ML20202C972
| ML20202C972 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1984 |
| From: | Tolson R TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18052B537 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 CP-QP-7.1, NUDOCS 8607110492 | |
| Download: ML20202C972 (9) | |
Text
.
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO CPSES
- P-QP-7.1 8
1 of g FEB 2 saa PREPARED BY:
Mble.
7-7-29 ISSUANCE AND CONTROL OF QUALITY h
Z2g DATE PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS 2!2 APPROVED BY:
DATE
1.0 REFERENCES
1-A CP-QP-6.0, " Preparation of Quality Procedures and Instructions" 2.0 GENERAL FOR 'HFOR E DH lH13 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure defines measures for issuance, control and distribution of site generated quality documents prepared in accordance wi th Reference 1-A.
It provides methods to assure that latest effective revisions of quali ty doctanents are available to personnel performing activities affecting the quality of safety-related strtictures, systems and components at the CPSES project.
2.2 DEFINITIONS 2.2.1 Controlled Copy The tem " controlled copy" means that revi sion to the docu-ment is maintained and that distribution of quality documents is known and traceable through established records.
2.2.2 Information Copy Infomation copies of documents are used to communicate prescribed QA/QC activities to affected or interested persons or orga nizati ons.
This type of di stribution does not assure revision control.
2.2.3 Advance Com Advance copies of documents are used to communicate Q^/QC activities to affected personnel in the interim period prior to issuing a " Controlled Cap.y".
N FCCA-85-59 8607110492 860630 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR j
N
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
FEB a
19:M 1
2.3 RESPONSIBILITIES The TUGC0 Site QA Supervisor has delegated the respons-ibili ty for control and distribution of quality documents to the CPSES QA Librarian.
Distribution li sts are establi shed infonnally based on input from responsible supervi sory and staff personnel.
3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 ISSUANCE AND CONTROL OF QUALITY DOCUMENTS.
Quality documents shall be issued by a Quality Document Transm ttal fonn similar to that shown in Figure 1.
The QA Librarian shall ensure that the documents have been received
- and, where applicable, superceded documents properly dispositioned.
(
Transmittal s which are not returned wi thin two weeks indicating receipt will be forwarded to the Quali ty Engineering Supervi sor for resolution and corrective action as required.
A Quality Document Holder's Li st shall be maintained. by the CPSES QA Librarian identifying all controlled Quality Manual holders.
Individual Distribution Log sheets shall be maintained behind the original document for. single controlled copy holders where applicable.
3.1.1 General Requirements Controlled copies of Quality documents shall be distributed to personnel directly involved with activities that influence the quality of safety-related structu res, systems and components. This includes discipline inspection supervisors and inspection personnel under their direction. Distribution shall be broad enough to assure that personnel are aware of and perform their assigned activities in accordance with applicable Procedures / Instructions.
Controlled copies may be distributed as single documents or in manual fonn.
3.1.2 Single Controlled Copies Individual copies shall be controlled by assigning a unique
,NJ copy number on the face of the document. The face of single documents shall al so be stamped " Controlled Copy".
A logging system using a fonn similar to Figure 2, shall be used to record distribution and to establish control fo r single copy distribution only.
TUGCO OA
%% 3
}
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
9 8-
,FEB 2 Igy Reduced controlled copies required by QC groups for use in the field shall be transmitted by the Procedures Coordinator to the File Custodian (authorized to handle DCC documents in accordance with DCP-3) for distribution to the individual inspectors using a fonn similar to Figure 3.
Each inspector shall be given a unique control number by the Procedures Coordi nator.
A list of these control numbers and the Procedures / Instructions received by each QC Discipline shall be kept in the Controlled Copyholder's Log; a copy of the list of control numbers for each inspector shall be maintained by the File Custodian. The File Custodian shall issue to each inspector the proper document and log it on a_fonn similar to Figure 4.
3.1.3 Quality Inspection Manuals When detennined by the Quality Engineering Supervisor that an inspection di scipline needs a compilation of several related Quality procedures and/or instructions, a Quality Inspection Manual is devised and issued to controlled copy holders.
Control of Procedures / Instructions maintained in such a manual shall be accomplished through a unique nenual number and maintained within the manual through the use of a Table of Contents identifying contents and revision number of the Quality documents contained.
The Manual to which each document is assigned will be noted on the Quality Documents Index issued monthly.
The Controlled Copyholders Log which contains copyholders and control numbers for the l
manuals, reduced controlled copies, and documents which are individually controlled shall be maintained in the QA Library office.
3.1.3.1 Document Heirarchy Within Manuals The following heirarchy of documents shall be used in the preparation of discipline inspection manuals. This heirarchy shall be reflected in the document order of the Table of Contents:
a.
CP-QP's b.
QI-QP's c.
CP-QAP's d.
QI-QAP's TUGCCOA i
~.. _ _.. _. _ - _ _ _ _ _.
I
l',
r t
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PACE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
4 f9 FEB pg e.
CP-CPM's f.
QI-CPM's g.
Construction Procedures h.
CI's to Construction Procedures The subordinate Quality Instructi.on(s) shall immedi ately follow its parent document.
Q P 's, QAP's, and CPM's shall be arranged neerically.
In cases where specific QP's are changed to incorporate requirements applicable only to Unit 2 work / inspection activities, a Unit 2 QP shall be prepared using the numerical identification _ previously assigned to the work /
inspection activity followed by a letter "A"
suffix.
Construction Procedures shall be arranged alpha-numerically.
3.1.4 Information copies Copies of procedures / instructions for which revision control is not desired shall be stamped "Information Only."
It is the doc uent holder's responsibility to assu re that he has the latest procedure / instruction revision before accompli shing work in accordance with that procedure /in-struction.
3.2.3 Advance Copies In an effort to get the latest approved infomation to the fi el d, " Advance Copies" of procedures / instructions will be i ssued and used until fomal revision of that respective procedure / instruction is made.
These advanced copies shall be identified by the following:
ADVANCE COPY VOID AFTER The procedure / instruction shall be void after the date indicated (nonnally two weeks).
Upon receipt of an " Advance Copy" of a procedure / instruction, the docuent holder shall insert the copy in the appropriate C
section of the respective manual.
l TUGCO OA
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
U 9 FEB 2 19p4 3.2 DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION Quality Assurance and Inspection Supervisors are responsible to assure that on-site personnel under their direction receive and are kept aware of the latest requi rements reflected by Quality Documents.
Normally, distribution to the inspection personnel will be accomplished through the Supervi sors.
Distribution of controlled copies off-site wilI be handled by transmittal letter with appropriate instruclions in order to maintain required controls.
3.3 QUALITY DOCUMENT FILES A file of site generated Quality documents shall be maintained in the CPSES QA Library office and shall contain the following:
a.
Table of Contents for each controlled manual b.
Current revisions of all Quality documents including, where possible, originals to attachments and figures A computerized Quality Documents Index including all c.
Quality Procedures and Instructions in use and the manual (s) in which they are distributed if ap"7' cable d.
Quality Document Holders List identifying all controlled Quality document holders 3.3.1 Historical Files A complete file of copies of all site-generated Quali ty documents shall be maintained in the Permanent Plant Records Vault and shall include all revisions of current, superceded, and deleted Quality documents.
b
_ _. fm - _
~
^
4 i
y 1
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
I I
FEB 2 198 4 6 of 9 FIGURE 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TO:
Distribution DATE:
FROM: Site QA Manager TRANS. MEMO NO.
Your new/ revised copy to your Manual is attached
(
to this transmittal.
Please notify the CPSES CA Librarian for Non ASME related documents at Extension 325, of any shortaces or errors.
Superceded Quality Documents must be destroyed or stamped "SUPERCECED."
Site Quality Assurance Manager i
PLEA 11 CHECK APPRCPRIATE BOX BELOW PRIOR TO $1GNING, AND RETURN 0?iE COPY OF THIS TRANSMITTAL MEMO TO CPSES QA CEPARTMENT.
Transmittal Contents Inserted Superceded Items Destroyed Sursar.eded Items Stamped "SLVERCEDED" i
RECEIVED CATE MANUAL NO.:
TUGCO OA
-_f'"" 3 3
4, PROCEDURE NE E
f TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
7 of 9 8j FIGURE 2 DISTRIBUTION LOG FOR $!NGLE COPY O!STRIBUTION DOCUMENT NO:
, REVISION NO.
(For other holders of this Document. consult the current Manual Holders' Listing for the Manual to which this Docunent is assigned.)
IN0!VfDUAL COPY NAME OF CATE OF C094ENTS CONTRCL NWEER DOCUMENT HOLDER ISSUE l
1 I
(
l I
l I
I
.at I
I AL P@'
I I
WYv i
s'l I
I I
I l
C i
TUGCO OA Form No. 3
i INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
CPSES CP-QP-7.1 8r EB 2 ;984 8 of 9 FIGURE 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TO:
DATE:
TRAM. MEMO NO.:
Attachet are reduced copies of Procedure / Instruction
. Rev.
for the following control nunters:
i m mmI 13 yt%rs g w -
Notify the CPSES Procedures Coordinator. Donna Riddle, at Ext. 325 of any errors or shortages.
Please check the appropriate box (es) below prior to signing and return one copy of this memo to the CPSES OA Cesartment.
Transmittal contents issued to pertinent inspectors Superceded items destroyed I
cc:
File Custodian Date I
i i
l TUGCO OA
%g,
~
.==...,..;,--:.-_...
I INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION AGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UT1UTIES GENERATING CO.
('
CPSES J
iEB 21984 j 9 of 9 FIGURE 4 QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR LOG Procedure / Instruction:
Title:
Inspector Control No.. Procedurt/ Instruction Revision No.
[
l l
I Ii l III l
I
(
j I
I S
e M
l e
k l
s
l l_.
. l l
l I
I l
1
!l I
i j
I i
l i
i l
l I
i j
I I
I i
I l
I i
I i
i I
1 I
I i
i l
NJ Indicate replacement of revised procedures and disposal of superceded procedures by placing a check (/) mark adjacent to the Inspector's name under the toolicable rev-Ision column.
j i
TUGCO OA
%g,
- ~*:--.-. _. -. -...... - -. -
3 a_
e =.
..__..~-'._:.._...=._.2u..,
,.L. a.
~ ' - -..
- - -. - ~
~*: " '-~'
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE ~
EFFECTIVE NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES 35-1195 02/09/84 1 of 2 DEI-12
/ /
0 M
ORIGINATOR M N v h ;9 2-7 M REVIEWED BY:
2 8Y DCC/ TASK FORCE y,
,ff-INTERFACE TUGC0 Q/A DATE APPROVED BY:
. h de A *rf 7 -FA#
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER
~DATE O.1 TABI.E OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
P f
J EulAlffg!g g pp y 2
3.0 PROCEDURE g
y,
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this instruction is to describe the document control activities as they interface with the Unit 1 Task Force Paper Flow Groups (PFG).
2.0 SCOPE This instruction addresses the activities of and responsibilities for the control, receipt, distribution, and retrieval of construction and design documents generated by the site or received by'the Document Control Center (DCC) for use in conjunction with the Task Force Paper Flow Groups and the related activities.
3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 With the creation of the Unit 1 Task Forces and their related Paper Flow Groups (PFG) the following instructions shall be adhered to in the management and control of controlled DCC related documentation.
~
t 3.2 Each Task Force Paper Flow Group shall provide personnel who shall I
have met the requirements of the Document Control orientation class j
and achieved a passing grade on the, test encompassing the material in DCP-3.
{
=
~
a-hNoh
,__ m- ~ _u a a-_x -_ _2_ m
..z PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES c.-
JOB 35-1195 i
DEI-12 0
02/09/84 2 of 2 j
3.3 When each drawing package is issued from a DCC satellite, each design change in the package will be checked against the Design Change Log by the satellite custodian in the presence of the PFG Custodian before the reciept for the package is signed.
When the package is returned from the PFG to the satellite, the same procedure shall be followed before the satellite custodian will acknowledge reciept of the package. If the package is incomplete upon review, the PFG Supervisor must submit a written explanation accounting for the missing documentation.
3.4 Each PFG shall make all packages assigned to them available for updating at a mutually agreed upon time and location. Th1s updating, when required, must be accomplished at least once daily. The DCC will not accept responsibility for packages not made available for updating.
3.3 The FFG groups may request and issue drawing packages for travelers so long as they meet the criteria set forth in DCP-3 under paragraph 3.4.
Drawings and design changes requested on travelers are the responsibility of the PFG where accuracy and relevance to the work to be performed or inspected.s concerned.
4 i
~
+
me h4
~.
.x TEXAS UT11.mES GENERATING CO NU B CPSES l
1 f6 FG ? 1 W
^ T2r I-20' PREPARED BY:
?t SURVEILLANCE OF DATE PLANT CONDITIONS MM22 I
APPROVED BY:
A h.
ut) 1.0 REFERENCE 1-A CP-QP-18.0, " Inspection Report" 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE FORV 70.N O ui The purpose of this i[r UN ls to out ine the method ed to implement, document, and when necessary, resolve findings of planned surveillances of plant conditions.
2.2 SCOPE The scope of this procedure is the surveillance inspections performed on activities related to the safety of the plant within Category I structures.
2.3 RESPONSIBILITY The Quality Engineering Supervisor'is responsible for the implementation of this procedure at a frequency sufficient to maintain confidence in plant conditions.
3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 IMPLEMENTATION Surveillance inspections of plant conditions shall be done by the Quali ty Engineering Supervi sor's designees.
The designees shall be from the Quali ty Engineers and the Quality Control Supervisors.
The surveillance inspections shall be perfomed utilizing
" Surveillance Inspection Guidelines" (Attachment 1) as a mi nimum..
70W85-59 pu-
^
Porm No. 2
~
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE
(,,
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
2 of 6 i
The surveillance activity shall be planned on a rotating basis such that any one area is surveilled the next time l
by a person other than the one who surveilled it the time before.
3.2 ACTIVITIES TO BE OBSERVED Activities to be observed during this surveillance include:
a.
Housekeeping b.
Contamination of stainless steel c.
' Equipment protection d.
Material storage Installed items e.
f.
Any other adverse activities that affect safety related I
items.
3.3 DOCUMENTATION An Inspection Repo rt (Attachment 2) shall be used to document the surveillance inspection results.
The IR lists the activities to be observed.
A copy of the IR documenting the surveillance results shall be sent to the Assistant Construction Project Manage r.
Upon verification of completion of the required corrective action, the IR shall be closed.
The IR shall be processed as per Reference 1-A, except that upon closure the IR shall be sent to the Quality Engineering Supervisor for subsequent filing in the Permanent Plant Records Vault.
TUGCO CA
_n___.___
PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
FES 21 1934 3 of 6 s
ATTACHMENT 1 SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION GUIDELINES 1.
HOUSEKEEPING a)
Work areas sufficiently clean and orderly.
b)
- Garbage, trash,
- scrap, litter and other excess materials removed or temporarily stored neatly.
c)
Areas of activity adequately lighted,
venti lated,
protected,
and accessible as appropri ate for the work being performed consistent with the quali ty requi rements.
2.
CONTAMINATION OF STAINLESS STEEL a)
Slings handling stainless steel made from nylon or stainless steel or have such as being covered with rubber, adequate protection or wood to prevent contact between carbon sk el slings and stainless steel su rfaces.
b)
Tool s (e.g.
wi re brushes,
- files, flapper wheel s,
drills) used on stainless steel materials designated by a fluoresant orange color code.
3.
MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT STORAGE a)
Evidence of damage or deterioration.
b)
Pipe Spools
- Stainless steel pipe ends capped with plastic caps or wood covers and plugs
- Carton steel pipe ends capped wi th plastic / metal caps or wood covers and plugs
- Stored off the ground in racks or on dunnage.
c)
Weld Rod
- Field storage in plugged-in ovens d)
Motors stored in place shall have all ventilation holes covered wi th fine screening to ensure that the internals of the motor are free from debris and rodent infestation.
TUGCO CA ser,,, no. 3
^
. - ~ ~,
e.
,. _ _... - ~ _ _
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
T CPSES CP-QP-19.5 4
FEB2 1i$84 4 of 6 e)
Space heaters, if provided on motors and motor operated limitorque valves, energized.
~
4.0 INSTALLED ITEMS 4.1 CABLES AND CABLE TRAYS a)
Cables covered wi th fire resistant materials anytime welding, grinding or torch cutting is being performed in an area that could damage cable.
b)
Items such as nuts, bolts, structural steel, pipe fi ttings, etc. shall not be stored or left in cable trays.
c)
Metal grating over cable trays should be covered to prevent trash from falling or accumulating in the trays.
d)
Flex conduit t'o equipment not broken, damaged or used to support any weight, e)
Trays containing cables shall not be used as walkways.
Besides being potentially damaging to the cables, the cables could be energized and cause severe personnel
- hazard, f)
Trays shall not be used as work platfoms.
EXCEPTIONS:
I When standard work platforms or work accesses are not feasible, the following procedure will be used:
1.
A 1/2", or thicker, piece of plywood extending l
across the top of the cable tray from siderail to siderail and stabilized so it cannot be accidentally dislodged, may be used as a temporary work platfom.
NOTE:
This exception shall not be used when additional siderails have been added to extend the depth of the cable tray.
2.
Alternatively, a 3 fold fire blanket covered with an approved electrical rubber blanket may be used when leaning over or into a cable tray but not for the purpose of supporting full body weight (i.e., standing, kneeling,etc.).
TUGCO CA
%g3 M
.-vy
,i-t.-m.
c PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE I.
TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO.
CPSES f
FEB 21 1984 5 of 6 g)
Cable trays shall not be used as structural supports, or to lift from.
h)
Hoses and cables may be suspended from the bottom of trays, but shall not be laid across the trays.
i)
Doors and covers to electrical equipment in place when no work is being performed on the item.
4.2 MECHANICAL a)
Open ends of components covered unless work is being perfomed on them, b)
Installed pi pe, especially pipe connected to valves and equipment, properly supported (by permanent or temporary 'hard' supports).
c)
No rigging off supports (unless authorized by Engineering in writing on a traveller, etc.)
4.3 INSTRUMENTATION a)
Protective coverings installed and maintained whenever working around indicators, gauges, tubing, etc.
l l
f TUGCO OA
-.n rw
+
~
INSTRUCTION ISSUE t
REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
CPSES c
FEB 21 1984
(
CP-QP-19.5 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2
~
CCM AN CHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC S TATION s*tr er INSPECTION REPORT lua 1
DC.
t ITEM QESCMipT.CN pOEN Taf tCA TION 4 g5vsTEM / $7 AyCTWE CgMha r,;N PLMT SURVE!LLANCE r!
?!
5PE C.NC, MEV.
REF C4 CCC. 6 4CV. & CM4NGE NO mea,%AE CR TE5T Ecus?..CCtT.NO.
s e
01" s7,,,5,$,
P,i.e MiT T c" WNI#c"Crg C ?~ncerto, W.'sAF:en
^
us4P. RESULTS O sisacer:om co=aterro, att araucaste ircus satisracrear O i=saretic= co==terro, unsarisracrear irrus usTro ec.ca
- '"5'"
- ^ ' '
ro INSPECTION ATTRISUTES N
,,,$C garg
,yg s
m -
,s 1.
Houtekseni m 2.
l Contastination of Stainless Steel l
l l
l
'l l I
I 3.
I Material /Ecuterent Storage l~l l
(
l 4
Installed Iteas l
l 4.1 Cables and Cable Trays l
I 4.2 Mechanien1 I
l 4.3 Ins trtmenta tion l
nesaaxs towGs,seccs, s'cj situ Tto aca =
u 1.R. CLOSED Q
j 4TE i stGNATUPS is l
QC rNSPECTCM I
gg TUGCO CA Porm No.1
. ~ - -
~ - -
I.
'IUGCO ENGINEERIN3 DIVISION PECEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE CONTPOLED Nd
-E 2
4-16-54 1 of 5 is
/
f[L.[
CONTE L OF ENGINEERING /
DESIGN REVIEW OF PREPARED BY
/
FIELD DESIGN QLtNGES APPPOVED BY M W
r V
1.0 REFEPENCES i
1-A
'IUGCO Quality Assurance Plan 1-B CP-EP-4.6 Design Change Control Procedure 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURMSE
'Ib establish the means by which engineeirng/ design review is con-trolled for field design changes. 'Ihis procedure is intended to assure a:xt.pliance with the provisions of Ref.1-A.
2.2 SCOPE We provisions of this procedure shall apply to all field design chames issued by CPPE in accordance with Ref.1-B.
2.3 RESENSIBILITY he Assistant Project General Manager has overall responsibility for the design, of the CPSES Project. We Authority for the imple-mentation of this procedure has been delegated to the Manager of Engineering and the respctive Managers of 'IUGCO Nuclear and Project Engineering.
The CPP Discipline Engineers shall be responsible for forwarding all field design changes to the Design Change Tracking Group (DCIG).
The means for forwarding the design change shall be documented in the established engineering instructions.
'Ite DCIG Supervisor has lmen delegated the specific responsibility for:
a) controlling and implementing the measures described herein, b) maintaining the criteria provided by Gibbs & Hill /New York and
(/
c) maintaining the adequate logging, tracking and status mechanisms to assure positive control and record of field design
{
changes.
'=
l
]'
~
-.p_%8OD D L
-.L
^^
'IUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PROCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE CP-EP-4.7 2
4-16-34 2 of 5
2.4 ABBREVIATIOE
CMC - Conponent M:x3ification Card DCA - Design Change Authorization FSEG - Field Structural Engineering Group (conduit / cable tray su m s.i.s)
PSE - Pipe Support Engineering TSDRE - Technical Services Design Review Engineerirg group G&H - Gibbs & Hill, Inc. - New York or Site Design Review team SSAG - Site Stress Analysis Group 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 RECEIPT DCIG shall receive DCA's & CMC-s from CPPE groups as specified in the applicable engineering instructions. Pertinent supporting documents such as Telex, Memorandums, etc., shall be obtained by the DCTG when required by the responsible design review organization.
3.2 PROCESSING AND 'IRANSMITIAL DCIG will pwcess field design changes as follows:
A.
Pipe Desion d anges:
Based cn criteria provided by G&H, changes shall be reviewed by qualified site engineering personnel or Gibts & Hill. Site review shall be documented on the face of the change document and statused in the Field Design Change and Review Status Iog.
When conpleted, these documents shall be a:mtrolled/ retained j
by the DCTG.
Changes requiring engineering / design review by the Gibbs & Hill New York team, shall be transmitted per Attachment 1.
TUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PBOCEDURE REVISIOii ISSUE PAGE DATE CP-EP-4.7 2
4-14-g4 3 of 5 B.
Pipe Supoort Design Changes:
Design review shall be performed in accordance with established engineering instructions for small and large bore pipe supports.
The DCIG shall indicate the appropriate reviewing agent in the Field Design Change and Review Status Iog and maintain status of all design changes reviewed by Gibbs & Hill. Pipe support design changes, included in the scope.of the " vendor certified drawing" program shall be entered in the Field Design Change and Review Status Icg as a pipe support change.
C.
Conduit Succort Field Design Changes:
FSEG shall transmit design changes directly to G&H as speci-fied in the established engineering instruction for design control. A copy of the transmittal letter will be sent to DCIG for statusing Field Design Change and Review Status Icg.
D.
Cable Tray Supoorts:
FSEG shall transmit design changes to DCIG per the established engineering instruction for design change control. DCTG shall transmit to G&H and maintain design review status in the Field Design Change and Review Status Icg.
E.
Instrumentation CMC's:
CMC's requiring transmittal to G&H shall be forwarded to the DCIG in accordance with established engineering instructions.
DCIG shall transmit to G&H and maintain design review status of CMC's in the Field Design Change and Review Status Log.
F.
Design Changes Reviewed Prior to Issuance As directed by the Manager of Engineering, certain design changes may be design reviewed prior to issuance. Changes reviewed prior to issuance shall be forwarded directly to the G&H Site Design Review team by the originating discipline. Upon completion of the design review, the design change shall be forwarded to the DCIG for transmittal to DCC. Transmittal of completed design changes to G&H New York shall be accomplished per Gibbs & Hill procedure.
G.
Others:
Field design changes not addressed above shall be transmitted to the Original Designer by DCIG utilizire attachment 61 as v
appropriate.
3.3 FIELD DESIGN GANGE AND REVIEW SIATUS IOG DCIG in conjunction with G&H/NY will maintain the Field Design Change l
and Review Status Icgs.
p
~._
n G T. ESGINEERING DIVISICN PFOCEDURE REVISICN ISSUE PAGE DATE CP-EP-4.7 2
4-16-84 4 of 5 i
ATTACHMENT #1 CPPA PARP A (TYPICAL)
Mr. R. E. Ballard Gibbs & Hill, Inc.
393 Seventh Avenue New York 10001 CNANOiE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATICN 1981-83 2300 M4 INSTALIATICN ENGINEERING AND DESIGN REVIEW OF SITE GENERATED DCA's/ CMC's TRANSMITIAL 6
Dear Mr. Ballard:
Please find attached herewith the CMC's/DCA's along with pertinent general documents for these changes. The attached list identifies those CMC's/DCA's included in this transnittal.
(
) 'Ihese are forwarded for your engineering t
verification / design review.
If you need any further information, please contact this office.
Sincerely yours, DESIG4 CHANGE TRACKING GIOUP REHo:dc
~
cc:
(G&H/NY, 1L)
ARMS 4
i y
l i
--w
-m.-
r
,-,--,,,-e.
-v.
r--
e----
.---y w
r-
.x _;.
- 2--
cu.
. : _. 2.c.
.r M DGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE i
4-16-84 5 of 5 Attachment #1 Part B (TYPICAL)
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION CPPA CMC /DCA TRANSMITTAL LIST ATT.SHT.# _OF _
l AFFECTED DISCIPLINE 1
CPSES UNIT 4 Other Other CMC /DCA Calculations Supporting CMC /DCA Calculations Supporting 20.
Attached W m=nts 10.
Attached Documents
&Rev.!O.
(YES/!O/NR)
Attached
&Rev.NO.
(YES/tO/NR)
Attached
nsistent with the design basis (or input), ESAR comnitments and applicable codes and standards. 'Ihis verification shall normally be acconplished by the original design organization in accordance with established procedures although the provisions of References 1-B or 1-E may be utilized at the discretion of the Assistant Project General Manager.
In the event the design verification activities indicate the dange/ deviation is unacceptable, the reviewing agency shall notify the originating organization who may, on the area in question, place a " Hold" or rescind and reissue the dange/
deviation. Any physical corrective action required in problem areas shall be evaluated and formulated on a case by case basis.
3.2.6 Interface control
' Significant danges/ deviations to engineered items involving A/E and vendor interfaces for equipment foundation details shall be reviewed with both the A/E and the vendor for compliance with design requirements, prior to approval for fabrication or construction.
Formal documentation where vendor or A/E approval is required shall be accomplished in accordance with Reference 1-C.
Ses.
W@
,,_,y 4
y**~
... ~.
.- y
'IUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE C?-EP-4.6 10 4-16-34 7 of 15 AITAOL W I ECR FOIN COMPLETICN
'Ihe Engineering Change Request Form (Figure 1) shall be completed as follows:
a.
ECR No. - assigned by the responsible site organization.
b.
Safety Belated Ibcument - Check appropriate block.
c.
Discipline - Designate appropriate Engineerirg organization.
d.
Applicable Spec / Dwg / Document - Cross out cbcuments that do not apply. Specify all known affected or interfacing engineering cbcuments.
e.
Details - Provide information on the change under consideration usirg adequate descriptions or references to other documents which clearly illustrate the problem and resolution. Attach the design doctrnents marked to adequately show the change.
f.
Supporting Documentation - References supporting cbcuments such as telephone conversations, telexes, telecopies, sketches, FCNs, DCAs, 'IDCRs, TDRs other ECRs, etc.
Handwritten forms will be accepted in isolated cases; however, typing is preferred.
The originator aM date shall be providad. Approval shall be provided, disposition responsibility assigned, aM the ECR forwarded for disposition as iMicated in Section 3.1.4.
Modifications required to the ECR in the disposition process shall be indicated by roting the change on the ECR. 'Ihe change shall be initialed or otherwise validated aM dated. All involved parties should be identified in the validation.
e
~
~ - - - - - ~ --
'IUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PBOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-34 8 of 15 ATTAC!MNr 2 DCA FORM COMPIETICN
'Ihe Design Change Authorization form (Figure 2) shall be completed as follows:
Authorization No. - Assigned by the responsible site organization.
a.
b.
(WIIL) (WILL tor) Be Incorporated in Design Documents - Cross out the one that does not apply.
As a general rule, design changes to a specification which are generic in a nature and will affect future work on a continuing basis shall be designated drawings that can be delineated on the drawing. Clarifications and/or interpretations involving design documents will normally not be incorporated into the design documents.
It is to be recognized that specific guidelines covering every. situation cannot be delineated in this procedure; as such, it will be the responsibility of the Originating Engineer /rechnician to exercise judgement and designate whether or not.a phange.should be incorporated. Note designation of inus;raticn is for preliminary use only.
Safety Belated Document - Check the appropriate block.
c.
d.
Originator - Check the appropriate block.
('Ibe " Originator" of a DCA resulting from a DE/CD should be noted as the " Original Designer").
