ML24002A813
| ML24002A813 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/2023 |
| From: | Traub D - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| EIP-ZZ-00240 ADD E, Rev 28 | |
| Download: ML24002A813 (1) | |
Text
PROCEDURE REVIEW FORM (PRF) 1.0 Initiation Initiator: David Traub PIN $5245 Date: 7/25/2023 Procedure Dept:
EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-00240 ADD E New Rev. #
028(3 thgits required)
Title:
Health Physics Coordinator (HPC) Checklist Level ofUse:
üContinuous Reference Information IlMultiple EN/A 2.0 Reason for Change/Description of Change (List commitments, CRs, eB Change Requests, OERS, Plant Mods etc. and record numbers here.)
CR 2023031 14-001
- Adding guidance for obtaining Emergency Coordinator concurrence prior to issuing Kl to onsite personnel.
Continued: fl ii Document Disposition QTemp Change IJNew Document EjMajor Revision Minor Revision ElCancellation ElAdministrative Correction Dept. Head or Designated Approver reqedfor Administrative Corrections (SinatureNate) no other signatures required 4.0 Interim Approval (Temp. Change Only)
Temp. Change #:
Expiration Date:
Cognizant Supervisor (Signature/PIN/Date)
SRO (Signature/PIN/Date)
5.0 Comments
Continued: Q 6.0 Reviews and Signatures (NOT requiredfor Administrative Corrections)
Reviews Required Dept PIN
$ignalure Date
ç4o439 Attached Preparer EP 852 7/25/2023 Technical Review f I.
I El Yes No Technical Review j
I19/
..___L/6:
z-3 Yes K1 No AddlReview L
JElYesElNo Addl Review El YesEl No DAdditional Reviews (See Attached CAOl39forms).
Number ofadditional CAOI39s:
--j;-
Coordinator - PIN Stgnature Date CA0139 Attached ElValidation I
EYes El No 50.59 Review FCA251O ElCA25 1 1 flCA25 12 / ON/A (perAPA-ZZ-00143)
Screener Initial/PiN Reviewer initial/PiN (Dept. Head or Designated Approver) Is a Change Management Plan required? flYes No (If YES, attach CA2773 or CA2774)
Is a CrossDiseipUnary review required? ElYes No 7.0 Approval (Either approval must be qua%fled as PAT/APVR or PAT/GAPR in QualMaster)
Senior Director Nuclear Operations Approval (pcrAPA-ZZ-OO1OI)
ORC is required in accordance with APA-ZZ-00091 Dc rtrnent Hejd fInal Review and Approval ORC Meeting: j9 ih
.I3cL7 Y/?%o)5 A-i4 Dept. Head or Designated Appro ci Senior Director Nuclear Operations
(.Signattire/PLN/I)ate)
(Signature/PIN/Date)
A190.0001, 2, 5, 35 - A210.0062, 65, 69; M190.0001 Page 1 of 2 APA-.ZZ-OO 101 Note: Page 2provides instructions to complete thisform andmaj be discarded CA0033 Rev. 002
APHACAB1LITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, appiy the identified procedures to that por(ion of the activity Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 of the 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidance.
I.
ActivitylDocument Number: EIP-ZZ-00240 ADD E Revision Number:
02$
Title:
Health PhysicsCoordinator (HPC) Checklist Brief Description of activity (what is being changed and why):
CR2023031 14-001 Adding guidance for obtaining Emergency Coordinator concurrence prior to issuing KI to onsite personnel.
S Page 10 of 19 Operations, Step 4: Modified last bullet to include discussion with EC receive concurrence prior to issuing Potassium Iodide (1(1) to onsite personnel.
3.
Security Plan which also includes the Cyber Security Plan?
(See 10 CFR 5054(p).)
4.
Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 5054(q).)
Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXX], equipment identified as important to emergency response [refer to KDP-ZZ-00013], or could alter response time, staffmg, or other items covered in the 16 Planning Standards or in Appendix F to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ-00400],
answer this question YES.
IfYES, no further 50.59 (or 72.48) review beyond this Applicability Determination (AD) is required, but
Response
complete the remainder ofthis form.
Identifi the applicable 50.59/72.48 NO fl YES Evaluation Log No., License Amendment No., or applicable document number.
Document #
Response
_ See Section 4.2.1 of the RM.
NO El YES IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 and FDP-ZZ-00 103.
IIfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 NO fl YES and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related facility or procedure change programs.
IIfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 NO fl YES and SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security Plan and related facility or
- procedure change programs.
IfYE$, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 and KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and related facility or procedure change programs.
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OOlO Page 1 II.
Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activIty that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a 50.59/72.48 Screen or evaluation has already been performed?
(See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.)
III.
Does the proposed activity involve a change to the:
1.
Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating License?
(See 10 CFR 50.90.)
2.
Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.54(a).)
GINO DYES CA25 10 Rev. 005
7.
Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License Condition 2.C(S).)
8.
Storage Cask Certificate ofCompliance (CoC), includmg appendices?
(See 10 CFR 72.244.)
9.
Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,
the ODCM) that are controlled by regulations, the Operating License (including Orders and License Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section 4.2.1 oftheRM.)
-iv Does the propotd auwty involve_______
1. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original (as designed) condition?
(See 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4).)
Note: Ifthe maintenance is on I$fSI or cask-related items, the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is subject to a 1 0 CFR 72.48 Screen on a CA3 145.
2.
A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) supporting maintenance (TASM) that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
IfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
IfYES, process per EDP-ZZ-O 1003 tfor ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
See FP Screening questions in EDP ZZ-04044. If any of the screening NO U
YES questions are answered YES, a Fire Protection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.
IF YES, then contact Regulatory NO fl YES tAffairs/Licensing to determine next steps IfYES, indicate the applicable NO YES program in Brief Description Section.
Response
Section 4 2 2 of the RM If YES, process change per NO El YES AZZ00 101 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00320/330/340 for Maintenance activities.
If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 101 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes of Procedurally Controlled Temporary Modifications or MDP-ZZ-fS001 for Freeze Seals.
Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-003 15, Appendix A.
APA-ZZ-OO143 A170.OO1O Page 2
- ) ;
- y
-, i-; :,
T D
,, ifl;: (-Th-i
- I I
i i&u i L t1nL.d) 5.
1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(f).)
NO EYES 6.
151 Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(g).)
NO flYES NO EYES CA2510 Rev. 005
A YES response means that the FSAR does NOT require further 50.59 review.
Process the IS Bases change per APA-ZZ-00108 and FDP-ZZ-OO103 for revising License Documents.
Note:
A NO response in the Response column at left means that the TS Bases change is one that requires further 50.59 review (i.e, is not N/A excludable from further review).
A YES response means that the TS Note: Inheu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a Bases Chan e does NOT re uire YES response may also be provided if the TS Bases change further 50 59 review requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination fo.)
I VI.Doesthe proposed activity involve a change to:
Response
See Section 4.2.4 1 4.2.6 of the RM 1.
Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or
[
activities (including software used only for the
. If YES process per APA-ZZ-001 01 implementation of administrative procedures, controls, or NO YES or APA-ZZ-00 109.
activities) governing the conduct of facility operations
(ubjeetto the control of 10CFR5O Appendix B)?
2.
Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation NO 1j YES IfYES, process per
based change process? tSee NEI 99-04.)
APA-ZZ-00540.
IfYES, perform a 72.4$ Screen per APA-ZZ-00143 unless the change is completely covered by the response VII Does the proposed activity potentially affect the design, to Section II.
. operation, or maintenance ofthe ISFS1 facility as described in NO YES the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See FDP-ZZ-00105 and Attachment I ofAPA-ZZ-00143.)
Note Editorial or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement
=
toperfoma72A8Review.
APA-ZZ-00143 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005 MPLICAB1LITY DETERfilNATION (Continued)
Does the p L poscIactn it\\ involve a di mg. tothe Respo ve See Section 4 2 3 ofthe RM 1
ic AD 21 mjr jJ viv Process the FSAR change per sJ IAPA-ZZ-00108 and FDP-ZZ-00 103 for revising License Documents.
Note:
ONO IjYES N/A A NO response in the Response column at left means that the FSAR/TS Bases change is one that requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is not excludable from further review).
If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
If the above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve an FSAR change that may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 ScreenlEvaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)
Note: In lieu of the exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided if the FSAR change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination form.)
2.
Technical Specification Bases?
