ML063070246

2006/07/27-E-Mail: Fwd: Fyi: Attaching File with My Assessment Tracking the Status of Our Metal Fatigue Questions - Jim

ML063070246
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	07/27/2006
From:	Jennifer Davis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Ford B Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
%dam200612, TAC MD2296
Download: ML063070246 (9)

Text

Kent!Joward

-Fwd: FYI : Attaching File With My Assessment Tracking the Status of Our Metal Fatigue Questions

-Jim From: James Davis To: Bford@entergy.com Date: 7/27/2006 3:58:51 PM

Subject:

Fwd: FYI : Attaching File With My Assessment Tracking the Status of Our Metal Fatigue Questions

-Jim Brian, Here is the status for Jim Medoff's questions.

Jim>>> James Medoff 07/27/2006 3:43 PM >>>CCO: Kenneth Chang; Peter Wen; Ram Subbaratnam c:\ter7'iP\GW100001.TMP Page 111I rGWIOOOO1 .TMP Page 1 II Mail Envelope Properties (44C91AF6.8DB

22 : 35346)

Subject:

Fwd: FYI: Attaching File With My Assessment Tracking the Status of Our Metal Fatigue Questions

-Jim Creation Date 7/27/2006 3:58:46 PM From: James Davis Created By: JAD@nrc.gov Recipients entergy.com BFord (Bford@entergy.com) nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 KXC2 CC (Kenneth Chang)nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 RXS2 CC (Ram Subbaratnam) nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 PXW CC (Peter Wen)Post Office OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 Route entergy.com nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 612 7/27/2006 3:58:46 PM Audit Team Tracking Form -Pilgrim Audit R1 7-27-2006.wpd 32844 7/27/2006 3:13:58 PM Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security: None Standard No None No Standard IUc-Kt"I~p\GW}O(O)O T -P Page 211 Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled If KeiitHoward_-_

Audit Tea m-Trackinq For-m-_-_

Pilq--rim- -Audit R1 7-27-2006.wpd Pa ge 1-11 If Kent Howard- Audit Team Tracking Form -Pilgrim Audit Ri 7-27-2006.wpd Page 1 tI Audit Team Tracking Form Audit Brief Description of the Date Q&A Brief Description of the Status: Basis for Status: Team Issue Raised in Audit Team Database Applicant's Response to the Question # Question Response Audit Team Question 503 TLAA -AMR reconciliation TBR Joint response to Questions 0 Open Draft Joint question for Class 1 503, 504, 505, and 506 will s A~ccepted Response has (Medoff) components designed to require amendment of the Eo Closed been accepted Section III requirements Fatigue AMRs in Tables 3.1.2-1, m Supp. LRA but not docketed 3.1.2-2, and 3.1.2-3. Amend. in Q&A database.o Supp. LRA Commit. Need to eliminate 0 Update FSAR first paragraph of Supplement Draft resp.504 TLAA -AMR reconciliation TBR Column entry for Question 503 11 Open Column entry for question for Class 1 is applicable.

m Accepted Question 503 is (Medoff) components designed to 0 Closed applicable.

B31.1 requirements m Supp. LRA Amend.o Supp. LRA Commit.o Update FSAR Supplement 505 TLAA -AMR reconciliation TBR Column entry for Question 503 0 Open Column entry for question for Class 1 is applicable.

m Accepted Question 503 (Medoff) components designed to [] Closed is applicable.

design codes other than m Supp. LRA Section III or B31.1 Amend.requirements 0 Supp. LRA Commit.0 Update FSAR Supplement

............. ..... ..... .... ..... ...........

... .----- -- _ _ _ _Kent Howard -Audit Team Trac ýIng form ý Pilgrim Audit R1 7-27-2006.w

_d Pag2, _J21 Kent. Howard..A di..eam.Tracing.

Form...ilgrim.Audit...

.........wp. Page 2 Audit Team Tracking Form Audit Brief Description of the Date Q&A Brief Description of the Status: Basis for Status: Team Issue Raised in Audit Team Database/

Applicant's Response to the Question # Question Other Audit Team Question Responses 506 TLAA -AMR reconciliation TBR Column entry for Question 503 0 Open Column entry for question for Non-Class 1 is applicable.

a Accepted Question 503 (Medoff) components

[] Closed is applicable.

a Supp. LRA Amend.o1 Supp. LRA Commit.Eo Update FSAR Supplement 507 RPV Internal Clarification Q&A Response was acceptable to 0 Open Question response:

clarify that only the shroud tie 0 Accepted (Medoff) 7/5/2006 rods received CUF calcs and to n Closed propose deletion of a confusing 0 Supp. LRA LRA clause in the LRA text. Amend.Amend: 0 Supp. LRA 7/19/2006 LRA Was amended to deleted Commit.the conflicting clause from the 0 Update FSAR RPV Internal discussion text. Supplement 508 Question asked which Initial Initial response clarified that n Open Awaiting fracture mechanics and Resp: three flaw evaluations had 0 Accepted amended (Medoff) flaw evaluations were 07/05/2006 potential to be TLAAs: (1) CRD 0 Closed response.

Work TLAAs for the PNPS LRA. nozzle cap weld, (2) recirc 0 Supp. LRA request to send Amend. thermal sleeves, and (3) recirc Amend. amended Resp: N2F nozzle but did not meet 01 Supp. LRA response to DCI TBR definition for TLAAs. Amend. Commit. for review.response to provide bases why. 03 Update FSAR Supplement TBR: to be received.

W-a-rd ---Audit Team __ Tr -acking Form -Pilgrim Audit R1 7-27-2006.wpd Page 3 11 1 kent Howard -Audit Team Tracking Form -Pilgrim Audit Ri 7-27-2006.wpd Page 311 Audit Team Tracking Form Audit Brief Description of the Date Q&A Brief Description of the Status: Basis for Status: Team Issue Raised in Audit Team Database Applicant's Response to the Question # Question Response Audit Team Question 515 Critical question on why Init. Resp. Amended draft response was to D Open 1. Accepted but the applicant had not 7/5/2006.

indicate that the applicant was o Accepted awaiting revised (Medoff) performed updated 60-year committing to perform updated 0 Closed response CUF calculations when Amend 60-year CUF calcs (including m Supp. LRA containing over half the transients are Resp: TBR critical Fen impacts) for the Amend. Comms #31 and projected to exceed their RRS piping and either updated

• Supp. LRA #35 as basis for maximum allowables before calcs, inspections or Commit. closing out TLAA the expiration fo the PEO. repair/replacment for RPV o Update FSAR 2. LRA and components.

Supplement FSAR Supp need updating to include Commits.517 Reconciliation Question to N/A 01 Open Need for resolve differences 0 Accepted Question was (Medoff) between 40-year CUF m Closed eliminated during values provided in TLA 0 Supp. LRA second TLAA Table 4.3-1 and those listed Amend. Audit of in Class 1 design basis 0 Supp. LRA July 17-19, 2006.CUF calcuations Commit. Issue is closed.0 Update FSAR Supplement 341 Question on whether the Q&A: Response provides basis why 0 Open Basis accepted cranes for PNPS should be 7/5/2006 cranes do not need to be within

• Accepted because unlike (Patel) TLAAs for the LRA the scope of TLAAs 0 Closed Brunswick and 0 Supp. LRA Browns Ferry, Note: Cranes were not TLAAs Amend. Pilgrim RB for Nine Mile Point but were for 0 Supp. LRA Cranes are Brunswick and Browns Ferry Commit. Seismic Cat II -LRA. o1 Update FSAR no CMAA-70 Supplement analysis was performed.

Note: meni Chiang would like to see minior revisionIs of Commi~tment1ts

.31 adu .35.

