ML20138K735

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RHR Controller Repositioning for Unit 2
ML20138K735
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/25/1996
From:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20138K159 List: ... further results
References
MR-92-141, NUDOCS 9702190121
Download: ML20138K735 (8)
v • d • e


Text

1 I. <

MWR WORK PLAN ,

l Residual IIeat Removal (RIIR) controller repositioning. MR 92-141 Work Order # 9605772 September 24,1996 i UNIT 2 Step No. Work Plan Description Initials Date The scope of this work plan is to reposition RIIR controllers 2IIC-00624 and 211C-00625 as well as 211C-00626 on main control board shelf 2CO3 - 14. The simulator configuration is to be updated as well.

The purpose of this work plan is to reposition 2IIC-00624 and 211C-00625 RIIR controller positions. These controllers currently do not conform to plant installation and design guidelines as stated in DG-G01 section 1.2.2 and section 2.5. In addition, controller 211C-00626 will be moved to a position in between 211C-00624 and 211C-00625 to further separate the 'A' train and 'll' train components.

This work plan requires that Unit #2 be in full core offload and will be accomplished during the U2R22 outage.

  • Due to sufficient existing wire length this work plan does not require new wiring to be used.

REFERENCE DRAWINGS:

WESTINGIIOUSE 50011728 SII. 203 WOLFEM E-1589E-A E-1591E-A NOTE: INFORM OPERATIONS OF WORK BEING PERFORMED ON MAIN CONTROL BOARD SIIELF 2003 - 14. I&C NOTE: FME CONTROLS ARE IN EFFECT FOR Tills WORK PLAN. INSURE ,

TIIAT NO FOREIGN MATERIAL OR TOOLS ARE LElT IN TIIE gge WORK AREA.

1 In main control board 2CO3, unplug 21IC-00624 from outlet box .

YLC outlet 3. I&C 9702190121 970210 I PDR ADOCK 05000301 Page 1 of 4 P PDR-

J.

l.

MWR WORK PLAN Residual IIcat Removal (RIIR) controller repositioning. MR 92-141 Work Order # 9605772 September 24,1996 UNIT 2 2 In main control board 2C03, unplug IIC-00625 from outlet box YLD outlet 2. _ _ _

I&C 3 In main control board 2CO3, unplug 211C-00626 from outlet box YLC outlet 2.

I&C 4 Disconnect and remove 2IIC-00624 from shelf 2CO3 - 14.

I&C 5 Disconnect and remove 21IC-00625 from shelf 2CO3 - 14. .,.

I&C

~ ^

6 Disconnect and remove 2ilC-00626 from shelf 2CO3 - 14 I&C 7 Label the power cord on the back of 211C-00624.

I&C 8 12bcl the power cord on the back of 211C-00625. .

I&C l

9 12 bel the power cord on the back of 211C-00626. -

I&C ,

l 10 Remove terminal block, power cord, and signal cord ..

corresponding to controller 211C-00626. I&C i

I l1 Remove terminal block, power cord, and signal cord corresponding to controller 211C-00625 and install them in the ...

position vacated by 211C-00626 terminal block, power cord, and I&C  ;

signal cord. )

12 Remove terminal block, power cord, and signal cord

'^

corresponding to controller 211C-00624 and install them in the position vacated by 211C-00625 terminal block, power cord, and I&C signal cord.

Page 2 of 4

I d

f-MWR WORK PLAN Residual IIeat Removal (RIIR) controller repositioning. MR 92-141 Work Order # 9605772 September 24,1996 UNIT 2 13 Install terminal block, power cord, and signal cord corresponding to 2flC-00626 in remaining open position.

I&C 14 Place 211C-00626 in shelf mount position vacated by 2HC-00624.

(center position - viewed from behind 2CO3) _

1&C 15 Place 211C-00624 in shelf mount position vacated by 211C-00625.

(left of 2IIC-00626 - viewed from behind 2CO3) .

I&C 16 Place 2IIC-00625 in shelf mount position vacated by 211C-00626.

(right of 211C-00626 - viewed from behind 2CO3)

I&C 17 Connect signal and power cords to the back of 211C-00624.

I&C 18 Connect signal and power cords to the back of 211C-00625. r I&C 19 Connect signal and power cords to the back of 2ilC-00626. _

I&C 20 Plug 211C-00624 into outlet box YLC outlet 3.

I&C 21 Plug 211C-00625 into outlet box YLD outlet 2. _

I&C 22 Plug 21IC-00626 into outlet box YLC outlet 2.

I&C 23 Perform a post maintenance Foreign Material Inspection of the work area (2CO3 rear). I&C Page 3 of 4

?

MWR WORK PLAN Residual IIeat Removal (RIIR) controller repositioning. MR 92-141 Work Order # 9605772 September 24,1996 UNIT 2 24 Post Maintenance Testing:

Perform a stroke test of valve 2RII-624, RIIR Heat Exchanger m . --

Reactor Coolant Outlet Control Valve in order to test the operation OPS of 21IC-624. Verify locally that valve 2RII-624 strokes from fully open to fully closed as required by the setting of controller 211C-624.

25 Post Maintenance Testing:

Perform a stroke test of valve 2RII-625, RIIR IIeat Exchanger Reactor Coolant Outlet Control Valve in order to test the operation ,_

of 211C-625. Verify locally that valve 2RII-625 strokes from fully OPS open to fully closed as required by the setting of controller 2IIC-625.

26 Post Maintenance Testing:

Perform a stroke test of valve 2RII-626, RIIR lleat Exchanger Reactor Coolant Outlet Control Valve in order to test the operation ,

of 211C-626. Verify locally that valve 2RII-626 strokes from fully OPS open to fully closed as required by the setting of controller 2IIC-626.

Page 4 of 4

p. . .

i s. -

5., NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT SER SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT Page1

, Tit!c of Proposed Modification, Procedure Change, Test or Experiment: Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Controller Repositioning Reference Document (s) #; MR 92-141 t

S 4

  1. ~

Prepared By' _ Date: September 24,1996 ,

, Reviewed By
,

Date: 7-d /%['

MSS Review /Date: MSS j ' Manager - PBNP Approval: Date:

In lieu of MSS and Manager signature, attach PDF-0026d if serial resiew has been conducted. (MSS and manager approvals are not necessary for a determination of non-applicability.)

Section 1 Screenine - Determination if Safety Evaluation is Required J

l A. Desenbe the modification, procedure change, test, or experiment and its expected effects. belude 1 interim configurations or conditions.

Unit #2 Residual Heat Removal (RHR) controllers,2HC-624 and 2HC-625 on 2C03 display an "A" train left and "B" train right configuration. Per Design and Installation Guideline, DG-G01, the convention for Unit #2 should be train "A" right and train "B" left. Modification MR 92-141 will correct this deficiency and also position controller 2HC-626 between 2HC-624 and 2HC-625, in order to improve the separation of the controllers.

Repositioning the controllers will entail: Disconnecting power to the three controllers, Disconnecting connection cords on the

back of each individual controller, Removal and repositioning of terminal blocks on the back of shelf 14 of MCB 2CO3 per the
modified position scheme, Removal and repositioning of applicable RHR controllers on MCB 2CO3 per the modified position
. scheme, Connecting cords on the back of each individual controller, Connecting power to the three controllers. Operation and

)

! performance of the three controllers will be checked with the performance of a Post Maintenance Test for each of the controllers.  ;

I The PMT will consist of a stroke test of each of the valves via their respective controllers.

]

l B. Does the change, test or experiment involve a change in the Technical Specification? O Yes @ No i If a change is required, briefly describe what the change should be and why it is required. )

, NOTE: NRC approvalis requiredprior to implementation. l C. Sp.rganjoe t for 10 CFR 50 59 and 10 CFR 72 48 Aeolicability:

1. 10 CFR 50 59 Screening:
a. Will any system, structure or component (SSC) described in the PBNP FSAR, including its O Yes @ No figures, be altered? (Refer to NP 10.3.1, step 3.1.2 for exception. This question may be answered "no" although the SSC is described in the PBNP FSAR.)
b. Could, within reasonable possibility, the proposed change affect the intended design, operation, 0 Yes @ No function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is desenbed in the PBNP FSAR7 (This includes interim conditions.)
c. Will any procedure described in the PBNP FSAR be altered? (Refer to NP 10.3.1, O Yes @ No Attachment A, Part E, for guidance.)

PDF 1515

' rennion 4 02/0l/96 -

h, i*

,; a

- (. NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT SER-SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT Page 2 i ,

Section 1 - Continuation

d. Will a test or experiment be performed which is not described in the PBNP FSAR and affects O Yes @ No

-g the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is 3

described in the PBNP FSAR?

c. Will implementation affect a prior documented regulatory commitment to the NRC pertaining O Yes @ No t to the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to s.-fety which is described in the PBNP FSAR7 l i
f. Is a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation required (are any of the above questions answered yes)? O Yes @ No i 2

g NOTE: Ifno, then provide basisfor decision in Part D.

