ML23205A243

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRC Staff Follow-up Question on Audit Question 18 TSTF-505 and 50.69 Regulatory Audit (E-mail Dated 7/19/2023) (EPIDs L-2022-LLA-0185 and L-2022-LLA-0186)
ML23205A243
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/2023
From: Richard Guzman
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1
To: Reynolds R, Rossi M
Constellation Energy Generation, Constellation Nuclear
References
EPID L-2022-LLA-0185, EPID L-2022-LLA-0186
Download: ML23205A243 (1)


Text

From:

Richard Guzman To:

Rossi, Matthew:(Constellation Nuclear)

Cc:

Reynolds, Ronnie J:(Constellation Nuclear); Passehl, David Bcc:

Richard Guzman

Subject:

RE: NMP1 Revised Responses for Audit Questions 17 and 19 [Follow-up to AQ-18]

Date:

Wednesday, July 19, 2023 5:29:00 PM Matt, Ron, The NRC staff has two follow-up questions on the response to audit question 18:

1. The response part c or d did not provide any discussion why the high-confidence wind speed is used for the screenhouse, while the 3-second gust wind speed is used for all other structures.Explain why the screenhouse uses a different method than all other structures.
2. In Response part e, the uncertainty c calculation is not consistent with Equation 4-10 of EPRI 3002003107, where it shows r or u = (s 2 + d 2 + p 2)0.5, but not c.Provide justification for deviation from EPRI 3002003107.

Please let me know if you intend to address and include in your updated response.

Thanks,

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov