|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARNL-24-0238, RIPE License Amendment Request to Change Containment Air Temperature Actions, Supplemental Information2024-06-14014 June 2024 RIPE License Amendment Request to Change Containment Air Temperature Actions, Supplemental Information ML24047A2092024-02-22022 February 2024 Calendar Year 2023 Baseline Inspection Completion NL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 ML21214A3182021-08-0202 August 2021 301 Comments NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-20-0034, Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R292020-01-17017 January 2020 Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R29 NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-2061, Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B2017-12-14014 December 2017 Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS NL-16-2541, Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results2016-11-29029 November 2016 Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results NL-16-0810, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report2016-06-0909 June 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report NL-16-0683, Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service2016-06-0202 June 2016 Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service NL-16-0751, Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C2016-05-23023 May 2016 Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML15253A4102016-03-11011 March 2016 Enclosure 2 Screening Analysis Report NL-15-2276, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20142015-12-23023 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2014 NL-15-1489, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-12082015-08-17017 August 2015 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-1208 ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML15182A1752015-06-26026 June 2015 Completion of Required Action by NRC Order EA-12-051 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis NL-15-0418, Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports2015-03-0505 March 2015 Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports NL-15-0080, Special Report 2015-001-002015-01-26026 January 2015 Special Report 2015-001-00 NL-14-1899, Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20132014-12-0808 December 2014 Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2013 NL-14-1109, Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2014-08-26026 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) ML14128A0832014-06-0303 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14101A1192014-04-16016 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14051A7342014-02-20020 February 2014 Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 22014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 2 ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 2024-06-14
[Table view] Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARNL-24-0238, RIPE License Amendment Request to Change Containment Air Temperature Actions, Supplemental Information2024-06-14014 June 2024 RIPE License Amendment Request to Change Containment Air Temperature Actions, Supplemental Information ML24047A2092024-02-22022 February 2024 Calendar Year 2023 Baseline Inspection Completion ML21214A3182021-08-0202 August 2021 301 Comments NL-20-0034, Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R292020-01-17017 January 2020 Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R29 NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-2061, Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B2017-12-14014 December 2017 Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B NL-16-2541, Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results2016-11-29029 November 2016 Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results NL-16-0810, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report2016-06-0909 June 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report NL-16-0683, Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service2016-06-0202 June 2016 Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service NL-16-0751, Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C2016-05-23023 May 2016 Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C ML15253A4102016-03-11011 March 2016 Enclosure 2 Screening Analysis Report NL-15-2276, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20142015-12-23023 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2014 NL-15-1489, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-12082015-08-17017 August 2015 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-1208 ML15182A1752015-06-26026 June 2015 Completion of Required Action by NRC Order EA-12-051 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis NL-15-0418, Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports2015-03-0505 March 2015 Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports NL-15-0080, Special Report 2015-001-002015-01-26026 January 2015 Special Report 2015-001-00 NL-14-1899, Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20132014-12-0808 December 2014 Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2013 NL-14-1109, Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2014-08-26026 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) ML14128A0832014-06-0303 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ML14101A1192014-04-16016 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0145, Proposed Alternative for the Fourth Lnterval Lnservice Inspection (FNP-ISI-ALT-14, Version 1.0)2014-02-18018 February 2014 Proposed Alternative for the Fourth Lnterval Lnservice Inspection (FNP-ISI-ALT-14, Version 1.0) NL-13-1936, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B2013-09-30030 September 2013 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-120B NL-13-0954, Proposed Path to Closure of Generic Safety Issue-191, Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized-Water Reactor Sump Performance.2013-05-16016 May 2013 Proposed Path to Closure of Generic Safety Issue-191, Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized-Water Reactor Sump Performance. NL-13-0171, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12,2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation.2013-02-27027 February 2013 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12,2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. ML12355A7862012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 331 of 561 - Page 373 of 561 ML12355A7872012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 374 of 561 - Page 415 of 561 ML12355A7852012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 