ML19168A028

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

(Sps), Units 1 and 2 - Supplement to Subsequent License Renewal Application Change Notice 3
ML19168A028
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 06/10/2019
From: Mark D. Sartain
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
19-248
Download: ML19168A028 (90)


Text

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 10 CFR 50 10 CFR 51 June 10, 2019 10 CFR 54

  • United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.: 19-248 Attention: Document Control Desk NRA/DEA: R2' Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 License Nos.: DPR-32/37 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY

The purpose of this letter is to update the SLRA to incorporate changes discussed with NRC staff during recent NRC onsite audits, document MRP 227-A, Revision 1 updates and update other editorial items.

Enclosure 1 provides descriptions of ten topics that require a SLRA supplement and

  • identifies each affected SLRA section and/or table. Enclosure 2 includes mark-ups of each affected SLRA section and/or table being supplemented, as described in Enclosure 1. It should be noted that changes to two commitments (Items #16 and #34) are provided in Table A4.0-1.

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 SLRA Supplement - Change Notice 3 Page 2 of 6 If there are any questions regarding this submittal or if additional information is needed, please contact Mr. Paul Aitken at (804) 273-2818.

Sincerely, Mark D. Sartain Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Fleet Support DIANE E. AITKEN NOTARY PUBLIC REG. #7763114 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MVCOMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 31, 2022 COUNTY OF HENRICO The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by Mark D. Sartain, who is Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Fleet Support of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He has affirmed before me that he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and that the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

Acknowledged before me this JQ___ day of ~ * , 2019.

My Commission Expires:~ 3lJ 2.Dt:z_

Commitments made in this letter:

The Licensee Commitments identified in Table A4.0-1 of Appendix A, Final Safety Analysis Report Supplement, are proposed to support approval of the subsequent renewed operating licenses and may change during the NRC review period.

Enclosures:

- Topics that Require a SLRA Supplement - SLRA Mark-ups - Change Notice 3

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 SLRA Supplement - Change Notice 3 Page 3 of 6 cc: (w/o Enclosures except *)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. Emmanuel Sayoc

  • NRC Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop O 11 F1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Mr. Tam Tran*

NRC Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop O 11 F1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Ms. Karen Cotton NRC Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Mr. G. Edward Miller NRC Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 0-9E3 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 SLRA Supplement - Change Notice 3 Page 4 of 6 State Health Commissioner Virginia Department of Health James Madison Building - y!h Floor 109 Governor Street Room 730 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Mr. David K. Paylor, Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, VA 23218 Ms. Melanie D. Davenport, Director Water Permitting Division Virginia Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 .

Richmond, VA 23218 Ms. Bettina Rayfield, Manager Office of Environmental Impact Review Virginia Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, VA 23218 Mr. Michael Dowd, Director Air Division Virginia Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, VA 23218 Mr. Justin Williams, Director Division of Land Protection and Revitalization Virginia Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, VA 23218 Mr. James Golden, Regional Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Piedmont Regional Office 4949-A Cox Road Glen Allen, VA 23060 Mr. Craig R. Nicol, Regional Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Tidewater Regional Office 5636 Southern Blvd Virginia Beach, VA 23462

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 SLRA Supplement - Change Notice 3 Page 5 of 6 Ms. Jewel Bronaugh, Commissioner Virginia Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services 102 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Mr. Jason Bulluck, Director Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation Virginia Natural Heritage Program 600 East Main Street, 24th Floor Richmond, VA 23219 Mr. Robert W. Duncan, Director Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries P.O. Box 90778 Henrico, VA 23228 Mr. Allen Knapp, Director Virginia Department of Health Office of Environmental Health Services 109 Governor St, 5th Floor Richmond, VA 23129 Ms. Julie Lagan, Director Virginia Department of Historic Resources State Historic Preservation Office 2801 Kensington Ave Richmond, VA 23221 Mr. Steven G. Bowman, Commissioner Virginia Marine Resources Commission 2600 Washington Ave Newport News, VA 23607 Dr. Mary Fabrizio, Professor Virginia Institute of Marine Science School of Marine Science 7509 Roper Rd, Nunnally Hall 135 Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Ms. Angel Deem, Director Virginia Department of Transportation Environmental Division 1401 East Broad St Richmond, VA 23219 Mr. Stephen Moret, President Virginia Economic Development Partnership 901 East Byrd St Richmond, VA 23219

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 SLRA Supplement - Change Notice 3 Page 6 of 6 Mr. William F. Stephens, Director Virginia State Corporation Commission Division of Public Utility Regulation 1300 East Main St, 4th Fl, Tyler Bldg Richmond, VA 23219 Mr. Jeff Caldwell, Director Virginia Department of Emergency Management 10501 Trade Rd Richmond, VA 23236 Mr. Bruce Sterling, Chief Regional Coordinator Virginia Department of Emergency Management 1070 University Blvd Portsmouth, VA 23703 Mr. Sanford B. Wanner, Administrator Surry County 45 School Street Surry, VA 23883

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 Enclosure 1 TOPICS THAT REQUIRE A SLRA SUPPLEMENT Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Energy Virginia)

Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 2 of 10 The following ten topics require the SLRA to be supplemented:

1. Components Supports and NSSS Fatigue TLAA AMR Lines
2. Aging Management of Neutron Shield Tank
3. Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation Aging Management
4. Pressure-Temperature Limits (Section 4.2.5): TLAA Evaluation Editorial Correction
5. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J program (82.1.32): UFSAR Supplement Revision
6. Fire Water System program (82.1.16): Enhancement Clarified, Operating Experience Update, Program Description Revision, and UFSAR Supplement Revisions
7. Masonry Walls program (82.1.33): Enhancement Revision
8. Structures Monitoring program (82.1.34): Program Description Revision, UFSAR Supplement Revision, and Enhancements Revised/Added
9. Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management: GAP Analysis Tables Clarification /Revision
10. Further Evaluation of Aging Management Associated With Increase in Porosity and Permeability Due to Leaching of Calcium Hydroxide and Carbonation in Inaccessible Concrete Areas Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 3 of 10 The following ten topics require the SLRA to be supplemented:

1. Component Supports and NSSS Supports Fatigue TLAA AMR Lines A fatigue TLAA was inadvertently identified for structural members associated with Component Supports and NSSS Supports in SLRA Section 3.5.2.2.2.5; and Tables 3.5.1, 3.5.2-36 and 3.5.2-38. Further review has confirmed that there are no TLAAs associated with Component Supports and NSSS Supports.

Based on the above, the SLRA is supplemented as shown in Enclosure 2, to clarify that there are no fatigue TLAAs associated with Component Supports and NSSS Supports in the following:

SLRA Section SLRA Table 3.5.2.2.2.5 3.5.1 3.5.2-36 3.5.2-38

2. Aging Management of Neutron Shield Tank The External Swiaces Monitoring of Mechanical Components program was assigned to manage loss of material for the external surfaces of the neutron shield tank. However, it was deemed more appropriate for the Structures Monitoring program to manage this aging effect. In addition, SLRA Section 2.4.1.38 (NSSS Supports) is updated to clarify that the neutron shield tank is evaluated with the reactor coolant system.

Based on the above, the SLRA is supplemented as shown in Enclosure 2, in the following:

SLRA Section SLRA Table 2.4.1.38 3.1.2-3 3.1.2.1.3 3.5.1

3. Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation Aging Management Operating experience identified degradation of the oiled-sand cushion beneath the fire protection/domestic water tank foundations. Loss of material and loss of form of the earthfill material (oiled-sand cushion) beneath the fire protection/domestic water tank foundations will be managed by the Structures Monitoring program (B2.1.34).

Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 4 of 10 Based on the above, the SLRA is supplemented as shown in Enclosure 2, to incorporate_ management of the oiled-sand cushion beneath the fire protection/domestic water tank foundations in the following:

SLRA Sections SLRA Tables 2.4.1.27 2.4.1-27 3.5.2.1.27 3.5.1-058 3.5.2-27

4. Pressure-Temperature Limits (Section 4.2.5): TLAA Evaluation Editorial Correction An editorial correction is made to the fifth paragraph of the TLAA Evaluation in Section 4.2.5 to specify the nozzle forging materials are documented in Tables 4.2.4-1, 4.2.4-3, 4.2.4-5, and 4.2.4-7.

Based on the above, Section 4.2.5 is supplemented, as shown in Enclosure 2, to specify the nozzle forging materials are documented in Tables 4.2.4-1, 4.2.4-3, 4.2.4-5, and 4.2.4-7.

5. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J program (82.1.32): UFSAR Supplement Revision.

The 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J program UFSAR Supplement is revised to include "subject to the requirements of 10 CFR Part 54" to be consistent with the NUREG-2191 Table X1-01, "FSAR Supplement Summaries for GALL-SLR Chapter XI Aging Management Programs."

SLRA Section A1 .32 is supplemented, as shown in Enclosure 2, to include the UFSAR Supplement revision described above.

6. Fire Water System program (82.1.16): Enhancement Clarified, Operating Experience Update, Program Description Revision, and UFSAR Supplement Revisions The Fire Water System program revision includes the following items:
  • Exception #1 is deleted with the commitment to permanently remove the exterior insulation of fire protection/domestic water tanks (a.k.a. fire water storage tanks).
  • Enhancement #7 is revised as follows:

Prior to the subsequent period of extended operation, the insulation on the exterior surfaces of the fire water storage tanks (FWSTs) will be permanently Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 5 of 10 removed. Wall thickness measurements will be performed on external tank areas exhibiting unexpected degradation. RefurbishmenUrecoating will be performed consistent with the severity of the degradation identified and commensurate with the potential for loss of intended function. Inspections of external tank surfaces will be on a refueling cycle frequency.

  • Enhancement #11 is revised to require visual inspection and wall thickness examination of the Unit 1 hydrogen seal oil deluge sprinkler piping that does not allow drainage as part of drainage reconfiguration. Wall thickness examination of the Unit 1 main transformer deluge sprinkler piping that does not allow drainage will also be performed as part of the drainage reconfiguration. Piping with unexpected degradation will be replaced.
  • Operating experience #6 and #7 for the FWSTs internal inspections results are revised to include August 2018 internal visual inspection results and March 2019 bottom thickness measurements.
  • Operating experience #10 for the fire protection system flow test results is revised to present motor driven fire pump and diesel driven fire pump discharge pressure data from the 2014 through 2019 flow tests.

The Fire Water System program UFSAR Supplement is revised as follows:

  • A cracking aging effect that was not incorporated with SLRA Change Notice #2 is incorporated. """
  • The following qualification commitment is incorporated and also included in the AMP program description:

The training and qualification of individuals involved in coating/lining. inspections of non-cementitious coatings/linings are conducted in accordance with ASTM International Standards endorsed in RG 1.54 including guidance from the NRC staff associated with .a particular standard.

Fire Hydrant flushing procedures were revised to ensure the following information is captured in a condition report when a fire hydrant barrel does not drain in 60 minutes:

Where soil conditions or other factors are such that a hydrant barrel does not drain within 60 minutes, or where groundwater level is above that of the hydrant drain, the hydrant drain shall be plugged and the water in the barrel shall be pumped out. Dry barrel hydrants that will be subject to freezing weather and have plugged drains shall be identified clearly as needing pumping after operation.

SLRA Section B2.1.16, Section A 1.16 and Table A4.0-1, Item 16 are supplemented, as shown in Enclosure 2, with enhancement revisions, operating experience revisions and UFSAR Supplement revisions.

Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 6 of 10

7. Masonry Walls program (82.1.33): Enhancement Revision The Masonry Walls program is revised to apply Enhancement #2 to Element 6, Acceptance Criteria.

SLRA Section 82.1.33 is supplemented, as shown in Enclosure 2, with the enhancement #2 clarification.

8. Structures Monitoring program (82.1.34): Program Description Revision, UFSAR Supplement Revision, and Enhancements Revised/Added The Structures Monitoring program is revised to include the following new enhancements:
  • Procedures will be enhanced to specify that evaluation of neutron shield tank findings consider its structural support function for the reactor pressure vessel.
  • Procedures will be enhanced to also include LOCAs as events that require evaluation for potentially degraded structures by Civil/Mechanical Design Engineering.
  • Procedures will be enhanced to include aging management of erosion for the oiled-sand cushion in the fire protection and domestic water storage tank foundations.

The Structures Monitoring program description and UFSAR Supplement are revised to include an aging effect of loss of material and loss of form for aging management of the earthfill material (oiled-sand cushion) beneath the fire protection/domestic water tank foundations.

SLRA Section B2.1.34, Section A1.34 and Table A4.0-1, Item 34 are supplemented, as shown in Enclosure 2, to include the program description and UFSAR Supplement revisions and enhancement revisions/additions described above.

Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 7 of 10

9. Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management: GAP Analysis Tables Clarification/Revision The following SLRA Appendix C components are supplemented, as shown in Enclosure 2, to incorporate the revisions/clarifications described below. Unless noted otherwise, reference Westinghouse letter AMLR-17-35-P Revision 1 for additional details.

SLRA Appendix C Components Changes or Clarifications Component App. C Description of Change Table (page#)

CRGT C3.3-3 Note #6 was used to reference the Areva evaluation for Flexures (page C-29) the Unit 1 (AREVA) flexures to identify Safety and Economic Consequences, FMECA Groups, and Risk Categorization. The SLR Inspection Category remains "N" (No Additional Measures).

r Fuel Alignment C3.3-3 Referred to Note #7 for further explanation of Pins (Upper) (page C-31) degradation mechanisms for upper fuel alignment pins.

Wear-related surface degradation is considered the leading degradation mechanism.

Core Barrel: C3.3-3 Corrected an editorial error to indicate the SLR Core Barrel (page C-36) Inspection Category is "X" instead of "E".

Flange (Surface)

Core Barrel: C3.3-3 Corrected an editorial error to indicate the SLR Core Barrel (page C-36) Inspection Category is "N" instead of "E".

Outlet Nozzle Core Barrel: C3.3-3 Corrected an editorial error that originated in Change Lower Axial (page C-36) Notice #2. The lower flange weld was supposed to be Weld removed, and Note #5 added, in Change Notice #2.

Lower Flange Instead, the lower axial weld was removed and Note #5 Weld was added. This error has been corrected in Change Notice #3.

Fuel Alignment C3.3-3 Referred to Note #7 for further explanation of Pins (Lower) (page C-37) degradation mechanisms for lower fuel alignment pins.

Wear-related surface degradation is considered the leading degradation mechanism.

CRGT C3.3-3 Note #6 is added to Table C3.3-3.

Flexures (page C-41)

Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 8 of 10 Fuel Alignment C3.3-3 Note #7 is added to Table C3.3-3.

Pins (page C-41)

CRGT C4.3-1 Expansion link to the CRGT continuous section sheaths Sheaths and (page C-54) and C-tubes has been added along with Note #18 for C-Tubes associated Primary component CRGT guide plates (cards).

Alignment and C4.3-1 The addition of Note #18 resulted in the previous Note Interfacing (page C-56) #18 being renumbered to Note #19.

Components:

Clevis insert bolts, Clevis insert dowels; Clevis bearing Stellite wear surface. Radial Support Keys, Stellite wear \-

surfaces.

CRGT Guide C4.3-1 Revised Note #2 to remove the following sentence:

Cards (page C-58) "Interim Guidance issued in PWROG Letter OG 18-76 amends the requirements regarding baseline examinations".

CRGT C4.3-1 Note #18 is added to Table C4.3-1.

Sheaths and (page C-58)

C-Tubes CRGT C4.3-2 Included a new line to identify an Expansion item for Sheaths and (page C-59) "Control Rod Guide Tube Continuous section sheaths C-Tubes and C-tubes" Core Barrel: C4.3-2 For the core barrel assembly, changed Note #9 to Note Middle Axial (page C-59) #8 for the middle axial weld (MAW) and lower axial weld Weld Lower (LAW), and for the upper girth weld (UGW). The reason Axial Weld for the change is the removal of Note #8, and the Upper Girth renumbering of Note #9.

Weld Core Barrel: C4.3-2 For the core barrel assembly, change Note #9 to Note Lower Flange (page C-60) #8 for the lower flange weld (LFW), and for the upper Weld & Upper axial weld (UAW). The reason for the change is the Axial Weld removal of Note #8, and the renumbering of Note #9.

Lower Support C4.3-2 An error was corrected that originated in Change Notice Forging & (page C-60) #2. The correct examination method for the lower Lower Support support forging and for the lower support column bodies Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 9 of 10 Column (cast) is VT-3 as indicated in MRP-227, Revision 1, but Bodies (cast) had been incorrectly changed to EVT-1 in CN#2. Note 5 was added to the Lower Support Column Bodies (cast).

Core Barrel: C4.3-2 Removed Note #8 and renumbered Note #9 to be Note MAW, LAW, (page C-61) #8.

UGW, LFW, UAW SLRA Appendix C Gap Analysis changes resulted in aging evaluation changes for the

  • following components:
  • Control rod guide tube (CRGT) continuous section sheaths and C-Tubes. An expansion link to the CRGT continuous section sheaths and C-tubes has been added for the associated Primary component CRGT guide plates (cards).
  • Core barrel outlet nozzle welds are eliminated as an expansion component in MRP-227, Revision 1.

Based on the above, the SLRA is supplemented as shown in Enclosure 2, to revise aging evaluation for the CRGT continuous section sheaths and C-tubes and the core barrel outlet nozzle welds in the following:

SLRA Tables 2.3.1-2 3.1.1-053a

3. f 1-059a 3.1.2-2 Enclosure 1

Change Notice 3 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Page 10 of 10

10. Further Evaluation of Aging Management Associated With Increase in Porosity and Permeability Due to Leaching of Calcium Hydroxide and Carbonation in Inaccessible Concrete Areas Further evaluation of aging management associated with increase in porosity and I permeability due to leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation in inaccessible concrete areas is clarified in SLRA Sections 3.5.2.2.1.9, 3.5.2.2.2.1 (4 ), and 3.5.2.2.2.3(3). The further evaluations are clarified to indicate that there is evidence of leaching in the accessible areas exposed to a water-flowing environment. Evaluation has determined that the observed leaching in accessible areas did not adversely impact the structural integrity or resulted in a loss of intended function of the inaccessible concrete areas. This applies to Containment and concrete structures within the scope of subsequent license renewal.

Based on the above, the SLRA is supplemented as shown in Enclosure 2, to clarify the further evaluations in the following:

SLRA Section 3.5.2.2.1.9 3.5.2.2.2.1(4) 3.5.2.2.2.3(3)

Enclosure 1

Serial No.: 19-248 Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 Enclosure 2 SLRA MARK-UPS CHANGE NOTICE 3 Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Energy Virginia)

Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2

Change Notice 2 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 Page 2 of 74 Enclosure 1 SLRA Section SLRA As-Submitted Pages*

Topic#

Table 2.3.1-2 2-58, 2-59 9 2.4.1.27 2-289 3 2.4.1.38 2-303 2 Table 2.4.1-27 2-332 3 3.1.2.1.3 3-16 2 Table 3.1.1 3-56, 3-62 9 Table 3.1.2-2 3-90, 3-91 9 Table 3.1.2-3 3-105 2 3.5.2.1.27 3-717 3 3.5.2.2.1.9 3-738 10 3.5.2.2.2.1(4) 3-741 10 3.5.2.2.2.3(3) 3-744 10 3.5.2.2.2.5 3-746 1 Table 3.5.1 3-759, 3-760, 3-764 1, 2, 3 Table 3.5.2-27 3-835 3 Table 3.5.2-36 3-848, 3-849 1 Table 3.5.2-38 3-854 1 4.2.5 4-71 4

.,..

App~n.cliiAzv .. ,:/1;;:i'..i.:;t,i:. i*:

',,,* 1:,  :.. ,;,"',ss\:;, '.?~ ', ,*, ..

'(* 'i'

', ,',

..,

  • "

-':+I *..,,,:. "'

" ; ..,:: *,.

. <" , ~ .. ,, "* ;,:,,, ' A! *',

'

,,, ' ' ,,,

A1 .16 A-14 6 A1.32 A-27 5 A1.34 A-28, A-29 8 Table A4.0-1 A-71 to A-73, A-92 6, 8 Enclosure 2

Change Notice 2 Serial No.: 19-248 SPS SLRA Docket Nos.: 50-280/281 Pag_e 3 of 74 Enclosure 1 SLRA Section SLRA As-Submitted Pages*

Topic#

B2.1.16 B-108toB-119 6 B2.1.33 B-220 to B-222 Q B2.1.34 B-223 to B-229 8 Table C3.3-3 C-29, C-31, C-36, C-37, C-41 9 Table C4.3-1 C-54, C-56, C-58 9 Table C4.3-2 C-59, C-60, C-61 9

  • SLRA As-Submitted page numbers may not correspond to the page numbers in Enclosure 2.

Enclosure 2

Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 App lication for Subsequent License Renewa l Change Notice 3 Mechanical Systems Table 2.3.1-2 Reactor Vessel Internals Subcomponent Intended Function(s)

Alignment and interfacing (clevis insert bolt) Structural Support Alignment and interfacing (clevis insert dowel) Structural Support Alignment and interfacing (clevis insert wear Structural Support surface)

Alignment and interfacing (internals hold-down Structural Support spring)

Alignment and interfacing (radial support key wear Structural Support surface)

Alignment and interfacing (thermal sleeve) Structural Support Alignment and interfacing (upper core plate Structural Support alignment pin wear surface)

Al ignment and interfacing (upper core plate Structural Support alignment pin)

Baffle former (baffle edge bolt) Structural Support Baffle former (baffle former bolt) Structural Support Baffle former (baffle plate) Flow Distribution , Structural Support Baffle former (corner bolt) Structural Support Bottom mounted instrumentation (column body) Structural Support Bottom mounted instrumentation (flux thimble Structural Support tube)

Control rod guide tube (continuous section sheath Structural Support and C-tube}

Control rod guide tube (guide plate) Structural Support Control rod guide tube (guide tube support pin Structural Support nut) (Unit 1 only)

See Table 2.1.5-1 for definitions of intended functions.

Page2-58 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 4 of 74

Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Mechanical Systems Table 2.3.1-2 Reactor Vessel Internals Subcomponent Intended Function(s)

Control rod guide tube (gu ide tube support pin) Structural Support (Unit 1 only)

Control rod guide tube (lower flange) Structural Support Core barrel (barrel former bolt) Structural Support Core barrel (core barrel flange) Flow Distribution , Structural Support GeFe eaFFel feeFe eaFFel el:ltlet ASi!:i!:le) StFl:letl:lFal Sl:l1313eFt Core barrel (lower axial weld) Structural Support Core barrel (lower flange weld) Structural Support Core barrel (lower girth weld) Structural Support Core barrel (upper axial weld) Structural Support Core barrel (upper flange weld) Structural Support Core barrel (upper girth weld) Structural Support Lower internals (fuel alignment pin) Structural Support Lower internals (lower core plate) Flow Distribution , Structural Support Lower support (column body) Structural Support Lower support (column bolt) Structural Support Lower support (lower support forging) Structural Support No additional measures components Flow Distribution , Structural Support Thermal shield (flexure) Structural Support Upper internals (fuel alignment pin) Structural Support Upper internals (upper core plate) Structural Support See Table 2.1. 5-1 for definitions of intended functions .

Page2-59 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 5 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Structures 2.4.1.27 Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation

System Description

The Fire Protection/Domestic Water Tank Foundations are supported on well-tamped sand and gravel with an oiled-sand cushion between the tank and the backfill. To contain this material under the tanks, reinforced concrete ring walls, whose tops are approximately at grade, were constructed just outside the perimeter of the tank . The Fire Protection/Domestic Water Tank Foundations are located adjacent to the Fire Pump House, west of the Intake Canal.

