ML083231008: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/04/2008
| issue date = 04/04/2008
| title = E-mail from N. Sheehan, OPA to L. Lund, NRR on Media Questions Board Notification
| title = E-mail from N. Sheehan, OPA to L. Lund, NRR on Media Questions Board Notification
| author name = Sheehan N A
| author name = Sheehan N
| author affiliation = NRC/OPA
| author affiliation = NRC/OPA
| addressee name = Lund A L
| addressee name = Lund A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000219
| docket = 05000219

Revision as of 04:48, 12 July 2019

E-mail from N. Sheehan, OPA to L. Lund, NRR on Media Questions Board Notification
ML083231008
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/04/2008
From: Neil Sheehan
Office of Public Affairs
To: Lund A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2008-0306
Download: ML083231008 (1)


Text

Donnie Ashley From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:05 PM To: Louise Lund Cc: Donnie Ashley

Subject:

Media questions re: board notification Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Louise, The APP just called on the board notification.

AmerGen actually sent the reporter the notification.

Here are two questions I could use your help on: 1.) How long will it take for AmerGen to do a reanalysis of the nozzle in question?;

2.) What did the previous analysis of the nozzle show in terms of the acceptance criteria, i.e., CUE?; and 3.) Why did the NRC staff not identify this issue until now?Thanks, Neil 22