|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217N4261999-10-25025 October 1999 Forwards Amend 17 to License DPR-9 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS by Deleting SR D.3.c,which Required Weekly Observation of Nitrogen Cover Gas Pressure within Sodium Storage Tanks Located in Sodium Building NRC-99-0085, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl NRC-99-0094, Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed ML20217P1661999-10-21021 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-17 on 990927-1005.No Violations Noted ML20217M0771999-10-19019 October 1999 Confirms Discussion Between GL Shear,M Mitchell,E Kosky, D Williams,B Rumins,D Harmon & W Rutenberg in Public Meeting on 990923.Purpose of Meeting Was to Discuss Current Status RP Program at Enrico Fermi 2 ML20217N9231999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 40 ML20217E5671999-10-14014 October 1999 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Already Available in Pdr.App B Records Encl & Being Released in Entirety NRC-99-0087, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons1999-10-12012 October 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons ML20217F5931999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-11 on 990724-0908.Two Violations Re Failure to Follow Procedures While Sampling Standby Liquid Control Tank & Wear Dosimetry Properly Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20217D5331999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 39 NRC-99-0083, Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-10-0707 October 1999 Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20217B8261999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards Summary of Decommissioning Insp Plan for Fy 2000. Plan Will Be Updated Annually & May Be Revised at Any Time Based Upon Future Insp Findings,Events & Resource Availability ML20212J8121999-10-0101 October 1999 Discusses Plant,Unit 2 Completion of Licensing Action for GL 98-01 & Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Ack Efforts That Licensee Have Completed to Date in Preparing Plant for Y2K Transition ML20212K8881999-09-30030 September 1999 Refers to 990928 Meeting Conducted at Fermi Unit 2 to Discuss Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & PSA Staff ML20217A3261999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 38 ML20212J8331999-09-27027 September 1999 Responds to Licensee 990924 Request That NRC Exercise Discretion Not to Enforce Compliance with Actions Required in TS 3/4.6.1.8.Ltr Documents 990923 Telcon with Util in Which NRC Orally Issued NOED NRC-99-0091, Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations1999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations NRC-99-0092, Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys1999-09-24024 September 1999 Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys ML20216G9791999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 37 ML20216H4541999-09-23023 September 1999 Informs That During 990914 Telcon L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements for Administration of Licensing Exams at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of Jan 31,2000.NRC Will Make Exam Validation Visit to Facility During Week of Jan 10,2000 ML20216H3561999-09-23023 September 1999 Informs That During 990914 Telcon,L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements with NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of 991129 Which Coincides with Util Regularly Scheduled Exam ML20212F3241999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 36 NRC-99-0081, Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public1999-09-17017 September 1999 Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public ML20217A9421999-09-0909 September 1999 Informs That NRC Plan to Conduct Addl Resident Insps Beyond Core Insp Program Over Next 6 Months to Assess Improvements in Areas of Procedural Compliance & Quality of Work. Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev NRC-99-0090, Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld ML20211Q0991999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Rev 35 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0066, Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211G4951999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards Rev 34 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) IR 05000341/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Discusses Insp Rept 50-341/99-13 & OI Rept 3-98-039 Conducted Into Potential Misconduct of Operator Formerly Employed by De.Nrc Determined That Violation of NRC Regulations Occurred.Synopsis of IO Rept Encl NRC-99-0056, Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation NRC-99-0055, Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval ML20211C0521999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Tables for Sections 3.6 & 3.7 of Draft Safety Evaluation of Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev ML20217E6181999-08-13013 August 1999 FOIA Request for Documents Re Implementing Regulations in 10CFR & Requesting That Region III Task Interface Agreement (TIA) Related to Fermi 2 Plant Be Made Available IR 05000341/19990011999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-01 on 990619-0723 & Nov. Violation of Concern Because Operators Did Not Understand License Requirements & Placed Plant in Configuration Where EDG 11 Was Removed from Service ML20211C4761999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS IR 05000341/19990121999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-12 on 990712-0716.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Implementation of Plant Chemistry & Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs & Operation of post-accident Sampling Sys NRC-99-0057, Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS1999-08-0404 August 1999 Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS ML20210N5451999-08-0303 August 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 33 NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS1999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS ML20210J2121999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses NRC OI Investigation Rept 3-98-039 Completed on 990524 & Forwards Notice of Violation NRC-99-0053, Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl1999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl ML20209H7211999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 32 NRC-99-0054, Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal1999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal ML20209F6571999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-09 on 990516-0618.No Violations Noted.Weak Procedural Guidance,Communications Issues & Configuration Control Weaknessess Were Evident NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions1999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions ML20196J5511999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses GL 92-01,Rev 1,Supp 1, Rv Integrity, Issued by NRC on 950519 & DE Responses & 980729 for Fermi 2.Informs That Staff Revised Info in Rvid & Released Info as Rvid Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20209C6141999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 31 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) ML20209E9991999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-016/99-01 on 990614-17.No Violations Noted.Potential Weakness in Airborne Effluent Concentration Assessment Identified 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARNRC-99-0085, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl NRC-99-0094, Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed ML20217N9231999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 40 NRC-99-0087, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons1999-10-12012 October 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons ML20217D5331999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 39 NRC-99-0083, Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-10-0707 October 1999 Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20217A3261999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 38 NRC-99-0091, Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations1999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations NRC-99-0092, Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys1999-09-24024 September 1999 Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys ML20216G9791999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 37 ML20212F3241999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 