IR 05000361/1997024: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 23:13, 30 January 2022

Partialy Withheld Insp Repts 50-361/97-24 & 50-362/97-24 on 971117-21 & 1203-05 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Being Considered for Ea.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program
ML20247H396
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/24/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247H362 List:
References
50-361-97-24, 50-362-97-24, NUDOCS 9805210154
Download: ML20247H396 (2)


Text

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _

.

I l

l DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE l

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket Nos.: 50-361; 50-362 License Nos.: NPF-10; NPF-15 Report No.: 50-361/97-24; 50-362/97-24 Ucensee: Southem Califomia Edison C Facility: San Onofre Nucfear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 Location: 5000 S. Pacific Coast Hwy.

l San Clemente, Califomia '

Dates: November 17-21 and December 3-5,1997 Inspecto A. B. Eamest, Security Specialist, Plant Support Branch Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Attachment: SupplementalInformation i

DOCUMENT CbNTAINS ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S) UPON SEPARATION THIS l PAGE IS DECONTROLLED l 9805210154 971224 PDR ADOCK 05000361

G PDR a____ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .__ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ }

,

. . .

,

,

-2- DOCUMENT CONTAINS

' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 NRC Inspection Report 50-361/97-24; 50-362/97-24 This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The areas inspected included review of access control- personnel, access control- packages, emergency power supply, compensatory measures, records and reports, protection of safeguards information, and security of contingency weapon Plant Support

- Personnel access to the protected area was controlled in an effective manner (Section S1.1).

- The program for searching handcarried packages and material was effective (Section S1.2).

- An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to provide backup power supply to a portion of the detection aids system (Section S2.1).

- An apparent violation was identified involving inadequate compensatory measures during three failures of the security computer system (Section S2.2).

L - An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to correctly report safeguards

!

events (Section S3.1).

l

- An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to adequately protect a copy of the safeguards contingency plan (Section S8.1).

- An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to adequately secure (lock)

safeguards contingency weapons containers (Section S8.2).

l l

l DOCUMENT C NTAINS ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S) UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED I

L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____