Latest revision as of 16:36, 23 July 2020

Text

Rev 0,to Evaluation of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations
	ML20127K812
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	01/19/1993
From:	Dibe R, Hootm C; TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20127K787	List: ML20127K784; ML20127K789; ML20127K812; ML20128G931; ML20128G949; ML20128G955; ML20128G968; ML20128G986; ML20128G994; ML20128G998; ML20128H018; ML20128H031; ML20128H052; ML20128H068; ML20128H077; ML20128H092; ML20128H102; ML20128H112; ML20128H119;
References
	ER-ME-082, ER-ME-082-R00, ER-ME-82, ER-ME-82-R, NUDOCS 9301260224
	Download: ML20127K812 (181)
	v • d • e

- ___ __ -_ _ _ ______ _ -______ __ ___ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

I s

ER ME-082, REV. O f PAGE 1 OF 8 i l .

TU ELECTRIC STEAh! ELECTRIC STATION- !

ENGINEERING REPORT EVALUATION OF UNIT 2 THERMO-LAG CONFIGURATIONS ER-hfE-082 REVISION 0 JANUARY 19,1993 .

u

PREPARED BY: c- i Olld -

REVIEWED BY: - _ .

~

APPROVED BY: b((

L -

9301260224 930119 6-DR- ADOCK 0500

- - . . = .

ER ME-082, REY. O PAGE 2 OF 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGS 1.0 PURPOSE 3

2.0 BACKGROUND

3 3.0 METHODOLOGY 4 4.0 EVALUATION 6

5.0 CONCLUSION

7

6.0 REFERENCES

7 A'ITACHMENT A TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS Al-A24 A'ITACHMENT B UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS B1-BS5 ATTACHMENT C MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY Cl-C24 ,

DEVIATIONS A*ITACHME!R D PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM Dl-D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS ATTACHMENT E STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS El-El1 A'ITACHMENT F AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS F1-F27 s

e ra

l ER ME 082, REV. O PAGE 3 OF 8 1.0 IMRPOSE The purpose of this evaluation is to provide reasonable assurance that Thermo bg 3301 Fire Barrier System configurations installed to protect Unit 2 electrical raceways and cables will provide a 1-hour fire endurance rating (Ref. 6.1) in accordance with the CPSES design and licensing basis (Ref. 6.2,6.3,6.4) for assuring at least one train of equipment, components and raceways necessary to achieve safe shutdown will be free from fire damage (Ref. 6.5).

Additionally, where Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier System configurations are utilized as part of a fire rated plant structural assembly, this evaluation provides reasonable assurance that these configurations will provide a fire endurance rating commensurate with that of the bariier (Ref. 6.6) in accordance with the CPSES design and licensing basis (Ref. 6.3,6.4,6.7).

2.0 BACKGROUND

The applicable CPSES Unit 2 Thermo-Lag installation specification (Ref. 6.8) and typical detail design drawings (Ref. 6.9) provide the technical requirements for installing Thermo Lag material on required commodities. For cable and raceway barrier -

configurations, these technical requirements such as material thickness, sealing and reinforcements of joints, etc., are based on methods used to construct test assemblies during TU Electric's 1-hour Thermo bg fire endurance qualification test program recently completed at Omega Point Laboratories (Ref. 6.10). For structural steel configurations, technical requirements are based on Underwriter's Laboratories tested designs (Ref 6.11). For a detailed description of the TU Electric Thermo-Lag test program including commodities and configurations tested, test results, structural steel applications, etc., refer to ER ME-067, " Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems" (Ref. 6.12).

The installation requirements and construction details for applying Thermo-Lag to most plant commodities and configurations thereof such as cable trays, conduits, junction boxes, etc., are enveloped by the typical detail design drawings and installation -

specification. Accordingly, most of these commodity configurations and techniques for Thermo-Lag installation are qualified directly by specific tests. However, it is recognized that due to specific field conditions and limitations such as interferences, clearances between commodities, etc., creation of unique design configurations and acceptance of minor deviations from specified technical requirements (where appropriately justified) are inevitable. It is also recognized that due to the number and variation of these special instances it is not feasible to qualify all aspects of each unique configuration or minor deviations through specific fire endurance testing, in fact, in some instances limitations of industry test apparatus may preclude such testing.

i,

ER ME 082, REV. O PAGE 4 OF 8 Instead, the goal of a qualification test program is to qualify the critical attributes of the fire barrier system, such as material thickness, joint reinforcement techniques, interfaces between different materials, etc., for the range of commodity sizes anticipated in plant-configurations. Based on the qualification of these critical attributes, specific plant conditions requiring unique configuration designs and minor deviations can be reasonably resolved. The NRC staff has recognized this concept through the provisions of Generic Letter 86-10 (Ref. 6.13) which enables licensees to evaluate field installations which vary from configurations qualified via fire endurance tests using criteria provided therein.

In accordance with the CPSES design control program, where due to field conditions, the techniques or configurations for installing Thermo-Lag on required commodities are not bounded by the installation specification or typical details, Construction Department personnel are required to identify the condition for resolution by Engineering via initiation of Design Change Authorizations (DCAs)(Ref. 6.14). Additionally, DCAs are initiated to identify specific instances where obstructing commodities (piping, ductwork, raceway, etc.) serve to interfere with the protective envelope such that specified requirements cannot readily be achieved. Resolution of these specific field conditions is provided by Engineering via the DCA approval process. Resolution of these issues is based on methods and techniques qualified through test, experience and familiarity ,

with the proper uses and limitations of Thermo-Lag materials gained through the qualification test program and conservative engineering practices. Accordingly, this evaluation serves to correlate Unit 2 Thermo-lag configurations to the applicable qualification test (" scheme"), or portions thereof and hence provide a basis for acceptance in accordance with the provisions of NRC Generic Letter 8610. This process will be utilized for all typical details approved for generic use via the design drawings -

(Ref. 6.9) and such unique configurations and minor deviations described above as bounded by the applicable DCAs.

3.0 ME'DiODDLOGY 3.1 Copies of all design drawings containing typical details (including DCAs issued, but not yet incorporated into the drawings) were obtained from the Document Control Center.

Additionally, copies of all DCAs posted against the design drawings and the installation specification (Ref. 6.8) that identified approved deviations from specified requirements were similarly obtained. The effective date for all DCAs reviewed is January 19, 1993.

The "Affected Document Update Reports" (ADURs) provided in Attachment F provide the complete listing of all DCAs reviewed within the scope of this report.

l ER-ME 082, REV. O PAGE 5 OF 8 P

3.2 It is recognized that Thermo-Lag installation on raceways in plant areas common to both units (Auxiliary /E&C Buildings)is still in process. Thermo-Lag installation on raceway and structural steel in Unit 2 (Safeguards Building) is complete. The total Thermo-Lag installation effort on Unit 2 commodities is 93% complete at this time, with completion targeted for January 29,1993. To account for the few remaining DCAs which may be generated prior to completion, Construction has performed detailed pre-installation walkdowns to survey any potential areas requiring a design change document and initiated DCAs accordingly. These documents were reviewed and included within the scope of this report. Therefore, with few exceptions, this evalua: ion included the entire Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configuration work scope. Review of any outstanding DCAs required to support Thermo-Lag completion will be performed in a subsequent revision of this document.

3.3 Once copies of all approved design changes to Unit 2 Thermo-Lag design documents were obtained, they were categorized into five (5) general categories based on the relative significance level of the design change implemented by the DCA. Accordingly, the

" typical details" are viewed as the most significant since these configurations are generally approved for use on a generic basis. The unique design configurations are viewed as the next most significant category followed by any deviations from specified requirements associated with the actual raceway, component or cabling requiring protection. Deviations from specified coverage on items protruding from or interfering with the commodity requiring protection (such as raceway supports) were grouped as the fourth category. Lastly, any deviations to Thermo-Lag configumtions on structural steel were compiled. This is based on the minor amount of structural steel requiring protection in the plant (support steel for 2-hour rated gypsum stairwell walls and on support frames for fire and tornado dampers in these walls). Also, since Thermo Lag panels are secured to structural steel with screw fasteners, and few protniding/ interfering commodities are located in these areas, these configurations are much less prone to 1 installation deviations.

3.4 Next, a detailed review was performed for each " typical detail" and unique design configuration to correlate the plant configutation to a test configuration " scheme" or l

applicable portions thereof. Where the plant design configuration required evaluation to correlate it to a tested configuration or if a tested configuration was not applicable, the NRC staff guidance provided in Generic Letter 86-10 (restated below) was utilized as

! " General Criteria" to " baseline" the evaluation. Similarly, the same process was utilized to evaluate the DCAs which identify specific configurations which deviate from specified requirements.

l l

. . _ . - _ _ . - . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ~~

ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 6 OF 8 e General Criteria -

1. Continuity of the materialis consistent with tested configurations.

2. Effective thickness of the materialis consistent with tested configurations.

3. The nature and effectiveness of the support assembly (if applicable) is .

consistent with tested configurations.

4. The application or end use of the material is consistent with tested configurations.

5. The configuration was reviewed by a qualified fire protection engineer and determined to provide an equivalent level of protection.

3.5 Each typical design detail and all DCAs were then compiled into a matrix format with -

corresponding supponing test configuration (" scheme") references. Where evaluation was utilized in the acceptance basis for a configuration, the " General Criteria" above or other criteria and justification listed um er the " Basis / Notes" heading was used as described in the matrix. Complete de scriptions of test configurations and results are provided by ER ME 067, (Ref. 6.12) ant' the associated Omega Point Laboratories Test Reports (Ref. 6.10) and are not reiterated in J.h mwt.

3.6 Any Thermo-Lag configuration determined by evaluation not to provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration or for which a reasonable correlation to a tested configuration cannot be demonstrated are identified by issuance of a ONE Form in accordance with STA-421 (Ref 6.15).

4.0 EVALUATION ..

Refer to Attachments A through E to this report for the acceptance basis associated with each Thermo-Lag configuration reviewed within the scope of this evaluation as follows:

Attachment A: Typical Design Details Attachment B: Unique Configurations Attachment C: Minor Protected Commodity Deviations Attachment D: Protruding / Interfering item Coverhge Deviations Attachment E: Structural Steel Deviations 9

ER ME-0S2. REV. O PAGE 7 OF 8

5.0 CONCLUSION

As detailed in Attachments A through E, all Thenno-Lag configurations evaluated within the scope of this report are either effectively bounded by the critical attributes of tested configurations or have been demonstrated by evaluation to provide an equivalent level of protection to that afforded by tested configurations with the following exceptions:

Attachment B: DCA 101320, REV. 2 DCA 102932, REV. 5 DCA 104011, REV. O DCA 104174, REV. 0 DCA 104246, REV. O Attachment C: DCA 102780, REV. O These configurations have all utilized Thctmo-Lag 330-660 "Fiexi-Blanket" material on the protected commodity (rigid conduit, junction boxes or cable trays) in areas where interferences exist such that Thermo-Lag 330-1 panel or prefabricated conduit section material could not be readily installed. As described in Section 3.6, ONE Form 93-184 has been issued to identify inese field conditions. The disposition of this ONE Form will result in configurations which are either bounded by test or can be demonstrated to provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration.

6.0 REFERESCES 6.1 ASTM E119-88, " Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials".

6.2 CPSES Design Basis Document DBD ME-020, Rev. 2, " Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis".

6.3 CPSES Fire Protection, Report (FPR), Rev. 6, Sec.11.

6.4 CPSES Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Sec. 9.5.1.

6.5 10CFR50, Appendix R.

6.6 CPSES Unit 2 Fire Hazards Analysis (FHA) Drawings, M2-1921 through M2-1942, Rev.

CP-1.

6.7 (VPSES Design Basis Document DBD-ME-063, Rev.1, " Fire Barriers".

,e

^

ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 8 OF 8 6

6.8 Specification CPES M 2032, Rev. 0, " Installation of Fire Barrier and Fireproofing .

Materials".

6.9 Drawing M2-1701, Shts. 01 15, Rev. CP-1. "Thermo-Lag Typical Details".

6.10 TU Electric Contract B-0046494-001 including "One Hour Fire Endurance Tests of Articles Protected with the Thenno Lag Fire Barrier System', Rev.10 (Test Plan) and the following test reports:

a. Project No. 12340-935436, Scheme 1-2

b. Project No. 12340-94367a, Scheme 91

c. :

Prcject No. 12340-94367c, Scheme 10-1

d. Project No. 12340-94367d, Scheme 10-2

c. Project No. 12340-94367e, Scheme 11-1

f. Project No. 12340-94367i, Scheme 12-1

g. Project No. 12340 94367h, Scheme 12-2

h. Project No. 12340 943671, Scheme 13-1

i. Project No. 12340-94367m. Scheme 14-1

j. Project No. 12340-94367), Scheme 9 6.11 Underwriters Laboratories " Fire Resistance Directory', Designs X-003 and X 611.

6.12 CPSES Engineering Report ER-ME-067, Rev. 2, " Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems".

d.13 USNRC Generic Letter 86-10 dated April 25,-1986.-

6.14 CPSES Unit 2 Procedure 2PP-5.01, " Design Change Authorizations".

6.15 CPSES Procedure STA-421, " Operations Notification and Evaluation (ONE) Form".

6.16 Calculation 2-FP-0080, Rev. O, " Unit 2 Maximum Permissible Fire Loading /Non- Rated -

Feature Analysis".

6.17 CPSES Unit I and 2 Calculation No. ME-CA-0000-0965, Rev. O, "Thermo-Lag Primary Prot uding Member Installation Requirements"_.

6.18 CPSES Unit I and 2 Calculation No, ME-CA-0000-2062, Rev._0, " Heat Transfer Analysis of Cable Tray Supports to Determine Thermo Lag Requirements".

l I

1

' ER-ME-Od2. REV. O PAGE Al OF A24

(

i ATTACIIMENT A a TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082 REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETA113 PAGE A2 OF A24 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 1-I.1 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2, Il-1, I-5 WTTH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 1-1.2 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE !RON PROTRUDING ITEM I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5,1 I WTTH 3304560 FLEXI-BLANIET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 1-2,1 N/A COVEFAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A l WTTH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS. Tills DETAIL l WAS TESTED-1-2.2 N/A COVERAGE OF TUBE STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A l

%TfH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS THIS WAS l TESTED. I i

1-3.1 103953.0 COVERAGE OF *C* CHANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1 N/A WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEL THIS WAS 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 TESTED. ;

i 1-3 2 N/A COVERAGE OF *C' CHANNEL PROTRUDING TTEM I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, I I

%1TH 33C460 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 i 1-3.3 104121/0 THIS DETAIL SilOWS THE TIE WIRE 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2-, 13-1 1-6, 73 INSTALLATION ON THE THERMO-LAG 330-1 & 14-1 PANELS COVERING A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT.

THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TIE WIRE BEING INSTA11 Fn THROUGH THE BOTTOM TRAY PANELS THAT BUTT UP TO THE TRAY SUPPORT.

1-4.1 N/A COVERAGE OF *I* BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-5 WITil 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEL. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 1-4.2 N/A COVERAGE OF *I* BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM 330- I -2,9- 1,10- 1,10-2,1 1 - T,, 1-5, I I 660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 I-5 103921/0 HILTI BOLT DETAIL FOR NITACHING THERMO- I-2,9-1,10 1,10-2,11-1, 1-6, 12 LAG TO A CONCRETE STRUCTURE. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 l l-5.1 103921/0 THIS IS A SQUARE WASHER DETAIL WHICH IS TO N/A N/A 103476/1 BE USED ON DETAIL I-5 AND REQUIRES NO ADDITIONAL JUSTIFICATION.

ATTACIIMENT A ER-ME-082 REV.O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS ,

PAGE A3 OF A24 i

TYPICAL DETAIL NO.- DCA NOJREV ' DESCRIPTION ~ SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24}

l-6 10122211 Tills DETAIL PROVIDES A METIIOD OF COVERING 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 15 A WEEP 110LE IN A TUBE-STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM WITH THERMO-LAG.

1-7 10401510 THIS DETAIL SHOWS COVERAGE OF RADIAX 11-1 1-5, 74 CABLE AND ITS SUPPORT AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE COVERAGE INCLUDES 330-1 PANELS ON Tile SUPPORT AND 330460 FLEXF-BLANKET ON THE RADIAX.

2-2 100820/0 Tills DETAIL IS FOR FIRE STOPPING NON I-2,11-1,12-1 AND 14-1 I-5, 17 103921/0 ESSENTIAL CONDUITS ATJUNCTION BOXES USING EITilER 330-1 OR 45B SILICONE ELASTOMER.

2-3 103020/3 Tills IS Ti1E STANDARD DETAIL FOR INSTALLING 10-1 1-5, 19 103634/2 TIIERMO-LAG ON JUNCTION BOXES IT ALSO GIVES AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN TO INSTALLING BANDS ON THE OUTER LAYER.

2-3.1 N/A Tills IS A DETAll SHOWING BANDING ON 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,I1-1. 1-5 THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON UNISTRUT WHICH 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 4

SUPPORTS THE JUNCTION BOX AND PROTRUDES OUT OF THE THERMO-LAG PACKAGE. '

s 2-3.2 N/A Tills IS A DETAIL SHOWING INSTALLATION OF 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5 TilERMO-LAG ON A JUNCTION BOX SUPPORT. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 (

2-3.3 103020/3 TlilS IS A DETAIL SilOWING STRESS SKIN AND 10 N/A TROWEL GRADE INSTALLED ATJUNCTION BOX

, JOINTS.

2-3.5 104060/0 THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH ALLOWS JUNCTION 10-1, IC-2 1-5, 40 BOX 2cd LAYER "V* RIB PANEL TO BE EXTF_NDED TO COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT TIIE BOX.

2-3.6 104060/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF 10-1, 10-2 I-5, 43 THERMO-LAG ON AN ESSENTIAL FLEXIBLE CONDUIT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX ENCLOSURE-rs >

ew , m -

w

ATTACHMENT A E2-ME-CE2, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS 1 PAGE A'1 OF A24

. TYPICAL DETAIL NO.' ' DCA NOJREV DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES

~

BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 3-1 & 3-1.1 N/A THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH SHOWS A 330-1 1-2,I1-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 & 1-5,20 THERMO-IAG BOX, FIRE STOPPED WHERE AN 14-1 AIR DROP ENTERS A CABLE TRAY.

3-1.2 N/A THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH SHOWS A 330-1 1-2,11-2.12-1,12-2,13-1 & 1-5. 17, 20 & 22 THERMO-LAG BOX SIMILAR TO DETAILS 3-1 & 3- 14-1 1.1 BUT THE AIR DROP COMES OUT OF A CONDUIT WHICH IS FIRE STOPPED LNSTEAD OF AT THE 330-1 BOX AND 230-660 FLEXI-BLANKET COVERS THE AIR DROP FROM THE CONDLTIT TO THE TRAY-3-2 & 3-2.1 100820/0 THESE DETAILS SHOW THE PROTECTION OF AIR 11-1 1-5.26 DROP CABLES WITH 330460 FLWI-Bt.ANKET FROM A TRAY TO A THROUGH WALL SLEEVE

('DVS). THE POINT OF ATTACHMENT AT THE TRAY IS TO THERMO-LAG 330-1 HALF RO'JNDS AND DIRECTLY TO THE SLEEVES AT THE TWS.

3-3 NIA THIS DETAIL SHOWS AN AIR DROP DE1 WEEN 11-1 1-5,20,25 CABLE TRAYS %TIR A COMBINATION OF 130-1 PANELS AND 1/2 ROUNDS AT THE ATTACHMENT TO THE TRAYS AND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP CABLES BETWEEN THE TRAYS.

3-4 (OPTION 1) 103020/3 THIS 15 THE STANDARD AIR DROP 11 1 102933/0 N!A CONFIGURATION FOR CABLES AIR DROPPLNG 100820/0 INTO A CABLE TRAY. THIS CONFIGURATION WAS TEs a w.

3-4 (OP110N 2) 103020/3 THIS IS THE STANDARD TESTED AIR DROP 11-1 1-5, 31 10293380 CONFIGURAT10N EXCEPT THAT STRESS SKIN 100820/0

%TTH TROWEL ORADE IS UTILIZED ON TOP OF THE TRAY INSTEAD OF 330-1 PANM M 3-4.3 103020/3 THIS PROVIDES SPECIFIC DETAILS %7IICH 15 TO 11-1 N/A BE USED IN CONNECTION %TTH THE STANDARD AIR DROP DETAIL (3-4 OFTION 1). THIS IS A -

TEM w CONIIGURATION-

ATTAcilMENT A ER-ME-082, REY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A5 OF A24 l

TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCliEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 3-4.4 & 3-4.5 103020/3 THESE ARE SPECIFIC DETAILS WHERE STRESS 11-1 i

i I-5, 31 SKIN WITil TROWEL GRADE IS UTILIZED ON TOP i

OF THE TRAY INSTEAD OF 330-1 PANELS. THESE DETAILS ARE ENCOMPASSED BY 3-4 (OPTION 2).

f l 3-5 103020/3 TIIIS IS TiiE STANDARD DETAIL FOR Il-1 N/A OVERLAPPING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG I/2 ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT FOR 3 & LARGER CONDUITS. Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

3-5.1 103020/3 TIIIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL FOR II-I N/A -

OVERLAPPING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330- i i THERMO-LAG 1/2 ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT FOR 2* & SMALLER CONDUITS. TlilS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

3-5.2 103020/3 THIS IS A STANDARD DETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 11-1 1-5, 34 j 104121/0 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG j ON EITIIER CONDUITS OR CABLE TRAYS. THIS IS l

A TESTED CONFIOURATION FOR INSTALLATION ON CONDUITS.

3-5.2.a 103020/3 ,

Tills IS A STANDARD DETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 11-1 1-5, 34, 35 104121/0 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG ON EITHER CONDUITS OR CABLE TRAYS TIIE SAME AS DETAIL 3-5.2 EXCEPT THAT IT DEALS WITH SITUATIONS WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS DO NOT ALLOW OVERLAP DISTANCES OF FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 AS INDICATED ON 3-5.2.

34 104121/0 TIIIS DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION 1-2.9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, 37 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING A SINGLE FIRE 12-l.12-2,13-1,14-.1 & 9-3 ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY.

34.1 104121/0 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION 11-1 1-5, 39 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING MULTIPLE FIRE ZONE R CABLES AS A PROTRUDING ITEM MOM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY.

ATTACilMENT A ER-M EG2. REY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PACE A6 OF A24 "ITPICAL DETAIL NO.' DCA NO./REV DESCRIFTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 4-1 103020/3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1,10-1 & 10-2 ; N/A 3* AND LARGER CONDUIT WITII 330-1 IIALF

, ROUNDS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

4-1.1 103020/3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-I. 10-1 & 10-2 N/A 2* AND SMALLER CONDUIT WITil 330-I HALF ROUNDS. THIS !S A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

4-2 & 4-2.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD COVEP. AGE OF 11-1 1-5, 45 CABLE BUNDLES AND FLEX CONDUlT %TTH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET.

4-3 & 4-3.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW COVERAGE ON CONDUITS 9-1, 10-I 10-2 & 9-3 I-5, 46

%TTII 3301 HALF ROUNDS AT CONCRETE SURFACES WHERE THE CONCRETE SURFACE PREVENTS COMPLETE COVERAGE OF Ti!E CONDUIT WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE %7TH STANDARD DETAII3.

4-4 N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TYPICAL FIRE l-2. II-I,12-1 & 14-1 1-5, 17 STOPPING OF CONDUITS.

4-5 N/A Tills DETAIL SHOWS CONDUIT PROTEGED WITH 9-l, 10-1, 10-2 & 9-3 I-5,50 330-1 HALF ROUNDS PENETRATING THROUGH A BLOCKOLT.

4-6,4-6.1,4 7. 4-7.1 103020/3 TiiESE DETAILS ARE THE SAME AS DETAILS 4-1 I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 46, 52 4-1.1,4-3 AND 4-3.1 RESPECTIVELY FOR 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 COVERING CONDUITS WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS EXCEPT THESE DETAIL 3 USE LARGER SIZED 330-1 L

HALF ROUNDS WHICH HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO COVER THE SMALLER CONDUIT.

4-8 103076/1 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE ON FLEXIBLE Il-1 I-5,53 CONDUITS WHERE CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERFACES WITH THE STANDARD COVERAGE ON THE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A7 OF A24 TYPICAL DETAIL NO.. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT 1EST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 4-9 103423/0 Tills DETAll SIIOWS HOW TO COMPENSATE FOR 9-1. 10-1, 10-2 & 9-3 1-5, 54 A GAP BETWEEN THE 2 SECTIONS OF A I/4*

OVERLAY ON A 2* CONDUIT BY INSTALLING TROWEL GRADE AND STRESS GRADE IN TiiE GAP.

5-1,5-1.1 & 5-1.2 10302013 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD l-2, Il-1,12-I,12-1,13-1 N/A CONFIGURATIONS FOR C0VERING CABLE TRAYS & 14-1 WITil 330-1 PANEL 3 AND INSTALLING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT JOINTS. THESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS-5-3 & 5-3.1 N/A THESE DETAILS SHOW FIRE STOPS IN CABLE I-2, Il-1,12-2 & 14-1 1-5, 55 TRAY USING BOTH 330-1 AND CABLE TRAY FIRE STOPS INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061. THE CABLE TRAY FIRE STOP INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061 HAS BEEN TESTED 5-2 N/A Tills DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF TIE l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2 & 13-1 I-5, 56 WIRES TO ATTACH BOTTOM TIIERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS TO THE RUNGS ON LADDER bACK TRAYS.

5-3.1, SEC. 2-2 (VAR.) ItM235/2 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES A METHOD OF I-2, 9-#, 10-1. 10-2, 11-1, 1-5, 57 UPGRADING NEW AND EXISTING FIRE STOPS .BY 12-1. 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 9-3

' INSTALLATION BAR STEEL AROUND THE END OF TIIE TRAY IN ORDER TO HOLD THE BOTTOM PANEL IN PLACE.

5-4 N/A Mils DETAIL SHOWS A CABLE TRAY PROTECTED l-2, i1-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 1-5, 59 WITH 330-1 PANELS WHICH PENETRATES & 14-1 THROUGH A BLOCKOUT FILLED WITH PENSEAL MATERIAL 5-5 (OITION 2) N/A- Dils DETAIL SHOWS THE THERMO-LAG I-2, 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1 1-6, 12 COVERAGE ON A RACEWAY BUTTING UP TO A' 12-1, 12-2. 13-I, 14-1 & 9-3 BLOCKOUT IN A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THEN FLARING OUT ALONG THE STRUCIURE SO THAT' THE PANEL EXTENDS TO THE CONCRETE WHERE IT IS HILTI BOLTED INTO THE CONCRETE.

A'ITACHMENT A E2-ME-032 REV. O TYPICAL DES!GN DETAILS PAGE A8 OF A24

, . TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 5-5 (OPTION 3) 100820!O THIS DETAIL SHOWS Tile 'nlERMO-LAG ON A I-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 & 14-1 14,61 RACEWAY BUTUNG UP TO THE M-BOARD ON A PENSEALED BLOCKOUT WTIE A THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE FILLET WHERE THE THERMO-LAC MEETS THE M-BOARD.

5-5.1 104121A)

THIS DETAIL SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING II-I l-5, 77 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY TO A CABLE AT A BLOCKOUT. THE FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAPS ONTO 330-1 COVERAGE ON BOTH TRAYS, IS MECHANICALLY FASTENED INTO THE 330-1 AND IS SEALED AT TIIE FORM SEAIJM-BOARD WITH A TROWEL GRADE.

5-5.2 104121/0 Tills SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 330-1 1-2, 11-1, 12-I, 12-2, 13-1 1-5,78 PANELS ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY I4-1 TO A CABLE TRAY AT A BLOCKOUT. THE JOINTS ARE SCORE AND FOLD OR SITTCHED AND THE i REQUIREMENTS FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWTL GRADE ATJOINTS APPLIES.

54,54A AND 54B 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW TTIE SCORE AND FOLD l-2. I t-1,12-I 12-2,13-I I-5, 63 METHOD ON RADIAL BENDS ON TRAYS AND AT & 14-1 THE CORNERS ON STRAIGHT TRAY RUNS. l 5-7 AND 5-8 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW CROSSBANDING AND TIE l-2, II-I,12-1,12-2.13-I N/A WIRE INSTALLATION FOR LONGITUDINAL JOINT & 14-I STRESS SKIN BOTH AT CABLE TRAY TEES THESE ARE TEs a w CONFIGURATIONS.

5-9 103020/3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALIATION OF THE I-2, 12-2 & 14-1 N/A BOTTOM PANEL AT A CABLE TRAY TEE. IT DEMONSTRATES BUTT JOINT TIE WIRES AND TIE WIRES OVER TRAY RUNGS. ALL BUT THE TIE WIRES OVER THE RUNGS ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. SINCE THE TTE WIRES OVER THE RUNGS WOULD BE AN ENHANCEMENT TO THE tea a w CONFIGURATION IT IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACilMENT A ER-ME-082. REY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS .

PACE A')OF A24 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPOR1 TEST SCHEMES B ASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 5-10. 5-11 & 5-14 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SilOW STANDARD I-2. 11-1. 12-1. 12-2. 13-1 N/A CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROVIDING STRESS SKIN & 14-1 ON LONGITUDINALJOINTS ATTRAY TEES.

STITCHING OF BUTT JOIN 13 WITil TIE WIRES AND COVERAGE OF SPLICE PLATES WITil 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEL AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE THESE DETAILS ARE TESTED CC' . IGURATIONS.

5-12 103020/3 Tills DETAIL SHOWS IlOW TO INSTALL 330-660 11-1 1-5. 34 104121/0- FLEXI-BLANKET OVER THE END OF A CABLE TRAY COVERED WITli 330-1 PANELS.

5-13 103020!3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE UPGRADE UTILIZING 11-I 12-1, 12-2. 13-1 & I-5, 68 STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES WHEN TIIE PANEL I4-1 ON THE BOTTOM OF A TRAY AT A TRAY SUPPORT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY Tile THERMO-LAG INSTALLED ON THE SUPPORT-5-13.1 & 5-16 103507/0 Tills DETAIL SHOWS HOW TO INSTALL I-2. 11-1. 12-1. 12-2. 13-1 1-5. 71 h LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL & 14-1 GRADE ON TRAYS WHERE AIR DROP COVERAGE INTERFERES WITH STANDARD COVERAGE. '

5-15. 5-15.1 & 5 15.2 100820/0 THESE DETAILS SilOW STANDARD BANDING FOR I-2.11-I.12-I.12-2.13-1 N/A 104121/0 CABLE TRAYS. THIS IS A TEM t:u & 14-1 CONFIGURATION.

5-17 103833/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF 1-2. 11-1. 12-1. 12-2. 13-1 1-5, 65 LONGITTJDINAL STRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAYS & 14-1 WHERE A GROUND CABLE PROTRUDES FROM THE SIDE OF THE TRAY.

6-1 SECTION AA 103020/3 CONDUIT LATERAL BENDS. 9-1, 10-1. 10-2 N/A 6-2,6-3.1 SECTION 3-3 '103020/3 SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS FOR CONDUIT ;2:

SCCTION I-1 SECT 10N 9-l 10-1.10-2. Il-1.12-1 1-5, 72 3* DIAMETER. 12-2.13-1 L 14-1 2-2,6-3.2 SECTION I SECTION 2-2 7-I 103020/3 FLEXI-BLANKET ATTHROUGH-WALL-SLEEVE Il-I.1-2.12-1.12-2. !3-1 1-S.60, 62 104121/0 INTERFACE. & 14-1

,___a__

ATTACHMENT A ER-MEM C.EY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE Al')OF A24 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO.iREV DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24).

7-2, 7-2. I 103020/3 RIGID CONDUIT TO FLEX CONDUIT. Il-1 14, 64 ei!

7-2.2 8 %9/I m%

THIS DETAIL SHOWS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED 11-1 1-5, 45, 75 GN A FLEX CONDUIT WHERE IT BUTTS TO A CONCRETE WALL THE COVERAGE IS INSTALLED ON THE FLEX CONDUITTO THE REQUIRED THICKNESS THEN ALL VOIDS ARE FILLED %TTH TROWEL GRADE AND A FILLET IS PROVIDED AT THE I LEXI-BLANKET CONCRETE '

INTERFACE.

7-3 VIEW 3 104121/0- CONTAINMENT PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES. 11-1 I-5,60,62,66 7-4 VIEW 4 104121/0 SUPPORT FRAME FOR CONTAINMENT II-I l-5,60, 62 PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES AND THROUGli WALL SLEEVES.

7-5 N/A THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF FIRE DETECTOR *S I-2. II-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 1-5, 67 AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. A 14-1 74 N/A THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALIf, TION ON FLEX 11-1 14,69 CONDUITTHROUGH A BLOCKOUT.

7-7, 7-7.1 N/A 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET DETAIL WHERE DUE TO Il-1 14,70 SPARE CONSIDERATIONS, TWO INDIVIDUAL COMPLETE BUNDLES CANNOT BE ACHIEVED.

8-2, OPTION 1, SEC. N/A AA ( CABLE BUNDLE WRAPPING OF SPLITS 11-1 1-5,51 8-2 (OPTCON 2) N/A %WPING CALLE BUNDLE SPUTS. 11-1 N/A 8 10191810 CABLE TRAY FLAT PANEL TRANSITION. 1-2, 12-1, 12-2. 10-2. 13-1 1-5,58

& 14-1 8-4 SECT. AA ; 10348610

' ESSENTIAL FLEXIBLE CONDUITS %TTHIN A - 11-1 1-5, 51 COMMON ENVELOPE.

41 N/A TYPICAL THERMO-LAG COVERAGE DETAIL FOR 9-1, Il-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, Y 14,47 SWAY STRUTS 14-1 & 1-2 0-2,9-2 SEC.1-1,9-2 103490/U i TYPICAL DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CABLE TRAY TO l-2, 11-1, 12-1. 12-2. 13-1 14,43 SEC. 2-2 CONCRETE & 14-1

p .

ATTACHMENT A ER MEM2. REV O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE All OF A24 i

TYPICAL DETAIL'NO. DCA NOJREV DESCRIETION SUPPORTTESYSCHE2tEC BASIS /NUTES (PAGE A14-A?.4) 9-3 N/A TYPICAL DETAIL USING FLEXI-BLANKET TO N/A 49

' CORRECT AN INTERFERENCE.

i '

9-4 'i 700870/0 4

V GROOVE / SCORING THERMO-LAG FOR l-2, M -$ 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 N/A i

RACEWAY BENDS

& 14.I 10-3 102522/1 SHIMMING DETAIL 11-1,12 '. 02-2,13 I,*4-I & 1 4, 44 3 1-1 104, 10-S, 104 102522/1 SHIMMING DETAIL 11-I.12-I,I2-2,13-1 & 14-1 1 4. 44 ,

II-I N/A THERMO-LAG PANELS ON CABLE TRAY T-LAG /M-B INTERFACE - 1 ""

INTERFACE WITH M-BOARD AT PENETRATION NONE CABLE TRAY T-SEAL ' LAG l-2,12-1,12-2,13-1 i

& 14-I Il-2 103020/3 THERMO-LAG PREFAB HALF-ROUNDS WHERE 9-I, 9-3 14,8 CLEARANCE BETWEEN CONDUITS IS (2 1/2" BUT

< 1") INADEGUA UG FIT llALF ROUND ON BOTH.CONrsUITS - HALF et9UND ON ONE OR OTilER IS TRIMMED BACK AFD SEALED l, , BEDVEEN T11E TWO CONDUTIS AS REQUIRED FOR JOINTS.

11-2..I 103020I3 1 SAME AS 11-2 EXCEPT DISTANC8 BETWEEN 9-i, "3 14,8 CONDUlTS IS < 1/2".

11-3, 11-3.1 N/A I TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 12-I 12-2,13-I,14-I & 1-2 N/A

, SIDE RAIL BOARD INTERFACE.

11-4, 11-4.1 N/A TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & I-2 14,9 j

SIDE RAIL BOARD INTERFACE USING SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE.

11-5 N/A TYPICAL LADDER TRAY BARRIER ASSEMBLY I2-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 14,9 ,

11 4 N/A 4

TRAY PRuitCTION WHERE TRAY SIDE RAIL IS 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 1 4, 10 TOO CLOSE TO CONCRETE AND TIIEREFORE MUST INTERFACE AGAINST CONCRETE WAf f--

I l-7 N/A TROWEL GRADE FILLET WHERE CLEARANCE 12-I, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 1-7,10,12 WILL NOT ALLOW FOR THERMO-LAG PANEL

_ FLARE-OUT.

w

n - - _

ATTACHMENT A ,

ER-ME-OS2, REV. O "IYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A12 OF A24 TYPICnL DETAIL NO. DCA NO.IREV DESCRIPTION SUPPOI TTEST SOIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 11-7.1 104121/0 FLEXI-BLANKET TO M-BOARD / CONCRETE 11-1 1-S,51 INTERFACE Wm{ Fil I ET.

Il-8 102957/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS TIIE INSTALLATION OF 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5,76 STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT STEEL I4-1 LNTERFERENCES BY EXTENDING THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE OUT ONTO THE STEEL LNTERFERENCE.

12-1, 12-1.1 103063/0 RACEWAY SUPPORT TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 10-1, 10-2 1 4, 13 12-2 103844/0 CONDUIT PENETRATING CABLE TRAY. 11-1,1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 1 4, 29

& 10-2 12-7.1 103844/0 THIS CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE l-2, 10-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, I-5, 79 OF DETAIL 17-2 EXCEIT THAT THE CONDUIT 13-1, 14-1 ENTERING TIIE BOX EXTENSION OF A HORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN UEU OF RIGID. THE USE OF 330460 ENTERING A HORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE HAS QUAUFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1. THE UPGRADE TECHNIQUES UTIUZED TO REINFORCE THE INTERFACE IsETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET' DURING THE TESF (330460 COLLAR FLARED OUT ON THE 330-1 PANEL) IS REQUIRED BY THE DETAIL ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS Wmi QUAUFIED -

TECHNIQUES (STITCHINGISTRESS SKIN). THE-INCREASED AIR VOLUME WmIIN THE ENVELOPE BENEFITS THE THERM AL PERFORMANCE OF THE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE, THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 1-HOUR RATING.

12-3 N/A SIL-TEMP COVERAGE. 12-2 N/A 13-1 N/A TRAY CONCREFE BEAM INTERFERERCE. 1-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 & 14-1 14,14 13-2 104121/0 CABLE TRAY TRANSmON INTO BANK OF 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-I 14-1 & 1 4, 16 SLEEVES WITH PROTRUDING AIR DROPS AND Il-1 EXISTING CONDUIT ENTERING ENVELOPE.

i ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A13 OF A24 TYPICAL DETAll NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 13-3 N/A i TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE FOR TYPICAL 9-1,1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1 & 1 4, 18 INTERFERENCES. j 14-1 13-4 N/A TYPICAL INTERFERENCE. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 14,21 ;

11-1 l

13-5 N/A IIVAC INTERFERENCE WITil CABLE TRAY. Il-1 1-5, 23 13-6 103548/0 PROTECTED AND NON PROTECTED TRAY- I-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & I-5, 24 11-1 14-1 N/A TilERMO-LAG 5" RULE. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 1-5, 25 Il-1 14-2 N/A TYPICAL BOX DETAIL FOR ITEMS ENTER.ING l-2,12-1,12-2,10-2,13-1,14-1 1-5, 17 RACEWAY. & 11-1 14-3, SEC.1-1 N/A TYPICAL CONDUIT / PIPE AND TRAY 9-1,10-2,12-1,12-2,13-I,14-1 I-5, 30 INTERFERENCE. & II-I 14-4 104121/0 TYPICAL TIIROUGl{ WALL SLEEVE THERMO-LAG. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & I-5, 32 Il 1 15-I N/A TYPICAL BOX DETAIL TRAY / TRAY. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-I & 1-5, 33 11-1 15-2 104121/0 TYPICAL BOX DETAllTRAY/ CONDUIT. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-I,14-1,11-1 1-5, 32

& 9-1 16-1 N/A ATTACllMENT TO STRUCTURAL STFF1- N/A 5,36 16-2 N/A ATTACllMENT TO STRUCIURAL STEEL N/A 5, 36 16-3 N/A TUBE STEEL WELDED TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 10-1,10-2 5,36,38 16-4 N/A ANGLE BRACE PLATE. N/A 5,36 16-5, 16-5.1 N/A- CAPS FOR llOLLOW MEMBERS. 10-1, 10-2 5,36,41 16 4, 16-7 N/A "ITPICAL STEEL PROTECTION DETAIL WITil 9-1,1-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 5,36,42 CONDUIT INTERFERENCE. & 14-1

ATTACHMENT A ER-M EM2. REY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A14 OF A24 NOTE ACLmANCE BASIS / NOTES '

DCAIREV L

CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC l 2.

EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3

THE NATURE AND ErrbCTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPUCABLE) IS CONSISTENT %TTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 4.

TIIE APPUCATION OR END USE OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT %TTil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5.

THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUAUFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

6.

SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATION EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH W GENERIC ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.).

7.

THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY 1-2,SCHEMES 12-1, 12-2, 13-I,14-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO CONSTRUCT FLARE OUT) ARE REINFORCED %TrH TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. THE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN M-BOARD AND FLARE-OUT OR FILLET WHERE THE NO FLARE OUT. PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST THE M-BOARD. IN ADDITION 104121 PER DCA REV. O. DETAIL 5-5.2 STICK PINS THROUGH THE SEAL TO SECURE THE THERMO-LAG FLARE OUT TO THE M-BOARD WILL

PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEFTABLE FOR THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE TRAY B AND FOAM SEAL ARE BOTH QUAUFIED FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE EXPOSURE, AND THE FOAM SEAL %TTH M-BOARD WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK.

8.

WITH INTERFACE BETWEEN THE TWO CONDU!id TREATED AS A JOINT. ADEQUATE THICKNESS IS PROVIDED 103020/3 TO MAINTA EQUIVALENT PROTECTION AS QUALIFIED BY FIRE TEST 9-1,9-3. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY.

9.

AS LONG AS EXTERNAL STRESS SKIN UPGRADES ARE APPUED TO TRAY RAILS, THIS SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE WOULD PROVIDE A BETTER LEVEL OF PROTECTION THAN Tb:tu CONFIGURATION DUE TO THE CONTINUOUS STRESS SKI IN HOLDING THE JOINT TOGETHER WHILE MAINTAINING 1/2 THICKNESS. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY.

10.

THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY12-2, 1-2, 12-1, SCHEMES 13-1 AND 14-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO CONSTRUCT THE FLAREOUT) ARE REDIFORCED WITil TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY PREVIOUS USTED TESTS. THE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN CONCRETE AND FLARE-O FILLET WHERE THERE IS NO FLAREOUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST THE CONCRETE. IN ADDITION PER TYPICAL DETAIL I-5. THE ENCLOSURE IS SECURED TO THE WALL VIA MECHANICAL FASTENER THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE ONE COMPLETE SIDE OF THE TRAY IS EXTENDED TO THE CONCRETE WALL AND WILL NOT BE DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A FIRE. ALSO THE CONCRETE W AS A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE THIS CONFIGURATION IS EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN Tb tu.

i ATTACIIMENT A ER-ME-082 REY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE AIS OF A24 1

NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA!REV 11.

Tile COVERAGE OF TIIE PROTRUDING STEEL Wmi TIIERMO-LAG IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH TIIE METIIODS UTILIZED TO COVER THE AIR DROPS IN TEST SCllEME 11-1. TIIE OVERLAPS OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET AND TIIE BANDING ARE IDENTICAL ALSO TEST SCIIEME 11-1 IIAD FLEXI-Bl>NKET INSTALLED DIRECTLY ON Tile ESSENTIAL CABLE 4

WIIEREAS TIIIS DETAIL HAS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED ON A PROTRUDING ITEM NOT ON AN ESSENTIAL COMMODITY.

12.

THE USE OF llILTI BOLTS TO PROVIDE A POSmVE MECIIANICAL ATTACllMENT TO THE CONCRETE PROVIDES JOINT 103921/0STR j AT THIS POINT WIIICil IS CONSISTENT Wml IF NOT BETTER TilAN THE TIIERMO-LAG JOINTS WillCH llAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN ALL OF TIIE TEST ASSEMBLIES. IN ADDITION,TIIE CONCRETE STRUCTURES WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK WillCII WILL PROVIDE ADDmCNAL PROTECTION AGAINST IIEAT BEING DRIVEN INTO TIIE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

13.

TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF JUNCTION BOX wml TUBE STEEL SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103063/0 t ONLY. ALTIIOUGH TIIE PROTRUDING ITEM IN TIIIS CASE IS A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MOUNTED TO AN EMBEDDED TIIE TUBE STEEL AND EMBEDDED PLATE Tile RACEWAY TilAN TiiE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

IS COVERED FOR 9" AND PROVIDES A BETTER IIEAT SINK TO REDUCE IIEA 1 14.

i Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES. HAS BEEN QUAUF!ED BY LISTED TEST. BY BUTTING TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE TO THE CONCRETE BEAM Tile BEAM WILL UMIT EXPOSUPJi FROM THAT SIDE AND ACT AS A IIEAT SINK. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TIIOSE TilAT BOX TO TIIE BEAM) ARE REINFORCED wmi TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY LISTED TESTS.