36 NRC-99-0081, Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public1999-09-17017 September 1999 Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev ML20211Q0991999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Rev 35 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0090, Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld NRC-99-0066, Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211G4951999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards Rev 34 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0056, Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation NRC-99-0055, Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev ML20217E6181999-08-13013 August 1999 FOIA Request for Documents Re Implementing Regulations in 10CFR & Requesting That Region III Task Interface Agreement (TIA) Related to Fermi 2 Plant Be Made Available NRC-99-0057, Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS1999-08-0404 August 1999 Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS ML20210N5451999-08-0303 August 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 33 NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS1999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS NRC-99-0053, Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl1999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl ML20209H7211999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 32 NRC-99-0054, Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal1999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions1999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions ML20209C6141999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 31 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0076, Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included1999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included NRC-99-0049, Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Disclosure Encl1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Disclosure Encl ML20209C1081999-06-29029 June 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 30 NRC-99-0050, Forwards Rev 7 to ITS Submittal of 980403,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Sections 3.5 & 3.8. Revision Instructions Included1999-06-24024 June 1999 Forwards Rev 7 to ITS Submittal of 980403,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Sections 3.5 & 3.8. Revision Instructions Included NRC-99-0075, Forwards Operator License Renewal Application,Nrc Forms 398 & 396 for CR Effan,License SOP-30186-3.Encl Withheld1999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Operator License Renewal Application,Nrc Forms 398 & 396 for CR Effan,License SOP-30186-3.Encl Withheld ML20212J3861999-06-18018 June 1999 Forwards Rev 29 to Approved UFSAR LCR That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0047, Responds to NRC 990513 RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design- Basis Accident Conditions. Revised Design Calculation DC-5957, GL 96-06 Calculations, Encl1999-06-0909 June 1999 Responds to NRC 990513 RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design- Basis Accident Conditions. Revised Design Calculation DC-5957, GL 96-06 Calculations, Encl ML20195G2001999-06-0808 June 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section), Rev 28 ML20195E7391999-06-0303 June 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section), Rev 27 NRC-99-0046, Forwards Rev 6 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal ,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Section 3.3, & Update ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses.Brief Abstract of Changes Contained in Attachment 11999-06-0202 June 1999 Forwards Rev 6 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal ,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Section 3.3, & Update ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses.Brief Abstract of Changes Contained in Attachment 1 ML20207D9631999-05-26026 May 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section) ML20195B3381999-05-19019 May 1999 Forwards Rev 25 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0040, Requests NRC Approval of Revs to Weld Tables of Encl Relief Requests RR-A21,rev 1 & RR-A22,rev 1.Revs Do Not Impact Basis for Original Requests for Relief Because There Is No Change to Technical Basis or Proposed Alternative1999-05-14014 May 1999 Requests NRC Approval of Revs to Weld Tables of Encl Relief Requests RR-A21,rev 1 & RR-A22,rev 1.Revs Do Not Impact Basis for Original Requests for Relief Because There Is No Change to Technical Basis or Proposed Alternative NRC-99-0041, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements to Examine Essentially 100% of Accessible Category B-D Nozzle Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Rev 1 to Relief Request RR-A6,encl1999-05-14014 May 1999 Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements to Examine Essentially 100% of Accessible Category B-D Nozzle Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Rev 1 to Relief Request RR-A6,encl NRC-99-0038, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI 1980 Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% If Category B-A RPV Shell Weld Lengths,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii)1999-05-14014 May 1999 Requests Relief from ASME Section XI 1980 Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% If Category B-A RPV Shell Weld Lengths,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii) NRC-99-0039, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% of Selected Category B-J Pipe Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Relief Request RR-A23,encl1999-05-14014 May 1999 Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% of Selected Category B-J Pipe Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Relief Request RR-A23,encl NRC-99-0045, Forwards Rev 5a to Fermi 980403 Submittal,Converting TS to Its.Encl Rev Provides Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Section 3.6 Contained in NRC 990211 Rai.Brief Abstract of Changes & Responses to Rai,Encl1999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Rev 5a to Fermi 980403 Submittal,Converting TS to Its.Encl Rev Provides Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Section 3.6 Contained in NRC 990211 Rai.Brief Abstract of Changes & Responses to Rai,Encl NRC-99-0044, Forwards Rev 5 to ITS to Provide Responses to RAI Re ITS Section 3.6 (Except ITS Section 3.6.1.3) Contained in & Update in ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses1999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to ITS to Provide Responses to RAI Re ITS Section 3.6 (Except ITS Section 3.6.1.3) Contained in & Update in ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses NRC-99-0059, Provides Notification Required by 10CFR50.82(a)(7) of Changes to Fermi 1 Decommissioning Cost Estimate1999-04-29029 April 1999 Provides Notification Required by 10CFR50.82(a)(7) of Changes to Fermi 1 Decommissioning Cost Estimate ML20206E2941999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section), Rev 24 NRC-99-0037, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 Ufsar,Per 10CFR50.71(e) & 10CFR50.4(b)(6).Summary of Changes to QA Program & Vol 1 of Technical Requirements Manual,Encl1999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 Ufsar,Per 10CFR50.71(e) & 10CFR50.4(b)(6).Summary of Changes to QA Program & Vol 1 of Technical Requirements Manual,Encl 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20244B0011989-03-0808 March 1989 Lists Facts to Consider for Action to Fix or Close GE Reactors Once & for All ML20042D4111988-08-22022 August 1988 Responds to Ch Weil 880712 Ltr Concerning safety-related Concerns at Facility.Author Finds NRC Closing of Investigation Due to Lack of Investigative Resources Incomprehensible ML20153G3081988-04-0808 April 1988 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Request to DOJ to Investigate Possible Breakdown in Plant Security Sys Concealed by Util ML20148G2521987-12-22022 December 1987 FOIA Request for All Documents in Connection w/ from TE Murley to Garde & Condit in Response to 870507 2.206 Petition on Behalf of Safe Energy Coalition of Michigan & Sister Servants of Immaculate Heart of Mary Congregation ML20245C3981987-07-0707 July 1987 FOIA Request for Records Re Facility,Including Documents Pertaining to 870629,0701 & 07 Meeting Between Util & Region III ML20235F7451987-06-30030 June 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Safeteam Programs Being Used at Listed Facilities ML20236D1281987-02-15015 February 1987 Forwards Preliminary Investigation of Worker Allegations About Safety of Plant Conducted by Gap in 1986.Investigation Revealed Enough Info to Raise Serious Questions Re Const Quality.Petition Per 2.206 Forthcoming ML20210T1721987-01-14014 January 1987 FOIA Request for All Info Re Main Steam Turbine Bypass Lines at Facility,Including Info on 861211 Meeting in Bethesda,Md, Info Generated Between Region Iii,Util & Other Parties & Info on Design & Life Expectancy of Lines ML20210T2541987-01-0505 January 1987 FOIA Request for Nrc,Region Iii,Architect or Engineering Company Documents Retained by Detroit Edison Re Completion of Engineering Calculations Prior to Licensing ML20214U3291986-10-0606 October 1986 FOIA Request for Info Re Concerns of Thompson Re Plant ML20210S9971986-10-0202 October 1986 Requests Change in Facility Svc List Address to Ref Address. Related Correspondence ML20209H4791986-08-19019 August 1986 Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for Documents Re Facility ML20214L2131986-07-17017 July 1986 FOIA Request for Documents Re Reactor Vessel Dome,Flange & Dryer ML20214L8461986-07-17017 July 1986 FOIA Request for Info Re 860715 Unusual Event,Including Spills of Radioactive & Nonradioactive Water,Leakage from Reactor Flange/Dome Area & Radiation Monitors & Vents in Dome of Reactor ML20207F6771986-07-17017 July 1986 FOIA Request for All Info Produced by INPO Re Facility, Including Sept 1985 & Apr 1986 Reviews of Operations & Mgt, All Info Re Security Problems & Violations & All Info from 860602-03 Meetings on Facility ML20204D2531986-07-10010 July 1986 FOIA Request for Name,Location,Owner & Wattage of All Nuclear Power Plants in Us & Info Re Failure of Enrico Fermi Experimental Breeder Reactor ML20207Q0861986-07-0909 July 1986 FOIA Request for Ofc of Investigations Probe of Control Room Mishap on 850701 & NRC Probe of Util Confidential Whistleblower Program for Plant Workers ML20210G7141986-07-0707 July 1986 FOIA Request for Info Re Facility,Including Documents,Notes, Memos,Reviews,Repts,Videofilm,Still Pictures,Silicone Castings & Other Data Concerning Reactor Dome & Flange of Reactor Vessel Scratches,Pitting,Corrosion & Cracks ML20207E2591986-06-11011 June 1986 FOIA Request for Documents Produced by INPO Re Fermi 2 & Info on Security Problems & Violations Issued Since 1984 ML20211P6991986-05-18018 May 1986 FOIA Request for All Records Re Nrc/Util 860509 Meeting & 860509 Enforcement Meeting in Chicago,Il & Util Exemption to App J of 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water Cooled Power Reactors ML20209H6931986-05-16016 May 1986 FOIA Request for Any & All Agency Records Including Notes, Ltrs,Memoranda,Drafts,Minutes,Tapes,Transcripts & Summaries Re Insp Rept 50-341/85-37 on 851109 Re Insp & Investigation of Safeteam Info ML20214T5921986-05-16016 May 1986 FOIA Request for Documents Re Task Force on Plant Safeteam Allegations Reviewed by Nrr,Ie & Region III Onsite on 850627 & 28 ML20215C1801986-05-16016 May 1986 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Evaluations,Reviews,Insps & Conclusions on Facility Health Physics Dept from Jan 1984 to Present ML20202D0281986-05-14014 May 1986 FOIA Request for All Documents on Health Physics Program & Dept at FERMI-2 from Jan 1984 to Present & Data & Rept on 860312 Closed Meeting in Washington,Dc ML20202G0251986-05-14014 May 1986 FOIA Request for Listed Documents,Including All Documents Re 850627-28 Onsite Insp & Meetings ML20207F9941986-04-30030 April 1986 Discusses Inadequacy of Evacuation Planning in Vicinity of Plant.Insufficient Conveyances to Evacuate 300 Nuns at Ihm Motherhouse.Concerns Re Terrorist Attacks Also Expressed ML20205L1291986-03-28028 March 1986 Requests That Recent Ofc of Investigation Rept on 850702 criticality/out-of-sequence Control Rod Pull Incident Be Taken Into Consideration in 860215 10CFR2.206 & 2.202 Petition ML20211Q4331986-03-24024 March 1986 FOIA Request for Three Categories of Documents,Including Ofc of Investigations & Ofc of Inspector & Auditor Repts on 850702 Criticality Event ML20202H9841986-03-24024 March 1986 FOIA Request for Three Categories of Documents Re Facility, Including Investigation Rept on 850702 Criticality Event ML20212J4641986-03-19019 March 1986 FOIA Request for All Records Re Ofc of Investigations Investigations Re Facility ML20137W5621986-02-15015 February 1986 Requests That Nrr,Ie & Region III Institute Immediate Proceedings,Per 10CFR2.206,re Ineffective & Incompetently Managed & Operated Licensee Program at Facility.License Should Be Revoked Based on Disregard for NRC Requirements ML20141N3101986-02-13013 February 1986 FOIA Request for NRC Ofc of Investigation Rept on Facility Inadvertent Criticality Incident of 850702 & All NRC Communications to Detroit Edison Chairman Wj Mccarthy Re Incident ML20137J9881985-11-20020 November 1985 FOIA Request for Three Categories of Documents Re Land Surveys & Water Tables at Plant ML20134D5881985-05-0808 May 1985 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Proposed Decommissioning Rule & Implementation of Rule to Decommissioned Reactors ML20125A7811985-04-17017 April 1985 Implores Govt to Institute Legal Action to Satisfactorily Address & Remedy Problem of flood-threatened Existing Evacuation Facilities Prior to Issuance of Full Power License ML20133B5591985-04-10010 April 1985 FOIA Request for Records Since Jan 1985 Evidencing Request by Individual or Group for Work Stoppage,Licensing Investigation or Any Other Related Investigation of Plant ML20099D7221985-03-0909 March 1985 Requests That NRC Not Grant Low Power/Fuel Load License Before Safe Energy Coalition of Michigan & Great Lakes Energy Alliance Concerns Re Computer sys,as-built Designs, Radwaste Processing Sys & Fire Protection Investigated ML20102B7411985-02-23023 February 1985 States Belief That Plant Is Not Needed Due to Util 39% Excess Capacity & Plans to Burn Solid Waste to Generate Electricity.Consideration of Options & Safety Features Before Fuel Loading Urged ML20101U8051985-01-28028 January 1985 Petitions NRC to Institute Proceeding &/Or Investigative Actions Into Significant Safety Matters at Plant.Requests That Low Power/Fuel Load License Not Be Issued Until Items Resolved ML20211E3271984-10-0101 October 1984 FOIA Request for All Documentation,Including Notes,Ltrs, Memoranda,Computer Printouts & Data Compilations Re Board Notification 84-149 Concerning Investigation Repts on Comanche Peak ML20101U4291984-06-30030 June 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Re 840626-27 Joint Emergency Exercise & Plant Compliance w/10CFR50.47 Emergency Plan Stds ML20101U5541984-06-15015 June 1984 FOIA Request for All Agency Records Generated in Connection W/Dg Eisenhut 840524 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Adequacy of Plant Diesel Generator Bldg ML20112E4681984-05-22022 May 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Re Meetings Between Members of Nrr,J Kane,H Singh,F Rinaldi & Others Re Resolution of Diesel Generator Bldg & Implementation of Recommendations or Conclusions from Brookhaven 831021 Rept ML20112G3911984-05-17017 May 1984 FOIA Request for Repts Re Facilities,Including SALP Repts, Const Audit Team Repts & Const Deficiency Repts from Start of Const to Present ML20084K8631984-05-11011 May 1984 Forwards Intervenor B Stamiris Second Supplemental Proposed Finding & Conclusions of Law Re QA & Mgt Attitude Issues & cross-reference to Previously Filed Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20084Q3491984-05-10010 May 1984 Requests That J Keppler Respond to Listed Issues Re Evaluation of Facility Completion.Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation of Plant,Taking Into Account Issues Discussed, Also Requested ML20084L6261984-05-10010 May 1984 Questions J Keppler Statement That Util Projected Schedule for Finishing Unit 2 by Dec 1986 Attainable & No Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation Planned.Objective Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation Requested ML20090K6941984-05-0202 May 1984 Expresses Belief That Intervenors Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council & M Sinclair Represent Small Minority of Community Persons Not Wanting Plants Completed & Operating.Majority of People in Favor of Facility Operation ML20112D2991984-05-0202 May 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Re Insp of Auxiliary Bldg ML20084N3611984-05-0101 May 1984 Presents Differing View from M Sinclair Re Safety Concerns. Closing of Plant Would Result in 5,000 Lost Jobs & Create far-reaching Economic Hardship Throughout Community 1989-03-08
[Table view] |
Text
.
(G J
5711 Sunnercet Drive Midland, Michigan 48e40 May 24,197+
Mr. Thomas Chief Engelhardt[n3 Counnel, Licenc Divicion Atonic Energy Cotniscion
. D. C. 20000
Dear Sir:
I am enclocing a ceries of correspondence with Congres:-
man Cederberg, Senatora Hart and Griffin, nnd the Director of Information Servicec of the Atomic Cnergy Conciscion, John A.
Harric, on the matter of the uncafe citing of the Midland r.-
planto and the Fermi # 2 plant in Michigan, according to the most recent citing guidelines of the AEC.
Please place all of thic correcpondence in the dockets of the Midland and Fermi #2 n-plants in the Public Documente roca.
Please let me know if thece docunents will be cent to the public files for the Midland n-ple.nte in Midinnd and to the Fermi d2 files in Detroit.
Thank you for this cervice.
Sincerely, Mary 31nstair b
Enclocures V
. ' 'A 9
1 8007250 Q
1
~_
COPY 3711 gunnercet priye Midland, Michigan 43640 February 26, 1974 The Hon. Elford Cederberg U. S. House of Reprocentativec ilachington, D. C. 20000
Dear Congreaccan Cederberg:
I am bringing to your attention the tecticony that Ralph Under procented before the Joint Cocmittee on Atonic Energy January 23, 1974 In his testinony, Relph Under charges that tuo documents of immence it?crtance to the people of this state have been cupprecced. One ic a cafety report prepared October,1971 by an AIC Tack Force. The other uns a report on neu citing guido-11n=3 that listed Midland and Ferti #2 ac unsafely sited.
pleaee dacand that thece documente be releaced to the public at_once, r
In his testinor.7, Rolph Under nico pointo out the many araas of grave concern to public health, cafety and national cecurity in uhich the Atomic Energy Cornission and the Joint Comaittee on Atonic Energy have fail.ed in their responsibili-
- ties. He pointo out that only through the efforta of indepen-l dent, public-cpirited Congreccuen, ccienticts and citicenc, have thoce serioua prob 1. ems been brought to public attention and come action begun on them.
Note the artic]c encloced on the Britich concerna over U. S. reactor cafety--and they renti: nave an energy cricis.
Sincerely, l
l Home addrecc: Mary Sinclair, Co-Director l Consolidated Matie.nal Intervenors 5711 sueneract Drive 153 "E" Street, S. E.
l Midland, Michigan a3640 'lachington,
. D. C. 20003 I
MS:sh Enclocures
~s
5711 summerset Drive Hid1'and, Michigan 43640 March 18, 1974 The Hon. Elford Cederberg U. S. House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20000
Dear Mr. Cederberg:
The reports you sent me bear little or no relationship to the nunnresand docunents that Ralph Under cited in his testiuony before the Joint Coanittee on Atomic Energy on January 28, 1974 The reports ne vant are the original studies by AEC's Regulatory Staff on core conservative citing guicelines and the AEC Task Force direct observation account of their evaluation of the abnormal oc-currences at the operating reactors in the U. S. over a 17-month period. Excerpts of this report were sent you. Enclosed is a Nucl.oonica ' leek report (Hay 10, 1973) of the dore conservative popu-lation linitations recotaended by the Regulatory Staff.
These data cake both the Midland and Ferni p 2 plants unsafe in their 6iting, The sanitized and politicized reports yow sent ne in no uay reflect tae real hazards to public health anc safety that the studies by the Regulatory Staff on siting the Task Force Report on licensing prob 1cus have revealed.
InthecourceofresearchingmyhraduatethesisonNuclear Pouer Environnental Communications at the University of Michigan, I found a study by Stanford University called "The Politics of Tech-nology". They pointed out and documented the fact that the basic reports subaitted to government agencies by eminent consultants or by the conpetent people on their own staff s are inevitably "politi-cized" by the top bureaucracy to confora uith the vieus of the special economic interests they are appointed to cultivate.
Your many years in office convince me that you can't possibly be taken in by this " cover-up" nothod of bureaucratic performance that the documents you sent ne illustrate so nell.
This time the issues are deadly serious. We are asking for the oricinal studies, please.
Yours sincerely, Home address: Mary Sinclair, Co-Director 5711 "u==creet Drive Consolidated National Intervenors Midland, Michigan 153 "E" Street, 3 E.
48640 Washington, D. C. 20003
streno"At ccccn2cnc AP bh"NQOM
= =.7=". . - . . , .
=t" ;" - .
Cottgicds of tip Elitittb 6tates .-.?%"."C.
. - .u m
-.. - o.~.
, m n.,- .m JJouge of Representatilles ? T'"
u m .*rm.
- "CJd l*" E21ssfjinaton,Di. 20515 ' " " " * " * " " ' " ' " ~ "
April 17, 1974 Ms. Mary Sinclair 5711 Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640
Dear Mary:
I have received a reply from the Atomic Energy Commis-sion regarding the questions that you raised in your .uarch 18th letter to me. I hooe that the enclosures answer those cuestions to your satisfaction. The AEC has expressed to me a strong desire to fully' answer any other questions that you may have and they have assured me that they are not hiding or classifying any information that may be relevant to the construction of nucle r power plants.
Thank you for writing. I can appreciate your interest in this area. If I can be of further assistance in this or any other area concerning the Federal government, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely yours, f M:^ n !? 2 - 3 EAC:lb Elford A. Cederberg Enclosures
)
- COS.Y~ ~ c-s..t +,1 .e<-. .- 0. w- e. . . * * -.... * .
a , - , .
.e.~ .u. .r ., .; , e ar h 3. .C. A.
s.m, .w.7.
e 3..
.o.., s 7 w, ig f."'1,. .p *** e w U.. O .. . . o . d C a c'. c..w h. o. u,
.q . ..tr,...e e
.J.
. C. .=.e. p.w a., a7.. . u3 ~. 4 . e e a
..C.,.we n o . . . .. , s.
. 3 w. . C. 2.e.O s r.ca .
s a
S O ..e~ a. '3 e .P.n.
. . Ce de %.e. c., ..
. dec.4ae d .o .a.0 :. ..:. a . . .e .n-. , . ~w .a u . . ~4 - n,. - . . w, 2,C . .. C...-. . O.
,.J m, . 1 o. 3 e, . . c . .a.. . --.,........./..n..,
4 ,.u e .c- ., .. .
