ML063420305: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML063420305 | | number = ML063420305 | ||
| issue date = 11/07/2006 | | issue date = 11/07/2006 | ||
| title = | | title = E-Mail: (PD) 2 More Questions | ||
| author name = Junge M | | author name = Junge M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/ACRS | | author affiliation = NRC/ACRS | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:11_P_-!ýýShl Yý7 2 more questions I .-.D. Ashley -2 more questions Page 1 From: Michael Junge To: D. Ashley Date: 11/07/2006 1:34:30 PM | {{#Wiki_filter:11_P_-!ýýShl Yý7 2 more questions I . - . D. Ashley - 2 more questions Page 1 From: Michael Junge To: D. Ashley Date: 11/07/2006 1:34:30 PM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
2 more questions Donnie, I got a couple more questions from our contractor on the OC LRA subcommittee | 2 more questions Donnie, I got a couple more questions from our contractor on the OC LRA subcommittee | ||
: 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood up?2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? | : 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood up? | ||
Where could it be from?Mike Lc:\tem p\3W 100003. | : 2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? Where could it be from? | ||
: 18 : 9982) | Mike | ||
Lc:\tem p\3W 100003. 1MHFae | |||
, Page _111 Mail Envelope Properties (4550DIAF.EC8 : 18 : 9982) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
2 more questions Creation Date 11/07/2006 1:34:23 PM From: Michael Junge Created By: MXJ2@nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO01 .HQGWDO01 DJAI (D. Ashley)Post Office Route OWGWP01 .HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1494 07 November, 2006 1:34:23 PM Options Expiration Date: None Priority: | 2 more questions Creation Date 11/07/2006 1:34:23 PM From: Michael Junge Created By: MXJ2@nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO01 .HQGWDO01 DJAI (D. Ashley) | ||
Standard ReplyRequested: | Post Office Route OWGWP01 .HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1494 07 November, 2006 1:34:23 PM Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
No Return Notification: | |||
None Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No Security: | No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}} | ||
Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 7 December 2019
| ML063420305 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/07/2006 |
| From: | Junge M Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Ashley D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| %dam200701, TAC 8261 | |
| Download: ML063420305 (2) | |
Text
11_P_-!ýýShl Yý7 2 more questions I . - . D. Ashley - 2 more questions Page 1 From: Michael Junge To: D. Ashley Date: 11/07/2006 1:34:30 PM
Subject:
2 more questions Donnie, I got a couple more questions from our contractor on the OC LRA subcommittee
- 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood up?
- 2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? Where could it be from?
Mike
Lc:\tem p\3W 100003. 1MHFae
, Page _111 Mail Envelope Properties (4550DIAF.EC8 : 18 : 9982)
Subject:
2 more questions Creation Date 11/07/2006 1:34:23 PM From: Michael Junge Created By: MXJ2@nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO01 .HQGWDO01 DJAI (D. Ashley)
Post Office Route OWGWP01 .HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1494 07 November, 2006 1:34:23 PM Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled