Text

Engineering Rept Evaluation of Unit 1 & Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations
	ML20069M876
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/10/1994
From:	; TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20069M868	List: ML20069M876; TXX-9415, Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re Thermo-Lag Certification.Rev 2 to ER-ME-082, Engineering Rept Evaluation of Unit 1 & Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations;
References
	ER-ME-082, ER-ME-082-R02, ER-ME-82, ER-ME-82-R2, NUDOCS 9406220168
	Download: ML20069M876 (520)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:. l l ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 1 OF 16 TU ELECTRIC COh1ANCIIE PErW STEAhl ELECTRIC STATION ENGINEERING REPORT EVALUATION OF UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 THERNIO-LAG i CONFIGURATIONS ! ER-h1E-082 i REVISION 2 JUNE 10,1994 ) I l PREPARED BY: nt

                                --N                           l I

l REVIEWED BY: JM1 h 1 : l APPROVED BY: O v b . 9406220168 DR 940616 ADOCK 05000445 PDR

1

l I l ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 2 OF 16 l TABLE OF CONTENTS l SECTION TITLE PAGE I REVISION RECORD RR1 - RR7 ; 1.0 PURPOSE 4 l

2.0 BACKGROUND

4 i 3.0 METHODOLOGY 6 4.0 EVALUATION 10

5.0 CONCLUSION

13

6.0 REFERENCES

13 ATTACHMENT A TYPICAL UNIT 2 DESIGN DETAILS Al-A25 ATTACHMENT B UNIT 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS B1-B65 A A'ITACHMENT C UNIT 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY Cl-C40 DEVIATIONS A'ITACHMENT D UNIT 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM Dl-D31 i COVERAGE DEVIATIONS 1 l l ATTACHMENT E STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS El-El1 A'ITACHMENT F UNIT 2 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE F1-F27 REPORTS l A'ITACHMENT G TYPICAL UNIT 1 DESIGN DETAILS GI-G26 ATTACHMENT H UNIT 1 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS H1-H45 l ATTACHMENT I UNIT 1 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY 11-119 ! DEVIATIONS 1 I

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 3 OF 16 ATTACHMENT J UNIT 1 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM J1-J15 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS ATTACHMENT K DM 92-077 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / Ki-125 g DEVIATIONS ATTACHMENT L UNIT 1 AFFECTED DOCUMENT L1-L61 UPDATE REPORT 1 l l l l l l l

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE RR1 OF RR7 REVISION RECORD Revision 1 A. General Description of Changes

1. Revision 0 of this report was issued when the installation of Thermo-Lag on Unit 2 commodities was approximately 93% complete. Design change documents since Revision 0 was issued, reflecting final Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations at the time of full power licensing, have been included within the scope of Revision 1.

2. Revision 0 of this report identified six (6) DCAs depicting six (6) field configurations for which the critical attributes were not bounded by tested configurations or evaluation could not demonstrate an equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration. This issue was documented via ONE Form 93-184. Subsequent to issuance of the ONE Form, two (2) other DCAs were identified which had critical attributes similar to those identified by the ONE Form. Seven (7) DCAs were revised and reworked in the field. The resulting configurations are evaluated in Attachment C of this report. Further review determined that the remaining DCA was consistent with tested configurations and was re-evaluated in Attachment B.

3. During the Unit 2 93-08 pre-fuel load inspection, the NRC staff reviewed eight (8) unique Thermo-Lag field configurations designed and constructed through the DCA process, as described in the 50-446/93-08 Inspection Report (Ref. 6.21).

At the time of the inspection, evaluations documenting the acceptability of such untested configurations in accordance with NRC Generic Letter 86-10 (ref. 6.13) were not complete. Revision 0 of this engineering report was subsequently issued to provide the acceptance basis for all Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations installed at that time and transmitted to the NRC staff via TXX-93023 dated January 19, 1993 (Rei.122). The staff's review of Revision 0 of this report was then issued as part of SSER 26 (REF. 6.23). In SSER 26, the staff concluded that the justification provided for two (2) of the configurations reviewed during the 93-08 inspection did not fclly establish an adequate acceptance basis relative to configurations qualified by testing. These configurations consisted of " box design" enclosures coi structed of Thermo-Lag panels whereby cable tray protective envelopes were extended beyond the cable tray boundaries to enclose air drop cables. Th: staff further indicated that this concern, i.e., the qualification basis for cable tray and air drop " box design" enclosures was generic to other such configuradons using similar construction techniques. Finally, the staff stated that review o.' Revision 0 of this report was on a sample basis and other such evaluations provided for untested configurations would be subject to

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE RR2 OF RR7 future audit. In response to the NRC staff's concern regarding " box design" enclosures described above, TXX-93101 (Ref. 6.24) was issued on February 26, 1993. In this correspondence, TU Electric committed to modify all " box design" cable tray / air drop enclosures (as described above) installed on Unit 2 raceways / cables to either provide an additional layer of Thermo-I2g puel material on the assemblies or otherwise modify the existing protective envelopes to conform with configurations bounded by test. The scope of this commitment consisted of 13 configurations, which were to be reworked in accordance with the CPSES site modification program (Ref. 6.19, 6.20). All work associated with these modifications has been completed (Ref. 6.28). Therefore, Revision 1 of this report provides revised evaluations for these plant configurations.

4. TU Electric transmitted copies of ten (10) Omega Point Laboratories (OPL) fire endurance test reports to the NRC staff via Ref. 6.22. Accordingly, Revision 0 of this engineering report utilized the results of these 10 fire endurance tests (i.e.,

test schemes") in the evaluations of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations contained therein. However, in SSER 26 the NRC identified concerns with the results of two (2) of these test schemes (Schemes 1-2 and 9-3) relative to their use in the Unit 2 Thermo-Lag qualification basis. Scheme 9-3 was a conduit assembly which tested 1/2 inch (nominal) thickness of Thermo-Lag coverage on 1 1/2 inch and 2 inch diameter conduits, which is representative of the existing Unit I configuration on these conduit sizes. As described by TXX-93061 dated January 28,1993 (Ref. 6.26), the results of this test will not be used to qualify Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations since the Thermo-Lag thicknesses on these conduit sizes were increased. Use of this test scheme was included in Revision 0 to justify minor areas on protected conduits in Unit 2 where the increased thicknesses of Thermo-Lag material could not be installed due to the interferences, etc. However, since the results of this test scheme have not been accepted by the NRC staff at this time, Revision 1 of this report eliminates reference to this test (see Section 6.10). Scheme 1-2 was a 36 inch wide cable tray assembly with tee section. Although the results of this test were satisfactory (i.e., acceptable cable and tray side rail temperatures were maintained and no visual cable damage occurred), this test was conducted in June 1992, prior to issuance of the October 29,1992 NRC letter (Ref. 6.27) which provided NRC concurrence on the TU Electric fire test program methodology and acceptance criteria. The NRC staff's concern was that since the test methodology at that time specified a straight stream hose test following the fire endurance test, which does not leave the Thermo-Lag barrier material intact, it was not possible to determine if " burn-through" of the barrier occurred. In response to this concern, Ref. 6.24 was issued with a commitment to perform a confirmatory fire test on a 36 inch cable tray utilizing the methodology and acceptance criteria contained in Ref. 6.27. This test was performed on March 4,1993 at OPL and the satisfactory results conveyed to the NRC staff via Ref. 6.25. Therefore, use of

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE RR3 OF RR7 the results of this test (Scheme 15-1) has been included in Revision 1 of this report as part of the qualification basis for Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations (see Section 6.10).

5. Revision 1 of this report also includes minor clarifications, corrections, etc.,

which existed in Revision 0.

6. No revision bars are included in Revision 1, however a description of the changes follows in Section B for traceability purposes.

B. Details of Changes

1. Added Record of Revision section to report.

2. Revised Table of Contents to reflect Revision 1 changes.

3. Revised Section 2.0 and 3.1 to reflect Design Change Notice (DCN) and Design Modification (DM) process for implementing field changes, since Design Change Authorization (DCA) process is no longer in effect.

4. Deleted Section 3.2 since installation of Thermo-Lag fire barriers is complete in Unit 2.

5. Renumbered Sections 3.3 through 3.6 to 3.2 through 3.5 and added reference to DCN design change process.

6. Revised Section 5.0 to delete description of six (6) DCAs identified in Revision '

0 as requiring rework (see item 2 of " General Description of Changes").

7. Revised Section 6.0 to include additional references (6.19 through 6.28) and revised list of Omega Point Laboratories Fire Test Reports (Ref. 6.10).

8. Revised Attachment A, " Typical Design Details" as follows:

a. DCAs 104015, Rev. I and 104235, Rev. 3 were issued subsequent to issuance of Rev. O of this engineering report (ER). Evaluations associated with the minor revisions to the typical design detail drawings have now been included in Attachment A.

l

9. Revised Attachment B, " Unique Configurations" as follows: )

a. As described in item A.3 above, this revision of the engineering report (ER) includes evaluation of field changes issued to modify " box design" j I

i I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 i PAGE RR4 0F RR7 i enclosures where the protective envelopes installed to enclose portions of cable trays and air drop cables were not considered to be direct extensions of the cable tray protective envelopes. Thirteen (13) such con 6gurations were identified as requiring modi 6 cation. Twelve (12) configurations I were modified via DCNs 5727,5742 and 5745 for provision of a second layer of Thermo-Lag 330-1 panels over the existing coverage, consistent with the des m qualified by Test Scheme 10-1 for junction boxes. One (1) conGguration (originally installed per DCA 103624, Rev. 2) was modiGed via DCN 5746 to utilize 330-660 flexi-blanket material coverage consistent with Test Scheme 11-1. All field work associated with these modifications is complete. Accordingly, the design change documents listed below and corresponding revised evaluations have been included in Attachment B:

i. DCA 103575, Rev. 0 (DCN 5727, Rev. 0) ii. DCA 103701, Rev. 0 (DCN 5727, Rev. 0) iii. DCA 102160, Rev.1 (DCN 5742, Rev.1) iv. DCA 102932, Rev. 5 (DCN 5742, Rev.1)

v. DCA 104124, Rev. 0 (DCN 5742, Rev.1) vi. DCA 102882, Rev. 0 (DCN 5745, Rev.1) vii. DCA 103472, Rev.1 (DCN 5745, Rev.1) viii. DCA 103489, Rev.1 (DCN 5745, Rev.1) ix. DCA 103680, Rev.1 (DCN 5745, Rev,1)

x. DCA 103884, Rev.1 (DCN 5745, Rev.1) xi. DCA 101498, Rev.1 (DCN 5746, Rev.1) xii. DCA 103624, Rev. 2 (DCN 5746, Rev.1) xiii. DCA 104217, Rev. 2 (DCN 5746, Rev.1)

b. Evaluatior of DCA 102479, Rev. 0 was included in Attachment D of Rev.

O of this ER. Subsequent to issuance of the ER, the DCA required . revision due to field conditions and final QC inspection. Resolution of the l field condition required modification of the Thermo-Lag configuration such that it is more appropriately addressed as a " unique" configuration. All field work has been completed and the evaluation associated with Rev. 1 of this DCA has been included in Attachment B. I

c. Evaluations for DCAs 103551, Rev.1,103892, Rev. O and 104222, Rev. l 1 were included in the scope of Rev. O of this ER. Subsequent to issuance of the ER, these DCAs required revision due tc field conditions and final QC inspections. All field work has been completed and evaluations associated with the final revisions of these DCAs have been included in Attachment B.

I 1

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE RR5 OF RR7

d. The DCAs listed below reflect field con 5gurations which were not installed at the time Rev. O of this ER was issued. All field work has been completed and the evaluations associated with these configurations have now been included in Attachment B:

i. DCA 104251, Rev. O ii. DCA 104257, Rev.1 iii. DCA 104265, Rev. O

e. As described in item A.2 above, One Form 93-184 was issued based on Rev. O of this ER to identify specific configurations where the existing design was not adequately bounded by a tested configuration. The DCAs associated with this condition were evaluated in Attachment B in Rev. O of this ER. The subject DCAs were revised and reworked in the field to conform with designs which could be justified based on tested configurations. Evaluations for these DCAs have now been included in Attachment C since the field configurations are no longer " unique":

i. DCA 101320, Rev. 3 ii. DCA 103574, Rev.1 iii. DCA 104011, Rev.1 iv. DCA 104174, Rev. I

v. DCA 104246, Rev. 2

f. The DCAs in Attachment B have been rearranged in numerical order in Rev.1 of this ER to facilitate usability.

10. Revised Attachment C, " Minor Protected Commodity Deviations" as follows:

a. As described in item A.2 above, One Form 93-184 was issued based on Rev. O of this engineering report (ER) to identify specific configurations where the existing design was not adequately bounded by a tested configuration. The DCAs associated with this condition were evaluated in Attachment B in Rev. O of this ER, except DCAs 102780 and 102861 l which were evaluated in Attachment C. The subject DCAs were revised and reworked in the field to conform with designs which could be justified based on tested configurations. The DCAs listed below reflect the revised configurations which are now included and evaluated in Attachment C:

1. DCA 101320, Rev. 3 ii. DCA 102780, Rev.1 iii. DCA 102861, Rev.1

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ; PAGE RR6 OF RR7 l iv. DCA 103574, Rev.1

v. DCA 104011, Rev. I vi. DCA 104174, Rev. I vii. DCA 104246, Rev. 2

b. The DCAs listed below reflect field configurations which were not installed at the time Rev. O of this ER was issued. All field work has been completed and the evaluations associated with these configurations have now been included in Attachment C:

i. DCA 104017, Rev.1 ii. DCA 104037, Rev.1 iii. DCA 104241, Rev.1 iv. DCA 104244, Rev. O

v. DCA 104248, Rev.1 vi. DCA 104250, Rev. O vii. DCA 104252, Rev. O viii. DCA 104253, Rev. O ix. DCA 104254, Rev. O

x. DCA 104255, Rev. O xi. DCA 104258, Rev. O xii. DCA 104261, Rev. O xiii. DCA 104262, Rev. O xiv. DCA 104264, Rev. O

c. Evaluations for DCA 103401, Rev. I and 104245, Rev. 0 were inadvertently omitted from the scope of Rev. O of this ER. They have been included and evaluated accordingly in Attachment C.

11. Revised Attachment D, " Protruding / Interfering Item Coverage Deviations" as follows:

a. The DCAs listed below reflect field configurations which were not installed at the time Rev. O of this ER was issued. All field work has been completed at the evaluations associated with these configurations have been included in Attachment D:

i. DCA 104256, Rev. O ii. DCA 104259, Rev. O iii. DCA 104263, Rev. O

b. Evaluations for DCAs 102884, Rev. O and 103846, Rev. 0 were included in the scope of Rev. O of this ER. Subsequent to issuance of the ER, these

ER-h1E-082, REV. 2 PAGE RR7 OF RR7 DCAs required revision due to field conditions and final QC inspections. All field work has been completed and the evaluations associated with Rev.1 of these DCAs have been included in Attachment D.

c. Evaluation of DCA 102479, Rev. O was included in Attachment D of Rev.

O of this ER. Subsequent to issuance of the ER, this DCA required revision due to field conditions and final QC inspection. Resolution of the field condition required modification of the Thermo-Lag configuration such that it is more appropriately addressed as a " unique" configuration. All field work has been completed and evaluation associated with Rev.1 of this DCA has been included in Attachment B.

12. No revisions were made to Attachment E, " Structural Steel Deviations".

13. Revised Attachment F, "Affected Document Update Reports" to provide an updated listing of the design change documents posted against the Unit 2 Thermo-Lag installation specification (Ref. 6.8) and Typical Design Detail Drawings (Ref. 6.9) which are evaluated in this ER.

Revision 2 A. TU Electric, in an effort to resolve all concerns related to Thermo-Lag fire barriers at CPSES, embarked on a final phase of fire testing and plant modification. In November 1992, Dh192-077 was originated for the purpose of upgrading all small diameter (3/4" and I") Unit 1 essential conduit runs. This upgrade consisted of installing 1/4" thick Thermo-Lag overlays atop the existing 1/2" Thermo-Lag material and reinforcing pull boxes and radial bends with stress skin and trowel grade buildup. In a parallel effort, additional test schemes were developed and subsequently constructed for testing at Omega Point Laboratories. The purpose of these tests was f. to confirm that less extensive upgrade methods could, in some instances, be incorporated into the Unit 1 Thermo-Lag barrier back fit effort. Testing was completed in August 1993. ! From August 1993 through hiay 1994, several Design hiodification Change Forms (DhtCF) were issued against Dh192-077 to initiate field upgrades of various Unit 1 plant configurations. The DhtCF issued in hiay 1994 provides closure to the CPSES Unit 1 and Unit 2 Thermo-Lag fire barrier installation and upgrade programs. l B. Revision 2 of this report adds the results of the Unit 1 upgrade program as indicated l by revision bars. Attachments G, H, I, J, K and L are added without revision bars. l i l i l - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

i I l ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 4 OF 16 1.0 PURPOSJ3 The purpose of this evaluation is to provide reasonable assurance that Thermo-Lag 2-Fire Barrier System con 6gurations installed to protect Unit I and Unit 2 electrical raceways and cables will provide a 1-hour fire endurance rating (Ref. 6.1) in accordance with the CPSES design and licensing basis (Ref. 6.2, 6.3, 6.4) for assuring at least one train of equipment, components and raceways necessary to achieve safe shutdown will be free from fire damage (Ref. 6.5). Additionally, where Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier System configurations are utilized as part of a Gre rated plant structural assembly, this evaluation provides reasonable assurance that these configurations will provide a fire endurance rating commensurate with that of the barrier (Ref. 6.6 and 6.35) in accordance with the 1 CPSES design and licensing basis (Ref. 6.3,6.4,6.7).

2.0 BACKGROUND

The applicable CPSES Unit 1 Thermo-Lag installation speciGcation (Ref. 6.29. Revs. I and 2) and typical detail design drawings (Ref. 6.30) provided the technical requirements for installing Thermo-Lag material on required Unit I commodities. For cable and raceway barrier con 0gurations, the technical requirements such as material thickness, scaling and reinforcements of joints, etc., were originally based on TSI installation data (Ref. 6.31). Initial Unit 1 Thermo-Lag installation was completed prior to the 1990 initial Unit I fuel load. In June,1991, the NRC established a Special Review Team to review the safety significance and generic applicability of certain technical issues regarding the use of Thermo-Lag at Nuclear power plants. The NRC released to the industry a draft generic letter (Ref. 6.32) in February,1992, which identified several concerns related to the acceptability of Thermo-Lag. In light of the concerns raised in the draft generic letter and the status of CPSES 1 Unit 2 construction activities (Thermo-Lag installation was to begin in the very near future), TU Electric performed an extensive review to assess its position with respect to the continued use of Thermo-Lag for CPSES Unit 2. Based on an NRC concern about the acceptance of previous Thermo-Lag tests, TU Electric performed independent full scale fire endurance testing of Thermo-Lag raceway assemblies that were representative of plant configurations rd enveloped the range of installed commodity sizes. Portions of a five (5) phase testing program completed at Omega Point Laboratories Ref. 6.10) resulted in modifications to the applicable Unit 2 Thermo-Lag installation specification (Ref. 6.8) and typical detail design drawings (Ref. 6.9) which provide

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 5 OF 16 the technical requirements for installing Thermo-Lag material on required commodities. For cable and raceway barrier configurations, these technical requirements are based on methods used to construct test assemblies during phases one (1) through four (4) of the aforementioned I hour Thermo-Lag fire endurance qualiGcation test program. Subsequent to the completion of the Unit 2 installations, a fifth phase of Gre endurance qualification testing was performed in an effort to confirm that less extensive upgrade methods could, in some instances, be incorporated into the Unit 1 Thermo-Lag barrier backfit effort. The revised Unit 1 Thermo-Lag installation specification (Ref. 6.29) and typical detail design drawings (Ref. 6.33) provide the technical requirements (based on the TU test program) for installing Thermo-Lag materials in cable and raceway barrier configurations. For structural steel configurations associated with both Units, technical requirements are based on Underwriter's Laboratories tested designs (Ref. 6.11). 2. For a detailed description of the TU Electric Thermo-Lag test program including commodities and con 6gurations tested, test results, etc., refer to ER-ME-067,

  " Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems" (Ref. 6.12).

The installation requirements and construction details for applying Thermo-Lag to most plant commodities and con 6gurations thereof such as cable trays, conduits, junction boxes, etc., are enveloped by the typical detail design drawings and installation speci6 cation. Accordingly, most of these commodity configurations and techniques for Thermo-Lag installation are qualified directly by specific tests. However, it is recognized that due to specific Deld conditions and limitations such as interferences, clearances between commodities, etc., creation of unique design configurations and acceptance of minor deviations from specified technical requirements (where appropriately justified) are inevitable. It is also recognized that due to the number and variation of these special instances it is not feasible to qualify

all aspects of each unique configuration or minor deviations through specific fire endurance testing. In fact, in some instances limitations of industry test apparatus may preclude such testing.

Instead, the goal of a qualification test program is to qualify the critical attributes of i the fire barrier system, such as material thickness, joint reinforcement techniques, interfaces between different materials, etc., for the range of commodity sizes anticipated in plant conGgurations. Based on the qualification of these critical l attributes, specinc plant conditions requiring unique configuration designs and minor deviations can be reasonably resolved. The NRC staff has recognized this concept through the provisions of Generic Letter 86-10 (Ref. 6.13) which enables licensees to evaluate Seld installations which vary from configurations qualified via fire

l ER4fE-082, REV. 2 PAGE 6 OF 16 endurance tests using criteria provided therein. In accordance with the CPSES design control program, where due to field conditions, the techniques or configurations for installing Thermo-Lag on required commodities are not bounded by the installation specification or typical details, Construction Department personnel are required to identify the condition for resolution by Engineering via initiation of a design change document. For field work implemented prior to fuel load, the applicable design change document was a Design Change Authorization (DCA) (Ref. 6.14). For field work implemented subsequent to fuel load, the applicable design change document is a Design Change Notice (DCN), controlled via the CPSES Design Modification (DM) program (Ref. 6.19, 6.20). Additionally, DCAs/DCNs are initiated to identify specific instances where obstructing commodities (piping, ductwork, raceway, etc.) serve to interfere with the protective envelope such that specified requirements cannot readily be achieved. Resolution of these specific field conditions is provided by Engineering in accordance with the governing design change process procedure. Resolution of these issues is based on methods and techniques qualified through test, experience and familiarity with the proper uses and limitations of Thermo-Lag materials gained through the qualification test program and conservative engineering practices. Accordingly, this evaluation serves to correlate Thermo-Lag configurations to the 2. applicable qualification test (" scheme"), or portions thereof and hence provide a basis for acceptance in accordance with the provisions of NRC Generic Letter 86-10. This process will be utilized for all typical details approved for generic use via the design drawings (Ref. 6.9 & 6.33) and such unique configurations and minor deviations described above as bounded by the applicable DCAs/DCNs. E 3.0 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Methodology for Unit 2, completed in Revision 1 of this document dated March 25, 1993 and unchanged in this revision. 2. 3.1.1 Copies of all design drawings containing typical details (including DCAs/DCNs issued, but not yet incorporated into the drawings) were obtained from the Document Control Center. Additionally, copies of all DCAs/DCNs posted against the design drawings and the installation specification (Ref. 6.8) that identified approved deviations from specified requirements were similarly obtained. The "Affected Document Update Reports" (ADURs) provided in Attachment F provide the complete listing of all DCAs/DCNs reviewed within the scope of this report which includes all field modifications completed in support of Unit 2 full power licensing. 3.1.2 Once copies of all approved design changes to Unit 2 Thermo-Lag design documents l Z, were obtained, they were categorized into five (5) general categories based on the I relative significance level of the design change implemented by the DCA/DCN.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 7 OF 16 Accordingly, the " typical details" are viewed as the most significant since these configurations are generally approved for use on a generic basis. The unique design configuratior.s are viewed as the next most significant category followed by any deviations from specified requirements associated with the actual raceway, component or cabling requiring protection. Deviations from specified coverage on items protruding from or interfering with the commodity requiring protection (such as raceway supports) were grouped as the fourth category. Lastly, any deviations to Thermo-Lag configurations on structural steel were compiled. This is based on the minor amount of structural steel requiring protection in the plant (support steel for 2-hour rated gypsum stairwell walls and on support frames for fire and tornado dampers in these walls). Also, since Thermo-Lag panels are secured to structural steel with screw fasteners, and few protruding / interfering commodities are located in these areas, these configurations are much less prone to installation deviations. 3.1.3 Next, a detailed review was performed for each " typical detail" and unique design 2. configuration to correlate the plant configuration to a test configuration " scheme" or applicable portions thereof. Where the plant design configuration required evaluation to correlate it to a tested configuration or if a tested configuration was not applicable, the NRC staff guidance provided in Generic Letter 86-10 (restated below) was utilized as " General Criteria" to " baseline" the evaluation. Similarly, the same process was utilized to evaluate the DCAs/DCNs which identify specific j configurations which deviate from specified requirements.

General Criteria

1. Continuity of the materialis consistent with tested configurations.

2. Effective thickness of the material is consistent with tested configurations.

l

3. The nature and effectiveness of the support assembly (if applicable) is consistent with tested configurations.

l l 4. The application or end use of the material is consistent with tested configurations.

5. The configuration was reviewed by a qualified fire protection engineer and l determined to provide an equivalent level of protection.

i 3.1.4 Each typical design detail and all DCAs/DCNs were then compiled into a matrix Z., format with corresponding supporting test configuration (" scheme") references. Where evaluation was utilized in the acceptance basia for a configuration, the

                                          " General Criteria" above or other criteria and justification listed under the
                                          " Basis / Notes" heading was used as described in the matrix. Complete descriptions l

l l

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 8 OF 16 of test configurations and results are provided by ER-ME-067, (Ref. 6.12) and the associated Omega Point Laboratories Test Reports (Ref. 6.10) and are not reiterated in this report. ; 3.1.5 Any Thermo-Lag configuration determined by evaluation not to provide an Z ! equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration or for which a I reasonable correlation to a tested configuration cannot be demonstrated will be identified by issuance of a ONE Form in accordance with STA-421 (Ref. 6.15). I ?.2 Methodology for Unit 1, originated in Revision 2 of this document is similar to the l Unit 2 methodology and varies only based on programmatic changes made during l the two Thermo-Lag installation phases. See Section 3.2.5 for methodology for evaluating protection of structural steel. 3.2.1 Copies of all design drawings containing typical details (including DCAs/DCNs I issued, but not yet incorporated into the drawings) were obtained from the Document ) Control Center. Additionally, copies of all DCAs/DCNs posted against the design ] drawings and the installation specification (Ref. 6.29) that identified approved deviations from specified requirements were similarly obtained. The "Affected Document Update Reports" (ADURs) provided in Attachment L provide the ) complete listing of all DCAs/DCNs reviewed within the scope of this report which ! includes all field modifications completed in support of the original Unit 1 Thermo- l Lag installation and the subsequent backfit effort. 3.2.2 Once copies of all approved design changes to Unit 1 Thermo-Lag design documents were obtained, they were categorized into five (5) general categories based on the relative significance level of the design change implemented by the DCA/DCN. , Accordingly, the " typical details" are viewed as the most significant since these configurations are generally approved for use on a generic basis. The unique design configurations are viewed as the next most significant category followed by any deviations from specified requirements associated with the actual raceway, component or cabling requiring protection. Deviations from specified coverage on items protruding from or interfering with the commodity requiring protection (such as raceway supports) were grouped as the fourth category. Lastly, all DCN's associated with the backfit effort were compiled into a fifth category. During the Unit 1 backfit effort, a comprehensive review of all essential raceways requiring Thermo-Lag was performed. This review compared original Unit i Thermo-Lag installations with the revised typical d/ tails (representing tested configurations). Through the issuance of a design modification (Ref. 6.34), standard upgrades were applied and any unique configurations or deviations were identified and processed on a DCN. Since these DCN's were predominantly grouped by room / area, rather than by nonconforming condition, they are all included in a single Attachment K, arranged by DCN number for convenience.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 9 OF 16 3.2.3 Next, a detailed review was performed for each " typical detail" and unique design configuration to correlate the plant configuration to a test configuration " scheme" or applicable portions thereof. Where the plant design configuration required evaluation to correlate it to a tested connguration or if a tested configuration was not applicable, the NRC staff guidance provided in Generic Letter 86-10 (restated below) was utilized as " General Criteria" to " baseline" the evaluation. Similarly, the same process was utilized to evaluate the DCAs/DCNs which identify specific configurations which deviate from specified requirements.

General Criteria

1. Continuity of the material is consistent with tested configurations.

2. Effective thickness of the materialis consistent with tested con 6gurations.

3. The nature and effectiveness of the support assembly (if applicable) is consistent with tested configurations.

4. The application or end use of the material is consistent with tested configurations.

Z.

5. The configuration was reviewed by a qualified fire protection engineer and determined to provide an equivalent level of protection.

3.2.4 Each typical design detail and all DCAs/DCNs were then compiled into a matrix format with corresponding supporting test con 6guration (" scheme") references. Where evaluation was utilized in the acceptance basis for a con 6guration, the

       " General Criteria" above or other criteria and justification listed under the
       " Basis / Notes" heading was used as described in the matrix. Complete descriptions of test configurations and results are provided by ER-ME-067, (Ref. 6.12) and the associated Omega Point Laboratories Test Reports (Ref. 6.10) and are not reiterated in this report.

3.2.5 Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier system configurations utilized as part of a fire rated plant structural assembly (non raceway application) will be evaluated by comparing the requirements of installation specification 2323-AS-47 (Reference 6.36) to the qualifying test, UL Design No. X-611 (Reference 6.11). The evaluation shall be

based on the guidance provided in GL 86-10 and shall determine if the installed I

configurations have continuity of material, effective thickness of material, nature and ! effectiveness of support assembly and application or end use of the material which j is consistent with tested configurations. l i l l 1

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 10 OF 16 3.2.6 Any Thermo-Lag configuration determined by evaluation not to provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration or for which a reasonable correlation to a tested configuration cannot be demonstrated will be identified by issuance of a ONE Form in accordance with STA-421 (Ref. 6.15). 4.0 EVALUATION 4.1 Unit 2 4.1.1 Refer to Attachments A through E to this report for the acceptance basis associated with each Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configuration reviewed within the scope of this evaluation as follows: Attachment A: Unit 2 Typical Design Details Attachment B: Unit 2 Unique Conngurations Attachment C: Unit 2 Minor Protected Commodity Deviations Attachment D: Unit 2 Protruding / Interfering Item Coverage Deviations Attachment E: Unit 2 Structural Steel Deviations 4.2 Unit 1 4.2.1 Refer to Attachments G through K to this report for the acceptance basis associated with each Unit 1 Thermo-Lag configuration for protected raceways reviewed within the scope of this evaluation as follows: Attachment G: Unit 1 Typical Design Details Attachment H: Unit 1 Unique Con 6gurations Attachment I: Unit 1 Minor Protected Commodity Deviations . Attachment J: Unit 1 Protruding / Interfering Item Coverage Deviations Attachment K: Unit 1 DM 92-077 DCN's 4.2.2 The Thermo-Lag fireproofing of structural components which are part of the fire rated plant structural assembly was installed in accordance with specification 2323- 1 , AS-47 (Reference 6.36). The Thermo-Lag 330-1 material was applied to the structural steel using the basic techniques outlined in U.L. Design Number X-611 i i

i l ER-ME-082, REV. 2 l I PAGE 11 OF 16 (Reference 6.11) and TSI Technical Notes 99777 (Reference 6.38) and 11601 ; (Reference 6.37). U.L. Design Number X-611 consisted of a 3 hour test of Thermo-Lag 330-1 material on an "H" column. The Thermo-Lag installation on the steel consisted of priming the steel with Thermo-Lag 351 primer then applying 330-1 with 330-71 fiberglass gauze embedded in the trowel grade. In general, the Thermo-Lag installed in the plant utilized the same installation methodology. 4.2.2.1 The differences between the installed and tested configurations are as follows: Issue 1: The installed configurations involved only protecting the exposed portions of steel within an otherwise fire rated wall or floor assembly (typically gypsum board on metal studs or concrete). Issue 2: The steel being protected was often a different size than the tested steel. Issue 3: Prefabricated boards were used in addition to trowel grade to obtain material thickness. Issue 4: At locations where door hardware and dampers extend to close proximity of the member being fireproofed, full fireproofing system thickness could not always be achieved. The fireproofing was applied to a maximum thickness the interfacing item will allow and still operate freely. The fireproofing thickness requirements under items in close proximity applies to the immediate area of interface only. This area was limited to a maximum of 5% of the surface area of the member being fireproofed. Issue 5: Various commodities which could provide a significant heat path into the protected envelope (i.e., conduits, other steel members, etc.) were protected for at least 12 inches. 4.2.2.2 The following are the basis for as-installed configurations being consistent with tested configurations: Issue 1: The installation of the Thermo-Lag on the steel was the same as on the tested configurations. The resulting configuration since it is installed partially in a fire rated barrier or attached to concrete would be partially shielded from fire exposure and the remainder of the structure would act 1 as a heat sink. The continuity and thickness of material is maintained and the attachment to the steel is the same as the tested configuration. Issue 2: The thickness of a given structural steel member significantly affects the

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 12 OF 16 required fireproofing coating thickness for a given fire exposure period. In order to allow for different types and thicknesses of steel on which Thermo-Lag is installed and differing fire rating requirements, an engineering evaluation (Reference 6.37) was performed which took fire testing data and determined the required Thermo-Lag thickness in order to achieve the tested results on other shapes and sizes of steel. These resulting thicknesses were entered into 2323-AS-47 along with thickness requirements for 2 hour rated enclosures which were derived utilizing the methodology contained in Reference 6.37. An additional safety factor was applied resulting in the utilized thickness being at least 10% greater than those derived using the engineering evaluation methodology. Issue 3: The specification allows the use of Prefabricated Thermo-Lag 330-1 panels to be inserted in the trowel grade material to help build up to the required material thicknesses. The prefabricated panels are the exact same material as the trowel grade material, only preformed and cured. The panels are cleaned and abraded before insertion into the trowel grade material to ensure bonding between the panels and the trowel grade material. When the trowel grade material cures, the fireproofing becomes monolithic. When the prefabricated panels are used, the fiberglass cloth required by U.L. X-611 is installed in a layer of trowel grade material l applied over the panels to ensure that the last 1/4 in. of the assembly l contains the fiberglass reinforcement. 1 4 Issue 4: As for reduction in thickness at the fire and tornado dampers, the affected j structural steel is a non-rated feature per Unit 2 Calculation 2-FP-0080, j (Reference 6.16). The angle irons are of heavy construction and are lightly loaded. The small portion of the damper frame where the thickness is reduced is not large enough to cause failure of the retaining angle and thereby failure of the fire damper. The area is at a fire damper frame and therefore the reduction in fireproofing will not cause an increase in heat transmission through the fire barrier. The reduction thickness at the door operator is limited to a small area (no more than 5% of the member being protected), the reduction in thickness is slight and the area is located at an egress path so there would be no combustibles in the immediate vicinity to directly expose the affected area. 1 The slight reduction does not affect an area large enough to cause failure of the protected mem'oer and it is shielded from direct fire exposure so it b would not cause an increase in heat transmission through the fire barrier. Issue 5: The specification requires that all protruding heat paths be protected for at least 12 in. (12" rule) to prevent the intrusion of a significant amount

i ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 13 OF 16 of heat into the envelope. The basis for the 12 in, rule is the U.L. requirement to protect steel decking for a minimum of 12 in, away from a fireproofed steel to prevent heat intrusion into the steel. The steel deck presents more of a challenge than a small protruding item, because the steel deck is continuous along the top for the column and is a heat path from both sides of the column. Therefore, the 12" rule provides more than adequate heat path protection. The resulting installation conGgurations have continuity of material, effective thickness of material, nature and effectiveness of support assembly and application or end use of the material which is consistent with tested configurations. The thermal and structural integrity of the { installed configurations are maintained. 5.0 CONCLUSIOE As detailed in Section 4 and Attachments A through E and G through K, all Thermo-Lag configurations evaluated within the scope of this report are either effectively 7 bounded by the critical attributes of tested configurations or have been demonstrated by evaluation to provide an equivalent level of protection to that afforded by tested configurations. Accordingly, no ONE Forms as described in Sections 3.1.5 and 3.2.5 resulted from this review. t

6.0 REFERENCES

6.1 ASTM E119-88, " Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials". 6.2 CPSES Design Basis Document DBD-ME-020, Rev. 2, " Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis". 6.3 CPSES Fire Protection Report (FPR), Rev. 6, Sec. II. 6.4 CPSES Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Sec. 9.5.1. 6.5 10CFR50, Appendix R. 6.6 CPSES Unit 2 Fire Hazards Analysis (FHA) Drawings, M2-1921 through M2-1942, Rev. CP-1. 6.7 CPSES Design Basis Document DBD-ME-063, Rev. 2, " Fire Barriers . l b l l

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 14 OF 16 6.8 Specification CPES-M-2032, Rev. O, " Installation of Fire Barrier and Fireproofing Materials". 6.9 Drawing M2-1701, Shts. 01-15, Rev. CP-1. "Thermo-Lag Typical Details". 6.10 TU Electric Testing program, "One Hour Fire Endurance Tests of Articles Protected with the Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier System", (Test Plan) and the following test 7 reports:

a. Project No. 12340-935436, Scheme 1-2

b. Project No. 12340-94367a, Scheme 9-1

c. Project No. 12340-94367c, Scheme 10-1

d. Project No. 12340-94367d, Scheme 10-2

e. Project No. 12340-94367e, Scheme 11-1

f. Project No. 12340-94367i, Scheme 12-1

g. Project No. 12340-94367h, Scheme 12-2

h. Project No. 12340-943671, Scheme 13-1

i. Project No. 12340-94367m, Scheme 14-1

j. Project No. 12340-95100a, Scheme 15-1

k. Project No. 12340-94367; Scheme 9-3

1. Project No. 12340-95766, Scheme 11-2

m. Project No. 12340-95767, Scheme Il-4

n. Project No. 12340-95768, Scheme 11-5

o. Project No. 12340-95769, Scheme 13-2

p. Project No. 12340-95770, Scheme 15-2 6.11 Underwriters Laboratories " Fire Resistance Directory", Designs X-003 and X-611.

6.12 CPSES Engineering Report ER-ME-067, Rev. 3, " Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire i Barrier Systems". L 6.13 USNRC Generic Letter 86-10 dated April 25,1986. 6.14 CPSES Unit 2 Procedure 2PP-5.01, " Design Change Authorizations". 6.15 CPSES Procedure STA-421, " Operations Notification and Evaluation (ONE) Form". 6.16 Calculation 2-FP-0080, Rev. O, " Unit 2 Maximum Permissible Fire Loading /Non-Rated Feature Analysis". 6.17 CPSES Unit I and 2 Calculation No. ME-CA-0000-0965, Rev. O, "Thermo-Lag Primary Protruding Member Installation Requirements". '

1 l ER-ME-082, REV. 2 l PAGE 15 OF 16 6.18 CPSES Unit 1 and 2 Calculation No. ME-CA-0000-2062, Rev. O, " Heat Transfer Analysis of Cable Tray Supports to Determine Thermo-Lag Requirements". 6.19 CPSES Procedure ECE 5.01-03, " Design Change Notices and Related Process Documentation". 6.20 CPSES Procedure STA-716, " Site Modification Process". 6.21 USNRC Correspondence from A.B. Beach to W.J. Cahill, Jr., dated February 23, 1993, "NRC Inspection Report 50-445/93-08; 50-446/93-08". 6.22 TU Electric Correspondence from W.J. Cahill, Jr. to USNRC logged TXX-93023 dated January 19, 1993. 6.23 NUREG-0797 Supplement No. 26, " Safety Evaluation Report related to the operation of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Units 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446," issued by USNRC, February 1993. 6.24 TU Electric Correspondence from W.J. Cahill, Jr. to USNRC logged TXX-93101 dated February 26,1993. 6.25 TU Electric Corre.spondence from W.J. Cahill, Jr. tr USNRC logged TXX-93125 dated March 10, 1993. 6.26 TU Electric Correspondence from W.J. Cahill, Jr. to USNRC logged TXX-93061 dated January 28,1993. 6.27 USNRC Correspondence from S.C. Black to W.J. Cahill, Jr., dated October 29, 1992, "Thermo-Lag Acceptance Methonology for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station - Unit 2". 6.28 CPSES Minor Modification (MM) Packages and applicable Design Change Notices (DCNs): MM 93-123, DCN 5745, REV.1 MM 93-124, DCN 5727, REV. O MM 93-125, DCN 5742, REV. I MM 93-126, DCN 5746, REV.1 6.29 Specification 2323-MS-38H, Rev. 4, " Cable Raceway Fire Barriers". 6.30 Drawing M1-1701, Shts.1-7, Rev. CP-1, "Thermo-Lag Typical Details".

l ER-ME-082, REV. 2 l PAGE 16 OF 16 l 6.31 TSI Technical Note 20684, Revision V, dated November 1985, "Thermo-Lag Fire l Barrier System Installation Procedures Manual Power Generating Plant l Applications". 6.32 NRC (Draft) Generic Letter 92-XXX, dated February 11,1992, "Thermo-Lag Fire 1 Barriers". l 6.33 Drawing M1-1701, Shts.1-16, (Current revs), "Thermo-Lag Typical Details". 6.34 CPSES Design Modification DM 92-077, Rev. O, " Unit i Thermo-Lag Upgrade". J 6.35 CPSES Unit 1 Fire Hazards Analysis (FHA) Drawings, M1-1920 through M1-1954, Rev. CP-1. 6.36 Specification 2323 AS-47, Rev. 3, "Fireproofing of Structural Steel" 6.37 TSI Technical Note 11601, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fireproofing Coating Thicknesses Required for 1 and 3 Hour Fire Ratings for Various Structural Steel Members used ' by Texas Utilities Services, Inc.", dated August 3,1981 by Wesson and Associates, Inc. 6.38 TSI Technical Note 99777, " Material Application Guides Thermo-Lag 330-1 1 Subliming Coating System" l i l 1 l

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE Al OF A25 ATTACIIMENT A TYPICAL DESIGN DETAIIS

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082 REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A2 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASISINOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 1-1.1 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2, I l-1, 1-5, 80 WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 1-1.2 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 11 WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 1-2.1 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A WITil 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG PANELS. Tills DETAIL WAS TESTED. 1-2.2 N/A COVERAGE OF TUBE STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A WITil 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS. THIS WAS TESTED. 1-3.1 103953/0 COVERAGE OF "C" CH ANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, N/A WITII 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG PANEL Tills WAS 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 TESTED. l-3.2 N/A COVERAGE OF "C" CllANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, 11 WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 1-3.3 104121/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TIE WIRE l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-6, 73 INSTALLATION ON TIIE THERMO-LAG 330-1 14-1,15-1 PANELS COVERING A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT. THIS DETAll SHOWS THE TIE WIRE BEING INSTALLED TilROUGH THE BOTTOM TRAY PANELS THAT BUTT UP TO THE TRAY SUPPORT. 1-4.1 N/A COVERAGE OF "I" BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1, 10-2, 11-1, I-5, 80 WITH 330-1 TilERMO-LAG PANEL 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 N/A COVERAGE OF "I" BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM 330- 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 11 1-4.2 660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 103921/0 HILTI BOLT /SELF TAPPING SCREW DETAIL FOR l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-6, 12 1-5 103476/l ATTACHING THERMO-LAG TO A CONCRETE 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 STRUCTURE. 1-5.1 103921/0 THIS IS A SQUARE WASHER DETAIL WHICH IS TO N/A N/A 103476/1 BE USED ON DETAll 1-5 AND REQUIRES NO ADDITION AL JUSTIFICATION.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 A'ITACHMENT A PAGE A3 OF A25 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAll3 DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCllEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV A25) 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 15 1-6 102222/1 Tills DETAIL PROVIDES A METilOD OF COVERING A WEEP llOLE IN A TUBE-STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM WITH THERMO-LAG. 11-1 1-5, 74 1-7 104015/1 THIS DETAIL SilOWS COVERAGE OF RADIAX CABLE AND ITS SUPPORT AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. Tile COVERAGE INCLUDES 330-1 PANELS ON Tl!E SUPPORT AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE RADIAX. 1-2,11-1,12-1,14-1,15-1 1-5, 17 2-2 100820/0 THIS DETAIL IS FOR FIRE STOPPING NON 103921/0 ESSENTIAL CONDUITS AT JUNCTION BOXES USING EITilER 330-1 OR 45B SILICONE ELASTOM ER. 10-1 1-5, 19 2-3 103020/3 Tills IS Tile TESTED DETAll FOR INSTALLING 103634/2 TilERMO-LAG ON JUNCTION BOXES. IT ALSO GIVES AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN TO INSTALLING BANDS ON THE OUTER LAYER. 1-2,9-1,10-1,!0-2,11-1, I-5, 81 2-3.1 N/A THIS IS A DETAIL SIIOWING BANDING ON 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON UNISTRUT WHICil SUPPORTS Tile JUNCTION BOX AND PROTRUDES OUT OF Tile THERMO-LAG PACKAGE. 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, 81 2-3.2 N/A Tills IS A DETAll SilOWING INSTALLATION OF 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 THERMO-LAG ON A JUNCTION BOX SUPPORT. 10-1 1-5, 19 2-3.3 103020/3 THIS IS A DETAIL SilOWING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE INSTALLED AT JUNCTION BOX JOINTS. Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 10-1, 10-2 1-5,40 2-3.5 104060/0 Tills IS A DETAIL WillCH ALLOWS JUNCTION BOX 2nd LAYER "V" RIB PANEL TO BE EXTENDED TO COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT Tile BOX. 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 43 2-3.6 104060/0 Tills DETAIL SIIOWS THE INSTALLATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON AN ESSENTI AL FLEXIBLE CONDUlT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX ENCLOSURE.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A4 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 3-1 & 3-1.1 100820/0 THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH SHOWS A 330-1 1-2, 11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1, 1-5, 20 THERMO-LAG BOX, FIRE STOPPED WHERE AN 14-1,15-1 AIR DROP ENTERS A CABLE TRAY. 3-1.2 N/A THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH SHOWS A 330-1 1-2, Il-1,12-1,12-2,13-1, 1-5, 17,20 & 22 THERMO-LAG BOX SIMILAR TO DETAILS 3-1 & 3- 14-1,15-1 1.1 BUT TIIE AIR DROP COMES OUT OF A CONDUIT WHICil IS FIRE STOPPED INSTEAD OF AT Tile 330-1 BOX AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET COVERS TIIE AIR DROP FROM THE CONDUIT TO THE TRAY. 3-2 & 3-2.1 10082010 TIIESE DETAILS SilOW THE PROTECTION OF AIR 11-1 1-5, 26 DROP CABLES WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET FROM A TRAY TO A TilROUGil WALL SLEEVE (TWS). THE POINT OF ATTACHMENT AT THE TRAY IS TO THERMO-LAG 330-1 IIALF ROUNDS AND DIRECTLY TO THE SLEEVES AT THE TWS. 3-3 N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS AN AIR DROP BETWEEN 11-1 1-5, 20, 28 CABLE TRAYS WITH A COMBINATION OF 330-1 PANELS AND 1/2 ROUNDS AT TIIE ATTACHMENT TO THE TRAYS AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON TIIE AIR DROP CABLES BETWEEN THE TRAYS. 34 (OPTION 1) 103020/3 THIS IS THE STANDARD AIR DROP 11-1 N/A 102933/0 CONFIGURATION FOR CABLES AIR DROPPING 100820/0 INTO A CABLE TRAY. THIS CONFIGURATION WAS TESTED. 103020/3 THIS IS THE STANDARD TESTED AIR DROP 11-1 1-5, 31 34 (OPTION 2) 102933/0 CONFIGURATION EXCEPT THAT STRESS SKIN 100820/0 WITil TROWEL GRADE IS UTILIZED ON TOP OF THE TRAY INSTEAD OF 330-1 PANELS. 34.3 103020/3 THIS PROVIDES SPECIFIC DETAILS WHICH IS TO 11-1 N/A BE USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE STANDARD AIR DROP DETAIL (34 OPTION 1). THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-OS2, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A5 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) TIIESE ARE SPECIFIC DETAILS WilERE STRESS 11-1 1-5, 31 3-4.4 & 3-4.5 103020/3 SKIN WITil TROWEL GR.ADE IS UTILIZED ON TOP OF TIIE TRAY INSTEAD OF 330-1 PANELS. TilESE DETAILS ARE ENCOMPASSED BY 3-4 (OPTION 2). 103020/3 TIIIS IS Tile STANDARD DETAIL FOR 11-1 N/A 3-5 OVERLAPPING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 TilERMO-LAG 1/2 ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT FOR 3" & LARGER CONDUITS. TIIIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 103020/3 TIIIS IS TIIE STANDARD DETAIL FOR II-I N/A 3-5.1 OVERLAPPING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG 1/2 ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT FOR 2" & SMALLER CONDUITS. Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 11-1 1-5, 34 3-5.2 103020/3 Tills IS A STANDARD DETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 104121/0 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 TilERMO-LAG ON EITilER CONDUITS OR CABLE TRAYS. Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION 1-OR INSTALLATION ON CONDUITS. 11-1 1-5, 34, 35 3-5.2.a 103020/3 Tills IS A STANDARD DETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 104121/0 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 TilERMO-LAG ON EITilER CONDUITS OR CABLE TRAYS Tile SAME AS DETAIL 3-5.2 EXCEPT TliAT IT DEALS WITil SITUATIONS WilERE SPACE LIMITATIONS DO NOT ALLOW OVERLAP DISTANCES OF FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 AS INDICATED ON 3-5.2. 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 37 34 104121/0 TIIIS DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING A SINGLE FIRE ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A TIIERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY. 11-1 1-5, 39 34.1 104121/0 Tills DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING MULTIPLE FIRE ZONE R CABLES AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A TilERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY. j 1

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A6 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 4-1 103020/3 THIS DETAIL SliOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1,10-1 & 10-2 N/A 3" AND LARGER CONDUIT WITH 330-1 IIALF ROUNDS. TIIIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 4-1.1 103020/3 Tills DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1, 10-1 & 10-2 N/A , 2" AND SMALLER CONDUIT WITH 330-1 HALF ! ROUNDS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 4-2 & 4-2.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SIIOW STANDARD COVERAGE OF 11-1 1-5, 45 CABLE BUNDLES AND FLEX CONDUIT WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 4-3 & 4-3.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SiiOW COVERAGE ON CONDUlTS 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 46 WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS AT CONCRETE SURFACES WHERE THE CONCRETE SURFACE PREVENTS COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE CONDUIT WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD DETAILS. 4-4 N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TYPICAL FIRE l-2, 11-1, 12-1 & 14-1 1-5, 17 STOPPING OF CONDUITS. 4-5 N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS CONDUIT PROTECTED WITli 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 50 330-1 HALF ROUNDS PENETRATING THROUGH A l BLOCKOUT. 4-6,4-6.1,47,4-7.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS ARE THE SAME AS DETAILS 4-1, 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 46, 52 4-1.1,4-3 AND 4-3.1 RESPECTIVELY FOR 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 COVERING CONDUITS WITil 330-1 HALF ROUNDS EXCEPT THESE DETAILS USE LARGER SIZED 330-1 HALF ROUNDS WillCH HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO COVER Tile SM ALLER CONDUIT. 103076/1 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE ON FLEXIBLE 11-1 1-5, 53 48 CONDUITS WilERE CONDUlT SUPPORT INTERFACES WITH THE STANDARD COVERAGE ON THE FLEXIBLE CONDUlT. L

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A7 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO.. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION _ SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 4-9 103423/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS HOW TO COMPENSATE FOR 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 54 A GAP BETWEEN THE 2 SECTIONS OF A 1/4" OVERLAY ON A 2" CONDUIT BY INSTALLING TROWEL GRADE AND STRESS GRADE IN Tile GAP. 5-1, 5-1.1 & 5-1.2 103020/3 TilESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-1, 13-1, N/A CONFIGURATIONS FOR COVERING CABLE TRAYS 14-1,15-1 WITH 330-1 PANELS AND INSTALLING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT JOINTS. TilESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. t 5-3 & 5-3.1 N/A THESE DETAILS SHOW FIRE STOPS IN CABLE l-2, I l-1,12-2 & 14-1 1-5, 55 TRAY USING BOTH 330-1 AND CABLE TRAY FIRE [ STOPS INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061. Tile CABLE TRAY FIRE STOP INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061 IIAS BEEN TESTED. 5-2 N/A TIIIS DETAIL SHOWS Tile INSTALLATION OF TIE l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2 & 13-1 1-5, 56 WIRES TO ATTACH BOTTOM TilERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS TO THE RUNGS ON LADDER BACK I TRAYS. 5-3.1, SEC. 2-2 (VAR.) 104235/3 TIIIS DETAIL PROVIDES A METilOD OF 1-2, 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-5, 57 UPGRADING NEW AND EXISTING FIRE STOPS BY 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 15-1 INSTALLING BAR STEEL AROUND THE END OF Tile TRAY IN ORDER TO HOLD THE BOTTOM PANEL IN PLACE. 5-4 N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS A CABLE TRAY PROTECTED l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, I-5, 59 WITil 330-1 PANELS WHICH PENETRATES 14-1,15-1 THROUGH A BLOCKOUT FILLED WITH PENSEAL MATERIAL N/A TIIIS DETAIL SilOWS Tile TiiERMO-LAG l-2, 9-I, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1 I-6, 12 5-5 (OPTION 2) COVERAGE ON A RACEWAY BUTTING UP TO A 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 15-1 BLOCKOUT IN A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THEN FLARING OUT ALONG THE STRUCTURE SO THAT Tile PANEL EXTENDS TO Tile CONCRETE WHERE IT IS HILTI BOLTED INTO THE CONCRETE.

A~lTACHMENT A ER-ME-082. REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A8 OF A25 i I TYPICAL DETAIL NO, DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) . i 5-5 (OIrTION 3) 100820/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE THERMO-LAG ON A 1-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 1 4, 61 l RACEWAY BlJITING UP TO THE M-BOARD ON A 15-1 l PENSEALED BLOCKOUT WITH A THERMO-LAG l TROWEL GRADE FILLET WHERE THE THERMO-LAG MEETS THE M-BOARD. 5-5.1 104121/0 TlilS DETAIL SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 11-1 1-5, 77 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY TO A CABLE TRAY AT A BLOCKOUT. TIIE FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAPS ' ONTO 330-1 COVERAGE ON BOTH TRAYS, IS MECHANICALLY FASTENED INTO THE 330-1 AND IS SEALED AT THE FORM SEAL /M-BOARD WITH A ! TROWEL GRADE. ! 5-5.2 104121/0 THIS SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 330-1 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5,78 ! PANE 13 ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY 14-1,15-1 TO A CABLE TRAY AT A BLOCKOUT. THE JOINTS l ARE SCORE AND FOLD OR STITCHED AND THE ! REQUIREMENTS FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT JOINTS APPLIES. , 54,54A AND 54B 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW THE SCORE AND FOLD l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5, 63 - METilOD ON RADIAL BENDS ON TRAYS AND AT 14-1,15-1 THE CORNERS ON STRAIGIIT TRAY RUNS. 5-7 AND 5-8 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW CROSSBANDING AND TIE l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, N/A WIRE INSTALLATION FOR LONGITUDINAL JOINT 14-1,15-1 i i STRESS SKIN BOTH AT CABLE TRAY TEES. I THESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 5-9 103020/3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF Tile l-2, 12-2 & 14-1 N/A l BOTTOM PANEL AT A CABLE TRAY TEE. IT { DEMONSTRATES BUTT JOINT TIE WIRES AND TIE : WIRES OVER TRAY RUNGS. ALL BUT THE TIE WIRES OVER THE RUNGS ARE TESTED l CONFIGURATIONS. SINCE THE TIE WIRES OVER ; THE RUNGS WOULD BE AN ENHANCEMENTTO THE TESTED CONFIGURATION IT IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE. ; I i

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV 2 ' TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A9 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) f 5-10, 5-11 & 5-14 103020!3 TIIESE DETAILS SiiOW STANDARD l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, N/A CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROVIDING STRESS SKIN 14-1,15-1 ON LONGITUDINALJOINTS AT TRAY TEES, STITClllNG OF BU'IT JOINTS WITil TIE WIRES AND COVERAGE OF SPLICE PLATES WITil 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG PANEL AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE. TiiESE DETAILS ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 5-12 103020/3 tills DETAIL SilOWS IlOW TO INSTALL 330-660 11-1 1-5, 34 I l 104121/0 FLEXI-BLANKET OVER Tile END OF A CABLE TRAY COVERED WITil 330-1 PANELS. ( , l 5-13 103020/3 Tills DETAIL SIIOWS Tile UPGRADE UTILIZING 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5, 68 j , STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES WIIEN Tile PANEL 14-1,15-1 ON TifE BOTTOM OF A TRAY AT A TRAY j SUPPORT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY TIIE TilERMO-l LAG INSTALLED ON TIIE SUPPORT. 5-13.1 & 5-16 103507/0 Tills DETAIL SilOWS llOW TO INSTALL I-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 1-5, 71 i 103626/0 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL 14-1,15-1 GRADE ON TRAYS WHERE AIR DROP OR l PROTRUDING ITEM TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE l INTERFERES WIT!! STANDARD COVERAGE. 5-15, 5-15.1 & 5-15.2 10032010 TilESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD BANDING FOR l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, N/A 104121/0 CABLE TRAYS. TlilS IS A TESTED 14-1,15-1 l , CONFIGURATION. l 5-17 103833/0 Tills DETAIL SIIOWS Tile INSTALLATION OF 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5, 65 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAYS 14-1,15-1 WIIERE A GROUND CABLE PROTRUDES FROM TIIE SIDE OF THE TRAY. 6-1 INCLUDING 103020/3 Tills DETAIL IS THE TESTED CONFIGURATION 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 N/A SECTION AA FOR CONDUIT LATERAL BENDS. 6-2, 6-3.1 INCLUDING 103020/3 SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS FOR CONDUIT 2 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 72 j l SECTIONS 3-3,1-1 3" DIAMETER. AND 2-2, 6-3.2 l ! INCLUDING SECTIONS ( l-1 AND 2-2

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A10 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 7-1 103020/3 FLEXI-BLANKET AT TIIROUGil-WALL-SLEEVE Il-1, 1-2, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5, 60, 62 104121/0 INTERFACE. 14-1,15-1 7-2,7-2.1 103020/3 RIGID CONDUIT TO FLEX CONDUIT. Il-1 1-6, 64 7-2.2 102759/1 TilIS DETAIL SIIOWS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED 11-1 1-5,45,75 ON A FLEX CONDUIT WilERE IT BUTTS TO A CONCRETE WALL. TIIE COVERAGE IS INSTALLED ON Tile FLEX CONDUlT TO Tile REQUIRED TilICKNESS TIIEN ALL VOIDS ARE FILLED WITII TROWEL GRADE AND A FILLET IS PROVIDED AT Tile FLEXI-BLANKET CONCRETE INTERFACE. 7-3 INCLUDING 104121/0 CONTAINMENT PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES. I l-1 1-5, 60, 62, 66 VIEW 3 7-4 INCLUDING 104121/0 SUPPORT FRAME FOR CONTAINMENT 11-1 1-5, 60, 62 VIEW 4 PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES AND TIIROUGil WALL SLEEVES. 7-5 N/A TilERMO LAG COVERAGE OF FIRE DETECTOR'S 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5, 67 AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. 14-1,15-1 7-6 N/A TilERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION ON FLEX 11-1 1-6, 69 CONDUIT THROUGli A BLOCKOUT. 7-7,7-7.1 N/A 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKLT DLTAll AT JUNCTION OF 11-1 1-6, 70 Fl.EX-CONDUIT AND RIGID CONDUIT 2" AND LISS WilERE DUE TO SPACE LIMITATIONS, TWO INDIVIDUAL COMPLETE BUNDLES CANNOT BE A:'llIEVED. 8-2, OPTION 1, N/A CABLE BUNDLE WRAPPING WilERE SINGLE 11-1 I-5,51 i INCLUDING SEC. AA BUNDLE SPLITS INTO 2 BUNDLES. N/A WRAPPING CABLE BUNDLE WillCII COMES OUT 11-1 N/A 8-2 (OPTION 2) r OF Tile SIDE OF Tile MAIN BUNDLE. Tills IS A l TESTED CONFIGURATION. 101918/0 CABLE TRAY "V*-RIB PANEL TO FLAT PANEL I-2, 12-I, 12-2, 10-2, 13-1, I-5, 58 8-3 TRANSITION. 14-1,15-1

ATTACilMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE All OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 8-4 INCLUDING 103486/0 ESSENTIAL FLEXIBLE CONDUITS WITilIN A i1-1 1-5,45, 51 SECT.AA COMMON ENVELOPE WillCII SPLIT INTO 2 SEPARATE ENVELOPES. 9-1 N/A TYPICAL TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE DETAIL FOR 9-1, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1 4, 47 SWAY STRUTS 14-1, 1-2, 15-1 9-2 INCLUDING SEC. 103490/0 TYPICAL DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CABLE TRAY TO l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 14,48 1-1 AND SEC. '2-2 CONCRETE & 14-1 9-3 N/A TYPICAL DETAIL USING FLEXI-BLANKET FOR l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 49 CABLE IN TRAY WilERE AN INTERFERENCE 14-1,15-1 PREVENTS STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE. 9-4 100820/0 V GROOVE / SCORING TIIERMO-LAG FOR l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 N/A RACEWAY BENDS. Tills IS A TESTED I4-1,15-1 CONFIGURATION. 10-3, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6 102522/1 SillMMING DETAILS FOR CABLE COVERAGE. Il-1,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1, 1 4, 44 15-1 11-1 N/A TilERMO-LAG PANELS ON CABLE TR AY l-2, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, I-7 INTERFACE WITil M-BOARD AT PENETRATION 15-1 SEAL WilERE Tile CABLE TRAY GOES TilROUGil Tile PENETRATION. 11-2, 11-2-1 103020/3 TilERMO-1 AG PREFAB ll ALF-ROUNDS WilERE 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 14,8 CLEARANCE BETWEEN CONDUITS IS INADEQUATE TO FIT llALF ROUND ON BOTil (ONDUITS - IIALF ROUND ON ONE OR OTilER IS

                                                                                                   *lRIMMED BACK AND SEALED BETWEEN Tile TWO CONDUITS AS REQUIRED FOR JOINTS.

11-3, 11-3.1 N/A TYPICAL DETAll OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 1-2, N/A SIDE RAll BOARD INTERFACE. Tills IS A TESTED 15-1 CONFIGURATION. 11-4, 11-4.1 N/A TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 1-2, 14,9 SIDE RAll BOARD INTERFACE USING SCORE AND 15-1 FOLD TECilNIQUE.

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME482, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A12 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCllEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 11-5 N/A TYPICAL LADDER TRAY BARRIER ASSEMBLY. 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 1-2, 14,9 Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION EXCEPT FOR 15-1 TIIE SCORE AND FOLD JOINT. I14 N/A TRAY PROTECTION WilERE TRAY SIDE RAllIS 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 1-2, 1 4 , 10 TOO CLOSE TO CONCRETE AND TilEREFORE 15-1 MUST INTERFACE AGAINST CONCRETE WALL. N/A TROWEL GRADE FILLET WIIERE CLEARANCE 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 1-7, 10 I l-7 WILL NOT ALLOW FOR TIIERMO-LAG PANEL FLARE-OUT. 104121/0 FLEXI-BLANKET TO M-BOARD / CONCRETE 11-1 1-5, 60 11-7.1 INTERFACE WITil FILLET. 102957/0 TIIIS DETAIL SIIOWS TIIE INSTALLATION OF 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5, 76 11-8 STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT STEEL 14-1,15-1 INTERFERENCES BY EXTENDING Tile STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE OUT ONTO TIIE STEEL INTERFERENCE. 103063/0 RACEWAY SUPPORT TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 1-2, 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, 12-1, 1 4, 13 12-1, 12-1.1 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 15-1 103844/0 CONDUIT PENETRATING CABLE TRAY. 11-1, 1-2, 12-1,12-2,13-1, 1 4, 29 12-2 14-1, 10-2, 15-1 L

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A13 OF A25 TYPICAL DETAIL NO.- DCA NO./REV - DESCRIlrTION SUPPORT TEST SCIIEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A15-A25) 12-2.1 103844/0 Tills CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE l-2,10-2, I l-1,12-1,12-2, 1-5, 79 OF DETAll 12-2 EXCEPT TilAT TIIE CONDUIT 13-1, 14-1, 15-1 ENTERING Tile BOX EXTENSION OF A flORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID TIIE USE OF 330-660 ENTERING A l IlORIZONTALTRAY ENVELOPE IIAS QUALIFIED l VIA SCllEME Il-1. Tile UPGRADE TECilNIQUES j UTILIZED TO REINFORCE Tile INTERFACE BETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET l DURING Tile TEST (330-660 COLLAR FLARED OUT l ON Tile 330-1 PANEL) IS REQUIRED BY Tile I DETAIL. ALL OTilER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS WITil QUALIFIED TECllNIQUES (STITClllNG/ STRESS SKIN). Tile INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITillN Tile ENVELOPE BENEFITS Tile TilERM AL PERFORM ANCE OF Tile CONFIGURATION. TilEREFORE, Tile CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT l-llOUR RATING. N/A SIL-TEMP COVERAGE ON CABLES IN TRAYS 12-2 1-5, 82 12-3 COVERED WITil TilERMO-LAG. TRAY CONCRETE BEAM INTERFERENCE. 1-1,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,15-1 1-5, 14 13-1 N/A CABLE TRAY TRANSITION INTO BANK OF 1-2, 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1, 1-6, 16 13-2 104121/0 SLEEVES WITil PROTRUDING AIR DROPS AND 11-1, 15-1 EXISTING CONDUIT ENTERING ENVELOPE. N/A TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE FOR TYPICAL 9-1,1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1, 1-6, 18 13-3 INTERFERENCES. 15-1 TYPICAL INTERFERENCE. 1-2,12-1, 12-2,13-1,14-1, 1-6, 21 13-4 N/A 11-1, 15-1 IIVAC INTERFERENCE WITil CABLE TRAY. 11-1 1-5, 23 13-5 N/A COVERAGE DETAIL FOR A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY l-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1, 1-5, 24 13-6 103548/0 FOR Tile 9" RULE. 11-1, 15-1 i l

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A14 OF A25 1 TYP! CAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCilEMES BASIS / NOTES '(PAGE A15-

                                                                                                                 'A25) e 14-1                   N/A           TIIERMO-LAG 5* RULE.                       1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,        1-5, 25 11-1, 15-1                                                              e 14-2                   N/A           TYPICAL BOX DETAll FOR ITEMS ENTERING      1-2,12-1,12-2,10-2,13-1,14-1    1-5, 27 RACEWAY,                                   & 11-1 14-3 INCLUDING         N/A           TYPICAL CONDUIT / PIPE AND TRAY            I-2, 9-1,10-2,12-1,12-2,        I-5, 30 S EC.1-1                              INTERFERENCE.                              13-1, 14-1, 11-1, 15-1 14-4                   I M 121/0     TYPICAL TliROUGil WALL SLEEVE TIIERMO-LAG. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,        1-5, 32 11-1, 15-1 15-1                   N/A           TYPICAL BOX DETAIL TRAY / TRAY.            1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1,        1-5, 33                                 ,

11-1, 15-1 15-2 IM121/0 TYPICAL BOX DETAIL TRAY / CONDUIT. 1-2, 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1, 1-5, 32 11-1, 9-1, 15-1 16-1 N/A ATTACilMENT TO STRUCTURAL STEEL. N/A 5, 36 i 16-2 N/A ATTACllMENT TO STRUCTURAL STEEL. N/A 5,36 . 16-3 N/A TUBE STEEL WELDED TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 10-1,10-2 5,36,38 4 N/A ANGLE BRACE PLATE. .N/A 5, 36 , t 4 16-5, 16-5.1 N/A CAPS FOR IIOLLOW MEMBERS. 10-1, 10-2 5,36,41 , i 9-1,1-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 5,36,42 : 16-6, 16-7 N/A TYPICAL STEEL PROTECTION DETAIL WITil CONDUIT INTERFERENCE. & 14-1 i

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE AIS OF A25 ! NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV L CONTINUITY OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC t

2. EFFECTIVE TilICKNESS OF Tile M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC l

l 3 TIIE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIE SUPPORT ASSEhlBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS.

4. Tile APPLICATION OR END U'iE OF TIIE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC i .< Tile CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC l EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATION EXIST FOR TIIE PLANT CONFIGURATION WIIICil WOULD GENERIC l ENIIANCE Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY j EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SillELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATil, ETC.).

7. Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCIIEMES l-2,12-1,12-2, l 13-1,14-1 AND 15-L ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TIIOSE TO CONSTRUCT FLARE OUT) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. TIIE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IlETWEEN M-BOARD AND FLARE-OUT OR FILLET WilERE Tl!ERE IS NO FLARE OUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR Tile TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST Tile M-BOARD. TiiE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR TilERMAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE Tile TRAY BOX CUT AND FOAM SEAL ARE BOTil QUALIFIED FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 IIOUR FIRE EXPOSURE.

8. WITil INTERFACE BETWEEN Tile TWO CONDUITS TREATED AS A JOINT, ADEQUATE TillCKNESS IS PROVIDED TO M AINTAIN 103020/3 EQUIVALENT PROTECTION AS QUALIFIED BY FIRE TEST 9-1. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY.

9. Tills SCORE AND FOLD TECilNIQUE WOULD PROVIDE A BETTER LEVEL OF PROTECTION TIIAN TESTED CONFIGURATION DUE TO Tile CONTINUOUS STRESS SKIN ASSISTING IN IIOLDING Tile JOINT TOGETilER WillLE M AINTAINING 1/2" TillCKNESS. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY. Tile SCORE AND FOLD METilOD WAS TESTED ON ALL OF TIIE CABLE TRAY TESTS ON TRAY RADIAL BEND COVERAGE.

10. TIIE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QU ALIFIED BY SCllEMES 1-2, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1,14-1 AND 15-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TilOSE TO CONSTRUCT Tile FLAREOUT) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECIINIQUES QUALIFIED BY PREVIOUS LISTED TESTS. Tile 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN CONCRETE AND FLARE-OUT OR FILLET WilERE TilERE IS NO FLAREOUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR TiiE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST TIIE CONCRETE.

Tile CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR TIIERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE ONE COMPLETE SIDE OF TIIE TRAY ENVELOPE IS EXTENDED TO Tile CONCRETE WALL AND WILL NOT BE DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A FIRE. ALSO Tile CONCRETE WALL ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK. TilEREFORE Tills CONFIGURATION IS EQUIVALENT OR BETTER Til AN TESTED.

11. Tile COVERAGE OF Tile PROTRUDING STEEL WITil TilERMO-LAG IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS CONSISTENT WITil TIIE METIIODS UTILIZED TO COVER Tile AIR DROPS IN TEST SCilEME 11-1. Tile OVERLAPS OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET AND TIIE BANDING ARE IDENTICAL. ALSO TEST SCllEME 11-1 liAD FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED DIRECTLY ON TIIE ESSENTIAL CABLES WilEREAS Tills DETAIL llAS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED ON A PROTRUDING ITEM NOT ON AN ESSENTIAL COMMODITY.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAIUS PAGE A16 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

12. Tile USE OF lilLTI BOLTS /SELF TAPPING SCREWS TO PROVIDE A POSITIVE MECilANICAL ATTACllMENT TO THE 103921/0 CONCRETE! METAL PROVIDES JOINT STRENGTH AT Tills POINT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH IF NOT BETTER THAN Tile 103476/1 TilERMO-LAG JOINTS WilICII HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN ALL OF Tile TEST ASSEMBLIES. IN ADDITION, THE CONCRETE / METAL STRUCTURES WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK WillCll WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION AGAINST HEAT BEING DRIVEN INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

13. Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF JUNCTION BOX WITil TUBE STEEL SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9- 103063/0 ONLY, ALTilOUGli Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MOUNTEI) TO AN EMBEDDED PLATE.

THE TUBE STEEL AND EMBEDDED PLATE IS COVERED FOR 9" AND PROVIDES A BETTER llEAT SINK TO REDUCE HEAT PATil TO Tile RACEWAY TilAN TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

14. Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES, IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. BY BUTTING Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE TO THE CONCRETE BEAM, Tile BEAM WILL LIMIT EXPOSURE FROM TilAT SIDE AND ACT AS A IIEAT SINK. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TilOSE TilAT BOX TO Tile BEAM) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS.

15. Tills TYPICAL DETAllIS FOR COVERING WEEP IlOLES IN TUBE STEEL WITil TilERMO-LAG WlilCII ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF 102222/1 THE 9"-11" TilERMO-LAG PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE IN ORDER TO PRECLUDE HEAT FORM BEING DRIVEN INTO Tile TUBE STEEL TilROUGil Tile IlOLE. Tile ADilESION OF Tile PANEL TO Tile STEEL USING TROWEL GRADE AND BANDS WILL COVER Tile IlOLE IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH Tile TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON STEEL.

16. Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. ALL 104121/0 CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TilOSE TO BOX AROUND SLEEVE BANK) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. Tile BASE PLATE AND THERMO-LAG PANEL INTERFACE BEING COVERED WITH TROWEL GRADE PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL. PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS ARE QUALIFIED BY SCilEME 11-1. Tile CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR TilERMAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE TIIE CONCRETE AND BASE PLATE WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK AND REDUCE Tile EXPOSURE OF llEAT INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

100820/0

17. THE USE OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP WAS TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1. THE USE OF PENETRATION SEAL FIRE STOPS 103921/0 llAS BEEN TESTED AND DOCUMENTED IN Tile PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM. ALSO ELASTOMER WAS TESTED AS A FIRE STOP ON TRAY CONFIGURATIONS IN SCl! EMES 1-2,12-2, AND 14-1.

18. Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS AND flALF-ROUND PRE-SHAPED PIECES FOR CONDUITS ARE QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING WilERE IIALF-ROUND PIECES AROUND TYPICAL INTERFERENCES CREATE LONGITUDINALJOINTS) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. SINCE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF M ATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUALIFIED TESTS, THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.

103020/0

19. THE JUNCTION BOX INSTALLATION IS Tile STANDARD CONFIGURATION WillCil WAS TESTED IN SCllEME 10-1. TIIE USE OF 103634/2 ANGLE IRON OR CLIPS MOUNTED TO Tile STRUCTURE TO SERVE AS ATTACllMENT POINTS FOR Tile BANDING IS AN ACCEPTABLE DEVIATION FROM Tile STANDARD (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE Tile METilOD OF ATTACllMENT SERVES Tile SAME FUNCTION IN SECURING Tile OUTER PANELS.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A17 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

20. Tills DETAIL IS NOT THE STANDARD TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR AIR DROPS INTO A CABLE TRAY BUT IT UTILIZES 330-1 100820/0 PANELS. IT USES TIE WIRES AT THE JOINTS AS WAS TESTED IN SCIIEMES 1-2,12-1,12-2, AND 13-1 AND THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE UTILIZED AS A FIRE STOP AS TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1. Tile ASSEMBLY IS BANDED TOGETilER AND BANDED TO Tile TRAY. Tills CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WillCil IS CONSISTENT WITil Tile COVERAGE PROVIDE BY Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION.

21. CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES USING V-GROOVED FLAT BOARD llAVE BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS ARE REINFORCED WITil TECllNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. FOR TilERM AL CONSIDERATIONS, Tile CORNER OR SIDE OF Tile TRAY WilERE Tile INTERFERENCE IS LOCATED IIAS BOTil EXTERNAL 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET WITil TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS ON THE INSIDE OF Tile CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL. Tile COMBINATION OF TilESE TWO PROVIDE ENilANCED PROTECTION IN Tile AREA WHERE Tile OUTER V-GROOVED BOARD TIIICKNESS IS REDUCED.

IN ADDITION Tile INTERFERENCES WILL PROVIDE SillELDING AND AN ADDITIONAL llEAT SINK IN Tile AREA OF CONCERN. THE COMBINATION OF TilESE FEATURES ALONG WITli TIE WIRES AND BANDING AS SHOWN WILL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER PROTECTION OF TIIE ENVELOPE TilAN TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

22. THE BOX DESIGN ON TIIE TRAY IS Tile SAME AS FOR DETAILS 3-1 AND 3-1.1 Tile FIRE STOP IS TIIE SAME AS TIIE FIRE STOP 100820/0 USED FOR PROTRUDING CONDUITS ON JUNCTION BOXES. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP IS Tile SAME AS THAT TESTED IN SCIIEME 11-1 EXCEPT WilERE IT OVERLAPS ONTO Tile CONDUlT AND Tile BOX ON Tile TRAY. SINCE THIS DETAIL IS ONLY TO BE USED WilEN Tile CONDUIT IS TOO CLOSE TO Tile TRAY TO USE DETAIL 3-1 AND 3-1.1, THE AMOUNT OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS MINOR (4"-5") SO TIIE ATTACilMENT TO Tile CONDUlT AND Tile BOX IS ACCEPTABLE.

23. TWO LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS CONSISTENT WITil QUALIFIED PROTECTION FOR LARGE AIR DROPS. IN Tills CASE Tile TRAY PROVIDES MORE TilERM AL M ASS AND A GREATER AIR SPACE TilAN AIR DROPS. IN ADDITION Tile IIVAC INTERFERENCE PROVIDES SOME DEGREE OF SillELDING AND HEAT SINK TO ONE SIDE OF THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. Tills APPLICATION IS EQU! VALENT TO FLEXI-BLANKET APPLICATIONS QUALIFIED IN SCllEME 11-1.

Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF CABLE TRAYS WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY. 103548/0 24. ALTilOUGil Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN TIIIS CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT AND A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY, THE COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES (SIDE, PARTIAL TOP AND BOTTOM) PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH.

25. EXISTING LISTED TESTS JUSTIFY CABLE TRAYS WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" IN Tills CASE PROTECTION OF TIIE SUPPORTS IS ONLY PROVIDED FOR 5" MINIMUM. Tills IS JUSTIFIED BY ENGINEERING CALCULATION ME-CA-0000-2062 WillCil ALLOWS USE OF Tile "5 INCll RULE" WilERE CONFIGURATIONS MEET ESTABLISHED MINIMUM CRITERIA SUCll AS A MINIMUM PERCENT TRAY FILL TO ESTABLISH EQUIVALENT PROTECTION TO REDUCE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

100820/0

26. ALL ASPECTS OF Tills AIR DROP CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1 EXCEPT FOR Tile ATTACllMENT OF 104121/0 Tile 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO Tile TWS. Tile INTERFACE OF Tile 330-660 AROUND EMBEDDED SLEEVES II AS BEEN SECURED WITil BANDING AROUND Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECHANICAL ATTACilMENT AND LARGE " FILLET WELD" BUILDUP OF TROWEL GRADE 330-660 MATERIAL FOR TilERMAL PROTECTION. Tile M ATERIAL TillCKNESSES AND APPLICATIONS IIAVE BEEN BOUNDED BY TEST. SEE ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR DETAll 5-3 FOR FIRE STOP AND 7-1 FOR ATTACHMENT TO TWS.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A18 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 27.. Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANEU TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. Tl!E USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITTINGS AND JUNCTION BOXES IS ALSO QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. WITH THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECilNIQUES FOR THE CABLE TRAY AND BOX DETAll AS QUALIFIED IN LISTED TESTS, Tile CRITICAL A'ITRIBUTES OF M ATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BOX ELEVATION IS SUCH TilAT CABLES IN Tile TRAY DO NOT CONTACT THE BACK OF THERMO-LAG PANEL. IN ADDITION, ITEMS SUCH AS A PIPE HANGER WOULD PROVIDE SOME DEGREE OF SHIELDING AND llEAT SINK. TilEREFORE Tills DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.

28. TIIE COVERAGE OF Tile AIR DROP CABLES WITil FLEXI-BLANKET IIAS BEEN TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1. Tile BOX DESIGNS AT THE TRAY INTERFACES ARE SIMILAR TO Tile BOXES IN DETAILS 3-1 & 3-1.1. THE FIRE STOPPING OF Tile NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE WITilIN THE BOX STRUCTURE IS CONSISTENT WITil DETAILS 3-1 & 3-1.1 AND Tile OVERLAP OF Tile 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO Tile CONDUIT IS CONSISTENT WITil THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tills CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WilICH IS CONSISTENT WITil THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

103844/0

29. Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS.

THE USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOAkD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITI'INGS AND JUNCTION BOXES IS ALSO QUALIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS. PROTECTION OF A PROTRUDING ITEM SUCil AS CONOUIT IS ALSO QUALIFIED BY EXISTING TEST. WITil TIIE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECilN! QUES FOR Tile CABLE TRAY AND BOX DETAIL AS QUALIFIED IN LISTED TEST, THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF tiler ' AL M ASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BOX DIMENSION ARE SIZED SUCil iMAT CABLES DO NOT TOUCil Tile BACK OF TilERMO-LAG PANELS. TilEREFORE THIS DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.

30. Tile USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGUR.ATIONS ARE QUALIFIED BY EXISTING LISTED TESTS. TIIE USE OF CONDUIT H ALF ROUND PREFABRICATED PIECES ARE ALSO QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. TiiE USE OF SHIMS ADDS ADDITIONAL M ATERIAL AND AIR VOLUME BENEFITS INSIDE Tile ENCLOSURE. WITil THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECllNIQUES QUALIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS, Tile PROTECTION OF CONDUIT / PIPE INTERFERENCES WITil CONDUIT IIALF ROUND PREFABRICATED PIECES AND FLAT BOARDS WITil SillMS CONSTITUTE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER PROTECTION SINCE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF THERMAL M ASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER TilAN TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

THIS IS THE TESTED CONFIGURATION EXCEPT Til AT INSTEAD OF BUTTING 330-1 PANELS TO Tile AIR DROP, STRESS SKIN WITil 103020/3 31. 102933/0 TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP IS INSTALLED. Tills IS THE SAME CONFIGURATION USED FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL BUILD UP AT JOINTS TilAT WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 AND 14-1. Tills CONFIGURATION PROVIDES 100820/0 COVERAGE WillCll IS CONSISTENT WITil THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES, ilAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY EXISTING LISTED 104121/0 32. TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TilOSE WillCil TRANSITION FROM Tile END OF Tile TRAY TO TWS) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. Tile CONCRETE WALL AND TilERMO-LAG PANEL INTERFACE HAVING A TROWEL GRADE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL TO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. BANDS TO SUPPORT i TRANSITION PANELS WILL ADD STRUCTURAL SUPPORT TO Tile ENVELOPE. Tile CONCRETE WALL WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK TO IIELP REDUCE EXPOSURE TO Tile WALL / PANEL INTERFACE. SINCE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS THIS DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A19 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

33. TIIE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY TESTS AS LISTED ON Tile M ATRIX. ALL JOINTS ON Tills CONFIGURATION (INCLUDING Tile BOX TRANSITION FROM TRAY TO TRAY) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. STRUCTURALLY, Tile TRAY TO TRAY TRANSITION CREATES NO GREATER STRUCTURAL CilALLENGE TilAN LARGE "T" CONFIGURATIONS ALREADY QU ALIFIED. TIIEREFORE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, M ATERIAL TillCKNESS AND TilERM AL CONSIDERATIONS ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUALIFIED TESTS.

103020/3

34. Tile COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. TIIE OVERLAP OF 330-660 ONTO CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES Tile SAME INSTALLATION TECilNIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE. ETC) USED FOR CONDUITS 104121/0 AND JUST MODIFIES TilEM TO ALLOW FOR Tile CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS.

103020/3

35. Tile COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS IS Tile SAME EXCEPT Tile OVERLAP 104121/0 REQUIREMENTS IIAVE BEEN REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR CONGESTED AREAS WilERE SPACE DOES NOT PERMIT Tile USE OF DLTAIL 3-5.2. Tile MINIMUM OVERLAP ALLOWED ON Tills DETAIL, ALTilOUGil NOT IDEAL, IS STILL SUFFICIENT WilEN COUPLED WITil Tile STAPLING AND TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN Tile FLEXI-BLANKET LAYERS TO ENSURE TilAT Tile CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE ACCEPTABLE MECilANICAL ATTACllMENT TO Tile 330-1 M ATERIAL WillCil MAKES Tile ARRANGEMENT CONSISTENT WITll Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION.

36. Tills DETAll IS SUPPORTED BY ENGINEERING EVALUATION, ER-ME-067, REV. 2 PG. 94.

104121/0

37. TIIIS DETAIL IIAS Tile OPTION OF COVERING Tile METAL JACKETED FIRE ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PER Tile 9" RULE WlilCil WAS FIRE TESTED IN ALL OF Tile SCilEMES OR FIRE STOPPED AS IN DETAIL 3-4 WillCil WAS FIRE TESTED IN SCilEME 11-1. TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

38. APPLICATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON TUBE STEEL AND OVER STEEL PLATE IS QUALIFIED ON SCilEME 9-1 TO ESTABLISil Tile 9*

RULE. TIIE ABILITY OF Tills CONFIGURATION TO MITIGATE IIEAT PROPAGATION INTO Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE WillLE MAINTAINING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY SUPPORTS Tile APPLICATION OF TilERMO-LAG TO PROTECT STRUCTURAL STEEL 104121/0

39. Tills DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE FOR FIRE ZONE R CABLES WillCll PROTRUDE FROM A TilERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY WillCH IS IDENTICAL TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING PROTRUDING CABLES IN DETAIL 3-4. Tills CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION.

104060/0

40. Tile DETAIL ALLOWS Tile TESTED JUNCTION BOX CONFIGURATION TO BE MODIFIED BY EXTE"NDING Tile "V" RIB PANELS TO COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT Tile JUNCTION BOX. Tile CONFIGURATION llAS MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME TilAN A TYPICAL J-BOX ENVELOPE WillCil WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. TilEREFORE SINCE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND TilERMAL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED. TIIE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

41. Tills TYPICAL DETAIL IS FOR COVERING TIIE OPEN END OF TUDE STEEL WilEN IT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF Tile " 9 INCil RULE" TO MITIGATE IIEAT FROM BEING DRIVEN INTO Tile TUBE STEEL. Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile SCORE AND FOLD TilERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS WITil TROWEL GRADE 330-1 AND S.S. BANDING IS EQUIVALENT TO Tile APPLICATION OF TIIERMO-LAG TO MEET Tile 9" RULE ON SCllEME 10-1 AND 10-2.

A'ITACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAIIS PAGE A20 OF A25 DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES

42. Tile USE OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS WITil PARTIAL PREFABRICATED CONDUIT llALF ROUNDS AND TROWEL GRADE JOINT M AINTAINS CONSISTENCY TO Tile CRITICAL ATTRIBUT6 OF M ATERIAL TIIICKNESS WITil PROTECTED STEEL FOR TIIE 9" RULE.

1(M060/0

43. Tills DETAIL ADDRESSES COVERING FLEX 1BLE CONDUIT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX WITil 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG IIALF ROUNDS 4" TO 8" OUT FROM BOX. Tills MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO BE 1NSTALLED ONTO Tile CONDUlT IN ACCORDANCE WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION (SCllEME 11-1). Tile INSTALLATION OF 330-1 HALF ROUNDS UP TO Tile JUNCTION BOX IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS SCIIEMES 10-1 AND 10-2. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES LISTED DlD NOT USE SillMS. IIOWEVER, ADDITIONAL THERMO-LAG M ATERI AL 102522/1 44. INSIDE Tile ENVELOPE AND INCREASED AIR VOLUME BENEFITS Tile ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS. TEST METilODS OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT ll AVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF Tile ENVELOPE. 103020/3

45. 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY FIRE TESTED IN SCilEME 11-1. FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT llAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. IlOWEVER, TIIE FLEX CONDUlT llAS Tile ADVANTAGE OF AN 103486/0 INSULATING CONDUIT JACKET AND A LARGER AIR VOLUME INSIDE TIIAN IS PRESENT IN A FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLE BUNDLE. Tills WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR Tile CABLES INTEGRITY TIIEREFORE, TIIE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

103020/3

46. Tile CONDUITS ARE COVERED WITII 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG llALF ROUNDS TO Tile EXTENT ALLOWED BY TIIE INTERFERING STRUCTURE TIIEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT Tile JUNCTION OF Tile CONDUIT II ALF ROUNDS AND Tile CONCRETE WALL. Tile FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BETWEEN TIIE TIIERMO-LAG AND CONCRETE TO MAINTAIN THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO Tile CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK, REDUCE Tile EXPOSED SURFACE AND ENilANCE Tile INTEGRITY OF Tile TIIERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

47. THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF M ATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TIIE PROTECTION OF SUPPORTS FOR Tile 9" RULE WillCil MITIGATED llEAT BEING CONDUCTED INTO Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE. IN ADDITION CONCRETE WILL PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL llEAT SINK. TilEREFORE Tile CONFIGURATION IS ADEQUATE FOR PROTECTION OF SWAY STRUTS.

103490/0

48. Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS OF CABLE TRAYS WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY.

ALTilOUGli Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT ATTACllED TO A BASE PLATE. Tile COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO Tile BASE PLATE AND WALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE ilEAT PATil. IN ADDITION Tile CONCRETE WALL ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK TO IIELP MITIGATE EXPOSURE OF HEAT. Tile EXTENSION OF THE TRAY COVERAGE TO PROTECT Tile AIR DROP FROM TIIE TRAY TO THE SLEEVES IS CONSISTENT WITH Tile TRAY COVERAGE. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURE INTEGRITY IS PROVIDED BY TIE WIRING ALL JOINTS IN ADDITION TO REINFORCING Tile JOINTS , WITil STRESS SKIN.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAll3 PAGE A21 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

49. Tills CONFIGUR.ATION IS ONLY USED WITH FIRE STOPS IN Tile END OF EACli TRAY STANDARD COVERAGE WHERE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES ENTER AND THE GAP IS RESTRICTED TO SilORT DISTANCE OF ABOUT I FOOT. THE PROTECTION OF THE CABLES WITH FLEXI-BLANKET AND THE ELASTOMER FIRE SEALS HAVE BEEN TESTED ALTHOUGH Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR THERMO-LAG EXTENDING TilROUGH A FIRE STOP WAS 330-1 IIALF ROUNDS, THE USE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET TIIROUGli Tile FIRE STOP WILL PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE INSTALLATION WillCil IS CONSISTENT WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES RESTING ON THE EXPOSED CABLE TRAY, ALTilOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY FIRE TESTED, IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY THE EXPOSED TRAY BECAUSE TilERE IS ONLY A MINOR AMOUNT OF EXPOSED TRAY AND Tile FLEXI-BLANKET ONLY COMES IN CONTACT WITil ONE OR TWO EXPOSED TRAY RUNGS. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS BASICALLY CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WilERE IT DEVIATES FROM THESE CONFIGURATIONS Tile DIFFERENCES ARE MINOR AND DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT Tile CORRELATION TO A TESTED CGNFIGURATION. THE M ATERIAL CONTINUITY AND TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED.

50. THIS CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO THE CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCllEMES 9-1,10-1,10-2 AND 9-3 EXCEPT TilESE TESTS IIAD TIIE TilERMO-LAG IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE PEN SEAL MATERIAL WilEREAS Tills DETAIL llAS A SilEET METAL SLEEVE WITH TROWEL GRADE FILLING THE GAP. Ti1E TROWEL GRADE IN Tile SPACE BETWEEN THE SLEEVE & CONDUIT AND Tile SHEET METAL SLEEVES DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1 AND Tile SHEET METAL SLEEVE IS SANDWICllED BETWEEN TROWEL GRADE & PEN SEAL M ATERIAL. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

104121/0 5L LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET 330-660 PROTECTING ALL BUNDLED LEGS OF THIS DETAll ARE CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. IN FIRE TEST SCllEME 11-1, Tile USE OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE WITil BANDING PROVED TO BE 103486/0 STRUCTURALLY SOUND WITH EXCELLENT BONDING OF SEAMS TilROUGilOUT Tile FIRE AND IlOSE STREAM TEST. TilEREFORE Tile USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE WITil llANDING TO STRUCTURALLY HOLD Tile SPLIT LEGS TO Tile PRIM ARY LEG AND SEAL LONGITUDIN AL SEAMS IS ACCEPTABLE. Tills DliTAllIS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR CRITICAL TilERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IS TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE. 103020/3

52. THE METilOD UTILIZED TO REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE 330-1 CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS IS TO SCORE THE M ATERIAL SO TilAT IT WILL CONFORM TO Tile SMALLER SHAPE TilEN FILLING Tile SCORED AREAS WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. THIS IS THE SAME METilOD UTILIZED IN FITTING 330-1 PANELS TO CABLE TRAY RADIAL BENDS WHICil WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2,13-1 AND 14-1. TilEREFORE Tile SCORING OF Tile CONDUIT llALF ROUNDS WILL NOT DETRACT FROM THE TESTED INTEGRITY OF TilESE CONDUIT SECTIONS. SINCE DETAILS 4.6 AND 4-6.1 ARE Tile SAME AS 4-1 AND 4-1.1 WillCH WERE TESTED IN SCHEMES 9-1,10-1 AND 10-2 THEY ARE CONSIDERED TO BE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. DETAILS 4-7 AND 4-7.1 ARE THE SAME AS DETAILS 4-3 AND 4-3.1 AND TilEY llAVE BEEN ANALYZED IN NOTE 46.

FLEXI-IALANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT llAS NOT IlEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. IlOWEVER, TIIE FACT THAT THE FLEXI-BLANKET 103076/1 53. CONFIGURATION llAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1 AND THE FLEX CONDUlT llAS Tile ADVANTAGE OF Ti!E CONDUIT JACKET AND Tile AIR VOLUME INSIDE Tile CONDUlT WillCil IS NOT PRESENT IN A CABLE BUNDLE, PROVIDES ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR Tile CABLES AND RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. TIIE REDUCTION IN THICKNESS AT Tile SUPPORT IS COMPENSATED FOR BY THE ADDITION THERMO-LAG ON Tile SUPPORT. Tile RESULTING COMBINATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON THE SUPPORT AND THE CONDUIT PLUS THE TROWEL GRADE IN ANY VOIDS AND AT THE EXTERNAL INTERFACE BETWEEN THE THERMO-LAG ON THE CONDUIT AND Tile SUPPORT RESULTS IN A TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE CONSISTENT WITH A TESTED CONFIGUR ATION.

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A22 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV Tills DETAIL DEPICTS STANDARD COVERAGE FOR 2" CONDUIT EXCEPT FOR A GAP NOT EXCEEDING 1/2" WilERE Tile 1/4" IIALF 103423/0 54. ROUNDS MEET. TROWEL GRADE OVER STRESS SKIN IS APPLIED TO Tile AREA TO ACIIIEVE Tile REQUIRED TIIICKNESS IN THE AREA. TIIE COMBINATION OF RESULTING CONFIGURATION PROVIDING TillCKNESS AND MATERIAL CONTINUITY CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS RESULTS IN Tills CONFIGURATION BEING ACCEPTABLE.

55. FIRE STOPS UTILIZING 330-1 TilERMO-LAG WERE TESTED IN SCIIEME l-2. IT WAS ALSO TESTED IN SCllEME 4 AND Tile FIRE STOP WAS NOT BREACIIED. Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

56. ALTilOUGli IT IS NOT A TESTED CONFIGURATION IT IS A DEFINITE ENil ANCEMENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND IT IS TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE. TEST SCllEMES 1-2,11-1,12-1,12-2 AND 13-1 IIAVE ESTABLISilED Tile ENII ANCEMENTS OBTAINED BY USING TIE WIRES TO "STITCil" TO EITilER PANELS AND Tills DETAll IS CONSISTENT WITII TilAT CONFIGURATION.

Tills DETAIL PROVIDES A METilOD FOR A POSITIVE MECilANICAL MEANS TO SUPPORT UNDER TIIE BOTFOM PANEL AT A FIRE 104235/3 57. STOP IN A CABLE TRAY. Tile BAR STEEL AND ALTERED ROD USED FOR Tills PURPOSE ARE SUBSTANTI AL AND WILL WITilSTAND A DESIGN BASIS FIRE. Tile BAR STEEL IS COMPARABLE TO Tile EXPOSED STEEL Til AT WAS TESTED IN ALL TIIE SCllEMES. Tile ALL TIIREAD ROD WOULD 11 AVE ELONGATE TO Fall AND TilAT IS NOT A CONCERN. Tile USE OF 330-1 TilERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS, SINGLE LAYER, WAS QUALIFIED ON SCIIEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOXES. IN 101918/0 58. Tills DETAIL, Tile TilERMAL EXPOSURE OF FLAT PANELS IS LESS CilALLENGING TilAN Tile EXPOSURE IN 10-2. REQUIRED OVERLAPS OF MATERIAL AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECilNIQUES ALONG WITil Ti1E USE OF V-GROOVE 330-1 PANELS ARE QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. IN ADDITION, Tile REQUIREMENT FOR PRE-BANDING BELOW FLAT PANELS, NO M ATTER Tile TRAY SIZE, WILL PROVIDE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AGAINST SAGGING CONSISTENT WITH Ti1E USE OF V-GROOVED BOARD. BASED ON Tile ABOVE, Tills DETAIL IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

59. Tills CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS IN SCllEMES l-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 AND 15-1 EXCEPT TilESE TESTS IIAD Tile TilERMO-LAG IN DIRECT CONTACT WITil Tile PENSEAL MATERIAL WilEREAS Tills DETAIL ll AS A SilEET METAL SLEEVE WITil TROWEL GRADE FILLING Tile GAP. Tile TROWEL GRADE IN TIIE SPACE BETWEEN Tile SLEEVE AND TIIE TRAY COVERAGE AND Tile S11EET METAL SLEEVE DOES NOT DETRACT FROM Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. TIIE TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP ll AS BEEN TESTED IN SCilEME 11-1 AND Tile SilEET METAL SLEEVE IS SANDWICllED BETWEEN TROWEL GRADE AND PENSEAL M ATERIAL. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

103020/3

60. Tile USE OF 330-660 TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCIIEME 104121/0 11-1. Tile USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINTS WAS ALSO QUALIFIED BY SCllEME 11-1.

Tile USE OF A 330-660 TROWEL FILLET AT Tile TRANSITION BETWEEN 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET AND M-BOARD OR CONCRETE WILL PROVIDE A POSITIVE SEAL TO Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE AT Tills TRANSITION. FOR TilERMAL CONSIDERATIONS, Tile CONCRETE AT Tile TRANSITION WILL PROVIDE A IIEAT SINK AND REDUCED IIEAT EXPOSURE TO TIIE TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. BASED ON Tile ABOVE, Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 100820/0

61. Tile FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR TIIE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST Tile M-BOARD AND IS SEALED TO BOTil Tile PENSEAL AND Tile CONCRETE WITil CAULK AND STICK PINS ARE USED AS REQUIRED. Tile CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR TilERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE Tile TRAY CONFIGURATION AND Tile PENSEAL ARE BOTil QUALIFIED FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 IlOUR FIRE EXPOSURE.

ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A23 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

62. IN ADDITION TO Tile DISCUSSION ON NOTE 60 FOR Tile M-BOARD / CONCRETE TO FLEXI-BLANKET TRANSITION, TIIE FLEXI- 103020/3 BLANKET IS ATTACilED IN ACCORDANCE WITil DETAIL 3-5.2 TO Tile RACEWAY. Tills MECilANICAL MEANS OF ATTACilMENT I M 121/0 TO TIIE RACEWAY WAS TESTED IN SCIIEME 11-1. FOR Tile CRITICAL TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS, Tills ASSEMBLY IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND TIIEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

63. Tile SCORE AND FOLD METIIOD llAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED ON RADIAL BENDS FOR CABLE TRAYS IN TESTS 1-2,11-1, 103020/3 12-1,12-213-1,14-1 AND 15-1. Tile METilOD USED TO SCORE AND FOLD ON TRAY RUNS IS Tile SAME AS TRAY RADIAL BENDS PLUS Tile TRAY JOINTS WILL RECEIVE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP. TIIEREFORE Tile SCORE AND FOLD METIlOD FOR TRAY RUN CORNERS IS ACCEPTABLE.

64. Tills DETAIL WAS QUALIFIED IN SCllEME 11-1, ONLY FOR AIR DROPS. TIIE DIFFERENCE OF liAVING FLEX-CONDUIT AS 103020/3 COMPARED TO AN AIR DROP ADDS TilERMAL M ASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO Tile ASSEMBLY AND TilEREFORE IS BL:TTER TilAN Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION.

65. Tills IS A MINOR DEVIATION FROM NORM AL STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND llAS NO IMPACT ON 103833/0 Tile ABILITY OF Tile STRESS SKIN TO PERFORM IT'S INTENDED FUNCTION SINCE Tile STRESS SKIN IS CUT OUT AROUND Tile GROUND CABLE TilEN BROUGilT BACK TOGETilER WilERE IT LAPS Ti!E JOINT. TlilS IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.

66. PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING ITEM FROM INTERFACE IS CONSISTENT WITil TIlOSE TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1 AND IS IN 121/0 TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

67. Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS AND CABLE TRAYS WITl! SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY.

ALTiiOUGil Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A DETECFOR llASE AND CONDUlT. Tile COVER AGE PROVIDED ONTO EXPOSED RACEWAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil.

68. Tills DETAIL UTILIZES CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON STRESS SKIN WITil TROWEL GRADE FOR 330-1 PANELS ON TiiE BOTTOM 103020/3 PANELS ON A CABLE TRAY WilERE IT BUTTS TO Tile TRAY SUPPORT TilERMO-LAG. CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON BUTT JOINTS WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ilAS BEEN TESTED IN SCllEMES 11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 AND 15-1. IN ADDITION Tile STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE IIAS BEEN STAPLED TO Tile VERTICAL 330-1 PANEL ON Tile SUPPORT WillCil WILL FURTilER ENilANCE Tile MECilANICAL ATTACl! MENT OF Tile STRESS SKIN.

69. Tile USE OF 330-660 TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES AND Tile MECllANICAL ATTACllMENT OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PRE-SilAPED CONDUIT llALF-ROUNDS ON BOTil AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS IS QUALIFIED BY TEST SCllEME 11-1. BY EMBEDDING Tile flALF-ROUND M ATERIAL INTO Tile M-BOARD 1/2" AND SEALING WITil A l/2" BEAD OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE, A POSITIVE MECilANICAL CONNECTION AND SEAL IS CREATED AT TIIIS TRANSITION.

TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS EQUAL TO OR BETTER TilAN CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1.

ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A24 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

70. Tile USE OF 330-660THERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCIIEME 11-1. THE USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINTS WAS ALSO QUALIFIED BY SCliEME 11-1.

THERMALLY, THE TillCKNESS AND AMOUNT OF LAYERS PROTEGING BUNDLES ARE EQUIVALENT TO OR BETTER TilAN TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. STRUCTURALLY 330-660 TROWEL GRADE WITH SS BANDING llAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE EFFECTIVE TO BOND SEAMS WITII Tile TWO BUNDLES SillELDING EACil OTilER AND HAVING GREATER M ASS TilAN A SINGLE BUNDLE, TIIIS CONFIGURATION llAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE A LESS SEVERE EXPOSURE TilAN Tile TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. FINALLY, CONDUlTS, AS OPPOSED TO AIR DROPS USED IN THE TEST, ADD TilERMAL M ASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO TiiE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

71. Tills DEVIATION AFFECTS ONLY A SM ALL PORTION OF TIIE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON Tile LONGITUDINAL JOINT 103507/0 AND LIMITS Tile AMOUNT OF DEVIATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACil OTilER SO TIIAN OVERALL MECHANICAL 103626/0 INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT IS NOT COMPROMISED. Tills IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.

72. PROTECTION OF SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS ARE CONSISTENT WITIl OTilER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS (1/2" THERMO-LAG 103020/3 THICKNESS AND JOINTS, TIE-WIRES, ETC.). TIIE LEVEL OF PROTECTION IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATION.

73. TIIIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION WillCil WAS USED IN ALL OF THE CABLE TR AY TEST CONFIGURATIONS EXCEPT THAT TIIIS 104121/0 DETAIL liAS Tile ENilANCEMENT OF INSTALLING THE TIE WIRES THROUGH Tile BOTTOM PANELS ON THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE THAT BUTTS TO TifE SUPPORT. SINCE Tills IS AN ENHANCEMENT TO A TESTED CONFIGURATION, IT IS ACCEPTABLE.

74. TIIE COVERAGE ON THE RADIAX CABLE WITH FLEXI-BLANKET IS SIMILAR TO COVERAGE ON PROTRUDING CONI"'?T ON 104015/1 SCllEME 11-1. THE AIR GAPS INSIDE Tile FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP ARE FILLED WITil TROWEL GRADE. THIS CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

75. Tile FLEX CONDUlTS ARE COVERED WITil FLEXI-BLANKET TO Tile EXTENT ALLOWED BY Tile INTERFERING STRUCTURE 102759/1 TilEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT Tile JUNCTION OF Tile CONDUIT llALF ROUNDS AND Tile CONCRETE WALL. Tile FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BETWEEN Tile TilERMO-LAG AND THE CONCRETE TO M AINTAIN Tile PROTECTED ENVELGPE. ALSO Tile CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK AND ENIIANCE TIIE INTEGRITY OF TiiE TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

76. THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE COVERAGE IS EXTENDED OUT ONTO THE STEEL THEREFORE TYING IT INTO THE 102957/0 STRESS SKIN ON TIIE JOINT. Tills PROVIDES COVERAGE WillCil WAS EQUIVALENT TO Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION.

77. FLEXI-BLANKET WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1. Tile COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUIT liALF ROUNDS IS A 104121/0 TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE OVERLAP OF 330-660 ONTO CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES Tile SAME INSTALLATION TECIINIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC) USED FOR CONDUIT AND JUST MODIFIES TilEM TO ALLOW FOR TiiE CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS. Tile FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE.

Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. Tile INSTALLATION METilODS USED ON Tile DETAll FOR Tile 330-1 BOX ARE AN EXTENSION OF THE TRAY COVERAGE AND 104121/0 78. llAVE ALL BEEN TESTED (SCORE AND FOLD, STITCIIING AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON JOINTS). Tile FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR Tile TRAY ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACIIMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A25 OF A25 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

79. Tills CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE OF DETAIL 12-2 EXCEPT TIIAT TIIE CONDUIT ENTERING Tile BOX EXTENSION 103844/0 OF A IlORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID. Tile USE OF 330-660 ENTERING A IIORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE ilAS QUALIFIED VIA SCllEME 11-1. Tile UPGRADE TECIINIQUES UTILIZED TO REINFORCE Tile INTERFACE BETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET DURING Tile TEST (330-660 COLLAR FLARED OUT ON Tile 330-1 PANEL) IS REQUIRED BY Tile DETAIL. ALL OTilER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS WITil QUALIFIED TECIINIQUES (STITCilING/ STRESS SKIN). Tile INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITIIIN Tile ENVELOPE BENEFITS Tile TilERMAL PERFORMANCE OF Tile CONFIGURATION. TilEREFORE, TIIE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT l-IlOUR RATING.

80. ATIIOUGII NOT EXACTLY A TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tills DETAllllAS ALL Tile SIGNIFICANT ATTRIBUTES OF A TESTED CONFIGURATION AND Tile DIFFERENCES ARE INSIGNIFICANT.

81. TIIIS DETAIL PROVIDES SPECIFIC GUIDANCE FOR INSTALLING TilERMO-LAG AND IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

82. Tills DETAIL PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON WilEN SIL-TEMP IIAS TO BE INSTALLED ON CABLES TO PROTECT TIIEM AGAINST POSSIBLE DAM AGE FROM TilERMO-LAG PANELS. Tills IS AN ELECTRICAL CABLE DAM AGE CONCERN AND llAS NO EFFECT ON Tile TilERMO-LAG PROTECrlVE ENVELOPE.

ER-ME482, REV. 2 PAGE B1 OF B65 , i I i l ATTACIIMENT H i UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS t

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B2 OF B65 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

                          -AREA / (Y/N)   (YIN)  CONCERN! RESOLUTION                       TEST                                         (PAGES B46-FIRE                                                            SCHEMES                                      B65)

ZONE 101282/1 SG 832' 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES DETAILS FOR CONSTRUCrlON OF REMOVABLE COVER JUNCTION BOX ASSEMBLY. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE 2 LAYERS OF FLAT 10-1 1-6,8 PANEL MATERIAL AROUND THE J-BOX SIDES AND FOR THE LIP SUPPORTING THE SEPARATE COVER ASSEMBLY. TIIEN ADD A LAYER OF V-RIBBED MATERIAL. CONSTRUCT Tile COVER WITil 2 LAYERS OF FLAT PANELS WITil A 4" (MIN.) OVERLAP INTO Tile LIP. MAXIMUM GAP BETWEEN COVER AND LIP IS 3/32". ALL JOINTS TO BE SECURED WITH TILE TIE WIRE STITCllING AND STRESS SKIN. TUR.NBUCKLES SilALL BE USED FOR SECURING TifE COVER IN PLACE. 101357/0 AB 790' 180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANELS ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: STOP STANDARD TRAY 11-1, 1-2, 1-5, 18 COVERAGE ABOUT 4" ON EITilER SIDE OF 12-1, 12-2, Tile PIPE SUPPORT. INSTALL 330-660 FLEXI- 13-1,14-1 BLANKET ON Tile CABLES AND EXTEND ACROSS THE 8" SPACE AND EXTEND INTO THE TRAY COVERAGE ON BOTH ENDS. INSTALL AN ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IN THE ENDS OF THE TRAY COVERAGE. FLEXI-BLANKET Sil ALL EXTEND TilROUGH THE FIRE STOP INTO THE TRAY COVERAGE.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B3 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' ' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCliEMES B65) ZONE 101498/l AS EC 778' X-Il5B AA154 Y Y ISSUE: Tile ARRANGEMENT OF ESSENTIAL MODIFIED BY CABLE TRAYS AND CONDUITS WITillN, DCN 5746 REV. I PRECLUDE Tile INSTALLATION OF (MINOR STANDARD RUN CABLE TRAY PROTECTION. MODIFICATION RESOLUTION: INSTALL TYPICAL DETAIL 5- 1-2, 10-1, I-5, 49 93-126) I FOR STANDARD CABLE TRAY 12-1, 12-2, PROTECTION WilERE SPACE AND 13-1, 14-1, ARRANGEMENT ALLOWS. WilERE CABLES 15-1 EXTEND ABOVE Tile TRAY SIDES SillM TIIE TOP PANEL UP PER DETAIL 10-3. WilERE CABLES AIR DROP FROM Tile VERTICAL TO IlORIZONTAL TRAY, ENCLOSE Tile CABLES IN A TilERMO-LAG BOX. ADD A SECOND LAYER TO Tile BOX IN ACCORDANCE WITil Tile REQUIREMENTS FOR JBs. 101499/0 AB 790' X-165 AA!21a N Y ISSUE: PARALLEL CONDUITS liAVE INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE AT LBDs TO j INDIVIDUALLY PROTECT EACll COM MODITY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE 10-1, 10-2, 1-5, 41 AROUND BOTil LBD FITTINGS. 9-1

NITACIIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B4 OF B65 f DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCIIEMES B65) ZONE 101627/2 E&C 778'- X-IISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: 3 CONDUITS AND JUNCTION BOX 0* ALL REQUIRING PROTECTION SIIARE A COMMON 4* X 4* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TO " BOX-IN* ALL COMMODITIES FOR A 5 FT. DISTANCE. RESOLUTION: BOXING IN TIIE CONDUITS IS 9-1, 10-1 60 NOT ACCEPTABLE. INSTALL STANDARD 330-1 CONDUIT SECTION MATERIAL OVER REQUIRED CONDUlTS. SINCE SO MUCII OF TIIE TUBE STEEL SURFACE WILL BE COVERED WIIEN Tile CONDUITS ARE PROTECTED, INSTALL 330-1 PANELS ON Tile SUPPORT FIRST FOR llEAT PATil (9* RULE), TIIEN INSTALL MATERIAL ON CONDUITS. 101986/1 SG 810' 2-083 7SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: /sLL CABLE AIR DROPS FROM TWO 103034/1 VERTICAL CABLE TRAYS TO TIIROUGil 104124/0 AS WALL SLEEVES (TWS), AS WELL AS TIIE MODIFIED BY CABLE TRAYS, REQUIRE TilERMO-LAG DCN 5742 REV. I COVERAGE. (MINOR MODIFICATION RESOLUTION: PROTECT ALL COMMODITIES 1-2, 10-1, 1-5, 36 WITil A COMMON ENCLOSURE AND 12-1, 12-2, 93-125) ' INSTALL 2 LAYERS W11ERE CABLES AIR 13-1, 14-1, DROP FROM Tile END OF Tile TRAYS TO 15-1 Tile WALL SLEEVES IN ACCORDANCE WITil TIIE REQUIREMENTS FOR JBs. 102058/0 SG 810' 2-079 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AND LBD REQUIRES PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ADJOINING CONDUIT /LBD IS TO CLOSE TO INSTALL STANDARD DETAIL. RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE 10-1, 10-2, 1-5, 41 AROUND BOTil LBD FITTINGS. 9-1

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B5 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV' ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF -SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 102103/0 EC 792* X-122 EA/54 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROP FROM TilROUGil WALL SLEEVES (DVS) TO CABLE TRAY DO NOT ALLOW Tile USE OF STANDARD DETAILS. RESOLUTION: BOX TilERMO-LAG *V" RIB l-2, 12-1, 1-5, 50 PANELS AROUND TWS AND CABLE TRAY. 12-2, 13-1, 14-1,15-1 102160!! AS SG 810' 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS MODIFIED BY DIRECTION FOR ENCLOSING CABLE AIR DCN 5742, REV. I DROPS FROM ONE IIORIZONTAL TRAY TO (MINOR ANOTIIER llORIZONTAL TRAY. MODIFICATION 93-125) RESOLUTION: EXTEND T11E TRAY l-2, 10-1, 1-5, 9 ENVELOPE FROM THE TRAY ABOVE DOWN 12-1, 12-2, ONTO Tile LOWER TRAY TO FORM A " BOX" 13-1, 14-1, CONFIGURATION FOR ENCLOSURE OF TIIE 15-1 AIR DROP CABLES. ADD A SECOND LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG TO TIIE AIR DROP UTILIZING "V"-RIBBED PANELS EXCEPT WilERE SPACE LIMITATIONS AT TUBE STEEL SUPPORTS AND AT SW PIPE MAKE IT NECESSARY TO INSTALL FLAT PANEL. INSTALL SECOND LAYER AND UPGRADE JOINTS PER JB REQUIREMENTS. 102265/0 AB 832' X-219 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION IS UNABLE TO INSTALL TilERMO-LAG ON 24" WIDE CABLE TRAY PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO KELLUM GRIPS INSTALLED ON CABLES. RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE TRAY AND l-2, 12-1, 1-5, 70 KELLUM GRIPS IN A COMMON ENVELOPE. 12-2, 13-1, 14-1,15-1

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B6 OF B65 BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE ' SCIIEMES B65) ZONE 102471/3 AB 790' X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: 18" AND 24" WIDE CABLE TRAYS X-180 AA/21a Y Y RUN PARALLEL BUT ARE TOO CLOSE FOR SEPARATE ENVELOPES. RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT COMMON TRAY l-2, 12-1, I-5, 7 ENVELOPE " PARTITIONED" BETWEEN Tile 12-2, 13-1, TRAYS. PREBAND TIIE TWO TRAYS TO 14-1,15-1 PREVENT TOP PANEL SAG. 102479/1 AB 832' 226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR DROP OUT OF Tile BOTTOM OF A JB TilROUGli SIIORT CONDUIT STUBS (3" TO 5" LONG) PRESENTING A COVERAGE PROBLEM SINCE TYPICAL DETAILS ONLY ADDRESS RIGID AND FLEX 1BLE CONDUIT COVERAGE. RESOLUTION: FIRE STOP TIIE CONDUIT 10-1, 10-2, I-5, 65 STUBS EXTENDING INTO Tile JB TO OBTAIN 11-1, 12-2, REQUIRED DEPTII. INSTALL 1/2" CONDUIT 14-1 IIALF ROUNDS ON CONDUIT STUBS TilEN EXTEND JB COVERAGE ON BOTTOM DOWN USING TIIERMO-LAG SillMS SO IT IS FLUSil WITil Tile BOTTOM OF Tile IIALF ROUNDS AND SEAL BOTTOM PANELS TO Tile liALF ROUNDS. COVERAGE ON Tile JB IS Tile STANDARD DOUBLE LAYER. SPACE INSIDE Tile CONDUIT liALF ROUNDS BELOW Tile FIRE STOP IS FILLED WITil TROWEL GRADE.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REY. 2 f ' I UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B7 OF B65 i DCA NO./REV - . BLDG ELEV ROOM- FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT . BASIS / NOTES , AREA / '(Y/N)- (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65)~ ZONE 102679/1 EC 778* X-IISB AA154 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY T220CBD15-22 IS AN ESSENTIAL TRAY WITil SEVERAL INTERFERENCE AND PROTRUDING ITEM PROBLEMS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLAT PANELS IN 1 -2, 1 -6, 48 LIEU OF V-RIB IN ORDER TO AVOID AN 9-1, 11-1, , INTERFERENCE WITil A PROTECTED 12-1, 12-2, CONDUIT. INSTALL HALF ROUNDS ON Tile 13-1 ESSENTIAL CONDUIT, REDUCING THE M ATERIAL THICKNESS WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH TRAY THERMO-LAG. AIR DROPS SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN A TilERMO-LAG BOX WHEN STANDARD DETAIL FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED. COVER PROTRUDING ITEMS PER TYPICAL DETAILS TO A DISTANCE OF 9" MINIMUM,11" MAXIMUM. 102726/0 SG 832' 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PROTECTED CONDUIT LBD INTERFERES WITH ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD TilAT REQUIRED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION: BOX-!N LBD IN 10-1, 10-2, I-5, 42 ACCORDANCE WITil DETAIL 6-1 AND 9-1 MODIFY DESIGN AT INTERFERENCE. 102800/2 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP FROM TRAY TO WALL DOES NOT IIAVE CONDUIT SLEEVE. RESOLUTION: BOX AIR DROP AT WALL I-2, 10-1, 1-5, 64 AND FORM COMMON ENCLOSURE WITH I I-1, 12-1, CABLE TRAY. 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, 15-1 i

! ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ATTACitMENT B PAGE BS OF B65 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DCA NO./REV TEST (PAGES B46-AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION SCllEMES B65) FIRE ZONE [ AB 810' X-207 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS 102882/0 AS DIRECTION FOR TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION MODIFIED BY OF ESSENTIAL J-BOX JB2A-2990 AND DCN 5745 REV.1 ESSENTIAL AIR DROP CABLES WillCil EXIT (MINOR CABLE TRAY BEFORE Tile END OF Tile MODIFICATION RACEWAY, PRECLUDING USE OF TYPICAL 93-123) DETAILS. l-2, 10-1, 1-5, 19 RESOLUTION: DIRECTION IS PROVIDED FOR INSTALLING A

BOX" EXTENSION TO 12-1, 12-2.

Tile CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE, WITil 330-1 13-1,14-1, PANELS FLARED TO ENCLOSE CABLE AIR 15-1 DROPS WITilOUT TOUCillNG TilEM. ALL JOINTS ARE TO BE M ADE USING Tile SCORE AND FOLD METilOD OR TIE WIRING TOGETilER AND STRESS SKIN, AND PANELS BUTTED TO Tile J-BOX. ADD A SECOND LAYER TO Tile ~ BOX" IN ACCORDANCE WITil Tile REQUIREMENTS FOR JBs. AB 790' X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS 102889/0 DIRECTION FOR COVERING TWO ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD FITTINGS, BETWEEN WillCII Tile GAP IS 1/4" 9-1, 10-1, I-5, 41 RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE BOTil LBDs IN A COMMON TilERMO-LAG 330-1 BOX 10-2 CONFIGURATION. USE TYPICAL DETAIL 6-I FOR DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION TECilNIQUES.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082. REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B9 OF B65 DCA~ NO./REV ' BLDG ELEV. ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES. ! . AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) ' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46. . '! ! FIRE SCllEMES . B65) ZONE ; 102931/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE < ' OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WilERE A !' 4" VD LINE PREVENTS FULLTillCKNESS

'                                                                                                                                              330-1 PANEL INSTALLATION ON TOP OF TIIE TRAY.                                   .,                                ,

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL i1-1, 12-1, 1-5, 54 ON TOP OF TRIM, WITli TillCKNESS 12-2, 13-1, REDUCED AS REQUIRED TO AVOID TIIE VD 14-1,15-1 LINE. A SECOND TIIICKNESS OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL IS TO BE USED IN TIIE IMMEDIATE I AREA OF TIIE INTERFERENCE, INSTALLED

,                                                                                                                                              BENEATil TIIE REDUCED PORTION AND ATTACHED.

6 'l i i I t _..mm _..__. _.- . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___._ _.___-_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -_r.

ATFACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B10 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-i

FIRE SCllEMES B65) l ZONE i

j 102932/5 AS SG 810' 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE l MODIFIED BY BETWEEN 30" WIDE CABLE TRAY BOTTOM DCN 5742 REV. I AND INSULATED 2" DIA. PIPE TO INSTALL (MINOR PANELS IN LOCALIZED AREA OF TRAY MODIFICATION BOTTOM. DCA 103912 ADDRESSES AN 93-125) INTERFERENCE TO Tile COVER. AGE ON Tile 103912/0 2" Cil LINE DIRECTLY BELOW Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY BY ANOTilER 2" Cil. ISSUE 2: REQUEST DIRECTION FOR PROTECTING CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN VERTICAL AND llORIZONTAL 30" WIDE TRAYS WIIICil BOTil REQUIRE PROTECTION. RESOLUTION 1: INTERRUPT 330-1 "V"- I-2, 11-1, 43 RIBBED PANEL COVERAGE ON TRAY 12-1, 12-2, BOTTOM IMMEDIATELY AT PIPING 13-1, 14-1, INTERFERENCE AND INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 15-1 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER CABLES. OVERLAP 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE ON TRAY l BOTTOM BY 9"-11". WRAP PIPING WITil 330-70 CERAMIC BLANKET TilEN WITil STAINLESS STEEL JACKET. FINALLY, WRAP j 2 LAYERS OF 330-660 AROUND Tile STAINLESS STEEL JACKET SECURE TO Tile 330-1 PANELS ON TRAY UNDERSIDE AND l BUTT ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANELS UP TO Tile FLEXI-BLANKET AND BAND TO TRAY. FILL GAPS WITil TROWEL GRADE. MODIFY Tile COVERAGE ON Tile 2" Cil LINE JUST BELOW Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY SO TilAT PIPE INSULATION CAN BE INSTALLED ON Tile 2ND Cil PIPE (DCA 103912)

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ; UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE Bil OF B65 ~ DCA NO./REV BLDG' ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP.' DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT; . BASIS / NOTES .. l AREA /- (Y/N) (Y/N) ' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-- , FIRE - SCilEMES - B65)~ ZONE 102932/5 RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL A BOX l-2, 10-1, 43

CONFIGURATION WHICII INCLUDES 2 12-1, 12-2, (CONT'D)

LAYERS INSTALLED CONSISTENT WITH 13-1, 14-1, ! DOUBLE LAYER COVERAGE ON JBs. ALL 15-1 I JOINTS ON BOTH LAYERS ARE EITHER TIE - WIRED TOGETIIER OR UTILIZE Tile SCORE "

AND FOLD METiiOD THEN UPGRADED WITil STRESS SKIN. Tile FIRST LAYER BOTTOM PANEL IS TIE WIRED TO Tile TRAY l

RUNGS AND TIIE FIRST LAYER COVERAGE i ' IS ATTACHED TO Tile WALL WITil SELF l TAPPING SCREWS. l 103001/0 SG 885' 2-109B 2SK17C Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN 330-1 PRESIIAPE CONDUIT SECTIONS (1/4*,1/2-) AND WALL, t ! PREVENTING PROPER INSTALLATION OF ; i FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAP AT RIGID CONDUIT / FLEX CONDUIT INTERFACE. ! i RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET II-1 1-5, 28 WRAP WilERE POSSIBLE. BUTT FLEXI-BLANKET AGAINST WALL AND PROVIDE A j TROWEL GRADE FILLET. ; 1 i 4 P

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B12 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

TEST AREA / (Y/N) -(Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION (PAGES B46--

FIRE SCHEMES B65) ZONE 103013/6 SG 810' 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROPS FROM A BANK OF EMBEDDED SLEEVES ENTER 3 IIORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS ABOVE 2 SW PIPING RUNS. Tile CABLES TilEN EXIT TilESE TRAY SEGMENTS AND AIR DROP DOWN INTO A IlORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY RUN BELOW Tile SW PIPING. FINALLY, PROTRUDING NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR DROP OUT OF Tile END OF TIIE BOTTOM TRAY. ENGINEERING DIRECTION IS REQUIRED FOR TIIIS CONFIGURATION. RESOLUTION: WRAP Tile CABLE AIR l-2, 11-1, 1-6, 10 DROPS FROM Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES TO 12-1, 12-2, Tile CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS WITH 330-660 13-1, 14-1, FLEXI-BLANKET. INSTALL 330-1 PANEIS ON 15-1 Tile TRAY SEGMENTS PER SPEC. REQUIREMENTS. CONSTRUCT A 12" WIDE BY 43" LONG BY 6" lilGil " CURB" VERTICAL EXTENSION OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ON Tile LOWER ELEVATION TRAY. WRAP Tile AIR DROP CABLE BUNDLES BETWEEN Tile UPPER ELEVATION TRAY SEGMENTS WITil 330460 AND EMBED WITillN Tile CURB EXTENSION OF Tile TRAY ENVELOPE WITil 330460 TROWEL GRADE. WRAP Tile PROTRUDING CABLES AT Tile TRAY END WITil 330-660.

m - ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B13 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG' 'ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE ' SCllEMES - B65)' ZONE 103046/2 SG 810' '2-082 2SB8 Y Y ISSUE: Tile NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS FROM AN ESSENTIAL TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED WITil TilERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE Tile AIR DROPS RUN PARALLEL ALONG Tile TOP OF Tile TRAY PREVENTING Tile COMPLETE WRAPPING OF . Tile AIR DROP WITil 330-660 FLEXI-l BLANKET BECAUSE OF TIIE INTERFERENCE BY Tile 330-1 PANELS ON TOP OF Tile TRAY. ALSO STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED BECAUSE TilERE ARE 3 AIR l DROPS TOO CLOSE TOGETilER AND TOO NEAR TIIE EDGE OF Tile TRAY. RESOLUTION: WRAP Tile CABLE BUNDLES 11-1 1-5, 45 , TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE BUTTING Tile r FLEXI-BLANKET TO Tile 330-1 PANEL ON TOP OF Tile TRAY BANDING Tile BUNDLES I IN PLACE AND TO Tile TRAY. TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP SIIALL BE INSTALLED AT Tile FLEXI-BLANKET 330-1 INTERFACE. i Tile INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES FOR Tile LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SilALL BE INSTALLED TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE. Tills AFFECTS ABOUT 2' LONG AREA ON TOP Tile TRAY AND STILL MAINTAINS AT LEAST I-1/2" OVERLAP OF Tile JOINT AND A M AXIMUM TIE WIRE i SPACING OF 10".

ATTACliMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B14 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN). CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCIIEMES B65) ZONE 103056/1 SB 832' 2-094 2SB15 Y Y ISSUE: FLEX CONDUIT llAS NUMEROUS OBSTRUCTIONS WilERE IT PENETRATES TilROUGli A BLOCKOUT WillCII PREVENTS TIIE INSTALLATION OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO TIIE CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: A BOX WAS BUILT AROUND 11-1, 1-2 1-6, 61 Tile FLEX CONDUlT AT Tile WALL AND EXTENDED OUT PAST Tile INTERFERENCES SO TilAT TIIERMO-LAG CAN BE INSTALLED ON Tile FLEX CONDUIT. Tile BOX WAS CONSTRUCTED OF 330-1 PANELS AND FILLED WITil TROWEL GRADE SO TliERE IS A MINIMUM OF 3/4" OF CCVPRAGE ON TIIE 2" DIA. FLEX CONDUIT. WilERE Tile FLEX CONDUITS EXIT TIIE BOX, CONDUIT liALF ROUNDS ARE INSTALLED, TIIEN A COMBINATION OF flALF ROUNDS AND FLEXI-BLANKET. Tile 2" DIA. FLEX CONDUIT AT Tile CONCRETE WALL IS PROVIDED WITil 3 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET TO TIIE EXTENT POSSIBLE, TilEN BUTTED TO Tile WALL WITil TROWEL GRADE IN AIR GAPS AND AT FLEXI-BLANKET TO WALL INTERFACES. 103061/1 SG 832' 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUEST INSTALLATION DETAll FOR ADJACENT CONDUIT PRESilAPE/FLEXI-BLANKET INTERFACE WITil INADEQUATE SEPARATION. RESOLUTION: DEVELOP TYPICAL DETAILS 11-1 1-5,40 7-7, 7-7.1.

l ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BIS OF B65 i DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-l FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103184/1 SG 832' 2-088 2SB/144 Y Y ISSUE 1: DCA 103184/1. CONGESTION AT 103192/1 JUNCTION BOX JB2S5312G AND CONDUITS l 103681/1 DUE TO FIRE ZONE "R" CABLES AND OTilER PROTRUDING ITEMS INTERFERES WITH PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. (NOTE: Tills DCA WAS SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681) ISSUE 2: DCA 103192/1. CLOSE PROXIMITY OF FIRE ZONE "R* CABLES TO CONDUIT ENTRANCE TO JUNCTION BOX JB2S5386G INTERFERES WITil PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. (NOTE: Tills DCA WAS SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681) ISSUE 3: CLEARANCE BETWEEN JUNCTION BOXES JB2S5312G AND JB2S5386G (SEE ISSUED 1 AND 2 ABOVE) DOES NOT ALLOW INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS OVER 330-1 FLAT PANEL RESOLUTION 1,2 & 3: FIRE STOP Tile FIRE 1-2, 10-1, I-5, 38 ZONE "R" CABLE AT BOTil JUNCTION 10-2, 11-1, BOXES. PROTECT BOTil JUNCTION BOXES 12-1, 12-2, WITil COMMON ENCLOSURE. 13-1, 14-1, 15-1

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B16 OF B65 DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST (PAGES B46-AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) ScilEMES - B65) FIRE ZONE [ SG 832' 96 SE16 Y Y ISSUE: Tile SUPPORT FRAME TO PROVIDE 103277/1 COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CABLES FROM TWO CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS TO A JUNCTION BOX CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-4 DUE TO Tile UNIQUE CONFIGURATION AND Tile LACK OF ADEQUATE ATTACilMENT POINT AT Tile 4 JUNCTION BOX. i1-1 1-5, 44 RESOLUTION: FABRICATE TWO METAL SLEEVES WillCil ARE ATTACilED TO Tile JUNCTION BOX WillCil WILL ALLOW TIIE SUPPORT FRAMING TO BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAll 7-4. TilEN Tile TilERMO-LAG CAN BE INSTALLED FOR PER TYPICAL DETAll 7-3. 103305/I SB 83. 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP CABLE RADIUS FROM CONDUlT TO CABLE TRAY IS TOO TIGitT TO WRAP WITil FLEXI-BLANKET. RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT BOX ON CABLE 10-1, 11-1 1-5, 62 TRAY AND CONSTRUCT TEE SECTION AT CONDUIT, TilEN WRAP FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLES IN BETWEEN.

ATTACllh1ENT B ER-hie-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B17 OF B63 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRllTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103406/1 SB 852' 103 2SE18 Y Y ISSUE: Tills IS A SITUATION WilERE Tile ARRANGEhiENT DOES NOT ALLOW FOR Tile COVERAGE OF AN AIR DROP FROM A CONTAINMENT PENETRATION TO A CABLE TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: A SLEEVE IS INSTALLED IN 11-1 1-5, 44 TIIE END OF TIIE TRAY SO TIIAT TIIE l SUPPORT FRAME CAN BE INSTALLED IN A M ANNER CONSISTENT WITil DETAIL 7-4. AN ELASTOMER FIRE SEAL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN Tile SLEEVE AND TRAY TO !{0LD Tile SLEEVE IN PLACE AND PROVIDE A POINT FOR ATTACilMENT. TIIE FRAMING IS TilEN COVERED WITil FLEXI-BLANKET CONSISTENT WITil Tile SPECIFICATION AND DETAIL 7-3. 103408/l AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE 1: DUE TO PROTRUDING AIR DROP FROM TRAY TIIE BOX FOR ESSE.iTIAL CONDUIT CANNOT BE INSTALLED. ISSUE 2: DUE TO PROXIMITY OF CONDUlTS AND TRAY, CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TO INSTALL DIFFERENT BOX. RESOLUTION 1 & 2: INSTALL BOX PER l-5, 55 DETAIL 12-2.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME482, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BI8 OF B65 ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCilEMES B65) ZONE 103409/5 SG 852' 2-100F 2SK/17A Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLATION OF REMOVABLE COVER ASSEMBLY FOR PRESSURE TRANSMITTER. RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT A STEEL 10-1, 11-1 1-6, 11 FRAMEWORK AROUND Tile l'T AS SilOWN USING I 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 1/4" ANGLE IRON. PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF FLAT 330-1 PANELS AROUND Tile FRAMEWORK AND SECURE WITil TIE WIRES. ALL JOINTS SilALL BE STITCHED AND REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. Tl{E

                                                    " BOX" ENCLOSURE SilALL BE FITFED WITII A DOUBLE LAYER LIP ASSEMBLY TO RECEIVE AND llOLD Tile COVER ASSEMBLY IN PLACE. Tile COVER SHALL AIJSO BE FABRICATED WITil 2 LAYERS OF PANELS.

Tile MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GAP BETWEEN COVER AND LIP SIIALL BE 3/32". SECURE Tile COVER WITl1 TURNBUCKLE ASSEMBLIES. COVER Tile PROTRUDING FLEX-CONDUIT WITil FLEXI-BLANKET AND COVER Tile TUBING WITil CONDUIT IIALF ROUND AND FILL WITil CERAMIC FIBER. i

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B19 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCilEMES B65) ZONE 103472/1 AND AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS 103489/1 BOTil AS DIRECTION FOR MULTIPLE CABLE AIR MODIFIED BY DROPS TilROUGli EMBEDDED CONDUITS DCN 5745 REV.1 (SLEEVES) WIllCH ENTER llORIZONTALLY (MINOR STACKED CABLE TRAYS ROUTED MODIFICATION IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF Tile SLEEVES. 93-123) RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT TilERMO-LAG l-2, 10-1, 1-6, 12 330-1 PANEL ~ BOX" ENCLOSURES TO 12-1, 12-2, ENVELOPE Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVE BANK, 13-1, 14-I. ALL CADLE AIR DROPS AND Tile PORTIONS 15-1 OF Tile STACKED CABLE TRAYS IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF Tile SLEEVE BANK. ADD A SECOND LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG TO TIIE ~ BOX" UTILIZING "V"-RIBBED PAN ELS. UPGRADE JOINTS PER TYP. J-BOX REQUIREMENTS. BUTT COVERAGE TO TUBE STEEL AND SPRINKLER PIPE INTERFERENCES SEALING OFF OPENINGS IN COVERAGE WITil TROWEL GRADE OR PANELS. 103486/0 EC 778' X-I ISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TYPICAL DETAILS FOR ADJACENT FLEX CONDUITS WITil INADEQUATE SEPARATION. RESOLUTION: DEVELOP TYPICAL DETAILS 11-1 1-5, 39 8-4.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082. REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B20 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRif410N/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT DASIS/ NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103407/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21B Y Y ISSUE: A VERTICAL CABLE TRAY IS INSTALLED 3" FROM Tile WALL. TWO CABLE BUNDLES EXIT Tile TRAY AND ENTER 2 SLEEVES EMBEDDED IN TIIE CEILING. REQUEST DIRECTION FOR COVERAGE. ALSO, AN INSTRUMENT LINE CROSSES UNDER TIIE TRAY WITil A 1/2" CLEARANCE UNDER TIIE TRAY SIDE RAILS. RESOLUTION: COVER Tile TRAY PER l-2. 12-1, 1-6, 37 TYPICAL DETAIL 13-2 SECURED TO TIIE 12-2, 13-1, WALL WITil IIILTI BOLTS PER DETAIL I-5. 14-1,15-1 COVER Tile INSTRUMENT LINE AND TUBE TRACK FOR 9" DISTANCE (MIN.) AS PROTRUDING ITEM. ALL JOINTS OF TIIE ' BOX CONFIGURATION AND FLARE OUT (FOR lilLTI ATTACllMENT) SliALL BE REINFORCED WITil TIE WIRES (TilROUGli STRESS SKIN) AND OVERLAPPED WITil EXTERNAL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. I

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B21 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG- ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCilEMES B65) ZONE 103533/0 AB 790' X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE 1: UPPER CABLE TRAY INTERFERES WITII INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP ENVELOPE FROM LOWER CABLE TRAY TO CONDUIT. ISSUE 2: INSTRUMENT TUBING TRAY INTERFERES WITH CONDUIT SUPPORT THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION FOR 9" RULE (i.e., < 7/16" CLEARANCE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF SUPPORT AND TOP OF INSTRUMENT TUBING TRAY - TillCKNESS DEVIATION). RESOLUTION 1: MODIFY UPPER CABLE l-2, 9-1, I-5, 25 TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE BY 10-1, 10-2, REMOVING 8-1/2" TO 11-1/2" LENGTII OF 12-1, 12-2, PANEL ACROSS ENTIRE BOTTOM WIDTH OF 13-1,14-1, ENCLOSURE. INSTALL PROTECTIVE 15-1 ENVELOPE ON CONDUIT. SillM SOUTilERN MOST PORTION OF CABLE TRAY ENCLOSURE = 3/4" TO l-1/4" PAST END OF CONDUIT ENCLOSURE. BOX IN AIR DROP BETWEEN UPPER AND LOWER CABLE TRAY. BOX COMMUNICATES UPPER AND LOWER CABLE TRAY VIA 8-1/2" TO 11-1/2" OPENING. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL STANDARD 9-1, 10-1, 1-5, 26 THERMO-LAG COVERAGE EXCEPT DOUBLE 10-2 LAYER 330-1 PANELS ON BOTTOM OF SUPPORT.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B22 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM- FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

                                                        . AREA / (Y/N)   (Y/N)  CONCERN / RESOLUTION                                                    TEST       (PAGES B46-FIRE                                                                                           SCilEMES  B65)

ZONE 103550/1 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED , DIRECTION ON Tile COVERAGE OF AIR DROP WillCll INCLUDES 3 TRAYS. ISSUE 2: PIPE INTERFERES WITil PROPER INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE FOR CACLE TRAY. RESOLUTION I & 2: AIR DROPS BEDVEEN Il-1 1-5, 27 ESSENTIAL TRAYS ARE WRAPPED WITli FLEXI-BLANKET, INSTALLED IN FIRE STOP M ATERIAL WITillN CABLE TRAY, WITil 330-1 PANEL CAP INSTALLED IN END OF CABLE TRAYS. CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN VICINITY OF PIPE

INTERFERENCE IS MODIFIED BY INSTALLING 330-1 PANELS INSIDE CABLE TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITil UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B23 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103551/2 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: THIS DCA DEALS WITH 4 SEPARATE PROBLEMS:

PROBLEM i HAS A SUPPORT ROD WHICH INTERFERES WITH THE COVERAGE ON Tile SIDE OF AN ESSENTIAL TRAY.
PROBLEM 2 IIAS AN INSULATED PIPE WilICH INTERFERES WITil THE COVERAGE ON Tile SIDE OF AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, TRAY SPLICE PLATES WHICil EXTEND ABOVE AND BELOW TRAY WHICII INTERFERES WITil TRAY COVERAGE, ESSENTIAL CABLES ABOVE THE TRAY SIDE RAILS WilERE TRAY GOES DOWN UNDER CONCRETE BEAM AND A GROUNDING CABLE WillCll INTERFERES WITil COVERAGE AND UNIT I FLEXI-BLANKET INTERFERES WITil TRAY COVERAGE.
PROBLEMS 3 AND 4 liAVE UNIT I TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON PROTRUDING CABLE TRAY SUPPORT WHICil INTERFERES WITil Tile COVERAGE ON A UNIT 2 TRAY.

ALSO A 1-1/2" FW LINE INTERFERES WITil COVERAGE ON Tile PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON Tile TRAY SUPPORT STEEL.

ATTACliMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B24 OF B65 D C A N O./R E V BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103551/2 RESOLUTION: 1-2, 12-1, 1-5, 66 (CONT'D) 12-2, 13-1, PROBLEM 1: BUTT TRAY COVERAGE UP TO 14-1,15-1 Tile ROD AND INSTALL AN ADDITIONAL PANEL ON Ti1E SIDE OVER Tile ROD. INSTALL 1/2" TIIICK CONDUIT liALF ROUNDS CUT DOWN TO FIT TIGIIT TO Tile ROD ABOVE AND BELOW Tile TRAY EXTENDING 5" TO 6" PAST TRAY COVERAGE. USE STRESS SKIN TO REINFORCE liALF ROUND TO TRAY INTERFACE. FILL ALL AIR GAPS WITil TROWEL GRADE. PROBLEM 2: CUT DOWN SPLICE PLATES AND RELOCATE GROUNDING CABLE TO ALLOW FOR STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE CUT BACK INSULATION ON TIIE PIPE TO TIIE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO GIVE AS MUCll ROOM AS POSSIBLE FOR INSTALLING TiiERMO-LAG. COMPENSATE FOR MINOR COVERAGE REDUCTION llY INSTALLING ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANELS INSIDE Tile TRAY. COVER CABLES LOCATED ABOVE Tile TRAY BY EXTENDING TRAY COVERAGE USING DOUBLE TIIICK COVERAGE ON TiiE SIDES TIE WIRED TOGETilER. COMPENSATE FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE IN A COUPLE OF AREAS BY TIE WIRING TOGETIIER Tile LONG!TUDINAL JOINTS. BUTT UNIT 2 T11ERMO-LAG TO UNIT I FLEXI-BLANKET.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B25 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCHEMES B65) ZONE 103551/2 PROBLEMS 3 AND 4: REMOVE Tile UNIT I (CONT'D) TilERMO-LAG AS NECESSARY TO GET STANDARD COVERAGE ON TIIE UNIT 2 COMMODITY TilEN REINSTALL UNIT I THERMO-LAG . INSTALL COVERAGE ON THE SUPPORT STEEL AS CLOSE TO TiiE FW LINE AS POSSIBLE REDUCING TillCKNESS AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE AN AIR GAP. INSTALL A SECOND LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG IN Tills AREA TO COMPENSATE FOR THE REDUCED TillCKNESS. I 103567/l SB 790' 2-070 2SB4 Y Y ISSUE: PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR CABLE AIR DROP FROM CABLE TRAY T23GSCE01 TO THE WALL PENETRATION. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 'V" RIB 11-1 1-6, 52 PANEL ON CABLE TRAY T23GSCE01 AND ON THE CABLE TRAY PROTRUDING FROM THE WALL PENETRATION AT COLUMN 9-A. WRAP THE CABLE AIR DROP IN TWO LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET PER DETAIL 5-12.

ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B26 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCliEMES B65) ZONE 103575/0 AS AB 832' X-226 AA21d Y N ISSUE 1: TiiERMO-LAG COVERAGE IS MODIFIED BY REQUIRED ON CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM DCN 5727 (MINOR CABLE TRAY T240ADA79 TO T240AF003. MODIFICATION 93-124) ISSUE 2: A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IS LOCATED WITillN A 9" DISTANCE OF ESSENTIAL TRAY T-240ADA78. RESOLUTION 1: CONSTRUCT A BOX FROM 1-2, 10-1, I-6, 24 TRAY T240ADA79 TO T240AF003 12-1, 12-2, ENCOMPASSING Tile CABLE AIR DROPS. 13-1, 14-1, INSTALL A FIRE STOP AT Tile END OF 15-1 TRAY T240AF003 TO PROVIDE A SEALED ENCLOSURE. ADD A SECOND LAYER TO TIIE " BOX" PER TIIE REQUIREMENTS FOR JBs. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL TIIERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITII TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1. 103582/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: TWO SPRINKLER llEADS PREVENT PROPER INSTALLATION OF Bort'OM PANEL FOR CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD l-2, 12-1, I-5, 31 ON BOTTOM OF CABLE TRAY AND INSIDE 12-2, 13-1. CABLE TRAY. CilAMFOR BOTTOM BOARD 14-1, 15 i TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF FLAT BOARD AROUND Tile SPRINKLER llEAD. 103589/0 AUX 831'- X-219 AA/21D Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION IS UNABLE TO 6" INSTALL TiiERMO-LAG ON 24" WIDE CABLE TRAY PER SPEC. DUE TO KELLUM GRIPS A INSTALLED ON CABLES. RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE TRAY AREA AND l-2, 12-1, I-5, 70 KELLUM GRIPS WlilCli EXTEND ABOVE 12-2, 13-1 SIDE RAILS. 14-1,15-1

ATTACllhiENT B ER-hie-082, REV 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B27 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV- ROOh! FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES - AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEhlES - B65) ZONE { 103600/2 SB 810' 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION FOR VERTICAL CABLE TRAY j AND AIR DROPS AT CEILING IS NOT COMPLETE DUE TO RECESSED SPARE EMBEDDED SLEEVE. ) RESOLUTION: FILL RECESS OF SPARE l-2, 12-1, 1-6,53 SLEEVE WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FLUSil 12-2, 13-1, WITli BARRIER SURFACE. EXTEND 14-1,15-1 TilERMO-LAG OVER AIR DROP TO BARRIER. UPGRADE ALL JOINTS WITil STRESS SKIN, STAPLES AND STITCIIING, FLANGE l TilERMO-LAG TO WALL OR CEILING USING SCORE AND FOLD METilOD AND lilLTI l BOLT PER DETAll 1-5. Tile BARRIER TilAT l IS NOT lilLTI BOLTED OR M AY BE BUTTED 1 TO THE BARRIER WITli DETAIL 11-7. I l

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B28 OF B65 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE AREA / (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-(YIN) FIRE SCllEMES B65) Z.ONE l 103624/2 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM 3 TilROUGil WALL SLEEVES (DVS) LOCATED IN A BANK OF SLEEVES CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO INSUFFICIENT ROOM, CABLE RIGIDITY AND Tile QUICK REDUCTION IN SIZE FROM EACil OF Tile TWS TO Tile AIR DROP BUNDLES. 1-5, 35 0 RESOLUTION: REMOVE A CABLE TRAY 11-1 RUNG WilERE Tile AIR DROP FROM Tile EXTENDED LENGTil WALL SLEEVE ENTERS TilROUGil Tile BOTTOM OF TIIE CABLE TRAY TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SLACK ON Tile CABLES SO TilAT FLEXI-BLANKET CAN BE INSTALLED ON Tile AIR DROP IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS. COVER Tile EXTENDED LENGTil SLEEVE WITil 330-1 CONDUIT IIALF ROUNDS. INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET ON TIIE OTilER 2 ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS AND EXTEND (l COVERAGE INTO Tile END OF Tile TRAY FAR ENOUGil SO TilAT A FIRE STOP CAN BE INSTALLED AROUND Tile FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED BUNDLES IN Tile TRAY. BUTT COVERAGE OF ALL 3 AIR DROPS TO Tile TWS TilEN ADD A FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR WHICH COMPLETELY COVERS THE 2 SHORT TWS AND OVERLAPS 2" TO 4" ON Tile 330-1 COVERAGE ON Tile LONG SLEEVE AND THE FLEXI-BLANKET COVERAGE ON ALL 3 AIR DROPS. _ _ _ - - n I

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B29 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRt! SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103634/2 SG 810' 2-083 2SD/9 Y N ISSUE: EXISTING CONFIGURATION OF 2 LARGE ADJACENT J-BOXES DOES NOT ALLOW BANDING TO BE WRAPPED CIRCUMFERENTIALLY AROUND BOXES FOR ADDITION OF SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANE 13. RESOLUTION: ATTACII BANDING ~"O STEEL 10-1, 10-2, 1-6, 13 ANGLE WillCII SHALL BE BOLTED TO Tile l-2, 14-1 WALL ABOVE AND BELOW Tile J-BOXES. 103670/0 AB 810' 207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: Tile IIVAC OVER Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY WAS TOO CLOSE TO ALLOW TIIE INSTALLATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON Tile TRAY. RESOLUTION: Tile IIVAC WAS TRIMMED l-2, 11-1, I-5, 51 SUFFICIENTLY TO ALLOW STANDARD 12-1, 12-2, COVERAGE BY 330-1 PANELS ON Tile TRAY 13-1,14-1 WilERE Tills COULD BE DONE. AT Tile IIVAC SUPPORT TIIE TRAY WAS NOTCIIED. THE RESULT WAS TilAT A 4' LONG AREA REQUIRED UNIQUE COVERAGE. FLAT PANELS WERE USED IN TIIE AREA WITil ALL JOINTS EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR STITCllED WITil TIE WIRE. TilERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT ROOM TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON Tile LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. ALSO IN Tile AREA WilERE TIIE TRAY IS NOTCilED Tile CABLES ARE NEAR Tile TilERMO-LAG 330-1 1 PANEL COVERAGE SO A 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IS INSTALLED BETWEEN Tile PANEL AND THE CABLES TO ENSURE TilAT TilERE IS SEPARATION.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B30 OF B65 SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF. CONCERN / RESOLUTION - TEST (PAGES B46-AREA / (Y/N)- (YIN) SCllEMES B65) FIRE ZONE AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 103680/1 AS BEDVEEN WALL SLEEVES AND BOTTOM OF MODIFIED BY JUNCTION BOX PREVENTS INSTALLATION DCN 5745 REV. I OF PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN (MINOR ACCORDANCE WITli STANDARD DETAILS. MODIFICATION 93-123) ISSUE 2: OVER FILL OF CABLES AT END OF TRAY FROM TilROUGil WALL SLEEVES (TWS) PREVENT INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN ACCORDANCE WITil STANDARD DETAILS. RESOLUTION I & 2: PROTECT CABLE TRAY, 1-2, 10-1, I-5, 34 TWS, AND JUNCTION BOXES AS COMMON 12-1, 12-2, ENCLOSURE. PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 330-1 13-1, 14-1, PANELS PER TIIE JUNCTION BOX 15-1 COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS. AB 832' 219 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM 103701/0 AS CEILING SLEEVES TO IlORIZONTAL CABLE MODIFIED BY TRAY CANNOT BE WRAPPED PER TYPICAL DCN 5727 REV. I DETAILS DUE TO INADEQUATE CLEARANCE (MINOR BETWEEN SLEEVES AIR DROP CABLE MODIFICATION ARRAY AND INTERFERENCE FROM A FIRE 93-124) PROTECTION SPRINKLER PIPE. RESOLUTION: MOVE Ti1E FIRE l-2, 10-1, I-5, 69 PROTECTION PIPE AND INSTALL A BOX 12-1, 12-2, AROUND Tile AIR DROP EXTENDING FROM 13-1, 14-1, TIIE CEILING DOWN Tile TRAY. ADD A 15-1 SECOND LAYER TO Tile BOX ACCORDANCE WITil Tile REQUIREMENTS FOR JBs. filLTI-BOLT Ti1E FIRST LAYER TO Tile CEILING AND SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRE TOGETilER ALL JOINTS AND REINFORCE WITil STRESS SKIN.

                                                      ^
      . - _ _                                                                              I

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-032, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B31 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCHEMES B65) ZONE 103740/1 AB 790' 180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: TIIERE ARE 4 DIFFERENT OBSTRUCFIONS TO STANDARD COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. THERE IS AN llVAC FLANGE AND A FLANGE ON A FIRE PROTECFION PIPE WHICH EXTEND INTO THE TRAY. THERE IS AN HVAC SUPPORT TOO CLOSE TO THE TOP OF Tile TRAY TO ALLOW COVERAGE AND TilERE IS AN HVAC FLANGE WillCil INTERFERES WITH SPLICE PLATE COVERAGE. RESOLUTION: WHERE THE FIRE l-2, 9-1, 11,58 PROTECTION PIPE FLANGE EXTENDS 10-1, 10-2, BELOW THE TOP OF THE TRAY Tile V-RIB 11-1, 12-1, BOARD IS CUT OUT AROUND THE FLANGE, 12-2, 13-1. FLAT PANEL IS INSTALLED BELOW THE V- 14-1 RIB PANEL, OVERLAPPING THE V-RIB PANEL AND SHIMS ARE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE V-RIB AND FLAT PANELS IF REQUIRED TO CLEAR Tile FLANGE. ALL JOINTS ARE STITCllED WITil TIE WIRE AND UPGRADED WITH STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE. PREBANDS ARE MODIFIED TO SUPPORT PANEL ARRANGEMENT. WilERE THE HVAC SUPPORT SPANS THE TRAY JUST ABOVE THE SIDE RAILS WHERE THICKNESS OF COVERAGE CANNOT BE ATTAINED, TROWEL GRADE IS APPLIED TilEN 330-1 PANELS ARE INSTALLED ON THE INSIDE OF THE TRAY AND OUT IN ALL DIRECTIONS SO THE METAL TRAY IS COVERED PER THE 9" RULE. INBETWEEN THE TRAY RAILS, A 330-1 PANEL WAS INSTALLED BELOW THE TOP OF THE TRAY AND BELOW THE ANGLE IRON AND STITCHED TO THE PANEL COVERING THE ,

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B32 OF B65 DCA NO./REV . BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103740/1 TOP OF TiiE TRAY. WIIERE TiiE ilVAC CONT'D ANGLE EXTENDS INTO TiiE TRAY, FLAT PANEL IS INSTALLED BELOW THE V-RIB USING TIIE SAME METIIODOLOGY USED AT THE FIRE PROTECTION FLANGE. WiiERE TiiE IIVAC INTERFERES WITil Tile SPLICE PLATE COVERAGE THE COVERAGE WAS AClllEVED BY COVERING Tile SIDE WITH FLAT PANEL NOTCilING Tile PANEL AND PLACING A PANEL BLOCK INSIDE Tile COVERAGE AT THE NOTCH TO MAINTAIN TIIICKNESS. 103792/0 AB 852' X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: GROUND CLAMP AND GROUND CABLE INSTALLED ON RADIAL BEN OF 4" CONDUIT INTERFERES WITil STRESS SKINTTROWEL GRADE UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS 9-1 1-5, 33 SKINrrROWEL GRADE BUILDUP ON RADIAL BEND TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE. WRAP STRESS SKIN ON GROUND CABLE, FLARE ! OUT ON RADIAL BEND, AND STAPLE / TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP STRESS SKIN. 103847/0 SG 832' 2-094 2SB15 Y Y ISSUE: AFTER INSTALLATION OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON JUNCTION BOXES, INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN JUNCTION BOXES FOR INSTALLATION OF 330-1 "V" RIBBED PANELS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL COMMON 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 32 ENVELOPE FOR BOTil JUNCTION BOXES.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-032, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B33 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPTJRT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103855/1 SB 832' 96 2SE16 Y Y ISSUE: TiiERE IS AN INTERFERENCE FROM A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT WilICll PREVENTS COVERAGE OF TIIE AIR DROP FROM Tile CONTAINMENT PENETRATION TO Tile CABLE TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITil STANDARD DETAILS 7-3 AND 7-4. RESOLUTION: PROVIDE SLEEVES AT BOTil 11-1 1-5, 44 TiiE CONTAINMENT PENETRATION AND AT TILE CABLE TRAY SO Tilt.T TIIERMO-LAG CAN BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS 7-1 AND 7-4. 103862/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: RADIAX CABLE INTERFERES WITil BOTTOM PANEL TifERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON CABLE TRAY T230ACG70, AND A COMPONENT COOLING WATER LINE INTERFERES WITilSIDE RAll COVERAGE ON CABLE TRAY T230ACG61. RESOLUTION: INSTALL A SLOTTED PANEL I-2, 9-1, I-5, 46 1 ON THE BOTTOM OF TRAY T230ACG70 TO 12-1, 12-2, ACCOMODATE Tile RADIAX CABLE. 13-1,14-1 INSTALL 330-1 PANEL ON TRAY BOTTOM OF TRAY OVER SLOT TO BLOCK ANY llEAT PATil. INSTALL NOTCilED SIDE PANEL TO ACCOMODATE 6-CC2-007-152-3. INSTALL 330-1 PANELS ON INSIDE OF TRAY ON SIDE RAIL.

     . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                      _           ~                                    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ATTACllMENT B ER-M E-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B34 OF B65 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103874/1 SG 810' 2-079 2SB/8 Y N ISSUE 1: DUE TO A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT INTERFERENCE, STANDARD JUNCrlON BOX SEAM UPGRADE CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISilED. ISSUE 2: DUE TO AIR DROPS ENTERING A CABLE TRAY, STANDARD CABLE TRAY SEAM UPGRADE CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISilED. RESOLUTION 1: CUT STRESS SKIN TO FIT 9-1, 10-1, 22 AROUND INTERFERING SUPPORT. 10-2, 11-1 INCREASE STRESS SKIN DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMPLISil BANDING. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET Il-1 22 COLLAR AND TROWEL GRADE / STRESS SKIN BUILDUP. 103884/1 AS AB 810' X-207 A A/21h Y N ISSUE: JB2A-301B AND CONDUlT C-24B41951 MODIFIED BY 832' X-226 AA/21d ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A NON-DCN 5745/1 ESSENTIAL TRAY AND VARIOUS OTilER (MINOR COMMODITIES. MODIFICATION 93-123) RESOLUTION: BOX IN CONDUlT AND TRAY l-2, 9-1, 1-6, 23 TOGETilER AND COVER ALL OTilER 10-1, 10-2 PROTRUDING COMMODITIES FOR A 12-1, 12-2, DISTANCE OF 9". ADD A SECOND LAYER 13-1, 14-1, TO Tile ~ BOX" PER Tile REQUIREMENTS 15-1 FOR JBs.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B35 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 103892/1 AB 852' X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS FOR TilERMO-LAG INSTALLATION DUE TO IIVAC DUCTS AND SUPPORTS, A TOTAL OF 13 INTERFERENCES. RESOLUTION: INTERFERENCE 1,2,9,1I l -2, 12- , 1-5, 56 AND 13 REQUIRED Tile INSTALLATION OF 12-2 330-1 FLAT BOARD TRIMMED TO ALLOW INSTALLATION BETWEEN TIIE CABLE TRAY AND IIANGER AND Tile IIVAC DUCT. ADD AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS FROM Tile AREA TilAT Tile FIRST REQUIRES MODIFYING. INTERFERENCE 3 REQUIRES Tile INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIB PANELS ON TIIE SIDE OF Tile TRAY unTil A 330-1 FLAT PANEL INSTALLED TO SPAN Tile SPLICE PLATE. INTERFERENCE 4 REQUIRES Tile INSTALLATION OF 330-1 ON Tile SIDE OF Tile TRAY IN Tile VICINITY OF Tile IIVAC llANGER. INTERFERENCE 5A REQUIRES TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE TO BE MODIFIED AT Tile CABLE TRAY IIANGER CROSS CilANNEL REQUIRING NOTClllNG OF Tile BOTTOM PANEL AND REQUIRES TIIE CABLE TRAY llANGER TO BE WRAPPED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM WilERE TIIE 2 X 2 ANGLE SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil Tile TOP COVER OF TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. INTERFERENCES 5B AND 7 ARE NOT PROBLEMS AND SilOULD NOT llAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED. INTERFERENCE 6 REQUIRES TIIE 330-1 PANEL ON Tile BOTTOM OF Tile TRAY TO

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 l UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B36 OF B65 l l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-l FIRE SCllEMES B65)

ZONE 103892/1 BE TRIMMED TO ALLOW FOR llVAC l CONT'D INTERFERENCE. WilERE TiiE PANEL llAS BEEN TRIMMED ADD A SECOND 330-1 FLAT PANEL TIE WIRED TO FIRST.

INTERFERENCE 8 REQUIRES INSTALLATION l OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL AT FP PIPE SUPPORT l

AND ADDING 2ND PANELS AROUND TIIE l INTERFERENCE IF Tile PANEL NEEDED TO l BE TRIMMED. INTERFERENCE 10 REQUIRES COVERAGE OF Tile IIVAC SUPPORT AS A ' PROTRUDING ITEM TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE BUTTING UP TO TiiE IIVAC DUCT. INTERFERENCE 12 REQUIRES Tile SAME MODIFICATION AS INTERFERENCE 3. 103935/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/2ili Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL DUE TO FLEX CONDUIT INTERFERENCE. IN ADDITION, FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP ENCLOSURE PER DETAIL 5-12 CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD l-2, 11-1, I-5, 30 ON SIDE RAll OF CABLE TRAY WilERE 12-1, 12-2, INTERFERENCE OCCURS. EXTEND 330-1 13-1. 14-1, PANEL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE 2" TO 4" 15-1 PAST END OF CABLE TRAY YO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP FLEXI-BLANKET.

ATTACllMENT B - ER-ME4)82, REV. 2 - UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B37 OF B65 i DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - AREA /' .(Y/N)~ (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-i FIRE - . SCllEMES : .B65) ZONE 104048/0. EC 778* X-IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: COLLAR AS REQUIRED AT AIR

DROP / CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INTERFACE CANNOT BE ISTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS.

1 , RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS 11-1 1-5, 29 SKINfrROWEL GRADE COLLAR AT INTERFACE; W11ERE STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED FLUSil WITil FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALL 11/16" WFT BUILDUP OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE. i 104060/0 EC 778* X-I ISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE CREATED BY INSTALLATION OF TiiERMO-LAG ON A CONDUIT PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANEL MATERIAL ON A J-BOX PER SPEC. J AND TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE STRESS SKIN 10-2 1-6, 17

SECURED TO 330-1 PANELS ON Tile J-BOX ,

AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP IN i LOCALIZED AREA OF IN7 ERFERENCE. i i I t i i i f i

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B38 OF B65 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 104078/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS ONE TIME DEVIATION FROM TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 TO UTILIZE FLAT 330-1 ON BOTTOM ON 12" WIDE CABLE TRAY FOR MAXIMUM LENGTII OF 24". ISSUE 2: WilILE USING DETAIL 8-3 TO INSTALL FLAT 330-1 PANEL ON Tile BOTTOM OF A SEPARATE TRAY, ONE END OF Tile PANEL BUTFS AGAINST A TRAY SUPPORT. CONSTRUCTION REQUEST , DIRECTION. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL FLAT PANELS TO 9-1, 10-2 1-6, 20 MAX. LENGTII OF 24" TO CLEAR 24" DIA. PIPE. t RESOLUTION 2: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PIECE OF FLAT PANEL (2" IIIGil) TO BUILD UP TillCKNESS AT SUPPORT AND SECURE IN PLACE Tile TIE WIRE 104087/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO CONDUlT SUPPORT AND PIPING INTERFERENCE TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE ON A 12" WIDE CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL 13-1 1-6, 16 PIECE ON TRAY SIDERAll AND EXTEND COVERAGE ONTO CONDUIT SUPPORT. ALSO, EXTEND TRAY ENVELOPE TO ENCLOSE INTERFERING PIPING FOR A DISTANCE OF 4" MIN. ON BOTil SIDES OF TRAY.

A'ITACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B39 OF B65 2 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROO1 FIRE !SUPP. DET. DESCRIFTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / -(Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCilEMES B65) ZONE _ l i l 104194/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: AIR DROPS FROM TilROUGH WALL SLEEVES (TWS) TO CABLE TRAY REQUIRE , PROTECTION. I ISSUE 2: INSUFFICIENT SPACE EXIST FOR AIR DROPS INTO TRAY. CANNOT INSTALL l DETAll 3-4. j ISSUE 3: P!PE WILL IIAVE 0" CLEARANCE AFTER PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE IS INSTALLED. RESOLUTION I & 2: BOX IN TWS WITil 1-2, 10-1, 1-5, 63 TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1, RESOLUTION 3: STRESS SKIN M AY NOT BE 15-1 ABLE TO BE INSTALLED DUE TO PIPE INTERFERENCE. I r t 1 t i

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B40 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YlN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE IM2M/0 AUX 790'- X-180 AA/21A Y Y ISSUE: NEED ENGINEERING DIRECrlON 6" FOR TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE AT TRANSITION POINT BEDVEEN 2 TRAYS (30" AND 24"). i RESOLUTION: ADD AN ADDITIONAL I-2, 14-1 1-5, 59 SUPPORT MEMBER TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR TilERMO-LAG FLAT PANEL UNDERNEATIl CABLES. UTILIZE 330-1 FLAT PANELS TO PROVIDE A TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE ACROSS TIIE AIR GAP BETWEEN Tile TWO TRAYS AND ENCLOSE CABLES. PROVIDE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET SillMS ON Tile BOTTOM PANEL TO PREVENT CABLES FROM CONTACTING BOTTOM PANEL BACK SIDE. INSTALL BANDING BEDVEEN EACli TRAY TO TifE GUIDE INSTALLED ON Tile NEW SUPPORT. TIIESE BANDS WILL SERVE AS AN INTERNAL FRAME WORK TO SUPPORTTIIE SIDE PIECES OF TiiE ENCLOSURE.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME482, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B41 OF B65 D C A N O./R E V BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCilEMES B65) ZONE 104217/2 AS AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: DUE TO CABLE FILL, AIR DROPS MODIFIED BY BEDVEEN TRAYS (PERPENDICULAR TO ONE DCN 5761 RE. I ANOTilER) CANNOT BE PROTECTED PER (MINOR STANDARD INSTALLATION DETAIL MODIFICATION 93-126) ISSUE 2: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTING BETWEEN WALL AND PROTECFED CONDUIT PREVENTS PROPER INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION 1: BOX IN AIR DROPS 1-2, 12-1, I-5,9 BETWEEN TRAYS AND INCLUDE AIR DROPS 12-2, 13-1, AS PART OF COMMON PROTECTIVE 14-1,15-1 ENVELOPE AT TRAY JUNCTION. ADD A SECOND LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG TO Tile

                                                                              ~ BOX" UTILIZING "V"-RIBBED PANELS PER JB COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL FIRST LAYER OF 11-1 1-5, 28 FLEXI-BLANKET COMPLETELY AROUND CONDUIT PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. REM AINING TWO LAYERS WILL BE MODIFIED TO BUTT-UP AGAINST WALL UNTIL ADEQUATE CLEARANCE EXISTS TO ALLOW FULL WRAP. ALL SEAMS, AS WELL AS Tile FLEXI-BLANKET / WALL INTERFACE, Sl!ALL llAVE A BUILDUP OF 11/16" WFT 330-660 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL.

! ATTACilh1ENT B ER-h1E-082, REV. 2 UN!QUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B42 OF B65 l DCA NO./REV BLDG- ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-l FIRE SCliEMES B65) ZONE 104222/3 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROPS BUNDLED WITII 330-660 M AY EXCEED llEIGliT OF CABLE SIDERAILS. ALSO, A PIPE SUPPORT IS WITillN 4" OF Tile CABLE TRAY SUPPORT AND TilUS CREATES A SECONDARY j INTERFERENCE TO Tile 9" RULE COVERAGE ON TiiE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE SillM BLOCKS TO l-2, 11-1, 1-6, 14 ( l RAISE AND LOWER TRAY ENVELOPE FROh! 12-1, 12-2, SIDE RAILS. SECURE 330-660 BUNDLES TO 13-1,14-1 CABLE TRAY RUNGS WITil BANDING. UTILIZE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE TO REINFORCE WHERE Tile FLEXI-BLANKET COVERED CABLES ENTER Tile TRAY COVERAGE. INSTALL DOUBLE LAYER OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS ON TRAY SUPPORT FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE. 104226/0 EC 788' X-IISB Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP BETWEEN CONDUlT AND TilROUGli WALL SLEEVE (TWS) WAS PREVIOUSLY PROTECTED AS PROTRUDING ITEM BUT IS ACTUALLY ESSENTIAL RESOLUTION: INSTALL A SMALL 330-1 11-1 1-5, 29 PANEL BOX AROUND A DVS AND BUILD STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE COLLAR WiiERE FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLES ENTER Tile BOX.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B43 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE EC 790' 113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: A LBD ON AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT l 104251/0 IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO AN ESSENTIAL JB AND BOTli ARE DIRECTLY UNDER A CONCRETE BEAM. ALSO A CONDUIT SUPPORT IS UP AGAINST Tile LBD. RESOLUTION: WRAP THE JUNCTION BOX, 9-1,10-1, 1-5, 67 LBD AND CONDUIT SUPPORT IN A COMMON 10-2 ENCLOSURE BUTTING UP TO Tile CONCRETE BEAM. COVERAGE IS TIIE SAME AS Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR JUNCTION BOXES WITil DOUBLE PANEL ENCLOSURE AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT OF JOINTS AND PENETRATING CONDUITS. BOX IS BUTTED TO CONCRETE BEAM IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURA" IONS PAGE B44 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPEORT BASIS /NmES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46 .. FIRE SCllEMES ,'B65) ZONE l 104257/1 AB 832' 226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR DROP OUT OF Tile BOTTOM OF A JB TilROUGil SilORT CONDUIT STUBS (APPROXIMATELY 3* LONG) PRESENTING A COVERAGE PROBLEM SINCE TYPICAL DETAILS ONLY ADDRESS RIGID AND FLEXIBLE CONDUIT COVERAGE. I RESOLUTION: FIRE STOP Tile CONDUIT 10-i, 10-2, 1-5, 65 STUBS EXTENDING INTO Tile JB TO OBTAIN 11-1, 12-2, REQUIRED DEPTil. INSTALL STANDARD 2 14-1 PANEL TillCK COVERAGE ON Tile JB. EXTEND TIIE COVERAGE ON Tile BOTTOM DOWN PAST Tile ENDS OF Tile SLEEVES USING TilERMO-LAG SillMS. INSTALL TROWEL GRADE TO SEAL OPENINGS BETWEEN PANELS AND BETWEEN PANELS AND SLEEVES AND TO FILL Tile END OF Tile SLEEVES. ATTACil Tile SECOND LAYER COVERAGE TO Tile WALL WITH lilLTI-BOLTS TO ALLEVIATE Tile EXTRA WEIGilT ON Tile JB. L

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-032, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B45 OF B65 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES B46-FIRE SCllEMES B65) ZONE 104265/0 EC 778' 113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT IS TOO CLOSE TO A NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AND LBD WilERE IT RUNS UNDER A CONCRETE BEAM TO ALLOW FOR STANDARD COVERAGE ON Tile CONDUlT. RESOLUTION: WRAP TIIE ESSENTIAL 9-1, 10-1, 1-5, 68 CONDUlT IN A COMMON ENCLOSURE WITil 10-2 Tile NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AND LBD. BUTF Tile BOX TO TFIE BEAM WilERE NECESSARY. CONSTRUCT T!!E BOX UTILIZING STANDARD LBD COVERAGE DETAILS AND STANDARD TilERMO-LAG TO CONCRETE INTERFACE DETAILS. STITCil JOINTS WITil TIIE TIE WIRES IN MINOR AREAS WilERE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE CANNOT BE USED. I

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ATTACllMENT B UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B46 OF B65 DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES GENERIC

1. CONTINUITY OF Tile M ATERI AL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

2. EFFECTIVE TillCKNESS OF TIIE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

3. Tile NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

4. Tile APPLICATION OR END USE OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

5. TIIE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

GENERIC

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR Tile PLANT CONFIGURATION WillCil WOULD ENilANCE Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECFLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SillELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATil, ETC.).

102471/3

7. Tile EFFECTIVE WIDTil OF Tile 2 TRAYS ACT AS A SINGLE 36' WIDE TRAY WillCll ll AS BEEN TESTED (15-1). TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION llAS STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT OF LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND BOTFOM BUTT JOINTS. Tile INSTALLED CONFIGURATION ll AS Tile SAME JOINT REINFORCEMENT PLUS TIE WIRING OF BOTFOM BUTT JOINTS AND Tile BOTTOM PANEL IS SECURED WITil TIE WIRES TO EVERY OTilER RUNG OF EAcil TRAY. ADDITION AL M ATERIAL INSIDE TIIE ENVELOPE (AT Tile SIDERAILS BETWEEN Tile TRAYS) AIDS IN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND TIIERM AL PROTECTION.

101282/1

8. TliE EFFECTIVENESS OF 2 LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS ON A JUNCTION BOX llAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED VIA SCilEME 10-1. Tile J-BOX IS MOUNTED TO A STRUCTURAL COLUMN WillCil REDUCES POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK. ALL JOINTS IIAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITil QUALIFIED TECilNIQUES (STITCllING AND STRESS SKIN).

ADDITIONAL TIE WIRES WERE USED TO SECURE PIECES TOGETilER FOR Tile COVER ASSEMBLY. Tile COVER FITS TIGIIT AT NORM AL TEMPERATURES (3/32" M AX. GAP) AND DUE TO EXPANSION OF Tile M ATERIAL DURING SUBLIM ATION AND CilAR LAYER FORM ATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. WILL COMPLETELY SEAL. Tile CONFIGURATION llAS MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME TilAN A TYPICAL J-BOX ENVELOPE WillCll WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. TilEREFORE, SINCE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND TilERM AL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED, Tile CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 102160/0

9. ALL JOINTS ON BOTil LAYERS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED AND TilEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS AS MOD.SKIN.

Tile CABLES DO NOT CONTACT TilERMO-LAG PANEL BACK SIDE SURFACES AND ARE WRAPPED WITil SILTEMP. BY DCNTile LARGE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME AND TilERM AL M ASS OF Tile CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITil Tile DEMONSTRATED 5742/0 PERFORMANCE OF 2 LAYERS OF TilERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS ON JUNCTION BOXES WILL M AINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE 104217/2 TEMPERATURES. TilEREFORE, Tile TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS OF TIIE CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN AS MOD. ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. Tile REDUCTION IN COVERAGE ON DCA 102160 AT Ti(E 10* SW PIPE IS COMPENSATED BY DCN BY Tile SilADOWING EFFECT RESTRICTING DIRECT FLAME IMPINGEMENT AND Tile ilEAT SINK PROVIDED BY Tile PIPE. 5746/1 I 1

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-OS2, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B47 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

10. TIIE USE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE AIR DROPS OF VARIOUS SIZES (FROM A SINGLE CABLE TO A LARGE 6" DIA. 103013/6 BUNDLE IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED VIA SCilEME 11-1. TIIE INTERFACE BEDVEEN CABLE BUNDLES ENTERING A IIORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE WAS ALSO QUALIFIED VIA SCllEME 11-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (!NCLUDING TilOSE TO CONSTRUCT Tile CURB EXTENSION) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY TEST. Tile INTERFACE OF THE 330-660 AROUND EMBEDDED SLEEVES HAS BEEN SECURED WITH BANDING AROUND THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECHANICAL ATTACilMENT AND LARGE " FILLET WELD" BUILDUP OF TROWEL GRADE 330-660 M ATERIAL FOR THERM AL PROTECTION.

THE M ATERIAL THICKNESSES AND APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN BOUNDED BY TEST. LARGER AIR DROP BUNDLES (> 6" DIA.) ARE LESS THERMALLY DEMANDING (DUE TO CABLE BUNDLE MASS) TIIAN THOSE TESTED. ADDITIONALLY TIIE CONCRETE WALL LIMITS POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND liAS IIEAT SINK EFFECTS AT EMBEDDED SLEEVE INTERFACES. Ti1EREFORE. TIIE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND TilERMAL ASPECTS OF Tile CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.

11. PROTECTION OF Tile FLEX CONDUIT ASSOCIATED WITil THE PT liAS BEEN QUALIFIED VIA SCllEME 11-1 WillCil USED 3 103409/5 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PROTECT A SINGLE CABLE AIR DROP. THIS PT CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO Tile REMOVABLE COVER J-BOX ENCLOSURE DESCRIBED IN NOTE 8. TWO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES EXIST. ONE, IS THAT THE J-BOX IS A SYMMETRICAL COMPONENT, TWO, IS THAT THE PT ENCLOSURE IIAS A PROTRUDING STAINLESS STEEL INSTRUMENT TUBE (FOR PT TEST PROPOSES). TIIE FIRST ASPECT WAS ADDRESSED BY CONSTRUCTING A STEEL FRAMEWORK ASSEMBLY AROUND Tile PT TO ENABLE SECURE ATTACllMENT OF Tile TilERMO-LAG PANEL LAYERS. Tile SECOND ASPECT WAS ADDRESSED BY ENCLOSING THE PROTRUDING INSTRUMENT TUBING WITil l' DIA. PREFAB 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS (1/2" NOMINAL TillCKNESS). Tills CREATED A TilERMO-LAG " SLEEVE" WIIICil WAS TIIEN FILLED WITil TilERMO-LAG 330-70 CONFORM ABLE CERAMIC BULK FIBER MATERIAL FOR A DEPTil OF 4" (MIN.). Tills ARRANGEMENT PROVIDES AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil PROTECTION INTO Tile ENCLOSURE. ALL OTilER THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES OF TIIE DESIGN ARE ADDRESSED BY NOTE 8.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B48 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

12. DUE TO Tile LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED TilERMAL M ASS OF TIIE PROTECTED COMMODITIES (PROTRUDING 103472/1 PORTIONS OF Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE M ASS AND Tile MASS OF Tile CABLE TRAYS) AND Tile ADDITION AND OF Tile SECOND LAYER OF PANELS CONSISTENT WITil JB COVERAGE TESTED IN SCllEME 10-1 Tile TilERMAL PROTECTION 103489/1 AFFORDED BY Tile " BOX" DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION, Tile LARGEST SURFACE OF Tile PROTEGIVE ENVELOPES AS IS AGUALLY Tile CONCRETE WALL WillCil PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM TilAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A IlEAT SINK. MODIFIED TilEREFORE, Tile CRITICAL ATTRIBUTE OF TilESE DESIGNS IS Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile " BOX" TlHS HAS BEEN BY DCN CONSERVATIVELY ADDRESSED VIA MECilANICALLY ATTACillNG Tile ENCLOSURES TO TIIE CONCRETE WALL WITil IIILTI 5745/1 BOLT FASTENERS. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE Tile ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITil DCA 103472 INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF A LARGE BANK OF SLEEVES (40), Tile OVERALL LENGTII OF Tile ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY 5'- 6". TO COMPENSATE FOR Tills LARGE SPAN, UNISTRUT MEMBERS WERE WELDED ACROSS TWO SUPPORTS FOR Tile MIDDLE TRAY IN TIIE STACK OF t TilREE TRAYS. Tile UNISTRUT SPANS Tile ENTIRE LENGTil OF Tile SIDE OF Tile ENCLOSURE FURTilEST FROM Tile WALL l AND IS USED TO SUPPORT TIIE PANELS WITil TIE WIRES. Tile TilERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO Tile CABLE TRAY ON l Tile BOTTOM OF HOTil BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACilED TO Tile RUNGS OF Tile CABLE TRAYS. ALL

! JOINTS ARE EITilER TIE WIRED OR SCORE AND FOLD, TilEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN. TilEREFORE, DUE TO TilESE CONSERVATIVE MECil ANICAL ATTACllMENT TECilNIQUES AND Tile ADDITION OF Tile SECOND LAYER, Tile ENCLOSURES ( ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF TilERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. BUTTING Tile SECOND LAYER COVERAGE TO THE TUBE STEEL AND SPRINKLER PIPE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT PENETRATE TIIE FIRST LAYER COVERAGE AND TilEREFORE AFFORD NO DIREG IlEAT PATil INTO Tile PROTECTED ENCLOSURE. TilEY ALSO PROVIDE A SilADOWING AFFEG AGAINST DIRECT FLAME IMPINGEMENT AND ACT AS A llEAT SINK TO COMPENSATE FOR Tile REDUCED COVERAGE.

13. Tills CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF 2 LARGE ADJACENT J-BOXES. ONE MEASURES 44" lilGil X 20" WIDE X 20" DEEP. Tile 103634/2 OTilER MEASURES 50" lilGil X 20" WIDE X 24" DEEP. BOTil ARE WALL MOUNTED EACil llAS TWO 5" DIA. CONDUITS 104245 ENTERING FROM Tile BOTTOM AND EXITING FROM Tile TOP. EACil IS ENCLOSED SEPARATELY WITil I/2" TillCK 330-1 FLAT PANELS. IlOWEVER, DUE TO LACK OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN Tile J-BOXES WITil FLAT PANELS INSTALLED, Tile SECOND LAYER (330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS) ENVELOPS BOTil BOX ENCLOSURES. Tile SPECIFIC DETAILS OF Tile DCA DEAL WITil INSTALLATION OF Tile RANDING ON Tills OUTER LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS. Tile USE OF ANGLE IRON MOUNTED TO STRUCTURE TO SERVE AS ATTACllMENT POINTS FOR Tile BANDING IS AN ACCEPTAI LE DEVIATION FROM Tile STANDARD (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE Tile METilOD OF NITACilMENT SERVES Tile SAME FUNGION IN SECURING Tile OUTER PANELS. ALL JOINTS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED AND THEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN. Tile CONDUIT INTERFACES WITil Tile ENCLOSURE II AVE ALL BEEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN QUALIFIED BY SCllEMES 10-l 1 AND 10-2. Tile SCALING ISSUE ASSOCIATED WITil Tills CONFIGURATION (SCllEME 10-1 QUALIFIED 2 LAYERS ON 18" X 12" X 6" J-BOXES) IS READILY JUSTIFIED DUE TO Tile INCREASED TilERM AL M ASS OF Tile BOXES AND Tile FACT TilAT ONE ENTIRE SURFACE OF Tile " ENCLOSURE" IS Ti!E CONCRETE WALL. Tills PREVENTS EXPOSURE ON TilAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK. THE USE OF A COMMON LAYER OF V-RIBBED PANELS IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON LARGE CABLE TRAY TESTS WHICil QUALIFIED STITCilING REINFORCEMENT ON llORIZONTAL BUTT JOINTS FOR A 36" CABLE TRAY WITil TEE SECTION (SCilEME l-2) AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT ON A 30" WIDE TRAY WITil TEE SECTION. TilEREFORE, BOTil TI ERM AL AND STRUCTURAL ASPEGS OF Tile CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. DCA 104245 IDENTIFIED i

INTERFERENCES WillCil PREVENTED BAND SPACING FROM BEING OBTAINED. ADDITIONAL ANGLES AND BANDING WAS INSTALLED TO OBTAIN/ MEET Tile SPACING REQUIREMENTS.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B49 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

14. Tile USE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PROTECT CABLE AIR DROPS OF VARIOUS SIZES (UP TO 6" DIA. BUNDLES)IIAS BEEN 104222/3 QUALIFIED VIA SCilEME 11-1. LARGER CABLE BUNDLES ARE ACCEPT- " DUE TO INCREASED TilERMAL M ASS OF CABLE.

SECURING TIIE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES TO Tile TRAY RUNGS (INST.

I TRAY ENVELOPE) WITil BANDING PROVIDES A POSITIVE MECilANICAL ATTACllMENT. Tile USE OF SillM BLOCKS ON W TRAY ENVELOPE PROVIDES MORE TilERMO-LAG M ATERI AL AND ENilANCES ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS (ALSO PROVIDu MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME). USING STRESS SKINAND TROWEL GRADE STAPLED TO Tile TRAY COVERAGE COUPLED WITil Tile 330-660 FIRE STOP IS COMPARABLE TO Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION WillCil UTILIZED A FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR WilERE AIR DROPS PENETRATE Tile TRAY ENVELOPE. FOR Tile 9" RULE, DEVIATION IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON Tile USE OF DOUBLE LAYER 330-1 PANELS ON Tile TRAY SUPPORT AND Tile IIEAT SINK EFFECT OF Tile ADJACENT 18" DIA. PIPE.

15. DELETED

16. Tills CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECTION IN TilAT INTERFERENCES 104087/0 PREVENT INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED 330-1 PANELS ON ONE SIDERAIL AND ON Tile BOTTOM OF A RADIAL BEND FOR t MINOR (< 6") DISTANCES. IN EACH CASE, Tile TRAY ENVELOPE WAS EXTENDED USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL TO ENCLOSE Tile INTERFERENCE FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil PROTECTION. TilERMO-LAG 330-70 CONFORM ABLE CERAMIC FIBER INSULATION MATERIAL IS UTILIZED TO FILL CAVITY AREAS WITillN TIIE TRAY ENVELOP 3s EXTENSION AND llENCE CREATE A TORTUROUS PATil TO PREVENT SIGNIFICANT llEAT INTRUSION INTO TIIE TRAY. Tills METilOD PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO Til AT PROVIDED BY 330-1 PANEL M ATERIAL INSTALLED FOR A 9" DISTANCE AS QUALIFIED BY TEST. JOINTS ARE REINFORCED VIA QUALIFIED TECilNIQUES (i.e., TIE WIRING TOGETilER AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT). T11EREFORE, TilERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY CONSIDERATIGNS IIAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY Tills CONFIGURATION.

17. Tills CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD J-BOX COVERAGE DETAILS. TO COMPENSATE FOR A 104060/0 LOCALIZED AREA ON Tile J-BOX UNDERSIDE WilERE AN INTERFERING CONDUIT (WillCil IS ALSO TilERMO-LAGGED)

PREVENT COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF PANELS, A STRESS SKIN AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP WAS UTILI7.ED. Tile 330-1 PREFAB M ATERIAL ON Tile INTERFERING CONDUIT WAS TilEREFORE EFFECTIVELY INCORPORATED INTO Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FOR Tile J-13OX. Tile TilERMO-LAG INSTALLED ON Tile CONDUIT IN CONJUNCTION WITil Tile TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP IN Tile INTERFERENCE AREA PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO TilAT QUALIFIED ON J-ROXES VIA SCilEME 10-2. Tile USE OF STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT IN Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCE ENSURES Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile MATERIAL.

18. Tile PROTECTION OF Tile CABLES WITil FLEXI-BLANKET AND Tile ELASTOMER FIRE SEALS IIAVE BEEN TESTED. 101357/l ALTilOUGil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR TilERMO-LAG EXTENDING TilROUGli A FIRE STOP WAS 330-1 IIALF ROUNDS, Tile USE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET'lilROUGil Tile FIRE STOP WILL PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE INSTALLATION WillCil IS CONSISTENT WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES RESTING ON Tile EXPOSED CABLE TRAY, ALTilOUGil NOT SPECIFICALLY FIRE TESTED, IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY Tile EXPOSED TRAY BECAUSE Tile 8" LIMIT ON Tile EXPOSED PORTION MEANS TilAT TilERE IS ONLY A MINOR AMOUNT OF EXPOSED TRAY AND Tile FLEXI-BLANKET ONLY COMES IN CONTACT WITil A SINGLE EXPOSED TRAY RUNG. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS BASICALLY CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WIIERE IT DEVIATES FROM TilESE CONFIGURATIONS Tile DIFFERENCES ARE MINOR AND DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT Tile CORRELATION TO A TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile M ATERIAL CONTINUITY AND TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B50 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

19. ALL JOINTS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED TIIEN STRESS SKIN REINFORCED. TIIE CABLE TRAY (ABOVE) AND 102882/0 Tile J-BOX (BELOW) LEND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO Tile OVERALL ENVELOPE CONSTRUCTION. Tile AIR DROP CABLES AS L)O NOT CONTACT TilERMO-LAG PANEL BACK SIDE SURFACES. Tile LARGE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME AND TilERMAL M ASS MODIFIED OF Tile CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITil TIIE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF 2 LAYERS OF TIIERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS BY DCN ON JUNCTION BOXES WILL M AINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. TIIEREFORE, Tile TilERMAL AND 5745/1 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS OF Tile CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.

20. DETAIL 8-3 ALLOWS USE OF A 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON CABLE TRAY BOTTOMS FOR A M AXIMUM LENGTil OF 12". TIIIS 104078/0 CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM Tile 12" (M AX.) LENGTil DUE TO PRESENCE OF A 24" DIA. PIPE WITil INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE FOR V-RIBBED PANEL. FLAT PANELS WERE INSTALLED AS DESCRIBED TO SPAN Tile INTERFERING PIPING.

Tile USE OF A SINGLE LAYER OF FLAT PANELS ON 18" X 12" X 6" J-BOXES WAS QUALIFIED VIA SCllEME 10-2.

ADDITIONALLY, SINGLE LAYER OF FLAT PANELS ON LARGE LATERAL BEND FITTINGS (5" DIA. CONDUIT) WAS QUALIFIED VIA SCilEME 9-l. TilEREFORE, DUE TO DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF SINGLE FLAT PANEL LAYERS AND DUE TO TIIE SilADOWING EFFECT AGAINST DIRECT FLAME IMPINGEMENT AND Tile IIEAT SINK CAPABILITY AFFORDED BY Tile 24" PIPE, TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. Tile ADDITION OF Tile SM ALL PIECE OF FLAT PANEL M ATERIAL TO BUILD UP TillCKNESS AT A SUPPORT (NOT ASSOCIATED WITil Tile TRAY ABOVE) IS AN ACCEPTABLE METilOD OF PROVIDING PROTRUDING ITEM PROTEcrION FOR CONDUCTIVE llEAT PATil. REQUIRED TillCKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND Tile PIECE IS SECURE IN PLACE WITil TIE WIRES.

21. DELETED

22. TIIE LHD ENCLOSURE RESOLUTION EMPLOYS A ONE PIECE STRESS SKIN CAP DESIGN BASED ON TYPICAL DETAIL 6-1. 103874/I WilERE Tile CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil Tile LBD BOX / CONDUIT REINFORCEMENT, Tile APPLICATION OF STRESS SKIN WAS NOTCilED IN Tile AREA OF SUPPORT BUT EXTENDED BEYOND Tile SUPPORT TO ALLOW BANDING. Tile AIR DROP ENTERING Tile PROTECTED CABLE TRAY IS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAILS 3-4 OPTION 2 AND 3-4.4.

23. ON Tile 810' ELEVATION, TWO LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS IIAVE BEEN INSTALLED ON A JUNCTION BOX AND ON Tile BOX 103884/1 RUNNING FROM Tile JB UP TO Tile CEILING. Tills ARRANGEMENT IIAS BEEN TESTED AND FOUND ADEQUATE VIA TEST AS SCllEME 10-1. Tile J-BOX IS MOUNTED TO STRUCTURE WillCil REDUCES POTENTI AL riXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT MODIFIED AS A ilEAT SINK. ALL JOINTS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED TilEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN. Tile BY DCN ESSENTIAL CABLES ARE ENCASED IN CONDUIT AND DO NOT CONTACT TilERMO-LAG PANELS. Tile LARGE ENCLOSED AIR 5745/1 VOLUME AND TIIERM AL M ASS OF Tile 2 LAYER COVERED BOXED COMMODITIES WILL M AINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. ON Tile 832' ELEVATION Tile BOX DESIGN EXTENDS FROM Tile PENETRATION SEAL TO A FIRE STOP IN TRAY T24BAEG24. ESSENTI AL CONDUIT C-24841951 PROJECTS FROM Tile SIDE OF Tile BOX. TilERMO-LAG TO FIRE STOP INTERFACE WAS TESTED IN SCilEME l-2. Tile CONDUIT / BOX INTERFACE WAS UP GRADED AS PROVIDED FOR JUNCTION BOXES PER DETAll 2-3 AND PER TEST SCIIEME 10-2.

ATTACilMENTB ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B51 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

24. ALL JOINTS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED TilEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN. Tile AIR DROP CABLES DO 103575/0 NOT CONTACT Tile TilERMO-LAG PANELS, AS TilEY ARE PROTECTED WITil SILTEMP BLANKET. Tile LARGE ENCLOSED AIR AS VOLUME AND TilERMAL M ASS OF Tile CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITil Tile DEMONSTRATED PERFORM ANCE OF 2 LAYERS MODIFIED OF TilERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS ON JUNCTION BOXES WILL M AINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. Tile FIRE BY DCN STOP INSTALLED IN TRAY T240AF003 WILL ADEQUATELY SEAL Tile ENCLOSURE. Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF TilERMO-LAG 5727/0 AND FIRE STOP ASSEMBLIES WAS DEMONSTRATED IN SEVERAL TEST SCilEMES.

25. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SillMS PRESENT IN DCA 103533/0 llAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 103533/0 PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile CABLE TRAY SIDE RAll SillMS IlOWEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENT TilAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS WillCil llAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCllEME 10-1 (i.e.. JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) Tile MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTil/ QUANTITY OF M ATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR SUBLIMING AND TilUS !

LOCALI7.ED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WITillN Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT Tile SillM(S) LOCATION. ALL JOINTS ARE EITilEPs SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED TilEN STRESS SKIN REINFORCED. TilESE TECilNIQUES ENSURE Tile INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. ALTilOUGil Tile BOXED-iN DESIGN COMMUNICATES TWO SEPARATE LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 CABLE TRAYS, Tile BOX DOES NOT COMPROMISE Tile SAFE SilUTDOWN CAPABILITY OF Tile PLANT. IN CONCLUSION, Tills INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

26. Tile INSTALLATION DESCRIBED ON DCA 103533/0 REPRESENTS A TillCKNESS DEVIATION FORM Tile STANDARD 103533/0 REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTING SUPPORTS FOR ESSENTIAL RACEWAYS. ALTilOUGli Tile MINIMUM TillCKNESS OF 1/2" WAS NOT M AINTAINED, Tile IlORIZONTAL BOTTOM OF Tile SUPPORT WAS COVERED WITil == 1/4" TillCK 3301 PANEL IN ADDITION, ONE ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL WAS INSTALLED TO VERTICALLY ENCLOSE Tile BOTTOM 7/16" OF TIIE SUPPORT. EVEN TilOUGil Tile REQUIRED 1/2" TillCKNESS IS NOT M AINTAINED, Tile 1/4" TillCK PANEL WILL PROVIDE A DEGREE OF PROTECTION MINIMlZING Tile IIEAT TRANSFER INTO Tile SUPPORT. Tile TORTUROUS IIEAT PATil TilAT Tile SUPPORT ARRANGEMENT PRESENTS ALSO MINIMlZES IIEAT TRANSFER INTO Tile ESSENTIAL COMMODITY. Tile INSTRUMENT TUBING INSTALLED BELOW Tile SUPPORT WILL FUNCTION AS SillELDING TO MINIMlZE RADIANT llEAT TRANSFER INTO Tile BOTTOM OF Tile SUPPORT. Tile CONDUIT SUPPORT IS PilYSICALLY ATTACilED TO Tile CONCRETE WALL WillCll ACTS AS A LARGE IlEAT SINK. Tile 1/4" TillCK 330-1 PANEL, ALTIIOUGil NOT SPECIFICALLY A TESTED CONFIGURATION, IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil BASIS / NOTES 1,3,4, AND 5, AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

l

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B52 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

27. Tills CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF TWO ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS PROTECTED BY 330-1 PANELS WITil ESSENTIAL CABLE 103550/1 AIR DROPS COMMUNICATING BETWEEN Tile TWO TRAYS, PROTECTED BY 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP. NON ESSENTIAL CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND NON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS ARE ALSO PROTECTED BY FLEXI-BLANKET WilERE Tile CABLE AIR DROP EXITS Tile ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION WilERE TilERMO-LAG GOES TilROUGli A FIRE STOP INVOLVES 330-1 CODUIT IIALF ROUNDS. IlOWEVER, Tile PERFORMANCE OF FLEXI-BLANKET IN Tile FIRE TESTS IS SUFFICIENTLY SIMILAR TO Tile PERFORM ANCE OF Tile IIALF ROUNDS TO REASONABLE EXPECT TilAT IT WOULD PERFORM CONSISTENT WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION IN A FIRE STOP. IN ADDITION AN END CAP OF 330-1 PANEL IS INSTALLED WilERE Tile FLEXI-BLANKET ENTERS Tile TRAY AND Tile 330-1/330-660 INTERFACE IS SEALED WITII TROWEL GRADE AS ARE ALL VOIDS BETWEEN TIIE 330-1 TRAY COVERAGE AND Tile FIRE STOP. ALTilOUGil Tile AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE /330-1 PANEL INTERFACE DOES NOT EXACTLY REPLICATE TEST SCilEME 11-1, TIIE INSTALLATION MEETS Tile REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

Tile ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IIAS BEEN MODIFIED TO AVOID Tile PIPE INTERFERENCE (WillCil IS LOCATED ABOVE Tile CABLE TRAY). Tills MODIFICATION CONSISTS OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS MOUNTED INSIDE Tile CABLE TRAY (IN Tile AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE) AND INSTALLED VIA TIE WIRES AND STRESS SKINTTROWEL GRADE UPGRADE PER BOTTOM JOINT REQUIREMENTS. ALTilOUGli Tile CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE DOES NOT EXACTLY REPLICATE TEST SCilEME 11-1, Tile INSTALLATION MEETS Tile REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

28. Tile AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE RESEMBLES TEST SCilEME 11-1, WITil EXCEPTION OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET POINT OF 104217/2 ATTACllMENT AT Tile CONDUIT / WALL INTERFACE. SINCE Tile FLEXI-BLANKET COULD NOT BE COMPLETELY WRAPPED 103001/0 AROUND Tile CONDUIT, Tile FLEXI-BLANKET WAS WRAPPED TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE TilEN IT WAS MODIFIED BY BUTTING EDGES OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET TO Tile CONCRETE WALL. TilESE EDGES / SEAMS WERE TilEN FILLED WITil 330-660 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL WITil A FINAL 11/16" WFT BUILDUP AT Tile OUTER LAYER / WALL INTERFACE. Tile ACCEPTABILITY OF Tills INSTALLATION IS BASED ON Tile FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES: Tile FLEXI-BLANKET WAS WRAPPED PER TYPICAL DETIALS TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE TilEN Tile REMAINING FLEXI-BLANKET WAS BUTTED TO Tile CONCRETE WALL WillCil ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK AND REDUCES Tile EXPOSED SURFACE OF Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE AND TilEN A TROWEL GRADE FILLET IS INSTALLED AT Tile WALL INTERFACE; Tile INSTALLATION RESEMBLES TYPICAL DETAILS 4-3.1, AND 4-7.1. _

29. TIIE BOX DESIGN llAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED BY ATTACllMENT A. Tile AIR DROP /FLEXI-BLANKET CONFIGURATION 1042.' ')

PENLTRATING Tile BOX DESIGN RESEMBLES TEST SCilEME 11-1 WITil EXCEPTION OF Tile COLLAR DESIGN. Tile STRESS 1040.oi0 SKIN AND 1 t/16* TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AT Tile AIR DROP / BOX INTERFACE ENSURES CONTINUITY OF M ATERIAL, l TillCKNESS OF M ATERIAL. AND EQUIVALENT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO Tile STAPLING / FLARE OUT DESIGN PRESENTED IN TEST SCllEME 11-1.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B53 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

30. FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP INSTALLATION BETWEEN CABLE TRAYS AS SilOWN ON DETAIL 5-12 IIAS BEEN EVALUATED 103935/0 SEPARATELY BY ATTACllMENT A. Tile It'STALLATION OF A RELATIVELY SilORT LENGTil OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON Tile CABLE TRAY SIDE RAll(VERSUS 330-1 V-RIBBED BOARD) AND Tile 2" TO 4" OVERLAP OF Tile END OF Tile CABLE TRAY IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON Tile FOLLOWING: Tile FLAT BOARD PROVIDES Tile SAME EQUIVALENT TillCKNESS AS A 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL; TilERE IS NO DISCONTINUITY OF M ATERIAL: ALL JOINTS ARE UPGRADED PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, AND Tile INSTALLATION EXillBITS NO IMPACT ON STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE.

