ML093500456: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML093500456 | | number = ML093500456 | ||
| issue date = 12/16/2009 | | issue date = 12/16/2009 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review E-mail, Relief Request ANO2-ISI-005 to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld, for Fourth 10-Year Interval | | title = Arkansas, Unit 2 - Acceptance Review E-mail, Relief Request ANO2-ISI-005 to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld, for Fourth 10-Year Interval | ||
| author name = Kalyanam K | | author name = Kalyanam K | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | ||
| addressee name = Bice D, Clark R | | addressee name = Bice D, Clark R | ||
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | | addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | ||
| docket = 05000368 | | docket = 05000368 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:17 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W; BICE, DAVID B Cc: Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet; Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:17 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W; BICE, DAVID B Cc: Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet; Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review results for ANO2-ISI-005 (TAC No. ME2566) | Acceptance Review results for ANO2-ISI-005 (TAC No. ME2566) | ||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
Request to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld | Request to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld -- ANO2-ISI-005 -- Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 TAC No.: ME2566 Dave and Bob: | ||
Dave and Bob: | |||
By letter dated November 4, 2009, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee), submitted Request to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld. | By letter dated November 4, 2009, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee), submitted Request to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld. | ||
Specifically, Entergy requested permission to extend the Inservice Inspection (ISI) interval that is required by Examination Categories B-N-2 and B-N-3 of Table IWB-2500-1 of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code, 2001 Edition, 2003 Addenda for the fourth 10-year interval for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2). Table IWB-2500-1, examination categories B-N-2 and B-N-3 requires a visual examination of the accessible interior attachment welds within and beyond the beltline region and a visual examination of the accessible core support structure surfaces of the reactor pressure vessel once each ten-year interval. | Specifically, Entergy requested permission to extend the Inservice Inspection (ISI) interval that is required by Examination Categories B-N-2 and B-N-3 of Table IWB-2500-1 of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) | ||
Code, 2001 Edition, 2003 Addenda for the fourth 10-year interval for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2). Table IWB-2500-1, examination categories B-N-2 and B-N-3 requires a visual examination of the accessible interior attachment welds within and beyond the beltline region and a visual examination of the accessible core support structure surfaces of the reactor pressure vessel once each ten-year interval. | |||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. | ||
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to | The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request for alternative in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), | ||
the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request for alternative in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480. | ||
Kaly N. Kalyanam PM, ANO-1 and 2 | Kaly N. Kalyanam PM, ANO-1 and 2 | ||
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (94A2A4408AC65F42AC084527534CF41603D98737E0) | E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (94A2A4408AC65F42AC084527534CF41603D98737E0) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review results for ANO2-ISI-005 (TAC No. ME2566) | Acceptance Review results for ANO2-ISI-005 (TAC No. ME2566) | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: 12/16/2009 12:16:48 PM Received Date: 12/16/2009 12:16:48 PM From: Kalyanam, Kaly Created By: Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Created By: | |||
Recipients: | |||
RCLARK@entergy.com (CLARK, ROBERT W) | RCLARK@entergy.com (CLARK, ROBERT W) | ||
Tracking Status: None DBICE@entergy.com (BICE, DAVID B) | Tracking Status: None DBICE@entergy.com (BICE, DAVID B) | ||
| Line 49: | Line 45: | ||
Tracking Status: None Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov (Burkhardt, Janet) | Tracking Status: None Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov (Burkhardt, Janet) | ||
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva) | Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl) | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl) | HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 11801 12/16/2009 Options Expiration Date: | ||
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}} | |||
Post Office: | |||
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov | |||
Files | |||
MESSAGE | |||
Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: | |||
Sensitivity: | |||
Latest revision as of 23:29, 13 November 2019
| ML093500456 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 12/16/2009 |
| From: | Kalyanam K Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | David Bice, Clark R Entergy Operations |
| Kalyanam N, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-1480 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME2566 | |
| Download: ML093500456 (2) | |
Text
From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:17 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W; BICE, DAVID B Cc: Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet; Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl
Subject:
Acceptance Review results for ANO2-ISI-005 (TAC No. ME2566)
Reference:
Request to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld -- ANO2-ISI-005 -- Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 TAC No.: ME2566 Dave and Bob:
By letter dated November 4, 2009, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee), submitted Request to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Visual Examination of Accessible Interior to Reactor Vessel Attachment Weld.
Specifically, Entergy requested permission to extend the Inservice Inspection (ISI) interval that is required by Examination Categories B-N-2 and B-N-3 of Table IWB-2500-1 of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV)
Code, 2001 Edition, 2003 Addenda for the fourth 10-year interval for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2). Table IWB-2500-1, examination categories B-N-2 and B-N-3 requires a visual examination of the accessible interior attachment welds within and beyond the beltline region and a visual examination of the accessible core support structure surfaces of the reactor pressure vessel once each ten-year interval.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request for alternative in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480.
Kaly N. Kalyanam PM, ANO-1 and 2
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (94A2A4408AC65F42AC084527534CF41603D98737E0)
Subject:
Acceptance Review results for ANO2-ISI-005 (TAC No. ME2566)
Sent Date: 12/16/2009 12:16:48 PM Received Date: 12/16/2009 12:16:48 PM From: Kalyanam, Kaly Created By: Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov Recipients:
RCLARK@entergy.com (CLARK, ROBERT W)
Tracking Status: None DBICE@entergy.com (BICE, DAVID B)
Tracking Status: None Susan.Lent@nrc.gov (Lent, Susan)
Tracking Status: None Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov (Burkhardt, Janet)
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 11801 12/16/2009 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: