ML18153A847: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/31/1995
| issue date = 05/31/1995
| title = Monthly Operating Repts for May 1995 for Surry Power Station Units 1 & 2.W/950612 Ltr
| title = Monthly Operating Repts for May 1995 for Surry Power Station Units 1 & 2.W/950612 Ltr
| author name = BOWLING M L, MASON D
| author name = Bowling M, Mason D
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:... e e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 June 12, 1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
{{#Wiki_filter:...
Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
e                                 e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 June 12, 1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                       Serial No.      95-289 Attention: Document Control Desk                           NO/RPC:vlh Washington, D. C. 20555                                   Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 Gentlemen:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Serial No. NO/RPC:vlh Docket Nos. License Nos. 95-289 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of May 1995. Very truly yours, M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing  
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of May 1995.
& Programs Enclosure cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station 9506210207 950531 PDR ADOCK 05000280 R PDR
Very truly yours, M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing & Programs Enclosure cc:   U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
* VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT No. 95-05 Approved:
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station 9506210207 950531 PDR ADOCK 05000280 R                   PDR
Station Manager f,-l"L"" j£ Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Section tlurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 2 of 17 Page Operating Data Report -Unit No. 1 .........................................................................................................
 
3 Operating Data Report -Unit No. 2 .........................................................................................................
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT   No. 95-05 Approved:
4 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions  
f,- l"L"" j£ Station Manager      Date
-Unit No. 1 ....................................................................................
 
5 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions  
tlurry     Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 2 of 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section                                                                                                                                  Page Operating Data Report - Unit No. 1 ......................................................................................................... 3 Operating Data Report - Unit No. 2 ......................................................................................................... 4 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 1.................................................................................... 5 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 2 ............. : ...................................................................... 6 Average Daily Unit Power Level - Unit No. 1.............................................................................................. 7 Average Daily Unit Power Level - Unit No. 2 .............................................................................................. 8 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 1 ......................................................................................... 9 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 2 ......................................................................................... 9 Facility Changes That Did Not Require N RC Approval ............................................................................... 10 Procedure or Method of Operation Changes That Did Not Require NRC Approval ........................................... 13 Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRG Approval ...................................................................... 14 Chemistry Report ............................................................................................................................. 15 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 1 ................................................................................................................... 16 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 2 ................................................................................................................... 16 Description of Periodic Test(s) Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications ................................................................................................... 17
-Unit No. 2 .............
 
: ......................................................................
                                                                                          -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 3 of 17 OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No.:   50-280 Date:    06-01-95 Completed By:    D. Mason Telephone:   (804) 365-2459
6 Average Daily Unit Power Level -Unit No. 1 ..............................................................................................
: 1. Unit Name: .................................................. . Surry Unit 1
7 Average Daily Unit Power Level -Unit No. 2 ..............................................................................................
: 2. Reporting Period: ........................................ .. May, 1995
8 Summary of Operating Experience  
: 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): ...................... .               2441
-Unit No. 1 .........................................................................................
: 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): ...................... .                847.5
9 Summary of Operating Experience  
: 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): ................ ..               788
-Unit No. 2 .........................................................................................
: 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): .. ..                       820
9 Facility Changes That Did Not Require N RC Approval ...............................................................................
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): ...... ..                     781
10 Procedure or Method of Operation Changes That Did Not Require N RC Approval ...........................................
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
13 Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRG Approval ......................................................................
: 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
14 Chemistry Report .............................................................................................................................
: 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:
15 Fuel Handling -Unit No. 1 ...................................................................................................................
This Month             YTD               Cumulative
16 Fuel Handling -Unit No. 2 ...................................................................................................................
: 11. Hours In Reporting Period ..........................                 744.0             3623.0             196703.0
16 Description of Periodic Test(s) Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications  
: 12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical ..........                     744.8             3443.7             133913.4
...................................................................................................
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours ...............                         0                   0               3774.5
17 OPERATING DATA REPORT -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 3 of 17 Docket No.: Date: Completed By: 50-280 06-01-95 D. Mason Telephone:
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line ...........................                 744.0             3409.2             131650.2
(804) 365-2459 1 . Unit Name: .................................................. . 2. Reporting Period: ........................................  
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours .....................                     0                   0               3736.2 16, Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) ......                     1802571.0           8238862.5           306692601. 7
.. 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): ...................... . 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): ...................... . 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): ................  
: 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ....                     604865.0           2773570.0           100387403. 0
.. 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): .. .. 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): ...... .. Surry Unit 1 May, 1995 2441 847.5 788 820 781 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons: 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe): 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any: This Month YTD Cumulative
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ........                   582138.0           2675084.0           95384107.0
: 11. Hours In Reporting Period ..........................
: 19. Unit Service Factor ...................................             100.0%               94.1%                 66.9%
744.0 3623.0 196703.0 12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical ..........
: 20. Unit Availability Factor...............................             100.0%               94.1%                 68.8%
744.8 3443.7 133913.4 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours ...............
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) ...........                     100.2%               94.5%               62.5%
0 0 3774.5 14. Hours Generator On-Line ...........................
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) ...........                     99.3%               93.7%               61.5%
744.0 3409.2 131650.2 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours .....................
: 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate ............................                   0.0%                 5.9%               16.5%
0 0 3736.2 16, Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) ...... 1802571.0 8238862.5 306692601.
: 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each}:
7 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) .... 604865.0 2773570.0 100387 403. 0 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ........ 582138.0 2675084.0 95384107.0
Refueling, August 31, 1995, 37 Days
: 19. Unit Service Factor ...................................
: 25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
100.0% 94.1% 66.9% 20. Unit Availability Factor ...............................
100.0% 94.1% 68.8% 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) ...........
100.2% 94.5% 62.5% 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) ...........
99.3% 93.7% 61.5% 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate ............................
0.0% 5.9% 16.5% 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each}: Refueling, August 31, 1995, 37 Days 25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
: 26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):
: 26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):
INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION FORECAST ACHIEVED 
FORECAST            ACHIEVED INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION
* -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 4 of 17 OPERATING DATA REPORT 1 . Unit Name: .................................................. . 2. Reporting Period: ......................................... . 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): ...................... . 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): ...................... . 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): ................. . 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): ... . 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): ....... . Surry Unit 2 May, 1995 2441 847.5 788 820 781 Docket No.: Date: Completed By: Telephone:
 