System Evaluation Boundary The evaluation boundary for the Fire Protection/Domestic Water Tank Foundations includes the reinforced concrete ring walls constructed just outside the perimeter of the tank and the oiled-sand cushion under the tank.

The Fire Protection/Domestic Water Tank is evaluated in the fire protection system .

System Intended Functions The Fire Protection/Domestic Water Tank Foundations are relied upon for compliance with regulations for Fire Protection (10 CFR 50.48). Therefore , the Fire Protection/Domestic Water Tank Foundations are within the scope of license renewal in accordance with the criteria of 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3).

UFSAR References Additional details of the Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation can be found in the UFSAR, Section 9.10.2.2 .1.

Subsequent License Renewal Boundary Drawings The subsequent license renewal boundary drawing for the Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation is listed below:

11448-SLRY-1 H Components Subject to Aging Management Review The component types subject to aging management review are indicated in Table 2.4.1-27, Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation .

The aging management review results for these component types are indicated in Table 3.5.2-27, Containments , Structures and Component Supports - Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation - Aging Management Evaluation .

Page2-289 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 6 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Structures System Evaluation Boundary The evaluation boundary for the NSSS Supports includes all supports for Nuclear Steam Supply System components . The evaluation boundary for each nuclear steam supply system support lies between the integral attachment on piping and equipment being supported and its Containment concrete supporting structure.

Specifically:

- Pins , bolting , and other removable hardware that are part of the connection to the NSSS equipment integral attachment have been evaluated with the nuclear steam supply system equipment supports.

- Spring supports, sliding surfaces , stainless steel elements , steel elements.

- Exposed portions of the embedded components (i .e. end portion of threaded anchor and nut) and grout are evaluated with the nuclear steam supply system equipment supports.

- Concrete supporting structures (including the embedded portion of threaded anchor) are evaluated with the Containment.

- Integral attachments for the nuclear steam supply system piping and equipment are evaluated for aging management with the specific nuclear steam supply system equipment.

- The neutron shield tank is evaluated with the reactor coolant system .

- Snubbers are active components and not subject to aging management.

System Intended Functions Portions of the NSSS Supports perform the following safety-related function: The NSSS Supports provide structural support for safety-related SSCs. Therefore, the NSSS Supports are within the scope of license renewal in accordance with the criteria of 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1 ).

UFSAR References Additional details of the NSSS Supports can be found in the UFSAR, Section 15.6.2 , Figure 15.6-1 ,

Figure 15.6-2 , Figure 15.6-3 , Figure 15.6-4 , Table 15.6-1, and Table 15.6-2.

Subsequent License Renewal Boundary Drawings There are no subsequent license renewal boundary drawing for the NSSS Supports.

Components Subject to Aging Management Review The component types subject to aging management review are indicated in Table 2.4.1-38, NSSS Supports.

The aging management review results for these component types are indicated in Table 3.5.2-38, Containments , Structures and Component Supports - NSSS Supports - Aging Management Evaluation .

Page2-303 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 7 of 74

Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Structures Table 2.4.1-27 Fire Protec tion and Domestic Water Tank Foundation Structural Membe r Intended Function(s)

Concrete element Structural Support Oiled-sand cushion Structural Suggort The AMR results for these compo nent types are indicated in Table 3.5.2-27 , Containments ,

Structures and Component Suppa rts - Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation -

Aging Management Evaluation.

See Table 2.1.5-1 for defi nitions of intended functions.

Page2-332 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 8 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Appl ication for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Aging Management Review Aging Effects Requiring Management The following aging effects, associated with the reactor coolant system , require management:

  • Cracking
  • Cumulative fatigue damage
  • Long-term loss of material
  • Loss of coating or lining integrity
  • Loss of fracture toughness
  • Loss of material
  • Loss of preload
  • Reduction of heat transfer
  • ASME Code Class 1 Small-Bore Piping (82 .1.22)
  • ASME Section XI lnservice Inspection , Subsections IWB, IWC, and IWD (82.1.1)
  • Bolting Integrity (82.1 .9)
  • Closed Treated Water Systems (82 .1.12)
  • External Surfaces Monitoring of Mechanical Components (82.1.23)
  • Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components (82.1 .25)
  • Internal Coatings/Linings For In-Scope Piping , Piping Components, Heat Exchangers, and Tanks (82.1.28)
  • Lubricating Oil Analysis (82.1.26)
  • One-Time Inspection (82.1.20)
  • Selective Leaching (82 .1.21)
  • Structures Monitoring (82.1.34)
  • Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) (82.1 .6)
  • Water Chemistry (82.1.2)

Page 3-16 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 9 of 74

Table 3.1.1 Summary of Aging Management Programs for Reactor Vessel , Internals, and Reactor Coolant System Evaluated in Chapter IV of the GALL-SLR Report Item Aging Aging Management Further Evaluation Component Discussion Number Effect/Mechanism Program Recommended 3.1.1-053a Stainless steel , nickel alloy Cracking due to SCC, AMP XI.M16A, PWR Vessel Yes (SRP-SLR Consistent with NUREG-2191 with exceptions.

Westinghouse reactor irradiation-ass isled Internals , and AMP XI.M2 , Section 3.1.2.2.9) Exceptions apply to the NUREG-2191 recommendations internal Primary sec, fatigue Water Chemistry (for sec for Water Chemistry (82 .1.2) program implementation .

components exposed to mechanisms only) The 1,QntrQI rQg gyiQ!l Ml!l (I.QDlinyQy~ ~!ll.liQn sheath reactor coolant, neutron flux ang C-tybe), core barrel (lower flange weld ) and core barrel (upper girth weld) align to this item but are listed as Expansion components in the Appendix C Gap Analysis.

See further evaluation in Section 3.1.2.2.9.

3.1.1-053b Stainless steel Cra cking due to sec, AMP XI.M1 6A, PWR Vesse l Yes (SRP-SLR Consistent with NUREG-2191 with exceptions.

Westinghouse reactor irradiation-assisted Interna ls , and AMP XI.M2,

  • Section 3.1.2.2.9) Exceptions apply to th e NU REG-2191 recommendations internal Expa nsion sec, fatig ue Water Chemistry (for sec for Water Chemistry (82 .1.2) program implementation .

components exposed to mechanisms only) The brackets, clamps, terminal blocks and conduit straps reactor coolant and neutron located on the periphery align to this item , and are flux expected to be elevated to a Primary Inspection component, as described in the Appendix C Gap Analysis . The upper internals (upper core plate) aligns to this item , and is listed as a Primary Inspection component in the Appendix C Gap Analysis . See further eva luation in Section 3.1.2.2.9.

3.1.1-053c Stain less steel , nickel alloy Cra ck ing due to SCC, AMP XI. M1 6A , PWR Vesse l Yes (SRP-SLR Consistent with NUREG-2191 with exceptions.

Westinghouse reactor irradiation-assisted Interna ls , and AMP XI. M2 , Section 3.1.2.2.9) Exceptions apply to the NUREG-2191 recommendations internal Existing Programs sec, fatigue Water Chemistry (for SCC for Water Chemistry (82 .1.2) program implementation .

components exposed to mechanisms only) Clevis insert bolts and dowels align to this item , but are reactor coolant, neutron flux listed as Primary Inspection components in the Appendix C Gap Analysis. See further evaluation in Section 3.1 .2.2.9.

3.1.1-054 Stainless steel bottom Loss of material due AMP XI. M37, Flux Thimble No Not applicable . Loss of material due to wear is addressed mounted instrument system to wear Tube Inspection in row 3.1.1-028. The associated NUREG-2192 aging flux thimble tubes (with or item is not used .

without chro me plating) exposed to reactor coo lant and neutron flux Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Page 3-56 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 10 of 74

Table 3.1.1 Summary of Aging Management Programs for Reactor Vessel, Internals, and Reactor Coolant System Evaluated in Chapter IV of the GALL-SLR Report Item Aging Aging Management Further Evaluation Component Discussion Number Effect/Mechanism Program Recommended 3.1.1-059a Stai nless steel (SS , Loss of fracture AMP XI. M1 6A, PWR Vessel Yes (SRP-SLR Consistent with NUREG-2191. The control rod guide including CASS , PH SS or toughness due to Internals Section 3.1.2.2.9) tube (continuouli liection shesith s;1nd C-M1e) core barrel martensitic SS) or nickel ne utron irradiation (lower flange and lower axial welds) and the lower alloy Westin ghouse reactor embrittlement an d for support (column body) also align to th is item, but are intern al Primary CASS , martensitic listed as Expansion com ponents in the Appe ndix C Gap components exposed to SS , an d PH SS due to An alysis . The lower interna ls (fue l alignment pin) als o reactor coo lant and ne utron thermal aging aligns to this item , but is listed as an Existing co mponent flux embrittlement; in the Appendix C Gap Analysis. See further evaluation in changes in Section 3.1.2.2.9.

dimensions due to void swelling ,

distortion ; loss of preload due to thermal and irradiation-enhanced stress re laxation ,

creep; loss of material due to wear Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Page 3-62 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent Licen se Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 11 of74

Table 3.1.2-2 Reactor Vessel , Internals, and Reactor Coolant System - Reactor Vessel Internals - Aging Management Evaluation Intended Ag ing Effect Requiring NUREG-21 91 Tabl e 1 Subcomponent Material Environment Ag ing Management Programs Notes Function(s) Management Item Item Bottom mounted ss Nickel alloy (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-355 3.1.1-053c C instrumentation and neutro n flux Water Chemistry (82 .1.2) IV.82.RP-355 3.1.1-053c D (flux thimble Loss of fracture toughness; PWR Vessel Internals (82 .1.7) IV.B2.R-424 3.1.1-119 E, 3 tube) changes in dimensions; loss of preload ; loss of material Loss of material Flux Thimble Tube Inspection (82.1 .24) IV.B2.RP-356 3.1 .1-028 E, 2 Control rod guide .S.S. Stainless <El Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (82 .1.7) IV.82 .RP-29§ J 1.1-053a c lube <continuous .s1e.e.l and neutron flux Water Chem istr:y (82 .1.2) IV.82 RP-29§ 3.1.1-Q53a Q section sheath and C-Miel Loss of material PWR Vessel Internals <B2 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-296 3.1.1-Q59a c Control rod guide ss Cast (E) Reactor coo lant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.82.RP-298 3.1.1-053a C tube (guide plate) austeniti c >250°c (>482°F) Water Chemistry (82 .1.2) IV.B2.RP-298 3.1.1-053a D stainless and neutron flu x Loss of fracture toughness PWR Vessel Internals (82 .1.7) IV.82.RP-297 3.1.1-059a C steel Loss of material PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-296 3.1.1-059a A Stainless (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (82.1 .7) IV.B2.RP-298 3.1.1-053a C steel and neutron flu x Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.B2.RP-298 3.1 .1-053a D Loss of material PWR Vessel Internals (82 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-296 3.1.1-059a A Control rod guide ss Nickel alloy (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (82 .1.7) IV.82.RP-355 3.1.1-053c C.10 tube (guide tube and neutron flux Loss of fracture toug hness; PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV>B2 .RP-287 3.1.1-059b C.10, support pin nut) loss of preload 11 (Unit 1 only)

Control rod guide ss Nickel alloy (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1 .7) IV.B2.RP-355 3.1.1-053c A.10 tube (guide tube and neutron flux Water Chemistry (82 .1.2) IV.B2.RP-355 3.1.1-053c 8 .10 support pin) (Unit Loss of fracture toughness ; PWR Vessel Internals (8 2.1.7) IV.B2.RP-287 3.1 .1-059b C,10 1 only) loss of preload Loss of material ; loss of PWR Vessel Internals (82 .1.7) IV. B2.RP-285 3.1 .1-059c C.10 preload Surry Power Station . Units 1 and 2 Page 3-90 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 12 of 74

Table 3.1.2-2 Reactor Vessel, Internals, and Reactor Coolant System - Reactor Vessel Internals - Aging Management Evaluation Intended Aging Effect Requiring NUREG-2191 Table 1 Subcomponent Material Environment Aging Management Programs Notes Function(s) Management Item Item Control rod guide ss Cast (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-298 3.1.1-053a C, 8 tube (lower austenitic >2so* c (>482°F) Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.B2.RP-298 3.1.1-053a D, 8 flange) stainless and neutron flu x Loss of fracture toughness PWR Vessel Internals (B2.1.7) IV.B2 .RP-297 3.1 .1 -059a C, 8 steel Stainless (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PW R Vesse l Internals (B2.1.7) IV.B2 .RP-298 3.1.1-053a A steel and neutron flu x Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.B2 .RP-298 3.1 .1-053a B Loss of fracture toughness PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-297 3.1.1-059a A Core barrel ss Stainless (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-273 3.1.1-053b A (barrel former steel and neutron flu x Water Chemistry (B2.1 .2) IV.B2.RP-273 3.1.1-053b B bolt)

Loss of fracture toughness; PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-274 3.1.1-059b A changes in dimensions ; loss of preload Loss of material PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-345 3.1.1-059c A Core ba rrel (core FD ;SS Stainless (E) Reactor coolant Cracking PWR Vesse l Internals (B2.1 .7) IV.B2 .RP-280 3.1.1-053a A barrel flange) steel and neutron flu x Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.B2 .RP-280 3.1 .1-053a B Loss of material PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-345 3.1 .1-059c A GeFe eaFFel (seFe ss Stai Riess (I;) ReasleF seelaRI GmsldR§ PWR l,lessel IRISFRals (82 . ~ .7) llJ.82 .RP 278 a.u l:leae A;--B eaFFel ettllel sleel aRel R9ttlF9R flttl( WaleF Gl'leFRiSlf'/ (82 . ~ .2) IV82.RP 278 a.u l:leae 8,-B

~ lll82.RP 2QQe bass ef FRaleFial PWR Vessel IR!eFRals (82 .~.7) a.u l:leQe G Core barrel ss Stainless (E) Reactor coolant Changes in dimensions PWR Vessel Internals (B2.1 .7) IV.B2.RP-270 3.1.1-059a C (lower axia l we ld) steel and neutron flu x Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-387a 3.1.1-053b A Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.B2 .RP-387a 3.1.1-053b B Loss of fracture toughness PW R Vesse l Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2.RP-388a 3.1.1-059b A Core barrel ss Stainless (E) Reactor coolant Changes in dimensions PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-270 3.1.1-059a C (lower flange steel and neutron flu x Cracking PWR Vessel Internals (B2 .1.7) IV.B2 .RP-280 3.1.1-053a A we ld)

Water Chemistry (B2.1.2) IV.B2.RP-280 3.1.1-053a B Loss of fracture toughness PWR Vesse l Internals (B2.1.7) IV.B2 .RP-297 3.1.1-059a C Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-91 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page13of74

Table 3.1.2-3 Reactor Vessel, Internals, and Reactor Coolant System - Reactor Coolant - Aging Management Evaluation Component Intended Aging Effect Requiring NUREG-2191 Table 1 Material Environment Aging Management Programs Notes Type Function(s) Management Item Item Pressurizer PB Steel with (E) Air - indoor Loss of material External Surfaces Monitoring of Mechanical IV.C2.R-431 3.1.1-124 C (upper head and stainless uncontrolled Components (B2.1.23) cladding) steel (E) Air with borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (B2.1.4) IV.C2 .R-17 3.1.1-049 A cladding water leakage (I) Reactor coo lant Cracking ASME Section XI lnservice Inspection , IV.C2.R-58 3.1.1-040 A Subsections IWB , IWC , and IWD (B2 .1.1) IV.C2.R-25 3.1 .1-042 A Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.C2.R-25 3.1.1-042 B Cumulative fatigue damage TLAA IV.C2.R-223 3.1.1-009 A Loss of material Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.C2.RP-23 3.1.1-088 B Pump casing PB Cast (E) Air - indoor Cracking External Surfaces Monitoring of Mechanical V.A.EP-103c 3.2.1-007 A (reactor coolant) austenitic uncontrolled Components (B2 .1.23) stainless Loss of material External Surfaces Monitoring of Mechanical IV.C2 .R-452b 3.1.1-136 A steel Components (B2 .1.23)

(I) Reactor coolant Cracking ASME Section XI lnservice Inspection , IV.C2 .R-09 3.1.1-033 A

>250°C (>482°F) Subsections IWB , IWC , and IWD (B2.1 .1)

Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) IV.C2.R-09 3.1 .1-033 B Cumulative fatigue damage TLAA IV.C2.R-223 3.1.1-009 A Loss of fracture toughness Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic IV.C2 .R-52 3.1.1-050 A Stainless Steel (CASS) (B2.1.6)

TLAA IV.C2.R-52 3.1. 1-050 E, 1 Loss of material Water Chemistry (B2.1 .2) IV.C2.RP-23 3.1.1-088 B Tank (neutron PB ;SS Steel (E) Air - indoor Loss of material E':JcteFAal S1:1rfaees MeAiteriA!J ef Meel'laAieal IV.C2 .l=I 4a1 d.1.1 124 A shield) un contro lled C8FAJ38A9A!S (82 .1.2d)

Structure~ Moni!Qring (B2 .1 ~4) IIIA~ TP-~02 l~.1-Q77 6 (E) Air with borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (B2 .1.4) IV.C2 .R-17 3.1.1-049 A water leakage (I) Closed-cycle Loss of material Closed Treated Water Systems (B2 .1.12) IV.C2.RP-221 3.1.1-089 B cooling water (E) Concrete None None IV.E .RP-353 3.1.1-105 A Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-105 Cha nge Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 14 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Aging Management Rev iew 3.5.2.1.27 Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation Materials The materials of construction for the fire protection and domestic water tank foundation structural members are:

  • Concrete
  • Earthfill (rip-rap, stone, soil)

Environment The fire protection and domestic water tank foundation structural members are exposed to the following environments:

  • Air - outdoor
  • Groundwater
  • Soil
  • Water - flowing Aging Effects Requiring Management The following aging effects, associated with the fire protection and domestic water tank foundation structural members, requ ire management:
  • Cracking
  • Cracking and distortion
  • Increase in porosity and permeability
  • Loss of bond
  • Loss of material, loss of form
  • Loss of material (spalling , scaling)
  • Loss of material (spalling , scaling) and cracking
  • Loss of strength Aging Management Programs The following aging management programs manage the aging effects for the fire protection and domestic water tank foundation structural members:
  • Structures Monitoring (82.1.34)

Page3-71 7 Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 15 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Aging Management Review 3.5.2.2.1.9 Increase in Porosity and Permeability Due to Leaching of Calcium Hydroxide and Carbonation Increase in porosity and permeability due to leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation could occur in inaccessible areas of concrete elements of PWR and BWR concrete and steel containments. Further evaluation is recommended if leaching is observed in accessible areas that impact intended functions. Acceptance criteria are described in BTP RLSB-1 (Appendix A.1 of this SRP-SLR) .

[3 .5.1-014] - UFSAR Section 15.3.1 discusses concrete mix designs . Reinforced concrete structures at SPS were designed , constructed , and inspected in accordance with ACI and ASTM standards, which provide for a good quality, dense, well-cured, and low permeability concrete. The mix proportions were established in accordance with ACl-301 , "Specifications for Structural Concrete for Buildings." Procedural controls ensured quality throughout the batching , mixing , and placement processes . The ASME Section XI , Subsection IWL program (B2 .1.30) and the Structures Monitoring program (B2 .1.34) identify and manage any cracks in the containment concrete . Crack control was achieved through proper sizing , spacing , and distribution of reinforcing steel in accordance with ACl-318-63 , "Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete." The Structures Monitoring program (B2.1.34) and the ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL program (B2 .1.30) inspect for evidence of leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation in accessible, and normally inaccessible structural components when scheduled maintenance work and planned plant modifications permit access. The Structures Monitoring program (B2 .1.34) and the ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL program (B2 .1.30) require that evaluation of inspection results includes consideration of the acceptability of inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of, or result in, degradation to inaccessible areas . Although plant operating experience has identified evidence of leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation, it has been determined that the observed leaching did not adversely impact the structural integrity or result in a loss of intended function of the conta inment structures.Plant operating experienoe has not identified any aging effeots related to inorease in porosity and permeability due to leashing of oaloium hydroxide and oarbonation. The Struotures Monitoring program (82.1.34) and the /\SME Scotian XI , Subseotion l\o.'L program (82.1 .30) confirm the absenoe of aging effeots related to leashing of oaloium hydroxide and oarbonation .

Therefore , aging effects due to leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation are not applicable, and a plant-specific aging management program for inaccessible areas to manage the effects of increase in porosity and permeability due to leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation is not required .

Page 3-738 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 16 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Aging Management Review

[3 .5.1-047] - Leaching - UFSAR Section 15.3.1 discusses concrete mix designs . Reinforced concrete structures at SPS were designed, constructed , and inspected in accordance with ACI and ASTM standards, which provide for a good quality, dense , well-cured , and low permeability concrete . The mix proportions were established in accordance with ACl-301 , "Specifications for Structural Concrete for Buildings." Procedural controls ensured quality throughout the batching ,

mixing , and placement processes . The Structures Monitoring program (B2.1 .34) identifies and manages any cracks in the concrete structures. Crack control was achieved through proper sizing ,

spacing , and distribution of reinforcing steel in accordance with ACl-318-63, "Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete." Additionally, the Structures Monitoring program (B2 .1.34) inspects for evidence of leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation in accessible, and normally inaccessible structural components when scheduled maintenance work and planned plant modifications permit access. The Structures Monitoring program (B2 .1.34) requires that evaluation of inspection results includes consideration of the acceptability of inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of, or result in ,

degradation to inaccessible areas. Although plant operating experience has identified evidence of leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation, it has been determined that the observed leaching did not adversely impact the structural integrity or result in a loss of intended function of the associated concrete structures .Plant operating experience has not identified any aging effects related to increase in porosity and permeability due to leashing of caloium hydroxide and carbonation. Therefore , a plant-specific aging management program for inaccessible areas to manage the effects of increase in porosity and permeability due to leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation is not required.

3.5.2.2.2.2 Reduction of Strength and Modulus Due to Elevated Temperature

[Reduction of strength and modulus of concrete due to elevated temperatures could occur in PWR and BWR Group 1-5 concrete structures. For any concrete elements that exceed specified temperature limits, further evaluations are recommended. Appendix A of American Concrete Institute (AC!) 349-85 specifies the concrete temperature limits for normal operation or any other long-term period. The temperatures shall not exceed 66°C (150°F) except for local areas, which are allowed to have increased temperatures not to exceed 93°C (200°F) . Further evaluation is recommended of a plant-specific program if any portion of the safety-related and other concrete structures exceeds specified temperature limits [i.e. , general area temperature greater than 66°C (150 °F) and local area temperature greater than 93°C (200°F)]. Higher temperatures may be allowed if tests and/or calculations are provided to evaluate the reduction in strength and modulus of elasticity and these reductions are applied to the design calculations. The acceptance criteria are described in BTP RLSB-1 (Appendix A.1 of this SRP-SLR) .

