|
|
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:WHITE PAPERUSG Interior Panel & Finishing SolutionsTYPE X VS. TYPE C NOT ALL GYPSUM BOARDS ARE CREATED EQUAL!It is a commonly held perception that there are just two basic kinds of gypsum board, regular and Type X, and that all gypsum board products of each type are the same regardless of the manufacturer. However, years of laboratory tests conducted by USG and tests by various independent testing organizations provide strong evidence that there can be signi~ cant | | {{#Wiki_filter:USG Interior Panel & WHITE PAPER Finishing Solutions TYPE X VS. TYPE C NOT ALL GYPSUM BOARDS ARE CREATED EQUAL! |
| ~ re-performance di erences between various gypsum board manufacturers.The ~ re performance of gypsum board is well recognized in the construction industry and one of its most important characteristics. This is attributable to the principal raw material used to manufacture the product, gypsum (CaSO 42H 2O). As its chemical formula shows, gypsum contains chemically combined water (approximately 50% by volume). When gypsum panels are exposed to ~ re, heat is absorbed as a portion of the combined water is driven o as steam. This chemical process is called calcination. The thermal energy that converts the water to steam is thus diverted and absorbed, keeping the opposite side of the gypsum panels cool as long as there is crystalline water left to be converted into steam or until the gypsum panel is breached.In the case of regular gypsum board, as the crystalline water is driven o , the reduction of volume within the gypsum core causes large cracks to form, eventually causing the panel to fail due to structural integrity. This is similar to the cracking that can be observed in a dry lake or river bed as shown in Figure 1. If such large cracks are permitted to form in the gypsum board, the board will quickly be breached by the ~ re's hot gases passing through the cracks. Figure 1: Dry lake bed, Mojave Desert, Weather Underground wunderground.com In Type X gypsum board, such as USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panels, special glass fibers are intermixed with the gypsum to reinforce the core of the panels. These fibers have the effect of reducing the size of the cracks that form as the water is driven off, thereby extending the length of time the gypsum panels resist fire without failure. USG invented USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panels, which provides even greater ~re resistance than Type X. As with the Type X panels, the core of the Type C panels contains glass
| | It is a commonly held perception that there are just two basic kinds of gypsum board, regular and Type X, and that all gypsum board products of each type are the same regardless of the manufacturer. However, years of laboratory tests conducted by USG and tests by various independent testing organizations provide strong evidence that there can be significant fire-performance differences between various gypsum board manufacturers. |
| ~bers, only in a much higher percent by weight. In addition to the greater amount of glass ~ber, the core of the Type C panels also contains vermiculite, which acts as a shrinkage-compensating additive that expands when exposed to elevated temperatures of a ~re. This expansion occurs at roughly the same temperature as the calcination of the gypsum in the core. It allows the core of the Type C panels to remain dimensionally stable in the presence of ~re, which in turn allows the panels to remain in place for a longer period of time even after the combined water has been driven o. To demonstrate the performance dierences between gypsum board Types, USG set up a unique small-scale ~re test. This demonstration is not a recognized test standard and is not meant to show the ~re-resistive capability of ~re-resistive assemblies. It is simply to show the dierences in behavior between Type X and Type C gypsum boards under ~re exposure. The demonstration shows that the Type C panel resists the ~re for over two hours, as compared to 57 minutes for Type X panel under the same elevated thermal conditions. Figures 2 and 3 show the time progression of the demonstration test conducted at the USG Corporate Innovation Center, in which USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panels (Type X) and USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panels (Type C) were compared. Both samples of gypsum board were exposed to a gas-~red burner producing a temperature of 1580°F (860°C). Each sample was 13" x 13" and had a 16 lb. 13 oz.
| | The fire performance of gypsum board is well recognized in the construction industry and one of its most important characteristics. This is attributable to the principal raw material used to manufacture the product, gypsum (CaSO4*2H 2 O). As its chemical formula shows, gypsum contains chemically combined water (approximately 50% by volume). When gypsum panels are exposed to fire, heat is absorbed as a portion of the combined water is driven off as steam. This chemical process is called calcination. The thermal energy that converts the water to steam is thus diverted and absorbed, keeping the opposite side of the gypsum panels cool as long as there is crystalline water left to be converted into steam or until the gypsum panel is breached. |
| weight located in the center of the panels to dramatize the point at which the samples failed.Figure 2: 13" x 13" sample of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel with a 16 lb. 13 oz. weight located in the center to dramatize the failure point.Figure 3: 13" x 13" sample of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel with a 16 lb. 13 oz. weight located in the center to dramatize the failure point.
| | In the case of regular gypsum board, as the crystalline water is driven off, the reduction of volume within the gypsum core causes large cracks to form, eventually causing the panel to fail due to structural integrity. This is similar to the cracking that can be observed in a dry lake or river bed as shown in Figure 1. If such large cracks are permitted to form in the gypsum board, the board will quickly be breached by the fire's hot gases passing through the cracks. |
| In Figure 4, the test has been in progress for 57 minutes, and the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel has collapsed due to the thermal exposure and the superimposed load. The glass
| | Figure 1: Dry lake bed, Mojave Desert, Weather Underground wunderground.com |
|
| |
|
| ~bers in the Type X panel have given it the strength to last nearly one hour under these severe conditions. In Figure 5, the test has been terminated at two hours two minutes with no sign of failure of the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel. The Type C panel resisted failure for over twice as long as the Type X panel.Figure 4: After 57 minutes, the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel collapsed due to the thermal exposure and the superimposed load.Figure 5: After two hours two minutes, the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel showed no signs of failure and the test was terminated. The Type C panel resisted failure for over twice as long as the Type X panel.Over the years numerous USG gypsum board assemblies have been tested by independent ~re-testing organizations such as Underwriters Laboratories Inc., The Ohio State University, University of California and Western Fire Center, resulting in hundreds of ~re-rated assemblies unique to USG.
