|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20216J0681999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards Rev 3 of AP600 Design Control Document, Incorporating Documentation Changes Resulting from Final Review Performed to Check Consistency of Implementation of Approved Design Change Proposals.With Summary of Changes ML20207G5411999-06-0808 June 1999 Discusses Request Made by Westinghouse on 981109 That Proprietary WCAP-14252,Rev 1,be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Determined Info to Be Proprietary & Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20195D5201999-06-0404 June 1999 Discusses Westinghouse Request That Change Pages Submitted on 980921 to WCAP-14292 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure. Determined Info to Be Proprietary & Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20196G2431999-05-21021 May 1999 Informs That USNRC Has Published in Fr Encl Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Re AP600 Design Certification Rule. Rulemaking Allows Applicants or Licensees to Construct AP600 Std Plant Design by Referencing Design Certification Rule ML20206G5411999-05-0505 May 1999 Forwards Draft Environ Assessment Re Proposed Certification of AP600 Std Plant Design.Environ Assessment Will Be Used as Basis for NRC Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Resulting from Certification of AP600 Design ML20205J3351999-04-0707 April 1999 Informs That USNRC Staff Has Completed Review of Rev 2 of AP600 Design Control Document,Verified That All of Changes in Rev 2 Are Acceptable & Determined That AP600 Dcd,Rev 2, Can Now Be Used in Proposed Design Certification Rule NSD-NRC-99-5827, Forwards Rev 2 to AP600 Design Control Document.Attachment 1 Provides Summary of Changes Made as Part of Mar 1999 Rev to AP600 Design Control Document1999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Rev 2 to AP600 Design Control Document.Attachment 1 Provides Summary of Changes Made as Part of Mar 1999 Rev to AP600 Design Control Document ML20205D3051999-03-25025 March 1999 Requests Amend to 920626 Application for Design Certification of AP600,including AP600 Ssar & AP600 Dcd,To Reflect Sale of CBS Commercial Nuclear Business to W ML20203C5481999-02-10010 February 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to AP600 Design Control Document (DCD) for Docket File.Dcd Provides Reference Basis for AP600 Design Certification ML20199H8671999-01-20020 January 1999 Forwards Comments on AP600 Design Control Document,Submitted by Westinghouse ML20199B1121999-01-0707 January 1999 Advises That Info Contained in NSRA-APSL-92-0268 & Containing Presentation Matl Used in 921209-10 Meeting,Marked Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA ML20198B4601998-12-14014 December 1998 Discusses W Ltr NTD-NRC-95-4556,dtd 950918,provided as Status Rept on Proprietary Matl Submitted to NRC to Support AP600 Design Review Effort.Proprietary Info in Encl Have Been Removed from AP600 Docket File & Being Returned ML20197G3501998-11-30030 November 1998 Forwards AP600 Design Control Document, Vols 1-12 for Docket File.Submittal Closes Confirmatory Items 1.5-1 & 1.5-2 from Sept 1998 Final SER Re Certification of AP600 Std Design ML20195E9331998-11-0909 November 1998 Requests That Rev 1 to WCAP-14252, AP600 Low-Pressure Integral Sys Test at or State Univ Final Data Rept, Vols I- Iv,Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) NSD-NRC-98-5806, Forwards non-proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14253 & Proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14252, AP600 Low-Pressure Integral Sys Test at or State Univ Final Data Rept. Proprietary Rept Includes Vols 1-4.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901998-11-0909 November 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14253 & Proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14252, AP600 Low-Pressure Integral Sys Test at or State Univ Final Data Rept. Proprietary Rept Includes Vols 1-4.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20155G9021998-11-0303 November 1998 Advises That Info Contained in 981012 ltr,NSD-NRC-98-5795, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b) (5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954,as Amended ML20155G9271998-11-0202 November 1998 Forwards Copy of NRC Staff FSER for Westinghouse AP600 Design.Staff Completed Review of Design & Issued Final Design Approval & FSER on 980903.Without Encl ML20155G7591998-11-0202 November 1998 Forwards Copy of NRC Staff FSER for Westinghouse AP600 Design,Per Discussion at Sept 1997 Meeting.Staff Completed & Issued Final Design Approval of FSER on 980903.Without Encl NSD-NRC-98-5795, Informs That Figures from Rev 0 & Rev 3 of PRA Which Indicate Location of H Igniters Should Be Considered Proprietary.Nonproprietary Versions of AP600 General Arrangement Drawings Were Provided in Rev 7 of Ssar1998-10-12012 October 1998 Informs That Figures from Rev 0 & Rev 3 of PRA Which Indicate Location of H Igniters Should Be Considered Proprietary.Nonproprietary Versions of AP600 General Arrangement Drawings Were Provided in Rev 7 of Ssar ML20154A4091998-09-29029 September 1998 Advises That Certain Info Contained in Westinghouse Ltr NTD-NRC-95-4506,dtd 950713,submitting WCAP-14425,will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5).Figure 3-1 Will Be Placed Into Public Record ML20153G2521998-09-25025 September 1998 Advises That Proprietary Matl Discovered by NRC in NSD-NRC-97-4966 & Proprietary Matl Noted by W in NSD-NRC-98-5772 Will Be Withhheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954 ML20153C1001998-09-15015 September 1998 Advises That Matls Re AP600 Notrump Final Validation Rept, WCAP-14807,marked Proprietary Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954,as Amended NSD-NRC-98-5788, Forwards Formal Transmittal of Correspondence Previously Sent Informally Over Period of 980702-0826.Index of Encl Matl Provided1998-09-15015 September 1998 Forwards Formal Transmittal of Correspondence Previously Sent Informally Over Period of 980702-0826.Index of Encl Matl Provided ML20151X4381998-09-15015 September 1998 Informs That Staff Has Decided to Accept Claim That Info in WCAP-14135,Rev 1 Is Proprietary & Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per W 980821 & 26 Ltrs ML20151X4041998-09-11011 September 1998 Discusses Revised Tier 2 Info for AP600 Design.Staff Revised Decision on Whether Fire Protection Should Expire at First Full Power Encl ML20151V1711998-09-0808 September 1998 Advises That Info Re Westinghouse AP600 Std Safety Analysis Rept Through Rev 4 & PRA Through Rev 5 Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5).Disposition of Ssar & PRA Proprietary Info Encl ML20151V2231998-09-0808 September 1998 Informs That NRC Determined That WCAP-14132 Encl in Westinghouse Ltr NTD-NRC-94-4244,dtd 940729 & Marked as Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per to 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954 ML20151S9181998-09-0303 September 1998 Advises That Info Marked as Proprietary Re Westinghouse AP600 Design Ltrs Concerning Pxs Scaling & Pirt Closure Rept WCAP-14727,will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) ML20239A1481998-09-0303 September 1998 Forwards Notice of Issuance of Final Design Approval & Final SER for AP600.FDA Allows AP600 Design to Be Referenced in Application for Construction Permit or Operating License Under 10CFR50 or Application for Combined License ML20239A3111998-09-0303 September 1998 Forwards Final SER Which Summarizes Staff Safety Review of AP600 Design Against Requirements of Subpart B of 10CF5R52 & Delineates Scope of Technical Details Considered in Evaluating Proposed Design ML20151V8521998-09-0101 September 1998 Extends Invitation to Attend Ceremony on 980911,where NRC Will Present Final Design Approval for AP600 Std Nuclear Reactor Design to Westinghouse NSD-NRC-98-5781, Informs That W Determined That AP600 FSER Contains No Proprietary Info1998-09-0101 September 1998 Informs That W Determined That AP600 FSER Contains No Proprietary Info ML20151V2201998-08-31031 August 1998 Informs That EPRI Documents, GOTHIC Containment Analysis Package Qualification Rept, GOTHIC Containment Analysis Qualification Manual, & Listed Documents Dtd Sept 1993 Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20151V8431998-08-31031 August 1998 Extends Invitation to Attend Ceremony on 980911,where NRC Will Present Final Design Approval for AP600 Std Nuclear Reactor Design to Westinghouse ML20238F3241998-08-31031 August 1998 Advises That AP600 RAI Responses Encl in Westinghouse Ltrs NTD-NRC-95-4598,dtd 951117,as Modified by NSD-NRC-98-5776, Dtd 980826,marked Proprietary Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) ML20238F5991998-08-31031 August 1998 Refers to W 980821 Revised Response to Insp Rept 99900404/97-01 That Contained All Substantive Info Provided w/DCP/NRC-1074 Ltr.Nrc Will Destroy DCP/NRC-1074,as Requested NSD-NRC-98-5783, Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14989, Accident Specification & Phenomena Evaluation for AP600 Passive Containment Cooling Sys1998-08-28028 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14989, Accident Specification & Phenomena Evaluation for AP600 Passive Containment Cooling Sys NSD-NRC-98-5782, Forwards Corrected Pages 4-28 Through 4-32 to Be Inserted in Rev 2 to non-proprietary WCAP-14953, AP600 Pxs Scaling & Pirt Closure Rept. Pages Were Originally Submitted W/Incorrect Header Which Stated 'W Proprietary Class 2.'1998-08-28028 August 1998 Forwards Corrected Pages 4-28 Through 4-32 to Be Inserted in Rev 2 to non-proprietary WCAP-14953, AP600 Pxs Scaling & Pirt Closure Rept. Pages Were Originally Submitted W/Incorrect Header Which Stated 'W Proprietary Class 2.' NSD-NRC-98-5778, Provides Commitment to Include Requested Changes Into AP600 Design Control Document.Discussion W/Vijuk on 980825 Re Disposition of Ltrs DCP/NRC1074,dtd 971016 & DCP/NRC1324,dtd 980403,formalized1998-08-27027 August 1998 Provides Commitment to Include Requested Changes Into AP600 Design Control Document.Discussion W/Vijuk on 980825 Re Disposition of Ltrs DCP/NRC1074,dtd 971016 & DCP/NRC1324,dtd 980403,formalized ML20237E4421998-08-27027 August 1998 Advises That Info Contained in Ltr DCP/NRC-0985,dtd 970821, Sought to Be Withheld,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954,as Amended NSD-NRC-98-5777, Provides Revised Response to NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 PCS Final Data rept,WCAP-14135 & WCAP-141381998-08-26026 August 1998 Provides Revised Response to NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 PCS Final Data rept,WCAP-14135 & WCAP-14138 NSD-NRC-98-5776, Forwards Proprietary Revised Response to Ref NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 Design Certification Test Program,Notrump Computer Code,Wcobra/Trac Computer Code & Loftran Computer Code.Proprietary Info Withheld1998-08-26026 August 1998 Forwards Proprietary Revised Response to Ref NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 Design Certification Test Program,Notrump Computer Code,Wcobra/Trac Computer Code & Loftran Computer Code.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20237E0731998-08-26026 August 1998 Advises That Info in WCAP-14812,revs 1 & 2, Accident Spec & Phenomena Evaluation for AP600 PCS, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20238F8031998-08-26026 August 1998 Requests That Proprietary W Revised Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info,Be Withheld from Public Disclosure IAW 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-98-5774, Informs That W Faxed Last Response Re Afser Open Item 1.1-1 to NRC on 980821.Last of Attachments Supporting Several of Responses Faxed to NRC Over Past Several Days Were Express Mailed to NRC on 980821.Responses Close Subject Open It1998-08-24024 August 1998 Informs That W Faxed Last Response Re Afser Open Item 1.1-1 to NRC on 980821.Last of Attachments Supporting Several of Responses Faxed to NRC Over Past Several Days Were Express Mailed to NRC on 980821.Responses Close Subject Open Item NSD-NRC-98-5773, Responds to Questions Raised in NRC 971022 & s Re Proprietary Info Contained in 970930 Summary of Meeting Held on 970804-15 Concerning Structural Design of AP600.Figure 12-24 of WCAP-14407 Still Considered Proprietary by W1998-08-21021 August 1998 Responds to Questions Raised in NRC 971022 & s Re Proprietary Info Contained in 970930 Summary of Meeting Held on 970804-15 Concerning Structural Design of AP600.Figure 12-24 of WCAP-14407 Still Considered Proprietary by W ML20237E7991998-08-21021 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Results of AP600 Design Assurance Review (Dar) That Was Commitment in W Response to NRC Insp Rept 99900404/97-02.Info Should Assist in Closing Nonconformances & Unresolved Item Identified in Insp Rept NSD-NRC-98-5771, Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14138, Final Data Rept for PCS Large-Scale Tests,Phase 2 & Phase 3. Submittal Satisfies Verbal Commitment to Revise non-proprietary Version of PCS Final Data Rept Made by W1998-08-21021 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14138, Final Data Rept for PCS Large-Scale Tests,Phase 2 & Phase 3. Submittal Satisfies Verbal Commitment to Revise non-proprietary Version of PCS Final Data Rept Made by W NSD-NRC-98-5769, Responds to NRC Ref Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info. Info Provided as Proprietary in Ref 1 Has Either Been Moved from Ssar to Ref 3,which Includes non-proprietary Version of Rept or Made non-proprietary in Current Version of1998-08-21021 August 1998 Responds to NRC Ref Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info. Info Provided as Proprietary in Ref 1 Has Either Been Moved from Ssar to Ref 3,which Includes non-proprietary Version of Rept or Made non-proprietary in Current Version of Ssar NSD-NRC-98-5772, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Info in Response to NRC Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info.Separate Ltr & Affidavit Justifying Proprietary Nature of Info,Encl. Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901998-08-21021 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Info in Response to NRC Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info.Separate Ltr & Affidavit Justifying Proprietary Nature of Info,Encl. Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 1999-09-29
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20216J0681999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards Rev 3 of AP600 Design Control Document, Incorporating Documentation Changes Resulting from Final Review Performed to Check Consistency of Implementation of Approved Design Change Proposals.With Summary of Changes NSD-NRC-99-5827, Forwards Rev 2 to AP600 Design Control Document.Attachment 1 Provides Summary of Changes Made as Part of Mar 1999 Rev to AP600 Design Control Document1999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Rev 2 to AP600 Design Control Document.Attachment 1 Provides Summary of Changes Made as Part of Mar 1999 Rev to AP600 Design Control Document ML20205D3051999-03-25025 March 1999 Requests Amend to 920626 Application for Design Certification of AP600,including AP600 Ssar & AP600 Dcd,To Reflect Sale of CBS Commercial Nuclear Business to W ML20203C5481999-02-10010 February 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to AP600 Design Control Document (DCD) for Docket File.Dcd Provides Reference Basis for AP600 Design Certification ML20197G3501998-11-30030 November 1998 Forwards AP600 Design Control Document, Vols 1-12 for Docket File.Submittal Closes Confirmatory Items 1.5-1 & 1.5-2 from Sept 1998 Final SER Re Certification of AP600 Std Design NSD-NRC-98-5806, Forwards non-proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14253 & Proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14252, AP600 Low-Pressure Integral Sys Test at or State Univ Final Data Rept. Proprietary Rept Includes Vols 1-4.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901998-11-0909 November 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14253 & Proprietary Rev 1 to WCAP-14252, AP600 Low-Pressure Integral Sys Test at or State Univ Final Data Rept. Proprietary Rept Includes Vols 1-4.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20195E9331998-11-0909 November 1998 Requests That Rev 1 to WCAP-14252, AP600 Low-Pressure Integral Sys Test at or State Univ Final Data Rept, Vols I- Iv,Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) NSD-NRC-98-5795, Informs That Figures from Rev 0 & Rev 3 of PRA Which Indicate Location of H Igniters Should Be Considered Proprietary.Nonproprietary Versions of AP600 General Arrangement Drawings Were Provided in Rev 7 of Ssar1998-10-12012 October 1998 Informs That Figures from Rev 0 & Rev 3 of PRA Which Indicate Location of H Igniters Should Be Considered Proprietary.Nonproprietary Versions of AP600 General Arrangement Drawings Were Provided in Rev 7 of Ssar NSD-NRC-98-5788, Forwards Formal Transmittal of Correspondence Previously Sent Informally Over Period of 980702-0826.Index of Encl Matl Provided1998-09-15015 September 1998 Forwards Formal Transmittal of Correspondence Previously Sent Informally Over Period of 980702-0826.Index of Encl Matl Provided NSD-NRC-98-5781, Informs That W Determined That AP600 FSER Contains No Proprietary Info1998-09-0101 September 1998 Informs That W Determined That AP600 FSER Contains No Proprietary Info NSD-NRC-98-5782, Forwards Corrected Pages 4-28 Through 4-32 to Be Inserted in Rev 2 to non-proprietary WCAP-14953, AP600 Pxs Scaling & Pirt Closure Rept. Pages Were Originally Submitted W/Incorrect Header Which Stated 'W Proprietary Class 2.'1998-08-28028 August 1998 Forwards Corrected Pages 4-28 Through 4-32 to Be Inserted in Rev 2 to non-proprietary WCAP-14953, AP600 Pxs Scaling & Pirt Closure Rept. Pages Were Originally Submitted W/Incorrect Header Which Stated 'W Proprietary Class 2.' NSD-NRC-98-5783, Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14989, Accident Specification & Phenomena Evaluation for AP600 Passive Containment Cooling Sys1998-08-28028 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14989, Accident Specification & Phenomena Evaluation for AP600 Passive Containment Cooling Sys NSD-NRC-98-5778, Provides Commitment to Include Requested Changes Into AP600 Design Control Document.Discussion W/Vijuk on 980825 Re Disposition of Ltrs DCP/NRC1074,dtd 971016 & DCP/NRC1324,dtd 980403,formalized1998-08-27027 August 1998 Provides Commitment to Include Requested Changes Into AP600 Design Control Document.Discussion W/Vijuk on 980825 Re Disposition of Ltrs DCP/NRC1074,dtd 971016 & DCP/NRC1324,dtd 980403,formalized ML20238F8031998-08-26026 August 1998 Requests That Proprietary W Revised Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info,Be Withheld from Public Disclosure IAW 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-98-5776, Forwards Proprietary Revised Response to Ref NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 Design Certification Test Program,Notrump Computer Code,Wcobra/Trac Computer Code & Loftran Computer Code.Proprietary Info Withheld1998-08-26026 August 1998 Forwards Proprietary Revised Response to Ref NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 Design Certification Test Program,Notrump Computer Code,Wcobra/Trac Computer Code & Loftran Computer Code.Proprietary Info Withheld NSD-NRC-98-5777, Provides Revised Response to NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 PCS Final Data rept,WCAP-14135 & WCAP-141381998-08-26026 August 1998 Provides Revised Response to NRC Ltr Re W Requests for Withholding Info Re AP600 PCS Final Data rept,WCAP-14135 & WCAP-14138 NSD-NRC-98-5774, Informs That W Faxed Last Response Re Afser Open Item 1.1-1 to NRC on 980821.Last of Attachments Supporting Several of Responses Faxed to NRC Over Past Several Days Were Express Mailed to NRC on 980821.Responses Close Subject Open It1998-08-24024 August 1998 Informs That W Faxed Last Response Re Afser Open Item 1.1-1 to NRC on 980821.Last of Attachments Supporting Several of Responses Faxed to NRC Over Past Several Days