NO YES If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
If the above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a TS Bases change comparable to that which may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803 (as described for an FSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)
i:i NO U
YES Page 3
cOO)1 OIOOOLIV oicv ioo-zz-vav OOO-ZZ-VdV -PP DUPJO3O1 UI UOJPflS!!WPVIO 1qWW 1IflOU1? 10 pp SJWJJ (OPJflO)J O 10fl!0 o uuoj s!IT1 !WqflS.10 OAO ps!I °W 1UWflOOJ/A2TAfl3V u uy a oui sup purs uo ainsuj (MJ!s)%
(w1?u uuj)
- oa
- J4 2JMIAJ p!.J!tO (KIa!s) tu, u!Id)
- a
- ?s-i::: :idij ppltnO
- polTnb3J T us 6coc aiojaop OAOq SUflj3O3Oid jo uow io ouo Xq pjoiiuo A1TAflO1 fl JO UOPOd v pannbai oW uoaiog 6coc aiojiq AO SO1flpOOJd qi jo oiom io uo Xq pIo;wo I(1AflO1 qI JO S13Odm jy
- 11o!snpuo:::
xi pat!nba1 iou i scud çç ztmq s!q JOJ jI?AolddP uoojou gnnbu ygj uoinjiw ioj urnj pu SUO!1rnIA% idwi rjrej ocwoo-zzjui pup (b)çç>.joj q (pjos i(ct pjoiuoo s! P S!q ptw aznpo.id tiiiuwdrnr jjpj ut si ppj
-ij
- Iu-uos13dJo Xjs pui onjo uonooid
&I!pnIow STTATD suodsai D1SUO 101 qisuods i j p s Dii ounssi uo.iowrnpiooj Auiui moi; ouiinuoo SAIOOJ pUP SUUOJUI 3JH I UO STUJ *(D{) ppo jo oounssi jo uorzuoipnt o pwiai sT1TpqsuodQi pu soi suodsj uo uoiogiiip sppt Apos ppy ooo-zz-aii o UO!S!A1 ii
- (I)paIt st) (s)stodll toj rouuuxjLtouf iii (p:rTuoD) MC AiJ1
50.54(q) Screening Form Document #, Rev #, &
Title:
EIP-ZZ-00240 Addendum E, Revision 028, Health Physics Coordinator (HPC) Checklist EP Tracking #:
2023031 Activity Description and
References:
CR202303 1 14-001 Adding guidance for obtaining Emergency Coordinator concurrence prior to issuing KI to onsite personnel.
Page 10 of 19 Operations, Step 4: Modified last bullet to include discussion with EC receive concurrence prior to issuing Potassium Iodide (KI) to onsite personnel.
Activity Scope:
YES NO Does this activity revise the Radiological Emçgçpcy Response Plan(RERP) or Imjcmcntingrocedures?
Change Type:
YES NO Is this activity editorial or typographical7......
El Previously Approved Change:
YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activity?
IfYLS, what is the previously approved activity?
Planning Standard Determinalion:
Does this activity impact any of the 50.47(b) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix E:
YES NO 50.47(b)(1)
- Assignment ofResponsibility (Organization Control)7 50.47(b)(2)
- Onsitc Emergency Organization7 D
II 50.47(h)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources7 50.47(b)(4) - Emergency Classification System?.....
50.47(b)(5)
- Notification Methods and Procedures?
Li IXI 50.47(b)(6) - Emergency Communications?
LI 1
50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information9 El 50.47(b)(X) - Emergency Facility and Equipment?
E lxi 50.47(b)(9) - Accident Assessment?
fl 50.47(b)(lO)
- Protective Response?
D LXI 50.47(b)(1 1)
- Radiological Exposure Control 50.47(b)(12)
- Medical and Public Health Support9 El lxi 50.47(b)(13)
- Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operations?
D 50.47(b)(14)
- Drills and Exercises?
50.47(b)(15)
- Emergency Responder Training?
L 5047(b)(l6)
- Emergency Plan Maintenance9 E
LXI Pall 50 ApperidixE?
E Commitment Impact Determination:
YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element?
If Yes, record the Commitment number:
Explanation of Determination: (Enter cm explanation to each determination-answer that needs ctarfication.)
Revision 028 of EIP-ZZ-00240 Add E, Health Physics Coordinator (HPC) Checklist is associated with Planning Standards 50,47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization, 50.47(b)(9) Accident Assessment and 50.47(b)(1O) Protective Response. However, the activity reinforces the RERP requirements for the Emergency Coordinator for directing overall emergency response on-site including implementation of onsite protective actions. This activity aligns with the RERP and has no impact on any of the regulatory required functions of the associated planning standards. Therefore, an evaluation in accordance with 50.54(q) is not required.
fiIe#A210.0038 Pagelof2 CA1523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002
50.54(q) Screening Form Screening Evaluation Results:
Based on the results of the information above, can the activity be implemented without performing a YES NO full 50.54(qjEffectiveness Evaluation?
Review/Approval:
Preparer (Sign/PIN)
Date Pnpctret, must quotift
&izergcnçv Response (cordbratoi Reviewer (SigPN) to1
Date:/a(Z 3 Reviewer nflr;t iutifx ci Em ge,ici Response Coordinator.
Emergency Preparedness Manager (S;gnjPN) tØTl Date Jt13 File # A210.0038 Page 2 of2 CA1523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002