50-281 06-01-95 D. Mason (804) 365-2459 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons: 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe): 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any: This Month YTD Cumulative
                                *                                                       -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 4 of 17 OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No.:    50-281 Date:    06-01-95 Completed By:    D. Mason Telephone:    (804) 365-2459
: 11. Hours In Reporting Period ..........................
: 1. Unit Name: .................................................. . Surry Unit 2
744.0 3623.0 193583.0 12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical ..........
: 2. Reporting Period: ......................................... . May, 1995
629.9 2433.2 130770.0 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours ...............
: 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): ...................... .               2441
0 0 328.1 14. Hours Generator On-Line ...........................
: 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): ...................... .               847.5
597.5 2368.8 128835.9 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours .....................
: 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): ................. .               788
0 0 0 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) ...... 1443568.4 5562394.5 300830858.8
: 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): ... .                       820
: 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) .... 478845.0 1857235.0 98299529.0
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): ....... .                     781
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ........ 461814.0 1790389.0 93383425.0
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
: 19. Unit Service Factor ...................................
: 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
80.3% 65.4% 66.6% 20. Unit Availability Factor ...............................
: 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:
80.3% 65.4% 66.6% 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) ...........
This Month             YTD               Cumulative
79.5% 63.3% 61.9% 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) ...........
: 11. Hours In Reporting Period ..........................                 744.0             3623.0             193583.0
78.8% 62.7% 61.2% 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate ............................
: 12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical ..........                     629.9             2433.2             130770.0
19.7% 5.8% 13.2% 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each}: 25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours ...............                         0                   0                 328.1
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line ...........................                 597.5             2368.8             128835.9
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours .....................                     0                   0                   0
: 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) ......                     1443568.4           5562394.5           300830858.8
: 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ....                     478845.0           1857235.0           98299529.0
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ........                   461814.0           1790389.0           93383425.0
: 19. Unit Service Factor ...................................               80.3%               65.4%                 66.6%
: 20. Unit Availability Factor ...............................             80.3%               65.4%                 66.6%
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) ...........                     79.5%               63.3%               61.9%
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) ...........                     78.8%               62.7%               61.2%
: 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate ............................                 19.7%                 5.8%               13.2%
: 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each}:
: 25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
: 26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):
: 26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):
INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION FORECAST ACHIEVED 
FORECAST            ACHIEVED INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION
* -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 5 of 17 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%) REPORT MONTH: May, 1995 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Method Docket No.: 50-280 Unit Name: Surry Unit 1 Date: 06-01-95 Completed by: Craig Olsen Telephone:
 
(804)365-2155 Duration of LER System Component Cause & Corrective Action to Date Type Hours Reason Shutting No. Code Code Prevent Recurrence (1) F: Forced S: Scheduled (4) (2) REASON: Down Rx None during the reporting period. A -Equipment Failure (Explain)
                                *                                                 -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 5 of 17 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%)
B Maintenance or Test C Refueling D Regulatory Restriction E Operator Training & Licensing Examination F Administrative G Operational Error (Explain)
REPORT MONTH:   May, 1995 Docket No.:   50-280 Unit Name:   Surry Unit 1 Date: 06-01-95 Completed by:   Craig Olsen Telephone:   (804)365-2155 (1)                  (2)        (3)                  (4)          (5)
Exhibit G -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry-Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NUREG 0161) (3) METHOD: 1 -Manual 2 -Manual Scram. 3 -Automatic Scram. 4 -Other (Explain)
Method Duration                 of       LER     System     Component     Cause & Corrective Action to Date     Type       Hours     Reason     Shutting   No.     Code         Code       Prevent Recurrence Down Rx None during the reporting period.
(5) Exhibit 1 -Same Source. 
(1)                           (2)                                                    (3)
* -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 6 of 17 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%) (1) Duration Date Type Hours 950511 F 36.7 950521 F 109.9 (1) F: Forced REPORT MONTH: May, 1995 (2) (3) (4) Method of LER System Reason Shutting No. Code Down Rx A 2 2-95-AA 004-00 A (2) REASON: 2 2-95-005-00 AA S: Scheduled A -Equipment Failure (Explain)
F:   Forced                 REASON:                                                METHOD:
B Maintenance or Test C Refueling D Regulatory Restriction (5) Docket No.: 50-281 Unit Name: Surry Unit 2 Date: 06-01-95 Completed by: Craig Olsen Telephone:
S:   Scheduled               A - Equipment Failure (Explain)                       1 - Manual B     Maintenance or Test                             2 - Manual Scram.
(804) 365-2155 Component Cause & Corrective Action to Code Prevent Recurrence RCT Manual reactor trip due to control bank 8, group 2 control rods dropping into core. RCT Manual reactor trip due to control bank A, group 2 control rods dropping into core. (3) METHOD: 1 -Manual 2 -Manual Scram. 3 -Automatic Scram. 4 -Other (Explain)
C     Refueling                                       3 - Automatic Scram.
E Operator Training & Licensing Examination F Administrative G Operational Error (Explain)
D     Regulatory Restriction                           4 - Other (Explain)
(4) Exhibit G -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NU REG 0161) (5) Exhibit 1 -Same Source.
E     Operator Training & Licensing Examination F     Administrative G     Operational Error (Explain)
* e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 7 of 17 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.: 50-280 Unit Name: Surry Unit 1 Date: 06-06-95 Completed by: Steve Hall Telephone:
(4)                                                                                  (5)
365-2793 MONTH: May, 1995 Average Daily Power Level Average Daily Power Level Day (MWe-Net) Day (MWe-Net) 782 17 789 2 784 18 788 3 784 19 788 4 783 20 788 5 778 21 788 6 790 22 788 7 794 23 787 8 796 24 787 9 794 25 785 10 794 26 786 11 792 27 788 12 770 28 770 13 780 29 662 14 791 30 785 15 790 31 787 16 788 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe -Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
Exhibit G - Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry-Sheets                       Exhibit 1 - Same Source.
MONTH: May, 1995 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 INSTRUCTIONS
for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NUREG 0161)
~urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 8 of 17 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Average Daily Power Level (MWe-Net) Day 787 17 788 18 788 19 787 20 786 21 786 22 785 23 785 24 785 25 785 26 734 '27 0 28 305 29 783 30 781 31 781 Docket No.: 50-281 Unit.Name:
 