Ifyes, complete Sections 2 and3.

l 2. 10 CFR 72.48 Screening for the Independent Soent Fuel Storace Installation (ISFSD:

)- a. Will any system, structure, or component (SSC) described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis O Yes @ No document, including its figures, be altered? (Refer to Step 3.1.2 for exception. This question may be answered "no" although the SSC is described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents.)  ;

) b. Could, within reasonable possibility, the proposed change affect the intended design, operation. O Yes @ No

function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the ISFSI
Licensing Basis documents? (This includes interim conditions.)
c. Will any procedures desenbed in the ISFS! Licensing Basis documents be altered? O Yes @ No
d. Will a test or experiment be performed which is not described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis O Yes @ No documents and affects the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC l

important to safety which is described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents?

e. Will implementation affect a prior documented regulatory commitment to the NRC pertaining O Yes @ No j to the design, operation, function, or method of function, of an SSC important to safety which is described in the ISFSI Licensing Basis documents?
f. Is a 10 CFR 72.48 evaluation required (are any of the above questions answered yes)? O Yes @ No NOTE: If no, then provide basisfor decision in Part D.

Ifyes, complete Sections 4 and 3.

D. Basis for determination that a safety evaluation is not required:

1 Modification MR 92-141 will reposition the existing residual heat removal (RHR) controllers on the main contro' board 2C03 in order to maintain the "A" train right and "B" train left configuration used at PBNP. This repositioning will correct the discrepancies to Design and Installation Guideline, DG-G01.

This modification changes the physical location of the RHR controllers,2HC-624,2HC-625, and 2HC-626. It does not change the operation or function of the controllers. The modification will be worked and completed during U2R22 when Unit 2 is in full

core ofnoad.

l The operation and function of the RHR controllers will be checked with the performance of a Post Maintenance Test for each of the controllers. The PMT will consist of a stroke test of each of the valves via their respective controllers verifing that the correct j valve strokes from fully open to fully closed.

This modification does not affect the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI).  !

i PDFISl3 Rnsion 4 0001/96

. ., ,, ,t_..

j I Work Control Document # YIOC222 '

I **. Time /Date of application:

,y, , :: p fg ,.,p Time /Date Tags Required:gy~ 7 , .f f . f f .

Requesting Individual: Requesting Work Group: y c_

Responsible Supervisor: gm y , Estimated Job Completion (Time /Daten fj,, , ,. , f f Equipment ID: c.cg 3 - //c..g j y g e r f g g Unit: ga Scope of Work: ff ,h ,g , )f

{

i

! i 4

Additional Work Control Documents: I 4,

Recommended Danger Tagging / Explanation: No Tags Req'd: .Esl Double Isolation: O

, Positive Control: O Grounding Req'd: O Partial Removal Req'd: O l

NOTE: The RMP/lWP/SMP/ Work OnterMort Plan may be referencat abovefor the tw....:.2d danger tagging.

1 i Reietences: (NOTE: Must include Rev. numberfor controlled documents used to venfy adequacy.) l 4

a 1

l Information: 3 70 i i l

l l

)

Appendix R: O Yes O No If yes, attach Fire Round Sheet Preparer-l LCO Req'd: O Yes O No If yes, attach LCO Tracking Form PBF-9133 Date:

Reviewer Date Approver (SRO) 76 Date b NOTE: Addstsonal renews and apprmals reg'dfor changa or addmons to originallagout. Describe dsanges in infornmanon secnon.

Reviewer Date Approver (SRO) Date Reviewer Date Approver (SRO) Date Danger Tags No Longer Required and Protected Worker Log Sign-Offs Complete Tag Series No.

Responsible Supervisor Date

. PBF 1906a

' Revison 1 03/18/%

l Work Order No. 74 os ; 7 e_

Return to Service Testing Reviews INITIALS Pre-Relente / Pre or Post-RTS

, Work Groun Post. Maintenance Testing wh A fut d f% f,dlw 4

/

l Section XI Ecuinment(Y)/ N . /

v Openbility Testing

'T. r- 7 11~

i Inservice Testing 17-197

/

e

/

- /

.i d

1 ENGINEERING REVIEW _ / )

l secTm N m Na mesRm o REvm w /v/e , c -

1

. N[P NUMBER: d%h Paga of INSTALLATION WORK PLAP J

PENP MINOR PROCEDURE ,

')

i Check As ) Ifil94 f

Applicable 4

f y f )2.59(/

. y MAINTENANCE WORK REQUEST WORK PLAN iN Q)7 BAY FOR MODIFICATION # , MWR#

INSTALLATION WORK PLAN 'i1TLE (A2R22. Tras%C~nbAl MO kDDlhCMIDN Of res Sa&M W

3 4 t UNIT QA-SCOPE b NON QA-SCOPE Originator Date /

i

// ib a  ;

Reviewer ,.,, Date /O'/3' n '

Final Design Group Head _ , ,

Date [2-- 15 fb T I I

Quality Engineo. ~ Date 1All I f96 t Y" to ad iiir ,

Date N N Manager -

Operations or DSF '

=*

Date /) /20( /fd i

0

, NOTE: Changes to this work plan must be done with the concurrence of the responsible or team engineer and the installation surpevisor, or as delineated within the IWP.

DG-G02.5 Revision 0

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138K735&oldid=2865856"