ML18085A111: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:... -*--""!> erick W. Schneider Vice President Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 201/430-7373 Production
{{#Wiki_filter:... -*- -""!>
* Septexnber 19, 1980 Mr. B9yce H. Grier, Director Off ice of Inspection and Enforcement Region l u.s.*Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue* King of Prussia, .PA 19406 Attention:
erick W. Schneider     Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 201/430-7373 Vice President Production Septexnber 19, 1980 Mr. B9yce H. Grier, Director Off ice of Inspection and Enforcement Region l u.s.*Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue*
Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Gentlemen:
King of Prussia, .PA 19406 Attention: Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Gentlemen:
COMBINED NR,C INSPECTION 50-272/80-16 ,ANO 50-311/80-12 SALEM GENERATING STATION, UNITS NOS. l AND 2 . We have reviewed the report of your conducted  
COMBINED NR,C INSPECTION 50-272/80-16 ,ANO 50-311/80-12 SALEM GENERATING STATION, UNITS NOS. l AND 2                         .
*by Mr. L. Norrholm during the *period July 1-31, 1980. Our response*
We have reviewed the report of your in~pection conducted *by Mr. L. Norrholm during the *period July 1-31, 1980. Our response*
to the item of noncompliance identified in Append-ix A a,nd the item of concern addressed in your report transmittal letter is as follows: Item: 1, r:nfraction Technical Specification
to the item of noncompliance identified in Append-ix A a,nd the item of concern addressed in your report transmittal letter is as follows:
: 3. O. 4 states, "Entry into. a,n Ol?EMTIONAL MODE or other specified applicability condition sha;ll not be* made unless the *conditions of the Limiting Condition for Operation are met without reliance on provisions contained in the ACTION ments unless otherwise excepted." Contrary to the above, the tinit was heated up to Mode 3 on July 9, 1980 with the Containment Spray System and the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump inoperable.
Item: 1, r:nfraction Technical Specification 3. O. 4 states, "Entry into. a,n Ol?EMTIONAL MODE or other specified applicability condition sha;ll not be* made unless the *conditions of the Limiting Condition for Operation are met without reliance on provisions contained in the ACTION state-ments unless otherwise excepted."
On July 14, 1980, valves 21CS6 and 22CS6 were 'found, tagged closed.,
Contrary to the above, the tinit was heated up to Mode 3 on July 9, 1980 with the Containment Spray System and the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump inoperable. On July 14, 1980, valves 21CS6 and 22CS6 were 'found, tagged closed., renderi~g the Containment Spray System inoperable *c.Technical Specification 3.6.2.1). On July 13, 1980 valves 21MS45 and 23MS45 were *found, tagged closed, rendering the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump inoperable . {Technical Specification 3. 7 .1. 21. In each case I the tagging predated the entry into Mode 3.
the Containment Spray System inoperable  
                    *The original response due date ;for this response* was September 15, 1980. However, .an extension was_ granted by Mr. L *. Nor;rholm until September 22, .1980.
*c.Technical Specification 3.6.2.1).
so102so 276
On July 13, 1980 valves 21MS45 and 23MS45 were *found, tagged closed, rendering the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump inoperable . {Technical Specification
 
: 3. 7 .1. 21. In each case I the tagging predated the entry into Mode 3. *The original response due date ;for this response*
Boyce H. Grier, Dir.                                   9-19-80 Reply to Item 1 A. 21/22CS6
was September 15, 1980. However, .an extension was_ granted by Mr. L *. Nor;rholm until September 22, .1980. so102so 276
: 1. The cause was an improper use of a temporary on-the-
,,*
              . spot change, as applied to a .surveillance procedure.
* Boyce H. Grier, Dir. 9-19-80 Reply to Item 1 A. 21/22CS6 1. The cause was an improper use of a temporary . spot change, as applied to a .surveillance procedure.
: 2. To correct the situation, the tags were released and
: 2. To correct the situation, the tags were released and valves were locked open.
                ~he valves were locked open.           *
* 3. To prevent recurrence, the Operating Department cedure *concerning the use of on-the-spot changes will be 'revised.
: 3. To prevent recurrence, the Operating Department pro-cedure *concerning the use of on-the-spot changes will be 'revised. This revision will prohibit the use of a temporary on-the-spot change to modify any surveillance restoration step. A Night Order Book entry was made to emphasize the proper use of the on-the-spot change.
This revision will prohibit the use of a temporary on-the-spot change to modify any surveillance restoration step. A Night Order Book entry was made to emphasize the proper use of the on-the-spot change. 4. Date for full-compliance is November 1, 1980. B. 21/23MS45
: 4. Date for full-compliance is November 1, 1980.
: 1. The cause was a personnel error. The identified tags .were released prior to entering Mode 3, however, the tags were not immediately removed nor the valves repositioned.
B. 21/23MS45
: 2. To correct the situation, the tags were removed and the valves were locked open.
: 1. The cause was a personnel error. The identified tags
* 3. To prevent recurrence, the administrative procedure for the Ta9ging System (AP-15} is being revised to require a log entry by the Senior Shift Supervisor when a tagging request is not released upon sign-off by the supervisor completing the work.
              .were released prior to entering Mode 3, however, the tags were not immediately removed nor the valves repositioned.
* 4. Date for procedure revision is November 1, 1980. Ttem 2,* unresolved  
: 2. To correct the situation, the tags were removed and the valves were locked open.               *
*Item 31"1/8*0*-*12:-:02 Heatup of the unit began on July 7, 1980 and Mode 4 established.
: 3. To prevent recurrence, the administrative procedure for the Ta9ging System (AP-15} is being revised to require a log entry by the Senior Shift Supervisor when a tagging request is not released upon sign-off by the supervisor completing the work.         *
The unit entered Mode 3 *(Hot Standby) on July 9. Cooldown to Mode 4 was initiated when it was discovered that several ment channels were not operable and tracking plant conditions l3 steam flow channels,*
: 4. Date for procedure revision is November 1, 1980.
one steam pressure *channel, and two surizer pressure *channels)
Ttem 2,* unresolved *Item No~* 31"1/8*0*-*12:-:02 Heatup of the unit began on July 7, 1980 and Mode 4 established.
* These channels were later found to be isolated.
The unit entered Mode 3 *(Hot Standby) on July 9. Cooldown to Mode 4 was initiated when it was discovered that several instru-ment channels were not operable and tracking plant conditions l3 steam flow channels,* one steam pressure *channel, and two pres-surizer pressure *channels)
due to shut isolation valves. The discovery was made prior to required operability of the respective instruments in accordance with Technical Specification 3.3.2.1. Due to the potential loss of required instrumentation, licensee corrective action to prevent recurrence is being requested.
* These channels were later found to be isolated. due to shut isolation valves. The discovery was made prior to required operability of the respective instruments in accordance with Technical Specification 3.3.2.1. Due to the potential loss of required instrumentation, licensee corrective action to prevent recurrence is being requested.
* Boyce H. Grier, Dir. -3 9-19-80 Reply to Item 2 These identified items were addressed in the follow:i.ng LERs: 80-10/03L (Pressurizer Pressure}
 
and 80-09/03L (Steam Flow and Pressure).
Boyce H. Grier, Dir.         - 3 ~                          9-19-80
The LER investigations revealed that these were isolated dents. We feel the corrective action conunitted to in the ated LERs is sufficient to prevent recurrence and no further action is anticipated.
* Reply to Item 2 These identified items were addressed in the follow:i.ng LERs:
If you have any further questions with regard to this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you*. Sincerely, cc Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement NRC Washington, DC 20555}}
80-10/03L (Pressurizer Pressure} and 80-09/03L (Steam Flow and Pressure).
The LER investigations revealed that these were isolated inci-dents. We feel the corrective action conunitted to in the associ-ated LERs is sufficient to prevent recurrence and no further action is anticipated.
If you have any further questions with regard to this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you*.
Sincerely, cc Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement NRC Washington, DC   20555}}

Latest revision as of 08:30, 3 February 2020

Responds to NRC 800819 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-272/80-16 & 50-311/80-12.Corrective Actions:Tags Were Released & Valves Were Locked Open
ML18085A111
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/19/1980
From: Schneider F
Public Service Enterprise Group
To: Brunner E, Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18085A110 List:
References
NUDOCS 8010230276
Download: ML18085A111 (3)
v • d • e


Text

... -*- -""!>

erick W. Schneider Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 201/430-7373 Vice President Production Septexnber 19, 1980 Mr. B9yce H. Grier, Director Off ice of Inspection and Enforcement Region l u.s.*Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue*

King of Prussia, .PA 19406 Attention: Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Gentlemen:

COMBINED NR,C INSPECTION 50-272/80-16 ,ANO 50-311/80-12 SALEM GENERATING STATION, UNITS NOS. l AND 2 .

