ML17321A554: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/17/2017
| issue date = 11/17/2017
| title = Acceptance Review E-mail Dated November 17, 2017: Relief Requests Associated with Extension of Fourth Interval Reactor Vessel and Piping Weld Inspections and 10-year ISI Extension; (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0124, 0127, 0128)
| title = Acceptance Review E-mail Dated November 17, 2017: Relief Requests Associated with Extension of Fourth Interval Reactor Vessel and Piping Weld Inspections and 10-year ISI Extension; (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0124, 0127, 0128)
| author name = Guzman R V
| author name = Guzman R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI
| addressee name = Mirzai M
| addressee name = Mirzai M
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000286
| docket = 05000286
| license number = DPR-064
| license number = DPR-064
| contact person = Guzman R V
| contact person = Guzman R
| case reference number = EPID L-2017-LLR-0124, EPID L-2017-LLR-0127, EPID L-2017-LLR-0128
| case reference number = EPID L-2017-LLR-0124, EPID L-2017-LLR-0127, EPID L-2017-LLR-0128
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard To: Mirzai, Mahvash Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource
{{#Wiki_filter:From:             Guzman, Richard To:               Mirzai, Mahvash Cc:               RidsNRRLIC109 Resource; Walpole, Robert W
; Walpole, Robert W


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Determination: Indian Point Unit 3 - Relief Requests Associated with Extension of Fourth Interval Reactor Vessel and Piping Weld Inspections and 10-year ISI Extension; (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0124, 0127, 0128)Date: Friday, November 17, 2017 12:19:23 PM
Acceptance Review Determination: Indian Point Unit 3 - Relief Requests Associated with Extension of Fourth Interval Reactor Vessel and Piping Weld Inspections and 10-year ISI Extension; (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0124, 0127, 0128)
: Mahvash,
Date:             Friday, November 17, 2017 12:19:23 PM
 
: Mahvash, By two letters dated October 18, 2017 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17297A455 (NL 130) and ML17297A461 (NL-17-131), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted the following three relief requests for Indian Point Unit No. 3 (IP3):
By two letters dated October 18, 2017 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17297A455 (NL-17-130) and ML17297A461 (NL-17-131)
* IP3-ISl-RR Relief Request to extend the reactor vessel weld (Fourth) inservice inspection interval (ISI) for IP3 from the Spring 2019 (RFO 20) to the Spring 2021 refueling outage (RFO 21).
, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted the following three relief requests for Indian Point Unit No. 3 (IP3): ~        IP3-ISl-RR-11
* IP3-ISl-RR Relief Request related to ASME Code Case N-770-2 to extend the cold leg weld inspections from the Spring 2019 to the Spring 2021 RFO.
- Relief Request to extend the reactor vessel weld (Fourth) inservice inspection interval (ISI) for IP3 from the Spring 2019 (RFO 20) to the Spring 2021 refueling outage (RFO 21).~        IP3-ISl-RR-12
* IP3-ISl-RR Relief Request to extend the current (Fourth) 10-year ISI by 12 months beyond the one-year extension already allowed by the ASME Section XI.
- Relief Request related to ASME Code Case N-770-2 to extend the cold leg weld inspections from the Spring 2019 to the Spring 2021 RFO.~        IP3-ISl-RR-13
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of these relief requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for all three actions. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief requests have any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
- Relief Request to extend the current (Fourth) 10-year ISI by 12 months beyond the one-year extension already allowed by the ASME Section XI.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of these relief requests.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for all three actions. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief requests have any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your requests for relief and concluded that they provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief requests in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment.
The NRC staff has reviewed your requests for relief and concluded that they provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief requests in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of these relief requests will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::315 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.


Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
 
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of these relief requests will take approximately 315 hours to complete.
The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 2018. If there are emergent complexities
 
or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion
 
date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated
 
during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov}}
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov}}

Latest revision as of 13:43, 8 March 2020

Acceptance Review E-mail Dated November 17, 2017: Relief Requests Associated with Extension of Fourth Interval Reactor Vessel and Piping Weld Inspections and 10-year ISI Extension; (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0124, 0127, 0128)
ML17321A554
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/2017
From: Richard Guzman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Mirzai M
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Guzman R
References
EPID L-2017-LLR-0124, EPID L-2017-LLR-0127, EPID L-2017-LLR-0128
Download: ML17321A554 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Guzman, Richard To: Mirzai, Mahvash Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource; Walpole, Robert W

Subject:

Acceptance Review Determination: Indian Point Unit 3 - Relief Requests Associated with Extension of Fourth Interval Reactor Vessel and Piping Weld Inspections and 10-year ISI Extension; (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0124, 0127, 0128)

Date: Friday, November 17, 2017 12:19:23 PM

Mahvash, By two letters dated October 18, 2017 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17297A455 (NL 130) and ML17297A461 (NL-17-131), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted the following three relief requests for Indian Point Unit No. 3 (IP3):
  • IP3-ISl-RR Relief Request to extend the reactor vessel weld (Fourth) inservice inspection interval (ISI) for IP3 from the Spring 2019 (RFO 20) to the Spring 2021 refueling outage (RFO 21).
  • IP3-ISl-RR Relief Request to extend the current (Fourth) 10-year ISI by 12 months beyond the one-year extension already allowed by the ASME Section XI.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of these relief requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for all three actions. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief requests have any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your requests for relief and concluded that they provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief requests in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment.

Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of these relief requests will take approximately 315 hours13.125 days <br />1.875 weeks <br />0.431 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17321A554&oldid=2537996"