ML111720667: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML111720667
| number = ML111720667
| issue date = 03/29/2011
| issue date = 03/29/2011
| title = Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 - E-mail from R.Guzman to T.Darling NMP2 EPU Draft RAIs - Containment Review
| title = E-mail from R.Guzman to T.Darling NMP2 EPU Draft RAIs - Containment Review
| author name = Guzman R V
| author name = Guzman R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee name = Darling T H
| addressee name = Darling T
| addressee affiliation = Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC
| addressee affiliation = Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC
| docket = 05000410
| docket = 05000410
| license number = NPF-069
| license number = NPF-069
| contact person = Guzman R V, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
| contact person = Guzman R, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
| case reference number = TAC ME1476
| case reference number = TAC ME1476
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:ME1476
| project = TAC:ME1476
| stage = RAI
| stage = Draft RAI
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                Guzman, Richard To:                  "Darling, Theresa H" Cc:                  "john.dosa@cengllc.com"
 
==Subject:==
NMP2 EPU Draft RAIs - Containment Review Date:                Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:25:00 AM
: Theresa, As we discussed, please see below draft RAI questions from the containment systems review supporting the NMP2 EPU review. The staffs review does account for the previous RAI response on the CAP topic (NMPNS letter dated 2/19/10). Let me know when you can support a conference call. This Thursday or early next week appears open on my end.
: Thanks, Rich Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov
-------------------------------------------DRAFT-------------------------------------------
RAI#1 - Containment Accident Pressure (CAP)
In the EPU application, it was stated that NMP2 does not need to credit containment accident pressure (CAP) to assure adequate NPSH to the ECCs pumps. However, based on Commission direction in SRM SECY 11-0014, the staff will be applying new guidance on NPSH margin to EPU reviews, including NMP2, to determine whether use of CAP would be necessary if uncertainties are included in the calculations. Also, the maximum erosion zone (defined in the guidance document) should be addressed. The following are some pertinent documents for the licensee.
Letter from NRC to BWROG (3/1/10) transmitting staff guidance ML100550903 Attachment to letter to BWROG containing guidance. ML100550869 Commission paper on the subject of using containment accident pressure ML102590196  to Commission paper: ML102110167  to Commission paper: ML102780592 Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) on Commission paper: ML110740604 Please consider the 3/1/10 guidance document as draft, as the document is being revised as a result of the SRM. The document, however, provides sufficient information to begin addressing the uncertainties and the maximum erosion zone on NPSH margin.
 
After due consideration of the requirements in the above referenced documents, provide a summary of the NPSH analyses at the EPU conditions, including NPSH required (NPSHR),
CAP used, method of calculating NPSH available (NPSHA). Provide the basis for the required NPSH of the ECCS pumps at NMP2, including flow rates assumed, and a comparison with the flow rate for the LOCA peak cladding temperature (PCT) analyses.
Also, provide the pump head drop value used in the NPSH analyses (3% or other).
RAI#2 - Combustible Gas Control in Containment Please provide a brief description of the strategies and guidelines in place at NMP2 for Severe Accident Management in relation to the combustible gas control in containment.}}

Latest revision as of 19:25, 12 November 2019

E-mail from R.Guzman to T.Darling NMP2 EPU Draft RAIs - Containment Review
ML111720667
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/2011
From: Richard Guzman
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Darling T
Nine Mile Point
Guzman R, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
References
TAC ME1476
Download: ML111720667 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Guzman, Richard To: "Darling, Theresa H" Cc: "john.dosa@cengllc.com"

Subject:

NMP2 EPU Draft RAIs - Containment Review Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:25:00 AM

Theresa, As we discussed, please see below draft RAI questions from the containment systems review supporting the NMP2 EPU review. The staffs review does account for the previous RAI response on the CAP topic (NMPNS letter dated 2/19/10). Let me know when you can support a conference call. This Thursday or early next week appears open on my end.
Thanks, Rich Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov

DRAFT-------------------------------------------

RAI#1 - Containment Accident Pressure (CAP)

In the EPU application, it was stated that NMP2 does not need to credit containment accident pressure (CAP) to assure adequate NPSH to the ECCs pumps. However, based on Commission direction in SRM SECY 11-0014, the staff will be applying new guidance on NPSH margin to EPU reviews, including NMP2, to determine whether use of CAP would be necessary if uncertainties are included in the calculations. Also, the maximum erosion zone (defined in the guidance document) should be addressed. The following are some pertinent documents for the licensee.

Letter from NRC to BWROG (3/1/10) transmitting staff guidance ML100550903 Attachment to letter to BWROG containing guidance. ML100550869 Commission paper on the subject of using containment accident pressure ML102590196 to Commission paper: ML102110167 to Commission paper: ML102780592 Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) on Commission paper: ML110740604 Please consider the 3/1/10 guidance document as draft, as the document is being revised as a result of the SRM. The document, however, provides sufficient information to begin addressing the uncertainties and the maximum erosion zone on NPSH margin.

After due consideration of the requirements in the above referenced documents, provide a summary of the NPSH analyses at the EPU conditions, including NPSH required (NPSHR),

CAP used, method of calculating NPSH available (NPSHA). Provide the basis for the required NPSH of the ECCS pumps at NMP2, including flow rates assumed, and a comparison with the flow rate for the LOCA peak cladding temperature (PCT) analyses.

Also, provide the pump head drop value used in the NPSH analyses (3% or other).

RAI#2 - Combustible Gas Control in Containment Please provide a brief description of the strategies and guidelines in place at NMP2 for Severe Accident Management in relation to the combustible gas control in containment.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML111720667&oldid=2116330"