Requests Hearing on Gj Galatis & We the People of the United States,Inc 950812 Petition,Submitted Per 10CFR2.206,for Purpose of Submitting Addl Evidence in Support of Petition. Request for Hearing Re AA Cizek 970303 Petition RenewedML20217C178 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Millstone, Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
---|
Issue date: |
07/09/1997 |
---|
From: |
Hadley E HADLEY, E.C., WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES (WE THE PEOPLE |
---|
To: |
Callan L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20217C047 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
0000603, 2.206, 603, G970140, NUDOCS 9803260343 |
Download: ML20217C178 (4) |
|
|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARDD-99-12, Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review DD-99-12 Has Expired.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 9910281999-10-28028 October 1999 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review DD-99-12 Has Expired.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 991028 ML20217N8261999-10-25025 October 1999 Discusses Errata Re 991021 Filing of Northeast Nuclear Energy Co Answer to Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene ML20217K3161999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Amend 195 to License DPR-61 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Deletes Certain TSs Either No Longer Applicable to Permanently Shutdown & Defueled State of Reactor or Duplicate Regulatory Requirements B17901, Submits Statement of Personal Qualification (NRC Form 398) Along with Supporting Certification of Medical Exam by Facility Licensee (NRC from 396) in Support of License Renewal for PM Miner.Encls Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-10-18018 October 1999 Submits Statement of Personal Qualification (NRC Form 398) Along with Supporting Certification of Medical Exam by Facility Licensee (NRC from 396) in Support of License Renewal for PM Miner.Encls Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17886, Requests Permission to Utilize Code Case N-623, Deferral of Insps of Shell-to-Flange & Head-to-Flange of Reactor Vessel,Section Xi,Div 1, for Millstone Unit 21999-10-18018 October 1999 Requests Permission to Utilize Code Case N-623, Deferral of Insps of Shell-to-Flange & Head-to-Flange of Reactor Vessel,Section Xi,Div 1, for Millstone Unit 2 05000336/LER-1999-012, Forwards LER 99-012-00,re Unrecoverable CEA Misalignment Entry Into TS 3.0.3 on 990917.Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-012-00,re Unrecoverable CEA Misalignment Entry Into TS 3.0.3 on 990917.Commitments Made by Util Are Encl ML20217G9491999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Exemption from Requirements of 1-CFR50,App E, Section IV.F.2.c,re Conduct of full-participation Exercise in Sept 1999,at Plant,Units 1,2 & 3 B17900, Forwards Revised Assumptions Used in Fuel Handling Accident Analysis & Summary of Results.List of Regulatory Commitments Are Listed in Attachment 11999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Revised Assumptions Used in Fuel Handling Accident Analysis & Summary of Results.List of Regulatory Commitments Are Listed in Attachment 1 ML20217D9671999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards Copy of Transcript of Public Meeting Held by NRC Staff & NNECO on 990825 at Waterford,Connecticut on Decommissioning Program for Millstone,Unit 1.Without Encl CY-99-137, Notifies NRC of Intent to Apply Haddam Neck Plant 10CFR50 App B,Qa Program to Activities Related to Development of ISFSI at Haddam1999-10-12012 October 1999 Notifies NRC of Intent to Apply Haddam Neck Plant 10CFR50 App B,Qa Program to Activities Related to Development of ISFSI at Haddam DD-99-11, Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision (DD-99-11) Expired & That Commission Declined Any Review.Decision Became Final Action on 9910041999-10-0808 October 1999 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision (DD-99-11) Expired & That Commission Declined Any Review.Decision Became Final Action on 991004 ML20217D3011999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Util 990118 Request for Amend to License NPF-49 to Allow full-core Offloads to Spent Fuel Pool During Core Offloads to Spent Fuel Pool During Core Offload Events ML20217P1201999-10-0606 October 1999 Informs NRC of Proposed Acquisition of Parent Holding Company of Central Maine & Requests NRC Concurrence,Based on Threshold Review,That Proposed Acquisition Does Not,In Fact, Constitute Transfer Subject to 10CFR50.80 ML20217F0031999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Original Petition to Intervene Being Filed on Behalf of Clients,Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone & Long Island Coalition Against Millstone,Iaw Provisions of 10CFR2.714 B17892, Requests Withdrawal of License Amend Application Re 24-month SG Tube Insp Surveillance Extensions,Submitted in Util 950726 & s to NRC1999-10-0505 October 1999 Requests Withdrawal of License Amend Application Re 24-month SG Tube Insp Surveillance Extensions,Submitted in Util 950726 & s to NRC ML20217B4711999-10-0404 October 1999 Informs That Staff Did Not Identify Any Safety Concerns Re Licensee Proposals to Modify Commitments Made for Action Items 4.2.1,4.2.2,4.5.1 & 4.5.2 of GL 83-28 by Providing Addl Justifications or Safety Bases for Changes ML20212L1261999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards Viewgraphs Presented by Licensee at 990923 Meeting with Nrc,In Response to Request ML20212L2171999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners,Wd Travers & Ferc,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island ML20212L2081999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance ML20212L1971999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Chairman