ML17142A412

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review for Indian Point Units 1, 2 & 3 - License Amendment Request Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 Implementation Schedule
ML17142A412
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/2017
From: Richard Guzman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Mirzai M
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Guzman R
References
CAC MF9656, CAC MF9657, CAC MF9658
Download: ML17142A412 (2)


Text

From: Guzman, Richard To: Mirzai, Mahvash Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 - License Amendment Request re: Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 Implementation Schedule (CAC No. MF9656, MF9657, MF9658)

Date: Monday, May 22, 2017 11:58:36 AM Ms. Mirzai, By letter dated April 28, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17129A612), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 that proposes a change to the Indian Point Energy Center Milestone 8 full implementation approach and schedule.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 600 hours25 days <br />3.571 weeks <br />0.822 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately seven months, which will be December 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

~~~~~~~~~

Rich Guzman

Sr. PM, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-8E10 l Phone: 301-415-1030