15.

' Tills TYPICAL DETAIL IS FOR COVTJNG WEEP HOLES IN TUBE STEEL Wmi THERMO-LAG WHICli ARE LOCATED OUTSI 102222/1 Tile 9*-1 t

THERMO-LAG PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE IN ORDER TO PRECLUDE IIEAT FORM BEING DRIVEN INTO TH STEEL TilROUGli Tile IlOLE. THE ADiiESION OF TIIE PANEL TO THE STEEL USING TROWEL GRADE AND BANDS WILL C TIIE IlOLE IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WCil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON S

, 16.

i TiiE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANLLS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY USTED 104121/0 TES CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TIIOSE TO BOX AROUND SLEEVE BANK) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECHNIQUES

, LISTED TEST. THE BASE PLATE AND TiiERMO-LAG PANEL INTERFACE BEING COVERED Wml TROWEL GRADE PROV POSmVE SEAL. PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS ARE QUAUFIED BY SCIIEME II-I.

CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR TilERMAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE Tile CONCRETE AND BASE PLATE WILL IIEAT SINK AND REDUCE TIIE EXPOSURE OF IIEAT INTO Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

17.

THE USE OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP WAS TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1. TIIE USE OF PENETRATION 100820/0 SE i IIAS BEEN TESTED AND DOCUMENTED IN TIIE PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM. ALSO ELASTOMER WAS TESTED 103921/0 AS STOP ON TRAY CONFIGURATIONS IN SCIIEMES 1-2.12-2. AND I4-1.

18.

THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANE 13 ON CABLE TRAYS AND HALF-ROUND PRE-SHAPED PIECES FOR COP:DUIT QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING WHERE HALF-ROUND PIECES AROUND TYPICA l INTERFERENCES CREATE LONGITUDINALJOINTS) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY USTTID i

CRmCAL PARAMETERS IS AN ACCElrTABLE OF MATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUA CONFIGURATION.

t r --

j s ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082. REV. O 4 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A16 OF A24 +

NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES-DCA/REV h 19.

THE JUNCTION BOX INSTALLATION IS Tile STANDARD CONFIGURATION WHICH WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 10-1. TH 103020/0 4 ANGLE IRON OR CUPS MOUNTED TO TIIE STRUCTURE TO SERVE AS ATTACHMENT POINTS FOR THE BANDING 10363412IS AN ACCEPTABLE DEVIATION FROM THE SAME FUNCTION IN SECURING TIIE OUTER PANELS.

STANDARD (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE THE METHOD OF ATTACIIME

, 20.

Tills DETAIL 15 NOT THE STANDARD TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR AIR DROPS INTO A CABLE TP.AY BUT IT UTIUZE PANELS. IT IISES TIE WIRES AT THE JOINTS AS WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES l-2,12-1.12-2. AND 13-1 AND THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE UTILIZED AS A FIRE STOP AS TESTED IN SCHEME II-I. THE ASSEMBLY IS BANDED TOGETHER AND BANDE TRAY. THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COVERAGE PROVIDE B CONFIGURATION.

21.

CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES USING V-GROOVED FLAT BOARD HAVE BEEN QUAUFIED BY ALL LISTED CABLETESTS TRAY JOINTS ARE REINFORCED WITli TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIO CORNER OR SIDE OF THE TRAY WilERE THE INTERFERENCE IS LOCATED HAS BOTli EXTERNAL 330-660 FLEXI-B TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AND 330-1 FLAT PANE 13 ON TIIE INSIDE OF THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL THE CO TilESE BVO PROVIDE ENilANCED PROTECTION IN THE AREA WHERE THE OUTER V-GROOVED BOARD TlilCKN IN ADDITION THE INTERFERENCES WILL PROVIDE SIIIELDING AND AN ADDITIONAL HEAT SINK IN THE AREA l*O THE COMBINATION OF THESE FEATURES ALONG WITH TIE WIRES AND BANDING AS SHOWN WILL PROVIDE EQU '

BETTER PROTECTION OF Tile ENVELOPE THAN TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

4 22.

TIIE BOX DESIGN ON THE TRAY IS THE SAME AS FOR DETAILS 3-1 AND 3-1.I THE FIRE STOP IS TIIE SAME AS TH USED FOR PROTRUDING CONDUITS ON JUNCTION BOXES. THE FLEXI-BLANKET ON TIIE AIR DROP IS TiiE SAME i TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1 EXCEPT WHERE IT OVERLAPS ONTO THE CONDUIT AND THE BOX ON TIIE TRAY.

IS ONLY TO BE USED WHEN TiiE CONDUIT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE TRAY TO U3E DETAIL 3-1 AND 3-1.1, THE AMOUNT OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS MINOR (4*-5*) SO THE ATTACHMENT TO THE CONDUIT AND THE BOX IS ACCEPTABLE.

23. I BVO LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS CONSimNT WITH QUAUFIED PROTECTION FOR 1ARGE AIR DROPS. IN THI TRAY PROVIDES MORE THERMAL MASS AND A GREATER AIR SPACE THAN AIF DROPS. IN ADDITION THE HVAC !

i INTERFERENCE PROVIDES SOME DEGREE OF SHIELDING AND HEAT SINK TO ONE SIDE OF THE PROTECT APPUCATION IS EQUIVALENT TO FLEXI-BLANKET APPUCATIONS QUAUFIED Ili SCIIEME Il-1, 24 THIS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF CABLE TRAYS WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9* ONLY.

103548/D ALTIIOUGH THE PROTRUDING ITEM IN THIS CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT AND A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY, THE COVERAGE i PROVIDED ONTO EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES (SIDE, PARTIAL TOP AND BOTTOM) PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCrlVE HEAT PATH. i 25.

EXISTING LISTED TESTS JUST1FY CABLE TRAYS WTTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9*. CASE PROTECTION OF Tile IN THIS SUPPORTS IS ONLY PROVIDED FOR 5* MINIMUM. THIS IS JUSTIFIED BY ENGINEERING CALCUIATION ME-C 1 ALLOWS USE OF THE ~5 INCH RULE" WHERE CONFIGURATIONS MEET ESTABUSHED MINIMUM CRITERIA S PERCENT ENVELOPE. TRAY FILL TO ESTABLISH EQUIVALENT PROTECilON TO REDUCE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROTEC!

J 1

u - - , ~ .- , -. -- e ,m,

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS r PAGE A17 OF A24 NOTE ACCElrTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV l 26.

ALL ASPECTS OF Tills AIR DROP CONFIGURATION liAVE BEEN TESTED IN SCHEllE 11-1 EXCEL"r FOR 100820/0 Tile 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO TIIE TWS. TiiE INTERFACE OF THE 330460 AROSJND EMBEDDED SLE -

Wmi BANDING AROUND Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECilANICAL ATTACHMENT AND LARGE

FI TROWEL BEEN BOUNDED GRADE BY TEST.330460 M ATERIAL FOR TIIERMAL PROTECTION. TIIE MATERIAL THICKNESSES ANDl

27. I!

Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TilAYS IIAS BEEN Q TIIE USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITTINGS AND JUNCTION BOX ,

LISTED TESTS. Wml Tile USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENTTECIINIQUES FOR TIIE CABLE TRAY AND BOX DE QUAUFIED IN LISTED TESTS, Tile CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF MATERIALTHICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BOX ELEVATION ?S SUCH THAT CAELES IN Tile TRAY D BACK OF TilERMO-LAG PANEL IN ADDITION, ITEMS SUCH AS A PIPE IIANGER WOULD PROVIDE SOME DEGREE OF SilIELDING AND IIEAT SINK. THEREFORE Tills DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.

28.

Tile COVERAGE OF THE AIR DROP CABLES Wml FLEXI-BLANKETHAS BEEN TESTED IN SCliEME Il-l. THE TIIE TRAY INTERFACES ARE SIMILAR TO THE BOXES IN DETAILS 3-1 & 3-1.1. THE FIRE STOPPING OF TI CABLE WITHIN TIIE BOX STRUCTURE IS CONSISTENT Wmi DETAILS 3-1 & 3-1.1 AND TIIE OVERLAP OF TiiE BLANKET ONTO TIIE CONDUIT IS CONSISTENT WITII TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. THIS CONFIGURATION P COVERAGE WillCli IS CONSISTENT WITil TIIE CGVERAGE PROVIDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

29.

THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS TO PROi ECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS IIAS 103844/0 BEEN QU

- Tile USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITUNGS AND JUNCTION BOX EXISTING TESTS. PROTECT 10N OF A PROTRUDING ITEM SUCli AS CONDUIT IS ALSO QUAUFIED BY E ,

USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE CABLE TRAY AND P9X DETAIL AS QUALIFIED IN USTED TEST, Tile CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF TilERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAI. INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED BOX DIMENSION DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.ARE SIZED SUCII THAT CABLES DO NOT TOUCil THE BACK OF TIIERMO-LAG PANELS. TH

30. .

TIIE USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS ARE QUAUFIED BY EXISTING USTED TESTS.j HALF ROUND PREFABRICATED PIECES ARE ALSO QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. THE USE OF SHIMS ;

4 MATERIAL AND AIR VOLUME BENEFITS INSIDE THE ENCLOSURE. %7Til TIIE USE OF JOINT REINF ,

QUALIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS. Tile PROTECTION OF CONDUIT / PIPE INTERFERENCES WITH CONDUrr HA PREFABRICATED PIECES AND FLAT BOARDS Wmf SIIIMS CONSTITUTE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER PR ;

ATTRIBUTES OF CONFIGURATIONS. THERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN TESTED

31. <

Tills IS Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION EXCEPT THAT INSTEAD OF INSTALUNG 330-1 PANELS AND BU 103020/3 i DROP STRESS SKIN; TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP IS IN.TTALLED. THIS IS TIIE SAME CONFIGURATION USED FOR STRESS SKIN I AND TROWEL BUILD UP AT JOINTS THAT WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 AND 14-1. TIIIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WillCH IS CONSISTENT WITil THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TE l

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DES!GN DETAll3 PAGE Al8 OF A24

{ NOle ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ~ '

DCA/REV 32.

THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROGVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES, ifAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY EXISTING USTED 104121/0 TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE WlilCH TRAN5 MON FROM THE END OF THE TRAY TO TWS) AR !

REINFORCED Wml TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. THE CONCRETE WALL AND THERMO-LAG PANEL INT i

HAVING A TROWEL GRADE FILLET PROVIDES A POSmVE SEALTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. BANDS TO SUPPORT TRANSmON PANELS WILL ADD STRUCTURAL SUPPORT TO TifE ENVELOPE. THE CONCRETE WALL WILL ACT AS A HE TO HELP REDUCE EXPOSURE TO THE WALUP*NEL INTERFACE. SINCE CRmCAL PARAMETERS OF TIIERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, THIS DETAIL is ACCEPTABLE.

t

, 33. :

< THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY TESTS AS USTE [

THE MATRIX. ALL JOINTS ON THIS CONFIGURATION (INCLUDING THE BOX TRANSmON FROM TRAY TO TRAY) ARE REINFORCED WIT 11 TECilNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. STRUCTURALLY. THE TRAY TO TRAY TRANSITION CREA NO GREATER STRUCTURAL CHALLENGE TilAN LARGE *T* CONFIGURATIONS ALREADY QUALIFIED. THEREFORE CRmCA PARAMETERS OF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, MATERIAL THICKNESS AND TIIERMAL CONSIDERATIONS ARE EQUIVALENT TO

, QUALIFIED TESTS. !

34. !

' THE COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE OVERLAP OF 330460 O 103020/3 CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES Ti1E SAME INSTALLATION TECliN1 QUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC) USED FOR CONDUITS 10412110 AND JUST MODIFIES THEM TO ALLOW FOR Tile CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS. ,

35. s TIIE COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEX!-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS IS THE SAME EXCEPT THE OVERLAP 103020/3 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR CONGESTED AREAS WilERE SPACE DOES NOT PERMIT104121/0 THE USE i DETAIL 3-5.2. Tile MINIMUM OVERLAP ALLOWED ON TlHS DETAIL, ALTHOUGli NOT IDEAL. IS STILL SUFFICIENT WHEN COUPLED WITil Tile STAPLING AND TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN THE FLEXI-BLANKET LAYERS TO ENSURE THAT THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE ACCEPTABLE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TO THE 330-1 MATERIAL WlHCH MAKES TIIE ARRANGEMENT CONSISTENT Wm1 TI{E TESTED CONFIGURATION.

36. THIS DETAIL IS SUPPORTED BY ENGINEERING EVALUATION, ER-ME-067, REV. 2 PG. 94 37.

j Tills DETAIL HAS THE OFTION OF COVERING THE METAL JACKETED FIRE ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PE 104121/0 RULE WillCH WAS FIRE TESTED IN ALL OF THE SCIIEMES OR FIRE STOPPED AS IN DETAIL 3-4 WHICH WAS FIRE TFmu IN j SCHEME 11-1. THIS CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

38.

APPUCATION OF THERMO-LAG ON TUBE STEEL AND OVER STEEL PLATE IS QUAUFIED ON SCHEME 9-1 TO ESTABLISH i RULE. Tile ABIUTY OF THIS CONFIGURATION TO MITIGATE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE W MAINTAINING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY SUPPORTS TIIE APPUCATION OF THERMO-LAG TO PROTECT STRUCTURAL STE 39.

1 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE FOR FIRE ZONE R CABLES WHICH PROTRUDE FROM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY 104121/0

W111CH IS IDENTICAL TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING PROTRUDING CABLES IN DETAIL 3-4. T1HS CONFIGURA CONSISTENT WTTH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

l !

ATTACIIMENT A ER-ME-082 REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE Al9 OF A24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCAfREV

40. THE DETAll ALLOWS Tile TESTED JUNCTION BOX CONFIGURATION TO BE MODIFIED BY EXTENDING TIIE 'V* RIB PANEI S TO IM060/0 COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT TIIE JUNCTION BOX. THE CONFIGURATION IIAS MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME T11AN A TYPICAL J-BOX ENVELOPE WIIICil WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. TIIEREFOR8 SINCE STRUCTURAL LNTEGRITY AND THERM AL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

41. Tills TYPICAL DETAIL IS FOR COVERING TIIE OPEN END OF TUBE STEEL WHEN IT IS LOCATED OtJTSIDE OF TIIE

9 INCH J RULE

TO MmGATE IIEAT FROM BEING DRIVEN INTO TIIE TUBE STEEL. Ti1E STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE SCORE AND :j FOLD TIIERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS WITH TROWEL GRADE 330-1 AND S.S. BANDING 15 EQUIVALENT TO TIIE APPLICATION OF l THERMO-LAG TO MEET TIIE 9" RULE ON SCHEME 10-1 AND 10-2. l

42. TIIE USE OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS WITil PARTIAL PREFABRICATED CONDUIT llALF ROUNDS AND TROWEL GRADE JOINT M AINTAINS CONSISTENCY TO TIIE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTE OF M ATERIAL TillCKNESS WITil PROTECTED STEEL FOR TIIE 9 RULE.

43. TlilS DETAIL ADDRESSES COVER.ING FLEXIBLE CONDUIT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX WITil 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS 4* 104060/0 TO 8' OUT FROM BOX. THIS M AKES IT PCSSIBLE FOR 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO BE INSTALLED ONTO TIIE CONDUIT IN ACCORDANCE Wml T11E TESTED CONFIGURATION (SCIIEME 11-1). THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 IIALF ROUNDS UP TO Tile JUNCTION BOX IS IN ACCORDANCE WITII T*.STED CONFIGURATIONS SCHEMES 10-1 AND 10-2. TiiE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

44. THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES LISTED DID NOT USE SillMS. IlOWEVER, ADDmONAL TIIERMO-LAG MATERIAL 102522/I INSIDE Tile ENVELOPE AND INCREASED AIR VOLUME BENEFITS THE ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS. TEST MET 110DS OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT liAVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF TIIE ENVELOPE.

45. 330-660 FLEXI-B*_.ANKET ON CABLE BUNDL8ES HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY FIRE TESTED IN SCifEME 11-1. FLEXI-BLANKET ON 10:020/3 FLEX CONDUIT IIAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. IlOWEVER. TiiE FLEX CONDUIT IIAS Tile ADVANTAGE OF AN INSULATING CONDUIT JACKET AND A LARGER AIR '/OLUME INSIDE T11AN IS PRESENT IN A FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLE BUNDLE. TIIIS WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR THE CABLES INTEGRITY TilEREFORE. Ti1E CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

46. Tile CONDUITS ARE COVERED Wml 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS TO Tile EXTENT ALLOWED BY TIIE INTERFERING 103020/3 STRUCTURE TIIEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT THE JUNCTION OF TIIE CONDUIT IIALF ROUNDS AND Ti1E CONCRETE WALL. T2iE FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOCD SEAL BETWEEN Tile TiiERMO-LAG AND CONCRETE TO MAINTAIN TIIE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO TIIE CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK AND ENHANCE Tl!E INTEGRITY OF TiiE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

47. TIIE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTES OF M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQ'UIVALENT TO TIIE PROTECTION OF SUPPORTS FOR THE 9* RULE WillCII MITIGATED 11 EAT BEING CONDUCTED INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. IN ADDmON CONCRETE WILL PROVIDE AN ADDmONAL HEAT SINK. THEREFORE TiiE CONFIGURATIJN IS ADEQUATE FOR PROTECTION OF SWAY STRUTS.

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A20 OF A24

^i NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

48. Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS OF CABLE TRAYS Wmi SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONI.Y. 103490!0 ALTilOUGil Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT ATTACIIED TO A BASE PLATE. Tile COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO Tile BASE PLATE AND WALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE ilEAT PATH. IN ADDITION Tile CONCRETE WALL ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK TO IIELP MITIGATE EXPOSURE OF IIEAT.

49. TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS NOT USED IN UNIT 2 UNLESS MODIFIED TO II AVE FIRE STOPS IN TIIE END OF EACll TRAY - ANY APPLICATIONS BACKFIT DETAIL 3-4.

SG. TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO T11E CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCllEMES 9-1,10-1,10-2 AND 9-3 EXCEPT T11ESE TEFTS IIAD THE TilERMO-LAG IN DIRECT CONTACT WITil Ti1E PEN SEAL MATERIAL WifEREAS Tills DETAllIIAS A SIIEET METAL SLEEVE WITII TROWEL GRADE FILLING Tile GAP. THE TROWEL CRADE IN Tile SPACE BETWEEN Tile SLEEVE & CONDUIT AND Tile SilEET METAL SLEEVES DOES NOT DETRACT FROM Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile TROWEL GRADE Af. A FIRE STOP IIAS BEEN TESTED IN SCIIEME 11-1 AND Tile SilEET METAL SLEEVE IS SANDWICllED BETWEEN TROWEL GRADF k PEN SEAL MATERIAL Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONS! STENT WITII TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

51. LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET 330-660 PROTECTING ALL BUNDLED LEGS OF Tills DETAIL ARE CONSISTENT WITil TESTED 104121/0 CONFIGURATIONS. IN FIRE TEST SCllEME !!-l. Tile USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE Wml BANDING PROVED TO BE 103486/0 STRUCTURALLY SOUND Wml EXCELLENT BONDING OF SEAMS THROUGilOUT Tile FIRE AND IIOSE STREAM TEST.

TilEREFORE Ti1E USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GR ADE WITil BANDING TO STRUCTURALLY IIOLD Tile SPLIT LEGS TO TIIE PRIM ARY LEG AND SEAL LONGITUDINAL SEAMS IS ACCEPTABLE. Tills DETAIL IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR CRTFICAL TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IS TIIEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

52. Tile MET 110D UTILIZED TO REDUCF Tile SIZE OF TIIE 330-1 CONDUIT 1143 F ROUNDS IS TO SCORE THE MATERIAL SO TilAT IT 103020/3 WILL CONFORM TO Tile SM ALLER SilAPE TIIEN FILLING TIIE SCORED AREAS Wml 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. Tills IS TIIE SAME i METIIOD UTILIZED IN FITTING 330-1 PANELS TO CABLE TRAY RADIAL BENDS Wil!CII WAS TESYED IN SCllEMES 1-2,11-1,12-1, 12-2,13-1 AND 14-1. TilEREFORE Tile SCORING OF Tile CONDUIT IIALF ROUNDS WILL NOT DETRACT FROM Tile TESTED INTEGRITY OF TIIESE CONDUIT SECTIONS. SINCE DETAILS 4.6 AND 4-6.1 ARE TiiE SAME AS 4-1 AND 4-1.1 WillCII WERE TESTED IN SC11 EMES 9-1,10-1 AND 10-2 TilEY ARE CONSIDERED TO BE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. DETAILS 4-7 AND 4-7.1 ARE TIIE SAME AS DETAILS 4-3 AND 4-3.1 AND Tile IIAVE BEEN ANALYZED IN NOTE 46.

l 53. FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT liAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. IlOWEVER TIIE FACT TIIAT Tile FLEXI-BLANKET 103076/1 l CONFIGURATION llAS BEEN TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1 AND TIIE FLEX CONDUIT IIAS Tile ADVANTAGE OF TIIE CONDUIT JACKET AND Tile AIR VOLUME INSIDE T11E CONDUIT WIIICil IS NOT PRESENT IN A CABLE BUNDLE, PROVIDES ADDmONAL PROTECTION FOR Tile CABLES AND RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. Tile REDUCTION IN TillCKNESS AT TIIE SUPPORT IS COMPENSATED FOR BY Tile ADDmON TIIERMO-LAG ON T11E SUPPORT. Tile RESULTING COMBINATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON Tile SUPPORT AND Tile CONDUIT PLUS Tile TROWEL GRADE IN ANY VOIDS AND AT Tile EXTERNAL INTERFACE BETWEEN TiiE TIIERMO-LAG ON TEIE CONDUIT AND TIIE SUPPORT RESULTS IN A THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE

, CONSISTENT Wmf A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

h

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082 REV. 0 -

TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A21 OF A24 NOTE - ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV -

54.

Tills DETAll DEPICTS STANDARD COVERAGE FOR 2" CONDUIT EXCEPT FOR A GAP NOT EXCEEDING 103423/0 I/2" ROUNDS MEET. TROWEL GRADE OVER STRESS SKIN IS APPLIED TO Tile AREA TO ACillEVE Tile REQUIRE AREA. Tile COMBINATION OF RESULTING CONFIGURATION PROVIDING TillCKNESS AND MATERIAL CONTIN WITli TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND TIIE FACT TIIAT SC11EME 9-3 TESTED 2" CONDUITS WITH 1/2" TillCK T CONDUIT IIALF ROUNDS RESULTS IN Tills CONFIGURATION BEING ACCEPTABLE.

, 55.

FIRE STOPS UTILIZING 330-1 TilERMO-LAG WERE TESTED IN SCIIEME I-2. IT WAS ALSO TESTED IN SCHE STOP WAS NOT BREACllED. Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

56.

ALTilOUGli TilEREFORE IT IS NOT ATEST ACCEPTABLE. TESTED CONFIGURATION IT IS A DEFINITE ENilANCEMENT TO TESTED CONFIGURAT SCllEMES 1-2,11-1,12-1,12-2 AND 13-1 IIAVE ESTABLISilED Tile ENIIANCEMENTS OBTAINED BY USING TIE WIRES TO "STITCil" TO EITilER PANELS AND TilIS DETAIL IS CONSISTENT WITil THAT CONFIGUR '

57.

Tills DETAIL PROVIDES A METilOD FOR A POSITIVE MECHANICAL MEANS TO SUPPORT UNDER104235/2 THE BOT STOP IN A CABLE TRAY. TIIE BAR ST AEL AND ALTERED ROD USED FOR THIS PURPOSE ARE SUBSTANTIA WITilSTAND A DESIGN BASIS FIRE. Tile BAR STEEL IS COMPARABLE TO TifE EXPOSED STEEL TilAT WAS SCllEMES. Tile ALL TilREAD ROD WOULD llAVE ELONGATE TO FAIL AND TilAT IS NOT A CONCERN.

53.

T11E USE OF 330-1 TilEPMO-LAG FLAT PANELS, SINGLE LAYER, WAS QUALIFIED ON SCHEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOXES. IN 101918/0 Tills DETAIL, THE TilERMAL EXPOSURE OF FLAT PANELS IS LESS CifALLENGING TilAN Tif E EXPOSURE IN 10-2. REQUIRED OVERLAPS OF M ATERIAL AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECilNIQUES ALONG WITil Tile USE OF V-GROOVE QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. IN ADDITION, Tile REQUIREMENT FOR PRE-BANDING BELOW FLAT PANELS, NO MATTER Tile t TRAY SIZE, WILL PROVIDB .'.TRUCIURAL SUPPORT AGAINST SAGGING CONSISTENT WITil THE USE OF V-GROOVED BOARD.

BASED ON Tile ABOVE, Tills DETAIL IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. '

59.

Tills CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS IN SCllEMES 1-2.11-1.12-1,12-2,13-1 AND 14-1 EXCEPT T11ESE TESTS IIAD Tile TilERMO-LAG IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TIIE PENSEAL MATERIAL WilEREAS Tills DETAIL HAS METAL SLEEVE WITil TROWEL GRADE FILLING THE GAP. Tile TROWEL GRADE IN TIIE SPACE BETWEEN TH Tile TRAY COVERAGE AND THE SilEET METAL SLEEVE DOES NOT DETRACT FROM Tile TESTED CONFIGUR I TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP IIAS BEEN TESTED IN SCilEME 11-1 AND THE SilEET METAL SLEEVE IS SAND BETWEEN TROWEL GRADE AND PENSEAL M ATERIAL. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITi CONFIGURATIONS.

60.

THE USE OF 330-660 TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS 103020/3 BEEN QUA 11-1. Tile USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKETJOINTS WAS ALSO QUALIFIED 104121/0 Tile USE OF A 330-660 TROWEL FILLET AT THE TRANSITION BEDVEEN 330MO FLEXI-BLANKET AND M-BOA WILL PROVIDE A POSITIVE SEAL TO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE AT Tills TRANSITION. FOR TilERMAL CONSIDERATIONS, THE CONCRETE AT TIIE TRANSITION WILL PROVIDE A IIEAT SINK AND REDUCED HEAT EXPOSURE TO THE THERMO ENVELOPE. . BASED ON Tile ABOVE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

i

ATTACilMENT A - ER-ME-OS2, REV. 0 '.

TYPICAL DESIGN DETAllE f PAGE A22 OF A24 :

5 i -t NOTE LACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES '

DCA/REV

61. i; Tile FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR Tile TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST TIIE M-BOARD AND IS SEALED TO BO 100820/0 'l PENSEAL AND Tile CONCRETE WITII CAULK AND STICK PINS ARE USED AS REQUIRED. THE CONFIGURATION IS;}

FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE TRAY CONFIGURATION AND THE PENSEAL ARE BOTH QUALIFIED1' MINIMUM OF I HOUR FIRE EXPOSURE.

62. l i IN ADDITION TO Tile DISCUSSION ON NOTE 60 FOR Tile M-BOARD / CONCRETE TO FLEXI-BLANKET TRANSITION, THE FLEXI . 103020/3 - "

BLANKET IS ATTACHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAll 3-5.2 TO THE RACEWAY. Tills MECilANICAL MEANS 104121/0OF AT ,

TO TIIE RACEWAY WAS TESTED IN SCIIEME 11-1. FOR TIIE CRITICAL TilERMAL AND S~lRUCTURAL CONSIDERATI l ASSEMBLY IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

! 63 Tile SCORE AND FOLD METilOD HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED ON RADIAL BENDS FOR CABLE TRAYS IN TESTS 1-2,11-1 103020/3' I 12-1.12-213-1 'AND 14-1. THE METilOD USED TO SCORE AND FOLD ON TRAY RUNS IS TIIE SAME AS TR ;

Ti1E TRAY FOR TRAY RUNJOINTS CORNERSWILL RECEIVE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP. TilEREFORE Tile SCORE AN IS ACCEPTABLE. '

64.

. THIS DETAll WAS QUALIFIED IN SC11EME 11-1. ONLY FOR AIR DROPS. Tile DIFFERENCE OF HAVING FLEX-CONDUI '103020/3 - ,

COMPARED TO A.N AIR BETTER TilAN THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

DROP ADDS THERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO Tile ASSEMBLY AND IS TilE l 65.

THIS IS A MINOR DEVIATION FROM NORMAL STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON LONGITUDINALJO!NTS103833/0 AND HAS Tile ABILITY OF Tile STRESS SKIN TO PERFORM IT*S INTENDED FUNCTION SINCE THE STRESS SKIN IS CUT .!

GROUND CABLE TllEN BROUGHT BACK TOGETilER W11ERE IT LAPS THE JOINT. Tills 15 AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGU t 66.

i PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING ITEM FROM INTERFACE IS CONSISTENT WIT 11 THOSE TESTED IN SCIIEME TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

11-1 AN 104121/0 67.

THIS CONFIGURATION IS JUST1FIED BY EXISTING TESTS AND CABLE TRAYS WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9f ALTIIOUGII Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A DETECTOR BASE AND CONDUIT. THE COVERAGE PROVIDED i EXPOSED RACEWAY SIIRFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATit

63. !

THIS DETAIL UTILIZES CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON STRESS SKIN WITH TROWEL GRADE FOR 330-1 PANELS 103020/3 l PANELS ON A CABLE TRAY WHERE IT BUTTS TO THE TRAY SUPPORTTHERMO-LAG. CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP O '

JOINTS WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1.12-1.12-2.13-1 AND 14 Tile STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE HAS BEEN STAPLED TO THE VERTICAL 330-1 PANEL ON TIIE SUPPO FURTHER ENilANCE Tile MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF THE STRESS SKIN.

69 i Tile USE OF 330-660 TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES AND THE MECHANICAL:

ATTACHMENT OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PRE-SHAPED CONDUIT HALF-ROUNDS ON BOTH AIR DROPS AN '

QUALIFIED BY TEST SCHEME 11-1. BY EMBEDDING THE IIALF-ROUND MATERIALINTO THE M-BOARD 1/2" A '

A I/2* BEAD OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. A POSITIVE MECHANICAL CONNECTION AND SEAL IS CREATED AT THIS ,

Tills CONFIGURATION IS EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCIIEME 11-1. !

_ - _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __________.:____=;

_s__._____sc

ATTACilMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 0 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS ,

PAGE A23 OF A24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 70.

TiiE USE OF 330460 TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIE 11-1. TIIE USE OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINTS WAS A130 QUALIFIED BY S TiiERMALLY, Tile THICKNESS AND AMOUNT OF LAYERS PROTEGING BUNDLES ARE EQUIVALENT TO OR BETTER TIIAN Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. STRUGURALLY 330460 TROWEL GRADE WITil SS BANDING HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BOND SEAMS WITII THE TWO BUNDLES SillELDING EACli OTilER AND IIAVING GREATER MASS TilAN A SINGLE BUNDLE, Tills CONFIGURATION liAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE A LESS SEVERE EXPOSURE THAN TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. FINALLY, CONDUITS, AS OPPOSED TO AIR DROPS USED IN Tile TEST ADD TIIERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO TIIE CONFIGURATION. TiiEREFORE TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

71.

Tills DEVIATION AFFECTS ONLY A SMALL PORTION OF TIIE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON TiiE LONGIT 103507/0 AND LIMITS Tile AMOUNT OF DEVIATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACil OTilER SO THAN OVERALL MECilANICAL INTEGRITY OF THE JOINT IS NOT COMPROMISED. TIIIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.

72.

PROTECTION OF SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH OTilER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS 103020/3 (

TillCKNESS AND JOINTS, TIE-WIRES, ETC.). TIIE LEVEL OF PROTECTION IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATION.

73.

Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION WillCli WAS USED IN ALL OF Tile CABLE TRAY TEST WNFIGURATIONS EXCEP 104121/0 DETAIL IIAS TIIE ENIIANCEMENT OF INSTALLING Tile TIE WIRES TIIROUGH TIIE BOTTOM ?ANELS ON Tile CABLE TRA COVERAGE TilAT BUTTS TO THE SUPPORT. SINCE THIS IS AN ENIIANCEMENT TO A TESTEL CONFIGURATION,IT IS ACCEPTABLE.

74 Tile COVERAGE ON TIIE RADIAX CABLE WITil FLEXI-BLANKET IS SIMILAR TO COVERAGE ON l'ROTRUDING CONDUI 104015!0 SCIIEME 11-1. Tile AIR GAPS INSIDE CONSISTENT WITII TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. TiiE FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP ARE FILLED WITli TROWEL GRADE. THIS CONF 75.

TiiE FLEX CONDUlTS ARE COVERED WITil FLEXI-BLANKET TO Tile EXTENT ALLOWED BY Tile INTERFERING 102759/I ST TilEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT THE JUNCTION OF Tile CONDUIT liALF ROUNDS AND Tile CONCRETE WALL. Tile FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BETWEEN TiiE TilERMO-LAG AND Tile CON ,

MAINTAIN THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO Tile CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK AND ENilANCE Tile INT Tile TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITli TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

76.

TIIE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE COVERAGE IS EXTENDED OUT ONTO TIIE STEEL TiiEREFORE TYING IT 102957/0 STRESS SKIN ON Tile JOINT. Tills PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH WAS EQUIVALENT TO TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION 77.

FLEXI-BLANKET WAS TESTED IN SCliEME 11-1. TIIE COVERAGE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDIJIT IMI21/0 li TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile OVERLAP OF 330460 ONTO CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES Tile SAME INSTALL (STAPLING OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC) USED FOR CONDUIT AND JUST MODIFIES TIIEM TO ALLOW FOR Tile CO.4 FIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS. THE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR TIIE T THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

70.

THE INSTALLATION METilODS USED ON TiiE DETAIL FOR TiiE 330-1 BOX IIAVE ALL BEEN TESITED (SCORE AND FOLD, IN121/0 STITCHING AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON JOINTS). THE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR TI ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCElrTABLE.

ATTACHMENT A

. ER-ME-082. REV O .

TYPICAL DESIGN DETAllJ PAGE A24 OF A24 -

NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES 'p DCA/REV 79.

Tills CONFIGURK110N IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE OF DETAIL 12-2 EXCEPT THAT THE CONDUIT ENTERING THE BOX EX 103844/0 OF A HORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID. TIIE USE OF 330460 ENTERING A IIORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE HAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1. Tile UPGRADE TECIINIQUES UTILIZED TO REINFORCE TIIE INTERFACE BETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-DLANKET DURING THE TEST (330460 COLLAR. FLARED OLTT ON TIIE 3 REQUIRED BY TIIE DETAIL ALL OTilER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS WITli QUALIFIED TECIINIQUES (STITCHING / STRESS SYJN). TIIE INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITHIN TIIE l 1 ENVELOPE BENEFITS TIIE THERM AL PERFORMANCE OF THE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE, THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT l-HOUR RATING.

+

ER-ME-082. REV. O '

PAGE BI OF BS5 H

11 ATTACIIMENT B UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS

ATTACIIMEN'T B ER-M E482. REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B2 OF B55 -

DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV ROOM. FIRE SUPP, DET. DESCRilTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT .- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)_ TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE -

SCHEMES BSS) -

ZONE 102471/3 AB 790' X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: 18" AND 24* WIDE CABLE TRAYS RUN X-180 AA/21a Y Y PARALLEL BUT ARE TOO CLOSE FOR SEPARATE ENVELOPES.

RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT COMMON TRAY l-2, 12-1, I-5, 7 ENVELOPE

PARTITIONED

BEDVEEN TIIE 14-1 TRAYS. PREBAND THE TWO TRAYS TO PREVENT TOP PANEL SAO.

i 101282/1 SO 832' 2496 2SE/16 Y Y

' ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES DETAILS {

FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REMOVABLE COVER i' JUNCTION BOX ASSEMBLY.

RESOLUTION: UTILIZE 2 LAYERS OF FLAT 10-1 1-6,8 PANEL MATERIAL AROUND TIIE J-BOX SIDES AND FOR TIIE LIP SUPPORTING TIIE SEPARATE COVER ASSEMBLY. TIIEN ADD A LAYER OF V-RIBBED MATERIAL. CONSTRUCTTIIE COVER WITil 2 LAYERS OF FLAT PANELS WITil A 4*

(MIN.) OVERLAP INTO Tile LIP. MAXIMUM GAP BEDVEEN COVER AND LIP IS 3/32*. ALL JOINTS TO BE SECURED WITH THE TIE WIRE STTTCHING AND STRESS SKIN. TURNBUCKLES SIIALL BE USED FOR SECURING TIIE COVER IN PLACE.

102160/0 SO 810' 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION FIQUESTS DIRECHON FOR ENCLOSING CABLE AIR DROPS FROM ONE IlORIZONTAL TRAY TO ANOTHER. IIORIZONTAL TRAY.

RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE TRAY ENVELOPE l-2, 12-1, 1-5,9 FROM THE TRAY ABOVE DOWN ONTO Tile . 12-2, 13-1,.

LOWER TRAY TO FORM A

BOX

14-1 CONFIGURATION FOR ENCLOSURE OF THE AIR DROP CABLES.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS i PAGE B3 OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV: ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET.-

DESCRIFTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN); (YIN)' TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE ; -

i SCHEMES BSS)

ZONE. ' {

j-.

3013/6 SG 810' 2-082 2SD/8 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROPS FROM A BANK OF EMBEDDED SLEEVES ENTER 3 IIORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS ABOVE 2 SW PIPING RUNS. Tile CABLES THEN EXIT TilESE TRAY SEGMENTS AND AIR DROP DOWN INTO A IIORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY RUN BELOW TIIE SW PIPING. FINALLY, PROTRUDING NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR DROP OUT OF TIIE END OF Tile BOTTOM TRAY. ENGINEERING DIRECTION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS CONFIGURATION.

RESOLUTION: WRAP THE CABLE AIR DROPS 1-2, 11-1, 1 4, 10 '

FROM TIIE EMBEDDED SLEEVES TO Tile CABLE 12-1, 12-2 TRAY SEGMENTS WITH 330460 FLEXI- 13-1, 14-1 BLANKET. INSTALL 330-1 PANELS ON THE TRAY SEGMENTS PER SPEC. REQUIREMENTS. '

CONSTRUCT A 12' WIDE BY 43" LONG BY 6*

HIGil

CURB" VERTICAL EXTENSION OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ON THE LOWER ELEVATION TRAY. WPAP TIIE AIR DROP i

CABLE BUNDLES BETWEEN Tile UPPER '

ELEVATION TRAY SEGMENTS WITil 330460 AND EMBED WITIIIN THE CURB EXTENSION OF TIIE TRAY ENVELOPE WITil 330460 TROWEL GRADE. WRAP THE PROTRUDING CABLES AT TiiE TRAY END WITil 330460.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B4 OF B55

. DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV' ROOM- FIRE SUPP. DET. . DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT-- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST. (PAGES B37-FIRE SCIIEMES - B55)

. ZONE:

l.

103409/5 SG 852' 2-100F 2SK/17A Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLATION OF REMOVABLE COVER ,

ASSEMBLY FOR PRESSURE TRANSMITTER.

i RECOLUTION: CONSTRUCf A STEEL 10-1. Il-1 14,1I FRAMEWORK AROUND TiiE FT AS SIIOWN USING I 1/2" X 1 1/2" X I/4" ANGLE IRON.

PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF FLAT 330-1 PANELS AROUND Tile FRAMEWORK AND SECURE WITil TIE WIRES. ALL JOINTS SilALL BE STITCHED AND REINFORCED WITli STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. TIIE " BOX" ENCLOSURE SilALL BE FITTED WITil A DOUBLE LAYER LIP ASSEMBLY TO RECEIVE AND IIOLD THE COVER ASSEMBLY IN PLACE. THE COVER SilALL A130 BE FABRICATED WITil 2 LAYERS OF PANELS. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GAP BETWEEN COVER AND LIP SHAI.L BE 3/32".

SECURE TIIB COVER WITil TURNBUCKLE ASSEMBLIES.

103472/1 AB 810' X-207 AAl21b Y Y 103489/1 ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION l

FOR MULTIPLE CABLE AIR DROPS TIIROUGil EMBEDDED CONDUITS (SLEEVES) WilICil l ENTER HORIZONTALLY STACKED CABLE TRAYS ROUTED IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF THE SLEEVES.

RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT TIIERMO-LAG 330-1 1-2, 12-1, 1 4, 12 PANEL

BOX

ENCLOSURES TO ENVELOPE TIIE 12-2,13-1, EMBEDDED SLEEVE BANK, ALL CABLE AIR I4-1 DROPS AND Tile PORTIONS OF THE STACKED CABLE TRAYS IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF THE SLEEVE BANK.

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME482. REV. O .

11N!QUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B5 OF L55 l

DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEVl ROOM- FIRE SUPPj DET. ' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION '

SUPPOItT ' BASIS / NOTES

-AREA /- '(Y/N) - (Y/N).

FIRE TEST , (PAGES B37-

' ZONE SCIIEMES B55) .

l l}t l 103634/2 i SG 810' 2-083 2SD/9 Y N l ISSUE: EXISTING CONFIGURATION OF 2 LARGE

'ADJACENTJ-BOXES DOES NOT ALLOW BANDING TO BE WRAPPED

CIRCLMFERENTIALLY AROUND BOXES FOR ADDITION OF SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS.

RESOLUTION: ATTACli BANDING TO STEEL 10-I 1-2. 1 4, 13 ANGLE WIIICil SIIALL BE BOLTED TO THE 14-1 V/ALL ABOVE AND BELOW TIIE J-BOXES.

104222/1 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROPS BUNDLED WITII 330-660 MAY EXCEED HEIGliT OF CABLE SIDERAILS. ALSO, A PIPE SUPPORT IS WITillN i 4" OF THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT AND TIlUS CREATES A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE OF 9*

RULE COVERAGE ON THE SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: UTILIZE SHIM BLOCKS TO RAISE I-2. 11-1, 1 4, 14 TRAY ENVELOPE ABOVE SIDE RAILS. SECURE 12-1, 12-2 330460 BUNDLES TO CABLE TRAY RUNGS WITI{ 13-1. 14-1 BANDING. UTILIZE 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AND TROWEL GRADE TO FIRESTOP TRAY COVERAGE. INSTALL DOUBLE LAYER OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL.S ON TRAY SUPPORT FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE.

. . . i ATTACllMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B6 OF BS5 l DCA NO./REV BLDG: ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION '

~

SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

( AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES B37-l FIRE SCllEMES . BS5) l u ZONE-104174/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO MULTIPLE INTERFERENCES, THE TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE ON A 30* WIDE CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAlli RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT ENVELOPE USING 2 I l-1,12-1 43 LAYERS OF J30-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANE 13 INSIDE OF TRAY SIDERAILS FOR MINOR DISTANCE TO I CLEAR INTERFERENCE. OVERLAP FL.EXI- I BLANKET AND FLAT PANEL 3 FOR DISTA.NCF OF 9*-11" WITII V-RIBBED PANELS ON OUTSIDE OF TRAY.

I&t087/0 AD 810* X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: DUE TG CONDUIT SUPPORT AND PIPING INTERFERENCE. TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE ON A I

12* WIDE CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS.

RESOLUliCN: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL 13-1 l-6, 16 PIECE ON TRAY SIDERAIL AND EXTEND COVERAGE ONTO CONDUIT SUPPORT. A130, EXTEND TRAY ENVELOPE TO ENCLOSE INTERFERING PIPING FOR A DISTANCE OF 4*

MIN. ON BOTH SIDES OF TRAY.

104060/0 EC 778' X-il5B AA!!54 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE CREATED BY INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG ON A CONDUIT PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANEL MATERIAL ON A J-BOX PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS.

RESOLUTION: UTILIZE STRESS SKIN SECURED f 0-2 1-6, 17 TO 330-1 PANELS ON THE J-BOX AND TROWEL GRAD BUILDUP TO IN LOCALIZED AREA nF j INTERFERENCE. l

.. -,--i e -- - .-

4 .s..,. , .._ .-'- , . . .-r- -

,:i..v.

.-,...........____.-L. .- ..._ ..

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082. REV. 0 '

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B7 OF B55 -

DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION /1SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) - TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE ' .

SCHEMES B55)

ZONE-104078/0 AB 810' ==

X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS ONE TIME DEVIATION FROM TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 TO UTILIZE FLAT 330-1 ON BOTTOM ON 12* WIDE

}

CABLE TRAY FOR MAXIMUM LENGTil OF 24*. t ISSUE 2: WillLE USING DETAIL 8-3 TO INSTALL 9-1, 10 2 1-6, 20 FLAT 330-1 PANEL UN THE BOTTOM OF A SEPARATE TRAY, ONE END OF THE PANEL BUTTS AGAINST A TRAY SUPPORT.

CONSTRUCTION REQUEST DIRECTION.

RESOLITTION 1: INSTALL FLAT PANELS TO MAX. LENGTH OF 24* TO CLEAR 24* DIA. PIPE.

RESOLIJTION 2: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PIECE OF FLAT PANEL (2* HIGH) TO BUILD UP ,,

THICKNESS AT SUPPORT AND SECURE IN PLACE THE TIE WIRE.

104011/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BEIWEEN CONDUIT SUPPORTS AND 12" WIDE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED PANEIE OVER SIDE RAILS.

1 RESOLUTION: AT LOCALIZED AREA OF Il-1,13-1 43 INTERFERENCE, CREATE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSIDE TIIE TRAY USING 2 LAYERS '

OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER THE CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANCLS INSIDE OF TRAY LuE RAILS. INSTALL V-RIBBED PANELS ON TOP OF THE ENVELOPE. .

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B8 OF BS5 1

DCA NO.lREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE _ . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUP? ORT BASIS / NOTES AREA /- (YIN)- (YIN)' TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE -

SCHEMES B55)

ZONE 102932/5 SG 810' 2-082 2SB/3 Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BETWEEN 30* WIDE CABLE TRAY BOTTOM AND INSULATED 2* DIA. PIPE TO INSTALL PANELS IN LOCALIZED AREA OF TRAY BOTTOM.

ISSUE 2: REQUEST DIRECTION FOR PROTECTING CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL 30* WIDE TRAYS WillCH BOTH REQUIRE PROTECTION.

e !

RESOLUTION 1: INTERRUI'T 330-1 RIBBED 11-1,12-1 43 PANEL COVERAGE ON TRAY BOTTOM l

IMMEDIATELY AT PIPING INTERFERENCE AND INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER CABLES. OVERLAP 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE ON TRAY BOTTOM BY 9*-11*.

WRAP PIPING WITH 4-1/2* TIUCK LAYERS OF 330-70 CONFORMABLE BIANKET WITH STAINLESS STEEL JACKET. FINALLY, WRAP 2 LAYERS OF 330460 AROUND THE STAINLESS STEEL JACKET AND SECURE TO T11E 330-1 PANELS ON TRAY UNDERSIDE.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL A BOX 12-1 43 CONFIGURATION SECURED EACH TO TRAY TO ENVEIDPE THE CABLE AIR DROPS. ALL JOINTS TO BE REINFORCED PER SPEC.

103912/0 SG 810' 2-082- 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND INSULATED PIPE PER DCA 102932/5 DOES NOT ENABLE INSULATION AROUND 2* PIP 3 BELOW.

l RESOLUTION: MINOR REMOVAL OF 330460 11-I,12-1 I4,21 i

FLEXI-BLANKET IN IMMEDIATE AREA OF PIPE INSULATION IS ACCEIFTABLE, PROVIDED l

L EXPOSED EDGES ARE SEALED WITH 330460 l TROWEL GRADE-i

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS 4 PAGE B9 OF BS5 DCA N ./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE . SCIIEMES B55) ;

ZONE-103533/0 AB 790* X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE 1: UPPER CABLE TRAY INTERFERES j WITH INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP ENVELOPE FROM LOWER CABLE TRAY TO CONDUIT.

ISSUE 2: INSTRUMENT TUBING TRAY INTERFERES WITH CONDUIT SUPPORT TiiERMO-LAG INSTALLATION FOR 9* RULE (i.e.,

< 7/16* CLEARANCE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF

. SUPPORT AND TOP OF INSTRUMENT TUBING l ;, TRAY - TIIICKNESS DEVIATION).

RESOLUTION 1: MOD!FY UPPER CABLE TRAY 10-1, 14-1 1-5. 25 PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE BY REMOVING 8-1/2*

l To 11-1/2" LENGTH OF PANEL ACROSS ENTIRE BOTTOM WIDTil OF ENCLOSURE.

INSTALL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ON CONDUIT. l SIIIM SOUTIIERN MOST PORTION OF CABLE TRAY ENCLOSURE - 3/4* TO I-1/4" PAST END OF CONDUIT ENCLOSURE. BOX IN AIR DROP BETWEEN UPPER AND LOWER CABLE TRAY.

BOX COMMUNICATES UPPER AND LOWER CABLE TRAY VIA 8-1/2" TO Il-1/2* OPENINO.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL STANDARD TilERMO- 9-1, 9-2 1-5, 26 LAG COVERAGE EXCEPT DOUBLE LAYER 330-1 PANELS ON BOTTOM OF SUPPORT.

104226/0 EC 788* X-115B Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP BETWEEN CONDUIT AND THROUGli WALL SLEEVE (TWS) WAS l PREVIOUSLY PROTECTED AS PROTRUDING ITEM BUT IS ACTUALLY ESSENTIAL.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL BOX 11-1 1-5,29 AROUND TWS AND BUILD STRESS SKINfrROWEL GRADE COLLAR AT AIR DROP / BOX INTERFACE.

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BIO OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV. ROOM FIRE - ' SUPP. DET. - DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF CONCERNIRESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES I AREA / (Y/N)- (Y/N). TEST (PAGES B37- . !. i FIRE . SCHEMES ' B55) I ZONE- [ j 103935/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL '

DUE TO FLEX CONDUIT INTERFERENCE. IN ADDITION, FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP ENCLOSURE PER DETAIL 5-12 CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO INTERFERENCE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON 1-5, 30 SIDE RAIL OF CABLE TRAY WHEPE INTERFERENCE OCCURS.' EXTEND 330-1 PANEL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE 2" TO 4" PAST END OF CABLE TRAY TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP FLEXI-BLANKET.

104048/0 EC 778* X-1ISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE COLLAR IS REQUIRED AT AIR DROP / CABLE TRAY ..

PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INTERFACE. !l PISOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL I I-I l-5, 29 GRADE COLLAR AT INTERFACE; WHERE STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED FLUSH WITH FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALL 11/16" WFT BUILDUP OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE.

'l

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482. REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE Bl1 OF B5S DCA NO./REV ' BLDO ELEV' ROOM. FIRE SUPPI DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE'OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPOltT - BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN). TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE .-

SCHEMES BSS)

ZONE-

}

104217/I , AB 790' X-180 AA/21: Y Y ISSUE 1: DUE TO CABLE FILL. AIR DROPS BETWEEN TRAYS (PERPENDICULAR TO ONE ANOTHER) CANNOT BE PROTECTED PER STANDARD INSTALLATION DETAIL ISSUE 2: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTING BETWEEN WALL AND PROTECTED CONDUIT PREVENTS PROPER INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.

RESOLUTION 1: BOX IN AIR DROPS BETWEEN 1-5. 9 TRAYS AND INCLUDE AIR DROPS AS PART OF COMMON PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT TRAY ,

JUNCTION.

,I RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL FIRST LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET COMPLETELY AROUND l-5, 28 CONDUIT PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. REMAINING TWO LAYERS WILL BE MODIFIED TO BUTT-UP AGAINST WALL UNTIL ADEQUATE CLEARANCE EXISTS TO ALLOW FULL WRAP. ALL SEAMS, AS WELL AS THE FLEXI-BLANKET / WALL INTERFACE, SHALL HAVE A BUILDUP OF i1/16*

WFT 330460 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL

ATTACIIMENT B - ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B12 OF B55 DCA NO./REV : BLDO ELEV- ROOM- FIRE. SUPP. DET. ' DESCRIETION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST. . (PAGES B37-SCHEMES BS5)

ZONE 103550/1 AB 790* X-180 AA/2in Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCIlON REQUIRED DIRECTION ON TIIB COVERAGE OF AIR DROP WHICil INCLUDES 3 TRAYS.

ISSUE 2: PIPE INTERFERES WITli PROPER INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE j FOR CABLE TRAY. j RESOLUTION I & 2: AIR DROPS BETWEEN 11-1 27 ESSENTIAL TRAYS ARE WRAPPED Wml FLEXI-BLANKET. INSTALLED IN FIRESTOP MATERIAL WmIIN CABLE TRAY, Wml 330-1 PANEL CAP INSTALLED IN END OF CABLE TRAYS. CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN VICINITY OF PIPE INTERFERENCE IS MODIFIED BY INSTALLING 330-1 PANELS INSIDE CABLE TRAY ;

IN ACCORDANCE Wm1 UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS 103574/0 AB 790* X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: PIPE SUPPORTS INTERFERE WITil Il I,13-1 I-5. IS TIIERMO-LAG INSTALLATION SEVERAL CABLE TRAYS.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET PANEIS UNDER TIIE CABLES IN Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCE THE FULL WIDTil OF CABLE TRAY.

103582/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21 Y Y ISSUE: TWO SPRINKLER HEADS PREVENT l-5, 31 PROPER INSTALLATION OF BOTTOM PANEL FOR CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON BOTTOM OF CABLE TRAY AND INSIDE CABLE TRAY. CHAM FOR BOTTOM BOARD TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF FLAT BOARD.

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O 1

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B13 OF B55 DCh NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.

DESCPJPTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37 .

FIRE ZONE SCIIEMES BS5) 103847/0 SG 832' 2-094 2SB15 Y Y ISSUE: AITER INSTALLATION OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON JUNCTION BOXES, INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN JUNCTION BOXES FOR INSTALLATION OF 330-1 B-RIBBED PANELS.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL COMMON ENVELOPE 10-2 1-5,32 FOR BOTII JUNCTION BOXES. '

103680/0 AB B10' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BETWEEN i

WALL SLEEVES AND BOTTOM OF JUNCTION BOX PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN ACCORDANCE WITII STANDARD DETAILS.

ISSUE 2: OVER FILL OF CABLES AT END OF I

TRAY FROM TIIROUGl{ WALL SLEEVES (TWS)

PREVENT INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE ;

ENVELOPE IN ACCORDANCE WITil STANDARD j DETAILS.

RESOLUTION I & 2: PROTECT CABLE TRAY, I-5, 34 "nVS, AND JUNCTION BOXES AS COMMON ENCLOSURE.

103792/0 AB 852' X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: GROUND CLAMP AND GROUND CABLE INSTALLED ON RADIAL BEN OF 4" CONDUIT INTERFERES WITH STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE UPGRADE.

RESOLITTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL 9-1, 9-2 1-5, 33 GRADE BUILDUP ON RADIAL BEND TO T11E EXTEND POSSIBLE. WRAP STRESS SKIN ON GRAND CABLE, FLARE OITT ON RADIAL BEND, AND STAPLE / TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP STRESS SKIN.

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS . PAGE B14 OF B5S DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ; SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN). (YIN) TETT (PAGES B37- !

FIRE - -

SCIIEMES BS5)

ZONE.

I 103624/2 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN AIR DROP AND CABLE TRAY TO INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET ENCLOSURE.

ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION FOR THROUGli WALL SLEEVE l (TWS).

4 ISSUE 3: REVISE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE !

AROUND FIRE PROTECTION HANGER. !

RESOLUTION 1,2 & 3: ENCLOSE AIR DROP.

CABLE TRAY. AND TWS IN COMMON ENCLOSURt REVISE ENCLOSURE DETAIL FOR l-5, 35 TWS TO TRANSITION OVER HANGER.

103874/1 SG 810' 2-079 2SB/8 Y N ISSUE 1: DUE TO A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT 22 INTERFERENCE, STANDARD JUNCTION BOX SEAM UPGRADE CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISIIED.

ISSUE 2: DUE TO AIR DROPS ENTERING A CABLE TRAY. STANDARD CABLE TRAY SEAM UrGRADE CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED.

I REtOLIJTION 1: CUT STRESS SKIN TO FIT AROUND INTERFERING SUPPORT. INCREASE STRESS SKIN DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMPLISH 9-1, 9-2 BANDING.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR AND TROWEL GRADE / STRESS SKIN BUILDUP.

Il-1,

ATTAC11 MENT B ER-ME41r2, REV O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BIS OF B55 DCA NO.IREV ' BLDG' ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. - DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YlN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE ZONE SCIIEMES . BS5) 103884/I AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y N ISSUE: JB2A-301B AND CONDUlT C-24B41951 832' X-226 AA/21d ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY AND VARIOUS OTiiER COMMODITIES.

RESOLUTION: BOX IN CONDI;7T AND TRAY l-2,9-1, 1-6, 23 TOGETIIER AND COVER ALL OTilER 10-1. 12-1,.

PROTRUDING COMMODITIES FOR A DISTANCE 12-2. 13-1, OF 9*. I4-1 103575/O AB 832' X-226 AAkId Y N ISSUE 1: TIIERMC-LAG COVERAGE IS s REQUIRED ON CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM CABLE TRAY T240ADA79 TO T240AF003.

l '

ISSUE 2: A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IS LOCATED WTTilIN A 9" DISTANCE OF ESSENTIAL TRAY T-240ADA78.

RESOLUT10N 1: CONSTRUCT A BOX FROM l-2, 12-1 1-6, 24 TRAY T240ADA79 TO T240AF003 ENCOMPASSING 12 ~ 13 1, THE CABLE A!R DROPS. INSTALL A FIRE STOP 14-1 AT TIIE END OF TRAY T240AF003 TO PROVIDE A SEALED ENCLOSURE.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL TIIERMO-LAO IN ACCORDANCE WIT 11 TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1.

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME-082 REU. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BI6 OF BS5 DCA NO1REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLUTIOld SUPPGRT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST. (PAGES B37-SCHEMES B55)

ZONE 7

103487/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21B Y Y :

ISSUE: A VERTIC AL CABLE TRAY 15 i INSTALLED 3* FF OM T11E WALL. DVO CABLE BUNDLES EXIT THE TRAY AND ENTER 2 SLEEVES EMBED DED IN THE CEILING.

REQUEST DIRECriON FOR COVERAGE. ALSO, AN INSTRUMENT LINE CROSSES UNDER Tile TRY WITil A I/2* CLEARANCE UNDER TliE TRAY SIDE RAILS.

RESOLUTION: COVER TIIE TRAY PER TYPICAL I-2,12-1, 1-6,37 DETAIL 13-2 SECURED TO Tile WALL WITil 12-2, 13-1, IIILTI BOLTS PER DETAIL I-5. COVER TIIE 14-1 INSTRUMENT LINE AND TUBE TRACK FOR 9*

DISTANCE (MIN.) AS PROTRUDING ITEM. ALL JOINTS OF Tile BOX CONFIGURATION AND FLARE OUT (FOR IIILTI ATTACllMENT) SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH TIE WIRES (THROUGH STRESS SKIN) AND OVERLAPPED WITil EXTERNAL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. l' i

101320/2 EC 778' X-Il3 EA/43 Y Y TIIIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING -

43 REVISED AND WILL BE EVALUATED AFTER ISSUE.

103551/1 A.B 790' X-IBO AA/2In Y Y Tills DOCUMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING - -

REVISED AND WILL BE EVALUATED AFTER !

ISSUE. I 101986/1 SG 810' 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y 103034/1 ISSUE: ALL CABLES AIR DROPS FROM TWO 12-2 I-5, 36 104124/0 CABLE TRAYS TO TIIROUGli WALL SLEEVES (TWS), AS WELL AS Tile CABLE TRAYS, REQUIRE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.

RESOLUTION: PROTECT ALL COMMODITIES WITH A COMMON ENCLOSURFL g

ATTACllMENT H - ER-ME-082 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B17 OF BSS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST. (PAGES B37-SCllEMES - BSS)

ZONE .

103184/1 SO 832' 2-088 2SB/144 Y Y 103192/1 ISSUE 1: DCA 103184/1. CONGESTION AT 11-1 38 103681/1 JUNCTION BOX JB2S53120 AND CONDUTTS DUE TO FIRE ZONE *R* CABLES AND OTIIER PROTRUDING ITEMS INTERFERES WITil PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION.

(NOTE: Tills DCA WAS SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681)

ISSUE 2: DCA 103192/1. CLOSE PROXIMITY OF 11-1 FIRE ZONE *R* CABLES TO CONDUIT ENTRANCE TO JUNCTION BOX JB2S53860 ,

INTERFERES WITII PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE i INSTALLATION. (NOTE: Tills DCA WAS '

SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681)

ISSUE 3: CLEARANCE BETWEEN JUNCT10N 10-1, 10--2 BOXES JB2S$3120 AND JB2S53860 (SEE ISSUED 1 AND 2 ABOVE) DOES NOT ALLOW INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS OVER 330-1 FLAT PANEL.

RESOLIJrION 1,2 & 3: FIRE STOP THE FIRE ZONE *R* CABLE AT BOTII JUNCTION BOXES IN COMMON ENCLOSURE. PROTECT BOTII JUNCTION BOXES WITII COMMGN ENCLOSURE.

101499/0 AB 790* X-165 AA/2In N Y' ISSUE: PARALLEL CONDUITS HAVE . 10-1, 10-2, I-5.41 INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE AT LBDs TO 9-1,9-2 INDIVIDUALLY PROTECT EACil COMMODITY.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE AROUND BOTH LBD FITTINGS.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REY. O '

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B18 OF BS5 DCA NOJREVc BLDO' ELEV ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTidN/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION --'

SUPPdRT. BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) '(Y/N)

+ TEST . (PAGES B37-FIRE c SCHEMES i ZONE 4 B55) 102726/0 SG. 832' 2@4 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PROTECTED CONDUIT LBD INTERFERES 10-1, 10-2, 1-5,42 WITH ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD TilAT 9-1, 9-2 REQUIRED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE-'

RESOLUTION: BOX-IN LBD IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL 6-1 AND MODIFY DESIGN AT INTERFACE OF INTERFERENCE. (

I 103001/0 SG 885' 2-109B 2SK17C Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS 11-1 1-5, 23 BETWEEN 330-1 PRESHAPE CONDUIT SECTIONS (1/4*,1/2*) AND WALL, PREVENT 7NG PROPER INSTALLATION OF FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAP AT RIGID CONDUIT / FLEX CONDUIT INTERFACE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP WHERE POSSIBLE. BUTT FLEXI-BLANKET AGAINST WALL AND TROWEL GRADE SEAMS, i BUTT.

ATTACllMEN'T B ER-ME-082 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BIO OF BS5 l

DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SdPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREAL' (YIN)- (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37 -

FIRE -

SCHEMES - B55)

ZONE 101246/0 AB 790* X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE I & 2: ilVAC IIANGER INTERFERES WITH PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION ON CABLE TRAY AND COVERAGE OF PROTRUD!NG l ITEM.

l ISSUE 3: TRAPEZE HANGER INTERFERES WITil COVERAGE OF HANGER SUPPORT.

l RESOLITTION 1: CONSTRUCT ENVELOPE USING 11-1, 12-1 1-6.43 2 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF !

TRAY SIDERAILS FOR MINOR DISTANCE TO I CLEAR INTERFERENCE. OVERLAP FLEXI- !

BLANKET AND FLAT PANELS FOR DISTANCE j OF 9*-11* WITH V-RIBBED PANELS ON OITTSIDE OF TRAY.

RESOLITTION 2: TRIM FLAT BOARD AT l-6,47 HANGER / SPLICE PLATE INTERFERENCE.

RESOLITTION 3: COVER BOTTOM OF TRAY AND l-6, 47 DIAGONAL TRAY SUPPORT UP TO INTERFERENCE, ADD 1 EXTRA FLAT PANEL THAT IS 3' WIDE AND RUN TIIE WIDTil OF INTERFERENCE. DO NOT SEAL PANELS TO TRAPEZE SUPPORT.

102103/0 EC 792' X-122 EAI54 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROP FROM TilROUGII WALL SLEEVES (IWS) TO CABLE TRAY DO NOT ALLOW THE USE OF STANDARD DETAILS.

RESOLITTION: BOX Ti!ERMO-LAG "V* RIB 14 1-5.50 PANELS AROUND TWS AND CABLE TRAY. i

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-083, REV. 0 '

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B20 OF B55 DCA NO./REV - BLDG. ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN! RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N)

FIRE TEST . (PAGES B37-SCl{ EMES .B5S)

ZONE 101498/l EC 778' X-1ISB AA154 Y Y ISSUE: Tile ARRANGEMENTOF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS AND CONDUITS WITillN, PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF STANDARD RUN CABLE TRAY PROTECTION.

a RESOLUTION: INSTALL TYPICAL DETAIL 5-1 1-2, 12-1, 1-5,49 FOR STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECTION 12-2, 13-1, WilERE SPACE AND ARRANGEMENT ALLOWS. 14-1, Il-1 WIIERE CABLES EXTEND ABOVE TIIE TRAY l

SIDES SillM Tile TOP PANEL UP PER DETAIL 10-

3. WilERE CABLES AIR DROP FROM TIIE VERTICAL TO IlORIZONTAL TRAY, ENCLOSE Tile CABLES IN A TilERMO-LAG BOX.

102882/0 AB 823' X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION OF FSSENTIAL J-BOX JB2A-2990 AND ESSENTIAL AIR DROP CABLES WIIICII EXIT CABLE TRAY BEFORE Tile END OF TIIE RACEWAY, PRECLUDING USE OF TYPICAL DETAJLS.

PESOLIJTION: DIRECTION IS PROVIDED FOR 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 19 INSTALLING A

BOX

EXTENSION TO Tile 12-2 CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE, WITil 330-1 PANELS FLARED TO ENCLOSE CABLE AIR DROPS WITi!OUT TOUCil!NG TIIEM. ALL JOINTS ARE TO BE MADE USING Tile SCORE AND FOLD METIIOD, AND PANELS BiffTED TO TIIE J-BOX PRIOR TO COVERING TIIE J-BOX PER TYPICAL DI? TAILS.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS i PAGE B21 OF B55 ~

DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE 'UPP.

S DET.c DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL. (Y/N)- (YIN).

FIRE 7 TEST . (PAGES P37-SCHEMES - B55).

ZONE'-

101357/1 AB 790' I80 AA/2ta Y Y ISSUE: PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERES WITH THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANELS ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

j.

RESOLUTION: STOP STANDARD TRAY 11-1, 1-2, I-5, 18 COVERAGE ABOUT 4* ON EITHER SIDE OF THE 12-1, 12-2, l PIPE SUPPORT. INSTALL 339460 FLEXI- 13-1, 14-1 i

BLANKET ON Tile CABLES AND EXTEND I ACROSS TIIE 8* SPACE AND EXTEND INTO TIIE j TRAY COVERAGE ON BOTH ENDS. INSTALL AN '

ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IN TiiE ENDS OF TIIE TRAY COVERAGE. FLEXI-BLANKETSHALL EXTEND TIIROUGli TIIE FIRE STOP INTO TiiE l TRAY COVERAGE.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B22 OF B55 -

DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLtJTION SUPPORT I BASIS / NOTES !-

AREA /. (YlN) (YIN) _ TEST FIRE .

(PAGES B37-- ;.

SCHEMES R55) ..

ZONE :; lt 103046/2 SG 810' 2-082 2SB8 Y Y ISSUE: THE NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS FROM AN ESSENTIAL TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED WIT 11 THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE THE AIR DROPS RUN PARALLEL ALONG TIIE TOP OF TIIE TRAY PREVENTING THE COMPLETE WRAPPING OF THE AIR DROP WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET BECAUSE OF Tile INTERFERENCE BY TIIE 330-1 PANELS ON TOP OF THE TRAY. ALSO STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED BECAUSE THERE ARE 3 AIR DROPS TOO CLOSE TOGETIIER AND TOO NEAR Tile EDGE OF TIIE TRAY.

RESOLUTION: WRAP TIIE CABLE BUNDLES TO 11-1 I-5, 45 '

THE EXTENT POSSIF'.E BUTTING TiiE FLEXI-BLANKET TO Tile 330-1 PANEL ON TOP OF TIIE !

TRAY BANDING TIIE BUNDLES IN PLACE AND !

TO TIIE TRAY. TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP '

SifALL BE INSTALLED AT THE FLEXI-BLANKET 330-1 INTERFACE. THE INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES FOR TIIE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. THIS AFFECTS ABOITT 2' LONG AREA ON TOP THE TRAY AND STILL MAINTAINS AT LEAST l-1/2' OVERLAP OF THE JOINT AND A MAXIMUM TIE WIRE l SPACING OF 10*.

l 103486/0 EC 778* X-IISB AAll54 Y Y i

ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TYPICAL I-5, 39 l DETAILS FOR ADJACENT FLEX CONDUITS WITil INADEQUATE SEPARATION.

l RESOLUTION: DEVELOP TYPICAL DETAILS 8-4 l

+-

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B23 OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP; DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF CONCEI'N/ RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA /. (Y/N)' ' ' (YIN)

TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE '

- SCIIEMES B55)

ZONE-

.i' 103061/1 SG 832' 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION PIQUEST INSTALLATION DETAIL FOR ADJACENT CONDUIT PRESHAPE /FLEXI-BLANKET INTERFACE WITil IN '.DEQUATE SEP ARATION.

RESOLUTION: DEVELOP TYPICAL DETAILS 7-7, I-5, 40 7-7.1.

102058/0 SG 810' 2 079 2SBIB Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AND LBD REQUIRES PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ADJOINING CONDUIT /LBD IS TO CLOSE TO INSTALL I STANDARD DETAIL l

RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE 10-I 10-2, 1-5,41 AROUND BOTH LBD FITTINGS. 9-1, 9-2 103862/0 AB 810' X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: RADIAX CABLE INTERFERES WITII BOTTOM PANEL TilERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON CABLE TRAY T230ACG70, AND A COMPONENT COOLING WATER LINE INTERFERES WITH SIDE RAIL COVERAGE ON CABLE TRAY T230ACG61.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL A SLOTTED PANEL ON 1-2, 9-I, 1-5, 46 TIIE BOTTOM OF TRAY T230ACG70 TO 12-1, 12-2 ACCOMMODATE THE RADIAX CABLE. INSTALL 13-1, 14-1 330-1 PANEL ON TRAY BOTTOM OF TRAY OVER SLOT TO BLOCK ANY HEAT PATIL INSTALL NOTCHED SIDE PANEL TO ACCOMMODATE 6-CC-2-007-152-3. INSTALL 330-1 PANELS ON INSIDE OF TRAY ON SIDE RAIL

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-OS2, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B23 OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV' ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFIlONIISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPOT.T EASIS/ NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE j SCHEMES B55)

ZONE 103277/1 SG 832' 96 SEI6 Y Y ISSUE: THE SUPPORT FRAME TO PROVIDE COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CABLES FROM TWO CONTAINMENT PENETR.\TIONS TO A JUNC110N BOX CANNOT BE INSTAla ED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-4 DUE TO THE U.VIQUE CONFIGURATION AND TIIE .'.ACK OF ADEQUATE ATTACHMENT POINT AT THE JUNCTION BOX.

RESOLUTION: FABRICATE TWO METAL Il-1 I-5, 44 SLEEVES WilICH ARE ATTACHED TO Tile JUNCTION BOX WHICH WILL ALLOW THE SUPPORT FRAMING TO BE INSTAI.1Fn PER ~I TYPICAL DETAIL 7-4. TitEN THE THERMO-LAG CAN BE INSTALLED FOR PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-3. ,

102679/I EC 778* X-IISB AA154 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY T220CBD15-221S AN ESSENTIAL TRAY WITH SEVERAL INTERFERENCE AND PROTRUDING ITEM PROBLEMS.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLAT PANEIS IN LIEU 1-2,14, 48 i

OF V-RIB IN ORDER TO AVOID AN 9-1, 11-1, INTERFERENCE %TIli A PROTECTED CONDUIT. 12-1,12-2, j INSTALL HALF ROUNDS ON THE ESSENTIAL 13-1 CONDUTT, REDUCING THE MATERIAL THICKNESS WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH TRAY THERMO4.AC. AIR DROPS SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN A THERMO-LAG BOX WHEN STANDARD D6 TAIL FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED COVER PROTRUDING ITEMS PER TYPICAL DETAILS TO A DISTANCE OF 9' MINIMUM,11* MAXIMUM.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B25 OF B5S DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS! NOTES AREAL (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE .

ZONE SCHEMES B5S) 103670/0 AB 810* 207 AAl21b Y Y ISSU3: THE HVAC OVER THE ESSENIIAL TRAY WAS TOO CLOSE TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG ON THE TRAY.

RESOLUTION: THE HVAC WAS TRIMMED I-2,Il-1, I-5,51 SUFFICIENTLY TO ALLOW STANDARD 12-1,12-2,

COVERAGE BY 330-I PANELS ON THE TRAY. 13-1,14-1 WIIERE THIS COULD, BE DONE AT THE HVAC SUPPORTTHt: TRAY WAS NOTCHED. THE RESULT WAS THAT A 4' LONG AREA REQUIRED UNIQUE COVERAGE. FLAT PANELS %TRE USED IN TIIE AREA %TTH ALL JOINTS EITIIER SCORE AND FOLD OR STITCHED WITH TIE WIRE. TilERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT ROOM TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON THE LONGITUDINALJOINTS. ALSO IN THE AREA WHERE THE TRAY IS NOTCHED THE CABLES ARE NEAR THE THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE SO A 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET IS INSTAT.T rn BETWEEN THE PANEL AND THE CABLES TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS SEPARATION.

l 103567/1 SB 790' 2-070 2SB4 Y Y ISSUE: PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR CABLE AIR DROP FROM CABLE TRAY T23GSCE01 TO THE WALL PENETRATION.

)

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 *V* RIB PANEL 11-1 14,52 ON CABLE TRAY T23GSCE01 AND ON TIIE CABLE TRAY PROTRUDING FROM THE WALL PENETRATION AT COLUMN 9-A. % RAP TIIE CABLE AIR DROP IN TWO LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET PER DETAIL 5-12. -

i i ey --- . -- .y ,. *- - ,. ~ w- w,. + ___m

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B26 OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAT (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE SCHEMES BS5)

ZONE ,

103600/2 SB 810' 2483 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALIATION FOR VERTICAL CABl.E TRAY AND AIR DROPS AT CEILING IS NOT COMPLETE DUE TO '

RECESSED SPARE EMBEDDED SLEEYE.

2 RESOLUTTON: FILL RECESS OF SPARE SLEEVE 14, 53 WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FLUSH %TTH BARRTER SURFACE. EXTEND TIIERMO-LAG OVER AIR DROP TO BARRIER. UPGRADE ALL

, , JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, STAPLES AND STITCHING, FIANGE THERMO-LAG TO WALL OR CEILING USING SCORE AND FOLD METHOD AND HILTI BOLT PER DETAIL I-5. THE BARRIER TIIAT IS NOT HILTI BOLTED OR MAY BE BUTTED TO THE BARRIER %TTH DETAIL 11-7.

102931/0 AB 790* X-180 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION r FOR THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF AN

} ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHERE A 4* VD LINE PREVENTS FULLTHICKNESS 330-1 PANEL i 4

INSTALLATION ON TOP OF THE TRAY.

RESOLIJT10N: INSTALL,330-1 FIAT PANEL ON 11-1, 12-1, I-5 S4 TOP OF TRIM, WTTH THICKNESS REDUCED AS 12-2,13-1, REQUIRED TO AVOID THE VD LINE. A SECOND 14-1 THICKNESS OF 330-I FIAT PANEL IS TO BE '

USED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE, INSTALLED BENEATH THE '

REDUCED PORTION AND ATTACHED.

I i

ATTACHMENT B ER-MEM REV. 0 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS t PAGE B27 OF BSS DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. - '

DESCRIP110N/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAI (YIN): (YIN)-

TEST (PAGES B37 .

FIRE SCHEMES B55)

. ZONE 103408/t AB 810' X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE 1: DUE TO PROTRUDLNG AIR DROP FROM TRAY THE BOX FOR ESSENTIAL CONDUIT CANNOT BE INSTAt i Fn.

ISSUE 2: DUE TO PROXIMITY OF CONDUITS AND TRAY, CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TO INSTALL DIFFERENT BOX.

RESOLUTION I & 2: INSTALL BOX PER DETAIL 1-5.55

, 12-2.

~

ATTAGIMENT B ER-ME-082. REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B18 OF BSS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. ' DESCRIPITONGSSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE SCHEMES B55)

ZONE 4 103892/0 AB 852* X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS FOR THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION DUE TO HVAC DUCTS AND SUPPORTS, A TOTAL OF 12 INTERFERENCES.

RESOLUTION: INTERFERENCE 1,2,9 AND II II-I 56 REQUIRED THE INSTALIATION OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD TRIMMED TO ALLOW INSTALLATION BETWEEN DIE CABLE TRAY AND HANGER AND THE HVAC DUCT. ADD AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS FROM THE AREA T11AT THE FIRST REQUIRES MODIFYING.

INTERFERENG 3 REQUIRES THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIB PANELS ON THE SIDE OF THE TRAY %TTH A 330-1 FLAT PANEL INSTALLED TO SPAN THE SPLICE PLATE.

LNTERFERENCE 4 REQUIRES DIE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 ON THE SIDE OF THE TRAY IN T11E VICINITY OF THE HVAC IIANGER.

INTERFERENCE SA REQUIRES THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE TO BE MODIFIED ATTHE CABLE g

TRAY HANGER CROSS CHANNEL REQUIRING NOTCHING OF THE BOITOM PANEL INTERFERENCE S REQUIRES THE CABLE TRAY HANGER TO BE WRAPPED AS A PROTRUDING IRLM WHERE THE 2 X 2 ANGLE SUPPORT INTERFERES WITH THE TOP COVER OF TRAY PROTECnVE ENVELOPE. LVTERFERENCE 6 REQUIRES THE 330-1 PANEL ON THE BOTTOM OF THE TRAY TO BE TRIMMED TO ALLOW FOR HVAC INTERFERENCE. WHERE THE PANEL HAS BEEN TRIMMED ADD A SECOND 330-1 FIAT PANEL TIE WIRED TO FIRST.

INTERFERENCE 8 REQUIRES INSTALLATION OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL AT FP PIPE SUPPORT.

INTERFERENCE 10 REQUIRES COVERAGE OF THE HVAC SUPPCRT AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. r INTERFERENCE 11 REQUIRES THE SAME I'

I

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-OS2, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGU"tATIONS PAGE C29 OF B5S DCA NO./REV . BLDO. ELEV ROOM- FIRE SUPP.' DET. DESCRii' TION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLIITION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAf (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE '-

SCHEMES BSS)

ZONE .

~}

103892/0 MODIFICATION AS INTERFERENCE 3.

CONT *D 103476/I SB 810' 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE I: CONSTRUCTION REQUEST ORIENTATION OF V-RIBS.

ISSUE 2: 2* CONDUIT IS ESSENTIAL RACEWAY ENGINEERING DIRECTION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE.

ISSUE 3: LACK OF CLEARANCE AT BARRIER PREVEFUS TOTAL INSTALLATION OF I/4*

OVERLAY.

RESOLUTION I: THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT AS TO DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION OF V-RIBS.

RESOLUTION 2: DISPOSMONED PER DCA 103423.

RESOLUTION 3: MODIFY I/4* CONDUIT 9-1, 9-2 I-S, S7 OVERLAY TO ALLOW BUTILNO TO WALL AND INSTALL FIf 3 FT.

ATTACHMENT B ER-MEM REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B30 OF B5S

' DCA NO.1REV ' BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET.- DESCRIPTIONilSSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

[

AREA / (YIN) (YIN) I TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE -

ZONE SCHEMES BS$)

103406/1 SB B52' 103 2SE18 Y Y ISSUE: THIS IS A SITUATION WHERE THE ARRANGEMENT DOES NOT allow FOR THE COVERAGE OF AN AIR DROP FROM A CONTAINMENT PENETRATION TO A CABLE TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAILS.

RESOLtJrION: A SLEEVE IS INSTALLED IN THE Il-1 1-5, 44 END OF THE TRAY SO THAT THE SUPPORT FRAME CAN BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT %7TH DETAIL 7-4. AN ELASTOMER FIRE SEALIS INSTAf f Fn BETWEEN THE SLEEVE AND TRAY TO HOLD THE SLEEVE IN PLACE AND PROVIDE A POINT FOR ATTACHMENT. THE FRAMINO IS THEN

COVERED %TTH FLEXI-BLANKET CONSISTENT WITH THE SPECIFICATION AND DETAIL 7-3.

i i

I l

l l

l i

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B31 OF B55 DCA NO /REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCIUPTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN). TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE SCHEMES B55)

ZONE 103740/1 AB 790* 180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: THERE ARE 4 DIFFERENT OBSTRUCTIONS TO STANDARD COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. T1IERE IS AN HVAC FLANGE AND A FLANGE ON A FIRE PROTECTION PIPE WIIICH EXTEND INTO THE TRAY. THEREIS AN HVACSUPPORTTOO CLOSE TO THE TOP OF THE TRAY TO ALLOW COVERAGE AND THERE IS AN HVAC FLANGE WHICH INTERFERES %TTH SPLICE PLATE COVERAGE.

RESOLUTION: %HERE THE FIRE PROTECTION 1-2, 9- 1, 1-5,58 PIPE FLANGE EXTENDS BELOW THE TOP OF 9-3, 10-1, THE TRAY 1EE V-RIB BOARD IS CUT OUT 10-2, Il-1 AROUND THE FLANGE, FLAT PANEL IS 12-1, 12-2 INSTALLED BELOW TiiE V-RIB PANEL, 13-1 14-1 OVERLAPPING THE V-RIB PANEL AND SHIMS ARE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE V-RIB AND FLAT PANELS IF REQUIRED TO CLEAR THE FLANGE. ALLJOINTS ARE STITCHED WITil TIE WIRE AND UPGRADED %TTH STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE. PREBANDS ARE MODIFIED TO SUPPORT PANEL ARRANGEMENT. WHERE THE HVAC SUPPORT SPANS THE TRAY JUST ABOVE THE SIDE RAILS. AT THE SIDE RAILS WHERE THICKNESS OF COVERAGE CANNOT BE ATTAINED TROWEL GRADE !S APPLIED THEN 330-1 PANELS ARE INSTALLED ON THE INSIDE OF THE TRAY AND OUTIN ALL DIRECTIONS SO THE METAL TRAY IS COVERED PER TIIE 9*

RULE. IN BETWEEN THE TRAY RA!"d. A 330-1 PANEL WAS INSTALLED BELOW THE TOP OF THE TRAY AND BELOW THE ANGLE IP,0N AND STITCHED TO THE PANEL COVERING THE TOP OF THE TRAY THATIS BUITED TO THE SUPPORT. WHERE THE HVAC ANGLE EXTENDS INTO THE TRAY, FLAT PANEL IS INSTALLED BELOW THE V-RIB TOP PANEL USING THE

ATTACIIMENT B ER-MERQEV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS . PAGE B32 OF BSS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE- SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST- (PAGES B37-' i FIRE SCHEMES B55)

ZONE 103740/1 CONT'D SAME METHODOLOGY USED AT THE FIRE PROTECTION FLANGE. %HERE THE HVAC '

INTERFERES WTTH THE SPIJCE PIATE COVERAGE THE COVERAGE WAS ACHIEVED BY g

COVERING THE SIDE WITII FLAT PANEL NOTCHING TIIE PANEL AND PLACING A PANEL BLOCK INSIDE THE COVERAGE AT THE NOTCH TO MAINTAIN THICKNESS, 103589/0 AUX 831'4

X-219 AA/21D Y Y

' ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION IS UNABLE TO INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON 24* WIDE CABLE TRAY PER SPEC. DUE TO KELLUM GRIPS INSTALLED ON CABLES. :

t RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE TRAY AREA AND 12-2 1-5, 9 KELLUM GRIPS WHICH EXTEND ABOVE SIDE RAILS. '

! 104204/0 AUX 790'4* X-180 AAl21A Y Y ISSUE: NEED ENGINEERING DIRECTION FOR THERMO-IAG COVERAGE AT TRANSITION i POLNT BETWEEN 2 TRAYS (30* AND 24*).

RESOLIJTION: ADD AN ADDITIONALSUPPORT I-2, 14-1 1-5,59 MEMBER TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR THERMO-IAG FI).T PANEL UNDERNEATH CABLES.

IJTILIZE 330-1 FLAT PANELS TO PROVIDE A THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE ACROSS THE AIR GAP BETWEEN THE TWO TRAYS AND ENCLOSE CABLES. PROVIDE 330450 FLEXI-BLANKET SHIMS ON THE BOTTOM PANELTO PREVENT CABLES FROM CONTACTING BOTTOM PANEL BACK SIDE. INSTALL BANDING BETWEEN EACH TRAY TO THE GUIDE INSTAT r Fn ON THE NEW SUPPORT. THESE BANDS WILL SERVE AS AN INTERNAL FRAME WORK TO SUPPORT THE 9 SIDE PIECES OF THE ENRO5URE.

~, --vv

A'ITACHMENT B - . ER-ME-082. REV. O UNIQUE CONF!GURATIONS PAGE B33 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BilX3 ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.t DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ~ SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES f AREAf (YIN). (Y/'4) '

TEST (PAGES B37<

FIRE ZONE SCHEMES B5S) 101627/1 EAC 778*-0* X-115B AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: 3 CONDUITS AND JUNLTION BOX ALL REQUIRINO PROTEC110N SHARE A COMMON 4" '

X 4* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT. ' CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TO " BOX-IN* ALL COMMODITIES FOR A 5 FT. DISTANCE.

RESOLITTION: BOXING IN THE CONDUlTS IS 9-1, 10-1 60 NOT ACCEPTABLE. INSTALL STANDARD 330-1 CONDUIT SECTION MATERIAL OVER REQUIRED i CONDUITS. SINCE SO MUCH OF THE TUBE STEEL SURFACE WILL BE COVERED WilEN THE CONDUITS ARE PROTECTED, INSTAU,330-1 PANELS ON TIIE SUPPORT FIRST FOR HEAT PATH (9* RULE), THEN INSTALL MATERIAL ON CONDUITS.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O !

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B34 OF BSS l DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /REWLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE ZONE .

SCHEMES B55)

}

103056/1 SB 832' 24D4 2SB15 Y Y .

ISSUE: FLEX CONDUIT HAS NUMEROUS OBSTRUCTIONS WTIERE IT PENETRADES THROUGH A BLG'XOUT WHICH PREVENTS THE INSTALLATION OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO THE CONDUTT. '

RESOLUTION: A BOX WAS BUILT AROUND THE II-1,1-2 1-6, 61 FLEX CONDUIT AT THE WALL AND EXTENDED OtJT PAST DIE INTERFERENCES SO THAT THERMO-IAG CAN BE INSTAI I FD ON T1{E FLEX CONDUlT. THE BOX WAS CONSTRUCTED 3

OF 330-1 PANELS AND FILLED %TTH TROV'EL GRADE SO THERE IS A MINIMUM OF 3/4*

F COVERAGE ON THE 2* DIA. FLEX CONDUIT.

' WHERE T11E FLEX CONDUITS EXIT THE BOX, '

CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS ARE INSTAT I Fn, THEN A COMBINATION OF HALF ROUNDS AND FLEXI-BLANKET. THE 2* DIA. FLEX CONDUIT AT THE CONCRETE WALL IS PROVIDED %TTH 3 i LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THEN BUTTED TO THE ALL WITH TROWEL GRADE IN AIR GAPS AND AT FLEXI-BLANKET TO WALL INTERFACES.

103305/1 SB 832' 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP CABLE RADIUS IS TO TIGHT TO WRAP WITH FLEXI-BLANKET.

RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT BOX ON CABLE 10-1,It-t 1-5,62 4

TRAY AND CONSTRUCT TEE SECTION AT CONDUIT THEN WRAP FLEXI-BLANKET.

t

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-062, CEV. C UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE C3S OF CSS 1

DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.

DESCRIP110N/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' SUPPOkT BASIS! NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST FIRE (PAGES B37- -

SCHEMES BS5)

ZONE l 104194/0 i AB 800* X-180 AA/2ta Y Y ISSUE 1: AIR DROPS FROM THROUGH WALL SLTEVE3 (TWS) TO CABLE "IRAY REQUIRE PROGCTION.

ISSUE 2: INSUFFICIENT SPACE EXIST FOR AIR DROPS INTO TRAY CANNOT INSTALL DETAIL 34.

I ISSUE 3: PIPE WILL HAVE 0* CLEARANCE AFTER PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE IS INFTALLED.

P,ESOLUTION 1 & 2: BOX IN TWS %TTH TRAY 10-1,It-I 63 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.

RESOLUTION 3: STRESS SKIN MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE INSTALLED DUE TO PIPE INTERFERENCE.

102800/0 AB 790* X-180 AA/21 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP FROM TRAY TO WALL DOES NOT HAVE CONDUIT SLEEVE.

RESOLUTION: BOX AIR DROP AT WALL AND 10-1. I t-1 1-5, 64 FORM COMMON ENCLOSURE WTTH CABLE TRAY.

10226S/0 AB 832* X-219 AA/23d Y Y ISSUE: CABLE GRIP STRUCTURE IS NOT ADDRESSED AS PART OF ENCLOSURE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL SCORED V-RIBBED SIDE Il-1 1-5, 9 AND TOP PANELS SIMILARTO STANDARD DETAIL 5-5.

- - - - _ , ~ _ _

g ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482. REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B36 OF B55

^

i

-DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM- FIRE ,. lSUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION :

SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL '(YIN) (YIN) TEST . (PAGES B37-FIRE; . !

