ML19043A945

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:12, 20 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000275/2019002, 05000323/2019002 and Request for Information
ML19043A945
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2019
From: Greg Werner
Operations Branch IV
To: Welsch J
Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
IR 2019002
Download: ML19043A945 (8)


See also: IR 05000275/2019002

Text

February 20, 2019

Mr. James M. Welsch

Vice President Nuclear Generation

and Chief Nuclear Officer

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Diablo Canyon Power Plant

P.O. Box 56, Mail Code 104/6

Avila Beach, CA 93424

SUBJECT: DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC

INSPECTION REPORT 05000275/2019002, 05000323/2019002 AND

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Welsch:

From April 8 to April 12, 2019, two inspectors from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commissions (NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification

inspection at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B,

Licensed Operator Requalification Program.

Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC

inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to

ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this

inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A

of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the

inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies

the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of

this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are

usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these

documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional

documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Amanda Sorenson of your regulatory

services organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated

schedule of examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the

material requested, please contact the lead inspector Nicholas Hernandez (832) 689-9928

(nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov).

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection

requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-

0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

J. Welsch 2

request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document

displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Agency Rules of Practice & Procedure," a copy

of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC

Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs

document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Gregory E. Werner, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-275,05-323

License Nos.: DPR-80, DPR-82

Enclosure:

Request for Information

ML19043A945

SUNSI Review ADAMS: Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Keyword:

By: NAH Yes No Publicly Available Sensitive

OFFICE SOE:OB C:OB

NAME NHernandez GWerner

SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/

DATE 02/04/2019 02/13/2019

BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

Inspection Report: 05000275/2019002, 05000323/2019002

Inspection Dates: April 8 to April 12, 2019

Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.11B, Licensed Operator Requalification

Program

Lead Inspector: Nicholas Hernandez, Operations Engineer

A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation

activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module

(i.e. 2.02, 2.04, etc.). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or by

CD/DVD in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than March 15, 2019. Do not

send USB flash drives.

  • Electronically: To: Nicholas.Hernandez@nrc.gov (lead inspector);

Cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov (inspector)

  • CD/DVD: To: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV

ATTN: Clyde Osterholtz

1600 E. Lamar Blvd

Arlington, TX 76011

General Requests:

  • List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
  • Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR

evaluators identified)

  • Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LOR continuing training

program

  • List of outstanding LOR program changes
  • List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

  • Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the LOR training program
  • Last 2 years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Last 2 years of Curriculum Review Committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes

Enclosure

02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality

  • The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
  • The current requalification cycle written examination results to date
  • All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to the date of

submittal. Include password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if

mailed per NUREG-1021.

  • The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)

02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality

  • The schedule for the operating tests to be given the week of April 8, , 2019
  • All operating tests (password protected) that have been approved for administration

up to and including the week of the onsite inspection

  • All 2019 NRC-required annual operating tests
  • Current requalification cycle operating test results
  • Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)

02.05: Licensee Administration of Requalification Exams

  • All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
  • All procedures used to assess operator performance
  • All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
  • All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

02.06: Requalification Examination Security

  • Tracking tools used to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and

ensure sampling of required topics on a periodic basis

  • Tracking tools used to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and ensure

sampling of all required malfunctions (major events, instrument/component

malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a periodic basis.

  • All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to

develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations

  • List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to

examination security and overlap

02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program

  • List of remedial training conducted or planned since last biennial requalification

inspection (includes remedial training for exam failures and training to correct generic

or individual weaknesses observed during previous requalification exam cycle)

  • Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and final documentation)

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • All procedures and program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,

tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators

  • All procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any

SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

2

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be

electronic or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test

procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient

test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert

review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.

o Transient test 3, Simultaneous closure of all main steam isolation valves

o Transient test 10, Slow primary system depressurization to saturated

condition with pressurizer relief or safety valve stuck open (inhibit activation of

high pressure emergency core cooling system)

o Steady State tests for low power test

  • SBT packages for any three scenarios used for the 2018 annual requalification

operating test

  • All simulator management and configuration procedures if not already provided for

Section 02.05 above

  • Simulator discrepancy report (DR) summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,

summary list for those items closed between April 8, 2017

  • Two examples of primary parameters tested in order to verify core physics

parameters. The applicable reference graphs from the plant physics data book

(electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test

procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results.

  • All simulator modification packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed

in the last 2-years

  • A list of simulator modification packages completed in the last 2-year window

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • A summary report of all condition reports related to licensed operator actions/errors

in the control room since April 8,2017

  • Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues since April 8,, 2017

B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection

activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on April 8, 2019.

02.02: Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Quality

  • All approved operating tests (password protected) to be administered subsequent to

the onsite inspection

  • All results up to the day the team leaves the site.

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • Access to licensed operators records
  • Access to licensed operators training attendance records
  • Access to licensed operators medical records

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • Simulator discrepancies reports (DRs) since April 8, 2017. This should include all

open and closed DRs, with documentation / justification for closure

3

  • Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at

the time of acceptance (as available)

  • Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulic and

neutronics models, to the actual plant

  • All current model deficiencies, including USAR vs design differences in the simulator
  • Summary list of plant modifications since April 8, 2017
  • Plant modifications (both hardware and software) incorporated onto the simulator

since April 8, 2017.

  • The complete book of all simulator annual performance test packages (either

hardcopy or electronic), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and

malfunction tests. This should also include the test procedures for each test, the

acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient test, the reference chart should

be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator

results with an analysis for any differences beyond the ANSI standard requirements

  • Simulator reactor core performance test packages used to verify core physics

parameters (ANSI/ANS 3.5 sections 3.4.3.3 / 4.4.3.3), including applicable reference

graphs from the plant physics data book, test procedures, acceptance criteria, and

results

  • All simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the

room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,

simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.

  • Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for simulator testing

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • All condition reports related to licensed operator actions/errors in the control room.
  • All condition reports from the last initial license exam

C. Diablo Canyon Power Plant is required to send the final results and any remaining

written exams and operating tests to the lead inspector for final review and

comparison against the significance determination tools in order to communicate the

exit results for the inspection. Report results in the format below:

1. Total number of licensed operators.

2. Number of licensed operators administered a requalification examination

required by 10 CFR 55.59(a).

3. Number of individual licensed operators who failed any portion of a

requalification examination (written, JPM, or individual simulator scenario

failures).

3.a. Number of individual licensed operators who failed written exam

3.b. Number of individual licensed operators who failed JPM exam

3.c. Number of individual licensed operators who failed simulator

scenario exam individually

4. Divide line 3 by line 2 to obtain the individual requalification examination  %

failure rate.

5. Number of crews administered simulator scenarios as part of a

requalification examination required by 10 CFR 55.59(a)

4

6. Number of crews who performed unsatisfactorily on the simulator

scenarios.

7. Divide line 6 by line 5 to obtain the crew simulator scenario failure rate. %

8. Describe the reason for each licensed operator who was not

administered an NRC-required requalification exam, or who did not pass an

administered requalification exam, and the stations plan to satisfy the

requalification exam requirement for each.

5