We have reviewed the report of your in~pection conducted *by Mr. L. Norrholm during the *period July 1-31, 1980. Our response*

to the item of noncompliance identified in Append-ix A a,nd the item of concern addressed in your report transmittal letter is as follows:

Item: 1, r:nfraction Technical Specification 3. O. 4 states, "Entry into. a,n Ol?EMTIONAL MODE or other specified applicability condition sha;ll not be* made unless the *conditions of the Limiting Condition for Operation are met without reliance on provisions contained in the ACTION state-ments unless otherwise excepted."

Contrary to the above, the tinit was heated up to Mode 3 on July 9, 1980 with the Containment Spray System and the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump inoperable. On July 14, 1980, valves 21CS6 and 22CS6 were 'found, tagged closed., renderi~g the Containment Spray System inoperable *c.Technical Specification 3.6.2.1). On July 13, 1980 valves 21MS45 and 23MS45 were *found, tagged closed, rendering the steam driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump inoperable . {Technical Specification 3. 7 .1. 21. In each case I the tagging predated the entry into Mode 3.

  • The original response due date ;for this response* was September 15, 1980. However, .an extension was_ granted by Mr. L *. Nor;rholm until September 22, .1980.

so102so 276

Boyce H. Grier, Dir. 9-19-80 Reply to Item 1 A. 21/22CS6

1. The cause was an improper use of a temporary on-the-

. spot change, as applied to a .surveillance procedure.

2. To correct the situation, the tags were released and

~he valves were locked open. *

3. To prevent recurrence, the Operating Department pro-cedure *concerning the use of on-the-spot changes will be 'revised. This revision will prohibit the use of a temporary on-the-spot change to modify any surveillance restoration step. A Night Order Book entry was made to emphasize the proper use of the on-the-spot change.
4. Date for full-compliance is November 1, 1980.

B. 21/23MS45

1. The cause was a personnel error. The identified tags

.were released prior to entering Mode 3, however, the tags were not immediately removed nor the valves repositioned.

2. To correct the situation, the tags were removed and the valves were locked open. *
3. To prevent recurrence, the administrative procedure for the Ta9ging System (AP-15} is being revised to require a log entry by the Senior Shift Supervisor when a tagging request is not released upon sign-off by the supervisor completing the work. *
4. Date for procedure revision is November 1, 1980.

Ttem 2,* unresolved *Item No~* 31"1/8*0*-*12:-:02 Heatup of the unit began on July 7, 1980 and Mode 4 established.

The unit entered Mode 3 *(Hot Standby) on July 9. Cooldown to Mode 4 was initiated when it was discovered that several instru-ment channels were not operable and tracking plant conditions l3 steam flow channels,* one steam pressure *channel, and two pres-surizer pressure *channels)

  • These channels were later found to be isolated. due to shut isolation valves. The discovery was made prior to required operability of the respective instruments in accordance with Technical Specification 3.3.2.1. Due to the potential loss of required instrumentation, licensee corrective action to prevent recurrence is being requested.

Boyce H. Grier, Dir. - 3 ~ 9-19-80

  • Reply to Item 2 These identified items were addressed in the follow:i.ng LERs:

80-10/03L (Pressurizer Pressure} and 80-09/03L (Steam Flow and Pressure).

The LER investigations revealed that these were isolated inci-dents. We feel the corrective action conunitted to in the associ-ated LERs is sufficient to prevent recurrence and no further action is anticipated.

If you have any further questions with regard to this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you*.

Sincerely, cc Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement NRC Washington, DC 20555

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18085A111&oldid=2411945"