FURTilERMORE,330-1 FLAT BOARD llAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN TEST SCIIEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOX PROTECTION WillCil IS REPRESENTATIVE OF TIIE SMALL LENGTil OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD USED FOR tills INSTALLATION. AUTOM ATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION IS PROVIDED IN Tile AREA.

31. Tills CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECTION IN TilAT SPRINKLER IIEAD 103582/0 INTERFERENCES PREVENT INSTALLATION OF Tile BOTTOM PANEL FOR AN APPROXIM ATE 12" LENGTil ACROSS Tile CABLE TRAY. Tile METIIOD USED TO PROTECT Tile CABLES WAS TO INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD TIE WlRED TO Tile CABLE TRAY RUNGS TilROUGil Tile AREA OF Tile SPRINKLER llEAD INTERFERENCE. Tile FLAT BOARD WAS CilAMFERED, AS REQUIRED, TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE AROUND Tile SPRINKLER llEAD SO TilAT SPRINKLER COVERAGE IS NOT IMPAIRED. 330-1 FLAT BOARD WAS ALSO INSTALLED INSIDE Tile CABLE TRAY (BELOW Tile CABLES), INSIDE Tile SIDE RAILS AND BELOW Tile TOP (OUTER) 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL. ALL SPACE BETWEEN RUNGS WAS FILLED WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AS WELL AS Tile SPACE BETWEEN Tile OUTER TOP PANEL AND INNER TOP PANEL. ALTilOUGil Tills CONFIGURATION DOES NOT REPLICATE ANY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE IN Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCE M AINTAINS Tile MINIMUM TESTED TillCKNESS Tile FIRE BARRIER M ATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, Tile METilOD OF SUPPORT DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DEVIATE FROM Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION, AND TilERE IS AN AUTOM ATIC SPRINKLER llEAD RIGIIT AT Tile REDUCITON IN COVERAGE. Tile FACT TilAT Tile INTERFERENCE IS A SPRINKLER llEAD PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CREDENCE AS TO Tile ACCEPTABILITY OF Tile DESIGN.

32. Tile INSTALLATION OF ONE LAYER OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON EACll JB TilEN INSTALLING AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 103847/0 V-RIBBED PANEL OVER BOTil BOXES DOES NOT SIGNIFICATLY DIFFER FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WILL NOT IMPACT OR DEGRADE Tile OVERALL DESIGN. Tills INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

33. WITil Tilli INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN ONTO Tile GROUND CABLE AND GROUNDING CLAMP, Tile TROWEL 103792/0 GRADE / STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON Tile 4" CONDUIT CLOSELY RESEMBLES TEST SCllEMES 9-1 AND 9-2. Tile SMALL AREA OCCUPIED BY Tile GROUNDING CLAMP / GROUND CABLE AND Tile FACT TilAT Tile REMAINDER OF Tile RADIAL BEND flAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY UPGRADED, SUPPORT Tile ACCEPTABILITY OF Tills INSTALLATION.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B54 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

34. DUE TO Tile LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED TilERMAL MASS OF Tile PROTECTED COMMODITIES (PROTRUDING 103680/1 PORTIONS OF TIIE EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS, JUNCTION BOX, AND Tile MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS) Tile TIIERMAL PROTECTION AFFORDED BY Tile 2 PANEL " BOX" DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION, Tile LARGEST SURFACE OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES IS ACTUALLY Tile CONCRETE WALL WillCil PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE, Tile CRITICAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS TIIE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile

                                                  " BOX". ADDITIONALLY, SINCE Tile ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITH DCA 103680 INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE COMMODITIES, Tile OVERALL WIDTil OF Tile ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY 5'- 2". TO COMPENSATE FOR Tills LARGE SPAN, A STRUCTURAL FRAME IIAS BEEN ATTACHED TO CABLE TRAY llANGERS AND LOCATED ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CABLE TRAY OF CONCERN. IlOWEVER, TIIE OVERALL WEIGilT OF THE BOX ASSEMBLY IS SIIARED BETWEEN THE JUNCTION BOX AND CABLE TRAY AS WELL AS Tile MODIFIED STRUCTURAL STEEL Tile TilERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO Tile CABLE TRAY ON Tile BOTTOM OF TIIE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACilED TO Tile RUNGS OF Tile CAHLE

! TRAYS. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED WITil BOTil LAYERS OF THESE ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITil QUALIFIED TECilNIQUES (TIE WIRING TOGETIIER OR SCORE AND FOLD AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT). TilEREFORE, DUE TO TilESE CONSERVATIVE MECilANICAL ATTACllMENT TECIINIQUES AND Tile 2 PANEL THICK CONSTRUCTION, Tile ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF TIIERMO-LAG M ATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES.

35. Tile INSTALLATION OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE AIR DROPS HAS BEEN FIRE TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1. THE UNIQUE 103624/2 FEATURES OF Tile DESIGN ARE THE FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLES WillCH PENETRATE TilROUGil TIIE ELASTOMER AS FIRE STOP IN Tile END OF llE CABLE TRAY AND Tile Cu 3.AR WillCil IS INSTALLED OVER TIIE FLEXI-BLANKET WilERE IT MODIFIED BUTTS UP TO Tile TilROUGil WALL SLEEVES (TWS). TECT SCHEME 11-1 DID TEST THERMO-LAG INSTALLED TilROUGil A BY DCN FIRE STOP BUT IT WAS 330-1 CONDUlT HALF ROUNDS. THIS TEST DID SilOW TIIAT FLEXI-BLANKET MAINTAINED IT'S 5746/1 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IN A FIRE LIKE TIIE CONDUIT llALF ROUNDS AND IT IS REASONABLE TO EXPECT THAT IT WOULD ACT TIIE SAME AS THE IIALF ROUNDS IN A FIRE STOP Tile COLLAR IS UTILIZED TO AVOID THE QUICK REDUCTION IN DI AMETER DUE TO ONLY A FEW CABLES COMING OUT OF A 4" TWS WHICH WOULD CREATE A FUNNEL SilAPED l INSTALLATION WHICil IS NOT DESIRABLE. Tile OVERLAP OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1. THE I

INSTALLATION MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES l-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE. l

A'ITACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B55 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

36. DUE TO THE LARGE . AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED TIIERMAL MASS OF Tile PROTECTED COMMODITIES (PROTRUDING 101986/1 ,

I PORTIONS OF TIIE EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS AND TIIE MASS OF Tile CABLE TRAYS) Tile TilERMAL 103034/1 PROTELTION AFFORDED BY TIIE 2 LAYER

BOX" DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION, Tile LARGEST SURFACE OF Tile 104124/0 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES IS ACTUALLY Tile CONCRETE WALL WillCil PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM TilAT SIDE AND ACTS AS AS A IIEAT SINK. TilEREFORE, Tile CRITICAL A'ITRIBUTE OF TilESE DESIGNS IS Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile
BOX". MODIFIED Tills IIAS BEEN CONSERVATIVELY ADDRESSED VIA MECilANICALLY ATTACillNG Tile ENCLOSURES TO Tile CONCRETE IN DCN WALL WITil filLTI BOLT FASTENERS AND TO EMBED PLATE VIA I/4" SELF TAPPING SCREWS. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE TIIE 5742/1 ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITil TIIE DCA(S) INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF SEVERAL SLEEVES, Tile OVERALL LENGTil (TOP TO BOTTOM) OF Tile ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY 7'- 6". Tile TilERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO Tile CABLE TRAY ON Tile FRONT OF THE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA BANDING A'ITACllED TO Tile BACK OF Tile CABLE TRAYS. Tile BOTTOM PORTION OF Tile ENCLOSURE IS SUPPORTED VIA IlORIZONTAL (TilROUGil BACK OF CABLE TRAYS) BANDING AND VERTICAL BANDING (AROUND CONDUlTS A'ITACllED TO WALL). ALL JOINTS ARE EITIIER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED TIIEN STRESS SKIN REINFORCED. IlOWEVER, Tile STRESS SKIN WAS NOT TIE WIRED TOGETilER. TilEREFORE, DUE TO TilESE CONSERVATIVE MECilANICAL A1TACilMENT TECilNIQUES, AND TIIE 2 LAYER INSTALLATION OVER TIIE AIR DROP, Tile ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF TilERMO-LAG M ATERIAL AT i

ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. 4 l l ! 37. Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACTUALLY A COMBINATION OF TWO TYPICAL DETAILS (1-5 AND 13-2) WillCil ARE EVALUATED 103487/0 SEPARATELY IN ATTACllMENT A. Tile USE OF lilLTI BOLTS TO SECURE PORTIONS OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FLARED OUT ONTO TIIE CONCRETE WALL PROVIDES POSITIVE MECilANICAL ATTACilMENT AND IS AN ENIIANCEMENT. Tile JOINT UPGRADE TESTS FOR ALL CABLE TRAYS AS WELL AS QUALIFICATION OF Tile 9" CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATil PROTECTION IS , BOUNDED BY Tile TEST SCilEMES INDICATED. ADDITIONALLY, Tile CONCRETE WALL PREVENTS EXPOSURE ON ONE OF l TIIE TWO LARGEST SURFACES AND llAS IIEAT SINK EFFECTS. TilEREFORE, BASED ON TIIE TIIERMAL AND STRUCTURAL i INTEGRITY ASPECTS DISCUSSED ABOVE, Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. i l c___--___-____-______ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B56 OF B65 DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES 103184/1

38. DCA 103184/1 AND DCA 103192/1 IIAVE BEEN SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681/l. Tills CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF 2 ADJACENT 103192/1 FIRE ZONE "R" J-BOXES (JB-2S5312G AND JB-2S5384G) MOUNTED BACK TO BACK ON A COMMON 3" TUBE STEEL SUPPORT. 103681/1 BOTil ARE WALL MOUNTED. EACil llAS CONDUlTS AND FIRE ZONE "R" CABLE EXITING FROM Tile SIDE. Tile SIDE EXIT FOR BOTil JUNCTION BOXES IIAVE BEEN PROTECTED BY ADDING A 4" FIRE STOP CONSTRUCFED OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS AND TROWEL GRADE. Tills FIRE STOP llAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY REINFORCED WITil BANDS AND TIE WIRES.

EACil JUNCTION BOX IS ENCLOSED SEPARATELY WITil 1/2" Til!CK 330-1 FLAT PANELS BANDED IN PLACE. IlOWEVER, DUE TO LACK OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN Tile J-BOXES (WITil FLAT PANELS INSTALLED), TIIE SECOND LAYER (330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS) WAS REQUIRED TO ENVELOP llOTil BOX ENCLOSURES. ALL JOINTS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR ARE TIE WIRED, T!iEN REINFORCE WITil STRESS SKIN. Tile CONDUIT INTERFACES WITil Tile ENCLOSURE IIAVE ALL BEEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN QUALIFIED BY SCllEMES 10-1 AND 10-2. Tile SCALING ISSUE ASSOCIATED WITil Tills CONFIGURATION (SCllEME 10-1 QUALIFIED 2 LAYERS ON 18" X 12" X 6" J-BOXES) IS READILY JUSTIFIED DUE TO Tile INCREASED TilERMAL M ASS OF Tile BOXES. Tile USE OF COMMON LAYER OF V-RIBBED PANELS IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON LARGE CABLE TRAY TESTS WillCll QUALIFIED STITClllNG REINFORCEMENT ON llORIZONTAL BUTT JOINTS FOR A 36" CABLE TRAY WITil TEE SECTION (SCilEME l-2) AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT ON A 30" WIDE TRAY WITil TEE SECTION. TilEREFORE, BOTil TIIERM AL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECFS OF Tile CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. Tile CONDUIT SLEEVE COMMON ENCLOSURE (BOX) IS SilOWN ON DCA 103184/1, PAGE 5. Tills COMMON ENCLOSURE IS INSTALLED AROUND (5) CONDUIT SLEEVES, UP TO AND INCLUDING Tile EXISTING ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IN TRAY T23GSCNSO, AND INCLUDES Tile ESSENTIAL CONDUIT FROM JUNCTION BOX JB2S5312G. Tile COMMON ENCLOSURE FOR Tile CONDUIT SLEEVES IIAS BEEN REINFORCED WITil TIE WIRE STITCillNG. Tile ESSENTIAL CONDUIT EXITING JUNCTION BOX 2B2S5312G llAS BEEN PROTECTED WITil FLEXI-BLANKET FROM Tile JUNCrlON BOX TO Tile CONDUIT SLEEVE COMMON ENCLOSURE. Tile OVERALL LENGTil OF Tills CONDUIT IS < 2 FT. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET llAS BEEN INSTALLED ON Tile CONDUlT IN ACCORDANCE WITil AIR DROP REQUIREMENTS OF TEST SCllEME 11-1. GIVEN Tile METilODS USED IN INSTALLATION M AINTAINING FIRE BARRIER TillCKNESS, CONTINUITY AND SUPPORT, Tills INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 103486/0

39. TYPICAL DETAIL 8-4 IIAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A, BASIS / NOTE NO. 51 AND IS ACCEPTABLE.

103061/1

40. TYPM'AL DETAll 7-7 AND 7-7.1 II AS BliliN liVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A, BASIS / NOTE NO. 70 AND IS ACCEPTABLE.

102058/0

41. LBDs ll AVE BEEN PROTECTED USING STANDARD DETAIL 6-1 EXPANDED TO ENCAPSULATE BOTil LBDs. STANDARD DETAIL 101499/0 6-1 IIAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACilMENT A. Tile BOX DESIGN USED TO PROTECT TilESE LBDs CLOSELY RESEMBLE Tile 102889/0 SAME TECilNIQUES USED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR JUNCTION BOXES AS WAS TESTED IN TEST SCilEME 10-1 AND 10-2.

Tile BOXING OF Tile BVO LBDs TOGETilER llAS BEEN TESTED IN SCllEME 10-2. IT PRESENTS A GREATER TilERM AL M ASS (WilEN COMPARED TO A SINGLE LBD) AND TilUS RESULTS IN LOWER OVERALL INSIDE TEMPERATURE. Tile RESULTING PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE MAINTAINS Tile MINIMUM M ATERIAL TillCKNESS, Tile M ATERIAL IS CPNTINUOUS, AND Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE OF Tile FIRE BARRIER IS CONSISTENT WITil Tile '"cSTED CONFIGURATIONS. Tills INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B57 OF B65 NOTE ' ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

62. Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FOR Tile ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD llAS BEEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITil STANDARD 102726/0 DETAIL 6-1 WITil EXCEPTION OF ONE CORNER WillCil llAS BEEN MODIFIED DUE TO AN EXISTING LBD TIIERMO-LAG " BOX" COVERAGE. AT Tile INTERFACE A SMALL PIECE OF 330-1 PANEL AND BANDS IIAVE BEEN INSTALLED /ATTACilED TO TllE EXISTING LBD ENVELOPE WITil A 1/4* TillCKNESS OF 330-1. Tile REMAINDER OF TIIE LBD IIAS BEEN PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY DETAIL 6-1 INCLUDING BANDING AND JOINT UPGRADES. ALTIIOUGli Tile INSTALLED DETAIL SLIGilTLY DEVIATED FORM Tile STANDARD DETAII1 TESTED CONFIGURATION Tile INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE TilERE IS NO DEVIATION IN MATERIAL TillCKNESS, TIIE MATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, AND Tile SUPPORT ASSEMBLY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITil TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

l ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 , PAGE B58 OF B65 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA!REV Tills DCA DEALS WITil 2 DISTINGIVELY DIFFERENT ISSUES. Tile FIRST DEALS WITil AN INTERFERING PIPE COVERED WITil i 43. FLEXI-BLANKET AND SECOND DEALS WITil A BOX DESIGN WillCII WAS UPGRADED BY ADDING A SECOND LAYER TO AIR DROP PROTECTED BY A BOX DESIGN (DCN 5742/1 OF MINOR MODIFICATION 93-125). l Tile FIRST ISSUE CONCERNS A 2" Cll LINE WillCll INTERFERES WITil Tile STANDARD COVERAGE ON Tile BOTTOM OF AN 102932/5 ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND A 2ND Cll LINE WillCil INTERFERES WITil Tile COVERAGE ON TIIE IST Cil LINE. TIIE 103912/0 INSTALLATION OF 2 LAYERS FOR FLEXI-BLANKET ON Tile INSIDE OF Tile TRAY. TilEN COVERING OVER TliE PIPE WITil AN ADDITIONAL 2 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET WAS, AT FIRST, CONSIDERED NOT TO BE CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WAS IDENTIFIED ON ONE FORM 93-184 ALONG WITil SEVERAL OTilER CONFIGURATIONS. IlOWEVER, i A CLOSER LOOK AT Tills CONFIGURATION INDICATED TilAT TIIE INSTALLATION CAN BE JUSTIFIED. UNLIKE Tile OTIIER CONFIGURATION ON ONE FORM 93-184, Tills INSTALLATION DOES NOT RELY ON JUST 1/2" OF FLEXI-BLANKET (21 AYERS) INSTALLED ON Tile INSIDE OF Tile TRAY TO PROTECT Tile ENVELOPE. IN ORDER FOR A FIRE TO BREACil TIIIS PROTECTED ENVELOPE IT WOULD llAVE TO GO TilROUGli 2 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET OR GET PAST AN INSULATED 2" Cil LINE, TilEN A 2" Cil LINE WRAPPED WITil 330-70 CERAMIC FIBER AND A METAL J ACKET INSIDE TiiE OUTER LAYERS OF FLEXI-l BLANKET, TilEN TilROUGil 2 MORE LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET. IN ADDITION, TROWEL GRADE IS INSTALLED IN ALL INTERNAL. VOIDS; A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS BUTTS TO Tile FLEXI-BLANKET, Tile FLEXI-BLANKET IS STAPLED TO Tile TRAY COVERAGE AND Tile PANEL IS BANDED TO Tile TRAY CONSISTENT WITil TYPICAL DETAIL AIR DROP COVERAGE , TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1 AND Tile 2" CII LINE INSIDE Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE IS WRAPPED WITil 330-70 CERAMIC FIBER, 1 A METAL JACK, TilEN 2 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKL'T, AS PER PROTRUDING COVERAGE,9" TO 11" ON EACil SIDE OF Tile ; I PROTECTED ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION, ALTilOUGil NOT SPECIFICALLY TESTED, IS SIGNIFICANTLY SIMILAR TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND SUFFICIENT CONSERVATISM IIAS BEEN UTILIZED WITil Tile DOUBLE

COVERAGE BY FLEXI-BLANKET, DOUBLE 220-1 PANELS. STAPLING AND Tile IIEAT SINK PROVIDED BY TIIE PIPE AND TILE

! SilADOWING AFFECT SilOULD Tile EXTERNAL LAYER FAIL, SO Til AT TilERE IS REASONABLE ASSURANCE TilAT Tile ASSEMBLY WILL PROTECT TIIE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY CONSISTENT WITil OTilER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 102932/5 Tile SECOND ISSUE CONCERNS Tile COVERING OF AN AIR DROP FROM A VERTICAL TO A IlORIZONTAL TRAY WITil A 330-1 AS BOX. Tile BOX IS INSTALLED WITil 2 LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS CONSISTENT WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR JBs IN MODIFIED SCllEME 10-1. ALL JOINTS ON BOTil LAYERS ARE EITilER SCORE AND FOLD OR TIE WIRED TOGETilER AND TilEN COVERED BY DCN WITil STRESS SKIN PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. Tile FIRST LAYER IS FURTilER ENilANCED BY Tile TIE WIRING Tile 5742/1 i BOTTOM PANEL TO TIIE TRAY RUNGS AND FLARING OUT COVERAGE AT TIIE WALL AND ATTACilING WITil SELF TAPPING ! SCREWS (METAL WALL COVERING). Tile AIR DROP CABLES DO NOT CONTACT Tile TilERMO-LAG PANELS AND TIIE CABLES l A PROTECTED WITil SILTEMP. Tile ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME, Tile TilERM AL M ASS OF CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITil TIIE l DEMONSTRATED PERFORM ANCE OF 2 LAYERS OF TilERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE l TEMPERATURES. TilEREFORE Tile TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS OF Tile CONFIGURATION llAS BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.

44. ONCE Tile SLEEVES IIAVE BEEN INSTALLED, Tile SUPPORT FRAME CAN BE INSTALLED SO TilAT TilERMO-LAG CAN BE 103277/1 INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-3. Tile CilANGES M ADE IN Tile SUPPORT FRAME DO NOT AFFECT ITS FUNCTIONALITY 103406/1 AND TilEREFORE Tile ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR DETAILS 7-3 AND 7-4 IN ATTACilMENT A APPLY TO Tills CONFIGURATION. 103885/l Tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B59 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV !

45. TIIE METilOD USED WAS WRAPPING Tile AIR DROP BY COVERING IT WITil FLEXI-BLANKET PER REQUIRED TillCKNESS AND 103046/2 BANDING AND TROWEL GRADING IT TO Tile TOP OF Tile 330-1 PANEL ON TOP OF Tile TRAY. Tills WILL RESULT IN Tile CABLES BEING COVERED WITil TIIE REQUIRED LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET AND FIRE STOPPED. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION CLOSELY RESEMBLES TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile ELIMINATION OF A MINOR AMOUNT OF STRESS SKIN ON Tile LONGITUDINAL JOINT DOES NOT llAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON Tile MECilANICAL INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT.

46. Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS ON 24" CABLE TRAYS IIAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED VIA TEST SCIIEME 12- 103862/0

2. COMPENSATION IIAS BEEN M ADE FOR Tile SMALL SLOT CUT IN TIIE TilERMO-LAG BOTTOM PANEL BY INSTALLING AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON Tile BOTTOM INSil)E OF T!!E TRAY. ALL GAPS AND VOIDS ARE FILLED WITil TROWEL GRADE TO ELIMINATE Tile CllANCE OF llEAT PROPAGATION INTO Tile PROTECTED SPACE. Tile SLIGitT REDUCTION IN MATERIAL TillCKNESS IN Tile AREA OF Tile CC LINE IS COMPENSATED FOR BY INSTALLING A FULL I/2" NOMINAL PANEL INSIDE Tile CABLE TRAY ABOVE, OVERLAPPING Tile INSIDE AND OUTSIDE PANELS BY 9" (MIN) PROVIDES NOT ONLY 1/2" TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION, BUT ALSO PROTECTS Tile CABLES FROM llEAT BEING CONDUCTED ALONG Tile METAL TRAY AND INTO Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

47. Tile REDUCTION OF TIIE PANEL AT Tile IIVAC INTERFERENCE WILL NOT COMPROMISE TIIE INTEGRITY OF TIIE 104246/0 PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE SINCE Tile REDUCTION IS ONLY I/8" AT Tile INTERFERENCE. ALTilOUGil Tills REPRESENTS A REDUCED TillCKNESS FROM Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION, Tile REM AINING ATTRIBUTES FOR PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. Tile LOCATION WilERE Tile TRAPE7.E IIANGER CROSSES Tile ANGLE SUPPORT AMOUNTS TO 1/2" X 2" IN AREA / DIMENSIONS. EXTRA 330-1 PANELS IIAVE BEEN INSTALLED TO CREATE A TORTUROUS PATil FOR llEAT AS WELL AS Tile SillELDING AFFECTS PROVIDED BY Tile ANGLElllANGER.

48. Tile INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANELS ON M" WIDE CABLE TRAY IS QUALIFIED TilROUGil TEST SCllEME 12-2, FLAT PANEL 102679/l SUBSTITUTION FOR "V" RIB PANELS IIAS BEEN DEEMED ACCEPTABLE PRE-BANDING EVERY 6" WilERE TIIE CABLE TRAY TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE INTERFACE, INSTALLATION IS IN >

ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL I)ETAll 14-3. ALL JOINTS AND SEAMS ASSOCIATED WITil Tile CABLE TRAY COVERAGE AS WEl.L AS Tile AIR DROP " BOX" ENCLOSURE SilALL BE UPGRADING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AND/OR REINFORCED WITil TESTED METilODS (TIE WIRE STITClllNG). ALL PROTRUDING ITEMS ARE PROTECTED FOR A DISTANCE OF 9" AS PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, WITil Tile EXCEPTION OF Tile IIVAC SUPPORTS. TilESE SUPPORTS ARE COVERED FOR TilEIR FULL LENGTil FROM Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY TO Tile IIVAC INSULATION (APPROX. 7-l/2" OF COVERAGE). Tills IIAS BEEN DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BASED ON Tile LARGE SURFACE AREA (llEAT SINK) OF Tile INSULATED llVAC DUCT. INTERFERING ITEMS WIIICil INillBIT TIIE INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAY T220CBD22 ARE RESOLVED TilROUGil DETAIL 5-16.

49. Tile M AJORITY OF TilERMO-LAG INSTALLED PER Tills DCA IS QUALIFIED BY STANDARD TEST SCilEMES INVOLVING CABLE 101498/l TRAY COVERAGE. IN SEVERAL AREAS Tile STANDARD CABLE TRAY TOP PANEL llAS BEEN RAISED BY Tile USE OF AS TilERMO-LAG SillMS AND 2 LAYER COVERAGE OF Tile AIR DROP INCREASES Tile INTERNAL VOLUME, LOWERING INTERNAL MODIFIED TEMPERATURES. JOINTS AND SEAMS ASSOCIATED WITil BOTil LAYERS OF Tile " BOX" DESIGNS ARE EITilER SCORE AND BY DCN FOLD OR TIE WIRED TilEN REINFORCED WITil STRESS SKIN. TilEREFORE DUE TO TilESE CONSERVATIVE MECil ANICAL 5746/1 ATTACllMENT TECilNIQUES AND Tile 2 LAYER COVERAGE OVER Tile AIR DROP. Tile ENCLOSURE ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF TilERMO-LAG AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B60 OF 365 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

50. Tills DESIGN IS SIMILAR TO TYPICAL DETAILS 9-2 AND 13-2 WillCil IIAVE BEEN ANALYZED IN ATTACllMENT A. Tile BOX 102103/0 DESIGN FOR Tile CABLE AIR DROPS FROM Tile TWS TO TIIE CABLE TRAY llAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED BY PRE-BANDING Tile BOX AT Tile WALL AND AT 12" CENTERS BACK TO Tile POINT WilERE Tile TOP PANEL IS FLUSil WITil Tile TRAY. Tile 330-1 PANELS BUTT TO Tile WALL, FLARE OUT, AND ARE MECilANICALLY ATTACilED TO Tile WALL WITil llILTI KWIK-BOLTS.

ALL JOINTS IIAVE BEEN UPGRADED WITil STRESS SKIN, STAPLES, AND TROWEL GR.ADE. ALTilOUGli Tile INSTALLATION DOES NOT MEET A TESTED CONFIGURATION, IT DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCilEME 14-1 WillCil TESTED A 30" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Tile INSTALLATION IS CONTINUOUS, MATERIAL TillCKNESS IS MAINTAINED, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITil TEST SCilEME 14-1 AND IS TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

51. FOR ALL BUT A 4' LONG AREA, Tile TilERMO-LAG ON Tile TRAY IS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITil TESTED 103670/0 CONFIGURATIONS. IN Tile 4' AREA AROUND Tile IIVAC SUPPORT WI!ERE FLAT PANELS WERE INSTALLED, ALL JOINTS WERE STITCilED AND LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN WAS NOT COMPLETE. Tile USE OF 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS WAS QUALIFIED IN SCilEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOXES. PREBAND SPACING WAS REDUCED AND ALL JOINTS ARE BANDED TO COMPENSATE FOR Tile FLAT PANELS. Tile USE OF STITCillNG IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN ON JOINTS WAS TESTED IN SCllEME l-2. Tile USE OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET BETWEEN Tile 330-1 PANEL AND Tile CABLES KEEPS Tile CABLES AWAY FROM Tile PROJECTED ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

52. 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET MATERIAL WAS INSTALLED ON CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN 330-1 MATERIAL Tile LARGEST CABLE 103567/1 BUNDLE TESTED WAS 3" O FROM A CEILING PENETRATION TO 3" CONDUIT SECTIONS PROTRUDING A TIIERMO-LAG PROTECTED CABLE TRAY. Tile FIELD INSTALLED CONFIGURATION IS COMPRISED OF FLEXI-BLANKET MATERIAL WRAPPED AROUND Tile CABLE TRAY TilERMO-LAG PANELS. TO COMPENSATE FOR Tile INCREASED SIZE OF Tile CABLE BUNDLE AND AREA OF OVERLAP, FLEXI-BLANKET M ATERIAL WAS PREBUTTERED AND ATTACllED WITil 1" LONG STAPLES ANCllORED INTO Tile 330-1 M ATERIAL EVERY 3" (APPROX.).

53. STANDARD DETAILS 9-2,1-5 AND 11-7 IIAVE BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A. FILLING Tile RECESS OF Tile SPARE 103600/2 SLEEVES PROVIDES A FLUSil SURFACE FOR INSTALLATION OF PANEL AT Tile CEILING. Tile FLANGE DETAILS IIAVE BEEN ENil ANCED BY Tile ADDITION OF A 2" WIDE 330-1 FLAT BOARD TO SECURE TIE WIRE TO STRESS SKIN. TilERE IS A DEVI ATION llOWEVER, REGARDING Tile 5" OVERLAP OF Tile LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. Tills IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE AT LEAST 4" CAN BE ACillEVED, AND Tile FACT TilAT ALL STAPLING REQUIREMENTS II AVE BEEN ADilERED TO. Tile FACT TilAT Tile M ATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, M ATERIAL TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED DETAILS, M AKES Tills INSTALLATION ACCEPTABLE.

54. Tills CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM TESTED CABLE TRAY PROTECTION SCilEMES BECAUSE TWO LAYERS OF 330-1 FLAT 102931/0 PANEL ARE USED TO PROVIDE ADDITION AL M ATERIAL IN Tile AREA OF TIIE INTERFERENCE (WilERE TOP PANEL TillCKNESS IS REDUCED). PANEL ATTACllMENT AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT METilODS USED AT TIIE DEVIATION (330-1 TROWEL GRADE PREBUTTERING AND FILLETS, STRESS SKIN APPLICATION, STAPLING TilROUGil-PANELTIE WIRING, STITCillNG OF LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND PRE-BANDING BENEATil PANELS) IN CONJUNCTION WITil TIIE USE OF TYPICAL DETAll 8-3 FOR Tile V-RIB TO FLAT PANEL TRANSITION PROVIDE Tile ENVELOPE WITil STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EQUIVALENT TO TilAT OF Tile TESTED DESIGNS. TIIE USE OF A SECOND FULL TillCKNESS 330-1 FLAT PANEL PROVIDES Tile REQUIRED TilERM AL IMPROVEMENT TO Tile DESIGN.

55. STANDARD DETAll 12-2 IIAS BEEN EVALU ATED IN ATTACllMENT A. TIIESE INSTALLATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE. 103408/l

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B61 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ' DCAIREV

56. INTERFERENCE 1: Tile REDUCTION IN TillCKNESS OF Tile 330-1 PANEL AT Tile INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON 103892/0 TIIE AMOUNT OF 330-1 PANEL INSTALLED AT TiiE DEVIATION AND TIIE ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANELS ADDED AROUND Tile AREA OF DEVIATION. Tills DOUBLING OF TIIE PANELS WILL PROVIDE NOT ONLY TWICE Tile M ATERIAL TO TilERMALLY SUBLIME, IT ALSO PROVIDES A MORE TORTUROUS PATil TilAT ANY IIEAT TRANSFER INTO Tile ENVELOPE.

INTERFERENCE 2: SEE INTERFERENCE 1. INTERFERENCE 3: Tile DEVIATION TO SPLICE PLATE COVERAGE IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON Tile JOINTS WIIERE Tile 330-1 FLAT PANEL WILL BUTT TO Tile 330-1 V-RIB PANELS. THE JOINTS ARE TIE WIRED TOGETilER WillCil IS A TESTED SECURING METilOD. TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL WILL FILL ALL AIR GAPS BElllND TIIE 330-1 FLAT PANEL AND MOST OF Tile SPLICE PLATE COVER WillCil WILL RECEIVE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE (SEE NEXT DEVIATION). TIIE OTilER DEVIATION CONCERNS Tile INABILITY TO ACillEVE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE AT Tile IIVAC IIANGER. Tills IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON Tile MINOR LENGTil OF Tile DEVIATION WillCII WILL llAVE A NEGLIGIBLE, TIIEREFORE ACCEPTABLE, AFFECT ON Tile JOINT STRENGTil OF Tile SPLICE PLATE COVER. INTERFERENCE 4: Tile INABILITY TO INSTALL Tile STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TIIE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO TIIE MINOR LENGTil OF Tile DEVIATION WillCil WILL llAVE A NEGLIGIBLE, T11EREFORE ACCEPTABLE, AFFECT ON Tile JOINT STRENGTil. INTERFERENCE 5A: Tile INABILITY TO INSTALL THE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON Ti1E LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO Tile TIE WIRING OF Tile TOP, SIDE. AND BOTTOM PANELS TOGETilER WITil APPROVED SECURING MECilANICS (TIE WIRES EVERY 3*11/2"). ALSO, TIIE COVERAGE FOR Tile CilANNEL AS A PROTRUDING ITEM, ALTilOUGli NOT TO Tile TYPICAL DETAILS, WILL PROVIDE A SECURE ONE-IlOUR BARRIER AROUND TiiE PROTRUDING ITEM. INTERFERENCE SB: ALL DETAILS OF Tills DESIGN CONFORM TO T11E DESIGN DETAILS AND ARE TiiEREFORE ACCEPTABLE. INTERFEBENCE 6: SEE INTERFERENCE I. INTERFERENCE 7: SEEINTERFERENCE5B. INTERFERENCE 8: SEE INTERFERENCE 1. INTERFERENCE 9: SEE INTERFERENCE 1.

ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B62 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

56. INTERFERENCE 10: Tile DEVIATION CONCERNS Tile INABILITY TO INSTALL COMPLETE 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE ON Tile CONT'D TRAY DUE TO Tile IIVAC SUPPORT LNTERFERENCE. Tills IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO Tile FACT TilAT Tile IIVAC llANGER llAS A I/16" TO 1/32' GAP BETWEEN IT AND Tile TRAY RAIL SIDE TilEREBY M AKING Tills AN INTERFERENCE. Tile COVERAGE OF Tile IIVAC llANGER AS A PROTRUDING ITEM TO Tite EXTENT POSSIBLE BUTTING UP TO Tile IIVAC DUCT WILL ENSURE TIIE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF FIRE BARRIER EXISTS ALONG Tills POSSIBLE ilEAT PATil TO KEEP Tile CABLES FUNCTIONING IN Tile EVENT OF A FIRE.

INTERFERENCE 11: SEE INTERFERENCE 1. INTERFERENCE 12: SEE INTERFERENCE I AND 3. l INTERFERENCE 13: SEE INTERFERENCE 1.

57. DELETED

! 58. WillLE NONE OF TilESE UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS IIAVE BEEN FIRE TESTED, Tile METilODS USED TO ATTACil Tile PANELS 103740/1 l TOGETilER BY OVERLAPPING TilEM AND TIE WIRING TilEM TOGETilER TilEN APPLYING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ARE TESTED CONCEPTS. WilERE TIIESE METilODS ARE USED TO MAINTAIN MATERIAL CONTINUITY AND MATERIAL TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED, TilEN TilESE CONFIGURATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE. WIIERE M ATERIAL TillCKNESS CANNOT BE M AINTAINED AT Tile SIDE RAILS Tills IS COMPENSATED FOR BY EXTENDING COVERAGE OUT ALONG Tile TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITil Tile 9' RULE. Tills WILL CREATE A TORTUROUS PATil FOR FIRE TO ENTER Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE. Tile COVERAGE OF PROTRUDING ITEMS PER Tile 9" RULE IIAS BEEN FIRE TESTED IN ALL OF Tile TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. TIIE COMBINED EFFECT OF ALL OF TIIE ABOVE RESULTS IN Tile CONFIGURATIONS BEING ACCEPTABLE.

59. Tills IS A UNIQUE CONFIGURATION IN WillCll A 3 FT. LONG TilERMO-LAG FLAT PANEL ENCLOSURE BRIDGES TWO TRAYS 104204/0 SEGMENTS WITil AIR DROP CABLES ENCLOSED WITillN Tile ENVELOPE. Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile ENCLOSURE IIAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY Tile ADDITION OF A SUPPORT MID-SPAN BETWEEN Tile TRAY SEGMENTS. Tile NEW SUPPORT l IIAS STEEL PLATE GUIDES WELDED ON WillCII SERVE AS ATTACilMENT POINTS FOR BANDING WillCII EXTENDS TO EACil l TRAY SEGMENT. Tile BANDS FORM A FRAMEWORK FOR PANEL PIECES INSTALLED ON Tile ENCLOSURE SIDES. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED ON Tile INSIDE OF Tile BOTTOM PANEL PREVENT CABLES CONTACTING Tile BACKSIDE SURFACE AND ALSO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TIIERM AL PROTECTION. ALL JOINTS ARE REINFORCED BY QUALIFIED METilODS. REQUIRED M ATERIAL TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED ALBEIT WITil FLAT PANELS. TilEREFORE Tile TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS IIAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED AND Tile CONFIGURATION PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT l-FLOUR RATING.

60. Tills CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A MINOR DEVIATION TO SPEC. REQUIREMENTS ONLY IN AS MUCil AS Tile SUPPORT 101627/1 WAS SPECIFIED FOR COVERAGE PRIOR TO INSTALLED ON Tile CONDUlTS FIRST. ALL CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES IIAVE BEEN M AINTAINED FOR PROTECTION OF Tile CONDUITS, TillCKNESS, CONTINUITY, ETC. TilEREFORE Tills CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE Tile REQUIRED l-FLOUR RATING.

ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGUR.ATIONS PAGE B63 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

61. Tills CONFIGURATION IS UNIQUE IN THAT A 330-1 BOX CONFIGURATION IS CONSTRUCTED TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR A 103056/1 MINOR PORTION OF A 2" DIA. FLEX CONDUlT AT A FOAM BLOCKOUT. WilERE Tile FLEX CONDUlT ENTERS Tile BOX,330-1 CONDUlT SECrlONS ARE INSTALLED WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP. Tile BOX IS FILLED WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND ALL JOINTS REINFORCED WITil TECllNIQUES QUALIFIED BY SCllEME 9-I FOR LBD ENCLOSURES. Tile INTERFACE WITil Tile FOAM BLOCKOUT IS PROVIDED WITil M-BOARD FOR ADEQUATE M ATERIAL SEPARATION (FOAM AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) AND TO PROVIDE TilERMAL PROTECTION. Tile MINOR AREA OF Tile OUTER 2" DIAM. FLEX CONDUIT WilERE 3 COMPLETE LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE IT BUTTS DIRECTLY TO Tile CONCRETE SURFACE WillCil SillELDS IT AND ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK. Tile AREA OF INCOMPLETE 3 LAYERS IS VERY MINOR AND EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISilES A TORTUROUS PATil. Tile DESIGN PROVIDES FOR ADEQUATE MATERIAL TillCKNESS (330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND CONDUlT SECrlONS) FOR Tile FLEX CONDUlT AT Tile BLOCKOUT PLUS EFFECTS OF FOAM SEAL AND M-BOARD M ATERIAL AND PROVIDES FOR STRUCTIJRAL INTEGRITY OF Tile BOX CONFIGURATION (STITCilING AND STRESS SKIN). Tile EFFECTIVE M ATERIAL TillCKNESS (330-660) FOR Tile FLEX CONDUIT AT Tile WALL IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE AN EQUlVALENT l-IlOUR RATING.

62. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SillMS PRESENT IN DCA 103305/0 IIAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 103305/1 PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile BOXED IN DESIGN UTILIZES STANDARD DETAll 12-2 WlHCil llAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A. TIIE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAll SillMS IlOWEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENT TilAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS WillCil llAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCllEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) Tile MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTil/ QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR SUBLIMING AND TilUS LOCALIZED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WITIIIN Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT Tile SillM(S) LOCATION. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN ll AS DEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING METilODS AS WELL AS Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECIINIQUE. Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECilNIQUE ENSURES Til AT Tile STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTINUOUS AT CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITil UPGRADED JOINT METilODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. Tile OVERALL WIDTil OF Tile BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA TIIAN WOULD NORM ALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION.

Tile CABLE AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IS A UNIQUE DESIGN IN Til AT AT Tile CONDUIT A TEE SECTION WAS FABRICATED FROM PRESilAPED CONDUIT SECTIONS WITil Tile OPEN END OF Tile TEE SECrlON COVERED BY A 330-1 FLAT BOARD. ALL JOINTS WERE UPGRADE WITil STRESS SKIN AND STITCillNG. Tile REM AINDER OF AIR DROP IS PROTECTED BY FLEXI-BLANKET UP TO Tile BOX AT Tile CABLE TRAY. ALTilOUGil Tills CONFIGURATION IS NOT TESTED IT DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCllEME 11-1. Tile FACT TilAT Tile MATERIAL TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED, Tile FIRE BARRIER IS CONTINUOUS, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITil Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION, Tile INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. IN CONCLUSION, Tills INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil BASIS! NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-032, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B64 OF B65 l l NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

63. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SillMS PRESENT IN DCA 104194/0 llAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 104194/0 i PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION BUT IS SIMILAR TO TYPICAL DETAILS 9-2 AND 13-2 WillCII IIAVE BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A. Tile CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL SillMS IlOWEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENTTilAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 l

l PANELS WillCil llAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCilEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) TIIE MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 j PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTil/ QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR SUBLIMING AND TilUS LOCAllZED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES W!Til!N Tile PROTECT!VE ENVELOPE AT Tile SillM(S) LOCATION. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING METIIODS AS WELL AS Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECilNIQUE. Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECilNIQUE ENSURES TIIAT Tile STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTINUOUS AT CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITil UPGRADED JOINT METilODS ENSURES LNTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. Tile OVERALL WIDTil OF Tile BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA TIIAN WOULD NORM ALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. ONE DEVIATION WAS IDENTIFIED WilERE TIE WIRES WERE DELETED ON Tile STRESS SKIN UPGRADE AT JOINTS. ALL JOINTS WERE STITCllED WilERE Tile PANELS INTERFACE. TROWEL GRADE AND STRESS SKIN WERE APPLIED OVER TilESE JOINTS WITil Tile STRESS SKIN AND STAPLES. Tills DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUlVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO Tile l TESTED CONFIGURATION. ANOTilER DEVI ATION OCCURS AT Tile SPLICE PLATE COVER. Tile DESIGN USED flEREIN ! UTILIZED A 330-1 FLAT PANEL TO FIT BETWEEN 330-1 V-RIB PANELS ON Tile SIDE RAILS. TIIE FLAT PANEL WAS STITCllED TOP AND BOTTOM, ENSURING Tile INTEGRITY OF Tile FIRE BARRIEP. IN CONCLUSION, Tills INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.

64. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SillMS PRESENT IN DCA 102800/0 llAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 102800/2 PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN llAS BEEN INSTALLED UTILIZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINING METilODS AS WELL AS Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECllNIQUE. Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECllNIQUE ENSURES TilAT Tile STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REM AINS CONTINUOUS AT CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITil UPGRADED JOINT METilODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. Tile OVERALL WIDTil OF Tile BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA TilAN WOULD NORM ALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36" CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. POSITIVE MECilANICAL ATTACllMENT IS PROVIDED AT Tile WALL BY USE 330-1 PANEL FLANGE AND lilLTI BOLT ARRANGEMENT AND " STICK-PINNED" TilROUGli T11E SILICONE FOAM PENETRATION SEAL.

IN CONCLUSION, Tills INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITil BASIS / NOTES I-5 AND IS ACCEPTAllLE AS-IS.

65. Tile RESULTING BOX CONFIGURATION IS Tile SAME AS Tile STANDARD DETAll COVERAGE (DETAll 2-3) EXCEPT Tile 102479/1 BOTTOM OF Tile BOX COVERAGE IS SillMMED DOWN AND TIIE CABLES AIR DROPPING OUT OF Tile BOTTOM OF Tile JB ARE 104257/1 FIRE STOPPED. Tile BASIC CONFIGURATION AND TIIE USE OF FIRE STOPS IIAVE BEEN FIRE TESTED. SillMMING IIAS BEEN FIRE TESTED ON "C" CilANNEL SUPPORTS FOR TRAYS AND ALTilOUGli Tills APPLICATION IS SOMEWilAT DIFFERENT, Tile CONCEPT OF USING Tile SillM TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL BACKING FOR Tile PRIM ARY COVERAGE IS Tile SAME. Tile ADDITIONAL TilERMO-LAG M ATERIAL INSIDE Tile ENVELOPE AND INCREASED AIR VOLUME BENEFITS Tile ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS.

ATTAC11 MENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B65 OF B65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

66. Tile SUPPORT ROD IN PROBLEM 1 IS AN INTERFERING ITEM WillCil DOES NOT REPRESENT A DIRELT llEAT PATil TO Tile 103551/2 ESSENTIAL COMMODITY PROTECTING Tile ROD AT Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE AND EXTENDING Tile PROTECTION 5" TO 6" FROM Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE COMPENSATES FOR Tile INTERFERENCE TO TIIE STANDARD TRA" COVERAGE. IN PROBLEM 2. RAISING TiiE TRAY COVERAGE TO ENCOMPASS Tile CABLES LOCATED ABOVE Tile TRAY .i ESSENTIALLY SillMMING TIIE TRAY COVERAGE. Tile SECOND PANEL ON Tile SIDES PROVIDES ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY.

TIIE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INSIDE Tile ENVELOPE AND INCREASED AIR VOLUME BENEFITS TIIE ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS. TIIE EXTRA PANELS INSIDE Tile TRAY AT Tile INSULATED PIPE INTERFERENCE COMPENSATES FOR Tile REDUCED TillCKNESS. BUTTING Tile TRAY COVERAGE TO Tile UNIT I FLEXI-BLANKET PROVIDES A CONTINUOUS PROTECTED ENVELOPE. IN PROBLEM 3, Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION INVOLVING UNIT I AND UNIT 2 COVERAGE IS STANDARD TESTED COVERAGE. Tile REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF UNIT I TilERMO-LAG IS ONLY TO ALLOW FOR PROPER COVERAGE OF Tile UNIT 2 COMMODITY. Tile FW PIPE IS AN INTERFERENCE TO Tile PROTRUDING SUPPORT STEEL COVERAGE AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A DIRECT IIEAT PATil TO Tile PROTECTED COMMODITY. Tile ADDITIONAL TilERMO-LAG AT Tile INTERFERENCE COMPENSATES FOR Tile REDUCED COVERAGE.

67. Tills DESIGN TAKES Tile CONSERVATIVE APPROACil OF COVERING ALL COMMODITIES PER TIIE MORE STRINGENT 104251/0 REQUIREMENTS OF A JUNCTION BOX. ATTACllMENT TO Tile BEAM IS PER TYPICAL DETAILS BY BUTTING TO Tile BEAM AND APPLYING A TROWEL GRADE FILLL;T AT Tile INTERFACE. Tile INCREASED INTERNAL AIR VOLUME AND ADDED TilERM AL M ASS OF Tile LBD AND Tile CONDUIT SUPPORT WILL BENEFIT Tile ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS. FINALLY Tile CONCRETE DEAM LIMITS POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK.

68. WRAPPING Tile ESSENTIAL CONDUIT IN A COMMON ENCLOSURE WITil Tile NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AND LBD IN 104265/0 ACCORDANCE WITil COVERAGE FOR LBDs IS CONSISTENT WITil TEST SCllEME 10-2 WilERE 2 LBDs WERE COVERED IN A COMMON ENCLOSURE. BUTTING Tile COVERAGE UP TO Tile CONCRETE BEAM WILL ENilANCE Tile COVERAGE BY LIMITING Tile SURFACE AREA SUBJECT TO FIRE EXPOSURE AND TIIE CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A flEAT SINK.

69. DUE TO Tile LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED TilERM AL M ASS OF TIIE PROTECTED COMMODITIES ( PROTRUDING 103701/0 PORTIONS OF Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE M ASS AND Tile M ASS OF Tile CABLE TRAY) Tile TilERM AL AS PROTECTION AFFORDED BY Tile 2 LAYER "B" DESIGN IS ADEQUATE IN ADDITION A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF TIIE MODIFIED '

PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IS Tile CONCRETE CEILING WillCil PREVENTS FIRE EXPOSURE FROM TilAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A BY DCN > IIEAT SINK. Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile BOX IS M AINTAINED PROVIDING 2 LAYERS OF COVERAGE ON Tile BOX, 5727/0 I REINFORCING ALL JOINTS ON BOTil LAYERS WITil TIIE SCORE AND FOLD METilOD OR BY TIE WIRING Tile JOINTS TOGETilER AND ADDING STRESS SKIN AND BY ATTACillNG Tile COVERAGE TO TIIE CEILING UTILIZING IllLTI-BOLTS. TilEREFORE, DUE TO TilESE CONSERVATIVE MECilANICAL ATTACllMENT TECilNIQUES AND Tile 2 LAYER INSTALLATION, Tile ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS OF TilERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT . ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. I

70. Tile BOXES AROUND Tile KELLUM GRIPS ARE SIMILAR TO TYPICAL DETAILS 12-2 AND 12-2.1. Tile JOINTS AROUND Tile 2" 103589/0 TUBE STEEL WillCil SUPPORTS Tile KELLUM GRIPS ARE SCORE AND FOLD WITil STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT. Tile 102265/0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DETAILS 12-2 AND 12-2.1 IN ATFACllMENT A APPLY TO Tills CONFIGURATION.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE C1 OF C40 ATTACIIMENT C MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS l l l l l

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-032. REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C2 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE' SCIIEMES C40) ' ZONE 101320/3 EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: 4" DIA. DRAIN PIPING INTERFERES WITil STANDARD M ATERIAL INSTALLATION ON 1 A 2*DIA. CONDUlT AND A' JUNCTION BOX. RESOLUTION: INSTALL M ATERIAL TO 9-1, 10-2, 1 4, 7, 34 , MAXIMUM TillCKNESS ALLOWED BY TIIE 11-1 INTERFERENCES ON Tile CONDUlT AND J-BOX TO AL. LOW 1/8" CLEARANCE. INCREASE TilERMO-LAG TillCKNESS ON Tile PROTECTED COMMODITIES IN IMMEDIATE AREA OF ! INTERFERING PIPING (AFTER ALLOWING FOR 1/8" CLEARANCE). i i r 102330/1 AB 852 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE 1: TL ON TRAY INTERFERES WITil TL ! ! INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT. i ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCrlON CANNOT INSTALL STRESS SKIN OVER RADIAL BEND DUE TO INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-1 14,9 SECrlONS AGAINST TOP TL PANEL OF TRAY AND SEAL i RESOLUTION 2: COVER EXPOSED PORTION OF 9-1 14,9 I RADIAL BEND WITil STRESS SKIN AND STAPLE. 102478/l AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING TL ON TRAY INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF TL ON ANOTilER I TRAY. i RESOLUTION: COVER SPLICE PLATE ON SIDE l-2,12-1, 1 4, 9, 10 RAIL WITil FLAT BOARD BUTT JOINED TO V- 12-2 RIB BOARD. STRESS SKIN UPGRADE IS 3 OMITTED IN AREA OF INTERFERENCE.

ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C3 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST- (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 102725/0 SG 832 24N4 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITil 2 (s 2" DIA) RIGID CONDUITS SUCil TIIAT COMPLETE COVERAGE WITil 1/4" OVERLAYS IS NOT POSSIBLE. RESOLUTION: 1/2" TillCK M ATERIAL, STRESS 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 7, 15 j SKIN AND 330-660 FOR 180: PROVIDE 1/2" l TillCK 330-1 CONDUIT M ATERIAL W/1/4" j OVERLAY FOR 180* AND 1/2" THICK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL WITil 1/4" OVERLAY AND STRESS SKIN BUTTED TO PIPE. 102758/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FULL COVERAGE ON CONDUIT SUPPORT (PROTRUDING ITEM) CANNOT BE AClllEVED DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil DUCT. RESOLUTION: SEAL TL PANELS ON SUPPORT TO 9-1,10-1 1-6, 13 SIDE OF DUCT WITil TROWEL GRADE 330-660. GAP BETWEEN SUPPORT END PLATE AND DUCT IS FILLED WITil TROWEL GRADE 330-660 PRIOR TO COMPLETING Tile SEALING OF Tile PANELS. 102780/1 EC 778 X-!!3 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR DRAIN PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF TL ON 4" DIA. CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: REDUCE THE Til!CKNESS OF 9-1, 11-1 1-6,7 MATERIAL ON THE CONDUIT TO PERMIT A 1/8" AIR GAP. INSTALL EXTRA I/2" TillCK CONDUlT SECTIONS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE INTERFERENCE FOR A MIN. DISTANCE OF 4" FROM Tile INTERFERING PIPE. l l i

ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME-082 REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C4 OF C40 , DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N). TEST (PAGES C31 - ~. FIRE SCl{ EMES C40) ZONE 102837/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE 1: PIPE INTERFERES WIT 114 (s 2" DIA) RIGID CONDUITS SUCil TilAT COMPLETE COVERAGE WITil I/4" OVERLAYS IS NOT POSSIBLE. ISSUE 2: CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORT INTERFERE WITil CONDUIT ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION 1: 1/2" TillCK M ATERIAL, STRESS 9-1, 11-1 1 4, 7. 15 SKIN AND 330460 FOR 180: PROVIDE 1/2" TillCK 330-1 CONDUlT M ATERIAL W/1/4" OVERLAY FOR 180* AND 1/2" TlilCK 330-1 CONDUlT M ATERIAL WITil 1/4" OVERLAY AND STRESS SKIN BUTTED TO PIPE. RESOLUTION 2: EXTEND ENVELOPE ONTO 9-1 1-6, 7, 15 SUPPORT VIA 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. a I l i

ATTACI. -fC ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COA.0DITY DEVIATION 5 PAGE C5 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 102858/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE BETWEEN TWO LBD'S. RESOLUTION: REMOVE ONE EAR FROM LBD. 9-1 1 4, 9, 16 SPLICE 2 PIECES OF FLAT PANEL TOGETIIER TO REST ON SIDE OF LBD AND REMAINING EAR. INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE WHERE POSSIBLE. 102861/1 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT. l l RESOLUTION: REDUCE Tile THICKNESS OF 9-1, 11-1 14,7 l MATERIAL ON THE CONDUIT TO PERMIT A I/8" l AIR GAP. INSTALL EXTRA l/2" TillCK CONDUlT SECTIONS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO Tile INTERFERING PIPE FOR A MIN. DISTANCE OF 4-102863/1 SG 852 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR CURB INTERFERES WITil TL ON CONDUIT AND CONDUIT UNION. RESOLUTION: TRIM OVERSIZED CONDUIT 9-1, 11-1 1 4, 7, 17 SECTION TO FIT BETWEEN CONDUIT FITTING AND CURB PLATE. INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT WilERE POSSIBLE. APPLY 1/2" TROWEL GRADE WilERE PREFORMED SECTIONS TOUCH OUTSIDE OF CURB WHERE TL TOUCilES ON INSIDE. ! 103007/1 SG 852 2-1008 2SK/17a Y Y ISSUE: GAS LINE (N2 ) INTERFERES WITH TL INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: APPLY 330-1 M ATERIAL LEAVING 9-1,Il-1 1 4, 9, 18 GAP FOR STRESS SKIN BUILD UP. ADD EXTRA TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL IN TIIE AREA AROUND THE DEVIATION.

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-032 REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C6 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE . SC11EM ES C40) ZONE 103037/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: TL ON SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: OMIT STRESS SKIN ON Tile SIDE 12-2 1-6,9 RAIL OF TRAY NEXT TO Tile INTERFERING TL ON TUBE STEEL. 103050/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT (1-1/2"). RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" CONDUIT SECTIONS 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 7, 18 TRIMMING TO FIT BETWEEN CONDUIT AND PIPE. INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAP SECTION AND BUTF AGAINST PIPE AND ADD TROWEL GRADE. 103076/I SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE 1: NEED DETAILS FOR CONDUlT MOUNTED ON TUBE STEEL. ISSUE 2: FULL TillCKNESS CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON SM ALL AREA OF SUPPORT, ~ BETWEEN BACK OF SUPPORT AND WALL, DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil GRATING SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: TYPICAL DETAILS PROVIDED 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 19 (4-8). RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL REDUCED TillCKNESS 11-1 1-6, 19 " TL PANEL ON BACK OF SUPPORT AT INTERFERENCE. INSTALL DOUBLE LAYERS ON EACil SIDE OF SUPPORT TO WALL AT INTERFERENCE TO PROTECT Tile REDUCED TillCKNESS SECTION FROM ANY EXTERNAL FIRE EXPOSURE. l l

       .--.-_..__._.______._.m_._________m -
                                                       - __        _m-        m -
                                                                                     -m                                                       ,.

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082 REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C7 OF C40 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION /IS5UE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE AREA / TEST (PAGES C31 - (YIN) (Y/N) FIRE SCilEMES C40) ZONE 103157/0 SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITil 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: FIT 1/4" OVERLAY AROUND Tile 9-1 1 4, 20 CONDUlT EXCEPT AT Tile TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL 1/4" OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACil SIDE OF TUBING WITli TROWEL GRADE. 103158/0 SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE l&3: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITil 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. ISSUE 2: UNISTRUT INTERFERES WITil 1/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUlT. ISSUE 4: PIPE INTERFERES WITil 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION I&3: FIT 1/4" OVERLAY AROUND 9-1 14, 18, 20, 21 Tile CONDUIT EXCEPT AT Tile TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL 1/4" OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACil SIDE OF TUBING WITil TROWEL GRADE. RESOLUTION 2:. FIT I/4" OVERLAY UP TO EDGE 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 18, 20, 21 OF INTERFERING UNISTRUT. SEAL UNISTRUT TO OVERLAY WITil I/2" OF TROWEL GRADE OUT FROM CONDUIT AND ON EACil SIDE OF UNISTRUT. RESOLUTION 4: TRIM I/4" OVERLAY SECTIONS 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 18, 20, 21 TO CLEAR INTERFERING PIPE. APPLY TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP AROUND DEVIATION AREA.

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C8 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERNIRESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40)

                                       ;                                                                             ZONE 103375/0                     SG               810                    2-082  2SB/8          Y     Y      ISSUE: TIIE WIRE AND STRESS SKIN REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET.

RESOLUTION: FIT STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES 12-1, 14-1, I-5, 9 AROUND AIR DROP INTO TRAY. OMIT STRESS 15-1 SKIN AT INTERFERENCE BETWEEN IIORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL TRAYS. 103401/1 EC 778 X-IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: 6* DIA. PIPING IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO CABLE TRAY REQUIRING TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED PANELS PER SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AT MINOR LOCALIZED AREAS AROUND PIPE FLANGES AND SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: IN LOCALIZED AREAS (ONLY) I-2, 11-1, 1-6, 11 WilERE INTERFERENCES EXIST, INSTALL 330-1 12-1, 12-2, FLAT PANELS ON BOTTOM SURFACE OF TRAY 13-1, 14-1, ENVELOPE. UTILIZE M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 15-1 8-3. SECURE INTERFACE (TRANSITION) BETWEEN V-RIBBED AND FLAT PANELS WITli i STRESS SKIN (STAPLED IN PLACE) AND ! TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. l

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C9 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ZONE 103414/1 l SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: STRESS SKIN CA.NNOT BE INSTALLED F PER REQUIREMENTS. ISSUE 2: STITCIIING CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS. ISSUE 3: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL STRESS SKIN PER 12-1, 14-1, 14,9 SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS. MINIMAL DEVIATION 15-1 FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL STRESS SKIN, STAPLES 12-1, 14-1, 14,9 AND TIE WIRES AS DIRECTED, OMIT 15-1 STITCillNG.

RESOLUTION 3: OMIT MINOR AMOUNTS OF 12-1, 14-1, 14,9 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN ON ONE SIDE OF 15-1 TRAY. 103574/1 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY SUPPORT COMMODITIES (ROD llANGERS AT SIDERAILS AND TUBE STEEL AT TRAY UNDERSIDES) INTERFERE WITil STANDARD ENVELOPE INSTALLATION ON OUTSIDES OF SEVERAL CABLE TRAYS. RESOLUTION: WilERE INTERFERENCES EXIST, 1-2, 11-1, 1 4, 14 INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 330460 INSIDE TRAY 12-1, 12-2, (UNDER CABLES). INSTALL FLAT PANEL 13-1,14-1 MATERIAL INSIDE TRAY RAILS. BUTT V-RIB OR 15-1 FLAT PANEL STOCK UP TO INTERFERENCES ON OUTSIDE OF TRAYS AND TIIEN INCREASE M ATERIAL TillCKNESS ON OUTSIDES OF TRAYS BY BUTTING UP AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE WITil ADDITIONAL LAYER OF PANELS.

ATTACllM ENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIO OF C40

, DCA NO./REV BLDG                            ELEV ROOM  FIRE           SUPP. DET.        DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION   SUPPORT      BASIS / NOTES AREA /         (Y/N)   (Y/N)                                                     TEST         (PAGES C31 -

FIRE SCllEMES C40) ZONE 103599/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL FULL TlilCKNESS OF TIIERMO-LAG ON PROTRUDING CONDUIT SUPPORT AT INTERFERENCE WITil INSTRUMENT TRACK. RESOLUTION: INSTALL REDUCED TIIICKNESS 9-1, 11-1 14,31 PANEL AT INTERFERENCE. ADD SECOND LAYER OF PANEL AROUND INTERFERENCE AND SEAL TO FIRST LAYER. 103602/0 AB 790 X-ISO AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: TilREADED ROD INTERFERES WITil TL ON TRAY. ISSUE 2: STRUCTURAL STEEL AND GROUND CABLE INTERFERES WITil TL ON TRAY. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL FLAT BOARD ON SIDE 11-1 1 4, 9, 22 OF TRAY AND FIT BETWEEN ROD AND TRAY. MAKE SM ALL DEVIATION FROM STRESS SKIN REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION 2: GROUND CAllLE 11-1 1 4, 9, 22 INTERFERENCE WAS REMOVED. INSTALL FLAT BOARD ON BOTTOM OF TRAY, NOTClllNG IF NECESSARY, TO FIT BETWEEN STEEL ANGLE AND TRAY. COVER Tile ANGLE WITil 1/2 FLAT BOARD AND TROWEL GRADE & BAND IN l

PLACE. MOVE GROUND CABLE.

l ( 103609/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITil STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON LONGITUDINALJOINT OF BOX OUT. RESOLUTION: STRESS SKIN UP TO BOTil SIDES 9-1, 10-1 14,9 i OF Tile INTERFERENCES. 1 I l

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME.082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cll OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION - SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES l AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - , i FIRE SCilEMES C40)

;                                  ZONE 103631/0    GEN. GEN. GEN. GEN.       VARI   Y      ISSUE: TO ALLOW FOR FIELD CONDITIONS, ES            CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS OPTIONS FOR GENERIC MODIFICATIONS IN TIE WIRE DETAILS USED TO 11ELP SECURE STRESS SKIN OVER CABLE TRAY LONGITUDINAL JOINTS.                                                                                       !

i RESOLUTION: OF Tile 3 PROPOSED OPTIONS, A 1-2, 12-1, I-5, 9, 9a AND B ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR GENERIC USE. 12-2, 13-1, OPTION C IS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ONLY I4-1, 11-1, WilERE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED. 15-1 I, l 103633/0 SG 790 2-071 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: UNABLE TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TRAY PER REQUIREMENTS DUE , TO INTERFERENCES. i l RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADES 11-1, 12-2 1-6,9 - FOR LONGITUDINALJOINTS AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO INTERFERENCES. USE EXTRA l STAPLING AS DIRECTED. 103636/0 SG 832 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: TUBE STEEL INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF 1/4" TL OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: BUTF 1/4" TL OVERLAY TO TUBE 9-1 1-6, 23 STEEL AND SEAL WITil TROWEL GRADE. COVER Tile SIDES OF Tile SUPPORT TOUCillNG Ti1E TL ON Tile CONDUIT FOR 2" ABOVE AND i BELOW Tile CONDUIT. 103650/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUlT PROTECTED WITil FLEXI-BLANKET INTERFERES WITil INSTALLING ! FLEXI-BLANKET ON ANOTilER CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: BUTF EACil LAYER OF FLEXI- 11-1 1-6, 24 BLANKET UP AGAINST TIIE EXISTING FLEXI-BLANKET ON Tile FIRST CONDUIT. SEAL EACil LAYER WITil TROWEL GRADE. !

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C12 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ZONE 103706/1 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: NUMEROUS INTERFERENCES WITil SECOND LAYER UPGRADE ON JB. RESOLUTION: REINFORCE ALL JOINTS AND 10-2 1-6,8 SEAMS ON FIRST LAYER AS IF TilEY WERE SECOND LAYER. 103718/l SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE 1: INTERFERENCE BETWEEN JB AND LBD WlilCil BOTil REQUIRE TL PROTECTION. ISSUE 2: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITil I/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUlT. 1 ISSUE 3: PIPE INTERFERES WITil I/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. ISSUE 4: CANNOT INSTALL JOINT UPGRADE PER REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION 1&4: INSTALL TL ON JB. IlUTT TL 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 9, 18, 20 FOR LBD AGAINST JB AND JOIN USING STRESS SKIN UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS GIVEN. RESOLUTION 2: FIT 1/4" OVERLAY AROUND 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 9, 18, 20 Tile CONDUIT EXCEPT AT Tile TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL 1/4" OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACil SIDE OF TUBING WITil TROWEL i GRADE. RESOLUTION 3: TRIM 1/4" OVERLAY SECTION 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 9, 18, 20 TO CLEAR INTERFERING PIPE. APPLY TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP AROUND DEVIATION AREA. 103721/1 SG 832 2-094 2SBIl5 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO BEND RADIUS, CANNOT INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUlT 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 12 SECTION MITERED TO FIT Tile BEND.

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME4)82, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl3 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ZONE 103730/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON 2 FLEX CONDUITS DUE TO PROXIMITY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-1,Il-1 1-6, 12 SECTIONS, MITERED AS NECESSARY, TO FIT. 103741/0 SG 852 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: BUTF 1/4" OVERLAY UP TO 9-1. 11-1 1-6,7 SUPPORT AND APPLY TROWEL GRADE TO JOINT. ADD FLAT PLATE ON SUPPORT AROUND INTERFERENCE. 103770/0 AB 852 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil DUCT. RESOLUTION: TRIM Tile 1/4" OVERLAY TO FIT 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 7 IN BETWEEN TIIE CONDUIT AND DUCT. ADD TROWEL GRADE INSIDE 1/4" SECTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 103780/0 AB 852 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AND CABLE INTERFERE WITil STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TWO CONDUlTS WITil RADIAL BENDS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE 9-1, 11-1 1-5, 9 EXCEPT AT Tile POINTS OF INTERFERENCE. 103782/0 SG 832 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: PilYSICAL ARRANGEMENT INTERFERES WITil TRANSITION OF FLEXI-BLANKET TO RIGID CONDUlT SECTION. RESOLUTION: OVERLAP FLEXI-BLANKET 6" 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 16 ONTO RIGID CONDUIT TO ALLOW BETTER DISTRIBUTION OF LOAD ON Tile JOINT.

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C14 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SC11 EMES C40) ZONE 103816/0 SG 810 2-083 2SDi9 Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS DUE TO LNTERFERENCES. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN WilERE 9-1, 10-1, 1-6,9 TilERE ARE NO INTERFERENCES FIRST, TilEN 10-2 INSTALL AT INTERFERENCE STAPLING TO ADJACENT COUPLING. ADD TIE WIRE TO ONE SPECIFIC STRESS SKIN INTERFERENCE. 103864/0 SG 810 2-079 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: BUTT 1/4" TL OVERLAY TO EACil 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 25 SIDE OF Tile STEEL ANGLE. COVER Tile ANGLE (BOTil LEGS) FOR Tile WIDTli OF Tile CONDUIT WITil FLAT BOARD SEALED TO Tile CONDUIT SECrlON WITil TROWEL GRADE. 103947/0 AB 810 X-208 AA/21c N Y ISSUE: PREFORMED CONDUIT SECrlONS WERE INSTALLED ON 2 FLEX CONDUITS. RESOLUTION: ACCEPTABLE. 9-1, 11-1 1-5, 12 103959/0 EC 778 X-IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 3rd LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON CONDUIT AT JUNCTION WITIl MOTOR llOUSING. , RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3rd LAYER AROUND 11-1 1-6, 26 CONDUlT AND BUTF EACli EDGE TO TIIE SIDE OF Tile MOTOR !!OUSING AND SEAL

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. ' MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIS OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . l AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - l FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ! ZONE 103988/0 AB X-810 207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN UPGRADE CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON CONDUIT BEND DUE TO l INTERFERENCE WITil PIPE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL UPGRADE ON EACil 9-1, 10-1 14,9 SIDE OF INTERFERENCE LEAVING CLEARANCE

FOR PIPE.

103991/0 EC 778 X-I I SB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 3rd LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON CONDUIT AT JUNCTION WITil MOTOR llOUSING. l l RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3rd LAYER AROUND 11-1 1 4, 26 ( CONDUIT AND BUTT EACil EDGE TO Tile SIDE l OF Tile MOTOR flOUSING AND SEAL 1 104011/1 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BETWEEN l 12 WIDE CABLE TRAY REQUIRING TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND ADJACENT (NON-ESSENTIAL) CONDUIT SUPPORTS TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED PANELS OVER SIDERAILS. RESOLUTION: AT LOCALIZED AREA OF 1-2, 11-1, 1 4, 14 INTERFERENCE, CREATE PROTECTIVE 12-1, 12-2, ENVELOPE INSIDE TIIE TRAY USING 2 LAYERS 13-1, 14-1, OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER Tile CABLES 15-1 AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF TRAY SIDERAILS. INSTALL V-RIBBED PANELS ON TOP OF Tile ENVELOPE. 101013/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/2th Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL ON CORNER OF JB DUE TO INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE FIRST LAYER JOINTS 10-1, 10-2 14,8 IN AREA OF DEVIATION AND TIIEN INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF BOARD AROUND INTERFERENCE.

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-032. REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C16 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT B. ASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIPE SCIIEMES C40) ZONE , 104017/1 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 1-1/2" CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil PIPE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: COVER Tile ESSENTIAL CONDUIT 9-1, 11-1 14,32 WITil 1/2" TlilCK M ATERIAL, TilEN INSTALL TIIE 1/4" OVERLAY M ATERIAL TO TIIE EXTENT POSSIBLE WillCII WILL LEAVE A 3 WIDE SPACE WITiiOUT OVERLAY COVERAGE. COMPENSATE AT TiiE SUPPORT INTERFERENCE BY COVERING Tile PIPE SUPPORT WITil 1/2" TillCK MATERIAL AND EXTEND COVERAGE OUT IN BOTil DIRECTIONS FROM Tile ESSENTI AL CONDUIT. 104026/1 EC 778 X-IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL ON JB DUE TO INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL 10-1, 10-2 14,8 AROUND INTERFERING CONDUIT. I N 027/0 EC 778 X-115B AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: TL ON RIGID CONDUIT LNTERFERES ! WITil TillRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TIIIRD LAYER OF 9-1, 11-1 1 4, 16 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND FLEX CONDUIT AND RIGID CONDUIT. I M 037/1 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: ROD IIANGERS FOR MISC. COMMODITIES INTERFERE WITil TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON PROTECTED CABLE TRAYS. RESOLUTION: COVER ROD liANGERS AS 1-2, 11-1, 14,30 PROTRUDING ITEMS PER SPECIFICATION. USE 12-1, 12-2, 330-1 FLAT PANELS AND 330460 FLEXI- 13-1,14-1, BLANKET TO EXTEND TRAY AND ASSOCIATED 15-1 TRAY SUPPORT ENVELOPE TO INCLUDE PROTRUDING ROD FLANGERS.

l A7 TAC 11 MENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C17 OF C40 l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SC11 EMES C40) ZONE IN047/0 EC 778 IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR ON AIR DROP CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE IT ENTERS TRAY AT SIIARP ANGLE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN BVO 11-1 1-5, 16 PIECES AS SilOWN. BAND AROUND TRAY. STAPLE FLEXI-BLANKET AND STRESS SKIN PER REQUIREMENTS. 104057/0 EC 778 X-Il3 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT APPLY 1/4' OVERLAY ON 2' CONDUlT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORT. l l RESOLUTION: TRIM 1/4" OVERLAY TO CLEAR 9-1,Il-1 1-6, 7 SUPPORT. 104075/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONDUlT INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF BOARD ON ONE SIDE OF JB. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE Ti1E JOINTS OF TiiE 10-1, 10-2 1-6,8 FIRST LAYER OF TL ON Tile JB. OMIT Tile SECOND LAYER OF TL ON TIIE SIDE WITil Tile INTERFERENCE. IN107/0 AB 832 X-226 AA!21d Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL TillRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WITil METAL SillELD AND CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TillRD LAYER OF 11-1 1-6, 27 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUlT BUTrlNG AGAINST Sil! ELD AND CONDUlT. INSTALL FOURTil LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AT TiiE INTERFERENCES SEALED TO Tile TIIIRD LAYER WITil TROWEL GRADE.

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIS OF C40 i DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)- TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SC11 EMES C40) ZONE 104115/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUlT AT INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY BUTTED 9-1, 11-1 1-6,7 UP AGAINST EITilER SIDE OF EACll SUPPORT ANGLE. ADD AN EXTRA LAYER OF 1/4* OVERLAY ON TOP OF AND SEALED TO EXISTING OVERLAY ON BOTil SIDES OF Tile SUPPORTS. 104151/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO PROXIMITY TO CEILING, INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN UPGRADES ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS ARE NOT FEASIBLE. RESOLUTION: TIIE WIRE LONGITUDINAL 12-1, 14-1, 1-5,9 JOINTS IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN. STAPLE Tile 15-1 CIRCUMFIRENTIAL BUTT JOINT STRESS SKIN ON Tile TRAY BOTTOM AND AT LEAST ONE SIDE. 104152/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: PilYSICAL ARRANGEMENT POSES PROBLEM WITil INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF PANEL ON JB. RESOLUTION: APPLY SINGLE LAYER OF TL ON 10-1, 10-2 1-5,8 SIDE OF JB. SillM INTERNALLY TO ACillEVE A STABLE CONFIGURATION. APPLY STRESS SKIN AND BANDING PER REQUIREMENTS.

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C19 OF C40 DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION- SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. TEST (PAGES C31 - AREA / (Y/N) (YIN)- SCIIEMES C40) FIRE ZONE X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO MULTIPLE INTERFERENCES, 104174/1 AB 790 Tile TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE ON A 30" WIDE CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT ENVELOPE USING 2 1-2,Il-1, 1-6, 14 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER 12-1, 12-2, CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF 13-1. 14-1, TRAY SIDERAILS FOR MINOR DISTANCE TO 15-1 CLEAR INTERFERENCE. OVERLAP FLEXI-BLANKET AND FLAT PANEL 3 FOR DISTANCE OF 9"-11" WITil V-RIBBED PANELS ON OUTSIDE OF TRAY. 104180/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLARS ON TilREE AIR DROPS CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL. DETAILS BECAUSE OF PilYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN 11-1 1-5, 16 PIECES AND SECURE AS DIRECTED. INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND STAPLE AS DIRECTED. 104186!O SG 832 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: INSTRUMENT LINE PROTRUDES TilROUGil AIR DROP INTERFERING WITil 4"-5" FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR. RESOLUTION: CUT OUT COLLAR AND FIT 11-1 1-5, 16 AROUND INSTRUMENT LINE. SEAL WITil TROWEL GRADE 330-660. INSTRUMENT LINE IS ALREADY COVERED AS A PROTRUDING LINE. 104197/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF TL ON TRAY AT SPLICE PLATE. RESOLUTION: COVER SPLICE PLATE ON SIDE 11-1, 12-2, 1-5, 10 RAIL WITil FLAT BOARD BUTT JOINED TO V- 13-1 RIB BOARD. INSTALL JOINTS PER REQUIREMENTS.

  - - - - - - _ = . . . _ . . . . - - . . . . .     . . . .     - . . . . . - - . - - - . - - - - . . . . . .- ... . . - . . . . - . - .

q- J

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-032, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C20 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRilrTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION - SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ! ZONE IM 205/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WITil BASEPLATE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY AND 10-1, 10-2 1-6,8 TRIM TO CLEAR BASEPLATE. ADD TRIM TO CLEAR BASEPLATE. ADD AN ADDITIONAL 1/4" OVERLAY BUTTED UP TO TiiE INTERFERENCE. SEAL WITil TROWEL GRADE. 104211/0 SG 810 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: TIllRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET llAS INTERFERENCE WITil GROUND CABLE. RESOLUTION: GROUND CABLE IS ALREADY 9-1, 11-1 1-5, 16 COVERED WITl! TL. CUT OUT FLEXI-BLANKET AND BUTT TO GROUND CABLE TL APPLY 330-660 TROWEL GRADE AROUND JOINT. 104223/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON AIR DROP PER TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE OF PilYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN BVO 11-1 1-5, 16 < OVERLAPPING PIECES AS DIRECTED. BAND AND SECURE JOINTS PER REQUIREMENTS. t 104234/0 AB 790 X-173 AA/2 ta N Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITli INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF BOARD i ON JB. RESOLUTION: OMIT COVERAGE OF SECOND 10-1, 10-2 1-6,8 I PANEL IN AREA ADJACENT TO INTERFERENCE. SEAL EDGE OF SECOND LAYER. I i 104237/0 EC 792 X-122 EA/54 Y Y ISSUE: JB INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF , l t/4" OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUlT. RESOLUTION: BUTT 1/4" OVERLAY UP TO SIDES 9-1, 11-1 1-5, 7 OF JB. I

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAOE C21 OF C40 SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES C31 - AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 104238/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: JB INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF 1/4" OVERLAY ON 1-1/2" CONDUlT. RESOLUTION: BUIT 1/4" OVERLAY UP TO SIDES 9-1, 11-1 1-6, 7 OF JB. 104239/0 AB 790 X-172 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITil BOX OUT INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT LBD. RESOLUTION: NOTCII ONE SIDE PANEL TO 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 9, 16 CLEAR EARS ON LBD. INSTALL A SECOND PANEL OVER THE NOTCilES AND BEVELED AT THE INTERFERING PIPE. STITCH JOINTS ON 3* CENTERS WHERE STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED AT Tile INTERFERENCE. 104241/1 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: MULTIPLE INTERFERENCES EXIST WITil SECOND LAYER OF TL ON JB. CEILING AND SMOKE DETECTOR INTERFERENCE WITil STRESS SKIN ON LBD. RESOLUTION: OMIT COVERAGE OF SECOND 10-1, 10-2 1-6, 8, 33 PANEL ON JB. COMPENSATE FOR INABILITY TO STAPLE STRESS SKIN JOINT REINFORCEMENT ON LBD DUE TO CLOSE PROXIMITY OF CEILING BY EXTENDING STRESS SKIN DOWN THE SIDES OF Tile LBD. CUT Tile STRESS SKIN AT SMOKE DETECTOR INTERFERENCE AND OVERLAP A SECOND STRESS SKIN PIECE OVER THE CUT. l

_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - l }

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C22 OF C40 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRilTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAI (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 104242/0 EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE 1: PIPE INTERFERES WITil TL ON TWO CONDUITS. ISSUE 2; PIPE INTERFERES WITil TL ON SUPPORT (PROTRUDING). RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL 1/2" PREFORMED, 9-1 1-6, 29 TRIMMED AS NECESSARY, TO CLEAR INTERFERENCE. IF 1/2" SECTION IS TRIMMED, INSTALL SECOND SECTION OVER FIRST AND SEAL IN Tile AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION 2.: INSTALL 1/2" FLAT BOARD ON 1-2, 11-1, 1-6, 29 Tile SUPPORT, TRIMMED AS NECESSARY AT 12-1 TIIE INTERFERENCE, TO CLEAR Tile PIPE. INSTALL SECOND PANEL SEALED TO FIRST IN TIIE AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE. 104243/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21h Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil I/4" OVERLAY ON 2" CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: TRIM TIIE 1/4" OVERLAY 9-1, 11-1 1-6,7 SECTIONS TO CLEAR TIIE INTERFERENCES AND SEAL TO FIRST LAYER. l

ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C23 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 104244/l EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BETWEEN 3" DIA. PIPING (W/ INSULATION) AND ESSENTIAL 2" DIA. CONDUIT PREVENTS COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF 1/4" TillCK OVERLAYS AT A RADIAL BEND. RESOLUTION: REDUCE TilICKNESS OF 9-1,Il-1 1-6,7 INSULATION ON PIPE. INSTALL 1/2" TillCK 330-1 CONDUlT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT AT RADIAL BEND. BUTT Tile 1/4" TillCK OVERLAYS AS TIGilT AS POSSIBLE TO AREA OF INTERFERENCE. 104245/0 AB 822 X-208 AA/2 tc N Y ISSUE: JUNCTION BOX MOUNTED ON CONCRETE WALL REQUIRES 2ND LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG PANELS. IlOWEVER, TilERMO-LAG M ATERIAL INSTALLED ON 2 CONDUlTS ENTERING Tile J-BOX AND ITS LOCATION AGAINST STRUCTURE PREVENT INSTALLATION OF BANDING ON SECOND PANEL LAYER PER SPEC REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION: ATTACil STEEL ANGLE IRON TO 10-1, 10-2 1-6, 35 CONCRETE WALL ADJACENT TO J-BOX WITil filLTI BOLTS. SECURE BANDING FOR 2ND PANEL LAYER TO Tile ANGLE IRON. 2" MAX. DISTANCE FROM LAST BAND TO EDGE OF J-BOX ENCLOSURE PER SPECIFICATION MAY BE EXCEEDED FOR Tills CONFIGURATION.

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082 REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS Pp.GE C24 OF C40 4 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ZONE 104246/2 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1&2: ilVAC IIANGER INTERFERES WITil PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION ON CABLE TRAY AND COVERAGE OF PROTRUDING ITEM. ISSUE 3: TRAPEZE IIANGER INTERFERES WITil COVERAGE OF IIANGER SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: CONSTRUCT ENVELOPE USING l-2, 11-1, 1-6, 14 2 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER 12-1, 12-2, CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF 13-1, 14-1, , TRAY SIDERAILS FOR MINOR DISTANCE TO 15-1 CLEAR INTERFERENCE. OVERLAP FLEXI-BLANKET AND FLAT PANELS FOR DISTANCE OF 9"-11* WITil V-RIBBED PANELS ON OUTSIDE OF TRAY. RESOLUTION 2: TRIM FLAT BOARD AT SAME AS 1-6, 36 IIANGER/ SPLICE PLATE INTERFERENCE. ABOVE RESOLUTION 3: COVER BOTTOM OF TRAY AND SAME AS 1-6, 36 DIAGONAL TRAY SUPPORT UP TO ABOVE INTERFERENCE, ADD I EXTRA FLAT PANEL TilAT IS 3 WIDE AND RUN Tile WIDTli OF INTERFERENCE. DO NOT SEAL PANELS TO TRAPEZE SUPPORT. l l l l l I __ . ____________ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _

ATI'ACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECFED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C25 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 104248/l AB 852 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION IS UNABLE TO USE STANDARD 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET DETAILS TO WRAP CABLE AIR DROPS BEDVEEN 2 TRAYS DUE TO BENDS IN CABLES AND SIIORT DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAYS. ISSUE 2: 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR AROUND WRAPPED CABLE BUNDLES CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS. ISSUE 3: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN IIVAC DUCT AND CABLE TRAY 1 IIANGER FOR STANDARD 9" PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON Tile SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: INCREASE SIZE OF 330-1 PANEL I-2, 11-1, 1 4, 37 ENVELOPES ON TRAYS WITil SillMS TO ENABLE 12-1, 12-2, 330460 CABLE BUNDLES TO BE INCLUDED 13-1, 14-1. WITilIN Tile TRAY ENVELOPES. INSTALL 330- 15-1 660 TROWEL GRADE FIRE STOPS IN EACH TRAY AND EXTEND PANEL COVERAGE OUT TO ENDS OF TRAYS. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL A COLLAR 11-1 l-6, 37 CONSTRUCTED OF 33049 STRESS SKIN AROUND Tile FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES. FLARE Tile STRESS SKIN OUT ONTO Tile 330-1 PANELS ON T11E TRAY AND STAPLE IN PLACE TilEN USE 330460 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP ON TIIE STRESS SKIN. RESOLUTION 3: USE 330-1 FLAT PANEL STOCK 1-2, 11-1, 1 4, 37 SIIAVED TO FIT BEDVEEN DUCT AND TRAY 12-1, 12-2, llANGER. ADD 2ND FLAT PANEL LAYER 13-1, 14-1, BUTTED TO INTERFERENCE AND TIE WIRED TO 15-1 FIRST LAYER. EXTEND 2ND LAYER COVERAGE OUT 2" MIN. DISTANCE IN ALL DIRECTIONS TO COMPENSATE FOR MINOR AREA OF REDUCED TillCKNESS.

ATI'ACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C26 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCllEMES C40) ZONE 104250/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP OF STRESS SKIN AROUND COMPLETE TRAY ENVELOPE AT BUTT JOINTS CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO MULTIPLE WRAPPED AIR DROPS ENTERING TRAY IN AREA OF BUTT JOINTS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN TO WRAP l-2, 11-1, 14,38 CIRCUMFERENCE OF TRAY ENVELOPE TO 12-1, 12-2. EXTENT PRACTICABLE, SECURE WITil 13-1, 14-1. ADDITIONAL STAPLES AND APPLY TROWEL 15-1 GRADE BUILDUP. 104252/0 AB 832 X-219 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE 1: EXISTING TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON UNIT I CABLE TRAY INTERFERES WITil COVERAGE ON SIDERAll OF ADJACENT UNIT 2 TRAY AT SPLICE PLATE. ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION IS UNABLE TO INSTALL 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR TO REINFORCE INTERFACE WilERE COVERED AIR DROP BUNDLES ENTER CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION 1: UTILIZE 330-1 FLAT PANEL I-2, 11-1, 1-6, 39 STOCK SillMMED OUT TO SPAN ACROSS SPLICE 12-1, 12-2 PLATE IlOLTS. TIE WIRE FLAT PANEL PIECE 13-1,14-1 TO STANDARD V-RIB PANELS INSTALLED ON 15-1 TRAY SIDE RAILS. RESOLUTION 2: UTILIZE 33049 STRESS SKIN 1-2, 11-1, 1 4, 39 SECURED TO 330-660 MATERIAL ON AIR DROPS 12-1, 12-2. AND TO 330-1 PANELS ON CABLE TRAY WITil 13-1, 14-1, STAPLES IN LIEU OF 330460 COLLAR. ADD 330- 15-1 660 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP ON Tile STRESS SKIN.

I ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ( MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C27 OF C40 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION!!SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCilEMES C40) ZONE i l 104253/0 EC 778 X-Il3 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: DVO (2) INSTANCES EXIST WilERE Tile OUTER (V-RIB) PANEL COVERAGE ON 1-BOXES CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCES. RESOLUTION: INSTALL OUTER LAYER OF V- 10-1, 10-2 1-6, 40 RIB PANELS ON TIIE J-BOXES TO EXTENT PRACTICABLE. FLAT PANEL STOCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN IMMEDIATE AREA OF INTERFERENCE ON 1-BOX JB2A-066B AND V-RIBS M AY BE FLA7TENED SLIGIITLY TO ENABLE FIT ON JB2A-06SW. IN BOTil CASES EXTEND Tile 2ND LAYER PANEL COVERAGE TO CONCRETE STRUCTURE AND SECURE USING DETAIL 11-6 OR 11-7. REINFORCEMENT OF ALL SEAMS AND JOINTS SilALL BE IN ACCORDANCE l WITil DETAIL 2-3. l i 104254/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: DUE TO BEND RADIUS OF 1" DIA. FLEX CONDUIT AND PROXIMITY TO ADJACENT RIGID CONDUIT (COVERED WITil 330-1 PREFORMED MATERIAL SECTIONS) COMPLETE 3RD LAYER WRAP OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON Tile FLEX CONDUlT CANNOT BE INSTALLED. RESOLUTION: NOTCil Tile 3RD LAYER OF 11-1 1-6, 41 FLEXI-BLANKET M ATERIAL IN AREA OF INTERFERENCE AND FILL GAP WITil 330-660 TROWEL GRADE. AT BEND RADIUS,3RD LAYER MAY CONSIST OF 2 SEPARATE PIECES OF 330-660 AS LONG AS 2"-4" OVERLAP BETWEEN PIECES IS M AINTAINED.

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C28 OF C40 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCIIEMES C40) ' ZONE i 104255/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCES BETWEEN 5 SEPARATE AIR DROP CABLE BUNDLES (WRAPPED WITil 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET) WilICil ENTER COMMON CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE, 330460 COLLAR ASSEMBLY CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL l 34 0N ONE BUNDLE. I RESOLUTION: BUTT Tile 330460 M ATERIAL 11-1 14,42 FOR Tile COLLAR ON Tile SUBJECT AIR DROP BUNDLE UP TO Tile COLLAR ASSEMBLY OF Tile ADJACENT AIR DROP BUNDLE. INSTALL 330460 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL W11ERE AIR DROP BUNDLES MEET ON BOTil SIDES. I l l t l I i l L_____. _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . j

ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C29 OF C40 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCilEMES C40) ZONE 104258/0 AB 822 X-208 AA/21c N Y ISSUE: A FLEX CONDUIT ENTERING A FOAM SEAL BLOCKOUT REQUIRES TIIERMO-LAG PROTECTION. Tills FLEX CONDUlT IS INSTALLED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO AN i ADJACENT RIGID CONDUlT TilAT IS PROTECTED WITIl 330-1 PREFORMED CONDUlT SECTION M ATERIAL DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE FOR INSTALLATION OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP ON TIIE FLEX CONDUIT, CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS USE OF 330-1 CONDUIT SECTION M ATERIAL ON Tile FLEX FOR AN APPROXIMATE 10" DISTANCE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 PREFORMED 9-1, 10-1, 14,43 CONDUIT SECTION MATERIAL ON Tile FLEX 10-2, 11-1 l FOR A 10" DISTANCE. TiiE REMAINDER OF TIIE FLEX CONDUIT SilALL BE PR.OTECTED WITil 330460 PER STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. SEAL l TIIE 330-1 MATERIAL TO Tile M-BOARD l DAMMING MATERIAL AT Tile BLOCKOUT WITil I A FILLET WELD OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. WilERE Tile 330-1 COVERAGE ON Tile ADJ ACENT CONDUITS INTERFACE, WRAP WITil STRESS SKIN AND BUILD UP WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. 104261/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: TWO (2) ADJACENT PROTECTED CABLE AIR DROP BUNDLES ENTER A CABLE TRAY ( PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN TOO CLOSE j PROXIMITY TO ENABLE INSTALLATION OF TIIE i 330460 COLLAR AROUND EACil BUNDLE SEPARATELY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL A SINGLE 330460 11-1 14,42 i COLLAR ASSEMBLY AROUND BOTil PROTECTED CABLE BUNDLES. FILL ANY VOID AREAS WITil 330460 TROWEL GRADE M ATERI AL.. __ .J

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C30 OF C40 ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES C31 - FIRE SCHEMES C40) ZONE 148262/0 AB 852 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO PROXIMITY OF A 8 X 8 ANGLE IRON SUPPORT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO Tile SIDE RAIL AREA OF A 36" WIDE CABLE TRAY AND ONLY 1/2" CLEARANCE FROM THE TRAY TOP PANEL AND CONCRETE CEILING, STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE OVERLAPPED ONTO Tile TOP PANEL SURFACE FOR A DISTANCE OF APPROXIM ATELY 30". RESOLUTION: SECURE Tile STRESS SKIN TO l-2, 11-1, 1-6, 44 BOTil SIDES OF Tile TRAY ENVELOPE AND 12-1, 12-2, ALSO ALL Tile WAY ACROSS Tile BOTTOM OF 13-1,14-1 THE TRAY WITil STAPLES AND BUILD UP WITH 15-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL FOR Tile 30-DISTANCE. IG1264/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/2!a N Y ISSUE: AN AIR DROP CABLE BUNDLE ENTERING TIIE TOP OF Tile CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE WAS ORIGINALLY PROTECTED WITil 330460 WRAPS AND FIRE STOPPED WITil 330460 TROWEL GRADE AS PROTRUDING (NON-ESSENTIAL) CABLES BUT REQUIRES PROTECTION AS ESSENTIAL CABLES UP TO THE 330-1 COVERAGE ON A 2* DIA. CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3 WRAPS OF 330460 11-1 1-6. 45 AROUND TIIE EXISTING (FIRE STOPPED) BUNDLE AT THE TRAY INTERFACE. CONTINUE THE 3 LAYER WRAP AND SECURE ON THE 2* DIA. CONDUIT PER TYPICAL DETAILS. _ _ _ _ _ _ __________.._____________._________-____m__ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_- - - - . _ - _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME4)82, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C31 OF C40 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

1. CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

2. EFFECTIVE THICK. NESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

3. THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS.

j 4. THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

5. THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICil WOULD GENERIC ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION. SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS. MOUNTED TO STRUCTURE. TORTUROUS PATii. ETC.).

I 7. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 1/2" THICK THERMO-LAG 330-1 PREFABRICATED SECTIONS ON 3 DIA. AND LARGER CONDUIT AND 1/2" 101320/3 THICK M ATERIAL IN CONJUNCTION WITH I/4" THICK ~ OVERLAY" SECTIONS ON 3/4 -2 DIA. CONDUITS HAS BEEN QUALIFIED 102780/1 VIA TEST SCHEMES 9-1,10-1,10-2 AND ll-L MINOR LOCAllZED AREAS WHERE EITHER THE 1/4 THICK OVERLAYS AND/OR 103741/0 THE I/2 THICK ~ BASE" M ATERIAL CANNOT BE INSTALLED TO FULL THICKNESSES REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATION DUE TO 103770/0 THE PRESENCE OF INTERFERENCES (WHICH ARE NOT PART OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE) ARE ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE I M 057/0 , FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL M ASS OF Ti!ERMO-LAG MATERIAL INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE INTERFERENCE 104115/0 l IS TYPICALLY INCREASED, RESULTING IN MORE MASS IN THE AREA SURROUNDING THE REDUCED COVERAGE. 104237/0 ADDITIONALLY, THE INTERFERING COMMODITY (PIPE, SUPPORT, CONDUIT, ETC.) ITSELF ACTS TO StilELD THE AREA OF 104238/O REDUCED MATERIAL COVERAGE.1.E., CREATES A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT TO ATTACK THE PROTECTED COMMODITY. 102863/1 FINALLY.THE INTERFERING COMMOD:TY WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. 103050/0 102725/0 102837/0 IM 243/0 IM 244/0

8. TEST SCHEME 10-2 DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 1/2" TL FLAT BOARD ON JUNCTION BOXES 103706/1 AND IS CREDITED WHERE INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF THE SECOND LAYER. THIS DEVIATION FROM IM013/0 SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 104026/1 IN075/0 104152/0 IM 234/0 IM241/1 i

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C32 OF CCD ACCEITANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV NOTE DUE TO THE SPECIFIC PLANT CONFIGURATION, DEVIATION (S) FPOM STRESS SKIN. TIE WIRING. STAPLING OR OTHER JOINT 102330/1 9. 102478/l ENHANCEMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE REQUIRED. THESE DEVIATION (S) ARE A SMALL PART OF THE MECHANICAL JOINING ON 102858/0 THIS INSTALLATION AND INDIVIDUAL LOCAL DEVIATION (S). THEY DO NOT COMPROMISE THE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF 103007/I THE JOINT (S) AS A WHOLE OR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FIRE BARRIER. 103037/0 103375/0 103414/I 103602/0 103609/0 103626/0 103633/0 103718/l 103816/0 103988/0 104151/0 103631/0 9a. Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED USES STRESS SKIN OVERLAP ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. THE STRESS SKIN WAS SECURED TO THE 330-1 PANELS WITII STAPLES AND TIE WIRES. ALL 3 OPTIONS SHOWN ALSO USE BOTH METHODS, llOWEVER Tile DETAILS FOR TIE WIRE INSTALLATION VARY SLIGHTLY FOR TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. OPTIONS A AND B ARE EQUIVALENT TO THE TESTED METilOD AND ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR GENERIC USE. OPTION C DOES NOT PROVIDE THE SAME DEGREE OF TIGHTNESS AS OPTIONS A AND B, AND SHALL NOT BE USED GENERICALLY. OPTION C METHC9 IS ACCEPTABLE WilERE INSTALLED SINCE STRESS SKIN IS STAPLED AND TROWEL GRADE APPLIED OVER BOTH STRESS SKIN AND STAPLES. Tile TIE WIRES SAG DURING TEST AND ALTHOUGH NOT TESTED WITHOUT, THEIR INHERENT EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING STRESS SKIN ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IS DEFINITELY SECONDARY TO THAT OF THE STAPLES COVERED WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. 102478/l

10. Tile ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION FOR COVERAGE OF THE TRAY SPLICE PLATE WITH FLAT BOARD PROVIDES THE SAME 104197/0 THICKNESS OF MATERIAL METHODS OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT HAVE BEEN TESTED AND EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE.

103401/1

11. THE IDENTIFIED CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES FOR Tile FULL RANGE OF UNIT 2 CABLE TRAY SIZES (12 -36* WIDE TRAYS) CONSTRUCTED OF 1/2" THICK (NOMINAL) 330-1 V-RIBBED PANE 13. THIS CONFIGURATION HAS 4 MINOR AREAS IN A 5 FT. HORIZONTAL TRAY RUN (EACH < 6' LONG) WHERE FLAT PANEL M ATERIAL WAS INSTALLED.

THE M ATERI AL THICKNESS IS M AINTAINED CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES USED AT THE TRANSITION BE'nVEEN V-RIBBED AND FLAT PANEL STOCK (STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP) IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. ADDITIONALLY THE INTERFERENCES THEMSELVES SERVE TO SHIELD THE LOCALIZED AREAS WITil FLAT PANEL STOCK INSTALLED, AND CREATE A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT ENTRY INTO THE ENVELOPE. TilEREFORE, THIS DEVIATION IS ACCEPTABLE. Tile USE OF FLAT PANEL STOCK AT LOCALIZED AREAS ON THE UNDERSIDES OF CABLE TRAi PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES IS CONSISTENT WITil M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 (SEE ATTACHMENT A FOR TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS DETAIL).

ATTAC11 MENT C ER-ME-082 REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C33 OF C40 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

12. THE USE OF MITERED PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS FOR COVERAGE OF FLEX CONDUIT IS NOT A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 103721/1 HOWEVER, SINCE THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO 103730/0 TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTARI F- 103947/0

13. THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE Tile FULL REQUIRED MATERIAL THICKNESS AT THE END OF THE 102758/0 CONDUIT SUPPORT. Tile PRIM ARY RACEWAY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. Tile SEALING OF THE SUPPORT TO TIIE INTERFERING DUCT PROTECTS THE END OF THE SUPPORT FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PATH FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT TRANSFER.

14. THE TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFIED CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES WITil 1/2' (NOMIN AL) TillCKNESS V-RIB PANEL 103574/l M ATERIAL INSTALLED AROUND EXTERIOR SURFACES OF CABLE TR AYS. TiiE COVERAGE DEVI ATIONS PER TilESE DCAs 104011/1 IDENTIFY SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AROUND CABLE TRAY PERIMETER SURFACES WHERE STANDARD (EXTERIOR) V-RIB PANEL 104174/1 l

COVERAGE CAN'T BE INSTALLED DUE TO INTERFERENCES (ROD HANGERS. ETC ; AT TRAY SIDERAILS AND SUPPORT MEMBERS 104246/2 ON TRAY UNDERSIDES. IN AREAS WHERE TIIESE INTERFERENCES EXIST. 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET (QUALIFIED j VIA SCHEME 11-1) ARE INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAYS (UNDER THE CABLES) AND PL AT PANEL STOCK IS INSTALLED INSIDE TRAY SIDERAILS. PANELS INSTALLED ON TRAY TOP SURFACES ARE PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. M ATERI AL CO'ERAGE OUTSIDE THE TRAYS IS ACIIIEVED BY BUTTING UP V-RIB PANEL STOCK AS CLOSE TO THE INTERFERING ITEM AS POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL FLAT PANEL STOCK IS THEN ADDED IN Tile IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE INTERFEi'ING ITEM TO FURTHER INCREASE M ATERIAL THICKNESS ON Tile OUTSIDE SURFACES OF THE TRAYS. EFFECTIVE M ATERI AL THICKNESSES, CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS ARE TIIEREFORE PROVIDED. THE INCREASED MATERIAL M ASS INSTALLED OUTSIDE THE TRAYS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO INTERFERING ITEMS ENHANCES SUBLIM ATION AND CHAR LAYER FORM ATION TO EFFECTIVELY COOL THE LOCALIZED AREAS WHERE M ATERIAL WAS INSTALLED ON THE INTERIOR TRAY SURFACES. FINALLY, THE INTERFERING ITEMS THEMSELVES AND NEIGHBORING ENHANCED THERMO-LAG THICKNESSES SERVE AS A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT ENTRY INTO THE ENVELOPE. THEREFORE. THESE CONFIGURATIONS PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND THE LOCALIZED AREAS OF DEVIATED COVERAGE ARE ACCEPTABLE.

15. FOR THE l' DIA. CONDUIT. THE MINOR AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE (< 3" LONG ON ONE SIDE ONLY) AND SHIELDING 102725/0 EFFECTS OF THE PIPE AND CONDUlT BELOW ARE CREDITED. SCHEME 11-1 DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVE USE OF 330-660 102837/0 FLEXI-BLANKET OVER 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS. EXTENSION OF CONDUlT ENVELOPE VIA TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FGR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH.

16. THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS FOR THIS INSTALLATION ARE M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. THE 102858/0 INSTALLATION USES M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 103782/0 104027/0 104047/0 104180/0 104186/0 IM2il/0 IN223/0 104239/0

ATTACHMENT C ER-MGO82, REV. 2 MINOR PROTEGED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C34 OF C40 ACCEPTANCE BASIS! NOTES DCA/REV NOTE THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACIIIEVE THE FULL MATERIALTHICKNESS WHERE Tile CONDUIT FITTING 102863/1 17. INTERFERES WITil Tile CURB. BITITING THE TL AGAINST Ti1E CURB AND COVERING Ti1E BACK SIDE OF THE CURB PROTECS Tile SM ALL AREA OF TilIN TL FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO Tile FIRE AND PROVIDFS A TORTUROUS PATil FOR CONVECTIVE ilEAT TRANSFER. ADDITIONALLY THE CONFIGURATION IS LOCATED RIGitT ABOVE A SEALED FLOOR PENETRATION PRECLUDING FIRE APPROACHING FROM BELOW OR THE SIDES. Tile CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE Tile FULL MATERIAL TillCKNESS IN A SMALL AREA AROUND YHE 103007/1 18. 103050/0 PIPE INTERFERENCE. Tile PIPE PROTECTS THE DEVIATION AREA FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO Tile FIRE. THE EXTRA TROWEL 103718/0 GRADE MATERIAL PROVIDES EXTRA PROTECTIVE M ATERIAL IN THE AREA AROUND TIIE DEVIATION AND A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT TRANSFER. 103076/1

19. Tile CONFIGURATION DOES NOT GET THE FULL TilICKNESS OF TL ON A SM ALL AREA ON Tile BACK SIDE OF A CONDUIT SUPPORT AWAY FROM Tile CONDUIT. THE TL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN Tile SUPPORT AND THE WALL. DOUBLE LAYERS OF Tile TL ARE INSTALLED ON EACII SIDE OF THE SUPPORT AND BUTTED TO THE WALL. THERE IS NO FIRE EXPOSURE TO THE BACK SIDE OF Tile SUPPORT AND Tile DOUBLE LAYERS ON Tile SIDES PROVIDE EXTRA RESISTANCE TO CONDUCTION IN THROUGil TIIE SIDES.

103157/0

20. Tile SUBJECT CONDUIT IS RUN PARALLEL TO Tile WALL. THE INSTRUMENT TUBING IS ALSO RUN PARALLEL TO Tile WALL 103158/0 CROSSING THE CONDUlT BETWEEN THE CONDUIT AND THE WALL. SEALING BEDVEEN THE WALL AND THE CONDUITS ON 103718/l EITilER SIDE OF Tile TUBING PROVIDES EXTRA M ATERIAL AROUND TIIE SM ALL AREA OF DEVIATION PROTECTS THE DEVIATION FROM DIRECT FIRE IMPINGEMENT AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT TRANSFER.

103158/0

21. PROVIDING TROWEL GRADE TO SEAL AROUND TIIE UNISTRUT PROTECTS THE DEVIATION FROM DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS AND PROVIDES EXTRA RESISTANCE TO HEAT TRANSFER.

103602/0

22. Tills INSTALLATION POTENTIALLY FAILS TO ACHIEVE FULL M ATERIAL THICKNESS BETWEEN THE STEEL ANGLE AI4D THE TRAY BOTTOM. Tile ANGLE SHIELDS Tile POTENTIAL DEV!ATION FROM ANY DIRECT FIRE EXPOSURE AND TIIE PANEUS OVER TIIE ANGLE PROVIDE EXTRA RESISTANCE TO HEAT TRANSFER ALONG WITH ENSURING A VERY TORTUROUS PATil TO THE AREA OF THE DEVIATION.

THIS CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACHIEVE Tile REQUIRED 1/4" OVERLAY BETWEEN Tile CONDUIT AND THE 103636/0 23. TUBE STEEL. BUTTING Tile OVERLAY AGAINST Tile TUBE STEEL AND SEALING WITH TROWEL GRADE PROTECTS THE AREA FROM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO A FIRE. INSTALLING FLAT BOARD ON TilREE SIDES PROVIDES EXTRA M ATERIAL FOR IIEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE AND ADDS EXTRA PROTECTION AROUND THE DEVIATION FROM ANY TYPE OF EXPOSURE. 103650/0

24. THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS IN THIS CONFIGURATION ARE M ATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. THE INSTALLED CONFIGURATION HAS MATERIAL T111CKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. NOT INSTALLING FULL LAYER (S) OF TL AT TIIE INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THE INTERFERENCE IS Tile REQUIRED THICKNESS OF TL

AlTACHMENT C ER-ME482, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C35 OF C40 NOTE ACCEITANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV J

25. TIIIS CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACHIEVE TIIE REQUIRED 1/4" OVERLAY BETWEEN Tile CONDUIT AND 103864/0 STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT. BUTTING Tile OVERLAY AGAINST BOTH SIDES OF TliE LEG OF THE ANGLE AND SEALING WITH TROWEL GRADE PROTECTS THE SM ALL AREA OF DEVIATION FROM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. INSTALLING FLAT BOARD ON BOTH LEGS OF THE ANGLE PROVIDES EXTRA M ATERI AL FOR liEAT TR ANSFER RESISTANCE AND EXTRA PROTECTION AROUND THE DEVIATION.

26. LOCALIZED OMISSION OF TillRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET NEXT TO Tile MOTOR HOUSING IS ACCEL 4ABLE BECAUSE THE 103959/0 CONDUIT TERMINATES AT THE MOTOR TIIE TL IS APPLIED TO SUPPORT OPER ABILITY OF THE MOTOR AND A FIRE AT THE 103991/0 POINT OF INTERFERENCE WOULD RENDER Tile MOTOR INOPERABLE AND THE TL UNNECE5SARY.

27. THIS CONFIGURATION AS INSTALLED COULD NOT ACHIEVE THE THIRD FULL LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AT INTERFERENCES IN107/0 WITH A STEEL SHIELD AND A CONDUIT. Tile TillRD LAYER WAS INSTALLED BUTFED UP AGAINST Tile INTERFERENCES A i FOURTH LAYER WAS INSTALLED SEALED TO Tile TillRD AND AROUND Tile AREA OF Tile DEVIATION TO PROTECT THE DEVIATION FROM DIRECF EXPOSURE TO THE FIRE AND TO PKOVIDF EXTR A M ATERI A!. FOR INCREASED RESISTANCE TO HEAT TRANSFER.

28. THIS CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACillEVE THE REQUIRED 1/4 OVERLAY ON THE CONDUIT AT THE 104205/0 BASEPLATE. BUTTING THE OVERLAY AGAINST THE STEEL AND ADDING EXTRA M ATERIAL AT THE INTERFERENCE PROTECTS Tile AREA FORM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. IT ALSO PROVIDES EXT RA M ATFRf Ai. COR HEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE TO PROVIDE MORE PROTECTION AT THE DEVIATION.

29 TIIIS CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED FAILS TO ACillEVE THE REQUIRED THICKNESS AT THE INTERFERENCES. IN242/0 ADDING EXTRA M ATERIAL AT Tile INTERFERENCE PROTECTS Tile AREA FORM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. IT ALSO PROVIDES EXTRA M ATERIAL FOR llEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE TO PROVIDE MORE PROTECTION AT THE DEVIATION.

30. Tile IDENTIFIED TEST SCIIEMES QUALIFIED CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES WITH PROTRUDING ITEMS SUCil AS IN037/1 SUPPORTS OR UNISTRUT MEMBERS. REQUIRED M ATERIAL TillCKNESSES AND CONTINUITY OF THE TRAY ENVELOPES ARE M AINTAINED AND CONSISTENT WITI'. TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. EFFECTS OF POTENTI AL MOVEMENTS OF THE PROTRUDING !

ITEMS ARE ADEQUATELY ADDr ESSED IN THE DESIGN.

31. Tile CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED. DOES NOT ACHIEVE THE FULL REQUIRED M ATERI AL Til!CKNESS ON A PROTRUDING 103599/0 ITEM AT AN INTERFERENCE. TIIE PRIMARY RACEWAY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. Tile EXTRA LAYER OF PANEL PROTECTS THE INTERFERENCE FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO A FIRE AND PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR RESISTANCE TO IIEAT TRANSFER.

32. Tile PIPE SUPPORT ONLY INTERFERES WITil THE INSTALLATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT BUT DOES NOT 104017/1 PRESENT A DIRECT HEAT PATil INTO Tile ESSENTIAL COMMODITY. IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE COVERED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. COVERING Tile PIPE SUPPORT WITil 1/2" TillCK THERMO-LAG AT Tile INTERFERENCE AND EXTENDING COVERAGE OUT APPROXIM ATELY 3 IN ONE DIRECTION AND 6 IN Tile OTIIER MORE Til AN COMPENSATES FOR Tile 3" WIDE 1/4" OVERLAY OMISSION.

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C36 OF C40 DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES 104241/1

33. TIIERE ARE MULTIPLE INTERFERENCES AROUND THE JB DUE TO CONDUITS AND SUPPORTS. ALSO THE JB IS UP AGAINST THE CEILING AND A BEAM WHICil RESTRICTS ACCESSIBILITY. THE INSTALLATION OF A SECOND LAYER OF THERMO-LAG ON THE JB WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN MULTIPLE GAPS WHERE THE 2ND LAYER COULD NOT HAVE BEEN INSTALLED MAKING THE 2ND LAYER INEFFECTIVE. THE TEST AS EXPLAINED IN NOTE 8. THE HEAT SINK AFFORDED BY THE CONCRETE CEILING AND BEAM AND Tile COMPLETE UPGRAl>E OF THE JOINTS AND PENETRATIONS MAKE THE INSTALLATION ACCEPTABLE.

THE COMPENSATION PROVIDED FOR THE MINOR PROBLEMS WITil APPLYING STRESS SKIN ON LBD JOINTS BY EXTENDING STRESS SKIN WilICH CANNOT BE STAPLED ON TOP OF THE LBD, DOWN ONTO THE SIDES WHERE IT CAN BE STAPLED AND BY REINFORCING THE CUT STRESS SKIN AT THE SMOKE DETECTOR WIT 11 A 2ND PIECE ON STRESS SKIN RESULTS IN AN ACCEPTABLE INSTALLATION WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITil THE TESTED CONFIGUR ATIONS. AS DESCRIBED BY NOTE 8, TEST SCHEME 10-2 DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG 330- 101320/3 34. I FLAT PANE 13 ON JUNCTION BOXES, WITH JOINTS BETWEEN THE PANEL PIECES REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN (STAPLED IN PLACE) AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL BUILDUP. CONDUIT ENTRANCES INTO THE JUNCTION BOX / PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ARE REINFORCED IN A SIMILAR MANNER. IN SOME INSTANCES, DUE TO INTERFERING COMMODITIES SUCH AS CONDUITS OR PIPING WHICII ARE NOT PART OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE, A LOCALIZED AREA BEDVEEN Ti1E JUNCTION BOX AND THE INTERFERING COMMODITY DOES NOT llAVE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE TO ALLOW THE FULLTHICKNESS OF A SINGLE PANEL TO BE INSTALLED ON THE JUNCTION BOX. THIS CONDITION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE THE MATERIAL TilICKNESS ON THE JUNCTION BOX IS INCREASED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE INTERFERENCE BY THE ADDITION OF A SECOND LAYER OF THERMO-LAG PANEL. THEREFORE SUFFICIENT TilERMO-LAG MATERIAL M ASS IS PROVIDED TO REACT WITH HEAT AT THE AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE SUCH TilAT SUBLIMATION AND CHAR LAYER FORM ATION WILL OCCUR TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE HEAT ENTRY INTO Tile JUNCTION BOX. ADDITIONALLY, Tile INTERFERING COMMODITY ITSELF WILL SERVE TO SillELD THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE AND ALSO SERVES AS A HEAT SINK TO PREVENT CONDUCTIVE HEAT TRANSFER INTO THE ENCLOSURE. 104245/0

35. THIS CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM SPECIFIED BANDING DETAILS ON THE 2ND PANEL LAYER ASSOCIATED WITH A JUNCTION BOX. THE M AXIMUM DISTANCE TYPICALLY ALLOWED FROM THE LAST BAND TO THE EDGE OF AN ENCLOSURE IS 2" TIIE INSTALLED CONFIGURATION RESULTS IN Tile LAST BAND BEING 3"-4" FROM THE EDGE. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE Tile BANDING ON THE 2ND PANEL LAYER IS SECURED TO STRUCTURE WITH ANGLE IRON. THE RESULTING BANDING CONFIGURATION WILL NOT IMPACT THE FIRE RESISTIVE PROPERTIES OF THE ENCLOSURE. THE MATERIAL THICKNESS (1.E.,2 PANEL LAYERS) IS CONSISTENT WITil A TESTED CONFIGURATION AND THE BANDING TECHNIQUES PROVIDED ARE ADEQUATE TO SECURE THE M ATERIAL IN PLACE.

104246/2 ! 36. THE REDUCTION OF THE PANEL AT THE HVAC INTERFERENCE WILL NOT COMPROMISE THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE SINCE THE REDUCTION IS ONLY 1/8" AT TIIE INTERFERENCE. ALTHOUGH THIS REPRESENTS A REDUCED THICKNESS FROM THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, THE REM AINING ATTRIBUTES FOR PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ARE IN ( ACCORDANCE WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE LOCATION WHERE Tile TRAPEZE HANGER CROSSES THE ANGLE SUPPORT AMOUNTS TO 1/2" X 2" IN AREAIDIMENSIONS. EXTRA 330-1 PANELS H AVE BEEN INSTALLED TO CREATE A ! TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT AS WELL AS THE SHIELDING AFFECTS PROVIDED BY Tile ANGLE / HANGER. i i

A'ITACHMENT C ER-ME-082 REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C37 OF C40 NOTE ACCEITANCE BASISINOTES DCA/REV

37. ISSUE 1: TEST SCHEME 11-1 QUALIFIED THE CONFIGURATION OF INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE 104248/l ENVELOPE AT THE POINT WHERE CABLE BUNDLES WRAPPED WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ENTERS THE END OF A CABLE TRAY. ALTHOUGH THE TRAY TEST WAS FOR A 24" WIDE TRAY AND THE DCA CONFIGURATION IS FOR A 36" WIDE TRAY, THE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES ARE THE SAME. THEREFORE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT QUALIFIED BY TEST AND IS ACCEPTABLE.

ISSUE 2: TEST SCHEME 11-1 QUALIFIED THE USE OF A " COLLAR" PIECE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO REINFORCE THE INTERFACE REGION WHERE CABLE BUNDLES WRAPPED WITil 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ENTER THE CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE CONSTRUCTED OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP TO REINFORCE Tile INTERFACE REGION. SINCE 330-69 STRESS SKIN IS ACTUALLY STEEL MESH WHICll IIAS BEEN SECURED TO Tile PANELS ON Tile TRAY AND TO Tile FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP ON THE AIR DROP WITH STAPLES, IT MAKES FOR A STRONGER " COLLAR" THAN FLEXI-BLANKET WHICH HAS AN INTEGRAL FICERGLASS GAUZE. THE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP PROVIDES ADEQUATE THERMAL PROTECTION AT THE INTERFACE. TilEREFORE THIS CONFIGURATION IS EQUIVALENT TO TilAT QUALIFIED BY TEST. NO ADVERSE EFFECT FROM REDUCED FLEX 1BILITY AT THE LNTERFACE REGION RESULTS FROM THIS DESIGN. ISSUE 3: THE REDUCTION IN 330-1 PANEL THICKNESS ON THE CABLE TRAY HANGER IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE THE COMMODITY IS A TRAY llANGER MEMBER (NOT THE RACEWAY ENVELOPE) WHICH IS COVERED FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION ONLY. THE REDUCED COVERAGE AREA IS VERY LOCALIZED AND THE ADDITIONAL LAYER OF PANEL IMMEDIATELY ! ADJACENT Tite INTERFERENCE PROVIDES SUFFICIENT MATERIAL M ASS TO REACT WITH HEAT WHiCH COULD ENTER THE ENVELOPE AT THE INTERFERENCE. FINALLY, THE INTERFERING ITEM IS THE TOP SURFACE OF A IIVAC DUCT WIIICH WILL l l SilIELD Tile AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE. THEREFORE THIS DEVIATION WILL H AVE NO EFFECT ON THF. ABILITY OF THE l CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE TO PERFORM IT'S FUNCTION.

38. THE IDENTIFIED CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES FOR THE FULL. RANGE OF UNIT 2 CABLE 104250/0

TRAY SIZES. THE TECHNIQUES UTILIZED FOR CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE JOINT REINFORCEMENT GENERALLY CONSISTED OF BOTil " STITCHING" OF BUTT JOINTS ON 110TTOM AND VERTICAL ENVELOPE SURFACES WITil TIE WlRES AND LAPPING THE BUTT JOINTS BY 5" (EACH SIDE) WITH A CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP OF STRESS SKIN (STAPLED IN PLACE) AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. THESE UPGRADE TECilNIQUES ARE INTENDED TO PRECLUDE JOINT FAILURE (UNDER FIRE CONDITIONS) UNDER ITS OWN WEIGHT AND/OR ESCAPING GASEOUS PRESSURE INDUCED BY HEAT UP OF THE MATERIAL. MINOR LOCALIZED AREAS WHERE BOTH TECHNIQUES ARE NOT INSTALLED HAVE NO EFFECT OF THE ABILITY OF THE TRAY ENVELOPE TO MAINTAIN ITS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. STITCHING TECHNIQUES ONLY ON BOTTOM BUTT JOINTS ON A 36" CABLE TRAY (WITH TEE SECTION) WERE QUALIFIED VIA SCllEME l-2 AND STRESS SKIN TECilNIQUES ONLY ON 30" AND 36" CABLE TRAYS WERE QUALIFIED VIA SCllEMES 14-1 AND 15-1. THEREFORE THE SUBJECT CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE QUALIFIED BY TEST AND ONLY RESULTS IN A REDUCED LEVEL OF CONSERVATISM TO TilAT REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATION.

ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C38 OF C40 ACCEPTANCE BASIS! NOTES DCA/REV NOTE = 104252/0

39. ISSUE 1: TIIE IDENTIFIED CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES FOR THE FULL RANGE OF UNIT 2 CABLE TRAY SIZES USING 330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS. Tile LOCALIZED USE OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL STOCK ON CABLE TRAYS SUCH AS AT SPLICE PLATES WHERE INTERFERENCES EXIST IS ACCElTABLE SINCE EFFECTIVE M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND CONTINUITY OF COVERAGE IS MAINTAINED. USE OF TIE WIRES TO SECURE SUCH ' FILL

PIECES TO THE STANDARD V-RIBBED PANELS PROVIDES ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY BASED ON TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

ISSUE 2: TEST SCHEME 11-1 QUALIFIED THE USE OF A 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR AROUND PROTECTED CABLE BUNDLES ENTERING A CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE TO REINFORCE THE TRANSITION REGION. USE OF STRESS SKIN WITH 330-660 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP SERVES Tile SAME FUNCTION BUT CAN BE MORE READILY FORMED AROUND ENTERING CABLE BUNDLES. Tile STRESS SKIN IS ADEQUATELY SECURED TO Tile CABLE TRAY PANEL SURFACE AND FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROPS WITil STAPLES. T1!E TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL BUILDUP PROVIDES ADEQUATE THERM AL PROTECTION. TilEREFORE. SUBSTITUTION OF STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE OF Tile 330-660 COLLAR IS EQUIVALENT TO TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. 104253/0

40. THIS DCA IDENTIFIES 2 J-BOXES WHERE MINOR VARIATIONS IN Ti1E 2ND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE WAS REQUIRED DUE TO CLEARANCE LIMITATIONS. THE STANDARD REQUIREMENT PER Tile INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION AND TYPICAL DETAILS IS FOR Tile IST PANEL LAYER OF J-BOXES TO CONSIST OF FLAT PANELS AND TIIE OUTER (2ND) LAYER TO CONSIST OF V-RIB PANE 13. THIS DCA ALLOWS Tile USE OF FLAT PANEL STOCK IN A LOCALIZED AREA ON ONE J-BOX AROUND A TUBE STEEL INTERFERENCE AND ALLOWS Tile V-RIBS TO BE FLATTENED IN A LOCALIZED AREA ON Tile OTHER J-BOX TO ENABLE FIT OF Tile 2ND LAYER. IN BOTil CASES Tile 2ND PANEL LAYER COVERAGE WAS EXTENDED TO STRUCTURE AND SECURED USING TYPICAL DETAILS 11-6 OR 11-7 WillCil WERE EVALUATED IN ATTACllMENT A TO Tills ENGINEERING REPORT. TEST SCllEME 10-1 QUALIFIED THE DOUBLE LAYER PANEL CONFIGURATION DESCRIBED ABOVE (INCLUDING JOINT REINFORCEMENT WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP) ON 3-BOXES. TEST SCHEME 10-2 QUALIFIED A SINGLE LAYER OF FLAT PANEL STOCK (WITH JOINT REINFORCEMENT) ON 3-BOXES. TilEREFORE TIIE CONFIGURATIONS DESCRIBED BY THIS DCA ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE MORE CONSERVATIVE DESIGN IN THAT EFFECTIVE MATERIAL THICKNESSES ARE M AINTAINED.

ADDITIONALLY, FLATTENING OF V-RIBS ON PANELS IS TYPICALLY UTILIZED FOR CABLE TRAY ENVELOPES WilERE THE TOP PANEL JOINS THE SIDE RAll PIECES. BASED ON THE ABOVE, THESE J-BOX CONFIGURATIONS ARE FULLY BOUNDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

l ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C39 OF C40 l NOTE ACCEirTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV I

41. TEST SCHEME 11-1 QUALIFIED THE USE OF 3 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKIir ON AIR DROP CABLES AND FLEX CONDUITS 2" ' 1(M254/0 l D!A. AND SM ALLER. THE TESTED CONFIGURATION USED COMPLETE WRAPS ON EACH LAYER WITH 2 -4* OVERLAP SEALED l WITH 330-660 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL THIS CONFIGURATION INVOLVES 2 LOCALIZED AREAS ON A 1* DIA. FLEX CONDUIT

! WHERE MODIFICATION OF STANDARD INSTALLATION OF THE 3RD 330-660 LAYER WAS REQUIRED DUE TO AN INTERFERENCE AND A SHARP BEND RADIUS. THE SHARP RADIUS AREA WAS PROTECTED BY USING 2 PIECES OF 330-660 M ATERIAL TO COMPRISE THE 3RD LAYER. THE OVERLAP ON Tile TWO PIECES WAS M AINTAINED CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION AND TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL WAS USED TO ADHERE THE SEPARATE PIECES TOGETHER. THEREFORE. THIS PORTION OF THE CONFIGURATION IS ADEQUATELY BOUNDED BY TEST. THE INTERFERENCE AREA WAS ADDRESSED BY PERMITTING THE 3RD LAYER TO BE NOTCHED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE TO ENABLE THE WRAP TO BE COMPLETED AROUND THE FLEX CONDUIT. THIS AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE THE INTERFERING COMMODITY IS THERMO-LAG 330-1 M ATERIAL INSTALLED OVER A ADJACENT RIGID CONDUIT. THE AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE WAS FILLED WITH 330-660 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF PROTECTION IN THE G AP BETWEEN Tile RIGID AND FLEX CONDUITS. SINCE EFFECTIVE TillCKNESS OF M ATERIAL IS MAINTAINED BY THE TROWEL GRADE ANu Tile INTERFERING ITEM WILL NOT ACT AS A CONDUCTIVE HEAT SOURCE. THE CONFIGURATION PROVIDES AN EQUP/ALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION AS THE QUALIFYING TEST SCHEME.

42. TEST SCHEME 11-1 QUALIFIED THE USE OF A 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR ASSEMBLY TO REINFORCE THE REGION WHERE HM255/0 PROTECTED CABLE AIR DROPS ENTER Tile 330-1 PANEL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ON A CABLE TRAY. THE SUBJECT CONDITION 104261/0 INVOLVES CONFIGURING THE COLLAR ASSEMBLY TO ENVELOPE 2 ADJACENT ENTERING CABLE BUNDLES AT THE TRAY INTERFACE. THE DETAIL USED TO CONSTRUCF Tile COMMON COLLAR ASSEMBLY INVOLVES BUTTING THE COVERAGE FOR ONE BUNDLE UP TO THAT OF AN ADJACENT BUNDLE. Tile EFFECTIVE M ATERI AL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE SEPARATE COLLAR PIECES IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH 330-660 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL.

TilEREFORE, THE CONFIGURATION PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION AND IS BASED ON TECilNIQUES QUALIFIED BY TEST.

43. Tile TEST SCHEMES LISTED H AVE QUALIFIED USE OF 330-1 PREFORMED CONDUlT SECTION M ATERIAL ON RIGID CONDUITS 104258/0 AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET M ATERIAL ON VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE AIR DROPS. THE SUBJECT CONFIGURATION UTILIZES 330-1 M ATERI AL SECTIONS FOR A 10" DISTANCE ON A FLEX 1BLE CONDUIT. ALTHOUGH 330-1 M ATERIAL HAS NOT BEEN TESTED ON FLEX CONDUITS OR CABLE AIR DROPS (LE., NOT RUN INSIDE RIGID CONDUIT), THE EFFECTIVE MATERIAL THICKNESS. INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES AND CONTINUITY OF COVERAGE OF THE 330-1 M ATERIAL INSTALLED ON THE FLEX CONDUIT AT THE BLOCKOUT HAS BEEN EFFECTIVELY BUILT UP AND SEALED WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL.

ADDITIONALLY, WHERE THE 330-1 M ATERIAL INSTALLED ON THE FLEX CONDUIT INTERFACES WITH THE 330-1 M ATERIAL ON THE ADJACENT RIGID CONDUIT, THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP PROVIDES ADDITIONAL THICKNESS FOR THERM AL PROTECTION OF THE FLEX. SINCE THE DISTANCE WHERE 330-1 CONDUIT M ATERIAL WAS INSTALLED ON THE FLEX CONDUIT IS ONLY 10" LONG AND THIS PORTION OF THE FLEX IS IMMEDIATELY AT THE POINT WHERE IT ENTERS A BLOCKOUT, NO SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN OVERALL FLEXIBILITY RESULTS. THE PORTION OF THE FLEX CONDUIT PROTECTED WITH STANDARD 330460 M ATERIAL IS OVER 30 LONG. THEREFORE. THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO TH AT QUALIFIED BY TEST.

ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C40 OF C40 ACCElTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV NOTE 104262/0

44. TIIE 30* LENGTH OF TRAY RUN WHERE STANDARD STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT IS MINOR IN RELATION TO TIIE ENTIRE TRAY RUN. TIIE USE OF TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AT ALL AREAS PROVIDES THERM AL PROTECTION CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CABLE TRAY CONFIGURATIONS. THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tile ENVELOPE IS ASSURED BY THE USE OF TIE WIRES SECURING THE BOTTOM PANELS TO EVERY OTHER TRAY RUNG. Tills IS A MORE CONSERVATIVE APPROACH THAN THE TECIINIQUES USED IN QUALIFICATION TESTS. SINCE ONLY 1/2" CLEARANCE BETWEEN TIIE TOP OF THE TRAY ENVELOPE AND Tile CONCRETE CEILING EXISTS, A CONSIDERABLE SHIELDING EFFECT WILL OCCUR ON THE TOP PANEL SURFACE.

THEREFORE, THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES A LEVEL OF PROTECTION W111CH IS BOUNDED BY TRAY TESTS WHICil USED LESS CONSERVATIVE JOINT UPGRADE TECHNIQUES. 104264/0

45. TIIIS CONFIGUR.ATION is ACTUALLY MORE CONSERVATIVE TIIAN THE PROTECTED CABLE AIR DROP BUNDLE! CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE INTERFACE DESIGN QUALIFIED VIA TEST SCllEME 11-1. THE ENTERING CABLE BUNDLE IS WRAPPED IN 2 LAYERS OF 330460 WITil A FIRE STOP INSTALLED INSIDE Tile BUNDLE USING 330-660 TROWEL GRADE. ADDITIONALLY,3 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ARE THEN INSTALLED AROUND Tile BUNDLE FROM THE POINT WHERE THE BUNDLES ENTER THE TRAY ENVELOPE BACK TO THE 2* DIA. CONDUIT WilERE THE AIR DROP ORIGINATES. SUFFICIENT BANDING IS INSTALLED AT TIIE TRAY ENVELOPE INTERFACE TO ENSURE Tile INTEGRITY OF THE AIR DROP ASSEMBLY. AMPACITY DERATING ISSUES ARE NOT A CONCERN DUE TO THE SHORT (4*-5") DISTANCE WIIERE INCREASED MATERIAL THICKNESS IS INSTALLED.

THEREFORE, THE RESULTING AIR DROP CONFIGURATION HAS BEEN BOUNDED BY TEST.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE D1 OF D31 l l l ATI'ACilMENT D PROTRUDING /f NTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 t PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D2 OF D31 BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE 101397/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/2th Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL TRAY STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT IN THE i AREA OF AN INTERFERING 2" TUBE STEEL SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG ON THE I l-1, 12-1, 1-6,7 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9' 12-2, 13-1, FROM THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. WHERE THE 14-1,15-1 2" TUBE STEEL SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION, EXTEND THE PROTECTION ONTO THE PIPE SUPPORT TO A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 9" FROM Tile CABLE TRAY. OMIT THERMO-LAG PROTECTION OF THE INSIDE FACE OF Tile PIPE SUPPORT TUBE STEEL 102221/1 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIALTRAY SHARES SUPPORT WITH ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY, BOTH ITEMS REQUIRED 9' RULE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION AS PROTRUDING ITEMS (MULTIPLE LOCATIONS, SAME TRAY RUN). SPACING i i BETWEEN SPLICE PLATE BOLTS AND A BEND IN ONE TRAY REPRESENT ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION PROBLEMS. CONSTRUCTION { REQUESTS DIRECTION. l RESOLUTION: COVER PROTRUDING TRAY AND 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 17, 34 l SUPPORT USING DCA DIRECTIONS (TYPICAL 12-2 13-1 DETAIL 13-6). COMPLETELY COVER WALL 14-1, 15-1 SUPPORT WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANEL, AND USE A COMMON ENCLOSURE FOR SPLICE PLATE BOLTS WHERE SPACE PROHIBITS STANDARD INSTALLATION. ij i i i t

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D3 OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCllEMES D31) ZONE < 102231/0 EC 778 X-Il3 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ' FOR INSTALLING TIIERMO-LAG ON A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WlilCH SHARES A SUPPORT WITH A PROTECTED TRAY. TIIE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IS WITillN Tile 9" DISTANCE FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION. RESOLUTION: PROTECT TIIE PROTRUDING 11-1, 12-1. 1-5, 17 TRAY USING M2-1701 DETAIL 13-6. ENCLOSE 12-2, 13-1 TRAY SPLICE PLATES AND BOLTING FOR BOTil 14-1,15-1 IN A COMMON 330-1 BOX TO SIMPLIFY INSTALLATION. 102266/0 AB 790 X-174 A A/21a N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUEST

ofRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERV'a-LAG ON A STRUCTURAL STEEL S'JPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY. T1.E SUPPORT IS ALSO USED AS A PIPE SUPPORT /tND Tile UNPROTECTED LINE IS WITilIN TIIE 9" DISTANCE FOR

                                                                                                                                            , CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil PROTECTION.

l RESOLUTION: INSTALL TIIERMO-LAG ON THE 11-1, 12-1, 1-6,8 STRUCTURAL TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR A 12-2. 13-1 DISTANCE OF 9" FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY 14-1,15-1 EXCEPT WHERE INTERFERED WITil BY THE UNPROTECTED LINE. l l _ _ _ _ -

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D4 OF D31 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM ~ FIRE (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-AREA / (YIN)

                               - FIRE                                                                 SCHEMES -      D31)

ZONE 102312/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING TIIERMO-LAG ON A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORTS WillCil ARE SIIARED WITil A PROTECTED , TRAY. TIIE NON-ESSENTI AL TRAY IS WITHIN TIIE 9" DISTANCE FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil PROTECTION. RESOLUTION: WRAP ADJACENT TRAY AND N/A SEE SIIARED SUPPORT MEMBERS WITil TIIERMO- ATTACilMENT LAG 330-1 PANEL AT Tile REQUIRED A FOR LOCATIONS PER M2-1701, DETAIL 13-6. ACCEPTANCE NOTE: TliE PANEL ATTACilMENT DIRECTIONS BASIS FOR i INCLUDED IN Tills DCA ARE NOW PART OF DETAIL 13-6 Tile TYPICAL DETAll ITSELF. 102524/0 EC 790 X-122 EA/54 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF SUPPORT STEEL AND CABLE TRAY WillCII INTERFERE WITil TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF A 2"4 ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORT STEEL AND 9-1,10-1 1-5,9 l ADJACENT TRAYS AS PROTRUDING ITEMS PER Tile 9" RULE, USING DCA DIRECTIONS FOR ATTACHMENT OF PANEL TO TRAYS. 102525/0 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING INTERFERING CABLE TRAY AS . A PROTRUSION INTO AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PROTECTIVE TIIERMO-LAG ENVELOPE PER THE 9" RULE. RESOLUTION: DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR 9-1, 10-1 1-5, 18 ATTACllMENT OF FLAT PANEL TO CABLE TRAY USING TIE WIRING AND DRILLED IIOLES.

i ATTACIIMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D5 OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE 102750/0 SG 790 2-071 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION TO COVER C4 CHANNEL STEEL SUPPORT MEMBER WHICH INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANEL TO TOP OF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL SANDEDfrRIMMED 330-1 11-1, 12-1, 1-6, 19 FLAT PANEL ON TOP OF TRAY PER M2-1701 12-2, 13-I. TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 (DCA 101918) AN THE 14-1,15-1 AREA OF C4 Cl{ANNEL INTERFERENCE. COVER ENTIRE C4 CHANNEL WITH 330-1 FLAT PANEL EXCEPT WiiERE IT INTERFACES WITH THE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IT SUPPORTS. APPLY 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT LOCATIONS WHERE C4 CilANNEL THERMO-LAG PANELS INTERFACE WITH PANELS COVERING THE TOP OF THE ESSENTIAL TRAY. 102789/1 AB 790 X-180 A A/2 f a Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION i FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL TRAY STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT IN THE j AREA OF AN INTERFERING 12"4 CONDENSATE l PIPE (2 LOCATIONS;. I

                                                                                                                       ' RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON THE          11-1, 12-1,  1-6, 10 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9"        12-2, 13-1, FROM THE PRIM ARY ENVELOPE. WHERE Tile         14-1,15-1 12"4 PIPE INTERFERES WITH TilERMO-LAG INSTALLATION, TRIM 330-1 PANEL AROUND PIPE TO ALLOW 1/8" AIR GAP BETWEEN PIPE AND THERMO-LAG. ADD A SECOND TIIICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL AT AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE EXTENDING 9" IN BOTH DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SUPPORT.

ATTACilMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D6 OF D31 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM. FIRE AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCllEMES D31) ZONE 102821/1 SG 821 24)82 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: SERVICE WATER LINE INTERFERES WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION AT SPLICE PLATE AREA OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. ISSUE 2: 'ITVO CIIILL WATER LINES INTERFERE WITH STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY DUE TO ZERO CLEARANCE. ISSUE 3: NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROP BETWEEN ADJ ACENT NON-ESSENTI AL CABLE TRAYS INTERFERES WITH TilERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION 1: TRIM SPLICE PLATE SCREWS 11-1, 12-1, I-5, 28 FLUSH WITil NUTS TO ALLOW FLAT PANEL 12-2, 13-1, INSTALLATION. TRANSFER FROM FLAT BOARD 14-I, 15-1 TO V RIB BOARD PER M2-1701 TYPICAL , DETAIL 8-3 CRITERIA (FROM DCA 101918).

l ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082. REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D7 OF D31 ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCllEMES D31) ZONE RESOLUTION 2: REMOVE EXISTING THERMO- 11-1, 12-1, 1-5. 29 102321/1 LAG FROM TRAY IN THE AREA OF THE 2 PIPES. 12-2, 13-1, CONT'D 14-1, 15-1 ADD INSULATION TO PIPES CONSTRUCT 330-1 PANEL BOXES AROUND PIPES, ATTACHED TO Tile PRIM ARY TRAY ENVELOPE. USE 2 LAYERS 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO WRAP EACH PIPE ABOVE AND BELOW Tile LEVEL OF TiiE TRAY, l' SING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. STRESS SKIN. AND STAPLES TO AITACli AND REINFORCE CONFIGUR ATION , RESOLUTION 3: USE FLAT PANEL 330-1 AT TIIE 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 28, 30 AREA OF AIR DROP INTERFERENCE, 12-2. 13-1, INSTALLING PER M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAll 8-3. 14-1, 15-1 22' M AXIMUM FLAT PANEL WIDTH WILL BE USED, DEVIATING FROM 12' M AXIMUM ALLOWED BY Tile DETAIL. 102859/0 EC 790' X-II5H AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: 1&C TURING AND TRAY INTERFERE WITH THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. OPEN-ENDED TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MEMBER AND ADJACENT NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT ARE SECONDARY INTERFERENCES. CONSTRUCTION REQUEST DIRECTION. RESOLUTION: COVER ALL PRIMARY AND 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 37 SECONDARY INTERFERENCES PER THE 9' RULE AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. COVER TUBE STEEL WITil THERMO-LAG CAPS PER DETAIL 16-5. l

y ATTACHMENT D - ER-ME-082, REY. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D8 OF D31 1 ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-(YIN) FIRE SCHEMES . D31) _ ZONE s 1 102884/1 AB 831 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: ANGLE IRON AND CONCRETE WALL INTERFERE WITH INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND ITS t SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: WRAP THE ANGLE WITH THE I l-1, 12-1, 1-6, 20 ESSENTIAL TRAY AND THE TRAY HANGER 12-2, 13-1, WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH 1/2" THICKNESS 14-1,15-1 INSTALLATION, AND COVER THE ANGLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM BEYOND THE TRAY IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, BUTTING PANELS TO ADJACENT WALL 103002/0 SG 892 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERAGE OF EMBEDDED SPARE CAPPED CONDUIT SLEEVE, WHICH IS LOCATED WITHIN t THE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE REQUIRED FOR A WALL MOUNTED STEEL SUPPORT ON WHICH JUNCTION BOX JB2S-1114Y IS MOUNTED. RESOLUTION: COVER THE END OF THE SPARE 10-1, 10-2 1-6, 11 i ' SLEEVE WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL, FILLING THE I/8" DEEP RECESS UNTIL IT IS FLUSH WITH THE WALL SURFACE. COVER SUPPORT STEEL WITH I i THERMO-LAG. t i A I v

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVI ATIONS PAGE D9 OF D31 l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE 103081/1 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE ZONE R FLEX CONDUITS WlilCH PROTRUDE FROM ESSENTIAL J-BOX JB2S-53830. DIRECTION IS A130 NEEDED FOR COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED, AND F'R FASTENING 310-1 PANEL TO STEF LINER WALLS. 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 36 RESOLUTION: WRAP ' FIRE ZONE R CABLES AS PROTRUDING ITEMS IP A COMMON THERMO-LAG 330-660 ENCLOSULE/ FIRE STOP PER TYPICAL DETAIL 3-3A METilODS. INSTALL COVERAGE ON THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT USING DETAIL 3.lA, BUTTING 330-1 PRESHAPED SECTIONS TO J-dOX AND ADDING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET WITH THE REQUIRED OVERLAP. INSTALL 330-1 PANEL To STEEL LINER WALL USING SELF-TAPPING METAL SCREWS FOR 9 RULE PROTECTION TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADD 330-70 CERAMIC BLANK IN THE GAP BETWEEN THE J-BOX AND l Tile STEEL LINER. I

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082 REV. 2 PROTRUDING /IN'TERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE DIO OF D31 FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-1 FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE I 103088/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING TilERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUBE STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF AN INTERFERING 1 1/4"c PIPE. ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUBE STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF AN INTERFERING 15/8"4 PIPE RESTRAINT. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 12 CONDUIT SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9" FROM Tile PRIM ARY ENVELOPE. ON Tile SIDE OF THE TUBE STEEL WHERE THE 1/4" DIA. PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION, INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE, AND ADD A SECOND 330-1 PANEL. TRIM THE PANELS TO ALLOW AN AIR GAP AT Tile I 1/4" DIA. PIPE. NOTCH PANEL ON Tile OPPOSITE SIDE OF Tile SUPPORT AS NECESSARY TO FIT FLUSil TO TUBE STEEL. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG ON 9-1, 10-1 1-6. 12 CONDUIT SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9" FROM Tile PRIM ARY ENVELOPE. INSTALL 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON Tile TUBE STEEL AT THE PIPE RESTRAINT INTERFERENCE, EXTENDING 9" FROM THE INTERFERENCE. TRIM PANELS AT Tile PIPE RESTRAINT TO M AINTAIN AN AIR GAP. INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON ADJACENT CONDUIT C23K31182 WHERE IT INTERFERES WITil TilERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON TIIE TUBE STEEL SUPPORT.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME4S2, REV. 2 PROTRUDING /INTERFERINGITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE DII OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION /!SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA! (yin) (yen) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE } ! l SCHEMES D31) ZONE l , 103143/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/D Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION

                                                                                                                                        ;                 FOR COVERING ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUBE l                 STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF A 2" DIA. FP L

PIPE. l i i RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 12 PANEL ON THE TUBE STEEL SUPPORT TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADD A SECOND THICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TWO SIDES OF THE SUPPORT ADJACENT TO THE INTERFERING

                                                                                      ,                                                                   PIPE. TRIM 330-1 PANELS AT THE AREA OF THE l                                                                   INTERFERENCE TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP.

l

ATTAcilMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D12 OF D31 BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCilEMES D31) ZONE 103476/l SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON T11ERMO-LAG 330-1 "V" RIB PANEL ORIENTATION FOR OUTER LAYER COVERAGE FOR J-BOX JB2S-53830. ISSUE 2A: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON INSTALLING 1/4" TilERMO-LAG OVERLAY ON 2" DIA. CONDUIT WilERE DIAMETER OF Tile FIRST LAYER OF 330-1 IS OVERLY LARGE. ISSUE 28: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF STEEL LINER WALL, WillCil PROTRUDES CONDUIT OVERLAY PROTECTION. ISSUE 3: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON 1/4 TilERMO-LAG 330-1 OVERLAY INSTALLATION W11ERE BARRIER IS AN INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION 1: NO DIRECTIONAL 10-1, 10-2 1-6, 13 ORIENTATION REQUIREMENT APPLIES FOR J-BOX OUTER LAYER COVERAGE. ENSURE AT LEAST 2 RIBS ON EAC11 PANEL ARE IN CONTACT WITil Tile PROTECTION SURFACE. RESOLUTION 2A: INSTALL OVERLAY PER DCA 9-1, 10-1, SEE ATT. A 103423 DIRECTION (M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 4- 10-2 FOR ACCEPT. 9). BASIS OF DET. 4-9 l l RESOLUTION 2B: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO 9-1, 10-1 1-5, 33 l ' STEEL LINER WALL TO PROTECT CONDUIT SUPPORT TO SATISFY Til's 9 RULE. USE SCREW TYPE FASTENERS IN LIEU OF lilLTI BOLTS.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D13 OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP, DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS! NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCllEMES D31) ZONE 103476/1 RESOLUTION 3: INST ALL 1/4 THICK CONDUIT I 9-1 1-5, 27 CONT'D OVERLAYS ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. WHERE BARRIER INTERFERES WITH OVERLAY INSTALLATION, BUTT COVERAGE TO BARRIER AND ADD 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET PER PROVIDED DIRECTIONS. 103484/1 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG 330-1 ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WilERE C6 CllANNELS INTERFERE WITil COVERAGE ON TOP OF THE TRAY. RESOLUTION: COVER C6 CHANNELS AND 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 32 CABLE TRAY ABOVE CilANNELS AS 12-2, 13-1, PROTRUDING ITEMS PER THE 9" RULE. 14-1,15-1 DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR ENCLOSING ALL THREE CHANNELS IN A COMMON TilERMO.L AG BOX BETWEEN Tile TWO CABLE TRAYS. 103488/0 AB ' 810 X-207 A A/215 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION

                                                                                                                  , FOR TilERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON ESSENTIAL. CABLE TRAY WHERE 7/8" PIPE SUPPORT ROD INTERFERES WITH STANDARD INSTALLATION.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL ON TRAY 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 21 UP TO THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE. WRAP 12-2, 13-1. SUPPORT ROD WITH 2 LAYERS 330-660 FLEXI- 14-1,15-1 BLANKET PER THE 9" RULE. CONSTRUCT FLAT PANEL BOX AROUND SUPPORT ROD, ATTACH TO TRAY. FILL BOX WITH 330-70 CERAMIC INSULATOR. SEAL BOX WITH THERMO-LAG 330-660 BULK GRADE AT TOP AND BOTTOM

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE Dl4 OF D31 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM- FIRE AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-. FIRE SCHEMES D31) I ZONE l 103508/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: ADJACENT NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND SHARED SUPPORT PROTRUDE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY TilERMO-LAG ENVELOPE (4 LOCATIONS). ISSUE 2: 2" DIA. PIPE STRUT AND 6* TUBE STEEL MEMBER INTERFERE WITH 9" RULE ( PROTECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. ISSUE 3: ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES WITil 9" RULE PROTECTION OF 2" x 4" TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY-RESOLUTION 1: WRAP ADJACENT TRAY AND N/A SEE A~IT. A PROTRUDING STEEL SUPPORT WITil THERMO- FOR LAG 330-1 PANEL. AT EACH OF 4 LOCATIONS ACCEPTANCE PER M2-1701, DETAIL 134. BASIS FOR DETAIL 134. RESOLUTION 2: WRAP STRUCTURAL STEEL 11-1, 12-1, 1 4, 10 SUPPORT WITH 330-1 PANEL, NOTCHING PANEL 12-2, 13-1, AROUND 2* DIA. PIPE STRUT TO MAINTAIN AIR 14-1, 15-1 GAP. ADD A 2nd LAYER 330-1 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF PIPE STRUT INTERFERENCE AND 6* TUBE STEEL INTERFERENCE, M AINTAINING AN AIR GAP AT BOTH INTERFERENCES. RESOLUTION 3: WRAP CABLE TRAY SUPPORT 11-1, 12-1, 1 4, 10 WITil 330-1 PANEL, USING REDUCED 12-2, 13-1 THICKNESS PANELS WHERE THE ADJACENT 14-1, 15-1 PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES. ADD A 2nd LAYER 330-1 PANEL TO THE HORIZONTAL MEMBER OF THE TRAY SUPPORT WEST OF THE PRIMARY TRAY ENVELOPE.

A*iTACHMENT D - ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D15 OF D31 i f l f DCA NO.iREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT' ~ BASIS / NOTES l AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26- , FIRE SCilEMES D31) t ZONE 103597/0 AB 810 X-20'1 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS I DIRECTION FOR COVERING A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AS A PROTRUSION INTO AN ESSENTIAL TRAY T11ERMO-LAG PROTECTIVE i ENVELOPE.

                                                                                                                                            -t ISSUE 2: A PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER                                              l INTERFERES WITH PROTECTION OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

ISSUE 3: A 2" O PIPE INTERFERES WITH PROTECTION OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION 1: COVER THE NON-ESSENTIAL 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 38 : TRAY AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PER THE 9" 12-2, 13-1, ! RULE IN ACCORDANCE WITil TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1,15-1 13-6 (DEVELOPED BY DCA 103548). RESOLUTION 2: COVER THE SUPPORT 11-1, 12-1 1-5,8 [ INTERFERENCE PER THE 9' RULE TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE, AS DIRECTED IN Tile 14-1,15-1 DISPOSITION OF DCA 102266. i ! RESOLUTION 3: INSTALL A 6 WIDE 330-1 FLAT 11-1, 12-1, I-5, 39 I PANEL SECTION TO Tile BOTTOM OF THE 12-2, 13-1, , TRAY, PERFORMING ANY MINIMAL SANDING 14-1,15-1 REQUIRED TO M AINTAIN AN AIR GAP l CLEARANCE AT TIIE PIPE (THE EXISTING GAP IS 5/8*). USE TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 FOR TRANSITION FROM "V" RIB TO FLAT PANEL ; f t

   ,.   -                  -                 s   ,    ,

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE Dl6 OF D31 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-AREA / (YIN) FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE 103613/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y .'53U'e. ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER IN I~ERFERES WITH 9' RULE PROTECTION OF STRL(TUR AL STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1. 12-1, 1-6, 14 PANEL ON CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2. 13-1, EXTENT POSSIBLE WITHOUT INSTALLING 14-1. 15-1 PANEL ON THE INTERFERENCE. 103799/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING CEILING LINER AS A PROTRUSION WilERE IT INTERFERES WITH 1/4" OVERLAY ON 2" DIA. CONDUIT. ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING 3* X 3" TUBE STEEL SUPPORT AND CEILING LINER WHERE LIMITED ACCESS PREVENTS USE OF FASTENERS. RESOLUTION 1: DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED 9-1, 11-1 1-5,43 FOR FASTENER SPACING AND PANEL INSTALLATION TO ACHIEVE 9 RULE PROTECTION. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 330-1 9-1, 10-1 1-5, 43 PANEL ON TUBE STEEL SUPPORT EXTENDING FROM 2 CONDUITS UP TO THE STEEL PLATE, WHICH IS TO BE COVERED WITH 330-1 PANEL (I LAYER) USING INDICATED SCREW SPACING.

ATTACllMENT D ER-ME-032, REV. 2 PROTRUDING %TERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE Dl? OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDGfELEV ROOM ! FIRE SUPP. l DET. ! DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASISINOTES 1 l AREA ! (Y/N) j(yin) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE ! I SCHEMES D31) ZONE l l j i 1 103809/0 AB 810 i X-207 AAt21r iY Y I ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION

                                                                                                      , FOR COVERING 3 FIRE 7.ONE R CABLES WillCII
                                                                                                      ' PROTRUDE ESSEN'II AL J-COX JB2 A-5363.

l l

                                                                                       '      i
                                                                                              !          RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 CONDUIT           10-1, 10-2   1-5, 35 SECTIONS ON FIRE ZONE R CABLES. EXTEND 4" MIN TO 5' M AX FROM J-ROX THERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND FILL WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE TO FORM A FIRE STOP. ENCLOSE TWO j OF Tile CABLES !N A COMMON ENVELOPE.

103846/1 AB 852 241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT STEEL WHERE ADJACENT IIVAC DUCT FLANGE INTERFERES WITH FULL PANEL THICKNESS INSTALLATION PER 9" RULE (3 LOCATIONSL i l RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORT STEEL WITH 11-1, 12-1, 1-6, 31 l FULL TIIICKNESS 330-1 TO THE EXTENT 12-2, 13-1, POSSIBLE PER TiiE 9' RULE. WHERE 14-1,15-1 INTERFERENCES NECESSITATE REDUCED PANEL TIIICKNESS, ADD A 2nd LAYER OF PANEL TO THE SUPPORT STEEL IN THE VICINITY OF THE INTERFERENCE.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING /IN'TERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D18 OF D31 FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLIJTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM AREAf (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE 103917/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: 4* DIA. PIPE IS WITHIN 1/8" OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WTTH 9' RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. ISSUE 2: 4* DIA. PIPE IS WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 1/16' OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9 RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 10 PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE. TRIMMING PANEL AT THE 14-1,15-1 LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO M AINTAIN AN AIR GAP. ADD A 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TOP AND SIDE SURFACES OF THE TRAY SUPPORT, ALSO TRIMMING THESE PANELS TO ACHIEVE A MINIM AL AIR GAP AT THE LOCATION OF THE PIPE INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 10 PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2, 13-1, EXTENT POSSIBLE, TRIMMING PANEL AT THE 14-1,15-1 LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO M AINTAIN AN AIR GAP. ADD A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TOP SURFACE OF THE TRAY SUPPORT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE INTERFERING PIPE, ALSO TRIMMING THESE PANELS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMAL AIR GAP AT THE PIPE INTERFERENCE.

ATTACilMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D19 OF D31 ! i l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIONSSSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D76-FIRE SCIIEMES D31) ZONE 103924/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: HVAC DUCT IS WITHIN 3/8" OF A CABLE I TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9" RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL MODIFIED 9" RULE 11-1, 12-1, 1-6, 10 THERMO-LAG PROTECTION AT THE AREA OF 12-2, 13-1, TIIE DUCT FLANGE INTERFERENCE, USING A 14-1.15-1 REDUCED THICKNESS 330-1 PANEL AND MAINTAINING A MINIM AL AIR GAP. INSTALL 3 THICKNESSES 330-1 PANEL TO THE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER ON BOTil SIDES OF THE REDUCED PANEL. USE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND TIE WIRE OR BANDING TO HOLD THE PANELS IN PLACE. l 104001/0 AB 810 X-207 A A/21h Y Y ISSUE ADJACENT UNISTRUT SUPPORT MEMBER IS WITHIN 1/4' OF A "C" CH ANNEL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9" RULE l PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 9" RULE PROTECTION 11-1, 12-1, 1-6, 10 l TO "C" CHANNEL USING 330-1 PANEL, 12-2, 13-1 TRIMMING PANEL AS NECESSARY TO AVOID 14-1,15-1 THE INTERFERING SUPPORT MEMBER. INSTALL A 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL INSIDE THE "C" CHANNEL AND TIE WIRE TO THE TRIMMED PANEL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL THICKNESS AT THE AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D20 OF D31 BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

 'DCA NO./REV AREA /   (YIN)   (Y/N)                                                                          TEST                                  (PAGE D26-FIRE                                                                                             SCHEMES                              D31)

ZONE i 104079/1 AB 810 X-207 AA/2th Y Y ISSUE: 2 CONDUITS INTERFERE PARTIALLY WITil INSTALLATION OF 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON J-BOX. ALSO, ANGLE IRON SUPPORT : INTERFERES PARTIALLY WITil 1st LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON J-BOX. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2nd LAYER 330-1 PANEL 10-2 1-5, 24 : TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AROUND CONDUIT INTERFERENCES. COMPLETELY COVER ANGLE IRON SUPPORT WITH 330-1 FLAT PANEL AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL TRIMMING A I/2* THICK 330-1 PANEL TO FIT SNUGLY BETWEEN Tile ANGLE IRON AND THE J-BOX. 104114/0 AB 804 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLATION OF TIIERMO-LAG ON 1 1/2" ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AT A RADIAL BEND, AND ON A PROTRUDING SUPPORT BRACE WillCH IS WITHIN 1/2* OF AN ADJACENT CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL RADIAL BEND 1/2* 9-1, 10-1 1-6, 12 SECTIONS AND 1/4" OVERLAY SECTIONS, INCLUDING STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. WRAP PROTRUDING SUPPORT PER THE 9" RULE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, ADDING A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL AROUND THE SUPPORT BRACE ALONG Tile LENGTH OF ANY PANELS WHERE THICKNESS IS REDUCED. i

ATTACilMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D21 OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ISUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCIIEMES D31) ZONE 104117/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON INSTALLING 330-660 AND STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON PROTRUDING AIR DROP BUNDLES IN CONGESTED AREA. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-660 COLLAR AND 11-1 1-5. 25 STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AS A COMMON ENCLOSURE AROUND 3 ADJACENT AIR DROP RUNDLES. INSTALL COLLAR AND STRESS S AiN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AS l A SINGLE AIR DROP ENCLOSING ON Tile NORTil MOST RUNDLE. 104173/0 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: ENGINEERING DIRECTION REQUESTED WiiERE PROTRUDING CABLE AIR DROPS REOUIRE 3m 660 rOLLAR' RACKFIT. ISSUE 2: ENGINEERING DIRECTION REQUESTED

WilERE PROTRUDING CABLE AIR DROPS REQUIRE 330-660

COLLAR" BACKFIT.

                                                                                   !                                           CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS PERMISSION TO USE A COMMON RUNDLE FOR TWO ADJACENT AIR DROPS.

l RESOLUTION 1: WRAP AIR DROP BUNDLES PER Il-1 1-5, 25 l M2-1701 DETAll 3-4 WilERE POSSIBLE. USE 2 j PIECE COLLAR VARIATION WilERE FIELD l CONDITIONS PROl!! BIT USE OF STANDARD DETAIL 1 l RESOLUTION 2: ENCLOSE AIR DROPS 2 & 3 IN A 11-1 1-5, 25 COMMON BUNDLE. USE DETAll 3-4 FOR 091ER BUNDLE, OR 2 PIECE VARIATION l WEIERE FIELD CONDITIONS PROillBIT USE OF i STANDARD DETAIL. 1

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082 REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D22 OF D31 BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NOJREV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D31) ZONE 104189/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTI AL CABLE TRAYS H AVE OPEN-END 4" X 6' TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MEMBERS WlIICH REQUIRE TilERMO-LAG CAPS, BUT LIMITED SPACE MAKES INSTALLATION IMPRACTICABLE. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION. RESOLUTION: COVER THE BOTTOM END OF N/A 26 Tile TUBE STEEL MEMBERS PER M2-1701, DETAIL 16-5. LEAVE Tile TOP OPENINGS WITilOUT COVERS. 104206/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT BASE PLATE IS WITHIN 3/8" OF 2* DIA. CONDUIT WHICH IS BEING PROTECTED PER Tile 9* RULE AS AN INTERFERENCE TO ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY T11ERMO-LAG PROTECTION. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 15 PANEL ON THE 2 DIA. CONDUIT TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE PER Ti1E 9" RULE. WHERE 14-1,15-1 SUPPORT PLATE PREVENTS COMPLETE CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP, BUTT CONDUIT IIALF-ROUNDS UP TO THE PLATE AND INSTALL A 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET (11/16" WET FILM T11ICKNESS) AT THE THERMO-LAGIBASEPLATE INTERFACE.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D23 OF D31 ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG AREA' (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCllEMES D31) ZONE 104221/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLATION ON llVAC DUCT AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT, WillCH INTERFERE WITil ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTION. ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS Dil'ECTION FOR COVERAGE OF PIPE SUPPORT BASE PLATE WillC11 IS A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE TO COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1,12-1, 1-5, 22 PANEL ON IIVAC SUPPORT MEMBERS 12-2, 13-1, VERTICALLY PER Tile 9" RULE AND 14-1,15-1 IIORIZONTALLY OUT TO THE liVAC DUCT INSULATION. RESOLUTION 2: APPLY 330-1 TROWEL GRADE 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 23 BETWEEN BASE PLATE AND CABLE TRAY 12-2, 13-1, SUPPORT. INSTALI 330-1 PANEL TO TRAY 14-1,15-1 g i SUPPORT, BUTTING UP TO BASE PLATE AND

                 !                                       ADDING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT PANEL / BASEPLATE INTERFACE.

104224/0 AB 790 X-174 A A/21a N Y ISSUE: 4" DIA. PIPE IS WITillN 7/16" OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9" RULE PROTECTION OF TIIE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG 330-1 11-12, 12-1, 1-6, 10 PANEL ON Ti1E CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO Tile 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE TRIMMING PANEL AT Tile 14-1,15-1 LOCATION OF Tile INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO M AINTAIN AN AIR GAP. COVER TIIE SUPPORT WITil A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL NEAR TIIE INTERFERENCE. ALSO TRIMMING Tile PANELS TO AC111 EVE A MINIM AL AIR GAP. l l _ _ _ _ _ i i

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082. REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D24 OF D31 SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE AREA / (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-(YIN) FIRE SCIIEMES D31) ZONE f 104227/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORT IS WITillN 1/2" OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITil 9" RULE PROTECTION OF Tile SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TiiERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1,12-1, 1-5, 16 PANEL ON TI{E CABLE TRAY SUPPORT "C" - 12-2, 13-1. CilANNEL MEMBER TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE. 14-1, 15-1 AT TIIE AREA OF Tile PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERENCE INSTALL 330-1 AROUND Tile OUTSIDE SURFACES OF Tile CIIANNEL FILL TIIE INSIDE AREA OF TIIE CIIANNEL WITil A BUILDUP OF 330-1 PANELS PRE-BUTTERED WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. TIIERMO-LAG IS OMITTED FROM Tile END OF TIIE "C" CilANNEL LEGS AT Tile PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERENCE. 104256/0 AB 790 X-ISO AA/21a Y Y ISSUE: IIANGER FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO INTERFERENCE FROM UNIT I ESSENTIAL CABLES WRAPPED IN FLEXI-BLANKET. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM l-2, 11-1, 1-5, 42 COVERAGE ON Tile CABLE TRAY llANGER IN 12-1, 12-2, ACCORL.*.NCti WITil TYPICAL DETAILS 13-1, 14-1, BUTTING COVERAGE TO Tile FLEXI-BLANKET 15-1 VfRAPPED UNIT I CABLES. INSTALL A TROWEL GPADE FILLET ALL AROUND TIIE IN"ERFACING AREA.

t ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDINO/ INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D25 OF D31 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES -l AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26 . [ FIRE SCHEMES D31) [ ZONE ' 104259/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: SPLICE PLATE ON UNISTRUT CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERFERES WITH SEALING THE PROTRUDING MEMBER AT THE 9" DISTANCE. RESOLUTION: WHERE SPLICE PLATE ENDS 9-1. 10-1, 1-6, 40 INSTALL A 1" MIN. DEPTH OF 330-1 TROWEL 10-2 , GRADE TO TOP AND BOTTOM UNISTRUT i MEMBERS. , 104263/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: AIR DROP CABLES FROM PROTECTED TRAY REQUIRE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR PER M2-1701 DETAILS. A 1 1/2" DIA. PIPE AND *C" CHANNEL INTERFERE WITH INSTALLATION OF THE COLLAR. : RESOLUTION: BUTT COLLAR UP TO *C" 11-1 1-6, 41 CHANNEL AND NOTCH COLLAR MATERIAL AROUND PIPE. SECURE TO TRAY ENVELOPE WITH STAPLES AND STRESS SKIN. FILL VOIDS WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE M ATERI AL .; i b

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE D26 OF D31 DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES GENERIC

1. CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

2. EFFECTIVE TIIICKNESS OF THE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

3. THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

4. THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

5. THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINEr O PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

GENERIC

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR Tile PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH WOULD ENHANCE Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SIIIELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.).

101397/0

7. EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCllEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATtON USES A REDUCED THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG WilERE THE TUBE STEEL INTERFERES. THE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

ADDITIONALLY, TilERMO-LAG IS PROVIDED ON Tile SECONDARY INTERFERENCE, INSTALLED TO COMPENSATE THE TRAY SUPPORT REDUCED THICKNESS. 102266/0

8. EACII OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103597/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USED REDUCED COVERAGE OF Tile STEEL SUPPORT WHERE Tile PIPING LINE PASSES TilROUGH. THE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOP IS NOT AFFECTED.

ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE TIGIIT SPACES INVOLVED BETWEEN TO INSIDE FACES TO Tile TUBE STEEL AND THE INTERFERING PIPE, A " TORTUROUS PATil" FOR llEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISilED. 102524/0

9. Tile CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ALTilOUGil THE " PROTRUDING" ITEMS INCLUDE NON-ESSENTI AL CABLE TRAYS, THE COVERAGE ON EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. METHODS OF PANEL ATTACllMENT TO TRAYS ARE JUSTIFIED IN ATTACllMENT A ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR M2-1701 DETAIL 13-6.

102789/1

10. EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103508/0 DISTANCE FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG 103917/0 AT Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCES (S) ON PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE. Tile PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOFE IS NOT 103924/0 AFFECTED. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO Tile EXTRA TillCKNESS OF 330-11 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF THE INTERFERENCE (S) AND 104001/0 THE MINIMAL AIR GAP BETWEEN Tile TIIERMO-LAG AND INTERFERENCE (S), A " TORTUROUS PATil" FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS 104224/0 ESTABLISIIED WHICH WILL COMPENSATE FOR Tile REDUCED TillCKNESS AT Tile INTERFERENCE.

103002/0

11. J-BOX TESTED CONFIGURATIONS RECEIVED llEAT EXPOSURE FROM ALL SIDES. THE WALL MOUNTED CONFIGURATION REDUCES POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. COVERING Tile ADJACENT EMBEDDED CONDUIT WILL FURTilER ENSURE TIIAT TilERE IS NO CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil INTO Tile J-BOX ENVELOPE.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D27 OF D31 COVERAGE DEV!ATIONS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 103088/0

12. THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED THICKNESS OF TilERMO-LAG AT TliE AREA OF 104114/0 INTERFERENCES. THE PRIM ARY (CONDUlT) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ADDITION ALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA THICKNESS 103143/0 OF 330-1 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF INTERFERENCES AND THE MINIMAL AIR G AP HL~ TWEEN THE THERMO-LAG AND INTERFERENCES, A " TORTUROUS PATil" FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISHED.

103476/1

13. TEST SCHEME 10-2 QUALIFIED THERMO-LAG PROTECTION ON J-BOXES (Ir X 12* X 6") USING A SINGLE LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL THE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION PROVIDED THE OUTER LAYER OF 330-1 IN THIS CONFIGURATION IS AN ENHANCEMENT TO THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. TEST SCHEME 10-1 QUALIFIED 2 LAYERS ON J-BOXES. SINCE THE 2ND LAYER "V"-RIBS ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE IST LAYER PANELS THER IS NO ADVATAGE GAINED FROM RIB ORIENTATION.

14. EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9* 103613/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES REDUCED COVERAGE OF TIIE STEEL SUPPORT AT THE INTERFERENCE. TIIE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE IIEAT SHIELDING EFFECT OF THE INTERFERING MEMBER AT THE LOCATION OF REDUCED 330-1 PANEL THICKNESS, A

           " TORTUROUS PATH" FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISilED.

104206/0

15. EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION INVOLVES PROTECTION OF AN INTERFERING ITEM (FOR 9" DISTANCE FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE) AS A PROTRUDING ITEM, EXCEPT AT THE LOCATION OF A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THE SECONDARY INTERFERENCE IS A WALL MOUNTED STEEL SUPPORT BASE PLATE. THE WALL AND PLATE TOGETHER IIAVE HEAT SINK CAPABILITIES, AND WILL EFFECTIVELY INHIBIT CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO THE PRIM ARY ENVELOPE.

104227/0

16. THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE ALL PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION OMITS COVERAGE ON THE EXTREME END OF THE TRAY SUPPORT AT 2 LOCATIONS APPROXIM ATELY l-1/2" IN LENGTH. BUT UTILIZES MULTIPLE MATERIAL THICKNESSES FOR THE ADJACENT SUPPORT SURFACES. THE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE OS NOT AFFECTED.

REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYF" CAL DETAll 13-6 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. ALTHOUGH IT REPRESENTS A 102231/0 17. SLIGHT DEVIATION FROM THE TYPICAL DETAIL, ENCLOSING ADI ACENT TRAY SPLICE PLATES AND BOLTING IN COMMON 102221/1 THERMO-LAG BOXES IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT USES M ATEMAL TillCKNESS, ATTACHMENT METHODS, AND JOINT INTEGRITY COMMENSURATE WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 102525/0

18. THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ALTHOUGH THE " PROTRUDING" ITEM IN THIS CASE IS A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY, THE COVERAGE ON EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH.

102750/0

19. REFERENCE APPENDIX A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. Tile LISTED TEST SCHEMES QUALIFIED 1/2" THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 ON CABLE TRAYS. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USED A SLIGHTLY REDUCED THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG AT THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE. ADDITION OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON THE INTERFERING TRAY SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF THE DEVIATION PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH.

_ ____ 1 I

ATTACHMENT D ER ME@2, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D28 OF D31 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS ACCElTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV NOTE 102884/1

20. SINCE THE ANGLE IRON IS AN INTERFERENCE WHICH DOES NOT REPRESENT A DIRECT llEAT PATil TO THE ESSENTI AL CABLE TRAY, PROTECTING IT AS A PROTRUDING ITEM IS CONSERVATIVE. TIIEREFORE, THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION CAN BE DIRECTLY CORRELATED TO THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS WlIERE STEEL IS PROTECTED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM.

103488/0

21. REDUCED TIIICKNESS OF THE PRIM ARY TRAY ENVELOPE AT Tile INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO COVERAGE OF THE SUPPORT ROD AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. TIIE BOX CONFIGURATION MAINTAINS MATERIAL THICKNESS AND JOINT INTEGRITY (USING STRESS SKIN, STITCHING AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) COMMENSURATE WITil TESTED TRAY CONFIGURATIONS. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET PIPE WRAPS M AINTAIN REQUIRED OVERLAP AND BAND SPACING COMMENSURATE WITil THE TESTED FLEXI-BLANKET TEST SCHEME (11-1).

I M 221/0

22. EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCIIEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITil SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES REDUCED COVERAGE OF THE STEEL SUPPORT WilERE Tile IIVAC DUCT INTERFERES WITil COMPLETE 9" RULE PROTECTION. Tile DEVIATION FROM COMPLETE 9" RULE PROTECTION IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE HEAT SINK CAPABILITIES OF TIIE LARGE INSULATED flVAC DUCT. THE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

104221/0

23. EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TIIE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TIIICKNESS OF TIIERMO-LAG WIIERE THE SUPPORT PLATE INTERFERES. TIIE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

ADDITIONALLY, THERMO-LAG IS BUTTED AND ATTACllED TO Tile SECONDARY INTERFERENCE. WillCH PROVIDES IIEAT SINK CAPABILITIES. I N 079/1

24. TEST SCHEME 10-2 QUALIFIED TIIERMO LAG PROTECTION ON 3-BOXES (18" X 12" X 6-) USING A SINGLE LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL.

Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES 2 LAYERS 330-1 EXCEPT AT Tile CONDUlT INTERFERENCES, WilERE ONE FULL PANEL TIIICKNESS EXISTS, AND AT THE ANGLE IRON SUPPORT. fills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE TIIE ENTIRE ANGLE IRON PIECE IS PROTECTED BY 1 LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL, EXCEPT WHERE IT INTERFACES WITH THE WALL Tile WALL ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK AND PROVIDES NO IIEAT PATH INTO THE ENVELOPE. REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 3-4,3-4.4 AND 3-4.5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. TIIESE FIELD 104173/0 25. 104117/0 CONFIGURATIONS REPRESENT ACCEPTABLE DEVIATIONS FROM TIIE TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE TIIE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IS M AINTAINED, ALL GAPS ARE FILLED WITil 330-660 BULK M ATERIAL, AND ATTACHMENT AND REINFORCEMENT METilODS ARE COMMENSURATE WITil TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. UTILIZING 2 PIECE COLLARS INSTEAD OF SINGLE PIECE COLLARS IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE MINIMUM OVERLAP REQUIREMENTS ARE MAINTAINED. 104189/0

26. REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 16-5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO OMIT END CAPS AT THE TOPS OF THE TUBE STEEL MEMBERS BECAUSE THE OPEN ENDS ARE FLUSil WITH A CONCRETE BEAM ON ONE SIDE,5* FROM A LARGE IIVAC DUCT ON Tile OPPOSITE SIDE, AND 12' FROM TIIE CONCRETE CEILING ABOVE. TilESE SURFACES WILL ALL ACT AS IIEAT SINKS AND ALSO TO BLOCK TIIE HEAT PATil INTO TIIE OPEN END. ADDITIONALLY, Tile TOP ENDS OF TIIE MEMBERS ARE APPROXIMATELY 7' ABOVE Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY LOCATIONS.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082. REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D29 OF D31 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACCEITANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

27. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 1/4* THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS OVER STANDARD 1/2" THICK M ATERIAL ON 3/4* - 2" DIA. CONDUITS 103476/1 HAS BEEN QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 9-1. MINOR LOCALIZED AREAS WHERE COMPLETE COVERAGE OF 1/4" OVERLAYS CANNOT BE MALNTAINED ARE ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE OVERALL M ASS OF M ATERIAL INSTALLED UP TO THE INTERFERENCE. TIIE SHIELDING / HEAT SINK EFFECTS OF THE INTERFERENCE ITSELF, CREATING A TORTUROUS PATH FOR IIEAT ENTRY AND THE I

TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE WALL INTERFACE.

28. REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 102821/1

29. THE ENCLOSURE USED ON THE CHILLED WATER PIPES EFFECTIVELY PROTECTS THEM AS PROTRUDING ITEMS TO THE 102821/1 PRIM ARY TRAY ENVELOPE. THE BOX CONFIGURATION M AINTAINS M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND JOINT INTEGRITY (USING STRESS SKIN, STITCilING AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) COMMENSURATE WITH TESTED TRAY CONFIGURATIONS. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET PIPE WRAPS M AINTAIN REQUIRED OVERLAP, AND BAND SPACING COMMENSURATE WITH THE TESTED FLEXI-BLANKET SCHEME (11-1).

30. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO USE A 22* MAXIMUM WIDTH FLAT PANEL, BECAUSE ALL OTHER ATTRIBUTES OF THE TYPICAL DETAIL 102821/1 WILL BE M ALNTAINED, INCLUDING MATERIAL OVERLAY, BANDING REQUIREMENTS, AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT OF JOINTS.

31. EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PREFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103846/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED THICKNESS OF TI{ERMO-LAG AT THE AREA OF INTERFERENCES (S). Tile PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA TillCKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF Tile INTERFERENCE (S) AND THE MINIM AL AIR GAP BETWEEN THE TIIFRMO-LAG AND THE INTERFERENCE (S), A " TORTUROUS PATH" FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISIIED.

32. EACll OF TIIE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103484/1 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG ON TOP OF THE ESSENTIAL TRAY, BUT COVERS THE INTERFERING C6 CHANNELS AND THE ABOVE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. THE THERMO-LAG 330-1 BOX USED TO ENCLOSE THE CHANNELS M AINTAINS M ATERI AL THICKNESS AND JOINT INTEGRITY COMMENSURATE WITH TESTED CABLE TRAY CONFIGURATIONS, AND THE C6 CilANNELS PROVIDE OVERALL STABILITY TO THE STRUCTURE.

33. REFERENCE DETAIL I-5 IN ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS 103476/1 LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. IN THIS CONFIGURATION, THE ONLY DEVIATION IS FROM THE TESTED METHOD OF PANEL ATTACHMENT (SELF-TAPPING SCREWS IN LIEU OF H:LTI KWIK-BOLTS), AND IS CONSIDERED INSIGNIFICANT IN TERMS OF ATTACHMENT ADEQUACY.

34. COVERAGE OF THE ENTIRE WALL SUPPORT IS MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN 9" RULE PROTECTION. OTHER MINOR DEVIATIONS 102221/1 FROM DETAIL 13-6 ATTACllMENT METHODS ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT TO CONFIGURATION STABILITY OR FIRE ENDURANCE.

ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-OS2, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D30 OF D31 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES 103809/0

35. THE FIRE STOPS PROVIDED ON THE ZONE R CABLES ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON ITEMS PROTRUDING FROM THERMO-LAGGED J-BOXES, BASED ON TYPICAL DETAIL 3-4 (SEE A1TACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR ACCEPTANCE BASIS).

COMBINING TWO OF THE CABLES IN A COMMON ENVELOPE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE REQUIRED MATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED, AND REINFORCEMENT IS PROVIDED USING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE, STAINLESS STEEL BANDING AND STRESS SKIN. 103081/1

36. WRAPPING OF NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AND ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PER DETAIL 3-3A METHODS IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THE DEVIATION (WRAPPING 2 CABLES IN A COMMON BUNDLE)IS MINOR IN NATURE. THE USE OF SELF-TAPPING METAL SCREWS FOR 330-1 PANEL ATTACHMENT TO THE STEEL LINER WALL IS PER TYPICAL DETAIL I-5. REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE MINOR DEVIATION FROM Tile 9" RULE COVERAGE OF THE STEEL LINER PLATING IS CONSIDERED INSIGNIFICANT BECAUSE OF THE ADDITION OF 330-70 BLANKET AND TIIE FACT THAT THE ACTUAL CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATH TO THE J-BOX FROM THE ADJACENT SUPPORT IS APPROXIM ATELY 11" 102859/0

37. THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. COVERING ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INTERFERENCES AS PROTRUDING ITEMS RESULTS IN A CONFIGURATION EXPEClED TO PERFORM AT LEAST AS WELL AS THE TESTED DESIGN, BECAUSE TIIERE IS NO DIRECT CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATil INTO Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AND OVERALL M ATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED.

REFERENCE A'ITACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR ACCEPTANCE BASIS OF DETAIL 16-5. 103597/0

38. REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR Tile TYPICAL DETAIL 13-6 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE LISTED TEST SCHEMES ALL QUALIFIED 9" RULE PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING SUPPORT STEEL.

103597/0

39. REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR THE TYPICAL DETAll 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE THERM AL PROTECTION PROVIDED BY THIS DESIGN IS EXPECTED TO BE EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF THE LISTED TEST SCHEMES, BECAUSE THE BOTTOM PANEL THICKNESS REDUCTION, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE MINIMAL AND WILL BE 5/8" WHICH IS IN EXCESS OF THE 1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS.

104259/0

40. USE OF TROWEL GRADE M ATERI AL TO SEAL OFF THE UNISTRUT SUPPORT MEMBERS WHERE THE SPLICE PLATE ENDS ACTS AS A FIRE STOP TO PREVENT ANY DIRECT HEAT PATH FROM EXPOSED SUPPORT STEEL TO THE PROTECTED CONDUIT.

104263/0

41. THE AIR DROP CABLES ARE NON-ESSENTIAL. PROVISION OF THE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR PER M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAILS IS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE M ATERIAL IS PROVIDED TO SEAL THE CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE AT THE PROTRUDING CABLE INTERFACE. THE INTENT OF THE COLLAR FUNCTION IS SATISFIED BY THE TECHNIQUE UTILIZED. SECURING THE PARTIAL COLLAR AROUND THE PROTRUDING CABLES WITH STAPLES, STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL EFFECTIVELY REINFORCES THE INTERFACE CONSISTENT WITH THE QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1.

104256/0

42. THE COVERAGE PROVIDED EXCEPT AT THE INTERFERENCE IS IN ACCORDANE WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE REDUCTION IN TYPICAL COVERAGE AT THE FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLES DOES NOT COMPROVISE THE EFFECTIVE THICKNESS ON THE SUPPORT COVERAGE. THE FLEXI-BLANKET ENVELOPE WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE INTERFACE WITH THE 330-1 MATERIAL COMPENSATES FOR THE DEVIATION FROM Tile TYPICAL DETAILS.

7 ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-032, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D31 OF D31 COVER AGE DEVI ATIONS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

43. TIIE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS / PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE EXTENDING OlJT 9" 103799/0 FROM THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. EXTENDING COVERAGE OUT ONTO A METAL CEILING LINER / METAL BASE PLATE IS CONSISTENT WITH TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION. IN ADDITION THE WALL WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK AND REDUCE THE EXPOSED SURFACES. USING SELF TAPPING SCREWS AND MUDDING THE PANELS TO THE METAL WITH TROWEL GRADE WilERE SCRiiW SPACING CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE ATTACHMENT FOR THE PANELS. DOUBLING THE THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON THE TUBE STEEL WILL ADD TO Tile CONSERVATISM OF THE PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE AND WILL PROVIDE ADDITION AL M ATERIAL TO WTUMESCE AND FURTHER PROTECT THE ENVELOPE ON THE ESSENTIAL COM MODITN l

ER-ME482. REV. 2 PAGE El OF 11 ATTACIIMENT E STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ __ m _ _ _-_ ___m- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

W FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES E9-E11) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE I 101634/0 SG 831*-6* 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE 1: THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION DETAILS 2-0968 2SM/157 N N AT THE SECURITY BARRIERS DEVIATE FROM SPEC CPES-M-2032 BY NOT BEING SECURED AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE COMPONENT. RESOLUTION: THE DESIGN PROVIDES FOR UL X-611 1-5,7,8 ADDITIONAL SCREWS TO BE INSTALLED ON AND X-003 EITHER SIDE OF THE SECURITY BARS ASSURING THAT Tile THERMO-LAG WILL REM AIN IN PLACE. ISSUE 2: INSTALLATION DETAILS DEVIATE FROM SCREW SPACING CRITERIA FOR THE FIRST LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG PANELS. RESOLUTION: THE DEVIATION IS UL X-611 1-5, 7, 8 CONSERVATIVE IN THAT SCREW SPACING IS AND X-003 REDUCED FROM 4" TO 3" FROM THE EDGE OF THE PANELS AND THOSE PLACED AT THE CENTER OF THE THERMO-LAG PANELS IN LIEU OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE COMMODITY. ISSUE 3: THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION METHODS DO NOT PROVIDE FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG AT SECURITY BARRIER ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS NEXT TO FLOOR. RESOLUTION: PROVIDE INSTALLATION UL X-611 1-5, 7, 8 DETAILS WHERE INTERFERENCES ARE CLOSE AND X-003 TO FLOOR. THIS DETAIL IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATION AND ONLY CLARIFIES EXISTING REQUIREMENTS.

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME482 REV. 2 l STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E3 OF Ell l SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE AREA / (YIN) TEST (PAGES E9-E11) (YIN) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE l 101435/0 SG 831'-6* 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE PREVENTS INSTALLING 2-096B 2SM/157 N N THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WrTH SPECIFICATION ON A TUBE STEEL COLUMN FOR A DISTANCE OF 14 FT. AS FOLLOWS: A - BOTTOM PANEL OF FIRST LAYER HAS NO SCREWS DRILLED INTO Tile COLUMN. B - BOTTOM PANEL OF THE SECOND LAYER DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SPACING REQUIREMENT FROM THE TOP EDGE. RESOLUTION: A - Tile FIRST LAYER WILL BE UL X-611 1 -5, 7, 9 PREBUTTERED WITH TROWEL GRADE TO AND X-003 ADilERE IT TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH TiiE PIECE SCORED AND FOLDED AROUND THE TUBE STEEL. Tile SECOND LAYER WILL IIAVE A SCREW TIIROUGli IT ANCHORING WITH BOTil SIDES OF THE PANEL AND IS PREBUTTERED TO Tile FIRST LAYER. B - THE BOARD THAT COVERS THE REST OF 1 i THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SECOND LAYER IS AFFIXED TO THE STEEL MEMBER BY THE PANEL (SCORE AND FOLD METilOD) ON THE WEST SIDE. THE 9" HIGH PIECE IS PREBUTTERED AND SECURED IN PLACE WITH ONE SCREW.

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082 REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E4 OF Ell DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIVION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES E9-Ell) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 101707/0 SG 831*-6* 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO OBSTRUCTION, THERMO-LAG 2-096B 2SM/157 N N COVERAGE ON THE ANGLE PLATE BEHIND THE TUBE STEEL INSIDE THE STAIRWELL IS REDUCED. RESOLUTION: COVER ANGLE CLIP UP TO THE UL X-611 1-6, 7, 10 TUBE STEEL, SHAVE A PIECE OF THERMO-LAG AND X-003 PANEL TO FIT BETWEEN THE TUBE STEEL AND THE ANGLE. THE STAIRWELL SUPPORT BELOW THE GRATING. WilICH IS NOT ATTACHED TO THE PROTECTED TUBE STEEL MEMBER DOES NOT REQUIRE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION. 101708/0 SG 831'-6" 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: THE PIPE PROTRUDING THROUGH THE 24)96A 250/3 N Y STAIRWELL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE REQUIRES i THERMO-L AG FOR HEAT PATH. RESOLUTION: THE PIPING IS ENCAPSULATED UL X-6t l 1-6. 7, 10 IN THERMO-LAG TO MEET THE 2 HOUR AND X-003 3 REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPEC. THE DCA ONLY PROVIDES INSTALLATION DETAILS REQUIRED TO MEET THE SPEC. THEREFORE, THIS IS NOT A DEVIATION FROM DESIGN. _-___ . . . . . .. . . . = - - . -

A1TACHMENT E ER-ME-082. REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E5 OF Ell DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIETION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES E9-EI1) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 101884/0 SG 790'4" 2-070 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: REDUCTION OF THERMO-LAG 2-074A 250/3 N Y THICKNESS ON THE STRUCTURAL STEFL AROUND FIRE & TORNADO DAMPERS TO 101885/0 SG 810'-6* 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ALLOW FOR Tile DAMPER BLADES 2-085B 2SO/3 N Y UNOBSTRUcrED FUNCTION. 101886/0 SG 831'4 " 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y RESOLUTION: WHERE TWO FULL LAYERS OF N/A 1 4. 11 2-096A 25 0/3 N Y TIIERMO-LAG WOULD OBSTRUCT THE DAMPER LEVER MECHANISM, A SINGLE LAYER IS 101887/0 SG 810' 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y INSTALLED WITil JOINTS AND SEAMS FILLED 2-085C 2SM/157 N N WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. WHERE SINGLE THICKNESS OF TilERMO-LAG PANELS CREATE 101888/0 SG 831'4 " 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y AN INTERFERENCE TOP COAT AND MATERIAL 2-096B 2SM/157 N N IS REMOVED BY SANDING AND GRINDING AND Tile TOP COAT REAPPLIED. 101891/0 SG R51 ' 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y 2-105B 2SM/157 N N 102300/0 GEN GEN GEN GEN N/A N/A ISSUE: STRUCTURAL STEEL CEILING AND WALL PLATES WITil ANCIIORS PREVENT INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER SCREW PLACEM ENT. RESOLUTION: PRIOR TO SECOND LAYER UL X411 1 4, 7. 12 INSTALLATION ON ANCHOR BOLTS, THE BACK AND X-003 OF THE PLATES ARE TO BE PREBUTTERED. DETAILS FOR SCREW PLACEMENTS ARE APPROVED IN TIIIS DCA. l l l l l

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E6 OF E11 l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLLTTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST (PAGES E9-El1) FIRE SCHEMES ! ZONE I 102465/0 SG 852*-6" 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y ISSUE INSUFFICIENT ROOM INSIDE 2-105B 2SM/157 N N STAIRWELL, PREVENTS FASTENING THE 1 SECOND LAYER OF THERMO-LAG TO THE [ STRUCTURAL STEEL AND APPLICATION OF TOP : L COAT TO ALL THE JOINTS AND SEAMS. L RESOLUTION: FIRST LAYER WAS UL X-611 1-6, 7. 13 PREBUTTERED, FOLDED AROUND THE DAMPER AND X-003 STEEL FRAMING AND FASTENED TO THE i STRUCTURAL STEEL WITil SCREWS. THE [ SECOND LAYER IS INSTALLED IN 'DVO PIECES I i WITH THE FIRST PIECE BEING PREBUTTERED I AND CLAMPED, CUT AND FOLDED AROUND 2 , Tile DAMPER FRAME. FOAM SEAL MATERIAL WAS INSTALLED BETWEEN THE WALL AND THE SECOND PIECE TO MOLD THE PIECE IN

PLACE.

4 s 102886/0 SG 821*-6" 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE 1: TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ! 2-096B 2SM!!S7 N N SECURITY BAR OVERLAPS THE COVER PLATE ! I OF THE MAGNETIC DOOR SWITCH BOX WHICH REQUIRES PERIODlc Y AINTENANCE AND j ADJUSTM ENTS RESOLUTION 1: THERMO-LAG IS SHAVED BY UL X-611 1-6, 7, 14 ; i 1/4" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1-1/2" TO ALLOW AND X-003

                                                                                                                ' FREE ACCESS TO Tile BOX.

I ! ISSUE 2: AN llVAC DUCT PREVENTS , INSTALLATION OF THE SECOND LAYER OF THERMO-LAG ON A SECURITY BAR TO SATISFY THE 4" RULE. I 4 RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL THE SECOND LAYER UL X-611 1-6, 7, 14

OF THERMO-LAG NOTCHED OUT BUT NOT AND X-003 l CONNECTED TO THE IIVAC DUCT. .

i ! J I

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E7 OF Ell BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES E9-El1) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 102915/0 SG 790* 2-070 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: MISSING INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR 2-074A 25 0/3 N Y THERMO-LAG ON DOOR FRAME, FIRE DAMPERTFORNADO DAMPER, AND STRUCTURAL STEEL USING TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: PREBUTTER THE BACK OF ALL UL X-611 1-6, 7, 15 PANELS WITil THERMO-LAG 330-1 TROWEL AND X-003 GRADE. TROWEL GRADE IS PLACED !N ALL CUT OUTS FOR BOLT PROTRUSIONS FLUSH WITH TOP OF TilERMO-LAG PANELS AFTER PANEL INSTALLATION. 103131/1 SG 810' 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO THE CONFIGURATION AND 2-085B 2SO/3 N Y INTERFERENCE OF THE DOOR FRAME WITH THE ADJOINING DAMPER FRAME, THE CONVENTIONAL SELF TAPPING SCREWS CANNOT BE USED TO ATTACll THE THERMO-LAG (3 ITEMS). RESOLUTION: DETAILS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED UL X-611 1-6, 7, 16 TO INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 FLAT PANELS AND X-003 PREBUTTERING TIIE BACK OF TiiE PANELS. SILICONE FOAM SEAL IS EXTENDED TO BUTF TO THE THERMO-LAG PANELS TO SECURE THEM TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL. 103189/2 SG 831'-6" 2-096 2SE/16 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO INTERFERENCE INSTALLATION 2-096A 2SO/3 N Y OF THERMO-LAG FOR THE FIRE DAMPER FRAMING REQUIRES ADDITIONAL DETAILING. l RESOLUTION: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG PANELS 1-6, 7, 11, 17 WITH ANCHOR BOLTS INSTEAD OF SELF TAPPING SCREWS, NOTCH PANELS AS l REQUIRED, FILL VOID WITil CERAMIC l INSULATOR 330-70 AND LEAVE ROOM FOR TORNADO DAMPER LEVER MOVEMENT. __.____..____.._______.._--___m_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ __. _ __m_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E8 OF Et1 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASISINOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGES E9-EI1) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 104185/0 SG 831*-6" 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: SHIMS ON STEEL ANGLES SUPPORTING UL X-003 1-6, 18 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y HATCH COVER REQUIRE PROTECTION FOR HEAT PATH. RESOLUTION: ATTACH 2 LAYERS OF PANEL MATERIAL ON SHIM BOTTOM SURFACES ONLY USING THE WIRES AND BANDING.

l ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. 2 l STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E9 OF El1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV NOTE ~ GENERIC

1. CONTINUITY OF THE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

2. EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

3. Tile NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

4. THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

GENERIC

5. TIIE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.

GENERIC

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH WOULD ENHANCE Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SilIELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATil, ETC.).

EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL THERMO-LAG CONFIGURATIONS HAS BEEN PROVIDED VIA ER-ME-067, APPENDIX D. THE GENERIC 7. EVALUATION PROVIDED THEREIN COMPARES Tile PLANT CONFIGURATIONS WITil UL DESIGNS X-611 AND X-003. 101434/0

8. Tile SCREW FASTENER SPACING USED IS WITHIN THE SPACING DISTANCE USED ON TiiE COLUMN IN UL X-003 AND THE EMBEDMENT IS SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE THERMO-LAG PANELS AND THEREFORE THE STRUCTUR AL STEEL.

101435/0

9. THE PANELS ARE PREBUTTERED WITil TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AND SCORE AND FOLDED SO TilAT THE STRESS SKIN IS INTACT. UL X-611 USES TOWEL APPLIED TilERMO-LAG 330-1 (ONLY) FOR ADHERENCE TO Tile COLUMN. PREBUTTERING TIIE BOARDS TO THE STEEL AND THE SECOND LAYER TO TIIE FIRST LAYER GLUES TiiE ASSEMBLY TOGETHER. FOLDING THE BOARD WITH THE STRESS SKIN AT THE CORNER REINFORCES THE JOINT AND ADDS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TO Tile THERMO. LAG. TIIE SCREWS ONLY ADD TO Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE M ATERIAL THE MINIMUM TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED. THEREFORE SINCE THE THERM AL INTEGRITY (TillCKNESS) IS M AINTAINED AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS EQUAL IF NOT GREATER TIIAN THAT TESTED IN UL X-611 THE STEEL IS ADEQUATELY PROTECTED.

101707/0

10. Tile TUBE STEEL COLUMN WHICH IS Tile COMMODITY PROTECTED IS ADEQU ATELY PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CPES-101708/0 M-2032. PROTRUDING ITEMS ONLY REQUIRE PROTECTION FOR HEAT PATH. Tile TIIERMO-LAG PROTECTS PROTRUSION SUCH THAT TilERE IS NO AREA WHERE A FIRE COULD HAVE FLAME IMPINGEMENT SUCH TO EFFECT THE BARRIER. THE 4" RULE FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL IS BASED ON A 3 HOUR FIRE RATING AND Tile PROTECTED ITEM COMPLETELY WITillN THE FURNACE. Tile TUBE STEEL IS EMBEDDED IN THE WALL SO THAT ONLY ONE SIDE IS EXPOSED WHICH INCREASES TIIE STEEL *S ABILITY TO ACCEPT HEAT FROM A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE FIRE RATING OF TIIE BARRIER IS FOR ONLY 2 HOURS AND NOT 3. BASED ON THE CONFIGURATION AND THE BASIS OF Tile DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. Tills CONFIGURATION IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR RATING TO TIIE STRUCTURAL STEEL.

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E10 OF E11 NOTE ACCEITANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

11. THE STRUCTURAL STEEL IS THE ANGLE IRON USED TO RETAIN THE FIRE DAMPER /FORNADO DAMPER ASSEMBLY. THIS 101884/0 ARRANGEMENT IS A NON-RATED FEATURE (NRF-012) PER CALCULATION 2-FP-0080, REV. O. THE ANGLE IRONS ARE OF HEAVY 101885/0 CONSTRUCTION AND ARE LIGHTLY LOADED. THE SM ALL PORTION OF THE DAMPER FRAME THAT IS UNPROTECTED IS NOT 101886/0 LARGE ENOUGH TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE RETAINING ANGLE AND THEREBY FAILURE OF THE FIRE DAMPER. THERE IS NO 101887/0 TEMPERATURE TEST REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE DAMPER AND THEREFORE THE REDUCTION IN FIREPROOFING WILL NOT 101888/0 CAUSE AN INCREASE IN HEAT TRANSMISSION THROUGH THE FIRE BARRIER. BASED ON TifE DESIGN OF THE DAMPER 101891/0 INSTALLATION AND THE SMALL REDUCTION IN FIREPROOFING, THE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE A 2 llOUR EQUIVALENT FIRE RATING.

12. THIS IS A SMALL AREA AND AT LEAST ONE SCREW IS INSTALLED TO FASTEN THE SECOND LAYER TO THE STRUCTURAL 102300/0 MEMBER. TIIE SECOND LAYER IS PREBUTTERED WITH TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL WlIICH WILL BOND THE SECOND LAYER TO THE FIRST LAYER. TilESE ARE SMALL AREAS AND Tile THERMO-LAG CARRIES NO SIGNIFICANT LOAD. THE TROWEL GRADE

                          ,                                                            MATERIAL ALONG WITH TIIE SCREW WILL IIOLD THE TilERMO-LAG IN PLACE. SINCE M ATERIAL TillCKNESS IS M AINTAINED l                                                            AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE FIREPROOFING WILL BE MAINTAINED THE STRUCTURAL STEEL WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR RATING.

13. THE THERMO-LAG IS BEING USED TO PROTECT TIIE STEEL FRAME OF TIIE FIRE DAMPER. THE REQUIRED THICKNESS OF 102465/0 THERMO-LAG IS INSTALLED. THE FOAM SEAL M ATERIAL WlilCil IS SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE THERMO-LAG AND THE WALL NOT ONLY PROVIDES SUPPORT OF TllE TIIERMO-LAG BUT PREVENTS THE THERMO-LAG FROM BEING DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A FIRE. SINCE THE TIIERMO-LAG TIIICKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND THE THERMO-LAG WILL REMAIN IN PLACE, THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 IIOUR FIRE RATING.

14. IN BOTil ISSUE I AND 2 OF DCA 102886/0 TIIE THERMO-LAG IS BEING INSTALLED ON A PROTRUDING ITEM USING Tile 4" RULE. 102886/0 TillCKNESS AND DISTANCE IS BASED ON A 3 HOUR FIRE TEST. THIS FIRE BARRIER IS ONLY A 2 IIOUR FIRE BARRIER. THERE IS ONLY A SM ALL AMOUNT OF THERMO-LAG WHICH IS NOT INSTALLED AND THE INTERFERING ITEM SHIELDS TIIE LOCATIONS WlIERE THE THERMO-LAG COVERAGE IS REDUCED. THEREFORE, THE HEAT PATH COVERAGE IS SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF HEAT INTO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING.

15. THE THERMO-LAG IS BEING USED TO PROTECT TIIE FIRE DAMPER FRAME AND DOOR FRAME. THE ARRANGEMENT DOES NOT 102915/0 ALLOW FOR SCREW SPACING REQUIREMENTS TO BE M AINTAINED. THE THERMO-LAG IS PREBUTTERED TO BOND THE TilERMO-LAG TO Tile FRAMES AND THE LAYERS TOGETHER. IN ORDER TO WORK AROUND BOLT INTERFERENCE. THREE LAYERS OF THERMO-LAG WAS INSTALLED IN MOST CASES. THE DISTANCES WITilOUT PilYSICAL RESTRAINTS ARE SM ALL.

BASED ON Tile CONFIGURATION OF l HE INSTALLATION ALONG WITH THE THERMO-LAG PREBUTTERING, TIIERMO-LAG THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY WILL BE MAINTAINED. THE DESIGN PROVIDES AND EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING.

ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082. REV. 2 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE Ell OF Ell NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV THE THERMO-LAG THICKNESS IS M AINTAINED IN ALL CASES. IN ITEM 1, THE FIRST LAYER IS BONDED TO THE FRAME USING 103131/1 16. TROWEL GRADE 330-1 AND THEN THE SECOND LAYER IS PREBUTTERED TO THE FIRST LAYER. THE PENETRATION SEAL IS EXTENDED TO REINFORCE (JAMMED IN PLACE) THE THERMO-LAG PANELS AND PROVIDES SOME PROTECTION TO THE THERMO-LAG. IN ITEM 2 ONLY TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL IS USED. SINCE THE DISTANCE IS ONLY 3/4" OF AN INCH AND X-611 USES ONLY TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL TO PROTECT A COMPLETE STEEL COLUMN. THE SMALL AMOUNT OF THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE WILL REMAIN IN PLACE. IN ITEM 3, THE FIRST LAYER IS BONDED TO THE DAMPER FRAMES USING TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AND SCREWED TO THE TUBE STEEL THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS USED SO THAT THE STRESS SKIN IS CONTINUOUS. THE FOLDS ADD STRUCTURAL STRENGTH TO THE INSTALLATION. THE SECOND LAYER IS PREBUTTERED TO Tile FIRST LAYER AND SCREWED TO THE TUBE STEEL Tile SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS ALSO USED ON Tills LAYER. THE VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE TUBE STEEL AND FRAME (@ l-1/2")IS FILLED WITH THERMO-LAG PREBUTTERED PANELS. THEREFORE IN ALL CASES STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS M AINTAINED. SINCE THERMO-LAG THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED, THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. 103189/2

17. ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED IN THE CONCRETE PROVIDE THE SAME STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENT AS SELF TAPPING SCREWS.

IN UL X-003, THE SPACING OF THE ANCHOR BOLTS EXCEEDS THE SCREW SPACING REQUIRED BY 3" FOR A SPACING OF 9". THE FREE SPAN ON THE COLUMN IS GREATER THAN 9" TilEREFORE THE 9" SPACING IS ACCEPTABLE. THE VOID SPACE IS FILLED WITil CERAMIC INSULATOR 330-70 WIIICH IS A NON-COMBUSTIBLE M ATERIAL AND PROVIDES AN ADDITIONAL THERM AL BARRIER FOR THE STEEL SINCE THE THERMO-LAG THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS M AINTAINED, THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. TIIE STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORTING THE HATCH COVER IS A NON-RATED FEATURE WiUCH, BASED ON CALCULATION 2-FP- 104185/0 18. 0080, REV. 0 (NRF-Oll) DOES NOT REQUIRE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION. THEREFORE, PROVISION OF THERMO-LAG ON BOTH THE SUPPORT ANGLE AND SHIM IS AUGMENTARY ONLY.

ER ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE F1 OF F2.9 ATTACIBIENT F AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPOR13

03/06/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE : 1

 .                                                                                                                                                                                                        PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE 6 FEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: CPES-M-2032                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                SHEET:                                        REV: O       P.O.:

MAINT LVL: S2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN8 REPORT ATT. N01

                                    .=:s = = = n = =. = r = .= s. = =                                                            nn-                                                       var =                                                                  u m. =                             ::n==    === =====

II b J b b I [i DCA 075774 Oc: .; 'I O C

                                     .                                                     -           .n .                       n-,                                                                              . , ,                                                                 v               e b,..                .
                                              .mp          I                                   ~../I XI I a            7                     %#           .s e                                                     w                       a uwn
                                                                                           -~-

vi,,,

                                          - -                                              stt                A                   n P A                                                                 p_g y                                                                            p}               (s u .. : .                                              v ,s .*m,f,%       ,                   -.                                                                    _. .                                                                             .                .
                   - DC A                                                                 070774                                005                                                                     ., N I                                                                           C               C G . ^.                                               C'/G7^4                                00e                                                                   C. I                                                                              :'              C
                                    .1,.
                                    %#bdM                                                 - I ~J V
                                                                                                     /_ f,    T t(\/

hsf I T4 kJ tJ DcA 095794 006 GR A SPEC DCA DCA 099501 000 NI R A , NO DEis/.

                                                                                                                                ^^"                                                                                                                                                     "
                                   '?.'                                                   <^^'t0                                                                                                      CF'                                                                                               C UCA                                                    10 0',e 6                             001                                                                     /IG                                                                             0               V DCA                                                    101182                               000                                                                               NI                                                                     R              :A                              RES
                                                                                          .~-~
                                   .,._m.                                                                                       --
                                                                                                                                                                                                     -, , . 4.                                                                          -
                                   ,                                                          v..v.                            vvv                                                                        ,                                                                             w                   ,

DCA

~.

101282 - - , . 001 NI R A f: 81 V bI_P ../4 4' / a. V V V V h.f1 4 h# t f D: r. 101020 001 CNI P O CCA 10 02' 002 ON: 0 0 DCA 101397 000 WI R A D DCA 1 0 1 3 9'9 000 NI R A edO DEV. DCA 101434 000 NI R A E DCA 101435 000 NI R A E

.x 10:4?C 0:0 cc': O C DCA 101498 00 6 NI R A 6

                                  ,C r                                                  1^140'                              ^^0"                                                                  C .-! !
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       ,",              r
                                  . .                                                    .m.          , . , ,                 ~ .                                                                   ,o,                                                                                                 ,.
                                  &J ba D                                                4   ',I & b# 6 I                     yV 4                                                                   .r . 1 4                                                                          W                  #

DCA 101707 000 , NI R A E DCA 101708 000 , NI R A E. OCA 101884 O O C- NI R A E DCA 101085 000 NI R A E DCA 10188e, 000 NI R A E DCA 101887 . 000 NI R A E DCA 101888 000 NI R A E DCA 101891 000 NI R A E -

                                . . - -                                                  . - . ~ , ,                         -n                                                                                       .,                                                               -               ,.

res s r i ey a a ww yvv wvT e a w n r. . .m.,m,, mmm ,- u , n r-DCA kb2077 bbk Nk R A P.ES < DCA 102078 000 NI R A RES l DCA 102103 000 NI R A 6

                                                                                                                           ^^^
                               " C .^                                                        ^214^                                                                                                EMI                                                                                  O               e ATTACHMENT F                                                                                                                                                          -

ER-ME 082, REV.1 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE Ft OF FZ9

03/08/93 ATTACNMENT I PAGL: 2 PART B FIEL D DESIGN CHANGE & PEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DW3: CPES-t'-2032 SHEET: REV: O P.O.: MAINT LVL: S2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS R E L.S D-ST MO D I FC TN-I R E f'OR.T ATf. [NO srs===ne,.==== u m =r= .. a r. = .cara en== === =:=== DCA 102160 001 NI R A 6 PI^ '^2222

                       ,         000        CN!          O DCA             102222    001           NI        R       A                        A DCA             102266    000           NI        R       A                        D DCA             102300    000           NI        R       A                        E
       " C .^          102200    000        LN!          O DCA             102330    001           NI    ~' R        A                        C
                       '0229C    000        ?"I          O                                                     _

DCA 102385 001 NI R A RES DCA 102465 000 NI R A E DCA 102478 001 NI R A

C DCA 102533 000 NI R A RGS DCA 102563 000 NI R !A RES CC: :0:070 000 CN! ::

00A 102679 001 NI R A .. (23 DCA 102709 000 NI R A NO DEV DCA 102728 000 NI R A R E..G DCA

"~~

102758 000 NI R n A c C 102?2C 00^ 9"'

                                 ^^^                             "
       "Cr            1 ^ 2 70'?            C"!          2 DCA            102789     001           NI        R       A                         D DCA            102800     002          NI         R       A                         6 DCA            102837     000           NI        R       A                         C DCA            102858     000 ,        NI         R       A                         g D^             102961     ^0^'       car          n       c DCA            102863     001'         NI         R  ,

A C Et!! " DC^ 202??^ ^^? 9 DCA 102886 000 ' ' NI R A E DCA 102915 000 NI R A E O C .^ 102022 ^^0 rMI e C C f- 102?22 ^C: C 'I C C CC" 100:02' 002 CN! " C 0 0 ^. 102702 000 C:l! O C m-. ,m,m-, mm. -m, m ,. DCA 102932 005 NI R A 6 DCA 102957 000 NI. R, A e A Cr te2ce? ^^e ear a DCA 103007 001 NI R A C

e :eee:2 cee e-t r a e

0 C /, 100010 001 DN: 0 _ ATTACHMENT F ER-ME 082, REV. '2 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F3 OF FZ9

I 03/08/93 AT(ACHMENT I PAGE: 3 , PART B l FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG ! AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: CPfS-M-2032 SHCET REV: O P.0,: ! MAINT LVL S2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNX

       = = = = : = = = e s. r. & = r. =  =r=         _m.=       = n r. = r- u = = ==2,    m=wn    -

RE PORT ATT / 'Noi C C ,' :0D0:0 0 2 Crl: P C

""^

10?O!? 002 CN! " C r y _, 1can,e nea car n e O C .^ 10:010 ^05 C"? O " DCA 103013 006 NI R A 6 ne A 4ngn73 nnn eur g g DCA 103037 000 NI R A C

       ""^                   ^"^^'       0^           CN!              O      t UCA                 103046        002                 NI        P      A                            O

DCA 10:050 000 NI R A C a v. 10000a s:Oc C;! r C UCA DCA 103056 001 001 NI R A

                                                                            'A 6

103076 NI R C" DCA 103081 001 NI R A D DCA 103088 000 NI R A - D

= :cCc;C :: CN: o c C :, ' :020?C 00 ' 'N !

      "C.^                10213:        000           CH               0     "

DCA 103131 001 NI R A E DCA 103143 000 NI R A g DCA 103157 000 NI R A DCA 103150 000 NI A C DCA R g 103159 000 NI R A DCA 103161 000 ,. NI R A RE.S CC , 10 iC0 000~ " C:'! C

::::C0 00: CN: O C DCA 103189 002 l

NI R A E i DCA 103305 001 NI R A g DCA 103375 000 NI R A c nc A 4n,tn4 nnn eut n e "C^ 102'0" 000 cd! n e OCf 102'^^' ^01 SMI O ?

     '! C .^              102'^9        002           c"!             "      C O C .^                !^2'^?        ^^2           CMI             O      ?

C C ', 10:007 000 01! P C DCA 103409 005 NI R A S e C .- :est:' 000 C :: : C DCA 103414 001 NI R A C DCA 103423 000 NI R A A I D C .^ 10 0 ' ? '. 00^ CN! O C ATTACHMENT F ER-MEM REV. E AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F'l OF F29

l 03/06/93 AYFACPMENT I PAGE 4

    .                                                      PART B FIELU DESIGN CHANGE 6 REVIEW STATUS L0G AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWGl CPCS-M-2032                                             SPEF:T:                  REV: O                 P.O.:

MAINT LVL 52 DES-CHNG-NUMBER s u u = r = r = r aa.=.- = REV arn DOCS anne RELS enra D-ST v s. r = N001FCTN1

                                                                                         ====a====

ggg DCA 103476 001 NI DCA 103480 000 NI R A A D DCA 103507 000 R y NI DCA 103508 000 NI P A A g 004 103533 000 NI R A g

C .' 1";255^ 00^ Ce!

P O E g UCA 103550 001 NI P A S m.. . m ., r : coe ,, , a e

            '".'                     100S5:      00        0. ' !-       :        C UCA                      103559      000         NI          R        A A
                                                                                                          ~

_ ' 10 54' ^IO C :- ! :' C DCA 103067 103C ^

001 occ NI R A 6 E?r 4 T .- DCA 103574 001 rJ I R A C DCA 103582 000 Ni R A . 6 DCA 103599 000 NI R A C" DCA 103400 OC? NI P A 6 UCA 103602 000 NI R A C 004 10360,9 000 NI R A C DCA 103613 000 NI R A D DCA 103631 000 N1 R A C DCA 103633 000 NI R A C

         --M+4                      10240'      00C       Ef!!          "         c 0 C .^                 10212'        001 _ CMI               D        c DCA                    103634        002       NI          R        A                                         6 DCA                   103636         000         NI          R        A                                         C DCA                    103650        000 ,       NI          R        A C

DCA 103600 001 , NI R A g DCA 103701 000 NI R A

           " C .^                102706 000               EMI           O        E                                         b    ,

DCA 103706 001 NI R A C

        --esA-                   10a'10' 000              cNI           e        c DCA                   103718         001         NI         ~R        A                                         C ec^                   lere           000       en:           e        e                    -

DCA 103721 001 NI R A C DCA 103730 000 NI R A C __

        -e,                      10r t 0 - 000            cel                    :

DCA 103740 001 NI R A 6 UCA 103741 000 NI R A C l DCA 103770 000 NI R A C 1 ATTACHMENT F ER-ME 082 REY. 2.- AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F50F F2,9 1 l 1 I

03/08/93 ATfACPMENT I FAGi 5 . PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & FEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: CPES-N-2032 SHCET: REV: O P.O.: MAINT LUL: S2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER e = = u = = .- m i. e- _ e x = REV m .- = DCCS

                                                ====

RELS

                                                          .=-n D-ST

- r = =

MODIFCTN8

                                                                             ==22==us=

ggggy Ap hg (10A 103780 000 NI R A C DCA 103792 000 NI R A B DCA 103799 000 NI R A D DCA 103016 3824 000 NI NI R R A A C

     $^
                         .m
                                      . ,, 3      , ,

NO DE DCA 103846 001 NI R A D DCA 103864 000 NI R A C, DCA 103873 000 Hi R A e gg$ 57 w 1

                         .m,,~
                            .ww     w v

m DCA 103884 001 NI R A - E"! " "

     "r^                1029m2        000 DCA                103892        001            NI        R        A                                 O DCA                103912        000            NI        R        A                     .           6 DCA                103917        000            NC        R        A                    '.-         D DCA                103924        000            NI        R        A                                D DCA                103947        000            NI        R        A                                C, DCA                103959        000            NI        R        A                                 C, DCA                10398,8       000            NI        R        A                                 C DCA                103991        000            NI        R        A                                 c can                10'^::        ^^0         Cr:I         r         :

DCA 104011 001 NI R A C DCA n-. 104013

                        .m.m.,

000 mmm m, NI R n A c DCA 104017 0017 NI R A C.

     " C .^             10;21       00^',       CHI             ,

DCA 104026 001 NI R A C DCA 104027 000 '- NI R A C,'

     ,,                  .m.m,,       mmm         e..,          n        e bA              tb4bb7        bbk            Nk        R        A                                 C DCA                104057- 000                  NI         R        A                                C DCA                104060',000                  NI        R        A                                8 DCA                104075        000            NI        R        A                                 C a
     ""^    .

10 ' ^~ ce^ ?"I ? DCA 104079 001 NI R A .D DCA 104087 000 NI R A B DcA 104096 000 NI R A RES DCA 104107 000 NI R A C DCA 104114 000 NI R A 3 DCA 104115 000 NI R A C l ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME-082, REY. t AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDA*IE REPORTS PAGE F6 OF FZ9

03/06/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGL: 6

        .                                                           PART B FIEtD DESIGN CHANGE & PEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: CPES-N-2032                                                  SNCET:                REV: O      P.O.

MAINT LUL: S2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST M0DIFCTNi 3 = = urs u = ,:s t.= r =.r = = . = a=,.= . =rn .. n = = ======1u= . REPORT ATT[ NOTf DCA 104124 000 DCA 104151 000 NI NI R R A A 3 DCA 104152 000 NI P A C g g ,* ;m ,, 2 mnn c .q v n e C DCA 104174 001 NI P A DCA C. 104188 000 NI R A DCA 104194 000 NI A NO M DCA 104205 000 NI R R A 3 DCA 104206 000 NI P A ( DCA 104211 000 NI R A p ' l u .. ; 10:21' 00^ C . ! " E

                                                                                                          ,          C l                " C .^            1^^21'            001          ?"'             n      c M be F7 n,

4 V T h. a= h V VV sur FT g W bp h 39 777 993 gue n e~ C C .^ 204222 ^^2 " *! I 2 " DCA 104222 003 NI DCA 104224 000 NI R A 6 DCA 104227 000 NI R A A D DCA 104234 000 NI R R A D UCA 104235 003 NI C DCA 104237 000 NI R R A A A D2A 104238 000 NI C R A DCA 104239 00 Q, NI R A C l DCA 104240 0007 NI R A C

               , , .             .m      ,..       mmm.                                                               -
                                                                -1,,            ,      -

NOT T-U DCn iO4bi Obi '

                                                                ~Ni             R'     A                             C DCA                104242            000             NI          R       A DCA                104243            000 Nt           R      A C

DCA 104244 000 NI R A C

              ,~                 .m.,          m   mmm             . . .        -      -                            C DbA                kb4b5b'bbb      .                 Nk          R      k                             C DCA                104252            000             NI          R      A                             C.

DCA 104254 000 NI R A DCA 104255 000 NI C _ DCA 104260 000 NI R R A A c DCA 104262 000 NI R A C ggg DCN 00S727 000 NI MR A MM-93-0124 neu cr'e2 e^^ C.':: C C e--e2 c:25 3 TUE 92-05683 000 NI A D Q D@ ( , l l I i ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME-On. REY. 2. AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F7 OF FZq i l l I

l 1 l 02/06/92 ATrACHMENT I P A G E. , 7 . PART B 1 FIELD DESIGN CHANGE 6 PEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: CPES-M-2022 SPCET: REV: O P.O.: MAINT LVL: 52 DE S- CHrJ G -N U M B E R REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNA REPORT ATT / A!OTE

     ======.:r3.=======           = = =      =nen     ent n     ru== ======-::==

TUE 92-05877 000 NI D A NO DE V TUE 92-06315 000 NI D A MOI)h TUE 92-06560 000 NI D A NO'DF_\ TUE 92-06572 000 NI D A R.ELS T ;'.- 72 06500 ^'1 C -l I P TUE 92-06590 002 NI D A NQ My

     'L'.-       ?O 06612         001          C r' '              E TUE         72-06613         002           NI          D      A                                           NO des TU~         92-07065         000           NI          O      A NODE p

l PREPARED BY . _/_/_ REVIEUED BY: /__./__ APPROVED BY: _/ __./ _ ATTAOIMENT F . ER-ME 082 REY. 2. . AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 3 PAGE F80F FZ9 1

03/08/93 AT(ACHMENT I PAGE:: 1 c PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGC 6 REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHCET: 001 REV: CPI P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-C61NG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN1

              = = = = = ma r = = u in s. = =c=       x. = i. =   ==ra     r=== ====. .,==                         REPORT ATT* [ NOTE DCA                101358      000                         R     A A

DCA 101524 000 GR A A

          -9 '                 20?222      ^^O          C -' !         P     C DCA               102222       001                        R      A                                                A DCA                102265      000             NI          R     A                                                B DCA               102466       000             NI         R      A                                                      NO DE DCA                102470      000             NI          R     A                                                      g g, DCA               102750       000             NI         R      A                                                g            ,

DCA 102758 000 NI R A C "I' : ^'~ 07

^^^

C"! : " DCA 102789 001 NI R A I D DCA 102837 000 NI R A C, DCA 102859 000 NI R -A D DCA 102884 001 NI NI R A Q DCA 102086 000 R A :- E DCA 102094 000 NI R A - NODE DCA 102915 000

^^^

NI R .A G

           " C .^             100^^7                   " '! !         O      C                                                             j
           '! C f-            202^       ^^0         S r' !         D      E                                                             i DCA                103034       001            NI          R      A                                                 B
           ":-                :Or m        coc         ser            e      e DCA                103476       001                        R      A                                                'D DCA                103559       000             NI         R      A                                                 A DCA                103735       000 ,          NI          R      A DCA                103921       000'                       R      A                                                 4 DCA                103924       000'           NI          R ,    A                                                g nce                :cce52       000         Ce:            r      :

DCA 103953 000 ' ' R A A DCA Pt F* A 104001 eMJA4 E Oc0 AAA NI r k t T R PR A P D UEA ib4 bid bbi R A k DCA 104079 001 NI R A D DCA 104121 000 R A A DCA 104185 000 NI R A g DCA 104189 000 NI R A D DCA 104221 000 NI R A D et- :ee 22 ::: sc:: r : See :0t222 001 0::: : n'^ 10'222 002 E -!! O E DCA 104222 003 NI R A 3 A*ITACHMENT F ER-MEM REV. 2 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F9 OF F29 1

1 03/08/93 ATTACHMENT ! FAGL: 2 I

   .                                                  PART B FIELD DESIGo' CHANGE 6 PEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT l

OWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 001 REV: Cri P.0,: i MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS 0-ST MODIFCTNt u = u = = w : = :- = = = = = r. = _ = . = = us.n re s. = = === o=== - REPORT ATT / N0' DCA 104227 000 NI NI R A D DCA 104256 000 R A D DCA 104259 000 NI R A p

                                          .~
                                              .~

m l l

 ,       PREPARED BY:                                                                    __f _/ _._

REVIEWED 8Y: _/ ,_._/ _,,,,, j l A P P ROVE.D BY: _,,,./ _ / , I ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME 082, REV. 2 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE Fl00F F29 I

           ,                         ~ - . - ~ . -                   . . .                                ..           -..-.           - - .   . . .

03/08/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1

   ,                                                            PART B FIEL D DESIGN CHANGE & FEVIEU S TATUS L DG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT                                                                                          '

DtlG M2-1701 SHCET: 002 REV: CPI P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 ' DES-CHNG-NUMBER .REV DCCS RELS D-ST FDDIFCTN8

                   =====:=.======.=                  ==.=  = u et a        u n s. n      nu==      ======2u=                 -- REPORT ATT / t40TE DCA             100920               000 DCA             101320               003         NI R

R A A A DCA 101627 002 NI P A

'~

DCA 102385 001 NI R A r, y 1974,e 999 r_,r n c RES DCA 102479- 001 NI R A ,O DCA 103002 000 NI

               ""3              1^~020 001                    CM!                D R          A C

D "C' IC2020 002 Cr!! " C DCA 102000 003

Cf :::: - ^0e Cm R

A

                                                                                                                 -                  A C
              ': C ^           10240'               001       CM!                O           C DCA              103634 002                                        R         A "Cf              1^2401               ^^^       ""'

C C 3 l0' 100'^4 0^0 C rlI ' C . DCA 103047 - 000 NI R A h

' C' ' ;^20C' ^^0 C l:

C DCA 103884 001 NI R A DCA 10392.1 000 R A 3 DCA 104013 000 NI R A A

             !' C '            !^'02d               ^^^

C I :' C - - - - { DCA 104026 001 NI R A

DCA 104060 000 P A C

DCA 104079 001 NI R A 3 DCA 104241 001 R A DCA 104245 000". NI R A DCA 104251 000 , NI R , A C DCA 104253 000 NI R A g m-, ._,,,, --m r., n , C bbA kb4bb7 bb1 N5 R k D E" ??5? S ??2 . NI MR A gg-{3-0125 6 bbN bb5[4b bb Nk MR k' MM-9b-bkbb l bbN bb5/4b bbk NE MR k MM-9b-b5bb 3 l PREPARED BY _ _/ _ / _.,_. REVIEWED BY: _ ,,_/ ___/ __ APPROVED BY: __, _ / , ,_./ _,_ ATTACHMENT F ER-ME OS2, REY.1 ~ AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE Fil OF FZ'1

03/05/93 ATTACPMENT I PAGE : 1 . PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE 6 PEVIEW STATUS LOG i AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 003 REV: CF1 P.0,: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER

      = = = s: = = = : = = = = = = r =

REV

                                         = . =

DCCS

                                                   ====

RCLS x.=..= D-ST

                                                                     = . = =

M0]IFCTN4

                                                                             ====_-.=-.=

ggggg7 477[gg7 , 2 DCA 100920 000 R A 4 DCA 102479 001 NI R A l "C^ Ic?d'o ^CO E"I c D DCA 102679 001 NI R A 3 D C ,' 100^?O ^^! C"! " E C C .^ 100000 ^^2 C"' C DCA 103020 003 DCA 103489 001 NI R R A A A 9C^ 102r50 ^00 9 'I n e 3 DCA UCA 103550 103681 001 001 rJI NI R P A A B DCA 103509 000 NI 3 DCA 104047 000 NI R R A

                                                                       ~A g

000 g DCA 104048 NI R A UCA 104121 000 R A *i n-. .n2se ans eu, n c DbA kb42b7 bbk Nk R A O DCA 104261 000 NI R A C DCA 104244 00') NI R A Q

.~

s~ PREPARED BY: .___. __/ _ ,,/ __ REVIEWED BY: - _,_f __/ APPROVED 8Y: . _/ _ ,_/._._ ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME 082., REV. 7- ' AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE Fl20F F29

03/0G/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 = PART B FIEL.D DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATilS L OG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 003A REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 REV DOCS RELS D-ST td0DIFCTNi DES-CHNG-NUMBER

       = = = ., = = m = 2. = =. = = n m  ===      ====   n=r=   w i. = = _========       REPORT ATT/tJOT DCA                 100820        000                  R     A                                            A DCA                 103020        003                  R     A                                            A DCA                 103001        001         NI       P     A                                            D
                                             .~

I . PREPARED BY: _f _/ __ REVIEWED BY: _/_/_ APPROVED BY: J_f _ ATTACHMENT F ER-MEM REV. 2. AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FOOF F29 1

03/08/93 ATTACPMENT-I PAGC: 1

            .                                                                   PART B FIEL D DESIGN CHANGE e- REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT                                                                                                j i

DWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 0038 REV: CP1 P.D.: ) MAINT LVL: C2 1 i DES- CHNG-NUM BE R REV DCCS RELS D-ST M03IFCTNA ggpg g T M t M Il '

                      = = = _: = n s c u e = = = . =            ===           rr=2 =     nue=            rr==            ======~_==

DCA 100020 000 R A

A

""^

10270' 000 CNI O

                                                                ^^^
                       "C'                   102922                             Cr'!          P             O----
                       " C .^                1^2722             ^^2             CN!           O             C n             e

n. r .

                                             . n .,e. e ,
                                              .           ..    ^ ^ e.

e ., e

                      ""^  -

10???2 ^0' EN! O C DCA 102932 005 NI R A 6 ; DCA 102933 000 R A A DC^ 202020 ^^1 E -' ? 9 E

                      " C .^                10:02^              002             C F!!                       C

new i ry 7.- o g nne g.n n g .

^^^

2 C .^ 102:0^ C F!! O C

                     - P " '-               !^219'              ^^1             E '! !        O             E "Ce                   *^229^              ^02             "N!
                      "C'                   1^2192              ^^0             EMI           D             F                                     -
                      "C^                   102 ??              ^^1             EMI           O             ?
                                                                ^C2             ' '  I      "             "

1^2 a2

^^^

0 C .^ 102 05 Cf'I O C DCA 10330.5 001 NI P A 3 DCA 103472 001 NI R A 3 ' E -! ! " D C .* *02955

                                              .                 ^^0                                         ?

DCA 103855 001 000 NI R A 3 DCA 103860 NI R A NODEN DCA n r. . 103912

                                            .m.ne, 000 ,

m-m, e., NI R n A e ObA kb4bb7 bb1', Nk R , A C DCA 104045 000 NI R A A DCA 104117 000 ', R A D DCA 104173 000 NI R A g DCA 104100 104186, 000 000 NI NI R A c ! DCA DCA 104223 .000 NI R R A A c l l DCA 104226 000 NI R A i

^^^

CCf 1^1202 CNI O C l DCA 104248 001 NI R A b ~ DCA 104255 000 NI R A C. NI 50

                                        .,  2942'
                                                                ???

R p _Q

       .              PREPARED BY:                                                                                                             _ / _ /_._

REVIEWED BY . _ . _ . __/ / _ APPROVED BY: _/ __/_ . ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME 482, REY.1. AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FHOF F19 I

03/08/93 ATTACNMENT f PAGE: 1 1

 ,                                                     PART B F] ELD OCSIGH CHANGE & PEVIEW STATUS LOG                                                           I AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701                                             SPCET: 004             REV: CP1            P.O.:

MAINT LUL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST MO DIFCTN:X

          = = =: a = = = = r o r u = =. =   = . =     =u=    u n e. =   :===     =.====mann              REPORT ATT/ DOT '

UCA 101320 003 NI R A C. DCA 101775 000 R A A 102220 ^CO "

         "C'                                          C r!!                 E DCA                 102300         001          NI         R       A DCA                 102725         000          NI         R       A

[ DCA 102700 001 NI R A 0 0 .^ *02911 000 E *!! " E UCA 102861 001 NI DC' 1020d2 ^00 E r R A 9 C DCA 102933 DCA 103001 000 000 NI R R A A

                                                                                             ',                A CCA                 100020        ^^0       C!          O       "                                   $

90' :030?C ^C1 E '!! " 9 CCA 1020:^ 002 C f.' ! C DCA 103C20 003 CCf 1000 ^00 Cf'! P O A C A DCA 103076 001

        " C .^              ;^ ^^P         ^^^

CM! R O A C C DC^ 2C20^0 . ^^1 ' 'M I " DCA 103423 000 DCA 103864 000 NI R R A A k C, DCA 103947 000 NI R A C P C '- 102"CS ^0^ E r'! " E n-. . n -i n e n an4 ,ui, n i, l DCA n-. 104027

                            .n.-,.-.

000" nn.- NI R A C r ii , n e

bbA kO[2k 7 00b Nk R A 6 DCA 104254 000 ', NI R A DCA 104265 000 NI R A { g PREPARED BY: / _ / __._ l REVIEWED BY: ___/_ /_ I APPROVED BY: _,._/ __ / _ ATTACHMENT F. - ER-ME OS2, REV. '2 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPOR73 PAGE FISOF Ff9 i l l l t

03/08/93 ATTACMMENT I FAGE: 1

           .                                                  PART B l

FIELD DESIGN CHANGE e- REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHCET: 004A REV: CP1 P.O : MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DDCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNG REPORT ATT [JOTE

                  . = = u = u m u r. u s :r s =   or=       r, = = r. = = =:c= ====.,-=-===

DCA 101775 000 R A A C C .^ 1000~^ 001 C"' C C 00^ 10?000 002 EMI D E DCA 103000 003 R A A

                                                    . ~,-
                                                                                                             /

PREPARED BY: ._/ _/ _._. REVIEWED BY: __./ d _ , i' APPROVED BY _ / _/ ATTACHMENT F . ER-ME 082, REV. ?_. AFFECI'ED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F60F F2M l l l l I

4 I l 1 03/06/93 ATTACNMENT I PAGE: L I

 ,                                                     PART B                                                           ;

FIEL D DESIGN CHANGE & FEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT l DWG: M2-1701 S H C E l' s 005 REV: CF1 P.O.: I MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DDCS RELS D-ST N03II"CTN1 REPORT ATT tJOT

          = = = n n u r u m a n e. r s =   n==     a=un         = nun     en==   =========

DOA 100561 000 NI P A A (ENVELOPED ' DCA 100020 000 R A pg DCA 101357 000 Nf R A g5 DCA 1019b6 001 NI R A g5 DCf 102222 ^C^ C"' C CCf 102222 001 '.' N ! O

         '! : '-            1021         ^O0         E"!                    P CCf                 '. 0 2 ^ '    001         CN!            O        C "Ce                 102'7!        002          9 !!           "       r DCA                 102471        003              NI        R        A             ,             @b "C'                 :02' c        000         Ce                      C l        DCA                 102478        001              NI        R        A                          (,

l DCA 102821 001 NI P 'A

                                                                                                        }7
        '! C '              10?992        ^ '? ^      C F'!          D

' 1^2002 ^01

CCf ^2^ 00: CN! O C i 0"f 102000 ^02 Cr'! :' C UCA r.n. 103020

                            <n,,,,

003 n-n eer R n A e

                                                                                                          /k DCA                 kbb47b         bbk             Nk         R       A                           f$
        "C'                100'.S'        ^C^         S '!                    C DCA                 103484         001             NI         R       A                           {}

DCA 103488 000 NI R A I) nrx ., r e

         ...                  m. - -   n. m. m. ,n . .ro,. . .       m f       DCA                 103550         001 '           NI         R       A l       DCA                 103551         002'.                      R ,     A DCA                 103559         000             NI         R       A OCf                 1^O5         0 0^ '~ CN!                O       C j       DCA                 103574         001             NI         R       A                           ()

t DCA 103575 000 NI R A f3 l DCA 103587 000 NI R A D DCA 103589 ,000 NI _,R A ($ DCA 103597 -000 NI R A

))

1::::: ::: N: : c DCA 103626 000 R A k DCA 103670 000 NI R A

[3 __ m-. .m,,m, mm- _ , , i - -

bbA 563685 65i 'k N I k k $h

! DCA 103701 000 NI R A ]3

.^ 1027'^ e00 eMI e C -

i l ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME-082, REV.1 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FOOF F2.9 i l

03/08/92 ATTACHMENT I PAGL. 2

 .                                                    PART B FJ EL U DESIGN CHANGE 6 FEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701                                             SHCET: 005        REV: CP1 P.O.:

MAINT LVL: C2 < DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN4 x = = n n u = i. n u r. . = = = = . = y=n= rnra n == =:m = :: :: = .: = = - M POU AM @ DCA 103740 001 NI R A DCA 103033 000 A D2A 103935 000 NI R R A 4 DC' *02952

                                 .          001       '!        O
                                                                                                      3 r,-                  , con,,     nog       gst          n       e DCA                  104011      001         NI         R       A C

n-- , nan,, nnn e .a r n c bbA ibkb37 bbi NI R A C UCA 1040e7 000 NI P A .O DCA 104121 000 R A A UCA 104197 000 NI A -' P C DCA 104204 000 NI R A g C : .' 101222 C^^ C .-- ! ~C C C .^ !"1222 001 SP' O "

          ' ~_ '                1O1222      ^^2       C '!         "

r UCA e:- 104222 1ec22c 003 cce ce NI R e A r 6 Dr^ 101225 ^^1 E '!! O " 0 0 .' 101225 CO2 E -! ! O E DCA 10423'5 003 R A A

          ^T^                   10'216      ^^!       S *' !               C DCA
        -0;'

104246 104010 002

^C^

NI C ,-' ! R A C C DCA 104248 001 NI R A C DCA 104249 000' NI R A - NO R DCA 104252 000' NI R , A C DCA 104260 000 NI R A > - No PE TUE 92-05971 000 ', NI D A

                                                                                                                 % DE l

l , PREPARED BY: _/ _ _/ _ REVIEUED BY: -

                                                                                          /__./ _

APPROVED BY: / /_ A'ITACHMENT F . ER-ME OS2, REY.1. AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE Fl80F F29

03/08/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 PART B FIEL U CESIGN CHANGE 6 REVIEW S T ATUS L.0G AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE. REPORT dug: M2-1701 SHCET: 005A REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 D E S-CHN G-N t;M B E R REV DCCS RELE D-ST MO D I F CTNil M PORT M'T MOTE

        =======.=u=s==.=                   n z. =        .= u :: = -e =           a. c =     ====_-====

DCA 100820 000 R A A CCf 10:020 000 "N! O

^^

O' f 100020 C ! P ? DCf ^3020 002 CN! C DOA 103020 003 P A A DCA 103507 000 R A A DCA 104121 000 R A A

GP PREPARED BY: . . . . _ . , ,_,,,, JJ REVIEWED BY: ,_/ _,,_/ , ,_ APPFiOVED B Y : , ,_ _,,,,/__,,/,,,,,,_ ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME-082, REY.1 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FISOF FZ8f

03/06/93 ATTACHMENT I FAGE:: .1 PART B FIf.LD DESIGN CHANGE 6 FEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUhENT UPDATE REPORT DWG M2-1701 SHCET: 006 REV: Cri P.O.. MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS REl.S D-ST MODIFCTN8

           = = = a c u .r = = =: = :. r. t = =r=         = = r; =    r_nnu   run= ===.=.==s==       - REPOR T ATT / NOTI DCA                 101499        000              NI         R      A 6

DCA 102058 000 NI R A DCA 102726 000 NI R A B DCA 102050 000 NI R A g DCA 102889 000 NI R A g "C^ 1^~"'^ ^C^ CN! O C DC' 1^C20^ '; C 1 Cr'! O C DC^ '^302^ C^2 CMI C C DCA 103020 003 R A DCA 103507 000 R A A

                                             ^^O                         "
                                                                                              ,              A 01'                 200C                      C r' '               E DCA                  103D74        001             NI          R      A                            6 DCA                  104241        001                         F      A 1
                                                                                                                           \

A 1 PREPARED BY: __ / ___/ _ REVIEWED BY: " _ / / __ APPROVED BY: . _ . - . /_.__/___ ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME-on, REY.1 ' AFFECED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F200F FZ9

! 03/06/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGL. 1 l PART S ' l l l ' FILLD DESIGN CHANGE 6 FEVIEW STATUS LOG j AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT [lWG : M2-1701 SHEET: 007 REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN' 3 = = u = = r u r. = = v. = : = nu = en== r=,= .== ========a REPORT ATT [t40 DCA 102729 000 '

                                              =                                              ccc R

A 10: = C::: + DCA 102759 001 P A j O C ,^ A l 10200 000 CF'! O C l:C ' 1020^0 00: T '! " E n~ .nnn,n nnn e.i, n e ! (ICA kh29b3 bbb R b A i 0 C ,^ * ^ - ; C ^ ^^1 C??! O C I ::' m 10 02^ ^C2 C '! " C UCA 10CO20 003

                                             , . .               .-,m.                       --,          .,

R n A A 1 DCA 103061 001 R A 6

-: - : 20C: ^^0 C:::

C

                                                                                            ^^^
                                           ""!                    ^ ^ ~' 7 -'                          Cf I              C DCA                  103277                      001           NI       P     A C C ."               1000^4                      0^^        C E!!       O     C O

DCA 103406 001 NI P A 6 CC? ^^^ " l *^272: C ?? ? C DCA 103721 001 NI R A C DCA 103730 000 NI R A C DCA 103782 000 Nf P A OC/ 1^2005 O^^ C F'! O C C DCA 103855 001 NI R A 6 DCA 103929 000 , NI R A NODI DCA 104121 000 ' R A A

 ,                                        PREPARED BY:                                                                                _/ __ /

REVIEWED BY: / _._/ _ APPROVED 8Y: _._/ _./ _ ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REY. 2-AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FZIOF F2.9

1 03/08/93 A T T A C Ntd EN T I FAGE- 1 . PART B l l FIEL0 CESIGN CHANGE & FEVIEW STATUS LDG j AFFECTED DOCUMENT OFDATE REPORT ; 1 DWG M2-1701 SHCET: 006 REV: CF1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN* R EPOR.T ATT/ NOT

      = = = = = u = ,.:= r:= ,.a se z   ===           ra. =  . n e. =  -i..= ======-n=        -

DCA 100020 000 R A A l DCA 101918 000 ' DCri 102933 000 R A A A O C ." * ^ 7 '. 0 : 0^^ C." ! R O C A OCA 103401 001 NI P A C, DCA 103486 000 A

; 10060' 001 Cr'I R

C 3 DCA 103624 002 NI R A b DCA 104078 000 NI F A O i-

.~.

i l i PREPARED BY: . _ _/ _._./ _, l REVIEWED BY: ___/ .__/ __. APPROVED BY: . _._/.__/ __ ATTACHMENT F - ER-ME-082, REY. 2. AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F#.0F F2.9 l 1 l _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _l

                                                              .                  __       ~                   .

03/03/93 ATTACFMENT I PAGE: i PART B FIELE DESIGN CHANGE t- PEVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHEET: 009 REV CF1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST MODIFCIN* m a a u = = n- u r s. r u e u a r:s a =ava rana e s:r a masas ,-n = - REPORT ATM AlO'T1 DCA 100820 000 R A A

                                           . . . .      m.,,.
                                                                     ?.       ,,

A DCf 10 0 6 0 f' 00: ;?' ". DCA NI 103600 002 P A O f:

.~

l l

i 1 1 l l

 ,   PREPARED BY:                              .                                            g_/ _

REVIEWED BY: _/_/_ l l APPROVED BYr gg_ ATTACHMENT F - ER-MEM REY.1 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FMF F23 1

03/09/93 ATTACHMENT I P A G E. - 1 PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE 6 PEVICU STATUS LOG { AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT l DUG: M2-1701 i SHCET: 010 REVi Cr1 F'.0.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV UGCS RELS D-ST M0DIFC,TN A

= us a n x c u n _ = =: = = ns a rue = e. n . u n re u = =====.:== _ REPORT ATT /WOT )

     'C'                ic?S?2       0 0       Ct'!            "

r i DCA 102L22 001 R A

.U 1000^5 ^^0 C r' ' "

C A ! DCA 103305 001 NI

"' 101222 0^^ Cr'!

R A C B

C /' 102:'22 ^^1 ""! O C i

T' 101222 0^2 C r' ! " C i DCA 104222 003 NI DCA 104233 000 NI R F A A h NODES

                                       ..~..

l 1 e i l l 4 l l i , PREPARED BY: ,

                                                                                   ,,__/ __/ _

REVIEWED BY: _,_/.__/_._ APPROVED BY: ,_ __/___/ ATTACHMENT F ^ER-ME-On, REV. L . AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F240F F2.9

03/00/92 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 PART B FIEL D DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUC L.0G AFFECTED COCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHCt:T : 011 REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LUL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN'

          = = = u - n r u m ._ r = r s. =  ===     r=2=       2. a r. a   r u s_ = = = 2 .2 = , 2 = =     M90RT ATT MO i DCA                101625         000                      GR DCA                101775        000                        R A

A A DCA 102931 000 NI R A DCA 102957 000 R A A g

         ': C '             102020        ^^0        C ." !          P         C                               4 C C ."               ^^^?^       001        S ." !          O        C CCf                102020        002        C . ,' I        "

C DCA 103020 003 DCA 103407 000 NI R P A A A DCA 104121 000 R A B DCA 104251 000 NI P A A DCA 104258 000 NI R A { 1

.~

l ;~ l 1 l l l 2 PREPARED BY: _./ _ / REVIEUED BY: _/._._/ _ APPROVED 0Y: _/ _/ _ ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. 2.- AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FMOF F 29 l

03/08/93 ATToiCHMENT I PAGL: 1 PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE 6 REVIEW STATUS LOG ' AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 012 REV: CPI P.O.: MAINT LUL: CP DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN8

         ., = = = = wr e r = , = -- r =   nu=       mw.=   .- ur =   r s. r = = : . .s = ., n : : =

REPORT ATT/ NOTE DCA

C .^

103063 t00005 000

^^^

CN P A C A DCA 103305 001 NI P A

^^^

C ' ^00 C"! O C DCA 103400 001 NI R A B

DCA 103044 000 R A A

                                             .~
                                               .~

PREPARED BY: /_ /_ REVIEUED BY: . ___/ / _ APPROVED BY: _/_/ ATTACHMENT F 'ER-ME OS2, REV. t . AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FZ60F FZ9

03/08/93 ATfACHMENT I PAGE: 1 PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & FEVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWGr M2-1701 SHCET: 013 REV: CF1 P.O.t MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN' U7 """"

                                                               ""%"   *"** ~ "             REPORT ATT [ NOTE
          ***"" " **755 M ".

r

                                              " " I,".

DCA 102221 001 NI A UCA 102231 000 NI R D i OCA 102312 000 NI R P A A D DCA 102524 000 NI R A ' DCA 102L25

          C '       10247^

000

^^^

NI C rt ! R A D DCA 102679 001 r, ; ^ 97 ,gg gen e.,e NI R e, A 7 B UCA 102788 001 NI R A DCA 102882 000 NT P A - A l DCA 102933 000 R A 3 l DCA 103497 000 NI A C C .'- 10 C 'm 000 Cr : P c A B

DCA 103548 001 R A DCA 103062 000 NI R A A

DCA 104121 000 P A 3 DCA 104124 000 NI A 4 R 1 l PREPARED BY: _/ _/ ,_ REVIEUED BY: . _._./ _/ _ APPROVED BY: / _/ ___ ATTACHMENT F ' ER-ME ')t2, REV. 2_ , AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE P270F F29 l l I

l l 03/08/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 , PART B FIEL D CESIGN CHANGC 6 FEVIEW S TATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG M2-1701 SHCET: 014 REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNi

     ..... _ . .. ..             . . .    -.=.    . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . = = . .

REPORT ATT [idOTE n,.,. <r,2,,, een r_,, r, - DbA khb47b bh1 Nh R b b a ~^ !02107 000 CNI : C UCA 103489 001 NI R A O

                                   . ~,.

PREPARED BTt ._ / /_ REVIEUED BY: . /_ /- , 1 APPROVED BY: /_._/ _ ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REY.1 . AFFECIED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F280F F19 i 1 l

03/08/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 8 * , PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEET: 015 REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DCCS RELS D-ST N0DIFCTNG

                                                                   .........           REPm M        on DCA         102600      000                     R        A c c.-       102c '      00:        cn:          0        :

A DOA 103624 002 NI R A 6 DCA 103644 000 GR A A DC# 104121 000 A DCA 104226- 000 R A NI 8 R A S o PREPARED BY: / , / _, REVIEUED BY: . _,,_/ _f APPROVED 8Y: . / ,_/ ATTANMENT F ER-ME42, RBY. 2_ . AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDA11 REPORTS PAGE P290F R2.9

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE G1 OF G26 ATTACIIMENT G TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS ( t

ATTACIIMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G2 OF G26 i DRAWINGS / BASISINOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) 1-1.1 SH.1/B-2 COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM 9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2, 11- 1-5, 80 WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS. 1,11-2,11-4,11-5,13-2, 14-1,15-1 1-1.2 SH.1/C-2 COVERAGE OF ANGLE 1RON PROTRUDING ITEM 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 11 WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 14-1,15-1 1-2.1 SH.1/B-4 COVERAGE OF ANGLE 1RON PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEIS. THIS DETAIL WAS TESTED.

l-2.2 511. I/C-4 COVERAGE OF TUBE STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A WITH 330-1 TilERMO-LAG PANELS. THIS WAS TESTED.

1-3.1 SH.1/B4 COVERAGE OF "C" CIIANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, N/A WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEL TIIIS WAS 14-1,15-1,11-2,11-4,11-5 TESTED. l-3.2 SH.1/C4 COVERAGE OF "C" CilANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, i1 WITil 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 14-1,15-1,11-2,11-4,11-5 1-3.3 SH. 1/E-6 Tlils DETAIL SHOWS THE TIE WIRE 11-1, 14-1,15-1,11-2, 1-6, 73 INSTALLATION ON Tile TiiERMO-LAG 330-1 11-4,11-5 PANELS COVERING A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT. THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TIE WIRE BEING INSTALLED THROUGH THE BOTTOM TRAY PANELS THAT BUTT UP TO THE TRAY SUPPORT. 4 1-4.1 SH. 1/E-2 COVERAGE OF "I" BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM 9-1,9-3,10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-5, 80 WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEL 14-1,15-1,11-2,11-4,11-5 1-4.2 SH.1/E-4 COVERAGE OF ~1" BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM 330- 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, 11 660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 14-1,15-1,11-2,11-4,11-5 1-5 SH. I A/A-1 HILTI BOLT /SELF TAPPING SCREW DETAIL FOR 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1,11-4 1-6, 12 ATTACHING THERMO-LAG TO A CONCRETE 14-1,15-1 STRUCTURE. 1-5.1 SIL lA/C-I THIS IS A SQUARE WASHER DETAll WHICH IS TO N/A N/A BE USED ON DETAIL I-5 AND REQUIRES NO ADDITION AL JUSTIFICATION.

i l ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV, 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G3 OF G26 ! DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIITION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) l 1-6 SH. I A/E-2 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES A METHOD OF COVERING 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 15 A WEEP HOLE IN A TUBE-STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM WITH THERMO-LAG. 1-7 SH. I AIB-4 THIS DETAIL SHOWS COVERAGE OF RADIAX 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 74 CABLE AND ITS SUPPORT AS A PROTRUDING i ITEM. THE COVERAGE INCLUDES 330-1 PANELS ! ON THE SUPPORT AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET i ON THE RADIAX. 1-8 SH. I A/E-4 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES FOR THE INSTALLATION 11-5 N/A OF CERAMIC TAPE (BANDING). TlilS WAS TESTED. 2-1 Sil. 2/B-1 REMOVABLE COVER, EVALUATED ON A CASE BY N/A N/A CASE BASIS I 2-2 SH. 2A/B-1 TlilS DETAIL IS FOR FIRE STOPPING NON 4,11-1,11-2 ,14-1,15-1 1-5, 17 ESSENTIAL CONDUITS AT JUNCTION BOXES j USING EITHER 330-1 OR 45B SILICONE ; ELASTOM ER. 4 2-3 SH. 2/B-3 THIS IS THE TESTED DETAIL FOR INSTALLING 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 19 TiiERMO-LAG ON JUNCTION BOXES. 2-3.1 SIL 2/D-2 THIS IS A DETAIL SliOWING BANDING ON 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, 81 THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON UNISTRUT WHICil 14-1,15-1 SUPPORTS THE JUNCTION BOX AND PROTRUDES

OUT OF THE TilERMO-LAG PACKAGE.

j 2-3.2 SH. 2/F-3 Tills IS A DETAIL SHOWING INSTALLATION OF 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 81 TilERMO-LAG ON A JUNCTION BOX SUPPORT. 14-1,15-1 2-3.3 SH. 2/D-3 THIS IS A DETAll SHOWING STRESS SKIN AND 10-1 1-5, 19 TROWEL GRADE INSTALLED AT JUNCTION BOX JOINTS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 2-3.5 SH. 2 A/E-1 THIS DETAIL USED DURING UNIT 2 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 40 l INSTALLATION. 2-3.6 SH. 2AiB-4 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF :0-1, 10-2 1-5, 43 THERMO-LAG ON AN ESSENTIAL FLEX 1BLE CONDUlT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX ENCLOSURE.

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G4 OF G26 t DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES ' TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) 2-3.7 SH. 2A/E-4 THIS DETAIL SIIOWS PROPER T-LAG 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 83 ARRANGEMENT ON A FLEX-CONDUIT EXITING / ENTERING A JUNCTION BOX. 3-1 SH. 3/A-1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS NON-ESSENTIAL 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2 1-5, 17 PROTRUDING CABLE COVERAGE. THE AIRDROP CONFIGURATION WAS TESTED. 3-2 & 3-2.1 SH. 3/D-1 THESE DETAILS SHOW THE PROTECTION OF AIR 11-1 1-5, 26 DROP CABLES WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET j FROM A TRAY TO A THROUGli WALL SLEEVE (TWS). THE POINT OF ATTACllMENT AT THE TRAY IS TO THERMO-LAG 330-1 liALF ROUNDS

,                                AND DIRECTLY TO THE SLEEVES AT Ti1E TWS.

i 3-3 SH. 3/B-3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS AN AIR DROP BETWEEN 11-1 1-5, 28 CABLE TRAYS WITil A COMBINATION OF 330-1 PANELS AND 1/2 ROUNDS AT THE ATTACHMENT TO THE TRAYS AND 330-660 FLEXI. BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP CAELES BETWEEN THE TRAYS. 3-4 (OPTION 1) SH. 3 A/B-1 THIS IS THE STANDARD AIR DROP 11-2 1-5 CONFIGURATION FOR UNIT 1 CABLES AIR DROPPING INTO/OUT OF A CABLE TRAY USING STAINLESS STEEL MESH REINFORCEMENT. 3-4 (OPTION 2) SH. 3 A/E-1 THIS IS Tile STANDARD AIR DROP 11-2 1-5 CONFIGURATION FOR UNIT 1 CABLES AIR DROPPING INTO/OUT OF A CABLE TRAY USING , STAINLESS STEEL MESH REINFORCEMENT. 3-4A (OPTION I) SH. 3B/B-1 THIS IS A TESTED AIR DROP CONFIGURATION. 11-1 I-5 3-4A (OPTION 2) SH. 3B/E-1 THIS JS A MODIFIED AIR DROP CONFIGURATION 11-1 1-5, 31 USED FOR UNIT 2 CABLES AIR DROPPING INTO/OUT OF A CABLE TRAY USING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE IN LIEU OF PANELS (ACCEPTABLE FOR UNIT I USE). 3-4 A.3 SH. 3C/E-1 THIS PROVIDES SPECIFIC DETAILS TO BE USED IN 11-1 N/A CONJUNCTION WITH THE STANDARD AIR DROP

DETAIL 3-1A OPTION 1.

l

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT 1 DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G5 OF G26 DRAWINGS / - BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) - 3-4A.4 & 3-4A.5 SH. 3C/B-1 THESE ARE SPECIFIC DETAILS USED IN 11-1 1-5, 31 CONJUNCTION WITH THE MODIFIED AIR DROP DETAIL 34A (OPTION 2) 3-5 SH. 3D/B-1 THIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL FOR I1-1, 11-2 N/A OVERLAPPING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1 1/2* DIA. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 3-5.1 SH. 3D/E-1 Tills IS THE STANDARD DETAIL FOR 11-1 N/A OVERLAPPING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-I 1 TilERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS ON RIGID f CONDUIT LESS THAN 1 1/2" DIAMETER. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 3-5.2 SH. 3D/D-4 THIS IS A STANDARD PETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 11-1 1-5, 34, 35 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKin ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS OR HALF ROUNDS WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS DO NOT ALLOW STANDARD OVERLAP. 3-5A Sit 3E/B-1 THIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL USED IN UNIT 2 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 34 FOR OVERLAPPING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 3* DIAMETER. AND IS THE PREFERRED METHOD OVER 3-5 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1 1/2* DIAMETER. 3-5 A.1 SH 3E/B-5 THIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL USED IN UNIT 2 11-1, 11-2 1-5 FOR OVERLAPPING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 HALF ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUlT LESS THAN 3* DIAMETER AND IS THE PREFERRED METHOD OVER 3-5.1 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION LESS THAN I 1/2" DIAMETER. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. I

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-032, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G6 OF G26 DRAWINGS / . _ BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO- LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) 3-5A.2 SH. 3E/E-1 THIS VIEW PROVIDES A GREATER LEVEL OF 11-1, 11-2 1-5 DETAIL FOR STAPLE AND OVERLAP REQUIREMENTS TO SUPPLEMENT TYPICAL DETA{L 3-5A. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 3-5 A.2.a SH. 3E/E-3 THIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL USED IN UNIT 2 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 34, 35 l FOR OVERLAPPING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 PANELS OR HALF ROUNDS WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS DO NOT ALLOW STANDARD OVERLAP AND IS THE PREFERRED METHOD OVER 3-5A.2 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IN EITHER UNIT. 3-6 SH. 3F/B-1 Tills DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION 9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1,11-2, 1-5, 37 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING A SINGLE FIRE 14-1,15-1 ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY. 3-6.1 SH. 3F/B-3 THIS DETAll PROVIDES INSTALLATION 11-1, 11-2 1-5. 39 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING MULTIPLE FIRE ZONE R CABLES AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY. 4-1 SH. 4/B-1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,13-2, N/A I I 112" AND LARGER CONDUIT WITH 330-1 HALF 11-1,11-2 ROUNDS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 4-1.1 SH. 4/B-3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1 N/A CONDUlTS LESS THAN I 1/2" WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 4-2 & 4-2.1 SH. 4/D-1 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD COVERAGE OF 11-1 1-5, 45 CABLE BUNDLES AND FLEX CONDUIT WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 4-3 & 4-3.1 SH. 4/B-5 THESE DETAILS SHOW COVERAGE ON CONDUITS 9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2 1-5. 46 WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS AT CONCRETE SURFACES WHERE THE CONCRETE SURFACE 1 PREVENTS COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE CONDUIT WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD DETAILS.

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAIU PAGE G7 OF G26 i DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION ' DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES ' (PAGES G16-G26) - 4-4 SH. 4A/A-1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TYPICAL FIRE 11-1, 11-2 & 14-1 1-5, 17 STOPPING OF CONDUITS.

. 4-5                     SH. 4 A/B-3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS CONDUIT PROTECTED WITH      9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2, Il-1,   N/A 330-1 ilALF ROUNDS PENETRATING THROUGH A      11-2 1                                          BLOCKOUT. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

l 4-6, 4-6.1, 4-7, 4-7.1 SH. 4/D-1 THESE DETAIM ARE THE SAME AS DETAIM 4-1, 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5, 46, 52 4-1.1,4-3 AND 4-3.1 RESPECTIVELY FOR Il-2,13-2,14-1,15-1 i COVERING CONDUITS WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS EXCEPT THESE DETAILS USE LARGER SIZED 330-1 HALF ROUNDS WHICH HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO COVER THE SMALLER CONDUIT. 4-8 SH. 4B/D-4 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE ON FLEXIBLE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 53 CONDUITS WHERE CONDUIT SUPPORT LNTERFACES WITII THE STANDARD COVERAGE

<                                         ON THE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT.

4-9 SH. 4B/D-4 THIS DETAll SHOWS HOW TO COMPENSATE FOR 9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-5, 54 A GAP BETWEEN THE 2 SECTIONS OF A 1/4" 11-2 OVERLAY ON A 2" CONDUIT BY INSTALLING TROWEL GRADE AND STRESS GRADE IN THE GAP. 5-1, 5- 1.1 SH. 5/B-I THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD 11-1, 11-2, 11-5, 13-2, 14-1, N/A CONFIGURATIONS FOR COVERING CABLE TRAYS 15-1 WITH 330-1 PANELS AND INSTALLING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT. THESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 5-I A,5-I A.] & 5-1 A.2 SH. 5/D-1 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2, N/A ! CONFIGURATIONS USED IN UNIT 2 FOR 14-1, 15-1 COVERING CABLE TRAYS WITH 330-1 PANELS. DETAIM 5-1 & 5-1.1 ARE PREFERRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. { 5-2 SH. 5/D-5 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF TIE 11-1 I-5, 56 WIRES TO ATTACH BOTTOM THERMO-LAG 330-1 I PANELS TO THE RUNGS ON LADDER BACK TRAYS. )

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G3 OF G26 DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO.- LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) . 5-3 & 5-3.1 SH. 5A/B-2 THESE DETAILS SHOW FIRE STOPS IN CABLE I1-1, Il-2 & 14-1 1-5, 55 TRAY USING BOTH 330-1 AND CABLE TRAY FIRE STOPS INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061. THE CABLE TRAY, FIRE STOP INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061 HAS BEEN TESTED. 5-3.1, SEC. 2-2 (VAR.) SH. 5A/C-4 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES A METHOD OF 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, Il-1, 14-1, 1-5, 57 UPGRADING NEW AND EXISTING FIRE STOPS BY 15-1 j INSTALLING BAR STEEL AROUND THE END OF THE TRAY IN ORDER TO HOLD THE BOTTOM PANEL IN PLACE. 5-4 SH. SB/B-1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS A CABLE TRAY PROTECTED 11-1, 14-1, 15-1 1-5, 59 l WITH 330-1 PANELS WHICH PENETRATES THROUGH A BLOCKOUT FILLED WITH PENSEAL M ATERIAL. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 5-5 (OPTION II) SH. 5B/D-1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE THERMO-LAG 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1, Il-4, 1-6, 12 COVERAGE ON A RACEWAY BUTTING UP TO A 14-1, 15-1 BLOCKOUT IN A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THEN FLARING OUT ALONG THE STRUCTURE SO THAT THE PANEL EXTENDS TO THE CONCRETE WHERE IT IS HILTI BOLTED INTO THE CONCRETE. 5-5 (OPTION III) SH. 5B/F-1 THIS DETAll SHOWS THE THERMO-LAG ON A 14-1, 15-1 1 -6, o l RACEWAY BUTTING UP TO THE M-BOARD ON A PENSEALED BLOCKOUT WITH A THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE F!LLET WHERE THE THERMO-LAG MEETS THE M-BOARD. 5-5.1 SH. 5B/B-4 THIS DETAIL SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 77 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY TO A CABLE TRAY AT A BLOCKOUT. THE FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAPS ONTO 330-1 COVERAGE ON BOTH TRAYS, IS

,                                    MECHANICALLY FASTENED INTO THE 330-1 AND j                                    IS SEALED AT THE FORM SEAL /M-BOARD WITH A TROWEL GRADE.
                                                                                                                                                                             .i

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 - TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G9 OF G26 DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES . TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIIFTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) 5-5.2 SH. 5B/F-4 THIS SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 330-1 I l-1, 14-1, 15-1 1-5, 78 PANELS ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY TO A CABLE TRAY AT A BLOCKOUT. THE JOINTS ARE S, CORE AND FOLD OR STITCHED AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT JOINTS APPLIES. 5-6, 5-6 A Sii. SC/B-1 THESE DETAILS SHOW THE SCORE AND FOLD 11-1,Il-2,Il-4,Il-5, I-5, 63 METHOD ON RADIAL BENDS ON TRAYS. 13-2, 14-1, 15-1 5-7 AND 5-8 SH. SC/F-1 THESE DETAILS SIIOW CROSSBANDING AND TIE 11-1, 11-5, 14-1, 15-1 N/A WIRE INSTALLATION FOR LONGITUDINAL JOINT STRESS SKIN BOTil AT CABLE TRAY TEES. THESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 5-8A SH. SC/E-3 TIIIS DETAIL SHOWS TIE WIRE INSTALLATION 11-1, 11-2, 14-1, 15-1 N/A USED ON UNIT 2. DETAIL 5-8 IS PREFERRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 5-9 SH. SC/B-5 THIS DETAll SilOWS BOTTOM PANEL 11-5, 14-1 1-5, 56 INSTALLATION STITCHED TO TRAY RUNGS. 5-9A SH. SC/E-5 THI'; DETAIL SilOWS THE INSTALLATION OF THE 14-1 N/A BOTTOM PANEL AT A CABLE TRAY TEE. IT DEMONSTRATES BUTT JOINT TIE WIRES AS WAS USED IN UNIT 2. DETAll 5-9 IS PREFERRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 5-10 SH. SD/B-1 THIS DETAIL SilOWS STRESS SKIN UPGRADE TIE 11-1, 11-5, 14-1, 15-1 N/A WIRE ATTACHMENT WHICH WAS USED IN UNIT 2 INSTALLATIONS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 1 5-11 SH. SD/B-4 THIS DETAIL SIIOWS STITCHING REQUIREMENTS 11-1, 14-1, 15-1 N/A FOR BOTTOM BUTT JOINT USED IN UNIT 2 INSTALLATIONS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

  .. 1                                               i....  .

ATTACllMENT G ER-ME-082, REV, 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE GIO OF G26 BASIS / NOTES DRAWINGS / TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) THIS DETAIL SHOWS HOW TO INSTALL 330-660 11-1, Il-2 1-5, 34 5-12 SH. 5D/E-1 FLEXI-BLANKET OVER THE END OF A CABLE TRAY COVERED WITH 330-1 PANELS. THESa DETAILS SHOW THERMO-LAG TO M- Il-1, Il-2,14-1,15-1, Il-4 1-5, 84 5-12.1, 5-12.2, 5-12.3 & SH. SE/B-1 5-12.4 BOARD AND FOAM SEAL INTERFACE. & 11-5 THIS DETAIL SHOWS Tile UPGRADE UTILIZING 11-1, 14-1, 15-1 1-5, 68 5-13 SH. 5E/F-1 STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES WHEN THE PANEL ON THE BOTTOM OF A TRAY AT A TRAY SUPPORT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE THERMO-LAG INSTALLED ON THE SUPPORT. SH. 5E/F-3 THIS DETAIL PRESENTS AN ALTERNATE TO 5-13 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, I-5, 85 5-13.1 USING T-LAG STRIPS SCREWED OR STAPLED INTO 11-5, 13-2 THE SUPPORT COVERAGE. THIS DETAIL IS A MODIFIED 5-13.1 INSTALLED 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 86 5-13.2 SH. 5E/F-4 AVOIDING AN INTERFERENCE. 11-5, 13-2 SH. 5F/B-1 THIS DETAIL SilOWS A SPLICE PLATE COVER 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, N/A 5-14 REINFORCEMENT. THIS IS A TESTED 11-5, 13-2 CONFIGURATION. 5-15, 5-15.1 & 5-15.2 SH. 5F/E-1 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD BANDING FOR 11-1, 14-1, 15-1 N/A CABLE TRAYS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. SH. 5GIB-1 THIS DETAll SHOWS HOW TO INSTALL 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 71 5-16 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL 11-5. 13-2 GRADE ON TRAYS WHERE A PROTRUDING ITEM INTERFERES WITH STANDARD REINFORCEMENT. SH. 5G/E-1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2, 1-5, 65 5-17 LONGITUDIN AL STRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAYS 14-1, 15-1 WHERE A GROUND CABLE PROTRUDES FROM THE SIDE OF THE TRAY. 5-18 & 5-18.1 Sit 5GIA-4 TiiESE DETAILS SHOW HOW TO P.EINFORCE 11-2 N/A GROUND CABLE COVERAGE INTERFERENCE WHERE IT EXITS A 330-1 OR 330-660 ENVELOPE. THE UPGRADE IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G11 OF G26 DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION ' DESCRWTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) 5-19 SH. SG/F-4 THIS DETAIL SHOWS HOW TO INSTALL 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 71 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL 11-5, 13-2 GRADE ON TRAYS WHERE AIR DROPS INTERFERE WITH , STANDARD REINFORCEMENT, 6-1 SH, 6/B-1 THIS DETAIL IS THE TESTED CONFIGURATION 9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2 N/A FOR CONDUIT LATERAL BENDS. 6-2, 6-3.1 & 6-3.2 SH. 6/B-4 SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS FOR CONDUIT 2 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 72 3" DIAMETER. 7-0 SH. 7/A-1 THIS DETAIL CONSISTS OF CHARTS TO ENSURE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 62 & 87 THAT THE PROPER STAPLE LENGTH IS INSTALLED. 7-1 SH. 7/C-1 FLEXI-BLANKET AT THROUGH-WALL-SLEEVE 11-1, 1-2, 14-1, 15-1 1-5, 60, 62, 87 INTERFACE. 7-2, 7-2.1 & 7-2.2 SH. 7/F-1 RIGID CONDUIT TO FLEX CONDUlT. 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 45, 64, 75, & 87 7-3 SH. 7/D-3 CONTAINMENT PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES. Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 60, 62, 66 7-4 SH. 7/F-3 SUPPORT FRAME FOR CONTAINMENT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 60, 62 PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES AND THROUGH WALL SLEEVES. 7-5 SH. 7A/A-1 THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF FIRE DETECTOR'S 1-2, 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, I-5, 67 AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. 14-1, 15-1 7-6 SH. 7A/C-1 THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION ON FLEX 11-1, 11-2, 13-2 1-6, 69 CONDUIT THROUGH A BLOCKOUT. 7-7,7-7.1 SH. 7A/E-1 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET DETAIL AT JUNCTION OF 11-1, 11-2 1-6, 70 FLEX-CONDUIT AND RIGID CONDUIT LESS THAN 1 1/2" WHERE, DUE TO SPACE LIMITATIONS, INDIVIDUAL COMPLETE BUNDLES CANNOT BE ACHIEVED.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ATTACHMENT G TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G12 OF G26 BASIS / NOTES DRAWINGS / LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES GI6-G26) TYPICAL DETAIL NO. 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 88 7-8 SH. 7A/E-4 Tills DETAIL SHOWS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED ON A FLEX CONDUIT WHERE IT BUTTS TO A CONCRETE WALL. THE COVERAGE IS INSTALLED ON TIJE FLEX CONDUIT TO THE REQUIRED THICKNESS THEN ALL VOIDS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE AND A FILLET IS PROVIDED AT THE FLEXI-BLANKET / CONCRETE INTERFACE. I1-1, 11-2, 15-2 1-5, 51 8-2 (OPTION 1) SH. 8/A-1 CABLE BUNDLE WRAPPING WHERE SINGLE BUNDLE SPLITS INTO 2 BUNDLES. WRAPPING CABLE BUNDLE WHICH COMES OUT I I-1, I l-2,15-2 N/A 8-2 (OlrTION 2) SH. 8/D-1 OF Tile SIDE OF THE M AIN BUNDLE Tills IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 10-2, 13-2, 1-5,58 8-3 SH. 8/F-1 CABLE TRAY V"-RIB PANEL TO FLAT PANEL TRANSITION. 14-1,15-1 11-1, 11-2, 15-2 1-5, 45, 51 8-4 SH. 8/C-5 ESSENTIAL FLEXIBLE CONDUITS WITHIN A COMMON ENVELOPE WHICH SPLIT INTO 2 SEPARATE ENVELOPES. 9-1, 11-1, 14-1, 1-2, 15-1 1-6, 47 9-1 SH. 9/A-1 TYPICAL THERMO-LAG COVERAGE DETAIL FOR SWAY STRUTS TYPICAL DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CABLE TRAY TO 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2, 1-6,48 9-2 SH. 9/D-1 CONCRETE 14-1 11-1, 14-1, 15-1, 15-2, 11-2, 1-5, 49 9-3 SH. 9/F-1 TYPICAL DETAll USING FLEXI-BLANKET FOR CABLE IN TRAY WHERE AN INTERFERENCE I l-4, I l-5,13-2 PREVENTS STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE. Il-1,11-2,11-4,11-5,13-2,14- 1-6, 44 10-3, 10-4, 10-5, & 10-6 SH.10/D-1 SHIMMING DETAILS FOR CABLE COVERAGE. I,15-1 SH. I1/A-1 TliERMO-LAG PANELS ON CABLE TRAY 14-1,15-1,11-2, I l-4, I l-5, 1-7 11-1 INTERFACE WITH M-BOARD AT PENETRATION 13-2 SEAL WHERE THE CABLE TRAY GOES THROUGH THE PENETRATION. 1

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV, 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G13 OF G26 DRAWINGS / ' BASIS / NOTES i TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES . (PAGES G16-G26) I1-2,Il-2 1 SH. I1/A-4 THERMO-LAG PREFAB HALF-ROUNDS WHERE 9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-6, 8 CLEARANCE BETWEEN CONDUITS IS 11-2, 13-2 l INADEQUATE TO FIT HALF ROUND ON BOTH COND.UITS - HALF ROUND ON ONE OR OTHER IS TRIMMED BACK AND SEALED BETWEEN THE TWO CONDUITS AS REQUIRED FOR JOINTS. 11-3, 11-3.1 SH. II/C-1 TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2, 14-1, N/A SIDE RAIL BOARD INTERFACE. THIS IS A TESTED 15-1 CONFIGURATION. 11-4, 11-4.1 SIL II/C-4 TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 1-6,9 SIDE RAIL BOARD INTERFACE USING SCORE AND 13-2 FOLD TECHNIQUE. 11-5 SH. II/D-I TYPICAL LADDER TRAY BARRIER ASSEMBLY- 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 1-6,9 THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION EXCEPT FOR 13-2 THE SCORE AND FOLD JOINT. Il-6 SH. I1/D-4 TRAY PROTECTION WHERE TRAY SIDE RAllIS 14-1,15-1, I l-2, I l-4,11-5, 1-6, 10 TOO CLOSE TO CONCRETF AND THEREFORE 13-2 MUST INTERFACE AGAINST CONCRETE WALL. I1-7 SH. I1/D-6 TROWEL GRADE FILLET WHERE CLEARANCE 14-1,11-2, Il-4, Il-5,13-2 1-7, 10 WILL NOT ALLOW FOR THERMO-LAG PANEL FLARE-OUT. 11-7.1 Sit II/F-5 FLEXI-BLANKET TO M-BOARDICONCRETE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 60 INTERFACE WITH FILLET. 11-8 SH. IIIF-1 THIS DETAll SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2, 1-5, 76 i STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT STEEL I4-1,15-1 4 INTERFERENCES BY EXTENDING THE STRESS 1 SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE OUT ONTO THE STEEL INTERFERENCE. 12-1, 12-1.1 SH.12/C-1 RACEWAY SUPPORT TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 9-1, 10-1. 10-2, 11-2, 11-4, 1-6, 13 11-5, 13-2, 14-1, 15-1 12-2 SH.12/B-4 CONDUIT PENETRATING CABLE TRAY. 11-1, 14-1, 10-2, 15-1, 11-2, 1-6, 29 11-4, 11-5, 13-2

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV,2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G14 OF G26 .

.=

DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) ; 12-2.1 SH.12/D-4 THIS CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE 10-2, 11-1, 14-1 15-1, 11-2, I-5, 79 OF DETAIL 12-2 EXCEPT THAT THE CONDUIT 11-4,11-5,1 ~: ' ENTERING THE BOX EXTENSION OF A HORIKONTALTRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID. THE USE OF 330-660 ENTERING A HORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE HAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME Il-1. THE UPGRADE TECHN! QUES UTILIZED TO REINFORCE THE INTERFACE BETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET DURING THE TEST (330-660 COLLAR FLARED OUT ON THE 330-1 PANEL)IS REQUIRED BY THE DETAIL. ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT. INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT , l OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS WITH QUALIFIED l TECHNIQUES (STITCHING / STRESS SKIN), THE l INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITHIN THE ENVELOPE BENEFITS THE THERM AL PERFORM ANCE OF THE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE, THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN l EQUIVALENT l-HOUR RATING. l l 12-3 SH.12/F-4 SIL-TEMP COVERAGE ON CABLES IN TRAYS 14-1 1-5, 82 COVERED WITH THERMO-LAG. I 13-1 SH.13/A-1 TRAY CONCRETE BEAM INTERFERENCE. 11-2,11-4,11-5,13-2,14-1, 1-5, 14 15-1 l l 13-2 SH.13/D-1 CABLE TRAY TRANSITION INTO BANK OF 14-1, 11-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-6, 16 SLEEVES WITH PROTRUDING AIR DROPS AND 11-5, 13-2 EXISTING CONDUIT ENTERING ENVELOPE. 13-3 SH.13/F-I THERMO-LAG COVERAGE FOR TYPICAL 9-1,14-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-6, 18 INTERFERENCES. I l-5, 13-2 13-4 SH.13/B-2 TYPICAL INTERFERENCE. 14-1, 11-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, I-6, 21 11-5, 13-2 13-5 SH.13/B-5 HVAC INTERFERENCE WITH CABLE TRAY- 11-I, 11-2 1-5, 23 13-6 S H.13/E-4 COVERAGE DETAIL FOR A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY I4-1, 11-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11- 1-5, 24 FOR THE 9 RULE. 4, I l-5,13-2 1

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL UNIT I DESIGN DETAILS PAGE GIS OF G26 DRAWINGS / BASIS / NOTES TYPICAL DETAIL NO. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES (PAGES G16-G26) 14-1 SH.14/A-1 THERMO-LAG 5* RULE. 14-1, 11-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 25 11-5, 13-2 14-2 SH.14/A-3 TYPICAL BOX DETAIL FOR ITEMS ENTERING 10-2, 14-1, 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 27 RACEWAY. 11-5,13-2 14-3 SH.14/D-1 TYPICAL CONDUIT / PIPE AND TRAY 9-1, 10-2, 14-1, Il-1, 15-1, I-5, 30 INTERFERENCE. Il-2, Il-4, Il-5,13-2 14-4 SH.14/F-1 TYPICAL TIIROUGH WALL SLEEVE THERMO-LAG. 14-1, 11-1, 15-1, 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 32 11-5, 13-2 14-5 SH. 14/C-4 TIIIS DETAIL DEPICTS A TYPICAL BOX 11-4 N/A ARRANGEMENT ENCOMPASSING MULTIPLE STACKED CABLE TRAYS FLARED AND ANCHORED TO CONCRETE STRUCTURE. TlilS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. 15-1 SH.15/B-I TYPICAL BOX DETAll TRAYTTRAY. 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2 14-1, 1-5, 33 11-1, 15-1 15-2 SIL 15/B-4 TYPICAL BOX DETAll TRAY / CONDUIT. 14-1, 11-1, 9-1, 15-1, 11-2, 1-5, 32 1I-4, 11-5, 13-2 15-3 SH.15/E-1 Tills DETAll CONSISTS OF A CHART USED FOR N/A N/A GUIDANCE IN BUNDLING CABLES FOR AMPACITY CONCERNS AND IS NOT A THERMO-LAG CONSTRUCTION DETAIL. 16-1 Sil. 16/A-1 ATTACHMENT TO STRUCTURAL STEEL. N/A 5,36 (UNIT 2 ONLY) 16-2 SH.16/C-1 ATTACHMENT TO STRUCTURAL STEEL. N/A 5,36 (UNIT 2 ONLY) 16-3 SH. 16/F-1 TUBE STEEL WELDED TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 10-1,10-2 5,36, 38 (UNIT 2 ONLY) 16-4 SH. 16/D-4 ANGLE BRACE PLATE. N/A 5,36 (UNIT 2 ONLY) 16-5, 16-5.1 SH. 16/D-4 CAPS FOR HOLLOW MEMBERS. 10-1, 10-2 5,36,41 (UNIT 2 ONLY) 16-6, 16-7 S H. 16/F-4 TYPICAL STEEL PROTECTION DETAll WITH 9-1,1-2,11-1,11-2,11-4,11-5, 5,36,42 (UNIT 2 ONLY)

                                 ; CONDUIT INTERFERENCE.                         12-1,12-2,13-1,13-2 & 14-1

ATTACHMENT G ER-M E-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G16 OF G26 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

1. CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

2. EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3 THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS.

4. THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC

5. THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. .

6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATION EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH WOULD GENERIC ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.).

7. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 11-1, 11-2, 11-4, 11-5,13-2,14-1 AND 15-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO CONSTRUCT FLARE OUT) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. THE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BEDVEEN M-BOARD AND FLARE-OUT OR FILLET WHERE THERE IS NO FLARE OUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST THE M-BOARD. THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE TRAY BOX CUT AND FOAM SEAL ARE BOTH QUALIFIED FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE EXPOSURE.

8. WITH INTERFACE BEDVEEN THE DVO CONDUITS TREATED AS A JOINT, ADEQUATE THICKNESS IS PROVIDED TO MAINTAIN 103020/3 EQUIVALENT PROTECTION .AS QUALIFIED BY FIRE TESTS 9-1,9-3,10-1,10-2,11-1 AND 11.2. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY.

9. THIS SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE WOULD PROVIDE A BETTER LEVEL OF PROTECTION THAN TESTED CONFIGURATION DUE TO THE CONTINUOUS STRESS SKIN ASSISTING IN HOLDING THE JOINT TOGETHER WHILE MAINTAINING 1/2" THICKNESS. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY. THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS TESTED ON ALL OF THE CABLE TRAY TESTS ON TRAY RADIAL BEND COVERAGE.

10. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 1-2, 11-1, 11-2, Il-4, Il-513-2.14-1 AND 15-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO CONSTRUCT THE FLAREOUT) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY PREVIOUS LISTED TESTS. THE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BEDVEEN CONCRETE AND FLARE-OUT OR FILLET WHERE THERE IS NO FLAREOUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST THE CONCRETE.

THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE ONE COMPLETE SIDE OF THE TRAY ENVELOPE IS EXTENDED TO THE CONCRETE WALL AND WILL NOT BE DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A FIRE. ALSO THE CONCRETE WALL ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN TESTED.

11. THE COVERAGE OF THE PROTRUDING STEEL WITH THERMO-LAG IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE METHODS UTILIZED TO COVER THE AIR DROPS IN TEST SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. THE OVERLAPS OF TME FLEXI-BLANKET AND THE BANDING ARE IDENTICAL. ALSO TEST SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2 HAD FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED DIRECTLY ON THE ESSENTIAL CABLES WHEREAS THIS DETAIL HAS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED ON A PROTRUDING ITEM NOT ON AN ESSENTIAL COM M ODITY.

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 f PAGE G17 OF G26 i TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS I NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV: 0 l 12. THE USE OF HILTI BOLTS /SELF TAPPING SCREWS TO PROVIDE A POSITIVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TO THE 103921/0 l CONCRETE / METAL PROVIDES JOINT STRENGTH AT THIS POINT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH IF NOT BETTER THAN THE 103476/1 l THERMO-LAG JOINTS WHICH HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN ALL OF THE TEST ASSEMBLIES. filLTI BOLTS WERE

;       SPECIFICALLY TESTED IN TEST SCHEME Il-4. THE SELF TAPPING SCREWS WOULD BE EXPECTED TO PROVIDE THE SAME MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT PROVIDEp BY THE HILTI BOLTS. IN ADDITION, THE CONCRETE / METAL STRUCTURES WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK WHICH WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION AGAINST HEAT BEING DRIVEN INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

i

13. THIS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF JUNCTION BOX WITH TUBE STEEL SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 103063/0 ONLY. ALTHOUGH THE PROTRUDING ITEM IN TlilS CASE iS A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MOUNTED TO AN EMBEDDED PLATE, 1 THE TUBE STEEL AND EMBEDDED PLATE IS COVERED FOR 9" AND PROVIDES A BETTER HEAT SINK TO REDUCE HEAT PATH TO

! THE RACEWAY THAN THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. i 14. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES, HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. BY I BUTTING THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE TO THE CONCRETE BEAM, THE BEAM WILL LIMIT EXPOSURE FROM TilAT SIDE AND ACT AS A HEAT SINK. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE THAT BOX TO THE BEAM) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECIINIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS.

15. THIS TYPICAL DETAIL IS FOR COVERING WEEP HOLES IN TUBE STEEL WITH THERMO-LAG WHICH ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF 102222/1 Tile 9"-11" THERMO-LAG PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE IN ORDER TO PRECLUDE HEAT FROM BEING DRIVEN INTO THE TUBE STEEL THROUGH THE HOLE. THE ADHESION OF THE PANEL TO THE STEEL USING TROWEL GRADE AND BANDS WILL COVER THE ilCLE IN A M ANNER CONSISTENT WITil THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON STEEL.

16. TIIE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES IIAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. ALL 104121/0 1 CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO BOX AROUND SLEEVE BANK) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. THE BASE PLATE AND THERMO-LAG PANEL INTERFACE BEING COVERED WITH TROWEL GRADE PROVIDES A 1

POSI;NE SEAL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS ARE QUALIFIED BY SCHEME 11-1. TIIE 1 CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE CONCRETE AND BASE PLATE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK AND REDUCE THE EXPOSURE OF HEAT INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ! 17. THE USE OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP WAS TESTED IN SCdEMES 4,11-1 and 11-2. THE USE OF PENETRATION SEAL 100820/0 FIRE STOPS HAS BEEN TESTED AND DOCUMENTED IN THE PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM. ALSO ELASTOMER WAS TESTED AS 103921/0 f ? A FIRE STOP ON TRAY CONFIGURATIONS IN SCHEMES 11-1,11-2,12-2 AND 14-1. 1

18. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS AND HALF-ROUND PRE-SHAPED PIECES FOR CONDUITS ARE

QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING WHERE HALF-ROUND PIECES AROUND TYPICAL INTERFERENCES CREATE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TEST. SINCE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUALIFIED TESTS, THIS 4 IS AN ACCEITABLE CONFIGURATION. ,

i

k. i

i UI ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE GIS OF G26 ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV NOTE 103020/0

19. THE JUNCTION BOX INSTALLATION IS Tile STANDARD CONFIGURATION WHICH WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 10-1. THE USE OF 103634/2 ANGLE IRON OR CLIPS MOUNTED TO THE STRUCTURE TO SERVE AS ATTACHMENT POINTS FOR THE BANDING IS AN ACCEPTABLE DEVIATION FROM THE STANDAED (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT SERVES THE SAME FUNCTION IN SECURING THE OUTER PANELS.

20. LEFT BLANK

21. CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES USING V-GROOVED FLAT BOARD HAVE BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. FOR THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS, THE CORNER OR SIDE OF THE TRAY WilERE THE INTERFERENCE IS LOCATED H AS BOTH EXTERNAL 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET WITH TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS ON Tile INSIDE OF THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL THE COMBINATION OF THESE TWO PROVIDE ENilANCED PROTECTION IN THE AREA WHERE THE OUTER V-GROOVED BOARD TIIICKNESS IS REDUCED.

IN ADDITION THE INTERFERENCES WILL PROVIDE SHIELDING AND AN ADDITIONAL HEAT SINK IN THE AREA OF CONCERN. THE COMBINATION OF THESE FEATURES ALONG WITil TIE WIRES AND BANDING AS SilOWN WILL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER PROTECTION OF Tile ENVELOPE THAN TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

22. LEFT BLANK

23. TWO LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS CONSISTENT WITil QU ALIFIED PROTECTION FOR LARGE AIR DROPS. IN THIS CASE THE TRAY PROVIDES MORE THERM AL M ASS AND A GREATER AIR SPACE THAN AIR DROPS. IN ADDITION THE HVAC INTERFERENCE PROVIDES SOME DEGREE OF SillELDING AND llEAT SINK TO ONE SIDE OF THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. THIS APPLICATION IS EQUIVALENT TO FLEXI-BLANKET APPLICATIONS QUALIFIED IN SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2.

103548/0

24. THIS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF CABLE TRAYS WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY. l ALTHOUGH THE PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT AND A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY, THE COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES (SIDE, PARTIAL TOP AND BOTTOM) PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATH.

25. EXISTING LISTED TESTS JUSTIFY CABLE TRAYS WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9". IN THIS CASE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORTS IS ONLY PROVIDED FOR 5" MINIMUM. Tills IS JUSTIFIED BY ENGINEERING CALCULATION ME-CA-0000-2062 WHICH ALLOWS USE OF THE "5 INCH RULE" WHERE CONFIGURATIONS MEET ESTABLISHED MINIMUM CRITERIA SUCH AS A MINIMUM PERCENT TRAY FILL TO ESTABLISH EQUIVALENT PROTECTION TO REDUCE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.

100820/0

26. ALL ASPECTS OF THIS AIR DROP CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2 EXCEPT FOR THE I N I21/0 ATTACHMENT OF THE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE TWS. THE INTERFACE OF THE 330-660 AROUND EMBEDDED SLEEVES HAS BEEN SECURED WITH BANDING AROUND THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT AND LARGE " FILLET WELD" BUILDUP OF TROWEL GRADE 330-660 M ATERIAL FOR THERM AL PROTECTION. THE MATERIAL THICKNESSES AND APPLICATIONS H AVE BEEN BOUNDED BY TEST. SEE ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR DETAIL 5-3 FOR FIRE STOP AND 7-1 FOR ATTACHMENT TO TWS.

1 L___

3 ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-062, REV. 2 ' TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE Gl9 OF G26 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

27. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS.

THE USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITTINGS AND JUNCTION BOXES IS ALSO QUAUFIED BY l USTED TESTS. WITH THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENTTECHNIQUES FOR THE CABLE TRAY AND BOX DETAIL AS } QUAUFIED IN LISTED TESTS, THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF MATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE i EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BOX ELEVATION IS SUCH THAT CABLES IN THE TRAY DO NOT CONTACT THE i BACK OF THERMO-LAG PANEL IN ADDITION, ITEMS SUCH AS A PIPE HANGER WOULD PROVIDE SOME DEGREE OF SHIELDING j AND HEAT SINK. THEREFORE THIS DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.

28. THE COVERAGE OF THE AIR DROP CABLES WTTH FLEXI-BLANKET HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES Il-1 AND 11-2. THE BOX

! DESIGNS AT THE TRAY INTERFACES ARE UPGRADED WITH STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE. THE FIRE STOPPING OF THE ! NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE WITHIN THE BOX STRUCTURE IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND THE OVERLAP OF THE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO THE CONDUIT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. l

29. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. 103844/0 THE USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITTINGS AND JUNCTION BOXES IS ALSO QUAUFIED BY EXISTING TESTS. PROTECTION OF A PROTRUDING ITEM SUCH AS CONDUIT IS ALSO QUALIFIED BY EXISTING TEST. WITH THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE CABLE TRAY AND BOX DETAIL AS QUALIFIED IN USTED TEST, THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF THERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

BOX DIMENSION ARE SIZED SUCH THAT CABLES DO NOT TOUCH THE BACK OF THERMO-LAG PANELS. THEREFORE THIS DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.

30. THE USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS ARE QUALIFIED BY EXISTING LISTED TESTS. THE USE OF CONDUIT j HALF ROUND PREFABRICATED PIECES ARE A130 QUALIFIED BY USTED TESTS. THE USE OF SHIMS ADDS ADDITIONAL j MATERIAL AND AIR VOLUME BENEFITS INSIDE THE ENCLOSURE. WITH THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENTTECHNIQUES i

QUAUFIED BY EXISTING TESTS, THE PROTECTION OF CONDUIT / PIPE INTERFERENCES WITH CONDUIT HALF ROUND PREFABRICATED PIECES AND FLAT BOARDS WITH SHIMS CONSTITUTE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER PROTECTION SINCE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF THERM AL M ASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN TESTED 1 CONFIGURATIONS. . j

31. THIS IS THE TESTED CONFIGURATION EXCEPT THAT INSTEAD OF BUTTING 330-1 PANELS TO THE AIR DROP, STRESS SKIN WITH 103020/3 TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP IS INSTALLED. THIS IS Tile SAME CONFIGURATION USED FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL BUILD UP 102933/0

! AT JOINTS THAT WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1 AND I4-1. THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH HX)820/0 IS CONSISTENT WIfH THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. .

32. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES. HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY EXISTING USTED 104121/0 i

TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE WHICH TRANSITION FROM THE END OF THE TRAY TO TWS) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. THE CONCRETE WALL AND THERMO-LAG PANEL INTERFACE HAVING A TROWEL GRADE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL TO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. BANDS TO SUPPORT < TRANSITION PANELS WILL ADD STRUCTURAL SUPPORT TO THE ENVELOPE. THE CONCRETE WALL WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK I TO HELP REDUCE EXPOSURE TO THE WALUPANEL INTERFACE. SINCE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF THERM AL AND l STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THIS DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE. ,

1 14* % l ER-ME-032, REV 2 ATTACHMENT G TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G20 OF G26 DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES

33. THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY TESTS AS LISTED ON THE M ATRIX. ALL JOINTS ON THIS CONFIGURATION (INCLUDING THE BOX TRANSITION FROM TRAY TO TRAY) ARE REINFORCED WITil TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. STRUCTURALLY, THE TRAY TO TRAY TRANSITION CREATES NO GREATER STRUCTURAL CHALLENGE THAN LARGE *T* CONFIGURATIONS ALREADY QUAUFIED. THEREFORE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUALIFIED TESTS.

103020/3

34. THE COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE OVERLAP OF 330-660 ONTO 104121/0 CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES THE SAME INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC) USED FOR CONDUITS AND JUST MODIFIES THEM TO ALLOW FOR THE CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS.

THE COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO , CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS IS THE SAME EXCEPT THE OVERLAP 103020/3 35. 104121/0 REQUIREMENTS IIAVE BEEN REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR CONGESTED AREAS WilERE SPACE DOES NOT PERMIT THE USE OF DETAIL 3-5.2. TIIE MINIMUM OVERLAP ALLOWED ON THIS DETAIL, ALTilOUGH NOT IDEAL, IS STILL SUFFICIENT WHEN COUPLED WITH TIIE STAPLING AND TROWEL GRADE BEBVEEN THE FLEXI-BLANKET LAYERS TO ENSURE TH AT THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE ACCEPTABLE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TO Tile 330-1 MATERIAL WillCH M AKES THE ARRANGEMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

36. THIS DETAIL IS SUPPORTED BY ENGINEERING EVALUATION, ER-ME-067.

104121/0

37. THIS DETAIL HAS THE OPTION OF COVERING THE METAL JACKETED FIRE ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PER THE 9' RULE WHIC11 WAS FIRE TESTED IN ALL OF Tile SCilEMES OR FIRE STOPPED AS IN DETAIL 3-4 WHICl{ WAS FIRE TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-: AND 11-2. THIS CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

38. APPLICATION OF THERMO-LAG ON TUBE STEEL AND OVER STEEL PLATE IS QUALIFIED ON SCHEME 9-1 TO ESTABUSH THE 9" RULE. THE ABILITY OF THIS CONFIGURATION TO MITIGATE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE WHILE M AINTAINING STRUCTUR.AL INTEGRITY SUPPORTS THE APPLICATION OF THERMO-LAG TO PROTECT STRUCTURAL STEEL 104121/0

39. THIS DETAll PROVIDES COVERAGE FOR FIRE ZONE R CABLES WHICH PROTRUDE FROM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY WHICH IS IDENTICAL TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING PROTRUDING CABLES IN DETAll 3-4. Tills CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

104060/0

40. THE DETAIL ALLOWS THE TESTED JUNCTION BOX CONFIGURATION TO BE MODIFIED BY EXTENDING THE ~V* RIB PANELS TO COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT THE JUNCTION BOX. THE CONFIGURATION HAS MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME THAN A TYPICAL J- BOX ENVELOPE WHICH WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. THEREFORE SINCE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND THERM AL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED, THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEirTABLE.