Surry Unit 2 Date: 06-06-95 Completed by: Steve Hall Telephone:
                                *                                               -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 6 of 17 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%)
365-2793 Average Daily Power Level (MWe-Net) 781 778 779 773 390 0 0 0 0 610 777 779 779 776 773 On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe -Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
REPORT MONTH: May, 1995 Docket No.:   50-281 Unit Name:   Surry Unit 2 Date: 06-01-95 Completed by:   Craig Olsen Telephone:   (804) 365-2155 (1)                  (2)        (3)                (4)      (5)
e -. Surry Monthly Operating Report
Method Duration                  of      LER      System  Component   Cause & Corrective Action to Date    Type      Hours      Reason    Shutting    No.      Code      Code     Prevent Recurrence Down Rx 950511      F      36.7        A          2      2      AA        RCT     Manual reactor trip due to 004-00                          control bank 8, group 2 control rods dropping into core.
950521      F      109.9        A          2      2      AA        RCT     Manual reactor trip due to 005-00                          control bank A, group 2 control rods dropping into core.
(1)                            (2)                                                (3)
F:  Forced                  REASON:                                            METHOD:
S:  Scheduled              A - Equipment Failure (Explain)                    1 - Manual B      Maintenance or Test                          2 - Manual Scram.
C      Refueling                                    3 - Automatic Scram.
D      Regulatory Restriction                      4 - Other (Explain)
E     Operator Training & Licensing Examination F     Administrative G     Operational Error (Explain)
(4)                                                                               (5)
Exhibit G - Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets                   Exhibit 1 - Same Source.
for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NU REG 0161)
* e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 7 of 17 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.:   50-280 Unit Name:   Surry Unit 1 Date: 06-06-95 Completed by:   Steve Hall Telephone:   365-2793 MONTH:     May, 1995 Average Daily Power Level                         Average Daily Power Level Day                     (MWe- Net)                   Day                   (MWe- Net) 782                       17                       789 2                         784                       18                       788 3                         784                       19                       788 4                         783                     20                       788 5                         778                     21                       788 6                         790                     22                       788 7                         794                     23                       787 8                         796                     24                       787 9                         794                       25                       785 10                         794                       26                       786 11                         792                       27                       788 12                         770                       28                       770 13                         780                       29                       662 14                         791                       30                       785 15                         790                       31                       787 16                       788 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe - Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
 
                                                                                    ~urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 8 of 17 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.:   50-281 Unit.Name:   Surry Unit 2 Date: 06-06-95 Completed by:   Steve Hall Telephone:   365-2793 MONTH:    May, 1995 Average Daily Power Level                         Average Daily Power Level Day                    (MWe- Net)                  Day                  (MWe- Net) 1                        787                      17                      781 2                        788                      18                      778 3                        788                      19                      779 4                        787                      20                      773 5                        786                      21                      390 6                        786                      22                        0 7                        785                      23                        0 8                        785                      24                        0 9                        785                      25                        0 10                        785                      26                      610 11                        734                      '27                      777 12                          0                      28                      779 13                        305                      29                      779 14                        783                      30                      776 15                        781                      31                      773 16                        781 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe - Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
 
e                                                   -                       . Report Surry Monthly Operating No. 95-05 Page 9 of 17


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTHNEAR:
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTHNEAR:     May, 1995 The following chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
May, 1995 No. 95-05 Page 9 of 17 The following chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
UNIT ONE:
UNIT ONE: 05/01/95 05/06/95 05/28/95 05/29/95 05/31/95 UNIT Two: 05/01/95 05/11/95 05/12/95 05/13/95 05/21/95 05/25/95 05/26/95 05/31/95 0000 The reporting period began with the unit operating at 99% power, 810 MWe. 1012 Started power increase.
05/01/95         0000     The reporting period began with the unit operating at 99% power, 810 MWe.
1136 Unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe. 2007 Started power reduction for removal of the high pressure heater drain pump 1A for maintenance.
05/06/95          1012     Started power increase.
2213 Stopped power reduction at 84% power, 650 MWe. 1829 Started power increase.
1136     Unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe.
2016 Unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe. 2400 The reporting period_ ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe. 0000 The reporting period began with the unit operating at 100% power, 820 MWe. 2231 Manually tripped reactor due to control bank B, group 2 control rods dropping into the reactor core. 2248 Reactor Critical.
05/28/95          2007     Started power reduction for removal of the high pressure heater drain pump 1A for maintenance.
1108 Generator on line. Started power increase.
2213     Stopped power reduction at 84% power, 650 MWe.
2206 Unit operating at 100% power, 810 MWe. 1223 Manually tripped reactor due to control bank A, group 2 control rods dropping into the reactor core. 0611 Reactor Critical.
05/29/95          1829     Started power increase.
0219 Generator on line. Stated power increase.
2016     Unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe.
1136 Unit operating at 100% power, 800 MWe 2400 The reporting period ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 810 MWe.
05/31/95          2400     The reporting period_ ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe.
DC-85-07-3 DC-88-23-1 DCP 90-12-2 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR:
UNIT Two:
May, 1995 Design Change Package e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 10 of 17 5-04-95 Design Change Package DC-85-07-3 installed a comprehensive on-line steam generator secondary side water chemistry monitoring system. The system will provide continuous analytical information from four main sample locations in the secondary system (final feedwater, steam generator blowdown -each steam generator, and condensate) and from two supplemental locations (make-up effluent and heater/moisture separator reheater drains). These modifications do not change the operation or capability of equipment important to safety. The new piping and tubing installation does not affect operations of existing equipment.
05/01/95          0000     The reporting period began with the unit operating at 100% power, 820 MWe.
This design change does not modify the basis of any Technical Specification.
05/11/95          2231     Manually tripped reactor due to control bank B, group 2 control rods dropping into the reactor core.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question was not created. Design Change Package (Safety Evaluation No. 90-158) 5-24-95 Design Change Package DC-88-23-1 installed new indicator and recorder scales on the main control boards and auxiliary shutdown panel. Three pressure transmitters and two flow indicators were replaced.
05/12/95        2248     Reactor Critical.
Labels and tactile changes were installed on reverse acting controllers.
05/13/95        1108     Generator on line. Started power increase.
Magnetic amplifiers in a non-safety related process rack were replaced with comparators and relays to perform the same control functions.
2206     Unit operating at 100% power, 810 MWe.
These Unit 1 modifications, which enhance operator ability to read and interpret data, affect indication and control only. The operation or performance of safety-related equipment or availability of safety-related power sources is not affected.
05/21/95        1223     Manually tripped reactor due to control bank A, group 2 control rods dropping into the reactor core.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist. Design Change Package (Safety Evaluation No. 92-211) 5-17-95 Design Change Package 90-12-2 replaced service water flow transmitters, associated power supplies, and temperature elements in the discharge lines from the recirculation spray heat exchangers.
05/25/95        0611     Reactor Critical.
These changes were made for compliance with the requirements of RG-1.97 for Type D Category 2 variables.
05/26/95        0219     Generator on line. Stated power increase.
This Design Change Package also replaced inlet service water flow transmitters and degraded cable. This modification was implemented to enhance the operators' ability to perform accident monitoring, assess the status of the plant, and take appropriate mitigating actions following an event. The change does not impact the operation or performance of safety-related equipment and does not affect the Technical Specifications margin of safety. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
1136     Unit operating at 100% power, 800 MWe 05/31/95        2400     The reporting period ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 810 MWe.
DC-85-16-3 SE 95-052 TM S2-95-08 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR:
 