SCHEMES B55)

ZONE--

102889/0 AB 790* X-174 AA12ta N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION I FOR COVERING TWO ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD ;

FITTINGS. BETWEEN WHICH THE GAP 15114*.

RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE BOTH LBDs IN A 9-1. 10-1 1-5.41 COMMON THERMO-LAG 330-1 BOX 10-2 i CONFIGURATION. USE TYPICAL DETAIL 6-1 FOR DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND r CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES. 1 103855/! SB 832* % 2SE16 Y Y ISSUE: THERE IS AN INTERFERENCE FROM A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT WHICH PREVENTS COVERAGE OF " IRE AIR DROP FROM THE - I CONTAINMENT PENETRATION TO THE CABLE 4 TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD i i '

DETAIIE 7-3 AND 7-4. ,

4 ,

i RESOLUTION: PROVIDE SLEEVES AT BOTH THE II-I I-5. 44 ;

l CONTAINMENTPENETRATION AND ATTHE 1 CABLE TRAY SO THAT THERMO-LAG CAN BE }

INSTAT 1 FD IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL ,

DETAIIS 7-3 AND 7-4. !

{

i f ..

i ?

i i

4, .

+

o ,

x. - - - - - - . - - + - - - . , v v - .e , e . .-,, y ,. -

-m+ . - - - . , , , s. .. ,, g.,

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B37 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCAIREV I.

CONTINUITY OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT %TTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC 2.

EFFECTIVE TIIICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSITTENT WITH TEs t tu CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC l 3.

THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPUCABLE) IS CONSISTENT %Tril TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 4.

THE APPUCATION OR END USE OF TiiE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WTTi{ Tes a eu CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5.

THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUAUFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. GENERIC TO PR 6.

SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TEs a eD CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGURATI GENERIC WOULD ENilANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHmLDING EFFECTS. TORTUROUS PATIL ETC.).

7.

THE EFFECTIVE WIDTH OF THE ". TRAYS ACT AS A SINGLE 30* OR 36* WIDE TRAY WHICH HAVE BEEN TESTED (1-2,12-1,14-10247113 I). ALL JOINTS ARE REINFORCED BY TESTED METHODS. THE BOTTOM PANEL IS SECURED TO EVERY OTHER RU EACH TRAY. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INSIDE THE ENVELOPE (AT THE SIDERAILS BETWEEN THE TRAYS) AIDS ]I STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND TIIERMAL PROTECTION.

8.

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 2 LAYERS OF 330-1 PANE 13 ON A JUNCTION BOX HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED 101282/IVIA S J-BOX IS MOUNTED TO A STRUCTURAL COLUMN WIHCH REDUCES POTEN11AL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND W HEAT SINK. ALL JOINTS HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WTTH QUAUFIED TECHNIQUES (STITCHING AND STRE ADDITIONAL TIE WIRES WERE USED TO SECURE PIECES TOGETHER FOR TFE COVER ASSEMBLY. THE COVE NORMAL TEMPERATURES (3/32* MAX. GAP) AND DUE TO EXPANSION OF THE MATERIAL DURING SUBUMATIO LAYER FORMATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERA 111RES, WILL COMPLETELY SEAL. THE CONFIGURATION HAS MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME THAN A TYPICAL J-BOX ENVELOPE WHICH WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES.' THEREFORE, SINCE STRUCTURALINTEGRITY AND THERMAL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED. THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABL 9.

ALL JOINTS UTIUZED IN THE

BOX

CONFIGURATION UTIUZE EITHER THE SCORE AND FOLD METHODS 102160/0 %TTH GRADE BUILDUP OR HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITH TESTED METHODS (TIE WIRES / STRESS SKIN). THE AIR 10421711 NOT CONTACT THERMO-LAG PANEL BACK SIDE SURFACES AND ARE WRAPPED %TTH SILTEMP. THE 103589/0 LARGE VOLUME AND THERMAL MASS OF THE CABLES IN CONJUNCHON WITH THE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE 102265/DOF LAG 330-I PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. THEREFOR THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSE

~ . _ _ _____.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME482. REV. O UNIQUE COMFIGURATIONS PAGE B30 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASISINOTES DCA/REV

10. i THE USE OF 330460 FLEX 1-BLANKET ON CABLE AIR DROPS OF VARIOUS SIZES (FROM A MNGLE CABLE103013/6 TO A LA ti BUNDLE HAS BEEN QUAUFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1. TIIE INTERFACE BETWEEN CABLE BUNDLES ENTERING A HORrl,ONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE WAS ALSO QUA.UFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TIIOSE TO CONS '{

i Ti1E CURB EXTENSION) ARE REINFORCED %1TH TEGINIQUES QUAUFIED BY TEST. THE INTERFACE OF THE 330 EMBEDDED SLEEVES HAS BEEN SECURED Wml BANDING AROUND THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECHANICAL i ATTACilMENT AND LARGE

FILL ET WELD

BUILDUP OF TROWEL GRADE 330460 MATERIAL FOR THERM AL PROTE [

] Tile MATERIAL TlHCKNESSES AND APPUCATIONS IIAVE BEEN BOUNDED BY TEST. LARGER AIR DROP B!

i ARE LESS THERMALLY DEM ANDING (DUE TO CABLE BUNDLE MASS) THAN TIIOSE TESTED. ADDITIONALLY THE C WALL LIMITS POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND HAS IIEAT SINK EFFECTS AT EMBEDDED SLEEVE INTERFACES.

TilEREFORE TIIE STRUCT"RAL INTEGRITY AND TIIERMAL ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN ADE ADDRESSED. !

[

I 1. i PROTECTION OF Tile FLEX CONDUIT ASSOGATED WITH Tile PT IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED VIA SCIIEME 11-1103409/S WHICH Ul i LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKETTO PROTECT A SINGLE CABLE AIR DROP. THIS PT CONFIGURATION IS SIMIL i REMOVABLE COVER J-BOX ENCLOSURE DESCRIBED IN NOTE 8. TWO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES EXIST. ONE, IS THAT DIE l

J-BOX IS A SYMMETRICAL COMPONENT. TWO, IS THAT TIIE PT ENCLOSURE IIAS A PROTRUDING STAINLESS STEEL

- INSTRUMENT TUBE (FOR PT TEST PROPOSES). THE FIRST ASPECT WAS ADDRESSED BY CONSTRUCTING A STEEL I i FRAMEWORK ASSEMBLY AROUND THE PT TO ENABLE SECURE ATTACilMENT OF TIIE THERMO-LAG PANEL LAYERS.

) SECOND ASPECT WAS ADDRESSED BY ENCLOSING THE PROTRUDING INSTRUMENT TUBING WITH 1* DIA. PREFAB 33 il CONDUIT SECHONS (1/2* NOMINAL THICKNESS). THIS CREATED A THERMO-LAG

SLEEVE

WHICH WAS THEN ,!F TilERMO-LAG 330-70 CONFORMABLE CERAMIC BULK FIBER MATERIAL FOR A DEPTH OF 4* (MIN.). THIS ARRANGE PROVIDES AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION INTO THE ENCLOSURE. ALL OTHER

'i j :

TIIERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE DESIGN ARE ADDRESSED BY NOTE 8.

. 12.

DUE TO TIIE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODITIES (PROTRUDI 103472/1 i PORTIONS OF Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS AND THE MASS OF TIIE CABLE TRAYS) THE THERMAL 10348911 PROTECTION AFFORDED BY TIIE ~ BOX

DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDmON,THE LARGEST SURFACE OF Tile PROTECTIVE l

ENVELOPES IS ACTUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE IT.JM THAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A II I SINK. THEREFORE, THE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF TIIE

BOX *. TIIIS HAS

! BEEN CONSERVATIVELY ADDRESSED VIA MECHANICALLY ATTACHING THE ENCLOSURES TO DIE CONCRETE W IIILE BOLT FASTENERS. ADDIT 10NALLY, SINCE TIIE ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITH DCA 103472 INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF A LARGE BANK OF SLEEVES (40), Tile OVERALL LENGTil OF THE ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY S*- 6*. TO COMPENSATE FOR Tills LARGE SPAN, UNISTRUT MEMBERS WERE WELDED ACROSS TWO SUPPORTS FOR TIIE MIDDLE TRAY IN THE STACK OF THREE TRAYS. .THE UNISTRUT SPANS DIE ENTIRE LENGT11 OF TIIE SIDE OF THE ENCLOSU!

FROM TIIE WALL AND IS USED TO SUPPORT TIIE PANELS WITH T1E WIRES. THE TIIERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURE!

! Tile CABLE TRAY ON Tile BOTTOM OF BOTH BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA T1E WIRES ATTACIIED TO THE RUNGS OF [

CABLE TRAYS. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN REINFORCED %TTH QUA

(" STITCHING

AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT). THEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CONSERVATIVE MECHANICAL !

t ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUES, THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY UMITATIONS OF l THERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. !

] j

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE C39 OF LSS l NOTE Au.tITANCE BASIS / NOTES .

DCNREY ,

13.

TIIIS CONFIG'JRATION CONSISTS OF 2 LARGE ADJACENT J-BOXES. ONE MEASURES 44* HIGH X 20* WIDE X 103634/2 OTHER MEASURES 50* HIGH X 20" WIDE X 24* DEEP. BOTH ARE WALL MOUNTED. EACH HAS TWO $* DIA. COND 104245

. ENTERING FROM THE BOTTOM AND EXITING FROM THE TOP. EACH IS ENCLOSED SEPARATELY WITH 11 PANELS. HOWEVER. DUE TO LACK OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE J-BOXES %TITI FLAT PANELS INSTALLED,THE SECOND LAYER (330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS) ENVELOPS BOTH BOX ENCLOSURES. THE SPECIFIC DETAILS OF THE DCA INSTALLATION OF Tile BANDING ON THIS OITTER LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS. THE USE OF ANGLE IRON MOUNTED STRUCTURE TO SERVE AS ATTACHMENT POINTS FOR THE BANDING IS AN ACCEPTABLE DEVIATION FROM (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT SERVES THE SAME FUNCTION IN SECURI ;.

PANE 13. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OUTER IAYER ErrilER UTILIZE THE SCORE AND FOLD TEC STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT OR ARE STITCHED WITH TIE WIRES. THE CONDUIT INTERFACES WITH THE E ,

HAVE ALL BEEN REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN QUALIFIED BY SCHEME 10-1. THE SCALING ISSUE ASSO !

CONFIGURATION (SCliEME 10-1 QUALIFIED 2 LAYERS ON 18" X 12* X 6" J-BOXES) IS READILY 3USTIFIED DUE TO !!

INCREASED THERMAL MASS OF TijE BOXES AND TiiE FACT THAT ONE ENTIRE SURFACE OF THE *ENCLOSUP.E* IS THE '

CONCRETE WALL. THIS PREVENTS EXPOSURE ON THAT SIDE AND ACIS AS A HEATSINK. THE USE OF A CO OF V-RIBBED PANELS IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON LARGE CABLE TRAY TESTS WHICH QUALIFIED STITCHI ON liORIZONTAL BUTT JOINTS FOR A 36* CABLE TRAY WITH TEE SECTION (SCHEME l-2) AND STRESS SKI ON A 30* WIDE TPAY WITil TEE SECTION. THEREFORE, BOTH THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF THE CONFIOURATION llAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. DCA 104245 IDENTIFIED INTERFERENCES WHICH PR BAND SPACING SPACING FROM BEING OBTAINED. ADDITIONAL ANGLES AND BANDING WAS INSTAIIFn TO OBTAINIM REQUIREMENTS.

! 14.

THE USE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKtT TO PRu a tCT CABLE AIR DROPS OF VARIOUS SIZES (UP TO10422211 6* DIA. B QUALIFIED VIA SCliEME Il-1. LARGER CABLE BUNDLES ARE ACCEPTABLE DUE TO INCREASED THERMAL M SECURING TiiE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES TO THE TRAY RUNGS (INSIDE THE TRAY ENVELOPE) WITH BANDI POSIT 1VE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT. THE USE OF SHIM BLOCKS ON THE TRAY ENVELOPE PROVIDES MATERIAL AND ENHANCES ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS (ALSO PROVIDES MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLU ATTACHMENT DETAIL USING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND THE END OF THE CABLE TRAYS TO FORM A THE 9/16' STAPLES. 330460(TROWEL GRADE) FIRESTOP HAS BEEN QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME Il-1 AND IS MECHANICALLY FOR THE 9' RULE, DEVIATION IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE USE OF DOUBLE LAYER 330-1 PANELS ON THE TRAY SUPPORT AND THE HEAT SINK EFFECT OF THE ADJACENT 18* DIA. PIPE.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-C82, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B40 OF BSS NOi6 ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 15.

THIS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TFAY PRUTECITON IN THAT INTERFERE 103574/0 PREVENT INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED PANELS ON TRAY BOTTOM OR SIDE RAIL SURFACES IN LOC 4UZED AREAS (i.e.,6* 104245/0 I LONG AREAS ON SIDE RAILS OR ACROSS CABLE TRAY BOTTOMS). THE METHOD USED TO PROTEC1' THE CABLES IS PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER THE CABLES AND TO INSTALL 330-I PANELS INSIDE THE TR RAILS. THE TOP PORTION OF THE ENVELOPE IS CONSTRUCTED OF V-RIB 3ED PANEL MATERIAL. THIS RESULTS IN

, EXTERIOR SURFACES BEING EXPOSED OR GAPS IN PANEL COVERAGE UNDER TIIE CABLES FOR A 6* DISTANC SIDE OF THE EXPOSED SIDE RAIL PORTION. V-RIB PANELS OVERLAP BOTH THE 330-660 FLEXI-BIANKET INSTALLED THE CABLES AND THE FLAT PANEL PIECES INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAY BY 9*-II* FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH 1- PROTECTION. TIIIS CONFIGURATION UTIUZES ASPECT 3 OF SCIIEME II-I FOR QUAUFICAT10N OF 2 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET AND THE CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES USTED FOR 330-1 PANEL THICKNESS AND 9' 4tULE QUAUFICA SIIIELDING EFFECT OF THE INTERFERING COMMODITY (e.g., UNISTRUT) AND THE IDCAUZED ARE.* OF EXPOSED STEEL CREATE A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT INTRUSION WITHOUT COMPROMISING STRUCTURALINTEGRITY OF THE CABL TRAY. SINCE THE EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF MATERIAL UTIUZED HAS BEEN QUALIFIED FOR PROTECTION OF CABLI AND AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION SYSTEM COVERAGE IS PROVIDED IN THE AREA, TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEFTAF?.E.

16.

ItC CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECTION IN TilAT INTERFERENC 104087/0 PREVEIC1F'STALLATION OF V-RIBBED 330-1 PANELS ON ONE SIDERAIL AND ON THE BOTTOM OF A RADIAL BEND FOR MINOR

(< 6*) DISTANCES. IN EACH CASE. THE TRAY ENVELOPE WAS EXTENDED USING 330-I FLAT PANEL TO ENCLOSE THE INTERFERENCE FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATH PROTECTION. THERMO-LAG 330-70 CONFORMABLE CERAMIC F INSULATION MATERIAL IS UTIUZED TO FILL CAVITY AREAS WITHIN THE TRAY ENVELOPE EXTENSION AND HENCE i A TORTUROUS PATil TO PREVENT SIGNIFICANT IIEAT INTRUSION INTO THE TRAY. THIS METHOD PROVIDES AN !

EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO THAT PROVIDED BY 330-I PANEL MATERIAL INSTAT.T rn FOR A 9* DISTANC QUAUFIED BY TEST. JOINTS ARE REINFORCED VIA QUAUFIED TECHNIQUES (Le., TIE WIRE

STITCHING

AND STRESS SKIN OVERLAP). TIIEREFORE, TIIERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY CONSIDERATIONS HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY THIS CONFIGURATION.

17.

T111S CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD J-BOX COVERAGE DETAILS. TO COMPENSA 104060/0 LOCAUZED AREA ON THE J-BOX UNDERSIDE WHERE AN INTERFERING CONDUIT (WHICH IS ALSO THE PREVENT COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF PANELS, A STRESS SKIN AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP WAS UTIUZED. THE 330-1 PREFAB MATERIAL ON THE INTERFERING CONDUIT WAS THEREFORE EFFECTIVELY INCORPORATED INTO THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FOR Tile J-BOX. THE THERMO-LAG INSTALLED ON THE CONDUIT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP IN THE kNTERFERENCE AREA PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO THA QUAUFIED ON J-BOXES VIA SCHEME 10-2. THE USE OF STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENTIN THE AREA OF INTERF ENSURES THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE MATERIAL.

~

ATTACHMENT B ER-MEC2, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B41 OF BSS NOTE . ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES I DCA/REV '

18.

THE PRut tCTION OF THE CABLES WITH FLEXI-BLANKET AND THE ELASTOMER FIRE SEALS HAVE BEEN TEu tu. 1013S7/0 I ALTIIOUGH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR THERMO-LAG EXTENDING THROUGH A FIRE STOP WAS 330-1 1 1/2 THE USE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BIANKET THROUGH THE FIRE STOP WILL PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE INSTALLATION W CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE FLEXI-BIANKET BUNDLES RESTING ON THE EXPOSED CABLE TRAY, ALTHOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY FIRE TESTED, IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY THE EXPOSED TRAY BECAUSE THE 8*

LIMIT ON THE EXPOSED PORTION MEANS THAT THERE IS ONLY A MINOR AMOUNT OF EXPOSED TRAY AND THE BLANKET ONLY COMES IN CONTACT WITH A SINGLE EXPOSED TRAY RUNG. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS BASICALLY CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WHERE IT DEVIATES F THESE CONFIGURATIONS THE DIFFERENCES A.RE MINOR AND DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE CORRELATI TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE MATEP.IAL CONTINUITY AND THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED.

19.

ALL JOINTS UTILIZED IN THE TRAY EAa bNSION

BOX

CONFIGURATION UTILIZE THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD 102882/D TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AND HAVE BEEN REINFORCED USING Ten to METHODS (TIE WIRES / STRESS SKIN).

TRAY (ABOVE) AND TiiE J-BOX (BELOW) LEND STRUCRJRAL STABILITY TO THE OVERALL ENVELOPE CONSTRU AIR DROP CABLES DO NOT CONTACT THERMO-LAG PANEL BACK SIDE SURFACES. THE LARGE ENCLOSED AIR V THERMAL MASS OF THE CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITH TiiE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF THERMO-LAG 3 PANEIS ON CABLE TRAYS WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. THEREFORE. TIIE THER STRUCIURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.

20.

DETAIL 8-3 ALLOWS USE OF A 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON CABLE TRAY BOTTOMS FOR A MAXIMUM LENGTH OF I2*. TIUS 104078/0

. CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM THE 12" (MAX.) LENGTH DUE TO PRESENCE OF A 24* DIA. PIPE %THI INSUFFICIE CLEARANCE FOR V-RIBBED PANEL FLAT PANELS WERE INSTAT I Fn AS DESCRIBED TO SPAN THE DTTERFERING THE USE CF A SINGLE LAYER OF FIAT PANELS ON 18* C I2* C 6* J-BOXES WAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 10-2.

ADDITIONALLY, SINGLE LAYER OF FLAT PANELS ON LARGE LATERAL BEND FITTINGS (S* DIA. CONDUIT) WAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 9-I. THEREFORE. DUE TO DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF SINGLE FIAT PANEL LAYERS AN SINK EFFECTS OF TIIE LARGE PIPE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. THE ADDITION OF THE SMALL PIECE OF FLAT PANEL MATERIALTO BUILD UP TlHCKNESS AT A SUPPORT (NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THETRAY ABOVE)IS AN METHOD OF PROVIDING PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. REQUIRED THICKNESS I I MAINTAINED AND THE PIECE IS SECURE IN PLACE WITH TIE WIRES.

' ATTAGIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B42 OF B55 4

NOTE ' ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES -

~

DCAIREV

21. ISSUE 1:

THIS CONFIGURATION DEVIAa tu FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY MATERIAL INSTALLATION SINCE THE 330-1 103912/0 PANEL COVERAGE ON THE TRAY BOTTOM IS INTERRUPTED AND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET MAMERIAL USED TO INTERFERING PIPE %TI111N THE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET (QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME I1 1) is PROVIDED UNDER THE 4 LAYERS (t/2* THICK EA. BEFORE COMPRESSION) OF 330-70 CONFORMABLE CERAMIC FIBER INSULATING MATERIAL AND STAINLESS STEEL JA THERMAL PROTECTION IS FURTHER ENHANCED BY WRAPPING 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND THE STAINLESS STEEL JACKETING. THE MINOR CAVITY AREA BETWEEN THE 330-1 PANELS ON THE TRAY UNDERSIDE IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL THE 330460 LAYERS AROUND THE INTERFERING PI SECURED TO THE ADJACENT 330-1 PANELS %TTH STAPLES AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. TO ENABG INSULA INSTALLED ON ANOTHER 2* DIA. PIPE DIRECTLY BELOW THE INTERFERING PIPE DESCRIBED ABOVE, DCA 10391210 PERMITTED A MINOR AREA OF THE OUTER 330460 MATERIAL (INSTALLED AROUND THE STAINLESS STE BE

NOTCHED

AND THE AREA FILLED IN WITH 330460 TROWEL GRADE. THE OVERALL LENGTH OF THE CABLE TR ENVELOPE WITHOUT 330-1 PANELS UNDERNEATH THE TRAY IS LESS THAN 6*. BASED ON THE CONSERVATIVE USE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET BOTH INSIDE THE TRAY (UNDER THE CABLES) AND AROUND THE IIITERFERING PIPE (AS MODI ABOVE), SHIELDING EFFECTS AND TORTUROUS PATH CREATED BY THE 2 INSULATED PIPES AND MINOR AREA INVOLVED.

THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

ISSUE 2:

THE BOX CONFIGURATION ENCLOSING THE CABMS WHIGI DROP FROM A VERTICAL 30* TRAY (MOUNTED AGAINST A WALL) INTO A HOPJZONTAL 30* TRAY IS CONSTRUCTED USING JOINT UPGRADE TECl!NIQUES QUAI TEST 12-1. THE VERTICAL PORTION OF THE ENCLOSURE IS SECURED TO STRUCTURE %TTH SCREWS FOR POSITIVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT. SHIMS ARE PROVIDED ON T:IE BOTTOM (HORIZONTAL) TRAY TO PREVENT CABLES CONTACTING THE PANEL BACKSIDE WHICH SPANS BETWEEN THE 2 TRAYS. THE SHIMS ALSO SUPPORT THIS PAN PREVENT POTENTIAL SAG. THE CABLES ARE WRAPPED WTTH SILTEMP TO PRECLUDE DAMAGE FROM STRESS INSTALLATION. THE ADDI110NAL 330-1 PANEL MATERIAL INSTAI i m AS SHIMS, THE WALL MOUNTED CONFIGURATION OF THE VERTICAL TRAY AND THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME %TTHIN THE

BOX

ENCLOSURE ALL ENHANCE THE TH PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENCLOSURE. THEREFORE, BASED ON CONSERVATIVE STRUCTURAL MOUNTING AND PROVEN JGINT REINFORCEMENT IN CONJUNCTION %TTH OBVIOUS THERMAL BENEFITS, THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

22.

' THE LBD ENCLOSURE RESOLUTION EMPLOYS A ONE PIECE STRESS 5RIN CAP DESIGN BASED ON TYPICAL DETAIL 103874/1

'WHERE THE CONDUIT SUPPO.'tT INTERFERES %TTH THE LBD BOX / CONDUIT REINFORCEMENT, THE APPLICATION OF STRESS SKIN WAS NOTCHED IN THE AREA OF SUPPORT BUT EXTENDED BEYOND THE SUPPORTTO ALLOW BANDING. T ENTERING THE PROTECTED CABLE TRAY IS INSTAT r m IN ACCORDANCE %TTH T YPICAL DETAI13 3-4 OPTION 2 AN

~

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B43 OF BS5 NOTE nCCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCAfREV 23.

ON THE 810' ELEVATION, TWO LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS HAVE BEEN INSTAI_tyn ON A JUNCTION BOX. THIS ARRANGEMENT Ic3884/1 l

HAS BEEN TESTED AND FOUND ADEQUATE VIA TEST SCHEME 10-1. THE J-BOX IS MOUNTED TO STRUCTURE 10300lr0 %T REDUCES POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND %1LL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. A11 JOINTS UTIUZED IN THE BOX -ll' CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN INSTAILED USING THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD %1TH TROWTL GRADE BUILD-BEEN REINFORCED WITH TEu tu METHODS (TIE %TRES/ STRESS SKIN). THE ESSENTIAL CABLES ARE ENCASED AND DO NOT CONTACT THERMO-LAG PANELS. THE LARGE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME AND THERMAL MASS OF THE COMMODITIES WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. ON THE 832' ELMATION THE BOX D EXTENDS FROM THE PENETRATION SEAL TO A FIRE STOP IN TRAY T24BAEG24. ESSENTIAL CONDUIT C-248419 ,i FROM THE SIDE OF THE BOX. THERMO-LAG TO FIRE STOP INTERFACE WAS TEutu IN SCHEME 1-2. THE CONDU LNTERFACE WAS UP GRADED AS PROVIDED FOR JUNCTION BOXES PER DETAIL 2-3 AND PER TEST SCHEME 9-1.

24.

ALL SEAMS AND JOINTS OF THE BOX DESIGN HAVE BEEN INSTALLED USING THE SCORE AND FOLD METHO 103575/0 GRADE BUILD-UP OR HAVE BEEN REINFORCED USING THE WIRES. THE AIR DROP CABLES DO NOT CON FAC LAG PANELS, AS THEY ARE PROTECTED %TTH SILTEMP BLANKET. THE LARGE ENCLOSED AIR VOLT!ME AND THERMAL MASS OF THE CABLES IN CONJUNCTION %TTH THE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANE CABLE TRAYS WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. THE FIRE STOP INSTALLED IN TR WILL ADEQUATELY SEAL THE ENCLOSURE. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THERMO-LAG AND FIRE STOP ASSEMBLIES W DEMONSTRATED IN TEST SCHEME l-2.

25.

THE BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SHIMS PRESENT IN DCA 103533/0 HAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY 1035334 BEEN INC PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL SHIMS HOWEVER. ARE NO DIFFERENTTHAN LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS WHIGI HAS BEEN TEu tu IN TEST SCHEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) THE MULTIPLE -

LAYERS OF 330-1 PANEL.S PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTH! QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVAIIABLE FOR S LOCALIZED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WTTHIN THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT THE SHIM BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TEM tu UPGRADE JOINTING METHODS AS WELL AS THE S FOLD TECHNIQUE. THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES THAT THE STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAI CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION %TTH UPGRADED JOINT METHODS ENSURES INTEGR11Y OF THE JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. THE OVERALL WIDTH OF THE BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AR WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36* CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOS ALTHOUGH THE BOXED-IN DESIGN COMMUNICATES TWO SEPARATE LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 CABLE TRAYS, THE BOX DOES NOT COMPROMISE THE SAFE SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY OF THE PIANT. IN CONCLUSION, THIS INST A'LLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND 15 ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

.p

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O !

UN!QUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B44 OF BSS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES {

DCA/REV l 26.

THE INSTALLATION DESCRIBED ON DCA 103533/0 REPRESENTS A THICKNESS DEVIATION FORM THE STANDARD 103533/0 REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTING SUPPORTS FOR ESSENTIAL RACEWAYS. ALTIIOUGH THE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 1/2 WAS NOT MAINTAINED. THE HORIZONTAL BOTTOM OF THE SUPPORT WAS COVERED %TTH = 1/4* THICK 330-1 PANEL INi

' ADDITION, ONE ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-I PANEL WAS INSTALLED TO VERTICALLY ENCLOSE THE BOTTOM 7/16' OF THE SUPPORT. EVEN THOUGH TIIE REQUIRED 1/2* TillCKNESS IS NOT MAINTAINED, THE 1/4' THICK PANEL WILL PROVIDE A DEGREE OF PROTECTION MINIMIZING THE HEAT TRANSFER INTO THE SUPPORT. THE TORTUROUS HEAT PATH THA ,

SUPPORT ARRANGEMENT PRESENTS ALSO MINIMIZES HEAT TRANSFER INTO TIIE ESSENTIAL COMMODITY. Tile !

INSTRUMENT TUBING INSTALLED BELOW TIIE SUPPORT WILL FUNCTION AS SHIELDING TO MINIMIZE RADIANT HEAT i TRANSFER INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE SUPPORT. TiiE CONDUITSUPPORT IS PHYSICALLY ATTACllED TO THE CONCRETEI WALL WhaCH ACTS AS A LARGE IIEAT SINK. THE 1/4* TIIICK 330-1 PANEL. ALTHOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY A TESTED '

CONFIGURATION, IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES 1,3. 4, AND 5, AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

[;

, 27.

THIS CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF TWO ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS PROTECTED BY 330-1 PANELS %TrH ESSENTIAL 103550il AIR DROPS COMMUNICATING BETWEEN THE TWO TRAYS, PROTECTED BY 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP. NON ESSENTIAL l

CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND NON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS ARE ALSO PROTECTED BY BLANKET WHERE TIIE CABLE AIR DROP EXITS THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. THERE IS NO TESTED CONFIGURATION FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED THROUGH Tile FIRE STOP MATERIAL HOWEVER, FLEXI-BIANKET INSTALLATION THROUGH Tile 330-1 PANEL (END CAP) DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCHEME 11-1. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET /330-1 PANEL END CAP !NTER SEALED WTTH 330-660 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL. 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IIAS BEEN INSTALLED ALL AROISD 'IllE FIRE STOP, TO ENSURE A COMPLETE FIRE BARRIER EXISTS %TTH NO OPENINGS OR VOIDS. ALTHOUGli THE t.sR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE /330-1 PANEL INTERFACE DOES NOT EXACTLY REPLICATE TEST SCIIEME 11-I. THE INSTALLA ,

MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES 1-S AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

i THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO AVOID THE PIPE INTERFEREN LOCATED ABOVE THE CABLE TRAY). THIS MODIFICATION CONSISTS OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS MOUNTED INSIDE TH TRAY (IN TIIE AREA OF THE LVTERFERENCE) AND INSTALLED VIA TIE WIRES AND STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE U PER BOTTOM JOINT REQUIREMENTS. ALTHOUGH THE CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE DOES NOT EXACTLY i REPLICATE AS-IS. TEST SCHEME 11-1. Ti1E INSTALLATION MEETS 111E REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES l-S AND IS ACC I

28. b THE AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE RESEMBLES TEST SCHEME 11-I %TTH EXCEPTION OF THE FLEXI-BLANKE 104217!! ,

ATTACHMENT AT Tile CONDUIT / WALL INTERFACE (= 3* TO 4* IN LENGTH). SINCE THE SECOND AND THIRD LAYERS FLEXI-BLANKET COULD NOT BE COMPLETELY WRAPPED AROUND THE CONDUTT, THE FLEXI-BLANKET WAS MODIFIED BY BUTTING EDGES OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE CONCRETE WALL. T11ESE EDGES / SEAMS WERE THEN FILLED; TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL %TTH A FINAL 11/16* WFT BUILDUP AT THE THIRD (OUTER) LAYER / WALL INTERFACE. T!

ACCEPTABILITY OF THIS INSTALLATION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES: THE FIRST LAYER AROUND THE:

CONDUIT PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IS CONTINUOUS; THE SECOND AND TlHRD LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET ARE BUTTED TO i

THE CONCRETE WALL (HEAT SINR) %TTH A TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP; THE INSTALLATION RESEMBLES TYPICAL DETAILS 4-l 3.I. AND 4-7.1 AND THE AREA IS PROTECTED BY AUTOMAT 1C SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION.

- n -n ---,4

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B45 OF BS5 l NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASISINOTES DCA/REV 29.

THE BOX DESIGN IIAS BEEN FREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED BY ATTACilMENT A. THE AIR DROP /FLEXI-BLANKET104226/0 CONFIGU PENETRATING THE BOX DESIGN RESEMBLES TEST SCHEME II-I WTTH EXCEITION OF THE COLLAR DESIGN. THE STRES 104048/0 SKIN AND IIII6* TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AT THE AIR DROP / BOX INTERFACE ENSURES CONTINUTTY OF MATERIAL, TillCKNESS OF MATERIAL, AND EQUIVALENT STRUCTURAL LNTEGRITY AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO Tile STAPLING / FLARE OUT DESIGN PRESENTED IN TEST SC (EME Il-L 30.

FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP INSTALLATION BETWEEN CABLE TRAYS AS SHOWN ON DETAIL S-12 HAS BEEN EVALUATE 103935/0 SEPARATELY BY ATTACilMENT A. THE INSTALLATION OF A RELATIVELY SilORT LENGTil OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON TII CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL (VERSUS 330-1 V-RIBBED BOARD) AND TIIE 2* TO 4* OVERLAP OF THE END OF THE CABLE TR ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: TIIE FLAT BOARD PROVIDES THE SAME EQUIVALENTTHICKNESS AS A 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL: TIIERE IS NO DISCONTINUITY OF MATERIA 14 ALL JOINTS ARE UPGRADED PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, AND TIIE INSTALLATION EXilIBITS NO IMPACT ON STRUCTURAL LNTEGRITY OF THE PROTECRVE ENCLOSURE.

FURTIIERMORE,330-1 FLAT BOARD IIAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN TEST SCHEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOX PROTECTION WHICli IS REPRESENTA' TIVE OF TIIE SMALL LENGTII OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD USED FOR THIS INSTALLATI AUTOM ATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION IS PROVIDED IN TIIE AREA.

j 31.

THIS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECTION IN THAT103582/0 SPRINKLE !

INTERFERENCES PREVENT INSTALLATION OF THE BOTTOM PANEL FOR AN APPROXIMATE 12* LENGTH ACROSS TRAY. TIIE METHOD USED TO PROTECT THE CABLES WAS TO INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD TIE WIRED TO Tile CAB RUNGS THROUGH THE AREA OF THE SPRINKLER HEAD INTERFERENCE. THE FLAT BOARD WAS CHAMFERED, AS REQUIRED.

TO PROVIDE = I/8" CLEARANCE ABOVE THE SPRINKLER HEAD. 330-1 FLAT BOARD WAS ALSO INSTAT I Fn INSIDE T CABLE TRAY (BELOW TIIE CABLES), INSIDE THE SIDE RAILS AND BELOW THE TOP (OUTER) 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL ALL SPACE BETWEEN RUNGS WAS FILLED WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AS WELL AS THE SPACE BETWEE TOP PANEL AND INNER TOP PANEL. ALTHOUGH THIS CONFIGURATION DOES NOT REPLICATE ANY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE IN THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE MAINTAINS THE MINIMUM TESTED THICKNESS, THE FIRE BARRIER MATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS THE METHOD OF SUPPORT DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DEVIATE FROM THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, AND TiiERE IS AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION IN Tile AREA. TIIE FACT TIIAT THE INTERFERENCE IS A SPRINKLER HEAD PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CREDENCE AS TO Tite ACCEPTABILI DESIGN, IN TIIAT THE SPRINKLER IIEAD WILL ACIUATE MINIMIZJNG HEAT INPUT TO TIIIS SECTION.

32.

THE INSTALLATION OF ONE LAYER OF 330-I FLAT BOARD PROVIDES ADEQUATE l-IIOUR PROTECTION AS DOCUME 103847/0 TEST SCllEME 10-2. THE ADDITION OF ONE LAYER OF 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL ENHANCES THE OVERALL DESIGN BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FOR SUBLIMING. FURTHERMORE,'IHE COMMON ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION TECIINIQUE WILL NOT IMPACT OR DEGRADE THE OVERALL DESIGN. THIS INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

33.

WITH THE INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN ONTO TIIE GROUND CABLE AND GROUNDING CLAMP, THE TROWEL 10379210 GRADE / STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON THE 4* CONDUIT CLOSELY RESEMBLES TEST SCHEMES 9-1 AND 9-2.111E SM OCCUPIED BY TIIE GROUNDING CLAMP / GROUND CABLE, THE FACT THAT THE REMAINDER OF Tile RADLM. BEND IIAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY UPGRADED, AND THE FACT THAT THE AREA IS PROVIDED WITH AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION SUPPORT THE ACCEPTABIIJTY OF TlHS INSTALLATION.

i

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B46 OF BS5 NOTE w.

ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV l!

34. -

DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODmES (PROTRUDING 103680/0 PORTIONS OF TIIE EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS, JUNCTION BOX, AND THE MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS) THE THERMAL PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE

BOX

DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDmON, THE LARGEST SURFACE OF TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES IS ACTUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WIIIGI PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AN A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE, THE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE

BOX *.

ADDITIONALLY, SINCE TIIE ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITII DCA 103680 INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE COMMODITIES. THE OVERALL WIDTH OF THE ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY S*- 2*. TO COMPENSATE FOR THIS LA SPAN, A STRUCTURAL FRAME HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO CABLE TRAY HANGERS AND LOCATED ABOVE TIIE TOP OF Tile CABLE TRAY OF CONCERN. HOWEVER THE OVERALL WEIGIIT OF THE BOX ASSEMBLY 15 SHARED BETWEEN THE BOX AND CABLE TRAY AS WELL AS THE MODIFIED STRUCTURALSTEEI THE THERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECUR CABLE TRAY ON THE BOTTOM OF TIIE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACllED TO THE RUNGS OF THE CA ,

TRAYS. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED wm1 THESE ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITH QUALIFIED T

(* STITCHING

AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT). THEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CONSERVATIVE MECHANICAL KITACHMENT TECilNIQUES, THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF THERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. ,

l 35.

DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODmES (PROTRUDIN 103624/2 PORTIONS OF THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS, CONDUIT, AND THE MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS)"IllE THERMAL PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE

BOX

DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDmON, ONE SURFACE OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IS ACTUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND ACTS A THEREFORE THE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE

BOX *. TH ADDRESSED BY ATTACIIING THE ENCLOSURES TO THE CONCRETE WALL VIA AN ANGLE FRAME ARRANGEMENT AND STANDARD DETAIL II-7. THE OVERALL WEIGHT OF THE COMMON ENCLOSURE IS SHARED BY THE ANGLE IRON, CABLE TRAY AND CONDUIT. THE THERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO THE CABLE TRAY ON THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE RUNGS OF THE CABLE TRAYS. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN REINFORCED Wml QUALIFIED TECHNIQUES (* STITCHING

AND STRESS SKIN R TIIEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CONSERVAT1VE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUES, THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF THERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATU

__.___.,____._m= - -- - - - - - - " ~ " "

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-0820 REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B47 OF BSS NOTE : ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES '

DCA/ REY ,

36. DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED T1IERMAL MASS OF TIIE PROTECTED COMMODmES (PROTRUDING 101996/I PORTIONS OF Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS AND Tile MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS) THE THERMAL 103034/I PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE

BOX" DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION, THE LARGEST SURFACE OF TIIE PROTECTIVE 104I24/0 ENVELOPES IS ACIUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE, THE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF TIIE

BOX". THIS HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVELY ADDRESSED VIA MECHANICALLY ATTAClilNG THE ENCLOSURES TO THE CONCRETE WALL WTTH HILTI BOLT FASTENERS AND TO EMBED PLATE VIA I!4* SELF TAPPING SCREWS. ' ADDmONALLY, SINCE THE ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED Wml Tile DCA(S) INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF SEVERAL SLEEVES, THE OVERALL LENGTH (TOP TO BOTTOM)

OF THE ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY 7*- 6*. THE THERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO THE CABLE TRAY ON THE FRONT OF Tile BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA BANDING ATTACHED TO THE BACK OF THE CABLE TRAYS. THE BOTTOM PORTION OF THE ENCLOSURE IS SUPPORTED VIA HORIZONTAL (mROUGH BACK OF CABLE TRAYS) BANDING AND VERTICAL BANDING (AROUND CONDUITS ATTACHED TO WALL). ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN t REINFORCED Wml QUALIFIED TECIINIQUES (*STITCIHNG* AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT). IlOWEVER, THE STRESS SKIN WAS NOT TIE WIRED TOGETHER. TIIEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CONSERVATIVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TECilNIQUES, TIIE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR TIIE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF TIIERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION ARE PROVIDED IN AREA. .

37. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACTUALLY A COMBINATION OF TWO TYPICAL DETAILS (I-S AND 13-2) WHICH ARE EVALUATED 103487/0 SEPARATELY IN ATTACIIMENT A. TIIE USE OF IIILTI BOLTS TO SECURE PORTIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FLARED OtJT ONTO THE CONCRETE WALL PROVIDES POSmVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT AND IS AN ENHANCEMENT. THE JOINT UPGRADE TESTS FOR ALL CABLE TRAYS AS WELL AS QUALIFICATION OF THE 9*. CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION IS BOUNDED BY THE TEST SCHEMES INDICATED. ADDmONALLY,'THE CONCRETE WALL PREVENTS EXPOSURE ON ONE OF THE "IWO LARGEST SURFACES AND HAS HEAT SINK EFFECTS. THEREFORE, BASED ON THE THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS DISCUSSED ABOVE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

,yu.p.a u,. oeamh %.am - - _ e sm e - - - - -- ------- 4.es+.- w a.mm.4 n-m %+.m w.um a *=_m w w. -e se s- - -

-*m -- = w s.. - e m 4ww .am, .

I

.'t a

'Y

'h l p

'( .

i d i i B' h

et !'

?

f. ,. .

s t h

L t

1 - 'j .

I 3

1 I

i

$' 5

,. l 4

J .

')

i k

_i

~I s i 4

e d s

. . . p

$. L - !.

a

.' h I .'

o b

8 e

' I i-r i~. t l .[

ll I k s

E 1 F -- ,

l 'i '

o

)- f i ;

3 -C t.-

t

?

I'?.

i

a_ .

f 4

?

l f

4 .' .k ,

l - -

4 t

b '.

!' +

e h

I '

s t

P t

[ 1 i 8

[L i

(

'h T

. ~~

.g I

'c.-

.I .i =

+

I k

L L ='.:-. . .. , . _ - - . . ~ ,

'M 9ser1ll--ae, em,y ~~~A-*L Q a,,,_ _ .., _ ;. . . . . , , _ -

- - I*wpo.rve 4e, my ,i.,

I # WI'%M. 4 GIF Tyy, p. 4g

i ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-02, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B48 OF BS5 NOTE ' ACCElTANCE BASIS / NOTES '

DCA/REV

38.

DCA 103184/5 AND DCA 103192/1 IIAVE BEEN SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681/l. IlOWEVER, DETAILS CONTAINED ON DCA 103184/1 103184/1 (COMMON ENCLOSURE AT FLOOR SLEEVES) WERE NOT TRANSFERRED TO DCA 103651/l. SINCE 103192/1Tile C ENCLOSURE AT TIIE FLOOR SLEEVES IIAS BEEN INSTALLED, THE INSTALLATION DETAILS / REQUIREMENTS OF DCA 103184/1 103681/1 WILL BE REVIEWED liEREIN UNTIL SUCH TIME TIIAT DCA 103681/1 IS REVISED. THIS CONFIGURATION C ADJACENT J-BOXES (IB.2S5312G AND JB-2S5384G) MOUNTED BACK TO BACK ON A COMMON 3* TUBE STG ARE WALL MOUNTED. EACII IIAS CONDUITS AND FIRE ZONE *R* CABLE EXmNG FROM THE SIDE. THE SIDE EXI BOTil JUNCTION BOXES IIAVE BEEN PROTECTED BY ADDING A 4 FIRE STOP CONSTRUCTED OF 330-1 FLAT TROWEL GRADE. Tills FIRE STOP HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY REINFORCED WITil BANDS AND TIE WIRES.

EACl! JUNCTION BOX IS ENCLOSED SEPARATELY %TTH I/2* TIIICK 330-1 FLAT PANELS BANDED IN PLA TO LACK OF CLEARANCE BisTWEEN TIIE J-BOXES (WTril FLAT PANELS INSTALLED). TIIE SECOND LAYER (3 ;

PANELS) WAS REQUIRED TO ENVELOP BOTil BOX ENCLOSURES. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED %TTH TiiE OU '

UTILIZE TIIE SCORE AND FOLD TECIINIQUE Wml STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT OR ARE STITCilED WIT!

CONDUlT INTERFACES Wml TIIE ENCLOSURE IIAVE ALL BEEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN QUALIFIE TIIE SCALING ISSUE ASSOCIATED Wml TIIIS CONFIGURATION (SCllEME 10-1 QUALIFIED 2 LAYERS ON 18* X 12 BOXES) IS READILY JUSTIFIED DUE TO THE INCREASED TilERMAL MASS OF Tile BOXES. TIIE USE OF COM !

RIBBED PANELS IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON LARGE CABLE TRAY TESTS WillCll QUALIFIED STITGilNG R

! HORIZONTAL BUTT JOINTS FOR A 36* CABLE TRAY Wml TEE SECTION (SCllEME l-2) AND STRESS SKIN'!

I A 30" WIDE TRAY WITH TEE SECTION. TilEREFORE, BOTil TilERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION IIAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. THE CONDUIT SLEEVE COMMON ENCLOSURE (BOX) IS SIIOWN ON DCA 103'18411, PAGE 5. TIIIS COMMON ENCLOSURE IS INSTALLED AROUND (5) CONDUIT SLEEVES, UP TO AND INCLUDING Tile EXISTING ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IN TRAY T23GSCN80, AND INCLUDES Tile ESSENTIAL CONDUlT FROM JUNCTION BOX JB2S5312G. Tile COMMON ENCLOSURE FOR THE CONDUIT SLEEVES IIAS BEEN REINFORCED WITH TIE WIRE STITCIllNG. Tile; CONDUIT EXmNG JUNCTION BOX 2B2S5312G IIAS BEEN PROTECTED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET FROM T11E JU Tile CONDUlT SLEEVE COMMON ENCLOSURE. TIIE OVERALL LENGTH OF THIS CONDUIT IS < 2 FT. THE F liAS BEEN INSTALLED ON Tile CONDUlT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AIR DROP REQUIREMENTS OF TT.ST SC a THE METIIODS USED IN INSTALLATION MAINTAINING FIRE BARRIER THICKNESS, CONTINUTTY AND SUPPORT,THIS INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

t 39.

TYPICAL DETAIL 8-4 IIAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACIIMENT A, BASIS / NOTE NO. 51 AND IS ACCEPTABLE.

103486/0 40.

TYPICAL DETAIL 7-7 AND 7-7.1 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A E' ASIS / NOTE NO. 70 AND IS ACC 103061/1 L

"s - - - -

_ .. ~ ._

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B49 OF BS5 Nuis ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCAIREV -

41.

LBDs HAVE BEEN PRuiEu eD USING STANDARD DETAIL 6-1, EXPANDED TO ENCAPSULATE BOTH LBDs. STANDARD DETAIL 10205810 6-1 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACHMENT A. THE BOX DESIGN USED TO PROTECT THESE LBDs CLOSELY 101499/0 RE SAME TECHNIQUES USED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR JUNCTION BOXES AS WAS TESTED IN TEST 102889/0 SCHEME 1 THE BOXING OF 1RE 'IWO LBDs PRESENTS A GREATER THERMAL MASS (WHEN COMPARED TO A SINGLE LBD RESULTS IN LOWER OVERALL INSIDE TEMPERATURE. ROOM 2-079 IS PROTECTED BY AUTOM ATIC SUPPRESSION AN DETECTION WHEREAS ROOM X-165 IS PROVIDED WITH DETECTION SYSTEMS ONLY.11(E RESULTING PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE MAINTAINS THE MINIMUM MATERIAL THICKNESS, THE MATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS. AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS AND END USE OF THE FIRE BARRIER IS CONSISTENT WITil THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THIS IN ACCEITABLE.

42.

TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FOR THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD HAS BEEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDAMCE %TTH ST 102726/0 DETAIL 6-I WITH EXCEPTION OF ONE CORNER WHICH HAS BEEN MODIFIED DUE TO AN EXISTLNG LBD THERMO-LA COVERAGE. AT THE INTERFACE A SM ALL PIECE OF 330-1 PANEL AND BANDS HAVE BEEN INSTALLEDIATTACllED TO EXIST 1NG LBD ENVELOPE WITH A I/4* T1HCKNESS OF 330-1. Tile REMAINDER OF THE LBD HAS BEEN PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY DETAIL 6-1 INCLUDING BANDING AND JOINT UPGRADES. ALTHOUGH THE INSTALLED DETAIL SLIGHTLY DEVIATED FORM THE STANDARD DETAII1 TESTED CONFIGURATION THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE DEVIATION IN MATERIALTHICKNESS, THE MATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, AND THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITH Tile TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

43.

REVIEW INDICATED THAT TIIIS INSTALLATION CANNOT BE EVALUATED AGAINST Tite TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.; ONE 104174/0 FORM 93-184 HAS BEEN WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT THIS SITUATION AND PROVIDE A MECHAN'SM TO BRING THIS10401110 INSTALLATION INTO CONFORMANCE WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION102932/5 INVOLVE TROWEL GRADE AND PREFORMED SECTIONS / PANEL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL IN THE AREA OF 101320/2 INTERFERENCE. THE 104246/0 44.

ONCE THE SLEEVES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, THE SUPPORT FRAME CAN BE INSTAT Irn 50 THAT THERMO-LAG CAN BE l'13277tl INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-3. THE CHANGES MADE IN THE SUPPORT FRAME DO NOT AFFECT ITS FUNCTI AND TIIEREFORE THE ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR JETAILS 7-3 AND 7-4 IN ATTACHMENT A APPLY TO THIS CONFIGURAT THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

45.

THE METHOD USED WAS WRAPPING THE AIR DROP BY COVERING IT %TTH FLEXI-BLANKET PER REQUIRED 103046/2 THI BANDING AND TROWEL GRADING IT TO THE TOP OF THE 330-1 PANEL ON TOP OF THE TRAY. THIS WILL RESULT I CABLES BEING COVERED WITH THE REQUIRED LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET AND FIRE STOPPED. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE tem.o CONFIGURATION. THE ELIMINATION OF A MINOR AMOUNT OF STR SKIN ON JOINT. THE LONGITUDINAL JOINT DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF T

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONOGU: .ATIONS PAGE B50 OF B55 i

NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 46.

TIIE EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS ON 24" CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED VIA TEST SC 103862/0 i 2. COMPENSATION IIAS BEEN MADE FOR THE SM ALL SLOT CIJT IN TIIE THERMO-LAG BOTTOM PANEL BY INSTALLING j

ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON TIIE BOTTOM INSIDE OF TIIE TRAY. ALL GAPS AND VOIDS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE TO ELIMINATE TIIE CIIANCE OF HEAT PROPAGAT!ON INTO TIIE PROTECTED SPACE. THE SLIGHT REDUCTION IN MATERIAL THICKNESS IN TIIE AREA OF TIIE CC LINE IS COMPENSATED FOR BY INSTALLING A FULL 1/2" NOMINAL PANEL INSIDE TIIE CABLE ABOVE, OVERLAPPING THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE PANELS BY 9" (MIN) PROVIDES NOT ONLY 1/2" TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION, BlJT ALSO PROTECTS TIIE CABLES FROM llEAT BEING CONDUCTED ALONG THE METAL TRAY AND INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

, 47.

' TIIE REDUCTIOM OF Tile PANEL AT TIIE IIVAC INTERFERENCE WILL NOT COMPROMISE THE INTEGRITY OF Tile 10424610 PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE SINCE TiiE REDUCTION IS ONLY 1/8 AT Tile INTERFERENCE. ALTHOUGli Tills REPRESE A REDUCED TIIICKNESS FROM THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, TIIE REMAINING ATTRIBUTES FOR PROTRUDING ITEM ;

PROTECTION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE LOCATION WilERE TIIE TRAPEZE HANGER CROSSES TIIE ANGLE SUPFORT AMOUNTS TO I/2" X 2" IN AREA / DIMENSIONS. EXTRA 330-1 PANELS HAVE BEEN If* ST i TO CREATE A TORTUROUS PATil FOR IIEAT AS WELL AS Tile SillELDING AFFECTS PROVIDED BY Tile ANGLE /IIANGER. '

48.

THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANELS ON 24 WIDE CABLE TRAY IS QUALIFIED TIIROUGli TEST SCHEME 12-2, FLAT PANEL 102679/1 ,

SUBSTITUTION FOR *V* RIB PANELS IIAS BEEN DEEMED ACCEITABLE PRE-BANDING EVERY 6*.WiiERE THE CABLE TRAY TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE INTERFACE, INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAIL I4-3. ALL JOINTS AND SEAMS ASSOCIATED WITH Tile CABLE TRAY COVERAGE AS WELL AS TIIE AIR DROP

BOX

ENCLOSURE SIIALL BE UPGRADING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AND/OR RE WITil TESTED METIIODS (TIE WIRE STTTCllING). ALL PROTRUDING ITEMS ARE PROTECTED FOR A DISTANCli OF 9" AS P TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, WITil TIIE EXCEITION OF TIIE HVAC SUPPORTS. TIIESE SUPPORTS ARE COVERED FOR TliEIR FULL LENGTII FROM TIIE ESSENTIAL TRAY TO TiiE HVAC INSULATION (APPROX. 7-l/2" OF COVERAGE). THIS IIAS BEE DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BASED ON TIIE LARGE SURFACE AREA (HEAT SINK) OF THE INSULATED llVAC DUCT. INTE i

ITEMS

16. WlilCH INIIIBIT TIIE INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAY T220CBD22 ARE RESOLVED TIIROUGH D

49. '

TIIE MAJORITY OF TilERMO-LAG INSTALLED PER THIS DCA IS QUALIFIED BY STANDARD TEST SCHEMES101498/l INVOLVIN TRAY COVERAGE. IN SEVERAL AREAS TIIE STANDARD CABLE TRAY TOP PANEL HAS BEEN RAISED BY THE USE OF TilERMO-LAG SHIMS WHICII INCREASES TO INTERNAL VOLUME, LOWERING INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. JOINTS AND SEAMS ASSOCIATED WITil Tile

BOX

DESIGNS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TIIE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD OR IIAVE REINFORCED USING QUALIFIED TECIINIQUES (TIE WIRE STITCllING AND STRESS SKIN).

50.

TIIE BOX DESIGN FOR TIIE CABLE AIR DROPS FROM TIIE DVS TO TIIE CABLE TRAY IIAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED BY PRE-102103/0 4 BANDING THE BOX AT THE WALL AND AT 12* CENTERS BACK TO THE POINT WiiERE THE TOP PANEL IS FLUSH WI TRAY. THE 330-1 PANELS BUTT TO Tile WALL. FLARE OUT, AND ARE MECllANICA11Y A'ITACilED TO THE WALL WITH lilLTI KWIK-BOLTS. ALL JOINTS HAVE BEEN UPGRADED %TTH STRESS SKIN, STAPLES, AND TROWEL GRADE. ALTilOUGli Tile INSTALLATION DOES NOT MEET A TESTED CONFIGURATION,IT DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCllEME 14-1 WlilCil TESTED A 30" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THE INSTALLATION IS CONTINUOUS, M ATERIAL TIIICKNESS IS MAINTAINED, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITH TEST SCllEME 14-1 AND IS TilEREFORE ACCElTABLE.

ATTACHMENT B ;e.U? 2 REV.O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS Pswa m OF B53 NOTE ACCElrTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 51.

FOR ALL BUT A 4' LONG AREA, TIIE THERMO-LAG ON Tile TRAY 15 INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITil TESTED 103670/0 CONFIGURATIONS. IN TIIE 4* AREA AROUND Tile IIVAC SUPPORT WIIERE FLAT PANFLS WERE INSTALLED, ALL JOINTS i WERE STITCHED AND LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN WA5 NOT COMPLETE. THE USE OF 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG FI WAS QUALIFIED IN SCllEME 10-7 FOR JUNCrlON BOXES. PREBAND SPACING WAS REDUCED AND ALL JOINTSj!

TO COMPENSATE FOR TIIE FLAT PANELS. TIIE USE OF STITCil!NG IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN ON JOINTS WAS TEST SCllEME l-2. THE USE OF TIIE Fi.EXI-BLANKET BETWEEN THE 330-1 PANEL AND THE CABLES KEEPS THE CABL FROM TIIE PROJECTED ENVELOPE. Tile FisULTING CONFIGl> RAT;ON IS ACCEPTABLE.

52. 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET M ATERIA!

< \S INSTALLED ON CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN 330-1 MATERIAL. THE LARGEST CABLE 103567/1 BUNDLE TESTED WAS 3* O FROM A dlLING PENETRATION TO 3* CONDUIT SECTIONS PROTRUDING A TilERMO-LA PROTECTED C BLE TRAY. Tile 96 "A INSTALLED CONFIGURATION IS COMPRISED OF FLEXI-BLANKET MATER AROUND Tile CABLE TRAY TilERO ' AG PANELS. TO COMPENSATE FOR THE INCREASED SIZE OF TIIE CABLE AREA OF OVERLAP, FLEXI-BI/NKT T MATERIAL WAS PREBUTTERED AND ATTACHED WITil 1* LONG STAPLES ANCHORED INTO TIIE 330-1 MATERIAL LVERY 3" (APPROX.).

53.

STANDARD DETAILS 9-2,1-5 AND 11-7 HAVE BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACilMENT A. FILLING THE RECESS OF Tile SPARE - 103600/2 SLEEVES PROVIDES A FLUSH SURFACE FOR INSTALLATION OF PANEL AT THE CEILING. Tile FLANGE DETAI ENHANCED BY THE ADDITION OF A 2* WIDE 330-1 FLAT BOARD TO SECURE TIE WIRE TO STRESS SKIN. TilERE IS A DEVIATION HOWEVER, REGARDING THE 5* OVERLAP OF TiiE LONGITUDINAI, JOINTS. Tills IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE AT LEAST 4* CAN BE ACHIEVED, AND Tile FACT THAT ALL STAPL!NG REQUIREMENTS HAVE ?1ECN ADHERED TO. TllE FACT THAT THE M ATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, MATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED, STRUCIURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED DETAILS, MAKES Tills INSTALLATION ACCEPTABLE.

t 54.

THIS CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM TESTED CABLE TRAY PROTECTION SCilEMES BECAUSE TWO LAYER 102931/0 PANEL ARE USED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL IN THE AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE (WIIERE TOP PANEL TillCKNESS IS REDUCED). PANEL ATTACilMENT AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT METHODS USED AT THE TROWEL GRADE PREBUTTERING AND FILLETS, STRESS SKIN APPLICATION, STAPLING, THROUGH-PANEL TIE WIRING, STITCillNG OF LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND PRE-BANDING BENEATH PANELS) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE :

DdTAIL 8-3 FOR THE V-RIB TO FLAT PANEL TRANSITION PROVIDE THE ENVELOPE WITH STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EQUlVALENT TO THAT OF Tile TESTED DESIGNS. TIIE USE OF A SECOND FULL TillCKNESS 330-1 FLAT PANEL TIIE REQUIRED TilERMAL IMPROVEMENT TO TIIE DESIGN.

55. t STANDARD DETAIL 12-2 IIAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACHMENT A. TIIESE INSTALLATIONS ARE ACCEI"rA2 103408/l 1

ATTACilMENT B - ER-ME-082, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B52 OF B55 w.,m.a NOTE 1 ACCEPTANCE BASif dCrtE wm DCA/REV 56.

INTERFURENCE 1: THE REDUCTION IN THICKNESS Oi THE 330-1 PANEL AT THE INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE BASED

.103892/0 L THE AMOUNT OF 330-1 PANEL INSTALLED AT THE DEVIATION AND THE ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANE 15ADDED AROUND THE AREA OF DEVIATION. THIS DOUBLING OF THE PANELS WILL PROVIDE NOT ONLY TWICE THE MATERIAL TO THERMALLY ,

SUBLIME, IT ALSO PROVIDES .A MORE TORTUROUS PATH THAT ANY llEAT TRANSFER INTO THE ENVELOPE. Tile ADDITIONAL WEIGHT IS LESS THAN 6 POUNDS AND T}lEREFORE IS ACCElrTABLE BECAUSE IT WILL NOT AFFECT THE 3:

SUPPORT'S ABillTY TO FULFILL IT'S DESIGN FUNCTION.

INTERFERENCE 2: SEE INTERFERENCE 1.

INTERFERENCE 3: THE DEVIATION TO SPLICE PLATE COVERAGE IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE JOLNTS WHERE T11E FLAT PANEL WILL BUTT TO TIIE 37'l V-RIB PANELS. TifE JOINTS ARE STITCiiED TOGETHER WITil AND APPROVED SECURING METIIOD, THE FACT THAT 330-1. TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL WILL FILL All. AIR GAPS BEIIIND TIIE 330-1 FLAT PANEL AND Tile LARGE PERCENTAGE OF TIIE SPUCE PLATE COVER WillCH WILL RECEIVE STRESS SKIN UPGR NEXT DEVIATION). TIIE OTIIER DEVIATION CONCERNS THE INABIUTY TO ACllIEVE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE AT THE HVA liANGER. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE MINOR LENGTil OF Tile DEVIATION' WillCli WILL HAVE A NEGUGIBLE, THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE, AFFECT ON TIIE JOINT STRENGTH OF Tile SPLICE PLATE COVER.

INTERFERENCE 4: TIIE INABILITY TO INSTALL THE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON THE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IS ACCE DUE TO TIIE MINOR LENGTII OF THE DEVIATIGN WHICH WILL HAVE A NEGLIGIBLE, I!!EPEFORE ACCEPTABLE AFFECT ON THE JOINT STRENGTH.

INTERFERENCE SA:

TIIE INABILITY TO INSTALL THE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON THE LONGrIUDINAL JOINTS IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE TIE WIRING GF Tile TOP, SIDE, AND 60TTOM PANELS TOGETHER %TTil APPROVED SECURING MECHANICS (11E WIRES EVERY 3"i1/2-). ALSO. THE COVERAGE FOR TIIE CHANNEL AS A PROTRUDING IT6M, ALTHOUGH NOT TO THE TYPICAL DETAILS, WILL PROVIDE A SECURE ONE-IIOU.R BARRIER AROUND T11E PROTRUDING ITEM.

l INTERFERENCE 5B: ALL DETAILS OF THIS DESIGN CONFORM TO THE DESIGN DETAll3 AND ARE THER'.T E ACCEPTABLE.

INTERFERENCE 6: SEE INTERFERENCE I.

INTERFERENCE 7: SEE INTERFERENCE 5B. i INTERFERENCE 8: SEE INTERFERENCE I.

INTERFERENCE 9: SEE INTERFERENCE 1.

- - ~~

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O -

UN!QUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B53.0F B5S '

NOIS ' ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ,

DCA/REV

56. INTERFERENCE 10:

CONT *D Tile DEVIATION CONCERNS THE INABILITY TO INSTALL COMPLETE 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE ON T TRAY DUE TO THE HVAC SUPPORT LNTERFERENCE. TN!S IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE FACT THAT T A 1/16* TO 1/32* GAP BETWEEN TT AND THE TRAY RAIL SIDE TlIEREBY MAKING THIS AN INTERFERENCE OF THE HVAC HANGER AS A PROTRUDING ITEM Will. EFSURE THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF FIRE BARRIE THIS POSSIBLE HEAT PATH TO KEEP THE CABLES FUNCTIONING IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE.

INTERFERENCE II: SEE INTERFERENCE I. i.

l INTERFERENCE 12: SEE INTERFERENCE 1 AND 3. I-57.

THE 1/4* OVERLAY AND STRESS SKIN WAS INSTALLED %TTH A TIGHT FIT AGAINST THE EXIS11NG TROWEL GRADE 103476/1 FIL 1/2* STAPLES WERE USED TO SECURE THE STRESS SKIN. A FILLET WAS INSTALLCD AT THE 1/4* OVERLAYlB INTERFACE. ALTHOUGH THIS INSTALLATION WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED AS PART OF A TEu w C THE INSTALLATION DOES RESEMBLE STANDARD DETAIL 4.3 AND 4.31 WHICH HAS BEEN EVALUATED I TiiE FACT TIIAT INSTALLATION TiiE CONDblT IS ROUTED AGAINST THE CONCRETE WALL THUS PROVIDES A GREATER IS ACCEPTABLE.

58.

WHILE NONE OF THESE UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS HAVE BEEN FIRE TEu w THE METHODS USED TO A 103740/1 TOGETHER BY OVERLAPPING TilEM AND TIE WIRING THEM TOGETiiER THEN APPLYING STRESS SKIN ARE TESTED CONCEPTS. WHERE THESE METHODS ARE USED TO MAINTAIN MATERIAL CONTINUITY AND M THICKNESS IS M AINTAINED. THEN THESE CONFIGURATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE. WHERE MATERIAL T MAINTAINED AT THE SIDE RAILS THIS IS COMPENSATED FOR BY EXTENDING COVERAGE OUT ALONG THE T ACCORDANCE WITH THE 9* RULE. THIS WILL CREATE A TORTUROUS PATH FOR FIRETO ENTER THE PROTECTE ENVELOPE. THE COVERAGE OF PROTRUDING ITEMS PER THE 9* RULE HAS BEEN FIRE TESTED IN ALL OF CONFIGURATIONS. THE COMBINED EFFECT OF ALL OF THE ABO'E RESULTS IN THE CONFIGURATIONS >

59.

Tills IS A UNIQUE CONFIGURATION IN WHICH A 3 FT. LONG THERMO-LAG FLAT PANEL ENCLOSURE 104204/0 BRI SEGMENTS WITH AIR DROP CABLES ENCLOSED WITHIN THE ENVELOPE.THE STRUCTURAL INIT:GRITY OF THE ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE ADDITION OF A SUPPORT MID-SPAN BETWEEN THE TRAY SEGMENTS. T l HAS STEEL PLATE GU! DES WELDED ON WHICH SERVE AS ATTACHMENT POINTS FOR BANDING WHIC TR AY SEGMENT. Tile BANDS FORM A FRAMEWORK FOR PANEL PIECES INSTAT Irn ON THE ENCLOSUR BLANKET INSTALLED ON THE INS!DE OF THE BOTTOM PANEL PREVENT CABLES CONTACTING THE BA AISO PROVIDE ADDITIONALTHERMAL PROTECTION. ALLJOINTS ARE REINFORCED BY QUALIFIED M MATERIAL TIIICKNESS IS MAINTAINED ALBEIT WITH FLAT PANELS. THEREFORE THE THERMAL AND STRUCT INTEGRITY RATING. ASPECTS HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED AND THE CONFIGURATION PROVIDES AN i

?

60.

Tills CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A MINOR DEVIATION TO SPEC. REQUIREMENTS ONLY IN AS 101627/1 MUCH AS WAS SPECIFIED FOR COVERAGE PRIOR TO INSTALLED ON THE CONDUITS FIRST. ALL CRITICAL ATTRIB MAINTAINED FOR PROTECTION OF THE CONDUITS. THICKNESS, CONTINUITY, ETC. THEREFORE THIS CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED l-HOUR RATING.

~

l ATTAC11 MENT B ER-ME-002, REV. O l

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BSS OF BS5 L

NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ,

61.

Tills CONFIGURATION IS UNIQUE IN TilAT A 330-1 BOX CONFIGURATION IS CONSTRUCTED AT CG SUPPORT 103056/1 T COVERAGE FOR A MINOR PORTION OF A 2* DIA. FLEX CONDUIT AT A FOAM BLOCKOUT. %IIERE THE FLEX CO ENTERS TiiE BOX 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS ARE INSTALLED WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD IS FILLED WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND ALL JOINTS REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY SCHE LBD ENCLOSURES. Tile INTERFACE WTTH Tile FOAM BLOCKOUT IS PROVIDED WITil M-BOARD FOR ADEQU SEPARATION (FOAM AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) AND TO PROVIDE TilERMAL PROTECTION. Tile MINOR AREA OUTER 2* DIAM. FLEX CONDUIT WilERE 3 COMPLETE LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED ACCEETABLE SINCE IT BUTTS DIRECTLY TO TIIE CONCRETE SURFACE WIIICH SillELDS IT AND ACTS AS A HEAT AREA OF INCOMPLETE 3 LAYERS IS VERY MINOR AND EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISHES A TORTUROUS PATil. TliE DES PROVIDES FOR ADEQUATE MATERIAL TIIICKNESS (330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND CONDUIT SECTIONS) FOR AT Tile BLOCKOUT PLUS EFFECTS OF FOAM SEAL AND M-BOARD MATERIAL AND PROVIDES FOR STRUCTURAL OF Tile BOX CONFIGURATION (STITCillNG AND STRESS SKIN). TIIE EFFECTIVE MATERIAL TlHCKNESS (330-660 FLEX CONDUIT AT TIIE WALL IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT l-llOUR RATING.

62.

TliE BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SillMS PRESENT IN DCA 103305/0 IIAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN !I 103305/I PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. TIIE BOXED IN DESIGN UTILIZES STANDARD DETAIL 12-2 WHICil llAS BE I IN ATTACllMENT A. TIIE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL SIIIMS 110 WEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENTTilAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 ,

PANELS Wil!Cil IIAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCIIEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) T11E MULTl/LE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTil/ QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR SUBLIMING AND THUS L REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WITillN TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT TIIE SillM(S) LOCATION. THE DMGN llAS BEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING MET 110DS AS WELL AS TIIE SCORE AND TECIINIQUE. THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES TIIAT THE STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTI CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITil UPGRADED JOINT METHODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. TifE OVERALL WIDTil OF THE BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSUR Tile CABLE AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IS A UNIQUE DESIGN IN TilAT AT THE CONDUIT A TEE SECTION FABRICATED FORM PRESilAPED CONDUIT SECTIONS WITil THE OPE!4 END OF TIIE TEE SECTION COVER BOARD. ALL JOINTS WERE UPGRADE WITII STRESS SKIN AND STITCHING. THE REMAINDER OF AIR DROP IS P FLEXI-BLANKET UP TO T11E BOX AT Tile CABLE TRAY. ALTHOUGli Tills CONFIGURATION IS NOT TESTED IT DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCilEME 11-I. TIIE FACT TIIAT TiiE MATERIAL TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED, TIIE FIRE BARRIER IS CONTINUOUS, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITil THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, Tile INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. IN CONCLUSION, Tills INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil BASIS! NOTES 1-5 AND IS j ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

ATTACHMENT B - ER-MEM REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BS5 OF B55.

NOTE J ACCEPTANCE BASISINOTES DCA/REV :

63. THE BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SIIIMS PRESENT IN DCA 104194/0 HAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 104194/D PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. TIIE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL SHIMS HOWEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENTTHAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS WHICII HAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCHEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) TIIE MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEFTil/ QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR SUBUMING AND THUS-LOCAUZED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WmlIN THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT TIIE SHIM (S) LOCATION. THE ,

BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING METHODS AS WELL AS THE SCORE AND ,

FOLD TECHNIQUE. THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES THAT THE STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTINUOUS AT CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH UPGRADED JOINT METHODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. TIIE OVERALL WIDTil OF TIIE BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA THAN WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36' CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTAU.ATION.

ONE DEVIATION WAS IDENTIFIED WIIERE TIE WIRES WERE DELETED ON TiiE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE AT JOINTS. All JOINTS WERE STITCIIED WIIERE THE PANELS INTERFACE. TROWEL GRADE AND STRESS SKIN WERE APPUED OVER TIIESE JOINTS'WITII THE STRESS SKIN STAPLES. TIIIS DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO THE TEsa w CONFIGURATION. ANOTIIER DEVIATION OCCURS AT Tile SPUCE PLATE COVER. Tile DESIGN USED HEREIN UTIUZED A 330-1 FLAT PANEL TO FIT BEDVEEN 330-I V-RIB PANELS ON THE SIDE RAILS. THE FLAT PANEL WAS STITCHED TOP AND BOTTOM, ENSURING THE INTEGRITY OF Tile FIRE BARRIER. IN CONCLUSION, TIIIS INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES I-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

64. TIIE BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SIIIMS PRESENT IN DCA 102800/0 HAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 102800/2 PART OF 'ITr,STED CONFIGURATION. TIIE BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTAT I Fn UTIUZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING METIIODS AS WELL AS Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE. THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES TIIAT THE STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTINUOUS AT CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITII UPGRADED JOINT .

METHODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF THE JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. THE OVERALL WIDTH OF THE BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA TilAN WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. POSITIVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT IS PROVIDED AT THE WALL BY USE 330-I PANEL FLANGE AND HILTI BOLT ARRANGEMENT AND

STICK-PINNED

THROUGH TIIE SIUCONE FOAM PENETRATION SEAL.

IN CONCLUSION, TIIIS INSTALLATION iS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES I-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

l l

i

.s-.

m. "'

ER-MEM REV. C' PAGE Cl OF C24

' ATI'ACIIMENT C MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O '

MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS +, . PAGE C2 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV i ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.

. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTIONSUPPORT AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) BASIS /NUTES I _ ,

~

TEST (PAGE C20-C24)

FIRE ,

2ONE' SCHEMES !

102330/1 AB 852 X-241 AA/2 tf Y Y ISSUE 1: TL ON TRAY INTERFERES WITII TL INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT.

ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION CANNOT INSTALL STRESS SKIN OVER RADIAL BEND DUE TO INTERFERENCE.

RESOLIJTION 1: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-I 14,9 SECTIONS AGAINST TOP TL PANEL OF TRAY AND SEAL RESOLUTION 2: COVER EXPOSED PORTION OF 9 14,9.

RADIAL REND Wml STRESS SKIN AND STAPLE.

102478/l AB S10 X-207 AA/211 Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING TL ON TRAY INTERFERES Wml INSTALLATION OF TL ON ANOTIIER TRAY.

RESOLUTION: COVER SPLICE PLATE ON SIDE l-2,12-1, 1 4, 9, 10 RAIL WITil FLAT BOARD BUTT JOINED TO V- 12-2 RIB BOARD. STRESS SKIN UPGRADE IS OMITTED IN AREA OF INTERFERENCE.

102725/0 SG 832 2-094 2SD/15 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH 2 ($; 2* DIA)

RIGID CONDUITS SUCH TIIAT COMPLETE COVERAOH WITII 1/4" OVERLAYS IS NOT POSSIBLE.

RESOLUTION: 1/2* THICK MATERIAL, STRESS 9-3, II-I 14, 7, 15 SKIN AND 330460 FOR 180: PROVIDE I/2" THICK 330-1 CONDUIT M ATERIAL W/l/4" OVERLAY FOR 180' ANDl/2* THICK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL WITil I/4* OVERLAY AND STRESS SKIN BUTTED TO PIPE.

.6

l ATTACllMENT C ER-ME4t2. REY. 0 '

MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C3 OF C24 DCA NO.IREV - BLDG ELEVE ROOM :- : FIRE SUPP. DET.

DESCRII' TION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' SUPPORT. ' BASIS / NOTES AREAI (YIN) (YIN) l FIRE TEST .

(PAGE C20-C24)

ZONE' SCHEMES '

102758/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FULL COVERAGE ON CONDUIT SUPPORT (PROTRUDING ITEM) CANNOT BE ACHIEVED ,

DUE TO INTERFERENCE Wml DUCT.

RESOLUTION: SEAI. TL PANED ON SUPPORT TO 9-1. 10-1 14,13 ^

SIDE OF DUCT Wml TROWEL GRADE 330460.

GAP BETWEEN SUPPORT END PLATE AND DUCT IS FILLED Wml TROWEL GRADE 330460 PRIOR ,

TO COMPLETING Tile SEALING OF TIIE !

PANE 11 102780/0 EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR DRAIN PIPE INTERFERES Wm! !

t INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION WRAP I LAYER OF FLEXI- 9-1,Il-1 30 BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BEIWEEN CONDUIT AND PIPE. WRAP SECOND LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BUTT .

TO PIPE AT INTEP.FERENCE WHICH PRO 11ECTS SINGLE LAYER FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE.

102837/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE 1: PIPE INTERFERES Wmi 4 ($; 2* DIA)

RIGID CONDUITS SUCH THAT COMPLETE COVERAGE Wml I/4 OVERLAYS IS NOT '

POSSIBLE.

ISSUE 2: CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORT INTERFERE Wml CONDUIT ENVELOPF..

RESOLUTION I: 1/2* THICK MATERIAL, STRESS - 9-3. Il-1 1 4, 7, 15 SKIN AND 330460 FOR 180: PROVIDE 1/2" THICK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL W/1/4* OVERLAY FOR 180* AND 1/2* THICK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL WITH I/4 OVERLAY AND STRESS

, SKIN BUTTED TO PIPE.

RESOLUTION 2: EXTEND ENVELOPE ONTO 9-3' 14, 7, IS '

SUPPORT VIA 330-1 TROWEL GRADE.

. - - s, , _- .-

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082 REV.G MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C4 OF C24 DCA NO.IREV BLDO ELEV' ROOM FIRE SUPP.~ DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLtJTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAI' (YIN) (YIN)' - '

TEST (PAGE C20-C24)

FIRE SCHEME $

ZONE 102R58/0 'AB 790 X-174 AAl2ta N Y ISSUE: INTER *'ERENCE BET % TEN DVO ISD'S.

l RESOLUTION: REMOVE ONE EAR FROM LBD. 9-1 1 4, 9. 16 !

SPLICE 2 PIECES OF FLAT PANEL TOGETIIER TO REST ON SIDE OF LBD AND REMAINING EAR. l i

INSTALL STRESS SKIN UFGRADE W11ERE POSSIBLE.

102861/0 AB 790 X-174 AAl21a N Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT.

RESOLtJTION: WRAP I LAYER OF FLEXI- 9-1, 11-1 1 4, 11, 14 BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BETWEEN CONDUIT AND PIPE. WRAP SECOND LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BUTT TO PIPE AT INTERFERENCE WillCH PROTECTS SINGLE LAYER FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE.

, 102863/1 SG 852 2-103 2 Sell 8 Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR CURB INTERFEPIS WITH TL ON CONDUIT AND CONDUIT UNION.

RESOLUTION: TRIM OVERSIZED CONDUIT 9-1, 9-3 1 4, 7, 17 SECTION TO FIT BEDVEEN CONDUIT FITTING AND CURB PLATE. INSTALL 1/4" OVERIAY ON CONDUIT WHERE POSSIBLE. APPLY 1/2-TROWEL GRADE WHERE PREFORMED SECTIONS TOUCH OUTSIDE OF CURB WHERE TL TOUCHES ON INSIDE.

103007/1 SG 852 2-100B 2SK/17a Y Y ISSUE: GAS LINE (NJ INTERFERES Will{ TL INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: APPLY 330-1 MATERIAL IEAVINO 9-1,11 14, 9, I B GAP FOR STRESS SKIN BUILD UP. ADD EXTRA TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL IN THE AREA AROUND THE DEVIATION.

!~

ATTACliMENT C ER-ME482, REV. 0 -

MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CS OF C24 DCA NO.lREV BLDO 'ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION . SdPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N)

FIRE TEST.I' (PAGE C20-C24) I SCllEMES ZONE-103037/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21: Y Y ISSUE: TL ON SUPPORT INTERFERES WITII STRESS SKIN UPGRADE.

RESOLUTION: OMIT STRESS SKIN ON TIIE SIDE 12-2 14,9 RA!L OF TRAY NEXT TO THE INTERFERING TL ON TUBE STEEL 103050/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITII INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT (1-1/2*).

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" CONDUIT SECTIONS 9-1, 9-3 1 4, 7. 18 TRIMMING TO FIT BETWEEN CONDUIT AND PIPE. INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAP SECTION AND -

BUTT AGAINST PIPE AND ADD TROWEL GRADE.

103076/l SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE 1: NEED DETAILS FOR CONDUIT MOUNTED ON TUBE STEEL ISSUE 2: FULL THICKNESS CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON SMALL AREA OF SUPPORT.

BImVEEN BACK OF SUPPORT AND WALL, DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil GRATING SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION 1: TYPICAL DETAILS PROVIDED 9-1, 11-1 1 4. 19 (4-8).

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL REDUCED TIIICKNESS 11-1 1 4, 19 TL PANEL ON BACK OF SUPPORT AT INTERFERENCE. INSTALL DOUBLE LAYERS ON EACil SIDE OF SUPPORT TO WALL AT INTERFERENCE TO PROTECT TIIE REDUCED TillCKNESS SECTION FROM ANY EXTERNAL FIRE EXPOSURE.

ATTACHMENT C -

- ER-ME-082. REY. d MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C6 OF C24 DCA NO./REV . BLDG" Ei.EV ROOM: FIRE SUPP. DET.'

- DESCRIFilON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION' SUPPORT ; BA51SINOTES AREA /) (YIN) .. (YIN). TEST ..,

FIRE '

(PAGE C20-C24)

SCHEMES :

ZONE-103155/0 SG 873- 2-109B ' 2SK/17e Y Y ISSUE: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITH 1/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: FIT 1/4" OVER11.Y AROUND THE 9-1 .14,20 CONDUIT EXCEPT AT TiiE TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL I/4" OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACII SIDE OF TUBING WITH TROWEL GRADE.

103158/0 SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE I&3: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITH 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT.

ISSUE 2: UNISTRUT INTERFERES WITH II4*

OVERLAY ON CONDUIT.

ISSUE 4: PIPE INTERFERES WITil 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUrr.

3 RESOLUTION I&3: FIT I/4* OVERLAY ARCUND 9-I, 10-1 1 4, 18, 20. 21' THE CONDUIT EXCEPT AT THE TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL I/4* OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACH SIDE OF TUBING WITH TROWEL GRADE..-

RESOLUTION 2: FIT 1/4" OVERLAY UP TO EDGE 9-1, 10-1 14,= 18, 20, 21 OF INTERFERING UNISTRUT. SEAL UNISTRUT.

TO OVERLAY WITH I/2* OF TROWEL GRADE OUT FROM CONDUIT AND ON EACH SIDE OF -

UNISTRUT.

RESOLUTION 4: TRIM I/4" OVERLAY SECTIONS 9-1, 10-1 1 4. 18, 20. 21 TO CLEAR INTERFERING PIPE. APPLY TROWEL

GRADE BUILD UP AROUND DEVIATION AREA.

.w. _ .._s_

_ _-_..-u . _._.

, ATTACllMENT C ER-ME482. REV. O "

MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS - PAGE C7 OF C24 -

DCA NO./REV BLDOS ELEVi ROOM FIRE SUPP.- DET.

DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN)

FIRE --

TEST., .(PAGE C20-C24)

ZONE =- SCHEMES 103375/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: THE WIRE AND STRESS SKIN REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET.

RESOLUTION: FIT STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES 12-1, 14-1 1-5,9 AROUND AIR DROP INTO TRAY. OMIT STRESS SKIN ATINTERFERENCE BETWEEN llORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL TRAYS.

103414/1 SG B10 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS.

ISSUE 2: STITCHING CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS.

ISSUE 3: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS. ,

RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL STRESS SKIN PER 12-1,14-1 74,9 SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS. MINIMAL DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL STRESS SKIN. STAPLES 12-1, 14-1 14,9 AND TIE WIRES AS DIRECTED, OMIT STITCillNG. . !

L RESOLUTION 3: OMIT MINOR AMOUNTS OF 12-1, 14-1. 14,9 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN ON ONE SIDE OF '

TRAY.

'103599/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL FULL THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG ON PROTRUDING CONDUIT-SUPPORT AT INTERFERENCE WITH INSTRUMENTTRACK.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL REDUCED THICKNESS . 9-1, 9-3 1 4. 31 PANEL AT INTERFERENCE. ADD SECOND LAYER OF PANEL AROUND INTERFERENCE AND SEAL TO FIRST LAYER.

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-08', A' Ev. 0 -

MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS , PAGE. C8 0F C24 '

DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM- FIRE - SUPP. DET.

DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION.. SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL (YIN) -- (Y/N)'

FIRE - TEST . (PAGE C20-C24) .

ZONE- SCllEMES 103602/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21s Y Y ISSUE I: TIIREADED ROD INTERFERES WITII TL !

ON TRAY.

1 ISSUE 2: STRUCTURAL STEEL AND GROUND CABLE INTERFERES WITli TL ON TRAY.

RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL FLAT BOARD ON SIDE Il 1 I4, 9, 22 OF TRAY AND FIT BETWEEN ROD AND TRAY.

MAKE SMALL DEVIATION FROM STRESS SKIN REQUIREMEf4S.

.i RESOLUTION 2: GROUND CABLE I l-1 1 4. 9, 22 INTERFERENCE WAS REMOVED. INSTALL FLAT BOARD ON BOTTOM OF TRAY, NOTCIIING IF NECESSARY TO FIT BETWEEN STEEL ANGLE AND TRAY. COVER TIIE ANGLE %TTil I/2" FLAT BOARD AND TROWEL GRADE & BAND IN PLACE. MOVE GROUND CABLE.

103609/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITII STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON LONGITUDINAL JOINT OF BOX OUT.

RESOLUTION: STRESS SKIN UP TO BOTII SIDES 9-1, 10-1 14,9 OF TIIE INTERFERENCES.

103631/0 GEN. GEN. GEN. GEN. VARI Y ISSUE: TO ALLOW FOR FIELD CONDITIONS, ES CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS OPTIONS FOR GENEPJC MODIFICATIONS IN TIE WIRE DETAILS USED TO IIELP SECURE STRESS SKIN OVER CABLE TRAY LONGITUDINAL JOIfRS.

RESOLUTION: OF THE 3 PROPOSED OPTIONS, A 1, 12-1, 12- 1-5,9,9a AND B ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR GENERIC USE. 2, 13-1, 14 OPTION C IS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ONLY 1. 11 ,

WIIERE PREVIOUSLY INSTAf f 8:D.

7

ATTACliMENT C ER-ME482. REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C9 OF C24

~ DCA NO./REV . BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET[ DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) '(YIN) '

TEST (PAGE C20-C24)

FIRE SCHF.MES -

-ZONE 103633/0 SG 790 2-071 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: UNABLE TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TRAY PER REQUIREMENTS DUE i

TO INTERFERENCES.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADES I l-1,12-2 14,9 FOR LONGITUDINALJOINTS AS CLOSE AS -

POSSIBLE TO INTFRFERENCES. USE EXTRA STAPLING AS DIRECTED.

103636/0 SG 832 2496 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: TUBE STEEL INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF I/4" TL OVERLAY ON CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: BUTT I/4" TL OVERLAY TO TUBE 9-1 1 4. 23 STEEL AND SEAL WITil TROWEL GRADE.

COVER TIIE SIDES OF TIIE SUPPORT TOUClllNG THE TL ON TIIE CONDUfT FOR 2* ABOVE AND BELOW TIIE CONDUIT.

103650/0 SG 832 2-094 2SBil5 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT PROTECTED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET INTERFERES WITH INSTALLING FLEXI-BLANKET ON ANOTHER CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: BlITT EACH LAYER OF FLEXI- 11-1 14,24 BLANKET UP AGAINST TIIE EXISTING FLEXI-BLANKET ON TIIE FIRST CONDUIT. SEAL EACH LAYER WITH TROWEL GRiDE.

103706/1 EC 778 X-IISB AN154 Y Y ISSUE: NUMI .OUS INTERFERENCES WITH SECOND LAYER UPGRADE ON JB.

RESOLUTION: REINFORCE ALL JOINTS AND 10-2 14,8 SEAMS ON FIRST LAYER AS IF TifEY WERE SECOND LAYER.

[

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082. RE. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C10 OF C24 -

DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N)' (YIN)

FIRE TEST . (PAOE C20-C24)

ZONE SCHEMES 103718/l SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE I: INTERFERENCE BETWEEN JB AND LBD WillCil BOTil REQUIRE TL PROTECTION.

ISSUE 2: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITil I/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT.

ISSUE 3: PIPE INTERFERES WITil I/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT.

ISSUE 4: CANNOT INSTALL JOINT UPGRADE PER REQUIREMENTS.

RESOLUTION I&4: INSTALL TL ON JB. BUTr IL 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 9, 18, 20 FOR LBD AGAINST JB AND JOIN USING STRESS SKIN UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS GIVEN.

RESOLUTION 2: FIT i/4" OVERLAY AROUND 9-I, 10-1 14, 9, 18,20 '

TiiE CONDUIT EXCEPT AT Tile TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL 1/4" OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACil SIDE OF TUBING WITil TROWEL GRADE.

RESOLUTION 3: TRIM I/4* OVERLAY SECTION 9-1, 10-1 14, 9, 18,20 TO CLEAR INTERFERING PIPE. APPLY TROWEL ORADE BUILD UP AROUND DEVIATION AREA.

103721/1 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO BEND RADIUS, CANNOT INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-1,II-I 1 4, 12 SECTION MITERED TO FIT Tile BEND.

103730/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON 2 FLEX CONDUITS DUE TO PROXIMITY.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-1. 11-1 14, 12-SECTIONS, MITERED AS NECESSARY TO Ftr.

?

ATTACllMENT C -

ER-ME-062. REY. 0 i MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS - PAGE Cil OF C24

' DCA NOJREV BLDG Eth.V - ROOM FIRE' SUPP. DET.

~

' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ~ SUPPORTj BASISINUTES AREA / (YIN)- (YIN): TESTj ' ' (PAGE C20-C24)

FIRE ' . . SCHEMES '

ZONEL 103741/0 SG 852- 2-103 2SElis Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 2*'

CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH SUPPORT. '

RESOLUTION: BUTF I/4* OVERLAY UP TO - 9-1, 9-3 14,7 '

SUPPORT AND APPLY TROWEL GRADE TO JOINT. ADD FLAT PLATE ON SUPPORT AROUND INTERFERENCE. '

103770/0 AB 352 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL I/4* OVERLAY ON 2*

CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH DUCT.

RESOLUTION: TRIM TIIE 1/4" OVERLAY TO FIT 9-I, 9-3 14,7 IN BETWEEN THE CONDUlT AND DUCT. ADD TROWEL GRADE INSIDE I/4* SECTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

103780/0 AB 852 X-241 AA121f I Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AND CABLE INTERFERE WITH STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON DVO CONDUITS WITH RADIAL BENDS.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE 9-1, 9-3 1-5, 9 EXCEPT AT THE POINTS OF INTERFERENCE.

103782/0 SG 832 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: PHYSICAL' ARRANGEMENT INTERFERES WITII TRANSITION OF FLEXI-BIANKET TO RIGID CONDUlT SECTION.

l-

! RESOLUTION: OVERLAP FLEXI-BLANKET 6* 9-1, 9-3, 1 4, 16.

ONTO RIGID CONDUITTO ALLOW BEITER 11-1 DISTRIBlJTION OF LOAD ON THE JOINT.

- ._._____m_. . , _ _ _ ___________.:-

ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME482, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl2 OF C24

~

DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION - SUPPORT ' BASIS / NOTES AREA' (Y/N). (YIN)

TEST (PAGE C20-C24)

FIRE .

Ll- SCHEMES ZONE 103816!0 SG 810 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS DUE TO INTERFERENCES.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN WHERE 9-1, 9-3, 14,9 THERE ARE NO INTERFERENCES FIRST, THEN 10-1, 10-2 INSTALL AT INTERFERENCE STAPLING TO ADJACENT COUPLING. ADD TIE WIRE TO ONE SPECIFIC STRESS SKIN INTERFERENCE.

103864/0 SG 810 2-079 2SB18 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4* OVERLAY ON

, CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: BUTT 1/4* TL OVERLAY TO EACil 9-1. 10-1 I-6, 25 SIDE OF Tile STEEL ANGLE. COVER THE ANGLE (BOTH LEGS) FOR THE WIDT11 OF THE CONDUIT WITil FLAT BOARD SEALED TO THE .'l CONDUIT SECTION %TTH TROWEL GRADE.

103947/0 AB 810 X-208 AA/21e N Y ISSUE: PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS WERE INSTALLED ON 2 FLEX CONDUITS.

RESOLUTION: ACCEPTABLE. 9-1,9-3 1-5, 12 103959/0 EC 778 X-l!5B AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 3rd LAYER OF FLEXI -

BLANrdiT ON CONDUIT AT JUNCHON WITII MOTOR llOUSING.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3rd LAYER AROUND 11-1 1 4, 26 CONDUIT AND BUTT EACH EDGE TO TIIE SIDE OF TIIE MOTOR HOUSING AND SEAL.

-__--_--.__.-_,.-__.___.r....__. ._ 9

ATTACliMENT C ER-ME482, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl3 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. 'DESCRII'rION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITrlONSUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAI (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGE .C20-C24) !

FIRE

'i SCHEMES ZONE j

103988/0 AB X-810 207 AAl21b Y Y ~

ISSUE: STRESS SKIN UPGRADE CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON CONDUIT BEND DUE TO INTERFERENCE WIT 11 PIPE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL UPGP.ADE ON EACH 9-1, 10-1 14,9 SIDE OF INTERFERENCE LEAVING CLEARANCE FOR PIPE.

103991/0 EC 778 X-115B AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 3rd LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON CONDUIT AT JUNCTION WITil MOTOR HOUSING.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3rd LAYER AROUND 11-1 1 4, 26 CONDUIT AND BUTT EACH EDGE TO THE SIDE OF THE MOTOR HOUSING AND SEAL 104013/0 AB 810 X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL ON CORNER OF JB DUE TO INTERFERENCE.

RESOLUTION: UPGRADE FIRST LAYER JOINTS 10-1, 10-2 14,8 IN AREA OF DEVIATION AND TIIEN INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF BOARD AROUND INTERFERENCE.

I M 017/O AB 790 X-174 AAI21a N Y !SSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 1-1/2" CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORT AS 9-1, 9-3 14,7 PROTRUDING ITEM.

IM 026/1 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL ON JB DUE TO INTERFERENCE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL 10-1, 10-2 14,8 AROUND INTERFERING CONDUIT.

m____. - . _ _ - -.

q ATTACitMENT C ER-ME-082. REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS ,i PAGE Cid OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET[ DESCRIPTIO' N / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT AREA /: BASIS / NOTES ,

(YIN)' (Y/N) TEST FIRE . (PAGE C20-C24) j-SCHEMES

~

l ZONE 104027/0 EC 778 X-115B AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: 7L ON RIGID CONDUIT INTERFERES WITli TillRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL TillRD LAYER OF 9-1. 9-3, 1 4, 16 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND FLEX CONDUIT AND 11-1 RIGID CONDUIT.

104047/0 EC 778 1ISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLM ON AIR DROP CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER FYPICAL DETAILS

. BECAUSE IT ENTERS TRAY / T SIIARP ANGLE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN TWO 11-1 1-5, 16 PIECES AS SHOWN. BAND AROUND TRAY.

STAPLE FLEXI-BLANKEY AND STRESS SKIN PER REQUIREMENTS.

1G4057/0 EC 778 X-Il3 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT APPLY I/4* OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: TRIM I/4" OVERLAY TO CLEAR 9-1, 9-3 14,7 SUPPORT.

I ;04075/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF BOARD ON ONE SIDE OF JB.

RESOLUTION: UPORADE Tile JOINTS OF THE 10-1, 10-2 14,8 FIRST IAYER OF TL ON TIIE JB. OMir THE SECOND LAYER OF TL ON Tile SIDE WITH TIIE INTERFERENCE.

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME482. REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIS OF C24 DCA NO.lREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP, DbT.:

AREA /

k DESCRIPTIC'N/ ISSUE OF CONCERN SUPPORT / RESOLUTION '

BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YIN).

FIRE TEST . . (PAGE C20-C24)

SCIIEMES ZONE 104107/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL THIRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANiliT ON FLEX CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WITH METAL SIIIELD AND CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL THIRD LAYER OF 11-1 1 4, 27 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT BlJITING AGAINST SHIELD AND CONDUIT. INSTALL FOURTil LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AT TliE INTERFERENCES SEALED TO Tile TillRD LAYER WITil TROWEL GRADE.

104115/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4* OVERLAY ON 2*

CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WTTII SUPPORTS.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4* OVERLAY BUTTED 9-1,9-3 14,7-UP AGAINST EITilER SIDE OF EACH SUPPORT ANGLE. ADD AN EXTRA LAYER OF 1/4*

OVERLAY ON TOP OF AND SEALED TO EXISTING OVERLAY ON BOTII SIDES OF THE SUPPORTS.

104151/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO PROXIMMY TO CEILING.

INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN UPGRADES ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS ARE NOT FEASIBLE.

RESOLUTION: THE WIRE LONGITUDINAL 12-1, 14-1 1-5, 9 JOINTS IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN. STAPLE Tile CIRCUMFIRENTIAL BUTT JOINT STPJISS SKIN -

ON THE TRAY BOTTOM AND AT LEAST ONE SIDE.

f- ...

. ATTACliMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIA110NS PAGE C16 OF C24

( DCA NO./REV Bi.DO ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.i DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES A REA/. (YIN) (YIN): TFST: . '

FIRE (PAGE C20-C24)

SCHEMES !

l ZONE' '

l 104152/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y

! ISSUE: PIIYSICA' ARRANGEMENT POSES '

)

PROBLEM WITH INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF PANEL ON JB.

l RESOLITTION: APPLY SINGLE LAYER OF TL ON 10-1, 10-2 1-5.8 SIDE OF JB. SHIM INTERNALLY TO ACillEVE A -

l- STABLE CONFIGURATION. APPLY STRESS SKIN AND BANDING PER REQUIREMENTS.

104180/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB18 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLARS ON TIIREE AIR DROPS CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE OF PIIYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

RESOLUT10N: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN Il-1 1-5, 16 PIECES AND SECURE AS DIRECTED. INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND STAPLE AS DIRECTED.

104186/0 SG 832 2-096 Y 2 Sell 6 Y ISSUE: INSTRUMENT LINE PROTRUDES TIIROUGli AIR DROP INTERFERING WITH 4*-5*

FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR.

RESOLUTION: CUT OUT COLLAR AND FIT 11-1 1-5, 16 AROUND INSTRUMENT LINE. SEAL WITH TROWEL GRADE 330-660. INSTRUMENT LINE IS ALREADY COVERED AS A PROTRUDING LINE.

104197/0 AB 790 X-ISO AA/21s Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF H. ON TRAY AT SPLICE PLATE.

RESOLUTION: COVER SPLICE PLATE ON SIDE 11-1, 12-2 1-5, 10 RAIL WrrH FLAT BOARD BUTT JOINED TO V- 13-1 RIB BOARD. INSTALL JOINTS PER j

REQUIREMENTS.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - .__.--- n-

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME482, FJV. O '

MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C17 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV. ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET.

DESCRIPT10N/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN), (YIN)

FIRE : TEST.O . (PAGE C20-C24) !

ZONE SCHEMES ;

l 104205/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WITil BASEPLATE. +

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY AND 9-1 14.28 TRIM TO CLEAR BASEPLATE. ADD AN ADDITIONAL 1/4" OVERLAY BUTTED UP TO THE LNTERFERENCE. SEAL WITII TROWEL GRADE.

104211/0 SG 810 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: THIRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET IIAS INTERFERENCE WITH GROUND CABLE.

RESOLUTION: GROUND CABLE IS ALREADY 9-1, 11-1 1-5, 16 COVERED WITH TL CUT OUT FLEXI-BLANKET !

AND BUTT TO GROUND CABLE TL. APPLY 330-660 TROWEL GRADE AROUND JOINT.

104223/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON AIR DROP PER TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN TWO 11-1 I-5, 16 OVERLAPPING PIECES AS DIRECTED. BAND AND SECURE JOINTS PER REQUIREMENTS.

104234/0 AB 790 X-173 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF BOARD ON JB.

RESOLUTION: OMIT COVERAGE OF SECOND 10-1. 10-2 1-6,8 PANEL IN AREA ADJACENT TO INTERFERENCE.

SEAL EDGE OF SECOND LAYER.

104237/0 EC 792 X-122 EA/54 Y Y ISSUE: JB INTERFERES WITH INSTAL 1ATION OF I/4* OVERLAY ON 2* CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: BITIT 1/4" OVERLAY UP TO SIDES 9-1,9-3 1-6,7 OF JB.

-m ATTACHMENT C ER-ME432, REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIR OF C24 .

DCA MO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM- FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLimON SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA /. (Y/N). (Y/N)

' FIRE -

TEST . (PAGE C20-C24)

, SCHEMES .

ZONE.

104238/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: JB INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF 1/4* OVERLAY ON I-1/2* CONDUlT, RESOLUTION: BUTT 1/4* OVERLAY UP TO SIDES 9-1,9-3 104239/0 OF JB. 14,7 14,7 AB 790 X-172 AA/2Ia N Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH BOX OUT. f INSTALLATION ON CONDUlT LBD.

RESOLUTION: NOTCII ONE SIDE PANEL TO 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 9, 16 CLEAR EARS ON LBD. INSTALL A SECOND PANEL OVER THE NOTCHES AND BEVELED AT Tile INTERFEPJNG PIPE. STITCH JOINTS ON 3*

CENTERS WHERE STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTAI I FD AT THE LNTERFERENCE.

104241/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y IMUE: INTERFERENCES EXIST WITH SECOND LAYER OF TL ON JB. ;;

I RESOLUTION: OMIT COVERAGE OF SECOND 10.I, 10-2 14,8 PANEL IN AREAS OF INTERFERENCE. SEAL EXPOSED EDGES OF SECOND LAYER WITH TROWEL GRADE.

. _ .t1

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME482. REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CI9 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIONIISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES ;

AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST , (PAOE C20-C24) !

FIRE SCHEMES i-ZONE- ;

EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y !

104242/0 ISSUE 1: PIPE INTERFERES WITil TL ON BVO CONDUITS.

ISSUE 2; PIPE INTERFERES WTTII TL ON SUPPORT (PROTRUDING).

RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL I/2" PREFORMED, 9-1 1 4, 29 TRIMMED AS NECESSARY, TO CLEAR ;

INTERFERENCE. IF 1/2" SECTION IS TRIMMED, i INSTALL SECOND SECTION OVER FIRST AND SEAL IN TIIE AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL 1/2" FLAT BOARD ON 1-2,11-1, 1 4, 29 ,

TIIE SUPPORT, TRIMMED AS NECESSARY AT 12-1 I Tile INTERFERENCE. TO CLEAR TIIE PIPE.

INSTALL SECOND PANEL SEALED TO FIRST IN THE AREA OF TiiE INTERFERENCE.

104243/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil I/4" OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: TRIM THE 1/4" OVERLAY 9-1, 9-3 I-6,7 SECTIONS TO CLEAR TIIE INTERFERENCES AND SEAL TO FIRST LAYER.

'~

ATTACHMENT C ER-M E-DS2, REV. 0 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS ,

PAGE C20 OF C24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCATREV 1.

CONTINUITY OF TIIE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 2.

EFFECrlVE TIIICKNESS OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3.

THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 4.

THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF TIIE MATERIALIS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5.

THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

TO PRO GENERIC 6.

SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGUR GENERIC ENIIANCE TIIE EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO StilELDING EFFECTS, MOUNTED TO STRUCTURE, TORTUROUS PATil, ETC.).

7.

TEST SCIIEME 9-3 DEMONSTRATED TiiE EFFECTIVENESS OF I/2* THICK PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS ON 1 1 103741/0 DIAMETER CONDUITS AND IS CREDITED WIIERE LOCALIZED INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE Tile INSTALLATION 103770!O OF OVERLAY. THIS DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 104017/0 IN 104057/0 104I15/0 104237/0 104238/0 102863/1

.103050/0 102725/0 107837/0 104243/0 8.

TEST SCllEME 10-2 DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 1/2* TL FLAT BOARD ON JUN 103706/1 AND IS CREDITED WHERE INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF THE SECOND 1AYER.'104013/0 Tills DEVI SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A TESTEP 104026/1 CON 104075/0 104152/0 104205/0 104234/0-104241/0

_n

ATTACHMENT C

. ER-ME-082. REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C21 OF C24 NuiE ' ~ ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 9.

DUE TO Tile SPECIFIC PLANT CONFIGURATION, DEVIATION (S) FROM STRESS SKIN. TIE WIRING, STAPLING OR OTHER JOINT102330/1 ENHANCEMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE REQUIRED. THESE DEVIATION (S) ARE A SMALL PART OF THE MECil 102478/l THIS INSTALLATION AND INDIVIDUAL LOCAL DEVIATION (S). THEY DO NOT COMPROMISE Tile YMECilANICAL OF INTEG 102858/0 TIIE JOINT (S) AS A WIIOLE OR TIIE EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIE FIRE BARRIER.

103007/1 103037/0 103375/0 ~ !

103414/11 103602/0, 103609/0 ;

103631/0 103633/0 103718/l' 103780/0 103816/0 103988/0 104151/0 104239/0 92.

Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED USES STRESS SKIN OuERLAP ON LONGITUDINALJOINT 103631/0 WAS SECURED TO Tile 330-1 PANELS WITil STAPLES AND TIE WIRES. ALL 3 OPTIONS SilOWN AISO USE BOTil METilODS, HOWEVER Tile DETAILS FOR TIE WIRE INSTALLATION VARY SLIGIITLY FOR TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. O ARE EQUIVALENT TO Tile TESTED METilOD AND ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR GENERIC USE. Ol' TION C DOES N SAME DEGREE OF TIGitTNESS AS OPTIONS A AND B, AND SIIALL NOT BE USED GENERICALLY. OlrTION C MET 110D IS l

ACCEPTABLE WiiERE INSTALLED SINCE STRESS SKIN IS STAPLED AND TROWEL GRADE APPLIED OVER B STAPLES. ' TiiE TIE WIRES SAG DURING TEST AND ALTIIOUGH NOT TESTED WITilOUT, THEIR INIIERENT EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING 330-1 STRESS TROWEL GRADE. SKIN ON LONGITUDINALJOLNTS IS DEFINITELY SECONDARY TO TilAT OF Tile STAPLE 10.

Tile ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION FOR COVERAGE OF THE TRAY SPLICE PLATE WITII FL4T BOARD 102478/l PRO TillCKNESS OF MATERIAL ENSURE INTEGRITY OF TIIE ENVELOPE. METilODS OF JOINT REINFORCEMENTIIAVE BEEN TESTED AND EFFECTIVELY 104197/0 IM 11.

THE USE OF FLEXI-BLANKET FOR COVERAGE ON RIGID CONDUIT IS NOT A TESTED CONFIGURATION. IlOWEVER, SINCE Tile 102861/0 CRITICAL PARAMETERS CONFIGURATIONS, OF MATERIAL TIIE INSTALLATION THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE F9UIVALENT TO TESTED IS ACCEPTABLE.

12.

Tile USE OF MITERED PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS FOR COVERAGE OF FLEX CONDUIT IS NOT 103721/1 IIOWEVER, SINCS TIIE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT 103730/0 TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEL' TABLE.

103947/0

ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C22 OF C24 NOTE- ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ,

DCAIREV .

13.

TIIE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACillEVE TIIE FULL REQUIRED MATERIAL TilICKNESS AT Tile END OF THE 102758/0 CONDUIT SUPPORT. TIIE PRIMARY RACEWAY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. THE SEALING OF TIIE SUPPORT TO THE IN TERFERING DUCT PROTECTS Tile END OF TIIE SUPPORT FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE AND PROVIDES A TOR PATil FOR CONDUCrlVE IIEAT TRANSFER. j 14.

TIIE CbNFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE TIIE FULL REQUIRED MATERIAL ~IlllCKNESS BETWEEN 102861/0 THE CONDUlT AND INTERFERING PIPE. FULL COVERAGE OF THE CONDUIT WITil THE FIRST LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS INSTALLED. BUTTING TIIE SECOND LAYER OF FLEXI-BIANKET DIRECTLY AGAINST THE PIPE PROTECTS THE SMA SINGLE LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO TIIE FIRE AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PATH FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT TRANSFER. ALSO, COMBUSTIBLE LOADING IN TIIE AREA IS LOW.

15.

FOR Tile 1* DIA. CONDUIT, TIIE MINOR AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE (< 3* LONG ON ONE SIDE ONLY) AND SIIIELDING 10272510 EFFECTS OF Tile PIPE AND CONDUIT BELOW ARE CREDITED. SCIIEME II-I DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVE 102837/0USE FLEXI-BLANKET OVER 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS. EXTENSION OF CONDUIT ENVELOPE VIA TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATIL 16.

Tile CRITICAL PARAMETERS FOR Tills INSTALLATION ARE MATERIAL TIIICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. 102858/0 THE INSTALLATION USES M ATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATION 103782/0 104027/0-104047/0 104I80/0 -

104186/0 104211/0 104223/0 104239/0 17.

TiiE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACillEVE THE FULL MATERIALTHICKNESS WHERE Tile CONDUlT FITTING 102863/1 INTERFERES WITH THE CURB. BUTTING THE TL AGAINST TiiE CURB AND COVERING THE BACK SIDE OF Tile C Tile SMALL AREA OF TIIIN TL FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO THE FIRE AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PATil FOR HEAT TRANSFER. . ADDITIONALLY TIIE CONFIGURATION IS LOCATED RIGHT ABOVE A SEALED FLOOR PENETRATIO PRECLUDING FIRE APPROACHING FROM BELOW OR THE SIDES.

18.

TIIE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE THE FULL MATERIALTIIICKNESS IN A SMALL AREA AROUND Tile 103007/1.

PIPE INTERFERENCE. Tile PIPE PROTECTS Tile DEVIATION AREA FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO THE FIRE. TH 103050/0 GRADE MATERIA.L PROVIDES EXTRA PROTECTIVE MATERIAL IN TIIE AREA AROUND T1IE DEVIATION AND A 103158/0 FOR HEAT TRANSFER. COMBUSTIBLE LOADING IN Tile AREA IS LOW.

10371811 19.

THE CONFIGURATION DOES NOT GET THE FULL TIIICKNESS OF TL ON A SMALL AREA ON 111E BACK103076/I SIDE OF A SUPPORT AWAY FROM TIIE CONDUIT. TIIE TL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN THE SUPPORT AND THE WALL. . DOU THE TL ARE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF Tile SUPPORT AND BUTTED TO THE WALL. THERE IS NO FIRE EX BACK SIDE TIIROUGH OF THE SUPPORT AND THE DOUBLE LAYERS ON THE SIDES PROVIDE EXTRA RESISTANCE TO CON TIIE SIDES..

A

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C23 OF C24 NOTE ~ ACCEPTANCE BASIS /NuitS i, DCA/REV 20.

Tile SUBJECT CONDUIT IS RUN PARALLEL TO THE WALL Tile INSTRUMENT TUBING IS ALSO RUN 103157/0 PARALLE CROSSING TIIE CONDUIT BETWEEN Tile CONDUIT AND Tile WALL SEALING BETWEEN Tile WALL AND Tile CON 103158/0 EITilER SIDE OF Tile TUBING PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL AROUND Tile SM ALL AREA OF DEVIATION PROTEC 103718/l DEVIATION FROM DIRECT FIRE IMPINGEMENT AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PATil FOR IIEAT TRANSFER.

21.

PROVIDING TROWEL GRADE TO SEAL AROUND Tile UNISTRUT PROTECTS Tile DEVIATION FROM103158/0 PROVIDES EXTRA RESISTANCE TO IIEAT TRANSFER.

DIRECT F 22.

Tills INSTALLATION POTENTIALLY FAILS TO ACillEVE FULL MATERIAL TIIICKNESS BENEEN Tile STEEL 103602/0ANGL TRAY BOTTOM. Tile ANGLE SillELDS Tile POTENTIAL DEVIATION FROM ANY DIRECT FIRE EXFOSURE AN Tile ANGLE PROVIDE EXTRA RESISTANCE TO IIEAT TRANSFER ALONG WITil ENSURING A VERY TORTURO AREA OF Tile DEVIATION. ADDITIONALLY. TilERE IS LOW COMBUSTIBLE LOADING IN Tile AREA.

23.

Tills CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACillEVE Tile REQUIRED 1/4" OVERLAY BETV/EEN Tile CONDUIT AND Tile 103636/0 TUBE STEEL BUTTING Tile OVERLAY AGAINST TIIE TUBE STEEL AND SEALING WITil TROWHL GRADE PR FROM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO A FlkE. INSTALLING FLAT BOARD ON TilREE SIDES PROVIDES EXTRA TRANSFER RESISTANCE AND ADDS EXTRA PROTECTION AROUND TIIE DEVIATION FROM ANY TYPE OF EXPO 24.

Tile CRITICAL PARAMETERS IN Tills CONFIGURATION ARE MATERIAL TIIICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL103650/0 INTEGRIT INSTALLED CONFIGURATION llAS MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIOMS. NOT INSTALLING FULL LAYER (S) OF TL AT Tile INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE Tile INTERFERENCE IS Tile REQUIRED TillCKNESS OF TL 25.

Tills CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAllE TO ACIIIEVE Tile REQUIRED 1/4" OVERLAY BETWEEN Tile CONDUIT AND 103864/0 STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT. BUTTING Tile OVERLAY AGAINST BOTil SIDES OF Tile LEG OF Tile ANGLE TROWEL GRADE PROTECTS Tile SMALL AREA OF DEVIATION FROM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. INSTA BOARD ONAROUND PROTECTION BOTil LEGS OF Tile ANGLE Tile DEVIATION. PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR llEAT TRANSFER RESIST ANCE AND EXT 26.

LOCALIZED OMISSION OF TillRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET NEXT TO Tile MOTOR IIOUSING IS ACCEPTAB 103959/0 CONDUIT TERMINATES AT Tile MOTOR Tile TL IS APPLIED TO SUPPORT OPERABILITY OF Tile MOTOR AND 103991/0 POINT OF INTERFERENCE WOULD RENDER Tile MOTOR INOPERABLE AND TIIE TL UNNECESSARY.

27.

Tills CONFIGURATION AS INSTALLED COULD NOT ACillEVE Tile TillRD FULL LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET 104107/0 AT WITil A STEEL SillELD AND A CONDUIT. Tile TillRD LAYER WAS INSTALLED BUTTED UP AGAINST Tile INTERF FOURTil LAYER WAS INSTALLED SEALED TO Tile TillRD AND AROUND Tile AREA OF Tile DEVIATION TO PRO DEVIATION FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO Tile FIRE AND TO PROVIDE EXTRA MATERIAL FOR INCREASED TRANSFER.

28.

Tills CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACIllEVE Tile REQUIRED 1/4" OVERIAY ON Tile CONDUIT AT Tile 104205/0 BASEPLATE. BUTTING Tile OVERLAY AGAINST TIIE STEEL AND ADDING EXTRA MATERIAL AT Tile INTERFE Tile AREA FORM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. IT ALSO PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR llEAT TRAN TO PROVIDE MORE PROTECTION AT Tile DEVIATION.

t.

r ~l

.1i t; ' N..

3 L

l f

'f i

5 i

f r

r b

+

)

.I i

S 1

i i

l- h

-'l I

l

.j

\

o d h_'

I

'I

-h ..

\

i

-- - + 2- .-m .,-_ .

2. . . . ,. , , ,

. * - .'- -.. O MM mm MMw____ pp,,,,, ---

---M'hhen.w w w ezw e,www _

p, p _.

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME42. REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C24 OF C24 - 4 NOTE - ACurrANCE BASIS / NOTES w

29.

THIS CONFIGURA110N, AS INSTATI Fn, FAILS TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED THICKNESS ATTHE INTERFERENCES.

104242/0 ADDING EXTRA MATERIAL AT THE INTERFERENCE PROTECTS THE AREA FORM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR HEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE TO PROVIDE MORE PROTECTION AT THE DEV 30.

REVIEW INDICATES THAT THIS INSTALLATION CANNOT BE EVALUATED AGAINST THE its a tu CONFIGUR 102780!O 93-1FA HAS BEEN WRITTEN TO DOCUMENTTills SITUATION AND PROVIDE A MECHANISM TO BRING CONFORMANCE WITH TEs a tu CONFIGURATIONS. THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION INVOLVES USING 330-1 T PREFORMED SECTIONS / PANEL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE.

31.

THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACIIIEVE THE FULL REQUIRED MATERIALTHICKNESS ON A PROTRUDING 103599/0 ITEM AT AN INTERFERENCE. THE PARIMARY RACEWAY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. THE EXTRA LAYER O PROTECTS HEAT THE INTERFERENCE FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO A FIRE AND PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FO TRANSFER.

0 1

k k

l 4 d "Vm - y w or e %+ w

ER44E482. BLEY.O PAGE DI OF D30 :;

t a

4 1~

4 i j.

. ATTACHMENT D PROTRUDING /INTERFDtING TTEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS l

2 '} .:

._ - - . . . . ...-.s, ... . . . . .._.r, , , , _ . ~ . , .- s.., , , ., . . _ . _ , . . . , . - . . . r_. _ . , ,

ATTACHMENT D ER-M O .Rr's.O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING TTEM 4 PD';d D2 01- G30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDG 'ELEY ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS /NOTSS AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 101397/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CON 5TRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING T11ERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL TRAY STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF AN LYTERFERING 2* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON Tile 11-1, 12-1 14.7 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9" 12-2, 13-1 FROM THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. %1{ERE TIIE & 14-1 2* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT INTTaFERES %1TH TiiERMO-LAG INSTALLATICN. EXTEND TIIE PROTECTION ONTO TIIE PIPE SUPPORT TO A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 9* FROM Tile CABLE TRAY. OMIT THERMO-LAG PROTECTION OF !

TIIE INSIDE FACE OF THE PIPE SUPPORT TUEE STEEL 102221/1 EC 778 X-115B AAll54 Y Y i q

ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY SilARES SUPPORT '

WTTil ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY, BOTH ITEMS REQUIRED 9* RULE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION AS PROTRUDING TTEMS (MULTIPLE LOCATIONS, SAMETRAY RUN). SPACING BETWEEN SPLICE PLATE BOLTS AND A BEND IN ONE TRAY REPRESENT ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION PROBLEMS. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION.

RESOLUTION: COVER PROTRUDING TRAY AND II-l.12-I, 1-S. 17, 34 SUPPORT USING DCA DIRECTIGNS (TYPICAL 12-2. 13-1 DETAIL 134). COMPLETELY COVER WALL & 14-1 .

SUPPORT WTTH THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANEL, !

AND USE A COMMON ENCLOSURE FOR SPLICE PLATE BOLTS WHERE SPACE PROIIIBITS STANDARD INSTALLATION. I 1

1

ATTACILMENT D ER-M E482, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING TTEM PAGE D3 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS

.DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ~ SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION!!SSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLUT10N SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE . SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 102231/0 EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHICH SHARES A SUPPORT WITH A PROTECTED TRAY. THE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IS %TTH N THE 9*

DISTANCE FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH

[ PROTECTION. !

RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE PROTRUDING 11-1,12-1, I-5, 17 j TRAY USING M2-1701 DETAIL 834. ENCLOSE 12-2, 13-1 i TRAY SPLICE PLATES AND BOLTING FOR BOTH & 14-1 IN A COMMON 330-1 BOX TO SIMPLIFY INSTALLATION.

102266/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON A STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY. THE SUPPORT IS ALSO USED l

AS A PIPE SUPPORT AND THE UNPROTECTED LINE IS WTTHIN THE 9* DISTANCE FOR -

CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION.

RESOLITTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON THE Il-1,12-1, 14,8 STRUCTURAL TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR A 12-2, 13-1 DISTANCE OF 9" FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY & 14-1 EXCEPT WHERE INTERFERED WITH BY THE UNPROTECTED LINE.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-CS2, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D4 OF P30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION!!SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA! (YIN) (YIN)

TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D30)

ZONE

'I; 102312/0 i AB 790 X-174 AA/2ta N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORTS W111CII ARE SHARED WITH A PROTECTED TRAY. THE NON-ESSENTIALTRAY IS %1 THIN THE 9* DISTANCE FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION.

RESOLIJIlON: WRAP AD? ACENT TRAY AND N/A SEE SHARED SUPPORT VEMMRS WITH THERMO- ATTACllMENT LAG 330-1 PANEL A' ME 9EQUIRED A FOR LOCATIONS PER M1 JF, OETAIL 13-6.

ACCEITANCE

. NOTE: THE PANEL *lTreCHMENT DIRECTIONS BASIS FOR INCLUDED IN TIII5 M ARE NOW PART OF DETAIL 13-6 THE TYPICAL DETAIL TTSELF.

102479/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROVIDING COVERAGE ON NON-ESSEN11AL FREE AIR CABLES PROTRUDING FROM ESSENTIAL J-BOX JB2A-628.

RESOLUTION: NO PROTECTION IS TO BE ADDED 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 36 FOR CABLES, SINCE THEY ARE SEALED INTERNALLY IN THE J-BOX, USING A 6* DEFTH OF ELASTOMER 45B.

102S24/0 EC 790 X-122 EA154 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF SUPPORT STEEL AND CABLE TRAY WHICH INTERFERE WITH THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF A 2*4 ESSENTIAL CONDUlT.

RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORTSTEEL AND 9-I, 10-1 1-5, 9 ADJACENT TRAYS AS PROTRUDING ITEMS PER THE 9" RULE, USING DCA DIRECTIONS FOR ATTACHMENT OF PANEL TO TRAYS.

w ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 0 POOTRUDING/ INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D5 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP.. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERh/ RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA! (Y/N) (YIN). TEST FIRE (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 102525 4 ! EC 778 X-IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING INTERFERING CABLE TRAY AS A PROTRUSION INTO AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PROTECTIVE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE PER THE l 9* RULE.

RESOLUTION: DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR 9-1,10-1 1-5. 18 ATTACHMENT OF FLAT PANEL TO CABLE TRAY USING TIE WIRING AND DRII f rn IlOLES.

102750/0 SG 790 2-071 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECHON TO COVER C4 CHANNEL STEEL SUPPORT MEMBER WHICH INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANEL TO TOP OF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL SANDED / TRIMMED 3?0-1 Il-1,12-1 1-6, 19 FLAT PANEL ON TOP OF TRAY PER M2-1701 12 2, 13-1 TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 (DCA 101918) AN THE & 9-3 AREA OF C4 CHANNEL INTERFERENCE. COVER ENTIRE C4 CHANNEL WITH 330-1 FLAT PANEL EXCEPT WHERE ITINTERFACES %TTH THE NON-ESSENTIALTRAY IT SUPPORTS. APPLY 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT LOCA110NS WHERE C4 CHANNEL THERMO-LAG PANELS INTERFACE %TTH PANELS COVERING THE TOP OF THE ESSENTIAL TRAY.

w . _- _ _ . _ ____ _ ______ ____. _________ _._._ __ _ _______ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . _

ATTAGIMENT D ER-ME482, REY. 0 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM

. PAGE D6 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS

~

DCA NO.lREV ELDO ELEVf ROOM: FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERNTAESOLITTION SUPPORT . basts /NOT1i3

. AREA / (YIN)1 (Y Q i ,

TEST (PAGE D26,

^ FIRE

!' ZONE -

SCHEMES D30) i,1 102789/I ; AB 790 X-190 : AA121s Y Y i: ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION i' FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL TRAY STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORTIN THE I. AREA OF AN INTERFERING 12*4 CONDENSATE

}

PIPE (2 LOCATIONS).

RESOLITTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON THE II-1.12-1. 1 4, 10 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9* 12-2, 13-1 FROM THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. WHERE THE & 14-1 12*4 PIPE INTERFERES WITH THERMO-LAG -

1

e. '

INSTALLATION TRIM 330-1 PANEL AROUND PIPE TO ALLOW 1/8* AIR GAP BETWEEN PIPE -

AND THERMO-LAG. ADD A SECOND THICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL AT AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE, EXTENDING 9* IN BOTH c

DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SUPPORT. ..

+2 h .i 4

4 .

i'

--- . . - . . . . . . . . . . - _ . . ~ .

, . . . -. - 4-.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D7 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERNIRESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

}

AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST . (PAGE D26-l FIRE SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 102821/I SG 821 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: SERVICE WATER LINE INTERFERES {

WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION AT SPLICE PLATE AREA OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

ISSUE 2: TWO CHILL WATER LINES LNTERFERE WITH STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON AN ,

ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY DUE TO ZERO CLEAIULNCE.

ISSUE 3: NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROP BET % TEN ADJACENT NON-ESSENITAL CABLE TRAYS INTERFERES WIT 11 THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE !

TRAY- ll RESOLUTION 1: TRIM SPLICE PIATE SCREWS 11-1, 12-1, I-5, 28 I FLUSH WITH NUTS TO ALLOW FIAT PANEL 12-2, 13-1 1 INSTALLATION. TRANSFER FROM FLAT BOARD & 14-1 i TO "V* RIB BOARD PER M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 CRITERIA (FROM DCA 101918).

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM ;, PAGE D8 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST . (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 102821/1 RESOLUTION 2: REMOVE EXISTING THERMO- 11-1, 12-1, I-5, 29 CONT'D LAG FROM TRAY IN THE AREA OF THE 2 PIPES. 12-2, 13-1 ADD INSULATION TO PIPES. CONSTRUCT 330-1 & 14-1 PANEL BOXES AROUND PIPES, ATTACHED TO THE PRIMARY TRAY ENVELOPE USE 2 LAYERS 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET TO WRAP EACH PIPE ABOVE AND BELO'V THE LEVEL OF THE TRAY, USING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE STRESS SKIN.

AND STAPLES TO ATTACH AND REINFORCE

,, CONFIGURATION.

RESOLUTION 3: USE FLAT PANEL 330-1 AT TIIE 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 28, 30 .

AREA OF AIR DROP INTERFERE! ICE, 12-2, 13-1 !l INSTALUNG PER M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3. & 14-1 l 22" MAXIMUM FLAT PANEL WIDTH WILL BE USED, DEVIATING FROM 12* MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY THE DETAIL.

102859/0 EC 790* X-1ISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: I&C TUBING AND TRAY INTERFERE

%TTH THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL j

CONDUIT. OPEN-ENDED TUBE STEEL SUPPO'.tT i MEMBER AND ADJACENT NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT ARE SECONDARY INTERFERENCES.

CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION.

RESOLUTION: COVER ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INTERFEhENCES PER THE 9" RULE 9-I, 10-1 1-6,38 AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. COVER BOTH OPEN t

ENDS OF THE PIPE SUPPORT TUBE STEEL WITH l THERMO-LAG CAPS PER DETAIL 16-5.

l

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDINGILNTERFERING ITEM PAGE D9 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV; BLDO ELIIV - ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET DESCRIPHON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION L SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA /. - (YIN). (YIN) TEST FIRE (PAGE D26-SCHEMES - D30)

ZONE 102884/0 AB 831 X-226 AA/2Id Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR GRATING AND 3* ANGLE IRON I INTERFERE WITil STANDARD THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

RESOLUTION: MODIFY FLOOR GRATING TO II-1,12-1, 1-6, 20 ALLOW PROPER THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION. 12-2, 13-1 WRAP THE 3* ANGLE WITH THE ESSENTIAL & I4-1 TRAY WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH t/2*

THICKNESS IN'TALLATION, AND COVER TIIE 3*

ANGLE FOR 5* BEYOND THE TRAY IN BOTil DIRECTIONS, BUTTING PANELS TO ADJACENT WALL AND USING 330-I TROWEL GRADE AND SCREWS TO ATTACH PANELS.

103002/0 SG 192 2-109B 25K/17e Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERAGE OF EMBEDDED SPARE CAPPED CONDUlT SLEEVE, WHICH IS LOCATED WITilIN THE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE REQUIRED FOR A WALL MOUNTED STEEL SUPPORT ON WHICH JUNCTION BOX J82S-11I4Y IS MOUNTED.

RESOLUTION: COVER THE END OF TIIE SPARE 10-I, 10-2 1-6, t 1 SLEEVE WIDI THERMO-LAG 330-1 TROWEL ORADE MATERIAL FILLING THE 1/8* DEEP RECESS UlfrIL IT IS FLUSH WITH THE WALL

- SURFACE. COVER SUPPORT STEEL WITH 11IERMO-LAG.

t

-n - , , e -, - -- - _ _ - -- - - _ _ . . - - _ - _ -

ATTACIIMENT D ER-ME-082 REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE DIO OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS.' NOTES AREAI (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE ,

SCHEMES D30)

ZONE ij 103081/I : SG 810 2482 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROTECTION OF FSSA FLEX CONDUITS WIUCH PROTRUDE FROM ESSENRAL J-BOX i JB2S-53330. DIRECTION IS ALSO NEEDED FOR j COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CONDUrr %11ERE SPACE IS UMITED, AND FOR FASTENING 330-1 PANEL TO STEEL UNER WALLS.

RESOLUTION: WRAP 2 FSSA CABLES AS 10-1, 10-2 1-S, 37

, PROTRUDING ITEMS IN A COMMON THERMO-LAG 330460 ENCLOSUREIFIRE STOP PER TYPICAL DETAIL 3-3A METHODS. INSTALL COVERAGE ON THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT USING DETAIL 3-3A, BUTTING 330-1 PRESHAPED SECITONS TO J-BOX AND ADDING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET WTnt THE REQUIRED j OVERLAP. INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO STEEL '

UNER WALL USING SELF-TAPPING METAL SCREWS FOR 9* RULE PRUTECTION TO DIE EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADD 330-70 CERAMIC .

BLANK IN THE GAP BETWEEN THE J-BOX AND THE STEEL UNER.

, . r -

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082 REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITi.M PAGE Dil OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASISINOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26 FIRE SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 103088/0 SG 832 2-09 t 25B/15 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCITON REQUESTS DIRECTION j FOR INSTALUNG THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL l CONDUIT TUBE STEEL SUPPORT IN Tile AREA l OF AN INTERFERING 1 I/4*4 PdE. l l

ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIREC110N l FOR INSTALUNG THERMO4AG ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUBE STEEL SUPPORT IN TIIE AREA j OF AN INTERFERING 15/8*d PIPE RESTRAlhT. I 1

RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON 9-1, 10-1 14,12 CONDUIT SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9*

FROM THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. ON THE SIDE OF Tile TUBE STEEL WHERE THE 1/4* DIA. PIPE INTERFERES WTTH INSTALLATION, INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, AND ADD A SECOND 330-1 PANEL. TRIM THE ;

PANELS TO ALLOW AN AIR GAP AT THE I 1/4" DIA. PIPE. NOTCH PANEL ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SUPPORT AS NECESSARY TO FIT FLUSH TO TUBE STEEL.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON 9-1, 10-1 1 4. 12 CONDUIT SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9*

FROM THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. INSTALL 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON THE TUBE STEEL AT THE PIPE RESTRAINT LVTERFERENCE. ;

EXTENDING 9* FROM THE I:6ERENCE. '

TRIM PANELS AT THE PIPE RESTRAINT TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP. INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON ADJACENT CONDUIT C23K31182 WHERE IT INTERFERES %TTH THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON THE TUBE STEEL SUPPORT.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482. REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D12 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPT10N/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)- TEST. (PAGE D26 '

FIRE SCHEMES i D30)

ZONE i 103143/0 SG 832 2494 2SB/IS Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUBE STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF A 2* DIA. FP PIPE.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 12 ,

PANEL ON THE TUBE SIEEL SUPPORT TO THE l EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADD A SECOND THICLNESS OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TWO SIDES OF THE SUPPORT ADJACENT TO TIIE INTERFERING PIPE. TRIM 330-1 PANELS AT THE AREA OF THE 1 INTERFERENCE TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-OS2. REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PACE Dl3 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAf (YIN) (YIN) TEST FIRE (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 103476/1 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCDON REQUESTS DIRECHON ON THERMO-LAG 330-1 *V* RIB PANEL ORIENTATION FOR OUTER LAYER COVERAGE FOR J-BOX JB25-53830.

ISSUE 2A: CONSTRUCHON REQUESTS DIRECHON ON INSTALUNG I/4" THERMO-LAG OVERLAY ON 2* DIA. CONDUIT %HERE

! DIAMETER OF THE FIRST LAYER OF 330-1 IS OVERLY LARGE.

ISSUE 2B: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON THERMO-IAG COVERAGE OF STEEL LINER WALL. WHICH PROTRUDES CONDUIT OVERLAY PROTECHON.

ISSUE 3: CONSTRUCHON REQUESTS DIRECTION ON 1/4* THERMO-LAG 330-1 OVERLAY 4

INSTALLATION 'l%RERE BARRIER IS AN l INTERFERENCE.

RESOLUTION 1: NO DIRECHONAL 10-2 1-6. 13 ORIENTATION REQUIREMENT APPLIES FOR J-BOX OUTERIAYER COVERAGE. ENSURE AT LEAST 2 RIBS ON EACH PANEL ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE PROTECTION SURFACE.

RESOLUDON 2A: INSTALL OVERLAY PER DCA N/A SEE ATT. A 103423 DIRECDON (M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 4- FOR ACCEPT.

9). BASIS OF DET.

4-9 RESOLUTION 28: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO 9-1. 10-1 1-5. 33 STEEL UNER WALL TO PROTECT CONDUIT SUPPORTTO SATISFY THE 9* RULE. USE SCREW TYPE FASTENERS IN LIEU OF HILTI BOE.TS.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482. CEV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D14 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA /. (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST (PAGE D26-ZONE SCHEMES D30) 103476/1 CONT'D RESOLUTION 3: INSTALL 1/4 THICK CONDUIT 9-3 1-5. 27 OVERLAYS ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. %HERE BARRIER INTERFERES WTTH OVERLAY INSTALLATION, BUTT COVERAGE TO BARRIER AND ADD 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET PER PROVIDED DIRECTIONS.

103484/1 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION

- FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG 330-1 ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHERE C6 CHANNELS INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE ON TOP OF THE TRAY.

ItESOLUTION: COVER C6 CHANNELS AND 11-1. 12-1. 1-5.32 CABLE TRAY ABOVE CHANNEIS AS 12-2, 13-1 PROTRUDING ITEMS PER THE 9" RULE. & 14-1 DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR ENCLOSING AllTHREE CHANNELS IN A COMMON THERMO-LAG BOX BETWEEN THE TWO CABLE TRAYS.

103488/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY %HERE 7/8* PIPE SUPPORT ROD INTERFERES WTIE STANDARD INSTALLATION.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL ON TRAY Il-l.12-1 1-5, 21 UP TO THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE. WRAP 12-2. 13-1 SUPPORT ROD WITH 2 LAYERS 330-660 FLEXI- & 14-1 BLANKET PER THE 9* RULE. CONSTRUCT FLAT PANEL BOX AROUND SUPPORT ROD, ATTACH TO TRAY. FILL BOX WITH 330-70 CERAMIC INSULATOR. SEAL BOX %TTH THERMO-LAG 330460 BULK GRADE AT TOP AND BOTTOM

_ .m

A'.rsCHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D15 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO. ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT - BASIS / NOTES AREAT (YIN) (YIN) TEST I FIRE (PAGE D26-SCHEMES . D30)

ZONE 103508/0 SG 810 2482 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: ADJACENT NON-ESSEhTIAL CABLE l TRAY AND SHARED SUPPORT PROTRUDE ESSENTTAL CABLE TRAY THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE (4 LOCATIONS).