41. Tills TYPICAL DETAll IS FOR COVERING THE OPEN END OF TUBE STEEL WilEN IT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE

9 INCH RULE
TO MITIGATE HEAT FROM BEING DRIVEN INTO THE TUBE STEEL THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE SCORE AND FOLD THERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS WITH TROWEL GRADE 330-1 AND S.S. BANDING IS EQUIVALENT TO THE APPLICATION OF THERMO-LAG TO MEET THE 9" RULE ON SCHEME 10-1 AND 10-2.

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME.082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G21 OF G26 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

42. THE USE OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS WITH PARTIAL PREFABRICATED CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS AND TROWEL GRADE JOINT MAINTAINS CONSISTENCY TO THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTE OF MATERIAL THICKNESS WTTH PROTECTED STEEL FOR THE 9" RULE.

43. THIS DETAIL ADDRESSES COVERING FLEXIBLE CONDUIT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS 4" 104060/0 TO 8" OUT FROM BOX. THIS M AKES IT POSSIBLE FOR 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO BE INSTALLED ONTO THE CONDUIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION (SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2). THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 HALF ROUNDS UP TO THE JUNCTION BOX IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS SCHEMES 10-1 AND 10-2. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

44. THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED DID NOT USE SHIMS. HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL THERMO-LAG MATERIAL 102522/1 INSIDE THE ENVELOPE AND INCREASED AIR VOLUME BENEFITS THE ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS TEST METHODS OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE.

45. 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY FIRE TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. FLEXI- 103020/3 BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT HAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. HOWEVER, THE FLEX CONDUIT HAS THE ADVANTAGE 103486/0 OF AN INSULATING CONDUif JACKET AND A LARGER AIR VOLUME INSIDE THAN IS PRESENT IN A FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLE BUNDLE. THIS WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR THE CABLES INTEGRITY THEREFORE, THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

46. THE CONDUITS ARE COVERED WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE INTERFERING 103020/3 STRUCTURE THEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT THE JUNCTION OF THE CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS AND THE CONCRETE WALL. THE FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BETWEEN THE THERMO-LAG AND CONCRETE TO M AINTAIN THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO THE CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK, REDUCE THE EXPOSED SURFACE AND ENHANCE Tile INTEGRITY OF THE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

47. THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO THE PROTECTION OF SUPPORTS FOR THE 9 RULE WHICH MITIGATED HEAT BEING CONDUCTED INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. IN ADDITION CONCRETE WILL PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL HEAT SINK. THEREFORE THE CONFIGURATION IS ADEQUATE FOR PROTECTION OF SWAY STRUTS.

48. THIS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS OF CABLE TRAYS WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY. 103490!O ALTHOUGH THE PROTRUDING ITEM IN THIS CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT ATTACHED TO A BASE PLATE. THE COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO THE BASE PLATE AND WALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. IN ADDITION THE CONCRETE WALL ACTS AS A HEAT SINK TO HELP MITIGATE EXPOSURE OF HEAT. THE EXTENSION OF THE TRAY COVERAGE TO PROTECT THE AIR DROP FROM THE TRAY TO THE SLEEVES IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TRAY COVERAGE.

ADDITIONAL STRUCTURE INTEGRITY IS PROVIDED BY TIE WIRING ALL JOINTS IN ADDITION TO REINFORCING THE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN. L

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAII S PAGE G22 OF G26 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCAIREV

49. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ONLY USED WITH FIRE STOPS IN THE END OF EACH TRAY STANDARD COVERAGE WHERE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES ENTER AND THE GAP IS RESTRICTED TO SHORT DISTANCE OF ABOUT I FOOT. Tile PROTECTION OF Tile CABLES WITH FLEXI-BLANKET AND THE ELASTOMER FIRE SEALS HAVE BEEN TESTED. ALTHOUGH Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR THERMO-LAG EXTENDING TilROUGH A FIRE STOP WAS 330-1 HALF ROUNDS, THE USE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TilROUGH THE FIRE STOP WILL PROVIDE AN ACCEFTABLE INSTALLATION WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITil THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE FI EXI-BLANKET BUNDLES RESTING ON Tile EXPOSED CABLE TRAY WAS, IN SCHEME 15-2, SPECIFICALLY FIRE TESTED, AND IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY THE EXPOSED TRAY. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS BASICALLY CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WHERE IT DEVIATES FROM THESE CONFIGURATIONS THE DIFFERENCES ARE MINOR AND DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE i CORRELATION TO A TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE M ATERIAL CONTINUITY AND THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED.

50. LEFT BLANK

51. LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET 330-660 PROTECTING ALL BUNDLED LEGS OF THIS DETAIL ARE CONSISTENT WITH TESTED 104121/0 CONFIGURATIONS. IN FIRE TEST SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. THE USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE WITil BANDING PROVED TO BE 103486/0 STRUCTURALLY SOUND WITH EXCELLENT BONDING OF SEAMS THROUGHOUT THE FIRE AND HOSE STREAM TEST.

THEREFORE THE USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE WITH BANDING TO STRUCTURALLY HOLD THE SPLIT LEGS TO THE PRIMARY LEG AND SEAL LONGITUDINAL SEAMS IS ACCEPTABLE. THIS DETAIL IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR CRITICAL THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IS THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

52. THE METHOD UTILIZED TO REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE 330-1 CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS IS TO SCORE THE M ATERIAL SO THAT IT 103020/3 WILL CONFORM TO THE SMALLER SH APE THEN FILLING THE SCORED AREAS WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. THIS IS Tile SAME METilOD UTILIZED IN FITTING 330-1 PANELS TO CABLE TRAY RADIAL BENDS WHICH WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1, 11-2, 11-4,

, 11-5.13-2 AND 14-1. THEREFORE THE SCORING OF THE CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS WILL NOT DETRACT FROM THE TESTED

!      INTEGRITY OF THESE CONDUIT SECTIONS. SINCE DETAILS 4.6 AND 4-6.1 ARE THE SAME AS 4-1 AND 4-1.1 WHICH WERE TESTED IN SCHEMES 9-1,9-3,10-1.10-2,11-1 AND 11-2 THEY ARE CONSIDERED TO BE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. DETAILS 4-7 AND 4-7.1 ARE THE SAME AS DETAILS 4-3 AND 4-3.1 AND THEY HAVE BEEN ANALYZED IN NOTE 46.

i 53. FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUlT llAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. HOWEVER, THE FACT THAT THE FLEXI-BLANKET 103076/1 l CONFIGURATION H AS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2 AND THE FLEX CONDUIT HAS THE ADVANTAGE OF THE CONDUIT JACKET AND THE AIR VOLUME INSIDE THE CONDUIT WHICH IS NOT PRESENT IN A CABLE BUNDLE, PROVIDES ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR THE CABLES AND RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. THE REDUCTION IN THICKNESS AT THE SUPPORT IS COMPENSATED FOR BY THE ADDITION THERMO-LAG ON THE SUPPORT. THE RESULTING COMBINATION OF THERMO-LAG ON THE SUPPORT AND THE CONDUIT PLUS THE TROWEL GRADE IN ANY VOIDS AND AT THE EXTERNAL INTERFACE BETWEEN THE THERMO-LAG ON THE CONDUIT AND THE SUPPORT RESULTS IN A THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE CONSISTENT WITH A TESTED CONFIGURATION. i 54. THIS DETAIL DEPICTS STANDARD COVERAGE FOR 2" CONDUIT EXCEPT FOR A GAP NOT EXCEEDING 1/2' WHERE THE 1/4' HALF 103423/0 ROUNDS MEET. TROWEL GRADE OVER STRESS SKIN IS APPLIED TO THE AREA TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED THICKNESS IN THE AREA. THE COMBINATION OF RESULTING CONFIGURATION PROVIDING THICKNESS AND M ATERIAL CONTINUITY CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS RESULTS IN THIS CONFIGURATION BEING ACCEPTABLE. 1 1

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G23 OF G26

DCA/REV NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES

55. THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THERMO-LAG AS A FIRE STOP WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 4 AND THE FIRE STOP WAS NOT BREACHED.

FIRE STOPS IN THERMO-LAG COVERED TRAYS WERE TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1, Il-2 AND 14-1. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. .

56. ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT A TESTED CONFIGURATION IT IS A DEFINITE ENHANCEMENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND IT IS THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE. TEST SCHEMES 11-1,12-1,12-2 AND 13-1 HAVE ESTABLISHED TIIE ENHANCEMENTS OBTAINED BY 4

USING TIE WIRES TO *STITCil" TO EITHER PANELS AND THIS DETAIL IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT CONFIGURATION.

57. THIS DETAIL PROVIDES A METHOD FOR A POSITIVE MECHANICAL MEANS TO SUPPORT UNDER THE BOTTOM PANEL AT A FIRE 104235/3 j

STOP IN A CABLE TRAY. Tile BAR STEEL AND ALTERED ROD USED FOR TilIS PURPOSE ARE SUBSTANTIAL AND WILL 4 WITHSTAND A DESIGN BASIS FIRE. Tile BAR STEEL IS COMPARABLE TO Tile EXPOSED STEEL THAT WAS TESTED IN ALL THE __ l SC11 EMES. TiiE ALL TliREAD ROD WOULD HAVE ELONGATE TO FAIL AND THAT IS NOT A CONCERN. 1 l

58. THE USE OF 330-1 THERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS, SINGLE LAYER, WAS QUALIFIED ON SCHEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOXES. IN 101918/0 THIS DETAIL. THE THERMAL EXPOSURE OF FLAT PANELS IS LESS CHALLENGING TilAN THE EXPOSURE IN 10-2. REQUIRED OVERLAPS OF MATERIAL AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES ALONG WITil THE USE OF V-CROOVE 330-1 PANELS ARE i QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. IN ADDITION, TIIE REQUIREMENT FOR PRE-BANDING BELOW FLAT PANELS, NO M ATTER T11E TRAY SIZE, WILL PROVIDE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AGAINST SAGGING CONSISTENT WITH THE USE OF V-GROOVED BOARD.

l BASED ON THE ABOVE, Tills DETAIL IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

59. THIS CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS IN SCHEMES 11-1,11-2,13-2,14-1 AND 15-1. Tile TROWEL i GRADE AS A FIRE STOP liAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES 4,11-1 AND 11-2 AND THE SHEET METAL SLEEVE IS SANDWICliED BETWEEN TROWEL GRADE AND PENSEAL M ATERIAL. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

l

60. TiiE USE OF 330460 THERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 103020/3 11-1 AND 11-2. THE USE OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINTS WAS ALSO QUALIFIED BY IG1121/0 SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. Tile USE OF A 330-660 TROWEL FILLET AT THE TRANSITION BETWEEN 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET AND

! M-BOARD OR CONCRETE WILL PROVIDE A POSITIVE SEAL TO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE AT THIS TRANSITION. FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS, THE CONCRETE AT THE TRANSITION WILL PROVIDE A IIEAT SINK AND REDUCED llEAT EXPOSURE TO THE TiiERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. BASED ON THE ABOVE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

61. THE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST TiiE M-BOARD AND IS SEALED TO BOTH Tile 100820/0 i PENSEAL AND THE CONCRETE WITH CAULK AND STICK PINS ARE USED AS REQUIRED. THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE l FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE TRAY CONFIGURATION AND THE PENSEAL ARE BOTH QUALIFIED FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE EXPOSURE.; 62. IN ADDITION TO THE DISCUSSION ON NOTE 60 FOR THE M-BOARD / CONCRETE TO FLEXI-BLANKET TRANSITION, THE FLEXI- 103020/3 BLANKET IS ATTACilED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAll 3-5.2 TO THE RACEWAY. THIS MECHANICAL MEANS OF ATTACHMENT 104121/0 l TO THE RACEWAY WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. FOR THE CRITICAL THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL
CONSIDERATIONS, THIS ASSEMBLY IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACllMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G24 OF G26 NOTE ACCEfTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

63. THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED ON RADIAL BENDS FOR CABLE TRAYS IN TESTS 11-1, 11-2, 103020/3 11-4, Il-5,14-1 AND 15-1. THE METHOD USED TO SCORE AND FOLD ON TRAY RUNS IS THE SAME AS TRAY RADIAL BENDS PLUS THE TRAY JOINTS WILL RECEIVE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP. THEREFORE THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD FOR TRAY RUN CORNERS IS ACCEPTABLE.

64. THIS DETAIL WAS QUALIFIED IN SCHEhiES 11-1 AND 11-2, ONLY FOR AIR DROPS. THE DIFFERENCE OF HAVING FLEX-CONDUIT 103020/3 AS COMPARED TO AN AIR DROP ADDS THERM AL MASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO THE ASSEMBLY AND THEREFORE IS BETTER TilAN THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

65. THIS IS A MINOR DEVIATION FROM NORMAL STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON LONGITUDINALJOINTS AND HAS NO IMPACT ON 103833/0 THE ABILITY OF THE STRESS SKIN TO PERFORM IT'S INTENDED FUNCTION SINCE THE STRESS SKIN IS CUT OUT AROUND THE GROUND CABLE THEN BROUGHT BACK TOGETHER WHERE IT LAPS THE JOINT. Tills IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.

66. PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING ITEM FROM INTERFACE IS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2 AND IS 104121/0 TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

67. Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS AND CABLE TRAYS WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY.

ALTilOUGH THE PP,OTRUDING ITEM IN THIS CASE IS A DETECTOR BASE AND CONDUIT, THE COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO EXPOSED RACEWAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH.

68. THIS DETAIL UTILIZES CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON STRESS SKIN WITH TROWEL GRADE FOR 330-1 PANELS ON Tile BOTTOM 103020/3 PANELS ON A CABLE TRAY WHERE IT BUTTS TO THE TRAY SUPPORT THERMO-LAG. CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON BUTT JOINTS WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES 11-1,11-2,14-1 AND 15-1. IN ADDITION THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE HAS BEEN STAPLED TO THE VERTICAL 330-1 PANEL ON TIIE SUPPORT WHICH WILL FURTHER ENHANCE THE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF Tile STRESS SKIN.

69. THE USE OF 330-660 THERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES AND THE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PRE-SHAPED CONDUIT HALF-ROUNDS ON BOTH AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS IS QUALIFIED BY TEST SCHEME 11-1. BY EMBEDDING TiiE HALF-ROUND M ATERIAL INTO THE M-BOARO 1/2" AND SEALING WITH A I/2 BEAD OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. A POSITIVE MECH ANICAL CONNECTION AND SEAL IS CREATED AT THIS TRANSITION.

THIS CONFIGURATION IS EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCHEMES !:-l AND 11-2.

70. Ti1E USE OF 330460 THERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. THE USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINTS WAS A130 QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. THERM ALLY, THE THICKNESS AND AMOUNT OF LAYERS PROTECTING BUNDLES ARE EQUIVALENT TO OR BETTER THAN THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. STRUCTURALLY 330-660 TROWEL GRADE WTTH SS BANDING HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE EFFECTIVE TO BOND SEAMS WITH THE TWO BUNDLES SHIELDING EACH OTHER AND HAVING GREATER MASS THAN A SINGLE BUNDLE. THIS CONFIGURATION HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE A LESS SEVERE EXPOSURE THAN THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. FINALLY, CONDUITS, AS OPPOSED TO AIR DROPS USED IN THE TEST, ADD THERM AL M ASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO THE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G25 OF G26 NOTE ACCEITANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

71. THIS DEVIATION AFFECTS ONLY A SMALL PORTION OF THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON THE LONGITUDINALJOINT 103507/0 AND LIMITS THE AMOUNT OF DEVIATIONS IN CLG?E PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER SO THAT OVERALL MECHANICAL 103626/0 INTEGRITY OF THE JOINT IS NOT COMPROMISED. THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.

72. PROTECTION OF SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS ARE CONSISTENT WTTH OTHER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS (1/2" THERMO-LAG 103020/3 THICKNESS AND JOINTS, TIE-WIRES, ETC.). THE LEVEL OF PROTECTION IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATION.

73. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION WHICH WAS USED IN ALL OF THE CABLE TRAY TEST CONFIGURATIONS EXCEIrr THAT THIS 104121/0 I

DETAIL HAS THE ENHANCEMENT OF INSTALLING THE TIE WIRES THROUGH THE BOTTOM PANELS ON THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE THAT BUTTS TO THE SUPPORT. SINCE TIIIS IS AN ENHANCEMENT TO A TESTED CONFIGURATION, IT IS ACCEPTABLE.

74. THE COVERAGE ON THE RADIAX CABLE WITH FLEXI-BLANKET IS SIMILAR TO COVERAGE ON PROTRUD!NG CONDUIT ON 104015/1 l

1 SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. Tile AIR GAPS INSIDE THE FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP ARE FILLED WITli TROWEL GRADE. THIS i CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

75. THE FLEX CONDUITS ARE COVERED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE INTERFERING STRUCTURE 102759/1 TilEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT TiiE JUNCTION OF Tile CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS AND THE CONCRETE WALL. THE FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BETWEEN THE THERMO-LAG AND THE CONCRETE TO MAINTAIN THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO TiiE CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK AND ENHANCE THE INTEGRITY OF THE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

a

76. THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE COVERAGE IS EXTENDED OUT ONTO THE STEEL THEREFORE TYING IT INTO THE 102957/0 STRESS SKIN ON THE JOINT. THIS PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH WAS EQUIVALENT TO THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.

77. FLEXI-BLANKET WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES Il-1 AND 11-2. THE COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUIT HALF 104121/0 ROUNDS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE OVERLAP OF 330-660 ONTO CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES THE SAME INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC) USED FOR CONDUIT AND JUST MODIFIES THEM TO ALLOW FOR THE CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS. THE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE

{ TRAY ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. i 78. THE INSTALLATION METHODS USED ON THE DETAIL FOR THE 330-1 BOX ARE AN EXTENSION OF THE TRAY COVERAGE AND IN121/0 j HAVE ALL BEEN TESTED (SCORE AND FOLD, STITClilNG AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON JOINTS). THE FILLET - PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. i 79. THIS CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE OF DETAIL 12-2 EXCEPT THAT THE CONDUIT ENTERING THE BOX EXTENSION 103S44/0 OF A HORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID. THE USE OF 330-660 ENTERING A HORIZONTALTRAY ENVELOPE HAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. THE UPGRADE TECilNIQUES UTILIZED TO REINFORCE THE - INTERFACE BETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET DURING THE TEST (330-660 COLLAR FLARED OUT ON THE 330-1 PANEL)IS REQUIRED BY THE DETAIL ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT

OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS WITH QUALIFIED TECHNIQUES (STITCHING / STRESS SKIN). THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITHIN THE 1 ENVELOPE BENEFITS THE THERM AL PERFORM ANCE OF THE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE, THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT l-HOUR RATING, t

   ,                                                                                                                                       a

n ATTACHMENT G ER-ME-082, REV. 2 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE G26 OF G26 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV

80. ALTHOUGH NOT EXACTLY A TESTED CONFIGURATION. THIS DETAIL HAS ALL THE SIGNIFICANT ATTRIBUTES OF A TESTED CONFIGURATION AND THE DIFFERENCES ARE INSIGNIFICANT.

81. THIS DETAIL PROVIDES SPECIFIC GUIDANCE FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG AND IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

82. THIS DETAIL PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON WHEN SIL-TEMP HAS TO BE INSTALLED ON CABLES TO PROTELT THEM AGAINST POSSIBLE DAMAGE FROM THERMO-LAG PANELS. THIS IS AN ELECTRICAL CABLE DAMAGE CONCERN AND HAS NO EFFECT ON THE THERMO-LAG PROTELTIVE ENVELOPE.

83. THIS DETAIL PROVIDES GUIDANCE FOR INSTALLING FLEXI-BLANKET ON A FLEX CONDUIT UP TO A JUNCTION BOX. IT REQUIRES THE JB TO BE PROTECTED WITH 330-1 PANELS AND FOR THE 330-660/330-1 INTERFACE TO BE REINFORCED.

84. JOINT AND SEAM UPGRADES ARE REQUIRED UP THE AREA OF THE WALL PENETRATION. WHERE THE ESSENTIAL RACEWAYS TRAVERSE THE SEISMIC GAP USE OF THESE DETAILS WILL MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF THE THERMAL AND SEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS. THESE DETAILS WILL ALLOW MINOR BUILDING / CABLE TRAY MOVEMENT WHILE MALNTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.

85. THE IDENTIFIED TEST SCHEMES SUPPORT THE USE OF CABLE TRAY THERMO-LAG COVERAGE AGAINST TR.AY SUPPORT THERMO-LAG. SCHEME 11-5 SPECIFICALLY UTILIZES THERMO-LAG STRIPS AS SHOWN IN THIS DETAIL.

86. THIS DETAIL IS A MODIFIED VERSION OF 5-13.1. REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE THERMO-LAG STRIPS IS JUSTIFIED SINCE THE INTERFERING SUPPORT KICKER, ITSELF, PROVIDES THE BOTTOM PANEL SUPPORT WHERE THE THERMO-LAG STRIPS ARE OMITTED.

j 87. TEST SCHEMES 11-1 & 11-2 USED STAPLES TO ATTACH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO 330-1 PANELS. PROPER LENGTH STAPLES ARE USED TO ENSURE FIRM MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT. 1

88. THIS DETAllIS EQUIVALENT TO DETAILS 4-7 & 4-7.1 IN ITS THERMAL PROTECTION, USING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IN PLACE OF 330-1 HALF ROUNDS.

4

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE HI OF H45 i ATTACIIMENT II UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS e

A~ITACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H2 OF H45 i DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV. ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASISINOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 81380/0 SG 790' l-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM 11-1, 11-2, 1-5,8

                        ,                                   WALL SLEEVES TO CABLE TRAY                                                 l1-4, 14-1 CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAIL RESOLUTION: A THERMO-LAG " BOX

DESIGN WAS ERECTED TO ENCLOSE THE THROUGH WALL SLEEVE (TWS),

AIR DROPS AND CABLE TRAY. THE FRONT PANEL AT TIIE TRAY RAll WAS RAISED UP TO ACCOMMODATE TiiE AIR DROPPING CABLES. THE TOP OF THE BOX WAS ANGLED FROM THE WALL TO THE FRONT OF THE TRAY AND THE SIDE AND FRONT PANELS WERE IN COMPRESSION. ADDITIONAL UPGRADES WERE PROVIDED BY DCN 6830. THE BOX JO!NTS AND BOTTOM BUTT JOINTS ON THE TRAY WERE UPGRADED WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. THE FIRE STOP WAS UPGRADED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 5-3.1 AND A " PICTURE FRAME" WAS INSTALLED AT THE WALL INTERFACE PER TYPICAL DETAIL 14-5. J

                                               -_ _ ___ _ _            _ _ _         _ _ _ . _ _ _ - . _ . . _ _ - - . - - . . .           . _ _ _ - _ . _ . - _ _ _ _ -             _f

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H3 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRiirTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN)' (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 03340/1 SG 831' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: 2 UNISTRUT SUPPORTS AND l' 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 9 COPPER LINE INTERFERE WITH THE 10-1, 10-2, COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL 11-4, 11-5, CONDUIT. 13-2 RESOLUTION: THE 1* COPPER LINE (INTERFERENCE), UNISTRUT SUPPORT AND THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT ARE ALL ENCLOSED IN A COMMON ENCLOSURE WHICH IS BUTTED TO A CONCRETE WALL THE 1* PIPE IS COVERED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM WHERE IT ENTERS THE ENCLOSURE. THE TOP, BOTTOM AND SIDES OF THE ENCLOSURE ARE INSTALLED AGAINST THE UNISTRUT

AND BUTTED TO THE CONCRETE. THE FRONT PIECE IS UNDER COMPRESSION ON ALL 4 SIDES. THERE IS A MINOR TRANSITION IN COVERAGE BETWEEN THE SUPPORTS WHICH IS ACCOMPLISHED WITH SCORE AND FOLD JOINTS. DCN 6984 UPGRADED ALL OF THE JOINTS AND THE CONDUIT AND PIPING ENTERING WITH STRESS SKIN, i TROWEL GRADE & STAPLES.

83342/3 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: CONGESTION MAKES IT N/A N/A (ISSUE 1) DIFFICULT TO COVER COUPLING ON ESSENTIAL CONDUITS INDIVIDUALLY. 1 RESOLUTION: THE BOX ENCLOSURES CONSTRUCTED BY THIS DCA WERE REVIEWED IN DCN 6909 AND THIS DCA NO LONGER APPLIES. 4

4-- 1 ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 i UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H4 OF H45 i DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF -- SUPPORT: BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-- FIRE . SCHEMES H45) ' ZONE 83342/3 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: CONGESTION MAKES IT 10-1, 10-2 1-6,7 (ISSUE 2) , DIFFICULT TO COVER ESSENTIAL JUNCTION BOXES INDIVIDUALLY. 1 RESOLUTION: JUNCTION BOXES JBIS607G, JBIS606G, JBIS605G, JBIS604G, PULL BOX AND CONDUIT Cl3G04189, ClIG01745 & ClIG04179 WERE ALL ENCLOSED IN 1 LARGE BOX ENCLOSURE. ENCLOSURE EXTENDS FROM FLOOR TO TOP OF JUNCTION BOXES AND BUTTS TO THE WALL. INTERIOR SUPPORT IS PRIM ARILY FROM THERMO-LAG BEING INSTALLED DIRECTLY AGAINST THE JUNCTION BOXES. A THERMO-LAG PANEL WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR BETWEEN THE FRONT PANEL AND THE CONDUITS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR BOTTOM OF THE ENCLOSURE. RESULTING ENCLOSURE IS 69" X 62" X 12". THE UNIT I UPGRADE PROGRAM (DM 92-077) ADDED STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES TO ALL JOINTS AND TO CONDUITS LEAVING THE BOXED , ENCLOSURE. 83342/3 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: ONLY STATES THAT ALL OTHER N/A N/A (ISSUE 3) COVERAGES TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT DESIGN. RESOLUTION: THIS ISSUE WAS TO INSTALL ANYTHING NOT ADDRESSED

BY THIS DCA IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4

THE SPECIFICATION AND TYPICAL DETAILS. o 1

1 ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-OS2, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H5 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT . BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERNIRESOLUTION TEST . ~ (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45); ZONE 83342/3 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: CHANGES TO TYPICAL DETAIL N/A N/A , (ISSUE 4) , 2-3 AND 2-3.1 WERE REQUESTED TO FACILITATE BANDING OF MULTIPLE JUNCTION BOX ENCLOSURES. RESOLUTION: THIS ISSUE WAS TO CHANGE BANDING REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED CN TYPICAL DETAIL 2-3 AND TO INCORPORATE THE CHANGE INTO DWG. Ml-1701 SH. 2. 83356/0 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: 2 LBDs ARE TOO CLOSE 10-1, 10-2, 15, 10, 40 TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED 9-1 (ISSUE 1) INDIVIDUALLY. RESOLUTION: THE LBDs ARE WRAPPED ' TOGETHER IN A COMMON ENVELOPE. ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN UPGRADED PER 4 TYPICAL DETAILS. 83356/0 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: FIELD REQUESTS ENCLOSING N/A N/A (ISSUE 2) NON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT WITH , ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. I RESOLUTION: NONESSENTIAL CONDUIT WAS WRAPPED AS NORMAL PROTRUDING ITEM SO NO CHANGE IS REQUIRED. 33356/0 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: HVAC INTERFERES WITH N/A N/A { (ISSUE 3) COVERAGE ON ESSENTIAL LBD. RESOLUTION: THE LBD WAS TRIMMED SO THAT COVERAGE COULD BE PROVIDED PER TYPICAL DETAIIA NO CHANGE REQUIRED,

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H6 OF H45 DCA/DCN ' BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES 1 NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST -(PAGES H37- - FIRE SCHEMES H45) - ZONE 83356/0 SG 810' I-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY SUPPORT N/A N/A l (ISSUE 4) , INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON l ESSENTIAL LBD. RESOLUTION: NO CHANGE WAS REQUIRED FOR THIS ISSUE. 84682/0 SG 810' 1-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: TWO LBDs ARE TOO CLOSE 10-1, 10-2, 1-5, 10 TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED 9-1 INDIVIDUALLY. BOTH ARE ESSENTIAL. RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE AROUND BOTH LBDs. 84866/0 SG 790' l-064 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: NONESSENTIAL LBD AND HVAC 10-1, 10-2, I-5, 10 DUCT INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE ON 9-1, 9-3 ESSENTIAL LBD. RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE AROUND BOTH LBDs. LBD COVER WAS TRIMMED SO THERE IS l ENOUGH ROOM BETWEEN THE LBD AND THE HVAC TO COVER PER TYPICAL DETAIL. l l l l 1

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H7 OF H45 DCA/DCN . BLDG' ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPOliT : BASIS /NdTES ' NO./REV AREA / (YIN)- (YIN) . CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES . H45) ZONE F 86194/0 EC 778' X-IISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: AN INSULATED 4" CHILL WATER l-2, 12-1, 1-6, 11

                                 ,                                             LINE INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON             12-2, 13-1, AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.                     14-1, 11-1, 15-1, Il-5 RESOLUTION: 330-660 FLEXI%AMKET IS INSTALLED BEDVEEN THEP;Pi AND THE TRAY SIDE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. TROWEL GRADE IS INSTALLED IN ANY VOIDS THEN PANEL 3 CONTOURED TO THE SHAPE OF THE PIPE WERE INSTALLED BEDVEEN THE 330-660 AND THE TRAY TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. 330-1 PANELS WERE ALSO INSTALLED INSIDE TifE TRAY AND EXTENDED 9" TO 11" TO EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE.

86764/0 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: AN INSULATED 6" CHILLED 11-1, 11-5, 1-6, 11 WATER LINE INTERFERES WITH I4-1, 15-1 COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE , TRAY. RESOLUTION: 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IS INSTALLED BEDVEEN THE PIPE AND THE TRAY SIDE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. TROWEL GRADE IS INSTALLED IN ANY VOIDS THEN PANELS CONTOURED TO THE SHAPE OF THE PIPE WERE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE 330-660 AND THE TRAY TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. 330-1 PANELS WERE ALSO INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAY AND EXTENDED 9" TO 11" TO EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE. t

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H8 OF H45 DCA/DCN - BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. D ET.' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES - NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) .. CONCERN / RESOLUTION - TEST _ (PAGES H37-

FIRE SCHEMES H45) -

ZONE 1 89513/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES IN ESSENTIAL 24" TRAY Il-1,Il-2, 1-5, 13

                                     ,                        ARE ABOVE THE RAILS AND TOUCHING       11-4,Il-5, A CONCRETE BEAM RUNNING OVER           13-2, 14-1 THE TOP OF THE TRAY.                   15-1 RESOLUTION: THE TRAY COVERAGE IS EXTENDED UP TO Tile CONCRETE BEAM. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY EXTENDING THE SIDE RAll AND TOP TRAY PANELS, BUTTING THEM TO THE BEAM AND SEALING WITH TROWEL GRADE. THE COVERAGE IS BANDED TO

THE TRAY UTILIZING 330-660 OVER THE CABLES TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE BANDING. DCN 6983 UPGRADED THE TRAY JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN.

TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. 89750/0 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FRO.M N/A 14 TWS TO CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: THERMO-LAG PRESHAPED SECTIONS WERE l*4 STALLED AROUND THE CABLES INSIDE THE WALL SLEEVES (9" TO 11") INTO THE WALL AND EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 3* PAST THE END OF THE SLEEVE. 330-660 WAS THEN INSTALLED ON THE AIR DROP CABLES OVERLAPPING THE PRESHAPED SECTIONS AT THE WALL SLEEVES AND EXTENDING TO THE CABLE TRAY. P

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE 119 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRilmON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 89751/1 EC 778' X-Il5A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM 4 11-1, 11-2, I-5, 15

                           ,                       TWS TO A CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE                                                          14-1,15-1 WRAPPED PER TYPICAL DETAIL RESOLUTION: TIIE 4 WALL SLEEVES AND Ti1E CABLE TRAY WERE COVERED WITH 330460 IN A COMMON ENVELOPE.

AN ADDITIONAL STRIP OF 330-660 WAS INSTALLED OVER THE GROUND CABLE LUG NUT AT THE WALL SLEEVES. DCN 6987 UPGRADED THE INSTALLATION BY STAPLING TIIE OVERLAP ON Tile TRAY TO TIIE TRAY COVERAGE.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H10 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT ' BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 89855/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORTS INTERFERE WTTH 10-2, 11-1, 1-5, 12

                                                   ,                                         COVERAGE ON ESSENTIAL CABLE                                                                 11-2, 11-4, TRAY.                                                                                       11-5, 13-2, 14-1,15-1 RESOLUTION: A BOX ERECTED SIMILAR TO TYPICAL DETAIL I4-1 TO ACCOMMODATE THE PIPE HANGERS WHERE THEY PENETRATE THE PLANE OF THE TOP OF Tile TRAY.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS INSTALLATION AND THE TYPICAL DETAIL IS THAT THIS BOX SITS IN THE SPACE BE'DVEEN THE TRAY EXTENSION PIECES AND THE CABLE TRAY FLANGES AND IS SUPPORTED BY THESE FLANGES. THERE IS NO LIP ON THE TOP OF Tile BOX AND THE COVERAGE ON THE TRAY TOP OVERLAPS TIIE TOP OF THE BOX AND IS SEALED TO THE BOX WITH TROWEL GRADE. THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX IS COVERED WITH 330-660 TO PROTECT THE CABLES FROM THE STRESS SKIN. TIE WIRES ARE USED TO ATTACH THE BOTTOM TO THE SIDES OF THE BOX. i

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE HII OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES ' NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST' (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 89857/1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: A 10* INSULATED PIPE 9-1, 9-2 1-5, 42

                            ,                                          INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON A 4" ESSENTIAL CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON THE CONDUIT IS BUTTED TO THE PIPE AND ALL VOIDS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE SEALING THE COVERAGE TO THE PIPE. 330-70 CERAMIC BLANKET IS THEN INSTALLED ON THE PIPE, BU'ITING UP TO THE CONDUITS THEN COVERED WITil A STAINLESS STEEL JACKET. A FILLET OF TROWEL GRADE IS PLACED AROUND Tile THERMO-LAG / STEEL JACKET INTERFACE. 330-70 IS INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 18" EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CONDUIT. 89858/l SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: A 10' INSULATED SERVICE 14-1, 11-1, 1-6, 11 WATER PIPE INTERFERES WITH 15-1, I l-5 COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IS INSTALLED BETWEEN THE PIPE AND THE TRAY SIDE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. TROWEL GRADE IS INSTALLED IN ANY VOIDS THEN PANELS CONTOURED TO THE SIIAPE OF THE PIPE ARE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE 330-660 AND THE TRAY TO THE

                              ,                                        EXTENT POSSIBLE. 330-1 PANELS WERE ALSO INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAY AND EXTENDED 9" TO 11" TO EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE INTERFERENCE.

W-ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE 1112 OF H45 ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA/DCN BLDG AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-NO./REV . FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 852' X-241 AA21f Y Y ISSUE: A 2* FIRE PROTECTION PIPE AND 11-1,Il-2, 1-6, 16 89993/3 AB A FIRE DAMPER INTERFERE WITH 13-2, 14-1, COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE 15-1 TRAY. RESOLUTION: THE INTERFERENCE FROM Tile FIRE DAMPER IS NOT A PROBLEM. THE FIRE PROTECTION PIPE IS WRAPPED WITil Tile TRAY WHERE IT INTERFERES, THEN WRAPPED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM WilEN IT LEAVES THE TRAY COVERAGE. THE TRAY COVERAGE EXTENDS TO TIIE FLOOR PENETRATION AND BUTTS TO Tile M-BOARD PER TYPICAL DETAILS. DCN 6996 i ADDED SIDE PANELS OVER Tile EXISTING TRAY COVERAGE AND BUTTED TO THE WALL WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS WERE UPGRADED WITli STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. 1

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H13 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST- (PAGES H37-3 FIRE SCHEMES ' H45) ZONE j 91235/1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: CABLES IN ESSENTIAL CABLE 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 29

!                                                                                ,                                                   TRAY ARE ABOVE THE SIDE RAIIJS IN                                                        13-2, 14-1, j                                                                                                                                     SEVERAL LOCATIONS DUE TO TRAY                                                            15-1 l                                                                                                                                   CONFIGURATION AND AIR DROPS INTO TRAY AND TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS.

l RESOLUTION: CABLE TRAY 15

COVERED STARTING WHERE CABLES i AIR DROP INTO TRAY AT NODE 33. A l FIRE STOP IS INSTALLED IN THE TRAY BETWEEN NODES 33 & 34. TRAY COVERAGE IS SHIMMED WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE CABLES OUTSIDE T11E TRAY.

COVERAGE AT NODE 32 IS SHIMMED TO INCLUDE THE END OF NONESSENTIAL TRAY T14KADC35 AND ITS AIR DROPS. A FIRE STOP WAS INSTALLED IN THIS TRAY JUST OUTSIDE Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY PROTECTED ENVELOPE. AIR DROPS FROM ESSENTIAL CONDUITS ) INTO TRAY AT NODE 37 ARE COVERED ' PER TYPICAL DETAILS. DCN 6993 UPGRADED TRAY JOINTS AND AIR DROPS INCLUDING TRAY AND CONDUIT INTERFACES PER TYPICAL DETAILS I AND INSTALLED BAR CLAMPS AT FIRE STOPS. 4 4

ATTACHMENT 11 ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H14 OF H45 SUPP. DET.' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES L DCA/DCN' BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE AREAI (YIN)- (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION _ TEST (PAGES H37-NO./REV ' FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY STOPS 9-1, 1-5, 44 91416/0 AB 852' X-241 AA21f IN A BLOCKOUT TilEN CABLES AIR 9-3, 10-1, DROP TO 2 TRAYS. CONFIGURATION 10-2, I l-1, CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL 11-2, 11-4, DETAILS. ALSO ANOTHER ESSENTIAL 11-5, 13-2, TRAY PASSES THROUGli THE SAME 14-1,15-1 BLOCKOUT. RESOLUTION: Tile ONE BLOCKOUT WAS COMPLETELY REWORKED BY DCN 6996 AND SUPERSEDES TIIE DESIGN IN Tills DCA. THE OTHER BLOCKOUT AREA IS ENCLOSED BY PLACING A 330-1 PANEL ACROSS Tile FACE OF TIIE BLOCKOUT, FLUSli WITil Tile WALL AND SEALING IT WITil TROWEL GRADE. Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY AND ANY OTilER CONDUCTIVE ITEMS PENETRATING THE ENCLOSURES ARE COVERED AT LEAST 2* INTO TIIE BLOCKOUT. ; NONESSENTIAL ITEMS ARE ALSO COVERED AT LEAST 2" OUTSIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE (TOTAL OF 4") PROVIDED TilERE IS NO DIRECT CONDUCTIVE PATH TO THE ESSENTIAL TRAY. Tile ANGLE IRON FRAMING FOR THE BLOCKOUT WHICH IS EMBEDDED IN Tile CONCRETE AT THE WALL FACE IS COVERED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM ITS POINT OF CONTACT WITil ESSENTIAL TRAY. f

ATTACilMENT II ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE HIS OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES

  ' NO./REV                       AREA /                         (Y/N)                             (Y/N)  CONCERN / RESOLUTION -                               TEST         (PAGES H37-FIRE                                                                                                                        SCHEMES      H45)

ZONE 91882/0 SG 790' l-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: A NONESSENTIAL TRAY Il-1,Il-2, 1-5, 17 92684/0 , INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON AN 15-2 ESSENTIAL VERTICAL CABLE TRAY. 4 RESOLUTION: THE CABLES IN THE , ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WERE i WRAPPED INTO TWO 9" DIAMETER 330-660 BUNDLES IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE (8'). THESE BUNDLES EXTEND OUTSIDE TIIE TRAY RAILS SO THE NORMAL TRAY COVERAGE HAS TO BE SHIMMED 3" TO 4" TO ACCOMMODATE THESE BUNDLES. DCN , 6830 UPGRADES THE BUNDLE / TRAY INTERFACE BY INSTALLING A . REINFORCEMENT COLLAR OF FLEXIBLE MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. THE TRAY COVERAGE HAD THE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. 2 1 1 e f I

i ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H16 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrTION/ ISSUE OF 'SUPPOllT BASIS / NOTES'-

  . NO./REV :                                AREAL.        (YIN)                   (YIN)~ CONCERN / RESOLUTION -                                                                                       TEST             .

l(PAGES H37-1 FIRE- SCHEMES H45) ZONE 92200/0 AB 852' X-241 AA21f Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY Il-1,Il-2, 1-5, 44

                                   ,                                                      CANNOT BE COVERED AT WALL                                                                                        i1-4,Il-5, BLOCKOUT PER TYPICAL DETAILS.                                                                                    13-2, 14-1, 15-1 RESOLUTION: THE BLOCKOUT IS ENCLOSED BY PUTTING A 330-1 PANEL ACROSS THE FACE OF THE BLOCKOUT CREATING AN ENCLOSURE RECESSED 1

INSIDE Tile WALL THE PANELS ARE l SEALED TO THE BLOCKOUT WITH TROWEL GRADE AND ALSO BANDED TO AN ANGLE IRON AND A THERMO-LAG COVERED SUPPORT WHICH RUN ACROSS THE FACE OF THE BLOCKOUT. Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY IS COVERED A MINIMUM OF 2" INTO THIS ENCLOSURE. 92205/l EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM A 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 30 CONDUIT OVER THE SIDE RAll OF A 11-4, 11-5, CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED PER 14-1.15-1 TYPICAL DETAIL. RESOLUTION: THE TRAY COVERAGE IS SHIMMED AT THE AIR DROP CREATING A 4" HIGH BY 18" LONG BOX EXTENDING FULL TRAY WIDTH WHICH ALLOWS ROOM FOR THE AIR DROP TO ENTER THROUGH THE SIDE OF THE TRAY COVERAGE. DCN 6987 HAS j UPGRADED THE JOINTS ON THE TRAY AND THE AIR DROP INTERFACE WITH THE TRAY WITH STRESS SKIN OR MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES PER TYPICAL DETAILS. THE OVERLAP OF THE FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUIT HAS BEEN UPGRADED WITH STAPLES. 1 f.

8 ATTACHMENT 11 ER-ME-OS2, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H17 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES - H45) ZONE 92295/0 SG S31' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: THREE ESSENTIAL, VERTICAL 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 31 CABLE TRAYS RUNNING ALONG A Il-4,Il-5, WALL CANNOT BE COVERED DUE TO 13-2, 14-1, INTERFERENCES FROM THE WALL AND 15-1 BASE PLATES ATTACHED TO Tile WALL RESOLUTION: THE BASE PLATES WERE COVERED WITH THERMO-LAG THEN THE FRONT AND BACK TRAY PANELS WERE EXTENDED OVER AND BUTTED TO THE CONCRE"!E WALL DCN 6984 UPGRADED THE COVERAGE BY INSTALLING STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES TO THE TRAY JOINTS PER TYPICAL DETAILS AND BY INSTALLING A 2" WIDE PANEL WHERE a THE PANELS BUTTED THE WALL AND lilLTI BOLTING IT TO THE WALL. 92383/0 SG 832' I-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: TWO ESSENTIAL VERTICAL- 9-1, I-5, 32 TRAYS PASSING THROUGH A BLOCKOUT 9-3, 10-1, IN THE FLOOR SIDE BY SIDE ARE TOO 10-2, 11-1, CLOSE TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED 11-2, 11-4, j' SEPARATELY. 11-5, 14-1, 15-1, 15-2 RESOLUTION: THE TWO TR.AYS ARE WRAPPED TOGETHER AT THE PENETRATION. THE COVERAGE IS

                =                                                        PROVIDED BY WRAPPING 1 TRAY AS REQUIRED THEN BUTTING THE COVERAGE ON THE 2ND TRAY TO THE FIRST. ANY GAPS BETWEEN THE TRAYS IS FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE HIS OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM- FIRE SUPP. DET. . DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF ' ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV ' AREAL - (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE '. SCHEMES H45) . ZONE l 92535/0 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING INTO N/A 33 CABLE TRAY HAVE CREATED ON OVERFILL CONDITION WHICH INTERFERES WITH CABLE TRAY

                                                      ' COVERAGE ON THESE NONESSENTIAL AIR DROPS AND CABLE TRAY.

RESOLUTION: THE TRAY COVERAGE HAS BEEN SHIMMED TO ACCOMMODATE THE FLEX-BLANKET WRAPPED AIR DROPS. 92541/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: A COVERAGE DETAIL IS NEEDED 9-1, 1-5, 34 (ISSUE 1) FOR CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM A 9-3, 10-1, VERTICAL CABLE TRAY TO FLOOR 10-2, 11-1, SLEEVES. 11-2, 11-4, 11-5,13-2, RESOLUTION: THE AIR DROPS AND 14-1, 15-1 CONDUITS ARE COVERED BY EXTENDING THE 330-1 PANELS FROM THE TRAY TO THE FLOOR. COVERAGE ALSO BUTTS TO THE WALL. DCN 6995 UPGRADES THE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. i 't I W

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H19 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF L ' SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES , NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST -(PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES II45) ZONE l 92541/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: A NONESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 9-1, 1-5, 34 i (ISSUE 2) , IS WITHIN 9' OF AN ESSENTIAL TRAY 9-3, 10-1, ! AT SHARED SUPPORTS IN 2 PLACES. 10-2, I l-1, 4 11-2,Il-4, i RESOLUTION: COVERAGE EXTENDS 11-5, 13-2, OUT ONTO THE NONESSENTIAL ra J , i4-1,15-1 , . WHERE ONLY 4* SEPARATION EXISTS AS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE 9" OF COVERAGE. BVO FIRE STOPS ARE PROVIDED IN THE TRAY,1 ABOVE AND 1 BELOW THE SUPPORT WHERE THE .' PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ENDS. COVERAGE EXTENDS OUT 5' ON THE CABLE TRAY HANGER WHERE SEPARATION IS 51/4*. 92545/1 SG 852' l-103 SE18 N Y ISSUE: A FIRE PROTECTION PIPE 11-1,Il-2, I-5, 35 INTERFERES WITH THE COVERAGE ON 11-4, 11-5 AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. 13-2, 14-1, ; 15-1 j RESOLUTION: THE 4* FIRE PROTECTION LINE IS WRAPPED WITH THE ESSENTIAL TRAY WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH SPLICE PLATE AND GROUND CABLE COVERAGE THEN OUT 9" IN BOTH

DIRECTIONS AS A PROTRUDING ITEM.

COVERAGE ON THE TRAY IS INSTALLED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE USING FLAT PANELS AND TROWEL GRADE THEN l PRESHAPED CONDUIT SECTIONS ARE INSTALLED ON THE SPRINKLER PIPE BUTTING UP TO THE TRAY COVERAGE. t

R -- ____._____..._I ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE H2O OF H45 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASISINOTES DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE AREA / (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-' NO./REV (YIN)" FIRE - SCHEMES H45) > ZONE Y ISSUE: CABLES COMING OUR OF THE 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 36 92555/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y BOTTOM OF AN ESSENTIAL JUNCTION 13-2, 14-1, BOX IN 4 CONDUlTS AND THEN AIR 15-1 DROPPING TO 2 CABLE TRAYS CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO CONGESTION. RESOLUTION: THE CONDUlTS COMING OUT OF Tile BOTTOM OF THE TRAY ARE ENCLOSED IN A BOX. TIIE CABLES AIR DROPPING TO THE TRAYS ARE COVERED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET. DCN 6995 UPGRADES Tile BOX AND AIR DROP INTERFACES WITH STRESS SKIN / MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. TIIE BOX COVERAGE IS EXTENDED TO TiiE WALL FLARED OUT 2* AND lilLTI BOLTED TO THE WALL. r

?,

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H21 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 92556/l AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: CABLES COME OUT OF THE 10-1, 10-2, 1,5 37 BOTTOM OF AN ESSENTIAL JUNCTION 11-1,Il-2, BOX IN 4 CONDUITS THEN AIR DROP TO Il-4,Il-5, 2 CABLE TRAYS CANNOT BE COVERED 13-2, 14-1, PER TYPICAL DETAIL DUE TO 15-1 CONGESTION AND OVERFILL IN TRAYS. ALSO AFFECTED ARE AIR DROPS FROM CONDUITS AND ANOTHER TRAY. RESOLUTION: THE CONDUITS AND AIR DROPS COMING OUT OF THE BOTTOM OF THE JUNCTION BOX ARE BOXED TO THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE. THE TRAY COVERAGE IS ALSO EXTENDED TO COVER THE END OF ONE OF THE CONDUlTS AIR DROPPING INTO THE TRAY. THE REM AINING AIR DROPS WERE COVERED WITli FLEXI-BLANKET PER TYPICAL DETAILS. DCN 6995 UPGRADES THE ENCLOSURES WITH STRESS SKIN / MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES ON JOINTS AND AIR DROPS PER TYPICAL DETAILS. ALSO

                                                         ~ PICTURE FRAME UPGRADE WAS PROVIDED ON THE BOXED CONDUITS AND AIR DROPS. A NONESSENTIAL TRAY IS ALSO A PROTRUDING ITEM AND IT WAS COVERED FOR 9" UTILIZING FIRE STOPS IN THE TRAY.

_g_ > _ ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H22 OF H45 ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF T SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) ' CONCERN / RESOLUTION - TEST (PAGES H37-NO./REV - FIRE SCHEMES H45) -' ZONE EC 778' X-1ISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM N/A 33 92566/0 MULTIPLE TWS TO A CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE WRAPPED PER TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: CABLE TRAY COVERAGE WAS SHIMMED TO ACCOMMODATE AIR DROPS. 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: A 4" PIPE INTERFERES WITli 14-1, 11-1, 1-5,1 I 92580/0 AB COVERAGE ON 2 SEPARATE CABLE Il-2,Il-5 TRAYS. RESOLUTION: 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IS INSTALLED BEDVEEN THE PIPE AND THE TRAY SIDE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, TROWEL GRADE IS INSTALLED IN ANY VOIDS THEN PANELS CONTOURED TO THE SHAPE OF T11E PIPE WilERE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE 330-660 AND THE TRAY TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. 330-1 PANELS WERE ALSO INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAY AND EXTENDED 9" TO 11' TO EACH SIDE OF THE P!PE. t

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 , UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H23 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. ' DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT . BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N). (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES 1145) ZONE . ! 92585/2 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: OVERFILL OF CABLE TRAYS 11-1,Il-2, 1-5, 38

                                      ,                                    INTERFERES WTFH COVERAGE ON THE                                                                                     Il-4,Il-5, TRAYS.                                                                                                              13-2, 14-1, 15-1 RESOLIT. ION: A BOX WAS                                                                                                                                   ,
!                                                                          CONSTRUCTED WillCH ENCLOSED THE 2 HORIZONTAL STACKED TRAYS AND THE BOTTOM OF THE 2 VERTICAL TRAYS.

BOX IS INSTALLED AGAINST TRAYS AND SUPPORTS AND BUTTED TO THE WALL. A FIRE STOP IS PROVIDED IN Tile TOP llORIZONTAL TRAY JUST OUTSIDE OF THE ENVELOPE. A SECOND BOX IS INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF ONE OF TiiE VERTICAL TRAYS WHERE CABLES AIR DROP TilROUGH SLEEVES IN Tile CEILING. THIS BOX IS HILTI BOLTED TO TiiE WALL AND CEILING. BOTH BOX ENCLOSURES HAVE THE. JOINTS UPGRADED WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. 92586/0 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: TUBE STEEL SUPPORT N/A 33 (ISSUE I) INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON AIR DROP FROM A CONDUlT TO A CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: 1 LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET WAS INSTALLED ON THE AIR DROP AND THE SECOND LAYER WAS BUTTED TO THE THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON Tile SUPPORT. ALL VOID 5 SPACES WERE FILLED WITH TROWEL g GRADE.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME482, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H24 OF H45 DCA/DCN - BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFI' ION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV .' AREA / (Y/N) -(YIN)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-- FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 92586/0 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROPS CANNOT BE N/A N/A (ISSUE 2) , COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE . TO CONGESTION. RESOLUTION: THIS WAS NOT A PROBLEM. AIR DROPS WERE COVERED

  ,g                 i PER TYPICAL DETAILS.

i

ATTACllMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H25 OF H45 DCA/DCN - BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT' ' BASIS / NOTES - NOJREV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST = (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES . _1145)- ZONE 92388/2 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: LARGE COMPLEX AIR DROPS 11-1, I l-2, 1-5, 39

                         ,                                     FROM TWS TO CABLE TRAYS AND FROM                                      13-2, 14-1, CABLE TRAYS TO CABLE TRAYS                                            15-1 CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO CONGESTION.

RESOLUTION: THE CABLE AIR DROPS WERE WRAPPED IN FLEX-BLANKET. Tile INTERFACES WITH CABLE TRAY COVERAGE IS ACCOMPLISHED IN SEVERAL WAYS. IN ONE CASE THE FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAPS ONTO THE TRAY COVERAGE. IN ANOTHER THE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLE GOES INTO THE TRAY 9* TO I1*, IN ANOTHER THE BUNDLE ENTERS THE END OF THE TRAY AND IS COVERED WITH A FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR WHICH OVERLAPS THE TRAY AND THE FLEXi-BLANKET AND IN ONE OTHER THE FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAPS ON CONDUIT PRESHAPED SECTIONS EXITING FROM 2 LBDs WHICH ARE WRAPPED TOGETHER IN A SINGLE ENVELOPE. CABLE TRAYS WHERE BUNDLES ENTER TRAY COVERAGE ARE SHIMMED AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE BUNDLE. DCN 6983 UPGRADED THE THERMO-LAG COVERAGE BY REINFORCING THE TRAY JOINTS AND FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLE / TRAY INTERFACE WITH STRESS SKIN / MESH,

                                  ,                            TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES.
                                             - . _ _ _ . _ _ .        _ _ _ _ _ .                                                           a ___.... _. _ _ _ -

^ A'ITACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE 1126 OF H45 i i DCA/DCN BLDG' ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT" BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN)- '(YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES H37-FIRE - SCHEMES H45) . ZONE I 92705/0 SG 831' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: SEVERAL PROTRUDING ITEMS 9-1, 1-5, 41

                                                                                    ,                      INTERFERE WITH THE COVERAGE ON           9-3, 10-1, j                                                                                                           AN ESSENTIAL 12" CABLE TRAY              10-2, 11-1,
,                                                                                                          PASSING THROUGH A BLOCKOUT AND           11-2, 11-4, PENETRATION SEAL.                        I l-5, 13-2, I

14-1,15-1, RESOLUTION: THE CABLES ARE BOXED 15-2 IN A 7" WIDE BY 3" IIIGH STAINLESS STEEL BOX THAT SITS INSIDE Tile TRAY. A FIRE STOP IS INSTALLED IN THIS BOX. THE TilERMO-LAG WAS ] INSTALLED OVER Tile BOX. THE THERMO-LAG IS COVERED WITH STAINLESS STEEL THEN THE BLOCKOUT IS SEALED. THE COVER. AGE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BLOCKOUT IS EXTENDED 9" TO 11" INTO THE STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE AND SEALED WITH 330-1 PANEL AND TROWEL GRADE. . t 92744/0 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: 4 CONDUITS LOCATED ABOVE A 11-4, 14-1, 1-6, 18 4 CABLE TRAY INTERFERE WITH 15-1 COVERAGE ON THE TRAYS. i RESOLUTION: TRAY COVERACE IS EXTENDED TO THE CEILING AND TO THE WALL FLARED OUT AND HILTI BOLTED TO THE STRUCTURE. TRAY j COVERAGE WAS SHIMMED OUT SO TRAY SUPPORT COULD BE COVERED. DCN 6987 UPGRADED ALL TRAY JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE I AND STAPLED. i 5 e a I

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H27 OF 1145 DCA/DCN BLDG' ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIlrTION/ ISSUE OF - SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN)- (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 92768/2 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION DETAILS ARE 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 19 NEEDED FOR COVERING CABLES 11-4,Il-5, WHERE THEY AIR DROP ACROSS Tile 14-1,15-1 SEISMIC GAP BETWEEN AUXILIARY AND UNIT 1 SAFEGUARDS BUILDINGS. RESOLUTION: THIS DCA ADDRESSED 4 INSTANCES WHF.RE THERE ARE AIR DROPS ACROSS A SEISMIC GAP INSIDE THE AUX. BUILDING. I CASE WAS MISTAKENLY ADDRESSED SINCE COVERAGE WAS NOT REQUIRED IN THE AUX. BLDG. AND 2 INSTANCES WERE REWORKED IN DCN 6995 WillCH SUPERSEDES TIIIS DCA. THE 1 REM AINING INSTANCE INVOLVED TRAY

T14BAEG18. COVERAGE IS PROVIDED BY WRAPPING 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND THE AIR DROPPING CABLES, a OVERLAPPING ONTO TRAY COVERAGE AT BOTII ENDS. OVERLAP COVERAGE , WAS PER TYPICAL DETAILS THEN UPGRADED WITH STAPLES PER DCN 4 6995. I 4

1 ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H28 OF 1145 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ~ SUPP. DET. DESCRIFFION/ ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N)' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-: FIRE SCHEMES H45) ' ZONE 92772/1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: 2 VERTICAL TRAYS AND A 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 51

                                 ,                        JUNCTION BOX LOCATED ALONG A            10-1, 10-2, W ALL CANNOT BE COVERED                 11-4 INDIVIDUALLY DUE TO CONGESTION AND INTERFERENCES.

RESOLUTION: JUNCTION BOX & TRAYS ARE COVERED IN A SINGLE ENVELOPE. ENCLOSURE INVOLVES MAINLY THE JUNCTION BOX AND A 24" TRAY SIDE BY SIDE WITH ONLY A MINOR AMOUNT OF COVERAGE ON THE OTHER TRAY. DCN 6993 UPGRADED THE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. 92791/1 AB 790' X-179 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: A PIPE SUPPORT FOR A 3" PIPE 9-1, 1-5, 43 X-180 INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON AN 9-3, 10-1, ESSENTIAL JUNCTION BOX. 10-2, 11-1, i Il-2,Il-4, RESOLUTION: THE PIPE SUPPORT IS 11-5, 13-2, COVERED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PER 14-1,15-1 TYPICAL DETAILS. THE PIPE IS ALSO WIT 111N 9" OF THE JUNCTION BOX SO IT ! I IS COVERED WITil 330-70 CERAMIC BLANKET OUT 9" TO 11" FROM THE SUPPORT, JACKETED WITil STAINLESS STEEL, THEN SEALED TO THE THERMO-LAG ON THE SUPPORT WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. l 6 I

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H29 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRitrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37 ' FIRE SCHEMES H45) - ZONE 92841/1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: STIFFENER FOR HVAC DUCT II-1,Il-2 1-5, 21

                                                                                                                        ,                       INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

RESOLUTION: 330-660 COVERAGE IS PROVIDED ON THE TRAY IN THE AREA OF Tile STIFFENER INTERFERENCES. i FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAPS THE 330-1 TRAY COVERAGE PER TYPICAL DETAILS ON BOTH SIDES. DCN 6993 UPGRADED COVERAGE BY STAPLING FLEXI-BLANKET TO 330-1 COVERAGE AT OVERLAPS. 92860/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING BETWEEN 10-1, 10-1, 1-5, 22 3 STACKED CABLE TRAYS INTERFERE 11-1, 11-2, WITil STANDARD COVERAGE ON TiiESE 11-4, 11-5, 3 TRAYS. 14-1,15-1 RESOLUTION: ALL TilREE TRAYS ARE BOXED TOGETHER. Tile TOP AND BOTTOM TRAYS ARE FIRE STOPPED 3 WHERE T11EY LEAVE THE ENCLOSURE (BOTil NONESSENTIAL). BOX BUTTS TO M-BOARD AT PENETRATION IN NORTH WALL. ALL JOINTS WERE UPGRADED WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES AND BAR CLAMPS (2) ARE I INSTALLED AT THE NORTH AND SOUTli END OF THE BOX TO HOLD THE BOTTOM PANEL IN PLACE. 4 1 9

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H30 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. -DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 92971/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: 3 STACKED HORIZONTAL CABLE 10-1, 10-1, 1-5, 23

                                                     ,                                       TRAYS AND 1 VERTICAL CABLE TRAY       11-1, 11-2, CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL         i1-4,Il-5, DETAILS DUE TO INTERFERENCES AND      14-1,15-1 CABLES AIR DROPPING BETWEEN TRAYS.

RESOLUTION: THE VERTICAL TRAY RUN ADJ ACENT TO THE HOR 17.ONTAL TRAYS AND AIR DROPS INTO THEM. TWO BOXES ARE INVOLVED,0NE INCLUDES THE TOP HORIZONTAL TRAY AND THE VERTICAL TRAY. THE OTHER INVOLVES Tile MIDDLE AND BOTTOM HORIZONTAL TRAYS AND THE VERTICAL TRAY. THE BOX COVERAGE CONTOURS TO THE ENCLOSED TRAYS EXCEPT FOR THE TOP PANEL ON THE TOP BOX AND THE SIDE PANEL BETWEEN THE VERTICAL TRAY AND THE BOTTOM OF THE BOTTOM TRAY WHICH ARE ANGLED TO ACCOMMODATE THE AIR DROPS. AIR DROPS TO THE MIDDLE TRAY ARE ENCLOSED IN FLEXI-BLANKET. THERE 15 A FIRE STOP AT THE NORTH END OF THE MIDDLE TRAY AND CABLES AIR DROPPING OUT OF THE SOUTH END OF THE TOP TRAY ARE COVERED IN FLEXI-BLANKET. DCN 6983 UPGRADED ALL JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES AND ALL AIR DROP TRAY INTERFACES WITH MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. THE FIRE STOP WAS REINFORCED WITH A BAR CLAMP. r r

l ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H31 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 93041/0 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: A CABLE TRAY AND AN AIR I1-1, 11-2, I-5, 24

                              ,                                                                                    DROP INTO THE TRAY CANNOT BE          Il-4,Il-5, COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE        13-2, 14-1, TO CABLE OVERFILL AT A TEE SECTION     15-1 ON THE TRAY.

4 RESOLUTION: THE AIR DROP BEDVEEN THE TRAYS IS WRAPPED IN FLEXI- , BLANKET AND OVERLAPPED ON THE I TRAY COVERAGE AT ONE END. THE OTHER END ENTERS TRAY COVERAGE AT A TEE SECTION. COVERAGE ON THE . TRAY HAS TO BE SHIMMED DUE TO CABLE OVERFILL. ALL JOINTS ARE REINFORCED AND THE TEE SECTION SHIMS ARE TIE WIRED TO THE SIDE PANELS. THE AIR DROP IS REINFORCED AT BOTH ENDS PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 93059/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 25 CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO INTERFERENCE FROM ANOTHER CONDUIT AND BUTTING TO 4 M-BOARD. RESOLUTION: THE 2 AIR DROPS ARE COVERED TOGETHER AT THE CABLE TRAY UNTIL THERE IS ADEQUATE SEPARATION TO WRAP THEM INDIVIDUALLY, BUTTING COVERAGE TO THE M-BOARD AT THE WALL PENETRATION. DCN 6995 UPGRADED THE AIR DROP TRAY INTERFACE WITH MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES.

-m

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H32 OF H45 i DCA/DCN BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV - AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST .(PAGES H37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE t 93117/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: A JUNCTION BOX DIRECTLY 9-1, 1-5, 26

                             ,                      ABOVE THE SLEEVES AND THE              9-3, 10-1,
,-                                                  ARRANGEMENT OF THE AIR DROP             10-2, Il-1, CABLES INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE          I l-2. I l-4, ON CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM THRU        11-5, 13-2, WALL SLEEVES TO A 24' CABLE TRAY.       14-1,15-1 RESOLUTION: COVERAGE IS PROVIDED FOR THE CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM THE WALL SLEEVES TO THE TRAY BY EXTENDING COVERAGE FROM Tile JUNCTION BOX ABOVE AND Tile CABLE TRAY TO ENVELOPE THE WALL SLEEVES. THE COVERAGE ON TOP OF THE TRAY IS ANGLED UP SLIGHTLY (1 1/4" UP) TO ACCOMMODATE AIR DROPPING CABLES. Tile COVERAGE IS BUTTED TO T11E WALL WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET COVERAGE ON THE TOP l                                                    AND SIDES OF THE JUNCTION BOX IS PER TYPICAL DETAIL AND THE TOP OF THE TRAY COVERAGE IS ONLY RAISED UP SLIGilTLY (1 1/4-). THE ACTUAL BOXED IN AREA BETWEEN THE TRAY AND Tile JUNCTION BOX IS ONLY 19" HIGH BY 10" WIDE BY 4'-0 LONG.

ATTACilMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2

UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H33 OF 1145 i

DCA/DCN - BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT- ' BASIS /NOT'dS i NO./REV AREA /. (YIN)- (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST (PAGES fi37-FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE. 93137/0 AB 852' X-241 AA21f Y Y ISSUE: TWO CONDUITS INTERFERE 11-1, 11-2, I-5, 27

                              ,                       WITH COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL         11-4,Il-5, CABLE TRAY.                           13-2, 14-1, 15-1 RESOLUTION: NORMAL TRAY COVERAGE WAS PROVIDED EXCEIrr IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE. THE TRAY TOP COVERAGE WAS NOTCHED IN THIS AREA AND A PIECE OF PANEL WAS ATTACHED TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE PANEL ON TOP OF THE TRAY USING TROWEL GRADE AND TIE W1RES. THE CONDUITS WERE COVERED AS PROTRUDING ITEMS AND TROWEL
,                                                     GRADE WAS USED TO COVER THE EXPOSED TRAY LIP. TRAY JOINTS WERE UPGRADED BY DCN 6996 PER TYPICAL DETAILS.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H34 OF H45 DCA/DCN - BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRililON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT , BASIS / NOTES - NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES H37- ' FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE i 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 28 93169/1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM A CONDUIT, RUN ALONG THE SIDE OF AN 13-2, 14-1, ESSENTIAL TRAY THEN INTO ANOTHER 15-1 ESSENTIAL TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: TIIE AIR DROP IS COVERED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET WHERE j IT PASSES BETWEEN THE ESSENTIAL i TRAY AND THE WALL AND THEN IT IS BOXED TO TiiE TRAY COVFRAGE BY EXTENDING TIIE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE TRAY COVERAGE TO Tile WALL AND INSTALLING SIDE PANELS UNDER COMPRESSION. DCN 6992 REINFORCED THE AIR DROP WHERE IT ENTERED AND LEFT THE ENCLOSURE AND REINFORCED Tile TRAY JOINTS PER TYPICAL DETAILS. DCN 4805, R1 AUX 810' X-207 AA216 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLED STRUCTURAL STEEL UL X-611 1-5,.45 SB 810' 2-082 2SB8 Y Y THERMO-LAG INTERFERES WITH FUSIBLE LINK INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION: REMOVE T-LAG AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THERM AL t LINK ASSEMBLY. DCN 7380, R4 SB 810' l-082 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE AIR 11-1,i1-2 1-5. 52 CWAR 309,375 SB 832' l-094 SB8 Y Y DROP PROTECTION IS LESS THAN 4" AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y MIN. REQUIRED. AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y AB 832' X-226 AA21d Y Y RESOLUTION: INSTALL ADDITIONAL AB 85 2' X-241 AA21f Y Y 330-660 M ATERIAL, SUCH THAT THE MIN. THICKNESS & LENGTH OF PROTECTION IS MET.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H35 OF H45 4 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES H37 - FIRE SCHEMES H45) ZONE 7437, R4 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: THERMO-LAG BARRIER HAS 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 46 ITEM I AB 810' X-207, AA21b Y Y SEPARATED FROM M-BOARD 15-1, 11-2, ONE FORM DCN AB 832' X-226 AA21d Y Y INTERFACE AT CORRIDOR WALLS. Il-4,II-5

AGAINST SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y DM 92-077 SG 790' 2-070 2SB4 Y Y RESOLUTION: REVISE DESIGN, PROVIDE SCOPE SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y NEW INSTALLATION DETAILS. BACKFIT (BASIC DESIGN) SG 810' 2-082 2SB8 Y Y BOTH UNIT I & 2 CONFIGURATIONS.

l SG 832' l-094 SB15 Y Y SG 832' l-094 2SB15 Y Y 7437. R4 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT SPACE TO 11-1, 14-1, I-5, 46, 47 ITEM 2 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y PROVIDE THE MINIMUM ALLOWED 15-1, 11-2, l CWAR 323,324, AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y COLLAR DIMENSION PER DETAILS 5-12.4 11-4, 11-5 358,398,366,372, AB 831' X-226 A A21d Y Y 406,412 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y RESOLUTION: ALLOW REDUCED AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y DIMENSION IN COLLAR WIDTH. AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ! 7437, R4 AB (II) 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: GAP BETWEEN TRAY ENVELOPE 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 47, 48, 49 ITEM 3 & M-BOARD IS GREATER THAN 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 315 ALLOWED PER DETAIL 5-12.4 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: REDUCE GAP BY INSTALLING ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 ACROSS THE TOP OF TRAY. t 7437,k4 AB (II) 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: T-LAG ENVELOPE IS . 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 49, 51 l ITEM 4 CONTINUOUS THROUGH THE FOAM 15-1, 11-2, , CWAR 362 BARRIER- 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: NO UPGRADE REQUIRED. 7437 R4 AB 831' 226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: WHAT T-LAG M ATERIAL MAY 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 46 ITEM 5 PENETRATE FOAM SEAL MATERIAL 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 429 11-4. Il-5 RESOLUTION: EITHER 330-1 OR 330-660.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H36 OF H45 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES 3' NOJREV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES H37-FIRE . SCHEMES H45) ZONE 4 j 7437, R4 AB (11) 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: LONG JOINT REINFORCEMENT 11-1, 14-1, I-5, 51 ITEM 6 , WAS NOT INSTALLED AS REQUIRED ON 15-1, Il-2, PAGE 68 TRAY, 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: "USE AS IS" MAJORITY OF UNREINFORCED JOINT IS COVERED W/330-660. 7437. R4 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 7 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y DEVIATIONS.

CWAR 451,454 RESOLUTICN: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS.

DCN 7437, R4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ISSUE: COLLAR DETAIL CANNOT BE 11-1, 14-1, I-5, 46 4 ITEM 8 INSTALLED WITH CURRENT 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 384 INSTALLATION CONTROLS. 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: PROVIDE MORE COMPREHENSIVE INSTRUCTIONS FOR STICK PINS AND COLLAR INSTALLATION. (GENERIC) 7437, R4 AB (U2) 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: COLLAR FASTENER TYPE TO BE 11-1,14-1, I-5, 46, 50 ITEM 9 USED AT T-LAG & GYPSUM BOARD 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 412 INTERFACE. 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: 1) AT T-LAG INTERFACE USE 1 1/4" #12 WOOD SCREW. 2) AT GYPSUM BOARD INTERFACE USE MOLY BOLT. I 1

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H37 OF 1145 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 1 CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 2 EFFECTIt E THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3 TIIE NATURE AND EFFEGIVENESS OF Tile SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE)IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS. , 4 THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTED WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5 Tile CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTEGION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. 6 SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR Tile PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH WOUED GENERIC ENilANCE THE EFFEGIVENESS OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, TORTURGUS PATH, ETC.). 7 SINGLE JUNCTION BOXES IN AN ENCLOSURE WITH A SINGLE LAYER OF THERMO-LAG PANEL 3 WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 10-2. 2 83342/3 LBDs IN A SINGLE ENCLOSURE WAS ALSO TESTED IN SCHEME 10-2. Tile LARGE AIR VOLUME AND THE MULTIPLE ENCLOSED COMMODITIES RESULTS IN A GREATER THERM AL MASS (WilEN COMPARED TO A SINGLE JB OR LBD) AND THUS RESULTS IN LOWER OVERALL INSIDE TEMPERATURES. THE BACK AND BOTTOM OF THE BOX ARE THE CONCRETE WALL AND FLOOR RESPECTIVELY WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE TO FIRE ON THESE SIDES AND ALSO ACTS AS A HEAT SINC. STRUGURE INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED BY INSTALLING THE PANELS AGAINST THE JUNCTION AND PULL BOXES AND ON THE FLOOR. /.! SO A PANEL HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE FLOOR BETWEEN THE FRONT PANEL AND THE CONDUITS GOING TEROUGli THE FLOOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE FRONT PANEL. PANELS ARE BANDED OR TIE WIRED TO THE JUNCTION AND PULL BOXES AND Tile INTERNAL CONDUITS. ALL ENCLOSURE JOINTS AND ALL CONDUITS LEAVING TIIE ENCLOSURE ARE REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. THIS INSTALLATION IS ACCElrTABLE. 8 THE INSTALLED CONFIGURATION INCLUDING THE REINFORCEMENT OF Tile JOINTS, THE UPGRADE OF Tile FIRE STOP AND 81380/0 THE WALL RESULT IN A DESIGN WillCH DEMONSTRATES A CONTINUITY OF MATERIAL, EFFEGIVE MATERIAL THICKNESS AND APPLICATION WlilCH IS CONSISTENT WITH TEST SCHEME 11-4. THE CONCRETE WALL PREVENTS EXPOSURE TO FIRE ON TH AT SIDE AND IT ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THE ENCLOSURE PROVIDES BOTH STRUCTURAL AND THERMAL INTEGRITY AND IS THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE. 9 THE BOX ENCLOSURE AND THE CONCRETE WALL PROVIDE THERM AL INTEGRITY WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH BOXED ON 83340/1 LBDs, JBs AND THE BOX ENCLOSURE TESTED IN SCHEMES 9-1,9-3,10-1. AND 10-2. THE UPGRADED JOINTS, THE INSTALLATION AGAINST THE UNISTRUT, THE FRONT PANEL IN COMPRESSION AND THE REINFORCEMENT OF CONDUITS AND PIPES WilERE THEY ENTER THE ENCLOSURE ALSO PROVIDES A STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY COMPARABLE TO TiiESE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

NITACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H38 OF H45 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 10 TIIE ORIGINAL INSTALLATION PLUS TliE UPGRADE RESULTS IN Tile LBDs BEING PROTECTED USING STANDARD DETAIL 6-1, 83356/0 EXPANDED TO FNCAPSULATE BOTH LBDs. STANDARD DETAIL 6-1 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN A'ITACHMENT G. THE BOX 84682/0 DESIGN USED TO PROTECT THESE LBDs CLOSELY RESEMBLE THE SAME TECIINIQUES USED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR 84866/0 JUNCTION BOXES AS WAS TESTED IN TEST SCHEME 10-1 AND 10-2. THE BOXING OF THE TWO LBDs TOGETHER IIAS BEEN i TESTED IN SCHEME 10-2. IT PRESENTS A GREATER THERM AL MASS (WHEN COMPARED TO A SINGLE LBD) AND THUS RESULTS IN LOWER OVERALL INSIDE TEMPERATURE. THE RESULTING PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE MAINTAINS Tile MINIMUM MATERIAL i THICKNESS. THE MATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE OF THE FIRE BARRIER IS j CONSISTENT WITH Tile TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THIS INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 11 THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO TYPICAL DETAIL 13-4. CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES USING V-GROOVED 86194/0 FLAT BOARD liAVE BEEN QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES 86764/0 l QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. FOR THERM AL CONSIDERATIONS, THE CORNER OR S!DE OF THE TRAY WHERE TIIE 89858/0 INTERFERENCE IS LOCATED liAS BOTli EXTERNAL 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET Wmi TFoWEL GR.ADE MATERIAL AND 330-1 FLAT 92580/0 PANELS INSTALLED AS CLOSE TO Tile PIPE AS POSSIBLE. TiiE MINOR GAP IN EXTEmAL COVERAGE IS COMPENSATED BY THE 330-1 PANELS INSTALLED ON Tile INSIDE OF Tile CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL THE COMBINATION OF THESE TWO PROVIDE ENHANCED PROTECTION IN Tills AREA. IN ADDITION TiiE INTERFERENCE WILL PROVIDE SHIELDING AND AN ADDITIONAL j HEAT SINK IN Tile AREA OF CONCERN. THE COMBINATION OF THESE FEATURES ALONG WITH TIE WIRES AND BANDING WILL l PROVIDE EQUIVALENT OR BE' ITER PROTECTION OF THE ENVELOPE TIIAN TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 12 Tile TRAY COVERAGE EXCEPT AT TiiE INTERFERENCE IS INSTALLED AND UPGRADED PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE 89855/0 TilERM AL INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED AT Tile INTERFERENCE BY M AINTAINING MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND BY MAINTAINING M ATERIAL CONTINUITY BY

STITCHING" THE BOTTOM OF Tile BOX TO THE SIDES AND OVERLAPPING THE TOP OF TiiE TRAY OVER THE BOX AND SEALING THE TROWEL GRADE. THE INTERFERING PIPE AND HANGER WILL SHIELD THIS AREA AND ACT AS A HEAT SINK. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS M AINTAINED BY THE METilOD OF ATTACHING TIIE BOX TO Tile TRAY COVERAGE Tile SM ALL SIZE OF TiiE BOX AND THE FACT TH AT THE BOX IS RECESSED INTO THE TRAY AND SIIIELDED BY Tile 4* PIPE AND THE TRAY COVERAGE ITSELF.

13 THIS IS JUST AN EXTENSION (3* TO 4*) OF THE STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE TO Tile CONCRETE BEAM. Tile TilERM AL AND 89513/0 STRUCTUR.AL INTEGRITY OF THE ENCLOSURE IS M AINTAINED BY BANDING TIIE ENCLOSURE TO TiiE TRAY, UPGRADING THE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES WHICH IN ESSENCE ADDS AN ADDITIONAL TlilCKNESS OF COVERAGE TO Tile SIDES OF THE ENCLOSURE IN ADDITION TO REINFORCING TiiE JOINTS. THE CONCRETE BEAM ON TOP AND THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE CONCRETE WALL ON Ti1E SOUTH SIDE SHIELDS THE ENCLOSURE AND ACTS AS IIEAT SINKS. THERE IS CONTINUITY OF MATERIAL AND THE THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND IN MANY CASES ENilANCED AND THE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR TiiE ENCLOSURE IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 14 THE CABLES BEING COVERED BY THIS DCA ARE NONESSENTIAL. Tile TilERMO-LAG ENCLOSURE ONLY llAS TO COVER THESE 89750/0 CABLES AND DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVIDE A FIRE RATED BARRIER FOR Tile ENCLOSED CABLES SINCE TilEY ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR SAFE SliUTDOWN. THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY THIS DCA ACCOMPLISHES THE OBJECTIVE AND IS THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H39 OF H45 e 4 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 15 THIS INSTALLATION IS PER TYPICAL DETAILS 3-5,7-1 AND 5-12. THE COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS IS 89751/0 A TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile OVERLAP OF 330460 ONTO CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES Tile SAME INSTALLATION TECIINIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC.) USED FOR CONDUITS AND JUST MODIFIES THEM TO ALLOW FOR THE CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS. THE USE OF 330460 THERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. THE USE OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINTS WAS AILSO QUALIFIED BY SCHEME 11-1 AND 11-2. THE USE OF 330460 TROWEL FILLET AT THE TRANSITION BETWEEN 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AND CONCRETE WILL PROVIDE A POSITIVE SEAL TO THE PROTECTED

ENVELOPE AT Tills TRANSITION. FOR TIIERM AL CONSIDERATIONS TIIE CONCRETE AT THE TRANSITION WILL PROVIDE A l HEAT SINK AND REDUCED HEAT EXPOSURE TO THE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. IN ADDITION THE FLEXI-BLANKET IS ATTACHED

! IN ACCORDANCE WITil DETAll 3-5 TO THE RACEWAY. THIS MECHANICAL MEANS OF ATTACHMENT TO THE RACEWAY WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1 AND 11-2. FOR Tile CRITICAL TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS, Tills ASSEMBLY IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE. 16 THE TRAY COVERAGE IS PER TYPICAL DETAILS EXCEPT THAT THE LONGITUDINALJOINTS NEXT TO THE WALL HAVE BEEN 89993/3 ELIMINATED BY THE ADDITION OF SIDE PANELS INSTALLED OVER THE EXISTING PANELS AND BUTTED TO THE WALL WITil A TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE WALL. Tile JOINTS ARE REINFORCED AND Tile WALL INTERFACE ARE PER TYPICAL DETAILS. THE SPRINKLER PIPE IS COVERED SIMILAR TO ANY OTHER PROTRUDING ITEM. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND M AINTAINS BOTH THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE. THE CONCRETE WALL SHIELDS THE ENCLOSURE AND ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK. 17 THE ARRANGEMENT OF FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPPED CABLES IN AN EXPOSED CABLE TRAY WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 15-2. 91882/0 HOWEVER. SINCE THE ARR ANGEMENT INVOLVES 2 LARGE BUNDLES (9" DIAMETER) CONTAINING MULTIPLE CABLES INSTEAD 92684/0 l OF A SINGLE CABLE (CONSIDERABLE MORE THERM AL M ASS), VERTICAL ORIENTATION INSTEAD OF HORIZONTAL AND THE REINFORCEMENT OF THE BUNDLES WHERE THEY ENTER THE 330-1 TRAY COVERAGE WITH A STEEL MESH, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLE COLLAR (BOTH ENDS), THIS CONFIGUR ATION MORE CLOSELY RESEMBLES TEST SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2. ALSO THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE BACK OF THE TRAY TO THE CONCRETE WALL WOULD SHIELD THE BUNDLES AND ACT AS A HEAT SINK. } IS THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACTUALLY A COMBINATION OF TWO TYPICAL DETAILS (1-5 AND 13-2) WHICH ARE EVALU ATED 92744/0 j SEPARATELY IN ATTACHMENT A. THE USE OF HILTI BOLTS TO SECURE PORTIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FLARED

OUT ONTO THE CONCRETE WALL PROVIDES POSITIVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT AND IS AN ENHANCEMENT. THE JOINT j UPGRADE TESTS FOR ALL CABLE TRAYS AS WELL AS QUALIFICATION OF THE 9" CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION IS i BOUNDED BY THE TEST SCHEMES INDICATED. ADDITIONALLY, THE CONCRETE WALL PREVENTS EXPOSURE ON ONE OF THE TWO LARGEST SURFACES AND H AS IIEAT SINK EFFECTS. THEREFORE, BASED ON THE THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS DISCUSSED ABOVE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.

19 THE COVERAGE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE OVERLAP OF 330460 ONTO 92768/2 f CABLE TRAY COVERAGE UTILIZES THE SAME INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC.) USED FOR CONDUITS AND JUST MOD!FIES THEM TO ALLOW FOR CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS. CABLE TRAY COVERAGE WAS UPGRADED AT THE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS PER TYPICAL DETAILS. THE RESULTING

CONFIGUR ATION PROVIDES BOTH STRUCTURAL AND THERM AL INTEGRITY AND IS THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.

, ATTACllMENT II ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H40 OF H65 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/PEV 20 TiiE BOX COVERS A WALL MOUNTED JUNCTION BOX AND A VERTICAL TRAY ADJACENT TO IT. THE SECOND TRAY HAS ONLY 92772/1 A MINOR AMOUNT OF COVERAGE IN THE BOX. SINGLE JUNGION BOXES IN AN ENCLOSURE WITH A SINGLE LAYER OF THERMO-LAG PANELS WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 10-2. 2 LBDs IN A SINGLE ENCLOSURE WAS ALSO TESTED IN SCllEME 10-2. THE 4 LARGE AIR VOLUME AND THE MULTIPLE ENCLOSURE COMMODITIES RESULTS IN A GREATER THERMAL M ASS (WHEN COMPARED TO A SINGLE JB OR LBD) AND THUS RESULTS IN LOWER OVERALL TEMPERATURES. THE BACK OF THE BOX IS THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EkPOSURE TO FIRE ON THIS SIDE AND ALSO ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. STRUGURE INTEGRITY IS M AINTAINED BY INSTALLING THE PANELS AGAINST THE JUNGION AND CABLE TRAY. PANELS ARE BANDED OR TIE WIRED TO THE JUNCTION AND CABLE TRAY. ALL ENCLOSURE JOINTS AND ALL CONDUITS LEAVING THE ENCLOSURE ARE REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. T111S INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 21 Tile. COVERAGE OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON AIR DROPS AND OVERLAPPING ONTO 330-1 CONDUIT COVERAGE IS A TESTED 92841/1 CONFIGURATION. THE OVERLAP ONTO CABLE TRAY COVERAGE AND Tile COVERAGE ON THE TRAY UTILIZES THE SAME INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC.) USED FOR CONDUITS AND AIR DROPS AND JUST MODIFIES THEM TO ALLOW FOR CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES. THE CABLE TRAY WILL AFFORD GREATER AIR VOLUME AND GREATER THERM AL M ASS THAN AN AIR DROP CABLE AND THUS RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. THE COVERAGE IS OVERLAPPED AT THE SIDE RAILS WHICil PROVIDES GREATER MATERIAL TillCKNESS IN THIS AREA. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE WRAPPED TRAY WOULD ALSO BE GREATER THAN Tile AIR DROP CABLES. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 22 THIS BOX CONFIGURATION CONFORMS TO TiiE CONTOUR OF Tile ENCLOSED TRAYS WHICH PROVIDES SUPPORT. ALL JOINTS 92860/0 ARE REINFORCED PER TESTED CONFIGURATION. IN ADDITION BAP CLAMPS ARE USED AT BOTH ENDS OF THE ENCLOSURE TO KEEP THE BOTTOM AND SIDE PANELS FROM SAGGING. THE INTERFACE WITil THE M BOARD PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL AND THE WALL REDUCES THE EXPOSURE TO A FIRE. TliE RESULTING ENCLOSURE IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS BOTil STRUCTURALLY AND THERM ALLY. 23 THIS INVOLVES 2 SEPARATE BOX ENCLOSURES WITli CABLE AIR DROPS. BOTH THE BOXES AND THE AIR DROPS ARE COVERED 92971/0 CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE BOXES CONTOUR TO THE PROTECTED TRAYS WITH A FEW MINOR EXCEPTIONS TO ACCOMMODATE AIR DROPS AND PROVIDES A GOOD SUPPORT STRUCTs)RE FOR THE BOXE- BOTH THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE M AINTAINED. 24 THE SHIMMING OF THE TEE TO ACCOMMODATE THE TRAY OVERFILL M AINTAINS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY WITH SHIMS 93041/0 INSTALLED FROM THE TOP OF THE TRAY SIDE RAILS TO THE TOP OF THE TRAY COVERAGE AND TIE WIRED TO THE SIDE PANELS. THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME ENHANCES THE THERM AL INTEGRITY. TiiE AIR DROPS ARE REINFORCED AT BOTH ENDS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. ALTHOUGH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR OVERLAP OF FLEXI-BLANKET ON 330-1 INVOLVED CONDUIT COVERAGE, THE INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES ARE THE SAME ONLY MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE THE TRAY CONFIGURATION. 25 THE UPGRADE OF THE INTERFACE AT THE CABLE TRAY WHERE THE AIR DROPS ARE WRAPPED TOGETHER 15 CONSISTENT 93059/0 WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE REINFORCEMENT COVERS THE CABLES WHERE THEY ARE WRAPPED TOGETHER, TilEN INDIVIDUALLY WHERE THEY ARE COVERED SEPARATELY. THE FLEXI-BLANKET BUTTING TO THE M-BOARD WITH TROWEL GRADE FILLET PROVIDES A GOOD POSITIVE SEAL. THE THERM AL AND STRUGURAL INTEGRITY HAS BEEN M AINTAINED. 9 4

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE 1141 OF H45 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 26 THE BOX ENCLOSURE IS ONLY AN EXTENSION OF THE TESTED CONFIGURATION ON JUNCTION BOXES AND CABLE TRAYS. THE 93117/0 BOXED AREA IS SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE JUNCTION BOX, CABLE TRAY AND CONCRETE WALL THIS WILL SillELD THIS AREA AND Tile CONCRETE WALL WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. THE ADDITIONAL MASS AND AIR VOLUME WILL ENHANCE THE TIIERMAL INTEGRITY OF Tile ENCLOSURE. THE CONCRETE WALL INTERFACE PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL AND ALL JOINTS ARE REINFORCED CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED INSIDE THE ENCLOSURE BY INSTALLING AGAINST THE JUNCTION BOX AND TRAY WITli UNSUPPORTED SECTIONS EASILY BOUNDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 27 TiiE MODIFIED COVERAGE ON TOP OF THE TRAY AND THE COVERAGE OF TiiE INTERFERING CONDUITS AS A PROTRUDING 93137/0 ITEM RESULTS IN A PROTECTED ENVELOP WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE CONTINUITY OF __ MATERIAL IS M AINTAINED IN THE RECESSED AREA WITH TIE WIRES AND TROWEL GRADE AND THE TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP IS CONFINED TO THE TOP OF TiiE TRAY BOUNDED BY THE COVERAGE ON Tile TRAY AND THE COVERAGE ON TiiE CONDUITS. TRAY JOINTS ARE UPGRADED CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION M AINTAINS HOTH STRUCTURAL AND THERMAL INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE. 28 THE RESULTING ENCLOSURE IS A MINOR EXTENSION OF THE TRAY COVERAGE. THE WALL INTERFACE PROVIDES A POSITIVE 93169/1 SEAL AND THE UPGRADES AT THE AIR DROPS ENTRY AND EXIT FROM THE TRAY COVERAGE ARE CONSISTENT WITH TESTED . CONFIGURATIONS. TiiE CONCRETE WALL WILL SHIELD THIS ENCLOSURE AND ACT AS A HEAT SINK. THE REMAINDER OF TIIE TRAY COVERAGE IS INSTALLED CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BOTil THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE M AINTAINED WITH THIS INSTALLATION. 29 THE RESULTING ENCLOSURE IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE SHIMMING PROVIDES ADDITIONAL 91235/1 THERMO-LAG M ATERIAL INSIDE THE ENVELOPE AND THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME ENilANCES THE THERM AL INTEGRITY. THE SHIMMING ALSO M AINTAINS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. THE CABLE TRAY JOINT, AIRDROP AND' FIRE STOP UPGRADED ARE CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 30 THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE TRAY COVERAGE IS SHIMMED WITH 92205/l THERMO-LAG. THE ADDITIONAL THERMO-LAG ON THE INSIDE OF THE TRAY COVERAGE PLUS THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME ENHANCES THE TiiERM AL INTEGRITY. THE SHIMMING ALSO M AINTAINS STRUCTUR AL INTEGRITY OF THE SIDE PANELS. THE UPGRADE AT THE TRAY JOINTS AND THE AIR DROP ARE CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 31 THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE WITH THE UPGRADES PROVIDES A PROTECTED ENVELOPE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH TiiE 92295/0 TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE 2 WIDE PANEL, HILTI BOLTED TO THE WALL AT THE TRAY COVERAGE INTERFACE ENHANCES THE ATTACHMENT TO THE CONCRETE AND ALSO SERVES AS AN ANCHOR POINT FOR THE STRESS SKIN ON THE TRAY JOINTS. THE CONCRETE WALL ELIMINATES FIRE EXPOSURE TO ONE SIDE OF THE TRAY AND WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. THE THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY HAVE BEEN M AINTAINED. 32 THIS DCA APPLIES TO THE PORTION OF THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE WHICH IS INTERNAL TO THE PENETRATION SEAL. THE 92383/0 COVERAGE OF THE TWO TRAYS IN A COMMON ENVELOPE PROVIDES ACCEPTABLE COVERAGE ESPECI ALLY SINCE THERE IS NO FIRE EXPOSURE TO THE TRAY. THE ABILITY OF THE PENETRATION SEAL TO PERFORM ITS FUNCTION IS NOT IMPAIRED BECAUSE THE 2 TRAYS WRAPPED TOGETHER IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COVERAGE ON A SINGLE TRAY PASSING THROUGH THE PENETRATION AND HAS BEEN TESTED ON ALL OF THE CONFIGURATIONS.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H42 OF H45 NOTE ACCElrTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 33 THE CABLE TRAY AND AIR DROPS ARE NOT ESSENTIAL AND ARE BEING COVERED WITH TilERM-LAG ONLY TO REDUCE 92535/0 EXPOSED COMBUSTIBLES IN THE ROOM. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR THIS ENCLOSURE TO PROVIDE A FIRE RATED 92566/0 BARRIER. Tile ENCLOSURE ACCOMPLISHES THIS OBJECTIVE BY COMPLETELY COVERING THE CABLES. 92586/0 34 THE USE OF V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY NUMEROUS TESTS. ALL 92541/0 CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING TilOSE ON TIIE BOX AROUND TifE AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECliNIQUES QUALIFIED BY FIRE TESTS. THE TilERMO-LAG TO CONCRETE FLOOR AND WALL PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL AND TIIE CONCRETE WALL AND FLOOR WILL REDUCE TIIE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE COVERAGE AND ACT AS A HEAT SINK. THE COVERAGE OUT ONTO T11E NONESSENTIAL TRAY WlilCli RESULTS IN PROTECTION OF Tile PROTRUDING ITEM FOR AT LEAST 9* ALONG TILE CONDUCTIVE PATII IS CONSISTENT WITH PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE IN ALL OF THE TESTING. TIIE PROTECTION OF THE OTilER SUPPORT FOR ONLY 5" IS JUSTIFIED BY ENGINEERING CALCULATION ME-CA-0000-2062 WHIC!! ALLOWS USE OF Tile "5 INCH RULE" WHEN CONFIGURATIONS MEET ESTABLISilED MINIMUM CRITERIA SUCH AS A MINIMUM PERCENT TRAY FILL TO ESTABLISH EQUIVALENT PROTECTION TO REDUCE IIEAT PROPAGATION INTO Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE. 35 TifE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ONLY A MINOR DEVIATION TO STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE. MATERIAL T111CKNESS AND 92545/1 CONTINUITY ARE M AINTAINED AND THE INSTALLATION IS ENHANCED DUE TO THE IIEAT SINK PROVIDED BY THE PIPE. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS NOT AFFECTED. DCN 6912 UPGRADES THE AREA WITH STRESS SKIN, TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES SINCE IT IS LOCATED ON THE SIDE RAIL PROTECTION AT A LONGITUDINAL JOINT. 36 Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE UPGRADES ON THE BOX, AIR DROP 92555/0 AND TRAYS ARE PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE BOX AROUND THE CONDUIT IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF THE JUNCTION BOX COVERAGE WHICII RESULTS IN GREATER AIR VOLUME WHICH ENHANCES THE TilERMAL INTEGRITY. THE ORIGINAL INSTALLATION AND TI1E UPGRADES M AINTAIN Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE ENCLOSURE. 37 THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION WITH UPGRADES PROVIDED IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGUhATIONS. JOINTS AND 92556/I AIR DROPS ARE REINFORCED AND WALL INTERFACES PROVIDE A POSITIVE SEAL. THE CONCRETE WALL LIMITS T11E EXPOSED AREA OF THE ENCLOSURES AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THE CONTINUITY OF M ATERIAL. M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND END USE OF THE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE UPGRADES ON THE ENCLOSURES AND THE INSTALLATION OVER THE JUNCTION BOX, CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS WITH MINOR EXTENSIONS TO COVER AIR DROPS PROVIDES STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TO THE ENCLOSURES. THE ADDITIONAL AIR VOLUME WILL ALSO ENHANCE THE THERM AL INTEGRITY. 38 THE BOX ENCLOSURES AS UPGRADED ARE CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE CONTINUITY OF MATERIAL, 92585/2 M ATEPIAL THICKNESS AND END USE ARE CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE INSTALLATION OVER THE TRAYS AND TRAYS SUPPORTS AND THE WALL AND CEILING PROVIDES GOOD SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR THE ENCLOSURE. THERE IS A POSITIVE SEAL AT THE WALL AND CEILING AND THE CONCRETE LIMITS THE EXPOSED SURFACES AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THE THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE ENCLOSURE IS M AINTAINED.

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-032, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H43 OF 1145 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 39 THE COVERAGE OF TiiESE AIR DROPS AND TiiE UPGRADES PERFORMED AT THE 330/1-330-660 INTERFACES RESULTS IN A 92588/2 CONFIGURATION WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEX NATURE AND SIZE OF THESE AIR DROPS SPECIAL CARE WAS TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE AIR DROPS WERE PROPERLY COVERED. ADDITIONAL TROWEL GRADE WAS APPLIED TO EACH LAYER OF Tile FLEXI-BLANKET AND ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENTS WERE PROVIDED AT TRAY AND CONDUIT INTERFACES TO ENSURE THAT TilERE WAS CONTINUITY OF COVERAGE AND THAT PROPER M ATERIAL THICKNESS WAS M AINTAINED IN ORDER TO M AINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. Tills, COUPLED WITil THE ADDITIONAL M ASS, ALSO MAINTAINED TIIE THERMAL INTEGRITY OF TllE ENVELOPE. 40 THE COVERAGE PROVIDED FOR ISSUES 2,3, & 4 WERE PER TYPICAL DETAILS SO NO JUSTIFICATION IS REQUIRED. 83356/0 41 Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE STAINLESS STEEL BOX WILL PROVIDE 92705/0 STRUCTUR AL STABILITY SIMILAR TO A CABLE TRAY AND THIS ENCLOSURE SITS IN Tile CABLE TRAY SO Tile TRAY AND TiiE SEAL IN THE BLOCKOUT WILL KEEP TiiE ENCLOSURE RIGID. Ti1E COVERAGE EXTENDS 9" TO 11" INTO TiiE STANDARD TRAY COVERAGE SO THE TRAY IS BEING TREATED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE JOINTS ARE PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND BEING LOCATED AT A CONCRETE WALL WILL HAVE A SillELDING EFFECT AND TiiE WALL WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK. BOTH THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS M AINTAINED. 42 THERE IS A MINOR REDUCTION IN COVER AGE AT THE PolNT Wl1ERE THE 4" CONDUIT AND 10' PIPE CROSS. THERE IS NO 89857/1 CONTACT BETWEEN THE PIPE AND Tile CONDUlT. THERMO. LAG COVERAGE ON THE CONDUIT IS BUTTED TO Tile PIPE AND ALL VOIDS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE SEALING THE COVERAGE TO THE PIPE AND MINIMIZING THE DEVIATION. Tile 330-70 INSULATION WITH THE STAINLESS STEEL J ACKET INSTALLED ON THE PIPE AND BUTTED TO THE CONDUIT COVERAGE WillLE NOT A FIRE RATED M ATERIAL. IS A NON COMBUSTIBLE CERAMIC M ATERIAL WHICil WILL WITHSTAND CONTINUOUS TEMPERATURES OF 2300*F SO IT WILL STAY INTACT IN A FIRE. THE INSULATED PIPE WILL PROVIDE AN EXCELLENT SHIELD AND THE INSULATING PROPERTIES OF THE 330-70 BLANKET AND TiiE HEAT SINK OF Tile 10" PIPE WILL PROTECT T11E CONDUIT. THE THERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF TiiE COVERAGE IS M AINTAINED. 43 SINCE THIS SUPPORT IS AN INTERFERENCE TO THE COVERAGE ON THE JUNCTION BOX, THERE IS NO DIRECT CONTACT WITH 92791/1 TiiE BOX AND AT MOST, TilERE WOULD BE ONLY A SINGLE POINT CONTACT BETWEEN THE PIPE AND SUPPORT, TilERE IS NOT A GOOD CONTINUOUS CONDUCTIVE PATH BETWEEN THE PIPE AND THE JUNCTION BOX. ALSO THE 330-70 INSULATION ON THE PIPE. WHILE NOT A FIRE RATED M ATERIAL. IS A NONCOMBUSTIBLE. CERAMIC M ATERIAL WHICli WILL WITHSTAND CONTINUOUS TEMPERATURES OF 2300*F AND WILL STAY INTACT IN A FIRE. THE INSULATED PIPE WILL SHIELD TiiE SUPPORT AND THE INSULATING PROPERTIES OF THE BLANKET AND THE HEAT SINK OF THE PIPE WILL LIMIT THE HEAT TRANSMITTED TO THE SUPPORT. THE TilERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE COVERAGE IS M AINTAINED. 44 THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE IS RECESSED INTO THE WALL WITH CONCRETE FOR SIDES AND A PENETRATION SEAL IN BACK 91416/0 LEAVING TiiERMO-LAG COVERAGE ONLY ON ONE SIDE. Tills ENCLOSURE IS SUBSTANTIALLY SHIELDED FROM ANY FIRE 92200/0 EXPOSURE AND Tl!E CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. PENETRATING ITEMS INTO THE ENCLOSURE IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE ESSENTI AL COMMODITY ARE COVERED 9 TO II" AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. OTHER NON-ESSENTIAL ITEMS ARE NOT COVERED AS PROTRUDING ITEMS BUT THERE IS NO DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE ESSENTIAL ITEM AND THEY ARE SUFFICIENTLY REMOTE FROM THE ESSENTIAL ITEM SO AS NOT TO REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT HEAT PATH. THE ENCLOSURE M AINTAINS THE TilERM AL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE.

i I ATTACHMENT 11 ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H44 OF 1145 ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV NOTE THERE IS A CONVOLUTED HEAT PATH FROM THE LOCALIZED TillNNED SPOT, THROUGH THE CONDUIT (WHICH SERVES AS A DCN 45 LONG IIEAT SINK TO DRAW AWAY FROM THE TilINNED AREA), THROUGli THE REMAINING THERMO-LAG TillCKNESS, AND 4805/1 EIT11ER THROUGH THE GROUT OR TIIROUGli ADDITIONAL TilERMO-LAG BEFORE REACilING THE BEAM. WITH THE RELATIVE M ASSIVE SIZE OF THE BEAM, ITS IIEAT CAPACITY AND ABILITY TO CONDUCT llEAT AWAY FROM Tile LOCAL AREA, AND Tile CONVOLUTION FACTORS DISCUSSED, TIIE ADDED HEAT TO THE BEAM UNDER FIRE CONDITIONS, DUE TO Tile PARTIALLY TillNNED AREA, IS NEGLIGlBLE. Tile AMOUNT OF THERMO-LAG REMOVED FROM TiiE DOOR FRAME IIEADER IS NEGLIGIBLE. THE FIRE R.ATING OF Tile DOOR ASSEMBLY DOES NOT RELY UPON T11E TIIERMO-LAG OVERLAPPING THE UPPER PART OF Tile DOOR FRAME HEADER AND THE APPLIED GROUT PROVIDES ADEQUATE INSULATION OF Tile BEAM FROM TiiE DOOR FRAME. THEREFORE, Tile FIRE RATING OF Ti1E DOOR ASSEMBLY IS NOT AFFECTED BY THE PARTIAL REMOVAL OF THERMO-LAG IN THIS AREA. THEREFORE, T11E REMOVAL OF THE DESCRIBED THERMO-LAG IS ACCEPTABLE. DCN 46 THE DESIGN CHANGE PROVIDED MEETS THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF TiiE TiiERMO-LAG PROTECTION. A MINIMUM 1/2" 7437/4 TIIICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG MATERIAL IS PROVIDED FOR A I HOUR FIRE BARRIER. JOINT AND SEAM UPGRAFeS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED UP TO THE AREA OF THE WALL PENETRATION THE THERMO-LAG COLLAR ARRANGEMENT AND THE ARRANGEMENT OF THERMO-LAG EMBEDDED INTO M-BOARD BOTil MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF THERMAL AND SEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS. THESE DETAILS WILL ALLOW MINOR BUILDING / CABLE TRAY (OR CONDUIT) MOVEMENT WHILE M AINTAINING Ti1E INTEGRITY OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE, THEREFORE, Tills CH ANGE IS ACCEPTABLE. DUE TO AN EXISTING COMMODITY PENETRATING THE M-BOARD, A DEVIATION FROM Tile MINIMUM DIMENSION IS REQUIRED DCN 47 7437/4 AND AUT110RIZED WHERE ALLOWARLE. SINCE ALL OTliER ATTRIBUTES (INCLUDING Tile PENETRATING ITEM) REM AIN UNCilANGED THE ARRANGEMENT OF THERMO-LAG EMBEDDED INTO M-BOARD PROVIDES NO REDUCTION IN PROTECTION AND MINIMIZES TiiE IMPACT OF Ti1ERM AL AND SEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS. DCN 48 DOUBLING THE THERMO-LAG TOP PANEL DOES NOT VIOLATE T11E INTENDED SCOPE OF THE TYPICAL DETAIL AND DOES NOT 7437/4 REPRESENT A DEVIATION. CONVERSELY. IT DOUBLc5 THE AMOUNT OF THERMO-LAG NECESSARY TO ACHIEVF A ONE ilOUR B AR RIER. DCN 49 Tile PURPOSE OF THE LONGITUDIN AL JOINT UPGRADE IS TO PROVIDE A PHYSICAL MEANS (IN ADDITION TO BANDING) OF llOLDING THE TiiERMO-LAG TOP, BOTTOM AND SIDE PANELS TOGETHER DURING A FIRE SCENARIO. FIRE TESTING OF 7437/4 TYPICAL TilERMO-LAG PROTECTED CABLE TRAYS, IDENTIFIED TH AT ON LONGITUDIN AL TRAV RUNS WHERE Tile JOINTS WERE NOT REINFORCED.THd BANDS WOULD HEAT UP AND EXPAND AND THE PANELS WOULD PULL AWAY FROM ONE ANOTHER. FURTilER TESTING RESULTED IN AN UPGRADE TECHNIQUE CONSISTING OF APPLYING THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL ONTO Tile PANELS. FASTENING STRESS SKIN OVER THE THERMO-LAG ONTO Ti1E PANELS AND COVERING THE STRESS SKIN IN MORE TROWEL GR ADE. THIS METilOD OF UPGRADE WAS SUCCESSFULLY TESTED (NOTE: DURING TESTING A 6' OMISSION OF STRESS SKIN WAS INCLUDED DUE TO A H ANGER OBSTRUCTION). IN TIIE IDENTIFIED FIELD CONDITION. THE SOUTH END OF THE THREE TRAYS. WHILE NOT REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN, ARE WRAPPED WITil 2 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET (IN ITSELF A ONE HOUR FIRE BARRIER) THE NORTH END OF THE TRAYS ARE BOUNDED BY THERMO-LAG COLLARS. ANCHORED TO THE WALL AND BY 10 INCHES OF FOAM PENETRATION SEAL M ATERIAL THE ONLY EXPOSED PORTION OF NON-REINFORCED LONGITUDINAL JOINT IS THREE INCHES (M AXIMUM) WHICH WHEN COMPARED TO THE TES TED CONFIGUR ATION IS NEGLIGlBLE

.a

ATTACHMENT H ER-ME-082, REV. 2 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE H45 OF H45 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES. DCA/REV. 50 WHILE THE TYPICAL DETAIL DESIGNATES STICK PIN FASTENERS, OTHER SUBSTANTIAL FASTENING METHODS ARE EMPLOYED DCN IN OTHER THERMO-LAG ARRANGEMENTS INCLUDING HILTI BOLTS, MOLY BOLTS, WOOD SCREWS, ETC. TIIESE ARE ALL 7437/4 ACCElrTED METHODS OF INSTALLATION AND MAY BE USED WilERE CONDITIONS WARRANT. 51 THERMO-LAG ARRANGEMENTS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAILS. NO DEVIATIONS OR UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS DCN ARE IDENTIFIED TilEREFORE TIIIS INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 7437/4 52 TIIIS INSTALLATION MAINTAINS THE MINIMUM M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS. ADHESION OF Ti1E DCN 330-660 BUILD-UP TO TiiE EXISTING AIR DROP PROTECTION IS ACCOMPLISHED BY PRE-BUTTERING THE 330460 PANELS WITil 7380/4 TROWEL GRADE AND SPLICING EXISTING AND NEW WRAPS OF TiiERMO-LAG 330-660 TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL LAYERS OF THERMO-LAG 330-660. AS A RESULT, THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE INSTALLATION IS M AINTAINED. TIIEREBY ALLOWING TIIE MATERIAL TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED. THE INSTALLATION OF THE THERMO-LAG MATERIALS AS DESIGNED HEREIN IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE. CWAR 309 & 375: IN THIS DESIGN CHANGE THE FUNCTION OF THE THIRD LAYER OF 330-660 IS SIMPLY TO HOLD THE FIRE BARRIER REPAIR M ATERIAL IN PLACE. FLARING THE THIRD LAYER OF 330-660 OUT ONTO THE INTERFERING ITEM AT THE POINT OF ZERO CLEARANCE DOES AFFECT Tile PERFORMANCE OF Tile THIRD LAYER OF M ATERIAL IN ITS STATED CAPACITY. Tile RESTORATION OF Tile FIRE BARRIER ITSELF IS ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. s

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE 11 OF 119 t ATTACIIN1ENT I MINOR PROTECTED COAIMODITY DEVIATIONS

l AlTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 12 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG EI.EV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF- SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 84868/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY HAS 14-1, 15-1,

                          ,                         INTERFERENCES FROM FIRE                                            Il-2 Il-4, PROTECTION PIPE, ANGLE IRON AND                                    11-5 NONESSENTIAL CONDUIT.

RESOLUTION: 1) WHERE A FIRE l-5.7 PROTECTION PIPE IS A INTERFERENCE AT THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL USE 330-1 FLAT PANEL IN THIS AREA TO PROTECT THE CABLE.

2) WilERE A HANGER ANGLE IS A 1-5,8 INTERFERENCE AT Tile CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL, PROTECT THE HANGER ANGLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM.

3) WHERE A CONDUIT IS AN- 1-5,9 INTERFERENCE TO THE INSTALLATION OF PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION,

INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE 9"-11' . PROTECTION FROM THE ESSENTIAL 84871/1 SG 831' I-094 A A21d Y Y ISSUE: FIRE PROTECTION PIPE 14-1, 15-1, I-5. 10 INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON 11-2,II-4, ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AT FLOOR 11-5 [ PENETRATION. RESOLUTION: COVER THE ' PENETRATION WITH 330-1 PANEL USING APPROVED FASTENERS. PROTECT THE FIRE PROTECTION PIPE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. 1

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 13 OF 119 l DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / .(Y/N) -(YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) , FIRE SCHEMES ZONE i 85011/0 EC 778' X-IISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: A WELDED LIFTING 9-1, 4,5,11 ] , ATTACHMENT INTERFERES WITH 9-3, 10-1, COVERAGE ON A RACEWAY. 10-2, I l-1, 11-2, 14-1, RESOLUTION: REDUCE MATERIAL 15-1, I l-4, THICKNESS AT TERMINATION OF 11-5, 13-2 Pr10TECTION AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR WELDED LIFTING EYELET OF CABINET.

!                                                        SEAL AREA WITH TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL.

85079/1 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: HVAC AND CONCRETE BEAM 13-2 1-5, 12 4 INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL 12" TRAY. ] RESOLUTION: 2 LAYERS OF 330460 HAS BEEN INSTALLtiD IN THE TRAY BETWEEN THE CABLES AND THE TRAY (BOTTOM AND SIDES) AND EXTENDS 9" 4 TO 11" IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE HARD CONTACT WITH THE HVAC DUCT. j A FLAT PANEL WAS INSTALLEO ON THE , TOP OF THE TRAY AND BUTTED TO THE 3 CONCRETE THEN SEALED TO THE

CONCRETE WITH TROWEL GRADE.

I 86095/0 SG 031' l-OSS SB144 Y Y ISSUE: ANGLE IRON INTERFERES WITH 9- 1, 9-3, I5,13 COVERAGE ON ESSENTIAL JUNCTION 10-1, 10-2 BOX, i RESOLUTION: PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION WITH DIRECTION FOR PLACEMENT OF 330-1 PANELS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTABLE PROTECTION OF THE JUNCTION BOX. , j

                 = _ _ _ __ __ _ __          _

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS - PAGE I4 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV . ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRilrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES NOJREV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE G7918/0 EC 790' X-125 EA157 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP CANNOT BE WRAPPED 11-1, Il-2 1-5, 14 PER TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: BOX THE AIR DROP BETWEEN THE TWO CABLE TRAYS (FROM TRAY TO TRAY) WITH 330-1 PANELS. SECURE ENCLOSURE TO EACH TRAY AND FIRESTOP. 88584/0 AB S10' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: RESTRAINT BLOCK INTERFERES I l- 1. 14-1, 1-5, 15 WITli COVERAGE ON A CABLE TRAY 15-1, 11-2 AND PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON 11-4,i1-5 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT CANNOT BE ACHIEVED DUE TO INTERFERENCE FROM ANOTiiER SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INCORPORATE BOTH THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT AND THE INSTRUMENT TRAY INTO A COMMON PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ENVELOPE. 8S660!! SG 810' l-082' SB8 Y Y ISSUE: 2* STAINLESS STEEL PIPE 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 16, 17 (ISSUE 1) INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON 11-2, 11-4, ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS. 11-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 PRESHAPED CONDUIT HALF ROUND ALONG TRAY SIDE RAllIN LIEU OF 330-1 PANEL WHERE PIPE IS AN INTERFERENCE. THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAIL 13-g 3.

ATTACllMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 15 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 80660/1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY SHARES 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 16, 17 (ISSUE 2) , SUPPORTS WITH ESSENTIAL TRAY. Il-2,11-4, Il-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR 5" MINIMUM FROM THE PROTECTED RACEWAY. 90227/0 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 24 INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON 15-1, i1-2, BOTTOM OF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 11-4, 11-5 TilEN CABLES IN CONDUIT AIR DROP TO ANOT11ER ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE A SECTION OF 330-1 PRESilAPED CONDUIT PROTECTION TO MAINTAIN THE CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE AT AN AREA OF INTERFERENCE WITH A CONDUIT. 91146/1 SG 810' 1-08'2 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: THIS DCA ADDRESSES 10 14-1, 15-1, SEPARATE INTERFERENCES TO 11-2, 11-4, COVERAGE ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 11-5 (8) AND ON A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT (2). RESOLUTION: 1) Tile SUBJECT TRAY N/A N/A NODE NO LONGER REQUIRES TiiERMO-LAG PROTECTION. 2,3 & 6) REMOVE A PORTION OF CABLE l-5, 9, 24 TRAY SIDE RAIL. INSTALL PROTECTION ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.

4) PROTECT INTERFERING ITEM PER PROTRUDING ITEM REQUIREMENTS.

5) PROTECT INTERFERING ITEM.

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV, 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 16 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP, DET. DESCRIIFTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS! NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 91631/1 SG 852' l-100 SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: VERTICAL TRAY GOING 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 16, 24 (ISSUE 1) , THROUGH BLOCKOUT IN FLOOR IS TOO 11-2,Il-4, CLOSE TO BE COVERED PER TYPICAL 11-5 DETAILS. RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY BY BUTTING THE 330-1 PANELS TO THE CONCRETE WALLS THROUGH THE BLOCKOUT AREA. 91631/1 SG 852' l-100 SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: THE ANGLE IRON ON 2 SUPPORTS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 16. 24 (ISSUE 2) INTERFERE WITH TRAY COVERAGE. 11-2, 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: TRIM THE INTERFERING ANGLE SUPPORTS. THEN INSTALL ESSENTIAL CABLT. TRAY PROTECTION. 91S23/1 SG 790' l-063 SBIc N Y ISSUE: VERTICAL CABLE TRAY CANNOT 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 16 BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 11-2,Il-4, WHERE IS PASSES THROUGH A 11-5 BLOCKOUT DUE TO BEING TOO CLOSE TO SIDE OF BLOCKOUT. RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY BY BUTTING THE 330-1 PANELS TO THE CONCRETE WALL THROUGH THE BLOCKOUT AREA. 91985/0 SG 831' I-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: TWO ESSENTIAL CONDUITS ARE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 20, 28 (ISSUE 1) TOO CLOSE TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED 10-1, 10-2 INDIVIDUALLY. RESOLUTION: PROTECT BOTH ESSENTIAL CONDUITS IN A COMMON ENVELOPE, UNTIL THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE TO PROTECT EACH CONDUIT SEPARATELY.

I ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 17 OF 119 i DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST . (PAGES 117-I19) i FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 91985/0 SG 831' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: A PIPE SUPPORT IS TOO CLOSE 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 20, 28 (ISSUE 2) , TO AN ESSENTIAL CONDUITTO ALLOW 10-1, 10-2 j COVERAGE WITH PRESHAPED SECTIONS. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE 330-1 FLAT PANEL TO PROTECT CONDUIT AT AREA OF PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERENCE, 92134/0 EC 778' X-IIS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PASSING 9-1. 9-3, N/A j THROUGH PENETRATION SEAL IN 10-1, 10-2 GYPSUM WALL CANNOT BE COVERED WITH STAINLESS STEEL PER TYPICAL DETAIL DUE TO BEND IN CONDUIT. ! RESOLUTION: INSTALL STAINLESS E STEEL ISOLATER IN MULTIPLE STRIPS TliROUGH THE RADIUS IN THE CONDUIT. 92206/0 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: ARRANGEMENT OF CABLE AIR 11-1, 14-1, N/A ) DROP INTO AN ESSENTIAL TRAY WIIERE 15-1, 11-2, IT PASSES THROUGH A PENETRATION 11-4, 11-5 SEAL INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF STAINLESS STEEL USED TO ISOLATE BISCO SEAL M ATERIAL AND THERMO-LAG. RESOLUTION: CUT / NOTCH THE STAINLESS STEEL AS IT EXITS THE l PENETRATION SEAL M ATERIAL , i

1 ATTACHMENT I ER-ME482, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 18 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFFION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT' BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 92214/1 SG 810' l-077N SA142 N Y- ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 24

                                ,                                              DROPPING OVER THE SIDE RAIL OF AN                                                                                                             Il-2,Il-4, I                                                                               ESSENTIALTRAY AND KELLEM GRIPS                                                                                                                11-5 f                                                                               INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE ON                                                                                                                                                 ,

ESSENTIAL TRAY. RESOLUTION: SHIM THE ESSENTIAL j CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE, AS REQUIRED, J TO ALLOW NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE AIR 2 DROP (FLEXI-BLANKET) PROTECTION TO PENETRATE THE CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE. UTILIZE 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON BOTTOM OF TRAY, AS REQUIRED, i TO CLEAR SUPPORT INTERFERENCES. 92294/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: THE STRUCTURAL STEEL 14-1, 15-1, I-5,7 FRAMEWORK FOR A BLOCKOUT IN THE Il-2,Il-4, FLOOR INTERFERES WITH THE I1-5 , COVERAGE ON THE BACK SIDE OF 4

VERTICAL TRAYS PASSING THROUdH THE BLOCKOUT.

1 RESOLUTION: PROTECT Tile BOTTOM OF THE 4 ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL THROUGH THE ! AREA OF INTERFERENCE.

~ ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS - PAGE 19 OF Il9 j DCA'DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES i NOJREV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES I17-I19) FIRE SCHEMES ( ZONE

92462/0 AB 831' X-226 AA2Id Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM A 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20

                            ,                                 BANK OF TWS TO TWO CABLE TRAYS NEED TO BE WRAPPED IN SEVERAL SEPARATE BUNDLES DUE TO AMPACITY CONCERNS. CLOSE SPACING OF SLEEVES AND ARRANGEMENT OF CABLES INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE.

RESOLUTION: PROTECTION OF ADJ ACENT CONDUIT STUB OUTS M AY BE ACCOMPLiSiiED BY TRIMMING THE 330-660 M ATERIAL WilERE WRAPS OF ONE CONDUlT INTERFACE WITil A PREVIOUSLY WRAPPED CONDUIT. INTERFACE JOINTS ARE SEALED WITH TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL. 92536/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: GRATING SUPPORT STEEL 9- 1, 9-3, N/A INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON 10-1, 10-2 ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PASSING THROUGH TiiE GRATING. 4

RESOLUTION: GRATING SUPPORT STEEL IS NOTCHED SO THAT STANDARD
COVERAGE CAN BE PROVIDED ON Ti1E 1

CONDUIT. 92537/0 AB 831' X-226 AA214 Y Y ISSUE: A HVAC DUCT INTERFERES WITH I4-1, 15-1, 1-5,7 j COVERAGE ON THE TOP OF AN 11-2,11-4, ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. 11-5 RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE ESSENTIAL TRAY USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL IN THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE WITH THE HVAC DUCT.

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 110 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT NO./REV AREA / ' BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST FIRE (PAGES 117-119) SCHEMES ZONE l 92564/1 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: 3 FLEXIBLE CONDUITS ARE TOO 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 20 CLOSE TOGETHER WHERE THEY ENTER THE TOP OF AN ELECTRICAL BOX TO BE WRAPPED INDIVIDUALLY. RESOLUTION: PROTECT EACH ESSENTIAL FLEX CONDUlT SEPARATELY UNTIL INSUFFICIENT SPACE EXISTS. THEN PROTECT THE CONDUITS IN A COMMON ENVELOPE. 92605/0 SG 831' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: BANDING CANNOT BE 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 18 INSTALLED ON CABLE TRAY COVERAGE 11-2, 11-4, BUTTING TO A CONCRETE WALL PER 11-5 TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: ROUTE BAND FASTENERS TIIROUGH THE 330-1 PANEL AND AROUND THE ESSENTIAL RACEWAY. SLOTS MADE IN THE PANELS FOR BANDING ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL. 92611/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM 2 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 19 VERTICAL CABLE TRAYS TO FLOOR 11-2, 11-4, SLEEVES CANNOT BE COVERED PER 11-5 TYPICAL DETAILS DUE TO CONGESTION. RESOLUTION: PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 330-660 PROTECTION TO THE CABLE AIR DROPS. FLEXI-BLANKET IS CUT TO FIT THE AD1ACENT FLEXI. BLANKET PROTECTION AT CONDUIT PROTECTION. THEREBY ALLOWING REQUIRED PROTECTION AND MAINTAINING PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE THICKNESS. r

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Ill OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG 'ELEV ' ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCR!!" TION / ISSUE OF S PPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA /- (Y/N) (Y/N)' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST - FIRE _ (PAGES 117-119) ' , SCHEMES -

ZONE 1

92615/0 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: TWO CONDUITS ARE TOO CLOSE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 3 TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED 10-1, 10-2 1 SEPARATELY FOR A 9" DISTANCE. RESOLUTION: PROTECT BOTH FLEX CONDUIT IN A COMMON ENVELOPE UNTIL TiiERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE TO PROTECT EACH SEPARATELY. 92642/0 AB 790* X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY AT A WALL 14-1, 15-1,

,                                                                                                                        1 4, 21 PENETRATION IS A SECONDARY STEEL       11-2,11-4, MEMBER FOR. STRUCTURAL STEEL            11-5 PROTECTION AT THE WALL AND ALSO CONTAINS CABLES WillCH REQUIRE COVERAGE.

RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE CABLE TRAY FOR 12" MIN. WITH THERMO-LAG MATERIAL PER STRUCTURAL STEEL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS. TIE T' HE NORMAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTION INTO THAT APPLIED FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL PER APPROVED METHODS. 4 92644/1 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: REQUEST TO DELETE FIRE STOP 9- 1, 9-3, I-5, 22 ON CONDUITS RUNNING ENTIRELY IN 10-1, 10-2 ROOM AND NOT PENETRATING ANY FIRE WALLS (I.E., EQUIPMENT TO EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENT TO INSTRUMENT, ETC.). RESOLUTION: DELETE CONDUIT FIRE STOP INSTALLATION FOR PROTECTED CONDUIT ROUTED BETWEEN EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE ROOM.

   -                             -                         -m--    _ _ _                                     e

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME482, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 112 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrrION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 92731/0 AB 810' X-209 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: DVO CONDUIT UNIONS ARE TOO 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 CLOSE TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED 10-1, 10-2 INDIVIDUALLY. RESOLUTION: PROTECT BOTH ESSENTIAL CONDUIT IN A COMMON ENVELOPE, BY PROTECTING ONE FIRST AND THEN BUTTING TIIE SECOND'S COVERAGE TO THE FIRST'S FOR THE LENGTH OF THE OCCURRENCE. MATERIAL THICKNESS IS TO BE MAINTAINED. 92831/0 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERFERES 9- 1, 9-3, I-5, 23 WITH TIIE 3' OVERLAP REQUIRED FOR 10-1, 10-2, 330-660 OVER 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS. Il-1,Il-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330460 MATERIAL OVERLAPPING I/2" MINIMUM ONTO TiiE 330-1 CONDUIT PROTECTION. 9283S/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: BANDING REQUIREMENTS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 18 CANNOT BE MET DUE TO 11-2, 11-4, INTERFERENCE TO CABLE TRAY I l-5 COVERAGE FROM A SUPPORT DIAGONAL BRACE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL WEDGE OF 330-1 MATERIAL SUCH THAT WHEN INSTALLED, BANDING WILL SECURE THE 330-1 PANELS OF THE TRAY ENVELOPE.

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 113 OF I19 1 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV- ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF- .'UPPORT S BASIS / NOTES ' NO./REV ' AREA / (YIN) (YIN) ' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . FIRE (PAGES 117-119) ,

SCHEMES ZONE.

92339/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y

'                                                         ISSUE: AN ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AND AN     9-1,9-3,     I-5, 20
                              '                           ESSENTIAL LBD ARE TOO CLOSE            10-1, 10-2 TOGETHER TO BE WRAPPED                                                i INDIVIDUALLY.

RESOLUTION: PROTECT BOTil RIGID CONDUIT RACEWAYS IN A COMMON 330-1 ENVELOPE UNTIL THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE TO PROTECT THEM ' SEPARATELY. , 92875/0 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y i ISSUE: A I" PIPE INTERFERES WITH 14-1, 15-I, 1-5,7 COVERAGE ON A CABLE TRAY. 11-2, 11-4 i Il-5 i RESOLUTION: MOVE THE CLAMP ! ASSOCIATED WITH THE CABLE TRAY GROUND CABLE. INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL ALONG THE SIDE RAIL BETWEEN THE TRAY AND PIPE.

! 9'2905/1 SG    810'   l-082   SB8       Y        Y ISSUE: 10" AND 2* PIPES INTERFERE      14-1,15-1,   1-5, 7, 24 i

WITH THE COVERAGE ON A CABLE 11-2, 11-4, TRAY. 11-5

'                                                        RESOLUTION: 1) WHERE THE 10' PIPE i                                                         PRESENTS AN INTERFERENCE, PROTECT THE ESSENTIAL TRAY USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL FOR 12" M AX. BETWEEN THE PIPE AND TRAY. 2) WHERE THE 2" PIPE                                   -

PRESENTS AN INTERFERENCE, REMOVE A SECTION OF TRAY SIDE RAIL EXTENSION, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE. i

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 114 OF 119 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP- DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST FIRE (PAGES 117-119) SCHEMES ; ZONE l 92934/0 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY WITH SIDE RAIL 14-1, 15-1, I-5,24

                                                                                                  '                           EXTENDERS IS FILLED TO THE TOP SO               Il-2,II-4, THAT CLEARANCE BETWEEN CABLES                   I l-5 AND STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE MAINTAINED.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL SILTEMP BLANKET TO ISOLATE THE CONTAINED CABLES FROM THE STRESS SKIN OF THE 330-1 PANELS. 93005/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y lSSUE: A CONCRETE WALL INTERFERES Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 25 WITH THE INSTALLATION OF 330-660 ON AN AIR DROP WHERE IT OVERLAPS ONTO CONDUIT COVERAGE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL THE FIRST LAYER OF 330-660 WITH A REDUCED OVERLAP OF THE 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS AND ABUTTING THE CONCRETE. INSTALL SECOND LAYER WITH NO OVERLAP. INSTALL ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS OVERLAPPING THE SECOND 330-660 LAYER. 93006/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE- CABLE TRAY WITH SIDE RAIL I4-1, 15-1, I-5, 24 EXTENSIONS HAS CABLES FILLED TO 11-2, 11-4, THE TOP SO THAT TOP PANEL ON 11-5 COVERAGE WILL COME IN CONTACT WITH THE CABLES. RESOLIJTION: INSTALL SILTEMP ! BLANKET TO ISOLATE THE CONTAINED CABLES FROM THE STRESS SKIN OF THE 330-1 PANELS.

s ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ) MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE IIS OF 119 1 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV- ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . NO.lREV AREAi- (YIN) (Y/N)'. CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES I!7-119) FIRE SCHEMES 4 ZONE 1 j 93010/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: STEEL FRAME AT BLOCKOUT IN 14-1,15-1, 1-5,7 ]' AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y FLOOR INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE I1-2, 11 4, ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. Il-5 I: RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL THROUGli THE FLOOR BLOCKOUT AREA. 93093/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY I4-1, 15-1, 1-5,16,17 (ISSUE 1) RUNS PARALLEL TO AN ESSENTIAL 11-2,i1-4, CABLE TRAY AND IS WITHIN 9" AT 11-5 SEVERAL SHARED SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION 5* MINIMUM FROM THE PROTECTED RACEWAY. 93G93/0 AB 831' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 16, 17 1 (ISSUE 2) 1 PROTECTED PER TYPICAL DETAILS 11-2,Il-4, WHERE AIR DROPS ENTER FROM 11-5 CEILING. 1 RESOLUTION: EXTEND CABLE TRAY , j 1 ENVELOPE TO THE CONCRETE WALL

AND BOX LAST 16" UP TO CEILING, i THEREBY ENCLOSING AIR DROPS.

93096/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: ARRANGEMENT OF AIR DROP 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 7, 26, 27 ' (ISSUE 1) BETWEEN 2 STACKED TRAYS AND A 11-2,11-4, ) SWAY STRUT INTERFERES WITH II-5,11-I ,. THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON THE TRAYS AND THE AIR DROP. ! RESOLUTION: BOX THE TWO CABLE

TRAYS TOGETHER AT THE AIR DROP.

1

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME482, REV. 2 MINOP, PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 116 OF I19 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES 117-119) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 93096/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: 2 PIPE SPOOL FLANGE 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 7, 26, 27 (ISSUE 2) INTERFERES WITH THERMO-LAG 11-2,11-4, COVERAGE OF CABLE TRAY. 11-5 RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE CABLE TRAY USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL BEDVEEN THE TRAY AND PIPE SPOOL FLANGE. 93096/0 SG 810' I-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS 14-1, 15-1. 1-5, 7, 26, 27 (ISSUE 3) DIRECTION IN PROTECTING TRAY 11-2, 11-4, SUPPORTS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN 11-5 PENETRATION SEAL RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ON EXPOSED SURFACES OF TRAY SUPPORTS. 93148/0 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CONCRETE WALL INTERFERES 14-1, 15-l, I-5, 18 WITil BOTH PREBAND AND BANDING OF i1-2,11-4, 24' CABLE TRAY COVERAGE. 11-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL A BASE PREBAND ALONG THE WALL SECTION WITHOUT CLEARANCE. UTILIZE THE BASE PREBAND TO HALTER THE REQUIRED REM AINING BAND FASTENERS. l 93240/0 AB 790' X-180 AA2ia Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCES ALONG A 3' 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 7 l SECTION OF THE BOTTOM OF AN 18* 11-2, 11-4, ! TRAY DO NOT ALLOW THE TRAY TO BE 11-5 COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: PROTECT THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL IN THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE.

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 117 OF !!9 l NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 1 CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 2 EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF Tile M ATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3 THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITil TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS. i ! 4 THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5 THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. 6 SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR Tile PLANT CONFIGURATION WlilCH WOULD GENERIC ENHANCE Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.). 7 TEST SCHEME 10-2 DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 1/2" 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON JUNCTION BOXES 84868/0 AND IS CREDITED WHERE INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE Tile INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIB PANEL REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF 93096/0 THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 92875/0 93240/0 92905/I 92294/0 93010/0 92537/0 8 THIS INSTALLATION FAILS TO ACHIEVE FULL M ATERIAL THICKNESS BETWEEN THE HANGER ANGLE AND THE TRAY SIDE 84868/0 RAIL. PROTECTION OF THE H ANGER ANGl.E AS PER PROTRUDING ITEM REQUIREMENTS M AINTAINS M ATERIAL CONTINUITY ALONG WITH SHIELDING THE DEVIAT!ON FROM DIRECT FIRE EXPOSURE. ) 9 THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, ACHIEVES THE FULL REQUIRED M ATERIAL PROTECTION OF THE PROTRUDING ITEM AT 84868/0 IN INTERFERENCE. THE PRIM ARY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. 91146/1 10 TEST SCHEME 11-4 DEMONSTRATES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A CABLE TRAY AT A BOX ENCLOSURE. Tile PENETRATION 84871/1 OPENING IN THIS CONFIGURATION IS CLOSED UTILIZED 330-1 PANEL M ATERIAL, LEAVING THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE INSIDE THE ENCLOSED PENETRATION. THE PRIM ARY ENVELOPE IS NO LONGER AFFECTED BY THE F.P. PIPE AND THE FIRE PROTECTION PIPE IS PROTECTED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM OF THE ENCLOSED PENETRATION / PRIMARY ENVELOPE. l 11 THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACHIEVE FULL MATERIAL THICKNESS AT THE INTERFERENCE. THE 85011/0 MATERIAL THICKNESS DEVIATION IS AT THE TERMINATION OF REQUIRED PROTECTION. THE PROTECTED RACEWAY TERMINATES INTO A NON-PROTECTED CABINET. THIS REDUCTION IN M ATERIAL THICKNESS DOES NOT COMPROMISE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE.

ATTACHMENT I ER-MW2, REV. 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Ind OF 119 1 12 THE TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFIED CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES WITH 1/2" (NOMINAL) V-RIB PANELS INSTALLED 85079/1 AROUND EXTERIOR SURFACES OF CABLE TRAY. THE COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PER THIS DCA IDENTIFY SPECIFIC LOCATIONS WHERE STANDARD V-RIB PANEL COVERAGE CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO INTERFERENCES (HVAC DUCT, CONCRETE BEAM). AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TRAY SIDE RAIL WHERE THE HVAC DUCT PRESENTS AN INTERFERENCE,2 LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET (QUALIFIED VIA SCHEMES 11-1 AND 11-2) ARE INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAY (AROUND THE CABLES). M ATERIAL COVERAGE ON THE TRAY SIDE AND BOTTOM IS ACHIEVED BY BUTTING V-RIB PANE 13 AS CLOSE TO THE INTERFERING ITEM AS POSSIBLE AND SEALING THE AREA WITH A TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. EFFECTIVE MATERIAL ' THICKNESS, CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS IS THEREFORE PROVIDED. THE M ATERIAL M ASS INSTALLED OUTSIDE THE TRAY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO Tile INTERFERING ITEM PROVIDE FOR SUBLIM ATION AND CHAR LAYER FORM ATION TO EFFECTIVELY COOL THE LOCALIZED AREA WHERE M ATERIAL IS INSTALLED INSIDE THE TRAY. FINALLY, THE INTERFERING HVAC DUCT SERVES AS TORTUOUS PATH FOR HEAT ENTRY INTO THE ENVELOPE. THE TRANSITION FROM V-RIB TO FLAT PANEL (ENVELOPE TOP PANEL) FOR CONSTRUCTABILITY IS ACCEPTABLE. REFER TO APPENNX G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THEREFORE, THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES AN EQEMALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND Tile LOCALIZED AREAS OF DEVIATED PROTECTION ARE ACCEPTABLE.

! 13 THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, IS QUALIFIED BY TEST SCHEME 10-2. REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF THIS REPORT FOR                                                     86095/0 1     TYPICAL DETAIL 2-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS.

14 TEST SCliEME 11-4 DEMONSTRATES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A BOX ENCLOSURE OF 330-1 PANEL SE'NNING BETWEEN 87918/0 ATTACHMENT POINTS UNSUPPORTED BY AN INTERNAL STRUCTURE. THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, IS SM ALLER THAN THE TESTED ENCLOSURE, REINFORCED INTERNALLY BY A FIRE STOP AND INSTALLED IN A VERTICAL ORIENTATION. THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT TO THE TRAYS IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 15 THE CONFIGURATION OF PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION, AS INSTALLED, IS CONSISTENT WITH AND QUALIFIED BY THE 88584/0 LISTED CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES. 16 TEST SCHEME 11-4 QUALIFIES THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PREFAB. M ATERIAL WHICH IS NOT IN COMPLETE CONTACT WITH 88660/1 THE RACEWAY, THEREBY FORMING AN EXTENDED ENCLOSURE. 93093/0 91631/1 91823/1 17 REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAll 14-1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 88660/1 93093/0 18 THE TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFIED CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES UTILIZING STAINLESS STEEL BANDING AS A 92605/0 FASTENING DEVICE. 92838/0 93148/0 19 THE TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFIED CABLE AIR DROPS WITHIN A 3M660 FLEXI-BLANKET ENVELOFE ROUTED BETWEEN 92611/0 CONDUIT AND CABLE TRAY. THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS FOR THIS CONFIGURATION ARE M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. THE INSTALLATION USES M ATERIAL THICKNESS AND M ATERIAL FASTENING METHODS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.

ATTACHMENT I ER-ME-082, REV, 2 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE 119 OF 119 20 THE WRAPPING MORE THAN ONE CONDUIT IN A COMMON ENVELOPE IS NOT A TESTED CONFIGURATION. IlOWEVER, SINCE 926'5/0 THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED 92462/0 CONFIGURATIONS, Tile INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 92711/0 92566! 92839/0 91985/0 21 THE TEST SCilEMES LISTED QUALIFIED CABLE TRAYS PROTECTED WITH 1/2" (NOMINAL

THICK 330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS. Tills 92642/0 CONFIGURATION HAS A MINOR AREA OF 12" MIN. LENGTH THAT IS PROTECTED WITH AN INCREASED (1 -2") MATERIAL THICKNESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE THERMO-LAG FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF STRUCTURAL STEEL Tile PROTECTION PROVIDED AT TliE WALL PENETRATION EXCEEDS NORMAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE THICKNESS REQUIREMENTS.

22 TliE CONDUIT TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES CONSTRUCTED OF 330-1 AND/OR 330-660 M ATERIAL 92644/1 TIIE DELETION OF INTERNAL CONDUIT FIRE STOPS FOR PROTECTED CONDUIT ROUTED BETWEEN EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE SAME ROOM WILL NOT AFFECT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECrlVE ENVELOPES. 23 THE CABLE AIR DROP FROM CONDUIT TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES CONSTRUCTED OF 330460 92831/0 AND 330-1 M ATERIAL TlHS DEVIATION IN Tile OVERLAP OF 330460 MATERIAL ONTO THE 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS STILL PROVIDES SUFFICIENT OVERLAP TO INSTALL ALL THE FASTENER DEVICES UTILIZED IN THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. SINCE THE INSTALLED CONFIGURATION M A!NTAINS Tile CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF MATERI AL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, Tile INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 24 THE CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFY THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. 91146/1 92905/1 91631!! 92934/0 92214/1 93006/0 90227/0 25 THE CABLE AIR DROP TEST SCHEMES LISTED QUALIFY A 330-660 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE PENETRATING A 330-1 PANEL TYPE 93005/0 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. Tile DEVIATION IN M ATERI AL OVERLAP IS M ADE LESS SIGNIFICANT BY THE ADDITION OF ADDITIONAL PREFORMED 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS. THE FINAL CONFIGURATION OF THE AIR DROP IS LIKENED TO AN AIR DROP INTO A 330-1 ENVELOPE. SINCE, THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE M AINTAINED, TiiE INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 26 THE CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEME 11-4 QUALIFIES A PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE OF 330-1 PANEL M ATERIAL WHICH ENCLOSES MORE 93096/0 THAN ONE CABLE TRAY. THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. 27 THE PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION'S ATTACHMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH METHODS UTILIZED IN STRUCTURAL STEEL 93096/O PROTECTION. 28 THE CONDUIT TEST SCHEMES LISTED QU ALIFIED 330-1 PREFAB. MATERIAL AS A PROTECTIVE tiNVELOPE. THE CSE OF A 91985/0 MINOR LENGTH OF FLAT PANEL IS A MINOR DEVIATION AND WILL NOT AFFECT THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THE INSTALLATION. d

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE J1 OF JIS l ATFACIIMENT J PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEMS COVERAGE DEVIATIONS

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J2 OF JIS DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES J13-J15) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 81340/0 AB 810' X-209 AA21c N Y ISSUE: TWO 3/8" O STAINLESS STEEL 9- 1, 9-3, I-5, 22

                         ,                           INSTRUMENT TUBES ARE WITHIN 8" OF                                                                       10-1, 10-2 THE PROTECTED COMMODITY AND CANNOT BE COVERED DLE TO INSULATION ON THE TUBING.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ON Tile CONDUIT SUPPORT PER TYPICAL DETAILS AND ON THE INSTRUMENT TUBE SUPPORT UP TO THE INSULATION. 81377/0 SG 790' l-067 SB2c N Y ISSUE: TWO EMERGENCY LIGIITS ARE N/A N/A REQUIRED TO BE COVERED AS PROTRUDING ITEMS DUE TO THE 9" RULE. RESOLUTICN: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ONTO THE LIGHTING UNITS TO Tile END OF TIIE LAMP STEM. NOTE: THE SUBJECT RACEWAY T1305CC31 NO LONGER REQUIRES THERMO-LAG PROTECTION PER Mi-1700. REF. DCA 87535 86804/0 SG 831' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: A SMOKE DETECTOR ATTACHED 14-1, 15-1, 1-5,8 TO A THERMO-LAG COVERED CABLE 11 2, 11-4, TRAY Sc? PORT DOES NOT ALLOW s1-5 COVERAGE PER THE 9" RULE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION AND EXTEND TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE C.I. BOX. EXCLUDING THE CONDUIT FIRESTOP, THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAll 7-5.

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J3 OF J15 l DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV : AREA / (YIN) (YIN). CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST , (PAGES J13-J15) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 84863/0 SG 831' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: ANGLE IRON AND ALLTilREAD 9-1, 9-3, I-5,7

                                                                           ,                                                                                                          ROD INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE ON                              10-1, 10-2 I

ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AND CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAIL DUE TO MOVEMENT OF THE ALL THREAD ROD. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ON ROD HANGER AND SUPPORT. FILL AREA BETWEEN .

ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PROTECTION AND PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION WITII 330-660 TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAIL 9-1.

86805/0 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: A SMOKE DETECTOR ATTACHED 14-1,15-1, I-5,S TO A TilERMO-LAG COVERED CABLE 11-2, 11-4, TRAY SUPPORT DOES NOT ALLOW 11-5 COVERAGE PER THE 9' RULE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION AND EXTEND TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF TiiE C.I. BOX. EXCLUDING THE CONDUIT FIRESTOP. , THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAIL 7-5. 88553/0 SG 810' I-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: 2 INSULATED PIPE INTERFERES 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 9 WTTH COVERAGE ON ESSENTIAL 10-1, 10-2 CONDUIT SUPPORT. ! RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FROM THE ,

PROTECTED RACEWAY ENVELOPE 81/2" i

{ MINIMUM - 11 M AXIMUM. a

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME4)82, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J4 OF JIS DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ' ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREAL. (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION - TEST . (PAGES J13-315) FIRE SCHEMES ZONE- l 89927/3 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: THE TYPICAL DETAILS FOR I1-1,Il-2 1-6, 10 AB 832' X-241 i AA21f Y Y COVERING NON ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y NEED TO BE MODIFIED IN ORDER TO ALLEVIATE WEIGHT ON Ti1E ESSENTIAL COMMODITY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTECTION ON THE SPECIFIED PROTRUDING ITEM AIR DROPS FROM TIIEIR RESPECTIVE CONDUIT SLEEVE TO TIIE CABLE TRAY. INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO BE LIKE ESSENTIAL AIR DROP. ALL CONDUIT SLEEVES TO BE FIRE STOPPED. THE INSTALLATION METHODS UTILIZED ARE CONSISTENT WITil TYPICAL i DETAILS 3-4 AND 7-1. 91906/0 EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY I4-1, 15-1, 1-5, 13 SHARES 6 SUPPORTS WITH A NON 11-2,Il-4, ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND TiiEY ARE 11-5 SEPARATED LESS THAN 9*. RESOLUTION: PROTRUDING ITEM PROTE(_ TION IS REDUCED TO 5* MIN. FROM TiiE ESSENTIAL RACEWAY. TilESE INSTALLATIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITil TYPICAL DETAll 14-1. r i 4 )

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J5 OF J15 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT . BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES J13-J15) - FIRE SCHEMES ZONE 92007/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: AN INSTRUMENT LINE 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 18

                               ,                          LNTERFERES WITH COVERAGE ON A                                                             Il-2,Il-4, SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL CADLE                                                            11-5 TRAY.

RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE THE j INSTRUMENT TUBE & ITS TRAY WTril i 330-1 PANELS AS PART OF THE PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION. 92168!! AB 852' X-241 AA21f Y Y ISSUE- INSTRUMENT TUBING AND 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 19 SUPPORT INTERFERE WITH COVERAGE Il-2,Il-4, ON Tile SUPPORT ON AN ESSENTIAL 11-5 TRAY. RESOLUTION: MODIFY INSTRUM ENT TUBE SUPPORT SUCH THAT ADEQUATE CLEARANCE EXISTS TO INSTALL ESSENTIAL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE. INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ON BOTH THE TRAY & TUBE SUPPORTS. 92515/0 SG S31' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: NONESSENTIAL CONDUITS 9- 1. 9-3, 1-5, 11 RUNNING FROM ESSENTIAL JUNCTION 10-1, 10-2 BOX TO CONTAINMENT PENETRATION 1 CANNOT BE COVERED AS PROTFUDING ITEM PER TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: EXTEND PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FROM THE JUNCTION BOX PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE TO THE ELECTRICAL MODULE SLEEVE. PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS MEASURED FROM PROTECTED ANGLE IRON ON JUNCTION BOX.

ATTACIIMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J6 OF J15 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET, DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NOJREV AREA / (Y/N)' (YlN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES J13-J15) FIRE SC11 EMES ZONE 92596/0 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y- Y ISSUE: 2* CC LINE INTERFERES WITH 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 21

                               ,                           COVERAGE ON A PIPE SUPPORT                                                                                          10-1, 10-2 COVERED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING

.                                                          ITEM PROTECTION ON TiiE SUPPORT 4

HANGER. BOX THE LOWER SECTION OF Tile IIANGER AT TIIE PIPE, PROVIDING AN UNSEALED JOINT AROUND Tile PIPE. 92610!O AB 852' X-241 AA21f Y Y- ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 12 '! RUNS PARALLEL TO AND SHARES 11-2, 11-4, SUPPORTS WITH AN ESSENTIAL TRAY. 11-5 , THE NONESSENTIAL TRAY FALLS WITHIN THE 9" RULE AT THE SHARED ! SUPPORTS.

     ,                                                     RESOLUTION: PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS REDUCED TO 5* MIN.                                                                                                                                 i FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY ENVELOPE.

THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAIL I4-1. MINOR USE i OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL ALONG THE ESSENTIAL TRAY SIDE RAll PROVIDES NECESSARY SPACE. ;

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J7 OF JIS 1 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES J13-J15) . . , FIRE SCHEMES l ZONE 92613/0 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: ESSENTIAL AND NON-ESSENTIAL 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 12

                                 ,                          CABLE TRAYS RUN PARALLEL AND            11-2, 11-4,                            -

SHARE SUPPORTS. THE NON-ESSENTIAL 11-5 TRAY FALLS WITHIN THE 9* RULE AT THE SHARED SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: PROTRUDING ITEM l PROTECTION IS REDUCED TO 5* MIN. 1 FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY ENVELOPE. THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1. MINOR USE j OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL ALONG THE ESSENTIAL TRAY SIDE RAll PROVIDES NECESSARY SPACE. 92665/2 AB S31' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 13 l RUNS PARALLEL TO ESSENTIAL TRAY 11-2, 11-4, j AND SHARES SUPPORTS. THE NON- 11-5

ESSENTIAL TRAY FALLS WITHIN 9' i RULE AT SHARED SUPPORTS.

I I RESOLUTION: PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS REDUCED TO 5* MIN. FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY. THIS l INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH l TYPICAL DETAIL 14-I. ! 92720/0 SG 831' I-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT COVER GROUND 14-I, 15-1, I-5, 14 CABLE FOR CABLE TRAY PER 9" RULE. I1-2,Il-4, 11-5 i RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FROM THE PROTECTED RACEWAY 9* MINIMUM ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. l I t

I . r ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE 38 OF J15 ROOM FIRE SUPP.' ~DET. DESCRIM10N/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT '- BASIS / NOTES . DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N). : CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES J13-J15) NOJREV . FIRE SCHEMES-ZONE AA21a Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY RUNS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 14 92868/0 AB 790' X-180 PARALLELTO AN ESSENTIALTRAY AND 11-2, 11-4, IS LESS THAN 9' APART AT A SUPPORT. Il-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FROM THE PROTECTED RACEWAY 9' MINIMUM ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. [ AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORTS FOR 2 STACKED I4-1,15-1, 1-5, 15 92876/0 CABLE TRAYS ARE ATTACHED TO AN 11-2. 11-4, EMBED PLATE WHICH IS LESS THAN 9- Il-5 FROM THE PROTECTED TRAY. NEED DETAIL TO COVER EMBED PLATE. l R.ESOLUTION: PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION SIIALL BE EXTENDED OUT FROM THE SUPPORT MEMBER ONTO THE EMBED PLATE IN ALL DIRECTIONS FOR A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE TO ACHIEVE 9' MINIMUM PROTECTION. THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL DETAIL 12-1. 6

ATTACIIMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE 39 OF JIS DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES J13-J15) FIRE SCliEMES ZONE 92917/0 AB 852' X-241 AA21f Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 13

                       ,                              RUN PARALLEL TO AN ESSENTIAL TRAY       Il-2,Il-4, AND WITHIN 9* AT A COMMON               11-5 SUPPORT.

RESOLUTION: PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS REDUCED TO 5* MIN. FROM Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY ENVELOPE. THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITil TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1. APPLICATION OF T-LAG MATERIAL ENCOMPASSING T11E NONESSENTIAL TRAY SIDE RAIL PROVIDES INCREASED LEVEL CONDUCTIVE ilEAT PROTECTION. 92935/0 EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUIT IS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 16 WITillN 9' OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE 11-2, 11-4, TRAY DUF TO A S11ARED GROUND 11-5 CABLE. RESOLUTION: SEAL TiiE OPEN END OF THE CONDUIT WITli 1/2" MIN. DFT 330-1 MATERIAL AND INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ON BOTH Tile GROUND CABLE AND NON-ESSENTI AL CONDUIT. J

l ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIAT'm PAGE J10 OF JIS 4 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. ' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT ' ' BASISiNOTES ? NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (YIN)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION - TEST . (PAGES J13-J15) FIRE SCHEMES j ZONE i-92977/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 14-1, 15-1,

                                                                                    ,                           RUNS PARALLEL TO AN ESSENTIAL            11-2,Il-4, CABLE TRAY AND WITHIN 9* AT              Il-5

] SEVERAL SHARED SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: 1) PROTRUDING ITEM l-5, 13 PROTECTION IS REDUCED TO 6" MIN. FROM THE ESSENTIAL RACEWAY ALONG THREE SUPPORT MEMBERS. THESE INSTALLATIONS ARE COMPARABLE TO TYPICAL DETAIL I4-1.

2) PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS l-5, 17 INSTALLED PER THE 9*-11* CRITERIA i

FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY ENVELOPE ALONG TWO SUPPORT MEMBERS. THESE INSTALLATIONS ARE COMPARABLE TO TYPICAL DETAIL 13-6. 93008/0 AB 790' X-180 A A21a Y Y ISSUE: THERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON 14-1,15-1, I-5, 14 PROTRUDING SUPPORT CANNOT BE' 11-2,11-4, ACHIEVED FOR THE ENTIRE 9" FROM 11-5 THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. i

RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR 9" MIN. AS i MEASURED FROM THE PROTECTED RACEWAY ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH.

j 93025/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY I4-1, 15-1, I-5, 14 IS WITHIN 9 OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE 11-2, 11-4, i TRAY ON A SHARED SUPPORT. 11-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING 1 ITEM PROTECTION FOR 9 MIN. AS MEASURED FROM THE PROTECTED s RACEWAY ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE , HEAT PATH. .

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J11 OF J15 DCA/DCN BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES I NO.IREV AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES J13-Ji5) FIRE . SCHEMES , ZONE 93108/0 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUlT AIR 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 20

                          ,                          DROPPING INTO ESSENTIAL TRAY            Il-2. Il-4, CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL           i 1-5 DETAIL RESOLUTION: THE NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUlT IS FIRE STOPPED AND I

PROTECTED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM.

SINCE THE CONDUlT RESTS ON THE TRAY FLANGE, THE PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS BLENDED INTO Tl!E TRAY ENVELOPE. THE CABLE AIR DROP IS ENCLOSED IN A 330-1 CONDUlT HALF ROUND EXTENDING OVER THE CABLE AND CAPPED AT THE END. ALL ,

INTERFACE JOINTS ARE REINFORCED - WITH STRESS SKIN. THIS INSTALLATION IS SIMILAR TO TYPICAL DETAIL 3-1. 93193/0 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY 14-1,15-1, I-5. 14 RUNS PARALLEL WITH AN ESSENTIAL 11-2, 11-4, TRAY AND IS WITH!N 9* AT SEVERAL 11-5 SHARED SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FROM THE PROTECTED RACEWAY 9 MINIMUM ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. i 4 i a

                            ,              -                     ~.                                          ,.      ,.

1 ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J12 OF JIS DCA/DCN ' BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP.' DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT' BASIS / NOTES ~ NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST. (PAGES J13-115) FIRE SCHEMES 4 ' ZONE. -

 ! '88583/0   AB   810' X-207    AA21b    Y       Y     ISSUE: INSTRUMENT TRAY INTERFERES    9-1,           1-5, 23
                              ,                         WITH COVERAGE ON 2 ESSENTIAL         9-2, 10-1, CABLE TRAYS.                           10-2, I l-1, 11-2,Il-4, RESOLUTION: INSTRUMEM TRAY IS          11-5, 13-2, WRAPPED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM PER       14-1, 15-1 TYPICAL DETAILS. INSTRUMENT TRAY IS ENCLOSED IN A BOX WHICH BUTTS TO THE CONCRETE WALL WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE 1

INTERFACE. l l l 4 'T 4

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J13 OF 315 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV I CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSIST ENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 2 EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3 THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE)IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS. , 4 THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE M ATERIAL IS CONSISTED WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5 THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. 6 SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR Tile PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH WOULD GENERIC ENH ANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SillELDING EFFECTS. TORTUROUS PATil, ETC.). 7 REFERENCE ATTACilMENT G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAll 9-1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION 84863/0 PROTECTS AN INTERFERENCE TO ESSENTI AL (CONDUlT) ENVELOPE INSTALLATION. THE AREA BETWEEN THE TWO INSTALLATIONS IS FILLED WITH ACCEPTABLE FIRE BARRIER M ATERIAL THE REQUIRED M ATERIAL THICKNESS FOR Tile ESSENTIAL (CONDUlT) ENVELOPE IS PROVIDED BY Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION. THE ESSENTIAL (CONDUIT) ENVELOPE IS INSTALLED PER THE TYPICAL DETAILS UP TO THE INTERFERENCE, WHERE IT IS CUT TO FIT AROUND THE PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION. 8 REFERENCE ATTACHMENT G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 7-5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION 86804/0 DOES NOT INCORPORATE A FIRESTOP WITHIN THE DETECTOR CONDUIT. THIS DEVIATION IS ACCEPTABLE AS THERE IS NO 86805/0 DIRECT CONDUCTIVE PATH TO THE ESSENTI AL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE. THE ESSENTI AL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ' 9 THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE 88553/0 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION PROVIDES FOR S 1/2" MINIMUM COVERAGE FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE ENVELOPE. BASED ON THE MINIMUM M ATERI AL THICKNESS OF 1/2", THERE IS SUFFICIENT BASIS TO CONCLUDE THAT 9' MINIMUM OF PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IS INSTALLED AS MEASURED FROM THE ESSENTIAL (CONDUIT) RACEWAY. THEREFORE, THIS CONFIGURATION MEETS THE PROVISION OF THE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION. THE PRIMARY (CONDUIT) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. 10 THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION TESTS WERE PERFORMED WITH ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS PROTECTED FROM A CONDUIT TO A 89927/3 TRAY. THESE FIELD CONFIGURATIONS OF NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS UTILIZE ESSENTIAL AIR DROP PROTECTION WITH A CONDUIT FIRE STOP TO M AINTAIN ENVELOPE INTEGRITY. REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAILS 3-4 AND 7-1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE ESSENTIAL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE INTEGRITY IS M AINTAINED. 11 THE JUNCTION BOX QUALIFICATION TESTS WERE PERFORMED WITH PROTRUDING !TEMS PROTECTED FOR 9* DISTANCfh j 92515!0 (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATION s C;a

ATTACIIMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE J14 OF JIS

12 REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF TilIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAll 14-1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. ALTHOUGH IT REPRESENTS A 92610/0 SLIGHT DEVIATION FROM THE TYPICAL DETAIL, INSTALLING MINOR LENGTilS OF FLAT PANEL ALONG THE TRAY SIDE RAIL IS 92613/0 ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT WILL NOT DECREASE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OR INCREASE THE THERMAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TIIE ENVELOPE. 13 REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF TlilS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 14-1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 92665/2 92917/0 92977/0 91906/0 , 14 EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCllEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITil PROTRUDING ITEMS PROTECTED FOR 92720/0 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION PROVIDES THE REQUIRED 9* MIN. OF 92868/0 PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION. Tile PRIM ARY 93008/0 (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. 93025/0 93193/0 15 REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 12-1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 92876/0 16 EACH OF TiiE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE 92935/0 (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. TiiE CONDUIT IS NOT PART OF THE ESSENTIAL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE. BUT, MERELY PART OF THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH ASSOCIATED WITH THE GROUND CABLE. Tile INSTALLATION IS COMPARABLE TO CAPPING A HOLLOW MEMBER PER TYPICAL DETAIL 16-5. THE ESSENTIAL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. 17 REFERENCE APPENDIX G OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 13-6 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 92977/0 18 EACH OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" 92007/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURES. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION ENCLOSES THE INSTRUMENT LINE AND ITS PROTECTIVE TRAY. WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE OF THE SUPPORT MEMBER WITHIN THE PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION THIS INSTALLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING ITEMS. THE ESSENTIAL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. 19 EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QU ALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9* 92168/l DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGUR.ATION SUCCESSFULLY MODIFIES A TUBING SUPPORT TO ALLOW FOR ACCEPTABLE INSTALLATION OF THE ESSENTIAL (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE AND PROTRUDING ITEM PROTEC flON. 20 THE AIR DROP CONFIGURATION AS INSTALLED PROVIDES PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION CONSISTENT WITH THE CABLE 93108/0 TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES IN WHICH PROTRUDING SUPPORTS ARE PROTECTED FOR 9* DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TiiE ESSENTIAL ENCLOSURE.

ATTACHMENT J ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS PAGE JIS OF JIS 21 THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTEGED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE 925 % /0 PROTECrlVE ENVELOPE. THE FIELD CONFIGURATION PROVIDES A TORTUOUS PATH FOR HEAT TRANSFER BETWEEN THE PIPE AND THE SUPPORT. THE PIPE ITSELF PROVIDES A SIGNIFICANT LEVEL OF SHIELDING AND HEAT SINK CAPABILITY. THIS DEVIATION PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. Tile PRIMARY (CONDUlT) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

 '.2 THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM TILE                                           81340/0 PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION PROVIDES A REDUCED LENGTli OF PROTECTION. THE INSTRUMENT LINES ARE COVERED WITH THERMAL INSULATION IN THE AREA OF REDUCED PROTECTION. THIS DEVIATION PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION ALONG THE CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH. THE PRIMARY (CONDUIT) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED.

23 THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON SUPPORTS WHICH WAS 88583/0 PRESENT IN ALL OF THE TESTS EXCEPT THE COVERAGE IS SUTTED TO A CONCRETE WALL THE ATTACl3 MENT TO THE WALL PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL AND THE WALL REDUCES THE EXPOSURE TO THE ENCLOSURES AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK.

p -w rsp. esp e- m - - - - - 4.s.ma,swa m us 4y.i,va mmen,a w 41s

                                                                                  -ame dggM m mww2 JA                     .s e m. -- --

454.4E h43- ^ - - - -" M h h eJah.hk .c 4 i 1 1 a 4 d 5 i i i i 6 i i f f ' I ; i f 4 1 l f I 5 j l I l 1 f I f > 1 i 4 i i a P i t r -9 I i l 1- _ _._ _ --- - - -**DTrmw.y. --- - . - - ---, _ _ . _ . . _ _-a,,, y

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE K1 OF K125 ATTACIIMENT K DM 92-077, DCN's UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-022, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K2 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRifrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 4S71, R2 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: A WALL MOUNTED SUPPORT 9-1 1 -5, 7 ! ITEM Q INTERFERES WITH THE INSTALLATION 11-1 OF THE 1/4" THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4-) TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. CUT THE CONDUIT SECTIONS AS NECESSARY AND FILL SPACES WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE TO ACHIEVE THE SMALLEST GAP POSSIBLE. 4871, R2 SG 832' l-OSS 5B144 Y Y ISSUE: lwo SUPPORTS INTERFERE 9-1 1-5. 8 ITEM R WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4* 11-1 THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. I. 11 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" THICK ) OVERLAY SECTIONS TO THE EXTENT l POSSIBLE. COVER BOTH SUPPORTS WITil A 1/2* THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG PER THE 9' RULE. 4S71, R2 SG S32' l-OSS 65:44 Y Y ISSUE: THREE ITEMS. 2 CONDUITS AND 9-1 1-5,8 ITEM S 1 SUPPORT, INTERFERE WITH THE 11-1 INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4' THICK UPGR ADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: COVER BOTH CONDUITS WITH A 1/2* THICKNESS OF TriERMO-LAG PER THE 9* RULE. COMPLETELY COVER SUPPORT WITH A I/2* THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG INCLUDING THE BASE PLATE.

5 ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV, 2 DM 924)77, DCN's - PAGE K3 OF K125 ' 4 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS , DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF - ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES t AREA / (YIN) (Y/N)' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES , K125) ZONE 4371, R2 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING THERMO-LAG ON A 9-1 1-5,9 ITEM T SUPPORT PREVENTS PROPER 9-3 ! APPLICATION OF STRESS SKIN UPGRADE 10-1 i AT A CONDUITILBD BOX INTERFACE. 10-2 i RESOLUTION: PERFORM TROWEL - GRADE AND STRESS SKIN UPGRADES TO Tile GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE-ENSURE A COMPLETE CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN WRAP WT111 THE REQUIRED MINIMUM 2* OVERLAP WHERE THE CONDUIT ENTERS THE LBD BOX. 4871, R2 SG 832' l-0S8 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: A CONDUIT INTERFERES %TFH 9-1 1-5, 20 ITEM U THE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4" THICK 11-1 { a UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: NO CHANGE REQUIRED. 4 ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOWED l INSTALLATION OF 1/4* THICK OVERLAY i UPGRADES. 4871, R2 SG 832' I-OSS SB144 Y Y ISSUE: AN HVAC SUPPORT WHICH IS 9-I l-5, 12 f ' i ITEM V PROTECTED WITH 1/2* THICKNESS OF 11-1 THERMO-LAG INTERFERES WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4 THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE THERMO-LAG FROM THE SUPPORT AS 4 NECESSARY TO INSTALL 1/4* THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS. REWORK THE THERMO-LAG ON THE SUPPORT AS NECESSARY TO REPLACE THE M ATERIAL REMOVED. , i

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME482, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K4 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KlG4 - FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 9 4871, R2 EC 778' X-IISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING THERMO-LAG ON A 9-1 1-5, 10 ITEM W CONDULET LBD's ARE CONNECTED 9-3 TOGETIIER. ENGINEERING DIRECTION 10-1 IS NEEDED FOR PERFORMING STRESS 10-2 SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE JOINT UPGRADES. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE TIIE ENCLOSURE USING A COMPLETE CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN WRAP AROUND BOTli CONDULET FITTINGS AND THE ASSOCIATED THERMO-LAG. 4371, R2 EC 778' X-IISA A A153 Y Y ISSUE: AN EXISTING CONDULET 9-1 1-5, 10 ITEM X FITTING IS BOXED WITH OVERSIZED 9-3 CONDUIT SECTIONS. ENGINEERING 10-1 4 DIRECTION IS NEEDED FOR 10-2 PERFORMING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE JOINT UPGRADES. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE UPGRADES AT BOTH ENDS OF Tile ENCLOSURE. 4871,R2 SG 852' l- 100 A SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: A UNISTRUT SUPPORT MEMBER 9-1 1-5,7 ITEM Y INTERFERES WITH TIIE INSTALLATION 11-1 OF THE 1/4* THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2* THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4*) TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. CUT THE CONDUIT SECTIONS AS NECESSARY AND FILL SPACES WITH 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE TO ACHIEVE THE SM ALLEST GAP POSSIBLE.

                                                                                               .-                                                  . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _                 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _       _______   _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ .              _-________a

l ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 i DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K5 OF K125. UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS

?                                                                                                                                                               r ROOM    FIRE     SUPP.  ' DET. DESCRilrTION/ ISSUE OF                                      . SUPPORT"       BASIS / NOTES
!  'DCN NO./REV    BLDG   ELEV                                                                                                                                  !

AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION - TEST (PAGES K104 ~ FIRE SCHEMES K125) l 4 ZONE SK17a Y Y ISSUE: A LARGE BOLT FROM AN 9-1 1-5, 7 '

!   4871, R2       SG     852' l-100B EMBEDDED CEILING SUPPORT                                       11-1 ITEM Z                                                                                                                                                  .,

INTERFERES WITH THE INSTALLATION , i I OF THE 1/4* THICK OVERIAY UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2* THICK MITERED OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4*) IN THE AREA OF THE

INTERFACE. CUT THE CONDUlT SECTIONS TO FIT AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE INTERFERENCE. FILL ANY GAPS AT THE INTERFERENCE %TTil 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE.

l l-100B SK17a Y Y ISSUE: 1/4* INSTRUMENT TUBING H AS 9-1 1-5, 7 j 4871, R2 SG 852' BEEN DEFLECTED BY THE 11-1 j ITEM AA

INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4" THICK OVERLAY UPGRADE.

l - RESOLUTION: REMOVE PORTIONS OF THE 1/4* OVERLAY AND INSTALL 1/2" TlilCK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4*) IN THE AREA OF THE 4 INTERFACE. CUT THE CONDUIT SECTIONS TO FIT AS CLOSE AS I POSSIBLE TO THE INTERFERENCE. FILL A.NY GAPS AT THE INTERFERENCE WITH 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE. 4 i

-i

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K6 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES - AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 4871, R2 EC 778' X-IISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: A BOLT FROM A WALL 9-1 1-5, 11 ITEM AB MOUNTED SUPPORT INTERFERES WITH Il-1 THE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4" THICK OVERLAY UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" THICK OVERLAY UPGRADES TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFACE. CUT THE CONDUIT SECTIONS TO FIT AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE INTERFERENCE. FILL ANY GAPS AT THE INTERFERENCE WITH 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE. 4871, R2 SG 880' l-109B SKil7c Y Y ISSUE: A SAFETY VALVE VENT 9-1 1-5,7 ITEM AC PREVENTS PROPER INSTALLATION OF 11-1 THE 1/4' THICK OVERLAY UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4-) IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFACE. CUT THE CONDUIT SECTIONS TO FIT AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE INTERFERENCE. FILL ANY GAPS AT THE INTERFERENCE WITH 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE. 4871,R2 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: THREE 1/4" INSTRUMENT 9-1 1-5, 20 ITEM A TUBING DRAIN LINES PREVENT PROPER 11-1 INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4 THICK OVERLAY UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: THE THREE DRAIN LINES SH ALL BE CUT TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4 THICK CONDUIT OVERLAYS.

        &                %                                                                   g'g v.

u7 c't 'd% v ^ g IMAGE EV Al.U ATION O '

                                                                                     /            ' ,$/ #g T      TEST TARGET (MT-3)

////

 \///
                                                                                                         +
                                                                                 ///
        $7                                                                                  <,

l.0 n"

                                                           ;" 122

p'"=2 0 1.1 V 1.8 ilm I.25 1.4 1.6

                                                    -           was

_ . _. - 15 0 m m > 4 6" - -- > 4-l? N4y, sgs$ 4 4;;s~:V

     't
                           %p                                                _

A,$'.

                                                                                            .+..
                                                                                                  //f8 e" is.
                                                                                                   .;g(y O                                                        .

sf{G) ggy:- q

6,

                 .. q'j r-a Y'            S                                                                                                          f
      '?, :-)              e,                                                                                                                   ..

I ~ IMAGE EVALU ATION / A%

  \            '

ifA TEST TARGET (MT-3)

                                                                                                   /                                         [ $? ' 4, N),//                                                                                                                                             *V
                                  &                                                       ffq
           +                                                                                                                 <,

l.0 l '" d6 2 2 l,l I+f!29

                                                                                -m l.8

[1lin 1 I l.25 I.4 l 1 I mes i rr.6 e

                                                   . -- - 15 0mm                     -                                                     >

4 . . . _ _ 6" - - - -- - -- 4

?.

wlf%3, 4 .f <uf4 f . x o

                                 //                                                                e;e, yv
                                                                                                                                        +;fQ

\

         ,;s .       Q, e       u.              ,p'                                                                               A
       'b        '

f IMAGE EVAL.U ATION -,Q,? 94

 \D                                                                                           /

ige TEST TARGET (MT-3) ,; f,7 49 k\pg!

                                                                                   ////                        'g        s'
        /            W@>                                                                   % %'%

49 l.0 J 2" e

                                                              ' ", 422 "L="

l.l g I.8 W= 1.25 1.4 1.6

                                                        ==            me
                                                --- 15 0 m m -

4

                                                                                      ~~        ~#

6" - - - - - ~ ~ -

                   ?ll+

w / $ ;)+ f 74 '; #py$77j 44 e w+, , .

                                                                                           .st Mppp
      . ),*
                                                                                             ,w b           w'5' . A' *~

4_

        'g                                                                                      q              sv cp

A, , mh 1 l MAGE EVALUATION e e:

                                                                                                                       <$ 4%
                                                                                               /                     [>. f[f 4{g

\/j/j// 9$# TEST TARGET (MT-3)

     \p,jp/                      4k#                                                      kp                            /('
              +                                                                                              <e 1.0        '"

ps

4 lV! 2 l,l llhx.0 i s I l l re.8

                                                                                  -e 1.25 l.4            1.6
                                                     - --- -- 15 0 m m -

4

                                             -__-_____.._..6"         - --                                          >

4 fm %,, /+ f4

                                                                                                                    >////h.

w ,s$, 19. n o qca.p ep

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K7 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG- ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIT!ON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES " AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST _ (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES - K125) ' ZONE 4871, R2 EC 778* X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: THE LOWER SURFACE OF THE 9-1 1-5, 13 ITEM B CHILLER INTERFERES WITH Tile Il-1 INSTALLATION OF Tile I/4" THICK OVERLAY UPGRADE. ADDITIONALLY, CONDENSATION ONTO Tile TilERMO-LAG SURFACE DEGRADED Tile CONDUlT PROTECTION. RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE WETTED THERMO-LAG FROM Tile CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS. INSTALL 1/2* TillCK TIIERMO-LAG ON Tile SUPPORTS AND 1/2" llALF ROL. IDS ON THE CONDUIT. INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY UPGRADES ON THE CONDUIT. PROTECT Tile SUPPORTS AND CONDUIT FROM FUTURE WATER IMPINGEMENT. 4871, R2 EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y. ISSUE: EXISTING TilERMO-LAG ON A 9-1 1-5, 12 SUPPORT PREVENTS PROPER 11-1 ITEM C APPLICATION OF 1/4" OVERLAY UPGRADES. RESOLUTION: REMOVE Tile EXISTING 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS FROM THE CONDUIT AND PANELS FROM THE SUPPORT. REINSTALL 1/2" PANELS ON Tile SUPPORT AND CONDUIT SECTIONS ON Tile CONDUIT THEN INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAYS. FINISH THE INSTALLATION WITH A l/2" TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT Tile INTERFACE.

A'ITACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077 DCN's PAGE K8 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE'OF ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES ' AREA / (Y/N). (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION.~ TEST (PAGES K104-'- FIRE SCHEMES - K125)' ZONE l 4871, R2 EC 778' X-I ISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: A 3" X 3" T.S. SUPPORT IS 9-1 1-5,8 ITEM D INTERFERING WITH TIIE INSTALLATION 11-1 OF THE 1/4" TillCK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, COVER Tile SUPPORT WITH A 1/2" THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG PER THE 9" RULE. ADD A l/2" TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE INTERFACE. 4871, R2 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: A 3" X 3" T.S. SUPPORT IS 9-1 1-5,8 ITEM E INTERFERING WITH THE INSTALLATION 11-1 OF THE 1/4" THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" TIIICK OVERLAY SECTIONS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. COVER THE SUPPORT WITH A 1/2" THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG PER THE 9" RULE. ADD A l/2" TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE INTERFACE. 4871, R2 EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: A SUPPORT WALL PLATE IS 9-1 1-5,8 ITEM F INTERFERING WITH THE INSTALLATION 11-1 OF THE 1/4* THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. COVER THE SUPPORT WALL PLATE WITH A I/2" THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG PER THE 9" RULE. ADD A 1/2" TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE INTERFACE.

A1TACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K9 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS I ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES K104-FIRE . SCHEMES K125) ZONE 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL FLEX 9-1 1-5,7 4871, R2 EC CONDUIT INTERFERES WITH Tile I1-1 ITEM G INSTALLATION OF Tile 1/4" THICK [ UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" TillCK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4") TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. CUT TIIE CONDUIT SECTIONS AS NECESSARY AND FILL SPACES WITH 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE TO ACillEVE THE SM ALLEST GAP POSSIBLE. 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING THERMO-LAG ON A 9-1 1-5, 12 4871, R2 EC SUPPORT PREVENTS PROPER 11-1 ITEM H APPLICATION OF 1/4" OVERLAY U PGRADES. RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE EXISTING 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS FROM Tile CONDUlT AND PANELS FROM Tile SUPPORT. REINSTALL 1/2" PANELS ON Tile SUPPORT AND CONDUIT SECTIONS ON Tile CONDUIT, THEN INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAYS. FINISH Tile INSTALLATION WITil A I/2" TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT Tile INTERFACE. 778' X-1 IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: STEEL WEBBING ON A FLOOR 9-1 1-5, 13 4871, R2 EC ITEMI SUPPORT IS INTERFERING WITil Tile 11-1 INSTALLATION OF Tile 1/4" TillCK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" TillCK OVERLAY SECTIONS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. FILL ANY GAPS AT Tile INTERFERENCE WITH TROWEL GRADE. w - .. . ..

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME.082, REV. 2 DM 924)77, DCN's PAGE K10 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG. ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT' BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)' CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE r SCITEMES K125) ZONE 4871, R2 SG 852' l-100B SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: A FLANGED GRATING SUPPORT 9-1 1-5,7 ITEM J BEAM (IN TWO PLACES) INTERFERES 11-1 WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4* THICK UPGRADE 'WF.RLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" 7 HICK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4*) TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE ESSI NTIAL CONDUIT. CUT Tile CONDUIT SECTIONS AS NECESSARY AND FILL SPACES WITil 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE TO ACillEVE THE SM ALLEST GAP POSSIBLE. 4871, R2 SG 852' l-100B SK17a Y Y ISSUE: A I/4' INSTRUMENT TUBE AND 9-1 1-5,7 ITEM K UNISTRUT SUPPORT INTERFERES WITII 11-1 TIIE INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4" THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4") TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. CUT THE CONDUIT SECTIONS AS NECESSARY AND FILL SPACES WITil 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE TO ACHIEVE THE SM ALLEST GAP POSSIBLE. 4871, R2 SG 852' l-100A SK l7a Y Y ISSUE: A PRESSURE GAGE PREVENTS 9-1 1-5, 20 ITEM L PROPER INSTALLATION OF Tile 1/4" 11-1 TillCK OVERLAY UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: REMOVE Tile PRESSURE GAGE AND REPLACE IT WITll A STREET ELBOW AND A NEW BOTTOM MOUNT GAGE. COMPLETE Tile INSTALL.ATION OF Tile 1/4" TillCK CONDUIT OVERLAYS.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082,'REV. 2 l I DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE Kit OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS FIRE SUPP. DET. .DESCRlirrlON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT . BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM 1 AREA / . (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) 1 ZONE. Y Y ISSUE: A NON-ESSENTIAL CONDUlT 9-1 1-5, 20 4871, R2 SG 852' l-100A SK17a INTERFERES WITH THE INSTALLATION 11-1 ITEM M OF THE 1/4" THICK UPGRADE OVERLAY. RESOLUTION: NO CHANGE REQUIRED. ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOWED INSTALLATION OF 1/4" THICK OVERLAY UPGRADES. SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: A 2" X 2" ANGLE 1RON PIPE 9-1 1-5, 7 4871, R2 SG 852' l-100A SUPPORT IS INTERFERING WIT 11 Tile Il-1 ITEM N INSTALLATION OF THE 1/4" TillCK UPGRADE OVERLAY. z RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/2" TillCK I OVERLAY SECTIONS (INSTEAD OF 1/4") TO Tile EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE I ESSENTI AL CONDUlT. CUT THE CONDUlT SECTIONS AS NECESSARY AND FILL SPACES WITH 330-1 TROWELABLE GRADE TO ACHIEVE TifE i SM ALLEST GAP POSSIBLE. l-109B SKl7a Y' Y ISSUE: A UNISTRUT SUPPORT IS 9-1 1-5, 13 4871, R2 SG 880' ITEM O INTERFERING WITH Tile INSTALLATION 11-1 OF THE REQUIRED STRESS SKIN AND 1/4" OVERLAY SECTION UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1/4" THICK OVERLAY SECTIONS AROUND Tile RADIAL BEND CUTTING TO FIT AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE FILL ANY GAPS AT THE INTERFERENCE WITH TROWEL GRADE. 1

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME482, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K12 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRIIrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KlGt-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 4871, R2 AB 790' l-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: EXISTINO SUPPORT COVERAGE 9-1 1-5, 12 ITEM P THERMO-LAG (IN 4 PLACES) PREVENTS 11-1 PROPER APPLICATION OF 1/4" OVERLAY UPGRADES. RESOLUTION: REMOVE Tile EXISTING 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS FROM EACH OF THE LOCATIONS. INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAYS ON THE CONDUlT, THEN REINSTALL 1/2" PANELS ON THE SUPPORTS. FINISH THE INSTALLATION WITH A I/2" TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT Tile INTERFACE. 6829, R1 AB 852' X-241 AA2 t f Y Y ISSUE: REMOVAL OF UNNECESSARY N/A N/A FIRE STOP MATERIAL COULD CAUSE CABLE DAMAGE. RESOLUTION: ABANDON FIRE STOPS IN PLACE - NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6830, R2 SG 790' l-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: A BOX INSTALLATION 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 15 ITEM 1 INTERFERES WITH Tile 11-2, 11-4, CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP UPGRADES. 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN ON BUTT JOINT & FLAIR OUT ONTO THE WALL. INSTALL A FLAT PANEL (PORTION OF BOX FRAME) OVER THE STRESS SKIN.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K13 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES . K125) ZONE 6C30, R2 SG 790' l-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: CABLES IN EXPOSED TRAY WITH 11-1 1-5, 16 ITEM 2 TWO LAYERS OF 330-660 FLEXI- 11-2 BLANKET. 15-2 RESOLUTION: UPGRADE THE TRAY FLEXI-BLANKET WITil MESH, FILL BETWEEN BUNDLES AND ALL VOIDS WITli TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL. 6830. R2 SG 790' 1-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: AN ANGLE SUPPORT AT THE 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 14 ITEM 3 BOTTOM OF A FIRE STOP PREVENTS 15-1, 11-2, NORM AL INSTALLATION OF THE CLAMP 11-4, 11-5, ASSEM BLY. 13-2 RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT THE BOTTOM CLAMP BAR IN A "U" SHAPE PATTERN TO FIT AROUND THE ANGLE SU PPORT. 6830, R2 SG 790' l-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 4 ISSUE. CWAR 56 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6830. R2 SG 790' l-063 SAlc N Y ISSUE: A SMALL AREA OF DAMAGE N/A N/A ITEM S OCCURRED UPON REMOVAL OF A CWAR 137 CH AMFER STRIP. RESOLUTION: REWORK THE DAMAGED AREA - NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS.

                                                                                       .                          .                      .              .                                           . ~-

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 . DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K14 OF K125 l UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV : ' BLDG. ELEVi ROOM- FIRE SUPP. :DE'- DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF " . SUPPORT - BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE - SCHEMES K125)

ZONE 6831, R4 GEN. ISSUE: ZERO CLEARANCE BETWEEN 9-1 1-5, 17 ITEM 1. PG 8 CONDUIT RACEWAY BOX ENCLOSURES. 9-3

! 10-1 RESOLUTION: WHERE BOTH 10-2 COMMODITIES ARE PROTECTED WITH THERMO-LAG M ATERIAL, THE REQUIRED JOINT UPGRADE MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY INSTALLING STRESS SKIN ON BOTH COMMODITIES AS A CONTINUOUS PIECE. 6831,R4 SB 880' l-109B SK17c Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1 1-5, 17 ITEM 2, PG 9 BETWEEN TWO JUNCTION BOX 9-3 ENCLOSURES. 10-1 10-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC FIBER BACK DAM BETWEEN THE BOXES, BUILD UP TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL, AND INSTALL THE REQUIRED JOINT UPGRADE BY INSTALLING STRESS SKIN ON BOTH COMMODITIES AS A CONTINUOUS PIECE. 4 6831,R4 SB 779' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 10-1 1-5, 18 ITEM 3, PG 10 BETWEEN A JUNCTION BOX AND 10-2 CONCRETE BEAM. t RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC FIBER BACK DAM BETWEEN THE BOX AND Tile BEAM, BUILD UP TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL, AND INSTALL TiiE REQUIRED UPGRADE BY INSTALLING STRESS SKIN ON THE BOX AND FLARING IT OUT ONTO THE BEAM, THEN lilLTI BOLTING I IT INTO PLACE UNDER TWO LAYERS OF FLAT PANELS.

A'ITACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K15 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . AREA / (Y/N) (YIN)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES ' K125) ZONE 6831, R4 SB 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: REMOVABLE TilERMO-LAG 10-1 1-5, 19 ITEM 4, PG 11 COVER FASTENING DEVICE. 10-2 RESOLUTION: REINFORCE THE BOX COVERS LONGITUDINALJOINTS. FOR COVER FASTENING DEVICE, SEE CWAR 399 LATER. 6831, R4 EC 779' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: DVO THERMO-LAGGED 10-1 1-5, 20 ITEM 5, PG 12 JUNCTION BOXES ARE NOT IDENTIFIED 10-2 AS REQUIRING UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: REINFORCE THE JUNCTION BOXES. 6831, R4 SB 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: TiiERMO-LAGGED JUNCTION 13-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 6, PG 12 BOXES ARE NOT IDENTIFIED AS REQUIRING 350-5000-10 TOPCOAT. RESOLUTION: APPLY 350-5000-10 TOPCOAT TO ALL THERMO-LAGGED JUNCTION BOXES. AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: T11ERE IS INSUFFICIENT 11-2 1-5, 21 6831. R4 ITEM 7 CWAR I CLEARANCE BETWEEN A 330-660 AIRDROP AND A 3.20-1 PROTRUDING GROUND CABLE TO INSTALL THE REQUIRED UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE USING WIRE MESH TO ENCAPSULATE BOTH ITEMS.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K16 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF.' SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST. . (PAGES K104 . FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6331, R4 SG 852' l-100F SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: 2 FLEX CONDUITS ARE SO CLOSE Il-2 1-5, 21 ITEM 8. CWAR 2 TOGETiiER TIIAT THE REQUIRED 330-660 UPGRADE CANNOT BE INSTALLED. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE BOTII AIR DROP AND FLEX BY ENCAPSULATING BOTil, UTILIZING WIRE MESII AND 330-660 TROWEL GR ADE. 6831, R4 SG 852' l-1008 SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1 1-5, 11 ITEM 9, CWAR 3 BETWEEN CONDUlT, IIANGER, 9-3 (ITEM 1) PROTRUDING ITEM, AND CEILING. 10-1 10-2 RESOLUTION: TRIM STRESS SKIN OR 11-1 WIRE MESil ON Tile RADIAL BENDS 11-2 AND EXTEND OUT ONTO PROTRUDING ITEM. WHERE CEILING INTERFERES, BUTT THE MESH OR STRESS SKIN AND FILLET WilERE ACCESSIBLE 6831, R4 SG 852' l-1008 SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE AT ITEM 9, CWAR 3 JUNCTION BOX AND SERVICE AIR PIPE. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: TRIM A MINOR AMOUNT OF TiiE EXISTING TROWEL GRADE TO ACHIEVE A SMOOTH SURFACE CONTOUR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE UPGRADE.

A'ITACIIMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K17 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIfrTION/ ISSUE OF. -SUPPORT' BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCIIEMES K125) ZONE 6831, R4 SG 852' l-100F SK17a Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE WITil 9-1 1-5, 22 ITEM 10 CWAR 4 PULL BOX, PROTRUDING ITEM T-LAG, 9-3 CONDUIT ll ANGER AND CEILING. 10-1 10-2 RESOLUTION: OMIT STRESS SKIN AT Il-1 PULL BOX, INSTALL STRESS SKIN AS 11-2 FAR AS POSSIBLE AND EXTEND ONTO Tile JB PANEL AND OMIT STRESS SKIN BETWEEN TIIE CEILING AND PROTRUDING ITEM. 6831, R4 SG 852' l-100B SK17a Y Y ISSUE: LACK OF ADEQUATE N/A N/A ITEM 11, CWAR CLEARANCE BETWEEN JB UPGRADE 66 AND INSTRUMENT TUBING. RESOLUTION: REMOVE SUFFICIENT AMOUNTS OF TilERMO-LAG FILLET TO ALLOW AIR GAP. COMMODITY CLEARANCE DEVIATION ONLY. 6831, R4 N/A N/A ITEM 12 EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE CWAR 60 SG 852' l-088 SBl44 Y Y DEVIATIONS. 61,62,67 SG 852' l-094 SB15 Y Y 69,70,71 SG 852' l-1008 SK17a Y Y RESOLUTION: NO TilERMO-LAG UNIQUE 75,117,118, SG 852' l-100F SKl7a Y Y CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 153, 107, 114, EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y 184, 336 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y 6831, R4 EC 778' X-IIS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: 12" M AX. IIILTI BOLT SPACING 11-4 1-5, 23 ITEM 13, CANNOT BE MAINTAINED. CWAR 138 RESOLUTION: EXTEND IIILTI SPACING REQUIREMENTS BY l'

e . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - . - . . . . ._. - . < - . . _ . . . _. - . . _ ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K18 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YlN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) l ZONE 6831, R4 AB 832' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCES CAUSE TIIE 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 24, 25 ITEM 14, NEED TO DELETE STRESS SKIN AND A 11-2,Il-4, CWAR 47 PORTION OF Tile PICTURE FRAME. I l-5,13-2 (ITEM !) RESOLUTION: DELETE INSTALLATION OF THE PICTURE FRAME ALONG TIIE NORTH SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE, UPGRADE SPLICE BLOCKS W/ STRESS SKIN & AT INTERFERING TRAY, DELETE STRESS SKIN & OMIT STAPLES. 6831, R4 AB 832' X-226 AA21d Y Y ISSUE: OUT OF SCOPE ITEM REQUIRING ITEM 14, REINFORCEMENT & UPGRADE TO CWAR 47 ENSURE ESSENTIAL ENVELOPE (ITEM 2) INTEGRITY. RESOLUTION: CONTINUE THE REQUIRED TRAY UPGRADE OUT ONTO THE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY & INSTALL A FIRE STOP & CLAMP BAR. 6831. R4 AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: TiiERE IS NO DETAIL FOR 11-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 15, UPGRADE OF FLEX CONDUlT TO/FROM CWAR 281 AN ENCLOSURE. RESOLUTION: APPLY A LAYER OF TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL APPROXIM ATELY 3/16' TlilCK,2" ONTO THE PANELS & 2" ONTO TIIE FLEX 1-BLANKET. COVER WITli MESH ONTO BOTH SURFACES. SECURE WITH STAPLES AND COVER WITH 1/16-TROWEL GRADE. FINISH WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET ALL AROUND THE INTERFACE.

ATTACllMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE Kl9 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST. CAGES K104-FIRE SCIIEMES KID ZONE 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: FLEX CONDUIT & JB COVER 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 19, 26 6831, R4 SG ITEM 16, FRAME INTERFERES WITi{ FLEXI-CWAR 399 BLANKET INSTALLATION AND MESH (ITEM 1) UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: USE DETAIL 2-3.6 PUTTING 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS IN PLACE OF FLEXI-BLANKET AND UPGRADE WITil WIRE MESIL 6831, R4 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: INADEQUATE TilERMO-LAG JB ITEM 16, COVER AND RESTRAINT DESIGN. CWAR 399 RESOLUTION: REWORK OR REBUILD (ITEM 2) COVER AND FABRICATE A T-LAG JB COVER RESTRAINT BAR. 810' l-077 A SA142 N Y ISSUE: SPACE CONSTRAINTS INIIIBIT 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 27 6832, R1 SG ITEM 1, CWAR 21 LONGITUDINAL JOINT UPGRADE Il-2,Il-4, INSTALLATION. 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: APPLY TROWEL GRADE M ATERI AL TO STRESS SKIN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ON Tile TRAY, SECURE USING STAPLES OR WIRES. WilERE PIIYSICAL OBSTRUCTIONS PERSIST, LAP STRESS SKIN ONTO TRAY AND OBSTRUCTION. 6832, R1 SG 810' l-077 A SA142 N Y ISSUE: REVISED DESIGN SPECIFICATION. N/A N/A ITEM 2, CWAR 255 RESOLUTION: NO TIIERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K20 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-- FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6832, R1 SG 810' l-077A SA142 N Y ISSUE: LONGITUDINAL JOINT 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 28 ITEM 3, REINFORCEMENT CANNOT BE 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 319 INSTALLED. 11-4, 11-5, (ITEM 1) 13-2 l RESOLUTION: REMOVE MINOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE & INSTALL 2 BANDS MINIMUM AROUND AN ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANEL 6832, R1 SG 810' l-077A SA142 N Y ISSUE: UNIQUE AIR DROP ITEM 3, CONFIGURATION IM PEDES THE CWAR 319 STANDARD 304 MESil AIR DROP (ITEM 2) REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: 304 MESH SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN TWO PIECES. 6832, R1 SG 810' l-077A sal 42 N Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 4, DEVI ATION. CWAR 400 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6833, R0 AB 810' X-203 AA216 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT UPGRADE N/A N/A RESOLUTION: NO UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6909, R1 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9- 1, 9-3, I-5, 29 ITEM I, CWAR 19 EXISTS TO INSTALL Tile REQUIRED 10-1, 10-2 STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: OMIT MINOR AMOUNTS OF STRESS SKIN.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K21 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF - SUPPORT- : BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6909, RI SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1, 9-3, !-5, 30 ITEM 2, CWAR 20 EXISTS TO INSTALL THE REQUIRED 10-1, 10-2, STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT. 11-1, 11-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2 PIECE STRESS SKIN, OMIT TIE WIRES & STAPLE AS NECESSARY. 6909, R1 SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 31 ITEM 3, CWAR 23 EXISTS TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN 10-1, 10-2 REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: OMIT STRESS SKIN AT INACCESSIBLE AREAS, AND FILL TilESE AREAS WITil TROWEL GRADE. 6909, RI SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: CLEARANCE BETWEEN 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 32 ITEM 4, CWAR 28 ESSENTIAL AND NON-ESSENTIAL 10-1. 10-3, CONDUITS EXITING T11E BOX 14-1, 15-1, ENCLOSURES AND CLEARANCE 11-2 BETWEEN THE CONDUITS AND TIIE WALL IS INSUFFICIENT FOR INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: REMOVE EXISTING T11ERMO-LAG AS NECESSARY, REINSTALL PREFORMED PIECES ON CONDUITS. INSTAL'. PANELS ON BOX & STITCII JOINTS. INSTALL PICTURE FRAME USING lilLTI BOLTS. INSTALL STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K22 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. .DESCRIirTION/ISSUN OF SUPPORT- - BASIS / NOTES E AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104 , FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE

<   6909, R1        SG     810' l-083 SD9      N        Y            ISSUE: REINFORCEMENT UPGRADES FOR                   l-2, 11-1,        1-5, 33 ITEM 5, CWAR 36                                                  TIIE STATED TRAYS CANNOT BE                         12-1, 12-2, INSTALLED DUE TO LIMITED WORK                       13-1, 14-1, i                                                                     SPACE & PROTRUDING ITEM                             15-1, Il-2, INTERFERENCE.                                       11-4, 11-4, 13-2 RESOLUTION: REMOVE EXISTING T-LAG M ATERIAL FROM THE TRAYS, SHIM THE TRAYS AS NECESSARY, REINSTALL TilERMO-LAG MATERIAL USING BANDS
                                                                     & STITCH ALL JOINTS. ATTACH A PICTURE FRAME USING HILTI BOLTS AND/OR STICK PINS.

6909, RI SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 6, DEVIATIONS. CWAR 50,51,149, 155 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6909, RI SG 810' l-083 SD9 N Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE 11-1, 14-1, I-5,20 ITEM 7, INTERFERENCE. 15-1, I l-2, 3 CWAR 111 11 4, 11-5, RESOLUTION: COVERAGE AS FAR AS 13-2 POSSIBLE PER DETAIL I4-1. i 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SEl6 N Y ISSUE: THE USE OF i 1/2" STAPLES 11-1, 11-2 l-5, 34 ITEM 1, CWAR 27 DURING THE UPGRADE COULD CAUSE DAM AGE TO TIIE INTERNAL CABLES. RESOLUTION: USE 7/8" STAPLES COMPLETELY AROUND THE FLEXI-BLANKET UPGRADE.

ATTACilMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K23 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRil* TION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT. - BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KlGS-FIRE SCHEMES K125) I ZONE 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT SPACE TO 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 15 ITEM 2, CWAR 29 INSTALL STRESS SKIN /MESII ONTO TIIE 10-1, 10-2 JB. RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE STRESS SKIN AS FAR AS PIIYSICALLY POSSIBLE AND ABUT TO THE CONTAINMENT WALL, FILLET WITH 330-660 AT THE WALL 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: TIIERMO-LAG INSTALLATION 1-2,Il-1, 1-5, 35 ITEM 3, CWAR 30 NOT ACCESSIBLE FOR JOINT 12-1, 12-1, REINFORCEMENT. 13-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE TiiERMO- Il-4 LAG 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET, INSTALL PANELS & STITCII JOINTS. REINFORCE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, REINSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET AND STAPLE INTO PLACE. 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION 1-2, 11-1, I-5, 35 ITEM 4, CWAR 31 NOT ACCESSIBLE FOR JOINT 12-1, 12-1, REINFORCEMENT. 13-1, 14-1, 15-1, 11-2, l RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE THERMO- 11-4 LAG 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET, INSTALL PANELS & STITCil JOINTS. REINFORCE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN, REINSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET AND STAPLE INTO PLACE. SG 832' l-096 SEl6 N Y ISSUE: TIIERMO-LAG PLATE COVER 11-2, 11-4, I-5, 36 6910. R2 ITEM 5, CWAR 39 PROIIIBITS INSTALLATION OF 7" T-LAG 11-5, 13-2 SUPPORT UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: ABUT THE T-LAG SUPPORT UPGRADE PIECE TO TIIE THERMO-LAG PLATE COVER.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077. DCN's PAGE K24 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO,/REV BLDG ELEV- ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT ~ BASIS / NOTES : AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ' ZONE 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 21 ITEM 6, CWAR 82 CANNOT BE INSTALLED. L RESOLUTION: COVER THE 330-660 PROTRUDING ITEM UTILIZING 2 STAINLESS STEEL MESH. STAPLE AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE A SNUG FIT. THEN FILLET. 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SEl6 N Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING ITEM STRESS SKIN 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 21, 15 ITEM 7, REINFORCEMENT UPGRADE IS CWAR 101 INSUFFICIENT. 4 RESOLUTION: REMOVE PREVIOUSLY 1 INSTALLED UPGRADE, INSTALL 4" TO 5" STRESS SKIN OR MESil. STAPLE INTO PLACE. WilERE 4" CANNOT BE AClllEVED, ABUT TO THE WALL AND ] FILLET. 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 8, DEVIATIONS. CWAR I13,446 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6910, R2 SG 832' l-096 SE16 N Y ISSUE: A 3" CONDUIT RESTRICTS THE 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 37 ITEM 9 INSTALLATION OF TIIE SPLICE PLATE 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 342 OVERLAY AND INTERFERES WITH LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: SPLICE PLATE OVERLAY AND LONGITUDINAL TRAY. REINFORCEMENT M AY BE TRIMMED / CUT AND INSTALLED IN 2 PIECES. FILLET TIIE ENTIRE LENGTH OF INTERFACE.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K25 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV ' BLDG ELEV -ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREA /. (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES . K125) ZONE 6911, R2 SG 852' l-100F SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: A NEW DESIGN IS REQUIRED FOR 10-1 1-5, 19 ITEM 1 THE EXISTING ENCLOSURE WITH 10-1 REMOVABLE COVER. RESOLUTION: REWORK AND/OR REBUILD REMOVABLE COVER AND BOX BY ADDING A 330-1 FLAT PANEL FABRICATING A BOX FRAME JAM AREA. FABRICATE AND INSTALL A THERMO-LAG COVER RESTRAINT BAR. INSTALL SECOND 330-1 LAYER ATTACHING TO EXISTING PANELS WITH TIE WIRE STITCHING. 6911, R2 SG 852.' l-1008 SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCES. 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 11 ITEM 2, CWAR 3 10-1, 10-2, RESOLUTION: DUPLICATED WITH DCN 11-1, 11-2 6831, REV. 4, CWAR 3 6911, R2 SG 852' l-100F SK17a Y Y ISSUE: AN ALTERNATE METHOD OF 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 19 ITEM 3, CWAR 14 ACHIEVING THE REQUIRED ENCLOSURE DEPTH IS NEEDED. RESOLUTION: ADD APPROX. 4" PANEL EXTENSION ONTO THE IDENTIFIED BOX - TO ALLOW THE REMOVABLE COVER TO FIT TIGHTLY.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K26 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRlirTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPO: "" - BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6911, R2 SG 852' l-100F SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO INTERFERENCE AND 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 15 ITEM 4, CWAR 17 LIMITED WORKING SPACE THE REQUIRED 2* MINIMUM JOINT REINFORCEMENT AT A SPLICE PLATE CANNOT BE COMPLETED. RESOLUTION: TRIM SPLICE PLATE TO FIT SNUG BETWEEN WALL & AIR DROP. INSTALL STRESS SKIN & TIE WIRE & STAPLE INTO PLACE. FILLET SIDES & BOTTOM, LAPPING ONTO TIIE AIR DROP. 6911, R2 SG 852' l-1008 SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 13-2 1-5, 13 ITEM 5, CWAR 24 EXISTS BETWEEN A RADIAL BEND, A SUPPORT HANGER & A CONDUIT TO INSTALL TIIE REQUIRED RADIAL BEND REINFORCEM ENT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UP TO THE INTERFERENCE. OMIT STRESS SKIN AT INACCESSIBLE AREAS. TIE WIRE & STAPLE TO ASSURE A SNUG FIT. 6911, R2 SG 852' l-1008 SK17a Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 6 SG 852' l-100F SK17a Y Y DEVIATIONS. CWAR 46,49,48 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K27 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) - ZONE SKl7a Y Y ISSUE: (ITEMS 1,2&3) MODIFICATIONS 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 19 6911 R2 SG 852' 1-100F ITEM 7, ARE REQUIRED TO Tile EXISTING CWAR 421 ENCLOSURE WITH REMOVABLE COVER. RESOLUTION: REWORK AND/OR REBUILD REMOVABLE COVER BY ADDING A 330-1 FLAT PANEL FABRICATING A BOX FRAME JAM AREA. FABRICATE AND INSTALL A TilERMO-LAG COVER RESTRAINT BAR. INSTALL SECOND 330-1 LAYER ATTACHING TO EXISTING PANELS WITil TIE WIRE STITCillNG. 852' l-103 SE18 N Y ISSUE: 1 1/2" LONG STAPLES COULD 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 38 6912 R1 SG ITEM 2, CWAR 9 PENETRATE INTO CABLES IN TRAY. RESOLUTION: COVER AREA WITII MESH AND TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLE USING 7/8" STAPLES. 852' l-103 SE18 N Y ISSUE: TRAY JOINT STRESS SKIN 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 15 6912, RI SG OBSTRUCTION. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 1 11-5,13-2 RESOLUTION: CONTINUE THE JOINT UPGRADE ONTO Tile OBSTRUCTING ITEM. 880' l-108B SKl7c Y Y ISSUE: SPECIAL TOP COAT IS REQUIRED 13-2 1-5, 20 6913 R1 SG ITEM 1 ON ALL THERMO-LAG IN ROOM 108B. RESOLUTION: APPLY TilERMO-LAG 350-5000-10 TOPCOAT TO ALL EXPOSED TilERMO-LAG IN ROOM 108B.

~.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K28 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS

               -DCN NO./REV     BLDG-    ELEV ROOM   FIRE     SUPP.    . DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF-               SUPPORT                 BASIS / NOTES AREA /   (Y/N)      (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION-                 TEST                    (PAGES K104-_.

FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6913, R1 SG 880' l-108B SKl7c Y Y ISSUE: TIIERE IS ONLY 0" TO 1/2" 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 10 ITEM 2, CWAR 5 BETWEEN 2 ENCLOSURES. 10-1, 10-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC FIBER AS A BACK DAM BETWEEN THE ENCLOSURES, COVER THE GAP WITH TROWEL GRADE AND INSTALL STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT ACROSS BOTH ITEMS AS A CONTINUOUS PIECE. 6914, R1 SG 880' l-109B SK17e Y Y ISSUE: THERE IS ONLY 0" TO 1/2" 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 10 ITEM I, CWAR 6 BETWEEN 2 ENCLOSURES. 10-1, 10-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC FIBER AS A BACK DAM BETWEEN THE ENCLOSURES, COVER THE GAP WITH TROWEL GRADE AND INSTALL STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT ACROSS BOTH ITEMS AS A CONTINUOUS PIECE. 6915, R2 EC 778' X-Il3 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 10

ITEM 1, CWAR 10 BETWEEN ~IWO JUNCTION BOX 10-1, 10-3 ENCLOSURES.

RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC FIBER BACK DAM BETWEEN THE BOXES, BUILD UP TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AND INSTALL THE REQUIRED JOINT UPGRADE BY INSTALLING STRESS SKIN ON BOTH COMMODITIES AS A CONTINUOUS PIECE. 4

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K29 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG AREA / (YIN) (YlN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) ZONE EA43 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 10 6915. R2 EC 778' X-113 BETWEEN TWO JUNCTION BOX 10-1, 10-2 ITEM 2, CWAR I1 ENCLOSURES. RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC FIBER BACK DAM BETWEEN Tile BOXES, BUILD UP TROWEL GRADE M ATERIAL AND INSTALL Tile REQUIRED JOINT UPGRADE BY INSTALLING STRESS SKIN ON BOTil COMMODITIES AS A CONTINUOUS PIECE. EA43 Y Y ISSUE: A PIPE INTFRFERES WITH 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 39 6915 R2 EC 778' X-Il3 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. 15-1, I l-2, ITEM 3, CWAR 16 I1-4,II-5 (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: OMIT Tile STRESS SKIN UPGRADE & INSTALL CERAMIC BANDING ON BOTil SIDES OF INTERFERENCE. 6914, R2 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE BUNDLES INTERFERE ITEM 3, CWAR 16 WITil FLEX-MESil UPGRADE. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: REMOVE TIIE EXISTING 330-1 TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE. REMOVE Ti1E FLEXI-BLANKET COVERAGE. REINSTALL AND UPGRADE PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6914, R2 EC 778' X-Il3 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: ALL-TilREAD RODS INTERFERE ITEM 3 CWAR 16 WITil TRAY SPLICE PLATE UPGRADES. (ITEM 3) RESOLUTION: WilERE OBSTRUCTION EXISTS, RUN Tile STRESS SKIN UPGRADE UP TO Tile INTERFERING ITEM.

A'lTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K30 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KIGi-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6914 R2 EC 778' X-Il3 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: TRAYS RUN TOO CLOSE 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 39 ITEM 3, CWAR 16 TOGETHER TO RECEIVE INDIVIDUAL 15-1, 11-2, (ITEM 4) STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. Il-4,Il-5 RESOLUTION. INSTALL STRESS SKIN ACROSS BOTH TRAYS. 6914, R2 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: UPGRADE OF 330-660 COVERAGE ITEM 3, CWAR 16 CANNOT BE AClilEVED DUE TO LIMITED (ITEM 5) SPACE. RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE 330-1 COVERAGE ON Tile TRAY, REMOVE THE 330-660 COVERAGE AND BOX THE ESSENTIAL ITEMS TO TIIE WALL PER TYP. DETAILS. 6915, R2 EC 778' X-Il3 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 30 ITEM 4, CWAR 22 EXISTS TO INSTALL TIE WIRE 13-2 FASTENERS 2" M AX. FROM THE END OF TIIE RADIAL BEND. RESOLUTION: STAPLE AS NECESSARY TO AClllEVE A SNUG FIT AND FILLET WITil 330-1. t>915, R2 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: RADIAL BEND WHICil REQUIRES 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 15, 30 ITEM 5 CWAR 25 UPGRADE IS ENCAPSULATED IN 3-2 TilERMO-LAG. RESOLUTION: STAPLE AND TIE WIRE STRESS SKIN IN PLACE AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE SNUG FIT. STRESS SKIN SilALL EXTEND ONTO PROTRUDING ITEMS 2' MIN.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K31 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104- - FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: A DUCT INTERFERES WITH 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 30, 40 6915, R2 EC STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION. 10-1, 10-2 ITEM 6 CWAR 26 RESOLUTION: PRE-FORM AND PRE-BUTTFR THE STRESS SKIN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND USE TIE WIRE TO SECURE IN PLACE. 778' EA43 Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN CAUSED A LIMITED 9-1, 9-3, 1-5,41 6915. R2 EC X-Il3 SPACE CONDITION. 10-1, 10-2 ITEM 7, CWAR 32 RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN AS FAR AS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE. 6915, R2 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 8 DEVIATIONS. I CWAR 52,53,124, 125, 159, 160, 162, RESOLUTION: NO TIIERMO-LAG UNIQUE 163,136 CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: LIMITED SPACE PREVENTS 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 42 6915, R2 EC ITEM 9, STANDARD THERMO-LAG CWAR 100 INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION: WRAP Tile AREA USING DETAILS 7-1 & 8-2, AND WHERE GROUND WIRE EXITS, WRAP IT WITil 2 LAYERS 330-660. EA43 Y Y ISSUE: 330-1 MATERIAL IS BUTTED TO 11-2 1-5, 21 6915, R2 EC 778' X-Il3 ITEM 10, FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES, CWAR 123 REINFORCEMENT AT THE INTERFACE IS rtEQUIRED. RESOLUTION: REINFORCE BY WRAPPING STAINLESS STEEL WIRE MESil AROUND BOTil ITEMS AND APPLY TROWEL GRADE.

A'ITACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2

'                                                                                                         DM 92-077, DCN's                                                           PAGE K32 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV -    BLDG ELEVl  ROOM'                                           FIRE                SUPP. . DET.  ' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF-                                                   _ SUPPORT .              BASIS / NOTES AREA /              '(Y/N)     (Y/N)  CONCERN / RESOLUTION                                                        TEST                   (PAGES K104-FIRE                                                                                                             SCHEMES               . K125)

ZONE 6915, R2 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: DELETE SIL-TEMP WRAPS ON - Il-1,Il-2 1-5,20 ITEM i1 AIRDROPS. CWAR 145 RESOLUTION: DELETE SIL-TEMP WRAPS ON AIRDROPS. 6915, R2 EC 778' X-113 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: STANDARD TIE WIRE SPACING 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 30 ITEM 12, CANNOT BE USED. 13-2 CWAR 15 RESOL.UTION: INSTALL TIE WIRE WHERE POSSIBLE THEN STAPLE TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT. 6915, R2 EC 778' X-I l3 EA43 Y Y ISSUE: TRANSFER RESPONSIBILITY OF N/A N/A ITEM 13, ITEMS BETWEEN ROOMS. CWAR 13 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6916. R1 EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: THERE IS A i 1/2" INTERFERENCE 11-1, I l-2 1-5, I I ITEM 1 BETWEEN A HVAC DUCT AND THE RADIAL BEND UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE SS-304 FLEXI-MESH TO REINFORCE THE CONDUIT RADIAL BEND. THE SS-304 FLEXI-MESH MAY BE TRIMMED AS REQUIRED AROUND THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE. UTILIZE STAPLES AND TIE WIRE TO SECURE THE Ft.EXI-MESH AROUND THE TRIMMED ARF . TO PROVIDE A SNUG FIT.

ATTACHMENT K ' ER-MEG 2, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K33 OF K125 1, _ UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV' ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES ' AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104 . FIRE SCHEMES K125) 4 ZONE 6916 RI EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 43 !' ITEM 2, CW/.R 33 HAS CAUSED LIMITED ACCESS 10-1, 10-2, PROHIBITING THE INSTALLATION OF 13-2 f STRESS SKIN. e RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN AS FAR AS POSSIBLE, STAPLE OR T!E WIRE AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE A SNUG , FIT. , 6916, RI EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT SPACE TO . 9-1, 13-2 1-5, 44 i ITEM 3, CWAR 35 INSTALL STRESS SKIN / MESH ON THE COMPLETED RADIAL BEND. RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE STRESS SKIN OUT ONTO THE PROTRUDING ITEM AND STAPLE / TIE WIRE TO ASSURE A SNUG ' FIT, APPLY A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWIL GRADE. , 6916, R1 EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: ADD 4 RADIAL BENDS TO THE N/A N/A ITEM 4, CWAR 37 UPGRADE SCOPE. RESOLUTION: NO UNIQUE THERMO-LAG CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6916, RI EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: 5* STEEL MESH AIR DROP 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 5, CWAR 41 COVERAGE CANNOT BE MET, ALSO A GROUND CABLE CANNOT BE COVERED PER TYPICAL DETAIL RESOLUTION: REMOVE THE THERMO-LAG M ATERIAL FROM THE GROUND CABLE, AIR DROP AND TRAY. REWORK THE GROUND WIRE AND REINSTALL THE THERMO-LAG PER TYPICAL DETAILS. ym..

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K34 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6916, RI EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: A PULLBOX UPGRADE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 44 ITEM 6, CWAR 42 COVERAGE CANNOT BE MET DUE TO 0* 10-1, 10-1 (ITEM 1) GAP BETWEEN CONDUIT SECTION AND WALL. RESOLimON: WRAP THE STRESS SKIN AS FAR AS POSSIBLE, SECURE W/ TIE WIRE & STAPLES TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT. ADD A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. 6916, RI EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: RADIAL BEND COVERAGE HAS 0* ITEM 6. CWAR 42 GAP BETWEEN RADIAL BEND & WALL. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: BUTT THE STEEL MESH / STRESS SKIN UP TO TiiE T-LAG SUPPORT COVERAGE. LAP OUT ONTO THE FLAT PANELS AND STAPLE TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT. 6916, R1 EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: 1/2" OVERLAP OF STRESS ITEM 6, CWAR 42 SKIN / MESH ONTO RADIAL BEND (ITEM 3) STRAIGHT CONDUIT CANNOT BF INSTALLED. RESOLUTION: BUTT THE F.ADIAL BEND UPGRADE TO THE FLEXT-BLANKET BUNDLE ADDING A TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE INTERF ACE. 6916. R1 EC 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: DETAIL 3-5.1 DOES NOT CALL 11-1, I l-2 1-5, 34 ITEM 9. CWAR 84 OUT WH AT SIZE STAPLES TO USE IN THIRD LAYER FLEXI-OLANKET. RESOLUTION: USE /8" STAPLES.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K35 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS i

                                                                                                                                                                                                        . SUPPORT -    BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV    jBLDG. ELEV ROOM   FIRE      SUPP. DET. DESCRil' TION / ISSUE OF .

AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6916, RI EC- 854' X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 10, DEVIATIONS. CWAR 115,116 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. X-150A EA74 N Y ISSUE: A CABLE TRAY TERMINATES 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 20, 91 6916, RI EC 854' WITil A FLAT THERMO-LAG PANEL AT 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 11, THE END OF THE TRAY. 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 191 RESOLUTION: CONFIGURATION DOES NOT REQUIRE SPECIAL UPGRADE. 6937, R0 GENERIC ISSUE: A METHOD OF DETERMINING AIR N/A N/A ITEM 1 DROP BUNDLE DI AMETER IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION: NO UNIQUE CONFIGURATION OR DEVIATION. 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS AIR 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 6980, RI SG ITEM 1 DROP INTERFERENCES OBSTRUCT TYPICAL DETAIL INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ENSURE PROPER OVERLAPS, AND SECURE WITH TROWEL GRADE AND STAPLES. 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: STAPLE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 9, 15, 36, 6980, R1 SG SPACE FOR APPLICATION 10-1, 10-2, 45 ITEM 2 11-1, 11-2, CWAR 239 RESOLUTION: ELIMIN ATE STAPLING 14-1, 15-1. (ITEM I) 11-4, 11-5, ALONG THE WALL DUE TO 2' CLEARANCE. 13-2

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K36 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6980, RI SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE TO INSTALL 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 9, 15, 36, ITEM 2, SUPPORT UPGRADE 10-1, 10-2, 45 CWAR 239 11-1,Il-2, (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: INSTALL AN 8" THERMO- 14-1,15-1, LAG STRIP BETWEEN TiiE INSTRUMENT 11-4, 11-5, TUBING COVERAGE AND THE END OF 13-2 THE TRAY. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: ADDITIONAL PANEL SUPPORT ITEM 2, CWAR 239 RESOLUTION: CIRCUMFERENTIALLY (ITEM 3) WRAP Tile OVERLAP AREA TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS TO ITEM 2, PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BOXOUT CWAR 239 CONFIGURATIONS (ITEM 4) RESOLUTION: STRESS SKIN ALL JOINTS AND SEAMS ON BOX OUTS. 6980, RI SG 790' I-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN ITEM 2, DEVIATIONS CWAR 239 (ITEM S&6) RESOLUTION: ABUT LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN TO EACH SIDE OF THE SUPPORTS AND INSTALL A FILLET, TERMINATE STRESS SKIN EACH SIDE OF STRUT. RUN STRESS SKIN ONTO THE SUPPORT, TERMINATE UPGRADE EACH SIDE OF KICKER. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP MODIFICATION ITEM 2 CWAR 239 RESOLUTION: EXTEND TRAY COVERAGE (ITEM 7) l' BEYOND TRAY

4 ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K37 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) i ZONE i l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: TEE SECTION ENHANCEMENTS 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 9, 15, 36, 6980, RI SG 790' ON EXTENDED SIDE RAILS 10-1, 10-2, 45 ITEM 2, 11-1, 12-2. CWAR 239 RESOLUTION: STITCH SHIMS FOR 14-1,15-1, (ITEM 8) 11-4, 11-5, 4 SUPPORT OF SIDE PANELS 13-2 6980, Rt SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: CIRCUMFERENTIAL BUTT JOINT ITEM 2, DEVIATION . CWAR 239 (ITEM 9) RESOLUTION: CIRCUMFERENTIALLY WRAP TIIE BUTT JOINT ON THE BOTTOM OF THE TRAY BY TRIMMING AND ABUTTING THE WRAP TO THE SUPPORT COVERAGE TilEN INSTALL SUPPORT UPGRADE. , 6980, R1 SG 790' I-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: VERTICAL RISE REINFORCEMENT ITEM 2, DIRECTIVE CWAR 239 RESOLUTION: STITCH PANELS (ITEM 10) TOGETilER 6980, RI SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: TEE SECTION MODIF'OATION ITEM 2, DUE TO CABLE EXITING TkAY AT CWAR 239 AIRDROP (ITEM II) RESOLIJFION: INCREASE Tile HEIGliT OF THE TOP PANEL BY 2*, STITCH ALL PANELS TOGETHER l-070 Y Y ISSUE: IN TWO PLACES AIR DROPS 11-1,'11-2 1-5, 21 6980, R1 SG 790' SB4 4 ITEM 3, CREATE STRESS SKIN DEVIATIONS. , CWAR 240 RESOLUTION: INSTALL LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN TRIMMING AROUND AIR DROPS AND STAPLE TO ACillEVE A SNUG FIT. INSTALL 304 MESil TO ENCAPSULATE TIIE BOX.

                                 .- --_ -_ .-                             -                                                        =-.._   _-

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K38 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGUR.ATIONS/ DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG. ELEV ROOM- FIRE - 'SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF : SUPPORT: BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST. (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6980, R1 SG 790' 1-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: LBD BOX ENCLOSURE CANNOT 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 21, 22 ITEM 4, BE UPGRADED DUE TO CLOSE JB. 10-1, 10-2 CWAR 246 (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: INSTALL LBD STRESS SKIN AND CAP, FASTEN WITH TIE WIRE. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT /LBD SUPPORT ITEM 4, PREVENTS JOINT FROM BEING , CWAR 246 UPGRADED. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: ABUT THE STRESS SKIN TO THE SUPPORT AND FILL GAP WITH TROWEL GRADE, TIE WIRES MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF STAPLES. 6980, RI SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT PROTRUDES INTO THE ITEM 4, LBD COVERAGE. CWAR 246 , (ITEM 3) RESOLUTION: CONDUIT SUPPORT SHALL , BE COVERED AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. 6980, RI SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: UNPROTECTED BASE PLATE ITEM 4, PREVENTS JOINT UPGRADE. CWAR 246 (ITEM 4) RESOLUTION: COVER BASEPLATE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: LIMITED SPACE BETWEEN LBD & ITEM 4, WALL PREVENTS STRESS SKIN STAPLE CWAR 246 INSTALLATION. (ITEM 5) RESOLUTION: UTILIZE TIE WIRES IN LIEU OF STAPLES 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 .Y Y ISSUE: OBSTRUCTIONS INTERFERE WITH ITEM 4, LBD UPGRADE. CWAR 246 (ITEM 6) RESOLUTION: THE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE SHALL BE OMITTED.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's ' PAGE K39 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF . SUPPORT? - BASIS / NOTES L AREA / (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION . , TEST (PAGES K104- - (Y/N) . FIRE ' SCHEMES ~ K125) ZONE 6930, R1 790' 1-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: CIRCUMFERENTIAL BUTT JOINTS 11-2,Il-4, 1-5, 46 SG ITEM 5, OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE AS THE 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 252 SUPPORT STEEL UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 STRIPS ON THE SUPPORTS. 6980, RI SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: CABLES EXIT THE TRAY ABOVE 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 47 Tile SIDE RAILS 12-2, 13-1, ITEM 6 4 CWAR 260 11-2, I l-4 i (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: INCREASE SIDE RAIL HEIGHT ABOVE TRAY EXTENSIONS BY 3 1/2" - STITCli ALL PANELS. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: LARGE TRANSITION IN A SilORT ITEM 6 AREA CAUSING FLEX-BLANKET CWAR 260 INSTALLATION PROBLEMS. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: ATTACil ADDITIONAL FLAT PANEL TO TRAY- ! 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALL PER DCN 7437. ITEM 6 CWAR 260 RES3LUTION: INCREASE SIDE RAll (ITEM 3) HEIGHT ABOVE TRAY EXTENSIONS BY 3 1/2" - STITCH ALL PANELS. l 6980, RI SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: ADDRESS STAPLE REQUIREMENT ITEM 6 PROBLEMS. CWAR 260 (ITEM 4) RESOLUTION: INSTALL STAPLES PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT STEEL UPGRADE. 11-2, 11-4, 1-5,48-1 ITEM 7 I l-5,13-2 i CWAR 268 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2 FLAT PANELS (ONE ATOP Tl!E OTHER ON THE SUPPORT)

ATTACliMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K40 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIq10N/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K1GS-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6980, R1 SG 790' l-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: ALLOW LONGER STAPLES TO BE 11-1,11-2 1-5, 34 ITEM 8 INSTALLED AT T11E 330-1,330460 CWAR 284 INTERFACE. RESOLUTION: USE I 1/2" STAPLES. 6980,41 SG 790' 1-070 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 9 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 329,330, 331,332,394 RESOLUTION: NO TIIERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6981, Rt SG 790' l-071 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE FOR 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20 ITEM i TlilRD LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET. RESOLUTION: REMOVE EXISTING M ATERIAL AND REINSTALL PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6981, R1 SG 790' l-071 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: ALLOW 330460 TO BE USED AS 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 49 ITEM 2, PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON CWAR 267 GROUND CABLE. (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 330460 AROUND GROUND CABLE. 6981, RI SG 790' l-071 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: PROVIDE DIRECTION ON TiiE ITEM 2, NUMBER OF 330-660 LAYERS TO CWAR 267 INSTALL ON A TRANSITION COLLAR. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET OVER THE TRANSITION AREA. 6931, RI SG 179' I-071 SB4 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N'A ITEM 3 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 395, 396, 397 RESOLUTION: NO TilERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVI ATIONS.

ATTACHMENT K - ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K41 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIiq'lON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT '- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125). ZONE l-079 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AIRDROP 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 6982, Rl SG 810' ITEM 1 INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-MESH TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. INSTALL TROWEL GRADE AND USE APPROVED FASTENERS TO AClilEVE A SNUG FIT. 810' l-079 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AIRDROP 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 6982, R1 SG ITEM 2 INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-MESil TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. INSTALL TROWEL GRADE AND USE APPROVED FASTENERS TO AClilEVE A SNUG FIT. 810' l-079 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: DOES PROTRUDING ITEM 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 6982, R1 SG PROTECTION ON CONDUIT SUPPORT 10-1, 10-2 ITEM 3, CWAR 139 REQUIRE JOINT REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: INSTALLED TiiERMO-LAG ON SUPPORTS DOES NOT REQUIRE REINFORCEMENT. 6982, R1 SG 810' l-079 SBS Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 4, DEVIATIONS, CWAR 202 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUlT AIR DROP 11-1, 11-2 1-5,50 ) 6983, RI SG ITEMi INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: TRIM FLEXI-MESil AT INTERFERENCE & COMPLETE JOINT UPGRADE PER TYPICAL DETAILS.

l A'ITACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2

  '                                                                          DM 92-077, DCN's                                                                            PAGE K42 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV       BLDG          ELEV     ROOM    .<E     ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF                                                                   SUPPORT     B' ASIS / NOTES AREA /     (Y/N)     (Y/N)  CONCERN / RESOLUTION .                                                                   TEST        (PAGES K104-.

FIRE SCHEMES K125)

! ZONE i

  !          6983, R1           SG            810'     l-082 SB8         Y        Y      ISSUE: 2 AIRDROPS CLOSE TOGETHER.                                                        Il-1,Il-2   1-5, 20 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION: UPGRADE THE SMALLER l                                                                                         AIR DROPS AS R.EQUIRED, AT THE INTERFACE, INSTALL FLEXI-MESH AS A SADDLE ENCOMPASSING BOTil AIR DROPS.

6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROPS CLOSE TOGETHER. Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 101 i ITEM 3 RESOLUTION: REINFORCE BOTH AIR DROPS TOGETHER UNTILTHERE IS SPACE TO SEPARATE THEM. FILL VOIDS WITH TROWEL GRADE. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: AN IDENTIFIED CONDUIT 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 20 ITEM 4, CWAR 90 REQUIRES UPGRADE AND IS NOT IN THE 10-1, 10-2 DM SCOPE. RESOLUTION: ADD CONDUIT TO SCOPE. 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: IDENTIFIED TRAY REQUIRES 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 20 ITEM 5, CWAR 91 UPGRADE & IS NOT IN DM SCOPE. 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2 , RESOLUTION: ADD TRAY TO SCOPE. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE:- 330-660 M ATERIAL THICKNESS 11-1, 11-2 i-5, 34 ITEM 6 EXCEEDS 1", WILL NOT ALLOW

CWAR 135 ADEQUATE STAPLE PENETRATION
(ITEM 1)

RESOLUTION: COVER 330-660 M ATERIAL WITH MESH AND STAPLE INTO PLACE. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL ITEM 6 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN DUE TO 0" CWAR 135 CLEARANCE. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: OMIT 12" .. REINFORCEMENT AT INTERFERENCE.

NITACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV 2 ! DM 92-O"i7, DCN's PAGE K43 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM- FIRE - 'SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV - BLDG AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K1042-FIRE - SCHEMES ' K125) ' ZONE l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: JOINT REINFORCEMENT CANNOT 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 20 6983, RI SG 810' ITEM 7 BE INSTALLED. CWAR 146 RESOLUTION: UTILIZE TYPICAL DETAIL 3-4. 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: PICTURE FRAME DETAIL I4-1,15-1, 1-5, 51 CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO 11-2,Il-4, ITEM 8 INTERFERENCE, filLTI VIOLATION. - I l-5,13-2 3 CWAR 166 ' RESOLUTION: UTILIZE STRESS SKIN AND STAPLES IN LIEU OF PICTURE FRAME. 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: UNIQUE CONFIGURATION OF AIR I1-1,Il-2 1-5, 20, 35 6983, RI SG DROP AT CONDUIT TIE IN, UPGRADE

ITEM 9 CWAR 166,190 CANNOT BE INSTALLED.

i RESOLUTION: REMOVE SUFFICIENT 330-1 TO ALLOW RESPOSITIONING OF GROUND CABLE, REMOVE 330460 TO ALLOW REPOSITIONING OF AIR DROP, REINSTALL PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONFIGURATION DOES NOT 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 52 6983, RI SG ALLOW INSTALLATION OF SUPPORT 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 10 STEEL UPGRADE. I l-5, 13-2 CWAR 189 RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT AT JOINTS, SECURED VIA TIE WIRE LACING. 4

i ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K44 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6983, 41 SG 810' l-082 SBS Y Y ISSUE: 3" CONDUlT RESTRICTS THE 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 37 ITEM 11 INSTALLATION OF THE SPLICE PLATE Il-2,Il-4, CWAR 192 OVERLAY REINFORCEMENT. 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: REINFORCEMENT MAY BE g TRIMMED, CUT & INSTALLED IN TWO PIECES, ABUT TO Tile CONDUIT, FILLET ENTIRE LENGTH OF INTERFACE. 6983 RI SG 810' l-082 SBS Y Y ISSUE: LIMITED SPACE DOES NOT 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 53 , ITEM 12 ALLOW INSTALLATION OF BUTT JOINT 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 193 CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP UPGRADE. Il-5,13-2 RESOLUTION: TRIM OR CUT THE JOINT REINFORCEMENT AND INSTALL ' t CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN, MAY BE OVERLAPPED & INSTALLED IN TWO PIECES. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: (ITEM 1) CONFIGURATION OF AIR 11-1,14-1, I-5, 20 ITEM 13 DROP - UPGRADE CANNOT BE 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 203 INSTALLED. (ITEM 2) INSTALLATION OF 11-4, 11-5, STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT 13-2 PROHIBITS INSTALLATION OF PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION. RESOLUTION: REMOVE 330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS, REPOSITION GROUND CABLES INSTALL NEW HALF ROUNDS & SECURE WITH TIE WIRE.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K45 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . (PAGES K104- ' FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE Y Y ISSUE: TRAY SUPPORT INTERFERES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 54 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 ITEM 14 WITH 3RD LAYER OF 330-660 FLEXI-CWAR 204 BLANKET. i RESOLUTION: TRIM & NOTCH THE I FLEXI-BLANKET M ATERIAL TO FIT SNUG TO THE SUPPORT, FILL VOIDS WITH TROWEL GRADE & REINFORCE WITH SS MESH. SECURE W/ TIE WIRES AND STAPLES & FINISif WITH FILLET. 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: BOX ENCLOSURE DOES NOT 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 55 6983, R1 SG ITEM 15 ALLOW STD FIRE STOP CLAMP BAR. 11-2, Il-4,

I 4,I3-2 CWAR 207 (ITEM I) RESOLUTION: FABRICATE & INSTALL 2 SPECIAL CLAMP BARS.

i ! 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: I" PIPE INTERFERES %TTH BUTT ITEM 15 JOINT REINFORCEMENT. CWAR 207 RESOLUTION: TRIM THE STRESS SKIN (ITEM 2) TO FIT AROUND THE INTERFERENCE. 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: BOX / TRAY REQUIRES 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 56 ' 6983, RI SG ENGINEERING DIRECTION. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 16 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 210 (ITEM I) RESOLUTION: INSTALL PER TYPICAL BOX DETAIL 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: SWAY STRUT INTERFERES %TTli ITEM 16 JOINT REINFORCEMENT. CWAR 210 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: REINFORCEMENT MAY BE TRIMMED /CUTTO FIT SNUG. CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP M AY I OVERLAP AND BE INSTALLED IN 2 ; PIECES. 4 4

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K46 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP, DET, DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KlGi-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP CONFIGURATION DOES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 ITEM 17 NOT ALLOW TIE WIRE INSTALLATION. CWAR 212 RESOLUTION: INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL MESH REINFORCEMENT OVER AIR DROP, USE TROWEL GRADE & STAPLE TO ENSURE A SNUG FIT. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONFIGURATION WRAP DOES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 57, 101 ITEM 18 NOT ALLOW FOR Tile REQUIRED CWAR 214 UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: WRAP BOTH COMMODITIES TOGETHER IN 330460, FILL VOID WITH TROWEL GRADE & REINFORCE JOINTS PER TYPICAL DETAIL. 6983, RI SG S10' 1-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT PB INTERFERES WITH 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 43 ITEM 19 TIIE INSTALLATION OF LONGITUDINAL 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 218 JOINT REINFORCEMENT. I l-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: STRESS SKIN TO BE TRIMMED / CUT & INSTALLED IN 2 PIECES. FILLET THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF INTERFERENCE. 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: MULTIPLE LONGITUDINAL JOINT 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 58 ITEM 20 UPGRADE INTERFERENCES. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 221 I l-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: FILL VOIDS WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE, INSTALL STRESS SKIN

                                                        & WIRE MESH AND SECURE WITH STAPLES OMIT Tile JOINT REINFORCEM ENT IN Tile IN ACCESSIBLE AREA.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K47 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRil* TION / ISSUE OF . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITli 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 59 ITEM 21 LONGITUDINAL JOINT REINFORCEMENT 11-2,Il-4, CWAR 222 & CONCRETE BEAM CAUSES LIMITED 11-5, 13-2 SPACE. RESOLUTION: TRIM & OMIT STRESS SKIN, INSTALL ALTERNATE STRESS SKIN WITil TIE WIRES & INSTALL CERAMIC BANDING. 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH SPLICE 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 37 PLATE JOINT REINFORCEMENT. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 22 Il-5,13-2 CWAR 224 RESOLUTION: REINFORCEMENT M AY BE TRIMMED / CUT AND INSTALLED IN 2 PIECES, SECURE WITH TIE WIRES. 6983, R t SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: AIRDROP REQUIRES SPECIAL 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 30, 60 ENG. DIREC1'lON DUE TO SIZE & 15-1, 11-2, ITEM 23 CWAR 225,244 CONFIGURATION. 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: SECURE ALL 330-660 M ATERIALS TO 330-1 M ATERIALS WITH STAPLES. INSTALL STEEL MESH & SECURE WITH TIE WIRES & STAPLES. SECURE PICTURE FRAME AS TIGHT AS POSSIBLE WITil APPROVED FASTENERS. 6983, Rt SG S10' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE & STRUT INTERFERES WITil 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 61 LONGITUDINAL JOINT 11-2, 11-4, i ITEM 24 CWAR 227 REINFORCEMENT. I l-5, 13-2 RESOLUTlON: TRIM / CUT REINFORCEMENT TO SUIT INTERFERENCE. SECURE WITH STAPLES. INSTALL CERAMIC BANDS. l

i ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 i DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K48 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG; ELEV. . ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. ~ DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF z ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES ' AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION L TEST (PAGES K104--- , FIRE ~ SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6983, RI SG 810' 1-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: SEVERAL INTERFERENCES WITII 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 61 ITEM 25 LONGITUDINAL JOINT 11-2, Il-4 CWAR 231 REINFORCEMENTS. I l-5, 13-2 (ITEM I) i RESOLUTION: OMIT THE LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN & INSTALL CERAMIC BANDS. 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: TRAY END PANEL INSTALLED ITEM 25 WITil NO FIRE STOP. CWAR 231 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT PER TYPICAL '7 DETAILS. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP DOES NOT ALLOW 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 62 ITEM 26 STANDARD UPGRADE-CWAR 232 RESOLUTION: INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL MESH & SECURE W/ STAPLES. FINISH WITH A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. 6983, R1 SG 810' 14)82 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING CONFIGURATION HAS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 21 ITEM 27 VISIBLE CRACKS. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 24I I l-5,13-2 RESOLUTION: COVER W/ STRESS SKIN, SECURE W/ STAPLES & INSTALL FILLET. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: OBSTRI'CTIONS DO NOT ALLOW 11-2, 11-4, I-5, 63 ITEM 28 STANDARD STRUCTURAL SUPPORT 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 242 UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 STRIP & SECURE WITil APPROVED SCREWS. COVER W/ STRESS SKIN & SECURE W/ STAPLES

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV, 2 I DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K49 OF K125 I UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE - SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES i AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION' TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) l ZONE I 6983, R1 SG 810' 1-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A i ITEM 29 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 243,278, 413,414,417,418, RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE l '- 619, 420 CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6983, RI SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION REQUIRES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 64 ITEM 30 SPECIAL ENGINEERING DIRECTION. CWAR 245 RESOLUTION: COPE & TRIM 330-660 FLEX-BLANKET TO FIT OBSTRUCTIONS, FILL VOIDS WfrROWEL GRADE. SECURE WITH STAPLES. 6983, R1 SG 810' l-082 SB8 Y Y ISSUE: JOINT REINFORCEMENT CAN 14-1,15-1, I-5, 43 ITEM 31 NOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO SERVICE 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 251 WATER INTERFERENCE. I l-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: CUT, TRIM & INSTALL STRESS SKIN TO ABUT THE PIPE. SECURE WITH STAPLES. 6984, RI SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: ROOM l-088 POSSESSES A HARSH 13-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 1 ENVIRONMENT WHICH COULD DAMAGE THERMO-LAG MATERIAL.S. RESOLUTION: APPLY 350-5000-10 TOP COAT TO ALL EXPOSED THERMO-LAG ! IN ROOM I-088. 4

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K50 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS

DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. ' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF. 'SUPPORTR BASIS / NOTES

,                                                                                    AREA /   (YIN)    (YIN)   CONCERN / RESOLUTION                          TEST                                       .                       (PAGES K104-2                                                                                     FIRE                                                                    SCHEMES                                                            K125)

ZONE 6984. RI SG 832' l-088 5B144 Y Y ISSUE: ONLY 3/8" CLEARANCE IS 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 65 ITEM 2 PROVIDED FOR 1/4" THICK THERMO-LAG 10-1, 10-2 INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION: INSTALL THE 3RD LAYER OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET WITH THE OVERLAP POSITIONED 90* TO 180* FROM THE AREA OF MINIMAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE TWO COMMODITIES. 4 THE POSITION OF THE 2ND LAYER OVERLAP SEAM SHALL NOT DICTATE THE PLACEMENT OF THE 3RD LAYER OVERLAP, SO AS TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF THE 3RD LAYER.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ( DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K51 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF- SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV . . BLDG AREA 1 (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERNIRESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-7 FIRE . SCHEMES K125) l ZONE SB144 Y Y ISSUE: WiiERE CABLES TRAYS RUN 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 66 j 6984, R1 SG 832' 1-088 ADJACENT TO THE 8-S WALL. THE Il-2,11-4, ITEM 3 THERMO-LAG 330-1 COVERAGE 11-5, 13-2 INTERMITTENTLY ABUTS THE ' CONCRETE WALL AND WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY HANGER BASE PLATES PROTECTED WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 MATERIAL. t RESOLUTION: WHERE THE CABLE TRAY. COVERAGE IS IN CONTACT WITH.THE CONCRETE WALL: REMOVE THE EXISTING 330-1 FILLET MATERIAL AND INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL IN STRIP 4 FORM WITH 330-69 STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT FOR THE LENGTH OF THE CONDITION. i WHERE THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE IS

IN CONTACT WITH THE CABLE TRAY II ANGER PLATE COVERAGE: INSTALL 330-69 STRESS SKIN ON THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE FOR CABLE TRAY l LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND OUT ONTO THE HANGER PLATE COVERAGE. THE STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT SHOULD BE INSTALLED ONTO THE HANGER PLATE COVERAGE TO THE EDGE OF THE HANGER PLATE COVERAGE, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 5".

ATTAC11 MENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K52 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCM NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SU'PPORT ' BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) 7.ONE 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SBl44 Y Y ISSUE: THE 3RD LAYER OF 330-660 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 67 ITEM 4, CWAR 87 FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL RESOLUTION: INSTALL THE 3RD LAYER OVERLAPPING THE HALF ROUNDS 1" TO 2 AND STAPLE INTO PLACE. l 6984, RI SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: THE 3RD LAYER OF 330-660 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 67 ITEM 5, CWAR 89 FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL. RESOLUTION: OVERLAP THE 3RD LAYER ONTO THE BOX ENCLOSURE 3* AND STAPLE INTO PLACE. 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: WHERE 2 CONDUITS MEET 13-2 1-5, 21 ITEM 6 STANDARD JOINT REINFORCEMENT CWAR 106 CANNOT BE INSTALLED. RESOLUTION: REINFORCE DOTH TOGETHER FILL VOIDS WITH TROWEL GRADE. SECURE REINFORCEMENT USING STAPLES TO ENSURE A SNUG FIT. 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: 3RD LAYER OF 330-660 FLEXI- 11-1, 12-1, I-5, 68 ITEM 7 BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER 12-2, 13-1, CWAR 112 TYPICAL DETAILS. 14-1, 15-1, I l-2 RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT A BOX TO RECEIVE ONE END OF THE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLE. UPGRADE WITH STITCHING & STRESS SKIN.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV, 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K53 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT! BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV AREA / (Y/N) (YlN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION . TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE ' SCHEMES K125) ZONE Y Y ISSUE: 3RD LAYER OF 330-660 FLEXI- 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 68 6984, R1 SG 832' l.088 SB144 BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER 12-2, 13-1, ITEM 8 TYPICAL DETAILS. 14-1, 15-1, CWAR 126 11-2 i RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT A BOX TO RECEIVE ONE END OF THE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLE. UPGRADE WITH STITCilING & STRESS SKIN. 832' I-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 13-1,14-1, 1-5, 69 6984, RI SG CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN AT I l-2,11-4, ITEM 9 INTERFERENCE. 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 127 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MODIFIED CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN & SECURE W/ STAPLES. ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 13 1, 14-1, 1-5, 69 6984, R1 SG 832' l088 SB144 Y Y CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN AT 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 10 INTERFERENCE. 11-5. 13-2 CWAR 151 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MODIFIED CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN & SECURE W/ STAPLES. 6984, R1 SG 832' I-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 11 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 154,211, 403 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. l.088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 70 6984, R1 SG 832' CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP AT 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 12 INTERFERENCE. I l-5,13-2 CWAR 158 (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: INSTALL MODIFIED CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP & SECURE WITil STAPLES AND TIE WIRES.

A~ITACHMENT K ER-ME-082 REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K54 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIlmON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 70 ITEM 12 LONGITUDINAL JOINT 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 158 REINFORCEMENT. Il-5,13-2 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: OMIT JOINT REINFORCEMENT. 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: TRAY INTERFERES WITH 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 71 ITEM 13 PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 172 11-5, 13-2 (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: CUT BACK THE CABLE TRAY. 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALL FIRE STOPS AND TRAY ITEM 13 SUPPORT UPGRADE. CWAR 172 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: INSTALL TRAY SUPPORT UPGRADE AND THERMO-LAG FIRE STOP. 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SBl44 Y Y ISSUE: LIMITED SPACE AND ITEM 13 INTERFERENCE FOR THE BUTT JOINT CWAR 172 REPAIR. (ITEM 3) RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLAT PANEL FULL WIDTH OF TRAY. 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SBI44 Y Y ISSUE: SillM BOARDS ARE REQUIRED. ITEM 13 CWAR 172 RESOLUTION: INSTALL SHIM BOARD. (ITEM 4) 6984, R1 SG 832' 1-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT ACHIEVE HILTI ITEM 13 INSTALLATION CWAR 172 (ITEM 5) RESOLUTION: ENSURE ALL VOIDS & GAPS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K55 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRilqlON/ ISSUE OF - SUPPORT BASISINOTES DCN NOJREV BLDG AREAL (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION- TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6984, R1 SG 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: REINFORCEMENT ON TRAY 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 21 PROHIBITS STRESS SKIN 11-2,Il-4, ITEM 14 REINFORCEMENT ON PROTRUDING 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 199 ITEM. RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH REINFORCEMENT & SECURE WITH STAPLES. 832' l-088 SB144 Y Y ISSUE: THE RADIAL BEND REQUIRING 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 15, 44 6984, R1 SG UPGRADE IS PARTIALLY 10-1, 10-2 , ITEM 15 CWAR 88 ENCAPSULATED IN PROTRUDING ITEM. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN & STAPLE INTO PROTRUDING ITEM. COVERAGE & TIE WIRE IN PLACE. ABUT STRESS SKIN TO THE WALL & FILLET. STAPLE TO ENSURE A SNUG FIT. , 6985, R1 SG 852' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: TYPO. ON ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. N/A N/A l i ITEM 1, CWAR 150 RESOLUTION: CORRECT TYPO. i t 852' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: ORIGINAL DOCUMENT REQUIRES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20 6985, R1 SG REMOVAL OF STRESS SKIN, REMOVAL ITEM 2 CWAR 177 NOT REQUIRED. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE PER TYPICAL DETAILS.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K56 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS 4

 ;        DCN NO./REV        BLDG.      ELEV ROOM'    FIRE      SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF -               SUPPORT'      BASIS / NOTES -

AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST _ (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) . ZONE 6985, RI SG 852' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: UNIQUE CONFIGURATION 11-1, 11-2 1-5,72 ITEM 3 REQUIRES NON STANDARD UPGRADE. CWAR 238 1 RESOLUTION: REMOVE SUFFICIENT AMOUNTS OF TIIERMO-LAG MATERIALS AND REINSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAILS. REINFORCE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY WITH STAINLESS STEEL MESil, TROWEL GRADE & SECURE WITH STAPLES. 6905, RI SG 852' l-094 SB15 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 4 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 249,250, 347,349,354 RESOLUTION:. NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS.

,         6986, RI           SG         832' I-095    SBIS      Y       Y        ISSUE: STAPLE LENGTH CONCERN.          11-1, 11-2    1-5, 34 ITEM 1 CWAR 256                                                               RESOLUTION: INSTALL 7/8" STAPLES.

6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y DELETED N/A N/A ITEM 1 6987, RI EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITil 3RD LAYER 11-1, 11-2 1-5,7 ITEM 2 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP. RESOLUTION: NOTCil AROUND OBSTRUCTING PIPE FLANGE, THEN ADD ADDITIONAL COLLAR AROUND THAT. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-1 IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH 3RD LAYER I I- 1, 11 -2 1-5, 20 ITEM 3 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET, RESOLUTION: NOTCH PIPE INSULATION, THEN INSTALL THERMO-LAG

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV, 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K57 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRIPTION / ISSUE'OF . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES . BLDG. AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104 . FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: TWO CONDUITS TOO CLOSE 11-1, Il-2 1-5,20 6987, R1 EC ITEM 4 TOGETHER TO INSTALL INDIVIDUAL l FLEXI-BLANKET WRAPS. I 1 RESOLUTION: WRAP BOTH CONDUITS I TOGETilER, FILL VOIDS WITH TROWEL GRADE. AA153 Y Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 73 6987, R t EC 778' X-115 A ITEM 5 INTERFERES WITH 3RD LAYER t COVERAGE ON ESSENTIAL AIR DROP. RESOLUTION: REMOVE PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE, INSTALL 3RD LAYER, REINSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE FILL VOIDS WITIl TROWEL GRADE. 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: 2 RADIAL BEND UPGRADES 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 44 6987, R1 EC INTERFERE WITH ONE ANOTHER. 13-2 ITEM 6 RESOLUTION: UTILIZE WIRE MESH AND TRIM IT TO BUTT TIGIIT WHERE TiiE INTERFERENCE EXISTS. 6987, R1 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CONCRETE BEAM INTERFERES 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 13 EC WITH LONGITUDINALJOINT UPGRADE. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 7 11-5,13-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN WHERE POSSIBLE TilEN BUTT TO THE CONCRETE BEAM & INSTALL A FILLET. l 2

                                                                                                                                                    -  c

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K58 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRilqlON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT: BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) - ZONE 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I ISA AAI51 Y Y ISSUE: A CONDUIT / TRAY INTERFACE IS 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 13, 50 ITEM 8 OBSTRUCTED BY A CONCRETE WALL. ) 1 RESOLUTION: CUT FLEXI-MESH TO FIT l THE ACCESSIBLE AREA, LAP ONTO THE TRAY AND BUTT TO THE WALL & INSTALL A FILLET. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AAI53 Y Y DELETED N/A N/A ITEM 9 6987, RI EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE IS NOT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 ITEM 10 AVAILABLE FOR AIR DROP UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TROWEL GRADE, $ MESH & SECURE WITH TIE WIRES AND STAPLES TO THE EXTENT THE INTERFERENCE WILL ALLOW. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: 2 PARALLEL TRAYS DO NOT 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 61 ITEM 11 ALLOW TYPICAL JOLNT UPGRADES. 11-2, 11-4, 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL JOINT i . UPGRADES ON OUTSIDE OF TRAYS, INSTALL UPGRADES ON INSIDES WHERE POSSIBLE, STAPLING TOP AND BOTTOM. INSTALL CERAMIC BANDING FOR ADDED SUPPORT. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS, TWO 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20, 101 ITEM 12 CONDUITS ARE TOO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER TO INSTALL INDIVIDUAL , REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: REINFORCE BOTH

,                                                              CONDUITS TOGETHER UNTIL THERE IS 3                                                               SUFFICIENT SPACE TO INSTALL g                                              INDIVIDUALLY.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K59 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS I ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF - SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO.7REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE Y ISSUE: CONDUIT / TRAY NOT IDENTIFIED 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 20 6937, RI EC 778' X-IISA AA153 Y FOR UPGRADE. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 13 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 13 RESOLUTION: UPGRADE COMMODITY PER TYPICAL DETAILS. Y Y ISSUE: EQUIPMENT IS NOT PROTECTED 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 74 6987, RI EC 778' X-115 A AA153 ITEM 14 - WITH THERMO-LAG. CWAR 85,86 RESOLUTION: TERMINATE THERMO-LAG

                                                                                                                                                         & INSTALL A TROWEL GRADE FILLET.

AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CONCRETE INTERFERES WITH Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 74 6987, R1 EC 778* X-1IS A ITEM 15 MESH UPGRADE. CWAR 93,94 RESOLUTION: EXTEND MESH PAST BEAM, STAPLE & FILLET 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT MEET TIE WIRE 9- 1, 9-3, I-5, 30 6987, RI EC PLACEMENT ON MESH UPGRADE. 13-2 ITEM 16 CWAR 96 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH AS FAR AS POSSIBLE, TRIM TO FIT, FILLET & FASTEN WITH STAPLES & TIE WIRES. 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: RADIAL BEND IS PARTIALLY 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 44 6987, R1 EC ENCAPSULATED IN THERMO-LAG. 13-2 ITEM 17 CWAR 97 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH AS FAR AS POSSIBLE, SECURE WITH STAPLES & TIE WIRES. 778' A A153 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET HAS BUTT JOINT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20 6987, RI EC X-IISA ITEM 18 SEPARATION. CWAR 99 RESOLUTION: FILL Tile SEPARATED AREA WITH TROWEL GRADE & INSTALL A FILLET.

i ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082 REV. 2 l DM 92-077, DCN'c PAGE K60 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG . . ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF - : SUPPORT ~ BASIS / NOTES l AREA / - (Y/N), (YIN)- CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST. . (PAGES K104- ~ a FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6987, RI EC 778' X-1ISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH RADIAL 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 44, 74 ITEM 19 BEND UPGRADE & GROUND CLAMP 11-1, 11-2, CWAR 102 UPGRADE. 13-2 s RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH UP TO 1 THE INTERFERENCE, FASTEN WITH TIE j WIRES & STAPLE AS REQUIRED TO

ACHIEVE SNUG FIT. WRAP THE GROUND: i. CABLE INTERFACE WITH MESH, STAPLE a & TIE WIRE.

q 6987, RI EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH RADIAL 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 44

ITEM 20 BEND UPGRADE. 13-2 CWAR 104 i

RESOLUTION: REMOVE TROWEL GRADE FROM THE INTERFERENCE & INSTALL A

FILLET, EXTEND MESH AROUND THE 1

PROTRUDING ITEM & SECURE WITH TIE WIRES & STAPLE TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT. 6987, RI EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH STRESS 9-1, 9-3, 1-5,9,10 ITEM 21 SKIN UPGRADE. 10-1, 10-2 CWAR 108 j RESOLUTION: OVERLAP STRESS SKIN ONTO THE INTERFERING ITEM & , SECURE WITH STAPLES. 6987, RI EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: NEED ENGINEERING APPROVAL 11-1, 14-1, I-5, 75 ITEM 22 FOR INSTALLATION OF DETAIL S-13.1 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 119 11-4, 11-5, RESOLUTION: USE DETAIL 5-13.1 13-2 1 j 7

ATTACilMENT K ER-ME-032, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K61 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS! DEVIATIONS r ! c ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO. IRE 7 BLDG AREAI (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST = (PAGES K104-l SCHEMES K125) FIRE l I ZONE , 6987, RI EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH STRESS 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 9, 10, 44 SKIN UPGRADE. 10-1, 10-2, ITEM 23 CWAR 120,121 11-1, 11-2, RESOLUTION: INSTALL WlRE MESH & 13-2 STRESS SKIN ONTO THE OBSTRUCTION, SECURE WITH STAPLES. 778' X-115 A AAI53 Y Y ISSUE: NEED ENGINEERING APPROVAL 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 6937, RI EC FOR INSTALLATION OF DETAIL 7-5. 10-1, 10-2, ITEM 24 13-2 a CWAR 122 i RESOLUTION: UTILIZE DETAIL 8-2. 6937, RI EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE- INTERFERENCES WITH I4-1, 15-1, 1-5, 76 STANDARD LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 25 INSTALLATION. 11-5, 13-2 CWAR131 RESOLUTION: ABUT THE STRESS SKIN TO THE OBSTRUCTION & INSTALL A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. 6987, RI EC 778' X-IIS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE WITH STRESS 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 15 SKIN UPGRADE. 10-1, 10-2 ITEM 26 CWAR 133 RESOLUTION: LAP STRESS SKIN ONTO Tile OBSTRUCTION & FASTEN PER TWICAL DETAILS. 4 6987, RI EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: STAPLE REQUIREMENTS AT 330- 9- 1, 9-3, 1-6 660/330-1 INTERFACE. 10-1, 10 2, ITEM 27 11-1, 11-2 CWAR 141 RESOLUTION: INSTALL ADDITIONAL HALF ROUNDS OVER THE EXISTING. FILL VOIDS WITH TROWEL GRADE & 7/8' STAPLES THROUGH FLEXI-BLANKET.

A'ITACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K62 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP, DET. DESCRIITON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6987, R1 EC 778' X-IISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCES WITH 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 73, 74 ITEM 28 STANDARD FLEXI-BLANKET CWAR 144 INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION: REWORK THE 330-660 PROTECTION, FILL VOIDS WITH TROWEL GRADE & FILLET THE INTERFACE. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: 1/4 SST TUBE INTERFERENCE. 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 7 ITEM 29 CWAR 148 RESOLUTION: TRIM THE FLEXI-BLANKET TO CLEAR THE INTERFERENCE & ADD AN ADDITIONAL LAYER. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A A A153 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL STRESS SKIN 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 76 ITEM 30 DUE TO INTERFERENCES. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 161 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: ABUT THE STRESS SKIN TO THE INSULATED PIPE & APPLY A FILLET AT THE INTERFACE. 6987 RI EC 778' X-l !5 A AAI53 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION PROBLEMS 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 37, 50, 77 ITEM 31 REINFORCEMENT PANEL. 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 165 11-4,11-5, (ITEM I) RESOLUTION: CUT THE 13-2 REINFORCEMENT PANEL TO COVER THE TRAY SUPPORT 6987 RI EC 778' X-1 IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION PROBLEMS WIRE ITEM 31 MESH CWAR 165 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: WRAP THE WIRE MESH AROUND THE 330-660 COVERAGE ONTO THE PROTRUDING ITEM.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K63 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS BLDG ELEV . ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT . BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES - K125) ZONE AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION PROBLEMS 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 37, 50, 77 6987, RI EC 778' X-115A STRESS SKIN. 15-1, 11-2, ITEM 31 Il-4,11-5, CWAR 165 RESOLUTION: REINFORCE THE SPLICE 13-2 (ITEM 3) PLATE WITH 2 PIECES OF STRESS SKIN. 6987, RI EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION PROBLEMS ITEM 31 REINFORCEMENT PANEL. CWAR 165 (ITEMS 4&5) RESOLUTION: TRIM STRESS SKIN & ABUT TO THE WALL & INSTALL A FILLET, SECURE WITH TIE WIRES. 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: BOX FRAME CANNOT BE 14-1,15-1, 1-5,78 6987, R1 EC INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 32 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 167 RESOLUTION: REINSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE. PRE-CAULK WITH TROWEL GRADE & INSTALL STRESS SKIN. 6937, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 33 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 173,174, 179, 180, 181, 182. RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE 183, 196, 272, 273 CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 274. 289, 291, 292. 293, 294, 295, 314, 315, 266, 401, 402, 407,437,438,439, 436,440,393 778' X-I IS A A A153 Y Y ISSUE: STRES~ (K!N CANNOT BE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 6987, R1 EC ITEM 34 INSTALLED ON THE AIR DROP. CWAR 175 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH (NOTCH AS NECESSARY)

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K64 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. ' DESCRINION/ ISSUE OF. SUPPORT'- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST._ (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES . K125) - ZONE 6987,RI EC 778' X-115 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: GROUND CABLE COVERAGE. 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 ITEM 35 CWAR 176,188, RESOLUTION: REINFORCE WITH SST 3io MESH, TIE WIRE & STAPLE TO ACHIEVE SNUG FIT. ' 6987, R1 EC 778' X-1 IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: BOX ENCLOSURE EXCEEDS 14" X 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 79 ) ! TEM 36 30" X 12" 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 185 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: UPGRADE BOX PER { TYPICAL DETAILS. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY AT TRAY SUPPORT 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 80 ITEM 37 UPGRADE. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 187 11-5, 13-2 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH IN ONE CONTINUOUS PIECE ACROSS TIIE BACK OF THE TRAY AND ONTO THE SUPPORT STAPLE TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT. 6987, RI EC 778' X-IIS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: INSTRUM ENT TUBE RACK 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 44 ITEM 38 INTERFERENCE. 13-2 CWAR 197 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH UP TO THE RACK & INSTALL A FILLET ON BOTH SIDES. USE STAPLES & TIE WIRES TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT-i 6987, R1 EC 778' X-l l5 A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: SEVERAL TRAYS TERMINATE l-2, 12-1, I-5, 81 l ITEM 39 PROTECTION WITil A THERMO-LAG 12-2, 13-1, l CWAR 198 PANEL IN LIEU OF A FIRE STOP. 14-1, 15-1, I l-2, 11-4, RESOLUTION: USE SST MESil TO '11-5 t ENCAPSULATE Ti1E END OF Tile TRAY, OR BOX TO STRUCTURE. l l t

A~lTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K65 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF- SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KIO4-(Y/N) FIRE SCIIEMES K125) ZONE Y Y ISSUE: MULTIPLE CABLE BUNDLES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20, 101 6987, R1 EC 778' X-IIS A AA153 ITEM 40 ENTER A TRAY. CWAR 200 RESOLUTION: ENCAPSULATE BUNDLES l IN A SINGLE WRAP OF MESli, FILL ALL VOIDS WITli TROWEL GRADE & FASTEN PER TYPICAL DETAILS. Y Y ISSUE: STAPLE UPGRADE CANNOT BE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 30 6987, R1 EC 778' X-IISA AA153 ITEM 41 A CillE h iD. CWAR 208 RESOLUTION: USE TIE WIRES IN PLACE OF STAPLES. Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 15 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 INSTALLED DUE TO INTERFERENCE. 11-2, 11-4, ITEM 42 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 21) RESOLUTION: TRIM TiiE STRESS SKIN AROUND Tile INTERFERENCE, FASTEN PER TYPICAL DETAILS AND INSTALL A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. AA153 Y Y ISSUE: TIE WIRE SPACING CANNOT BE 11-2, 11-4, I-5, 20 6987, RI EC 7A' X-I IS A M ET. 11-5 ITEM 43 CWAR 222 RESOLUTION: INSTALL WIRES 1/2" TO l' FROM EDGE OF OVERLAP. Y Y ISSUE: DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING 3RD 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 35 6987, R1 EC 778' X-115 A AA153 ITEM 44 LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET IS REQUIRED. CWAR 235 RESOLUTION: REMOVE SUFFICIENT FLEXI-BLANKET M ATERIAL TO ALLOWING BANDING, REINSTALL T11E REQUIRED BLANKETS AND SEAL WITil A TROWEL GRADE FILLET.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K66 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP. DET. ~ DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF i SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST _ (PAGES K104 S FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6987, RI EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: TIIERMO-LAG CANh0T BE Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 45 INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL CWAR 236 RESOLUTION: INSTALL PER TYPICAL ' DETAIL 8.4 6987, R1 EC 778' X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: IDENTIFIED RACEWAYS HAD 7/8' 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 34 ITEM 46 STAPLES INSTALLED WHERE I 1/2" 10-1, 10-2, CWAR 248 STAPLES WERE REQUIRED. 11-1, 11-2 RESOLUTION: BACKFIT USING 1 1/2" STAPLES. 6987, RI EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: STANDARD INSTALLATION 11-1, 11-2 1-5,20 ITEM 47 CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO l CWAR 254 INTERFERING ITEM. RESOLUTION: WRAP TIIE ESSENTIAL RACEWAYS WITH 2 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET & FILL ANY GAPS WITH TROWEL GRADE. 6987, R1 EC 778' X-I IS A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: DETAIL 3-5.2 REQUIRES 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 82 ITEM 48 ENGINEERING APPROVAL CWAR 262 & PG. 252 RESOLUTION: DETAll 3-5.2 APPROVED. 6987, R1 EC 778 X-IISA AA153 Y Y ISSUE: CONGESTION EXISTS IN THE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 49 AREA OF FLEXI-BLANKET CWAR 269 REQUIREM ENT. RESOLUTION: WRAP THE ESSENTIAL RACEWAY IN FLEXI-BLANKET THEN WRAP THE OTIIER 5 ITEMS IN TiiE SECOND FLEXI-BLANKET LAYER. FILL ALL GAPS WITH TROWEL GRADE.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME 082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K67 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) ZONE X-115A AA153 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLE IS 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 34 6987, RI EC 778' ITEM 50 ONLY 41/8" DIAMETER, WillCl{ SIZE CWAR 275 STAPLES ARE TO BE USED. RESOLUTION: USE 7/8" STAPLES. AA153 Y Y ISSUE: EXPOSED GROUND CABLES 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 20 6987, RI EC 778' X-115A ITEM 51 WERE ADDED TO ROOM X-Il5A. CWAR 360 RESOLUTION: INSTALL TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE. X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE. INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE TO 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 20, 50, 85 6988, R1 EC 792' REINFORCE 330-660 AIRDROPS AT TRAYS 11-4, 11-5 ITEMi AUGMENTED DUE TO INTERFERING ITEMS. INSTRUCTIONS (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: TRIM REINFORCING MESil AS REQUIRED. FLARE MESil OUT ONTO COMMODITIES IN UPGRADE AREA. 6988, R1 EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: FIRE STOP CLAMP CANNOT BE ITEM 1 INSTALLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT AUGMENTED SPACE. INSTRUCTIONS (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT UPGRADES ON EAC11 SIDE OF Tile LAST TRAY SUPPORT. 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION OF TRAY 11-1, 14-1, 1-6, 8, 15, 38, 6988, R1 EC CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN AT 15-1, 11-2, 101 ITEM 2 TRAY BOXOUT CONFIGURATION. 11-4, 11-5 CWAR 369

                     -(ITEM 1)

RESOLUTION: OVERLAP CIRCUMFERENTIAL TRAY STRESS SKIN ONTO BOX OUT STRESS SKIN & SECURE BOTil,

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K68 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. : DESCRit' TION / ISSUE OF . SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6988. R1 EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: SIL-TEMP CABLE WRAP THAT 11-1, 14-1, 1-6, 8, 15, 38, ITEM 2 INTERFERES WITil 3RD 330-660 LAYER 15-1, 11-2, 101 CWAR 369 INSTALLATION. I1-4,11-5 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: REMOVE INTERFERING SIL-TEMP WRAP, THEN INSTALL 3RD FLEXI-BLANKET LAYER. 6988, RI EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING 330-660 INTERFERES ITEM 2 WITil 3RD LAYER INSTALLATION. CWAR 369 (ITEM 3) RESOLUTION: WRAP BOTH CABLE BUNDLES IN COMMON 3RD LAYER, UNTIL BUNDLE REQUIRING 3RD LAYER CAN BE WRAPPED ALONE. 6988, R1 EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES ITEM 2 INTERFERE WITH 3RD LAYER 330-660 CWAR 369 INSTALLATION. (ITEM 4) RESOLUTION: WRAP NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. THE FLEX-MESH UPGRADE WILL NOT USE STAPLES. 6988. R1 EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: CABLE BUNDLE 3RD LAYER ITEM 2 WRAP THAT BUTTS TO EXISTING 330-1 CWAR 369 COVERAGE OF A TWS SLEEVE. ^ (ITEM 5) RESOLUTION: REINFORCE THE M ATERIAL INTERFACE WITH FLEX-MESH "SS-304" 6988, R1 EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: REINFORCING THE 330-l/330-660 ITEM 2 M ATERIAL INTERFACE AT TRAY ENDS. CWAR 369 (ITEM 6) RESOLUTION: REINFORCE M ATERI AL INTERFACE WITH SS-304 MESH.

ATTACIIMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92477, DCN's PAGE K69 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) ZONE 6983,RI EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING CABLE AIR DROP IS 11-1, 14-1, 1-6, 8, 15, 38, ITEM 2 , ONLY 3" LONG. 15-1, Il-2, 101 CWAR 369 11-4,11-5 (ITEM 7) RESOLUTION: EXTEND PROTRUDING ITEM WRAP OUT AROUND ESSENTIAL BUNDLE TO ACillEVE 4*-5" REQUIRED & FIRE STOP. 6988, R1 EC 792' X-125 EA57 Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 3 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 457,458, 459 RESOLUTION: NO Ti1ERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6989. R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: 330460 BUNDLES TOO CLOSE TO 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20, 101 ITEM i INSTALL JOINT REINFORCEMENT. AUGM ENTED INSTRUCTIONS RESOLUTION: REINFORCE BUNDLES COLLECTIVELY AT TRAY INTERFACE. 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE IS 11-1, 14-1, I-5, 20, 21 ITEM 2 INTERFERING WIT 11330-660 BUNDLE TO 15-1, 11-2, AUGM ENTED TRAY UPGRADE & 330-660 BUNDLES TOO 11-4, 11-5 INSTRUCTIONS CLOSE TO INSTALL JOINT REINFORCEMENT. RESOLUTION: TRIM SS-304 MESil AROUND INTERFERENCES, REINFORCE BUNDLES COLLECTIVELY AT TRAY INTERFACE. 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: 3RD LAYER CANNOT BE 11-2, 11-4, I-5, 86 ITEM 3 INSTALLED COMPLETELY IN EXPOSED 11-5, 15-2 CWAR 276 TRAY DUE TO TiiERMO-LAG FIRESTOPS. (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: TEMPORARILY REMOVE FIRE STOP.

ATTACllMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K70 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRINION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104 FIRE SCHEMES - K125). ZONE 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: 3RD 330-660 LAYER IN EXPOSED 11-2, 11-4, 1-5, 86 ITEM 3 , TRAY CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO 11-5, 15-2 CWAR 276 INTERFERING PIPES. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: TRANSITION TO 330-1 PROTECTION IN AREA OF INTERFERENCES. 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE TO ITEM 3 INSTALL 330-1 V-RIB PANELS. CWAR 276 (ITEM 3) RESOLUTION: FLATTEN V-RIB's AS REQUIRED. ALL JOINTS ARE REINFORCED WITH STITCHES OR V-GROOVE AND FOLDED. 6939. RI AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE FOR ITEM 3 CABLE TRAY TOP PANEL CWAR 276 (ITEM 4) RESOLUTION: UTILIZE UNIT 2 ENVELOPE TO PROVIDE TOP PANEL OF UNIT I ESSENTI AL TRAY. REINFORCE INTERFACE JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN. 6989, RI AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCES TO MESH 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 87 ITEM 4 REQUIREMENTS. TRAY COVERAGE 12-2, 13-1, CWAR 307 TERMINATING WITil A 330-1 PANEL, 14-1, 15-1, (ITEM I) WITH MULTIPLE 330-660 BUNDLES. Il-2,Il-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL A FIRESTOP. 6989, RI AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: TiiE VERTICAL SECTION OF A ITEM 4 RAISED TOP PANEL IS NOT " SCORE & CWAR 307 FOLDED" OR STITCHED TOGETHER. (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: STITCH TOP PANEL & VERTICAL SECTION TOGETHER.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME482, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K71 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ! ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRil' TION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT' BASIS / NOTES AREA /. (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) ~ ZONE 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE TO 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 87 ITEM 4 , INSTALL 3RD 330-660 LAYER. BAND 15-1, Il-2, CWAR 307 SPACING CANNOT BE MAINTAINED DUE 11-4, 11-5 (ITEM 3) TO BUNDLE ANGLE OF ENTRY INTO CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: WRAP TWO BUNDLES TOGETHER, ABUT ANOTHER BUNDLE AND USE ITS MATERIAL FLARE 3RD 330-660 LAYER OUT ONTO TRAY'S 330-1 AND SECURE IT. 6989, Rt AB 'iN X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT SPACE TO ITEM 4 INSTALL SS-304 MESH BE'lWEEN CABLE CWAR 307 BUNDLES AT TRAY INTERFACE. (ITEM 4) RESOLUTION: TRIM 330-69 STRESS SKIN AROUND AIR DROP BUNDLES, THEN REINFORCE AIR DROP BUNDLES COLLECTIVELY. 6989, RI AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: THE TOP PANEL OF A SHIMMED ITEM 4 UP SECTION OF TRAY IS DAMAGED. CWAR 307 (ITEM 5) RESOLUTION: REWORK THE 330-1 MATERIAL AND ADD 330-1 STIFFENERS UNDER THE TOP PANEL 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: LONGITUDINAL JOINT ITEM 4 REINFORCEMENT DEVIATION DUE TO CWAR 307 ADJACENT AIR DROPS. (ITEM 6) RESOLUTION: ABUT THE 330-69 STRESS SKIN LONG. JOINT REINFORCEMENT UP TO AIR DROP. OMIT FINAL 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AS 330-660 TPCWEL GRADE FROM AIR DROP UPGRADE WILL COVER STRESS SKIN.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K72 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN No./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE.0F -SUPPORT: . BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN)- (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST . .. -(PAGES. K104-1 FIRE SCHEMES K125)- ZONE 6989 R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: BOTTOM PANEL BUTT JOINT 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 87 ITEM 4 , CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER Mi-1701 15-1, Il-2, CWAR 307 DUE TO A SUPPORT MEMBER'S 11-4,Il-5 (ITEM 7) COVERAGE. RESOLUTION: CUT THE STRESS SKIN AROUND THE SUPPORT MEMBER 330-1 COVERAGE. 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: BAND SPACING REQUIREMENT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 88 ITEM 5 CANNOT BE MET ON 3RD 330-660 l CWAR 279 LAYER, AT THE TRAY. RESOLUTION: FLARE THE 330-660 3RD i LAYER M ATERIAL OUT ONTO THE l TRAY'S 330-1 PANEL AND SECURE. l 6898, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: SS-304 UPGRADE OF AIR DROP 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 88, 89 ITEM 6 BUNDLES TO TRAYS CANNOT BE 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 381 INSTALLED DUE TO LACK OF SPACE. 11-4, 11-5 (ITEM I) RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE 330-1 TRAY ENVELOPES TO THE CEILING (BOX CONFIGURATION) ENCAPSULATING THE l AIR DROPS. 6893, RI AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY 330-1 COVERAGE ITEM 6 TERMINATES WITH A 330-1 PANEL. CWAR 381 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: REINFORCE AFFECTED PANEL JOINTS WITH STRESS SKIN. 6898, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: BAND SPACING REQUIREMENTS ITEM 6 CANNOT BE MET ON 3RD 330-660 LAYER CWAR 381 AT THE TRAY. (ITEM 3) RESOLUTION: FLARE THE 330-660 3RD LAYER MATERIAL OUT ONTO THE TRAY'S 330-1 PANEL AND SECURE IT. l

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K73 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRiiU10N/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCIIEMES K125) ZONE 6989, RI AB 790' X-174 AA21a N Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY SUPPORT STEEL 11 2, 11-4, I-5, 90 ITEM 7 , UPGRADE CANNOT BE INSTALLED. 11-5 CWAR 426 RESOLUTION: BUILDUP 330-1 (FLAT) PANELS BETWEEN WALL & TRAY PANEL, TiiEN SECURE IT. 6989, R1 AB 790' X-174 AA21s N Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 8 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 467,468, 469,470 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6990, RI AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT NOT IDENTIFIED FOR 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 20 ITEM 1, CWAR 43 UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6990, RI AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CONGESTION & OBSTRUCTION 12-1, 12-2, 1-5, 83 ITEM 2, PROHIBIT FLEX-BLANKET 13-1,14-1, CWAR 156 INSTALLATION. 15-1, 11-2, Il-4,Il-5 RESOLUTION: REMOVE EXISTING THERMO-LAG TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF A THERMO-LAG BOX. 6990, RI AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: GROUND CABLE COVERAGE 11-1, 14-1, 1-5, 20 ITEM 3 REINFORCEMENT. 15-1, I l-2, CWAR 164 11-4, 11-5 RESOLUTION: REINFORCE USING DETAIL 3-4.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME.082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K74 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS-DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrllON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)' CONCERN / RESOLUTION- TEST. (PAGES K104-; FIRE - SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6990, RI AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: 2 FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP 12-1, 12-2, I-5, 84 ITEM 4 , UPGRADES CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE 13-1,14-1, , CWAR 265 TO LIMITED SPACE. 15-1, 11-2, i1-4,Il-5 RESOLUTION: ENCAPSULATE BOTH AIR ' DROPS INTO 1 BOX CONFIGURATION. 6990, R1 AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y N ISSUE: 1 1/2" LONG STAPLES ARE 11-1, Il-2 1-5, 82 ITEM 5 REQUIRED. CWAR 288 RESOLUTION: INSTALL PER DETAIL 3-5.2. 6990, R1 AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: TROWEL GRADE FILLET COVERS 11-1,Il-2 1-5, 74 ITEM 6 ACCESS BOLTS. CWAR 377 RESOLUTION: OMIT THE TROWEL GRADE FILLET NEAR THE BOLTS. 6990, RI AB 790' X-175 AA2ia Y Y ISSUE: 330-660 OVERLAP EQUALS 1 1/2". 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 34 ITEM 7 CWAR 383 RESOLUTION: INSTALL THE REQUIRED 1 1/2" STAPLES. 6990, RI AB 790' X-175 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 8 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 453. 461, 462,463,464,465, RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE 186 CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. . 6991 RI AB 790' X-179 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT NOT IDENTIFIED FOR 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 t ITEMi UPDATE. 13-2 s CWAR 178 , RESOLUTION: UPDATE COMMODITY PER ; TYP! CAL DETAILS. l l 5 5

                                              , .-.    ,  w.                          -,                ,                    ,

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K75 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRINION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KlOS-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6991, R1 AB 790' X-179 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: FLEX BUNDLE ENTEPJNG A BOX 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 21, 50 ITEM 2 , REQUIRES UPGRADE. CWAR 205 RESOLUTION: INSTALL A 2 PIECE MECHANICAL UPGRADE. 6991. R1 AB 790' X-179 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 3 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 450,452, 456 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6992 RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: INSULATED PIPE INTERFERES Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 20 ITEM i WITH 3RD LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP. RESOLUTION: TRIM THE INSULATION FROM THE PIPE, THEN INSTALL THERMO-LAG 6992, RI AB 790 X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET UPGRADES. N/A N/A ITEM 2 RESOLUTION: THESE ISSUES WERE SUPERSEDED BY SUBSEQUENT CWARs. NO CHANGE REQUIRED 6992. RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE TO 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 21 ITEM 3 INSTALL INDIVIDUAL UPGRADES. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE THE 2 AIR DROPS IN A COMMON FLEXI-MESH BUNDLE. 6992, RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING BOX WAS INSTALLED 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 20 ITEM 4 WITH NO SUPPORT AT THE WALL. 10-1, 10-2, CWAR 55 14-1, 15-1, RESOLUTION: UPGRADE PER DETAIL 12- 11-2. 11-4,

2. Il-5

                   ._-_.__ -_________ _ _ _____-__ - - ____-__________ _ _ _ _ - _ _                                            _ .--               -              -             -.   ~

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN'a PAGE K76 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIlrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES l AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6992 R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT NOT IDENTIFIED FOR 9- 1, 9-3, I-5, 20 ITEM 5 , UPGRADE. 10-1, 10-2 CWAR 81 RESOLUTION: UPGRADE PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6992 R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: RADIAL BEND UPGRADE CANNOT 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 44, 35 ITEM 6 BE ACilIEVED DUE TO INTERFERENCE 13-2 CWAR 128 WITil CONCRETE WALL ALSO,3RD LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET IS OBSTRUCTED. RESOLUTION: WRAP WITH MESH TO THE WALL & STAPLE. INSTALL A TROWEL GRADE FILLET. REMOVE FLEXI-BLANKET, REPOSITION CABLES & REINSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET. 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: 0" CLEARANCE BETWEEN WALL 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 44, 15 ITEM 7 & RADIAL BEND. 10-1, 10-2, CWAR 130 13-2 (ITEM 1) RESOLUTION: ABUT MESH TO CONCRETE, STAPLE & INSTALL TROWEL GRADE FILLET. 6992, Rt AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: A PROTRUDING ITEM BOXED TO ITEM 7 AN LBD. CWAR 130 (ITEM 2) RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN ON BOX SEAMS PER TYPICAL UPGRADE. 6992, RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: RADIAL BEND ABUTS A BEAM. ITEM 7 CWAR 130 RESOLUTION: ABUT MESil TO (ITEM 3) CONCRETE, STAPLE & INSTALL TROWEL GRADE FILLET.

                                                             - _ -_______ - _- - -- - - - -                                         '~
                                                                                                                                                                                                             ~

ATTACHMENT K DM 92-077, DCN's ER-ME-082, REV. 2 PAGE K77 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRIIrrION/ ISSUE OF AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST FIRE (PAGES KIM-ZONE SCHEMES K125) 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y ITEM 7 Y ISSUE: LBD INTERFERENCE W/ BEAM. 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 44, 15 CWAR 130 10-1, 10-2, (ITEM 4&5) RESOLUTION: INSTALL PREBUTTERED 13-2 STRESS SKIN, TIE WIRE & STAPLE TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT, APPLY A TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE BEAM INTERFACE. 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y ITEM 7 Y ISSUE: CONDUIT RUNS THROUGH BOX. CWAR 130 (ITEM 6) RESOLUTION: UPGRADE ALL JOINTS & SEAMS, ABUT STRESS SKIN TO CONCRETE & STAPLE. ADD A TROWEL 6992, R1 GRADE FILLET AT INTERFACE. AB 790' X-180 ITEM 7 AA2Ia Y Y ISSUE: IIANGER & BOX INTERFACES CWAR 130 WITH RADIAL BEND UPGRADE. (ITEM 7) RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE MESH ONTO Tile PROTRUDING ITEM AND STAPLE TO ACHIEVE A SNUG FIT. FINISH WITH A 6992, RI TROWEL GRADE FILLET. AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ITEM 5 ISSUE: GROUND CABLE 9- 1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 CWAR 132 REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS 10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 11-2, RESOLUTION: REINFORCE USING 13-2 DETAIL 3-4 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y ) ITEM 6 Y ISSUE: VARIOUS OBSTRUCTIONS 14-1, 11-1, 1-5, 43, 72, 91 CWAR 168 INTERFERE WITH UPGRADE I S-1, 1 1 -2, INSTALLATION. 11-4, I l-5 RESOLUTION: TYPICAL ALTERNATE UPGRADE METHODS INCLUDE BUTTING STRESS SKIN TO THE OBSTRUCTION AND APPLYING A TROWEL GRADE FILLET TO THE INTERFACE AREA.

ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ATTACHMENT K PAGE K78 OF K125 DM 92-077, DCN's UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS l SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES l FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF (PAGES K104-- BLDG ELEV ROOM CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST l DCN NO.IREV AREAL (YIN) (YIN) SCHEMES K125) l FIRE f ZONE I 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 72 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: A TRAY RUNC DREVENTS THE 790' X-180 15-2 6992, R1 AB 3RD LAYER OF Fl EXI-BLANKET FROM ITEM 7 BEING INSTALLED AND IJANDING f CRITERIA CANNOT BE !!ET. l CWAR 2tS RESOLUTION: CUT & REMOVE THE TRAY RUNG. STAPLE FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR TO Tile 330-1 PANEL THEN APPLY A MESH & TROWEL GRADE COLLAR OVER. N/A N/A AA21a Y Y ISSUE: EXPLORATORY INVESTIG ATION. AB 790' X-180 6992, R1 ITEM 8 RESOLUTION: N/A CWAR 216 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 92 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: 2" EXTENSION SPLICE PLATE 11-2, 11-4, AB 790' X-180 6992, RI UPGRADE CANNOT BE INSTALLED. I l-5,13-2 ITEM 9 CWAR 226 RESOLUTION: TERMINATE THE STRESS SKIN AT Tile TOP OF THE HANGER. 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 11, 43, 36, AA21a Y Y ISSUE: BECAUSE OF THE EXISTING 11-2, 11-4, 93 AB 790' X-180 ARRANGEMENT, STANDARD UPGRADES, 6992, RI 11-5, 13-2, ITEM 10 (INCLUDING FLEXI-BLANKET 3RD 15-2 CWAR 230 LAYER, LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN, SUPPORT UPGRADE & CLAMP BARS) CANNOT BE INSTALLED. RESOLUTION: REMOVE Tile EXISTING THERMO-LAG AND REBUILD THE AREA USING PROPER UPGRADE TECHNIQUES.

ATTACliMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K79 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV - BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125) ZONE 6992 R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: MODIFICATION TO A BOX 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 94 ITEM i1 , CONFIGURATION & GROUND CABLE 12-2, 13-1, CWAR 233 COVERAGE. 14-1,15-1, Il-2,Il-4, RESOLUTION: REINSTALL A BOX IN 11-5 ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAILS

                                                                                                                      & GROUND CABLE UPGRADE PER DETAIL 3-4.

6992, R1 AB 790' X-I80 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: VARIOUS INTERFERENCES 11-2,Il-4, I-5, 86 ITEM 12 INHIBIT THE INSTALLATION OF 3RD 11-5, 15-2 CWAR 276 LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET. RESOLUTION: REMOVE FLEXI-BLANKET

                                                                                                                      & INSTALL 330-1 COVERAGE.

6992. RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: VARIOUS INTERFERENCES WITH 11-2, 11-4, 1-4, 95 ITEM 13 3RD LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET 11-5, 15-'2 CWAR 339 INSTALLATIONS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3RD LAYER FLEX-BLANKET, & ABUT TO OBSTRUCTION AS TIGHT AS POSSIBLE, INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON OBSTRUCTIONS. 6992 RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: 3RD LAYER FLEX-BLANKET WILL 15-2 1-5, 96 ITEM 14 OBSTRUCT TRAY COVER CWAR 346 REPLACEMENT. RESOLUTION: TERMINATE FLEXI-BLANKET COVERAGE 2* SHORT.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ! DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K80 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS l l DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES ! AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-l FIRE SCHEMES K125) l ZONE i 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT ROD OBSTRUCTS THE Il-1,Il-2 1-5, 97 ITriM 15 , 3RD LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET. CWAR 348 RESOLUTION: TERMINATE THE 3RD LAYER COVERAGE TO AVOID OBSTRUCTION. 6992. RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: VARIOUS OBSTRUCTIONS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 98 ITEM 16 INTERFERE WITH LONGITUDINAL AND 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 357,405 SPLICE PLATE STRESS SKIN UPGRADES. 11-5 RESOLUTION: TYPICAL ALTERNATE UPGRADE METHODS INCLUDE CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN WRAP, CERAMIC BANDING, EXTENDING STRESS SKIN ONTO OBSTRUCTING ITEMS & INSTALLING 330-1 PANELS FOR SUPPORT. 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: 3RD LAYER FLEXI-BLANKET 11-1, 11-2, 1-5, 95 ITEM 17 CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO 0* 15-2 CWAR 370 CLEARANCE WITH A H ANGER. RESOLUTION: ABUT 3RD LAYER TO HANGER & INSTALL PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE ON THE HANGER. 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: LIMITED ACCESS NECESSITATES 12-1, 12-2, 1-5, 99 ITEM 18 MODIFIED BOX DESIGN. 13-1, 14-1, CWAR 371 15-1, 11-2, RESOLUTION: REMOVE AND REBUILD 11-4, 11-5 THE BOX USING TYPICAL DETAll TECHNIQUES.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN'c PAGE K81 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIITION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104 : FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLE EXITS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 20 ITEM 19 , 330-1 TRAY END PANEL. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 378 11-5 RESOLUTION: REMOVE TOP PANEL, INSTALL FIRE STOP, REPLACE TOP PANEL 6992, R1 AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: 2 HVAC SUPPORTS OBSTRUCT 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 11, 100 ITEM 20 THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 390 11-5 RESOLUTION: BOX THE SUPPORTS AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. 6992, RI AB 790' X-180 AA21a Y Y ISSUE: OBSTRUCTIONS & CONGESTION 14-1,15-1, I-5, 92 ITEM 21 PREVENTS COMPLETE SPLICE PLATE 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 426 UPGRADE AND TOPCOAT APPLICATION. 11-5 RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE STRESS SKIN AS FAR AS PRACTICAL AND TERMINATE. INSTALL TOP COAT WHERE POSSIBLE. 6992 RI AB 790' X-180 AA2 ta Y Y ISSUE: COMMODITY CLEARANCE N/A N/A ITEM 22 DEVIATIONS. CWAR 472,473, 474, 475, 478, 480, RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE 482,. 483, 484, 485 CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIONS. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: TUBE STEEL SUPPORT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 l ITEM i INTERFERES WITH MESH UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: TRIM THE MESH TO FIT AROUND THE SUPPORT ONTO THE TRAY

                                                                                            & AIR DROP.

ATTACIIMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K82 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV l ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRil' TION / ISSUE OF ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES ' AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES KIO4-FIRE SCllEMES K125) . ZONE 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y 'Y ISSUE: GROUND CABLE COVERAGE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 ITEM 2 , INTERFERES WITII MESil UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: TRIM THE MESH TO FIT AROUND TiiE GROUND CABLE ONTO TIIE JUNCTION BOX AND AIR DROP. 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA2th Y Y ISSUE: FREE SWING CONDUIT SUPPORT 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 43 ITEM 3 INTERFERES WITil LONGITUDINAL 11-2, 11-4, STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. 11-5 RESOLUTION: OMIT STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT AT INTERFERENCE. 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y DELETED N/A N/A ITEM 4 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y DELETED N/A N/A ITEM 5 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROPS ARE TOO CLOSE 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 101 ITEM 6 TOGETIIER TO ALLOW INDEPENDENT UPG RADE. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE BOTil AIR DROPS TOGETIIER. 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WITil 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 92 ITEM 7 SPLICE PLATE UPGRADE. 11-2, 11-4, Il-5 RESOLUTION: TRIM STRESS SKIN AS REQUIRED TO AClilEVE TIIE GREATEST COVERAGE POSSIBLE.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 ! DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K83 OF K125 , UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS l l SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF I AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE

f Y ISSUE: PROTRUDING ITEM INTERFERES 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 30, 44 l 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y ITEM 8 , WITH RADIAL BEND UPGRADE. 13-2 CWAR 54 RESOLUTION: INSTALL TIE WIRES, STAPLE STRESS SKIN ONTO PROTRUDING ITEMS & FILLET THE INTERFACE. 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT NOT IDENTIFIED FOR 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 20 ITEM 9 UPGRADE. 10-1, 10-2, CWAR 83 13-2 RESOLUTION: UPGRADE PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: TRAY IS NOT LOCATED IN ROOM N/A N/A ITEM 10 X-207. CWAR 91 RESOLUTION: DELETE THE TRAY FROM THE SCOPE. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN UPGRADE CANNOT 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 50 ITEM 11 BE INSTALLED IN AIR DROP. CWAR 258 RESOLUTION: INSTALL MESH & ABUT TO THE CONCRETE WALL INSTALL A TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT THE INTERFACE. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: 2 LBDs: BUTT TOGETHER 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 21, 10 ITEM 12 OBSTRUCTING UPGRADE & A RADIAL 10-1, 10-2, CWAR 261 BEND UPGRADE IS OBSTRUCTED. 13-2 RESOLUTION: WRAP BOTH LBDs TOGETHER IN A SINGLE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE. INSTALL MESH IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN ON RADIAL BEND UPGRADE.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K84 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS l DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRilvilON/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K1M-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 102 ITEM 13 , CANNOT BE INSTALLED. Il-2,Il-4, CWAR 296 11-5 RESOLUTION: OVERLAP THE STRESS SKIN & FASTEN THE TWO ENDS TOGETIIER. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21F Y Y DROPS TOGETilER.lSSUE: COMMODITY N/A N/A ITEM 14 CLEARANCE DEVIATIONS. CWAR 297,298, i 299,327,333,334 RESOLUTION: NO THERMO-LAG UNIQUE l 335, 340, 352, 409, CONFIGURATIONS OR DEVIATIO'NS. 410,415,416,422, 424,428,433,447, 448,455,460,326, l 355,476,477,486, 481,479 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: BOX ENCLOSURE EXCEEDS 14" X l-2, 12-1, 1-5, 103 ITEM 15 30" X 12" 12-2, 13-1, CWAR 302,303, 14-1, 15-1, 304, 308 RESOLUTION: BUILD BOX USING 11-2, 11-4, TYPICAL DETAILS & UPGRADE JOINTS & 11-5 i SEAMS 6993, RI AB 810' X '.07 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: LEACillNG WAS DISCOVERED ON 9-1, 9-3, I-5, 35 ITEM 16 THERMO-LAG. 10-1, 10-2, CWAR 306,341 13-2 RESOLUTION: CLEAN THE AREA AND INSTALL MOISTURE RESISTANT TOPCOAT. 6993 R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: TillCKNESS OF FLEXI-BLANKET 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 34 ITEM 17 IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR I 1/2" LONG CWAR 311 STAPLES. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 1 1/4" STAPLES.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K85 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: 3 RELATED AREAS, STRESS SKIN 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 15, 43, 104 ITEM 18 , COULD NOT BE COMPLETELY 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 313 INSTALLED. I l-5 RESOLUTION: OMIT 13" OF LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN, TRIM THE CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS SKIN TO ABUT THE SUPPORT, INSTALL 2" SUPPORT REINFORCEMENT AND OMIT LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN WilERE TRAY SUPPORT PROIIIBITS INSTALLATION. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT STEEL UPGRADE 11-2, 11-4, I-5, 36 ITEM 19 CANNOT BE INSTALLED. 11-5 CWAR 316 RESOLUTION: INSTALL PER NEW TYPICAL DETAIL. 6993, Rt AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: POSSIBLE FLEXI-BLANKET / PANEL 12-1, 12-2, I-5, 68 ITEM 20 OVERLAP VIOLATION. 13-1,14-1, CWAR 320 15-1, 11-2, RESOLUTION: REMOVE FLEXI-BLANKET 11-4, 11-5 AND CONDUIT SECTIONS & BUILD A BOX AS DESCRIBED. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN UPGRADE CANNOT 11-2. 11-4, 1-5, 105 ITEM 21 BE INSTALLED ON TIIE BACK SIDE OF 11-5, 13-2 CWAR 328 TRAYS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL UPGRADES & BOX THE TRAYS TO TIIE WALL & ALLOW ALTERNATE UPGRADES. l i

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077 DCN's PAGE K86 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-- FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN 14-1,15-1, 1-5, 15 ITEM 22 , CANNOT BE INSTALLED. Il-2,i1-4, CWAR 337,338 11-5 RESOLUTION: EXTEND THE STRESS SKIN ONTO THE COVERED PROTRUDING ITEM. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 15 ITEM 23 CANNOT BE INSTALLED. 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 350 11-5 RESOLUTION: TRIM STRESS SKIN TO ABUT TO Tile ClllLL WATER LINES. 6993, Rl AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: VARIOUS INSTANCES OF STRESS 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 106 ITEM 24 SKIN DEVIATIONS BECAUSE OF 11-2, 11-4, CWAR 359 PROXIMITY TO WALL, PLANT 11-5 CONFIGURATION, INACCESSIBILITY & LIMITED SPACE, ETC.) RESOLUTION: USE ALTERNATE UPGRADE METilODS (I.E., LAP STRESS SKIN ONTO PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE, OMIT STRESS SKIN & INSTALL CERAMIC BANDING, ETC.) 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL FLEXI- 11-1, 14-1, 1-6, 107 ITEM 25 BLANKET TRANSITION. 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 364,367 II-4,Il-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL AN EXTRA 330-1 PANEL TO SMOOTH TRANSITION. 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: 2 FIRE STOPS ARE REQUIRED. 4, 14-1, 1-5, 108 ITEM 26 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 365 RESOLUTION: INSTALL FIRE STOPS PER 11-4, 11-5 TYPICAL DETAILS.

ATTACHMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE KB7 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO.iREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET, DESCRIETION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) CONCERN / RESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCHEMES K125) ZONE 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: STAPLES CANNOT BE INSTALLED 14-1, 15-1, 1-5, 109 ITEM 27 , THROUGH METAL CLIP. Il-2,Il-4, CWAR 373 11-5 RESOLUTION: OMIT STAPLES IN THIS AREA. 6993 R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: STAPLE LENGTH 11-1, 11-2 1-5, 34 ITEM 28 REQUIREMENTS. CWAR 374 RESOLUTION: MEASURE FLEXI-BLANKET THICKNESS & INSTALL STAPLES 1/4" TO 3/8" LONGER. 6993 R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IS 4, 14-1, 1-5, 20 ITEM 29 REQUIRED. 15-1, 11-2, CWAR 386 Il-4,Il-5 RESOLUTION: INSTALL ELASTOMER FIRE STOP PER TYPICAL DETAILS. 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 A A21b Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP 11-2, 11-4, 1-5,48 ITEM 30 INTERFERES WITH STANDARD SUPPORT 11-5 CWAR 389 UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL A DOUBLE THICK TRAY SUPPORT UPGRADE UNDER FLEXI-BLANKET. 6993, Rl AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: PREBANDING CANNOT BE l-2, 12-1, I-5, 110 ITEM 31 ACHIEVED ON A TRAY. 12-1, 13-1, CWAR 408 14-1, 15-1, RESOLUTION: THE BUTT JOINT SHOULD 11-2, 11-4, BE STITCHED WITH TIE WIRES. 11-5 6993, R1 AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET OBSTRUCTS THE 11-2, 11-4, I-5,48 ITEM 32 SUPPORT UPGRADE INSTALLATION. 11-5 CWAR 425 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 2 FLAT PANEt3 l (SUPPORT UPGRADE) AGAINST THE FLEXI-BLANKET.

ATTACIIMENT K ER-ME-082, REV. 2 DM 92-077, DCN's PAGE K88 OF K125 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS / DEVIATIONS DCN NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIIrTION/ ISSUE OF SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N) CONCERNIRESOLUTION TEST (PAGES K104-FIRE SCllEMES K125)~ ZONE 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21b Y Y ISSUE: 2 PROTRUDING ITEMS PREVENT I l-2, 11 -4, 1-5, 36 ITEM 33 , SUPPORT STEEL UPGRADE 11-5 CWAR 432 INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLAT PANEL SUPPORT UPGRADES BETWEEN Tile PROTRUDING ITEMS. 6993 R1 AB 810' X-207 AA2 t h Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE 9-1, 9-3, 1-5, 61 ITEM 34 INSTALLED ON LBD. 10-1, 10-2 CWAR 435 l RESOLUTION: INSTALL CERAMIC BAND IN ITS PLACE. 6993, RI AB 810' X-207 AA21h Y Y ISSUE: CLAMP BAR CANNOT BE 14-1, 15-1, I-5, 14 ITEM 35}}

ML20069M876

Text

2.0 BACKGROUND

5.0 CONCLUSION

6.0 REFERENCES

2.0 BACKGROUND

6.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search