KenFtHloard

-Audit Team Tracking Form -Pilgrim Audit R1 7-27-20 06.wpd Page 4 Audit Team Tracking Form Audit Brief Description of the Date Q&A Brief Description of the Status: Basis for Status: Team Issue Raised in Audit Team Database Applicant's Response to the Question # Question Response Audit Team Question 342 Question requested the Q&A Response to Question provided 51 Open Response was basis for CUF exclusions in 7/5/2006 definitive valid ASME Code m Accepted accepted but (Patel) LRA Table 4.3-1 exclusion paragraphs for those 11 Closed requires an LRA components in LRA Table 4.3-1

• Supp. LRA amendment of Amend: that were excluded from CUF Amend. the LRA.TBR calculations 0 Supp. LRA Commit. Currrent 01 Update FSAR response may Supplement conflict with responses to 343 and 503/504/505 343 Question asked why Class Q&A Response provide basis for C1 Open Response was 1 components designed to 7/5/2006 removing Fen impacted CUFs m Accepted accepted but B31.1 do not require from Table 4.3-3 for three 0 Closed requires an fatigue assessments.

LRA component locations m Supp. LRA amendment of Similar to questions raised Amend: Amend. the LRA.in 504 and 505. TBR 0 Supp. LRA Commit. Current response o Update FSAR may conflict with Supplement responses to 343 and 503/504/505 344 Question raised the issue Q&A Response provided a basis why [: Open Initial response why cycle counting alone 7/5/2006 cycle counting alone was u Accepted Was acceptable would ensure the adequacy 'sufficient.

0 Closed because they of the Section III LRA 0 Supp. LRA were going to tie components evaluated by Amend: Amend. it to 515. New CUF assessments TBR 0 Supp. LRA Comms. #31 and Commit. #35 appear to o] Update FSAR necessitate a Supplement newer amended response.

IFK-ent qo-ward- Auc(ff-T-eamTracki-n-7q-F-0rM-Fli-q-riffi-AW-d-it R1 7-27-20-0-6-mo-d-Page 5 11 I K n Ho ad .A dtTa.r .i.. .Form .P A ...... .Page ...Audit Team Tracking Form Audit Brief Description of the Date Q&A Brief Description of the Status: Basis for Status: Team Issue Raised in Audit Team Database Applicant's Response to the Question # Question Response Audit Team Question 345 Informed applicant that the Q&A Response ties to the revised 0 Open Response is CUF value for the 7/5/2006 Commitment

1. 35. u Accepted acceptable but feedwater nozzle was 0 Closed requires an'inaccurate and requested a LRA u Supp. LRA amendment to new 60-year calculations Amend: Amend. the LRA.TBR 0 Supp. LRA Commit.0 Update FSAR Supplement 346 and Ask for clarification on how Q&A Response ties to the revised 0 Open Response is 347 the environmental CUF 7/5/2006 Commitment

1. 31 m Accepted acceptable but values for critical Class 1 0 Closed requires an components were LRA m Supp. LRA amendment to calculated Amend: Amend. the LRA.TBR 0 Supp. LRA Commit.o1 Update FSAR Supplement 425 Requested information why Q&A Response was tied to response

• Open Still open CUF values in LRA Table 7/5/2006 to Question 345 01 Accepted according to the 4.3-1 did not reflect 0 Closed July 5, 2006 Q&A Thermal Power LRA 0 Supp. LRA Database.Optimization impacts in a Amend: Amend. However, it would GE report used for the TBR 0 Supp. LRA seem the PNPS design basis. Commit. upcoming 0 Update FSAR responses with Supplement new Comm will I close this.

11 Kent Howard -Audit Team Trackina Form --Pilarim Audit R1 7-27-2006.wpd Page 6 I -- --, .. .- --"-Audit Team Tracking Form Audit Brief Description of the Date Q&A Brief Description of the Status: Basis for Status: Team Issue Raised in Audit Team Database Applicant's Response to the Question # Question Response Audit Team Question 426 and Questions on metal fatigue Q&A Responses informed staff that o Open Response to 426 427 evaluations for emergency 7/5/2006 the TLAAs for EDG expansion

-Accepted-426 was accepted.diesel expansion bellows bellows were done to B31.1 m Closed-427 requirements are valid for PEO. 0 Supp. LRA Response to 427 Amend. was closed.o1 Supp. LRA Commit.o Update FSAR Supplement o Open o Accepted o Closed o Supp. LRA Amend.o3 Supp. LRA Commit.o Update FSAR Supplement o] Open o1 Accepted o1 Closed O Supp. LRA Amend.o Supp. LRA Commit.o Update FSAR Supplement