ML23319A390

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11-CW-2023-09 Public Forms
ML23319A390
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 09/20/2023
From: Heather Gepford
NRC/RGN-IV/DORS/OB
To:
Ameren Union Electric Co
References
Download: ML23319A390 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Form 2.3-f Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Callaway Date of Examination: 9/1 1/2023 9/20/2023 (Y)esl(N)o Item Task Description a b* c#

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (K/A) categories are Y appropriately sampled.
b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or genetic topics. Y
c. Justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are acceptable. j_ 1 Y
a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument Y and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major I transients.
b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on i y Y subsequent days.
c. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 -q Y and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s). j U. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and %q Y

quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.

a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on Y Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).
b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audittest(s).

4(

,f Y

c. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are )I Y duplicated on subsequent days.
a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including Y probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).
b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is Y appropriate.
c. Check whether K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater Y than or equal to 2.5.
d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams. t L_

\]

Y

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. Y
1. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior Y reactor operator).

Printed Name/Signatur Date,

a. Author . /
b. Facility Reviewer (*) )f4Oi3OCT / - QI Z&/ 23
c. NRC Reviewer (#) Thomas Farina 8/28/23 NRC Chief Examiner Thomas Farina 8/28/23 NRC Supervisor Heather Gepford / 8/31/23 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.

Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist

a. Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable:
  • task standard
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time critical
  • alternate path JPMs are labeled as alternate path
  • operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues TF statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item TF distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms.

Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: I I2I3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be TF out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. TF
3. Each event description consists of the following:

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated TF

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew j ,x
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)

(Y)es / (N)o QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a b* c#

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. N Y Y
5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to Y observe and evaluate applicant performance.
6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time Y constraints. Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. Y
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to Y ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. Y
10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4-1 Y submitted with the scenario set. I V
11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across Y scenarios, when possible.
12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. f _

Y Actual Attributes by (Y)es / (N)o TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4) Scenario No.

11213 b*

a c#

1. Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP) 4/2/2 Y entry_(12)
2. Abnormal events (24) 3/4/2 Y
3. Major transients (12) 1 / 1 /1 L L.. Y
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 1 /2/1 i Y
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 1 /0I1 Y

(? 1 per scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarios I prepared for the scheduled exam)

6. Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 2 / 2 /3 Y Printed NameIignature Date
a. Author c I
b. Facility Reviewer (*) L- cOLT Thomas Farina I 8/28/23
c. NRC Reviewer (#)

Thomas Farina 8/28/23 NRC Chief Examiner Heather Gepford / 8/31/23 NRC Supervisor The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

  1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.

Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Callaway Date of Exam: 9/20/2023 Exam Level: RD []SRO[]

Item Description (Y)es/(N)o a b* c#

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each question includes a technical reference. Y I
2. a. All questions reference NRC knowledge and abilities (K/As) requirements.
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor \J \/ Y analysis.

Y

3. Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level.

j_ _

4. The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, including full (1 00-question) retake examinations, consult the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensing program office.)

1 Y Y

5. Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed.

The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.

The examinations were developed independently. Y The licensee certifies that there is no duplication.

Other (explain):

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution> 42/

27 I 6 6I5 1

7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RD exam and 14 ) Y Memo C/A at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual 40 /

RD/S RD-only question distribution> 14 1 .L. Y

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. Y
9. Question content conforms to specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination Y

outline and is appropriate for the K/A statements assigned tier; deviations are justified. ( ...

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2. Y

.f

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. Y I

Printed Name/ignature Date

a. Author :vv I
b. Facility Reviewer () SIaOlpC r / /-/ 2.-
c. NRC Reviewer (#) T. Farina 8/28/23 T. Farina 8/28/23 NRC Chief Examiner NRC Regional Supervisor Heather Gepford / 8/31/23 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer performs steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review.

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: Callaway Date of Exam: 9/11/2023 - 9/20/9023 Operating Test No.:2023-1 E Scenarios - Team 1: I1, I2, R1 A V M

P E I

P N L T 1 2 3 4 T N I O I C

spare T M T

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*

N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E #

O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I1 3,4,5, 2,3,5 3,5,6 2,5,6, 3,4,5,8 11 I/C 4 4 2 7,8,9, 6,8,9 8,9 10 MAJ 6 7 7 7 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3 2,7,9 5,8 2 1 1 0 TS 3,4 4,5 2 0 2 2 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 2 1 1 1 I2 5,7,10 2,3,4,5 9 I/C 4 4 2 7,8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 5,7 2 1 1 0 TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 R1 3,4,8,9 2,4,7 8 I/C 4 4 2 8

MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3,4,8,9 2,7 6 1 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2

Facility: Callaway Date of Exam: 9/11/2023 - 9/20/9023 Operating Test No.:2023-1 E Scenarios - Team 2: I3, I4, R2 A V M

P E I

P N L T 1 2 3 4 T N I O I C

spare T M T

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*

N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E #

O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I3 3,4,5, 2,3,5 3,5,6 2,5,6, 3,4,5,8 11 I/C 4 4 2 7,8,9, 6,8,9 8,9 10 MAJ 6 7 7 7 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3 2,7,9 5,8 2 1 1 0 TS 3,4 4,5 2 0 2 2 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 2 1 1 1 I4 5,7,10 2,3,4,5 9 I/C 4 4 2 7,8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 5,7 2 1 1 0 TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 R2 3,4,8,9 2,4,7 8 I/C 4 4 2 8

MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3,4,8,9 2,7 6 1 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2

Facility: Callaway Date of Exam: 9/11/2023 - 9/20/9023 Operating Test No.:2023-1 E Scenarios - Team 3: U1, I5, R3 A V P E M P N I L T 1 2 3 4 T N I O I C T spare T M A Y POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U N P S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*

T E R T O R T O R T O R T O O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 U1 3,4,5, 2,3,5 3,5,6 2,5,6, 3,4,5,8 11 I/C 4 4 2 7,8,9, 6,8,9 8,9 10 MAJ 6 7 7 7 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3 2,7,9 5,8 2 1 1 0 TS 3,4 4,5 2 0 2 2 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 2 1 2 1 1 1 I5 5,7,10 2,3,4,5 9 I/C 4 4 2 7,8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 5,7 2 1 1 0 TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 1

RX 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 R3 3,4,8,9 2,4,7 8 I/C 4 4 2 8

MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3,4,8,9 2,7 6 1 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2

  • Per ES-3.4 Section C item 2(9) "Replace reactivity manipulation and normal evolution events with an additional I/C failure event on a one-for-one basis, if desired." For all applicants, the requirement for 1 reactivity manipulation is being replaced with an additional I/C Failure.

Form 3.4-1 Instructions for the Events and Evolutions Checklist

1. Mark the applicant license level for each simulator operating test number.
2. For the set of scenario columns, fill in the associated event number from Form 3.3-1, Scenario Outline, to show the specific event types being used for the applicant while in the assigned crew position for that scenario.
  • Minimums are subject to the instructions in Section C.2, License Level Criteria.

KEY: RX = Reactivity Manipulation; NOR = Normal Evolution; I/C = Instrument/Component Failure; MAJ = Major Transient; Man. Ctrl = Manual Control of Automatic Function; TS = Technical Specification Evaluation; RO = Reactor Operator; SRO-I or I = Instant Senior Reactor Operator; SRO-U or U = Upgrade Senior Reactor Operator; SRO = Senior Reactor Operator; ATC = At the Controls; and BOP = Balance of Plan

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 07/31/2023 to 09/30/2023 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 By Date # Candidates Exam Staart Exam End Site Docket # Insp Rpt Cac # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Chief Examiner

  1. Author Examiner 8/6/2023 8/12/2023 Callaway 05000483 2023301 000956 0 0 0 0 FB-OR-ONSITE Farina, Farina, VALIDATION Thomas Thomas; You, OF INITIAL David; Murphy, LICENSE Kevin; EXAMINATION Williams, (OV) Russell 9/10/2023 9/16/2023 Callaway 05000483 2023301 000500 3 0 5 1 FB-OR-INITIAL NFF Farina, Farina, LICENSE EXAM Thomas Thomas; You, ADMINISTRATI David; Murphy, ON (EXAD) Kevin; Williams, Russell Sites: CALL Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV Prepared on 9/6/2023 4:21:09 PM

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Region/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 3 5 1 0 9 Exam Date/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 9/10/2023 3 5 1 0 9 Region/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 3 5 1 0 9 Exam Date/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 9/10/2023 3 5 1 0 9 Sites: CALL Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV Prepared on 9/6/2023 4:21:09 PM

0 Form 7.3-7 Examination Security Agreement (7) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing th examinations scheduled for the week(s) of Sept 1 1th 2023 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

(2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Sept 11th &l8h1, 2023. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC.

Print Name Job Title Signure (1) Date Signature (2) Date Note r S&- - /i L/i a , aq/a2 t2/3

V S S. Ja  !-L--

f4(t7-C-P/S(i\ h-,/2 7_

4. Cocb.i bcnk £v 72Z4i4/ 3/q/23 B1...& t*-

) 41 P6

) OA i-  ?/z i/z L%f-  ? /2uJtø2 Z rcTSc1wi*1 £Z)d 3/viYc TiJ%z 9-1 T ç7A1,,,e7L R-D  %-Z9.Z3 7%P143 k&V D1 2 1///?3 flh1<%\ /c)7/)3

9. --%()r&j C\L- 4Ji4 A
Tai A)4M YR 1t/tT

.11. To &Lj q-)c-)3 ZwL-I Po4 iz hn L

NOTES:

CI) -

A 1__ I it ,

-- 4

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (7) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing 8th examinations scheduled for the week(s) of Sept 1 1th 2023 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

(2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Sept 11th &l8th, 2023. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC.

Print Name Job Title Signature (7) Date Signatur (2) Date Note Z b.. Lt/ L -3/-Z3 t3q42D i-22.-)3 5kITiIz- 1Lc iI-2-3 cjtvc 4Z_

-ii- /!1/Z3 5%,9 L_

/y/zJ (t1q1,- 3#i-J Z,- Fg7- 2 c 2; C f-%1 JEcA 1?Q --- 23 L

z_ a) 4)!? Z-J I1AD TAIW& 512-c f2 (/--5

/r;3 i2 :yje:( &.& I fre-r s (/Z3 qq iL 72v5 - I /iI/t5 Zr -/z7/zs i_c_ rr% OS ii q-/--3 V V NOTES:

ELA 37%3,

Form 1.3-7 Examination Security Agreement (7) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing 8th examinations scheduled for the week(s) of Sept 1 1th 2023 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

(2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Sept 11th &l8th, 2023. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC.

Print Name Job Title Siture (1) Date Sjgnature (2) Date Note T Z 23

z  % /1 J\ S< oS 9/( z3 (u-3

_ iA00 IJAdM- 05 Mci< ci-r 05 /ii/a3 7-11-z3

\

-iz-3 j; c T c,J( %f7 ge:q,s i 9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

NOTES:

Swan, Phillip B From: Cody Eubanks <codyjeubanks1983@gmail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 7:25 PM To: Swan, Phillip B

Subject:

[EXTERNAL] Exam security PhishAlarm Report Suspicious If any aspect of this email seems suspicious, click the Report Suspicious button.

EXTERNAL SENDER STOP.THINK.QUESTION.

Verify unexpected requests before opening links or attachments.

This is Cody Eubanks and I sign of security for the 2023 NRC license exam. I divulged no information.

Sent from my iPhone 1

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief: Farina Facility: cw Date of Written Exam: 9/20/2023 U/1: Start of Op Test: 9/11/2023 End of Op Test: 9/15/2023 Written Exam Developed By: Facility Operating Test Developed By: Facility uue uate Descnnuon Date complete lnllJals --..ioln For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for 1/9/2023 Examination administration date confirmed q ( 1[)-fn ,:- the facility to submit reference materials 2/13/2023 NRC examiners and facility contact assigned

<v/1s(ze. -ii:-

2/13/2023 Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements 1151--.. -rF 2/13/2023 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams 1-JA- ES-2.1.F NA 2/13/2023 Corporate Notification Letter sent Letter 2.1-1 produced by CE ffy/*(n -rv-2/27/2023 NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact 91*"/n ,\= Forms 4.1-BWR/PWR and COMMON 4/10/2023 Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due Forms 1.3-1, 2.3-1, 3.2-1, 3.2-2, 3.4-1, 3.3-1

(.1'1 /t3 Tr:::

Operating test ouUine(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided 4/24/2023 to facility licensee L, /--z,c,, '7_,P *--w Form 2.3-1 signed by CE & BC NRG-prepared examinations approved by the NRC supervisor and 6/5/2023 forwarded for facility licensee review NA tv>r Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and 6/26/2023 reference materials due. Co I Z&/ Zl. -u=

Peer review of written exam complete Form 2.3-5 7/10/2023 7 /19ic.-1 v=:

7/24/2023 Written exam and operating test reviews completed Document review on Forms 2.3-1 and 2.3-5

,fzvi /zi., "Tr-8/7/2023 Feedback approved by Branch Chief fh/m --f' Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility 8/7/2023 r;- 17/c3:, (F licensee 8/7/2023 On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications 0-7/lJ} u-8/14/2023 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 5/1,{0 ff 8/21/2023 Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed "6 / }i3 \/

1" 8/28/2023 Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due Form 2.2-1 f (, '/cJ 9/4/2023 Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief

'fs/1/2>

Facility licensee management feedback on the examination 9/4/2023 requested by the NRC supervisor tvtA- 11.rVt Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and 9/4/2023 waiver/excusal letters sent Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with f ' hi: 7J- BC signs Exam Approval Letter (Form 2.3-1) 9/4/2023 facility licensee 9 / 111 l t,,<, -.F 9/4/2023 Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners c; I vi It:> -a:

9/11/2023 Administer Operating Test

(.? /11 ITJ _,..,'4-9/29/2023 Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's c:r /-zs:t<:

10/10/2023 Post exam comments and graded exams received lo(3/Z3 tf Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC 10/18/2023 grading completed rohs/-u, 7,--

Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 10/18/2023 1ot3cln \C' updated Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam 10/25/2023 Signed ES 303's to BC grading completed / 0 )3,o /-Z,'{ T,C:"

11/1/2023 Branch Chief review of exam results completed 10/'Jo/?J Ttc 11/8/2023 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision .NIA N\A 11/8/2023 License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results I 1/1 (Z:?>

11/8/2023 RPS/IP number of examinees updated

\\/1 /v, print Report-21 11/29/2023 Final Denial Letters mailed ( no request for informal review) tbd tbd 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.

12/6/2023 Examination Report Issued produced by CE "I j/-zJ TC::

12/13/2023 Ref Mat'I Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals tbd tbd Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 12, Forms 2.1-1 and 5.1-1 ReY.12

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML23319A390&oldid=3644511"