Applicable Spec /Dwg/ Document - Cross out the documents that do not apply.
e.
Specify all known affected or interfacing engineering documents, f.
Details - Provide information on the change under consideration using adequate descriptions or references to other document (s) which clearly illustrate the problem ard its resolution and provide sufficient information to reflect the "as-built" configuration.
g.
Supporting Documentation - Reference supporting documents sudi as telephone conversations, telexes, telecopies, DE/CD's, sketches, ECis,
'IDCRs, TDRS, etc. If the DE/CD is modified by site engineering, the word " Modified" shall be placed adjacent to the DE/CD number.
m
- * ^
~
e TUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISICN PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PME DATE CP-EP-4.6' 10 4-16-34 9 of 15 Handwritten forms will be accepted in isolated cases, however, typing is perferred.
The DCA is then reviewed for technical acceptance by the designated personnel.
Approval is obtained by signature and dating the appropriate blanks as indicated in Section 3.2.2.
In the event formal approval and design verification is required prior to issue, the DCA shall be forwarded to the responsible organizatien.
Completion of those activities by the responsible organization shall be indicated by signature and date in the "DESICN REVIEW PRIOR TO ISSUE" blank.
If formal approval and design verification is not required prior to issue, mark "NA" in the "DESIG REVIEW PRIOR TO ISSUE" blank.
Note "NA" does not indicate approval and design verification is not subsequently required.
Revisions to a DCA will use Figure 2 and are filled out as described with the following exceptions:
, te same authorization number shall be used, a.
b.
The appropriate revision number shall be placed after the authorization number.
Subsection 3.B, Details, shall contain the following:
c.
"This revision voids and supersedes Design Change Authorization No.
, Revision d.
7.f it is necessary to void or rescind a Design Change Authorization, it should be done by a revision to the existing DCA. Subsection 3-B (Details) of Figure 2 should contain the following statement "This revision voids Design Change Authorization No.
and all revisions thereto".
.L
'IUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISICN ISSUE PAGE DATE CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-84 10 of 15 ATTACliMENT 3 CMC FOIN COMPLETICN Re Conponent Edification Form (Figure 3) is completed as follows unless otherwise stated in engineering instructions supplementing this procedure.
Se card should be filled out using, a black ink pen or " dark" pencil.
a.
Serial No. - Prenursered, or as established through detailed application instructions supplementing this procedure.
b.
Section 1, Application - State ganeric category of work (e.g. mechanical equipnent, electrical equipment, pipe, pipe supports, etc).
Weld 2d., Q, Non-Q - Check appropriate block.
Design Change Deviation - Cross out the one that cbes rot @ ply.
Enter N/A or leave blank if not a change or deviation to design.
c.
Section 2, Dug. No. - Enter the cutplete number and revision of the affected design basis and/or canstruction drawings as follows:
1.
Electrical - Enter desig" b-ais drawing numbers.
2.
Piping and Instrumentation - Enter the design and construction drawing numb - 'or all design change /dev'.: ions; and construction drawing numbers for construction changes.
3.
Pipe Supports - Enter the construction drawi,g nurters, d.
Section 3, Line No./Conponent No. - Enter the specific identification number of the conponent to be nodified; spool nu-ter, equipment number, etc. It is not required to enter the pipe support number in block 3.
If a numoer of items are affected, enter "see sketch", and show all changes in block 5.
Section 4, aeason for Change - State briefly but cancisely the reason e.
for the change. If to implement a change properly approved by the Original Design, clearly state this fact (e.g., 'Ib inplement DE/CD 8600).
f.
Section 5, Instructions - Describe completely and accurately the change to be made.
1.
Where there are no welds or material removed or a!ded, enter "N/A" in the appropriate blocks.
2.
For renoval and/or addition of welds and/or material, check the appropriate block and enter all weld numbers and/or Bill of Material 1:em nurters removed and/or added. It is not mandatory to disposition the future use and/or storage requirements for deleted material.
r TUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE 3
DATE CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-84 11 of 15 3.
FOR PIPING ONLY AND INTEGRAL HANGER ATTACHMENTS - If, after the original issue of BRP drawing, a weld has to be renoved and rewelded, the wld number will be chaged to indicate same by adding an "A" for the first removal, "B" for the second renoval, etc. to the weld nu:rbers, e.g.,
for the weld 6, the first removal / reweld is 6A, and if 6A requires rework, the second removal / reweld is 6B.
4.
FOR PIPING CNLY - When stainless steel materials are re-used and the heat affected zone not removed, the new weld number will include the next sequential letter of the item with the highest numerical weld nunber.
Ebr exanple, if the pipe between welds 7A and 8C is deleted, ard the remaining parts welded together, the new weld number will be 8D, not 7B.
In the situation where weld 6A is cut and a pup installed between the t1e pieces, the new welds will be nuntered 6B and 6A-1.
5.
PIPING ONLY - If, after the original issue of the BRP drawing, an added weld is required which is not a reweld of an a:isting weld; the new weld will be keyed to the lower of the two numbered welds ard suffixed by "-1" for the first weld,
"-2" for the second weld, etc., if a weld is added between weld "3" and "4", the new weld will be "3-1".
- g. Section 6-Provide a sketch indicating the new arrangement when necessary for clarification. When more than one CE affects a drawing, care shall be taken to avoid conflicts between the C4C's. This block should include specifications of itens added that are not listed on the affected drawing.
It should also show new weld locations, and all required aking point dimensions (cut lengths for piping ard hangers are rot required),
- h. Section 7 - Originator - Enter the name of the individual preparing the nodification (for pipirg changes, foreman requestire the change should be entered).
- i. Section 8 - Approvad By - Approval shall be obtained in accordance with Section 3.2.2.
- j. Section 9 - Distribution - If rot predesignated, the Engineer / Technician preparing the C E shall enter the name of each agency requirim an
" Engineering nd Office Use Only" copy and shall indicate the nunber of required copies for each.
r
.a.
TUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE
(~
CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-84 12 of 15
- k. General - Extra sheets may be used where necessary to adequately cover the subject. All sheets nust be marked with the OC serial number and ntsnbered page of
- 1. Revisions to a OC may be accouplished by changing the original form or by utilizing a new form (nonserialized) and filling it out as outlined above. Se following additions shall be noted on the revised CMC, as applicable.
i 1.
%e same serial number shall be used.
2.
Re appropriate revision number shall be placed adjacent to the serial number.
3.
If the reason for the revision is different from the original, enter the additional circumstances in Block 4.
4.
We CMC shall contain the following statement:
" mis revision voids and supersedes document Serial Number
, Revision
- m. When an occasion arises where a OC has been issued and for some reason that card is rot needed, it nust be voided.
1.
Tb void a 00, the original card must be revised arri clearly marked
" Voided - Not Super:eied".
2.
A void OC shall not be reactivated.
i 1M L,________
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - ^ - - - - -
- - ^ ^ ' ' - -
4 TUGCO ENGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE
(,'-
CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-84 13 of 15 I
FIGURE 1 REV.
PAGE 1 OF CJMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUEST ECR NO.
1.
SAFETY REIATED CHANGE:
YES NO I
2.
DISCIPLINE: CPPE
'INE 3.
DESCRIPTION:
i A.
APPLICABLE SPEC /DWG/DOCLNENT i
B.
DETAIIS l
i C.
REASON EUR CHANGE 5
4.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION:
i l
j 5.
APPIOVAL SIGNATURES:
1 1
A.
ORIGINATOR DATE i
?-
B.
APPICVED BY DATE
]
C.
DISPOSITION BY TNE CPPME CPPItC j
6.
DISPOSITION:
A.
APPIOVED APPIOVED AS TOTED REJECTED B.
DRAWING f REVISICN AFFECTED BY ECR INCORPORATIOi OR JUSTIFICATICN FOR REJECTION:
BY:
DATE
{;
4 t
l l
ECR FORM 10-83 I
t 4
.s
" '^
^
- ^ - ^
e j
i
'IUGO:) ENGINEERING DIVISION PIOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE DATE CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-84 14 of 15 PAT 1 OF
~
CDMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATIN DESIGN CHANGE AUIHORIZATION 4
(WIIL) (WIIL NOF) BE INCORPORATED IN DESIG DOCUMENT DCA NO.
1 1.
SAFEIY IEIATED EDCUMENT:
YES NO 2.
ORIGINNIOR: CPPE ORIGINAL DESIGNER 3.
DESCRIPTION:
j A.
APPLICABIE SPEC /DWGMJMENT REV.
t B.
DE'IAIIS a
i 4.
1 i
9 4.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENIATION:
l l
t j
5.
APEPOVAL SIGNNIURES:
i A.
ORIGINNIOR:
DATE i
B.
DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE:
DNIE C.
DESIGN REVIEW PRIOR 'IU ISSUE:
DNTE 4
4 j
6.
STANDAliD DISTRIBUPICN:
j ARMS (ORIGINAL)
(1)
/
CUALITT ENGINEERING (1)
Dcm FOR ORIG. DESIGN (1) i DCA PORM 3-84 i
m w
.~
1 EXXD ENGINEERING DIVISION PEOCEDURE REVISION ISSUE PAGE mrE 7
1 i
CP-EP-4.6 10 4-16-34 15 of 15 I
CMC mIE (TYPICAL) i l
1 E
l 2
2 2
3 3
3 ud.
5 E
8 E
1 5
Ed3 1
?
i hE i s..
5 a
s i
_2 5
l 8
1 I
l e 00e e
3 0
.--w..
~
'r'
'f s. # \\.'./\\.
s
- g W.,
=
g 4
,';'~
g
}g s.
t' '
g
- s e t / \\.., / %
e
=
4 e
4
- ~~~
. i..
g
=y m
=
s,..
1 0
G
>=
q Met 2
==_ -
g g g o
y 0
g
.s.
I g
e O-I E
s E3 24.
=
a si g
5-r-
s w3 0
E 1
1 3
g_m a
5 se,e ea 8
)
.. 1
- _.