ML20199F721

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 8 to Simulator Mod Control,Training Desk Guide 6.3
ML20199F721
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/1998
From: Cotton S
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20199F708 List:
References
PROC-980522, NUDOCS 9901220031
Download: ML20199F721 (22)
v • d • e


Text

______-___

Attachment ts 1CANO19901 January 14,1999 ANO-1 SIMULATOR PERFORMANCE TESTING REPORT l

)

I 9901220031 DR 990114 p ADOCK 05000313 PDR

i  ;

l l

l l

l Section 1  !

Simulator Modification Control ,

Guideline i l

l l

l l

l

Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 6.3 Rev.8 05/22/98 4

['

4 l

l

, n.

k,nterg i

Reviewed by: ..

JA' >/f/ l supervisor, Simulator Training Approved by: "-'

[ R

' Director, Training and Emergency Planning '

1 I

i i

Simulator ModNication Control Training Desk Guide 4.3 Rev.8 05/22/98 TABLE DICONTENTS 1.0 OBJECTIVE 2.0 DEFINITIONS  ;

2.1 DESIGN CHANGE PACKAGE (DCP) 2.2 DESIGNDATABASE(DDB) 2.3 DISCREPANCY 2.4 DISCREPANCYREPORT(DR) 2.5 ENGINEERINGREQUEST(ER) 2.6 HARDWARE COORDINA*IOR 2.7 HARDWARE'IECHNICIAN 2.8 LIMITED CHANGE PACKAGE (LCP) 2.9 PLANTCHANGE(PC) 2.10 PLANT MODIPICATION(PM) 2.11 SIMULATOR ENGINEER (SE) 2.12 SIMULATOR ENHANCEMENT 2.13 SIMULATORINSTRUCIOR(SI) 2.14 SIMULATOR MODIMCATION(SM) 2.15 SIMULATORTRAINING SUPERVISOR 2.16 SOFTWARE MODULE

- 2.17 SOFTWARE SIMULATION SYSTEM 2.18 SOFTWARE SPECIALIST ,

2.19'IEMPORARY ALTERATION (TA) 2.20 PHOTO SURVEY

)

3.0 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CMS) 3.1 FUNCTIONS 3.2 DESIGNDATABASE 3.3 PLANTMODIMCATIONS 3.4 DISCREPANCYREPORT 3.5 AVAILABILITY 4 i

4.0 DISCREPANCY REPORT PROCESS 4.1 DISCREPANCYREPORTFLOWPATH 4.2 SPECIALSITUATIONS 5.0 ATTACHMENTS MG1 SIMULATOR MODIFICATION PROCESS DIAGRAM MG2 CMS MAIN MENU MG3 DISCREPANCY REPORT 2

l . - -.-_-

i' l

j

- Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 6.3 Rev.8 05/12/98 '

1.0 OBJECTIVE j To establish guidelines for the control ofmodifications to the Arkansas Nuclear One Unit I and Unit II simulators to ensure fidelity.  ;

2.0 DEFINITIONS l

2.1 Danign Channe Packa=* (DCP): A collection of documentation providing the speciScs of a plant modification.

l 2.2 Design Data Base (DDB). A collection of data consisting of reference plant l drawings, manuals, performance data and other documents that defines the plant being simulated.

2.3 Discrepancy

A difference between observed performance and the current data base.

2.4 Discrepancy Report (DR): A computer based form used to identify discrepancies (problems), needed corrections, upgrading of the simulator hardware and/or software and initiates the review and correction process.

2.5 Engineering Request (ER). A formal request for engineering technical support by

[ which Fnainawing personnel resolve and disposition such requests. The ER process provides a single mechanism to request engineering technical support, l suggest a solution to satisfy the request, and to develop a documentation package l with an engineering solution appropriate to the resolution of the request. This l process will eventually replace the design change package (DCP), limited change l Package (LCP), and plant change (PC) processes 2.6 Hardware Coordinator: An individual appointed by the Simulator Supervisor to direct hardware work flow and ensure proper simulator maintenance is performed.

2.7 Hardware Technician: An individual quali6ed to perform hardware modification ,

and repair on the simulators. These individuals are typically matrixed from the I Computer Support Group, l 2.8 I imit*A Channe Packmee (LCP): A design package that does not result in a design l

basis or a technical specification revision.

2.9 Plant Channe (PC): A design package that does not alter system / component  !

function, interaction, operation or failure mode outside existing design analysis i

3 i

Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 8.3 Rev.8 08/12/98 limits. A plant change does not result in a design basis or a technical specification revision.

2.10 Plant Modification (PM): Term used to describe one or all of the following - PC, DCP, TA, or LCP.

2.11 Simulator Engineer (SE): An individual responsible for changes in the performance of the simulators.

2.12 Simulator Enhancement. A simulator modification which will increase the ,

capability, maintainability, performance or operability of the simulator or results in elimination of simulation design simplifications.

2.13 Simulator Instructor (SI): An instructor currently certified by the NRC to conduct simulator training and appointed by the Simulator Supervisor as the interface between the Operations Training group and the Simulator Support group.

2.14 Simulator Modi 6cition (SM): A change in the simulation software or hardware.

2.15 Simulator Traininn Supervisor: Individual responsible for simulator training

, programs and the completion of performance / operability test as well as compliance l with established regulations. Additional responsibilities include hardware and software maintenance of the simulators and peripheral equipment.

2.16 Software Module A unit of software whose source code is contained in one file.

l 2.17 Software Simulation System: The simulation system consists of the software ne y to execute and control the simulation. This shall include thejob streams necessary to load, save, restore and unload the simulation system.

l i 2.18 Software Soecialist: An individual responsible for performing modifications on the software simulation system.

2.19 Temporary Alteration (TA): Modifications to the reference plant that are not intended to be permanent.

l 2.20 Photo Survev: Photo Survey conducted after plant modifications are completed.

Photo Surveys will normally be conducted at the completion of each outage or as the need for documentation ofplant changes is required.

4

?

i l .

Simulator ModNication Control Training Desk Guide 6.3 Rev.8 05/12/98 3.0 Configuration Management System (CMS) 3.1 Functions 3.1.1 The CMS provides the following functions: i

a. Establishes a baseline record (DDB); i
b. Maintains a current data base of simuistor design (DDB) ; '
c. Tracks plant changes affecting simulator design and operation (PM);
d. Controls the paperless DR process,
e. Tracks differences between the simulator and the simulator design bases (DR);  :
f. Tracks identified improvements needed in si mulator design (DR); *
g. Maintains additional databases used by Simulator Support which includes availability.

3.2 Design Data Base (DDB) 3.2.1 The DDB includes all the baseline documents used during procurement and installation as well as current information such as technical manuals, and any plant modifications or resolved discrepancies that have been made to the simulator.

3.2.2. The maintenance of the DDB aids in compliance with ANS 3.5-1985 and provides a mechanism for maintaining simulator fidelity.

3.3 Plant Modifications 3.3.1. The PM field of the DR record provides documentation for the implementation ofplant modifications into the simulator.

3.3.2. All plant modifications are reviewed for impact to the simulators during the Training Center Need's Analysis Meeting A Training Evaluation Action Request (TEAR) is initiated for all plant modifications suspected to impact the simulator. TEARS are initiated and closed for plant modifications that do not impact the simulator to document the review.

3.3.3 Existing Discrepancy Reports (DR) relating to plant modifications may be suspended by the Simulator Training Supervisor, or his designee, if the plant modification is delayed at the reference plant. Suspended discrepancy repons will be reviewed periodically and will be reinstated when the plant modification is

  • scheduled to be implemented.

5

1 i

Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 8.3 Rev.8 05/22/98 E 3.4 Discrepancy Reports  !

i 3.4.1 Discrepancy Reports (see Figure 3) are the focal point of all simulator modifications. Modifications should not be implemented on the simulator  ;

without a DR.

3.4.2 Discrepancy Report data is entered into CMS during each phase of the DR l

process (see Section 4.1).  !

i 3.5 Availability i L

3.5.1 The availability database tracks the simulators availability as a percentage of time  ;

available to time scheduled. '

3.5.2 Data is provided by Simulator Instructors at the beginning of each month for the previous month.

4.0 DISCREPANCY REPORT PROCESS 4.1 Discrepancy Report Flowpath i

4.1.1 Identification ofDiscrepancy: It is the responsibility of all knowledgeable individuals to initiate a Discrepancy Report for all perceived discrepancies  ;

between the simulator and reference plant. DRs are originated within the Configuration Management System (see Figure 2). t CMS will immediately forward new DRs to the Simulator Training Supervisor. DRs are expected to L originate from the following sources:

l

a. Modifications to the Reference Plant: Modifications to a simulator's reference plant (i.e., ER, DCP, LCP, PC, or TA) may result in similar modi 6 cations to the simulator. The problem l description should contain the noun name of the Plant i Modi 6 cation and the Plant Modification Number. The Plant i Modification Number should also be entered in the PM field.
b. Simulator Discrenancv: Trainees, Simulator Instructors or other knowledgeable persons who observe a discrepancy should initiate a DR. The problem description should contain the initial condition number where the discrepuncy was observed and any malfunctions that may have been active.
c. Simulator Enhancements It may become desirable to enhance the i simulation beyond its current capabilities. The problem l description should sufficiently document the requested i

l 3

I l

l s- w e - ,-- , , a n ----.- +- - , . .- + - - - . - - -a

Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 4.3 Rev.8 08/12/98 enhancement and list any plant documents that may be helpful in completing the anhane-nant 4.1.2 The Simulator Training Supervisor, or designee, should review all new DRs. The I following elements should be included in the review

n. Training value and accuracy, (DRs determined to bem' accurate or of '

extremely low training value may be closed during this review. The originator of the closed DR should be notified and provided an  ;

explanation for the closure.) )

b. Modeling or hardware; (It should be noted that the individual originating the DR may make this determination, if knowledgeable; however, the SS may change the designation, if appropriate.) 4
c. Priority. (DRs should be assigned priorities between one and twenty-one. f A revolving Top Twenty list will be generated from these priorities to ensure that DRs with the most impact to training are corrected first. It should be noted that the priorities ofDRs can be changed and an updated Top Twenty list can be generated at any time by the Simulator Training Supervisor or designee.)

Upon completion of the review, the Simulator Training Supervisor or designee should assign the DR to a responsible individual based upon expertise and workload. The CMS will automatically forward the DR to the assigned responsible individual.

4.1.3 Upon receipt of a DR, the responsible individual (Hardware Technician, Simulator Engineer, or Software Specialist) will perform a simulator modification / repair, as appropriate. Simulator modifications / repairs can be divided into three categories:

a. DRs related to hardware;
b. DRs related to software;
c. DR related to both hardware and software.

Hardware related DRs refer to the installation of new components or the repair or replacement of existing components. The priority of hardware DRs is assigned by the Simulator Training Supervisor or designee based on the severity of the DR and scheduled simulator scenarios. The Hardware Coordinator will review the assigned priorities and simulator time available to make job assignments for the hardware technicians. Upon completion of a hardware DR, j 7

l t

- Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 6.3 Rev.8 05/22/94 the responsible hardware technician should document the work completed in CMS. CMS will automatically forward the DR to be tested.

SoAware related DRs refer to modeling discrepancies, soAware simulation system errors or PMs requiring soRware changes only SoAware DRs should be worked based on priority when it is reasonable. Control ofchanges to all simulator soAware is desired The following method should be used to control soAware changes:

a. The soAware module header should contain a program history section.

The program history section should contain an identifier (initials followed by a sequential number, i.e. DB01, RR02, etc.) and the date the revision was updated and placed in the training load. The program history section can also be used for any comments or descriptions of the change such u a plant modi 6 cation number,

b. Changes to individual lines of source code should be identi6ed with the identifier preceded by an ~Imation pom~ t (FORTRAN comment syntax).
c. ' Satisfactorily tested soAware modules names should begin with SM_

followed by the name of the module. Changes to the module should begin with T#_ with the number being a sequential indicator of the number ofchanges from the tested model. Models are updated from T#_

to SM_ upon completion of testing Upon completion of a soAware moddication, the responsible individual should docurnent the modi 6 cation in CMS. CMS will automatically forward the DR to be tested.

DRs related to both hardware and soAware typically originate as a result from a plant modification. The responsible individual should determine the necessary hardware modi 6 cation and initiate a correspondmg hardware DR. The hardware DR should be of sufficient detail for the hardware technician to make all modifications and follow established conventions. Photo Surveys should be used, if available, to ensure that its installation is consistent with the plant. The hardware DR should be addressed as stated above. The remaining soAware modifications should be addressed as a soAware modification.

4.1.4 DRs ready for test are available in CMS (see Figure 2). Hardware DRs may be tested by any individual knowledgeable of the component and the component's interaction in the simulator. SoAware DRs should be tested by a Simulator Instructor with the originator of the DR being preferable, when practical. The test should ensure that the modification meets the requirements specified by the 8

l.

Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 6.3 Rev.8 06/22/98 DR. It is the responsibility of the individual performing the test to ensure that the modification has not created additional discrepancies.

Upon completion of the test, the individual performing the test should document the results in CMS. The individual's name and test date should be entered for DRs that satisfactorily meet all testing requirements. The CMS entry for DRs determined to be deficient should include the test performed and discrepancies observed during the test.

4.1.5 Hardware DRs may be closed by the responsible hardware technician upon satisfactory testing. The responsible individual for software DRs should ensure that the changes to the software have been controlled, as described above, and update the module (s) to SM_. The updated module (s) should be duplicated in the Training Load and all preliminary work on the Development Load should be scratched. The software DR may now be closed.

4.2 Situations may necesdtate a modification to the simulator prior to initiation of a DR. In these cases, a DR should be initiated as soon as reasonably achievable. All modifications and testing performed should be documented as under normal situations.

4.3 DRs records should be maintained throughout the life of the simulator. They may be archive;l for space consideration, but will remain retrievable for history purposes.

9

n- - .s - a _ a 1 ti t

-. ()

a ,

1; 4 <

1, s

g J 11 a

i=

E i

  • i\

i g -

.t' e

1 E& i e

A 2

j}

s , i s

O,

\

h 1

{ [u i <

1

-- i l

\

, 8k. 1?

-q

}\

l a W '

1 Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 4.3 Rev. 8 05/22/98 l

FIGURE 2 CMS MAIN MENU M Miuosult Au rsu lftsvegation Monuj ^

==

r= Elle Edit Becords Help A

'I*fWMCI$WQ&fff i F"AisiisabWip?"" munw&{ a a wumma tem @ % m w w w p%pene

ey c. g aw- 'N'IFO p @ M M D 3.5,
srian.mv ,_ -,a w
y7
#q:gg ww.rq yn n% yp*W%h5tWgswt p

,nqg }M g;;;u, gig n u-5 A n n u w w <h., y

}.g.7.y.

p ge f4 gp y

y r-egyr gjjjp g a I

' n w. ,,-- , ..

+<'1_ m J5' g

,T m **Cupp %gyR 9  !,

m, . ms I y

i n u9 TWYeT&?  !

w 3

! W@ml a)4"Raumm'4MQa89 g gpg:MiiiiitRM O 4

E ejgME T pg j&ggj.g$g.Apgag Q(" .h -NyyOft&' 11 r 7y .7_..x f P .,.-~DRs,&,

h M 0 pen 48 y ,

w ., , , + a ~4 - g i

'cy g; 4 b;

d4 ,,4.emwhTONpa.x;;;e n' ,wh 4%

  1. p;@WR$W^ A

- o ;omw , 6 e /* y .;h MM S, fMesortiSearchl Ms EhMH wu 4- RimdijiihiiN9

_K,; . .q,

. ~ .;

en . , ~ - , . .,.,m.  % c ,- 2

-a s h.p_e Q.)

s:U E ff iN

_ ' ,, k., -

a e --

an,.c.emrmg46Mprit6e mn.wytem . ... .

ua, an e

$.s.mulatorSupport + ~

Con -iguration swanagement System unwa w a==a w ea w ea m ar m w n na

l l

Simulator Modification Control Training Desk Guide 6.3 Rev.8 06/22/98 FIGURE 3 DISCREPANCY REPORT l

J= file Edit Ylew Becords Help r newemmm amm ' ,

MS v <

. wwwwwwmmwom%#1%p ,

2n 49%, i a s.

}$,

1

,> .mu , - - . ,, w m , ,

.w . ,gpay, g. ~ l j p bead Nuudsa

[ { }

AND1a(: ,.,e v.

Cantr

____rema. icgi OsIWessiangd; t m- + wwwm.m,mm, em._ ~u~w[p p q , Mast t

g c

a .-A+p;e ,s sa t.

g. .99. , q;p.:

h 3

9 SB0125 Dateladlisted:M 234r-98!i %vf6 Saggsesting Da=====hir+%@id

$ *Ww,mmmkr&[3,

ws.8
] o a a ns a a ~ m ..sJ w yy mwa+z.,,a g;;,sg wwuw w a (u a s wa x , e ,-- k n y n a.v n a m w a n an

.usaawuw.uaaa,uu.ww i2 ebTil 3*M "WWW"""~"d " W'"**Wi?"WWM W T"'~ $.a s

v; '

is

SW pump chscharge pesetse a hgh The sm4ator does not model the ICW cooler bypass valves whch the (

m' j

n operators mrmany use to conhol SW pesetse. These wakes need to be modeled SW402fA and SW40268.

These can be found on P&lD M210 area E3.

k 84

[g

. 1 18 gg4r>94gwein- +"+WpW*9 +t 7"weve ~'?fn*N*yg*&we4*hM-pWp;WTf9rnWe%WR@ pt"3%p>*r*****+ **r -

, em mu- kW

-_m.smo NWY s .

~

  1. Ja.

g

- me-wama--- . f. \$W5 l o n f  ; Added ICW cooler bypass vanes to servce water

-- c

  • IE h _III N

$y ,

model Remote functons for these vakes (SW4026A and SW402GB) are located h group g

. I~T ""$.h' ki' $y

, g u

{ SW. L JSWSWB gly,2; S Ch,_4N ,. , T k 4y hmmnwr~wrm"mmrmm~n7?rmmW evn.

w y nr8r*e s9mM . wcom M e wm~ m ww&x i mWnem terms W>+ w +w im un crg % den < '

$S 3 sc . -s- . , , , #. % .. , .u.- -i. -.- l --

3 N f hdu e

' # M

)

t I

I r

1 i

S I

l 1 l  !

l t

l 1

l t

l t

l l r l Section 2 i

Exception to AS'SI/AS~S 3.5-1985 l l

I l

l I

?

I  !

l i

l l

l i

T i

l

?

i l

Exception To ANSI /ANS 3.5-1985 Section 3.1.2, " Plant Modifications", contains a list of malfunctions that shall be included in the simulator and specifies in item 12 the ability to simulate control rod failures including uncoupled rod and drifting rods be provided. The Unit I simulator does not presently have that specific capability, but our present capabilities in the area of rod malfunctions are more than adequate to provide the operators with the necessary training related to rod operation.

Section 3 Plant Modifications

l Plant Modifications

Plant Med : he  ; Date Number ~ Complete SS-Sett REPLACE SAILEY TRANSMITTERS AND INDICATORS 87/28/97 92-1913 RCP 328 MOTOR REPLACEMENT 06/04/D6 92-1910 ADD VALVES AND CONTROLS FOR WATER HAMMER ON SW AND ACW 10/31/96 92-1932 HPl AUK LUSE PUMP ELECTRICAL MODIFICATION. NEW POWER FROM 367 & 386 NEW 01/12/06 STARTERS WITH LOCAUREMOTE & NO POWER TRANSFER 92 4010 ADDS BSOLATION VALVE TO S.W. COMMON RETURN MADER - SPUTS COMMON RETURN 02/26/96 HEADER 924032 MODIFY CONTROL CElWNG - CHANGE LOCATION OF VENTIUATION DUCTS. 08/16/06 93-1000 MAIN CHILLER REPLACEMENT 01/06M 93-1918 (1) PHASE I OF CLASS E INVERTER REPLACEMENT (GREEN TRAIN) 06/04/96 REPLACE Y11/13/26 D83/D06 WITH Y11/13/16 D03A/D0313 REPLACE Y22/24 WITH Y22/24/26, DM WITH DNA/DMS 83-1918 (2) PHASE 2 OF INVERTER AND SATTERY CHARGER REPLACEMENT (RED TRAIN) 10/17/90 93-1913 REPLACE EXISTING LOVE JOY TURBINE CONTROLS WITH NEW LOVEJOY SYSTEM. 12/13/96 MODIFY ICS TO HANDLE MFW TRP. CHANGE PZR SPRAY SETPOINT.

93-1913 (DCPR #14) INSTALL POWER RESET SWITCHES ON L9VEJOY MODULES 86/31/97 93-1913 (DCPR #9) DEFEAT THE D6 AGNOSTIC MANUAL MODE TRANSFER DUE TO ICS S4GNAL FAILURE PER 81/29/97 DCPR4 834032 ADDITION OF HIGH SOURCE RANGE COUNTS A ARM 94/04/96 83 4037 ADDS, DELJTES AND CHANGES BORIC ACID MIX TANK NSTRUMENTATION 07/1946 CHANGES PMS, INSTRUMENT LD. ON CH, AfC POWER DEPENDENCIES 934041 TR9901 REPLACEMENT- ADDS 2 POINTS WHICH ALARM TO KM 03/26/98 834 004 REPLACE TR6800 -CHANGE SETPOINTS ON TRetee Afe FIS1278-12T3 01/26/06 M-teet E1A&B LEVEL CONTROL SETPOINTS 86/64/06 M-1982 MAIN TURRINE TSI 10/2848 M-1983 ANO-1 MFW VENVURI REPLACEMENT 83/31/97 M-tete ICCMDS UPGRADE 07/26/97 1

M-1919 REMOVAL OF CV7443 & CV7447 01/19M M4002 REPLACE T84223 Afc Tl4228 ON COG 10/M/05 M 4003 CV7443 7448 7447 7440 NO LONGER OPERABLE FROM CONTROL 10/31 M ROOM. NOINDICATION M4010 CV-1982 STROKE TIME 07/10/95 M4010 REPLACE UNIT 1 PLANT COMPUTER PRINTER 91/11/96 M4020 REPLACE US 2416,2416, M18, AND 2410 WITH DlXSON INDICATORS 10/13/96 M4021 HPT EFFCIENCY CHANGE 01/16/98 M 4022 SW VALVE LINE-UP CHANGES FOR SW PUMPS 84/08/95 M4038 CAUBRATE, MSTALL SCALES, AND INSTALL THE FOLLOd1NG DIXON METERS W CM : 06/29/98 Fl4218/2210 Fl4222,Fl4008,M-2L28, LIS4203, M-3008. P14007/3 M4032 RAD MONITOR RECORDERS REPLACEMENT C34 & Cas. 10/23/06 M 4034 HYDROGEN ANALYZER MODIFICATIONS 44/24/08 (PDSTM4,7605) e4-7864 EH OIL SYSTEM MODFCATION 16/24/98 M-7028 CV1238 STROKE TIME CHANGE AND VALVE TRIM 07/10/95 M-7028 CHANGE PMS POINT YS3343 INPUT TO ALXK06C2 (THIS WAS DISCOVERED ON THE FINAL M/30/97 REVIEW AND CLOSE OUT OF PC64-7028).

M-Teet C20 POWER MODIFCATlON 04/04/96 CREATE POWER DEPENDENCY FOR WEATHER STATIDN INPUTS FROM WSTRUCTOR STATION M-7084 ADD LL WTERLOCK FROM T20 TO PS2 A/B 03/06/96 M-7006 NEW EFE INPUTS TO PMS 84/04/06 M-7002 INSTALL MCROPHONES IN CONTROL ROOM CEluNG. 08/16/06 M-7002 INSTALL VOICE RECORDER WITH TIME STAMPING ST/14/97 M-7008 ALARM SETPOWT CHANGE FOR FIS 2400 & FIS2401 TO 1100 GPM. ( LATER CHANGED TO 01/11/96 1964 BYDCPR-1) l M-1994 C03 ELEVATED CONSOLE. 06/18/97 INSTALL THE BALANCE OF EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE NEW CONSOLE.

INCLUDES (2) 37 INCH MON! TORS ,SDS COMPUTERS. AND SWITCHING HARDWARE M tete MAIN FEEDWATER PUMP TSI 04/08/08 M-1011 MAIN GENERATOR MONITORING 04/14/97 2

.. - - . , _ _ ~_ - _ . ..

M-1912 REVERSE P3WER RELAY / TRF HARDENWG 14/23/9s M-1916 ADV REPLACMENT. WSTAlls LOCAL CONTROLLERS 11/07/97 95-1918 CONDENSER TUSE REPLACEMENT (E11A/E118) 0s/12/98 i

M4020 REPLACE RS PURGE VALVES "V1" AND" V2" M/21/93 M4000 REPLACE T1-1111 WITH DIXSON INDICATOR ON C03. 01/18/98 M4010 SERVICE WATER SYSTEM CROSSOVER VALVES 84/16/98 MJM7 CHANGES PIT 2811,2812 to PT2811,2812 04/21/97 l NJ014 K2A&B LUBE OIL PUMP PRESSURE SWITCH SETPOINT AND LOGIC CHANGE 11/07/97 M-7023 CHANGES LOW TEMP START UMIT FOR ftCP STARTS (FOURTH PUMP) FROM 600F TO 01/11/98 366F.

MJ020 HP TURSINE FIRST STAGE PRESSURE TRANSMITTER PT4843 TO PMS AND POINT P8083 04/03/97 N-7034 REMOVE FLOW TRANSMITTERS PDT6003,8818,0840,8547 64/18/97 M-7046 REMOVES PDT3031 & PDT3036 AND COMPUTER POINTS. 02/27/95 M-7064 DECAY HEAT CIRCulT MOOlFICATKWS AND DIXSON INDICATORS 84/2147 N-7065 CRD ALARMS FOR ELECT TRIPS 12/06/96 HJOSS RCP CIRCulT MODS 10/28/96 N-7000 RCP OIL RESERVOIR SYSTEM 12/18/96 I

M4006 INSTALLS LOCAL SWITCH AT CONDENSER VACUUM PUMPS (REMOTE FUNCTION ON 04/23/96 SIMULATOR) TO MAKE PUMPS GO WTO HOGGING MODE M 4090 ADD FULL OR PARTIAL ARC TO C33, CHANGES PUSHSUTTONS. 96/04/97  !

95 4 106 ADJUST ULD TO 103% OF H2.5 MW. 03/26/98 HJ108 U-1 CONTROL ROOM COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE. 64/10/97 INSTALLS NEW PHONES.

1 96-3063 SAS RCS FLOW MISMATCH SETPOINT CHANGE 01/29/97 M-3073 CONDENSER VACUUM TRANSMITTERS (REPLACES Pl2SH AND Pl2841 WITH DIXSON 07/14/97 WDICATORS) 963111D191 REPLACE RCP SEAL RECORDERS QR86204623 12/14/97 3

983281P191 PfMMDES ADDITIONAL RCS TEMPERATURE NdDICATIONS TO PMS 10/2948 983278P191 TR9001 DESCREPANCY 04/2147 i I

983330P191 NEW TURalNE CONTROL PANEL DISPLAYS 84/23/98 983402P191 ESAS LOW RCS PftESSURE SETPOINT CHANGE 10/28/98 98342EP191 PRESSURIZER GROUP S RUS-16 FAILURE 06/3047 983441P191 EFic COMPENSATION MODULE CHANGE (ADJUSTS TDEE SWITCH POINTS BETWEEN LOW 1948/98 AND HIGH RANGE LEVEL SIGNALS WHEN CREATING THE FULL RANGE LEVEL OUTPUT) 983457P191 REMOVAL OF CV0871 AND RELATED COMPONENTS. 08/16/98 REMOVES HS4871 ON CO2 AND WWUNG.

983660P191 PMS N18 DISPLAYS 9848/97 981014P191 SECONDARY WATER HAMMER 84/27/98 CHANGES HS4006 TO 3 POSITION DELETES LC4000.01.82.83 973842P101 TVGV uMIT SWITCH REPLACEMENTS (REMOVES SOME COMPUTER POWTS) 08/1148 Z80828.Z80820 973851L191 ALARM LTOP (K0047) AND ERV SETPOINT CHANGES (LIC48-108 RCS 81/1948 ,

PRESSURE / TEMPERATURE LIMIT CHANGE FOR 31 EFPY) l Sf3490P191 RCP ZERO SPEED SENSING SYSTEM UPGRADE (C13) 04/27/98 973714P191 EFW PUMP LOW SUCTION PRESSURE SETPOINT CHANGES 1147/97 l

973087P301 ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE FOR VSF4 0146/98 973006D191 ICS UNIT MASTER STAR MODULE (ENGINEERING REPORT 97 R 191041) 04/27/98 974275P191 NNI/ICS TRANSMITTER UPGRADE 0443/98 I

974291D191 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR LOAD SHED MODIFICATIONS 04/27/98 I 9748380141 CV2828 REWORK (DETERMINE AND ADJUST STROKE TIME) 04/20/08 N4086P191 DECAY HEAT VALVES REWORK ( DETERMME AND ADJUST STROKE TIMES) 04/20/98 9751000101 POWER /IMaan andCEELOW SETPOINT CHANGE $4/27/98 900039D181 AND-1 CONTROL ROOM RADIATION MONITOR MODIFICATION 04/27/98 900169P301 CHANGE VOLTAGE TAPS ON Sud, EFFECTS SPDS AND PMS ALSO 88/11/98 900101P191 P7A RPM AND TRIP SETPOINT REDUCTION 04/2248 4

Section 4 l

Simulator Operability Test l

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20199F721&oldid=2999030"