ML20134K369

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 850710 Request Re Status of Implementation & Review Schedules.Util Conforms to or Has Provided Acceptable Justification for Deviations from Reg Guide 1.97 W/Exception of Fuel Zone Level Instrumentation.Dcrdr & SPDS Discussed
ML20134K369
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1985
From: Siegel B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Samelson A
ILLINOIS, STATE OF
References
RTR-REGGD-01.097, RTR-REGGD-1.097 NUDOCS 8508300161
Download: ML20134K369 (8)


Text

. . - . - - - - - - - - -- . -_ --

. a ux UNITED STATES

<q

.fr, g j

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

  • g, ,/1 AUG 14 1985 Docket No. 50-461 i

j' Mr. Allen Samelson Assistant Attorney General Environmental Control Division

' State of Illinois

,- Springfield, Illinois 62706 i

Dear Mr. Samelson:

SUBJECT:

STATUS OF ILLIN0IS POWER COMPANY'S IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND THE NRC STAFF'S REVIEW SCHEDULE l

i

In response to your July 10, 1985 letter requesting the status of the imple-mentation and review schedules for completion of certain specified items,

, the following information is provided.

1. Water Level Measurement System Improvements

.As you are aware. Illinois Power Company (IP) has committed to provide separate Class IE power sources for each of the fuel zone water level measurement channels. Supplement 5 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report (Section 7.5.3.1, Conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.97) which is '

currently anticipated to be published in September or October, proposes a license condition to be incorporated into the operating license that requires this modification to be completed prior to startup from the first refueling outage. As you are aware, an instrumentation and control system audit, which was to include water level instrumentation, was previously scheduled to be performed by the NRC Staff July 29 through July 31. This audit has now been postponed, and a new date has not yet been identified.

2. Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS)

IP has stated that the dynamic simulation tests on the SPDS will be per-formed and the test results submitted to the NRC Staff by October 4, 1985.

The Staff has tentatively set October 22 and 23,1985, for the dates of the SPDS audit. Depending upon the dynamic simulation test results, the audit may not be performed. However, if the October audit is cancelled, the staff will review the SPDS during its emergency response facility audit which will be scheduled sometime after the issuance of the low power license and before issuance of the full power license.

F DR h! PDR g

l 1.' .

'4 3. Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation (RG 1.97)

With the exception of the fuel' zone level instrumentation described under Item 1, IP either conforms to or has provided acceptable justifi-cation for deviations from the guidance of RG 1.97 for each post accident monitoring variable. Supplement 5 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report will contain the staff's evaluation and our contractors' Technical Evalu-ation Report concerning the applicant's compliance to Regulatory Guide 1.97 instrumentation requirements. No specific audit related to this item is scheduled or anticipated by the NRC staff.

4. Detailed Control Room Design Review IP has stated that a sumary report on all human engineering discrepancies in the control room would be provided to the NRC staff-in September 1985 and that a supplement to the sumary report would be provided in October.

The NRC staff is planning to perfom a site audit during the fourth week of September 1985.

When specific dates for'these audits are established, the Staff antici-pates that you will be notified by IP in accordance with the Joint Stipulation agreemer,t. The results of the Staff reviews on these issues are expected to be contained in either Supplerent 5 or 6 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report.

Please contact ne if you have questions regarding this response (301)492-8344.

Sincerely, l'Vf t&

ByfonSiegel,ProjectManager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing cc: .See next page

, 1 l

(

l L -_

5 ,

. Mr. Frank A. Spangenberg Clinton Power Station Illinois Power Company Unit I cc:

Jean Foy, Esquire 511 W. Nevada Urbana, Illinois 61801 Richard B. Hubbard Vice President Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Ave. - Suite K San Jose, CA 95125 Mr. D. P. Hall Vice President Clinton Power Station P. O. Box 678 Clinton, Illinois, 61727 Mr. H. R. Victor Manager-Nuclear Station Engineering Dpt.

Clinton Power Station P. O. Box 678 Clinton, Illinois 61727 Sheldon Zabel, Esquire Schiff, Hardin & Waite 7200 Sears Tower 233 Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR 3, Box 229 A Clinton, Illinois 61727 Mr. R. C. Heider Project Manager Sargent & Lundy Engineers l 55 East Monroe Street

! Chicago, Illinois 60603 l Mr. L. Larson Project Manager General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue, N/C 395 San Jose, California 95125 Regional Administrator, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Clinton Power Station

, Unit 1 cc:

Chirman of DeWitt County c/o County Clerk's Office DeWitt County Courthouse Clinton, Illinois 61727 Director, Criteria & Standards (ANR-460)

Office of Radiation Programs U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 EIS Review Coordinator Environmental Protection Agency Region V 230 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Attorney General 500 South 2nd Street Springfield, Illinois 62701

, Illinois Department of Public Health ATTN Chief, Division of Nuclear Safety 535 West Jefferson Springfield, Illinois 62761 Director, Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P. O. Box 3009 Montogomery, Alabama 36193

, . , , . , . . - - - . . . . , - - , - . - - - - , - . - - - ,--e - , --,-, - - - - ,-- , w. --.- -. -+ .---- - -w-

'3. , Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation (RG 1.97)

With the exception of the fuel zone level instrumentation described under Item 1, IP either confoms to or has provided acceptable justification for deviations frcia the guidance of.RG 1.97 for each post accident monitoring variable. Supplement 5 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report will contain the staff's evaluation and cur contractors Technical Evaluation Report of

, the applicant's compliance to Regulatory Guide 1.97 instrumentation requirements. No specific audit related to this item is scheduled or anticipated by the NRC staff.

4. Detailed Control Room Design Review IP has stated that a sumary report on all human engineering discrepancies in the control room would be provided to the NRC staff in July and a sup-plement to the sunmary report would be provided in September. The NRC staff _is planning to perfom a site audit in September; however, no date has been set, khen specific dates for these audits are established, you will be notified by IP in accordance with the Joint Stipulation agreement. The results of the staff reviews on these issues will be contained in either Supplement 5 or 6 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding this response (301)492-8344.

Sincerely, Byron Siegel, Project flanager Licensing Branch'No. 2 Division of Licensing cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION Focket File NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC LBk2 Reading EHylton BSiegel OELD, Goddard ACRS(16) JPartlow BGrimes EJordan GLapinsky JJoyce RFroelich RKendall Ruarnick FJebicnski LB# L/Pil LB#2/DL/BC [EL B 1:mk WButler too ard ,

7 -

7/ /85 7/ p I

L

3. Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation (RG 1.97)

With the exception of the fuel zone level instrumentation described under Iten 1, IP either conforms to or has provided acceptable justifi-cation for deviations from the guidance of RG 1.97 for each post accident monitoring variable. Supplement 5 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report will contain the staff's evaluation and our contractors' Technical Evalu-ation Report concerning the applicant's compliance to Regulatory Guide 1.97 instrumentation requirements. No specific audit related to this item is scheduled or anticipated by the NRC staff.

4. Detailed Control Room Design Review IP has stated that a surcoary report on all human engineering discrepancies in the control room would be provided to the NRC staff in September 1985 and that a supplement to the sunnary report would be provided in October.

The NRC staff is p1 aning to perform a site audit during the fourth week of September 1985.

When specific dates for these audits are established, the Staff antici-pates that you will be notified by IP in accordance with the Joint Stipulation agreement. The results of the Staff reviews on these issues are expected to be contained in either Supplerent 5 or 6 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report.

Please contact ne if you have questions regarding this response (301)492-8344 Sincerely, Byron Siegel, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC LB#2 Reading EHylton BSiegel 0 ELD, Goddard ACRS(16) JPartlow BGrines EJordan GLapinsky JJoyce RFreelich RKendall RWarnick FJabicnski

  • Previously concurred:

LB#2/0L/FM LB#2/DL/BC OELD

  • BSiegel :mk WUutler *RGodda rd 7/26/85 8/l4/85 7/3/85 (subject to modifications as noted)
3. Reculatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation (RG 1.97)

With the exception of the fuel zone level instrumentation described under Item 1, IP either conforms to or has provided acceptable justifi-cation for deviations from the guidance of RG 1.97 for each post accident monitoring variable. Supplement 5 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report will contain the staff's evaluation and our contractors' Technical Evalu-ation Report concerning the applicant's compliance to Regulatory Guioe 1.97 instrumentation requirements. No specific audit related to this item is scheduled or anticipated by the NRC staff.

4. Detailed Control Room Design Review IP has stated that a sumary report on all human engineering discrepancies in the control room would be provided to the NRC staff in September 19bb and that a supplement to the sumary report would be provided in October.

The itRC staff is planning to perform a sitt audit during the fourth week cf September 1985.

When specific cates for these audits are established, the Staff antici-pctes that you will be notified by IP in accordance with the Joint Stipulation agreement. The results of the Staff reviews on these issues are expected to be contained in either Supplemer.t 5 or 6 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report.

Please contact ne if you have questions regarding this response (301)492-8344 Sincerely, Byrcn Siegel, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC LB#2 Reading EHylton BSiegel 0 ELD, Goddard ACRS(16) JPartlow BGrimes EJordan GLapinsky JJoyce RFroelich RKendall RWarnick FJablonski

  • Previously concurred:

LB#2/DL/FM LB#2/DL/BC OELD

  • BSiegel :mk WButler O *RGoddard 7/26/85 8/@/85 .D 7/3/85 (subject to modifications as notcd)
3. Regulatory Guide 1.97 'Instrur;enta t. ion (RG 1.97) bith the exception of the fuel zone level instrunentation described under item 1, IP either conferr.s to or has provided acceptable justification ter deviations from the guidance of RG 1.97 for each post accident monitoring variable. Suppler,ent 5 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report will contain ,

the staff's evaluation and our contractors Technical Evaluation Report of the applicant's compliance to Regulatory Guide 1.97 instrumentation requirements. No specific audit related to this item is scheduled or anticipated by the NRC staff.

4. Detailed Control Room Design Review IP has stated that a sunnary report on all human engineering discrepancies in the control room would bc provided to the NRC staff in July and a sup-plenent to the sunmary report would be provided in September. The NRC staff is planning to perfom a site audit in September; however, no date has been set.

bl.en specific dates for these audits are established, you will be notifieo by IP in accordance with the Joint Stipulation agreenent. The results of the staff reviews on these isst.ss will be contained in either Suppleraent 5 or 6 to the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding this response (301)492-8344 Sincerely, B.yron Siegel, Project lianager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing cc: See next page DISTRIEUTI0t!

Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR I4 SIC LBh2 Reading EHylton BSiegel OELD,Goddaro ACRS(16) JPartlow BGrinies EJordan GLapinsky JJoyce RFroelich RKendall RUarnick FJeblonski LB#2/DL/Pli BS LB#2/DL/BC WButler

[potward ELM ,

7

/lltel 5

mk7/ /85 7/3// p W