ML20206L425: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20206L425 | |||
| issue date = 11/01/1988 | |||
| title = Insp Repts 50-277/88-38 & 50-278/88-38 on 880926-30. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Corrective Actions for Previous Environ Qualification (EQ) Findings & Licensee EQ Documentation Re Cable Splices Qualificability | |||
| author name = Anderson C, Cheung L | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = 05000277, 05000278 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = 50-277-88-38, 50-278-88-38, NUDOCS 8811290567 | |||
| package number = ML20206L417 | |||
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | |||
| page count = 9 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000277/1988038]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:- | |||
. | |||
- ' | |||
. . | |||
. . | |||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION I | |||
50-277/88-38 | |||
Report Nos. 50-278/88-38 | |||
50-277 | |||
Docket Nos. 50-278 | |||
DPR-44 | |||
License Nos. OPR-56 Priority -- | |||
Category C_ | |||
Licensee: Philadelphia Electric Company | |||
P.O. Box 7520 | |||
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 | |||
Facility Name: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 2 and 3 | |||
Inspection At: Delta, Pennsylanvia | |||
Inspection Conducted: September 26-30, 1988 | |||
Inspectors: W d-or Engineer | |||
Leonard Cheung, Senior Re date | |||
Approved by: / // ' f I | |||
C. J// Andarson, Chief date | |||
Plan't Systems Section, EB/ ORS | |||
Inspection Summary: Inspection on September 26-30, 1988, Combined Inspection | |||
Report Nos. 50-277/88 9 and 50-278/88-38 | |||
Areas Inspected: Special announced inspection to review the licensee's | |||
corrective actions for previously ident'fied environmental qualification (EQ) | |||
findings and to review the licensee's EQ documentation to determine the | |||
qualifiability of the deficient cable splices identified by the licensee. | |||
Results: A) The following violations were identified (three were identified | |||
by the licensee, one example was identified by the NRC): | |||
est12*[Ik | |||
PDR | |||
> | |||
C - | |||
O | |||
. | |||
[~* | |||
. . | |||
. . | |||
. . | |||
2 | |||
Identified Discussed in | |||
Violation By Paragraph .Itam Number | |||
1. Wire crimps in NRC 2.4 00-277/88-38-01; | |||
Limitorque Valve 50-278/88-38-01 | |||
Actuators | |||
2. Raychem Cable Licensee 3.1 50-277/88-38 02; | |||
Splices 50-278/88-38-02 | |||
3. Ideal Wirenuts Licensee 3.2 50-277/88-38-03; | |||
50-278/88-38-03 | |||
4. Amp Butt Splices Licensee 3.3 50-277/88-38-04; | |||
50-277/88-38-04 | |||
B) Four unresolved items were closed. | |||
Item No. Title Status | |||
50-277/87-18-01 Identification of RG1.97 instrument Closed | |||
50-278/87-18-01 in control room. | |||
50-277/87-18-03 Raychem cable splice on braided cable Closed | |||
50-278/87-18-03 | |||
50-277/87-18-05 Qualification of Rockbestos Closed | |||
50-278/87-18-05 coaxial cables | |||
50-277/87-18-07 Qualification of wire crimp Closed | |||
50-278/87-18-07 in Limitorque valve actuators | |||
[ | |||
~ | |||
n- , , | |||
.. . . | |||
- . - | |||
t | |||
P | |||
Details | |||
Persons Contacted | |||
' | |||
1. | |||
. 1.1 Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) | |||
D. Ahmuty, Training Records | |||
R. Artus, Requalification Instructor, | |||
*W. Birely, Peach Bottom Licensing Branch | |||
*C. Boyce, Peach Bottom Licensing Branch | |||
*0.-Brown, Peach Bottom Material Superintendent | |||
a *W. Clune, Engineering Service Section/PECO | |||
*J. Evans, Nuclear Quality Assurance | |||
K. Flaming, Peach Bottom Field Engirwer | |||
*F. Lear, Peach Bottom Licensing Branch | |||
G. Lengyel, Peach Bottom Maintenance Engineer | |||
, "M. Lohr, Engineering Service Section/PECO | |||
!- L. MacEntee, | |||
R. Maldonado, Reactor Operator, Peach Bottom | |||
*M. McKenna, Peach Bottom Lead Project Engineer | |||
*R. Ogitis,' Instrument System Ergineer | |||
, | |||
*R. Rock, Engineering Service Section, PCDB | |||
1 *D. Thompson, Jr. Engineering Service Section/PEC | |||
t | |||
1.2 Consultants | |||
1 | |||
*G. Chew, DiBenedeto Associates, Inc. | |||
*S. Dasgupta, Gilbert Associates | |||
. | |||
l 1.3 United States' Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
i | |||
T. Johnson, $enior Resident Inspector | |||
L. M/ers, Resident In pactor | |||
l | |||
* Denotes those present at the exit meeting on September 30, 1988 at the | |||
, | |||
Corporate Office. | |||
i | |||
~ | |||
2.0 Review of Licensee's Corrective Actions _on Previously Identified | |||
FQ Findings | |||
' | |||
2.1 Closed (50-277/87-18-01; 50-278/87-18-01) pertaining to the | |||
; identification of RG 1.97 indicating instruments in the control | |||
' | |||
room, and the licensee's commitment to train their control room | |||
j operators to recognize the reliable instrumentation under the given | |||
accident conditions. The licensee had undertaken several corrective | |||
; | |||
actions to resolve this deficiency. | |||
! | |||
, | |||
I | |||
, | |||
. | |||
* | |||
' | |||
. . | |||
. . | |||
? | |||
. | |||
-- | |||
,.. | |||
4 | |||
1) For the instrument identification part, the licensee: initiated | |||
modification package #2132 on July 22, 1987, entitled "Control | |||
Room Panels Human Factors Enhancements". The inspector reviewed | |||
Revision 5 ci the "Construction Job riemorandum, Doc. #107 for | |||
. - Modification Package #2132" dated February 24,1988. Job de- | |||
scription No. 2 outlines the modification to provide identifica- | |||
m' tion of RG 1.97 instrumentation in the control room. This part | |||
of the modification requires each of the affected RG 1.97 indica- | |||
ting instruments to be provided with a h" wide yellow sticker | |||
attached to the face of the instrument. The inspector conducted | |||
a walkdown in the control room for Unit 2 and Unit:3 to verify | |||
the presence of this identification. There are about 25 instru- | |||
ments belonging to this category in each Unit. The inspector | |||
found that for Unit 2, the yellow sticker identification was | |||
completed. There were about 4 instruments in Unit 3 that were | |||
not yet completed. The licensee stated that the identification | |||
for Unit 3 was scheduled to be completed before the end of | |||
October 1988. The instruments included in this category consist | |||
of torus water level instruments, drywell pressure, reactor | |||
water level and pressure, neutron monitors and vent stack monitors. | |||
2) For the training of control room operators, the licensee included | |||
two lesson plans related to RG 1.97 instrumentation identification | |||
into their requalification program for their control room operators: | |||
a) Lesson Plan No. 87-03B entitled "Environmental Qualification | |||
for Control Room Operators" dated November 27, 1987; and, b) Lesson | |||
Plan No. 88-018 entitled "Review of Control Room Enhancements" | |||
dated April 8, 1988. The inspector interviewed two control room | |||
operators and reviewed six training records of Lesson Plan No. | |||
87-038. The inspector concluded that the training program for | |||
the recognition of RG 1.97 instrumentation was adequately | |||
implemented. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
2.2 closed (50-277/87-18-03; 50-278/87-18-03) pertaining to Raychem | |||
cable splices on braided cables. On November 24, 1987, the licensee | |||
started a 100% walkdo,<n of all Raychem spilcos on EQ components with | |||
electrical pigtails. The results of this walkdown indicated that no | |||
Raychem splices on impregnated braids were installed at Peach Bottom | |||
2 and 3. However the licensee did identify other types of cable | |||
splice deficiencies as described in Section 3.0. | |||
This item (Raychem splice over braided cable) is considered closed. | |||
2.3 Closed (50-277/87-18-05; 50-278/87-18-05) pertaining to the | |||
qualification of Rockbestos coaxial cable (EQ file No. 43). The | |||
inspector reviewed EQ file 43 and verified that the following | |||
docun,ents were included in the file: | |||
-- _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _--- _ ___ | |||
, | |||
''. . | |||
. | |||
. | |||
; - . | |||
5 | |||
. | |||
1) Rockbestos test report #QR-6802 entitled "Report on | |||
Qualification tests for Rockbestos Adverse Service Coaxial, | |||
Twinaxial, and '-faxial Cable Generic Nuclear Incident for | |||
' | |||
Class 1E Service it Nuclear Generating Stations" dated | |||
March 12, 1986. This report documented the qualification test | |||
of Rockbestos series 1E coaxial cable.- | |||
2) Rockbestos document entitled "Analysis of Similarity between | |||
Coaxial Insulation Types Polymer LO and Polymer LE" dated | |||
July 15, 1986. | |||
, | |||
3) SCEW sheet for cable 104 and cable 110 identifying that the | |||
cables to be qualified are RSS-6-104/LD and RSS-6-110/LO | |||
respectively (handwritten change). | |||
This item is closed. ; | |||
< | |||
