Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
EPID:L-2020-SLE-0002, Comment (2) of Raymond Hardy on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach, Units 1 and 2 (Approved, Closed) |
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, ... further results|Request]]
- Acceptance...
|
MONTHYEARML20329A2482020-11-16016 November 2020 Enclosure 3, Attachment 2, Appendix E Applicants Environmental Report Subsequent Operating License Renewal Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Other ML20321A1872020-11-16016 November 2020 Single Positive Test Form Collected on 02/11/2020 Project stage: Request ML21033A4022021-01-22022 January 2021 NextEra Energy Point Beach - Point Beach Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 Subsequent License Renewal Project stage: Other ML20351A3922021-01-26026 January 2021 Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process (EPID No. L-2020-SLE-0002) (Docket No. 50 266 and 50-301) - Letter Project stage: Other PMNS20210090, Environmental Scoping Meeting Related to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Point Beach), Subsequent License Renewal Application2021-02-0303 February 2021 Environmental Scoping Meeting Related to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Point Beach), Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Meeting ML21048A0362021-02-0404 February 2021 Comment (1) of Willard Sielaff on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21040A2232021-02-0505 February 2021 Comment (2) of Raymond Hardy on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21040A2282021-02-0808 February 2021 Comment (3) from Hannah Mortensen on Behalf of Physicians for Social Responsibility Wisconsin on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A0822021-02-12012 February 2021 Comment (4) of Geralyn Leannah Opposing Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A0832021-02-14014 February 2021 Comment (5) of Bruce Krawisz on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A0862021-02-14014 February 2021 Comment (6) of Theresa Deluca Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A0882021-02-16016 February 2021 Comment (7) of Randy Connour on Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A0892021-02-16016 February 2021 Comment (8) of Eric Newgent on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21056A5612021-02-17017 February 2021 Physicians for Social Responsibility (Psr) Request for Extension of Scoping Comment Period Project stage: Request ML21042B9452021-02-17017 February 2021 Scoping and Process Meeting - February 17, 2021 Project stage: Meeting ML21062A1922021-02-17017 February 2021 Transcript from Point Beach Nuclear Plant Subsequent License Renewal Scoping Meeting Project stage: Meeting ML21075A3432021-02-17017 February 2021 Meeting Summary: Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (EPID No.: L-2020-SLE-0002) - Summary Project stage: Meeting ML21050A0992021-02-17017 February 2021 Comment (10) of Ann Rogers Opposing Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1052021-02-17017 February 2021 Comment (12) of Shahla Werner Opposing Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A0922021-02-17017 February 2021 Comment (9) of Diane Palecek Opposing Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1022021-02-17017 February 2021 Comment (11) of John Duffin Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1092021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (13) of Pamela Richard Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1272021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (20) from Pam Nelson Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1322021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (24) of Sandra Couch on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Nexteraenergy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1182021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (16) from Andrew Benson Supporting Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1252021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (19) of Ellen Atkison Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1222021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (18) of Kristina Mageau on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement Nexteraenergy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1212021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (17) from Stephen Roddy Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1332021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (25) of Mark Giese on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1312021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (23) from Patrick Bosold Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1382021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (27) of Leonard Kellum Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1342021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (26) of Jim Yarbrough Opposing Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1292021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (22) from Dennis Schaef on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1162021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (14) of Marie Luna on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1282021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (21) of Karl Koessel Opposing Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1172021-02-18018 February 2021 Comment (15) of Joann Nishiura on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Nexteraenergy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1592021-02-19019 February 2021 Comment (29) of Philip Ratcliff on Notice of Lntent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0162021-02-19019 February 2021 Comment (31) of Karen Wilson on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0152021-02-19019 February 2021 Comment (30) of Claire Gervais Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21050A1392021-02-19019 February 2021 Comment (28) of Croitiene Ganmoryn on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0182021-02-20020 February 2021 Comment (32) of Larry Troshynski on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0262021-02-21021 February 2021 Comment (35) of Dwight Rousu on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0282021-02-21021 February 2021 Comment (37) of Karen Kirschling on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0272021-02-21021 February 2021 Comment (36) of Ernest Fuller on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0242021-02-21021 February 2021 Comment (34) of Miriam Kurland Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0232021-02-21021 February 2021 Comment (33) of Kristin Womack on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0292021-02-25025 February 2021 Comment (38) of Satya Vayu on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0332021-02-26026 February 2021 Comment (41) of Gerrit Bruhaug Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0342021-02-26026 February 2021 Comment (42) of Avery Schwab on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML21062A0352021-02-26026 February 2021 Comment (43) of Dawn Wallander on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request 2021-02-19
[Table View] |
Text
3/4/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/b6c2cc0a-ad70-4694-86e8-86e39b39e243 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/b6c2cc0a-ad70-4694-86e8-86e39b39e243 1/2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 3/4/21 4:08 PM Received: March 01, 2021 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. klr-3dhf-svwx Comments Due: March 03, 2021 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0108 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-02001 Submitter Information Email: kevin@beyondnuclear.org Organization: Beyond Nuclear and Don't Waste Michigan General Comment If Point Beach is to be allowed to operate for not 60, but rather 80 years, then it is high time for cooling towers to be required to be installed.
Point Beach has no cooling towers. Unit 1 has operated since 1970. Unit 2 has operated since 1973. And that entire time, these atomic reactors have been dumping 2/3rds of the waste heat generated from the splitting of atoms, directly into Lake Michigan.
Unit 1 and Unit 2 are each rated at 1,800 Megawatts-thermal. This means that both units regularly discharge 1,200 MW-t of waste heat into Lake Michigan, for lack of cooling towers. This has gone on for more than half a century. Now Point Beach proposes continuing to do so not for 10 more years, but 30 more years.
These waste heat discharges cause a significant, negative environmental impact on the Lake Michigan environment and ecosystem. Not only are life forms sucked into the Point Beach nuclear power plant via cooling water inflow -- and thereby injured or killed -- but the waste heat discharge water flow increases the temperature of Lake Michigan out to a significant distance. The elevated temperature is disadvantageous to indigenous species of plants and animals, while advantageous to certain non-native/invasive species.
Please see the Beyond Nuclear report entitled Licensed to Kill: How the Nuclear Power Industry Destroys Endangered Marine Wildlife and Ocean Habitat to Save Money, for more information on the ecological impacts of atomic reactors that lack cooling towers. It is posted online here:
<http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/356082/3590840/1247621149403/ltk_full.pdf?
token=CoXF%2BvQtuOods%2Fajf6xEV4dtO2M%3D>. While the report's title refers to "marine" and "ocean," the report also examines atomic reactor thermal waste water discharges into rivers, lakes, SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Bill Rogers, Mary Neely Comment (103)
Publication Date:2/1/2021 Citation: 86 FR 7747
3/4/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/b6c2cc0a-ad70-4694-86e8-86e39b39e243 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/b6c2cc0a-ad70-4694-86e8-86e39b39e243 2/2 reservoirs, etc. The report's lessons learned are certainly applicable to Point Beach's negative thermal waste water discharge impacts on Lake Michigan's ecosystem.
The lack of cooling towers has led to atomic reactors not operating for 60, much less 80 years. The State of New York made clear to Indian Point's owner that if cooling towers were not installed, it would not allow Indian Point to operate for 60 years. The state retains authority over surface water quality, as re: the Hudson River, and asserted that authority at Indian Point. Indian Point's owner, Entergy, does not want to spend the $2.5 billion, or more, it would cost to install cooling towers. Thus, Indian Point Unit 2 shut for good in April 2020. Indian Point 3 will shut for good in April 2021.
Indian Point's two reactors were responsible for killing a billion fish and other aquatic life forms each and every year, for a half century. This represents a massive harm perpetrated on the Hudson River ecosystem by a nuclear power plant lacking cooling towers.
The lack of cooling towers at the Oyster Creek, New Jersey atomic reactor also led to permanent shut down, even before expiration of its NRC operating license. NRC rubber-stamped a 20-year extension at Oyster Creek, allowing it to operate for 60 years. However, the State of New Jersey, under the governorship of Chris Christie, agreed to only allow Oyster Creek to operate 50 years, but not 60 years, due to the lack of cooling towers. This "deal," to allow Oyster Creek to violate the Clean Water Act for 10 additional years, while still lacking cooling towers, was questionable. Oyster Creek should have been forced to close at the end of its 40-year initial license. But Gov. Christie agreed to allow Oyster Creek to continue violating the law, and harming Barnegat Bay, for another decade. In the end, though, Oyster Creek did close for good on Sept. 17, 2018, because its owner did not want to spend the money to build cooling towers, in order to continue operating for yet another decade into the future.
During its half century of operations, once every six weeks, the single reactor at Oyster Creek would draw in a volume of water equivalent to the entire volume of the narrow, shallow Barnegat Bay. Immense harm was done to Barnegat Bay's ecosystem by this half century of cooling water intake, and thermal waste water dumping, abuse.
If Point Beach is going to be allowed to operate for another three decades, on top of the five decades it has already operated, then cooling towers must be installed. Point Beach has already done immense harm to Lake Michigan's ecology. This cannot be allowed to continue for 30 more years, including during yet another 20-year license extension.
Sincerely, Kevin Kamps Beyond Nuclear, Radioactive Waste Specialist; Don't Waste Michigan, Board of Directors Member, representing the Lake Michigan Chapter; Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Advisory Board Member Beyond Nuclear 7304 Carroll Avenue, #182 Takoma Park, Maryland 20912 kevin@beyondnuclear.org www.beyondnuclear.org