ISSUE 2: 2* DIA. P;PE STRUT AND 6* TUBE STEEL MEMBER LNTERFERE %TTH 9* RULE PROTECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

ISSUE 3: ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES %TTH 9* RULE PROTECTION OF 2*

x 4* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

RESOLUTION 1: WRAP ADJACENT TRAY AND N/A SEE ATT. A PROTRUDING STEEL SUPPORT %TTH THERMO- FOR LAG 330-1 PANEL AT EACH OF 4 LOCATIONS ACCEPTANCE PER M2-1701, DETAIL 134.

BASIS FOR DETAIL 134.

RESOLUTION 2: WRAP STRUCTURAL STEEL I l-1,12-1, 1 4, 10 SUPPORT WITH 330-1 PANEL. NOTCHING PANEL 12-2, 13-1 AROUND 2* DIA. PIPE STRUTTO MAINTAIN AIR & 14-1 GAP. ADD A 2nd IAYER 330-1 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF PIPE STRUT INTERFERENCE AND 6* TUBE STEEL INTERFERENCE, MAINTAINING AN AIR GAP AT BOTH INTERFERENCES.

RESOLUTION 3: WRAP CABLE TRAY SUPPORT I1-1, 12-1, 14,10

% Tnt 330-1 PANEL, USING REDUCED 12-2, 13-1 THICKNESS PANELS WHERE THE ADJACENT & 14-1 PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER thTERFERES. ADD A 2nd IAYER 330-1 PANEL TO THE HORIZONTAL MEMBER OF THE TRAY SUPPORT WEST OF THE PRIMARY TRAY ENVFfAPE.

n%

ATTACHMENT D 3 ER-ME-082. REV. O ,

PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D15 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS '

I- ,

j-j DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION

SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAI (YIN) (YIN)'

l TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE l SCHEMES D30)

ZONE ,

ij i 103597/0 i AB 310 X-207 AA/21s Y Y

.. ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION I, FOR COVERING A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY ,

' AS A PROTRUSION LVTO AN ESSENTIAL TRAY THERMO-LAG PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.

ISSUE 2: A PIPE SUPPORT MEMBEa, " T (FERES WITH PROTECTION OF AN ESSENTIA ABLE !

TRAY. !

ISSUE 3: A 2*$ PIPE INTERFERES WITH PROTECTION OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

a t RESOLimON 1- COVER THE NON-ESSENTIAL 11-1,12-1. 1-5. 39 TRAY AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PER TIIE 9* 12-2, 13-1.

RULE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1 I

' 134 (DEVELOPED BY DCA 103548).

RESOLimON 2: COVER THE SUPPORT t-5. 8 >

INTERFERENCE PER THE 9* RULE TO THE I t-1,12-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE. AS DIRECTED IN THE 12-2, 13-1.

DISPOSITION OF DCA 102266. 14-1 '

I l

RESOLUTION 3; INSTALL A 6* WIDE 330-1 FLAT 1-5,40 PANEL SECTKW TO THE BOTTOM OF THE Il-1,12-1.

TRAY, PERFORMING ANY MINIMAL SANDING 12-2, 13-1, ,

REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP 14-1 ;

CLEARANCE ATTHE PIPE (THE EXISTING GAP IS 5/8*). USE TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 FOR -

{ i

l. TRANSITION FROM *V* RIB TO FLAT PANEL I

e i

.,x._. m __ _ _ . ._.m . ____.__ . ___ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

ATTAGIMENT D ER-ME-082. REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D17 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./PEV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. : DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPditT BASIS / NOTES I AREAL (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26 . I FIRE SQlEMES D30) l ZONE l 103613/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21 Y Y ISSUE: ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES %TTH 9" RULE PROTECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

R2 SOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1,12-1, 1-6, 14 PANEL ON CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE %1TIIOUT LNSTALUNG & 14-1 PANEL ON THE LVTERFERENCE.

103799/0 SG 832 2494 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE I: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING CEIUNG UNER AS A PROTRUSION %11ERE IT INTERFERES %TTH 1/4" OVERIAY ON 2" DIA. CONDUIT.

ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING 3* X 3* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT AND CEIUNG LINER WHERE UMITED ACCESS ,

I PREVENTS USE OF FASTENERS.

RESOLUTION 1: DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED 9-3 I-5, 27 FOR FASTENER SPAGNG AND PANEL INSTALIATION TO AGIIEVE 9* RULE PROTECTION.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL 2 UNERS OF 330-1 9-1, 10-1 1-5. 12 PANEL ON TUBE STEEL SUPPORT EXTENDING FROM 2 CONDUITS UP TO THE STEEL PLAT 5E, WHICH IS TO BE COVERED %TTH 330-1 PANEL (I LAYER) USING INDICATED SCREW SPAGNG.

ATTACHMENT D ER-MEM REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D18 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREAI (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST . (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30) -

ZONE 103809/0 AB 810 X-207 AAl2 tli Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING 3 FIRE ZONE R CABLES WHICH PROTRUDE ESSENTIAL J-BOX JB2A-5363.

PISOLUT10N: INSTALL 330-1 CONDUIT 10-1. 10-2, 1-S,35 SECTIONS ON FIRE ZONE R CABES, EXTEND 4" 2-1 MIN TO 5* MAX FROM J-BOX THERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND FILL %TTH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE TO FORM A FIRE STOP. ENCLOSE TWO OF TiiE CABLES IN A COMMON ENVELOPE.

103846/0 AB 852 241 AA/21I Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY SUPPORTSTEEL WHERE ADJACENT HVAC DUCT FLANGE INTERFERES WITH FUil. P.9EL THICKNESS INSTALLATION PER 9* RULE (3 LOCATIONS). U 3

RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORTSTEEL WITH Il-1.12-1, 1 4, 10 FULL THICKNESS 330-I TO TUE EXTENT 12-2, 13-1 POSSIBLE PER THE 9* IdIa2. WHERE & 14-1 INTERFERENCES NF"JT,61 TATE REDUCED PANEL THICKNEP. LUNTAIN AN AIRGAP AND ADD A 2nd LAYER OF PANEL TO THE SUPPORT STEEL IN THE VICINITY OF THE INTERFERENCE.

ATTACHMENT D E2-ME442. REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE DI? OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS b

d DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM- FIRE SUPP. DET.

~ DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA 1 (YIN) (YIN):

TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE ' . SCHEMES ZONE- D30) 103917/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: 4* DIA. PIPE IS %1THIM I/8* OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING %TTH 9" RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT.

ISSUE 2: 4* DIA. PIPE IS %TTHIN APPROXIMATELY 1/16' OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING % TIE 9* RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT.

RESOLtJI' ION I: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1. 12-I. 1-5, 10 ;

PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2, f 31 !

EXTENT POSSIBLE, TRIMMING PANEL AT THE & 14-1 '

LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP. ADD A 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TOP AND SIDF SURFACES OF THE TRAY SUPPORT. AISO TRIMMING THESE PANEIE TO ACIHEVE A MINIMAL AIR GAP AT THE LOCATION OF THE PIPE INTERFERENCE.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 Il-1,12-1, I-5, 10 PANEL ON THE CABG TRAY SUPPORTTO THE 12-2. 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE, TRIMMING PANEL AT THE & 14-1 LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP. ADD A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TOP SURFACE OF THE TRAY SUPPORT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE INTERFERING PIPE. ALSO TRIMMING THESE PANELS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMAL AIR GAP AT THE PIPE -

INTERFERENCE.

l

ATTACHMENT D -

ER-ME-062. REY. 0 -

PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM <

PAGE D20 OF D30 CO~.~ERAGE DEVIATIONS i

DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPITON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN)" (YIN) _ TEST (PAGE D26- -

FIRE ZONE SCHEMES D30) !

103924/0 AB 810 X-207 AAt21b Y Y ISSUE: HVAC DUCT IS WITHIN 3/8* OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY,

, INTERFERING %TTH 9" RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT.

l RESOLUTION: INSTALL MODIFIED 9" RULE I t-1,12-1, - 1 4, 10 THERMO-LAG PROTECTION ATTHE AREA OF 12-2, 13-1 THE DUCT FLANGE INTERFERENCE. USING A & 14-1 -

REDUCED THICKNESS 330-1 PANEL AND MAINTAINING A MINIMAL AIR GAP. INSTALL 3 l

THICKNESSES 330-1 PANELTO THE TRAY l SUPPORT MEMBER ON BOTH SIDES OF THE REDUCED PANEL. USE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND TIE WIRE OR BANDING TO HOLD THE f PANELS IN PLACE.

104001/0 AB 810 X-207 AA121b Y '

Y ISSUE: ADJACENT Uh%TRUT SUPPORT MEMBER j

IS WITHIN 1/4" OF A *C* CHANNEL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9* RULE

PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 9* RULE PROTECTION I1-1, 12-1, 1 4, 10 TO *C' CHANNEL USING 330-1 PANEL, 12-2, 13-1 TRIMMING PANEL AS NECESSARY TO AVOID & 14-1 THE INTERFERING SUPPORT MEMBER.

INSTALL A 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL INSIDE THE *C" CHANNEL AND TIE WIRE TO THE M*

TRIMMED PANELTO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL "

I i

MATERIALTHICKNESS AT THE AREA OF THE l INTERFERENCE.

l; i

i t D

f I

t c . . ~ . .

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-OR2. REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D81 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPT10NIISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D25-FIRE SCHEMES D30)

IONE 108079/1 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: 2 CONDUITS INT 5RFERE PARTIALLY

%TTH INSTALLATION OF 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON J-BOX. ALSO, ANGLE IRON SUPPORT INTERFERES PARTIALLY WITH Ist LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON J-BOX.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2nd LAYER 330-1 PANEL 10-2 1-5, 24 TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AROUND CONDUIT INTERFERENCES. COMPLETELY COVER ANGLE IRON SUPPORT %TTH 330-1 FLAT PANEL AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL. TRIMMING A 1/2* THICK 330-1 PANEL TO FIT SNUGLY BEDVEEN THE ANGLE IRON AND THE J-BOX.

104114/0 AB B04 X-!80 AA/21s Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG ON 1 1/2*

ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AT A RADIAL BEND AND ON A PROTRUDING SUPPORT BRACE WHICII IS WTnIIN t/2* OF AN ADJACENT CABLE TRAY.

1 RESOLUTION: INSTALL RADIAL BEND 1/2* 9-1. 10-1 & 1-6. 12 SECTIONS AND I/4" OVERLAY SECTIONS, 9-3 INCLUDING SDtESS SKIN UPGRADE. %7AP PROTRUDING SUPPORT PER THE 9* RULE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE ADDING A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL AROUND THE SUPPORT BRACE ALONG THE LENGTH OF ANY PANELS WHERE THICKNESS IS REDUCED.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O PROTRUDING /LNTERFERING ITEM PAGE D22 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS

-DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIONilSSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) i; TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE; '

ZONE SCHEMES D30) i;j i

10411711 AB 790 X-180 AAi21a Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON INSTALLING 330460 AND STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON PROTRUDING AIR DROP BUNDLES IN CONGESTED AREA.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330460 COLLAR AND Il-1 1-5, 25 STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AS A COMMON ENCLOSURE AROUND 3 ADJACENT ,

AIR DROP BUNDLES. INSTALL COLLAR AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AS A SINGLE AIR DROP ENCLOSING ON THE NORTH MOST BUNDLE-104173/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE I: ENGINEERING DIRECITON REQUESTED WHERE PROTRUDING CABLE AIR DROPS REQUIRE 330460

COLLAR

BACKFIT.

ISSUE 2: ENGINEERING DIRECTION REQUESTED '

WHERE PROTRUDING CABLE AIR DROPS REQUIRE 330460

COLLAR

BACKFIT.

4 CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS PERMISSION TO USE A COMMON BUNDLE FOR TWO ADJACENT AIR DROPS-RESOLUTION 1: WRAP AIR DROP BUNDLES PER 11-1 1-5. 25 M2-1701 DETAIL 34 WHERE POSSIBLE. USE 2 PIECE COLLAR VARIATION WIIERE FIELD '

CONDITIONS PROHIBIT USE OF STAMDARD DETAIL.

RESOLUTION 2: ENCLOSE AIR 1>ROPS 2 & 3 IN A i1-1 1-5. 25 COMMON BUNDLE. USE DETAIL 34 FOR.

OTHER BUNDLE, OR 2 PIECE VARIATION WHERE FIELD CONDITIONS PROHIBIT USE OF STANDARD DETAIL.

A'ITACHMENT D ER-ME482, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE DZ3 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLURON SUPPOkT BASIS / NOTES AREA /- (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCIIEMES D30)

ZONE' 104189/0 SG 832 2494 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS HAVE OPEN-END 4* X 6" TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MEMBERS WHICH REQUIRE THERMO-LAr"APS, BUT LIMITED SPACE MAKES INSTAL ATION IMPRACTICABLE. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION.

RESOLUTION: COVER Tile BOTTOM END OF N/A 26 THE TUBE STEEL MEMBERS PER M2-1701 DETAIL 16-5. LEAVE TIIE TOP OPENINGS WITHOUT COVERS.

104206 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT BASE PLATE IS %TTHIN 3/8* OF 2* DIA. CONDUIT %111CH IS BEING PROTECTED PER THE 9* RULE AS AN INTERFERENCE TO ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY TIIERMO-LAG PROTECTION.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-I.12-1, I-5, 15 PANEL ON THE 2* DIA. CONDUTT TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE PER THE 9* RULE. WHERE & 14-1 SUPPORT PLATE PREVENTS COMPLETE CIRCUMFERENTIAL %1 LAP BUTT CONDUIT HALF-ROUNDS UP TO THE PLATE AND INSTALL A 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET (11/16* WET FILM THICKNESS) AT THE THERMO-LAG / BASEPLATE INTERFACE.

- _ .__ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - ~

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D24 OF D30 COVERAVE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.

' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)

FIRE TEST (PAGE D26-

' ZONE SCHEMES D30)

+

104221/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/2In Y Y

ISSUE I: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECHON FOR INSTALLATION ON IIVAC DUCT AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT, WHICH INTERFERE WITH ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTION.

ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERAGE OF PIPE SUPPORT BASE PLATE WHICH IS A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE TO COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION I: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 I l-1,12-1, 1-S 22 PANEL ON IIVAC SUPPORT MEMBERS 12-2, 13-1 VERTICALLY PER TiiE 9* RULE AND & 14-1 IIORIZONTALLY OUT TO Tile HVAC DUCT INSULATION. 1;

!, RESOLUTION 2: APPLY 330-1 TROWEL GRADE 11-1, 12-1, I-5. 23 BEIWEEN BASE PLATE AND CABLE TRAY 12-2, 13-1 SUPPORT. INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO TRAY & 14-1 SUPPORT, BUTTING UP TO BASE PLATE AND ADDING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT PANEIJBASEPL. ATE INTERFACE.

104224/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y i ISSUE: 4* DIA. PIPE IS WITHIN 7/16* OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9* RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 Il-12,12-1, 1-6, 10 PANEL ON Tile CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO TIIE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE TRIMMING PANEL ATTilE & 14-1 LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP.

COVER THE SUPPORT WTTH A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL NEAR THE INTERFERENCE, ALSO TRIMMING T11E PANELS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMAL AIR GAP.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-0820 REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D25 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV ' BLDG ELEV ROOM" FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D30)

ZONE 104227/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORTIS WITHIN 1/2" OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ,

ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WTH{ 9" RULE PROTECITON OF THE SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: INSTAIL THERMO-LAG 330-1 1I-1. 12-1. 1-5. 16 PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT *C" - 12-2. 13-1 CHANNEL MEMBER TO DIE EXTENT POSSIBLE. & 14-1 AT THE AREA OF THE PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERENCE INSTALL 330-1 AROUND THE OIRSIDE SURFACES OF THE CHANNEL. FILL Tile INSIDE AREA OF THE CHANNEL WITH A BUILDUP OF 330-1 PANELS PRE-BUTTERED WInt 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. THERMO-LAG IS OMFITED FROM THE END OF THE *C-CHANNEL LEGS AT THE PIPE SUPPORT l INTERFERENCE.

i

ATTACilMENT D ER-M E-082. REV. 0 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM i PAGE D26 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/ REY 1.

CONTINUITY OF TiiE MATERIAL IS CONSIs i LNT %TTH TEs a tu CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC 2.

EFFECTIVE TlHCKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSisItNT %TTH ]esItu CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3.

TIIE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TEsItu CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 4.

TIIE APPLICATION OR END USE OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC l S.

TIIE CONFIGURATION EQUIVALENT WAS REVIEWED BY A QUAUFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED LEVEL OF PROTECTION. GENER!C TO P 6.

SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR TIIE PLANT CONFIGU GENERIC ENIIANCE TIIE EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SlilELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.).

7.

EACH OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS 101397/0 PROTECT DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. TlHS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TilIC THERMO-LAG WilERE T11E TUBE STEEL INTERFERES. TIIE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTE ADDITIONALLY, TilERMO-LAG IS PROVIDED ON TIIE SECONDARY INTERFERENCE. INSTALLED TO COMPENSATE THE TRAY SUPPORT REDUCED TIIICKNESS 8.

EACH OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 102266/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USED REDUCED 103597/0 C STEEL SUPPORT WilERE THE PIPING UNE PASSES THROUGIL THE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE TIGHT SPACES INVOLVED BETWEEN TO INSIDE FACES OF THE TUBE STEEL AND Tile INTERFERING PIPE, A

TORTUROUS PATii* FOR HEATTRANSFER.IS ESTABUSHED.

9.

THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TEsis LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ALTIIOUGH THE

PROTRUDING

ITEMS INCLUDE NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS,THE 102S24/0FOR COVERAGE ON EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEA PANEL ATTACHMENT TO TRAYS ARE JUSTIFIED IN ATTACHMENT A ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR M2-1701 DETAIL 1 10.

EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES USTED WERE PREFORMED %TTII SUPPORTS PROTE 102789/I DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. TIIIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED 103508/0 T TIIERMO-LAG AT TI!E AREA OF INTERFERENCES (S). THE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. 103917/0 ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA TIIICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF THE LNTERFERENCE(S) AND Tile 103924/0 MINIMAL AIR ESTABUSIIED. GAP BETWFEN THE TiiERMO-LAG AND THE INTERFERENCE (S). A

TORTUROUS PATH

FOR 104001/0 104224/0 II.

J-BOX TESTED CONFIGURATIONS RECEIVED HEAT EXPOSURE FROM ALL SIDES. THE WALL MOUNTED 103002/0 CO REDUCES POTFNTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK COVERING THE ADIACENT WILL FURTilER ENSURE TilAT TiiERE IS NO CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO THE J. BOX FNVELOPE.

m . . _ __ ._.

ATTACilMENT D ER-ME-082. REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D27 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACCFFTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV u _

12.

Tile CONDUIT QUAUFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9; DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM 103088/0 TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. TIIIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TillCKNESS OF THERMO-LAG103476/1 AT Tile AR INTERFERENCES. TiiE PRIMARY (CONDUIT) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA THICKNESS 104114/0 l OF 330-1 PANEL IN TIIE VICINITY OF INTERFERENCES AND TiiE MINIMAL AIR GAP BETWEEN THE TilERMO-LAG AND 103799/0 i:

INTERFERENCES, A

TORTUROUS PATII" FOR llEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISilED.

103143/0 )

13.

TEST SCIIEME 10-2 QUALIFIED TIIERMO-LAG PROTECTION ON J-BOXES (18* X 12" X 6*) USING A SINGLE LAYtER 103476/1 OF TIIE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. PROVIDED BY TIIE OUTER LAYER OF 330-1 IN TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS AN ENHANCEM 14.

EACil OF TIIE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED103613/0 FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. TIIIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES AEDUCED COVERAGE OF T STEEL SUPPORT AT Tile INTEP"ERENCE. TIIE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO Tile HEAT SillELDING EFFECi <3F Tile INTERFERING MEMBER AT Ti1E LOCATION OF REDUCED 330-1 PANEL TIIICKNES

TORTUROUS PATII" FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISilED.

15.

EACil OF TIIE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCllEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED104206/0 FOR 9*

DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. TlilS FIELD CONFIGURATION INVOLVES PROTECTION OF AN INTERFERING ITEM (FOR 5* DISTANCE FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE) AS A PRUTRUDINGITEM, EXCEPT AT Tile LOCATION OF A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE. Tills IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE Tile SECOP'DARY INTERFERENCE IS MOUNTED STEEL SUPPORT BAS!! PLATE. TIIE WALL AND PLATE TOGETilER HAVE HEAT SINK CAPABluTIES, AND WILL EFFECTIVELY INIIIBIT CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil INTG THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE.

16.

T11E CAELE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES LISTED WERE ALL PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 104227/0 FO (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. Til'S FIELD CONFIGURATION OMITS COVERAGE ON THE EXTREME END TRAY f;UPPORT AT 2 LOCATIONS APPROXIMATELY I 1/2* IN LENGTH, BUT UTIUZES MULTIPLE MATERIALTlHCKNESSES FOR TIIE ADJACENT SUPPORT SURFACES. Tile PRIMARY (CABLE TKAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

17.

REFERENCE ATTACIIMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 13-6 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. ALTHOUGli fr REPR IU2231/0 SLIGIIT DEVIATION FROM THE TYPICAL DETAIL, ENCLOSING ADJACENT TRAY SPUCE PLATES A'ID BOLTING IN COMMON 10222111 TilERMO-LAG BOXES IS ACCEPTA.BLE BECAUSE IT USES MATERIALTIIICKNESS, ATTACilMENT METHODS, AND JOINT INTEGRITY COMMENSURATE WITri TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

18.

Tile CONDUIT QUAUFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUoPORTS PROTECTED FOR102525/0 9" DISTAN TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ALTIIOUGli TIIE

PROTRUDING

ITEM IN THIS CASE IS A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY, THE COVERAGE ON EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATil.

19. ,

REFERENCE APPENDIX A OF Tills REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. TIIE LISTED TEST SCllEMES 102750/0 QUALIFIED 1/2" THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 ON CABLE TRAYS. TIIIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USED A SUGIITLY REDUCED TillCKNESS OF THERMO-LAG AT THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE. ADDITION OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON Til INTERFERINO PATH. TRAY SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF THE DEVIATION PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDU

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D28 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES '

i DCA/REV 20.

THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE I:ECAUSE IT REPRESENTS AN ENIIANCED VERSION OF M2-1701 102884/0 14-1 (REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A FOR ACCEI'TANCE BASIS FOR DETAIL I4-1). THE ANGLE IS AN INTERFERENC THAN A PROTRUSION, AND THEREFORE PROVIDES NO DIRECT CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE.

21.

REDUEED TillCKNESS OF Tile PRIMARY TRAY ENVELOPE AT TIIE INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTA 103488/0 SUPPORT ROD AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. Tile BOX CONFIGURATION MAINTAINS MATERIALTlHCKNESS AND J (USING STRESS SKIN, STITCilING AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) COMMENSURATE WITH TESTED TRAY CONFIGURATIONS. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET FIPE WRAPS MAINTAIN REQUIRED OVERLAP AND BAND SPACING COMMENSURATE WITH T BLANKET TEST SCllEME (11-1).

~

22.

EACil OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCllEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 104221/0 F DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES PEDUCED COVERA STEEL SUPPORT WHERE TiiE IIVAC DUCT INTERFERES WITH COMPLETE 9" RULE PROTECTION. THE DEVIATION FR COMPLETE 9* RULE PROTECTION IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE IIEAT SINK CAPABILITIES OF Tile LARGE INSULA DUCT. Tile PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

23.

EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCllEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED IM211/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. TIIIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED THICKN TilERMO-LAG WifERE Tile SUPPORT PLATE INTERFERES. THE PRIMARY (CMLL 'NAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTE ADDITIONALLY, TilERMO-LAG IS BUTTED AND ATTACIIED TO TIIE SECONDARY NTERFERENCE WHICH PROVIDES HEAT SINK CAPABILITIES.

_, i 24.

TEST SClicME 10-2 QUALIFIED TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION ON J-BOXES (18* X 12* X 6*) USING A SINGLE 104079/1 LAY l Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES 2 LAYERS 330-1 EXCEPT AT THE CONDUIT INTERFERENCES, WHERE ONE FULL PANEL TillCKNESS EXISTS, AND AT Tile ANGLE IRON SUPPORT. TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THE ENTIRE ANGLE IRON PIECE IS PROTECTED BY I LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL, EXCEPT WHERE IT INTERFACES WTTH Tile WALL. Tile WALL ACTS AS A IIEAT S!NK AND PROVIDES NO IIEAT PATH INTO Tile ENVELOPE.

25.

REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 3-4,3-4.4 AND 3-4.5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. TilESE FIELD 104173/0 CONFIGURATIONS REPRESENT ACCEPTABLE DEVIATIONS FROM Tile TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE Tile RE I M II7/0 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET IS MAINTAINED, ALL GAPS ARE FILLED WITH 330-660 BULK M ATERIAL, AND ATTAC"*1ENT AND REINFORCEMENT METIIODS ARE COMMENSURA7 i WTTH TiiE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

26.

REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF Tills REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 16-5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. IT IS ACCEri 104189/0 .m.h END CAPS AT Tile TOPS OF Tile TUBE STEEL MEMBERS BECAUSE THE OPEN ENDS ARE FLUSil WTril A CONC ONE SIDE,5* FROM A LARGE liVAC DUCT ON TIIE OPPOSITE SIDE,. AND 12" FROM THE CONCRhiTE CEILING ABOVE. TilESE SURFACES WILL ALL ACT AS IIEAT SINKS AND ALSO TO BLOCK THE HEAT PATH INTO THE OPEN END. ADDITIONALLY, Tile TOP ENDS OF TIIE MEMBERS ARE APPROXIMATELY 7* FROM TIIE ESSENTIAL TRAY LOCATIONS.

27.

TEST SCllEME 9-3 DEMONSTRATED Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF 1/2* TlHCK PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS 103799/0 ON DIAMETER CONDUlTS AND IS CREDITED WHERE LOCALIZED INT!!RFERENCES PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION 103476/I O l

OVERLAY. THIS DEVIATION A TESTED CONFIGURATION. FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENIS:'TILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION IN AC l

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482 REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING JTEM PAGE D29 OF D30 COVERAGli DEVIATIONS NOTE ACCEfrTANCE BASIS / NOTES '

DCA/REV 1 28.

REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF Tills REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 102884/0 102821!!

29.

Tile ENCLOSURE USED ON THE CHILL WATER PIPES EFFECTIVELY PROTECTS THEM AS PROTRUDING ITEMS 102821/1 TO TRAY ENVELOPE. Tile BOX CONFIGURATION MAINTAINS MATERIAL THICKNESS AND JOINT IN'IEGRITY (USING STRESS SKIN, STITClllNG AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) COMMENSURATE WITH "ESTED TRAY CONFIGURATIONS. THE FLEXI-BLAN WRAPS MAINTAIN REQUIRED OVERLAP, AND BAND SPACING COMMENSURATE WITil THE TESTED FLEXI-BLANKET SCHEME (Il-1).

30.

IT IS ACCEL' TABLE TO USE A 22" MAXIMUM WIDTil FLAT PANEL, BECAUSE ALL OTHER ATTRIBUTES OF THE TYPICAL DETAIL 102821/I WILL BE MAINTAINED, INCLUDING MATERIAL OVERLAY, BANDING REQUIREMENTS, AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT OF JOINTS.

31.

EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES LISTED WERE PREFORMED WTTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9 103846/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TillCKNESS TilERMO-LAG AT THE AREA OF INTERFERENCES (S). THE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. .

ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA THICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL IN TIIE VICINITY OF THE INTERFERENCE (S) AND THE t MINIMAL AIR ESTABLISIIED. GAP BETWEEN THE TilERMO-LAG AND THE INTERFERENCE (S) A " TORTUROUS PATil* FOR IIEAT TRA 32.

EACil OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103484/1 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED T111CKNE TIIERMO-LAG ON TOP OF THE ESSENTIAL TRAY, BUT COVERS THE INTERFERING C6 CHANNELS AND THE ABOVE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. THE THERMO-LAG 330-1 BOX USED TO ENCLOSE THE CilANNELS M AIN MATERIAL THICKNESS AND JOINT INTEGRITY COMMENSURATE WITil TESTED CABLE TRAY CONFIGURATIONS, AND Tile C6 CilANNELS PROVIDE OVERALL STABILITY TO THE STRUCT1JRE.

33.

Tile CONDUIT QUALIFICATION tests LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED103476/1. FOR 9* D THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. IN THIS CONFIGURATION, Tile ONLY DEVIATION IS FROM THE TESTED METHOD OF PANEL ATTACHMENT (SELF-TAPPING SCREWS IN "IEU OF HILTI KWIK-BOLTS), AND IS CONSIDERED INSIGNIFICANT IN TERMS OF ATTACllMENT ADEQUACY.

34.

COVERAGE OF THE ENTIRE WALL SUPPORT IS MORE CONSERVATIVE TIIAN 9* RULE PROTECTION. 102221/1 OTHER MI FROM DETAIL ENDURANCE. 13-6 ATTACHMENT METHODS ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT TO CONFIGURATION STABILIT 35.

Tile FIRE STOPS PROVIDED ON Tile ZONE R CABLES ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON ITEMS PROTRUDING FROM 103809/0 LAGGED J-BOXES. BASED ON TYPICAL DETAIL 3-4 (SEE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR ACCEPTAN COMBINING TWO OF THE CABLES IN A COMMON ENVELOPE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE R5 QUIRED MATERIAL MAINTAINED, AND REINFORCEMENT IS PROVIDED USING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. STAINLESS STEEL BANDING AND STRESS SKIN. ,

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D30 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE iACCEFTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 36.

Tile METHOD OF SEALING THE CABLES INTERNALLY USING 6* OF 45B ELASTOMER IS EQUIVALENT TO THE P 102479/0 PRESCRIBED IN TYPICAL DETAIL 2-2.~ REFERENCE ATTAC11 MENT A TO THIS REPORT FOR DETAIL 2-2 ACCEP 37.

W' TAPPING OF NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AND ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PER DETAIL 3-3A METHODS IS103081/1 ACCElTA DEVIATION (WRAPPING 2 CABLES IN A COMMON BUNDLE)IS MINOR IN NATURE. TIIE USE OF SELF-TAPPING FOR 330-1 PANEL ATTACHMENT TO THE STEEL LINER WALL IS PER TYPICAL DETAIL I-S. REFERENCE ATTA REPORT FORTYPICAL DETAIL ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE MINOR DEVIATION FROM THE 9* RULE COVERAG LINER PLATING IS CONSIDERED INSIGNIFJCANT BECAUSE OF THE ADDITION OF 330-70 BLANKET AND TFE FA ACTUAL CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATli TO THE J-BOX FROM THE ADJACENT SUPPORT IS APPROXIMATELY 11*.

38.

Ti1E CONDUlT QUALIFICATION insTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WTTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTA 102859/0 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. COVERINO ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INTERFERENCES AS PROTRUDING A ITEM CONFIGURATION EXPECTED TO PERFORM AT LEAST AS WELL AS THE TESTED DESIGN, BECAUSE TIIERE IS NO DIRECT .

CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AND OVERALL MATERIAL Tl!ICKNEp IS MAINTAINED. '

REFERENDE ATTACllMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR ACCEPTANCE BASIS OF DETAIL 16-S.

39. l REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR THE TYPICAL DETAIL 13-6 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 103597/0 THE LIST !'

ALL QUALIFIED 9" RULE PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING SUPPORT STEEL !'

40.

REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF Tills REPORT FOR THE TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE THER 103597/0 PROVIDED BY THIS DESIGN IS EXPECTED TO BE EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF THE LISTED TEST SCllEMES, BECAUSE THd BOTTOM PANEL TIIICKNESS REDUCTION, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE MINIMAL.-

I

.... - -- ._._.a _ . _ . - ._ _ _ __

O

ER-M E42, REY. .

, PAGE El OF 11 -

A'ITACIIMENT E STRUCTUIML STEEL DEVIATIONS

.y n ,4

- - + - ,

,)

ATTACIIMENT E ER-ME-082 REY. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS , PAGE E2 OF ElI DCA NO./REV BLDG' ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DEri DESCRIFFION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLUTIdN - SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) _.

FIRE TEST . . (PAGES E9-EII)

SCHEMES ZONE 101434/0 SG 831'4 " 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE 1: TIIERMO-LAG INSTALLATION DETAILS 2-096B 2SMll57 N N AT TIIE SECURITY BARRIERS DEVIATE FROM SPEC CPES-M-2032 BY NOT BEING SECURED AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE COMPONENT.

RESOLUTION: THE DESIGN PROVIDES FOR UL X411 I-5,7,8 ADDITIONAL SCREWS TO BE INSTALLED ON AND X-003 EnllER SIDE OF THE SECURITY BARS ASSURING THAT T11E TIIERMO-LAG WILL REMAIN IN PLACE.

ISSUE 2: INSTALLATION DETAILS DEVIATE FROM SCREW SPACING CRITERIA FOR TiiE FIRST LAYER O'i' TliERMO-LAG PANELS.

RESOLUTION: TIIE DEVIATION IS UT. X411 I-5,7,8 CONSERVATIVE IN THAT SCREW SPACING IS AND X-003 REDUCED FROM 4* TO 3" FROM TiiE EDGE OF TIIE FANELS AND THOSE PLACED AT THE l' CENTER OF Tile THERMO-LAG PANELS IN LIEU OF THE CENTERLINE OF TIIE COMMODITY.

ISSUE 3: TIIERMO-LAG INSTALLATION METHODS DO NOT PROVIDE FOR INSTALLING TIIERMO-LAG AT SECURITY BARRIER ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS NEXT TO FLOOR.

RESOLUTION: PROVIDE INSTALLAT10N UL X411 I-5,7,8 DETAILS WHERE INTERFERENCES ARE CLOSE AND X-003 TO FLOOR. TIIIS DETAIL IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF TIIE SPECIFICATION AND ONLY CLARIFIES EXISTING REQUIREMENTS.

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082 REV, O :

STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E3 OF Ell DCA NO.lREV BLDG ELEV. ROOMJ FIRE - SUPP. DET. ~ DESCRIITION/ ISSUE 01 CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT" BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) .. 'll!ST (PAGES E9-Eli) -

FIRE -

SCHEMES ZONE-101435/0 SG 831'-6" 2M)6 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE PREVEffrS INSTkLLING 2-096B 2SM/I57 N N THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WTTII l' SPECIFICATION ON A TUBE STEEL COLUMN FOR A DISTANCE OF I4 FT. AS FOLLOWS; A - BOTTOM PANEL OF FIRST LAYER HAS NO SCREWS DRILLED Iffr0 THE COLUMN.

B - BOTTOM PANEL OF TIIE SECOND LAYER DOES NOT MEET TiiE FJNIMUM SPACING REQUIREMENT FROM 1HE TOP EDGE.

RESOLUTION: A - THE FIRST LAYER WILL BE UL X-611 1-5,7,9-PREBITITERED WITH TROWEL GRADE TO AND X-003 ADHERE IT TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL WITil THE PIECE SCORED AND FOLDED AROUND THE TUBE STEEL THE SECOND LAYER WILL HAVE I, A SCREW THROUGH IT ANCHORING WTTH BOTH SIDES OF THE PANEL AND IS PREBUTTERED TO THE FIRST LAYER.

B - THE BOARD THAT COVERS THE REST OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SECOND LAYER IS - l AFFIXED TO THE STEEL MEMBER BY THE PANEL (SCORE AND FOLD METHOD) ON THE WEST SIDE. THE 9" HIGH PIECE IS PREBITITERED AND SECURED IN PLACE WITH ONE SCREW.

1. _ _ ._

ATTACllMENT E ER-ME42. REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E4 OF Eli DCA NO./REN BLDG ELEV. ' ' ROOM- FIRE . SUPP; DET.: DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION.' SOPPORT : BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) '- (YIN) TEST : ' (PAGES E9-Ell)

. FIRE .

SCHEMES '

ZONE.

101707/0 SG' '831'4

2-096 2SE/16 Y Y' ISSUE: DUE TO OBSTRUCTION,' TilERMb-LAG 2-096B 2SM/157 N N COVERAGE ON THE ANGLE PLATE BEllIND THE TUBE STEEL INSIDE THE STAIRWELL IS REDUCED.

RESOLUTION: COVER ANGLE CLIP UP TO TIIE UL X411 ' 1 4, 7, 10 TUBE STEEL, SHAVE A PIECE OF THERMO-LAG AND X-003 PANEL TO FIT BliTWEEN THE TUBE STEEL AND THE ANGLE. Ti1E STAIRWELL SUPPORT BELOW THE GRATING, WHICH IS NOT ATTACHED TO

' THE PROTECTED TUBE STEEL MEMBER DOES NOT REQUIRE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION.

, .101708/0 SG 831'4

2-094 2SB/13 Y Y ISSUE: THE PIPE PROTRUDING THROUGH THE 2-096A 2S0/3 N Y STAIRWELL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE REQUIRES THERMO-LAG FOR HEAT PATH.

RESOLUTION: THE PIPING IS ENCAPSULATED UL X411 14, 7, 10 IN THERMO-LAG TO MEET THE 2 HOUR AND X-003 REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPEC. THE DCA ONLY PROVIDES INSTALLATION DETAILS REQUIRED l TO MEET THE SPEC. THEREFORE, THIS IS NOT l A DEVIATION FROM DESIGN.

f'

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082 REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE ES OF Eli

- DCA NO.'IREV BLDG ELEV ROOM :- FIRE ' JUPP. DET.- DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N)- L(Y/N)2 ,

TEST (, .( PAGES E9-Eli)

FIRE SCHEMES - a ZONE.

101884/U SG 790*4* 2-070 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE. REDUCI10N OF THERMO-LAG l 2-074A 250/3 N Y TIIICKNESS ON THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AROUND FIRE & TORNADO DAMPERS TO 101885/0 SG 810'4* 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ALLOW FOR THE DAMPER BLADES 2-085B 2SO/3 N Y UNOBSTRUCTED FUNCTION.

101886/0 SG 831'4 ' 2-094 2SB/15 Y' Y RESOLUTION: WHERE TWO FULL LAYERS OF N/A 1 4, 11 2-096A 250/3 N Y THERMO-LAG WOULD OBSTRUCT THE DAMPER LEVER MECHANISM, A SINGLE LAYER IS 101887/0 SG 810'4' 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y INSTALLED WITH JOINTS AND SEAMS FILLED 2485C 2SM/157 N N WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. WHERE SINGLE THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG PANELS CREATE 101888/0 SG 831'4

2496 2 Sell 6 Y Y AN INTERFERENCE. TOP COAT AND MATERIAL 24968 2SM/157 N N IS REMOVED BY SANDING AND GRINDING AND THE TOP COAT REAPPLIED.

101891/0 SG S51'4" 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y 2-105B 2SMll57 N N ;

i 102300/0 GEN GEN GEN GEN N/A N/A ISSUE: STRUCIURAL STEEL CEILING AND WALL PIATES WITH ANCHORS PREVENT -

INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER SCREW PLACEMENT.

RESOLUTION: PRIOR TO SECOND LAYER UL X41I 1 4, 7, 12 -

INSTALLATION ON ANCHOR BOLTS, THE BACK AND X403 OF THE PLATES ARE TO BE PREBITTTERED.

DETAILS FOR SCREW PLACEMENTS ARE APPROVED IN TIUS DCA.

p-

ATTACllMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E6 OF Ell DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE. SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES E9-Ell)

FIRE SCHEMES ZONE l

102465/0 SG 852'4* 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y ISSME; S INSUFFICIENT ROOM INSIDE l 2-105B 2SM/157 N N STAIRWELL, PREVENTS FASTENING T11E !

SECOND LAYER OF TIIERMO-LAG TO THE STR'JCTURAL STEEL AND APPLICATION OF TOP COAT TO ALL THE JOINTS AND SEAMS.

RESOLtrTION; FIRST LAYER WAS UL X411 1 4, 7, 13 PREBUTTERED, FOLDED AROUND TIIE DAMPER AND X-003 ,

STEEL FRAMING AND FASTENED TO Tile i STRUCTURAL STEEL WITil SCREWS. T11E SECOND LAYER IS INSTALLED IN BVO PIECES f' WITil TIIE FIRST PIECE BEING PREBUTTERED AND CLAMPED. ClJT AND FOLDED AROUND TliE DAMPER FRAME. FOAM SEAL MATERIAL WAS INSTALLED BETWEEN T!1E WALL AND TIIE SECOND PIECE TO MOLD THE PIECE IN PLACE.

102886/0 SG 821'4 " 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE 1: TifERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF 2-0968 2SM/157 N N SECURITY BAR OVERLAPS Tile COVER PLATE OF TIIE MAGNETIC DOOR SWTTCII BOX WHICII REQUIRES PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND ADJUSTMENTS.

RESOLtJTION 1: THERMO-LAG IS SIIAVED BY UL X411 1 4, 7, 14 1/4" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1-1/2" TO ALLOW AND X-003 FREE ACCESS TO TIIE BOX.

ISSUF2 AN IIVAC DUCT PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF THE SECOND LAYER OF THERMO-LAG ON A SECURTTY BAR TO SATISFY Tile 4" RULE.

RESOLIJTION 2: INSTALL THE SECOND LAYER UL X411 1 4, 7, 14 OF THERMO-LAG NOTCllED OUT BUT NOT AND X-003 CONNECTED TO Tile ilVAC DUCT.

_ r

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS , PAGE E7 OF Ell DCA NO.IREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREA / - (Y/N)' (Y/N) TEST (PAGES E9-El1)

FIRE SCHEMES =

ZONE I 102915/0 SG 790'4* 2-070 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: MISSING INSTALLATION DETAIU FOR 2-074A 25 0/3 N Y THERMO-LAG ON i>OOR FRAME, FIRE DAMPER / TORN /.DO DAMPER, AND STRUCTURAL STEEL USING TYPICAL DETAILS.

RESOLUTION: PREBUTTER THE BACK OF ALL UL X411 1 4, 7, 15 PANELS WITH TilERMO-LAG 330-1 TROWEL AND X-003 GRADE. TROWTL GRADE IS PLACED IN ALL CUT OUTS FOR BOLT PROTRUSIONS FLUSil WITH TOP OF THERMO-LAG PANELS AITER

PANEL INSTALLATION.

103131/1 SG 810*-0* 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO TIIE CONFIGURATION AND 2-085B 25 0/3 N Y INTERFERENCE OF TIIE DOOR FRAME WITH Tile ADJOINING DAMPER FRAME, TIIE CONVENTIONAL SELF TAPPING SCREWS CANNOT BE USED TO ATTACil TIIE THERMO-LAG (3 ITEMS).

RESOLUTION: DETAILS IIAVE BEEN PROVIDED UL X411 1-6, 7, 16 TO INSTALL TilERMO-LAG 330-1 FLAT PANELS AND X-003 PREBUTTERING TIIE BACK OF TIIE PANELS.

SILICONE FOAM SEAL IS EX'IENDED TO BUTT TO THE THERMO-LAG PANELS TO SECURE TIIEM TO TIIE STRUCTURAL STEEL 103189/2 SG 831'4

2&6 2SE/16 Y Y ISEffa DUE TO thTERFERENCE, INSTALLATION 2-096A 2SO/3 N Y OF TIIERMO-LAG FOR Tile FIRE DAMPER FRAMING REQUIRES ADDITIONAL DETAILING.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG PANELS N/A 1-6, 7. II,17 WITH ANCHOR BOLTS INSTEAD OF SELF TAPPING SCREWS, NOTCH PANELS AS REQUIRED, FILL VOID WITH CERAMIC INSULATOR 330-70 AND LEAVE ROOM FOR TORNADO DAMPER LEVER MOVEMENT.

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082. REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS > PAGE E8 OF Ell

. DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ~ ROOM FIRE SUPPJ DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /PISOLlTTION -' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL (YIN)~

(Y/N)' TEST (PAGES E9-Ell)

FIRE- . SCHEMES ZONE _.

104185/0 SO 831'-6* 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y JSS_UFa SHIMS ON STEEL ANGLES SUPPORTINO UL X-003 1 4, 18 i I

2-082 2SB/8 Y Y HATCH COVER REQUIRE PROTECTION FOR HEAT PATH.

RESOLUTION: ATTACH 2 LAYERS OF PANEL MATERIAL ON SHIM BOTTOM SURFACES ONLY USINO THE WIRES AND BANDING.

i i

=.=::

q

ATTACllMENT E ER-ME-082. REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE EO OF Ell NOTE ' ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ; DCA/REV f

1. CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITli TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

2. EFFECTIVE TlilCKNESS OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WTTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. , GENERIC

3. TiiE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED GENERIC .

CONFIGURATIONS.

4. TIIE APPLICATION OR END USE OF TiiE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

5. Tile CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC -

EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR TIIE PLANT CONFIGURATION WlHCII WOULD GENERIC ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SillELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.).

7. EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL THERMO-LAG CONFIGURATIONS IIAS BEEN PROVIDED VIA ER-ME-067. APPENDIX D. THE GENERIC EVALUATION PROVIDED THEREIN COMPARES TiiE PLANT CONFIGURATIONS WITH UL DESIGNS X-61I AND X.003.

8. Tile SCREW FASTENER SPACING USED IS WITHIN THE SPACING DISTANCE USED ON Tile COLUMN IN UL X-003 AND THE 101434/0 l EMBEDMENT IS SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF TIIE T11ERMO-LAG PANE 13 AND THEREFORE TIIE STRUCTURAL STEEL

9. Tif E PANELS ARE PREBUTTERED WITH TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AND SCORE AND FOLDED SO THAT TIIE STRESS SKIN IS 101435/0 INTACT. UL X-61I USES TOWEL APPLIED THERMO-LAG 300-1 (ONLY) FOR ADHERENCE TO THE COLUMN. PREBIJTTERING THE BOARDS TO THE STEEL AND THE SECOND LAYER TO THE FIRST LAYER GLUES THE ASSEMBLY TOGETHER. FOll)ING THE BOARD WITH THE STRESS SKIN AT THE CORNER REINFORCES TiiE JOINT AND ADDS STRUCTURAL INTEGRTTY TO THE THERMO-LAG. THE SCREWS ONLY ADD TO Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE MATERIAL Tile MINIMUM TillCKNESS IS l i

MAINTAINED. THEREFORE SINCE THE TIIERMAL INTEGRITY (THICKNESS) IS MAINTAINED AND THE STRUCI1JRAL INTEGRITY IS EQUAL IF NOT GREATER TIIAN THAT TESTED IN UL X-61I Tile STEEL IS ADEQUATELY PROTECTED.

10. Tile TUBE STEEL COLUMN WHICH IS THE COMMODITY PROTECTED IS ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITTI CPES- 101707/0 i M-2032. PROTRUDING ITEMS ONLY REQUIRE PROTECTION FOR HEAT PATIL THE TIIERMO-LAG PROTECTS PROTRUSION SUCH 101708/0 THAT TIIERE IS NO AREA WHERE A FIRE COULD HAVE FLAME IMPINGEMENT SUCH TO EFFECT TIIE BARRIER. THE 4* RULE FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL IS BASED ON A 3 HOUR FIRE RATING AND THE PROTECTED ITEM COMPLETELY WITHIN THE FURNACE. Tile TUBE STEEL IS EMBEDDED IN THE WALL SO THAT ONLY ONE SIDE IS EXPOSED WlilCH INCREASES THE STEEL *S ABILITY TO ACCEPT HEAT FROM A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE FIRE RATING OF THE BARRIER IS FOR ONLY 2 IIOURS l AND NOT 3. BASED ON THE CONFIGURATION AND THE BASIS OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 2 IlOUR RATING TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL ,

< _m

\

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082. REY. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E10 OF Et t NOTE ACCElrTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV . '

11. Tile STRUCTURAL STEEL IS TIIE ANGLE IRON USED TO RETAIN TIIE FIRE DAMPER / TORNADO DAMPER ASSEMBLY. TIIIS 101884/0 l ARRANGEMENT IS A NON-RATED FEATURE (NRF-012) PER CALCULATION 2-FP-0080, REV. O. TIIE ANGLE IRONS ARE OF llEAVY 101885/0 {

CONSTRUCTION AND ARE LIGIITLY LOADED. Tile SMALL PORTION OF TIIE DAMPER FRAME TilAT IS UNPROTECTED IS NOT 10tE86/0 LARGE ENOUGli TO CAUSE FAILURE OF Tile RETAINING ANGLE AND TIIEREBY FAILURE OF Tl{E FIRE DAMPER. THERE IS NO 10iE37/0 TEMPERATURE TEST REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE DAMPER AND TIIEREFORE TIIE REDUCTION IN FIREPROOFING WILL NOT 101838/0 CAUSE AN INCREASE IN IIEAT TRANSMISSION TIIROUGli Tile FIRE BARR!ER. BASED ON TIIE DESIGN OF Tile DAMPER 101891/0 INSTALLATION AND Tile SM ALL REDUCTION IN FIREPROOFING,T11E DESIGN IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE A 2 IlOUR EQUlVALENT FIRE RATING.

12. TIIIS IS A SMALL AREA AND AT LEAST ONE SCREW IS INSTALLED TO FASTEN T!IE SECOND LAYER TO Tile STRUCTURAL 102300/0 MEMBER. Tile SECOND LAYER IS PREBUTTERED WITil TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL WHICH WILL BOND Tile SECOND LAYER TO Tile FIRST LAYER. TIIESE ARE SMALL AREAS AND TIIE TIIERMO-LAG CARRIES NO SIGNIFICANT LOAD. TIIE TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL ALONG WITil TifE SCREW WILL HOLD Tile TIIERMO-LAG IN PLACE. SINCE MATERIAL TIIICKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile FIREPROOFING WILL BE MAINTAINED, Tile STRUCTURAL STEEL WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 2 IlOUR RATING.

13. TIIE TIIERMO-LAG IS BEING USED TO PROTECT TIIE STEEL FRAME OF THE FIRE DAMPER. Tile REQUIRED THICKNESS OF 102465/0 TIIERMO-LAG IS INSTALLED. Tile FOAM SEAL M ATERIAL WillCil IS SANDWICIIED BETWEEN TIIE TilERMO-LAG AND TIIE WALL NOT ONLY PROVIDES SUPPORT OF THE TilERMO-LAG BUT PREVENTS Tile THERMO-LAG FROM BEING DIRECTLY i EXPOSED TO A FIRE. SINCE Tile THERMO-LAG TillCKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND TIIE TilERMO-LAG WILL REMAIN IN PLACE.

Tile DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 IlOUR FIRE RATING. -

14. IN BOTil ISSUE I AND 2 OF DCA 10286/0 Tile THERMO-LAG IS BEING INSTALLED ON A PROTRUDING ITEM USING THE 4" ROLE. 1028F6/0 TilICKNESS AND DISTANCE IS BASED ON A 3 IlOUR FIRE TEST. Tills FIRE BARRIER IS ONLY A 2 IIOUR FIRE BARRIER. THERE IS ONLY A SM ALL AMOUNT OF TilERMO-LAG WlilCil IS NOT INSTALLED AND TIIE INTERFERING ITEM SillELDS TIIE LOCATIONS WilERE TIIE TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE IS REDUCED. TIIEREFORE TIIE IIEAT PATH COVERAGE IS SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF llEAT INTO TIIE STRUCTURAL STEEL THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 IlOUR FIRE RATING.

15. THE THERMO-LAG IS BEING USED TO PROTECT TIIE FIRE DAMPER FRAME AND DOOR FRAME. Tile ARRANGEMENT DOES NOT 102915/0 ALLOW FOR SCREW SPACING REQUIREMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED. TIIE TIIERMO-LAG IS PREBUTTERED TO BOND TIIE THERMO-LAG TO Tile FRAMES AND TIIE LAYERS TOGETHER. IN ORDER TO WORK AROUND BOLT INTERFERENCE. TilREE LAYERS OF TiiERMO-LAG WAS INSTALLED IN MOST CASES. Tile DISTANCES WITIIOUT PilYSICAL RESTRAINTS ARE SMALL BA*ED ON Tile CONFIGURATION OF THE INSTALLATION ALONG WITH TIIE THERMO-LAG PREBUTTERING, TilERMO-LAG TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY WILL BE MAINTAINED. THE DESIGN PROVIDES AND EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING.

__- -- r

ATTACHMENT E ER-M E-082. REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE Ell OF Ell NOTE, 1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 16.

THE TIIERMO-LAG THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED IN ALL CASES. IN TTEM 1, THE FIRST LAYER IS BONDED TO THE FRAME USING 103131/1 TROWEL GRADE 330-1 AND THEN THE SECOND LAYER IS PREBITITERED TO THE FIRST LAYER. THE PENETRA110N SEA EXTENDED TO REINFORCE (JAMMED IN PLACE) THE THERMO-LAG PANELS AND PROVIDES SOME PROTECTION TO 1BE THERMO-LAG. IN ITEM 2, ONLY TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL IS USED. SINCE THE DISTANCE IS ONLY 3/4* OF AN INCH AND j

X-611 USES ONLY TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL TO PROTECT A COMPLETE STEEL COLUMN. THE SMALL AMOUNT OF T i LAG TROWEL GRADE WILL REMAIN IM PLACE. IN ITEM 3. THE FIRST LAYER IS BONDED TO THE DAMPER FRAMES USING f TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AND SCREWED TO Tile TUBE STEEL Tile SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS USED SO 111AT STRESS SKIN IS CONTINUOUS. THE FOLDS ADD STRUCTURAL STRENGTil TO THE INSTALIATION. THE SECOND LAYER IS PREBUTTERED TO THE FIRST LAYER AND SCREWED TO TIIE TUBE STEEL THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS ALSO ON THIS LAYER. THE VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE TUBE STEEL AND FRAME (@ I a/2*) IS FILLED Will{ THERMO-IAG PREBUTTERED PANELS. THEREFORE IN ALL CASES STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED. SINCE THERMO-LAG AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED. THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 IlOUR FIRE RATING.

17.

ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED IN THE CONCRETE PROVIDE THE SAME STRUCIURAL ATTACHMENT AS SELE TAPPING 103189/2SCRE TIIE SPACING OF Tile ANCHOR BOLTS EXCEEDS THE SCREW { SPACING REQUIRED BY 3* FOR A SPACING OF 9*.

IN UL X 003 TIIE FREE SPAN ON THE COLUMN IS GREATER THAN 9*. THEREFORE THE 9* SPACING IS ACCEPTABLE. THE VOID SPACE IS FILLED WITH CERAMIC INSULATOR 330-70 WHICH IS A NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL AND PROVIDES AN ADDITIONAL TilERMAL BARRIER FOR THE STEEL SINCE TIIE THERMO-LAG THICKNESS AND STRUCIURAL INTEGRITY IS MAINTA DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 IlOUR FIRE RATING.

18.

TIIE STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORTING TIIE HATCH COVER IS A NON-RATED FEATURE WHICH, BASED ON CALCULATION 2-FP- 104185/0 0080, REV. 0 (NRF-011) DOES NOT REQUIRE THERMO-LAG FROTECTION. THEREFORE, PROVISION OF THERMO-LAG ON BOTH THE SUPPORT ANGLE AND SHIM IS AUGMENTARY ONLY.

- ER ME-082, REY. 0

- PAGE F1 OF F27 6

E l

ATTACHMENT F AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS i

i

Ot/j9/Y3 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 PART B \/

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: CPES-N-2032 SHEE1: REUs O P.O.:

MAINT LVL:

DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN4 REpog7~ ,57 T~[A/07E m.............. ... .... .... .... .........

Pr^ ^^^

^^F'"' CB'! O C Dr^ ^"C7"' ^^! C"! O C nct n_ o, e ,n o

. n. n. _n r u. ,

.. . .n .-

GC^ 07C7^' 000 CN! C C

^^'

OC^ ^757"^ C"! P O OC^ 0?C7?4 0^C CN! O C DCf ^ "'""

004 C"! P C DCA 095794 007 GR A GDE(. DCA DCA 099501 000 NI R A g, ggj OCA 100C60 0^O CN! "

C OCf 10^C60 001 V ',' I C V DCA 101182 000 NI R A Ghyj OCA 101200 000 C"! 9 ?

DCA 101282 001 NI R A OCf 10132^ 0^^ CN! O P

{3 ~ -.

DCf 10:020 ^0: CNI O C DCA 101320 002 NI R A 8 DCA 101397 000 NI R A D DCA 101399 000 NI R A MO 3eV-DCA 101434 000 NI R A , pf DCA 101435 000 NI R A gg ac: :01470 000 CN: c C DCA 101498 001 NI ~ R A DCf 10:427 0^^ C"! "

C {3 OCA 1^14?? 0^1 CN! "

I DCA 101707 000 NI R A

%[

DCA 101700 000 NI R A tr DCA 101884 000 NI R A F DCA 101885 000 NI R A E DCA 101886 000 NI A R Ei DCA 101887 000 NI R A G DCA 101888 000 NI R A DCA 101891 G

000 NI R A g ace 0:90 Oc^ CN: r C BC^ !^2^77 000 CN! O C DCA 102077 001 NI R A ~~"

R2[ $

DCA 102070 000 NI R A ---

Eg: g DCA 202103 000 NI R A Or^ !^??'^ 0^^ C"! " {b C

DCA 102160 001 NI A R

[$

ATTACHMENT F ER-ME482, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F2 OF F27

0.t il V/ 93.- ATTACHMENT?I PAGE1. :

P A RT B ' - \J-- ' .

FIELD-DESIGN CHANGE A-REVIEW STATUS' LOG?

,AFFECTED_ DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTL ,

~

- DUG: CPES-M-2032, SHEET: REVrEO P'0.1-M AINT '_ LVL :l-DES-CHNG-NUMBER -REV DOCS RELS D-ST-. ..........

MODIFCTNt' REF6ET! ATT-/A/0TES O C .^ 102:22 000 ' O!? ! P C DCA 102222 001 -NI R A .AL DCA :102266 000 NI R A~ D-DCA 202300i 000- NI R A- g CCA ;022:- 000 C':: r C DCA Or'

--202330- 001 1022PC 000

-NI C5'?

R P

A

?

-sc

^ ~

DCA 102385' 001 NI R A DCA 102465-000 NI A 12Q .

R

'E DCA 102478 -001 NI R A g

DCA 102533 000 -

ggg' NI NI R A pg '

gCA igg 56g , , . { p , g3 :

,, s.. m ..s,, , ... -, u -= -,

DCA 202679 001 NI R A .(3; UCA 102709 000 NI: R A- AoI y DCA 202728 000. NI R A _ gg DCA 102750 000 NI R A '

C DCA 102780 000 NI R A g

DCA ;02707 000 cN: 0 0 DCA 202789 001 NI R A 3 DCA 102800 002 NI .A-DCA ~102837 000 TNI R

R A 6-DCA 102850 000 NI R A C

c,-

DCA 102861 000 NI R- A :C -

DCA 102863 001' NI R A C DCA- 102884 000 NI R A 1)

DCA 102886 000 NI R- A .E l 'DCA 102915 000 NI R LA 6 '

OCA 102700 000 CN O C O C .^ 102720 00: Cf!! "

C oc^ 10 0 m:tr oce cNI e r s

DCA 102700 _000 C!._ P _C feeA 102732 004 ON! O P -

DCA- 102932- 005 NI R- A b DCA 102957- 000 NI R OCA 10:007 000 :N: 0 A --

C

.4 DCA 103007' 001 NI R -A'

{_

OCA 100010 000 CN! D = s- +

.CCA 100010 001 CNI P P OCA 100010 002 CM! "

C J

ATTACHMENT F- ER ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F3 OF F27

. w

04 'ly/Y3 AT1ACHMEN1 I t' AGE : 3 PART D FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: CPES-N-2032 SHFET: REV: O P.O.:

MAINT LVL:

DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN#

,============== === ==== ==== ==== ==u------

REPenzi urr/ NoTis 00^ 10?01? ^0? 9"I O 9 --

OCA 20?O!? 0^' EN! 0 9 DC^ 1020?P ^05 CNI P C -

DCA 103013 006 NI A D C .^ 1^3^?" ^^^

C"!

R P C DCA 103037 000 NI R A g, nrx 4n,no, nn4 nur n e bbA kb3b46 bbb Nk R A Ib DCA 103050 000 NI R A g nrx .n,ne, nnn ru, n r _

bbA kb3b56 bbk Uh R A [h DCA 103076 001 NI R A C DCA 103081 001 NI R A [3 DCA 103088 000 NI R A D

^^^

{C^ 100070 ^"!

, O C OCf 100070 ^^1 'J " I O 'J nr. .n,4 n, nna ru, e vu avwewm w v v wri . .n v DCA 103131 001 NI R A DCA 103143 000 NI R A DCA 103157 000 NI R A

{)

c._

DCA 103150 000 NI R A (;

DCA 103159 000 NI R a pyyg DCA 103161 000 NI R A ggy; 00^ 1^O10? ^^^

C"! O C 4 C.^ !^21P^ ^O1 C"! O P DCA 103189 002 NI R A 6 DCA 103305 001 NI R A ES DCA 103375 000 NI R A 00^ 1^2'02 00^ CNI O C

(~ , _

OCA 100407 000 C": O C 4CA *^3400 ^^1 C"! P C

-0C A 100407 000 C"! O C __

CCA ;00407 ^00 C"I P C - .

GC^ 143^0^ O^^ CN! O F DCA 103409 005 NI R A gg CCr :0: 4:* 900 m:: e r DCA 103414 001 NI R A (',

DCA 103423 000 NI R A OCA 100'76 O^^ C ." I P P 4

DCA 103476 001 NI R A

((}

ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F4 OF F27 i

ol/av/Y3 i'ATT ACHMEN1,3 ~ 'PAGE: 4) ,

PARTr8

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUSELOG AFFECTED-DOCUMENT UPDATE ~ REPORT DWG: CPES-N-20321 SHEET: REV - 0 . P , 0 ::

MAINT LUL :

i DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS- RELS D-ST--MODIFCTN4

~ RdPor47 ATT/AleTE I i DCA 103488- 000 NI R A

-D DCA- 103507 000 NI R A- A:

DCA 103508 .000 NI R A

{}

DCA 103533 000 NI. R A nna 4neven aan eur n e . b-bbA- __kbbbbb bb[ NE R k t _n n i 4nece. nun ru, n - (($.

bbA lbbbb[ bb[ hk R ,k O' ;

DCA 103559 000 NI R A 'l

_m m . .m,,,, mmm ru, n - k DCA kO3567 bbk Uk R k Eb DCA 103574 .000- NI R A {i ;

DCA 103582--000 NI R A, 8 103599 000- {

DCA NI R A. C, -j DCA 103600 002 NI R A- /.g {

DCA 103602 -000 NI R A- c_- ;

DCA 103609 000 NI 'A .

DCA 103613 =000- NI-R R A .

cg

~

i

{

DCA 103631 000 NI R A DCA 103631 000 NI .A

_c. l cCe R (, - l

^0 CNI : '

-DC^ 1^242' ^^2 ~"

C"! C l DCA 103634 002 NY R A A,0f j

DCfL .103636 000 NI R A .c DCA .103650 000 NI R A c, j 00A 1^07^4 0^^ C"I O C DCA 103706 001 NI R A (_

DC^ 20??29 0^0 E." ' O C DCA 103718 001 NI R 'A (1 DC^ 1^2721 0^^ C"! "

C DCA 103721 001 NI R A~ C DCA 103730 000 NI R A (;

^^^

OCf 1 ^ C 7 '. ^ CNI ^

C DCA 103740- 001 NI R A E) .

-DCA 103741 000 NI R A C, DCA 103770 -000 NI. R A di DCA 103780 000 -NI R A C-

.DCA 103792 000 NI R .6 DCA 103799 000 NI R A b DCA 203816 000 NI R A di ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. 0 -

AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FS OF F27 I

L:-

., . . ..- ~ . . . - - . . . ~ . ..

- ,01,(19/93: 5ATTACHMEN111- PAGE10: 7s?,

-PARTcB'- "V FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS-LOG- .

AFFECTED-DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT. "

dug'r-CPES-N-2032- SHEET: REUs 0: P.O.:

MAINT LVLt.

DES-CHNG-NUMBER- REV lDOCSJ RELS. D-ST MODIFCTN# 12ET:t>f2T* Wi"T~/tJ0TE DCA- 103824 -000- NI R A jJ0' DEN/

DCA- 103046 '000 NI R A D

-DCA. :103864 000- NI- R A C, ~;

DCA' 103873- 000 NI R A --r- EEshI nn. . nema, man ru, n -

bbA --Eb3bb4 - bbi Nf R A O.I DCA 103892 000 - NI -R' A - GEi DCA 103912 000 NI R A B

DCA 103917 -000 NI R A D DCA 103924 -000 NI- R A D ,

DCA 103947 :000 NI R A -c DCA 103959- 000 NI R A~ c1 DCA 103980 -000 NI- R. A -

DCA 103991 000 NI R- A [(gg

'DCA. 104011 000 NI R A ; gg :

DCA .104013 000 -NI R -A (, 45 DCA .104017 000 NI" R A (_

cc: ::t::: ::: :::: c t

-DCA 104026 001 NI R; -A c.: -

NI DCA =104027- 000 'R A - '

-(7 DCA. 104057Jl000- NI R A- -(

NI 'A

'DCA 104060- 000 R

-3 f f. f f. ,. f, O f f k. 0- -

. .kkh m> . ...

m ,

. . . . h. i DCA. 104079 001' '

NI LR -A

DCA 104087-- 000 NI -R -A-

.DCA 104096: 000- NI DCA 104107- 000 NI R

R A'

A c,-

REC '

DCA 104114. 000: NI. R A DCA 104115 000 NI R' A ; p[ .

DCA 104124 000 --NI R A' -

DCA 104151 000 NI R A -

DCA- 104152 '000 NI R A- <;

DCA 104174 .000 NI R A- G3' DCA. 104188: 000 NI R- -A -----

MD' W DCA 104194 000. NI R A -25

.DCA '104205' 000- : NI R' A . C_ -

': 104206 000 DCA NI R A -[y DCA 104211 000 NI . R A' (;

DCA 1^t217 ^^^ Ch'! "

C 4

d ATTACHMENT F - ER ME-082, REV. D - -

7 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F6 OF F27-e e ,

W39/93~ ATTACHMENT I PQGE: 6' ('

~PART.B -

FIELD DESIGN: CHANGE ALREVIEW STATUS' LOG AFFECTED-DOCUMENTiUPDATE-~ REPORT- *

. DUG: CPES-N-2032 SHEET:- -REV O P.O.s' *

-MAINT LVL:

DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS ~ RECS ! -~ D-ST - MODIFCTN#

................ ... .... .... ..... ......... RETec7'AT7-[AloTC-DCA

_- .104217 001

. , , , - - ___ ~,

~NI Ri

'A

- l$'

bbA DCA.

kb42bb' bbkE

-104224 000 Nk NI 'R R ~A:

A-b: I DCA 104227. 000 NI R A D-DCA 104234- 000 NI R A , f 7 --

DCA 104237= 000 NI R -- A C

4 DCA 104238- 000 NI R A C ;

DCA 104239 000 NI R A- 'C_

DCA 104241 000 NI- R A - (, -

DCA NI 104242 .000 R A .C- !

DCA 104243- 000 NI- R A G.

DCA 104246- 000 NI. R .A & .

TUE 92-05683 -000 NI R A

- A/O h TUE 92-05877 000 NI D A N0 W -

TUE 92-06315- 000 NI D A TUC-- 92-06560 -000 NI D A

/Jo @ -

' Ab y .

TUE- 92-06572 000 NI D A

.gg-Tuc 72 ::::: ::: cn: : <

TUE- 06590. 002 NI D A -

- Alo ZW' +

, - - m, ,1 ,,.-- m. , , , , , m -

TbE' 9h-Ohhf3 00b kk D A MO ZXD/

TUE 92-07065 000 NI._. D 'A tJO DEV i-l l :

I PREPARED BY: //

~ -REVIEWED BY: _./ /_

l APPROVED BY: _/ /_ _

l o

A'ITACHMENT F ER ME-082. REV. 0 l AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F7 OF F27-p

01/1Y/93 ATTACHMENI I PAGE: 1 PART B N' FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 001 REV CP1 P.O :

MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN4 REpopT A.pr/rlofiiE"

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

DCA 101358 000 R A 4t DCA 101524 000 GR A Jg DC^ 102222 00^ EMI " C DCA 102222 001 R A Ag DCA 102265 000 NI R A y DCA 102466 000 NI R A 1.3

'" Mo be/

DCA 102470 000 NI R A Mo DEV DCA 102750 000 NI R A D DCA 102758 000 NI R A c,

-0CA 10 N200 ^^0 CH! " E DCA 102789 001 NI R A I)

DCA 102837 000 NI R A C-DCA 102059 000 NI R A D

-DCA 102886 000 NI R A EE DCA 102894 000 NI R A NO DB/

DCA 102915 000 NI R A Gi OC^ 102007 000 CMI P C

-CCf 10000' 000 CN! "

C DCA 103034 001 NI R A g

_.M P A ( MMAM1 AAA P kt ? M e DCA kO347b bbh R A bD r 4 DCA 103559 002 NI R A -A DCA 103735 000 NI - R A MO DEY DDA 103921 000 R A di 33i !?3!2) 032 m " ,I $ $ 3)

DCA 103953 000 R A A DCA 104001 000 NI R A I)

DCA 104015 000 A DCA 104079 001 NI R

R A 4

1)

DCA 104121 000 R A DCA 104185 000 NI R A !\ d; _

DCA 104189 000 NI R A 3)

DCA 104221 000 NI R A 4K7 })

10'222 000 C?'I O I DCA 104222 001 NI R A Eh DCA 104227 000 NI R A 3)

PREPARED BY: __/__/__

REVIEWED BY: __/__/__

APPROVED BYr __/__/__

ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F8 OF F27

DEj9/93- 1ATTACHMEN1'I- PAGE: ,l' ,

'+

PART B^ .kg-

-FIELD DESIGN CHANGE A~ REVIEW STATUS' LOG'-

-AFFECTED DOCUMENT: UPDATE REPORT-' .

< DUG:-N2-1701- SHEET:= 002 REV~CP1.

P.O.t'

-MAINT LVL 'C2; -

DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-STI MODIFCTNG- REPoR'I ATT[Al0Y

=============== === ==== ..... ==== ========= ,

DCA- 100820 '000 ~ R- -A -k DCA 101627- 002 NI :R ~A

-B

-DCA 102385 001 NI -R A' ~ Qg

-DCA

102479 000- NI R A 'S

'DCA .103002 000 .NI- R A' y CCe :::::: 20: n: :: : , , _

-DC f ^3:20 ^02 "

Ci?! . C DCA 103020 003: R_ _A k n e, . . m,,m. mm m., m m ,

-ir- awwww www er 1 ie as W

^^

CCf 1^O'O' CP?! O C DCA 103634 002 R A fp '

00,^ 100'0: ^^C Ci?! :' C n ^

^ 0 ? ^ .'. ^^0 ON: 0 0' kk

~

!.!!$b, Skk...

,U.,.

a .

,,' W DCA 103804: -001. NI -R A- 6 DCA 103921- 000- R A .A; DCA- 104013 000- -NI R- A

-CC A ; ^ t ^ 2l, ^^C CP?! O C

_g DCA 104026 '001 NI R -A C,,

DCA 104060 000 DCA 104079 001 NI R

R A.

A DCA 104245 000

'b NI R -A $_

PREPARED 8Y: / ,_/ _ _

REVIEUED 8Y:. ,__/ , ,_/_,,,,, - _

APPROVED 8Y: _f /__

ATTACHMENT F ER-ME 082 REV, O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F9 OF F27

'19/93 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: 1 PART B .\

l l FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 0U0: H2-1701 SHEET: 003 REV: CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNO-NUMDER

===

REV

=

DOCS

==

RELS

==

D-ST

==

MODIFCTNt

=

A E ATr/elDTE DCA 100820 000 R A A O C .^ 102'7^ 000 CM! P C DCA f] C .^

102679 103020 001 00 NI EMI R

A 9

g

@CA 100000 002 CN! ? P DCA 103020 003 R A M DCA 103409 001 NI R A g-D C .^ 20?550 000 CM! "

r DCA 103550 001 NI R A G DCA 103681 001 NI R A 6 DCA 103009 000 NI R A D DCA 104047 000 NI R A C DCA DCA 104048 104121 000 000 NI R A 3 R A 4

PREPARED BY: _/_/_

REVIEUED BY: __/_/_

APPROVED DY: _/ _f _

ATTACHMENT F ER ME482, REV. O i AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F10 OF F27

-va.19/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 'I PART B

~ \)

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHEET: 003A REVS CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST. MODIFCTN4

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

RETDRT ATT/sJoT'Ei DCA 100820 000- R A A DCA 103020 003 R A A DCA 103081 001 NI R A b i

l l

1

-PREPARED BY: _/ _/ ,_

REVIEWED bye

_/__/___

APPROVED BYi __ /_/ _

ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE Fil OF F27

s t e l v / *i s , ATTACHMENI 1 PAGE: 1 x PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHEEli 003B REV: CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTNs ret 6RT ATT/ dote

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

DCA 100820 000 R A A DCA 102780 000 NI R A c

O C f, 102702 000 CNI O C OCf 100?CO 002 C.": "

C C C .'- 102002 000 CN! "

C

-0C A 102702 00' CH: "

C -

DCA 102932 102933 005 NI R A lb DCA 000 R A OCA 100020 001 C"! O C A

-D C .^ 103020 002 SMI " E

~

OCf 1000^.4 ^O0 C"! O F

- D C .^ 10219' 000 C"! D E OCA 10010' 001 CN! O C 4 C '- 10310' 002 " '

V"!

OCA 100172 O^0 CN! O OCA 100170 001 C" O C

{CA 100172 002 VN! O V OCA 100000 000 CN! "

C DCA 103305 001 NI R A O DCA 103472 001 NI R A m-. .m,--- mm. m. - - {3 bCA kO38bb 001 hk R N Ch DCA 103860 000 NI R A Mo Cgg/

DCA 103912 000 NI R A O DCA 104045 000 R A /s DCA 104117 000 NI R A ]>

DCA 104173 000 NI R A 33 DCA 104100 000 NI R A C

DCA 104106 NI 000 R A c, DCA 104223 000 NI R A DCA 104226 000 NI R A C

gg TUE 92-05953 000 NI D A NO DET/

PREPARED BY: _

__/ __/__,

REVIEUED BY: __/__/__

APPROVED BY: __/__/__

ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F12 OF F27 I

PART B \

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHEE1: 004 REV: CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LUL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMDER RCV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNG REFbEtr ATT / DOTE

..........m.... ... .... .... .... .........

DCA 101775 000 R A A

-9 0 ^ 10000^ ^^0 CN! P C DCA 102330 001 NI R A C DCA 102725 000 NI R A C DCA 102861 000 NI R A C

10 2 Cl.,0 ^^^ "

00^ CN! C DCA 102933 000 R A b DCA 103001 000 NI R A n OCA 103020 0^0 CN! P C D OCA 10:020 001 CN! -S --

OCA 100020 002 CNI O C -

DCA 103020 003 R A 4

-oc+ 10:07e. Occ CN! O C DCA 103076 001 R A C oCA 10:07C 000 CN! O C DCA - -- --MOBO99---GO4 VNI- -- - -D . . _ . _ . .-.-

DCA 103423 000 R A A DCA 103864 000 NI R A C DCA 103947 000 NI R A g

=c C A 103700 000 CN: 0 C n r* A 1 A M M f" M AA1 f fif T M ff DCA kbkOb7 bbb Nk R A O DCA 104217 001 NI R A 13 PREPARED BY: _/_/_

REVIEWED BY _/_/_

APPROVED BY: _/g_

ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F13 OF F27 '

. . _ ... . . _. - -_ =_ . . _ . -- .

9/93 ATTACHMEN1 3 PAGEi 2 PART B- N N

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIFW S1 ATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT bubt tC-1701 SHEE1 004A REV CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL C2 DEG-CHNO-NUNDER REV DOCH RELS D- 0,T HDDIF"TN8 ReDT2T" A'IT/ Al@

DCA 101775 000 R A A~

DC.^ !04020 002 SM! P S.

-4K ^ !O30:9 002 ?"! P F DCA 1030'20 003 R A A i

t

+

PREPARED BY: _/_/_

REVIEUED BY: _/_/_

APPROVED BY: ._/_/_ ,

ATTACHMENT F ER ME 082. REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F14 OF F27 N. . _ , . . . . , . . . . , . ~ ~

Av/93 ATTACHHEN1 2 PAGLI a N g

PART D FIELD DESIDN CHANGE A REVICU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEE1 005 REV CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNO-NUNDER

==.............

REV 00C0 RELS

==

D-ST MDDIFCTNe

...u.....

f?EFbW /.~rT/M A

~

DCA 100561 000 NI R A k 5'11$ # U D')

DCA 100020 000 R A A DCA 101357 000 NI R A T DCA 101906 001 NI k A 4Kif 10E202 000 CHI O P 9Et 102202 001 -VN! D "

-DC A 10247: 000 CN! "

r

-BC I- 202: 00: SN! D " . _ - - -

- OCf 102: 002 9N! D 9 __

DCA 102471 003 NI R A

-0C A 490'?O 000 EN! 0 9 3

DCA 102470 001 NI R A C DCA 102021 001 NI R A y) me^ 102ee2 000 eN 9 e 1;CA 109000 00 ' 'N !

. P V CC^ 203020 001 SNI P E

-O C f 200020 002 CN4 P S-DCA 103020 003 R A 4

-96&- - - 100'72 0^^ OMI P O DCA 103472 001 NI R A

-D C ^ 10?'9^ 000 E t'!- 9 ?

DCA 203484 001 NI R A 1)

DCA 103408 000 NI R A I)

@CA 100500 000 "N! P C DCA 103550 001 NI R A Eb DCA 203559 000 NI R A 4 DCA 103574 000 NI R A 6 DCA 103575 000 NI R A Eb DCA 103502 000 NI R A Ib DCA 103509 000 NI R A p';

DCA 103597 000 NI R A

-0Cf 100'2' 000 CNI_ " " ")

DCA 103626 000 R A 4 DCA 103670 000 NI k A DCA 103600 000 NI A

{3 R 5(

-eG& - : 097:4 G----400- CNI- - U- E-DCA DCA 103740 001 103033 000 NI R A 3 R A A UCA 103935 000 NI R A R

-GGA - 403S53- 001 UNI--. 4) U

~

i l

l

(

l A1TACHMENT F ER ME-082. REV. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FIS OF F27 u a

t u yJ ATTACHNENl 1 PAGEl ~D PART B s FIELD DESIGN CHANGE A REVIEW STATUS LDG- i AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWU: M2-1701 SHEE1 005 REUt CP1 P.O.

NAINT LVL: C2 DCS-CHNO-NUNDER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTNG PEA:st27 ATT/MOE DCA 104011 000 NI R A 6 DCA 104087 000 NI R A 6 DCA 104121 000 R A A DCA 104197 000 NI R A C ;

DCA 104204 000 NI R A g

>F'^ 10i?22 000 EN! P ,

DCA

""^

104222 2^^23:

001 000 NI SH1 C R A C

6 DGA- ^4335 001- CN! a- C - --

DCA 104235 002 R A A TUE 92-05971 000 NI D A eJoW r

i 1

PREPARED BY: _ _/ __/ _

REVIEUED BY: _/_/_

APPROVED BY: _/_/_

i ATTACHMENT F ER-ME 082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F16 OF F27

,eg.-

1/2v/9a AT1 ACHt4EN ! 1 PAGLt 3 PART D FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REV2EU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 5

DUG H2-1701 SHEET: 005A REV CP1 P.O.: I MAINT LVL C2

+

DCS-CHNG-NUNDER REV DOCS RELfi D-fit MdDIFC1N8 RE7DRT ATT[#JD7E DCA 20082 >0 R A A

.OfM - --- 10Ger* 4 ---- -GN 3 - - -- U - P -

DGA 2 00 0TM.' . 404 S M i---4)- -- S -

DC ^. 100000 002 C N 1- - -- -U - S DCA 1 UJuk'U UU3 R A $

DCA DCA

_103507 104121 000 000 R A k R A k

i

(

I 1

l i

PREPARED DY //

REVIEUED DY: _/ .__ /

APPR0VED BYi //

1 1

ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082. REV. O AFFEC'IliD DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F17 OF F27

.-. .a

04/19/93 ATTACHNER1 1 PAGE: J PART B ,

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG !

AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT .;

DUU H2-1701 SHEE1: 006 REV CP2 P.O.:

MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUNDER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTNe (?6po(27A77[McT6~

DCA 101499 000 NI R A 6 DCA 102050 000 NI R A S DCA 102726 000 NI- R A 6 DCA 102058 000- NI R A C '

DCA 102809 000 NI R A F)

-DC^ -'!O?020 000 SN! P C

-DC^ 10?000 OO! 94? P F O C/' 102020 002 EMI 9 ?

DCA 103020 003 R A A DCA 103507 000 R A A mm .mem,. _ ,. m - - - - - -

bbE kb3b74 bbi Uk k b 6 t

t PREPARED DY: _/_/_

REVIEUED BY _/_/-

APPROVED BY: /--./ -

ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FIS OF F27 a

v 'v3 ATTACHMEN1 I eeGE N

4 S

PART B TIELD DESIGN CHANGE A REVIEW S1ATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT OWbt h2-1701 SHEE11 007. REV1 CP1 P.O.i MAINT LVL: C2 UCC-CHNO-NUMDER REV 0000 RELS D-ST NODIFCTNt Wm;2T~ ATT[ MON DCA 102729 000 R A k w :02700 000 Ct:: e r DCA 102759 001 4K a 100000 000 Cf!!

R P

A C

4 4?r ^ 1020^0 ^H Cf!! "

P

^^^

"I 20204^ C f!! e E DCA 102933 000 R A 4

DGr. 2^302^ 002 C H4 "

C nr^ ^^"

202^?^ c"! P 9 DCA 103020 003 R A A

""^ ?02061 ^^^

C!'? ? r DCA 103061 001 R A B 0"^ 1030P: 0^^ C?'? "

C OC^ 10327"' 0^^ CF?! "

C DCA 4K ^

103277 202101 001 000 NI R A R C i!! - C DCA 103406 001 NI "C- :came: eee 03::

R e

A C

DCA 10372? 001 NI R A C. .

DCA 103730 000 NI R a C DCA 103782 000 NI R A ocA :00000 0^O C::: -+--- c C _

DCA 103055 001 NI _. R A E DCA 103929 000 NI R A tJD LP/ ,

104123 DCA 000 R A k

PREPARED BY: _/ /_

REV1EUED BY: /_/-

APPROVED BY: _/ /_

A'ITACHMENT F ER-ME-082. REV O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F19 OF F27

Av/93 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: A PART B \

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG M2-1701 SHEET 000 REV: CP1 P.O. I HAINT LVL C2 '

DES-CHNO-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST

. . c.

NODIFCTNG RETbf2T AM idOT DCA 100020 000 R A A DCA 101918 000 R A A DCA 102933 000 R A 4

""^

20?iO! 000 EMI !' E DCA 103401 001 NI R A Ff; DCA 103486 000 R A g

D C .^ 10M2' 001 SHI D --- F DCA 103624 002 NI R A DCA 104070 000 NI R A D 4

PREPARED BY: _/ _/ _ ;

REVIEUED BY: _/ /

APPROVED BY: _/ /_

ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F20 OF F27

ei jv/Y3 .ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: a ,,

PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIE'u STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT

, UWG: H2-1701 SHEE1 009 REV CP1 P.O.

NAINT LVL: C2 UES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS 0-ST N00IFCTN4 R~ PORT ATT'/dDTE DCA 100820 000 R A L ocA 103490 000 R A um :cuce cce Cn: r r 4-sw+ <c. inn nn< eu, n e bbA kb3bbb bbb Ni R A A3 I

PREPARED BY: __/__/.,__

REVIEUED DY: .__/_ / ___

APPROVED BY: _,,_/ _/

ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REV. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F21 OF F27 m a

~. . -

, a tr / 93 ATTACHnfitf! 2 PAGL 1 N i PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHEET: 010 REV CP1 P.O.I NAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUNDER REV DOCS RELS D-ST HODIFCTNe RETTET AT71Morg

^^^

-0C .', 1^2522 C"! D E DCA 102522 001 R A 4

.DCA 10230C ^^0 ""! ." C DCA

, , ~

103305

.m,.,,

001 NI

-m, R

A g

DCA kb4bbb bb1 N5 ht k 6 DCA 104233 000 NI R A Mo y PREPARED BY: _/_/_

REVIEUED BYi _/_/_

APPROVED BY _/_/_

ATTACl! MENT F ER-ME-082 REY. 0 '

AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F22 OF F27.

.- .. .. . - - -. . - . . ~- - -- . .

0; t :. / 93 ATTACHHEUl 1 PAGE: 1 PART B \

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFCCTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DVD4 t42-1701 SHEET: 011 REV -CP1 P.O.

NAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNg

% E7"ATT[ blot 6 DCA 101625 000 GR A A DCA 101775 000 R A A DCA 202931 000 NI R A DCA 102957 000 R A OC^ 10302^ 000 C"! -G - C

-U C '- 203020 ^^! CN! (! C

-DC ^ 14G02^ 000 CNI C C DCA 103020 003 R A k DCA 203407 000 NI R A 6 DCA 104121 000 R A A PREPARED BY: _/_/_

REVIEUED BY: _/_/_

APPROVED DY[ _/_/_

ATTACHMENT F ' ER ME482. REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F23 OF F27 L

.. ty/93

. ATTACHMEN'I I PAGE: a N' PART D FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT-UPDATE REPORT dug: H2-1701 SHEET: 012 REV CF2 P.O.

NAINT LVLi C2 DES-CHNO-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTN8

% TAT ATT-MOG DCA 103063 000 R A

-DCA ~ ~~-t49905-4&O--- SHI - - S - - - - -- -

4 DCA 103305 001 NI R A 4E^ 200'00 000 CP! O C DCA 103408 001 NI R A 6 DCA --103044 000 A R

4 i

PREPARED BY: ._,_/ ,,,,,_/

REVIEUED BYt _ _,f _ /

APPR0VED BY / _f ATTACHMENT F ER ME 082. REV. 0 -

AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F24 OF F27 i

s-- J

J2Y/93 -Q1TACHMEN1.2 PALE: 1 N.

PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPDRT DWG1 M2-1701 SHEETS 013 'REV1 CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL: C2-DCS-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCD RELS D-ST NODIFCTN4 Resp 0RT"AT'T"[ dote

............... .... <2... .... ==== .........

-0Cf 0222: -

^^^

SMI D S DCA 102221 001 NI R A 1)

DCn 102231- 000 NI R A I)

DCA 102312 000 NI R A I)-

DCA- 102524 000 NI R A JD -

DCA 102525 000- NI R A JD "C" 02477 ^00 CMI P c DCA 102679 001 . NI R A- 3 hPA 1AM4h8 AAA f911 T h e __

bbA kbh788 551 NI. -R k A.

DCA 102882 000 NI R A GL DCA 102933 000- R A A

_h .fk)f, kOf -, , h Eb-bb kb3h4h bbk R k ]\

DCA 203862- 000 NI R A {$.

DCA 104121 000' R A Aq DCA 104124 000 NI R A pg t

l I PREPARED.BY .__/d_

t-

REVIEWED BYi /_/_

l'. ' APPROVED BY __/__/__

ATTACHMENT F . .

ER ME-082iREV. 0

- AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS . . PAGE F25 OF F27 L

U

01'14'93 A1TACHMENT 3 PAGE: 1 PART D g

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATuti LOG ;

AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWie : M2-1701 SHEET: 014 REV: CP1 P.O.

MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST. MODIFCTN4 R&~Ebf2T' ATT[dDT6

...:.1 ...====... === .... ==== ==== =========

^^^

esk- :00172 CN! O C DCA 103472 001 NI* R A F3 er' : C 0 i 0';-- 000 CN: P r -

DCA 103489 001 NI R A 8-4 1

PREPARED BY: ,,,,_/ /

REVIEUED BY: _,,,/ / .,,,,,,

APPROVED BY: ,_/ _ /

ATTACHMENT F ER ME482, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F26 OF F27 d

03/19/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 PART B ,

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE A REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFCCTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUGS H2-1701 SHEE11 015 REV: CP1 P.O.

NAINT LVL C2 DCS-CHNG-NUNDER REV DOCH RELD D-DT HDDIFCTN4 Rb~PCJ27~AY!OW

=====:========== === ==ca ==== ==== ========= -

DCA 302600 000 R A A at^ 10312' 001 CMI h C

DCA 103624 002 NI R A 3 DCA 103644 000 GR A DCA 104121 000 R A A

DCA 104226 000 NI R A 4 g

i ,

PREPARED BY: __

JJ REVIEUED BY: i -

._./ _/ _

APPR0VED DY:- / /_

A'ITACHMENT F ER ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F27 OF F27

- j

ML20127K812: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:36, 23 July 2020

Contents

Text

2.0 BACKGROUND

5.0 CONCLUSION

6.0 REFERENCES

2.0 BACKGROUND

5.0 CONCLUSION

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

===

=

==

==

==

=

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

==

Navigation menu

ML20127K812: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:36, 23 July 2020

Text

2.0 BACKGROUND

5.0 CONCLUSION

6.0 REFERENCES

2.0 BACKGROUND

5.0 CONCLUSION

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

===

=

==

==

==

=

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

========= === ==== ==== ==== ===

==

Navigation menu

Search