| | In Type X gypsum board, such as USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panels, special glass fibers are intermixed with the gypsum to reinforce the core of the panels. These fibers have the effect of reducing the size of the cracks that form as the water is driven off, thereby extending the length of time the gypsum panels resist fire without failure. |
| Other manufacturers have developed some of their own ~re-resistance designs, but USG oers the most comprehensive coverage. USG has developed a wide variety of systems ranging from wood or steel stud walls, shaftwall assemblies, wood or steel oor/ceiling assemblies, and even column and beam assemblies. It is extremely important to realize each component within a tested assembly is considered a critical component. From the fastener spacing to the location, thickness and density of insulation to, most importantly, the speci~c type of gypsum board required, all components speci~ed in a | | USG invented USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panels, which provides even greater fire resistance than Type X. As with the Type X panels, the core of the Type C panels contains glass fibers, only in a much higher percent by weight. In addition to the greater amount of glass fiber, the core of the Type C panels also contains vermiculite, which acts as a shrinkage-compensating additive that expands when exposed to elevated temperatures of a fire. This expansion occurs at roughly the same temperature as the calcination of the gypsum in the core. It allows the core of the Type C panels to remain dimensionally stable in the presence of fire, which in turn allows the panels to remain in place for a longer period of time even after the combined water has been driven off. |
| ~re-resistive design should be carefully considered. The tested assemblies have been engineered to provide protection to occupants from heat and ~re and are tested as full systems. It is critical to realize that no single component provides a ~re-resistive rating. The ~re-resistive rating, measured in time, is provided by the performance of the system as a whole.When looking at wall assemblies, the typical gypsum board type used in these assemblies is Type X gypsum board. The option to use a Type C product is usually included in these designs as well. When considering oor/ceiling assemblies, whether steel and concrete or wood construction, the required gypsum board type to be used as the ceiling membrane is Type C. Looking back at the ideas previously presented in this paper, we showed that Type C products are specially engineered to be placed in a horizontal orientation as a ceiling. The easiest way to remember this idea is to think Type C for ceilings. Although in some applications Type X may be used in a ceiling application, typically it takes multiple layers of Type X to achieve the same rating in which only a single layer of Type C can be used.INDEPENDENT TESTING SUPPORTS PERFORMANCE CLAIM The ~re-performance features of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X and Firecode C gypsum core formulations, together with the independent ~re tests, provide several advantages for architects. First, since the independent testing organizations are widely recognized by federal, state and municipal authorities as well as insurance inspection agencies, it makes building approvals much easier. Speci~cations using independent ~re tests allow for fewer delays and problems and are typically required to obtain permits. Secondly, architects can simply utilize existing ~re-test designs to obtain the correct materials and construction details to provide the ~re-resistance ratings required. Thirdly, architects can have con~dence when specifying a ~re-resistance system published by a third-party testing agency that all components have been tested together and the conformance to the test standard has been evaluated by an impartial party. Lastly, as a result of USG's own tests and those of other organizations, an architect can feel con~dent that his/her speci~ed partition will perform as expected. Where fewer layers of gypsum board can be used to provide the same ~re rating, signi~cant amounts of dead weight as well as material costs can be saved.The advantages in producing a speci~ed ~re-resistive design with fewer layers of gypsum panels are even more bene~cial to the drywall contractor. It reduces both labor and material costs and eases the need to stock more product. The use of USG ~re-rated assemblies can save money for a drywall contractor because the assemblies are often lighter in weight, require fewer components and/or are easier to install.The fact that most architects are specifying ceiling and wall assemblies by the UL design number leaves no doubt about what speci~c materials the drywall contractor must use to construct them.
| | To demonstrate the performance differences between gypsum board Types, USG set up a unique small-scale fire test. This demonstration is not a recognized test standard and is not meant to show the fire-resistive capability of fire-resistive assemblies. It is simply to show the differences in behavior between Type X and Type C gypsum boards under fire exposure. The demonstration shows that the Type C panel resists the fire for over two hours, as compared to 57 minutes for Type X panel under the same elevated thermal conditions. Figures 2 and 3 show the time progression of the demonstration test conducted at the USG Corporate Innovation Center, in which USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panels (Type X) and USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panels (Type C) were compared. Both samples of gypsum board were exposed to a gas-fired burner producing a temperature of 1580°F (860°C). Each sample was 13" x 13" and had a 16 lb. 13 oz. |
| That also makes it easier for the drywall contractor to bid the project.In conclusion, it has been demonstrated that not all gypsum board products are created equal. There is a signi~cant ~re-performance dierence between Type X gypsum board and Type C gypsum board and in which applications each should be used. The bene~ts and critical nature of using the proper components was also discussed: Remember Type C for ceilings. USG has been designing and testing ~re-resistance assemblies for use in commercial and residential construction for over 100 years. When specifying or installing USG products and solutions, you can have con~dence and trust that our systems have been engineered to be the strongest, lightest and highest-performing systems on the market.ARCHITECTS AND CONTRACTORSRUNDOWNPRODUCT INFORMATION See usg.com for the most up-to-date product information.CAUTIONDust may cause irritation to eyes, skin, nose, throat and upper respiratory tract. Cut and trim with a utility knife or hand saw to minimize dust levels. Power tools must be equipped with a dust collection system. Wear eye, skin and respiratory protection if necessary. If eye contact occurs, ush thoroughly with water for 15 minutes. If irritation persists, call a physician. Do not swallow. If swallowed, call a physician. | | weight located in the center of the panels to dramatize the point at which the samples failed. |
| | Figure 2: 13" x 13" sample of USG Sheetrock Brand Figure 3: 13" x 13" sample of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel with a 16 lb. 13 oz. weight located Firecode C Gypsum Panel with a 16 lb. 13 oz. weight located in the center to dramatize the failure point. in the center to dramatize the failure point. |
| | |
| | In Figure 4, the test has been in progress for 57 minutes, and the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel has collapsed due to the thermal exposure and the superimposed load. The glass fibers in the Type X panel have given it the strength to last nearly one hour under these severe conditions. In Figure 5, the test has been terminated at two hours two minutes with no sign of failure of the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel. The Type C panel resisted failure for over twice as long as the Type X panel. |
| | Figure 4: After 57 minutes, the USG Sheetrock Brand Figure 5: After two hours two minutes, the USG Sheetrock Firecode X Gypsum Panel collapsed due to the thermal Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel showed no signs of failure exposure and the superimposed load. and the test was terminated. The Type C panel resisted failure for over twice as long as the Type X panel. |
| | INDEPENDENT TESTING SUPPORTS Over the years numerous USG gypsum board assemblies have been tested by independent fire-PERFORMANCE CLAIM testing organizations such as Underwriters Laboratories Inc., The Ohio State University, University of California and Western Fire Center, resulting in hundreds of fire-rated assemblies unique to USG. |
| | Other manufacturers have developed some of their own fire-resistance designs, but USG offers the most comprehensive coverage. USG has developed a wide variety of systems ranging from wood or steel stud walls, shaftwall assemblies, wood or steel floor/ceiling assemblies, and even column and beam assemblies. |
| | It is extremely important to realize each component within a tested assembly is considered a critical component. From the fastener spacing to the location, thickness and density of insulation to, most importantly, the specific type of gypsum board required, all components specified in a fire-resistive design should be carefully considered. The tested assemblies have been engineered to provide protection to occupants from heat and fire and are tested as full systems. It is critical to realize that no single component provides a fire-resistive rating. The fire-resistive rating, measured in time, is provided by the performance of the system as a whole. |
| | When looking at wall assemblies, the typical gypsum board type used in these assemblies is Type X gypsum board. The option to use a Type C product is usually included in these designs as well. |
| | When considering floor/ceiling assemblies, whether steel and concrete or wood construction, the required gypsum board type to be used as the ceiling membrane is Type C. Looking back at the ideas previously presented in this paper, we showed that Type C products are specially engineered to be placed in a horizontal orientation as a ceiling. The easiest way to remember this idea is to think Type C for ceilings. Although in some applications Type X may be used in a ceiling application, typically it takes multiple layers of Type X to achieve the same rating in which only a single layer of Type C can be used. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS AND CONTRACTORS The fire-performance features of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X and Firecode C gypsum core formulations, together with the independent fire tests, provide several advantages for architects. First, since the independent testing organizations are widely recognized by federal, state and municipal authorities as well as insurance inspection agencies, it makes building approvals much easier. Specifications using independent fire tests allow for fewer delays and problems and are typically required to obtain permits. Secondly, architects can simply utilize existing fire-test designs to obtain the correct materials and construction details to provide the fire-resistance ratings required. Thirdly, architects can have confidence when specifying a fire-resistance system published by a third-party testing agency that all components have been tested together and the conformance to the test standard has been evaluated by an impartial party. Lastly, as a result of USGs own tests and those of other organizations, an architect can feel confident that his/her specified partition will perform as expected. Where fewer layers of gypsum board can be used to provide the same fire rating, significant amounts of dead weight as well as material costs can be saved. |
| | The advantages in producing a specified fire-resistive design with fewer layers of gypsum panels are even more beneficial to the drywall contractor. It reduces both labor and material costs and eases the need to stock more product. The use of USG fire-rated assemblies can save money for a drywall contractor because the assemblies are often lighter in weight, require fewer components and/or are easier to install. |
| | The fact that most architects are specifying ceiling and wall assemblies by the UL design number leaves no doubt about what specific materials the drywall contractor must use to construct them. |
| | That also makes it easier for the drywall contractor to bid the project. |
| | RUNDOWN In conclusion, it has been demonstrated that not all gypsum board products are created equal. |
| | There is a significant fire-performance difference between Type X gypsum board and Type C gypsum board and in which applications each should be used. The benefits and critical nature of using the proper components was also discussed: Remember Type C for ceilings. USG has been designing and testing fire-resistance assemblies for use in commercial and residential construction for over 100 years. When specifying or installing USG products and solutions, you can have confidence and trust that our systems have been engineered to be the strongest, lightest and highest-performing systems on the market. |
| | PRODUCT INFORMATION See usg.com for the most up-to-date product information. |
| | CAUTION Dust may cause irritation to eyes, skin, nose, throat and upper respiratory tract. Cut and trim with a utility knife or hand saw to minimize dust levels. Power tools must be equipped with a dust collection system. Wear eye, skin and respiratory protection if necessary. If eye contact occurs, flush thoroughly with water for 15 minutes. If irritation persists, call a physician. Do not swallow. If swallowed, call a physician. |
| For more information call Product Safety: 800 507-8899 or see the SDS at usg.com. | | For more information call Product Safety: 800 507-8899 or see the SDS at usg.com. |
| KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDRENTRADEMARKSThe trademarks USG, FIRECODE, SHEETROCK, IT'S YOUR WORLD. BUILD IT., the USG logo, the design elements and colors, and related marks are trademarks of USG Corporation or its aliates. NOTICEWe shall not be liable for incidental or consequential damages, directly or indirectly sustained, nor for any loss caused by application of these goods not in accordance with current printed instruction or for other than the intended use. Our liability is expressly limited to replacement of defective goods. Any claim shall be deemed waived unless made in writing to us within thirty (30) days from date it was or reasonably should have been discovered.SAFETY FIRST! Follow good safety/industrial hygiene practices during installation. Wear appropriate personal protective equipment. Read SDS and literature before speci~cation and installation.}} | | KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN TRADEMARKS The trademarks USG, FIRECODE, SHEETROCK, IT'S YOUR WORLD. BUILD IT., the USG logo, the design elements and colors, and related marks are trademarks of USG Corporation or its affiliates. |
| | NOTICE We shall not be liable for incidental or consequential damages, directly or indirectly sustained, nor for any loss caused by application of these goods not in accordance with current printed instruction or for other than the intended use. Our liability is expressly limited to replacement of defective goods. Any claim shall be deemed waived unless 800 USG.4YOU made in writing to us within thirty (30) days from date it 800 (874-4968) was or reasonably should have been discovered. |
| | usg.com SAFETY FIRST! |
| | Follow good safety/industrial hygiene practices during Manufactured by WB2605/rev. 12-15 installation. Wear appropriate personal protective United States Gypsum Company © 2015 USG Corporation and/or equipment. Read SDS and literature before specification 550 West Adams Street its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
| | and installation. Chicago, IL 60661 Printed in U.S.A.}} |
Letter Sequence Request |
---|
EPID:L-2018-RNW-0023, Dominion'S Presentation on Surry'S SLRA Safety Meeting-Final (for April 17, 2018) (Open) EPID:L-2018-RNW-0024, Dominion'S Presentation on Surry'S SLRA Safety Meeting-Final (for April 17, 2018) (Approved, Closed) |
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance, Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML18297A045, ML18319A184, ML18319A252, ML18345A244, ML18351A051, ML19015A243, ML19046A433, ML19098A810, ML19100A254, ML19128A079, ML19169A329, ML19198A059, ML19248C228, ML19267A042, ML19270E741, NRC-2018-0247, Federal Register Notice - Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Correction and Extension of Date to Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene Regarding the Virginia Electric and Power Company'S Application for Subsequent
|
MONTHYEARML18121A0342018-03-29029 March 2018 Possible Topics for the April 17, 2018 Public Meeting with Dominion on Its Surry SLRA Project stage: Request ML18102A5692018-04-17017 April 2018 Dominion'S Presentation on Surry'S SLRA Safety Meeting-Final (for April 17, 2018) Project stage: Request ML18129A3142018-05-16016 May 2018 04/17/2018 Summary of Pre-Application Meeting with Dominion Energy Regarding the Surry, Units 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Meeting ML18291A8422018-06-30030 June 2018, 15 October 2018 Submittal of Application for Subsequent Renewed Operating Licenses Project stage: Request ML18291A8362018-06-30030 June 2018 Enclosure 4, Attachment 1: ANP-3679NP, Revision 0, Topical Report Project stage: Request ML18291A8352018-10-15015 October 2018 Submittal of Application for Subsequent Renewed Operating Licenses Project stage: Request ML18291A8342018-10-15015 October 2018 Appendix E - Environmental Report Project stage: Request ML18297A0452018-10-26026 October 2018 Receipt and Availability of the Subsequent License Renewal Application for Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Other ML18297A0932018-10-26026 October 2018 Receipt and Availability of the Subsequent License Renewal Application (EPID Nos. L-2018-RNW-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024) Project stage: Request ML18319A2522018-11-16016 November 2018 Subsequent License Renewal Application Online Reference Portal (EPID Nos. L-2018-RNW-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024) Project stage: Other ML18319A1842018-11-26026 November 2018 Plan for the Operating Experience Audit Regarding the Subsequent License Renewal Application Review (EPID Nos. L-2018-RWN-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024 Project stage: Other ML18320A2362018-12-0303 December 2018 Acceptance Scheduling and Opportunity for Hearing Letter - v3 Project stage: Acceptance Review ML18320A2352018-12-0303 December 2018 Acceptance Scheduling and Opportunity for Hearing FRN - v2 Project stage: Request NRC-2018-0247, Federal Register Notice - Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Correction and Extension of Date to Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene Regarding the Virginia Electric and Power Company'S Application for Subsequent2018-12-12012 December 2018 Federal Register Notice - Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Correction and Extension of Date to Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene Regarding the Virginia Electric and Power Company'S Application for Subsequent Lice Project stage: Other ML18345A2442018-12-12012 December 2018 Federal Register Notice - Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Correction and Extension of Date to Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene Regarding the Virginia Electric and Power Company'S Application for Subsequent Lice Project stage: Other ML18340A2672018-12-17017 December 2018 Federal Register Notice - Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Other ML18340A2652018-12-17017 December 2018, 21 December 2018 Notice of Intent to Prepare an Enviromental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML18351A0512018-12-18018 December 2018 Correction and Extension of Date to Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene Regarding the Virginia Electric and Power Company'S Application for Subsequent License Renewal Project stage: Other ML18351A2572018-12-20020 December 2018 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of Virginia Electric and Power Company'S Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, Regarding the Application for Subsequent License Renewal of Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 an Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML19046A0092018-12-20020 December 2018 Comment (10) from Bettina Rayfield on Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Relicensing Project stage: Request ML18340A2662018-12-21021 December 2018 Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Other ML19024A1992019-01-0808 January 2019 Subsequent License Renewal Scoping Meeting Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Meeting ML19016A0932019-01-12012 January 2019 Comment (1) of Erica Gray on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19025A1542019-01-13013 January 2019 Comment (9) of W. Frank Adams on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19016A0962019-01-14014 January 2019 Comment (3) of Kay Patrick on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19016A0942019-01-14014 