PY-CEI-NRR-2033, Submits Addl Info to Support 960116 LAR on Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements,Per 960228 Telcon W/Nrc.Proposed TS Page mark-ups in Present Format & Amend 69 Format (Improved TS) Encl

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Addl Info to Support 960116 LAR on Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements,Per 960228 Telcon W/Nrc.Proposed TS Page mark-ups in Present Format & Amend 69 Format (Improved TS) Encl
ML20100N943
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/1996
From: Shelton D
CENTERIOR ENERGY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20100N946 List:
References
PY-CEI-NRR-2033, NUDOCS 9603060573
Download: ML20100N943 (2)


Text

'

CENTERf0R ENERGY PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Mail Address: Donald C. Sh6! ton 10 C ER ROAD SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT R , OHlo 44081 ER O 081 NUCLEAR (216) 259-3737 March 1,1996 PY-CEl/NRR-2033L United States Nucle:ar Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 j Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-440 Additional Information to Support License Amendment Request on Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements l

Gentlemen:

In a telephone call on February 28,1996, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff provided feedback on the Perry Nuclear Power Plant license amendment request involving Technical Specification requirements for drywellleak rate testing. The original request was submitted by letter dated January 16,1996 (PY-CEl/NRR-2007L). Specifically, the staff noted that additional time would be required for review of portions of the request such as i the drywell air lock testing changes. Therefore, issuance of a subset of the proposalis requested in support of the fifth refueling outage.

The proposed page mark-ups are attached to this letter, in both the present format and the Amendment 69 format (the improved technical specifications). The changes consist of a one-time exception to the surveillance test frequency for the drywell bypass leak rate test, extending performance of this test to the sixth refueling outage. The test would not be performed during the fifth refueling outage. This current proposal would be considered more conservative than that analyzed and found to be acceptable in the Significant Hazards Consideration accompanying the request dated January 16,1996. Therefore, the previously submitted Significant Hazards Consideration would bound the current proposal, and submittal of a new Significant Hazards Consideration is not necessary.

Review of the full original proposal is requested in a timely manner, to support outage planning efforts for the sixth refuel outage.

9603060573 960301 PDR ADOCK 05000440 P PDR U b U('4 ]

o w a ,c m es 00i CMoN f ec'r c a pc+ g TO CO E W (k

.- . . . . . . - .- ~. ...... - -- . - . . . . . ~ . - - .--.- . .

PY-CEl/NRR-2033L March 1,1996 Page 2 i

l l

If you have questions or require additionalinformation, please contact ,

Mr. James D. Kloosterman, Manager - Regulatory Affairs at (216) 280-5833.  :

l Very tr urs, l

% v i

l BSF:bf l l

Attachment l I

cc: hRC Project Manager l NRC Resident inspector Office )

NRC Region lli I State of Ohio I

l l

I 1

l l

l i