Were Express Mailed to NRC on 980821.Responses Close Subject Open Item ML20237E7991998-08-21021 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Results of AP600 Design Assurance Review (Dar) That Was Commitment in W Response to NRC Insp Rept 99900404/97-02.Info Should Assist in Closing Nonconformances & Unresolved Item Identified in Insp Rept ML20237D3161998-08-21021 August 1998 Requests That W Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-98-5773, Responds to Questions Raised in NRC 971022 & s Re Proprietary Info Contained in 970930 Summary of Meeting Held on 970804-15 Concerning Structural Design of AP600.Figure 12-24 of WCAP-14407 Still Considered Proprietary by W1998-08-21021 August 1998 Responds to Questions Raised in NRC 971022 & s Re Proprietary Info Contained in 970930 Summary of Meeting Held on 970804-15 Concerning Structural Design of AP600.Figure 12-24 of WCAP-14407 Still Considered Proprietary by W NSD-NRC-97-5370, Transmits Results of AP600 Foake Design Assurance Review as Requested in NRC .Info Is Being Provided to Close Unresolved Item Identified in Insp Rept 99900404/97-011998-08-21021 August 1998 Transmits Results of AP600 Foake Design Assurance Review as Requested in NRC .Info Is Being Provided to Close Unresolved Item Identified in Insp Rept 99900404/97-01 NSD-NRC-98-5763, Responds to NRC Ltrs Re W Claim for Treatment of Proprietary Info Submitted in .As Discussed W/Nrc on 980821, Info Contained in W Is self-critical Analysis of W QA Program & Therefore Falls Under Items of Affidavit1998-08-21021 August 1998 Responds to NRC Ltrs Re W Claim for Treatment of Proprietary Info Submitted in .As Discussed W/Nrc on 980821, Info Contained in W Is self-critical Analysis of W QA Program & Therefore Falls Under Items of Affidavit NSD-NRC-98-5772, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Info in Response to NRC Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info.Separate Ltr & Affidavit Justifying Proprietary Nature of Info,Encl. Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901998-08-21021 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Info in Response to NRC Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info.Separate Ltr & Affidavit Justifying Proprietary Nature of Info,Encl. Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-98-5769, Responds to NRC Ref Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info. Info Provided as Proprietary in Ref 1 Has Either Been Moved from Ssar to Ref 3,which Includes non-proprietary Version of Rept or Made non-proprietary in Current Version of1998-08-21021 August 1998 Responds to NRC Ref Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info. Info Provided as Proprietary in Ref 1 Has Either Been Moved from Ssar to Ref 3,which Includes non-proprietary Version of Rept or Made non-proprietary in Current Version of Ssar NSD-NRC-98-5771, Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14138, Final Data Rept for PCS Large-Scale Tests,Phase 2 & Phase 3. Submittal Satisfies Verbal Commitment to Revise non-proprietary Version of PCS Final Data Rept Made by W1998-08-21021 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Rev 2 to WCAP-14138, Final Data Rept for PCS Large-Scale Tests,Phase 2 & Phase 3. Submittal Satisfies Verbal Commitment to Revise non-proprietary Version of PCS Final Data Rept Made by W ML20237D3551998-08-20020 August 1998 Requests That Proprietary Info Re W Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info Concerning AP600 Pxs Scaling & Pirt Closure Rept, WCAP-14727 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure IAW 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-98-5762, Forwards Proprietary Change Pages for Chapters 7 & 8,for Inclusion as Rev 2 of TR WCAP-14727,in Response to NRC Ltr Dtd 980714.Non-proprietary Rev 2 to TR WCAP-14953 Re AP600 Scaling & Pirt Closure Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld1998-08-20020 August 1998 Forwards Proprietary Change Pages for Chapters 7 & 8,for Inclusion as Rev 2 of TR WCAP-14727,in Response to NRC Ltr Dtd 980714.Non-proprietary Rev 2 to TR WCAP-14953 Re AP600 Scaling & Pirt Closure Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld NSD-NRC-98-5764, Responds to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info from Public Disclosure for W AP600 Design Ltr of 951117,dtd 960229.W Considers Matl Proprietary Since Matl Discusses Approach Used by W to Develop Analysis Models of Cctf Test1998-08-20020 August 1998 Responds to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info from Public Disclosure for W AP600 Design Ltr of 951117,dtd 960229.W Considers Matl Proprietary Since Matl Discusses Approach Used by W to Develop Analysis Models of Cctf Test NSD-NRC-98-5768, Responds to NRC Ref Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info. Specific Info Considered non-proprietary or Proprietary Discussed1998-08-20020 August 1998 Responds to NRC Ref Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info. Specific Info Considered non-proprietary or Proprietary Discussed NSD-NRC-98-5766, Provides Summary of 980813 Telcon W/Nrc Re W Explanation of Rationale Which Was Used to Determine What Info Was Considered to Be Proprietary in TR WCAP-148121998-08-20020 August 1998 Provides Summary of 980813 Telcon W/Nrc Re W Explanation of Rationale Which Was Used to Determine What Info Was Considered to Be Proprietary in TR WCAP-14812 NSD-NRC-98-5770, Responds to NRC Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info.W Withdraws AP600 Rept Entitled, Wcobra/Trac Core Makeup Tank Preliminary Validation Rept, Since Rept Was Not Required by NRC to Make Safety Determination of AP6001998-08-20020 August 1998 Responds to NRC Ltrs Re W Requests for Withholding Info.W Withdraws AP600 Rept Entitled, Wcobra/Trac Core Makeup Tank Preliminary Validation Rept, Since Rept Was Not Required by NRC to Make Safety Determination of AP600 NSD-NRC-98-5760, Forwards Rev 25 to GW-GL-021, AP600 Ssar, Vols 1-11. Revised Tables of Contents,Change Page Instructions,List of Effective Pages,Document Cover Sheet & Change Roadmap Outlining Changes in Each Section Also Encl1998-08-19019 August 1998 Forwards Rev 25 to GW-GL-021, AP600 Ssar, Vols 1-11. Revised Tables of Contents,Change Page Instructions,List of Effective Pages,Document Cover Sheet & Change Roadmap Outlining Changes in Each Section Also Encl NSD-NRC-98-5761, Provides Written Confirmation That Identified Figure Is Not Considered Proprietary by W.Refs 1-5,discussed1998-08-19019 August 1998 Provides Written Confirmation That Identified Figure Is Not Considered Proprietary by W.Refs 1-5,discussed ML20237D2681998-08-18018 August 1998 Requests That Proprietary Informal Correspondence Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-97-5046, Submits