ML18139A755: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:i RC. FORM 3.66. 7;'17} ,."
{{#Wiki_filter:i RC. FORM 3.66.                                                                                                                             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7;'17}             ,."
* e U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT e CONTROL BLOCK: .... I _,____.__.___.___..___,I G) 1 6 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) I v I A I s I P I s I 2 101 o Io I -Io Io I ol ol o I -I o I o 101 4 ! 1 !1 I 1 ! 1101 1
* e           LICENSEE EVENT REPORT                               e CONTROL BLOCK: I...._,____.__.___.___..___,I                       G)                   (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1                                  6
* 10 :::. 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 . 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 57 CAT 58 kE]
~              I v I A I s I P I s I 2 101 o Io I - Io Io I ol ol oI -I oI o101 4 ! 1 !1 I 1 ! 1101 1* 10
L2J© I o I s I o I o I o 1 2 1 s 11 1011 I o I o I 3 I s I o 101 1 1 o 1::1 I 6 I s I o I G) 8 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES@
:::. 9                         LICENSEE CODE               14       15                   LICENSE NUMBER                           25   . 26     LICENSE TYPE         30     57 CAT 58 kE]       8
:2J2J I With Unit #2 at 100% power, Periodic Test 27D revealed that the amperage for Circuit 2A Panel 10 (Unit 112 BIT inlet line and valves MOV-2867 A & B) was below the Accept-ance Criteria stipulated in the .PT. The redundant Heat Tracing Circuit was operable. This is a degraded mode of operation as specified in T. S. 3. 3. B. 5 and is report ab le in accordance with T.S.6.6.2.b(2).
:;~~~~ L2J©   60 I o I s I o I o I o 12 1s 11 61                DOCKET NUMBER                  68 1011 69 Io Io I3 I sI o101 EVENT DATE            74      75 1 1 o 1::1 I 6 I s I o IG)
The health and safety of the public were not affected.  
REPORT DATE           80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES@
]JI] B 9 SYSTEM CODE I cl BI@ 9 10 r;:;-.., LEA/RO LVENT YEAR REPORT I 8 ! O j NUMBER 21 22 CAUSE CAUSE COMP. CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUB CODE w@w@ I H I E I A I T I E I R 1@ 1.:£..J@)
:2J2J         I With Unit #2 at 100% power, Periodic Test                                                         27D revealed that the amperage for Circuit 2A Panel 10 (Unit 112 BIT inlet line and valves MOV-2867 A & B) was below the Accept-ance Criteria stipulated in the .PT.                                           The redundant Heat Tracing Circuit was operable.
11 12 i3 18 19 SEQUENTIAL OCCUR REN CE REPORT REPORT NO. CODE TYPE I I 10 12 I s I I/I IO I 3 I 23 24 26 2 7 28 29 30 VALVE SUBCODE ui@ 20 L:=J 31 REVISION NO. LQ.J 32 COMPONENT 80 ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWI\'
~                      This is a degraded mode of operation as specified in T. S. 3. 3. B. 5 and is report ab le
r:;;;,, ATTACHMENT NPRD..: PRIME COMP .
~                      in accordance with T.S.6.6.2.b(2).                                           The health and safety of the public were not affected.
* r~El@IT~OIG~)
]JI]
0 r~AI@ MIE~HI I O I H~r~ Po ! SUiM~I@ Fr~ SI sr~1 I@) MANUFACTURER 33 34 3~ 36 37 40 41 42 43 IT I 11 Bj 51@ CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @ 44 47 :Im The Heat Tracing Tape was; damaged during :erection*
B 9                                                                                                                                                                                   80 SYSTEM               CAUSE           CAUSE                                                           COMP.           VALVE CODE                 CODE        SUBCODE                     COMPONENT CODE                   SUB CODE         SUBCODE I cl BI@
of scaffolding to s_upport IILechanicall work in the nearby area. The defective Heat Tracing Tap~ was replaced and verified TIIJ .1-_o_p_e_r_a_b_l_e_.
9          10 w@w@
______________________________________
11            12 I H I E I A I T I E I R 1@ 1.:£..J@) ui@
_ ITD 1...' _________________________________________
i3                               18         19               20 SEQUENTIAL                               OCCUR REN CE         REPORT                         REVISION r;:;-..,      LEA/RO LVENT YEAR                                      REPORT NO.                                 CODE               TYPE                           NO.
_, IE) 8 *9 FACILITY '3o' METHOD OF A BO STATUS % POWER OTHER STATUS I.;::;} DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION Q}] L!J@ 111 0 IO I@ ..... ! __ N_A ____ ....... ~@)L....I
              ~ REPORT NUMBER I !
__ E_le_c_t_r_ic_i_an
8 O j                I23 I         10 12       I s26I        I/I             IO   I 3 29I          ~              L:=J           LQ.J 21          22                        24                          27              28                    30              31            32 ACTION FUTURE r~El@IT~OIG~)
__________
33                  34 0EFFECT r~AI@
...J 8 9 10 12 13 44 45 46 ACTIVITY CONTENT Q,, RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY ~@~@I NA a 9 : 10 11 80 NA LOCATION OF RELEASE @ 44 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES Q,. NUl!iBER TYPE DESCRIPTION NA Q2J I 0 1 ° I O l0l:.J@ B 9 11 121 L.3,-. ------------------------------------...J80 PERSONNEL INJURIES Q tJUMBER DESCRIPTION~ I O 10 JO J@).__ _________
3~
N_A _________________ 8 9 11 12 80 NA
SHUTDOWI\'
* LOSS OF OR D"'-t/.,'..GE TO FACILITY '43\ TYPE DESCRIPTION
MIE~HI 36 I OI 37 H~r~
* l::.::.J ~@ 8 9. '-,o------------------------------------=--------.J80 Pc.:8L /CITY Q.. ISSUEC,Q DESCRIPT/01\1 NRC USE ONL y "' LE.le,.___
r:;;;,,
__________
Po !   40 ATTACHMENT SUiM~I@
--'-N=A~---------...J I I I I I I 11 I I I I I 8 d 9 . 10 68 69 80 .;: l O 2 ~11.li? 'REPARER . J. L. Wilson PHONE:_(_8_0_4_)_3_57_-_3_1_8_4
41 NPRD..:
____ 
Fr~ SI 42 sr~43 1I@)
* ***
PRIME COMP .
* e e ATTACHMENT 1 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO: 50-281 REPORT NO: 80-025/03L-O EVENT DATE: 10-03-80 TITLE OF REPORT: HEAT TRACING FAILURE 1. Description of Event: With Unit 2 at 100% power, Pe.riodic T.est 27D revealed that the amp readings for circuit 2A Panel.10 (Unit #2 BIT inlet line and valv.es) were below the Acceptance Criteria stipulated in the PT. This is a degraded mode of operation as specified in T.S.3.3.B.5 and is portable in accordance with T.S.6.6.2.b(2).
44 COMPONENT MANUFACTURER IT I 11     Bj 51@
: 2. Prob ab le Consequences  
47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @
& Status of Redundant Systems: 3. 4. The Heat Tracing is intended to ,maintain a temperature above that needed for flow. The redundant Heat Tracing Circuit was operable, therefore, the.health and safety of the public were not affected.
:Im                   The Heat Tracing Tape was; damaged during :erection* of scaffolding to s_upport                                                                             IILechanicall work in the nearby area.                             The defective Heat Tracing Tap~ was replaced and verified TIIJ         .1-_o_p_e_r_a_b_l_e_._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Cause: The *Heat Tracing Tape was damaged during . .erection of scaffolding to support* mechanical work in the nearby area. Immediate Corrective Action: The immediate corrective action was to verify that the redundant circuit was operable.
ITD           1 . . . '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
: 5. Subsequent Corrective Action: The defective Heat Tracing Circuit was replaced within the time span specified by the Technical Specifications.
IE) 8   *9                                                                                                                                                                                 BO FACILITY STATUS                     % POWER                         OTHER STATUS
                                                                                          '3o' I.;::;}
METHOD OF DISCOVERY                             DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION A
                                                                                                                                                                              ~
Q}] L!J@                             111 0 IO I@!. . .__N_A_ _ _ _.......                                 ~@)L....I__E_le_c_t_r_ic_i_an_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                                    ...J 8     9                     10               12     13                                   44     45           46                                                                     80 ACTIVITY               CONTENT                                               Q,,
RELEASED OF RELEASE                                 AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY                                                             LOCATION OF RELEASE          @
~            ~@~@I                                                       NA                                                        NA a     9 :                   10           11                                               44           45                                                                           80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES                                   Q,.
NUl!iBER         ~ TYPE             DESCRIPTION Q2JB        I9 0
1   ° I O
11l0l:.J@                                                     NA 1 2 1L.3,-.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . J 8 0 PERSONNEL INJURIES                     Q tJUMBER               DESCRIPTION~
~            I O10 JO J@).___________N_A_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~
8   9                       11       12                                                                                                                                             80 LOSS OF OR D"'-t/.,'..GE TO FACILITY             '43\
TYPE               DESCRIPTION
* l::.::.J
*            ~@                                                                                     NA 8   9.                 '-,o------------------------------------=--------.J80 Pc.:8L /CITY             Q..
ISSUEC,Q DESCRIPT/01\1                 ~                                                                                                                      NRC USE   ONL y         "'
~            LE.le,._____________- - ' - N = A ~ - - - - - - - - - . . . J                                                                                       I I I I I I 11 I I I I I ~
8d                                            ~
l O 2 ~11.li? 'REPARER .                                                                                                                                                                 ~
9 .                10                                                                                                                        68    69                            80 .;:
J. L. Wilson                                                       PHONE:_(_8_0_4_)_3_57_-_3_1_8_4_ _ _ _
 
e                                 e ATTACHMENT 1
* SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO:
REPORT NO:
50-281 80-025/03L-O EVENT DATE: 10-03-80 TITLE OF REPORT:         HEAT TRACING FAILURE
: 1. Description of Event:
With Unit 2 at 100% power, Pe.riodic T.est 27D revealed that the amp readings for circuit 2A Panel.10 (Unit #2 BIT inlet line and valv.es) were below the Acceptance Criteria stipulated in the PT. This is a degraded mode of operation as specified in T.S.3.3.B.5 and is re-portable in accordance with T.S.6.6.2.b(2).
: 2. Prob ab le Consequences & Status of Redundant Systems:
The Heat Tracing is intended to ,maintain a temperature above that needed for flow. The redundant Heat Tracing Circuit was operable, therefore, the.health and safety of the public were not affected.
: 3. Cause:
The *Heat Tracing Tape was damaged during ..erection of scaffolding to support* mechanical work in the nearby area.
: 4. Immediate Corrective Action:
The immediate corrective action was to verify that the redundant circuit was operable.
: 5. Subsequent Corrective Action:
The defective Heat Tracing Circuit was replaced within the time span specified by the Technical Specifications.
: 6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:
: 6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:
No additional  
No additional *actions are deemed necessary.
*actions are deemed necessary.
: 7. Generic Implications:
: 7. Generic Implications:
The task force has reviewed the total. spectrum of the Heat Tracing sys tern and a Design Change is being prepared as a .result of the Task Force Study. Long lead items are b.eing procured . I J}}
The task force has reviewed the total. spectrum of the Heat Tracing sys tern and a Design Change is being prepared as a .result of the Task Force Study. Long lead items are b.eing procured .
I}}