May, 1995 Design Change Package ~urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 11 of 17 5-30-95 Design Change Package 85-16-3 performed the demolition of the existing spent resin catch tank system. A newly designed replacement system was also installed.
e  Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 10 of 17 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 DC-85-07-3  Design Change Package                                                             5-04-95 Design Change Package DC-85-07-3 installed a comprehensive on-line steam generator secondary side water chemistry monitoring system. The system will provide continuous analytical information from four main sample locations in the secondary system (final feedwater, steam generator blowdown - each steam generator, and condensate) and from two supplemental locations (make-up effluent and heater/moisture separator reheater drains).
The new system will permit flexibility in handling of spent radioactive resins in preparation for shipment to a burial facility.
These modifications do not change the operation or capability of equipment important to safety. The new piping and tubing installation does not affect operations of existing equipment. This design change does not modify the basis of any Technical Specification.
These non-safety related modifications do not affect the safe operation of either unit. The spent resin system is not required to prevent or mitigate the consequences of an accident.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question was not created.
The Technical Specifications do not provide any limiting conditions for operation or surveillance requirements for the spent resin systems. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist. Safety Evaluation 5-04-95 Safety Evaluation 95-052 evaluated the substitution of manual operator actions for the inoperable automatic safety functions of the field forcing and over excitation protection features for the Main Generator.
DC-88-23-1  Design Change Package                                                             5-24-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 90-158)
All other automatic safety functions remained operable.
Design Change Package DC-88-23-1 installed new indicator and recorder scales on the main control boards and auxiliary shutdown panel. Three pressure transmitters and two flow indicators were replaced. Labels and tactile changes were installed on reverse acting controllers. Magnetic amplifiers in a non-safety related process rack were replaced with comparators and relays to perform the same control functions.
These Unit 1 modifications, which enhance operator ability to read and interpret data, affect indication and control only. The operation or performance of safety-related equipment or availability of safety-related power sources is not affected. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
DCP 90-12-2  Design Change Package                                                           5-17-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 92-211)
Design Change Package 90-12-2 replaced service water flow transmitters, associated power supplies, and temperature elements in the discharge lines from the recirculation spray heat exchangers. These changes were made for compliance with the requirements of RG-1.97 for Type D Category 2 variables. This Design Change Package also replaced inlet service water flow transmitters and degraded cable.
This modification was implemented to enhance the operators' ability to perform post-accident monitoring, assess the status of the plant, and take appropriate mitigating actions following an event. The change does not impact the operation or performance of safety-related equipment and does not affect the Technical Specifications margin of safety. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
 
                                                                    ~urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 11 of 17 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR:       May, 1995 DC-85-16-3  Design Change Package                                                               5-30-95 Design Change Package 85-16-3 performed the demolition of the existing spent resin catch tank system. A newly designed replacement system was also installed. The new system will permit flexibility in handling of spent radioactive resins in preparation for shipment to a burial facility.
These non-safety related modifications do not affect the safe operation of either unit. The spent resin system is not required to prevent or mitigate the consequences of an accident. The Technical Specifications do not provide any limiting conditions for operation or surveillance requirements for the spent resin systems. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
SE 95-052  Safety   Evaluation                                                                 5-04-95 Safety Evaluation 95-052 evaluated the substitution of manual operator actions for the inoperable automatic safety functions of the field forcing and over excitation protection features for the Main Generator. All other automatic safety functions remained operable.
These controls were temporary and in effect until repairs were completed.
These controls were temporary and in effect until repairs were completed.
The evaluation determined that Main Generator malfunctions are not initiating events for any of the accident functions described in the Safety Analysis Report. The evaluation also concluded that failure of the generator or its protective features will not prevent any other system's protective features from being actuated.
The evaluation determined that Main Generator malfunctions are not initiating events for any of the accident functions described in the Safety Analysis Report. The evaluation also concluded that failure of the generator or its protective features will not prevent any other system's protective features from being actuated. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist. Temporary Modification (Safety Evaluation No. 95-055A) 5-25-95 Temporary Modification (TM) S2-95-08 installed a temporary strainer and piping in the generator air side Hydrogen Seal Oil system to perform a partial flush of the system in order to remove debris and restore pressure control function reliability of the seal oil pump. The Hydrogen Seal Oil system is non-safety related and has no interface with related systems. This system continues to operate within existing design parameters.
TM S2-95-08 Temporary Modification                                                               5-25-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 95-055A)
Temporary Modification (TM) S2-95-08 installed a temporary strainer and piping in the generator air side Hydrogen Seal Oil system to perform a partial flush of the system in order to remove debris and restore pressure control function reliability of the seal oil pump.
The Hydrogen Seal Oil system is non-safety related and has no interface with safety-related systems. This system continues to operate within existing design parameters.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question did not exist.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question did not exist.
TM 81-95-05 FS 95-13 TM 82-95-09 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR:
 