Jackson & Commissioners Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance to Ensure Public Health & Safety ML20212L1831999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Wd Travers Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Millstone to Ensure Adequate Protection to Public Health ML20212K1241999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to Chairman Jackson,Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performace of Millstone to Ensure That Public Health & Safety,Adequately Protected ML20212J9991999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Clinton,H Clinton, Chairman Jackson &/Or Wd Travers Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Plant to Ensure That Public Health & Safety Adequately Protected ML20212J3051999-10-0101 October 1999 Discusses GL 97-06 Re Degradation of SG Internals,Dtd 971230.GL Requested Each PWR Licensee to Submit Info That Will Enable NRC Staff to Verify Whether PWR SG Internals Comply & Conform to Current Licensing Basis for Facilities ML20212J2451999-10-0101 October 1999 Informs That Util 980807 & 990629 Responses to GL 98-01, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at NPPs Acceptable.Nrc Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Units 2 &3 ML20212J6621999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs of Completion of mid-cycle PPR of Units 2 & 3 on 990916.Identified Several Recent Instances in Which Condition Repts Were Not Initiated,Resulting in Untimely or Inadequate C/As.Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl ML20217A9271999-09-30030 September 1999 Discusses Investigation Conducted at Millstone Nuclear Power Station by NRC OI Region I on 980319 to Determine If Contract Training Instructor Was Terminated for Raising Concerns About Quality of Training Matls ML20217B3221999-09-30030 September 1999 Refers to Investigation Rept 1-1997-035 Conducted at Millstone Nuclear Power Station by NRC Ofc of Investigation Field Ofc,Region I on 970915 to Determine Whether Former Health Physics Technician Discriminated Against B17887, Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) Which Requires Licensees to Maintain Secondary Financial Protection Beyond Primary Layer1999-09-28028 September 1999 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) Which Requires Licensees to Maintain Secondary Financial Protection Beyond Primary Layer ML20216J1341999-09-28028 September 1999 Ltr Contract:Task Order 49, Millstone Units 2 & 3 Employee Concerns Program Insp, Under Contract NRC-03-98-021 B17890, Provides Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-09-27027 September 1999 Provides Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal B17883, Forwards Mnps Unit 3 ISI Summary Rept,Cycle 6, IAW ASME Section XI,IWA-62301999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Mnps Unit 3 ISI Summary Rept,Cycle 6, IAW ASME Section XI,IWA-6230 B17888, Informs That There No Longer Exists Need to Maintain Millstone Unit 2 SRO License for CA Hines,License SOP-10741-01,effective 9909151999-09-24024 September 1999 Informs That There No Longer Exists Need to Maintain Millstone Unit 2 SRO License for CA Hines,License SOP-10741-01,effective 990915 B17884, Forwards NRC Form 536, Operator Licensing Exam Data, for Mnps,Units 2 & 3,per Administrative Ltr 99-031999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536, Operator Licensing Exam Data, for Mnps,Units 2 & 3,per Administrative Ltr 99-03 ML20212D0341999-09-20020 September 1999 Expresses Appreciation for Accepting NRC Request for Tour of Haddam Neck Facility During on 991014.Invites R Mellor to Participate in NRC 1999 Decommissioninng Power Reactor Work- Shop:Nrc Insp Program at Decommissioning Power Reactors ML20212F4961999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-245/99-08,50-336/99-08 & 50-423/99-08 on 990615-0809.Four Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy 05000336/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Thermal Reactor Power Limit That Was Exceeded.Commitments Made by Util Encl1999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Thermal Reactor Power Limit That Was Exceeded.Commitments Made by Util Encl B17867, Requests Relief from Requirements of 10CFR50.55a(g),IAW ASME Section XI for Millstone,Unit 3.Util Requests Relief from Performing Visual Exam of Reactor Pressure Supports to Extent Required by Code for Class 1 Supports1999-09-17017 September 1999 Requests Relief from Requirements of 10CFR50.55a(g),IAW ASME Section XI for Millstone,Unit 3.Util Requests Relief from Performing Visual Exam of Reactor Pressure Supports to Extent Required by Code for Class 1 Supports B17865, Provides NRC Staff with Updated Proposed Rev of FSAR Section 14.6.3, Radiological Consequences of SG Tube Failure. Updated Proposed Rev Will Replace Info Provided in Attachment 3 of Initial Submittal1999-09-16016 September 1999 Provides NRC Staff with Updated Proposed Rev of FSAR Section 14.6.3, Radiological Consequences of SG Tube Failure. Updated Proposed Rev Will Replace Info Provided in Attachment 3 of Initial Submittal B17876, Informs That Util Will Adopt Last Approved Northeast Util QA Program (Nuqap) Tr,Rev 21,dtd 990630,as Unit 1 Nuqap,Per Decision to Permanently Cease Operations at Subject Plant1999-09-16016 September 1999 Informs That Util Will Adopt Last Approved Northeast Util QA Program (Nuqap) Tr,Rev 21,dtd 990630,as Unit 1 Nuqap,Per Decision to Permanently Cease Operations at Subject Plant B17880, Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Rf Martin,License SOP-10397-0.Encls Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Rf Martin,License SOP-10397-0.Encls Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17881, Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Le Olsen,License SOP-10398-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Le Olsen,License