin Procedures?... ... .. ...
ChangeType: YES NO Is this activity editorial or typographicai? ......
P zz .
Previously Approved Change: YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activIty9 D If YES. what is the previously approved activity? -
Planning Standard Determination:
Does this activity impact any ofthe 50.47(b) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix E: YES NO 50.47(b)(l) Assignment ofResponsibility (Organization Control)?
LI 50.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization?
. El 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response Support and Resources7 50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System?
50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures9 50.47(b)(6) Emergency Communications?
1 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information9 50.47(b)(8) Emergency facility and Equipment?
U 50.47(bX9) Accident Assessment9 50.47(b)(lO) Protective Response?
50.47(b)(l 1) Radiological Exposure Control?
50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support9
. E 50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operationsr7 1
50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises7 50.47(b)(15) Emergency Responder Training9 50.47(b)(16) Emergency Plan Maintenance9 fl Part5OAppendixE9 .. .
.,p.
Commitment Impact Determination: YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element9 l If Yes, record the Commitment number: . ...
File # A2 1 0.003 8 Page 1 of 2 CAl 523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002
50.54(q) Screening Form Explanation ofDetermination: (Enter an explanation to each determination-answer that needs clarjflcation.)
None ofthe changes made to EIP-ZZ-COOlO Addendum F, RevOl7, Off-Site Liaison Coordinator Checklist affect the planning standards. Therefore, a 1O.CFR 50.54(q) evaluation is not required.
Screening Evaluation Results:
Based on the results ofthe information above, can the activity be implemented without performing a YES NO full 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation9 .....,...... .,... . .
Review/Approval:
Preparer (SignIPIN) rer must be qualifle t/f8u?
ergency Response Coordinator.
Date:Jf)..#.3 Reviewer(SignJPlN) , .
Reviewer n
/h.S t(fte Ernergeçv Response Coordinator.
. .. Date:. It 1° Emergency Preparedness . nager (SigWPffi):
- LL G311 .
Date:J!]J!
File#A210.0038 Page2of2 CA1523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002