2.4 Closed (50-277/87-18-07; 50-278/87-18-07) pertaining to the ; | |||
qualification of wire crimps in Limitorque valve actuators. As a ' | |||
result of the Raychem cable splices walkdown, the licensee identified | |||
additional wire crimps in their Limitorque valve actuators. The | |||
licensee replaced all wire crimps at Peach Bottom Unit 2 with | |||
qualified Raychem cable splices. For Peach Bottom Unit 3 the wire , | |||
crimp replacement (with Raychem splices) was still in progress. The | |||
licensee committed to complete the cable splice replacement program | |||
for Unit 3 before the end of March 1989 and before the scheduled | |||
restart of Unit 3. | |||
i | |||
For the replaced wire crimps, the licensee produced qualificattu | |||
data to demonstrate their qualifiability during the inspection. The .t | |||
licensee's qualification data included the following: ' | |||
, | |||
1. Evaluation of nylon insulated blind barrel crimp connectoi.s. on | |||
230/460 volt dual voltag motor windings in Linitorque motor | |||
operators, prepared by the licensee during the week of the | |||
; inspection. | |||
2. Containment and Safety Related Equipment Transient Temperature | |||
j Analysis Foilowing a MSLB dated June 1975. | |||
3. Wyle Test Report - 17955-1 dated January 29, 1988 for Clinton | |||
Power Station (not available for review) | |||
4. NP-1472 dated August 1985 "Radiation Data for Design and Qualification | |||
of Nuclear Plant Equipment." | |||
The inspector reviewed t 5 licensee's evaluation and agreed that the | |||
replaced wire crimps we-e qualifiable. This unresolved item is | |||
closed. However, t's a the qualification of these wire crimps was | |||
not established befor a Noverr.ber 30, 1985, this item constitutes a | |||
* | |||
* | |||
. . | |||
. . | |||
.. . | |||
6 | |||
violation of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) which require that | |||
each item of electrical equipment important to safety be qualified | |||
and the qualification be completed at a time no later than | |||
. November 30, 1985. (50-277/88-38-01; 50-278/88-38-01). | |||
3.0 Review of Qualification Documents for Various Cable Splices | |||
As part of the 1 %ensee's response to Information Notice 86-53, on | |||
September 16, 1967, the licensee started a cable splice inspection | |||
program for Unit 2 based on a selected sample of Raychem splices. (17 | |||
solenoid valves and 2 motors). The result of this inspection indicated | |||
that splice deficiencies existed in the installed cable splices at Peach | |||
Sottom 2. On November 24, 1987, the licensee initiated a 100*.' walkdown | |||
of all cable splices on EQ components with electrical pigtails. As a | |||
result of this inspection program, various splice deficiencies were | |||
identified by the licensee. The licensee stated that, due the similar | |||
design of both units, similar deficiencies would probably exist in | |||
Unit 3. For Unit 2, all but several Scotch Tape Splices (see paragraph | |||
3.3) were replaced with qualif'ed Raychem splices. For Unit 3 the | |||
licensee decided to replace all these splices without performing an | |||
inspection. At the time of this inspection, replacement of Unit 3 cable | |||
splices was still in progress. The licensee's management committed to | |||
complete Unit 3 cable splice replacement before the end of Marcr.1989 | |||
and befo e the scheduled restart of Unit 3. | |||
The cable splice deficiencies identified by the licensee include: 1) | |||
Raychem c3ble splices not meeting the qualification criteria; 2) Ideal | |||
Wirenuts; 3) Arp butt splices; and, 4) Scotch tape splices. These | |||
deficiencies see discussed individually as follows: | |||
3.1 Raychem Cable Splices | |||
The licensee identified that numerous Raychem splices did not moet | |||
the qualification criteria. The deficient. splices were due to | |||
a) insufficient seal length (less than 2"); and, b) too small a | |||
bending radius (less than the minimum bend iadius criteria specified | |||
by Raychem). The licensee replace these deficient splices with now | |||
Raychem splices using qualified installation procedures. The licensee | |||
used Wyle test report No. 17859-02B for Commonwealth Edison Company | |||
entitled "Qualification test program on Raychem Nuclear cable | |||
splices ..." dated March 11, 1987 to demonstrate the qualifiability | |||
of the replaced cable splices. This report documented the qualifica- | |||
tion test of Raychem splices with seal length as short as 1/8" and | |||
with very tight bending radii. The inspector agreed that these | |||
splices were qualifiable. However, because qualification of these | |||
splices was not established before November 30, 1985, this constitutes | |||
' | |||
a violation of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) which require each | |||
item of electrical equipment important to safety be qualified and the | |||
qualification be conpleted at a time no later than November 30, 1985 | |||
(50-277/88-38-02; 50-278/88-38-02). | |||
. - | |||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - | |||
* | |||
* | |||
. . | |||
. . | |||
, . | |||
7 | |||
3.2 Ideal Wirenuts | |||
The licensee identified in Unit 2 that Ideal wirenuts were used to | |||
connect Atkomatic colenoid valves to the field wire. These | |||
Atkomatic soleno'd valves are located in the CAD (Containment | |||
Atmosphere Dilution) analyzer racks outside the Drywell. These | |||
wirenuts were subsequently replaced by qualified Raychem iplices. | |||
The wors6 ::=a post 08E environmental conditions for the affected | |||
analyzer racks are: | |||
Temperature = 130 F | |||
Pressure = Atmos | |||
Re1 Humidity = 100% | |||
Radiation (TID) = 1.60 x IOC Rads | |||
Since this is a relatively mild environment, radiation is the only | |||
parameter of concern. The licensee determined that the insulating | |||
material for the wirenuts was polypropylene. The licensee determined | |||
the radiation withstand capability for polypropylene from EPRI | |||
NP-1558 to be 3 x 10' rads. The inspector agreed that the wirenuts | |||
for this application were qualifiable. However, since the qualifica- | |||
tion was not established before November 30, 1985, this item | |||
constitutes a violation of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) | |||
, which require each item of electrical equipment important to safety | |||
be qualified and the qualification be completed at a time no later | |||
than November 30, 1985 (50-277/88-38-03; 50-178/88-38 03). | |||
3.3 Amp Butt Splices | |||
The licensee identified in Unit 2 that Amp butt splicts were used in | |||
the plant. These splices were subsequently replaced by qualified | |||
Raychem splices. During the week of the inspection, the licensee | |||
evaluated the qualifiability of the replaced Amp splices. These | |||
splices were used for both control and instrumentation applications. | |||
For control applications where leakcge current is not a serious | |||
concern, the following components were affected: | |||
Environmental conditions | |||
SOV # Lo :ation Peak temperature / radiation | |||
A0-2509 Rcom #508 120 F/2.75 x 10' rad | |||
A0-2570 R;om #508 120 F/2.75 x 10' rad | |||
SV-2978A f.oom #107 138 F/9.') x 10' rad | |||
SV-2978E Acom #107 138 F/9.9 x 10' rad | |||
SV-2671A Room #1 183 F/2.29 x 10' rad | |||
SV-2671B Room #1 183 F/2.29 x 10' rad | |||
SV-2671D Room #1 183*F/2.29 x 10' rad | |||
SV-2671E Room #1 183 F/2.29 x 10' rad | |||
OPIS-2-13-083 Room #8 123 F/2.99 x 10' rad | |||
DPIS-2-13-084 Room #8 123*F/2.99 x 10' rad | |||
- | |||
- . | |||
, | |||
' - | |||
. . | |||
. | |||
8 | |||
The licensee used Wyle test report No. 17866-02 dated January 29, 1987 | |||
to justify the temperature qualifit;ation of the replaced Amp butt | |||
splices for control application. 'ihis test report documented a LOCA | |||
test of four Amp splices for Fort it. Vrain. For the radiation quall- | |||
fication, the licensee analyzed the splice material and determined | |||
that the weakest material is nylon The licensee referenced EPRI | |||
report No. NP-1472 which indicated that nylon can be qualified for a | |||
radiation dose of 4 x 10' rads. Since a large margin exists between | |||
this dose and the actual dose at the plant, the inspector agreed that | |||
Amp splices for this application are qualifiable for the harsh tem- | |||
perature and radiation environment. | |||
The licensee reviewed the walkdown records and determined that only | |||
1 transmitter used Amp butt splices. The affected transmitter is | |||
LT-2-81238 "Torus Water Level", which is a Barton transmitter for RG | |||
1.97 application. This transmitter is located outside the Drywell | |||
(in Room #9). It is to be used for post LOCA operation. The trans- | |||
mitter is subject to a peak temperature of 128 F and a radiation dose | |||
of 2.99 x 10' rads. The inspector agreed that temperature is not a | |||
qualification concern. The licensee used anaiysis as described above | |||
for control applications to demonstrate the radiation qualification | |||