January 2019 Comment (2) of Scott Burger on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19017A0132019-01-16016 January 2019 Comment (4) of Anonymous Individual on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19025A1462019-01-20020 January 2019 Comment (5) of David Martin on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19025A1492019-01-21021 January 2019 Comment (6) of Glen Besa on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19015A2432019-01-22022 January 2019 Plan for the In-Office Regulatory Audit Regarding the Subsequent License Renewal Application Review (EPID Nos. L-2018-RNW-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024) Project stage: Other ML19025A1522019-01-22022 January 2019 Comment (8) of Randal Owen on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19025A1502019-01-22022 January 2019 Comment (7) of Scott Price on Virginia Electric and Power Company; Dominion Energy Virginia: Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML19042A1372019-01-29029 January 2019 Submittal of Supplement to Subsequent License Renewal Operating Licenses Application for Sufficiency Review Change Notice 1 Project stage: Supplement ML19046A4332019-03-0404 March 2019 Report for the Operating Experience Review Audit Regarding the Subsequent License Renewal Application Review (EPID: Nos. L-2018-RNW-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024) Project stage: Other ML19044A5562019-03-0404 March 2019 License Renewal Environmental Site Audit Plan Regarding the Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Other ML19044A6592019-03-0404 March 2019 License Renewal Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Audit Plan Regarding the Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Other ML19095A6662019-03-31031 March 2019, 2 April 2019 Submittal of Supplement to Subsequent License Renewal Application Change Notice 2 Project stage: Request ML19095A5972019-04-0202 April 2019 Submittal of Supplement to Subsequent License Renewal Application Change Notice 2 Project stage: Supplement ML19095A6002019-04-0202 April 2019 Enclosure 1 - Topics That Require a SLRA Supplement Project stage: Request ML19095A6022019-04-0202 April 2019 Enclosure 2 - SLRA Mark-Ups Change Notice 2 Project stage: Request ML19087A2662019-04-0303 April 2019, 30 April 2019 Environmental Impact Statement for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at the Clinch River Nuclear Site Project stage: Request ML19106A3332019-04-0404 April 2019, 5 April 2019 Draft Environmental Rai'S for Surry Power Station Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Request ML19106A4022019-04-11011 April 2019 Request for Additional Information Set 1 - Surry SLRA Environmental Review Project stage: RAI ML19114A4232019-04-11011 April 2019 Final Environmental Rai'S for Surry Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Request ML19114A4352019-04-11011 April 2019 RAIs 4-4-19 r3 Project stage: RAI ML19107A0192019-04-16016 April 2019, 29 April 2019 Summary of the Subsequent License Renewal Environmental Audit Project stage: Request ML19107A0202019-04-16016 April 2019 Audit Need Update Tracking Spreadsheet Project stage: Request ML19098A8102019-04-17017 April 2019 On-Site Regulatory Audit Regarding the Subsequent License Renewal Application Review (EPID Nos. L-2018-RNW-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024) Project stage: Other ML19106A4162019-04-25025 April 2019 Summary of the Subsequent License Renewal Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Audit Project stage: Other ML19100A2542019-04-29029 April 2019 Schedule Revision for the Subsequent License Renewal Application Review (EPID Nos. L-2018-RNW-0023 and L-2018-RNW-0024) Project stage: Other 2019-01-14
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Surry |
---|
Category:Journal Article
MONTHYEARML19235A0802019-08-19019 August 2019 Thermo-Lag Website ML19235A0792019-08-19019 August 2019 Pyrocrete Website ML19235A0782019-08-19019 August 2019 Mineral Wool Website ML19235A0772019-08-19019 August 2019 Micarta Website ML19235A0762019-08-19019 August 2019 Marinite Website ML19235A0752019-08-19019 August 2019 Marinite Slide Plates Products - Piping Tech ML19235A0742019-08-19019 August 2019 Kbs Sealbags Website ML19235A0732019-08-19019 August 2019 Gypsum Website ML19235A0722019-08-19019 August 2019 Duxseal Website ML19235A0712019-08-19019 August 2019 Cerafiber Website ML19235A0702019-08-19019 August 2019 Cera Blanket Website ML19235A0692019-08-19019 August 2019 Bio K-10 Website ML19235A0682019-08-19019 August 2019 3M Interam Website ML19093B1121978-07-14014 July 1978 Response to Concerns Use of a Certain Type Cable Manufactured by the Continental Wire and Cable Company 2019-08-19
[Table view] Category:Report
MONTHYEARML24270A0022024-09-25025 September 2024 Inservice Inspection Owners Activity Report (OAR) ML24170B0532024-06-10010 June 2024 DOM-NAF-2-P/NP-A, Revision 0.5, Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code ML23167B0072023-05-31031 May 2023 Proposed Emergency Plan Revision - Relocation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) Supplemental Information - LOCA Dose Calculation Summary ML23103A2282023-04-12012 April 2023 Stations Units 1 and 2; Millstone Power Station Units 2 and 3, DOM-NAF-2-P/NP-A, Revision 0.4, Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code ML23054A1922023-02-22022 February 2023 ASME OM Code Inservice Testing Program Alternative Request V-01, Use of Mechanical Agitation Process for Pressure Isolation Valve 1-SI-241 Seat Leakage Testing Supplemental Information ML22353A6202022-12-19019 December 2022 Request for Approval of Appendix F Fleet Report DOM-NAF-2-P, Qualification of the Framatome ORFEO-GAIA and ORFEO-NMGRID CHF Correlations in the Dominion Energy VIPRE-D Computer Code ML22263A3642022-05-23023 May 2022 Alert and Notification System Evaluation Report - ANS Evaluation Redacted Pages 1 - 95 ML22263A3692022-05-0101 May 2022 Alert and Notification System Evaluation Report - ANS Evaluation Redacted Pages 96-190 ML21175A2472021-06-24024 June 2021 2020 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Model Changes Pursuant to the....- ML20091L9852021-05-0404 May 2021 Record of Decision ML20091L9832021-05-0404 May 2021 SLR License ML21042B3212021-02-11011 February 2021 Stations, Units 1 & 2; Millstone Power Station, Units 2 & 3 - Request for Approval of Fleet Report DOM-NAF-2 Qualification of the Framatome BWU-I CHF Correlation in the Dominion Energy VIPRE-D Computer Code ML20296A6802020-10-22022 October 2020 ASME Section XI Inservice Inspection Program Request for NRC Approval of Proposed Alternative S1-I5-ISL-05 and S2-15-ISL-06 ML20247J6162020-09-0303 September 2020 Request to Use a Provision of a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI ML20203M1602020-07-20020 July 2020 VA Elec. & Power Co., Dominion Energy Nuclear Co. Inc., Dominion Energy Sc Inc., Millstone Power Station 2, N. Anna & Surry Power Stations 1 & 2, Virgil C. Summer Station 1, Updated Anchor Darling Double Disc Gate Valve Information & Status ML20076A5762020-05-28028 May 2020 Staff Assessment of Flood Hazard Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment ML19249B7722019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 4 - North Anna Power Station, EAL Technical Bases Document Final (Updated) ML19249B7682019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 3 - Millstone Power Station EAL Technical Bases Documents Final (Updated) ML19249B7742019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 5 - Surry Power Station EAL Technical Bases Document Final (Updated) ML19249B7782019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 6 - Millstone Power Station, Unit 2, Comparison Matrix RCS Pot. Loss A.1 ML19235A0682019-08-19019 August 2019 3M Interam Website ML19235A0742019-08-19019 August 2019 Kbs Sealbags Website ML19235A0702019-08-19019 August 2019 Cera Blanket Website ML19235A0722019-08-19019 August 2019 Duxseal Website ML19235A0802019-08-19019 August 2019 Thermo-Lag Website ML19235A0692019-08-19019 August 2019 Bio K-10 Website ML19235A0782019-08-19019 August 2019 Mineral Wool Website ML19235A0732019-08-19019 August 2019 Gypsum Website ML19235A0712019-08-19019 August 2019 Cerafiber Website ML19235A0752019-08-19019 August 2019 Marinite Slide Plates Products - Piping Tech ML19235A0762019-08-19019 August 2019 Marinite Website ML19235A0772019-08-19019 August 2019 Micarta Website ML19235A0792019-08-19019 August 2019 Pyrocrete Website ML19204A3582019-06-30030 June 2019 WCAP-18258-NP, Revision 1, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation for Susceptible Reactor Coolant Loop Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel Elbow Components for Surry Units 1 and 2. ML19163A1542019-06-0606 June 2019 SLRA - Attachment 4D Letter - Draft to Dominion ML19140A2762019-05-20020 May 2019 Essential Fish Habitat Mapper Results for Surry Power Station ML19095A6022019-04-0202 April 2019 Enclosure 2 - SLRA Mark-Ups Change Notice 2 ML19011A1722019-01-0404 January 2019 Enclosure 3, Attachments 2C-3C - MPS3 EAL Technical Bases Document (Marked-Up) ML19011A1742019-01-0404 January 2019 Enclosure 5 - Surry Power Station, EAL Scheme Revisions-Supporting Documents ML19011A1732019-01-0404 January 2019 Enclosure 4 - North Anna Power Station Units 1 & 2, EAL Scheme Revisions-Supporting Documents ML18218A1712018-07-31031 July 2018 Attachment 5, ANP-3676NP, Revision 0, Surry Fuel-Vendor Independent Small Break LOCA Analysis, Licensing Report ML18108A1232018-04-11011 April 2018 Proposed Alternative Requests S1-15-ISl-04 and S2-15-ISl-04 Use of Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques in Lieu of Radiography in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) ML17325A7792017-11-22022 November 2017 Review of Steam Generator Tube Report for the Fall 2016 Inspections During Refueling Outage 27 (CAC No. MF9683; EPID L-2017-LRO-0009) ML17339A1752017-09-0707 September 2017 Structural Integrity Associates Report No. 1601007.401, September 2017, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of the Hot Leg Surge Line Nozzles Using ASME Code Section XI, Appendix L. ML17241A0462017-08-24024 August 2017 Submittal of Cycle 28 Startup Physics Tests Report ML17251A9002017-06-0505 June 2017 Enclosure 2, Attachment E to 17-296, WEKO-SEAL - Recommended Installation Procedures for Water and Waste-Water Piping, Miller Pipeline, Revised 03/05/17 ML16355A1722016-12-20020 December 2016 Storm Surge Technical Evaluation Report Surry Power Station Hazard Reevaluation Review ML15335A0932015-12-15015 December 2015 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) Seismic Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review ML15244B2052015-08-24024 August 2015 Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion) Surry Power Station Unit 1, Cycle 27 Startup Physics Tests Report ML15097A0782015-04-0707 April 2015 Soarca Surry 2005 Site File 2024-09-25
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARML24170B0532024-06-10010 June 2024 DOM-NAF-2-P/NP-A, Revision 0.5, Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code ML23167B0072023-05-31031 May 2023 Proposed Emergency Plan Revision - Relocation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) Supplemental Information - LOCA Dose Calculation Summary ML23103A2282023-04-12012 April 2023 Stations Units 1 and 2; Millstone Power Station Units 2 and 3, DOM-NAF-2-P/NP-A, Revision 0.4, Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code ML22263A3642022-05-23023 May 2022 Alert and Notification System Evaluation Report - ANS Evaluation Redacted Pages 1 - 95 ML22263A3692022-05-0101 May 2022 Alert and Notification System Evaluation Report - ANS Evaluation Redacted Pages 96-190 ML21175A2472021-06-24024 June 2021 2020 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Model Changes Pursuant to the....- ML21042B3212021-02-11011 February 2021 Stations, Units 1 & 2; Millstone Power Station, Units 2 & 3 - Request for Approval of Fleet Report DOM-NAF-2 Qualification of the Framatome BWU-I CHF Correlation in the Dominion Energy VIPRE-D Computer Code ML20296A6802020-10-22022 October 2020 ASME Section XI Inservice Inspection Program Request for NRC Approval of Proposed Alternative S1-I5-ISL-05 and S2-15-ISL-06 ML20203M1602020-07-20020 July 2020 VA Elec. & Power Co., Dominion Energy Nuclear Co. Inc., Dominion Energy Sc Inc., Millstone Power Station 2, N. Anna & Surry Power Stations 1 & 2, Virgil C. Summer Station 1, Updated Anchor Darling Double Disc Gate Valve Information & Status ML19249B7742019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 5 - Surry Power Station EAL Technical Bases Document Final (Updated) ML19249B7782019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 6 - Millstone Power Station, Unit 2, Comparison Matrix RCS Pot. Loss A.1 ML19249B7682019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 3 - Millstone Power Station EAL Technical Bases Documents Final (Updated) ML19249B7722019-08-29029 August 2019 Enclosure 4 - North Anna Power Station, EAL Technical Bases Document Final (Updated) ML19235A0682019-08-19019 August 2019 3M Interam Website ML19235A0692019-08-19019 August 2019 Bio K-10 Website ML19235A0802019-08-19019 August 2019 Thermo-Lag Website ML19235A0702019-08-19019 August 2019 Cera Blanket Website ML19235A0712019-08-19019 August 2019 Cerafiber Website ML19235A0722019-08-19019 August 2019 Duxseal Website ML19235A0732019-08-19019 August 2019 Gypsum Website ML19235A0742019-08-19019 August 2019 Kbs Sealbags Website ML19235A0752019-08-19019 August 2019 Marinite Slide Plates Products - Piping Tech ML19235A0762019-08-19019 August 2019 Marinite Website ML19235A0772019-08-19019 August 2019 Micarta Website ML19235A0792019-08-19019 August 2019 Pyrocrete Website ML19235A0782019-08-19019 August 2019 Mineral Wool Website ML19204A3582019-06-30030 June 2019 WCAP-18258-NP, Revision 1, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation for Susceptible Reactor Coolant Loop Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel Elbow Components for Surry Units 1 and 2. ML19095A6022019-04-0202 April 2019 Enclosure 2 - SLRA Mark-Ups Change Notice 2 ML19011A1742019-01-0404 January 2019 Enclosure 5 - Surry Power Station, EAL Scheme Revisions-Supporting Documents ML19011A1732019-01-0404 January 