. . . . . . - . . . . . . . n ~..%.. 1,. . . e of Mr JChn A. Ha ris (Cffice C' Inforr.ation Services O' the
.u: w ) ,..t,,,.,.g,,
, . O ..g.. 1. ...... . . , C .o 4.3.-
r- -
. .u. 47 ..i,..
'.A- p . *7.3.%.%.4 .e
. . .p.7 a. .=. a.g ..{. s.. .. .k. 4 a.b. w. A- ... . n. . . .a c. . .e .g .;.
. . . . .n u . A. e. 4 . 4 -.
3 .- 3
.k..a.d %. g n .e. e.
u .,3 n w. e e g e. d .a .. A,=.41 . .. .e... d t.'. . . g ,.' . a " C.
'. 3 .C '. g"*...". a"..".*."s.S.*...*.=
~...< -. e. a.
- 3 j-. .'.- 1. .e g ~. .s n.e. .a .. =~ g n. e...%. a.
ge 3.c,7)-
. .y...A- e. i g..n ~ . g O .e .c~ .L , ( h ,
g , e. . . p . g.,_,a. . .w.. aau . .w . a. d ys. . %.; ,,.4,. ..a w
. . ....t* e a... - a. .s.. .. L 4 o.g g ...,-
~
.~4.. . . . .
7."a.G"Cd #w0 """ e."4 . 3 ?
. . * ** S ." a. .' e .". .* .".g *^
.w.
4.p f o. .. < .% ,1 *--
- s. .m. a. .e. 2.y . a. e. . .k.o.
. ...,...-..t.
.. ..w .. .w ." .~. .... .Nw. w. .. - .m. a. o .-.s-0 ".4 C.u ". ~., ~. .*. ^.,, ,~) S C .'
.'.Y.*.^.."'.'.***.~ ~
~. .k. . ' . " . . * ^ . " .
- n. .' C C .". " * .~. . ". '. " . . * . * . . * . . ~ . * . . * . . * .
wa g p. 4.
. . . cd. . 3. .. .e. *..h a4 ,_,,* .. k g *. ueow . . 4 m,. e..fy. e .. #. g *o b g *. ;,.. g 1 f. .=. c- g a. I% a. g 4.a g a'. ....,
4 .* a. E t.w.o. eg u.. . . g- t - . g..g1 . u~ %. .jw . o m.. e. ,% 1 3 .~..a u... --
- ..s,.. . .h.e. ,p ....- 1 g e. w .a . .a . ,-
e g.e . .. gm m1 pe . ,y.. . . p .% ,.1 3 ..a
.
- 7_ g .. , . .-. - , n...g.. .e. mo. d t'sg o. c., . a..g...f.
.n.- o. .. . ..1.1. s , ~. .L.a ....a. ** -1
, o.k..' .4 ~" C d. ." *. *. C ." '. CC"14 w w
. . O '. E.".d do e. G
.Ow Swa O . .x. 4 e Cl t. . . . . . . t., . .w. . r..u.n. .3 SO . . : a,...
L o . . o u .e .
. . .s, ra g .. = o. .c. e = O ".'.l.
,i . . .h.; ,7." *. 7, .".' .*.*. .* 0 .. a" #^_.**.*.,*.*..~'. (a"w*"
< , . . - a ."a. -
c a ."
's . s . g . . . .. .o... ) .3 ,.- 4 -ui .ng, q,: m e n.;,y
. , .o .,. , .w.s , ..a g e u. .- .4. 1 7 4.e, .n. .gw .. ~:- . . _
.--.".u"a.".. O .' .'.~'. ~. '. ^v "e '. " #.;" ."l.al ",.."O'.'.w..'.'...4.^..^. O.# .".". N.."
a w
. . . 3.' a.".' a" a ."..#
s.. U. . .,. k a. . v...o..~,.,,.. .e..C.J.3 w
. . .u. . .T-wa n .. . ....
- . C wn
..a. ..e.ea. . g
~..s.. n 3 .a0. . .n .a- u
-, n .,
. .m a. .?... . .. . m.,..C.. . . A ( 0n ..u.s % .e. ..s . n.a . a. .- .n..'r. a. n. w.u.g
. a. l. 4 .3.4 . . .-- . . . .e .q. m w .
4 . ., ..i. ..n. n . .. . ) . 6,. . .
.v . . g ;n. o. ... w . = .
n:.. ,n ..a w ..a.g , , o" 0 0 .aa ,.' *. c. . e.'."7 e C . .a#. *^
k.,
.w a ^ of k.a ,. " a. ". -
3*. 4 .5
- k.o. . g.% f' y, , 44 .aw . .r *- g4. .%~ a., 9. , e., W"S ^ *O
-p. gw.e, s .. . '.*,CCO g . b.ee.O.*. .. ". ".e" ".a".w*.*." a **
4-*".~.
=.
.. e.~y" e ^ *. a. d '. O -.a b'" a.".
aCCidon:.8
.,o,.,.,. d "
C O '.1 C e. '".'.n.
.. ."A- .is" S. a. a y",o "s;, .".* 2 . e '. .".a. .". '.o d.' .9 C'.c .~ a. -- '"e da.a,n c".h. o " *. w" u' .'
. .% . . **c.. " . " . "5 . 3 *. .b.e".A c *. u -' .* a. r*.
g . . ,.a w
.- a y< . . .- , a a ..wo- . , . . . " ", .1 a ~. O ". e" -
~,.
f .3 3. .. _
.u. ..
3 .
. .. 4. a
- u. f,. ,.9. g .a .a .. w.e. ., a..g .w e- a.
..w e.**) . S 0. .t.r.a.
. . . n.g .-. .. a. .e s..-. . ,4
..e 4
. . . . . - 1rdoAw-... 4.
~. .w.e .e 4
. c .,
-g . a. .w e-,1 a-
- T. .ce..~."
."O" C.". '.".*.* .".> "D,i a. *. *, .
Y. . .I o 4 .e
. . . e e G*" .* "g"* . *'O."'.^*."a.
. ~ . . ' ' ' . '.'.".'.CO.**..*'.'a"' *. ~.
, al- * * "
. ~ . . . e"' C . O
. COPY - -
Cong. Cederberg Page 2 April 26, 1974 cently that the Raanussen study is futile according to an expert fror ':ASA _uho stated this approach had been tried and diccarded as u 21 css long ago in the aerospace program.
Even greater nicrepresentation by Mr. Harris appears in the original data en the citing and population report that was sent to ne. He states, "This document does not even laply that nuclear poner plante precently cperating or under conctruction are not cafely sited. In fact, quite the contrary is true.
All of them have been found acceptable in ter:c of population no wel? ac all other safety considerations."
The internal AEC report directly contradicts this crate-cent. It indicates that about 30% of sites proposed to date have current populationc rhich cnneed the neu population guide-lines. (The report states 70$ fall below these levels (p. E of Appendin a) -- therefore 30% are above.)
Dan Ford of the Union of Concerned Scientists calculated uhich proposed'or opernting plants in the country enceeded thene population guidelinec, There are tuelve, involving nany millionc of peopic. The Midland n-plants and For=1 #2 vere anone- than. -
Furthermore, several conths af ter this, study, the AEC Regulatory Staff, on the basic of these neu siting guidelines, asked that the Newtold Island n-nlant rite be scved~ to Sale:)
pennsylvania, because Neubold Ic' to philadelphia.
l and uns too cloce (10 miles (See October 8, 1973, Enerrt Renort.)
Thece facts cake Mr. Harris' statement nanifectly untrue.
Finally, the report discucces the meeting ' tith utility enecutives en this neu population guidelinec pol. icy on April 12, 1973. It states that the utility enecutives narned that the principal inpact of the policy could be adverse public reaction because these guidelines indicated that the safety of the reactors was in question. And, indeed, the uhole basis for raking thic ctady unc the admission in the report that citing in metropolitan areas chculd be diccouraged for rea-cons of public cafety.
The reasons for not publishing the siting guidelines, then, vere political in nature. Again, public health and safety take a back cent.
Thin is but another enample of the secrecy and deception uith uhich the pronotion end of the AEC is conducted and hou it accc=nocates industry to the detricent of the public.
~
COPY Cong. Cederberg Page 3 April 26,1974 There is no point in bringing any threat to Mr. Harria on thic point. AEC Chairnan Dinic Lee Ray hercelf has grossly nicrepresented many facts about the current nuclear progran to the nation in her appearances on Face the nation and Xeot the Presc TV shouc. I uill be glad to document tnic clait any tine you nich.
For example, Dr. Ray claims that nuclear poner is nec-eacary to reach the goal of energy independence cet forth by Precident Minon. Yet the head of AEC's Materials Management, Frank Baranoucki, states that ne vill be out of economical uranium f uel b-/ 1980 (See article encloced.)
The deception on nuclear poner permeates the pro =otion end of AEC and the inductry.
Sincerely yours, Home address: Mary Sinclair, Co-Director Concolidated Hational Intervenor 5711 suanerset Drive 153 "E" s Midland, Michigan 48640 street,d..
Vashington, D. E.
20003
i i
l ELFORD " AL" C ED ER DERG coau'nts-
.w..w-um e m e u. APPROPRI AT lONS
. ....... ~ ... _ , .. _ , ...
=""- Cottgredd of tije Eittitch fibrates ,,,,"r". ;"".
- . . . m m.
^* ~'"-
, "; , = .,",;,., %)ouse oI EepresentatibL4 w.. _ .o c. .... - - . . , - .
~ ~ ~ EBasbington, D.C. 20515 .
~~'""'a""-'
' May 20, 1974 Ms. Mary Sinclair 5711 Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640
Dear Mary:
Thank you for your recent letter in which you pointed out some misrepresentations in the letter from Mr. John A. Harris responding to your March 27th letter. As usual your arguments were deLailed arid well documented.
However, in your reference to an appropriation for Professor Norman Rasmussen of MIT to study risk probabilities of nuclear plants, you quoted an incorrect figure. I am sure that you meant to type a dollar total of S2 million instead of $2 billion as this is very close to the correct figure.
I appreciate your continued effort to keep me informed on this issue. As always, feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely yours, A"'
f= 2 EAC:lb ,
Elford A. Cederberg
(
..- I
5711 Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 May 24, 1974 Congressman Elford Cederberg United States House of Representatives Unshington, D. C. 20000
Dear Congressman Cederberg:
I apprecirte your response to my letter on the misrep-resentations that .tEC's Director of Information Services cado to you on the nature of the internal AEC documents on the new siting guidelines and safety concerns determined last year by acabers of AEC's Regulatory Staff.
How that you have confizned the fact that the data within aEC's siting report do ru,nort statistien31y the fact that the Hidland and Permi 42 plants do nas meet Acc's new siting gu.ide-lines, our question to you 13, unn.t no trou intend to do n. bout thene matters? Hou are you moin: to re,rnsent tname very ir.-
Mo rt ".nt nuOlle h941tn and GP.l'et'f m9.tter9 l'Or IC9 n90n19 of the Tenth Congressional Lietrict ann Ine usate or nien1:mr?
I have asked Senator Griffin and benator tiart to support getting the whole nuclear problem into the Office of Tech-nology Assessment. I have also asked Senator Hart to hold hearings on all the nuclear issues in his capacity as Chairman of the Environment Committee of the Commerce Department.
All of this correspondence on these siting and safety catters will be placed in AUC's Public Documents room to es-tablish the public record on thece matters.
I regret the typing error unich stated G2 billion dollars uns appropriated for the Rasmussen Study on n-plant accident probabilitics, i'ho figure of U2 million is the one I men nt to use.
Thank you for your prompt attention to these matters.
Sincerely, Home address: Mary Sinclair, Co-Director 5711.Summerset Drive Consolidated National Intervenors Midland,'iichigan 153 "E" Street, S. E.
48640 washington, D. C. 20003
~ ... . e-,,,,~
'2Cnifeb Siafes Senafe wFICE OF THE ASSISTANT MINORITY LEAoER WASHINGTON, D.C. 2Q$10 May 10,1974 Ms. Mary Sinclair 5711 Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640
Dear Ms. Sinclair:
Reference is made to previous correspondence.
The Atomic Energy Commission has furnished my office with a copy of its April 15th response to Congressman Cederberg. No doubt by this time you have received a copy of that report from the Cong re s s man.
With kind regards, I am Sincerely, ,
R ert P. Gr U. S. ' Senator RPG:cm I
l l
l'
5711 cammeract Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 May 24, 1974 Senator Robert Griffin United Statea Sonato Wachington, D. C. 20000
Dear Senator Griffin:
Your letter of May 10th tells me that you received a copy of the letter sont to Congreaanan Cederborg from tne Atomic Energy Conniacion in rcrerence to my reoucat for the AEC in-ternal documents on the alting of nuclear planto and the Tack Force Hoport on abnormal incidents in reactora nov in opera-tion, developed by AEC's Regulatory Staff last year.
That letter la a totally f alse appraisal of what la ac-tually in the internal AEC alting document of April, 1973. The document does support in its statiatical data that there are 12 planta in the United States in operation or under construc-t2on which do not meet the neu alting criteria of the AEC. The Midland plants and Forni d2 are among then. I have pointed these fact.c- out in a rnply to Congreaccan Cederbern. I analy:ed the report by citing tre actual passa;ca and data that t!w authur of the A2C letter, Director of tho Office of Inforcation Ser-Vicea, John Harria, lied about and totally disrepreacnted in his ancuer to Congrecacan Cederberg.
Mr. Harria una undoubtedly relying on the fact that neither Congress::.an Cederborg nor your offico would atudy the docu=ent itacif in order to make cure he una telling the truth.
In this assumption, Mr. Harris nas apparently correct.
I am conding a copy of the lotter I prepared for Congreaa-man Cederberg, analy.~,ing the report in relation to Mr. Harris' letter to you for your atudy. On Hay 21, I received a reply from Congreac an Cederberg, confirming that ny facts and analyses were correct. However, he did not state vhat, if anything, he vould do about theac aerious matters.
It la nou clear that Conrrecenan Cederber78 9 office has ,
been able to octanilan unan tr.c niciana ana . c_w.a P. nuclenr plant sitoa are, Inucet, unnarc in Oneir citinN accortin? to the coat recent altinr criteria or tno at;0 It i n nov a t go clear trw.; m.J c"one :non anu :.;c J alnt Lom:attee Pn te attern:ce tn r n-ceivo us on Inla lasue. .itn tho ce f acta in ninu, cur c.ucct:.an to you n3*.* 1 a , " ca t cc tou, na enc o. ;ienL 7 n' 1 nont inn rt 7 ciectod rowmenuatives in Lonareca, nian to ao nuout i t? no 13 r0n PO C O n J11L' On3 "COpid O n 3 2. 3 I S Gl[0't I am placing all of this correspondence on this issue in AEC's Public Documento Roon in the dochets of both the Midland
Senator R. Griffin Pago 2 May 24, 1974 and the Fermi #2 nuclear plants to catablish the public record on this matter.
Also enclosed is a copy of a statement I presented to the Commission of the ntpartme-: of Natural Resources on April 11, 1974 In this statement, . summari:cd the contents of major technical studiec, documents and articleo published in the past 2 years by EPA, AEC, and independent scientists on the current development of nuclear power and related them to Michi-gen's operating and proposed plants.
In thin study, you will be abic to s'ee hou much of the data developed by the most conpetent scientista anc other professionals in the field haw not been reflected in the en-vironmental impact statements of Michigan's nuclear plants, either by the AEC or the utilities. _ _ _ _
This duplicity between the best information available and how this technology is being promoted is going on all over the country. It cannot continue for long. There are too many citizens' groups that have caught on to this rape of our country and indeed, the planet, under the guice of a saf e, clean and cconomical cncrcy acurce when, ac a matter er ract, nuclear fiosion pouer is none of these things. It is, instead, the technology most threatening to the existence of life on the planet.
I believe you should try to percuade Senator liart to hold hearings on those matters in his capacity as Chairman of the Environment Committee of the Commerce department. Per-haps you could also try to get it placed with the Office of Technological Accesament for study.
I have already brought these issues in current nucicar development to the attention of Congressman Marvin Esch, who la on the Committee for Technological Aasescaent.
Certainly the Joint Coccittee on Atomic Energy has not dealt fairly with Congrens by failing to provide them uith all the developing information on the nuclear program which Con-greos should knou in order to deal effectively uith 10. Mean-time, the JCAE, the AEC, the nuclear industrien and utilities have held back the development of safer, cican for=s of en-erGy.
Many thoughtful and vise scientists within the AEC and outside have unrned that ue are nou making decisions that 1 are as profound as mankind has over nade in relation to lif e on the planet. ,
t
m, Senator R. Griffin Pag 5 3 May 24, 1974 I appeal to you to look at. this whole issue more closely and to get it studied more fully in Congress by more commit-tees.
Yours sincerely, l . .
Hono address: Mary S tir, Co-Director 5711 Sunnerset Drive Consolid.ated national Intervenora Midland, Michigan 153 "E" Street, S. S.
48640 Washington, D. C. 20003 Enclosures Cc: Senator Philip Hart Congresscan 31 ford Cederberg i
t e
e
[
L i
l L
8 5711 su==ercet Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 May 24, 1974 Senator Philip Hart United States Senate Vaohington, D. C. 20000
Dear Senator Unrt:
Both Congressaan Cederberg and Senator Robert Griffin folloued up on ny request for the internal docu=cnts on nu-clear safety problena and the neu guidelines for siting of nucicar reactors that ucre developed by AEC8 s Regulatory Staff and then suppressed by the AEC and the Joint Concittee.
While I urote to you on this matter alco, I have not heard fron your office.
The letter that the AEC Director of Infor=ation Services, J. Harris, sent uith the sunpresced internal docunent on citing uhich has nou been released, falsely reprccented the facta uith-in the docu=ent itacif. I urote to Congrecscan Cederberg, point-ing this out to hin, and he hnc confirced that ny observations were correct.
I vant you to be anare of all this correspondence for two reasons. In the firct place, I hope yop uill take the ac-tion necessary to stop this deception in inforcation provided to the public and cenbers of Congrecc by .iEC spokec en. '.le nuct restore accountability and integrity in government. Second, you are in the position to be very offective in getting the serious issues--the safety, economic and enviror.nental prob-lenc--in nuc1 car development to the public by holding henrings in your capacity as Chairman of the Environ =ent Coccittee of the Concerce Department.
Enclosed is all the correspondence relating to these catters to give you the necessary background that has devel-oped on this matter.
It in nov clen.r thnt Concrecenan Cederberc's office has bonn abic to estnblich Inn the in'nnc e7t Femi m nucien_r nlant ci;or c.re, inc.ec'.. uncare :n ~ ncir citinn acco: c. ire to the mont racont 31 tin? criteria or One EU , 10 1c neu alc,o clear that A C 3 70::03:en anc. Ine J oint C0=100cc nave attennted to de-ceive us or. t t- i r.ue ,
- :ith .e se ractn in :ina, our comtion to vou no ' ic, una; do you, o s one or ;1ce_:P.n 8 3 oG; it-OrtnnG clected renresentatives in Concrezs, nian to co acout it? cno is renrosentir. the nconle on ;c.ia issuc?
I am placing all of this correspondence on this issue in AEC8 c Public Documents hoon in the dockets of both the Midland j
Senator Hart Page 2 May 24, 1974 I am placing all of this correspondence on this issue in AEC8 s Public Documents Room in the dockets of both the Midland and the Fermi d2 nuclear plants to establish the public record on this matter.
Also enclosed is a statement uhich I presented to the Com-mission of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources on May lith. Since that time, House Speaker William Ryan has asked me to draft a proposal for a fact-finding study which vill become the basic for teacning the Michigan Legislature che icaues on nuclear pouer. William Ralls of the Public Service Conmission has asked for all information I have avail-able on the economics of nuclear power.
-A-bill-for a coratorium on nuclear pouer plant construc-tion and licensing vill be introduced to the hichigan Legis-lature uithin a feu days.
I hope you uill give these urgent matters your close attention.
51ncerely, Hone address: Mary Sing _Iair, Co-Director 5711 butmorset Drive Consolid(ited national Intervenors Midland, Michigan 153 "E" street, s. E.
, 48640 Washington, D. C. 20003 Enclosures
\
-f I e
i.
CHICM;O DAILY NEWS, Wednesday, M1y 22,1971
..,...,g,.- m . . . . . 1 C,:,l.racd
,; g front y Ps:s 1 )* @.g4 ,
' , [y,
.sut the nation. A special inder., called the " site pepulation
. . htor," was used to measure the scope cl .;otential safety '
l 9 risk at all 49 locations.
$n d g4
", I Only four piar.t sites were given a higher -isk factor than TU % ) .' d- the Zion plant by the AEC staff and tw) of those were
.L scrapped long ago because of dense populat on nearby, and
- the AEC ordered the third proposed plant, in New Jersey, e] $ O
~
9 0* e moved to another site for the same reason.
r ,
,t U T1.is leaves one nuclear power plant, Indian Point, a part-g
- y Q ,,, ,,_,1. . ly completed facility in Upstate New York, with a higher
! risk factor than the Zion plant. .
. Tile 19)3 'AEC STAFF RET' ORT propot.(d special treat-4' O
. g.h so
- ment for plant sites with populations of 30.0X.within 5 milas, whhin 20 miles and 2 rnillion within to miles'.
- *'- Li ..
Population levels around the Zion plant exceeded these proposed guidelines at all three distances. fly 19S0, accord.
- ing to the staff estimate, 5,184.000 people would be living 4
within 40 miles of the Zion site.
Oi b j
,, )- Under guidelines proposed by the AEC staff, the Zion la -!A -
~
plant and facilities with comparable nerby populations would have to meet special standards. P.)wer companies w uld have to submit an analysis of alternative sites r.nd .
BY liarlan Draeger also add stronger safety controls. -
A rovernment report strongly indicates that the Zion ' DIE PROPOSED 11AILLY NUCLEAR POWER plant be-r.uc! car power plant would have been built at a safer dis- ,
tween Gary and Michigan City also was . liven a high-risk
- -sc !n.cn Chiruo if the de;icion were made today, n rep;rt was drafted by the staff of the Atomic Energy rating by the AEC staff in 1973. It was ranked 'as the"I'0th was .
Comminion in April,1973, for use within the AEC an rr,t rnade public until a year later, Early last month, Northern Indiana Public Service Co.
ed In the recently released document, the AEC staff ana1 peter.tial safety hazards to large population centers st;;.ia. ly event of a severe reactor accident.
Nudear power plants should not be bul1t in metropo ,,
areas, the staff said, unless there are ,,significant ,,
remic, enyttramental or other advantages. had " suppressed" the 1973 staff report f) a full year de spite ne $t% million Zion plant, currently the targest nuclear formal requests for all such data in the E ailly license dispute.
f the fadl;ty in the world, is located roughly 40 miles er _
,9 g Lwp Commenwealth Edison completed the two ,
watt reactor umts within the last year. tremely small. Nexertheless it conc!Lded that sites hear Ti!E POTESTIAL PUBLIC !!AZARD is that a major re- populous areas add an " increment of r4sk above that at a cctor accidtnt cc,uld send deadly radioactive clouds over a site in a low population-density area."
wide area. Osann said the AEC did not publicly release the April 17, Su su:h accident ever had occurred, and AEC Chairman 1973, staff report untillast April 9, one Jty after he received r,im 1.u R ay last month termed the risk " trivial." But a a copy of the decision in the Bailly case,
' [y ,'.k[tue
~ .ety study 4',,003 lives.said that, theoredcally, a major accident OSANN AND CillCAGO ATTORNEY .MYRON CllERRY, Ar. Edisca executive said Zion still is "a pretty acceptable. .
a veteran AEC critic, noted sections of the staff report re .
l ,, , , ferrmg to a "mteting with selected utility executives" on*
the subject on April 12,1973. Said the report:
1$ its 1973 report, the AEC regulatory staff reviewed popu - *
,- "The consensus of the meeting was thit the principal im , j' l . Me ll, Co'umn 1 pact of the policy would be the patential adverte public ' l
.. ,. . . ..x_
reactio').to any action which indicated that the saf:ty of reacters was in question. ( !.
"It was agreed, however, that if the policy were to be implemented, there was no vial,le alternative to a 1 u';lic anncuncernent by the AEC."
%c staff " partially adopted" utility su;7;(stions that the policy statement stress the industry's good safety recard, he need for more operating experience and similar pah:ts.
Commonwealth Edison was one of six utthfies reprete.ted at the meeting.
Cherry said the staff rep')it was mrtde phiic cn April 9 onlytnder pressure from Rsiph Nader and others. Ile said the staff deliterately withheld the report for a year and asked: "llow are we to believe any AEC statemer.tr. on safety?" -
?v i .
i l
IN WA5f tlNGTON, CA!!L GUSTIN, an AEC spcktsman, i said the staff report is just an "intrrnal working paper" and
, does not represent official AEC policy.
Gustin said the AEC last December proposed environmen-tal plant siting guidelines, ir.clud;ng a sectier, on populat:on ' ' -
density. Last month, the ALC said it is awaiting rcsuP.s cf '
"more reliable" studies of the populat;on-risk issue by Nor-man Rasmussen, a professor at blassachusetts Instito:e cf Technology.
- Gustin said he did not know if the staff report was con-
, , , . . _. = . . -
' sidered when the Zion plant received its first o;'erating license last year. Dut he added:
" Population density certainly was considered. I can stat;
[
categorically that populatic,n density has been a consid-eratiun throup,hout the nucle.ir program."
ILYRON LEE JR., AN EDISON vice presidant, said the Zion site was selected about ISEG or 1:.67. The chcTice th:n, he explained, was between Zion and a site in La Salle C)unty, south
Lee said the AEC always has con idered populat.cn den-sity and that the Zion site met "all the criteria" when the con truction license was issued in ISCL "It was realized that Zion was a more densely po;ulated site than anything other than Indian l'omt at the time,"
he said.
"But somebody has to be No. I evea if they're a!! cut :n the
' boondocks. As a result,I would like to think the AEC kd.ed o' at it in rr. ore detail We still think Zicn sti!! is a pretty acceptable site."
Lee said Edison sould ro' have chown a chtferrnt s. e even if the 1973 staff repart haj been av;ilabic tix sc.ui ago. lie said that power companiet try to locrie ;t ris n
- near as possible to their load center, for ulia'oif.ty. ,
"Under today's atmosphere. if we tr.ed to bu:Id Zrar., 2
' don't know if we would r,et approval" Lee said. ,
. 9'
.1