ML21069A026

Comment (161) of Marcie Bronchella on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2

ML21069A026
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	03/03/2021
From:	Bronchella M - No Known Affiliation
To:	Office of Administration
References
86FR7747 00161, NRC-2020-0277
Download: ML21069A026 (2)

Text

3/9/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/d08ed26f-d803-4be4-a49b-769ff2ccd337 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/d08ed26f-d803-4be4-a49b-769ff2ccd337 1/2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 3/9/21 9:37 AM Received: March 03, 2021 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. klu-1ws3-f5gh Comments Due: March 03, 2021 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0166 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-02001 Submitter Information Name: Marcie Bronchella Address:

Mesquite, General Comment These are my concerns regarding the point Beach nuclear power plant which I would like to be part of the scoping meeting on this topic.

I think the environmental impact statement needs to communicate the population surrounding it what would happen in the event of a reactor accident whether large medium or small. It needs to investigate all those situations. It also needs to discuss how far away impact would occur. It needs to list the types of impact to people, bodies of water, animals, plants, the air, and the economy and livelihoods.

It needs to take into account that the PBNP is like Fukushima on a large body of water and has the potential of contaminating it.

This statement also needs to address the radiation that is already leaking from the reactor. To do this all of the data from the Wisconsin health department needs to be released from the last three years.

How is this radiation monitored currently if at all.

What plans are there to improve the brittleness of the outer layer of the plant before use and during use in the future.

Because it is not unheard of for the great lakes to have earthquakes and tornadoes, and because the risk from this plant could last for thousands of years, the EIS needs to take these potential accidents into account.

In the past this plant has had excess heat and used lake water for cooling but heating up the lake.

Especially in the face of climate change, what has been the effect of dumping this warm waste water into the lake in the past and what will it be in the future. These are also points that need to be addressed in the environmental impact statement How much will it cost customers to shut this down now versus the increased risk of energy versus switching to other sources of energy.

Thank you for your time.

SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Bill Rogers, Kevin Folk, Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comment (161)

Publication Date:2/1/2021 Citation: 86 FR 7747

3/9/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/d08ed26f-d803-4be4-a49b-769ff2ccd337 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/d08ed26f-d803-4be4-a49b-769ff2ccd337 2/2