May, 1995 Temporary Modification (Safety Evaluation No. 95-056) tlurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 12 of 17 5-25-95 Temporary Modification
tlurry    Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 12 of 17 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR: May, 1995 TM 81-95-05 Temporary Modification                                                               5-25-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 95-056)
{TM) 81-95-05 installed stand alone spot coolers to provide air cooling for each of the eight rod control power cabinets.
Temporary Modification {TM) 81-95-05 installed stand alone spot coolers to provide air cooling for each of the eight rod control power cabinets.
Additional cooling will prolong the life of the printed circuit boards and decrease the probability of equipment malfunction.
Additional cooling will prolong the life of the printed circuit boards and decrease the probability of equipment malfunction. Should the temporary spot coolers fail, the cabinet cooling would revert to the previously existing natural circulation. The operation of the rod control system is not affected and the control rod remain trippable. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
Should the temporary spot coolers fail, the cabinet cooling would revert to the previously existing natural circulation.
FS 95-13    Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Change                                           5-25-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 95-057)
The operation of the rod control system is not affected and the control rod remain trippable.
UFSAR Change 95-13 deleted incorrect statements in Chapter 6, Engineering Safeguards, Section 6.2, Safety Injection, Subsection 6.2.4.1.4, regarding the application of the lnservice Inspection {ISi) and lnservice Testing (1ST) Programs for the Safety Injection and Recirculation Spray Systems. The change also added paragraphs in Subsections 6.2.4.2, 6.3.1.5.1, and 6.3.1.5.2 to correctly describe the ISi and 1ST Program requirements for the Safety Injection System, Containment Spray System, and Recirculation Spray System.
Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Change (Safety Evaluation No. 95-057) 5-25-95 UFSAR Change 95-13 deleted incorrect statements in Chapter 6, Engineering Safeguards, Section 6.2, Safety Injection, Subsection 6.2.4.1.4, regarding the application of the lnservice Inspection
This change was made to remove statements in UFSAR Chapter 6 that are incomplete or inaccurate regarding the ASME Section XI 181/IST Program and add statements that accurately reflect the implementation of this program. This change involves administrative corrections and has no material impact on plant equipment, operation, inspection, or testing. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
{ISi) and lnservice Testing (1ST) Programs for the Safety Injection and Recirculation Spray Systems. The change also added paragraphs in Subsections 6.2.4.2, 6.3.1.5.1, and 6.3.1.5.2 to correctly describe the ISi and 1ST Program requirements for the Safety Injection System, Containment Spray System, and Recirculation Spray System. This change was made to remove statements in UFSAR Chapter 6 that are incomplete or inaccurate regarding the ASME Section XI 181/IST Program and add statements that accurately reflect the implementation of this program. This change involves administrative corrections and has no material impact on plant equipment, operation, inspection, or testing. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist. Temporary Modification (Safety Evaluation No. 95-058) 5-30-95 Temporary Modification (TM) 82-95-09 installed a jumper to defeat the high bearing temperature protective trip for the chilled water refrigeration unit, 2-CD-REF-1.
TM 82-95-09 Temporary Modification                                                               5-30-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 95-058)
This action was taken to prevent unnecessary trippng of the chiller due to a defective bearing temperature detector.
Temporary Modification (TM) 82-95-09 installed a jumper to defeat the high bearing temperature protective trip for the chilled water refrigeration unit, 2-CD-REF-1. This action was taken to prevent unnecessary trippng of the chiller due to a defective bearing temperature detector.
Chiller bearing temperatures will be monitored.
Chiller bearing temperatures will be monitored. This mechanical chiller is not a safety-related component. It neither impacts the operation of equipment important to safety nor is it used to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Containment temperature and pressure limits will continue to be adhered to according to the provisions of Technical Specification 3.8. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
This mechanical chiller is not a related component.
 
It neither impacts the operation of equipment important to safety nor is it used to mitigate the consequences of an accident.
eSurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 13 of 17 PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period
Containment temperature and pressure limits will continue to be adhered to according to the provisions of Technical Specification 3.8. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
 
e Surry Monthly Operating Report PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR:
eSurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 14 of 17 TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period
May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period No. 95-05 Page 13 of 17 e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 14 of 17 TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR:
 
