|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24029A2902024-01-29029 January 2024 Comment (3) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1542024-01-25025 January 2024 Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1402024-01-24024 January 2024 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML22228A1642022-08-15015 August 2022 Comment (5) of Cindy Marie Absey, Neil Havlik & Kim Murry on Behalf of League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activ ML22203A0462022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (3) of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc., on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22203A0452022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (2) of Jane Swanson on Behalf of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22202A4242022-07-19019 July 2022 Comment (1) of Anonymous on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML15275A2152015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (40) of Bruce Campbell on Helium Finding Adds New Wrinkle to Newport-Inglewood Fault ML15275A2132015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (38) of Mary Ivora on Environmental Benefits of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2292015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (31) Regarding Civilian Nuclear Power ML15275A2282015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (30) of Unknown Individual Opposing Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 ML15275A2302015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (32) of Joe Ivora Supporting the Relicensing of Diablo Canyon ML15275A2342015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (36) of Elizabeth Brousse on Behalf of Mothers for Peace on the License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2312015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (33) of Debby Nicklas, on Behalf of French Hospital Medical Center, Supporting the License Renewal and Ongoing Operations of PG&E ML15282A3002015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (45) of Allen Myers Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15289A3742015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (84) of Gene Nelson of Californians for Green Nuclear Power Supporting Renewal of the License Application for Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15292A5462015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (103) of Becky Ota and Craig Shuman, on Behalf of California Department of Fish and Wildlife, on Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant License Renewal ML15287A4362015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (71) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact ML15282A2982015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (43) of Minea Herwitz Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15258A3472015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (29) of Craig Shuman on Behalf of the State of CA - Natural Resources Agency, Regarding Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML15282A3042015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (49) of David Traub Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15282A3032015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (48) of Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15292A5452015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (102) of Bruce Campbell on Deis in Regards to Diablo Canyon Facility License Extension ML15292A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (92) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2352015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (91) of Alexander Cannara on Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2372015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (93) of Bob Greene on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2382015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (88) of Meagan Wilson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (89) of Mike Kirkwood on Behalf of Economic Alliance of Northern Santa Barbara County on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (90) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A3392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (94) of Sarah Risley, Heather Tarango, Shilo Terek, Megan Wilson, and Kristin Zaitz Supporting Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (95) of Madeline Cimone on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3412015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (96) of Daryl Gale Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3892015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (97) of Anthony Allen Bisset Opposing on the Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3902015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (98) of Joseph Ivora on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15258A3452015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (28) of Ann Mcpherson, on Behalf of Us EPA, on Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Operating License Renewal for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, California ML15292A3912015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (99) of Nina Beety, on Behalf of Smart Meter Harm, Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3922015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (100) of Margaret Smith on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A5442015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (101) of Antoinette Stein on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A4052015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (82) of Anthony Armini on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4032015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (81) of William P Gloege on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3132015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (83) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3142015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (85) of Lmh Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3152015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (86) from Anonymous Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3162015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (87) of Steve Mcgrath Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3982015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (76) William P. Gloege of Supporting Re-Licensing of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15289A4022015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (80) of Jerry Brown on Behalf of World Business Academy on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4012015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (79) of Kirk Gothier on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4002015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (78) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3992015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (77) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal ML15289A3972015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (75) of Jane Swanson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal 2024-01-29
[Table view] |
Text
8/16/22, 1:48 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/0351012a-f14a-4a23-8ae4-3f2cfb69eeba SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 As of: 8/16/22, 1:47 PM E-RIDS=ADM-03 Received: August 15, 2022 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Felica Keith, Samson Lee, Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. l6v-036y-2ry4 Jennifer Harrity- Comments Due: October 19, 2022 Dixon. Mary Neely Comment (5) Submission Type: Web Publication Date:
6/23/2022 Docket: NRC-2022-0132 Citation: 87 FR 37533 Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Comment On: NRC-2022-0132-0001 Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Document: NRC-2022-0132-DRAFT-0005 Comment on FR Doc # 2022-13406 Submitter Information Email: zestykimm@yahoo.com Government Agency Type: Local Government Agency: League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County General Comment Docket ID NRC-2022-0132 Please see the attached letter regarding Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning versus possible license extension Attachments Letter on Diablo Decommisiong 8-15-22 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/0351012a-f14a-4a23-8ae4-3f2cfb69eeba 1/1
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Mailing Address: PO Box 4210, San Luis Obispo CA 93403 VOICE MAIL (805) 242-6990 EMAIL info@lwvslo.org WEBSITE www.lwvslo.org August 15, 2022 OFFICERS Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Panel President California Energy Commission Cindy Marie Absey 1st Vice-President/ The League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County (LWV SLOCO) has been Administration & Program following the issues of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant decommissioning and Vallerie Steenson the possibility of license extension. The California League of Women Voters has adopted positions that promote the environmentally sound use of energy resources, with 2nd Vice-President/ consideration of the entire cycle of energy production; predominant reliance on Ed Cabrera renewable resources; and policies that limit reliance on nuclear fission. With the desire Secretary to see our community well-informed of potential consequences of an extension, we ask Mary Bianchi the appropriate agency or company to answer the questions below.
Treasurer Energy needs Janice Langley 1. What is the status of the current plan to provide energy when the DCPP is DIRECTORS decommissioned?
- 2. What has changed that would require the power from DCPP?
Director 3. If Diablo Canyon is de-commissioned on schedule, what can the public expect Sue Bonitz (quantify) in terms of interruption to electric power? How much of that can be mitigated with a cost of more CO2 (gas fired plants)? Where and how will the Director Janice Carr line be drawn along the continuum from no additional CO2 to using all available sources?
Director 4. What other options to extension of DCPP operation have or should be Dianne Draze considered? Are there new options in light of emerging technologies and innovations? Possible examples might include Director a. V2G* storage, David Humphreys b. more home battery backup systems, Director
- c. acceleration of installation of battery storage, Elizabeth Manak d. development of a smarter grid to forestall consequences of dependence on intermittent renewable energy sources, Voter Service Director e. incentivization of solar thermal electricity, such as heating a fluid (even Julie Rodewald salt to get it to a molten stage) that can drive steam turbines well after the sun goes down, Social Policy Director
- f. use of gravity potential energy from pumping water to higher elevation Glenn Silloway during the day for hydro power at night.
Page 2 Safety
- 1. What are the safety issues for extension of DCPP operation? Specifically
- a. How will additional nuclear fuel storage be handled given that both the spent fuel pools and casks capacity is full?
- b. What is the delayed maintenance due to the anticipated decommissioning and how will it be addressed?
Timescale and process
- 1. Will the extension of DCPP operation require re-licensing, extension of the current license, or some other process? What is the timescale and cost?
- 2. What agencies and decision-making bodies will have a say over the decision on license extension or relicensing, and what is the timing of the public process of each agency or decision-making body?
- 3. If the request is for an extension rather than relicensing, what guarantee does the public have that there might not be further extensions, adding up to a span of years that would normally warrant the full process of relicensing?
- 4. What is to become of the money that has been spent and work that has been done on the application and DEIR for the Decommissioning Plan being processed by the County? Will this effort simply be abandoned, or will the work somehow be folded into a new application and DEIR with a different project description? Will the extension of DCPP operation constitute a "project" under CEQA, and, if so, will the County remain the Lead Agency? If not, what agency will be the place for the public to go with its questions and concerns?
Collateral Impact
- 1. What are the environmental impacts of extension of DCPP operation and their mitigations?
- 2. What is the impact on future planned use of the facility for other power purposes such as the offshore wind turbines?
- 3. Is there any intention to request permission for the seismic blasting approved by the State Lands Commission in 2012 and then denied by the Coastal Commission, and, if so, who, under present circumstances, would have the authority to permit or deny this?
Relative cost
- 1. What is the cost per kwH of continuing DCPP operation versus renewable power sources such as developing additional solar power with storage batteries? Given the net investment it will take to reverse course and extend the life of Diablo Canyon, is it more cost effective to invest those monies in renewable sources of energy.
- 2. What would be the estimated costs related to covering the delayed maintenance issues that have occurred if the DCPP is continued?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Cindy Marie Absey, President League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County Neil Havlik and Kim Murry Co-Chairs, Natural Resources Committee, League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County