284 of 561 - Page 330 of 561 ML12355A7842012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 234 of 561 - Page 283 of 561 ML12355A7832012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 184 of 561 - Page 233 of 561 ML12355A7822012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 141 of 561 - Page 183 of 561 ML12355A7812012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 104 of 561 - Page 140 of 561 ML12355A7802012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 59 of 561 - Page 103 of 561 NL-12-2266, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Cover - Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 58 of 5612012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Cover - Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 58 of 561 ML13004A2632012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4, Page 130 of 143 Through End NL-12-2266, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4: Unit 1-Area Walk-by Checklists, Page 71 of 161 - Pag2012-11-26026 November 2012 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4: Unit 1-Area Walk-by Checklists, Page 71 of 161 - Page NL-12-2266, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4: Unit 1-Area Walk-by Checklists, Page 1 of 161 - Page2012-11-26026 November 2012 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4: Unit 1-Area Walk-by Checklists, Page 1 of 161 - Page 7 NL-12-2266, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 59 of 561 - Page 12012-11-26026 November 2012 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 59 of 561 - Page 103 NL-12-2266, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Cover - Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 58 of 5612012-11-26026 November 2012 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Cover - Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 58 of 561 NL-12-2267, SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Cover Through Page 46 of 462012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Cover Through Page 46 of 46 ML13004A2612012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 431 of 467 Through Attachment 4, Page 63 of 143 ML13004A2602012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 373 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 431 of 467 ML13004A2582012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 307 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 372 of 467 ML13004A2572012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 232 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 306 of 467 ML13004A2562012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 177 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 231 of 467 ML13004A2552012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 123 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 176 of 467 ML13004A2542012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 58 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 122 of 467 ML13004A2532012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 1, Page 1 of 26 Through Attachment 3, Page 57 of 467 ML13004A2622012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4, Page 64 of 143 Through Page 129 of 143 ML12355A7952012-11-26026 November 2012 SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 4: Unit 1-Area Walk-by Checklists, Page 118 of 161 - End 2024-06-14
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 rA qj Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN NE] Ui0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment (D No: QIHIINGR2504t, Equip; Class'pkg F141 EquipmentDescription RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL. 155 Room, Area ___Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results o f the Seismic Walkdown of an item Of equipiment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used toxrecord the results ofjudgments and findintgs.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting 6ther conanetits.
Anchorag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2.. Is the, anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YE NE] UE] N/AN YYO NE] UE] N/AR]4. Is the anchorage:free of visible:cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE] N/A0 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: Tthis question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuratidn verification is required.)
Reference U733260 V2 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NE] UE NIA0 YZ NE] UM Enier-flie equipnlentcdas ihale frohi AppcndixB:;
Classes 6f Eqbipinent.
Page 141 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0~171\Sheet 2 of 6 status: YG] Nn UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QHIH1NGR25041, Equip. Class- 20 Pka Fl-41 Equipment Description.
RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets freefro'm impact by nearby equipment orstructures?
YMJ NEI UE] NiAE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO' NEI UE] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No overhead items.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Visible Conduits adequately flexible.Also cabinet is very rigid.1:0. Based oh the. above seismic interaction evaluationsi, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NE1 UE1 N/A-Yg NE1 UE Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Haye you looked for and found no other, seismic conditions thatcould adversely a ffect .the safety finctions of the equipment?
YZ Ni"UE]Corn ments Addi'tional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinet adjacent (N-42).per D-175069 is< 3/4 "away, but adequately stiff to pose no, adverse seismic I/A concern, This package was originally signed on 8-214-2 but retyped for clarify on 10-15-12.Evaluated by: Yun by,,,Telecon
/vIi a Paul Miktus / J!Date: V-21/12 8k21/2 Page 142 of 561 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 143 of 561 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0<4 Page 144 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 1FI-,cY)II 76 Page 145 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS V NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION ,Tl Page 146 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Sheeti of 14 StatuS: YN NRl ULI Equipment.ID No. QIHIINGSSP2506G Equip. Class ,206 Equipmeont Descrpntion SOLID STATE.,PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY FoorEl. 155, Room, Area 416 Mantufacturer., Modei, Etc. (optio6bal.btitiec6mmcnd&Id)
Instructions for. Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document:the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of tile, fklowing.questions maybe used to record the results of judgments and: findings.
Additional space, i§ pr6ovided itt the end.of.this§ cheekist for documenting otlier cofoments, Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL item s requiringsuh verficaion)?
- YZ NO 2.. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that -is more than mild surface oxidation?
Y. ,NO UEIC YN NENi UF] N/AF-4-. Isthe anchorage free of visible-cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NE]. Un N/AMI 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This questiobnonly Aippjies if the item is one of-tle.,50%
for which an anchorage configurationverification is required.).
Refer-ence SEWS'for'QIHI ING.SSP2506J dated 5/25/94 and 2506G: 5/25/94., Verified ahchorage.bqy.-puIling up carpet from front and back of QIHI1NSSP2506G, IH&4I.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NE] UE] N/AE-Y[9 NE] UE1 DOE terthquj~imicnt class niame 660m Aflpendix.,B:
Classes ofEquipnient.
Page 147 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2of 14 Status- YO NEI Un Equipment ID No. QIHi INGSSP25O6G Equip. Class' 20 , Pkg FI-42 Eq-auipment Descrip ion SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or-structures?
YZJ NEI iEI 1NIA 8. Are overhead equipment, distffibutiofi systems, deiling tiles and lightinf , NE Ui N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the.equipment?
- 9. DO attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage 10. Based on the above. seismic inteaction.eyiluations, is equipmenit free of potentially adverse'.seismic interaction effects?YZ NE UO N/AO YZ NO UE Other Adverse Conditions 1j. Have you.looked for and found no other seismic conditions thatcould adversely affect the safety fimetions of the equipment?, No Comments YGl NEI UE Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinet adjacent (N-42) per D-175069 is < 3/4" away, but adequately stiff to pose: no adverse seismic I/A concern.This package was originally signed on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.Evaliaked .hv-PaukMiktus 2 Date- 8121112&21,112 Page 148 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 9 A-i r4A Page 149 of 561 9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 150 of 561 CD 0 01I a?m z cn)m-I C/)z 0 Ci)z 7)0 m C/)0 z.
- ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIO*Page 152 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 4'Page 153 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONRO Page 154 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 155 of 561
- ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 Page 156 of 561 9IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .V Page 157 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONO Page 158 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.00 Page 159 of 561 9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 160 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sh$1ee-t 1 f statu'§: YLJ NO ~Seismic Walkdo Checklist (SWC)Equipmen lIDNo. Q1H21EO05-3.
Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4, 16KV SWITCHGEAR&
1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bdg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 12.1 Rkbm, Area -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. '(optional bit. recommiended)
InstructionsI for Completing Checklist.
This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an iem of equipment on the SWEL. The*spa. below each of the following questionsitmay be used to record ibe tesults of judgmrents and findings.
Additional spaceis provided atthe end of this checklist fordocumenting other domments., 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required'(i.e., is theitem one Y96 ND of0ile kd%of SWEL items requii'ring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?, 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more~than mildsurface oxidation?
'Y ND N/AO YO ND Ug"N/AD 4, hs the anchorage free of visible cracks in the.concrete near the anchors? Y ND UFD N/AD S. Is anchorage~configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: Thifs question-only applies if the item is one of the 53% for which an anchorage configuration verification*.
is required.)
YD ND I N/AD+6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seisrmic conditioins?
YD ND o~4 *c41L ua .4 -~Enter th~e eq~r~tcsname tFrom AppondixB:
Ct are fEquipm~ent.
