ML15225A116

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:23, 6 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (2) of Adrianne Davis Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML15225A116
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/30/2015
From: Davis A
Downwinders
To:
Division of Administrative Services
SECY RAS
References
80FR37664 00002, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15225A116 (2)


Text

WPage 1 of 2As of: 8/7/15 2:27 PMReceived: July 30, 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status" PendingPostComments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantLicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact StatementDocument: NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0019Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921Submitter Information ......: " ...Name: Adrianne Davis ... .. :..*- -------.--- ------. -- -~ ,.--i-- I7- ---flVTZr--.General CommentTo the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, e:/_,'_.Regarding Docket ID NRC-2009-0552The Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 must close now and save the time, energy and cost ofpreparing anEnvironmental Impact Statement. There is no perceptible gain except for the power company to delay whatneeds to be done without delay. Shut it down.The prospect of an "incident" happening any day, at any time, involving the plant where if the plant fails andexposes theCalifornia Counties' San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura and beyond, will likely cause a dead zone,prominent for a millennia. It's a plant built in the wrong place and need not be given a license to renew.Never.What must happen is a decision to shut it down and efficiently plan a Decommission Schedule to start, verysoon, with an end date but not 45-65 years later. How many years did it take to build? Quadruple that timeand heavily penalize the owner for going overtime and not leaving the beautiful space totally clean. Thatpenalty must be delivered back to the citizens and utilized in nuclear safety programs where it is presentlyunderfunded, in my opinion, and rarely tested.This plant, Diablo Canyon, is dangerous residue from time when it's purpose was considered a clean processfile :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-00 19.html 08/0'77/2015 Page 2 of 2built in the best Of locations. Now that it is known, thirteen seismic faults makes for a holocaust and its agemultiplies the weaknesses in that sacrificial zone. Spent fuel rods add heavily to a commotion of catastrophe.Nobody will get out alive for many miles around. This is not what we want in a good neighbor who isresponsible, upfront and truthful about his property.I ask that you all pay attention to the thought/image of all of your family members living daily in thisenvironment and under a cloud of real destruction, an uncontrolled nuclear incident gone mad. The timer ison.Thank you,A.A. DavisSanta Barbara CountyDownwinderfile :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-05 52-DRAFT-00 19 .html 08/07/2015