2019 Enclosure 4 - North Anna Power Station Units 1 & 2, EAL Scheme Revisions-Supporting Documents ML19011A1722019-01-0404 January 2019 Enclosure 3, Attachments 2C-3C - MPS3 EAL Technical Bases Document (Marked-Up) ML18218A1712018-07-31031 July 2018 Attachment 5, ANP-3676NP, Revision 0, Surry Fuel-Vendor Independent Small Break LOCA Analysis, Licensing Report ML17339A1752017-09-0707 September 2017 Structural Integrity Associates Report No. 1601007.401, September 2017, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of the Hot Leg Surge Line Nozzles Using ASME Code Section XI, Appendix L. ML17241A0462017-08-24024 August 2017 Submittal of Cycle 28 Startup Physics Tests Report ML17251A9002017-06-0505 June 2017 Enclosure 2, Attachment E to 17-296, WEKO-SEAL - Recommended Installation Procedures for Water and Waste-Water Piping, Miller Pipeline, Revised 03/05/17 ML16355A1722016-12-20020 December 2016 Storm Surge Technical Evaluation Report Surry Power Station Hazard Reevaluation Review ML15244B2052015-08-24024 August 2015 Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion) Surry Power Station Unit 1, Cycle 27 Startup Physics Tests Report ML14086A1732014-04-0909 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14079A0182014-02-27027 February 2014 30-Day Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Model Changes Pursuant to the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 ML14002A1452014-02-19019 February 2014 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 (Mitigation Strategies) ML14043A4442014-02-12012 February 2014 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2, TAC Nos.: MF1002 and MF1003 (Revision 2) ML13179A0152013-05-31031 May 2013 Units I and 2, Qualification of the ABB-NV and Wlop CHF Correlations in the Dominion VIPRE-D Computer Code ML11215A0592011-06-30030 June 2011 WCAP-17345-NP, Rev 2, H*: Resolution of NRC Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (3-Loop Model 44F/ Model 51F), Attachment 5 to 11-403 ML1023904192010-08-31031 August 2010 DOM-NAF-2, Rev. 0.2-A, Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code. ML1026002162010-05-13013 May 2010 Engineering Transmittal, ET-CEP-10-0006, Revision 0, Evaluation of Aluminum Conduit Seal Penetration Fire Tests, Dated May 13, 2010, North Anna and Surry Power Stations Units 1 and 2 (Redacted Version), Enclosure 2 ML0930701642009-10-15015 October 2009 Technical Report No. EE-0116, Revision 5 ML0926606162009-08-27027 August 2009 LTR-SGMP-09-108 NP-Attachment, Response to NRC Request for, Additional Information on H*; Model 44Fand Model 51F Steam Generators. ML0921504622009-06-30030 June 2009 WCAP-17092-NP, Revision 0, H*: Alternate Repair Criteria for the Tubesheet Expansion Region in Steam Generators with Hydraulically Expanded Tubes (Model 51F), Attachment 6 ML0921202022009-05-0606 May 2009 LTR-SGMP-09-64 Rev. 2 Np, Surry, Unit 1, Support for Emergency Technical Specification Amendment to Address Permeability Variation Signals at the Tube Ends. ML0826107152008-09-17017 September 2008 Final Precursor Analysis - Surry 2 (LER 281/06-002) 2024-06-10
[Table view] |
Text
USG Interior Panel & WHITE PAPER Finishing Solutions TYPE X VS. TYPE C NOT ALL GYPSUM BOARDS ARE CREATED EQUAL!
It is a commonly held perception that there are just two basic kinds of gypsum board, regular and Type X, and that all gypsum board products of each type are the same regardless of the manufacturer. However, years of laboratory tests conducted by USG and tests by various independent testing organizations provide strong evidence that there can be significant fire-performance differences between various gypsum board manufacturers.
The fire performance of gypsum board is well recognized in the construction industry and one of its most important characteristics. This is attributable to the principal raw material used to manufacture the product, gypsum (CaSO4*2H 2 O). As its chemical formula shows, gypsum contains chemically combined water (approximately 50% by volume). When gypsum panels are exposed to fire, heat is absorbed as a portion of the combined water is driven off as steam. This chemical process is called calcination. The thermal energy that converts the water to steam is thus diverted and absorbed, keeping the opposite side of the gypsum panels cool as long as there is crystalline water left to be converted into steam or until the gypsum panel is breached.
In the case of regular gypsum board, as the crystalline water is driven off, the reduction of volume within the gypsum core causes large cracks to form, eventually causing the panel to fail due to structural integrity. This is similar to the cracking that can be observed in a dry lake or river bed as shown in Figure 1. If such large cracks are permitted to form in the gypsum board, the board will quickly be breached by the fire's hot gases passing through the cracks.
Figure 1: Dry lake bed, Mojave Desert, Weather Underground wunderground.com
In Type X gypsum board, such as USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panels, special glass fibers are intermixed with the gypsum to reinforce the core of the panels. These fibers have the effect of reducing the size of the cracks that form as the water is driven off, thereby extending the length of time the gypsum panels resist fire without failure.
USG invented USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panels, which provides even greater fire resistance than Type X. As with the Type X panels, the core of the Type C panels contains glass fibers, only in a much higher percent by weight. In addition to the greater amount of glass fiber, the core of the Type C panels also contains vermiculite, which acts as a shrinkage-compensating additive that expands when exposed to elevated temperatures of a fire. This expansion occurs at roughly the same temperature as the calcination of the gypsum in the core. It allows the core of the Type C panels to remain dimensionally stable in the presence of fire, which in turn allows the panels to remain in place for a longer period of time even after the combined water has been driven off.
To demonstrate the performance differences between gypsum board Types, USG set up a unique small-scale fire test. This demonstration is not a recognized test standard and is not meant to show the fire-resistive capability of fire-resistive assemblies. It is simply to show the differences in behavior between Type X and Type C gypsum boards under fire exposure. The demonstration shows that the Type C panel resists the fire for over two hours, as compared to 57 minutes for Type X panel under the same elevated thermal conditions. Figures 2 and 3 show the time progression of the demonstration test conducted at the USG Corporate Innovation Center, in which USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panels (Type X) and USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panels (Type C) were compared. Both samples of gypsum board were exposed to a gas-fired burner producing a temperature of 1580°F (860°C). Each sample was 13" x 13" and had a 16 lb. 13 oz.
weight located in the center of the panels to dramatize the point at which the samples failed.