Rev 1 of W Ltr Originally Submitted 970917,which Transmitted Proprietary & non-proprietary Informal Correspondence.Rev Includes Notarized Affidavit as Part of Application for Withholding Info.Proprietary Info Withheld1998-08-18018 August 1998 Submits Rev 1 of W Ltr Originally Submitted 970917,which Transmitted Proprietary & non-proprietary Informal Correspondence.Rev Includes Notarized Affidavit as Part of Application for Withholding Info.Proprietary Info Withheld NSD-NRC-98-5759, Submits Response to NRC Ltrs Re Request for Withholding Info.Figure 8-19 Will No Longer Be Considered Proprietary by W1998-08-17017 August 1998 Submits Response to NRC Ltrs Re Request for Withholding Info.Figure 8-19 Will No Longer Be Considered Proprietary by W NSD-NRC-98-5756, Responds to NRC 980714 & 21 Ltrs Re Request for Withholding Proprietary Info That Was Not Clearly Identified Other than Being Marked W Proprietary Class 21998-08-14014 August 1998 Responds to NRC 980714 & 21 Ltrs Re Request for Withholding Proprietary Info That Was Not Clearly Identified Other than Being Marked W Proprietary Class 2 NSD-NRC-98-5757, Responds to Ref NRC Ltrs Re Request for Withholding Proprietary Info Re W AP600 Ltr.Per 980708 Telcon,W Has Reviewed TRs WCAP-13288 & WCAP-13289 & Considers None of Info to Be Proprietary1998-08-14014 August 1998 Responds to Ref NRC Ltrs Re Request for Withholding Proprietary Info Re W AP600 Ltr.Per 980708 Telcon,W Has Reviewed TRs WCAP-13288 & WCAP-13289 & Considers None of Info to Be Proprietary ML20151Z0971998-08-13013 August 1998 Requests That Proprietary Rev 5 to WCAP-14807, Notrump Final Validation Rept, Be Withheld from Public Disclosure, Per 10CFR2.790 NSD-NRC-98-5754, Forwards non-proprietary Versions of Revs 3-5 to WCAP-14808 & Proprietary Version of Rev 5 to WCAP-14807, Notrump Final Validation Rept for AP600, in Form of Replacement Pages. Proprietary Encl Withheld1998-08-13013 August 1998 Forwards non-proprietary Versions of Revs 3-5 to WCAP-14808 & Proprietary Version of Rev 5 to WCAP-14807, Notrump Final Validation Rept for AP600, in Form of Replacement Pages. Proprietary Encl Withheld NSD-NRC-98-5749, Forwards Rev 13 to AP600 PRA for Simplified Passive Advanced LWR Plant Program. Rev Represents Final Version of AP600 Pra.All NRC Comments Related to Rev 12 of AP600 PRA Have Been Resolved1998-08-13013 August 1998 Forwards Rev 13 to AP600 PRA for Simplified Passive Advanced LWR Plant Program. Rev Represents Final Version of AP600 Pra.All NRC Comments Related to Rev 12 of AP600 PRA Have Been Resolved NSD-NRC-98-5753, Responds to Ref NRC Ltrs & W Ltr Re Request for Withholding Proprietary Info Re AP600 Design Ltrs1998-08-13013 August 1998 Responds to Ref NRC Ltrs & W Ltr Re Request for Withholding Proprietary Info Re AP600 Design Ltrs NSD-NRC-98-5752, Responds to Open Item 1.1-2 Contained in 980501 Advance Final SER for AP600 Requesting Update of Comparison of AP600 to NRC Reviewed Version of Alwr Util Requirements Document. Changes Resulting from NRC Comments Re Plant Design,List1998-08-13013 August 1998 Responds to Open Item 1.1-2 Contained in 980501 Advance Final SER for AP600 Requesting Update of Comparison of AP600 to NRC Reviewed Version of Alwr Util Requirements Document. Changes Resulting from NRC Comments Re Plant Design,Listed NSD-NRC-98-5755, Forwards Rev 7 to Simplified Passive Advance Light Water Reactor Plant Program AP600 Tier 1 Matl, Incorporating Comments Received from NRC Technical Staff,As of 980812.Encl Closes Open Item 14.3-1 from Advanced Final SER1998-08-13013 August 1998 Forwards Rev 7 to Simplified Passive Advance Light Water Reactor Plant Program AP600 Tier 1 Matl, Incorporating Comments Received from NRC Technical Staff,As of 980812.Encl Closes Open Item 14.3-1 from Advanced Final SER ML20153D9491998-08-12012 August 1998 Submits Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info.Info Does Not Have Commercial Value & No Longer Considered to Be Proprietary by W NSD-NRC-98-5751, Submits Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info.Info Does Not Have Commercial Value & Is No Longer Considered Proprietary by W1998-08-12012 August 1998 Submits Response to NRC Ltrs Re Requests for Withholding Info.Info Does Not Have Commercial Value & Is No Longer Considered Proprietary by W NSD-NRC-98-5748, Forwards Rev 24 of AP600 Ssar.Revised Tables of Contents, Change Page Instructions,List of Effective Pages,Document Cover Sheet & Change Roadmap Outlining Changes in Each Section Also Encl.Rev Submitted Under Encl Oath1998-08-0707 August 1998 Forwards Rev 24 of AP600 Ssar.Revised Tables of Contents, Change Page Instructions,List of Effective Pages,Document Cover Sheet & Change Roadmap Outlining Changes in Each Section Also Encl.Rev Submitted Under Encl Oath NSD-NRC-98-5743, Forwards Table Which Compares Combined License (COL) Info Items Identified in AP600 Design Certification Application W/Col Action Items Identified in AP600 Advance Final SER Provided to W by NRC on 9805061998-07-31031 July 1998 Forwards Table Which Compares Combined License (COL) Info Items Identified in AP600 Design Certification Application W/Col Action Items Identified in AP600 Advance Final SER Provided to W by NRC on 980506 NSD-NRC-98-5733, Forwards Rev 6 to GW-GL-030, Simplified Passive Advance LWR Plant Program,AP600 Tier 1 Matl, Which Incorporates Comments Received from NRC Technical Staff as of 9807221998-07-27027 July 1998 Forwards Rev 6 to GW-GL-030, Simplified Passive Advance LWR Plant Program,AP600 Tier 1 Matl, Which Incorporates Comments Received from NRC Technical Staff as of 980722 NSD-NRC-98-5742, Forwards Rev 12 to AP600 PRA Rept. All NRC Open Items Related to AP600 PRA Have Been Resolved1998-07-24024 July 1998 Forwards Rev 12 to AP600 PRA Rept. All NRC Open Items Related to AP600 PRA Have Been Resolved 1999-09-29
[Table view] |
Text
,
I I
t w:,
,. Westinghouse Energy Systems hx355 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15230-0355 Electric Corporhtion
( NSD-NRC-97-5166 l l DCP/NRC0899 j Docket No.: STN-52-003 '
June 4,1997 j i
1 Document Control Desk '
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 l
ATTENTION: T. R. QUAY ,
- l.
SUBJECT:
AP600 DESIGN CERTIFICATION; FIRE PROTECTION OPEN ITEMS; RESUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION :
Dear Mr. Quay:
As requested by NRC, this provides a resubmittal of fire protection open items resolution information.
The information was originally provided by a March 20,1997 fax. The attachment to this letter is that .
l provided by the fax, marked up to reflect resolution of comments received from NRC during our joint t fue protection meetings.
1 if you have any questions, please call J. W. Winters (412-374-5290).
l 0:~/#h'.L.
Brian A. McIntyre, h anager Advanced Plant Safety and Licensmg jml i l
Attachment:
Markup of March 20,1997 fax (14 pages) )
cc: N. J. Liparulo, Westinghouse (w/o Attachment) l g
9706100154 970604 c 00'
.~
i
!- DR ADOCK 05200003 -
t PDR
, ,$ h 100002
_ , _ - . - _ _ _ - - , - - I
l
)
01306. NRC's concerns regarding AP600 safe shutdown capabilities during and/or after a design basis fire.
L AP600 Compliance with Regulations for Passive ALWRs A. Compliance with HTP CMEB 9.5-1 1
SSAR Table 9.5.1-1, note the following: 1 Item 16 AP600 uses two levels of damage limits: safe shutdown and design !
basis accidents (in contrast to three in App. R: hot shutdown, cold shutdown, and DBAs). Safe shutdown capability is protected from damage caused by a single fire.
- acci mb b (AP600 " safe shutdown" is dee"'ed q"M--: deold shutdown'.'in SECY 94-084, it is recognized that Passive ALWR designs are limited by the inherent ability of the j' passive heat removal processes. EPRI's position is that safe stable shutdown condition is at 420 *F, and that passive safety systems need not be capable of achieving cold
{
shutdown, based on the belief that the passive decay heat removal systems have ;
inherently high long-term reliability, i
The NRC Staff position is that an RHR system be able to bring the plant to cold l shutdown conditions (with reference to GDC 34 and RG 1.139) was established to enable the licensee to perform inspection and repair at the plant. The Staff believes l that other plant conditions may constitute a safe shutdown state as long as reactor !
suberiticality, decay heat removal, and radioactive materials containment are properly maintained for the long term.
The Staff recommends that the Commission approve the EPRI's proposed 420 degrees F or below, rather than the cold shutdown condition reauired by RG 1.139, as a safe stable condition which the passive decay heat removal systems must be capable of achieving and maintainine following non-LOCA events. This recommendation is oredicated on an acceptable passive safety system performance and an acceptable resolution of the issue of regulatory treatment of non safety systems.)
The Commission has made determinations on the Staff's recommendations (SECY-94-084) regarding Safe Shutdown Requirements (item C)in the memorandum of June !
30,1994 from John C. Hoyle to James M. Taylor.
I
1 l
( + ,
\
f \
- Item 25 Safe shutdown systems are protected such that reliance on alternative or j;
l' dedicated shutdown capability is not necessary (in contrast with App. R allowed Alternative or Dedicated Shutdown). '
i-I i
P600 safe shutdown capabilities include methods for using safety related systems only, safety-related and nonsafety related systems, or nonsafety-related systems only, i
- The safe shutdown capabilities 'using safety related systems are fully protected to I i .
ensure that at least one safe shutdown capability is available in the event of a single I fire, without taking any credit for repairs or operator actions in the fire-affected area, l
)
and all equipment within the fire area is rendered inoperable by the fire..AP600 does
_ not rely on an alternative or dedicated shutdown capability. T W a g oacA a s< ~l*< 1 e & + u n .f L A > " , o.,
au. L w w / .Jun,-J byt wh mb. f i
i 1 l
I i
4 i
3 i
3 l
i k
1 i
i i
i-b
)l 4 .
1 H. SECY-90 016 Evolutionary I WR Certification Issues Gan. 12, 1990)
(re-iterated in SECY-93-087)
"D. Fire Protection" The evolutionary ALWR desinners must ensure that AP600 complies. At least safe shutdown can be achieved, assuming that all one of safe shutdown equipment in any one fire area will be rendered capability using safety-i inoperable by the fire and that re-entry into the fire related systems (SSAR area for repairs and operator actions is not oossible.
7.4.1.1) is available in the The control room is excluded from this approach. event of a single fire, provided an independent alternative shutdown without requiring repairs capability that is physically and electrically or operator actions in the
- independent of the control room is included in the fire-affected area.
design.
4 Evolutionary ALWRs must provide fire protection for AP600 complies. SSAR redundant shutdown systems in the reactor containment 9A.3.1.1 provides the
- building that will ensure. to the extent practicable, that FHA and Safe Shutdown !
one shutdown division will be free of fire damage. Analysis.
Additionajiv, the evolutionary ALWR designers must AP600 compiles.1 tre-ensure that smoke, hot eases, or the fire suppressant smoke dampers are l w not migrate into other fire areas to the extent that
_j!!
utilized to minimize they could adversely affect safe shutdown capabilities. migration of the effects of including operator aStions. fire through the shared HVAC. (See attached sketch and response to 01-323 located elsewhere in this letter.)
C. April 26,1990 Staff Letter to the Commission, Re. Evolutionary LWR Certification Issues and Their Relationship to Current Regulatory Requirements "6 Fire Protection" Proposed enhancements that represent a significant AP600 complies. Fire-improvement in physical separation requirements and smoke dampers are in the need to consider the effects of smoke, heat, and utilized to minimize fire suppressant migration into other areas. In migration of the effects of particular, redundant train separation is likely to be the fire through the shared most significant feature leading to reduced fire risk. HVAC.
'. 3'
\
l
. i
' D. Additionally, in the NRC Request for Additional Information. RAI 2X0.12 it i
was stated that .........." based on its review of Section 7.4, the staff has determined that safe shutdown as defined above can be achieved within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> following a fire event using only safety-related equipment and can be maintained long term (i.e., beyond 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> after it has been achieved) provided: (1) the safety related passive systems used for safe shutdown perform their intended function: (2) nonsafety-related equipment are available for long-term maintenance of safe-shutdown; and (3) all staff's concerns identified in the following sections are resolved. For the above reasons, consistent with SECY-94 084 (approved by Commission, see SRMs dated June 30,1994 and June 28, 1995) position on safe shutdown requirements for passive plant designs the staff accepts safe shutdown as defined above as a safe stable condition for AP600, subject to an acceptable passive . system performance and an acceptable resolution of the issue of regulatory treatment of non-safety systems (RTNSS).
" Response:
Westinghouse concurs with the definition of safe shutdown presented in this Request for Additional Information."
l l
I
\
i l
4
~
)
For discussion purposes only, the followine AP600 comparison with App. R and s other reculations/cuidelines for I,WRs is presented. No regulations require such !
comparison as App. R is not applicable to AP600.
1 A. AP600 short term safe shutdown capability (:c S: 9!2 d 5_.!ce 5; 2 dedge -
MN Re-evegwhen using safety-related systems eludes onlyd:e maintaining l the reactor subcritical, the reactor coolant average temperature less than or I equal to no load temperature, and adequate coolant inventory and core cooling.
]
The long term safe shutdown conditions are the same as the short-term safe shutdown conditions except that the coolant temperature shall be less than !
i 420 *F. This long-term condition must be achieved (using safety related
' j equipment) within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> and maintained indefinitely. (SSAR 7.4) i Based on the ab' ove:
44 (1) AP600 long-term safe shutdown condition shall b: I::=deqwda::c ,
cold shutdown discussed in Appendix R of 10CFR50. SECY-94-084 j confirms +!: eq &ncy.O uwMdd/ rI do ypmc4.
(2) App.R III.G.I.b. " Systems necessary to achieve and maintain cold 4 shutdown from either the control room or emergency control station (s) l can be repaired within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />"is not applicable to AP600. I (3) App.R III.G.3 that provides "Altemate or dedicated shutdown capability"is also not needed for AP600, because on AP600 none of the l
following App.R conditions exist; a) protection of systems whose function is required for hot shutdown does not satisfy the requirement of III.G.2, and b) where redundant trains of systems required for hot shutdown located in the same fire area may be subject to damage from the suppression activities or from the rupture or inadvertent operation of fire suppression systems. However, the App.R requirement of"In addition, fire detection and a fixed fire suppression system shall be installed in the area, room, or zone under consideration" has been comhd imp!ecntd for AP600 Containment fire area. Fire detectors and standpipe and hose coverage are provided.
See also AP600 SSAR Table 9.5.1 1 (Comparison with BTP CMEB 9.5-1 Guidelines) Item 25. Remarks: " Safe shutdown systems are protected such that reliance on alternative or dedicated shutdown capability is not necessary".
GL 86-10 that provides interpretations of App. R regarding the Alternative or Dedicated Shutdown is also not applicable on AP600.
And the interpretation of App. R " free of fire damage" is not applicable, because on AP600, all equipment within the fire area rendered inoperable by the fire, in compliance with SECY-90-016.
" %.1 g 5
3 1
(4) App.R.Ill.L. detailing the requirements of Alternative and dedicated l shutdown capability provided for a specific fire area is not applicable to AP600. Item (3) above confinns that AP600 does not require an Alternative or dedicated shutdown capability.
B. App.R Fire Damage Limits for hot shutdown safety function is "One train of equipment necessary to achieve hot shutdown from either the control room or emergency control station (s) must be maintained free of fir- damage by a single fire, including an exposure fire", and for cold shutdown is "Both trains of equipment necessary to achieve cold shutdown may be damaged by a single fire, including an exposure fire, but damage must be limited so that at least one train can be repaired or made operable within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> using onsite capability" l
AP600 complies with the fire damage limits for hot shutdown safety function, i and even better for cold shutdown function, because AP600 safe shutdown i systems (using safety related systems) are fully protected such that reliance on repairs of fire-damaged equipment within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> is not necessary. See also l AP600 SSAR Table 9.5.1-1 (Comparison with BTP CMEB 9.5-1 Guidelines)
Item 16 Remarks: "AP600 uses two levels of damage limits: safe shutdown l and design basis accidents. Safe shutdown capability is protected from damage i caused by a single fire."
Also, GL 8610 that provides interpretations of App. R regarding the allowed repair of cold shutdown equipment is also not applicable on AP600.
l C,
Based on the discussions above, a major fire involving the Turbine Building with its potential consequences of loss of the nonsafety related RHR systems should not be a nuclear safety issue on AP600. It may become a property loss prevention issue, especially from the plant underwriter's perspective. However, AP600 turbine building fire protection is consistent with the current industry standards, such as, NFPA 803,804,850 and EPRI NP-4144 (July 1985).
6
J 01314. AP600 Fire Detection and Alarm System
- 1. Compliance with BTP CMEB 9.51 (see SSAR Table 9.5.1 I) 112. Fire detection systems should be AP600 complies.
provided for areas that contain or present a fire exposure to safety-related equipment.
' 113. Fire detection systems should AP600 complies, no exception to NFPA
, comply with the requirements of Class A 70 & 72D is identified.
systems as defined in NFPA 72D and Class I circuits as defined in NFPA 70.
I14. Fire detectors should be selected and AP600 complies, no exception to NFPA installed in accordance with NFPA 72E. 72 is identified.
I15. Testing of pulsed line-type heat AP600 complies.
detectors should demonstrate that the frequencies used will not affect the actuation of protective relays in other plant systems.
I16. Fire detection systems should give AP600 complies.
audible and visual alarm and annunciation in the main control room.
I17. Where zoned detection systems are AP600 complies.
used in a given area, local means should be provided to identify which zone has actuated.
I18. Local audible alarms should sound AP600 complies.
in the fire area.
l 119. Fire alarms should be distinctive and AP600 complies.
unique so they will not be confused with any other plant system alarms.
120. Primary and secondary power AP600 complies, no exception to NFPA
- supplies, which satisfy the provisions of 72D is identified.
section 2220 of NFPA 72D, should be l provided for the fire detection system and for electrically operated control valves for automatic suppression systems.
a l
l
]
9 1
.._-.--__...____._______-._._.____.____....____m_____.._.___
3' l
i . .
i L 2. Disposition of NRC concerns i
- 1. Fire detection in safety related areas is AP600 does not intend to have a seismically qualified, seismically qualified fire detection l system. The're is no requirement to make l
the fire detection system to withstand design basis earthquake, or to remain functional following a seismic event.
However, with microprocessor-based equipment and components the fire detection system can be expected to be unaffected by earthquakes, and the potential of spurious actuation should be minimal.
l 1 l
5 I
i I
l l
,-Q - - - -
. l 3!l 01-321. AP600 Fire Pumps I
- 1. Compliance with BTP CMEB 9.51 (see SSAR Table 9.5.1 1) 128. A sufficient number of pumps AP600 complies, one electric motor-
. should be provided so that 100 percent driven and one diesel-driven fire pump, 4 j capacity will be available assuming 100'7e capacity each, are provided. ;
failure of the largest pump or loss of j offsite power. !
l 129. Individual fire pump connections to AP600 complies. Fire pump discharge i the yard fire main loop should be lines are re-arranged so they are '
separated with sectionalizing valves individual connections to the yard fire i between connections. main, with sectionalizing valves between l connections. '
130. Each pump and its driver and AP600 complies.
controls should be separated from the Each fire pump and its controller are remaining fire pumps by a 3-hour rated located in a room enclosed by 3-hour fire fire wall. barrier.
131. The fuel for the diesel tire pump AP600 complies.
should be separated so that it does not Fuel oil day tank is in the diesel engine-provide a fire source exposing safety- driven fire pump room that is enclosed by related equipment. 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire barrier. The fuel oil storage tank is located outdoor.
132. Alarms indicating pump running, AP600 complies.
driver availability, failure to start, and Refer to P&lD FPS M6-001.
Iow fire main pressure should be :
provided in the main control room. j 133. The fire pump installation should AP600 complies. No excepuon to l conform to NFPA 20. NFPA20 is identified. (See Table 9.5.13.)
i i
i 9
3
' 2. Disposition of NRC concerns L. Can the yard fire main be supplied by Yes. The fire pumps can still supply the the fire pumps if there is fire damage to yard main and the yard main extension the yard main extension inside the can be isolated if it is damaged by the Turbine Building? fire.
2.Will the air intake of the diesel tire No. The fire pump diesel-engine driver pump be affected by the turbine building outside air intake is located at the same fire? side of the building with the other HVAC outside air intakes, remote from the discharge points including smoke relief i
through the roof. Additionally, the intake i is located within the envelope of the fire pump fire area.
- 3. Will the power supply of the electrical Fire pump motor supply is designed and motor-driven fire pump survive a fire in routed in conformance with NFPA 20 and the Turbine Building? NFPA 70.
Since routing from the non-diesel bus is less susceptible to a turbine building fire and a diesel back fire pump is not required if a diesel fire pump is installed, the present SSAR 9.5.1.2.3 wording "The motor-driven fire pump is supplied with power from the. diesel backed non Class lE switchgear", will be revised in SSAR I Rev.12 to indicate the motor-driven fire !
pump is not on the plant diesels.
- 4. Are the fire tanks too close to the 4. As noted in meetings with the NKC, Turbine Building? Could they be this is not a licensing issue but an damaged by a turbine building fire? insurance issue. Westinghouse is presently reviewing its design in this area to determine its insurance liabilites.
10
S 1
01322. AP600 Basis for Selecting NFPA 14, Class II, Standpipe and Hose Stations l
BTP 9.5-1 guidelines recommend installation of standpipe and hose stations that meets the requirements of NFPA 14, however, it does not call for a specific class of standpipe system per NFPA 14 to be provided. NFPA 14 provides three classes for a standpipe system based on its intended use (for the manual firefighting efforts),
however, it too does not specify specific applications, buildings or facilities where such classes of standpipe systems should be provided.
As stated in SSAR 9.5.1.2.1.5, the AP600 fire protection standpipe and hose systems are provided for each building, for Class 11 service in accordance with NFPA 14, i.e.,
primarily intended for use primarily by the building occupants or by the fire department (plant fire brigade) during initial response. Each hose reel or rack contains up to 100 ft. of 1-1/2 in. fire hose.
AP600 fire hazard and prctection analyses (SSAR section 9A) showed that in the nuclear island the postulated fires are primarily fires involving electrical equipment and cables or ordinary class A combustibles such as paper or trash. There are no insitu ,
Dammable liquids or gases expected to be present within the nuclear island. Consistent I with the postulated fire characteristics and manual extinguishing techniques, plus the AP600 fire areas compartmentalization and configurations, a Class 11 standpipe with I-1/2" hoses is deemed most practical as it can be safely used by the plant fire brigade without undue damages to nonfire affected facilities and equipment.
In the Turbine Building, recognizing that the postulated fires may involve Hammable liquids or gases, such as, lubricating fluid, hydraulic Guid, hydrogen, etc., the hose stations are provided with a 2-1/2 in. angle valve. A 2-1/2 to 1-1/2 hose coupling is installed at the hose rack, together with the up to 100 ft, of I-12 in. fire hose. Hence the fire brigade has the option to breakaway the hose coupling, and attached their portable 2-1/2 in, hoseline in order to obtain a greater now rate.
In either case, the fire brigade can also supplement the interior hosestreams by using the additional 2-1/2 inch hoses that are connected to the nearest hydrant (s), should it become necessary.
g g 4. -tt. Abd I , d9 7 6, u/ 94 ch.it %,g c 4 g i
s patu clus zc yJ.,, A~cw+.
r l
1 ful
. j 1 .
01323. AP600 Protection from Smoke Spread
- 1. Compliance with BTP CMEB 9.51 (see SSAR Table 9.5.1 1)
- 99. Smoke and corrosive gases should be AP600 complies. smoke exhaust outlets discharged directly outside to an area that are located remote from outside air intake !
will not affect safety related plant areas. openings to preclude recirculation of smoke into the buildings.
100. To facilitate manual firefighting. AP600 complies. smoke and heat venting '
separate smoke and heat vents should be capability is provided as described in provided in certain areas. App.9A. Fire Protection Analysis.
101. Release of smoke and gases AP600 complies.
containing radioactive materials to the environment should be monitored.
- 2. Compliance with SECY-90-16, Evolutionary LWR Certification Issues I (Jan.12,1990)
Additionally, the evolutionary ALWR AP600 complies. Fire-smoke dampers are designers must ensure that smoke, hot utilized to minimize migration of the gases, or the fire suporessant will not effects of fire (smoke and hot gases) migrate into other fire areas to the extent through the shared HVAC ductwork that that they could adversely affect safe- serves a single train of safety-related shutdown capabilities, including operator equipment rooms (Div. A&C, or actions. Div. B&D).
12
J i
b'1 1
- 3. Disposition of NRC concerns
- l. Define the detector to smoke damper Opening and closing of the combination logic. fire / smoke dampers will be controlled by
) the fire detection system that comprises
) of area detectors and in-duct detectors.
The area smoke detectors will initiate the.
closing of the fire / smoke dampers. A high i
temperature override will close the damper when the in-duct secondary high j
temperature sensor senses a temperature higher than the fire damper's fusible link
, rating.
l 2. Detine the location of smoke detectors Area smoke detectors will be used for
} used for damper control, controlling the opening / closing of the combination fire / smoke dampers. The t
concept is to close the smoke damper and l
)
to isolate the fire-affected room at the early stage of the fire, and as soon as j
smoke is developed and detected by the area detector (s), while allowing the
! HVAC system to continue running and I
providing pressurization of the non-affected rooms.
4
- 3. Describe overall smoke control Smoke control logic will be integrated l philosophy, logic and implementation. with the corresponding HVAC control 4 logic.
Upon detection of smoke in a room, that
- room will be immediately isolated by
- using the combination fire / smoke
! dampers. Meanwhile, the HVAC is i designed to continue running to serve the other non-affected rooms and to provide ambient pressurization that will help l,
, confine smoke and hot gases within the fire-affected room. For post fire recovery the fire / smoke damper will be reopened and smoke removal will be accomplished by running the HVAC system in a once-through mode.
13
. )
1
- 4. Describe in details the re-opening of Reopening the combination fire / smoke 1 fire and smoke dampers. dampers can be accomplished from a !
remote location, i.e. from the fire alarm i
< and control panells). However, when the damper is closed due to high temperature. :
resetting the high temperature sensor :
needs to be made at the damper.
l Therefore, on AP600 the damper actuators and controller will be located !
outside of the fire-affected areas, either in j the corridor ceiling or in the mechanical ;
equipment room s
I 4
I i
e a 0
, __,.,,_-,_.-,--r ._,. . . ma - _ _ _ M