NUREG-1829, Example Xlpr LOCA Frequency Estimates Compared to NUREG-1829 Expert Elicitation Results

From kanterella
(Redirected from NUREG-1829)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Example Xlpr LOCA Frequency Estimates Compared to NUREG-1829 Expert Elicitation Results
ML22166A352
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/14/2022
From: Matthew Homiack
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
Download: ML22166A352 (11)


Text

E x a m p l e x L P R L O C A F r e q u e n c y E s t i m a t e s C o m p a r e d t o N U R E G - 1 8 2 9 E x p e r t E l i c i t a t i o n R e s u l t s J u n e 1 4, 2 0 2 2 Matthew Homiack Materials Engineer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Division of Engineering Reactor Engineering Branch Matthew.Homiack@nrc.gov

+1 (301) 415-2427

> Review data and assumptions from NUREG-1829

> Develop best-estimate xLPR inputs using latest data as applicable

> Generate component-level LOCA frequency estimates from xLPR simulation and compare to NUREG-1829 base case results

> Aggregate xLPR component-level estimates to arrive at system-level estimate and compare to NUREG-1829 expert elicitation results for piping system 2

O b j e c t i v e a n d A p p r o a c h

> Explore use of the Extremely Low Probability of Rupture (xLPR) probabilistic fracture mechanics code to generate loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) frequency estimates and compare those estimates with the expert elicitation results from NUREG-1829 2

I n p u t s a n d M o d e l i n g A s s u m p t i o n s We s t i n g h o u s e R e a c t o r P r e s s u r e Ve s s e l ( R P V ) O u t l e t N o z z l e D i s s i m i l a r M e t a l We l d ( D M W ) A n a l y s i s

> Data re-used from NUREG-1829

> New data as compared to Dave Harris analysis Component geometry Capacity factor (80%)

LOCA definitions:

> Notable modeling assumptions No fatigue, only primary water stress-corrosion cracking Use crack initiation model No mechanical mitigation Circumferential cracks only 3

LOCA Category Leak Rate (LR)

Crack Opening Area (COA)

1. Small-break (SB) 100 gpm 0.196 in2
2. Medium-break (MB) 1,500 gpm 1.77 in2
3. Large-break (LB) 5,000 gpm 7.07 in2 Material properties (similar)

Loads Initial crack size (slightly deeper)

Leak rate detection (1 vs. 5 gpm)

Plant operation (80 vs. 60 years)

Welding residual stresses (included with uncertainties)

Different inservice inspection schedule (more inspections) and probability of detection (details on Slide 11)

x L P R W e s t i n g h o u s e R P V O u t l e t N o z z l e D M W L O C A E s t i m a t e s 4

SMALL variation among SB, MB, and LB LOCA estimates Leakage Detection Inservice Inspection MORE variation from LOCA definition (i.e., LR vs. COA)

x L P R R e s u l t s v s. N U R E G - 1 8 2 9 P W R - 1 B a s e C a s e ( 1 o f 3 )

5 Leakage Detection Inservice Inspection

> x L P R e s t i m a t e s a r e h i g h e r, a s e x p e c t e d

> M u c h m o r e v a r i a t i o n a m o n g N U R E G - 1 8 2 9 e s t i m a t e s

x L P R R e s u l t s v s. N U R E G - 1 8 2 9 P W R - 1 B a s e C a s e ( 2 o f 3 )

6 Leakage Detection Inservice Inspection At 25 years, the xLPR results are within the range of the NUREG-1829 estimates At 60 years, the xLPR results show a higher increase relative to the NUREG-1829 estimates

x L P R R e s u l t s v s. N U R E G - 1 8 2 9 P W R - 1 B a s e C a s e ( 3 o f 3 )

7 Leakage Detection Inservice Inspection NO LOCA EVENTS in xLPR simulation with a sample size of 100,000 realizations UPPER-BOUND estimated using rule of 3 approach consistent with NUREG/CR-7278, Section 4.3.6.4

W e l d R e s i d u a l S t r e s s ( W R S )

S e n s i t i v i t y S t u d y R e s u l t s 8

Leakage Detection Inservice Inspection xLPR Results with Linear WRS Profile WRS Profile Comparison

> L i n e a r W R S p r o f i l e i s u n r e a l i s t i c

x L P R R e s u l t s v s. N U R E G - 1 8 2 9 P W R H o t L e g E x p e r t E l i c i t a t i o n 9

Leakage Detection Inservice Inspection SBLOCA Results MBLOCA Results LBLOCA Results x4 Westinghouse RPV Outlet Nozzle DMW

1 0

K e y O b s e r v a t i o n s 10

> T h e L O C A f r e q u e n c y e s t i m a t e s r e s u l t s a r e s e n s i t i v e t o t h e m o d e l i n g i n p u t s a n d a s s u m p t i o n s, a n d t h e s e s e n s i t i v i t i e s c a n b e s t u d i e d

> T h e x L P R c o d e c a n b e u s e d t o d e v e l o p s y s t e m - o r p l a n t - l e v e l L O C A f r e q u e n c y e s t i m a t e s u s i n g c u r r e n t c a p a b i l i t i e s

> L e a k r a t e d e t e c t i o n h a s a s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t

S u p p o r t i n g I n f o r m a t i o n - P r o b a b i l i t y o f D e t e c t i o n C u r v e C o m p a r i s o n s 11