May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period CHEMISTRY REPORT MONTH/YEAR:
e                      .
May, 1995 Unit No. 1 Primarv Coolant Analysis Max. Min. Ava. Gross Radioactivity, µ.Ci/ml 3.48E-1 2.18E-1 2.82E-1 Suspended Solids, ppm 50.10 50.10 50.10 Gross Tritium, µ.Ci/ml 1.53E-1 1.02E-1 1.27E-1 1131, µ.Ci/ml 7.11 E-4 4.30E-4 6.10E-4 113111133 0.08 0.06 0.07 Hydroi:ien, cc/kg 42.4 32.1 35.6 Lithium, ppm 2.23 1.69 1.92 Boron -10, oom* 59.0 38.4 47.9 Oxygen, (DO), ppm 50.005 50.005 50.005 Chloride, ppm 0.003 50.001 0.002 pH at 25 dei:iree Celsius 7.44 7.28 7.34
Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 15 of 17 CHEMISTRY REPORT MONTH/YEAR: May, 1995 Unit No. 1                       Unit No. 2 Primarv Coolant Analysis           Max.       Min.       Ava. Max.          Min.        Ava.
* Boron -1 O = Total Boron x 0.196 Comments:
Gross Radioactivity, µ.Ci/ml           3.48E-1     2.18E-1   2.82E-1 1.99E-1      5.80E-3      1.35E-2 Suspended Solids, ppm                   50.10      50.10       50.10   50.10        50.10        50.10 Gross Tritium, µ.Ci/ml                 1.53E-1     1.02E-1     1.27E-1 4.04E-1      2.14E-1      3.09E-1 1131, µ.Ci/ml                         7.11 E-4   4.30E-4     6.10E-4 1.60E-4      3.00E-5      1.03E-4 113111133                               0.08       0.06       0.07    0.09        0.05        0.07 Hydroi:ien, cc/kg                       42.4       32.1       35.6   44.1        33.7        36.8 Lithium, ppm                             2.23       1.69       1.92   2.60        1.74          2.17 Boron - 10, oom*                         59.0       38.4       47.9   308.3        196.4        235.1 Oxygen, (DO), ppm                       50.005    50.005      50.005  50.005       50.005       50.005 Chloride, ppm                           0.003     50.001       0.002   0.009        0.003        0.005 pH at 25 dei:iree Celsius               7.44       7.28       7.34   6.72        6.30          6.59
None e . Surry Monthly Operating Report Unit No. 2 Max. Min. 1.99E-1 5.80E-3 50.10 50.10 4.04E-1 2.14E-1 1.60E-4 3.00E-5 0.09 0.05 44.1 33.7 2.60 1.74 308.3 196.4 50.005 50.005 0.009 0.003 6.72 6.30 No. 95-05 Page 15 of 17 Ava. 1.35E-2 50.10 3.09E-1 1.03E-4 0.07 36.8 2.17 235.1 50.005 0.005 6.59 New or Spent Fuel Shipment Date Stored or Number Received FUEL HANDLING UNITS 1 & 2 MONTH/YEAR:
* Boron - 1O = Total Boron x 0.196 Comments:
May, 1995 Number of Assemblies per Shipment Assembly Number ANSI Number e Surry Monthly Operating Report Initial Enrichment No. 95-05 Page 16 of 17 New or Spent Fuel Shipping Cask Activity No Fuel Received or Stored During the Reporting Period
None
.,. ,. e Surry Monthly Operating Report DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST(S) WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MONTHNEAR:
 
May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period No. 95-05 Page 17 of 17}}
e   Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 16 of 17 FUEL HANDLING UNITS 1 & 2 MONTH/YEAR: May, 1995 New or Spent                    Number of                                                     New or Spent Fuel Shipment Date Stored or    Assemblies     Assembly          ANSI            Initial      Fuel Shipping Number      Received      per Shipment       Number         Number         Enrichment     Cask Activity No Fuel Received or Stored During the Reporting Period
 
eSurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 17 of 17 DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST(S) WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period}}

Latest revision as of 23:11, 2 February 2020

Monthly Operating Repts for May 1995 for Surry Power Station Units 1 & 2.W/950612 Ltr
ML18153A847
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1995
From: Bowling M, Mason D
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
95-289, NUDOCS 9506210207
Download: ML18153A847 (18)


Text

...

e e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 June 12, 1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.95-289 Attention: Document Control Desk NO/RPC:vlh Washington, D. C. 20555 Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of May 1995.

Very truly yours, M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing & Programs Enclosure cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station 9506210207 950531 PDR ADOCK 05000280 R PDR

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT No. 95-05 Approved:

f,- l"L"" j£ Station Manager Date

tlurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 2 of 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Operating Data Report - Unit No. 1 ......................................................................................................... 3 Operating Data Report - Unit No. 2 ......................................................................................................... 4 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 1.................................................................................... 5 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 2 ............. : ...................................................................... 6 Average Daily Unit Power Level - Unit No. 1.............................................................................................. 7 Average Daily Unit Power Level - Unit No. 2 .............................................................................................. 8 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 1 ......................................................................................... 9 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 2 ......................................................................................... 9 Facility Changes That Did Not Require N RC Approval ............................................................................... 10 Procedure or Method of Operation Changes That Did Not Require NRC Approval ........................................... 13 Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRG Approval ...................................................................... 14 Chemistry Report ............................................................................................................................. 15 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 1 ................................................................................................................... 16 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 2 ................................................................................................................... 16 Description of Periodic Test(s) Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications ................................................................................................... 17

-urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 3 of 17 OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No.: 50-280 Date: 06-01-95 Completed By: D. Mason Telephone: (804) 365-2459

1. Unit Name: .................................................. . Surry Unit 1
2. Reporting Period: ........................................ .. May, 1995
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): ...................... . 2441
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): ...................... . 847.5
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): ................ .. 788
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): .. .. 820
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): ...... .. 781
8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:

This Month YTD Cumulative

11. Hours In Reporting Period .......................... 744.0 3623.0 196703.0
12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical .......... 744.8 3443.7 133913.4
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours ............... 0 0 3774.5
14. Hours Generator On-Line ........................... 744.0 3409.2 131650.2
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours ..................... 0 0 3736.2 16, Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) ...... 1802571.0 8238862.5 306692601. 7
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) .... 604865.0 2773570.0 100387403. 0
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ........ 582138.0 2675084.0 95384107.0
19. Unit Service Factor ................................... 100.0% 94.1% 66.9%
20. Unit Availability Factor............................... 100.0% 94.1% 68.8%
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) ........... 100.2% 94.5% 62.5%
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) ........... 99.3% 93.7% 61.5%
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate ............................ 0.0% 5.9% 16.5%
24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each}:

Refueling, August 31, 1995, 37 Days

25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):

FORECAST ACHIEVED INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION

  • -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 4 of 17 OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No.: 50-281 Date: 06-01-95 Completed By: D. Mason Telephone: (804) 365-2459
1. Unit Name: .................................................. . Surry Unit 2
2. Reporting Period: ......................................... . May, 1995
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): ...................... . 2441
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): ...................... . 847.5
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): ................. . 788
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): ... . 820
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): ....... . 781
8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:

This Month YTD Cumulative

11. Hours In Reporting Period .......................... 744.0 3623.0 193583.0
12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical .......... 629.9 2433.2 130770.0
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours ............... 0 0 328.1
14. Hours Generator On-Line ........................... 597.5 2368.8 128835.9
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours ..................... 0 0 0
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) ...... 1443568.4 5562394.5 300830858.8
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) .... 478845.0 1857235.0 98299529.0
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) ........ 461814.0 1790389.0 93383425.0
19. Unit Service Factor ................................... 80.3% 65.4% 66.6%
20. Unit Availability Factor ............................... 80.3% 65.4% 66.6%
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) ........... 79.5% 63.3% 61.9%
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) ........... 78.8% 62.7% 61.2%
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate ............................ 19.7% 5.8% 13.2%
24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each}:
25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):

FORECAST ACHIEVED INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION

  • -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 5 of 17 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%)

REPORT MONTH: May, 1995 Docket No.: 50-280 Unit Name: Surry Unit 1 Date: 06-01-95 Completed by: Craig Olsen Telephone: (804)365-2155 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Method Duration of LER System Component Cause & Corrective Action to Date Type Hours Reason Shutting No. Code Code Prevent Recurrence Down Rx None during the reporting period.

(1) (2) (3)

F: Forced REASON: METHOD:

S: Scheduled A - Equipment Failure (Explain) 1 - Manual B Maintenance or Test 2 - Manual Scram.

C Refueling 3 - Automatic Scram.

D Regulatory Restriction 4 - Other (Explain)

E Operator Training & Licensing Examination F Administrative G Operational Error (Explain)

(4) (5)

Exhibit G - Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry-Sheets Exhibit 1 - Same Source.

for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NUREG 0161)

  • -urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 6 of 17 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%)

REPORT MONTH: May, 1995 Docket No.: 50-281 Unit Name: Surry Unit 2 Date: 06-01-95 Completed by: Craig Olsen Telephone: (804) 365-2155 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Method Duration of LER System Component Cause & Corrective Action to Date Type Hours Reason Shutting No. Code Code Prevent Recurrence Down Rx 950511 F 36.7 A 2 2 AA RCT Manual reactor trip due to 004-00 control bank 8, group 2 control rods dropping into core.

950521 F 109.9 A 2 2 AA RCT Manual reactor trip due to 005-00 control bank A, group 2 control rods dropping into core.

(1) (2) (3)

F: Forced REASON: METHOD:

S: Scheduled A - Equipment Failure (Explain) 1 - Manual B Maintenance or Test 2 - Manual Scram.

C Refueling 3 - Automatic Scram.

D Regulatory Restriction 4 - Other (Explain)

E Operator Training & Licensing Examination F Administrative G Operational Error (Explain)

(4) (5)

Exhibit G - Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets Exhibit 1 - Same Source.

for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NU REG 0161)

  • e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 7 of 17 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.: 50-280 Unit Name: Surry Unit 1 Date: 06-06-95 Completed by: Steve Hall Telephone: 365-2793 MONTH: May, 1995 Average Daily Power Level Average Daily Power Level Day (MWe- Net) Day (MWe- Net) 782 17 789 2 784 18 788 3 784 19 788 4 783 20 788 5 778 21 788 6 790 22 788 7 794 23 787 8 796 24 787 9 794 25 785 10 794 26 786 11 792 27 788 12 770 28 770 13 780 29 662 14 791 30 785 15 790 31 787 16 788 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe - Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

~urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 8 of 17 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.: 50-281 Unit.Name: Surry Unit 2 Date: 06-06-95 Completed by: Steve Hall Telephone: 365-2793 MONTH: May, 1995 Average Daily Power Level Average Daily Power Level Day (MWe- Net) Day (MWe- Net) 1 787 17 781 2 788 18 778 3 788 19 779 4 787 20 773 5 786 21 390 6 786 22 0 7 785 23 0 8 785 24 0 9 785 25 0 10 785 26 610 11 734 '27 777 12 0 28 779 13 305 29 779 14 783 30 776 15 781 31 773 16 781 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe - Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

e - . Report Surry Monthly Operating No. 95-05 Page 9 of 17

SUMMARY

OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 The following chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.

UNIT ONE:

05/01/95 0000 The reporting period began with the unit operating at 99% power, 810 MWe.

05/06/95 1012 Started power increase.

1136 Unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe.

05/28/95 2007 Started power reduction for removal of the high pressure heater drain pump 1A for maintenance.

2213 Stopped power reduction at 84% power, 650 MWe.

05/29/95 1829 Started power increase.

2016 Unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe.

05/31/95 2400 The reporting period_ ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 825 MWe.

UNIT Two:

05/01/95 0000 The reporting period began with the unit operating at 100% power, 820 MWe.

05/11/95 2231 Manually tripped reactor due to control bank B, group 2 control rods dropping into the reactor core.

05/12/95 2248 Reactor Critical.

05/13/95 1108 Generator on line. Started power increase.

2206 Unit operating at 100% power, 810 MWe.

05/21/95 1223 Manually tripped reactor due to control bank A, group 2 control rods dropping into the reactor core.

05/25/95 0611 Reactor Critical.

05/26/95 0219 Generator on line. Stated power increase.

1136 Unit operating at 100% power, 800 MWe 05/31/95 2400 The reporting period ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 810 MWe.

e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 10 of 17 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 DC-85-07-3 Design Change Package 5-04-95 Design Change Package DC-85-07-3 installed a comprehensive on-line steam generator secondary side water chemistry monitoring system. The system will provide continuous analytical information from four main sample locations in the secondary system (final feedwater, steam generator blowdown - each steam generator, and condensate) and from two supplemental locations (make-up effluent and heater/moisture separator reheater drains).

These modifications do not change the operation or capability of equipment important to safety. The new piping and tubing installation does not affect operations of existing equipment. This design change does not modify the basis of any Technical Specification.

Therefore, an unreviewed safety question was not created.

DC-88-23-1 Design Change Package 5-24-95 (Safety Evaluation No.90-158)

Design Change Package DC-88-23-1 installed new indicator and recorder scales on the main control boards and auxiliary shutdown panel. Three pressure transmitters and two flow indicators were replaced. Labels and tactile changes were installed on reverse acting controllers. Magnetic amplifiers in a non-safety related process rack were replaced with comparators and relays to perform the same control functions.