Figure 2: 13" x 13" sample of USG Sheetrock Brand Figure 3: 13" x 13" sample of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel with a 16 lb. 13 oz. weight located Firecode C Gypsum Panel with a 16 lb. 13 oz. weight located in the center to dramatize the failure point. in the center to dramatize the failure point.
In Figure 4, the test has been in progress for 57 minutes, and the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X Gypsum Panel has collapsed due to the thermal exposure and the superimposed load. The glass fibers in the Type X panel have given it the strength to last nearly one hour under these severe conditions. In Figure 5, the test has been terminated at two hours two minutes with no sign of failure of the USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel. The Type C panel resisted failure for over twice as long as the Type X panel.
Figure 4: After 57 minutes, the USG Sheetrock Brand Figure 5: After two hours two minutes, the USG Sheetrock Firecode X Gypsum Panel collapsed due to the thermal Brand Firecode C Gypsum Panel showed no signs of failure exposure and the superimposed load. and the test was terminated. The Type C panel resisted failure for over twice as long as the Type X panel.
INDEPENDENT TESTING SUPPORTS Over the years numerous USG gypsum board assemblies have been tested by independent fire-PERFORMANCE CLAIM testing organizations such as Underwriters Laboratories Inc., The Ohio State University, University of California and Western Fire Center, resulting in hundreds of fire-rated assemblies unique to USG.
Other manufacturers have developed some of their own fire-resistance designs, but USG offers the most comprehensive coverage. USG has developed a wide variety of systems ranging from wood or steel stud walls, shaftwall assemblies, wood or steel floor/ceiling assemblies, and even column and beam assemblies.
It is extremely important to realize each component within a tested assembly is considered a critical component. From the fastener spacing to the location, thickness and density of insulation to, most importantly, the specific type of gypsum board required, all components specified in a fire-resistive design should be carefully considered. The tested assemblies have been engineered to provide protection to occupants from heat and fire and are tested as full systems. It is critical to realize that no single component provides a fire-resistive rating. The fire-resistive rating, measured in time, is provided by the performance of the system as a whole.
When looking at wall assemblies, the typical gypsum board type used in these assemblies is Type X gypsum board. The option to use a Type C product is usually included in these designs as well.
When considering floor/ceiling assemblies, whether steel and concrete or wood construction, the required gypsum board type to be used as the ceiling membrane is Type C. Looking back at the ideas previously presented in this paper, we showed that Type C products are specially engineered to be placed in a horizontal orientation as a ceiling. The easiest way to remember this idea is to think Type C for ceilings. Although in some applications Type X may be used in a ceiling application, typically it takes multiple layers of Type X to achieve the same rating in which only a single layer of Type C can be used.
ARCHITECTS AND CONTRACTORS The fire-performance features of USG Sheetrock Brand Firecode X and Firecode C gypsum core formulations, together with the independent fire tests, provide several advantages for architects. First, since the independent testing organizations are widely recognized by federal, state and municipal authorities as well as insurance inspection agencies, it makes building approvals much easier. Specifications using independent fire tests allow for fewer delays and problems and are typically required to obtain permits. Secondly, architects can simply utilize existing fire-test designs to obtain the correct materials and construction details to provide the fire-resistance ratings required. Thirdly, architects can have confidence when specifying a fire-resistance system published by a third-party testing agency that all components have been tested together and the conformance to the test standard has been evaluated by an impartial party. Lastly, as a result of USGs own tests and those of other organizations, an architect can feel confident that his/her specified partition will perform as expected. Where fewer layers of gypsum board can be used to provide the same fire rating, significant amounts of dead weight as well as material costs can be saved.
The advantages in producing a specified fire-resistive design with fewer layers of gypsum panels are even more beneficial to the drywall contractor. It reduces both labor and material costs and eases the need to stock more product. The use of USG fire-rated assemblies can save money for a drywall contractor because the assemblies are often lighter in weight, require fewer components and/or are easier to install.
The fact that most architects are specifying ceiling and wall assemblies by the UL design number leaves no doubt about what specific materials the drywall contractor must use to construct them.
That also makes it easier for the drywall contractor to bid the project.
RUNDOWN In conclusion, it has been demonstrated that not all gypsum board products are created equal.
There is a significant fire-performance difference between Type X gypsum board and Type C gypsum board and in which applications each should be used. The benefits and critical nature of using the proper components was also discussed: Remember Type C for ceilings. USG has been designing and testing fire-resistance assemblies for use in commercial and residential construction for over 100 years. When specifying or installing USG products and solutions, you can have confidence and trust that our systems have been engineered to be the strongest, lightest and highest-performing systems on the market.
PRODUCT INFORMATION See usg.com for the most up-to-date product information.
CAUTION Dust may cause irritation to eyes, skin, nose, throat and upper respiratory tract. Cut and trim with a utility knife or hand saw to minimize dust levels. Power tools must be equipped with a dust collection system. Wear eye, skin and respiratory protection if necessary. If eye contact occurs, flush thoroughly with water for 15 minutes. If irritation persists, call a physician. Do not swallow. If swallowed, call a physician.
For more information call Product Safety: 800 507-8899 or see the SDS at usg.com.
KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN TRADEMARKS The trademarks USG, FIRECODE, SHEETROCK, IT'S YOUR WORLD. BUILD IT., the USG logo, the design elements and colors, and related marks are trademarks of USG Corporation or its affiliates.
NOTICE We shall not be liable for incidental or consequential damages, directly or indirectly sustained, nor for any loss caused by application of these goods not in accordance with current printed instruction or for other than the intended use. Our liability is expressly limited to replacement of defective goods. Any claim shall be deemed waived unless 800 USG.4YOU made in writing to us within thirty (30) days from date it 800 (874-4968) was or reasonably should have been discovered.
usg.com SAFETY FIRST!
Follow good safety/industrial hygiene practices during Manufactured by WB2605/rev. 12-15 installation. Wear appropriate personal protective United States Gypsum Company © 2015 USG Corporation and/or equipment. Read SDS and literature before specification 550 West Adams Street its affiliates. All rights reserved.
and installation. Chicago, IL 60661 Printed in U.S.A.