SOP-10398-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17859, Forwards up-to-date Distribution Lists for NRC Correspondence to NNECO & NUSCO.Side-bars Indicate Changes from Previous Lists Provided to NRC on 9801281999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards up-to-date Distribution Lists for NRC Correspondence to NNECO & NUSCO.Side-bars Indicate Changes from Previous Lists Provided to NRC on 980128 B17882, Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 369 in Support of License Renewal for Bb Parrish,License SOP-10399-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 369 in Support of License Renewal for Bb Parrish,License SOP-10399-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17872, Informs of Election to Consolidate Previous Commitments Re Work Observation Program with Two New Programmatic Commitments Listed in Attachment 11999-09-14014 September 1999 Informs of Election to Consolidate Previous Commitments Re Work Observation Program with Two New Programmatic Commitments Listed in Attachment 1 B17838, Forwards Revs 34 & 35 to Physical Security Plan.Explanation of Changes Provided as Attachment 1.Without Encls1999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Revs 34 & 35 to Physical Security Plan.Explanation of Changes Provided as Attachment 1.Without Encls ML20212A9011999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Application for Exemption,Dtd 990803.Proposed Exemption Would Provide Relief from Requirement of 10CFR50 ML20212A7501999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Staff Requirements Memo Response,Dtd 990525,which Provides Actions NRC Plans for Continued Oversight of safety-conscious Work Environ & Employee Concerns Program ML20212A3171999-09-10010 September 1999 Discusses Investigation Rept 1-1998-045 Conducted on 981112 to Determine If Former Senior Health Physics Technician Being Denied Employment at Millstone in Retaliation for Having Raised Safety Concerns in Past.Synopsis Encl ML20211J9291999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards mark-ups & Retypes of Proposed Conforming License Changes Required in Connection with Transfers Being Sought in 990615 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217N8261999-10-25025 October 1999 Discusses Errata Re 991021 Filing of Northeast Nuclear Energy Co Answer to Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene B17901, Submits Statement of Personal Qualification (NRC Form 398) Along with Supporting Certification of Medical Exam by Facility Licensee (NRC from 396) in Support of License Renewal for PM Miner.Encls Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-10-18018 October 1999 Submits Statement of Personal Qualification (NRC Form 398) Along with Supporting Certification of Medical Exam by Facility Licensee (NRC from 396) in Support of License Renewal for PM Miner.Encls Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17886, Requests Permission to Utilize Code Case N-623, Deferral of Insps of Shell-to-Flange & Head-to-Flange of Reactor Vessel,Section Xi,Div 1, for Millstone Unit 21999-10-18018 October 1999 Requests Permission to Utilize Code Case N-623, Deferral of Insps of Shell-to-Flange & Head-to-Flange of Reactor Vessel,Section Xi,Div 1, for Millstone Unit 2 05000336/LER-1999-012, Forwards LER 99-012-00,re Unrecoverable CEA Misalignment Entry Into TS 3.0.3 on 990917.Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-012-00,re Unrecoverable CEA Misalignment Entry Into TS 3.0.3 on 990917.Commitments Made by Util Are Encl B17900, Forwards Revised Assumptions Used in Fuel Handling Accident Analysis & Summary of Results.List of Regulatory Commitments Are Listed in Attachment 11999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Revised Assumptions Used in Fuel Handling Accident Analysis & Summary of Results.List of Regulatory Commitments Are Listed in Attachment 1 CY-99-137, Notifies NRC of Intent to Apply Haddam Neck Plant 10CFR50 App B,Qa Program to Activities Related to Development of ISFSI at Haddam1999-10-12012 October 1999 Notifies NRC of Intent to Apply Haddam Neck Plant 10CFR50 App B,Qa Program to Activities Related to Development of ISFSI at Haddam ML20217P1201999-10-0606 October 1999 Informs NRC of Proposed Acquisition of Parent Holding Company of Central Maine & Requests NRC Concurrence,Based on Threshold Review,That Proposed Acquisition Does Not,In Fact, Constitute Transfer Subject to 10CFR50.80 ML20217F0031999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Original Petition to Intervene Being Filed on Behalf of Clients,Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone & Long Island Coalition Against Millstone,Iaw Provisions of 10CFR2.714 B17892, Requests Withdrawal of License Amend Application Re 24-month SG Tube Insp Surveillance Extensions,Submitted in Util 950726 & s to NRC1999-10-0505 October 1999 Requests Withdrawal of License Amend Application Re 24-month SG Tube Insp Surveillance Extensions,Submitted in Util 950726 & s to NRC B17887, Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) Which Requires Licensees to Maintain Secondary Financial Protection Beyond Primary Layer1999-09-28028 September 1999 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) Which Requires Licensees to Maintain Secondary Financial Protection Beyond Primary Layer B17890, Provides Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-09-27027 September 1999 Provides Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal B17883, Forwards Mnps Unit 3 ISI Summary Rept,Cycle 6, IAW ASME Section XI,IWA-62301999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Mnps Unit 3 ISI Summary Rept,Cycle 6, IAW ASME Section XI,IWA-6230 B17884, Forwards NRC Form 536, Operator Licensing Exam Data, for Mnps,Units 2 & 3,per Administrative Ltr 99-031999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536, Operator Licensing Exam Data, for Mnps,Units 2 & 3,per Administrative Ltr 99-03 B17888, Informs That There No Longer Exists Need to Maintain Millstone Unit 2 SRO License for CA Hines,License SOP-10741-01,effective 9909151999-09-24024 September 1999 Informs That There No Longer Exists Need to Maintain Millstone Unit 2 SRO License for CA Hines,License SOP-10741-01,effective 990915 05000336/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Thermal Reactor Power Limit That Was Exceeded.Commitments Made by Util Encl1999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Thermal Reactor Power Limit That Was Exceeded.Commitments Made by Util Encl B17867, Requests Relief from Requirements of 10CFR50.55a(g),IAW ASME Section XI for Millstone,Unit 3.Util Requests Relief from Performing Visual Exam of Reactor Pressure Supports to Extent Required by Code for Class 1 Supports1999-09-17017 September 1999 Requests Relief from Requirements of 10CFR50.55a(g),IAW ASME Section XI for Millstone,Unit 3.Util Requests Relief from Performing Visual Exam of Reactor Pressure Supports to Extent Required by Code for Class 1 Supports B17876, Informs That Util Will Adopt Last Approved Northeast Util QA Program (Nuqap) Tr,Rev 21,dtd 990630,as Unit 1 Nuqap,Per Decision to Permanently Cease Operations at Subject Plant1999-09-16016 September 1999 Informs That Util Will Adopt Last Approved Northeast Util QA Program (Nuqap) Tr,Rev 21,dtd 990630,as Unit 1 Nuqap,Per Decision to Permanently Cease Operations at Subject Plant B17865, Provides NRC Staff with Updated Proposed Rev of FSAR Section 14.6.3, Radiological Consequences of SG Tube Failure. Updated Proposed Rev Will Replace Info Provided in Attachment 3 of Initial Submittal1999-09-16016 September 1999 Provides NRC Staff with Updated Proposed Rev of FSAR Section 14.6.3, Radiological Consequences of SG Tube Failure. Updated Proposed Rev Will Replace Info Provided in Attachment 3 of Initial Submittal B17859, Forwards up-to-date Distribution Lists for NRC Correspondence to NNECO & NUSCO.Side-bars Indicate Changes from Previous Lists Provided to NRC on 9801281999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards up-to-date Distribution Lists for NRC Correspondence to NNECO & NUSCO.Side-bars Indicate Changes from Previous Lists Provided to NRC on 980128 B17881, Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Le Olsen,License SOP-10398-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Le Olsen,License SOP-10398-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17880, Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Rf Martin,License SOP-10397-0.Encls Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 for Rf Martin,License SOP-10397-0.Encls Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17882, Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 369 in Support of License Renewal for Bb Parrish,License SOP-10399-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 369 in Support of License Renewal for Bb Parrish,License SOP-10399-2.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) B17872, Informs of Election to Consolidate Previous Commitments Re Work Observation Program with Two New Programmatic Commitments Listed in Attachment 11999-09-14014 September 1999 Informs of Election to Consolidate Previous Commitments Re Work Observation Program with Two New Programmatic Commitments Listed in Attachment 1 B17838, Forwards Revs 34 & 35 to Physical Security Plan.Explanation of Changes Provided as Attachment 1.Without Encls1999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Revs 34 & 35 to Physical Security Plan.Explanation of Changes Provided as Attachment 1.Without Encls ML20211J9291999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards mark-ups & Retypes of Proposed Conforming License Changes Required in Connection with Transfers Being Sought in 990615 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests ML20216H0591999-09-0202 September 1999 Responds to Re Issues Submitted by Cullen on Behalf of Several Petitioners Concerning Offsite Emergency Prepardeness for Millstone Nuclear Power Station 05000336/LER-1999-010, Forwards LER 99-010-00,documenting 990804 Event of Failure to Perform ASME Section XI IST on Pressurizer Relief Line Flow Control Sample Valve Following Maint Activities.List of Util Commitments Contained in Attachment 11999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-010-00,documenting 990804 Event of Failure to Perform ASME Section XI IST on Pressurizer Relief Line Flow Control Sample Valve Following Maint Activities.List of Util Commitments Contained in Attachment 1 CY-99-111, Submits Clarification of Changes Made to Connecticut Yankee QA Program,Per Util 990810 Submittal.Change Will Be Submitted to NRC in Dec 1999 as Part of Annual Update1999-09-0202 September 1999 Submits Clarification of Changes Made to Connecticut Yankee QA Program,Per Util 990810 Submittal.Change Will Be Submitted to NRC in Dec 1999 as Part of Annual Update ML20211N9241999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Document Classification Form for Insertion Into Emergency Planning Services Department Procedures B17851, Forwards Semiannual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for 990101-990630 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Units 1,2 & 3,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards Semiannual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for 990101-990630 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Units 1,2 & 3,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) B17855, Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 396 in Support of License Renewal for SRO TE Grilley,SOP-4053-04.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 396 in Support of License Renewal for SRO TE Grilley,SOP-4053-04.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 B17849, Forwards Second Quarter Backlog Performance Rept for 1999, Which Represents Fourth Rept on Mnps Performance Since Restart of Unit 3 & First Status Update for Unit 2.No Regulatory Commitments Are Contained in Ltr1999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Second Quarter Backlog Performance Rept for 1999, Which Represents Fourth Rept on Mnps Performance Since Restart of Unit 3 & First Status Update for Unit 2.No Regulatory Commitments Are Contained in Ltr B17854, Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2,per TS 6.9.1.7.Revised Repts for May & June Also Encl Which Reflect Correct Faulty Printometer Readings1999-08-14014 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2,per TS 6.9.1.7.Revised Repts for May & June Also Encl Which Reflect Correct Faulty Printometer Readings B17850, Forwards First Lhc Quarterly Assessment Rept for Assessment Performed 990621 to 990701.NNECO Taking Appropriate Actions to Address Observations in Rept1999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards First Lhc Quarterly Assessment Rept for Assessment Performed 990621 to 990701.NNECO Taking Appropriate Actions to Address Observations in Rept B17837, Forwards COLR for Cycle 7, for Millstone Unit 3,IAW TS 6.9.1.6.Explanation of Changes to COLR Also Encl1999-08-0707 August 1999 Forwards COLR for Cycle 7, for Millstone Unit 3,IAW TS 6.9.1.6.Explanation of Changes to COLR Also Encl B17657, Requests Schedular Exemption from Emergency Plan Exercise Requirements of 10CFR50,App E,Part Iv,Section F,Paragraph 2.c.Requests That Nrc/Fema Evaluated Exercise Be Conducted in Mar 2000 Rather than Sept 19991999-08-0303 August 1999 Requests Schedular Exemption from Emergency Plan Exercise Requirements of 10CFR50,App E,Part Iv,Section F,Paragraph 2.c.Requests That Nrc/Fema Evaluated Exercise Be Conducted in Mar 2000 Rather than Sept 1999 B17845, Forwards Revised Commitment for Surveillance Scheduling & Tracking.Options for Surveillance Scheduling & Tracking Methodologies to Be Incorporated in Standardized Station Surveillance Program Are Currently Being Reconsidered1999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Revised Commitment for Surveillance Scheduling & Tracking.Options for Surveillance Scheduling & Tracking Methodologies to Be Incorporated in Standardized Station Surveillance Program Are Currently Being Reconsidered CY-99-048, Forwards Cyap Rept CY-HP-0031,Rev 0, Bounding Dose Assessment for Offsite Radioactive Matls1999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards Cyap Rept CY-HP-0031,Rev 0, Bounding Dose Assessment for Offsite Radioactive Matls B17831, Informs NRC Staff That Change 3 to Rev 25 of Mnps Emergency Plan Was Implemented on 990715.Change Removes Facility Organizational Charts from Emergency Plan & Identifies Relocation to Nuqap1999-07-26026 July 1999 Informs NRC Staff That Change 3 to Rev 25 of Mnps Emergency Plan Was Implemented on 990715.Change Removes Facility Organizational Charts from Emergency Plan & Identifies Relocation to Nuqap B17834, Forwards Proprietary Revised NRC Form 398,which Certifies That SL Doboe Has Completed Eligibility Requirements for Sro,Per 10CFR55.31.Proprietary Info Withheld1999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Proprietary Revised NRC Form 398,which Certifies That SL Doboe Has Completed Eligibility Requirements for Sro,Per 10CFR55.31.Proprietary Info Withheld B17811, Submits Response to NRC AL 99-02,requesting That Licensees Provide Numerical Estimates of Licensing Actions to Be Expected to Be Submitted in Fy 2000 & 20011999-07-20020 July 1999 Submits Response to NRC AL 99-02,requesting That Licensees Provide Numerical Estimates of Licensing Actions to Be Expected to Be Submitted in Fy 2000 & 2001 B17836, Forwards Revised NRC Form 396 & Supporting Physician Rept for Licensed Operator Restricted from Licensed Duties, Effective 990628,due to Medical Condition.Without Encl1999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Revised NRC Form 396 & Supporting Physician Rept for Licensed Operator Restricted from Licensed Duties, Effective 990628,due to Medical Condition.Without Encl CY-99-066, Forwards Revised Plan for Recovery of Licensed Matl from Offsite Locations.Completion of Implementation of Plan During Summer of 1999 Is Planned,Contingent on Support Extended by Property Owners,Weather & Uncontrolled Factors1999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Revised Plan for Recovery of Licensed Matl from Offsite Locations.Completion of Implementation of Plan During Summer of 1999 Is Planned,Contingent on Support Extended by Property Owners,Weather & Uncontrolled Factors ML20210S9911999-07-18018 July 1999 Requests NRC Intervene for All Shareholders of New England Electric System & to Help with Merger with National Grid Group & That NRC Petition Security & Exchange Commission to Investigate Matter Relative to No Shareholder Options B17835, Forwards Rev 33 to Millstone Station Physical Security Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Licensee Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Rev Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(d)(1)1999-07-16016 July 1999 Forwards Rev 33 to Millstone Station Physical Security Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Licensee Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Rev Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(d)(1) B17818, Provides NRC Staff with Change to TS Bases Sections 3/4.5.2 & 3/4.5.3, ECCS Subsystems for Info Only.Change Was Reviewed & Approved by Unit 3 Plant Operations Review Committee IAW Provisions of 10CFR50.591999-07-16016 July 1999 Provides NRC Staff with Change to TS Bases Sections 3/4.5.2 & 3/4.5.3, ECCS Subsystems for Info Only.Change Was Reviewed & Approved by Unit 3 Plant Operations Review Committee IAW Provisions of 10CFR50.59 B17824, Forwards Monthly Oeprating Rept for June 1999 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Unit 21999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Monthly Oeprating Rept for June 1999 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Unit 2 ML20212K1701999-07-13013 July 1999 Submits Concerns Re Millstone & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Should Provide Adequate Emergency Planning in Case of Radiological Accident B17816, Provides Certification That M Lettrich,Has Completed Eligibility Requirements,Per 10CFR55.31 for Operator License.Util Requests That Licensing Action Be Taken for Named Individual1999-07-0101 July 1999 Provides Certification That M Lettrich,Has Completed Eligibility Requirements,Per 10CFR55.31 for Operator License.Util Requests That Licensing Action Be Taken for Named Individual ML20209C3911999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards TS Page 6-3 for Haddam Neck Plant 1999-09-03
[Table view] |
Text
~'
Y O '. M l'l 6 ,
I. ,
h4'. C(40(o03 + WONO I t
'O -
~
J 4 #4 g y cahn j
[vrd/ [ h, on io4o a wAm sTacet gg e o. sox s4e west waacsim. uA oes7e g
Gcidber .OGC ERN[s7c.HADLcv (sos) temss4 gg rcovNstL
./OLtEN PAYCUR OLSEN FAX (506) teS 7oO2 g WAITE P. STUML WebumAIL,OE REF:000060 /G970140--ASSIGNED TRAVERS July 9, 1997 CYS T0: TRAVERS ULL ma -
Leonard J. Callan MIRAGLJA Executive Director of Operations ZIMMERMAN U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MARTIN Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 SLOSSON B0HRER re: Request for Licensing Actions 10 C.F.R. 5 2.206 Northeast Utilities i Millstone Units 1, 2 and 3, and Connecticut Yankee
Dear Mr. Callan:
On behalf of my clients, George J. Galatis and We the People of the United States, Inc. ("We the People"), I am writing to request that the hearing on their petition submitted pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 2.206, dated August Ql2 r 1995, be reconvened for the purpose of submitting additional evidence in support of the petition. At the same time, I renew my request for a hearing submitted on behalf of my client, Albert A. Cizek, on his S 2.206 petition, dated March 3, 1997.
As I am sure you are aware, a hearing on the petition submitted by Mr. Galatis and We the People originally was held on April 8,1996.
Nearly 15 months have passed since that hearing and no decision on the petition has been issued and none appears to be forthcoming.1 In that time, Petitioners have amassed a further body of evidence that is relevant and material to their contentions that NU engaged in knowing, willful and flagrant wrongdoing. Petitioners wish to present this evidence prior to a decision on the merits of their petition.
Petitioners fully acknowledge receipt of the disingenuous NRC document dated December 26, 1996 and entitled, " Partial Director's 1
/ Most recently, by letter dated June 30, 1997, Petitioners
( were advised that the staff still is reviewing the petition issues.
9803260343 980211 PDR 0 ADOCK 05000213 PDR
r..
f Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206." (Perhaps partial was intended to 1, refer to the Director?) At page 4 of the document, it clearly states, " Petitioners' issues 1 and 2 assert wrongdoing on the part of the licensee. The NRC staff has not yet completed its review of possible wrongdoing on the part of the Licensee and will address this issue (sic) in a subsequent Director's Decision." Since those were the only two issues raised by Petitioners that were accepted ,
as being within the scope of 5 2.206, what the next 16 pages of the !
document " decides" remains a mystery to Petitioners.
Moreover, Petitioners are equally rystified by that portion of the purported decision that " granted" their requests. Petitioners specifically requested that the license of Millstone Unit 1 be revoked until the facility was in full compliance with the terms and conditions of its license and, thereafter, suspended for a period of 60 calendar days. Neither of these events has occurred.
Thus, Petitioners are at a loss to understand precisely what it is they won.
Petitioners are equally at a loss to understand how the NRC issued a " favorable" decision on their 5 2.206 petition without ever invoking the required proceeding. Section 2.206 clearly states that "(ajny person may file a request to institute a proceeding under S 2.202 to modify, suspend, or revoke a license, . . .
(emphasis added) Section 2.202, in turn, spells out an extremely detailed formal procedure which must be invoked prior to granting
, the action requested in a petition. No such proceeding has ever
- been instituted. Section 2.206(b) does not permit the issuance of l 4
a favorable decision without the required proceeding. That section '
states, "the Director of the NRC office with responsibility for the subject matter of the request shall either institute a proceeding or shall advise the person who made" the request in writing that no proceeding will be instituted . . .. (emphasis added)
Petitioners further note that, under 5 2.206(b), they are entitled to a decision "[w]ithin a reasonable time . . .
Apparently, the NRC believes it is reasonable to undertake and complete the entire review process for the restart of the three Millstone units in less time than it takes to issue a decision on the 5 2.206 petition.
Given the fact that a reasonable period of time already has passed without a decision on the petition, my clients will not be prejudiced by any delay that results from a reconvening of the hearing.2 Jointly, Petit'oners further request that their reconvened hearing be combined with a hearing on the 9 2.206 petition filed by Mr.
Cizek on March 3, 1997. On April 8, 1997, Samuel J. Collins, 2
/ This should not be in any way construed as a waiver of my clients' right to a decision within a reasonable period of time in the absence of a decision to reconvene the hearing.
2
l Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), denied,
! without explanation, Mr. Cizek's request for a hearing. On April i 16, I wrote to Mr. Collins objecting to that denial and renewing l Mr. Cizek's request for a hearing. Specifically, I noted that no reason for the denial had been given and there was precedence for ,
holding the hearing. I further commented on the NRC's willingness I and ability to commit extraordinary resources to the restart effort, but not committing any resources to giving the public
, meaningful input to ensure the safe and legal operation of the Millstone units.
Mr. Collins has never responded to my April 16 letter. Therefore, ,
I only can conclude that he had no legitimate reason for denying the request. Indeed, it is my belief that the NRC has absolutely j no predetermined criteria for reviewing a request for a public 1 hearing under 5 2.206.3 . would note that the fact that Mr.
l Galatis appeared on the cover of Time Magazine and Mr. Cizek did not is hardly a legitimate reason for denying Mr. Cizek's request for a hearing.
The reconvening of the hearing is especially impcrtant since, time and again over the last several months, the NRC has declared that )
the public health and safety was never jeopardized at any of the Millstone units.' Thus, it would appear the NRC already has reached a conclusion on issues that impact upon the petition. It is obvious that this conclusion is based on evidence other than 1 I
that submittedduringtheg2.206 hearing, since NU submitted no f evidence at the hearing. Basic fairness, as well as the !
constitutional requirement of due process of law, dictate that the i hearing be reopened so Petitioners will have the opportunity to rebut this new evidence.
3
/ Of course, this has a familiar ring to it. The NRC plans to conduct the entire Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP), which will determine the restart dates of the Millstone units, without any predetermined criteria for reviewing the ICAVP findings.
l 4
/ Of course, this raises the very interesting question of why the three Millstone units have not been allowed to restart for the last several months. If the units are, and always have been, safe then it would seem to be an injustice of monumental proportions has been perpetrated on NU and the State of Connecticut. Clearly, it would be a gross abuse of authority for the NRC to keep the units closed because of its own bad publicity problems instead of for safety reasons.
5
/ Rather, as you will recall, NU chose to talk about the future instead of the past.
3
h .-
f For the reasons set forth above, Mr. Galatis and We the People t- request that the 5 2.206 hearing be reconvened for the taking of additional evidence and Mr. Cizek renews his request for a hearing.
Sin erely, bf cc. a. ca1 tie
'D S. Comley A. Cizek G. Mu11ey, OP3 I
1 l
l(L ,
l l
l
.1 l
\
l 4
i
~
e p
[% \ UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WAe6WNeTON, D.o. Stees GOM
- August 7, 1997 Ernest C. Hadley, Esq.
1040 B Main Street West Wareham, MA C2576
Dear Mr. Hadley:
I am responding to your letters of April 16 and July 9, 1997, regarding my response of April 8, 1997, to the petition that you filed pursuant In.
to 10 CFR 2.206 (Petition) on behalf of Mr. Albert Cizek (Petitioner)latory particular, you repeated your request for the U.S. Nuclear Regu Commission (NRC) to hold a public hearing on the issues mentioned in the Petition and, if this request was denied, you asked the NRC to furnish you with its reasons for denying the request. Comments and requests in your j July 9,1997, letter not related to the Petition submitted by Mr. Cizek will be addressed in separate correspondence.
Although not explicitly stated in ny letter of April 8, 1997, in denying the j i
Petitioner's request for a public hearing before restart or decommissioning of any of the Millstone units or Haddam Neck, the NRC staff was guided by NRC Management Directive 8.11. " Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions," which specifies the process to be followed for petitions filed under 10 CFR 2.206.
This directive states that an informal public hearing is not automatic and will not be held simply because it is requested by a petitioner. Rather, the l i
staff will determine if an opportunity for an informal public hearing is to be offered to a petitioner according to the following criteria. The first l i
element listed below (a) must always be met and either one of the other following elements (b) or (c) must also be met.
(n) Informal public hearings will not be held if to do so will !
compromise " sensitive" information that may need to be protected from disclosure, such as safeguards or facility security information, proprietary or confidential commercial information, or '
information relating to an ongoing investigation of wrongdoing.
(b)Thepetitionprovidesnewinformationwithreasonablesupporting facts that raises the potential for a significant safety issue. For nuclear reactors, a significant safety issue is an issue that, if validated, could lead to an occupational exposure dose equivalent
' exceeding 10 ren, could cause significant core damage, or could otherwise result in a significant reduction of protection of public 3
i health and safety. The information is considered 'new" if one of F the following applies:
i- - The petition presents a significant safety issue not previously
's evaluated by the staff.
- The petf, tion presents new information on a significant safety l issue previously evaluated.
- The petition presents a new approach for evaluating a significant safety issue previously evaluated and, on preliminary assessment,
'the new approach appears to have merit and to warrant u
l reevaluation of a significant safety issue previously evaluated.
l Y
I, Ernest C..Nadley -
2-j (c) The petition alleges violations of NRC requirements involving a signifir~' safety issue (which usually would include nearly all 1 Severit vel I, most Severity Level II, and possibly some Severity i Level la violations under the Connission's enforcement policy) for which new information or a new approach has been provided and presents reasonable supporting facts ~that tend to establish that the violation occurred.
In.this instance, the NRC staff concluded that item (a) may be satisfied.
However, with regard to items (b) and (c), the NRC staff reviewed the
'information presented in the Petition and concluded that neither item (b) nor item (c) were satisfied. Accordingly, based upon the application of Management Directive 8.1, an informal public hearing in this matter is not warranted.
Finally, as you note in your letter, the NRC staff did conduct an informal public hearing associated with a petition submitted by you pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.206 on behalf of Mr. George Galatis and We the People, Inc. The ,
then Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation informed you in his l letter to you of October 26, 1996, that an informal public hearing w:s appropriate in that instance due to the public interest in the matter, irrespective of whether Management Directive 8.11 was satisfied. These same considerations do not apply in this matter because there is already a public forum for the Petitioner to raise issues and ask questions. The NRC staff has been holding, and will continue to hold, regularly scheduled public meetings in the vicinity of the Millstone facility. At these meetings, members of the public can raise issues of concern. Thus, the Petitioner has a public forum in which to raise his concerns and disseminate his views. In fact, the Petitioner has attended these meetings and has made statements as well.
Accordingly, your request for a public hearing is denied.
I remain dedicated to ensuring that sound and readily understood decisions are made by the NRC staff throughout its review of the Millstone restart and the Haddam Neck decommissioning processes. Decisions made by the staff will be based on thorough review of relsvant safety information and with due regard for public invol fement in accordance with the Commission's regulations and policies.
Sincerely, MMk SamudJ.0otis Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~915IRIBitTION see next page DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REYNOLDS\HADLEY
- See previous concurrence u.w ..m am,e 0FFICE SPO-L
,n.wn a m.m.m c .cm u .u..m lC SPO-L:LAh(
f C TECH ED* l SPD-L:DD* l SP0:D ) l NAME SReynolds A. LBerry W BCalure PMcKee WTravens ,/
g.ogg.j.zg..;ga-t _ .m.p .w a NANE .t S%11V[ /m eFfi.ud DATE T O K /97- iff/97 07/ '/97 ,07[_/97 07/ /97 0FHCIAL RECORD COPY u
q
,.,b j
g g
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
, f WASHINGTON, D.C. 20086-0001
% ***** /
October 14, 1997 David A. Lochbaum Nuclear Safety Engineer Union of Concerned Scientists 1616 P Street NW. Suite 310 Washington, D.C. 20036-1495
Dear Mr. Lochbaum:
This is in reference to your September 9.1997 letter to the Comission requesting a review of its enforcement program and providing comments on the subjectivity, timeliness, and consistency of NRC enforcement actions. The thrust of your comments is that there is too much subjectivity in enforcement and that civil penalties should be consistently imposed.
At the outset, you should be aware that the staff is in the process of reviewing its experience with the NRC Enforcement Policy (NUREG-1600) that was substantially revised in June 1995. An opportunity to comment on the revised policy was noticed in the Egderal Reaister at 62 Fed. Reg. 5494 (February 5.
1997). While the comment period has closed, we are considering your comments in the review.
While we share your concerns about the importance of timely and consistent enforcement actions, we do not believe that the desire for consistency should be achieved by assessing the same civil penalty to every violation as suggested by your comments. The policy reflects that the regulation of I nuclear activities, in many cases. does not lend itself to a mechanistic treatment. Judgment and discretion must be exercised in determining the appro)riate enforcement sanctions. including the severity levels of violations 1 and tne decision to issue a Notice of Violation or to propose or impose a I civil penalty and the amount of the penalty. These decisions are made after '
considering the principles of the Commission's Policy Statement and the significance of the violations and their surrounding circumstances. I Enforcement actions are used not only as a deterrent and to emphasize the i importance of compliance with Commission requirements, but also to encourage prompt identification and prompt, comprehensive correction of violations.
Thus, the licensee's response to a violation is a relevant consideration.
In assessing a civil penalty the Commission considers a number of factors.
including the severity of the violation, licensee's )ast performance, corrective action, whether the licensee identified tie violation. and willfulness, consistent with the legislative history to section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Admittedly, this requires subjective decisions to be made, but discretion is an im)ortant consideration in developing remedial sanctions. On balance, t11s is considered a strength of the program and not a weakness. It provides the opportunity to tailor regulatory messages to licensees and the licensed industry. Licensees against which civil penalties are assessed are being given clear notice of the need to
? 70+e44tW zM-
i y a
+.
improve-their performance. We believe that enforcement is serving the Commission's safety mission.
As to timeliness, this is an area that the staff strives to improve. However, many of the more significant penalties are based on team inspections and investigations by the Office of Investigations. These require coordination within the agency, as well as. in the case of many investigations, the Department of Justice. As one might expect, the more significant violations are often more difficult to assess and take more time to determine the most effective enforcement action.
I have enclosed a copy of NUREG-1525. the 1995 Assessment of the NRC -
Enforcement Program, which discusses the philosophy behind the Commission's enforcement program and the development of its enforcement )olicy.
Recognizing that enforcement is a complex subject. I would Je pleased to discuss your comments with you in a public meeting. If you desire such a meeting, please call me at (301) 415 -2741.
Sincerely,
% b ames Lieberman. Director Office of Enforcement
Enclosure:
NUREG-1525. " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program"
. . . .. .. )