Page 3-741 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 17 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 App lication for Subsequent License Renewa l Change Notice 3 Aging Management Review

[3.5.1-051] - UFSAR Section 15.3 .1 discusses concrete mix designs . Reinforced concrete structures at SPS were designed , constructed , and inspected in accordance with ACI and ASTM standards, which provide for a good quality, dense, well-cured , and low permeability concrete. The mix proportions were established in accordance with ACl-301 , "Specifications for Structural Concrete for Bu ildings. " Procedural controls ensured quality throughout the batching , mixing , and placement processes . The Structures Monitoring program (82 .1.34) , which includes Group 6 structures , identifies and manages any cracks in the concrete structures. Crack control was achieved through proper sizing , spacing , and distribution of reinforcing steel in accordance with ACl-318-63 , "Bu ilding Code Requ irements for Reinforced Concrete." Additionally, the Structures Monitoring program (82.1.34) inspects for evidence of leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation in accessible, and normally inaccessible structural components when scheduled maintenance work and planned plant modifications permit access . The Structures Monitoring program (82 .1.34) requires that evaluation of inspection results includes consideration of the acceptability of inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of, or result in. degradation to inaccessible areas. Although plant operating experience has identified evidence of leaching of calcium hydroxide and carbonation, it has been determined that the observed leaching did not adversely impact the structural integrity or result in a loss of intended function of the associated concrete structures. Plant operating experience has not identified any aging effects related to increase in porosity and permeability due to leaching of calcium hydrmcide and carbonation . Therefore , a plant-specific aging management program for inaccessible areas to manage the effects of increase in porosity and permeability due to leach ing of calcium hydroxide and carbonation is not required .

3.5.2.2.2.4 Cracking Due to Stress Corrosion Cracking, and Loss of Material Due to Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Cracking due to SSC and loss of material due to pitting and crevice corrosion could occur in: (a)

Group 7 and 8 SS tank liners exposed to standing water; and (b) SS and aluminum alloy support members; welds; bolted connections; or support anchorage to building structure exposed to air or condensation (see SRP SLR Sections 3.2.2. 2.2, 3.2.2.2.4, 3.2.2.2.8, and 3.2.2 .2. 10 for background information).

For Group 7 and 8 SS tank liners exposed to standing water, further evaluation is recommended of plant-specific programs to manage these aging effects. The acceptance criteria are described in BTP RLSB 1 (Appendix A.1 of this SRP SLR).

Page 3-744 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 18 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Aging Management Review

[3.5 .1-100] - Plant-specific OE has identified pitting or crevice corrosion or cracking for stainless steel piping components exposed to air or condensation (see Further Evaluation 3.4.2.2.2). The Structures Mon itoring program (B2 .1.34) will manage the aging of stainless steel and aluminum alloy components to ensure that these components continue to perform their intended functions during the subsequent period of extended operation .

3.5.2.2.2.5 Cumulative Fatigue Damage Due to Fatigue Evaluations involving time-dependent fatigue , cyclical loading, or cyclical displacement of component support members, anchor bolts, and welds for Groups 81.1 , B1 .2, and B1.3 component supports are TLAAs as defined in 10 CFR 54. 3 only if a CLB fatigue analysis exists.

TLAAs are required to be evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(c) . The evaluation of this TLAA is addressed in Section 4. 3, "Metal Fatigue Analysis," and/or Section 4. 7, "Other Plant Specific Time-Limited Aging Analyses," of this SRP-SLR. For plant-specific cumulative usage factor calculations, the method used is appropriately defined and discussed in the applicable TLAAs.

[3.5.1 -053] - The evaluation of fatigue for component support members, anchor bolts , and *.velds for Group B1 .1 oomponents is addressed as a TL.AA in SL.RA Scotian 4.3.2, ASME Code , Scotian Ill , Class 1 P:atigue Analyses. The evaluation of fatigue for component support members, anchor bolts , and welds for Group B1 .2 components are addressed as TL.Ms in SLR/\ Section 4 .3.3,

/\ll>JSI B31 .1 Allmvable Stress Analyses .There are no TLAAs associated with component support members, anchor bolts, and welds for Groups B1 .1 and B1 .2 component supports. Group B1 .3 component supports are associated with BWRs: therefore, not applicable.

3.5.2.2.2.6 Reduction of Strength and Mechanical Properties of Concrete Due to Irradiation Reduction of strength, loss of mechanical properties, and cracking due to irradiation could occur in PWR and BWR Group 4 concrete structures that are exposed to high levels of neutron and gamma radiation . These structures include the reactor (primary/biological) shield wall, the sacrificial shield wall, and the reactor vessel support/pedestal structure. Data related to the effects and significance of neutron and gamma radiation on concrete mechanical and physical properties is limited, especially for conditions (dose, temperature, etc.) representative of light water reactor (LWR) plants. However, based on literature review of existing research, radiation fluence limits of 1 x 10 19 neutronslcm 2 neutron radiation and 1 x 10 8 Gy (1 x 10 10 rad) gamma dose are considered conservative radiation exposure levels beyond which concrete material properties may begin to degrade markedly (Ref 17, 18, 19).

Page 3-746 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 19 of 74

Table 3.5.1 Summary of Aging Management Programs for Containments, Structures and Component Supports Evaluated in Chapters II and Ill of the GALL-SLR Report Item Aging Aging Management Further Evaluation Component Discussion Number Effect/Mechanism Program Recommended 3.5.1-052 Groups 7, 8 - steel Cracking due to SCC ; Plant-specific ag ing Yes (S RP-SLR Not applicable. See further evaluation in Section components: tank liner Loss of material due management program Section 3.5.2.2.2.4) 3.5.2.2.2.4 .

to pitting and crevice corrosion 3.5.1-053 Support members; welds ; Cumulative fatigue TLAA , SRP-SLR Section 4.3 Yes (SR P-SLR GeAsisleAI wi!R ~H::J~EeG ~~ g~ . Gl:lFl'Hllali>,<e fali§l:le bolted con nections ; support damage due to cyclic Metal Fatigue, and/or Section Section 3.5.2.2.2.5) ElaA'la§e ef 13elliA§ aAEl steel eleA'leAls is a TLM.!:c!Qt anchorage to building loading (O nly if CLB 4.7 Other Plant-Specific sir212licable. Th§r§ sir§ OQ TLAAs aiisQQisited with sur212ort structure fatigue analysis Time-Limited Aging Analyses m§m!;lers anQhQr QQlts sing welQll fQ[ QQ[O(;!Qnenl exists) sur212orts . See further evaluation in Section 3.5.2.2.2.5.

3.5.1-054 All groups except 6: Cracking due to AMP X I.S6, Structures No Consistent with NUREG-2191 .

concrete (accessible areas): expansion from Monitoring all reaction with aggregates 3.5.1-055 Building co ncrete at Reduction in concrete AMP X I.S6 , Structures No Consistent with NUREG-2191 .

locations of expansion and anchor capacity due Monitoring grouted anchors ; grout pads to local concrete for support base plates degradation/ service-induced cracking or other concrete aging mechanisms 3.5.1-056 Concrete: exterior above- Loss of material due AMP X I.S7 , Inspection of No Consistent with NUREG-2191 . Loss of material of and below- grade; to abrasion ; cavitation Water-Control Structures concrete elements exposed to water-flowing is managed foundation ; interior slab Associated with Nuclear by the Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated Power Plants or the with Nuclear Power Plants (B2.1.35) program .

FERC/US Army Corp of Engineers dam inspections and maintenance programs .

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-759 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 20 of 74

Table 3.5.1 Summary of Aging Management Programs for Containments, Structures and Component Supports Evaluated in Chapters II and Ill of the GALL-SLR Report Item Aging Aging Management Further Evaluation Component Discussion Number Effect/Mechanism Program Recommended 3.5.1-057 Constant and variable load Loss of mechanical AMP XI.S3, ASME Section No Consistent with NUREG-2191 .

spring hangers ; guides; function due to XI , Subsection IWF stops co rrosion, distortion ,

dirt or debris accumulation, overload , wear 3.5.1-058 Earthen water-control Loss of material ; loss AMP XI.S7, Inspection of No Consistent with NUREG-2191 . Loss of material; loss of structures: dams; of form due to erosion , Water-Control Structures form of earthen dike and embankment is managed by the embankments; reservoi rs ; settlement, Associated with Nuclear Inspection of Water-Control Structu res Associated with channels; canals and ponds sedimentation , frost Power Plants or the Nuclear Power Plants (82 .1.35) program . A different action , waves , FERG/US Army Corp of siging msinsigement tirQgrsim (Str1JQ\1Jre§ MQnitQring currents , surface Engineers dam inspections (82 .1.34)) i§ i;;redited fQr msinsiging IQss Qf msiterisil s1nd runoff, seepage and ma intenance programs. IQ§§ Qf fQrm Qflhe Qiled-§sind Q!.l~hiQn sutitiQrting the Fire PrQtectiQn/Domestic Wsiter S!Qrsige tanks 3.5 .1 -059 Group 6: co ncrete Cra cking; loss of AMP X I. S7, Inspection of No Consistent with NUREG-2 191 . Cracking ; loss of bond ;

(accessible areas) : all bond ; and loss of Water-Control Structures and loss of material (spalling , scaling) of group 6 material (spalling , Associated with Nuclear concrete elements (accessible areas) is managed by the scaling) due to Power Plants or the Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated with corrosion of FERG/US Army Corp of Nuclear Power Plants (82 .1.35) program .

embedded steel Engineers dam inspections and maintenance programs .

3.5.1-060 Group 6: concrete Loss of material AMP XI.S7, Inspection of No Consistent with NUREG-2191 . Loss of material (spalling ,

(accessible areas) : exterior (spalling , scaling) and Water-Control Structures scaling) and cracking due to freeze-thaw of group 6 above- and below-grade; cracking due to Associated with Nuclear co ncrete elements (accessible areas) is managed by the foundation freeze-thaw Power Plants or the Inspection of Water-Control Structu res Associated with FERG/US Army Corp of Nuclear Power Plants (82.1.35) program.

Engineers dam inspections and maintenance programs .

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Page 3-760 Cha nge Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 21 of 74

Table 3.5.1 Summary of Aging Management Programs for Containments, Structures and Component Supports Evaluated in Chapters II and Ill of the GALL-SLR Report Item Aging Aging Management Further Evaluation Component Discussion Number Effect/Mechanism Program Recommended 3.5.1-076 Sliding surfaces: radial Loss of mechanical AMP XI.S6 , Structures No Not applicable - BWR only.

beam seats in BWR drywell function due to Monitoring corrosion , distortion ,

dirt or debris accumulation ,

ove rload , wear 3.5.1-077 Steel components: all Loss of material due AMP XI.S6 , Structures No Consistent with NUREG-2191 . For those components structural steel to corros ion Monitoring credited with a fire barrier function , the Fire Protection Program (B2 .1.15) is used in conjunction with the Structures Monitoring Program (B2 .1.34) to manage loss of material. In li!QQi!iQn !Q QQn!2inm!1nl~ Str!.!Ql!.!r!1~ 2nd QQmQQn!1nt Su1212or:t~* the n!1utrQn ~hi!11Q t 2 nk which is

!1V 2 1u 2 jed with the re 2 Q!Qr cool 2 n! ~~§!!1m i§ 21igned tQ

!hi~ it!1m.

3.5.1-078 Stainless steel fuel pool Cracking due to sec; AMP XI. M2 , Water No Consistent with NUREG-2191 with exceptions .

liner Loss of material due Chemistry, and monitoring of Exceptions apply to the NUREG-219 1 recommendations to pitting and crevice the spent fue l pool water for Water Chemistry (B2 .1.2) program implementation .

corros ion level and leakage from the Monitoring of the spent fue l pool wate r level and leakage leak ch ase channels . from the leak chase channels is performed by the Structures Monitoring (B2.1.34) program .

3.5.1-079 Steel components: piles Loss of material due AMP XI.S6 , Structures No Consistent with NUREG-2191 .

to corrosion Monitoring 3.5.1-080 Structural bolting Loss of material due AMP XI.S6 , Structures No Consistent with NUREG-2191.

to general, pitting , Monitoring crevice corrosion 3.5.1-081 Structural bolting Loss of material due AMP XI.S3, ASME Section No Consistent with NUREG-2191 .

to general , pitting , XI, Subsection IWF crevice corros ion 3.5.1-082 Stru ctural bolting Loss of material due AMP X I.S6, Structures No Consistent with NUREG-2191 .

to general, pitting , Monitoring crevice corrosion Su rry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-764 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 22 of 74

Table 3.5.2-27 Containments, Structures and Component Supports - Fire Protection and Domestic Water Tank Foundation -

Aging Management Evaluation Structural Intended Aging Effect Req uiring NUREG-2191 Table 1 Material Environment Aging Management Programs Notes Member Function(s) Management Item Item Concrete element ss Concrete (E) Air - outdoor Cracking Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) II I.A3.TP-204 3.5.1-043 E , 1, 2

II I.A3.TP-25 3.5.1-054 A, 2 Cracking ; Joss of bond; and Structures Monitoring (B2.1 .34) III.A3.TP-26 3.5.1-066 A, 2 loss of material (spalling ,

scaling)

Loss of material (spalling , Structures Monitoring (B2.1 .34) IIJ.A3.TP-23 3.5.1-064 A, 2 scaling) and cracking (E) Groundwater Cracking ; loss of bond ; and Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) IIJ.A3.TP-212 3.5.1-065 A, 2 loss of material (spall ing , 111.A3.TP-27 3.5.1-065 A, 2 scaling)

Increase in porosity and Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.A3.TP-29 3.5.1-067 A, 2 permeability ; cracking ; loss of material (spalling, sca ling)

(E) Soil Cracking Structures Monitoring (B2.1 .34) III.A3.TP-204 3.5.1-043 E, 1, 2

Cracking and distortion Structures Monitoring (B2.1 .34) III.A3.TP-30 3.5.1-044 A, 2 Cracking; loss of bond ; and Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.A3.TP-212 3.5.1-065 A, 2 loss of material (spalling , III.A3.TP-27 3.5.1-065 A, 2 scaling)

Increase in porosity and Structures Monitoring (B2.1.34) III.A3.TP-29 3.5.1-067 A, 2 permeability; cracking ; loss of material (spalling , scaling)

(E) Water - flowing Increase in porosity and Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.A3.TP-24 33.5.1-067 A, 2 permeability; loss of strength Qil~Q-IH!nQ ~ .E.fil1hfill_ (El Air - Q!.l\QQQr LQ~~ Qf m2t~ri2I* IQ~~ Qf fQrm Str!.JQ!!.lr~~ MQnitQring (B2.1 .J4) 111.A§.T-22 J:i.1-Q58 Ll

~  !.r.iJ2:.r.ru2.

~!Qn~ ~Qil)

Table 3.5.2-27 Plant-Specific Notes:

1. The plant-specific aging management program used to manage the applicable aging effect(s) for this component type, material, and environment combination is the Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) program .

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-835 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 23 of 74

2. Concrete element includes the ring wall.
3. Structures Monitoring (82 .1.34} program instead of Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associates with Nuclear Power Plants (82 .. 35 program will manage loss of materials: loss of form of the oiled-sand cushion supporting the Fire-Protection/Domestic Water Storage tanks.

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Page 3-836 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 24 of 74

Table 3.5.2-36 Containments, Structures and Component Supports - Component Supports - Aging Management Evaluation Structural Intended Aging Effect Requiring NUREG-2191 Table 1 Material Environment Aging Management Programs Notes Member Function(s) Management Item Item Alumin um EN;SS Aluminum (E) Air Loss of material; cracking Structures Mon itoring (B2 .1.34) III.B2.T-37b 3.5.1-1 00 A, 2 elements III.B3.T-37b 3.5.1 -100 A, 2 III.B4.T-37b 3.5.1-100 A, 2 III.B5.T-37b 3.5.1-100 A, 2 Bolting ss Steel (E) Air - indoor Gl:lA'll:llali\*e faligl:le eaA'!age +tAA 111.81 .2.T 2e a.e.1 Qea A uncontrolled (ORiy if GLB faligl:le aAalysis

~

Loss of material Structures Monitoring (B2.1 .34) II I.B2 .TP-248 3.5.1-080 A III.B3.TP-248 3.5.1-080 A III.B4.TP-248 3.5.1-080 A III.B5.TP-248 3.5.1-080 A ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (B2.1 .31) III.B1 .2.TP-226 3.5.1-081 A III.B1 .2 .T-24 3.5.1-091 A Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III. B2.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A III. B3.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A III.B4.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A III.B5.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A Loss of preload ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (B2.1.31) III.B1 .2.TP-229 3.5.1-087 A Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.B2.TP-261 3.5.1-088 A III.B3.TP-261 3.5.1-088 A III.B4.TP-261 3.5.1-088 A III.B5.TP-261 3.5.1-088 A (E) Air with borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (B2 .1.4) III.B1 .2.T-25 3.5.1-089 A water leakage III.B2.T-25 3.5.1-089 A III.B3.T-25 3.5.1-089 A III.B4.T-25 3.5.1-089 A III.B5.T-25 3.5.1-089 A III. B5 .T-25 3.5.1-089 A Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Page 3-849 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 25 of 74

Table 3.5.2-36 Containments, Structures and Component Supports - Component Supports - Aging Management Evaluation Structural Intended Aging Effect Requiring NUREG-2191 Table 1 Material Environment Aging Management Programs Notes Member Function(s) Management Item Item Grout ss Grout (E) Air - indoor Reduction in concrete Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.B1 .2.TP-42 3.5.1-055 A uncontrolled anchor capacity III.B2.TP-42 3.5.1-055 A III.B3.TP-42 3.5.1-055 A III.B4.TP-42 3.5.1-055 A III.B5.TP-42 3.5.1-055 A Sliding surfaces ss Lubrite (E) Air - indoor Loss of mechanical function Structures Monitoring (B2.1 .34) III.B2.TP-46 3.5.1-074 A uncontrolled Spring support ss Steel (E) Air - indoor Loss of mechanical function ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (B2.1.31) III.B1 .2 .T-28 3.5.1-057 A uncontrolled (E) Air with borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (B2 .1.4) III.B2.T-25 3.5.1-089 A water leakage Stainless steel ss Stain less (E) Air Loss of material; cracking ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (B2.1.31) III.B1 .2.T-36b 3.5.1-099 A elements steel Steel elements EN ;SS Steel (E) Air - indoor G1,1A't1,1lali*t1e fali§1,1e elaA'ta§e +tAA III.B1 .2.T 26 a .6.1 gi;a A,4 uncontrolled (ORiy if GLB fali§1,1e aAalysis 9*i&ls}

Loss of material ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (B2 .1.31) III.B1 .2.T-24 3.5.1-091 A, 1 Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.B2.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A, 1 III.B3.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A, 1 III.B4.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A, 1 III.B5.TP-43 3.5.1-092 A, 1 (E) Air with borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (B2.1.4) III.B1 .2.T-25 3.5.1-089 A, 1 water leakage III.B2.T-25 3.5.1-089 A, 1 III. B3 .T-25 3.5.1-089 A, 1 111.B4.T-25 3.5.1-089 A, 1 III.B5.T-25 3.5.1-089 A, 1 Vibration isolation ss Non-metallic (E) Air - indoor Reduction or loss of isolation Structures Monitoring (B2 .1.34) III.B4.TP-44 3.5.1-094 A elements (e.g., rubber) uncontrolled function Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-850 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 26 of 74

Table 3.5.2-38 Containments, Structures and Component Supports - NSSS Supports - Aging Management Evaluation Structural Intended Aging Effect Requiring NUREG-2191 Table 1 Material Environment Aging Management Programs Notes Member Function(s) Management Item Item Bolting ss Hig h-strength (E) Air Cracking ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF (82.1.31) 111.81.1.TP-41 3.5.1-068 A steel Stainless (E)Air Loss of material ; cracking ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF (82.1 .31) 111.81 .1 .T-36b 3.5.1-099 A steel (E) Air with borated None None 111.81 .1.TP-4 3.5.1-098 A water leakage Steel (E) Air - indoor Loss of material ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF (82.1 .31) 111.81 .1.TP-226 3.5.1-081 A uncontrolled Loss of preload ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF (82 .1.31) 111.81 .1.TP-229 3.5.1-087 A (E) Air w ith borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (82 .1.4) 111.81 .1.T-25 3.5.1-089 A water leakage Grout ss Grout (E) Air - indoor Reduction in concrete Structures Monitoring (82.1.34) 111.81 .1.TP-42 3.5.1-055 A uncontro lled anchor capacity Sliding surfaces ss Lubrite (E) Air - indoor Loss of mechanical function ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (82.1.31) 111.81.1 .TP-45 3.5.1-075 A uncontrolled Stainless steel ss Stain less (E) Air Loss of material; crack ing ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (82 .1.31) III.B1.1 .T-36b 3.5.1-099 A, 2 elements steel (E) Air with borated None None 111.8 1.1.TP-4 3.5.1-098 A, 2 water leakage Steel elements ss Steel (E) Air - indoor Gt1A'lt1lati"'e fali§t1e aaA'la§e +!:AA III.B1 .1.T 26 a.e.1 oea A;-4 uncontrolled (Only if GLB fati§t1e ana lysis

~

Loss of material ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (82.1.31) 111.81 .1.T-24 3.5.1-091 A, 1 Loss of mechan ica l function ASME Section XI , Subsection IWF (82 .1.31) 111.81 .1.T-28 3.5.1-057 A, 1 (E) Air with borated Loss of material Boric Acid Corrosion (82 .1.4) 111.81 .1.T-25 3.5.1-089 A, 1 water leakage Table 3.5.2-38 Plant-Specific Notes:

1. Steel elements include support members, spring supports, bearing plates, base plates, and connections, inclu ding maraging steel.
2. Stainless steel elements include support members.

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page 3-855 Cha nge Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosu re 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 27 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Time-Limited Ag ing Analyses 4.2 .5 PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE LIMITS TLAA

Description:

10 CFR 50 Appendix G requires that the RV be mainta i ned within established pressure-temperature (P-T) limits , including heatup and cooldown operations. These limits specify the maximum allowable pressure as a function of reactor coolant temperature. As the RV is exposed to increased neutron irradiation , its fracture toughness is reduced . The P-T limits must account for the anticipated RV fluence .

The current P-T limits are based upon fluence projections for 60 years of plant operation . Because they were based upon a fluence assumption of 60 years of operation, the P-T limits analyses meet the definition of 10 CFR 54.3(a) (Reference 1.7-2) and have been identified as TLAAs.

TLAA Evaluation:

Heatup and cooldown limit curves are calculated using the most limiting value of RT NOT corresponding to the limiting material in the beltline region of the RV. The most limiting RT NOT of the material in the core region (beltline) of the RV is determined by using the unirradiated RV material fracture toughness properties and estimating the irradiation induced shift (LlRT NOT)

  • RT NOT increases as the material is exposed to fast neutron irradiation ; therefore , to find the most limiting core region (beltline) RT NOT at any time , LlRT NOT due to the neutron radiation exposure associated with that time must be added to the original unirradiated RT NOT Using the ART values ,

P-T limit curves are determined in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 ,

Appendix G, as augmented by ASME Code,Section XI , Appendix G.

The P-T limits for 48 EFPY (currently maintained in the Technical Specifications for Units 1 and 2) are based on the K 1a methodology and the latest fluence data.

According to NUREG-2192, Section 4.2.2.1.4, the P-T limits for the subsequent period of extended operation need not be submitted as part of the SLRA since the P-T limits are required to be updated through the 10 CFR 50 .90 licensing process when necessary for P-T limits that are located in the Technical Specifications . The current licensing basis will ensure that the P-T limits for the subsequent period of extended operation will be updated prior to exceeding the EFPY for which they remain valid.

Nozzle materials were evaluated in WCAP-18242-NP at 48 EFPY and 68 EFPY; the nozzle forging materials evaluated are documented in Tables 4 .2.4-1 , 4.2.4-3, 4.2.2 54.2.4-5 , and e4.2.4-7. All nozzle materials were assigned the fluence values at the postulated 1/4T flaw location for each specific nozzle in Table 4.2 .1-1 and Table 4 .2.1-2. Thus , Unit 1 Inlet Nozzle 1 and Unit 2 Inlet Nozzle 1 and Outlet Nozzle 3 have neutron fluence values greater than 1.0 x 10 17 n/cm 2 (E > 1.0 MeV) at 68 EFPY. In order to fully assess the Units 1 and 2 P-T limit curves applicability to 68 EFPY, a nozzle corner fracture mechanics analysis was completed for all nozzle materials.

Page4-71 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 28 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix A - UFSAR Supplement monitoring of air moisture content and contaminants such that specified limits are maintained , and performance of opportunistic inspections of components for indications of loss of material.

This program is based on the Surry response to NRC GL 88-14 , "Instrument Air Supply Problems ;"

and utilizes guidance and standards provided in EPRI TR 108147 "Compressor and Instrument Air System Maintenance Guide: Revision to NP-7079," and ANSI/ISA-S7.3-1975 , "Quality Standard for Instrument Air." The Compressed Air Monitoring program activities implement the moisture content and contaminant criteria of ANSI/ISA-S7 .3-1975 (incorporated into ISA-S7.0.01-1996).

Program activities include air quality checks at various locations to ensure that dew point ,

particulates, and hydrocarbons are maintained within the specified limits. Opportunistic inspections of the internal surfaces of select compressed air system components for signs of loss of material will be performed.

A1 .15 FIRE PROTECTION The Fire Protection program is an existing condition and performance monitoring program comprised of functional tests and visual inspections. The program manages:

  • loss of material for fire-rated doors, fire damper housings, the halon systems, RCP oil collection system , steel seismic gap covers and the low-pressure carbon dioxide systems
  • loss of material (spalling) or cracking for concrete structures , including fire barrier walls ,

ceilings , and floors

  • hardening , shrinkage , and loss of strength for elastomer fire barrier penetration seals and seismic gap elastomers
  • loss of material , change in material properties , cracking/delamination , and separation for non-elastomer fire barrier penetration seals, fire stops , fire wraps , and coatings cracking/delamination, and separation
  • loss of material and cracking for aluminum seismic gap covers This program includes fire barrier inspections. The fire barrier inspection program requires periodic visual inspection of fire barrier penetration seals, fire barrier walls , ceilings, and floors, fire damper housings, and periodic visual inspection and functional tests of fire-rated doors to demonstrate that their operability is maintained. The program also includes periodic inspections and functional tests of the halon systems and low-pressure carbon dioxide systems.

A1.16 FIRE WATER SYSTEM The Fire Water System program is an existing condition monitoring program that manages cracking. loss of material , flow blockage due to fouling , and loss of coating integrity for in-scope water-based fire protection systems . This program manages aging effects by conducting periodic PageA-13 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 29 of 74

l !

'

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement visual inspections , flow testing , and flushes consistent with provisions of the 2011 Edition of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 25 . Testing of sprinklers that have been in place for 50 years is performed consistent with NFPA 25 , 2011 Edition . With exception of two locations ,

portions of the water-based fire protection system that have been wetted but are normally dry have been confirmed to drain and are not subjected to augmented testing and inspections.

The water-based fire protection system is normally maintained at required operating pressure and is monitored such that loss of system pressure is detected and corrective actions initiated . Piping wall thickness measurements are conducted when visual inspections detect surface irregularities indicative of unexpected levels of degradation . When the presence of organic or inorganic material sufficient to obstruct piping or sprinklers is detected , the material is removed and the source is detected and corrected . Non-code inspections and tests follow site procedures that include inspection parameters for items such as lighting , distance offset, presence of protective coatings ,

and cleaning processes that ensure an adequate examination .

The training and qualification of individuals involved in coating/lining inspections of non-cementitious coatings/linings are conducted in accordance with ASTM International Standards endorsed in RG 1.54 including guidance from the staff associated with a particular standard .

A1.17 OUTDOOR AND LARGE ATMOSPHERIC METALLIC STORAGE TANKS The Outdoor and Large Atmospheric Metallic Storage Tanks program is an existing condition monitoring program that manages the effects of loss of material and cracking on the outside and inside surfaces of aboveground metallic tanks constructed on concrete or soil. This program is a condition monitoring program that manages aging effects associated with outdoor tanks with internal pressures approximating atmospheric pressure including the refueling water storage tanks (RWSTs) , refueling water chemical addition tanks (CATs) , emergency condensate storage tanks (ECSTs) , and the emergency condensate makeup tanks (ECMTs). This program also manages aging of the fire protection/domestic water storage tanks (FWSTs) bottom surfaces exposed to soil.

The program includes preventive measures to mitigate corrosion by protecting the external surfaces of steel components per standard industry practice. The RWSTs are insulated and rest on a concrete foundation covered with an oil sand cushion . Caulking is used at the concrete-component interface of the RWSTs . The ECSTs and ECMTs are internally coated and protected by concrete missile barriers. Weep holes, located around the circumference of the ECSTs where the concrete missile shield meets the concrete foundation , allow drainage of leakage or condensation to the outside perimeter of the ECSTs. The weep holes will be inspected for water leakage once each refueling cycle . The CATs are skirt supported and insulated with sprayed-on rigid polyurethane foam .

The program manages loss of material on tank internal bare metal surfaces by conducting visual inspections . Surface exams of external tank surfaces are conducted to detect cracking on the PageA-14 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 30 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement A1 .31 ASME SECTION XI , SUBSECTION IWF The ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF program is an existing condition monitoring program that manages loss of material , cracking , loss of preload , and loss of mechanical function for supports of Class 1, 2, and 3 components . There are no Class MC supports at SPS . This program consists of periodic visual examination of piping and component supports for signs of degradation , evaluation ,

and corrective actions. This program recommends additional inspections beyond the inspections required by the 10 CFR Part 50.55a ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF program . This includes a one-time inspection within five years prior to entering the subsequent period of extended operation of an additional 5% of the sample populations for Class 1, 2, and 3 piping supports. The additional supports will be selected from the remaining population of IWF piping supports and will include components that are most susceptible to age-related degradation . For high-strength bolting with an actual yield strength equal to or greater than 150 ksi in sizes greater than one inch nominal diameter, volumetric examination comparable to that of ASME Code ,Section XI , Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-G-1 are performed to detect cracking in addition to the VT-3 examination . If a component support does not exceed the acceptance standards of IWF-3400, but is electively repaired to as-new condition , the sample is increased or modified to include another support that is representative of the remaining population of supports that were not repaired .

A1.32 10 CFR PART 50 , APPENDIX J The 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J program is an existing performance monitoring program that manages cracking , loss of leak tightness , loss of material , loss of preload and loss of sealing.

Leakage rates through the Containment pressure boundary are monitored , including the Containment liner, associated welds , penetrations , isolation valves , fittings , and other access openings to detect degradation of the Containment pressure boundary. Corrective actions are taken if leakage rates exceed acceptance criteria . Leakage rate testing is performed in accordance with the regulations and guidance provided in 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix J , Option B; Regulatory Guide 1.163, "Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program ;" afl4-NEI 94-01 , "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR 50 , Appendix J~" and subject to the requirements of 10 CFR Part 54.

PageA-27 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 31 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement A1.33 MASONRY WALLS The Masonry Walls program is an existing condition monitoring program that is implemented as part of the Structures Monitoring program (A 1.34) and manages loss of material , cracking , and loss of material (spalling and scaling) that could impact the intended function of the masonry walls .

The Masonry Walls program consists of inspections, consistent with Inspection and Enforcement Bulletin (IEB) 80-11 and plant-specific monitoring proposed by Information Notice (IN) 87-67 , for managing shrinkage, separation , gaps, loss of material and cracking of masonry walls such that the evaluation basis is not invalidated and intended functions are maintained . The inspections of the masonry walls within the scope of subsequent license renewal are conducted by qualified personnel at a frequency not to exceed five years .

A1.34 STRUCTURES MONITORING The Structures Monitoring program is an existing condition monitoring program that monitors the condition of structures and structural supports that are within the scope of subsequent license renewal to manage the following aging effects:

  • Cracking
  • Cracking and distortion
  • Cracking, loss of material
  • Cracking, loss of bond , and loss of material (spalling , scaling)
  • Increase in porosity and permeability, cracking , loss of material (spalling , scaling)
  • Loss of material
  • Loss of material, loss of form
  • Loss of material , change in material properties
  • Loss of material (spalling, scaling) and cracking
  • Loss of mechanical function
  • Loss of preload
  • Loss of sealing
  • Reduction in concrete anchor capacity
  • Reduction of foundation strength and cracking
  • Reduction or loss of isolation function This program consists of periodic visual inspection and monitoring the condition of concrete and steel structures, structural components , component supports, and structural commodities to ensure that aging degradation (such as those described in ACI 349.3R, ACI 201 .1R, and other documents)

PageA-28 Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 32 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix A - UFSAR Supplement will be detected , the extent of degradation determined and evaluated , and corrective actions taken prior to loss of intended functions . Inspections also include seismic joint fillers , elastomeric materials; and steel edge supports and steel bracings associated with masonry walls , and periodic evaluation of groundwater chemistry and opportunistic inspections for the condition of below grade concrete. Quantitative results (measurements) and qualitative information from periodic inspections are trended with photographs and surveys for the type , severity, extent, and progression of degradation . The acceptance criteria are derived from applicable consensus codes and standards.

For concrete structures , the program includes personnel qualifications and quantitative acceptance criteria of ACI 349.3R-02, "Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures." The inspection of structural components , including masonry walls and water-control structures , are performed at intervals not to exceed five years, except for wooden poles, which are inspected on a 10-year frequency.

Qualified inspectors identify changes that could be indicative of Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR). If ind ications of ASR development are identified , the evaluation considers the potential for ASR development in concrete that is within the scope of the Structures Monitoring program (A 1.34) , the ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL prog ram (A 1.30), or the Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated With Nuclear Power Plants program (A 1.35) .

ASME Code ,Section XI , visual exam inations (VT-1) are conducted to detect cracking of stainless steel and aluminum components.

PageA-29 Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 33 of 74

Table A4.0-1 Subsequent License Renewal Commitments

  1. Program Commitment AMP Implementation The Fire Water System program is an existing condition monitoring program that will be enhanced as follows:
1. PFeeeeh::1Fes iAs13eetisA §1:1isaAee will 13e Fe*rises ts Feei1:1iFe Fe13laeeFAeAt sf aAy s13FiAkleF tl:iat sl=lsws aAy sf tl=le fellswiA§ :

leak,;1§e , esFFssisA , 131:lysieal saFAa§e , lsasiA§ , 13aiAtiA§ 1:1Aless 13aiAtes 13y tl=le s13FiAkleF FAaA1:1faet1:1FeF, SF iASSFFeet Program will be sFieAtatisA . S13FiAkleFs at tl=le fellswiA§ lseatisAs will 13e asses ts tl=le test see13e : +Re ~aswaste Faeility, A1:11EiliaFy BeileF, implemented and MaiAteAaAee B1:1ilsiA§ , GeAseAsate Pslisl=liA§ B1:1ilsiA§ , ba1:1ASF'.f B1:1ilsiA§ , aAs Mael=liAe S1=le13 B1:1ilsiA§ . (Comgleted Change inspections or tests Notice 1) begin 5 years before the

2. Prior to 50 years in service , sprinkler heads will be submitted for field-service testing by a recognized testing laboratory subsequent period consistent with NFPA 25 , 2011 Edition , Section 5.3.1. Additional representative samples will be fie ld-service tested every of exten ded 10 years thereafter to ensu re signs of aging are detected in a timely manner. For wet pipe spri nkler systems , a one-time operation.

test of sprinklers that have been exposed to water including the sample size , sample selection criteria , and minimum time Inspections or tests in service of tested sprinklers will be performed . 81 !ils!Qh unit, s! ~s1m12l!il of J0.{Q ors! msiximum of t!;ln ~grinkl!;lr~ with no mor!;l that are to be than four sgrinklers ger structure shall be tested . Testing is based on a minimum time in service of fiftl£ l£ears and severitll of completed prior to ogerating conditions for each gogulation. (Revised Change Notice 2) the subsequent Fire Water 3. Procedures will be revised to specify :

16 82.1.16 period of extended System program a. Standpipe and system flow tests for hose stations at the hydraulically most limiting locations for each zone of the operation are system on a five year interval to demonstrate the capability to provide the design pressure at required flow.

completed 6 months

b. Acceptance criteria for wet pipe main drain tests. Flowing pressures from test to test will be monitored to determine if prior to the there is a 10% reduction in full flow pressure when compared to previously performed tests . The Corrective Action subsequent period Program will determine the cause and necessary corrective action. of extended
c. If a flow test or a main drain test does not meet acceptance criteria due to current or projected degradation additional operation or no later tests are conducted. The number of increased tests is determined in accordance with the corrective action process ; than the last however, there are no fewer than two additional tests for each test that did not meet acceptance criteria . The additional refueling outage inspections are completed within the interval in which the original test was conducted . If subsequent tests do not meet prior to the acceptance criteria, an extent of condition and extent of cause analysis is conducted to determine the further extent of subsequent period tests. The additional tests include at least one test at the oth er unit with the same material , environment, and aging of extended effect combination. operation.
d. Main drains for the standpipes associated with hose stations within the scope of subsequent license renewal will also be added to main drain testing procedures .

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 PageA-71 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 34 of 74

Table A4.0-1 Subsequent License Renewal Commitments

  1. Program Commitment AMP Implementation
4. Procedures will be revised to gerform internal visual insgections of sgrinkler and deluge system giging to identit'. internal corrosion, foreign material, and obstructions to flow. Follow-ug volumetric examinations will be gerformed if internal visual insgections detect age-related degradation in excess of what would be exgected accounting for design, grevious insgection exgerience, and insgection interval. If organic Qr foreign material, or internal flow blockage that could result in failure of system function is identified, then an obstruction investigation will be gerformed within the Corrective Action Program that includes removal of the material, an extent of condition determination, review for increased insgections, extent of follow-ug examinations, and a flush in accordance with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition, Annex D.5, Flushing Procedures. The internal visual Program will be insgections will consist of the following : (Relocated from Commitment 10 and corrected - Change Notice 2} implemented an d
a. Wet gige sgrinkler systems - 50% of the wet gige sgrinkler systems in scoge for subsequent license renewal will have inspections or tests visual internal insgections of giging by removing a hydraulically remote sgrinkler, gerformed eve[Y five years, consistent begin 5 years with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition , Section 14.2. During the next five-year insgection geriod , the alternate systems greviously before the not insgected shall be insgected. subsequent period of extended
b. Pre-action sgrinkler systems - gre-action sgrinkler systems in scoge for subsequent license renewal will have visual operation .

internal insgections of giging by removing a hydraulically remote nozzle, gerformed eve[Y five years, consistent with Inspections or tests NFPA 25, 2011 Edition. Section 14.2.

that are to be C. Deluge systems - deluge systems in scoge for subsequent license renewal will have visual internal insgections of giging completed prior to by removing a hydraulically remote nozzle, gerformed eve[Y five years, consistent with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition, Section the subsequent Fire Water 14.2.

16 82 .1.16 period of extended System program 5. Procedures will be revised to perform system flow testing at flows representative of those expected during a fire . A flow operation are resistance factor (C -factor) w ill be calcu lated to compare and trend the friction loss characteristics to the resu lts from completed 6 months previous flow tests. (Renumbered Change Notice 2) prior to the

6. PFeseElufes faf hyElfaAl flushiA§ y,*ill ee fe>w<iseEI ta feeiuife fully a13eAiA§ the hyElfaAl aAEI fully flawiA§ the hyElfaAl faf Re less subsequent period thaA aAe miAute aAEI uAtil fafei§A malefial has sleafeEI . IA aEIElitieA . J3feseElufes will ee fe>w<iseEI te eeseFYe ElfaiAiA§ ef the of extended hyElfaAl eaffel aAEI alsa feeiuife the eaffe l ee 13um13eEI Elfy sheulEI it Rel ElfaiA withiA eQ ffliAutes . 1-lyElrnAts eutsiee the operation or no later 13rntesteEI arna that am withiA the sso13e of sueseeiueAt liseAse FeAewal will ee aEIEleEI to the flush sso13e .(Comgleted than the last Change Notice 1 and renumbered Change Notice 2 refueling outage
7. +he Fife VIJatef Systeffl J3fO§faffl will ee fe*.iiseEI to 13efi0Elisally iAs13est the iAsulateEI eidefiof suffases of the fife watef taAks prior to the eA a ~ Q yeaf ffeeiueAsy ElufiA§ the sueseeiueAl 13efiaEI ef e13efatieA. IAsulaliaA is feme..,eEI le J3f9>w<iee a ffliAiffluffl iAs13estioA subsequent period 13a13ulatiaA af ~a aAe seiuafe foot saffl13les. +he saffl13les will ee ElistfieuteEI iA sush a way that iAs13estiaAs assuf aA the taAk of extended Elaffle. Aeaf the laAk eaUaffl. al 13aiAts whern stfusturnl su1313aFts. 13i13e. af iAstfuffleAt A9i!:i!:les 13eAetfate the iAsulatieA aAel operation.

whefe watef saulel sallest. IA aElelitiaA . iAs13estiaA lasatiaAs will ee eases aA the lil~elihaael af saFFasiaA uAeleF iAsulatiaA aoourriA§. Prior to the subsequent geriod of extended ogeration, the insulation on the exterior surfaces of the fire water storage tanks (FWSTs} will be germanently removed. Wall thickness measurements will be gerformed on external tank ares;1§ exhibiting un!;lxgected degradation . Refurbishment/recoating will be gerformed consistent with the severi!y of the degradation identified and commensurate with the gotential for loss of intended function. lnsgections of external tank surfaces will be on a refueling cycle frequency. (Renumbered Change Notice 2 and revised Change Notice 3} Surry Power Station . Units 1 and 2 PageA-72 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Append ix A - UFSAR Supplement En closure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 35 of 74

Table A4.0-1 Subsequent License Renewal Commitments

#        Program                                                                             Commitment                                                                              AMP        Implementation
8. PFeeeeh::1Fes feF FAaiAliAe stFaiAeF fh,1sl:liA§ will ee Fe't'ised te Feei1:1iFe fl1:1sl:liA§ 1:1Atil eleaF wateF is eeseFYed afteF eael:l e13eratieA eF flew test IA additieA te fl1:1sl:liA§ afteF e13eratieA , tl:le ~adwaste Faeility FAaiAliAe straiAeF will Feei1:1iFe aA iAs13eetien e't'el)'

fi*,*e yeaFs feF daFAa§ed and eeFFeded 13aFts.(Comi;ileted - Change Notice 1 and renumbered Change Notice 2}}

9. A procedure will be created to provide a Turbine Building oil deluge systems spray nozzle air flow test to ensure that patterns are not impeded by plugged nozzles , to ensure that nozzles are correctly positioned , and to ensure that obstructions do not prevent discharge patterns from wetting surfaces to be protected. (Renumbered Change Notice 2) rn. PFeeed1:1Fes will ee FeYised te 13effeFFA iAteFAal 1.<<is1:1al iAs13eetieAs ef s13FiAkleF aAd del1:1§e systeFA 13i13iA§ te identify iAteFAal Program will be eeFFesien, feFei§n FAateFial , aAd eestF1:1etiens te flew. Fellew 1:113 \lel1:1FAetFie eMaFAinatieAs will ee 13effeFFAed if iAteFAal 't'is1:1al implemented and iAs13eetiens detest a§e Felated de§FadatieA iA eiEeess ef wl:lat we1:1ld ee eM13eeted aeee1:1AtiA§ feF desi§A, we*.<<ie1:1s iAs13eetieA inspections or tests eM13eFieAee , aAd iAs13eetieA iAtePw'al. If eF§aAie eF ferni§A FAatmial , eF iAteFAal flew eleeka§e tl:lat ee1:1ld rns1:1lt iA fail1:1rn ef begin 5 years systeFA f1:1Aetien is identified , tl:len an eestF1:1etien in't'esti§atieA will ee 13effeFFAed witl=lin tl:le GeFFeeti*.<<e Aetien PFe§FaFA tl:lat before the iAel1:1des FeFAe*,al ef tl:le FAateFial , aA eMteAt ef eenditien deteFFAinatien , Fe*.<<iew feF ineFeased ins13eetiens, eMtent ef fellew 1:113 subsequent period elEaFAiAatiens, and a fl1:1sl:l in aeeeFdaAee witl=I ~IFPA 2e , 2011 Editien, AAAei1 g_e, Fl1:1sl:liA§ PFeeed1:1Fes. +l=le inteFAal 1Jis1:1al of extended ins13eetieAs will eeAsist ef tl=le fellewiA§: (Old Enhancement 9 was relocated to Enhancement 4 Change Notice 2) operation .

Inspections or tests

a. !Alet 13i13e Sl3FiAl~leF systeFAS e0% ef tl=le wet 13i13e s13FiAl~leF systeFAs iA see13e feF s1:1eseei1:1eAt lieeAse FeAewal will l:la>.<<e that are to be
                                 't'is1:1al iAteFAal iAs13eetieAs ef 13i13iA§ ey FeFAe*,in§ a l:lydFa1:1lieally FeFAete s13FinkleF, 13effeFFAed e't'ei:y fi*.<<e yeaFs , seAsisteAt completed prior to witl:l ~IFP/\ 2e , 2011 Editien , Seetien 14 .2. (;)1:1Fin§ tl=le neMt fi'4*e yeaF iAs13estieA 13mied, tl:le alteFAate systeFAs 13rn\*ie1:1sly the subsequent Fire Wate r                  Aet iAs13eeted sl:lall ee iAs13ested.

16 B2.1.16 period of extended System program b. PFe aetieA Sl3FiAkleF systeFAS 13Fe aetieA s13FiAkleF systeFAs iA see13e feF s1:10seei1:1eAt lieeAse Fenewal will Ra\le \lis1:1al operation are iAteFAal ins13estiens ef 13i13in§ ey FeFAe\lin§ a 1:lydra1:1lieally FeFAete Aezzle , 13effeFFAed e>.<<el)' fi1Je yeaFs , sensistent witl=I completed 6 months

                                  ~JFP.O. 2e , 2011 Editien , Sestien 14 .2.

prior to the C. (;)el1:1§e systeFAs del1:1§e systeFAs in see13e feF s1:10SeE11:1ent lieense FeAewal will Ra\le 1,is1:1al inteFnal ins13eetiens ef 13i13in§ subsequent period ey FeFAe*,in§ a l=lydra1:1lieally FeFAete Aezzle, 13effeFFAed e*,el)' fi*,e yeaFS , eensistent witl=I ~IFP.o. 2e, 2011 Editien , SeetieA of extended

                                 ~

operation or no later

10. Procedure wi ll be revised to provide inspection guidance related to lighting , distance and offset for non-ASME Code than the last inspections . The procedure will specify adequate lighting be verified at the inspection location to detect degradation . refueling outage Lighting may be permanently installed , temporary, or portable (e.g ., flashlight) , as appropriate. For accessible surface prior to the inspections, inspecting from a distance of two to four feet (or less) will be appropriate. For distant surface inspections, subsequent period viewing aids such as binoculars may be used . For viewing angles which may prevent adequate inspection , a viewing aid of extended such as an inspection mirror or boroscope should be used . operation .
11. The Unit 1 hydrogen seal oil system deluge sprinkler pipe and Unit 1 station main transformer '1A' deluge sprinkler piping will be reconfigured to allow drainage .A§ i;iact Qf th~ drainag~ r~QQofigurs;itiQn vi§ys;il in§i;i~Q1iQn§ and ws;ill thiQkn~§§ measurements will be i;ierformed on the Unit 1 hJ'.drogen seal oil SJ'.Stem deluge si;irinkler i;iii;ie that does not drain . In addition, wall thiQkness examination of the Unit 1 main transformer deluge sgrinkler giging that does not allow drainage will also be i;ierformed as i;iart of the drainage reconfiguration . Pii;iing with unexi;iected degradation will be rei;ilaced . (Revised Change Notice 3)

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 PageA-73 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 36 of 74

Table A4.0-1 Subsequent License Renewal Commitments

#        Program                                                                  Commitment                                                                 AMP       Implementation
12. The grogram will be revised to reguire insgections and tests be gerformed by gersonnel gualified in accordance with site Program will be grocedures and grograms for the sgecified task. (Added Change Notice 2} implemented and
13. Procedures will be revised to reguire when degraded coatings are detected by internal coating insgections, accegtance inspections or tests criteria and corrective action recommendations consistent with the Internal Coatings/Linings for ln-Scoge Piging, Piging begin 5 years Comgonen!~. Heat Exchangers and Tanks (82.1 .28} grog ram are followed in lieu of NFPA 25 section 9.2.7 (1 }, (2}, and (4}. before the When interior gitting or general corrosion (beyond minor surface rust) is detected, tank wall thickness measurements are subsequent period conducted as stated in NFPA 25 Section 9.2.7(3} in vicinity of the loss of material. Vacuum box testing as stated in NFPA of extended 25 Section 9.2.7(5} is conducted when gitting, cracks, or loss of material is detected in the immediate vicinity of welds . operation .

(Added Change Notice 2} Inspections or tests

14. Procedures will be revi sed to address recurring internal corrosion with the use of Low Frequency Electromagnetic that are to be Technique (LFET) or a similar technique on 100 feet of piping during each refueling cycle to detect changes in the pipe wa ll completed prior to thickness . LFET scree ni ng or a similar technique wi ll also be performed on accessib le interior fire water storage tank the subsequent Fire Water 16 bottoms durin g periodic inspecti ons. The procedure will specify thinned areas found during the LFET screening be followe d B2 .1.16 period of extended System program up with pipe wall thickness examinations to ensure aging effects are managed and wall thickness is within acceptable operation are limits. In addition to the pipe wa ll thickness exami nation , the performa nce of opportunistic visual inspections of the fire completed 6 months protection system will be requ ired whenever the fire water system is opened for maintenance. prior to the subsequent period of extended operation or no later than the last refueling outage prior to the subsequent period of extended operation .

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 PageA-74 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewa l Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 37 of 74

Table A4.0-1 Subsequent License Renewal Commitments

#        Program                                                                          Commitment                                                                     AMP        Implementation The Structures Monitoring program is an existing condition monitoring program that will be enhanced as follows :
1. Procedures wi ll be revised to include inspection of the following structures that are within the scope of subsequent license renewal : decontamination building , radwaste facility, health physics yard office building, laundry facility, and machine shop.

lnsgections for the added structures will be gerformed under the enhanced grogram in order to establish guantitative baseline insgection data grior to the subseguent geriod of extended oi;ieration . (Revised Change Notice 1)

2. Procedures will be revised to add the oiled-sand cushion to the insgection of the fire grotection/domestic water tank foundation .(Added Change Notice 3)
3. Procedures will be revised to include preventive actions to ensure bolting integrity for replacement and maintenance activities by specifying proper selection of bolting material and lubricants, and appropriate installation torque or tension to prevent or minimize loss of bolting preload and cracking of high-strength bolting. For structural bolting consisting of ASTM A325 , ASTM A490 , ASTM F1852 and/or ASTM F2280 bolts, the preventive actions for storage , lubricant selection , and bolting and coating material selection discussed in Section 2 of the Research Council for Structural Connections publication, "Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts," will be used .
4. The checklil;;t for l;;tructural and suggort steel will be revised to indicsite: "Are anll connection memt;!ers loose, misl;;ing or Program damaged (bolts, rivets, nuts, etc.)?". (Added Change Notice 2) enhancements for
5. Prases1:1res will 13e revises ta req1:1ire at least f.i*,e years af mE13erieAse (ar /\GI iAs13estar sertif.isatiaA) fer saAsrete iAs13estors SLR will be Structures ta 13e saAsisteAt witl=l AGI J49 .J~ GG~ . Procedures will be revised to regu ire at least five )lears of exgerience (or ACI implemented 34 Monitoring B2.1.34 insgector certification) for concrete insgectors to be consistent with ACI 349 .3R-002 . Procedures will be revised to 6 months prior to program eliminate ogtions for insgector gualifications that are not consistent with ACI 349.3R-002.(Revised Change Notice 2) the subsequent
6. Proses1:1res ,,,*ill ee re*,ises ta iAs13est ,..,,aaseA 1301,.rer 13ales aA a rn year freq1:1eAsy. Procedures will be revised to sgecifll period of extended that wooden gole insgections will be gerformed eve[ll ten )lears bl,'. an outside firm that grovides wooden gole insgection operation.

services that are consistent with standard indust[ll gractice . Visual examinations mall be augmented with sound ings or other technigues aggrogriate for the t)li;ie, condition, and treatment of the wooden goles, including borings to determine the location and extent of decall and excavation to determine the extent of decal£ at the groundline. (Revised Change Notice 2)

7. Procedures will be revised to sgecifll that evaluation of insgection resu lts includes consideration of the accegtabilitll of inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the gresence of, or result in, degradation to such inaccessible areas. (Added Change Notice 2)
8. Procedures will be enhanced to sgecifll VT-1 insgections to identifll cracking on stainless steel and aluminum comgonents .

A minimum of 25 insgections will be gerformed eve[ll ten )lears during the subseguent geriod of extended ogeration from each of the stainless steel and aluminum comgonent gogulations assigned to the Structures Monitoring grogram . If the comgonent il:! measured in linear feet, at least one foot will be insgected to gualifll as an insgection . For other comgonents, at least 20% of the surface area will be insgected to gualifll as an insgection. The selection of comgonents for insgection will consider the severit)l of the environment. For examgle, comgonents gotentialll£ exgosed to halides and moisture would be insgected, since those environmental factors can facilitate stress corrosion cracking. (Added Change Notice 2) Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 PageA-95 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Appendix A - UFSAR Supplement Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 38 of 74

Table A4.0-1 Subsequent License Renewal Commitments

#        Program                                                                      Comm itment                                                                      AMP        Implementation
9. Procedures will be enhanced to sr;iecib£ for the samr;iling-based insr;iections to detect cracking in stainless steel and aluminum comr;ionents, additional insr;iections will be conducted if one of the insr;iections does not meet accer;itance criteria due to current or r;irojected degradation unless the cause of the aging effect for each ar;ir;ilicable material and environment is corrected b~ rer;iair or rer;ilacement for all comr;ionents constructed of the same material and exr;iosed to the same environment . No fewer than five additional insr;iections for each insr;iection that did not meet accer;itance criteria or 20 r;iercent of each ar;ir;ilicable material, environment, and aging effect combination will be insr;iected, whichever is less.

Additional insr;iections w ill be comr;ileted within the 10-~ear insr;iection interval in which the original insr;iection was conducted . The resr;ionsible engineer will initiate condition rer;iorts to generate work orders to r;ierform the additional insr;iections. The resr;ionsible engineer will evaluate the insr;iection results, and if the subseguent insr;iections do not meet acc~r;itance criteria, an extent of condition and extent of cause anal~sis will be conducted . The resr;ionsible engineer will then determine the further extent of insr;iections. Additional samr;iles will be insr;iected for an~ recurring degradation to ensure corrective actions ar;ir;iror;iriatel~ address the associated causes. The additional insr;iections will include insr;iections of comr;ionents with the same material, environment, and aging effect combination at both Unit 1 and Unit 2. If an~ r;irojected insr;iection results will not meet accer;itance criteria r;irior to the next scheduled insr;iection, insr;iection freguencies will be adjusted as determined b~ the Corrective Action Program . (Added Change Notice 2}

10. Procedures will be enhanced to sr;iecib£ that evaluation of neutron shield tank findings consider its structural sur;ir;iort function for the reactor r;iressure vessel. (Added Change Notice 3}
11. Procedures will be enhanced to also include LOCAs as events that reguire evaluation for r;iotentiall~ degraded structures b~

Civil/Mechanical Design Engineering. (Added Change Notice 3) The Inspection of Water Control Structures Associated with Nuclear Power Plants prog ram is an existing condition monitoring program that will be enhanced as fo llows: Program Inspection of enhancements for

1. Procedures wi ll be revised to provide guidance for specification of bolting material, lubricants and sea lants, and installation Water Control SLR will be torque or tension to prevent degradation and assure structural bolting integrity.

Structures implemented 35 2. Procedures will be revised to specify the preventive actions for storage discussed in Section 2 of Research Council for B2.1.35 Associated with 6 months prior to Nuclear Power Structural Connections publication "Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts" for ASTM A325 , the subsequent ASTM F1852, ASTM F2280, and/or ASTM A490 structural bolts . Plants program period of extended

3. Procedures will be revised for concrete inspection to require at least five years of experience (or ACI inspector certification) operation .

to be consiste nt with AC I 349.3R-2002. Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 PageA-96 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Appendix A - UFSAR Su pplement Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 39 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs 82.1.16 Fire Water System Program Description The Fire Water System program is an existing cond ition monitoring program that manages loss of material , flow blockage , cracking and loss of coating integrity for in-scope water-based fire protection systems. This program manages aging effects by conducting periodic visual inspections, flow testing , and flushes. Testing and inspections are conducted on a refueling outage interval as allowed by NUREG-2191 , Section XI.M27 , Table XI.M27~1 . "Fire Water System Inspection and Testing Recommendations". There are no nozzle strainers , glass bulb sprinklers , fire pump suction strainers , or foam water sprinkler systems within the scope of subsequent license renewal. The Fire Water System program will include testing a representative sample of the sprinklers prior to fifty years in service with additional representative samples tested at 10-year intervals. Sprinkler testing will be performed consistent with the 2011 Edition of NFPA 25 , "Standard For The Inspection , Testing and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems," Section 5.3.1 . The fifty year in-service date for sprinklers is October 26, 2021 . Portions of water-based fire protection system components that have been wetted , but are normally dry, such as dry-pipe or preaction sprinkler system piping and valves, were designed and installed with a configuration and pitch to allow draining . With the exception of two locations , Engineering walkdowns confirmed the as-built configuration that allows draining and does not allow water to collect. Corrective actions have been initiated for the two locations to verify a flow blockage condition does not exist and to restore the two locations to original configuration requirements that allow draining and do not allow water to collect. After corrective actions, portions of the water-based fire protection system that have been wetted , but are normally dry, will not be subjected to augmented testing and inspections beyond those required by NUREG-2191 , AMP XI.M27 , Table XI. M27-1 . The water-based fire protection system is normally maintained at required operating pressure and is monitored such that loss of system pressure is detected and corrective actions initiated . A low pressure condition is alarmed in the Main Control Room by the auto start of the electric motor driven fire pump , followed by the start of the diesel-driven fire pump if the low pressure condition continues to exist. The status of the fire pumps is indicated in the Main Control Room and at the fire pump control panels in the pump house. Both fire pumps may be manually started from the control room . Piping wall thickness measurements are conducted when visual inspections detect surface irregularities indicative of unexpected levels of degradation . When the presence of organic or inorganic material sufficient to obstruct piping or sprinklers is detected , the material is removed and the source is detected and corrected. Page B-108 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 40 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Inspections and tests are performed by personnel qualified in accordance with procedures and programs to perform the specified task. Non-code inspections and tests follow procedures that include inspection parameters for items such as lighting , distance, offset , presence of protective coatings , and cleaning processes that ensure an adequate examination. If a flow test (i.e ., NFPA 25, 2011 Edition , Section 6.3.1) or a main drain test (i .e., NFPA 25, 2011 Edition , Section 13.2 .5) does not meet the acceptance criteria due to current or projected degradation , additional tests are conducted. The number of increased tests is determined in accordance with the site's corrective action process ; however, there are no fewer than two additional tests for each test that did not meet the acceptance criteria. The additional inspections are completed within the interval (i .e., five years or annual/refueling) in which the original test was conducted . If subsequent tests do not meet the acceptance criteria , an extent of condition and extent of cause analysis is conducted to determine the further extent of tests required. The additional tests will include at least one test at the other unit on site with the same material , environment, and aging effect combination . In addition to piping replacement , actions will be taken to address instances of recurring corrosion due to microbiological induced corrosion. Low Frequency Electromagnetic Technique (LFET) or similar scanning technique will be used for screening 100 feet of accessible piping during each refueling cycle to detect changes in the wall thickness of the pipe . Thinned areas found during the LFET scan are followed up with pipe wall thickness examinations to ensure aging effects are managed and that wall thickness is within acceptable limits. In addition to the pipe wall thickness examination , opportunistic visual inspections of the fire protection system will be performed whenever the fire water system is opened for maintenance. Aging of the external surfaces of buried and underground fire main piping is managed by the Buried and Underground Piping and Tanks program (B2 .1.27) . Loss of material and cracking of the internal surfaces of cement lined buried and underground fire main piping are managed by the Internal Coatings/Linings For In-Scope Piping, Piping Components, Heat Exchangers, and Tanks program (B2 .1.28) . Aging of the fire water storage tank bottom surfaces exposed to oil soil are managed by the Outdoor and Large Atmospheric Metallic Storage Tanks program (B2 .1.17). When degraded coatings are detected during internal inspections of the fire water storage tanks , acceptance criteria , and corrective action recommendations of the Internal Coatings/Linings For In -Scope Piping, Piping Components, Heat Exchangers, and Tanks program (B2.1 .28) are followed. The training and qualification of individuals involved in coating/lining inspections of non-cementitious coatings/linings are conducted in accordance with ASTM International Standards endorsed in RG 1.54 including guidance from the staff associated with a particular standard . Page B-109 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 41 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix B - Ag ing Management Programs NUREG-2191 Consistency The Fire Water System program is an existin g program that , follow in g enhancement, will be consistent, with exception , to NUREG-2191 , Section XI M27, Fire Water System . Exception Summary The following program element(s) are affected : Detection of Aging Effects (Element 4)

1. (Deleted exception for fire water storage tanks insulated external surface inspections - Change Notice 3) The fire water storage tanlm are insulated oarbon steel tanlm looated in an outdoor environment. ~JU REG 2191, AMP XI.M27 , Table XI.M27 1 and note 10 recommends the insulated mcternal surfaoes of fire water storage tan Im be inspeoted for signs of degradation on a refueling outage interval for signs of degradation . This would require insulation removal each refueling cycle . Therefore , inspections of the external carbon steel surfaces of the fire water storage tanks will be performed on a 10 year frequency during the subsequent period of operation .

Justification for Exception : The line item in NU REG 2191 , Section XI.M27 , Table XI.M27 1, for water storage tank external surfaces recommends the inspection guidance of NFPA, 2011 Edition , Section 9.2 .5.5, which requires inspeotion of insulated tank surfaoes. ~ff PA, 2011 Edition , Scotian 9.2 .5.5, does not provide specifio inspection guidance for oorrosion of metallio surfaoes under insulation in an outdoor air environment. NU REG 2191 , Section XI.M29, Outdoor and Large Atmospheric Metallic Storage Tanks , element 4, provides inspeotion guidanoe for oorrosion under insulation for insulated oarbon steel tanl<s looated in an outdoor environment. NUREG 2191 , Section XI.M29 , Table XI.M29 1, recommends a 10 year frequency for corrosion under insulation during the subsequent period of operation .

2. NUREG-2191 , Table XI.M27-1 , note 10 recommends main drain tests at each water-based system riser to determine if there is a change in the condition of the water piping and control valves on an annual or refueling outage interval. Surry Power Station will perform the main drain tests on twenty percent of the standpipes and risers every refueling cycle .

Justification for Exception As indicated by NUREG-2191 Table XI.M27-1 , note 10, access for some inspections is feasible only during refueling outages which are scheduled every eighteen months. Main drain tests on twenty percent of the standpipes and risers every eighteen months provide adequate information to determine the condition of the fire water piping is maintained consistent with the design basis. Page B-11 0 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 42 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Enhancements Prior to the subsequent period of extended operation , the following enhancement(s) will be implemented in the following program element(s) : Parameters Monitored or Inspected (Element 3) , Detection of Aging Effects (Element 4) , Acceptance Criteria (Element 6) , and Corrective Actions (Element 7)

1. (Sprinkler inspections - Completed Change Notice 1)
2. Prior to 50 years in service , sprinkler heads will be submitted for field-service testing by a recognized testing laboratory consistent with NFPA 25 , 2011 Edition , Section 5.3.1. Additional representative samples will be field-service tested every 10 years thereafter to ensure signs of aging are detected in a timely manner.

For wet pipe sprinkler systems, a one-time test of sprinklers that have been exposed to water including the sample size , sample selection criteria , and minimum time in service of tested sprinklers will be performed . At each unit, a sample of 3% or a maximum of ten sprinklers with no more than four sprinklers per structure shall be tested . Testing is based on a minimum time in service of fifty years and severity of operating conditions for each population . (Revised - Change Notice 2)

3. Procedures will be revised to specify :
a. Standpipe and system flow tests for hose stations at the hydraulically most limiting locations for each zone of the system on a five year interval to demonstrate the capability to provide the design pressure at required flow.
b. Acceptance criteria for wet pipe main drain tests. Flowing pressures from test to test will be monitored to determine if there is a 10% reduction in full flow pressure when compared to previously performed tests . The Corrective Action Program will determine the cause and necessary corrective action .
c. If a flow test or a main drain test does not meet acceptance criteria due to current or projected degradation additional tests are conducted . The number of increased tests is determined in accordance with the corrective action process; however, there are no fewer than two additional tests for each test that did not meet acceptance criteria . The additional inspections are completed within the interval in which the original test was conducted . If subsequent tests do not meet acceptance criteria , an extent of condition and extent of cause analysis is conducted to determine the further extent of tests. The additional tests include at least one test at the other unit with the same material, environment, and aging effect combination .
d. Main drains for the standpipes associated with hose stations within the scope of subsequent license renewal will also be added to main drain testing procedures.

Page B-111 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 43 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B -Aging Management Programs

4. Procedures will be revised to perform internal visual inspections of sprinkler and deluge system piping to identify internal corrosion , foreign material , and obstructions to flow.

Follow-up volumetric examinations will be performed if internal visual inspections detect an unexpected level of degradation due to corrosion product deposition. If organic or foreign material , or internal flow blockage that could result in failure of system function is identified , then an obstruction investigation will be performed within the Corrective Action Program that includes removal of the material , an extent of condition determination , review for increased inspections, extent of follow-up examinations , and a flush in accordance with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition , Annex 0 .5, Flushing Procedures. The internal visual inspections will consist of the following : (Relocated from Enhancement 1O and Corrected - Change Notice 2)

a. Wet pipe sprinkler systems - 50% of the wet pipe sprinkler systems in scope for subsequent license renewal will have visual internal inspections of piping by removing a hydraulically remote sprinkler, performed every five years , consistent with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition , Section 14.2. During the next five-year inspection period , the alternate systems previously not inspected shall be inspected.
b. Pre-action sprinkler systems - pre-action sprinkler systems in scope for subsequent license renewal will have visual internal inspections of piping by removing a hydraulically remote nozzle, performed every five years , consistent with NFPA 25 , 2011 Edition ,

Section 14.2.

c. Deluge systems - deluge systems in scope for subsequent license renewal will have visual internal inspections of piping by removing a hydraulically remote nozzle, performed every five years , consistent with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition , Section 14.2.

Parameters Monitored or Inspected (Element 3) , Detection of Aging Effects (Element 4) , and Monitoring and Trending (Element 5)

5. Procedures will be revised to perform system flow testing at flows representative of those expected during a fire . A flow resistance factor (C-factor) will be calculated to compare and trend the friction loss characteristics to the results from previous flow tests .-(Renumbered :.

Change Notice 2) Parameters Monitored or Inspected (Element 3) and Detection of Aging Effects (Element 4)

6. (Hydrant flushing Completed :_Change Notice 1 and renumbered - Change Notice 2)
7. Prior to the subsequent period of extended operation, the insulation on the exterior surfaces of the fire water storage tanks (FWSTs) will be permanently removed . Wall thickness measurements will be performed on external tank areas exhibiting unexpected degradation .

Refurbishment/recoating w ill be performed consistent with the severity of the degradation identified and commensurate with the potential for loss of intended function . Inspections of external tank surfaces will be on a refueling cycle frequency. The Fire Viator Sy<stem program PageB-112 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 44 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs

    \*,ill be revised to periodically inspect the insulated exterior surfaces of the fire water tanks on a 1O year frequency during the subsequent period of operation. Insulation is removed to provide a minimum inspection population of 25 one square foot samples . The samples will be distributed in such a 1.vay that inspections occur on the tank dome , near the tank bottom , at points 1Nhere structural supports , pipe, or instrument nozzles penetrate the insulation and where ,,..ater could collect. In add ition , inspection locations will be based on the likelihood of corrosion under insulation occurring .(Renumbered - Change Notice 2 and revised - Change Notice 3)
8. (Strainer flushing G~ompleted :..Change Notice 1 and renumbered - Change Notice 2)
9. A procedure will be created to provide a Turbine Building oil deluge systems spray nozzle air flow test to ensure that patterns are not impeded by plugged nozzles, to ensure that nozzles are correctly positioned, and to ensure that obstructions do not prevent discharge patterns from wetting surfaces to be protected. (Renumbered - Change Notice 2)

(Old Enhancement #9 was Rr elocated to Enhancement 4 - Change Notice 2) Detection of Aging Effects (Element4)

10. Procedure will be revised to provide inspection guidance related to lighting , distance and offset for non-ASME Code inspections. The procedure will specify adequate lighting be verified at the inspection location to detect degradation . Lighting may be permanently installed ,

temporary, or portable (e.g., flashlight) , as appropriate. For accessible surface inspections , inspecting from a distance of two to four feet (or less) will be appropriate. For distant surface inspections, viewing aids such as binoculars may be used . For viewing angles which may prevent adequate inspection , a viewing aid such as an inspection mirror or boroscope should be used. 11 . The Unit 1 hydrogen seal oil system deluge sprinkler pipe and Unit 1 station main transformer

    '1A' deluge sprinkler piping will be reconfigured to allow drainage . As part of the drainage reconfiguration, visual inspections and wall thickness measurements will be performed on the Unit 1 hydrogen seal oil system deluge sprinkler pipe that does not drain. In addition, wall thickness examination of the Unit 1 main transformer deluge sprinkler piping that does not allow drainage will also be performed as part of the drainage reconfiguration. Piping with unexpected degradation will be replaced. (Revised - Change Notice 3)
12. The program will be revised to require inspections and tests be performed by personnel qualified in accordance with site procedures and programs for the specified task. (Added Change Notice 2)
13. Procedures will be revised to require when degraded coatings are detected by internal coating inspections, acceptance criteria and corrective action recommendations consistent with the Internal Coatings/Linings for In-Scope Piping , Piping Components , Heat Exchangers and Page B-113 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 45 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Tanks (B2.1 .28) program are followed in lieu of NFPA 25 section 9.2.7 (1) , (2) , and (4) . When interior pitting or general corrosion (beyond minor surface rust) is detected , tank wall thickness measurements are conducted as stated in NFPA 25 Section 9.2.7(3) in vicinity of the loss of material. Vacuum box testing as stated in NFPA 25 Section 9.2.7(5) is conducted when pitting , cracks , or loss of material is detected in the immediate vicinity of welds . (Added Change Notice 2) Detection of Aging Effects (Element4) and Acceptance Criteria (Element 6)

14. Procedures will be revised to address recurring internal corrosion with the use of Low Frequency Electromagnetic Technique (LFET) or a similar technique on 100 feet of piping during each refueling cycle to detect changes in the pipe wall thickness . LFET screening or a similar technique will also be performed on accessible interior fire water storage tank bottoms during periodic inspections. The procedure will specify thinned areas found during the LFET screening be followed up with pipe wall thickness examinations to ensure aging effects are managed and wall thickness is within acceptable limits. In addition to the pipe wall thickness examination , the performance of opportunistic visual inspections of the fire protection system will be required whenever the fire water system is opened for maintenance.

Operating Experience Summary The following examples of operating experience provide objective evidence that the Fire Water System program has been , and will be effective in managing the aging effects for SSCs within the scope of the program so that their intended functions will be maintained consistent with the current licensing basis during the subsequent period of extended operation.

1. In January 2012 , an Engineering walkdown of the fire protection piping header along the north wall of the Unit 2 Turbine Building revealed a potential leak location on the supply line to a hose rack. The flanged connection and straight pipe were removed and replaced .
2. In January 2012 , a section of 2-inch fire protection "drop" piping in the Turbine Building developed a leak. The investigation for extent of condition and determination for the extent of fire protection piping to be inspected and replaced , as necessary, involved inspections of three locations in the Turbine Building and three locations in the Auxiliary Building . Microbiologically induced corrosion (MIC) was evident in many locations, but the extent of corrosion was not as severe in the Auxiliary Building as it was in the Turbine Building. Despite the less severe corrosion in the Auxiliary Building , the three segments of piping that were inspected were replaced . Similarly, one of the three segments of piping in the Turbine Building was replaced .

A capital project was proposed for a multi-year process of replacing segments of 2-inch , 4-inch , and 10-inch piping in the Turbine Building . The initial phase that was completed included replacing 200 feet of ten inch piping in the Turbine Building . Additional phases were proposed , and described in the Fire Protection Strategic Plan . See April 2013 and November 2015 operating experience. Page B-114 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 46 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix B - Ag ing Management Programs

3. In June 2012 , during inspection of Auxiliary Building fire protection piping minor sediment was discovered in the supply header to the Unit 1 cable tunnel sprinklers. Debris and MIC nodules were discovered inside a spool piece and accessible four inch piping . The sediment and debris were removed , the visual inspection was performed , and the blind flanges and spool pieces were replaced . The necessary pipe replacement is included in the Fire Protection Strategic Plan.
4. In March 2013, NRC Information Notice 13-06, "Corrosion in Fire Protection Piping Due to Air and Water Interaction", identified industry operating experience involving the loss of function of fire protection water systems due to the potential for adverse air and water interactions in pre-action and dry-pipe systems . Engineering evaluated the potential for similar adverse conditions and associated degradation in deluge systems at Surry Power Station that are periodically flow tested . Subsequently, in January 2018, a walkdown was performed to confirm that plant design specifications on drainage features for piping downstream of all in-scope pre-action and deluge valves in the fire protection system continued to be in effect. Two locations, one relating to main transformer 1A and one relating to Unit 1 generator hydrogen seal oil system , were identified as having a potential for adverse air and water interactions and entered into the corrective action program .
5. In April 2013, a section of two 10-inch fire protection system piping in the Turbine Building developed a leak. A walkdown of six locations was performed to determine extent of condition in the Turbine Building and the Auxiliary Building . MIC was evident in four locations , but the extent of corrosion in the Auxiliary Building was not as severe. Replacement of 4-inch and 10-inch fire protection header is a like-for-like replacement. The replacement of the Turbine Fire Protection Header was split into four different phases. One phase was to be accomplished each year. The second phase is planned to replace approximately 400 feet of ten-inch header pipe and 200 feet of two-inch hose station pipe. The necessary pipe replacement is included in the Fire Protection Strategic Plan .
6. In February 2014, visual and volumetric inspections were performed for Fire Protection/domestic water storage tank 1A to determine the extent of additional degradation that had occurred since similar inspections were completed in December 2008 . The most significant degradation was noted on the tank floor. The result of the visual inspection was that coating degradation was continuing , and that some bare metal was evident. Similarly, volumetric examinations found additional thinning for the tank floor. /\n engineering e*;aluation projeoted that the tanl( floor plate would reaoh minimum aooeptable thiokness prior to the expiration of the Unit 2 renmued operating lioense. Monitoring of the tank floor will oontinue until the tank floor is repaired or replaoed . The neoessary tanl( repair or replaoement is inoluded in the fire Proteotion Strategio Plan . Follow-up visual examinations were performed in August 2018 and follow-up wall thickness examinations were performed in March 2019.

Prior wall thickness measurements were confirmed to be attributed to laminations that existed from original steel plate fabrication. An engineering evaluation projected the tank floor plate Page B-115 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 47 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs would maintain acceptable wall thickness thoughout the subsequent period of extended operation . Work orders were generated to refurbish/recoat the FWST interior surfaces prior to the subsequent period of extended operation .

7. In August 2014, visual and volumetric inspections were performed for Fire Protection/domestic water storage tank 1 B to determine the extent of additional degradation that had occurred since similar inspections were completed in December 2008 . The most significant degradation was noted on the tank floor. The result of the visual inspection was that coating degradation was continuing , and that some bare metal was evident. Volumetric mmminations found some thinning of the tank floor. /\n engineering evaluation projected that the tank floor plate would reach minimum acceptable thicl<ness prior to the expiration of the Unit 2 renewed operating license . Monitoring of the tank floor will continue until the tanl{ floor is repaired or replaced. Follow-up visual examinations were performed in August 2018 and follow-up wall thickness examinations were performed in March 2019 . Prior wall thickness measurements were confirmed to be attributed to laminations that existed from original steel plate fabrication .

An engineering evaluation projected the tank floor plate would maintain acceptable wall thickness thoughout the subsequent period of extended operation. Work orders were generated to refurbish/recoat the FWST interior surfaces prior to the subsequent period of operation .

8. In September 2014, a materials analysis was performed on buried cement lined grey cast iron fire main piping that was fractured during flow testing of hose station valves . The fracture was attributed to a latent material defect in the cast iron . The piping was removed and replaced with an equivalent spool piece. Based on the oxidation along the top segment of the crack , the pipe was cracked for a long period of time . High levels of calcium deposits on the fracture (from the cement lining) indicate that the pipe was partially cracked at the top segment before factory installation of the cement liner (manufacturing process) . Material analysis of the pipe determined that the microstructure consisted of graphite flakes that were approximately 75%

ferrite and 25% pearlite. This resulted in a reduction in the supplied material hardness. Failure of pipe was not preventable through maintenance. The failure was caused by ground settling . During the pipe replacement it was observed that there was vertical misalignment between the replacement pipe and the existing buried pipe, which indicated that the buried side piping was exerting a large bending load at the anchor/foundation . This bending load along with the pre-existing crack and lower hardness value caused the pipe fracture . The balance of the failed pipe was found in good condition with no significant loss of cement lining material , corrosion , cracking , fouling , or reduction of pipe interior diameter.

9. In November 2015 , an effectiveness review of the Fire Protection Program aging management activity (AMA) (UFSAR Section 18.2.7) was performed . The AMA was evaluated against the performance criteria identified in NEI 14-12 for the Detection of Ag in g Effects , Corrective Actions , and Operating Experience program elements. A comprehensive fire water system assessment recommended a large scale piping replacement of turbine building and auxiliary Page B-1 16 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 48 of 74

l Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix B - Aging Management Programs building piping . The large scale piping replacement project to be performed over multiple refueling outages was identified as a measure to address degradation in carbon steel system piping and to ensure that system intended functions were maintained . Completed and closed phases of this effort have included replacement of approximately 400 feet of 4 inch piping and 200 feet of 2 inch piping in 2014 and approximately 567 feet of 4 inch piping and 303 feet of 2 inch piping in 2015. An additional phase replacing approximately 175 feet of 4 inch piping and 100 feet of 2 inch piping has been completed and is awaiting final testing. Work documents for additional phases are planned and issued for work extending into 2019.

10. In April 2016, March 2019, results from fire protection system 2500 gpm flow tests with the motor driven fire pump in April 2016 , July 2013 , and April 2010 from 2014 through 2019 consistently showed that thesatisfactory system pressure is higher than the required value for the corresponding flow rate . In 2016 , the result ind icated that the measured pressure exceeded the required pressure by fourteen psi. In 2013, the measured pressure was thirteen psi higher than required . The result in 2010 measured a pressure that v,as 19 psi higher than required . The trend from these results does not indicate significant degradation over the s+*five-year interval , particularly considering the two most recent measurements. Results from fire protection system 2500 gpm flow tests with the diesel driven fire pump from 2014 through 2019 also consistently showed satisfactory system pressure for the corresponding flow rate.

There is confidence that continued implementation of flow monitoring for the fire protection system using the three year interval required by the Technical Requirements Manual will effectively manage aging prior to a loss of intended function. 11 . In December 2016, as part of oversight review activities, a review of procedures credited by initial license renewal AMAs was conducted to confirm the following:

  • Procedures credited for license renewal were identified
  • Procedures were consistent with the licensing basis and bases documents
  • Procedures contained a reference to conduct an aging management review prior to revising
  • Procedures credited for license renewal were identified by an appropriate program indicator and contained a reference to a license renewal document Procedure changes were completed as necessary to ensure the above items were satisfied.
12. In November 2017, as part of oversight reviews of the Fire Protection Program AMA (UFSAR Section 18.2.7), an inconsistency was identified in the performance interval for system integrity demonstration by main drain testing . The test interval had been extended from quarterly to each 18 months but the extended interval had not been incorporated into program documents.

An Engineering Assignment to review operating experience to trended performance data to 2011 has been completed with no significant degrading trends observed . The new interval is Page B-11 7 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 49 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs consistent with the test interval of NFPA 25 (2011 Edition) Table 13 .1.1.2 modified by NUREG-2191 , Section XI.M27 , Table XI.M27-1 , Note 10.

13. In January 2018 an aging management program effectiveness review was performed for the Fire Protection Program AMA (UFSAR Section 18.2.7). Information from the summary of that effectiveness review is provided below:

The Fire Protection Program AMA is meeting or exceeding the requirements of selected NEI 14-12, "Aging Management Program Effectiveness," elements. Key activities of the Fire Protection Program AMA that were reviewed include the inspection of components , the evaluation of inspection results , repairs/replacements, corrective actions, and AMA document updates. Engineering reports from 2006 to 2017 of inspections results were reviewed to confirm inspection frequencies were conducted at appropriate intervals and corrective actions taken consistent with the observed aging degradation . The review also included pertin ent issues found in the Corrective Action Program from 2006 through 2017 for age related degradation of fire protection components within the scope of license renewal. In the past, multiple fire water piping leaks had been identified in the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Turbine Buildings. As a result, a five phase large scale fire protection piping replacement project has been underway since 2015 to replace Turbine Building header piping and hose station piping as well as the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Auxiliary Building Hose station piping . Two of the Turbine Building phases are complete and two are waiting on testing . Phase five includes the remaining scope in the turbine building and the entire scope in the Auxiliary Building and is planned to start in 2018. Once complete , a large majority of the above ground fire protection piping in the plant will have been replaced , including areas where reoccurring leaks were previously identified . The fire water/domestic water storage tanks are managed by the Tank Inspection Activities AMA (UFSAR Section 18 .1.3) ; but , are also discussed here for overall fire protection performance considerations. The fire water/domestic water storage tanks were found to have failing internal coatings and loss of material on the tank floors. Estimates for projected useable tank lifetime and evaluations for additional monitoring were performed . Recommendations are being prepared for repair or replacement project considerations. Multiple operating issues, and obsolescence of the diesel driven fire pump resulted in a design change that replaced the diesel driven fire pump and associated control panel. The new diesel driven fire pump has exhibited substantially improved performance compared to the original fire pump. Act ivities to implement NFPA 25 , 1998 Edition , Section 2-3.1 .1 (1998 edition) , testing of sprinklers that have been in service for fifty years have been initiated to prove continued functionality. The Unit 1 and Unit 2 turbine building sprinklers have been sampled and will be tested by 202 1, when fifty years of service is reached . Page B-118 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 50 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Recurring Internal Corrosion (RIC) Recurring internal corrosion , including through-wall failures due to microbiological induced corrosion , has occurred on several occasions . Periodic fire protection system piping flushes , flow testing and piping thickness measurements will be performed to identify pipe degradation prior to loss of system intended function . Periodic visual inspections and tank bottom thickness measurements are performed on the fire water storage tanks . In addition to recent piping replacements in the Turbine Building and the Auxiliary Building to address instances of RIC due to microbiologically-influenced corrosion , Low Frequency Electromagnetic Technique (LFET) or a similar technique on 100 feet of piping during each refueling cycle to detect changes in the pipe wall thickness . LFET screening or a similar technique will also be performed on accessible interior fire water storage tank bottoms during periodic inspections. Thinned areas found during the LFET scan are followed-up with pipe wall thickness examinations to ensure aging effects are managed and that wall thickness is within acceptable limits. In addition to the pipe wall thickness examination , opportunistic visual inspections of the fire protection system will be performed whenever the fire water system is opened for maintenance. The above examples of operating experience provides objective evidence that the Fire Water System program includes activities to perform periodic fire main and hydrant inspections and flushing , sprinkler inspections , functional test , and flow tests to identify loss of material , flow blockage, and loss of coating integrity for in-scope water-based fire protection systems within the scope of subsequent license renewal , and to initiate corrective actions. Occurrences identified under the Fire Water System program are evaluated to ensure there is no significant impact to the safe operation of the plant and corrective actions will be taken to prevent recurrence . Appropriate guidance or corrective actions for additional inspections, re-evaluation , repairs , or replacements is provided for locations where aging effects are found . The program is informed and enhanced when necessary through the systematic and ongoing review of both plant-specific and industry operating experience. There is reasonable assurance that the continued implementation of the Fire Water System program , following enhancement, will effectively identify aging , and initiate corrective actions , prior to a loss of intended function . Conclusion The continued implementation of the Fire Water System program , following enhancement , will provide reasonable assurance that aging effects will be managed such that the components within the scope of this program will continue to perform the ir intended functions consistent with the current licensing basis during the subsequent period of extended operation. Page B-119 Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 51 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Ag ing Management Programs 82.1.33 Masonry Walls Program Description The Masonry Walls program is an existing condition monitoring program that manages loss of material, cracking , and loss of material (spalling and scaling) for masonry walls. The Masonry Walls program is implemented as part of the Structures Monitoring program (B2.1.34) . The Masonry Walls program consists of inspections, consistent with IE Bulletin 80-11 (IEB 80-11) , "Masonry Wall Design ," and plant-specific monitoring proposed by IN 87-67 , "Lessons Learned from Regional Inspections of Licensee Actions to IE Bulletin 80-11 ," for managing shrinkage , separation, gaps, loss of material and cracking of masonry walls such that the evaluation basis is not invalidated and intended functions are maintained . The Masonry Walls program relies on periodic visual inspections, conducted by qualified personnel at a frequency not to exceed five years , to monitor and maintain the condition of masonry walls within the scope of subsequent license renewal so that the established evaluation basis for each masonry wall remains valid during the subsequent period of extended operation . Qualifications for personnel perform ing inspections and evaluations are consistent with ACI 349.3R-02, "Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures". Inspections are performed and results evaluated consistent with applicable industry documents to ensure that a loss of intended function does not occur. Conditions found to impact the intended function of the masonry wall or invalidate its evaluation basis are documented and entered into the Corrective Action Program for evaluation which will result in analysis, repair or replacement. Masonry walls that are considered fire barriers are also managed by the Fire Protection program (B2.1.15) . Steel elements of masonry walls are visually inspected by the Structures Monitoring program (B2.1.34) . NUREG-2191 Consistency The Masonry Walls program is an existing program that, following enhancement , will be consistent with NUREG-2191 , Section XI.S5 , Masonry Walls. Exception Summary None Enhancements Detection of Aging Effects (Element 4)

1. Procedures will be revised to clarify qualifications for personnel performing inspections of masonry walls and concrete to be consistent with ACI 349.3R-02.

Page B-224 Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Page 52 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Monitoring and Trending (Element 5) . Acceptance Criteria (Element 6)

2. Procedures will be revised to explicitly address the trending of inspection results and projection to the next inspection interval. The procedure will be revised to include acceptance criteria for masonry wall inspections that will be used to ensure observed aging effects (cracking, loss of material , or gaps between the structural steel supports and masonry walls) do not invalidate the evaluation basis of the wall or impact its intended function .

Operating Experience Summary The following examples of operating experience provide objective evidence that the Masonry Walls program has been , and will be effective in managing the aging effects for SSCs within the scope of the program so that their intended functions will be maintained consistent with the current licensing basis during the subsequent period of extended operation .

1. In May 2009 , during a walkdown of the Unit 1 Normal Switchgear Room a crack was identified around a concrete block wall. Inspection of the opposite side of the wall showed that the same crack existed on the Unit 2 side. The crack was less than 1/8 inch wide on both sides. The crack was repaired by work order. which was completed and accepted on 5/26/2009 .
2. In June 2012 , while performing inspections, a 0.050 inch crack was observed in the masonry block and mortar of the Unit 1 'A' Fuel Oil Pump House exterior. The crack width decreased to 0.025 inch between the mortar and the masonry as it progressed along the west wall to the south wall. A work order was issued and the wall crack was repaired .
3. In May 2015, an approximate 1/2 inch diameter hole was identified in a masonry block wall which is located between Battery Room 1A and the Unit 1 Emergency Switchgear Room . This wall is a fire barrier wall. The hole did not completely penetrate the block wall and may have been created for an anchor bolt that has since been removed. A work order was submitted and the hole in the block wall was repaired .

The above examples of operating experience provide objective evidence that the Masonry Walls program includes activities to perform visual inspections to manage loss of material, cracking , and loss of material (spalling and scaling) for masonry walls within the scope of subsequent license renewal , and to initiate corrective actions. Occurrences identified under the Masonry Walls program are evaluated to ensure there is no significant impact to the safe operation of the plant and corrective actions will be taken to prevent recurrence. Guidance or corrective actions for additional inspections, re-evaluation , repairs. or replacements is provided for locations where aging effects are found. The program is informed and enhanced when necessary through the systematic and ongoing review of both plant-specific and industry operating experience. There is reasonable assurance that the continued implementation of the Masonry Walls program , following enhancement, will effectively manage aging prior to a loss of intended function. Page B-225 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 53 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Conclusion The continued implementation of the Masonry Walls program , following enhancement, will provide reasonable assurance that aging effects will be managed such that the components within the scope of this program will continue to perform their intended functions consistent with the current licensing basis during the subsequent period of extended operation. Page B-226 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 54 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs 82.1.34 Structures Monitoring Program Description The Structures Monitoring program is an existing condition monitoring program that manages aging of the structures and components that are within the scope of subsequent license renewal by managing the following aging effects:

  • Cracking
  • Cracking and distortion
  • Cracking , loss of material
  • Cracking , loss of bond , and loss of material (spalling , scaling)
  • Increase in porosity and permeability, cracking , loss of material (spalling , scaling)
  • Loss of material
  • Loss of material, loss of form
  • Loss of material (spalling , scaling) and cracking
  • Loss of material , change in material properties
  • Loss of mechanical function
  • Loss of preload
  • Loss of sealing
  • Reduction in concrete anchor capacity
  • Reduction of foundation strength and cracking
  • Reduction or loss of isolation function The Structures Monitoring program implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 , "Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants ," consistent with guidance of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.160, "Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants ," and Nuclear Management and Resources Council 93-01 , "Industry Guidelines for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants ". The scope of the Structures Monitoring program includes structures and components in the scope of subsequent license renewal. The program relies on periodic visual inspections to monitor and maintain the condition of structures and components within the scope of subsequent license renewal. Inspections are conducted by qualified personnel at a frequency not to exceed five years, except for wooden poles , which will be inspected on a 10-year frequency. The interval between successive recurring inspections may be decreased based on conditions discovered in previous inspections.

Page B-227 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 55 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix B - Ag ing Management Programs Structural monitoring inspections consist primarily of periodic visual examination of accessible structures and components performed by qualified personnel. For concrete and associated components , ACl-349.3R , "Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures ," and other applicable industry documents are used as guidance for the inspections , inspector qualifications , and evaluation of inspection results. The inspection program for structural steel is similar to the concrete program and is based on the guidance provided in the AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings and Code of Standard Practice. For earthen structures , evaluation of inspection results is performed by a qualified civil/structural engineer. Procedures will include preventive actions to provide reasonable assurance of structural bolting integrity, as discussed in Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) documents (such as EPRI NP-5067 , "Good Bolting Practices, A Reference Manual for Nuclear Power Plant Maintenance Personnel ," and TR-104213 , "Bolted Joint Maintenance & Application Guide"), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards, and AISC specifications , as applicable. In order to evaluate the potential of water to cause degradation of inaccessible below-grade concrete , samples of groundwater will be taken at intervals not to exceed five years . The water chemistry is evaluated , and should the results of water testing indicate potentially harmful levels of substances such as chlorides > 500 ppm , sulfates > 1,500 ppm , or a pH < 5.5, inaccessible areas are assessed for aging when aging degradation exists in accessible areas and opportunistically inspected when excavated . Ground water monitoring has shown the ground water to be non-aggressive , except for one sampling point. In 2007, a sample with a significantly high chloride level was obtained from the Turbine Building sump. Subsequent sample results from this sump have found additional chloride levels above the acceptance limit. An inspection was performed to assess the structure for any degradation that could be attributed to the elevated levels of chloride . The inspection found no evidence of significant degradation . There have been no indications of concrete degradation due to elevated chloride levels anywhere in the plant. Engineering continues quarterly monitoring of the ground water in this sump. For surfaces provided with protective coatings , observation of the condition of the coating is an effective method for identifying the absence of degradation of the underlying material. Therefore, coatings on structures within the scope of the Structures Monitoring program are inspected only as an indication of the condition of the underlying material. ASME Code , Section XI visual examinations (VT-1) or surface examinations will be conducted to detect cracking of stainless steel and aluminum components exposed to aqueous solutions or air environments containing halides. A minimum sample of 25 inspections will be performed from each of the aluminum and stainless steel component populations every ten years. Page B-228 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 56 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs If any sampling-based inspections to detect cracking in aluminum and stainless steel do not meet the acceptance criteria , additional inspections will be conducted , unless the cause of the aging effect for each applicable material and environment is corrected by repair or replacement. There will be no fewer than five additional inspections for each inspection that did not meet acceptance criteria, or 20% of each applicable material , environment, and aging effect combination inspected ,

  • whichever is less . If any subsequent inspections do not meet acceptance criteria , an extent of condition and extent of cause analysis will be conducted to determine the further extent of inspections required . Additional samples will be inspected for any recurring degradation to ensure corrective actions appropriately address the associated causes . The additional inspections will include inspections of components with the same material , environment , and aging effect combination at both Unit 1 and Unit 2. The additional inspections will be completed within the interval (i.e ., 10 year inspection interval) in which the original inspection was conducted. Where practical, the inspections will focus on the bounding or lead components most susceptible to aging because of time in-service, severity of operating conditions, and lowest design margin.

Concrete inspection results are evaluated to identify changes that could be indicative of Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) development. If indications of ASR development are identified , the evaluation considers the potential for ASR development in concrete that is within the scope of the ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL program (82.1.30) , the Structures Monitoring program (B2.1 .34) , or the Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated with Nuclear Power Plants program (82 .1.35) . In 1988, a research study was performed to evaluate the degradation processes that could affect the reinforced concrete structures. Concrete core samples were secured from the intake canal , Unit 1 Condensate Storage Tank Missile Shield , Unit 2 Safeguards Building and Unit 2 Containment. Based on testing of these samples , the study concluded that there was no evidence of ASR. Evaluation of inspection results includes consideration of the acceptability of inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of, or result in , degradation to such inaccessible areas. Structural sealants , seismic gap joint filler, vibration isolation elements , and other elastomeric materials are monitored for cracking , loss of material , and hardening. These elastomeric elements are acceptable if the observed loss of material, cracking , and hardening will not result in a loss of intended function . Visual inspection of elastomeric elements is supplemented by tactile inspection to detect hardening if the intended function is suspect. Procedures will include preventive actions to ensure bolting integrity for replacement and maintenance activities by specifying proper selection of bolting material and lubricants , and appropriate installation torque or tension to prevent or minimize loss of bolting preload and cracking of high-strength bolting . For structural bolting consisting of ASTM A325, ASTM A490 , ASTM F1852 and/or ASTM F2280 bolts , the preventive actions for storage , lubricant selection , and bolting and coating material selection discussed in Section 2 of the Research Council for Structural Page B-229 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 57 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs Connections publication , "Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts ," will be used. Spent fuel pool (SFP) liner leakage through the leak chase channels is monitored . An alarm is provided on the SFP to sound at a level loss of approximately 0.5 feet (UFSAR Section 9.5.3.3). A review of recent leak chase channel monitoring reports shows acceptable leakage rates with no tell-tale drains being completely blocked . The Masonry Walls program (B2.1.33) and the Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated with Nuclear Power Plants program (B2.1 .35) are implemented as part of this program . NUREG-2191 Consistency The Structures Monitoring program is an existing program that , following enhancement, will be consistent with NUREG-2191 , Section XI.S6 , Structures Monitoring . Exception Summary None Enhancements Prior to the subsequent period of extended operation , the following enhancement(s) will be implemented in the following program element(s) : Scope of Program (Element 1)

1. Procedures will be revised to include inspection of the following structures that are within the scope of subsequent license renewal: decontamination building , radwaste facility, health physics yard office building , laundry facility, and machine shop. Inspections for the added structures will be performed under the enhanced program in order to establish quantitative baseline inspection data prior to the subsequent period of extended operation .
2. Procedures will be revised to add the oiled-sand cushion to the inspection of the fire protection/domestic water tank foundation. (Added Change Notice 3)

Preventive Actions (Element 2)

3. Procedures will be revised to include preventive actions to ensure bolting integrity for replacement and maintenance activities by specifying proper selection of bolting material and lubricants, and appropriate installation torque or tension to prevent or minimize loss of bolting preload and cracking of high-strength bolting . For structural bolting consisting of ASTM A325 ,

ASTM A490 , ASTM F1852 and/or ASTM F2280 bolts , the preventive actions for storage , lubricant selection , and bolting and coating material selection discussed in Section 2 of the Research Council for Structural Connections publication , "Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts," will be used. Page 8-230 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 58 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs

4. The checklist for structural and support steel will be revised to indicate: "Are any connection members loose, missing or damaged (bolts , rivets , nuts, etc.)?".

Detection of Aging Effects (Element 4)

5. Procedures will be revised to eliminate options for inspector qualifications that are not consistent with ACI 349.3R-002.
6. Procedures will be revised to specify that wooden pole inspections will be performed every ten years by an outside firm that provides wooden pole inspection services that are consistent with standard industry practice. Visual examinations may be augmented with soundings or other techniques appropriate for the type , condition , and treatment of the wooden poles , including borings to determine the location and extent of decay and excavation to determine the extent of decay at the groundline.
7. Procedures will be revised to specify that evaluation of inspection results includes consideration of the acceptability of inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of, or result in , degradation to such inaccessible areas .
8. Procedures will be enhanced to specify VT-1 inspections to identify cracking on stainless steel and aluminum components. A minimum of 25 inspections will be performed every ten years during the subsequent period of extended operation from each of the stainless steel and aluminum component populations assigned to the Structures Monitoring program . If the component is measured in linear feet , at least one foot will be inspected to qualify as an inspection . For other components , at least 20% of the surface area will be inspected to qualify as an inspection . The selection of components for inspection will consider the severity of the environment. For example , components potentially exposed to halides and moisture would be inspected, since those environmental factors can facilitate stress corrosion cracking.

Corrective Actions (Element 7)

9. Procedures will be enhanced to specify for the sampling-based inspections to detect cracking in stainless steel and aluminum components, additional inspections will be conducted if one of the inspections does not meet acceptance criteria due to current or projected degradation ,

unless the cause of the aging effect for each applicable material and environment is corrected by repair or replacement for all components constructed of the same material and exposed to the same environment. No fewer than five additional inspections for each inspection that did not meet acceptance criteria or 20 percent of each applicable material , environment , and aging effect combination will be inspected, whichever is less. Additional inspections will be completed within the 10-year inspection interval in which the original inspection was conducted. The responsible engineer will initiate condition reports to generate work orders to perform the additional inspections. The responsible engineer will evaluate the inspection results , and if the subsequent inspections do not meet acceptance criteria , an extent of Page 8-231 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 59 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Append ix B - Aging Management Programs condition and extent of cause analysis will be conducted. The responsible engineer will then determine the further extent of inspections. Additional samples will be inspected for any recurring degradation to ensure corrective actions appropriately address the associated causes . The additional inspections will include inspections of components with the same material , environment, and aging effect combination at both Unit 1 and Unit 2. If any projected inspection results will not meet acceptance criteria prior to the next scheduled inspection , inspection frequencies will be adjusted as determined by the Corrective Action Program .

10. Procedures will be enhanced to specify that evaluation of neutron shield tank findings consider its structural support function for the reactor pressure vessel. (Added Change Notice 3)
11. Procedures will be enhanced to also include LOCAs as events that require evaluation for potentially degraded structures by Civil/Mechanical Design Engineering . (Added Change Notice 3)

Operating Experience Summary The following examples of operating experience provide objective evidence that the Structures Monitoring program has been , and will be effective in managing the aging effects for SSCs within the scope of the program so that their intended functions will be maintained consistent with the current licensing basis during the subsequent period of extended operation .

1. In March 2007, a condition report (CR) was written to document a ground water monitoring sample with a chloride level of 1210 ppm , which exceeded the acceptance limit of <500 ppm.

This sample was obtained from the Turbine Building sump. Corporate and site Engineering continue to monitor the quarterly sample results from the Turbine Building sump and have found additional chloride levels above the acceptance limit , as high as 2700 ppm . An inspection of the Turbine Building sump was performed in July 2008 to assess the sump structure for any degradation that could be attributed to the elevated level of chlorides . The inspection found no evidence of significant degradation to the interior concrete. There are no safety-related components in the vicinity of the Turbine Building sump , and there have been no indications of concrete degradation due to elevated chloride levels anywhere in the plant. The source of the chlorides has not been determined . The Turbine Building sump is the deepest dewatering point and closest to the Intake Canal where expected underground leakage from the canal could influence the chloride level. The potential for in-plant sources of chlorides reaching the sump via secondary drains or local ground water was studied and determined to be unlikely. An Engineering evaluation concluded that , while the chloride level has remained high in the Turbine Building sump , the other sumps/piezometer well locations , some of which are located in close proximity to the Turbine Building sump , have been found to be consistently within acceptable levels . Engineering will continue to monitor the chloride levels in the Turbine Building sump on a quarterly basis. The plant procedure has been revised Page B-232 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 60 of 74

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs to maintain sampling requirements so that trending may continue but eliminate the comparison to the acceptance criterion for this sampling point.

2. In May 2011 , a spall was found on the inside concrete surface of the bioshield wall of the Unit 2 Containment 'C' steam generator cubicle. The spall was approximately six inches long by six inches wide and 1-1/4 inches deep . The reinforcing steel was not exposed. It was determined that the bioshield wall remained fully functional , but the spalled concrete required repair prior to unit startup to prevent potential degradation of the reinforcing steel. A work order was submitted and the spalled concrete has been repaired.
3. In December 2011, several embedded anchor bolts for the condenser unit of a Unit 1 Control Room chiller were found to be degraded . The anchor bolts displayed signs of corrosion and material loss. A work order was submitted and the anchor bolts were repaired in December 2011 , which consisted of chipping the existing concrete around the anchor bolts until sound metal was reached , performing a weld repair of each anchor bolt, and repairing the concrete slab.
4. In October 2012 , leakage (approximately one gpm) was identified in the bottom portion of the steel to concrete joint (interface between the steel elbow and the concrete pipe) of the Unit 2
   'D' 96-inch circulating water line. Corrosion and coating failure on the bottom third of the pipe was observed at this location . The urethane seal around the leading (upstream) edge of the joint was also missing and degraded . A work order was submitted and the Unit 2 'D' 96-inch circulating water line joint has been repaired .
5. In January 2013, the Service Building roof was leaking , causing water to collect in two locations on the floor of the Service Building hallway. The first location was near the #1 EDG room . The second location was approximately halfway between the doors to the health physics area and the door to the operations annex. A work order was submitted and degraded roof areas were repaired .
6. In December 2014, a CR was written to document a ground water monitoring sample that showed a chloride level of 610 ppm . The sampling point that exhibited unacceptable chloride levels is located adjacent to the Intake Canal , which draws water from the river. Three months later the same sampling point was found to have chlorides at 676 ppm . These values exceeded the acceptance limit of <500 ppm. The CR evaluation determined that the elevated chloride level was probably due to unusually low rain fall on the James River, temporarily increasing its natural salinity. Results from subsequent monitoring of ground water have been acceptable , and no degradation of concrete due to elevated chloride levels has been identified .
7. In December 2015, an effectiveness review of the Civil Engineering Structural Inspection Activity (UFSAR Section 18.2.6) was performed. The aging management activity (AMA) was Page B-233 Enclosure 2 Serial No. : 19-248 Page 61 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs evaluated against the performance criteria identified in NEI 14- 12 for the Detection of Aging Effects , Corrective Actions , and Operating Experience program elements . No gaps were identified by the effectiveness review.

8. In December 2016, as part of oversight review activities, a review of procedures credited by initial license renewal AMAs was conducted to confirm the following :
  • Procedures credited for license renewal were identified
  • Procedures were consistent with the licensing basis and bases documents
  • Procedures contained a reference to conduct an aging management review prior to revising
  • Procedures credited for license renewal were identified by an appropriate program indicator and contained a reference to a license renewal document Procedure changes were completed as necessary to ensure the above items were satisfied .
9. In November 2017, as part of oversight review activities, the Civil Engineering Structural Inspection Activity (UFSAR Section 18.2.6) AMA owners confirmed that AMA inspections had been performed and the inspections addressed the required SSCs consistent with the aging management activity commitments required in UFSAR Chapter 18. Security lighting poles were within the scope of license renewal but were not inspected during the Civil Engineering Structural Inspection Activity cycle completed in 2012 . The omission of the security lighting poles from the 2012 inspection cycle was entered in the Corrective Action Program. In December 2017 , Civil Engineering inspected the light poles and noted no degradation . The License Renewal Application and supporting documentation were reviewed for in-scope structures requiring inspection , and that information was cross-referenced with the implementing procedure to confirm ag ing management program commitments required by UFSAR Chapter 18 were satisfied . The security lighting poles are identified in the implementing procedure as being within scope of license renewal and will be inspected during subsequent structural inspections.
10. In January 2018, an aging management program effectiveness review was conducted for the Civil Engineering Structural Inspection Activity (UFSAR Section 18.2.6), which include the Structures Monitoring program (82.1 .34) , Masonry Walls program (82 . 1.33) and the Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated with Nuclear Power Plants program (82.1.35) . Information from the summary of that effectiveness review is provided below:

The Civil Engineering Structural Inspection Activity is meeting or exceeding the requirements of selected NEI 14-12, "Aging Management Program Effectiveness," elements. Key activities of the AMA that were reviewed included structural inspections for aging management that have been incorporated into the periodic inspections performed for Maintenance Rule compliance . Maintenance Rule inspections, along with trending and evaluation for evidence of Page B-234 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 62 of 74

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Change Notice 3 Appendix B - Aging Management Programs aging effects , ensure the continuing capability of civil engineering structures to meet their intended functions consistent with the current licensing basis. A 10-year review of inspection results and corrective actions did not identify any aging that resulted in a loss of intended function(s) . 11 . In March 2018 , the existing Structures Monitoring program was revised to improve the inspection techniques and to adopt new inspection techniques to manage aging effects associated with ASR degradation of concrete structures and components consistent with industry operating experience IE Notice 2011-20 (IN 2011-20) , "Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction ," and EPRI Report #3002005389 (2015) , "Tools for Early Detection of ASR in Concrete Structures." The above examples of operating experience provide objective evidence that the Structures Monitoring program includes activities to perform volumetric and visual inspections to identify aging effects for structures , structural supports , and structural commodities within the scope of subsequent license renewal , and to initiate corrective actions. Occurrences identified under the Structures Monitoring program are evaluated to ensure there is no significant impact to the safe operation of the plant and corrective actions will be taken to prevent recurrence . Guidance or corrective actions for additional inspections, re-evaluation , repairs , or replacements is provided for locations where aging effects are found. The program is informed and enhanced when necessary through the systematic and ongoing review of both plant-specific and industry operating experience. There is reasonable assurance that the continued implementation of the Structures Monitoring program , following enhancement, will effectively manage aging prior to a loss of intended function. Conclusion The continued implementation of the Structures Monitoring program , following enhancement, will provide reasonable assurance that aging effects will be managed such that the components within the scope of this program will continue to perform their intended functions consistent with the current licensing basis during the subsequent period of extended operation . Page B-235 Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Page 63 of 74

Table C3.3-3 SLR Expert Panel Review Results Table Assembly Sub-assembly Component Material Screened-in Degradation C: Mechanisms 3 Q) u Q) u u < C. u 1:- Q) Q) 1:- 0

                                                                                                                   -c e            .!2               .!2 0
l C: 0 u u C: 0
                                                                                                                                                                                             ;::i .c MRP-191,      MRP-191,        Expert     0
l Z' C:

Q) E C: Q) w C. E ,_ Z' Q) Cl .E Q) Cl u 1:- 0 :l ::1: ~ .l!! Q) 0

                                                                                                                   .r:  =     Q)   :l  0             :l  0   (!)  a., ::J       0    :l
                                                                                                                        -

Panel c / C. Cl Rev. 0 Rev. 1

                                                                                                                         "' -      C"  C:

C" 11. Z' ... 0 C: < - C" u"' C: C" u"' V) Q) Q) Q) en"' Q) Q)

                                                                                                                                                                                             -= ...
                                                                                                                                               -
11. 0 0 MRP en
                                                                                                                             "'    Q)

V) u V) Q) (!) 0 u w U V) -" u V) -"

                                                                                                                   -" 0
J C:

0 w C: 0 w ::1: g .!!l w C: V) 0:: u"' 2018-022 u u en "' 11. u 0:: u0 *- 0:: ...I en Upper Control rod guide Bolts (Note 3) 31 6 ss None Non e sec. L M L 1 1 A A N internals tube assemblies and Fatigue assembly flow downcomers C-tubes (Note 3) 304 ss Wear Wear Wear, M M M 2 2 B B N Fatigue Guide tu be enclos ures 304 ss SCC-W, SCC-W SCC-W, L M M 1 1 A A N (Note 3) Wear Fatigue Flanges - intermedi ate 304 ss SCC-W , SCC-W, SCC-W, L M M 1 1 A A N (Note 3) Fatigue Fatigu e Fati gue CF8 SCC-W , SCC-W, SCC-W, L M M 1 1 A A N Fatigue, TE Fatigu e , TE Fatigue, TE Fl anges - lower 304 ss SCC-W, SCC -W, SCC-W, M M M 2 2 B B p Fatigue Fatigu e IASCC , Fatigue, IE CF8 SCC-W, SCC-W, SCC-W, M M M 2 2 B B p Fatigue, Fatigue, IASCC , TE , IE TE , IE Fatigue, TE, IE Flexureless inserts (Unit 2 304 ss None None Fatig ue L L L 1 1 A A N on ly) (N ote 3) Flexu res (Unit 1 only) ~ X-750 sec sec sec, ~ h M J J G G N Fatig ue NQN. NQN. NQN. NQN. NQN. ~ tl.Q1tl

                                                                                                                       §         §        Q.       Q.       Q.

Guide plates (ca rds) 304 ss SCC-W, SCC-W, SCC-W, H H M 3 3 C C p We ar, Wear, Wear, Fatigue Fatigu e Fatig ue CF8 -- SCC-W, SCC-W, H H M 3 3 C C p Wear, Wea r, Fatigue, Fatigue , TE TE , IE Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-29 Change Notice 3 Appl ication for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosu re 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Append ix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 64 of 74

Table C3.3-3 SLR Expert Panel Review Results Table Assembly Su b-assembly Component Material Screened-in Degradation Mechanis ms a Q) Q)

                                                                                                                                                             <               a.       Q) i::'      Q) i::'

C: 0

,

u u u u u *- .c MRP-191 , MRP-191 , Expert "0 0

                                                                                                                                 ~
, ~ Q)

Q) C:

,
                                                                                                                                                 .!:1 E

C: Q)

,

w a. E .._

i: :::,
                                                                                                                                                                       .!:1 0 (!)

0

                                                                                                                                                                                  ~Q)

C: Q)

,

0 fill

                                                                                                                                                                                           ....
                                                                                                                                                                                                 .!:1 E

C: Q) 0 Cl

, 2 uQ) i::'

0

                                                                                                                                -

Panel c / ~ *; 0 u.. 0 0 a. Cl Rev. O Rev. 1 ai u.. -n) C" Q) C: C" Q)

                                                                                                                                                             ~     ... C:   <    -n) C" Q)   un) 0C:

C" n) Q) u (/) Q)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                .=: ....

MRP -" 0

i Cl) (/)

C: 0 w 0 u (/) C: 0

                                                                                                                                                             -Q) n)

(!) 0 u w ::i: U w Cl) g ~ w u g~ 0:: n) u 2018-022 u u Cl) u.. u 0:: u 0:: ..J Cl) Upper Mixing devices Mixing devices (N ote 3) CF8 SCC-W, SCC-W, SCC-W, L L M 1 1 A A N internals TE , IE TE , IE Fatigue , assembly T E, IE (cont.) Upper core plate and Fuel alignment pin s 304 ss -- Wear IASCC , H L M 3 3 B B X fuel alignment pins Wear, Fatigue, IE

                                                                                                           ~

Upper co re pl ate 304 ss Wear, Wear, IASCC , M M H 2 3 B C E Fatig ue Fatigue , IE Wear, Fatigue, IE Upper co re plate insert 304 ss -- -- Wear, IE M M M 2 2 B B N (Note 3) Upper co re plate insert bolts 316 ss -- -- IASCC , L L M 1 1 A A N (Note 3) Fatig ue , IE , ISR/IC Upper co re plate insert locking 304L SS -- -- Fatigue , IE L L M 1 1 A A N devices and dowel pins (Note 2) (Note 3) Upper core plate insert locking 316 ss -- -- Fatigu e, IE L L M 1 1 A A N devices and dowel pin s (Note 2) (Note 3) Upper Bolting (Note 3) 316 ss None None None -- -- -- 0 0 A A N instrumentation co nduit and supports 304 ss -- None None -- -- -- 0 0 A A N Brackets , clam ps , terminal 304 ss None None sec. H L H 3 3 B C N blks, co nduit straps (Note 3) Fatigue CF8 -- TE sec, L L H 1 2 A B N Fatigue , TE, IE Conduit se al assembly : body, 304 ss None None sec, H M M 3 3 B B N tubesheets, tubesheet we lds Fatigue (Note 3) Surry Powe r Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-3 1 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analys is for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 65 of 74

Table C3.3-3 SLR Expert Panel Review Results Table Assembly Sub-assembly Component Material Screened-in Degradation C: Mechanisms 3 QI QI < 0.

, QI ~ QI ~ 0 "O

0 ... QI lJ C: .~ lJ C: (.) w .~ 0 g 0 .~ lJ C: 0 *- .c ti ~ MRP-191 , MRP-191 , Expert  :, ~ QI E QI 0. E .._ ~ QI Cl E QI Cl 0

                                                                                                                       .s:: ::     QI    :,        :,  ~      :,   0   (!)  QI   :, .2l       :, .2l    QI    0
                                                                                                                             -

Panel c / 0 u. 0 0. Cl Rev. O Rev. 1 Ill

u. -Ill C' C: C' 0
                                                                                                                                                              ... C:  <   -Ill  C'  Ill  C:  C' Ill 3l (.)    t/)   QI QI        QI  ~                         QI (.)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       -= ....
                                                                                                                                                       -

Q) ti) 0 ti) 0 (.) 0 (/) (!) MRP -" C: lJ C: QI lJ w (/) ~-" lJ C: -" a::(.)Ill

i 0 0 w 0 Ill w~ 0 .!!l w 0 .!!l 2018-022 (.) (.) (/) u. (.) a:: (.) a:: ...I

(/) Lower Core barrel Core barre l flange (surface: 304 ss SCC-W, SCC-W, SCC-W , L M H 1 2 B B e internals upper fla nge weld is included Wear Wear Wear,

                                                                                                                                                                                                            ~

below w ith upper co re barrel Fatigue assembly girth welds) (cont.) Core barrel outlet nozzles 304 ss SCC-W, SCC-W, SCC-W, L M H 1 2 B B e Fatigue Fatig ue Wear, Fatigue N Lower core barre l axial w elds 304 ss SCC-W , SCC-W , SCC-W, M M H 2 3 B C E (includes MAW and LAW) IAS CC, IE IASCC , IE IASCC,

                                    ~                                                                   Fatigue , IE, vs Lowe r core barrel girth welds  304  ss   SCC-W,       SCC-W,       SCC-W,             M           M         H          2         3           B            C            p

(~ LGW aREI lF\OJ) IASCC , IE IASCC , IE IASCC ,

                                    ~                                                                   Fatigue , IE, vs Upper core barrel axial welds   304  ss   SCC-W,       SCC-W, IE    SCC-W,             M           M         H          2         3           B            C            E (includes UAWJ                            IASCC , IE                Fatigue Upper co re barrel girth welds  304  ss   SCC-W,       SCC-W , IE   SCC-W,             M           M         H          2         3           B            C            p (includes UFWJ Note 5                     IASCC , IE                Fatig ue Diffu ser plate      Diffuser plate (Note 3)         304  ss   Non e        Non e        None                --         --        --         0         0          A             A            N Flux thimble (tubes) Flux thimble tu be plugs        Alloy 600 --           SCC-W,       SCC-W,             M           L         L          2         2           B            B            N (Note 3)                                               IASCC , IE , IASCC, vs           Fatigue, IE ,

vs Flux thimbles (tubes) Alloy 600 -- SCC-W, SCC-W, H L L 3 3 B B X IASCC, IASCC, Wear, IE, Wear, vs Fatigue , IE , vs Head coo ling spray Head cooling spray nozz les 304 ss None None Fatigue L L L 1 1 A A N nozzles (Note 3) Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-36 Ch ange Noti ce 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analys is for PWR Vesse l Internals Ag ing Management Page 66 of 74

Table C3.3-3 SLR Expert Panel Review Results Table Assembly Sub-assembly Component Material Screened-in Degradation C: Mechanisms 3 Cl) 0 Cl) 0

                                                                                                                                                              <(                C.
J Cl) 0 ~ Cl) 0 ~ 0 MRP-191, MRP-191, Expert
                                                                                                                        -c 0

0

                                                                                                                                ...

Cl)

J .?;-

C: Cl)

                                                                                                                                                   .!:!

E C: Cl) (.) w

                                                                                                                                                              ~

C.

                                                                                                                                                                         .!:!

E ._ 0

                                                                                                                                                                                    .?;-

C: Cl) 0 C)

                                                                                                                                                                                                  .!:!

E C: Cl) 0 C)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ;

0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        .0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ~
                                                                                                                        .r: ::           Cl)   ::J  0
J 11.
J 0 (!) (1):::,  ! 0
J Cl) ni Cl)

C. 0 C) Rev. O Rev. 1 Panel c / .... C' C' 0 .... C' C'O C' Cl) u C'O C: C: <( C: 1/) Cl) Qi C'O Cl) Cl) .?;- ... C'O Cl)(.)

                                                                                                                               ....11.0             0                     0 (.)
                                                                                                                                                                                          §~       0              E ....
                                                                                                                                                                                                        §~

Cl) 1/) 1/) MRP ,:,(, 0

                                                                                                                                                              ....

Cl) (!) 0 w 0 C'O

J C:

0 w C: 0 C'O w~ Cl) w 0:: u 2018-022 (.) (.) Cl) 11. (.) 0:: (.) 0:: ...J Cl) Lower Irradiation specimen Irradiation specimen access 316 ss -- -- None -- -- -- 0 0 A A N internals guides plug (dowel pin) (Note 3) assembly Irradiatio n specimen access 304 ss IE IE None -- -- -- 0 0 A A N (cont. ) plug (plug) (Note 3) Irradiation specimen access X-750 -- -- None -- -- -- 0 0 A A N plug (spring) (Note 3) Irradiation specimen guide 304 ss Wear, IE Wear, IE SCC-W, L L L 1 1 A A N (Note 3) Wear, Fatigue Lower core plate and Fuel alignment pins 304 ss -- IASCC , IASCC , H L M 3 3 B B X fuel alignment pins Wear, IE, Wear, IE, (added by vs vs IG) fr:IQ1w Lower core plate 304 ss SCC-W, SCC-W, IASCC , L M H 1 2 A B X IASCC, IASCC , Wear, Wea r, Wear, Fatigue , IE , Fatigue , IE , Fatigue, IE , vs vs vs Lower support Lower support column bodies CF8 IASCC , TE, IASCC, TE , IASCC , L L L 1 1 A A E column assemblies IE , VS IE, VS Fatigue , TE , IE, VS Lower support column bolts 316 ss -- IASCC , IASCC , M L M 2 2 B B E Wear, Wear, Fatigue, IE, Fatigue, IE, VS, ISR/IC VS, ISR/IC Lower support column bolt 304L SS -- -- IASCC , L L L 1 1 A A N locking devices (N ote 3) Fatigue, IE , vs Lower support column nuts 304 ss None None Fatigue L L L 1 1 A A N (Note 3) Lower support column sleeves 304 ss None None None -- -- -- 0 0 A A N (Note 3) Surry Power Station , Un its 1 and 2 Page C-37 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent Licen se Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Ana lysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 67 of 74

a. Degradation mechan isms:

Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) [1A is applicable for sec welds (SCC-W)] Irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) Wear Fatigue (FAT) Thermal aging embrittlement (TE) Irradiation embrittlement (IE) Void swelling (VS ) Thermal and irradiation-induced stress relaxation or irradiation creep (ISR/IC)

b. P = Primary, E = Expansion , X = Existing , N = No additional measures C. Degradation mechan ism added during Expert Panel review as ind icated in LTR-AMLR-17-35 and LTR-AMLR-18-4.

Notes:

1. Alloy 600 was identified as the material for the support pin nuts at Surry Unit 1. These nuts were replaced as part of the control rod guide tube support pin replacement performed by AREVA. The AREVA evaluation indicates that the aging degradation mechanisms of concern are sec and irradiation-enhanced stress relaxation/irradiation-enhanced creep (ISR/IC) .
2. The upper core plate insert locking devices are 304L SS , and the dowel pins are 316 SS .
3. No additional measu res.
4. The therma l shield flexure locking devices are 304L SS and the dowel pins are 304 SS .
5. MRP-227 , Revision 1, added expansion links from the upper flange weld (UFW) to the lower flange weld (LFW) and to the upper girth weld (UGW).
6. For Unit 1, Babcock & Wilcox replaced the CRGT support pins and flexures with a modified design fabricated from Alloy X-750 during the CRGT replacement. The MRP-191, Revision 2, expert panel considered the Alloy X-750 flexures to be a Category C component. However, AREVA performed an evaluation of the replacement CRGT assemblies, including the replacement flexures . Section 4.1 of the AREVA report (AREVA Licensing Report ANP-357 4, Rev 0, "Surry Unit 1 Modified Replacement CRGT Assembly Reconciliation with MRP-227-A for an 80-Year License", September 2017) listed those Surry Unit 1 replacement CRGT assembly components that were assigned to Categories Band C (i.e., "non-Category A") and did not include the replacement flexures in those categories. Based on this designation as a Category A component, the replacement flexures require no additional measures. Since the flexure design was modified during CRGT replacement, the B&W classification is considered appropriate for the Surry reactor internals program .
7. The fuel alignment pins screen in for multiple mechanisms because of the conservative screening criteria used and the high radiation exposure of the pin locations. However, for the fuel alignment pins in both the upper core plate and the lower core plate, degradation mechanisms other than wear are not expected to impact the function of the pins. either due to the limited amount of degradation anticipated or due to the redundancy of the pins (more than one per fuel assembly) . Wear-related surface degradation that has been observed. particularly for pins with Malcomized hardening treatment, is considered the leading degradation mechanism for the fuel alignment pins.

Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-41 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 68 of 74

Table C4.3-1 Primary Components Expansion Link Examination Method / Frequency Source of Revision/ Primary Item Effect (mechanism) Examination Coverage (Note 1) (Note 1) Addition Control Rod Guide Loss of material (wear) QQntrQI rQg guige Visual (VT-3) inspections and quantitative An update provided in MRP 2018-007 MRP-227, Rev. 1 added Tube Assembly !1.1be QQn!in!JQ!Jli measurements are performed . Per the indicates wear measurements to be WCAP-17451-P, lleQ!iQn llhei;!lhli req uirements ofWCAP-17451-P, the obtained in 37 of the 48 CRGT MRP-2018-007 supplements Guide plates ang Q-!1.1beli absence of sig nificant degradation during locations. industry WCAP-17451-P (cards)

                                                           <Note 1BlNef:le      the inspections in 2012 , confirm that no                                             requirements .

additional inspection is required prior to the normal ten-year interval 8 (Note 2) . Control Rod Guide Cracking (SCC , Fatigue) Remaining Enhanced visual (EVT-1) examination to 100% of outer (accessible) CRGT Rev. 1 added Expansion to Tube Assembly accessible determine the presence of crack-like lower flange weld surfaces and remaining CRGT lower flange Irradiation Embrittlement (IE) and CRGT assembly surface flaws in flange welds no later than 2 0.25-inch of the adjacent base metal welds; Rev. 1 rem oved Lower flange welds , Thermal Embrittlement (TE) are lower flange refueling outages from the beginning of the on the individ ual periphery CRGT Expansion to items upper core LFW applicable aging mechanisms welds first license renewal period and subsequent assemblies (Notes 4 and 5). plate and lower support exam ination on a ten-year in terval.b forging ; added 0.25 inch of BM I column base metal to examination bodies (Note 3) coverage . Core Barrel Cracking (SCC) Upper girth weld Enhanced visual (EVT-1) examination , no 100% of the accessible weld length of MRP-227A initially established Assembly (UGW) later than 2 refueling outages from the one side of the UFW and 0.75-inch of examination coverage. beginn ing of the first license renewal period adjacent base metal shall be MRP-227, Rev 1, removed Upper flange weld ; Lower flange and subsequent examination on a ten-year examined. (Notes 6 and 9). Expansio n to core barrel outlet UFW weld (LFW) interva l.c nozzles , and to lower support Upper axial weld column bodies ; Rev. 1 added (UAW) Expansion to UGW, LFW, and Lower support UAW, and to lower support forging . (Note 3) forging/casting ; reduced coverage to 25%. However MRP 2018-026 increased the required examination coverage. Core Barrel Cracking (SCC , IASCC , Fatigue) Middle and lower Periodic enhanced visual (EVT- 1) 100% of the accessible weld length of MRP 2018-022 added core Assembly core barrel axial examination , no later than 2 refueling the OD of the LGW and 0.75-inch of barrel axial welds , upper core Irradiation Embrittlement (I E) is an welds . outages from the beginning of the first adjacent base metal shall be plate , and lower support Lower girth weld ; applicable aging mechanism . lice nse renewal period and subsequent examined . (N ote 9). column bodies as Expansion LGW Upper core plate . examinations on a ten -yea r interval.d items. (Note 8) Lower support MRP 2018-026 revised the column bodies required examination (cast). (Note 3) coverage . Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-54 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No .: 19-248 Append ix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 69 of 74

Table C4.3-1 Primary Components Expansion Link Examination Method/ Frequency Source of Revision/ Primary Item Effect (mechanism) Examination Coverage (Note 1) (Note 1) Addition Alignment and Distortion (Loss of load due to None Direct measurement of spring height w ith in Measurements should be taken at MRP-227A. Interfacing stress relaxation) (Note 17) th ree cycles of the begin ning of (before or several points around the A calculation of required hold Components after) the first license renewa l period. If the circumference of the spring , with a down spring he ight for the first set of measurements is not sufficient to statistically adequate number of Internals hold down 80-year design life confirms assess remaining life , additional spring measurements at each point to spring that the existing measured height measurements will be required .l min imize uncertainty. spring heights for both units (Note 17) are acceptable, and no further measurements are necessary Alignment and Cracking (SCC) , Loss of material None Vis ual (VT-3) no later than 2 refuel ing All clevis insert bolts and clevis insert Clevis insert bolts elevated to Interfacing (We ar) outages from the beginning of the first dowels. the Primary category by Components license renewal period . k MRP 2018-022; the scope is Subsequent exam inations on a ten-year expanded to include clevis Clevis insert bolts insert dowels . Clevis insert dowels interval. (Note 4-819.) Alignment and Loss of material (Wear) None Vis ual inspection for top of CRGTs and/or Wea r surfaces for top of CRGT and/or Added as a Primary Interfacing bottom of therma l sleeve guide funnel for bottom of the rmal sleeve gu ide funnel compo nent in MRP 2018-022 . Components indications of wear per MRP 2018-01 O per MRP 2018-010 (TB-07-02). (TB-07-02). MRP 2018-027 implements this Thermal sleeves inspection as described in NSAL 18-1 . Therma l Shield Cracking (fatigue) or Loss of None Visua l (VT-3) no later tha n 2 refue ling 100% of the rma l shield flexures MRP-227A Assem bly Material (wear) that resu lts in outages from the beginning of the first thermal shield flexures excessive license renewal period . Subsequent Thermal shield wear, fracture , or full separation exam inations on a ten-year interval. 1 flexures Radial Support Loss of material (Wear) None Vis ua l (VT-3) no later than 2 refueling Wear surfaces and radial support Added as a Primary Keys outages from the beginning of the fi rst keys component in MRP 2018-022 . license renewa l period. Subsequent Radial support keys examinations on a ten-year interval. Stellite wear surfaces (Note 4-819.) Alignment and Loss of material (Wear) None Visual (VT-3) no later than 2 refueling Wear surfaces and radia l support Added as a Primary Interfacing outages from the beginn ing of the first keys component in MRP 2018-022. Components license renewa l period . Subsequent examinations on a ten-year interval. Clevis bearing Stellite wear surface (Note 4-819) Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-56 Change Notice 3 Appl ication for Subsequent License Renewa l Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Append ix C - MRP-227-A Gap Ana lysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 70 of 74

j. Direct measurements of the hold down spring height were performed for Unit 1 and Unit 2 in 2012 . The measurements were obtained at 8 locations around the circumference of the spring . Three measurements were performed at each location . The results indicated an acceptable spring height that confirms the capability of the hold down spring to perform its intended function for 80 years of operation .
k. The clevis insert bolting was inspected for integrity during the 2013 and 2014 outages for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively . VT-3 exams were performed using VT-1 acuity . The enhanced visua l acuity was used specifica lly to address industry OE concerns of cl evis insert bolt cracking . No issues were identified .

I. VT-3 examinations were performed in 2013 for the six therma l shield flexures in Unit 1. T he Unit 2 inspections for the six thermal shie ld flexures were performed in 2014. All inspection results were satisfactory; there was no evidence of cracking (fati gue) or loss of material (wear) . Notes: 1 Examination acceptance criteria and expansion criteria for the Westinghouse components are in Table 5-3 of MRP-227-A. 2 Examination method updated in MRP-227, Revision 1 based on issuance of WCAP-17451-P for industry use. Interim Guidance issued in PWROG Letter OG-18-76 amends the requirements regarding baseline examinations. 3 The FMECA expert panel determined that Surry would follow MRP-227, Revision 1, for the expansion inspection components of the CRGT lower flange welds , which include the remaining CRGT lower flange welds and the BMI column bodies. The lower support columns (cast) and the upper core plate are added as Expansion links to the lower core barrel girth weld (Primary) , and the lower core support forging would be added as an Expansion link to the upper core barrel flange weld (Primary) . 4 MRP-227-A Note : A minimum of 75% of the total identified sample population must be examined . 5 Clarification in MRP-227 , Revision 1, to state that 0.25 inch of the adjacent base metal must be examined for the CRGT lower flange we lds. 6 MRP-227-A Note: A minimum of 75% of the total we ld length (examined+ unexamined) , including coverage consistent with the Expansion criteria in Table 5-3, must be examined from either the inner or outer diameter for inspection credit. 7 The examination coverage for core barrel welds was redefined in MRP-22 7, Revision 1. 8 The upper girth weld was moved to an Expansion link from the upper flange weld in MRP-227 , Revision 1. 9 MRP 2018-026 revised the examination coverage to require a minimum of 50% of the circumference of either the ID or the OD of the weld being examined 10 MRP-22 7-A Note: The lower core barrel flange weld may be alternatively designated as the core barrel-to-support plate weld . 11 The lower flange weld was moved to an Expansion link from the upper flange weld in MRP-227 , Revision 1. 12 Bracket bolts are not applicable to the Surry design . 13 MRP-227-A Note: A minimum of 75% of the total bolt population (exam ine+ unexamined) , including coverage cons istent with the Expansion criteria in Table 5-3 of MRP-227 , must be examined for inspection credit. 14 Corner bolts will be added as a Primary component in the next revision of MRP-227 . They will be treated the same as baffle-former bolts. 15 MRP-227-A Note: Void swelling effects on the component are managed through management of void swelling on the entire baffle-former assembly. 16 Examin ation timing and frequency is updated in MRP-227, Revision 1, based in issuance of MRP 2017-009 for industry use. 17 Language clarified/simplified in MRP-227 , Revision 1. 18 Sheath or C-tube wear measurement can be considered best practice, but optional until the inspection when the guide card wear just above the sheaths or C-tubes has a ligament that is worn-through or is projected to wear-through before the time of the next inspection. 19 Added as a Primary component in MRP 2018-022. Su rry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-5 8 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendi x C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 71 of 74

Table C4.3-2 Expansion Components Primary Link Source of Revision/ Expansion Item Effect (mechanism) Examination Method/ Frequency Examination Coverage (Note 1) Addition Upper Internals Assembly Cracking (Fatigue , wear) Core barrel Visual (VT-3) examination . 25% of accessible surfaces. MRP-227, Revision 1. Lower Girth (Notes 4 and 5) MRP 2018-022 Upper core plate Re-inspection every 10 years following Weld (Note 2) initial inspection . (N ote 3) specified VT-3 exam ination and 25% coverage . Contro l Rod Guide Tube Cracking (SCC , Fatigue) CRGT Lower Enhanced visual (EVT- 1) examination to A min imum of75% of the CRGT assembly MRP-227 , Revision 1, Assembly Flange Welds determ ine the presence of crack-like lower flange weld surfaces and 0.25 inch added the requ irement Irradiation Embrittlement (IE) (Notes 2 and 6) surface flaws in flange welds. of the adjacent base metal for the flange for 0.25 inch of Remain ing CRGT lower and Thermal Embrittlement (TE) we lds not inspected under the Primary adjacent base metal. flange welds (N ote 6) are applicable aging Subsequent exam ination on a ten -year link. mechanisms . interval. CQDlCQI RQd Guide Iube LQSS Qf Msi!erisil (Wesir) CRGTGuide Per the regiiiremeo!s Qf WCAP-17451-P E2rnminsi!iQn QQversige (;)er !he MRP-227A Assembly Plsi!es (Qsirdsl RevisiQn 2. regiiirements Qf WQAP-17 451-P ReyisiQn 2 CQn!iniiQiis seQ!iQo shesiths sing Q-!ubes Bottom Mounted Cracking (Fatigue) including the CRGT Lower Visual (VT-3) examination of BMI column 100% of BMI co lumn bodies for which MRP-227A Instrumentation System detection of completely Flange Welds bodies as indicated by difficulty of insertion/ difficulty is detected during flux thimble fractured co lumn bodies . (Note 2) withdrawal of flu x thimb les . insertion/withdrawal. Bottom-mounted instrumentation (BMI) Irradiation Embrittlement (IE) is Re-inspection every 10 years following column bodies an applicable aging mechanism . initial inspection . Flux thimble insertion / withdrawal to be monitored at each inspection interval. Core Barrel Assembly Cracking (SCC, IASCC) Lower co re Enhanced visual (EVT- 1) exam ination . 100% of the accessible we ld length of the MRP 2018-026 barrel cylinder OD of the MAW and LAW and 0.75-inch of changed the Middle axial weld (MAW) Irradiation Embrittlement (IE) is Re-inspection every 10 years following girth weld adjacent base metal shall be examined . examination coverage. and Lower axial weld (LAW) the applicable aging initial inspection . (LGW) (Notes 4 and Q_a) mechanism . Core Barrel Assembly Cracking (SCC) Upper core Enhanced visual (EVT-1) examination . 100% of the accessible weld length of one MRP-227, Revision 1, barrel flange side of the UGW and 0.75-inch of added the UGW to the Upper girth weld (UGW) Re-in spection every 10 years following weld (UFW) . adjacent base metal shall be examined Expansion category as initial inspection . (Note ~ ) a link from Primary-Upper flange weld (UFW). MRP 2018-026 changed the examination coverage . Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-59 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 72 of 74

Table C4.3-2 Expansion Components Primary Link Source of Revision/ Expansion Item Effect (mechanism) Examination Method/ Frequency Examination Coverage (Note 1) Addition Core Barrel Assembly Cracking (SCC) Upper core Enhanced visual (EVT-1) examination . 100% of the accessible weld length of the MRP-227 , Rev ision 1, barrel flange OD surface of the LFW and 0.75-inch of added the LFW to the Lower flange weld (LFW) Re-inspection every 10 years following weld (UFW). adjacent base metal shall be examined . Expansion category as initial inspection . (Note ea) a link from Primary-Upper flange weld (UFW) . MRP 2018-026 changed the examination coverage. Core Barrel Assembly Cracking (SCC , IASCC) Upper core Enhanced visual (EVT-1) examination . 100% of the accessible weld length of one MRP-227, Revision 1, Irradiation Embrittlement (IE) is barrel flange side of the UAW and Y.' of adjacent base added the UAW to the Upper axial weld (UAW) Re-inspection every 10 years following weld (UFW) . metal shall be examined (Note ~ ) Expansion category as an applicable aging mechanism . initial inspection . a link from Primary-Upper flange weld (UFW) . MRP 2018-026 changed the examination coverage . Lower Internals Assembly Cracking (SCC) Upper Core Visual (E-V=t4VT-3 ) examination . 25% of the bottom surface. MRP-227, Revision 1, Barrel Flange added this item to the Lower support forgi ng Re-inspection every 10 years following (Notes 4 and 5) Weld (UFW) Expansion category. initial inspection . (N ote 3) (Note 2) MRP 2018-022 specified VT-3 examination and 25% coverage. Lower Support Assembly Cracking (IASCC) includ ing Lower core Visual (E-V=t4~ ) examination. 25% of accessible support column MRP-227 , Revis ion 1, detection of completely barrel girth assemblies as visible from above the added this item to the Lower support column Re-inspection every 10 years following fractured column bodies . Weld (Note 2) lower core plate. (Note~ 4...aO.Q...2) Expansion category. bodies (cast) initial inspection . (Note 3) MRP 2018-022 Irradiation Embrittlement (IE) is specified VT-3 an applicable aging mechanism . exam ination and 25% coverage. Core Barrel Assembly Cracking (IASCC, Fatigue) Baffle-former Vo lumetric (UT) examination 100% of accessible barrel-former bolts MRP-227A bolts (minimum of 75% of the total population). Barrel-former bolts (Note 7) Irradiation Embrittlement (IE), Re-inspection every 10 years following void swelling , initial inspection . Accessibility may be limited by presence irrad iation-enhanced stress of thermal sh ield or neutron pads . relaxation (ISR) aging (Note4) mechanisms Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-60 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 73 of 74

Table C4.3-2 Expansion Components Primary Link Source of Revision/ Expansion Item Effect (mechanism) Examination Method/ Frequency Examination Coverage (Note 1) Addition Lower Support Assembly Cracking (IASCC , Fatigue) Baffle-former Volumetric (UT) examination 100% of accessible lower support column MRP-227A bolts bolts (minimum of 75% of the total Lower support column bolts Irradiation embrittlement (IE), Re-inspection every 10 years following population}, or as supported by and irradiation-enhanced stress initial inspection . plant-specific justification . (Note 4) relaxation (ISR) are applicable aging mechanisms Notes: 1 Examination acceptance criteria and expansion criteria for the Westinghouse components are in Table 5-3 of MRP-227-A. 2 The FMECA expert panel determined that Surry would follow MRP-227 , Revision 1, for the expansion inspection components of the CRGT lower flange welds, which include the remaining CRGT lower flange welds and the BMI column bodies. The lower support columns (cast) and the upper core plate are added as Expansion links to the lower core barrel girth weld (Primary) , and the lower core support forg ing is added as an Expansion link to the upper core barrel flange weld (Primary). 3 MRP-227-A specifies an EVT-1 examination for the upper core plate, lower support forging, and lower support columns (cast). It is noted that in MRP-227, Revision 1, the inspection technique for these components is changed to a visual (VT-3) examination . 4 MRP-227-A Note: A minimum of 75% coverage of the entire examination area or volu me, or a minimum sample size of 75% of the total popu lation of like components of the examination is required (including both the accessible and inaccessible portions) . 5 The examination coverage for the upper core plate, lower support forging , and lower support column bodies was redefined in MRP-227, Revision 1. 6 Remaining CRGT lower flange we lds is added as an Expansion component in MRP-227, Revision 1, but as stated in Note 2 above, Surry will inspect in accordance with MRP-227 , Revision 1 for this component. 7 MRP 2018-022 was issued on the baffle-former bolt expansion components which specifies that the lower support column bolts remain the first expansion component of the BFB unless a large cluster of BFB indications is discovered during the UT exams. The presence of clustering would trigger expansion of the barrel-former bolts adjacent to the large cluster of BFB indications due to the potential for clustering to result in ind ications of the barrel bolts. The terms "large cluste r and "barrel-former bolts adjacent to the cluster" are defined in M RP 2018-022 . The oore barrel outlet nozzle welds are eliminated as an E:>Epansion oomponent in MRP 227. Revision 1. The examination coverage for core barrel welds was redefined in MRP-227 , Revision 1. Surry Power Station , Units 1 and 2 Page C-61 Change Notice 3 Application for Subsequent License Renewal Enclosure 2 Serial No.: 19-248 Appendix C - MRP-227-A Gap Analysis for PWR Vessel Internals Aging Management Page 74 of 74}}