Page 161 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet a2 ofyq Status: YO NEI] U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)
Equipment.1 No- QIH21EO05 Equip. 20..Equipment Descri pioni .o4 1 6KV SWITCHGEAR IG LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free-from impact by nearby, equipment:or structres?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribdition systems, ceiling files and lighting, iand iasoniy 'block Wa tsl not likely to collapse onto. the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse, seismic. interaction effects?Y~fNO. UO:JN/AQ YILJ NOl UO.N/AO I ONEI Ti N/AC, Y6NO U0J Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and fdund no other seismic conditions that :culd y5( NEI UC adversely affec6tithe safety functions of the equiomeni?
Comments (Additioaal pages hay:o e added as necessary)
- .... .,... ...[ 'E-valuated by: ~ ~ ' iQ&u-D~ate: ___________
\,J Page 162 of 561 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 Page 163 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0.P, .Page 164 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 f-- k -A Sheet 1 of-i-Status: YE-- NE-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location:
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 0056C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX'N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
RQ~e,-c..Wc CNCX.Cý 17- (icm 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?~ c.3eA- vjk ý 'e ~0 A ~~.k'~.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO- N- UP(N/A--YO NO UpJ[ N/AI 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NBI UO N/Ar" 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NB UOEf'N/AO YO NBi UF'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 165 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of Status: Yfl] NF- UI 7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) S Equipment ID No. 01H21E505 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J LOCAL CONTROL PANEL.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YJ%/NEJ UD] N/AD]C___&,.4 ".- -ý," %:-_ 6 £ C . 10.& o~- '- 4t -a c".er lj -n c, : +t,,_ Voe.ke 4,, 4 ,re~ cc 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UD] N/AD]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
V4L4. Z c...a -4=.%,-,, 0- c + 6, r-e'h ý 4 eAL-.- ' ,c. ;&Lc e 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? UEI N/A I1 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YPND U[]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? N Other Adverse Conditions S11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo(NEI U'-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
F.leP-Y00 cc-' &A Sizc 00
ýeee,.Evaluated by: I.-rIa',s Date: ,a51.-! 4_Page 166 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT.01, VERSION 1.0 j5cv -3, j!r RD~ ~ ph4.OM..T6-_-I-IF-0 cý.Al-.r ýLeett-J, =PC-ZC- _gqýbým~&. pkej ovt. 4t. S o-6*S 44- aid , 4-k wg % h rot. 4 A Ma 1 4wv*l 7 4m zr*,4-4.~ -A 1-nc V s,, y A. v s 4w rsýdý -#a o
- 0 t acheeo'-%l16&W 0% SW 64-a64- m%.i e.+f A4 Page 167 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 168 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 169 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 170 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of Status: Y[] ND UA Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment fD No. Q1H24E506 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4,16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bldg. SWIS FloorEL 188 Rbom, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Cheeldist This checklist maybe used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWBL. The space below each of the following, questions.mihay be used to record the results ofjudginents and findings..
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnients, Anchorage 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NO of the 50% of:SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchoragefree.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?31. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidatioii?
YE NO EA N/AE]YO NE UIl] N/AE U 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in. the concrete near the anchors? YO NE Uj N/A-5. Isý the anchorage conf!gur4tion consistent with plani.douminentation?(Note: This quiestion only applies if the iten is one of the 50/.for which an anchorage.configuration verification~is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free:of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE NE U1E IN/AE YE NE .Uq.I Enter the equipment classname from Appendix B: Classes doEquipment.
Page 171 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of X4 Status: YOI NI] UZýEquipment ID No. Q1H21E506 Equip,.Class' 20 : .EquipmentDescription 4,16KV SWtTCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONTPANEL interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by~nearby equipment or structures?
Y17 NEn UO N/AD/'8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and. lighting, Y NE] U N./AD and mas'niy block walls not.likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to-avoid damage?10. Based on the. above seissmic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?"/M NO UD1 N/AD SND; UD Other Adverse;Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions that could Y ýND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
'Evaluated bK v:i tI2- FR.A 1tt- : MIA. uxf4w)U/m oa -ua a Date: Page 172 of 561 9 CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0-I'..,. 0'Page 173 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS/-.q 5" ,C.............
.... ..... ...NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 174 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0'-44 Sheet 1 ofXt Status: YrtZ ND" U@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).Equipment ID No, Q1H21E527 Equip. Class 20 Equipment .Descrptii6n, DIESEL GENERA TOR1B tBOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155-- Room, Area, M\4anufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiona but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SW EL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findiings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.1. Is the anchorage configurattion verifibation'required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring:
such verification)?
ArY~hov is fsf&.0-4 -po.4-WCA wldie vr notV I bit cdý-H +ry'e- , o voI t 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosion that is more than mildsurface oxidation?
- 4. Is the ancborage.free of visible cracks in the concrete nebl the anchors?5. Is the. anchorage configuration Consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question.
only applies if the item is~one of the.50%.for whichl an anchorage.
configuration verification is required.)
6: BaSed on the Above anichorage eYaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YX NO YoJ NOl Up N/Afl VYEJ NEI UAZ N/AEI YO NF1 UM, N/Afl YO NOl UP- NA:' Enter theequipment class name from Appendix B-.Classs offEiiipinenit.
Page 175 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofZ*Status: Y] NU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Equipment ID No. QIH21E527 Equip. Class' 20.Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment.
or struct'res?
Yj% NEI. U0 NiAD it4( ý4~et CAAC0~4A J~LA 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and, lighting, YA ND UD N/AEJ and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage" Y% NDI Ur N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment, free Y4, ND uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI' UD adversely affect the safety functions Of the equipment?
/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary), Evaluatedy L jU) Lt:2./6tDaX, Lxpw-o 1 accAcqj Page 176 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 177 of 561 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOR Page 178 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetol of A--Status: Y[L Ufj Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)S Equiipmenit 1ll)No, Q1H21NBAFP26o5A Equip. ClassI 20, Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A Location: .Bldg.. AUXILIARY Ftoor'El, 121 Room, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but rie;ommend.ed)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the. results of the Seismic Watkdown of an item of equipment.6on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be, used torecord thezresults ofjudgments.
and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othedr omiOents..Anchorage 1t. Is the anchorage configuration verification requilred (i.e., is the item one YI) NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?,.2. Is the anchoragvfree of bent, broken,. missing0or loosehardware?
- 3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion.that is more.than minld surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free. of visible cracksin.
the concrete near the anchors?Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Notn: T'his question, only applies if the item is one of the 50% for:which an anchorage verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evalhatioris, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yq, NED UD N/-AEF Yý NE, UE N./An YU NE uQ]; N/AD 5V NEI UE N/AE]YN NE UE IEnter the equipment el ass natne fromn Appendix B: Claqses~ofEquipment.
Page 179 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0..F1ý4n SI k:Seismic Waikdown Checklistt (SWC)Sheet2-offp Status: YE] N[W UE]EquipmnenvtD No. Q1H21NAFrP2605A Equip. Class' 20*Equipment.
Description HOTSHUTDOWN PANEL A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fromrimpact by nearby equipmeni or structures?
,8. Are overhead equipmren!, distribt!tion'systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block.watls not likely to'collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?11 ND UD N!/AD Y0 ND UD N/ADýY9 ND UDI N/AD3 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y50 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1.1, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NK UD adversely affece the slafety fuxttions of the equipment?
A cair~\ 4oV 00r co, Thý fm vye -tP OA-"C CV6 A)- 11 l-cvfA Com mients (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by., *~ju AA ( ct &aL.WolvMa~a Date; f3L-5:9/jz Ii z-Page 180 of 561 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION19 i Page 181 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 182 of 561 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS
.-f,, -'cl)'NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 183 of 561