ML12145A312: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Kee, Ernie To:Singal, Balwant Cc:Blossom, Steven; Paul, Jamie
{{#Wiki_filter:From:           Kee, Ernie To:             Singal, Balwant Cc:             Blossom, Steven; Paul, Jamie


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Documents for Public Meeting on LOCA Frequency and Jet Formation Date:Friday, May 18, 2012 11:12:58 PM Attachments:
Documents for Public Meeting on LOCA Frequency and Jet Formation Date:           Friday, May 18, 2012 11:12:58 PM Attachments:     UT_May2012_CFD_FINAL.docx loca-hybrid-final.pdf
UT_May2012_CFD_FINAL.docxloca-hybrid-final.pdf Balwant, Please find attached two documents we would like to discuss with the Staff in a Public Meeting. Thedocuments are on recently completed work in LOCA frequency and Jet Formation.
: Balwant, Please find attached two documents we would like to discuss with the Staff in a Public Meeting. The documents are on recently completed work in LOCA frequency and Jet Formation.
We would like the meeting to focus primarily on the new methodology we have introduced in the LOCAfrequency application in the GSI-191 context. We believe in this new method, we have addressed the Staff concerns associated with accounting for degradation mechanisms while also maintaining the NUREG 1829 frequencies. Also new in this method from last year is accounting for the epistemic uncertainties, and we are accurately preserving the 5th percentile, Median, and 95th percentile parameters which we concerns expressed by Bob Tregoning.
We would like the meeting to focus primarily on the new methodology we have introduced in the LOCA frequency application in the GSI-191 context. We believe in this new method, we have addressed the Staff concerns associated with accounting for degradation mechanisms while also maintaining the NUREG 1829 frequencies. Also new in this method from last year is accounting for the epistemic uncertainties, and we are accurately preserving the 5th percentile, Median, and 95th percentile parameters which we concerns expressed by Bob Tregoning.
I would appreciate it if we could have the meeting scheduled shortly after  June 10 as I will not be inthe country after next week, returning June 9. It is possible for me to join a teleconference however it will be extremely expensive to do so while out of the country.
I would appreciate it if we could have the meeting scheduled shortly afterJune 10 as I will not be in the country after next week, returning June 9. It is possible for me to join a teleconference however it will be extremely expensive to do so while out of the country.
Thank you in advance for your help in scheduling this meeting.Ernie Kee}}
Thank you in advance for your help in scheduling this meeting.
Ernie Kee}}

Latest revision as of 03:13, 12 November 2019

E-mail Documents for Public Meeting on LOCA Frequency and Jet Formation
ML12145A312
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/18/2012
From: Kee E
South Texas
To: Balwant Singal
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Singal B
Shared Package
ML12145A232 List:
References
TAC ME7735, TAC ME7736
Download: ML12145A312 (1)


Text

From: Kee, Ernie To: Singal, Balwant Cc: Blossom, Steven; Paul, Jamie

Subject:

Documents for Public Meeting on LOCA Frequency and Jet Formation Date: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:12:58 PM Attachments: UT_May2012_CFD_FINAL.docx loca-hybrid-final.pdf

Balwant, Please find attached two documents we would like to discuss with the Staff in a Public Meeting. The documents are on recently completed work in LOCA frequency and Jet Formation.

We would like the meeting to focus primarily on the new methodology we have introduced in the LOCA frequency application in the GSI-191 context. We believe in this new method, we have addressed the Staff concerns associated with accounting for degradation mechanisms while also maintaining the NUREG 1829 frequencies. Also new in this method from last year is accounting for the epistemic uncertainties, and we are accurately preserving the 5th percentile, Median, and 95th percentile parameters which we concerns expressed by Bob Tregoning.

I would appreciate it if we could have the meeting scheduled shortly afterJune 10 as I will not be in the country after next week, returning June 9. It is possible for me to join a teleconference however it will be extremely expensive to do so while out of the country.

Thank you in advance for your help in scheduling this meeting.

Ernie Kee