ML15225A116

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (2) of Adrianne Davis Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML15225A116
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/30/2015
From: Davis A
Downwinders
To:
Division of Administrative Services
SECY RAS
References
80FR37664 00002, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15225A116 (2)


Text

WPage 1 of 2 As of: 8/7/15 2:27 PM Received:

July 30, 2015 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status" PendingPost Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Document:

NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0019 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921 Submitter Information

......: " ...Name: Adrianne Davis ... .. :..*- -------.--- ------. -- -~ ,.--i-- I7- ---fl VT Zr--.General Comment To the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, e:/_,'_.Regarding Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 The Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 must close now and save the time, energy and cost of preparing an Environmental Impact Statement.

There is no perceptible gain except for the power company to delay what needs to be done without delay. Shut it down.The prospect of an "incident" happening any day, at any time, involving the plant where if the plant fails and exposes the California Counties' San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura and beyond, will likely cause a dead zone, prominent for a millennia.

It's a plant built in the wrong place and need not be given a license to renew.Never.What must happen is a decision to shut it down and efficiently plan a Decommission Schedule to start, very soon, with an end date but not 45-65 years later. How many years did it take to build? Quadruple that time and heavily penalize the owner for going overtime and not leaving the beautiful space totally clean. That penalty must be delivered back to the citizens and utilized in nuclear safety programs where it is presently underfunded, in my opinion, and rarely tested.This plant, Diablo Canyon, is dangerous residue from time when it's purpose was considered a clean process file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-00 19.html 08/0'7 7/2015 Page 2 of 2 built in the best Of locations.

Now that it is known, thirteen seismic faults makes for a holocaust and its age multiplies the weaknesses in that sacrificial zone. Spent fuel rods add heavily to a commotion of catastrophe.

Nobody will get out alive for many miles around. This is not what we want in a good neighbor who is responsible, upfront and truthful about his property.I ask that you all pay attention to the thought/image of all of your family members living daily in this environment and under a cloud of real destruction, an uncontrolled nuclear incident gone mad. The timer is on.Thank you, A.A. Davis Santa Barbara County Downwinder file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-05 52-DRAFT-00 19 .html 08/07/2015