These Unit 1 modifications, which enhance operator ability to read and interpret data, affect indication and control only. The operation or performance of safety-related equipment or availability of safety-related power sources is not affected. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

DCP 90-12-2 Design Change Package 5-17-95 (Safety Evaluation No.92-211)

Design Change Package 90-12-2 replaced service water flow transmitters, associated power supplies, and temperature elements in the discharge lines from the recirculation spray heat exchangers. These changes were made for compliance with the requirements of RG-1.97 for Type D Category 2 variables. This Design Change Package also replaced inlet service water flow transmitters and degraded cable.

This modification was implemented to enhance the operators' ability to perform post-accident monitoring, assess the status of the plant, and take appropriate mitigating actions following an event. The change does not impact the operation or performance of safety-related equipment and does not affect the Technical Specifications margin of safety. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

~urry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 11 of 17 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 DC-85-16-3 Design Change Package 5-30-95 Design Change Package 85-16-3 performed the demolition of the existing spent resin catch tank system. A newly designed replacement system was also installed. The new system will permit flexibility in handling of spent radioactive resins in preparation for shipment to a burial facility.

These non-safety related modifications do not affect the safe operation of either unit. The spent resin system is not required to prevent or mitigate the consequences of an accident. The Technical Specifications do not provide any limiting conditions for operation or surveillance requirements for the spent resin systems. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

SE 95-052 Safety Evaluation 5-04-95 Safety Evaluation 95-052 evaluated the substitution of manual operator actions for the inoperable automatic safety functions of the field forcing and over excitation protection features for the Main Generator. All other automatic safety functions remained operable.

These controls were temporary and in effect until repairs were completed.

The evaluation determined that Main Generator malfunctions are not initiating events for any of the accident functions described in the Safety Analysis Report. The evaluation also concluded that failure of the generator or its protective features will not prevent any other system's protective features from being actuated. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

TM S2-95-08 Temporary Modification 5-25-95 (Safety Evaluation No. 95-055A)

Temporary Modification (TM) S2-95-08 installed a temporary strainer and piping in the generator air side Hydrogen Seal Oil system to perform a partial flush of the system in order to remove debris and restore pressure control function reliability of the seal oil pump.

The Hydrogen Seal Oil system is non-safety related and has no interface with safety-related systems. This system continues to operate within existing design parameters.

Therefore, an unreviewed safety question did not exist.

tlurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 12 of 17 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR: May, 1995 TM 81-95-05 Temporary Modification 5-25-95 (Safety Evaluation No.95-056)

Temporary Modification {TM) 81-95-05 installed stand alone spot coolers to provide air cooling for each of the eight rod control power cabinets.

Additional cooling will prolong the life of the printed circuit boards and decrease the probability of equipment malfunction. Should the temporary spot coolers fail, the cabinet cooling would revert to the previously existing natural circulation. The operation of the rod control system is not affected and the control rod remain trippable. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

FS 95-13 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Change 5-25-95 (Safety Evaluation No.95-057)

UFSAR Change 95-13 deleted incorrect statements in Chapter 6, Engineering Safeguards, Section 6.2, Safety Injection, Subsection 6.2.4.1.4, regarding the application of the lnservice Inspection {ISi) and lnservice Testing (1ST) Programs for the Safety Injection and Recirculation Spray Systems. The change also added paragraphs in Subsections 6.2.4.2, 6.3.1.5.1, and 6.3.1.5.2 to correctly describe the ISi and 1ST Program requirements for the Safety Injection System, Containment Spray System, and Recirculation Spray System.

This change was made to remove statements in UFSAR Chapter 6 that are incomplete or inaccurate regarding the ASME Section XI 181/IST Program and add statements that accurately reflect the implementation of this program. This change involves administrative corrections and has no material impact on plant equipment, operation, inspection, or testing. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

TM 82-95-09 Temporary Modification 5-30-95 (Safety Evaluation No.95-058)

Temporary Modification (TM) 82-95-09 installed a jumper to defeat the high bearing temperature protective trip for the chilled water refrigeration unit, 2-CD-REF-1. This action was taken to prevent unnecessary trippng of the chiller due to a defective bearing temperature detector.

Chiller bearing temperatures will be monitored. This mechanical chiller is not a safety-related component. It neither impacts the operation of equipment important to safety nor is it used to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Containment temperature and pressure limits will continue to be adhered to according to the provisions of Technical Specification 3.8. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.

eSurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 13 of 17 PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period

eSurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 14 of 17 TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period

e .

Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 15 of 17 CHEMISTRY REPORT MONTH/YEAR: May, 1995 Unit No. 1 Unit No. 2 Primarv Coolant Analysis Max. Min. Ava. Max. Min. Ava.

Gross Radioactivity, µ.Ci/ml 3.48E-1 2.18E-1 2.82E-1 1.99E-1 5.80E-3 1.35E-2 Suspended Solids, ppm 50.10 50.10 50.10 50.10 50.10 50.10 Gross Tritium, µ.Ci/ml 1.53E-1 1.02E-1 1.27E-1 4.04E-1 2.14E-1 3.09E-1 1131, µ.Ci/ml 7.11 E-4 4.30E-4 6.10E-4 1.60E-4 3.00E-5 1.03E-4 113111133 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.05 0.07 Hydroi:ien, cc/kg 42.4 32.1 35.6 44.1 33.7 36.8 Lithium, ppm 2.23 1.69 1.92 2.60 1.74 2.17 Boron - 10, oom* 59.0 38.4 47.9 308.3 196.4 235.1 Oxygen, (DO), ppm 50.005 50.005 50.005 50.005 50.005 50.005 Chloride, ppm 0.003 50.001 0.002 0.009 0.003 0.005 pH at 25 dei:iree Celsius 7.44 7.28 7.34 6.72 6.30 6.59

None

e Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 16 of 17 FUEL HANDLING UNITS 1 & 2 MONTH/YEAR: May, 1995 New or Spent Number of New or Spent Fuel Shipment Date Stored or Assemblies Assembly ANSI Initial Fuel Shipping Number Received per Shipment Number Number Enrichment Cask Activity No Fuel Received or Stored During the Reporting Period

eSurry Monthly Operating Report No. 95-05 Page 17 of 17 DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST(S) WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MONTHNEAR: May, 1995 None During the Reporting Period