ML063420303: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML063420303 | | number = ML063420303 | ||
| issue date = 11/07/2006 | | issue date = 11/07/2006 | ||
| title = | | title = E-Mail: (PD) Additional Questions | ||
| author name = Ashley D | | author name = Ashley D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA | ||
| addressee name = Hufnagel J | | addressee name = Hufnagel J | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:RD. Ashley- additional questions Page 111 From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 11/07/2006 1:42:18 PM | {{#Wiki_filter:RD. Ashley- additional questions Page 111 From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 11/07/2006 1:42:18 PM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
additional questions John-Two more questions from ACRS to add to the list that I sent earlier.1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood Up?2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? | additional questions John-Two more questions from ACRS to add to the list that I sent earlier. | ||
Where could it be from?regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 dial @nrc.qov L*D. Ashley -TEXT.htm Page 11 John-Two more questions from ACRS to add to the list that I sent earlier.1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood up?2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). | : 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood Up? | ||
Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? | : 2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? Where could it be from? | ||
Where could it be from?regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov | regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 dial @nrc.qov | ||
9:"10848) | |||
L*D. Ashley - TEXT.htm Page 11 John-Two more questions from ACRS to add to the list that I sent earlier. | |||
: 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood up? | |||
: 2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now | |||
(>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? Where could it be from? | |||
regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov | |||
c:\temp\ElW}ei M I M1 5A3. Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (4550D38A.PDE:* 9:"10848) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Creation Date | additional questions Creation Date 11/07/2006 1:42:18 PM From: D. Ashley Created By: DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time exeloncorp.com Transferred 07 November, 2006 1:42:51 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel) | ||
Priority: ReplyRequested: | Post Office Delivered Route exeloncorp.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1965 07 November, 2006 1:42:18 PM TEXT.htm 1623 D. Ashley.vcf 302 08 August, 2006 2:46:52 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
Return Notification: | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Security: To Be Delivered: | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened}} | ||
Status Tracking: | |||
& Opened}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 7 December 2019
| ML063420303 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/07/2006 |
| From: | Ashley D NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA |
| To: | Hufnagel J Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| %dam200701, TAC 8261 | |
| Download: ML063420303 (3) | |
Text
RD. Ashley- additional questions Page 111 From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 11/07/2006 1:42:18 PM
Subject:
additional questions John-Two more questions from ACRS to add to the list that I sent earlier.
- 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood Up?
- 2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now (>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? Where could it be from?
regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 dial @nrc.qov
L*D. Ashley - TEXT.htm Page 11 John-Two more questions from ACRS to add to the list that I sent earlier.
- 1) Since water collected from the drywell sand bed region drains should be sampled prior to dicarding the contents of the collection containers--Did the analysis of the containers that were discarded during the recent NRC inspection suggest that the leakage is anything other than water from the reactor cavity region during the refueling flood up?
- 2) It was stated by the applicant at the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on October 3, 2006, that the committment to seal the reactor cavity region with strippable coating was not carried out during two refueling outages because it was assumed at that time that the plant was to be decommissioned (1998-2000). Is it possible that the contents of the collection bottles was approximately 8 years old? Is ti possible that the leakage is occurring even though you are now
(>2000), coating the cavity region during refueling outatges? Where could it be from?
regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov
c:\temp\ElW}ei M I M1 5A3. Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (4550D38A.PDE:* 9:"10848)
Subject:
additional questions Creation Date 11/07/2006 1:42:18 PM From: D. Ashley Created By: DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time exeloncorp.com Transferred 07 November, 2006 1:42:51 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)
Post Office Delivered Route exeloncorp.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1965 07 November, 2006 1:42:18 PM TEXT.htm 1623 D. Ashley.vcf 302 08 August, 2006 2:46:52 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened