ML090710091: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 03/11/2009
| issue date = 03/11/2009
| title = Conveying Draft RAI Questions from the Instrumentation and Controls Branch Regarding the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
| title = Conveying Draft RAI Questions from the Instrumentation and Controls Branch Regarding the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
| author name = Tam P S
| author name = Tam P
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| addressee name = Pointer K, Salamon G
| addressee name = Pointer K, Salamon G
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000263
| docket = 05000263
| license number = DPR-022
| license number = DPR-022
| contact person = Tam P S
| contact person = Tam P
| case reference number = TAC MD9990
| case reference number = TAC MD9990
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
Line 23: Line 23:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Monticello - Draft RAI from EICB re. Proposed EPU Amendment (TAC MD9990)  Ken:  Our review of your 11/5/09 application for an extended power uprate amendment is ongoing. Our Instrumentation and Controls Branch (EICB) has provided the following draft RAI questions. Please contact me to set up a conference call to discuss these questions:  
Monticello - Draft RAI from EICB re. Proposed EPU Amendment (TAC MD9990)  Ken:  Our review of your 11/5/09 application for an extended power uprate amendment is ongoing. Our Instrumentation and Controls Branch (EICB) has provided the following draft RAI questions. Please contact me to set up a conference call to discuss these questions:
(1)  Enclosure 5, Page 2-104, Table 2.4-1, identifies various instrument setpoints where analytical and/or allowable values have been changed. Provide a summary calculation for the revised setpoints. This summary calculation should provide all the values calculated in accordance with the setpoint methodology, such as acceptable as found band, acceptable as left value, etc., and a reasoned quantitative or qualitative analysis for these values.        (2)  The surveillance frequency in TS Section 3.3.1.1, Surveillance Requirement SR 3.3.1.1.6, is proposed to be revised from 2000 effective full power hours to 1770 full power hours,  However, no detailed analysis to justify the change was provided. Please provide the calculation to demonstrate the basis for the proposed change.
(1)  Enclosure 5, Page 2-104, Table 2.4-1, identifies various instrument setpoints where analytical and/or allowable values have been changed. Provide a summary calculation for the revised setpoints. This summary calculation should provide all the values calculated in accordance with the setpoint methodology, such as acceptable as found band, acceptable as left value, etc., and a reasoned quantitative or qualitative analysis for these values.        (2)  The surveillance frequency in TS Section 3.3.1.1, Surveillance Requirement SR 3.3.1.1.6, is proposed to be revised from 2000 effective full power hours to 1770 full power hours,  However, no detailed analysis to justify the change was provided. Please provide the calculation to demonstrate the basis for the proposed change.
This e-mail aims solely to prepare you and others for the requested conference call. This e-mail does not convey a formal NRC staff position, and does not formally request for additional information. Peter S. Tam , Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
This e-mail aims solely to prepare you and others for the requested conference call. This e-mail does not convey a formal NRC staff position, and does not formally request for additional information. Peter S. Tam , Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  



Revision as of 02:35, 12 July 2019

Conveying Draft RAI Questions from the Instrumentation and Controls Branch Regarding the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
ML090710091
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/2009
From: Tam P
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Pointer K, Salamon G
Northern States Power Co
Tam P
References
TAC MD9990
Download: ML090710091 (2)


Text

Accession No. ML090710091

From: Peter Tam Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:32 PM To: 'Pointer, Kenneth'; Salamon, Gabor Cc: Hukam Garg

Subject:

Monticello - Draft RAI from EICB re. Proposed EPU Amendment (TAC MD9990) Ken: Our review of your 11/5/09 application for an extended power uprate amendment is ongoing. Our Instrumentation and Controls Branch (EICB) has provided the following draft RAI questions. Please contact me to set up a conference call to discuss these questions:

(1) Enclosure 5, Page 2-104, Table 2.4-1, identifies various instrument setpoints where analytical and/or allowable values have been changed. Provide a summary calculation for the revised setpoints. This summary calculation should provide all the values calculated in accordance with the setpoint methodology, such as acceptable as found band, acceptable as left value, etc., and a reasoned quantitative or qualitative analysis for these values. (2) The surveillance frequency in TS Section 3.3.1.1, Surveillance Requirement SR 3.3.1.1.6, is proposed to be revised from 2000 effective full power hours to 1770 full power hours, However, no detailed analysis to justify the change was provided. Please provide the calculation to demonstrate the basis for the proposed change.

This e-mail aims solely to prepare you and others for the requested conference call. This e-mail does not convey a formal NRC staff position, and does not formally request for additional information. Peter S. Tam , Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Tel. 301-415-1451 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (C56E360E9D804F4B95BC673F886381E71D99BB6C2F)

Subject:

Monticello - Draft RAI from EICB re. Proposed EPU Amendment (TAC MD9990)

Sent Date: 3/11/2009 4:31:57 PM Received Date: 3/11/2009 4:31:00 PM From: Peter Tam

Created By: Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients:

Kenneth.Pointer@xenuclear.com ('Pointer, Kenneth') Tracking Status: None

Gabor.Salamon@xenuclear.com (Salamon, Gabor) Tracking Status: None Hukam.Garg@nrc.gov (Hukam Garg)

Tracking Status: None

Post Office:

HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time

MESSAGE 7884 3/11/2009

Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False

Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: