ML13101A061: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Benney, BrianTo:"mark.morgan@sce.com"Cc:Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet; Broaddus, | {{#Wiki_filter:From:Benney, BrianTo:"mark.morgan@sce.com"Cc:Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet; Broaddus, Doug | ||
==Subject:== | |||
MF1379 AcceptanceDate:Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:38:34 AM | |||
==Dear Mr. Morgan:== | |||
By letter dated April 5, 2013, as supplemented on April 9, 2013, (Agencywide DocumentsAccess and Management System Accession Nos. ML13098A043 and ML13100A021), | |||
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Southern California Edison (SCE) requested Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval of the proposed amendment to make a temporary change to the steam generator management program and the license condition for maximum power. For the duration of Unit 2, Cycle 17, the proposedamendment would change the terms "full range of normal operating conditions" and "normal steady state full power operation" and restricts operation to 70 percent of the maximum authorized power level. "Full range of normal operating conditions" and "normalsteady state full power operation" shall be based upon the steam generators being operated under conditions associated with reactor core power levels up to 70 percent Rated Thermal Power (2406.6 megawatts thermal). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) staff's acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed todetermine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended toidentify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technicalinformation in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared tothe detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised byseparate correspondence. Please note that acceptance is not approval of the amendment. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2767. Sincerely, Brian Benney, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Southern California Edison (SCE) requested Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval of the proposed amendment to make a temporary change to the steam generator management program and the license condition for maximum power. For the duration of Unit 2, Cycle 17, the proposedamendment would change the terms "full range of normal operating conditions" and "normal steady state full power operation" and restricts operation to 70 percent of the maximum authorized power level. "Full range of normal operating conditions" and "normalsteady state full power operation" shall be based upon the steam generators being operated under conditions associated with reactor core power levels up to 70 percent Rated Thermal Power (2406.6 megawatts thermal). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) staff's acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed todetermine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended toidentify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technicalinformation in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared tothe detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised byseparate correspondence. Please note that acceptance is not approval of the amendment. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2767. Sincerely, Brian Benney, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:07, 5 April 2018
ML13101A061 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | San Onofre |
Issue date: | 04/11/2013 |
From: | Benney B J Plant Licensing Branch IV |
To: | Morgan M Southern California Edison Co |
Benney B J | |
References | |
TAC MF1379 | |
Download: ML13101A061 (1) | |
Text
From:Benney, BrianTo:"mark.morgan@sce.com"Cc:Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet; Broaddus, Doug
Subject:
MF1379 AcceptanceDate:Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:38:34 AM
Dear Mr. Morgan:
By letter dated April 5, 2013, as supplemented on April 9, 2013, (Agencywide DocumentsAccess and Management System Accession Nos. ML13098A043 and ML13100A021),
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Southern California Edison (SCE) requested Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval of the proposed amendment to make a temporary change to the steam generator management program and the license condition for maximum power. For the duration of Unit 2, Cycle 17, the proposedamendment would change the terms "full range of normal operating conditions" and "normal steady state full power operation" and restricts operation to 70 percent of the maximum authorized power level. "Full range of normal operating conditions" and "normalsteady state full power operation" shall be based upon the steam generators being operated under conditions associated with reactor core power levels up to 70 percent Rated Thermal Power (2406.6 megawatts thermal). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) staff's acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed todetermine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended toidentify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technicalinformation in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared tothe detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised byseparate correspondence. Please note that acceptance is not approval of the amendment. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2767. Sincerely, Brian Benney, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation