ML20138K803
Text
.-
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT D
WORK PLAN Work Control Document: WO # 9610564 Work Plan Originator: P. M. GERUM Date: October 22,1996 No. Work Plan Description Worker Date "MR 96-058'8, Relocation of U2 PPCS alarm "
Outage activity # 3828 i Modify PPCS alarm circuitry enclosure as follows:
a) Configure sonalert wiring to connect two sonalert power wires to inner side enclosure terminal board connections 6 (BLACK) and 5 (WillTE) Use heat shrink on exposed connections.
b) Label outer termiaal board connection 6 as "V+" where newly connected inner -- L. ,
wire color is (BLACK ) and terminal board connection 5 as "V " where the newly I&C connected ine:er color is (WillTE).
2 FME At 2C20 cut a i 1/8" hole as shown on Attachment 1. Provide adequate FME ,], _
protection to catch foreign material from dropping into equipment. kr ff l,o8 h htt>< amphAm /m u wb,o kk n de k eut' . 6tc s.7/x/9t, I&*.
3 Mount sonalert in the hole that was cut. Label the panel area as "SP". File hole burrs. _
" j 4 Route 14 AWG SIS wiring from new PPCS sonalert location to PPCS alarm circuitry enclosure terminal board at bottom of panel per Responsible Engineer. Provide conductori draint with tywraps. Lug conductors. -
ll oCj I&C
~
5 QC Check lugs on new conductors. _ g,g,94 i QC 6
Label ends of sonalert conductors "N"UNM( to insulate exposed at respective "+" and " " terminals. Use heat shrin g connectio V)r ,k>~tvev -* x /W - V* /$0- vr & x/sf-V~/p -V' -
frAtw<> c.wukyemtowe M 4 //50 -Ve(W- Ve H X/s0- /*/W.- V' l&C NOTE: Inform Control Operator that PPCS alarm will be removedfrom service and that the PPCS monitor will be sole means ofalarm notification. In addition, commencefrequent monitoring ofPPCS alarm page.
CAUTION: Tile WORK IN Tile FOLLOWING STEPS MAY INVOLVE ENERGlZED WIRING (+15 VDC), USE APPROPRIATF ELECTRICAL SAFETY PRACTICES.
7 Lift and tape all leads on old enclosure box terminal board, use wire removal form. _ _
I&C 8 Remove old PPCS alarm enclosure and install newly modified PPCS alarm enclosure at same mountmg position. I I&L 9702190166 9702f0 PDR ADOCK 05000301 Page 1 P PDR
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT l
\
R WORK PLAN i l
Work Control Document: MWR # 9610564 Work Plan Originator: P. M. GERUM Date: October 22,1996 No. Work Plan Description Worker Date I
- MR 96-058'B , Relocation of U2 PPCS alarm **
Outage activity # 3828 9 Land new leads from sonalert on respective PPCS alarm circuitry enclosure "+" and g
" -" terminal board connections. ,4 I
Verify sonalert leads landed as stated above;~ .
lac initials
~
-10 Check the newly installed sonalert "+" and " " conductors for continuity to ground. ' ~
fM Acceptance: no continuity for "+", continuity for " " .
(/-07 11 At PPCS alarm circuitry enclosure terminal board, land leads as removed per step 7 wire removal form. lk0)
NOTE: Alethod ofPPCS alarm initiationfor testing determined by OPS depending on \
ethtingplant conditions 12 PMT Perform a test of the U2 PPCS alarm to verify the alarm is functional. fp oC[
13 SQUG IIave a SQUG evaluation performed for the installation. ftp M f5 sit O'd_ lpj l 14 PMT Perform a sound level survey per Attachment 2. Acceptance criteria: 8 to 10 dB above background, no greater than 85 dB. #' l'@
- 7 $
tr mcyY 5/Mc kn toiuaint cinouw u rx .srtf I /aa a -.
s., //-ti ito 4pers Srrt y h wiu -eie r f/re pA la %edenf,yo 64,. .
-i 9 l
i I
Page 2
__ m a
y- -
m/L-%-03~b*S gair 2 %f 5"* '
AyparAM 8A5 S/m (bd 0o9 1 af- W a rsg % M to o3 y - 6 0 l a
E4A 249 14C -
143 _
8c 7 L .... - /
aees Pt usy at o'cs W~l ff'L,
' New
,,, 3 I 5599
+ 2 u tz 13 5.c-? '. ce ?> c aj., ,.
-4 === -
( f/d344 bcde F A. moo s e -wo. F..e P c_ ' =v . .r
- af M7 0 M /rfA/4-/)
{A.. .1M2R WC as s 3 g35 W ,
((g ' _ -' g ..
l 65 53 4 =-f 'j:[e , l
-.- l-bb e ...
edg'e "=-
gg s,
-v 6-=9999 -
l O O O!
6 6 O 1
1 FRONT ELEVATION (SC ALE ef a #W)
II Il
!I i
] m :ua e m m c=
e nravini lI '
' l l}
Il I i }
!I ; I
' l I . 1[
\
Mit 96-058 i Post installation Sound Level Survey Measured in dIl(A)
Pre Survey Calibration: __
instrument used: __ u.bor /fy/tl Atf SM.* Hgp 5000[0 u ma a :o aw n o3 . coi u-
, 6f 6' 60 59 5'4 (, r Sr 61 Gr W /ka9.v s \
72 77 X X X X ur/ a tz _ ry. , yv 7c/
X X X X g .;,9 73 y y; .;, r twr / /4 l
Post Sunes Cahbration.
.ht. b1v.4t1 p/ fjApr $ h IO /O>&& r&,lso./C [5d6 g . t 9 '&
4 e
I d
Attachment 2
. NUCIIAR POWER DEPARTMENT SER SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT Page1 Title of Proposed Modification, Relocation of the 1(2)C20 PPCS alarns Procedure Change, Test or Experiment:
R;ference Document (s) #: WO 9610563, WO 9610564, MR 96-058' A, MR 96-058'B Prepared By: r ,_
Date: 10/4/96 Reviewed By: Date: jo - / .5' n ,
MSS Review /Date: MSS #:
Manager - PBNP Approval: Date:
In lieu of MSS and Manager signature, attach PBF-0026d if serial review has been conducted. (MSS and manager approvals are not necessary for a determination of non-applicability.)
Section i Screening - Determination if Safety Evaluation is Reauired A. Describe the modification, procedure change, test, or experimer.t and its expected effects. Include interim configurations or conditions.
He 1(2)C20 PPCS alarms will be relocated from the inside of 1(2)C20 to the outside of the front panel of 1(2)C20 for better audibility of the alarm by the Control Operators. De PPCS alarm will be temporarily inoperable during disconnection and subsequent reconnection in the new circuit.
B. Does the change, test or experiment involve a change in the Technical Specification? O Yes G No If a change is required, briefly describe what the change should be and why it is required.
NOTE: NRC opprovalis requiredprior to implementation.
C. Screenine for 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Aoplicability:
- 1. 10 CFR 50.59 Screening:
- a. Will any system, structure or component (SSC) described in the PBNP FSAR, including its O Yes g No figures, be altered? (Refer to NP 10.3.1, step 3.1.2 for exception. This question may be answered "no" although the SSC is described in the PBNP FSAR.)
- b. Could, within reasonable possibility, the proposed change affect the intended design, operation, O Yes e No function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the PBNP FSAR? (This includes interim conditions.)
- c. Will any procechre described in the PBNP FSAR be altered? (Refer to NP 10.3.1, O Yes @ No Attachment A, Part E, Sr guidance.)
- d. Will a test or experiment be performed which is not described in the PBNP FSAR and affects the O Yes 8 No design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the PBNP FSAR?
- e. Will implementation affect a prior documented regulatory commitment to the NRC pertaining to O Yes e No the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the PBNP FSAR?
PDF-1515 Revision 4 02A)I/96
. - -- - . . - . . - - . _ . ~ . - - - .- - - - ~ _ . . . . . _ _ - . . . _ .
b b
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT SER SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT Page 2 ;
Section 1 - Continuation l
- f. Is a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation required (are any of the above questions answered yes)? O Yes g No !
NOTE: ifno, thenprovide baskfor deckton in Part D.
Ifyes, complete Sections 2 and3.
- 2. 10 CFR 72.43 Scraanine for the fa'-- "- " Snent Fuel Storane Inonlintbn (ISFSIh i i
- a. Will any system, structure, or component (SSC) described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis O Yes @ No document, including its figures, be altered? (Refer to Step 3.1.2 for exception. His question j may be answered "no" although the SSC is described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents.)
- b. Could, within reasonable possibility, the proposed change affect the intended design, operation, O Yes @ No function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the ISFSI .
Licensing Basis documents? (His includes interim conditions.)
- c. Will any procedures described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents be altered? O Yes E No
- d. Will e test or experiment be performed which is not described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis - O Yes g No t I
documents and affects the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents?
- e. Will implementation affect a prior documented regulatory commitment to the NRC pertaining to O Yes g No the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents? ,
- f. Is a 10 CFR 72.48 evaluation required (ne any of the above questions answered yes)? O Yes G No ,
NOTE: Ifno, then provide baskfor deckton in Part D.
Ifyes, complete Sections 4 and 5.
D. Basis for determination that a safety evaluation is not required:
The 1(2)C20 PPCS alarms will be relocated from the insidc of the ASIP to the outside of the front panel of the ASIP for better audibility of the alarm as needed by the Control Operators and other Control Room personnel. The power supply of the alarm is from the +15 Vdc power supply in C174(C175), which respectively i's A(B) train DC power. Train separation will be maintained in the new wire routing as per the original Stone & Webster specification 02-1(J.O. #13754.02}. The new alarm installation will be seismically evaluated and approved. QA materials will be used in the installation. He alarm will be relocated and new wire runs will be installed first and then disconnections and new terminations done last to minimize the amount of time the alarm is inoperable. The Control Operator will be informed prior to the alarm being inoperable, and then the Control Operator or dedicated operator will utilize the PPCS monitor as an acceptible interim identification method for an alarming condition. He Control Operator will then be subsequently informed when the new alarm circuit is connected. A test of the new alarm circuit will be done after installation. De manufacturers frequency specification of 2900 Hz * $00 Hz meets the NUREGS00 recommended frequency band of 200 Hz to 5000 Hz. FME practices will be employed during pertinent installation activities. His modification will not change the PPCS and ASIP function or description as stated in the FSAR. De Main Control Board integrity will not be compromised by the mounting of the alarm. Dere is no unreviewed safety question. There is no ISFSI applicability and therefore a 10CFR72.48 evaluation is not required.
. PlF.15i$
,, Point Beach Nuclear Plant 1
WIRE REMOVAL LOG Sheet I of I
- his log to be used when more than one wire is lifted at a time. ;
l Removal Date //- O9- 7h Restoration Date ll- O 9- 96 NOTE: Use of thisform doer not supersede any of the requirements ofPBNP 3.1.1 Independent Venpcation and Concurrent i Checks.
l Hilin the applicable block 6) Initials Location TB No. Wire No. Color First Wire Wire Second i Person Rernoved Restored Person l Check Check
. _ , =
Al ~ ~~t Y-54 > ,
I ' '
A*nk - 2 X-ss , 4 g .
Alo w Tes +*
~~'
""4 3 X-5L X-K 7 i
_k./
/
/
n _4
/
z .
5 -
6 -
-fl5 voc 9 x-s2 _ J ,
p -
aun n x-s3 i i 7 i a www AootD _
u- r x /so-v /sP- \l- - -
[ i_
v'+ 6 v'/so-wlsP- v'+
Vl v
3_
i I
Attach this form to the procedure or MWR.
SMP/RMP/ICP No.
~
MWR No. 76 /OIW Other PBF@36 Rsvision 2 04/29/04
'- - -..y ,
Work Order No. 9(o l OT(oQ Return to Service Testing Reviews INITIALS Pre-Rele= =, / Pre or Post-RTS Work Group Post-Maintenance Testina G d ...t _ h J
&&W Md M e d e
Section XI Ecuinment Y 'bl /
, I l
Occrnbilitv Testing
/b t sVh 1
l 1
Inservice Testine bc t'?
//
l 4 '
ENGINEERING REVIEW / 1 3 p_
SECTIGN XI ENGINEERING REVIEW /
l
~ ^
\\
N -
.s:~.;;NG. -++ + n ea u 22h? ++vvvvvu+H un na + < %. 4 WO Priority: 4 v UNIT 2'* MWO
- UNIT 2*
Resp Grcup: IC ,n*n**n* HEA7ER PAGE m*n**n Siep Print i0/23/96 Equipment: C-020 System: V M.7 HP Zone Equipment Name: AUX SAFETY 1NSTRUMENT PANEL (ASIP)
Physicai Localion: 44/CD/rp pj3covery Date 09/19/96 Probies
Description:
RELOCATE THE UNIT 2 PPCS ALARM TO FRONT OF ASIP 2C20. COMMITMENT FOR RESPONSE TO CAL RIIr 96-12. DESIGN TO BE COMPLETE MID OCTOBEP, Originator- - IPE Outage ID: U2R22 Activity: 3828 Tag / Sticker Placed: N No: 97502 T aci/St i c ker Lc tn:
Job Type: MODIFICATION SUPPORT Proiect ID: Condition Report tl Wark Function: WORK ORDER Mod Ret ?: 96 - C'58 B
==============================================================================-
QA: Y SEIS i Operability Pre-Test: N Procedures:
SR: Y LCO: N EQ: N PhT Y Operability Post-Test: N Procedures SSA: Y CIV: N MRULE: Y A/P- P CACC:
RRN: -- - - - fech Spec Ref 3.5 QA Codes- 26 Sect XI Class:
"oots Needed:
===_=======================================,-===:. ,================ .==_
Wark DIan/Insiructions reviewed. Ptanner IC S .-
LINE SUPERVISOR ! ..;._!._:.
l_l_.l NAME .._____,. ._ ._ ._ _. D A T E - o!/ _t / $
===================================================== =__ =================_= -
Plant Conditions: ANY CONDITIJN Ignition Control Pereit N Other Cond:tions: Transient Combustible Pera!t N Fire Barrier Penetration Pero 1i: N RWP N Equipment Isolation Required' N FME. Y Isola + ion Tag Series t , _ . _ . _ _ . . _ . . _ . . . . . _ _ . _ _
Operacility Pre-Test Compiete. . _ _ _ Equipment Isoi.ation as requerted. . _ . .
Pe r a i ..:s i on g r a n t e d to perfo o Work. j Ops DSS Norification Req: Y Ops DSS Signature Date- //_ /[ /N . i
===============================================:_. ____ :==================:-
Special Notification 1 l
l Number of Steps' C O '.
A c. .; t ;: 00 - 00000 - i200138 - 00000 MFG Code: MERCRY lech Manual Cntt i:
======================================:-===================-2============ e = :. ._ _
- WORK ORDER CLOSEQUT *
======================- - ================================================:
Group Head Signature:/,d . . _ _ _ _ Date: /4/.14. /f4 .
= = ,: = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = _ = - = -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = :pps fgi4 ##. ='= -. .- _ -.
l 0 i ,
l
- s , ,
i
, .. \
I-l,0RIGINAL ********** PBNP *********M WD No 9610564001 lNO Priority: 4
- UNIT 2
- MWO
- UNIT 2
- i Resp Group: IC ********** STEP DETAIL ********** Step Print: 10/23/96
. Eo.u i p men t : C-020 System: MMS HP Zone:
' Equipment Name: AUX SAFETY INSTRUMENT PANEL (ASIP) !
l Physical Location: 44/CD/CR-Sequence No: Oi Need Date i l
Short Desc: RELOCATE U2 PPCS ALARM Sched Start Date:
- ===============================================================================
PLANNED: WORK PROCEDURES- :
Crew: I i
Shift: 2 '
Class: 330
===================================================================
, Work Plan
Description:
INSTALL NEW SONALERT PER THE ATTACHED WORK PLAN WRITTEN BY PAT GERUM.
=======================================================================.
'QC REVIEW REQUIRED: Y LECLAIR, GENE IC S DATE:- 102396 i
====================================== _ - =====-- ============ '
i 2
, WORK PERFORMED: __..ls u f A. u.E k _ _. $ 0 d L========-=======.1=AX E f X __ .f $ ___l N 0 __o.7===l.LAs #_
G M- ._ _L U M - 2_ n_ . 6t 10 3- o18 I'
/ .2 c.s bla SA.h_-J.2. b.1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _5_IZEMEO _ _ _ZAT_ _ /G C_ _ .IM<DCK. _ _0dAl _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ .1/o_ _ E.G_C_f_ _ _ .S.LL _ _ .Y d_"_)_G _ _ _W_ .LU_ _ _ JfN _ _ . .DA__~__ZI)3. ./_ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
______________ __.____________________________________________________________ l
==
============================================db3__gjs=============
MTE: __________ ____ _____ -_________ QAR: _ _ _T/_ -
)ID.Sz v_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ .- - _ .. .
t2/08 _-________ __________
===================================================================
~
SHIFT: __2..____._____________________________.__
WORKER CLASS: _,7zt____. _-_______ _________ _________ _________
NUMBER OF WORKERS: I TOTril HOURS: _ _ /.0.. 0.. _ _ _ .. _________ _________ _________ ___.._____
TTL EXF,OSUR.E/STEF (MR.EM) .. ___#_____ _________ _________ ________.. _________
===================================================================
PARTS USED LIST ATTACHED: Y /($E '
WO TAGS REMOVED: ' / N / NA WORK COMPLETE DATr: /t/ f_/f_/
EMPLOYEE NUMBER: l. '. 2. ', EMPLOYEE NAME ._______________ __
===================_. ....:=========================_ .=================== 1
- WORK COMPLETED
- Cause Failure Code: PM/([@)/ NRM /_______
.As:Found-Out of Spec: Y / N / (9? Machine History Review Required: CD / N Failed Component:
Corrective Action: ifdvRP/RE/__.______
M . Downtime: ___. hrs s
.LINE SUPERVISOR:
^*/' NAME: _2aru _________ DATE: ///.g/ ft
============_ a======================___ .=================
- EQU MENT RETURN O SERVICE
- Operability Post Testing: _ _.w.c /d .,4 e ~
7 EQUIP. TAKEN 005 - DATE: _/4 / _ _ /f_4_ T I M E / _ G _7 s v_ RTN DATE: 7_1_/ _3__/ _' I_T I M E :__ ___~/Y_'_o Operability Procs Performed ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________
NON.0PS SUPV: I' ' t I !.I NAME: ___ _____-_ DATE: ._/__/__ ,
DSS: . ._ ! /NAME: _ -. _________ DATE: _/_4/_2_5 /.rt.. i i
l I
I
1 A :
b,
~
l NUMBER: Ti-C'AT-0 3 (# -
Page I cf INSTALLATION WORP "_^f I N . h.,.:.r D,'n .q y)Y t l r!. M D'g PSNP MINOR PROCEDURE R4b , . .
kyl hL5h cw n _
Appkable
\A)odT Gde.r MAIN 5GNANGEWOBifAEGWE6T WORK PLAN Wo FOR MODIFICATION # 9 E~ O M , MWRd 960477)
INSTALLATION WORK PLAN TITLE 579A v Acorr,vr %w ha 6~rsm Y 2*c - 4%A O
UNIT 1 QA SCOPE NON QA-SCOPE Originato _. ,
- J Date (#!'s ! 9 b Reviewer ' '~
Date 7 M
, ! /
Final Des' Group He.. __., . ~ _
~
~
Date 7 ~, a 4 Quality Engineer 4. M Date 2// S/ f/
Installatiot *
/
Group Heae . .a .?; ,I
. Date /[/9/
/ .
+
/
/
Manager - f -
p Operations or DSS , ,#t- _
page 7#
N3TE: Changes to this work plan must be done with the concurrence of the responsible or team ensinoer and the installation surpevisor, or as delineated within the IWP.
DG G02.5
- - Revision 0 i
d Y
. an u ninpr>2 sis _nu vu. _ _ _ no.ru ntyinm uteunneru ec.ci une :c_cn_a2.r