Latest revision as of 01:20, 3 February 2020

LER 80-025/03L-0:on 801003,w/Unit 2 at 100% Power,Periodic Test 27D Revealed That Amperage for Circuit 2A Panel 10 Was Below Acceptance Criteria.Caused by Damaged Heat Tracing Tape.Verified That Redundant Circuit Was Operable
ML18139A755
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1980
From: Joshua Wilson
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18139A602 List:
References
LER-80-025-03L-03, LER-80-25-3L-3, NUDOCS 8010200524
Download: ML18139A755 (2)


Text

i RC. FORM 3.66. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7;'17} ,."

  • e LICENSEE EVENT REPORT e CONTROL BLOCK: I...._,____.__.___.___..___,I G) (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

~ I v I A I s I P I s I 2 101 o Io I - Io Io I ol ol oI -I oI o101 4 ! 1 !1 I 1 ! 1101 1* 10

. 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 . 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 57 CAT 58 kE] 8
~~~~ L2J© 60 I o I s I o I o I o 12 1s 11 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 1011 69 Io Io I3 I sI o101 EVENT DATE 74 75 1 1 o 1
:1 I 6 I s I o IG)

REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES@

2J2J I With Unit #2 at 100% power, Periodic Test 27D revealed that the amperage for Circuit 2A Panel 10 (Unit 112 BIT inlet line and valves MOV-2867 A & B) was below the Accept-ance Criteria stipulated in the .PT. The redundant Heat Tracing Circuit was operable.

~ This is a degraded mode of operation as specified in T. S. 3. 3. B. 5 and is report ab le

~ in accordance with T.S.6.6.2.b(2). The health and safety of the public were not affected.

]JI]

B 9 80 SYSTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUB CODE SUBCODE I cl BI@

9 10 w@w@

11 12 I H I E I A I T I E I R 1@ 1.:£..J@) ui@

i3 18 19 20 SEQUENTIAL OCCUR REN CE REPORT REVISION r;:;-.., LEA/RO LVENT YEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE NO.

~ REPORT NUMBER I !

8 O j I23 I 10 12 I s26I I/I IO I 3 29I ~ L:=J LQ.J 21 22 24 27 28 30 31 32 ACTION FUTURE r~El@IT~OIG~)

33 34 0EFFECT r~AI@

3~

SHUTDOWI\'

MIE~HI 36 I OI 37 H~r~

r:;;;,,

Po ! 40 ATTACHMENT SUiM~I@

41 NPRD..:

Fr~ SI 42 sr~43 1I@)

PRIME COMP .

44 COMPONENT MANUFACTURER IT I 11 Bj 51@

47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @

Im The Heat Tracing Tape was; damaged during :erection* of scaffolding to s_upport IILechanicall work in the nearby area. The defective Heat Tracing Tap~ was replaced and verified TIIJ .1-_o_p_e_r_a_b_l_e_._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

ITD 1 . . . '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,

IE) 8 *9 BO FACILITY STATUS  % POWER OTHER STATUS

'3o' I.;::;}

METHOD OF DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION A

~

Q}] L!J@ 111 0 IO I@!. . .__N_A_ _ _ _....... ~@)L....I__E_le_c_t_r_ic_i_an_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ...J 8 9 10 12 13 44 45 46 80 ACTIVITY CONTENT Q,,

RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE @

~ ~@~@I NA NA a 9 : 10 11 44 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES Q,.

NUl!iBER ~ TYPE DESCRIPTION Q2JB I9 0

1 ° I O

11l0l:.J@ NA 1 2 1L.3,-.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . J 8 0 PERSONNEL INJURIES Q tJUMBER DESCRIPTION~

~ I O10 JO J@).___________N_A_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~

8 9 11 12 80 LOSS OF OR D"'-t/.,'..GE TO FACILITY '43\

TYPE DESCRIPTION

  • l::.::.J
  • ~@ NA 8 9. '-,o------------------------------------=--------.J80 Pc.:8L /CITY Q..

ISSUEC,Q DESCRIPT/01\1 ~ NRC USE ONL y "'

~ LE.le,._____________- - ' - N = A ~ - - - - - - - - - . . . J I I I I I I 11 I I I I I ~

8d ~

l O 2 ~11.li? 'REPARER . ~

9 . 10 68 69 80 .;:

J. L. Wilson PHONE:_(_8_0_4_)_3_57_-_3_1_8_4_ _ _ _

e e ATTACHMENT 1

  • SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO:

REPORT NO:

50-281 80-025/03L-O EVENT DATE: 10-03-80 TITLE OF REPORT: HEAT TRACING FAILURE

1. Description of Event:

With Unit 2 at 100% power, Pe.riodic T.est 27D revealed that the amp readings for circuit 2A Panel.10 (Unit #2 BIT inlet line and valv.es) were below the Acceptance Criteria stipulated in the PT. This is a degraded mode of operation as specified in T.S.3.3.B.5 and is re-portable in accordance with T.S.6.6.2.b(2).

2. Prob ab le Consequences & Status of Redundant Systems:

The Heat Tracing is intended to ,maintain a temperature above that needed for flow. The redundant Heat Tracing Circuit was operable, therefore, the.health and safety of the public were not affected.

3. Cause:

The *Heat Tracing Tape was damaged during ..erection of scaffolding to support* mechanical work in the nearby area.

4. Immediate Corrective Action:

The immediate corrective action was to verify that the redundant circuit was operable.

5. Subsequent Corrective Action:

The defective Heat Tracing Circuit was replaced within the time span specified by the Technical Specifications.

6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:

No additional *actions are deemed necessary.

7. Generic Implications:

The task force has reviewed the total. spectrum of the Heat Tracing sys tern and a Design Change is being prepared as a .result of the Task Force Study. Long lead items are b.eing procured .

I