for this transmitter. The inspector agreed that the replaced Amp | |||
splices for both control and instrumentation application were quali- | |||
fiable. However, since the qualification of these splices was not | |||
established before November 30, 1985, this item constitutes a viola- | |||
tion of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) which require each item | |||
of electrical equipment important to safety be qualified and the | |||
qualification be completed at a time no later than November 30, 1985 | |||
(50-277/88-38-04; 50-278/88-38-04). | |||
3.4 Scotch Tape Splices | |||
The licensee identified that numerous Scotch tape splices were used | |||
in various areas outside the Drywell. The licensee replaced all of | |||
these splices with qualified Raychem splices except those used for | |||
the following fan motors: | |||
fan Location Environmental Condition | |||
2EV24 Room 9 126*F peak /8x102 rad | |||
2FV24 Room 9 126 F peak /8x102 rad | |||
2GV24 Room 10 126*F peak /8x102 rad | |||
2FV25 Room 4 128*F peak /5x10' rad | |||
2EV25 Room 5 128*F peak /5x10' rad | |||
0AV'O Room 33 105*F peak /2x108 rad | |||
The licensee has an EQ file (Package No. 37) to demonstrate the | |||
qualification of the Scotch tape splices. This EQ file contains | |||
a Franklin test report No. F-C5022-2 entitled "Qualification Test of | |||
_. | |||
r , | |||
* . | |||
. . | |||
. . . | |||
. - | |||
9 | |||
terminal blocks and splice - insulating assemblies in a simulated | |||
loss-of-coolant accident environment - Phase B" dated November 1978. | |||
The test speciment was tested to a peak temperature of 340 F and a | |||
radiation dose of 1 x 10' rads. The inspector reviewed the EQ file | |||
and did not identify any deficiencies. | |||
4.0 Exit Meeting | |||
The inspectors met with the licensee corporate personnel and the | |||
representatives from both plants at the conclusion of the inspection on | |||
September 30, 1988. The inspectors summarized the scope of the inspection | |||
and the inspection findings. | |||
At no time during this inspection was written material given to the | |||
licensee. | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 21:03, 19 December 2021
ML20206L425 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Peach Bottom ![]() |
Issue date: | 11/01/1988 |
From: | Anderson C, Cheung L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20206L417 | List: |
References | |
50-277-88-38, 50-278-88-38, NUDOCS 8811290567 | |
Download: ML20206L425 (9) | |
See also: IR 05000277/1988038
Text
-
.
- '
. .
. .
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
50-277/88-38
Report Nos. 50-278/88-38
50-277
Docket Nos. 50-278
License Nos. OPR-56 Priority --
Category C_
Licensee: Philadelphia Electric Company
P.O. Box 7520
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Facility Name: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 2 and 3
Inspection At: Delta, Pennsylanvia
Inspection Conducted: September 26-30, 1988
Inspectors: W d-or Engineer
Leonard Cheung, Senior Re date
Approved by: / // ' f I
C. J// Andarson, Chief date
Plan't Systems Section, EB/ ORS
Inspection Summary: Inspection on September 26-30, 1988, Combined Inspection
Report Nos. 50-277/88 9 and 50-278/88-38
Areas Inspected: Special announced inspection to review the licensee's
corrective actions for previously ident'fied environmental qualification (EQ)
findings and to review the licensee's EQ documentation to determine the
qualifiability of the deficient cable splices identified by the licensee.
Results: A) The following violations were identified (three were identified
by the licensee, one example was identified by the NRC):
est12*[Ik
>
C -
O
.
[~*
. .
. .
. .
2
Identified Discussed in
Violation By Paragraph .Itam Number
1. Wire crimps in NRC 2.4 00-277/88-38-01;
Limitorque Valve 50-278/88-38-01
Actuators
2. Raychem Cable Licensee 3.1 50-277/88-38 02;
Splices 50-278/88-38-02
3. Ideal Wirenuts Licensee 3.2 50-277/88-38-03;
50-278/88-38-03
4. Amp Butt Splices Licensee 3.3 50-277/88-38-04;
50-277/88-38-04
B) Four unresolved items were closed.
Item No. Title Status
50-277/87-18-01 Identification of RG1.97 instrument Closed
50-278/87-18-01 in control room.
50-277/87-18-03 Raychem cable splice on braided cable Closed
50-278/87-18-03
50-277/87-18-05 Qualification of Rockbestos Closed
50-278/87-18-05 coaxial cables
50-277/87-18-07 Qualification of wire crimp Closed
50-278/87-18-07 in Limitorque valve actuators
[
~
n- , ,
.. . .
- . -
t
P
Details
Persons Contacted
'
1.
. 1.1 Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO)
D. Ahmuty, Training Records
R. Artus, Requalification Instructor,
- W. Birely, Peach Bottom Licensing Branch
- C. Boyce, Peach Bottom Licensing Branch
- 0.-Brown, Peach Bottom Material Superintendent
a *W. Clune, Engineering Service Section/PECO
- J. Evans, Nuclear Quality Assurance
K. Flaming, Peach Bottom Field Engirwer
- F. Lear, Peach Bottom Licensing Branch
G. Lengyel, Peach Bottom Maintenance Engineer
, "M. Lohr, Engineering Service Section/PECO
!- L. MacEntee,
R. Maldonado, Reactor Operator, Peach Bottom
- M. McKenna, Peach Bottom Lead Project Engineer
- R. Ogitis,' Instrument System Ergineer
,
- R. Rock, Engineering Service Section, PCDB
1 *D. Thompson, Jr. Engineering Service Section/PEC
t
1.2 Consultants
1
- G. Chew, DiBenedeto Associates, Inc.
- S. Dasgupta, Gilbert Associates
.
l 1.3 United States' Nuclear Regulatory Commission
i
T. Johnson, $enior Resident Inspector
L. M/ers, Resident In pactor
l
- Denotes those present at the exit meeting on September 30, 1988 at the
,
Corporate Office.
i
~
2.0 Review of Licensee's Corrective Actions _on Previously Identified
FQ Findings
'
2.1 Closed (50-277/87-18-01; 50-278/87-18-01) pertaining to the
- identification of RG 1.97 indicating instruments in the control
'
room, and the licensee's commitment to train their control room
j operators to recognize the reliable instrumentation under the given
accident conditions. The licensee had undertaken several corrective
actions to resolve this deficiency.
!
,
I
,
.
'
. .
. .
?
.
--
,..
4
1) For the instrument identification part, the licensee: initiated
modification package #2132 on July 22, 1987, entitled "Control
Room Panels Human Factors Enhancements". The inspector reviewed
Revision 5 ci the "Construction Job riemorandum, Doc. #107 for
. - Modification Package #2132" dated February 24,1988. Job de-
scription No. 2 outlines the modification to provide identifica-
m' tion of RG 1.97 instrumentation in the control room. This part
of the modification requires each of the affected RG 1.97 indica-
ting instruments to be provided with a h" wide yellow sticker
attached to the face of the instrument. The inspector conducted
a walkdown in the control room for Unit 2 and Unit:3 to verify
the presence of this identification. There are about 25 instru-
ments belonging to this category in each Unit. The inspector
found that for Unit 2, the yellow sticker identification was
completed. There were about 4 instruments in Unit 3 that were
not yet completed. The licensee stated that the identification
for Unit 3 was scheduled to be completed before the end of
October 1988. The instruments included in this category consist
of torus water level instruments, drywell pressure, reactor
water level and pressure, neutron monitors and vent stack monitors.
2) For the training of control room operators, the licensee included
two lesson plans related to RG 1.97 instrumentation identification
into their requalification program for their control room operators:
a) Lesson Plan No.87-03B entitled "Environmental Qualification
for Control Room Operators" dated November 27, 1987; and, b) Lesson
Plan No.88-018 entitled "Review of Control Room Enhancements"
dated April 8, 1988. The inspector interviewed two control room
operators and reviewed six training records of Lesson Plan No.87-038. The inspector concluded that the training program for
the recognition of RG 1.97 instrumentation was adequately
implemented.
This item is closed.
2.2 closed (50-277/87-18-03; 50-278/87-18-03) pertaining to Raychem
cable splices on braided cables. On November 24, 1987, the licensee
started a 100% walkdo,<n of all Raychem spilcos on EQ components with
electrical pigtails. The results of this walkdown indicated that no
Raychem splices on impregnated braids were installed at Peach Bottom
2 and 3. However the licensee did identify other types of cable
splice deficiencies as described in Section 3.0.
This item (Raychem splice over braided cable) is considered closed.
2.3 Closed (50-277/87-18-05; 50-278/87-18-05) pertaining to the
qualification of Rockbestos coaxial cable (EQ file No. 43). The
inspector reviewed EQ file 43 and verified that the following
docun,ents were included in the file:
-- _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _--- _ ___
,
. .
.
.
- - .
5
.
1) Rockbestos test report #QR-6802 entitled "Report on
Qualification tests for Rockbestos Adverse Service Coaxial,
Twinaxial, and '-faxial Cable Generic Nuclear Incident for
'
Class 1E Service it Nuclear Generating Stations" dated
March 12, 1986. This report documented the qualification test
of Rockbestos series 1E coaxial cable.-
2) Rockbestos document entitled "Analysis of Similarity between
Coaxial Insulation Types Polymer LO and Polymer LE" dated
July 15, 1986.
,
3) SCEW sheet for cable 104 and cable 110 identifying that the
cables to be qualified are RSS-6-104/LD and RSS-6-110/LO
respectively (handwritten change).
This item is closed. ;
<
2.4 Closed (50-277/87-18-07; 50-278/87-18-07) pertaining to the ;
qualification of wire crimps in Limitorque valve actuators. As a '
result of the Raychem cable splices walkdown, the licensee identified
additional wire crimps in their Limitorque valve actuators. The
licensee replaced all wire crimps at Peach Bottom Unit 2 with
qualified Raychem cable splices. For Peach Bottom Unit 3 the wire ,
crimp replacement (with Raychem splices) was still in progress. The
licensee committed to complete the cable splice replacement program
for Unit 3 before the end of March 1989 and before the scheduled
restart of Unit 3.
i
For the replaced wire crimps, the licensee produced qualificattu
data to demonstrate their qualifiability during the inspection. The .t
licensee's qualification data included the following: '
,
1. Evaluation of nylon insulated blind barrel crimp connectoi.s. on
230/460 volt dual voltag motor windings in Linitorque motor
operators, prepared by the licensee during the week of the
- inspection.
2. Containment and Safety Related Equipment Transient Temperature
j Analysis Foilowing a MSLB dated June 1975.
3. Wyle Test Report - 17955-1 dated January 29, 1988 for Clinton
Power Station (not available for review)
4. NP-1472 dated August 1985 "Radiation Data for Design and Qualification
of Nuclear Plant Equipment."
The inspector reviewed t 5 licensee's evaluation and agreed that the
replaced wire crimps we-e qualifiable. This unresolved item is
closed. However, t's a the qualification of these wire crimps was
not established befor a Noverr.ber 30, 1985, this item constitutes a
. .
. .
.. .
6
violation of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) which require that
each item of electrical equipment important to safety be qualified
and the qualification be completed at a time no later than
. November 30, 1985. (50-277/88-38-01; 50-278/88-38-01).
3.0 Review of Qualification Documents for Various Cable Splices
As part of the 1 %ensee's response to Information Notice 86-53, on
September 16, 1967, the licensee started a cable splice inspection
program for Unit 2 based on a selected sample of Raychem splices. (17
solenoid valves and 2 motors). The result of this inspection indicated
that splice deficiencies existed in the installed cable splices at Peach
Sottom 2. On November 24, 1987, the licensee initiated a 100*.' walkdown
of all cable splices on EQ components with electrical pigtails. As a
result of this inspection program, various splice deficiencies were
identified by the licensee. The licensee stated that, due the similar
design of both units, similar deficiencies would probably exist in
Unit 3. For Unit 2, all but several Scotch Tape Splices (see paragraph
3.3) were replaced with qualif'ed Raychem splices. For Unit 3 the
licensee decided to replace all these splices without performing an
inspection. At the time of this inspection, replacement of Unit 3 cable
splices was still in progress. The licensee's management committed to
complete Unit 3 cable splice replacement before the end of Marcr.1989
and befo e the scheduled restart of Unit 3.
The cable splice deficiencies identified by the licensee include: 1)
Raychem c3ble splices not meeting the qualification criteria; 2) Ideal
Wirenuts; 3) Arp butt splices; and, 4) Scotch tape splices. These
deficiencies see discussed individually as follows:
3.1 Raychem Cable Splices
The licensee identified that numerous Raychem splices did not moet
the qualification criteria. The deficient. splices were due to
a) insufficient seal length (less than 2"); and, b) too small a
bending radius (less than the minimum bend iadius criteria specified
by Raychem). The licensee replace these deficient splices with now
Raychem splices using qualified installation procedures. The licensee
used Wyle test report No. 17859-02B for Commonwealth Edison Company
entitled "Qualification test program on Raychem Nuclear cable
splices ..." dated March 11, 1987 to demonstrate the qualifiability
of the replaced cable splices. This report documented the qualifica-
tion test of Raychem splices with seal length as short as 1/8" and
with very tight bending radii. The inspector agreed that these
splices were qualifiable. However, because qualification of these
splices was not established before November 30, 1985, this constitutes
'
a violation of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) which require each
item of electrical equipment important to safety be qualified and the
qualification be conpleted at a time no later than November 30, 1985
(50-277/88-38-02; 50-278/88-38-02).
. -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - -
. .
. .
, .
7
3.2 Ideal Wirenuts
The licensee identified in Unit 2 that Ideal wirenuts were used to
connect Atkomatic colenoid valves to the field wire. These
Atkomatic soleno'd valves are located in the CAD (Containment
Atmosphere Dilution) analyzer racks outside the Drywell. These
wirenuts were subsequently replaced by qualified Raychem iplices.
The wors6 ::=a post 08E environmental conditions for the affected
analyzer racks are:
Temperature = 130 F
Pressure = Atmos
Re1 Humidity = 100%
Radiation (TID) = 1.60 x IOC Rads
Since this is a relatively mild environment, radiation is the only
parameter of concern. The licensee determined that the insulating
material for the wirenuts was polypropylene. The licensee determined
the radiation withstand capability for polypropylene from EPRI
NP-1558 to be 3 x 10' rads. The inspector agreed that the wirenuts
for this application were qualifiable. However, since the qualifica-
tion was not established before November 30, 1985, this item
constitutes a violation of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g)
, which require each item of electrical equipment important to safety
be qualified and the qualification be completed at a time no later
than November 30, 1985 (50-277/88-38-03; 50-178/88-38 03).
3.3 Amp Butt Splices
The licensee identified in Unit 2 that Amp butt splicts were used in
the plant. These splices were subsequently replaced by qualified
Raychem splices. During the week of the inspection, the licensee
evaluated the qualifiability of the replaced Amp splices. These
splices were used for both control and instrumentation applications.
For control applications where leakcge current is not a serious
concern, the following components were affected:
Environmental conditions
SOV # Lo :ation Peak temperature / radiation
A0-2509 Rcom #508 120 F/2.75 x 10' rad
A0-2570 R;om #508 120 F/2.75 x 10' rad
SV-2978A f.oom #107 138 F/9.') x 10' rad
SV-2978E Acom #107 138 F/9.9 x 10' rad
SV-2671A Room #1 183 F/2.29 x 10' rad
SV-2671B Room #1 183 F/2.29 x 10' rad
SV-2671D Room #1 183*F/2.29 x 10' rad
SV-2671E Room #1 183 F/2.29 x 10' rad
OPIS-2-13-083 Room #8 123 F/2.99 x 10' rad
DPIS-2-13-084 Room #8 123*F/2.99 x 10' rad
-
- .
,
' -
. .
.
8
The licensee used Wyle test report No. 17866-02 dated January 29, 1987
to justify the temperature qualifit;ation of the replaced Amp butt
splices for control application. 'ihis test report documented a LOCA
test of four Amp splices for Fort it. Vrain. For the radiation quall-
fication, the licensee analyzed the splice material and determined
that the weakest material is nylon The licensee referenced EPRI
report No. NP-1472 which indicated that nylon can be qualified for a
radiation dose of 4 x 10' rads. Since a large margin exists between
this dose and the actual dose at the plant, the inspector agreed that
Amp splices for this application are qualifiable for the harsh tem-
perature and radiation environment.
The licensee reviewed the walkdown records and determined that only
1 transmitter used Amp butt splices. The affected transmitter is
LT-2-81238 "Torus Water Level", which is a Barton transmitter for RG
1.97 application. This transmitter is located outside the Drywell
(in Room #9). It is to be used for post LOCA operation. The trans-
mitter is subject to a peak temperature of 128 F and a radiation dose
of 2.99 x 10' rads. The inspector agreed that temperature is not a
qualification concern. The licensee used anaiysis as described above
for control applications to demonstrate the radiation qualification
for this transmitter. The inspector agreed that the replaced Amp
splices for both control and instrumentation application were quali-
fiable. However, since the qualification of these splices was not
established before November 30, 1985, this item constitutes a viola-
tion of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (f) and (g) which require each item
of electrical equipment important to safety be qualified and the
qualification be completed at a time no later than November 30, 1985
(50-277/88-38-04; 50-278/88-38-04).
3.4 Scotch Tape Splices
The licensee identified that numerous Scotch tape splices were used
in various areas outside the Drywell. The licensee replaced all of
these splices with qualified Raychem splices except those used for
the following fan motors:
fan Location Environmental Condition
2EV24 Room 9 126*F peak /8x102 rad
2FV24 Room 9 126 F peak /8x102 rad
2GV24 Room 10 126*F peak /8x102 rad
2FV25 Room 4 128*F peak /5x10' rad
2EV25 Room 5 128*F peak /5x10' rad
0AV'O Room 33 105*F peak /2x108 rad
The licensee has an EQ file (Package No. 37) to demonstrate the
qualification of the Scotch tape splices. This EQ file contains
a Franklin test report No. F-C5022-2 entitled "Qualification Test of
_.
r ,
- .
. .
. . .
. -
9
terminal blocks and splice - insulating assemblies in a simulated
loss-of-coolant accident environment - Phase B" dated November 1978.
The test speciment was tested to a peak temperature of 340 F and a
radiation dose of 1 x 10' rads. The inspector reviewed the EQ file
and did not identify any deficiencies.
4.0 Exit Meeting
The inspectors met with the licensee corporate personnel and the
representatives from both plants at the conclusion of the inspection on
September 30, 1988. The inspectors summarized the scope of the inspection
and the inspection findings.
At no time during this inspection was written material given to the
licensee.