ML20129J367
Text
.
~5' i
)
g[
$= 820 0,
UNITED STATES y *f,,rg j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
. r REGION IV
- M.
S, y$
[
$11 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE.$UITE to:C
% *%/*..../
ARLINGTCN TEXAS 76C12 March 13, 1980 Docket No. 50-498 50-499 M M 1HA Et21 FOR:, File THEU:
. C. Seidle, Chief, 2C&ES 3 ranch sp. A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section FROK:.
W. G. Hubacek,. Reactor Inspector, Projects Section
SUBJECT:
MEETING WITE BOCSTC5 LIGEIING AND ?C M M ) MANA M CONCERNING NINE POINT ACTION PLAN FOR RESUMPUCN 07 PIACIMENT OF SAFETY-MLA*5"n COMPLEI CONCLCE SO M TEIAS PROJECT, ENITS 1 & 2, DN 50-498; 50-499 At the request of HL&P management, a meeting was held February 28, 1980, at the Region IV office to discuss the status of the nine point action prograz for restaption of placement of safety-related complex concrete at STF. The meeting was attended by G. *J. Oprea and E. A. Turner of EIAP and W. C. Seidle, W. A. Crossman, and W. G. Hubacek of NEC, RIV.
Mr. oprea supplied a letter dated February 28, 1980, which provided an update of the nine point action program identified in a letter, dated December 28, 1979, and a subsequent status report, dated January 25, 1980.
i Messrs. Oprea and Turner reviewed the status of the nine action items and requested RIY concurrence in the resumption of concrete complex placements on March 3, 1980.
i Mr. Seidle informed Messrs. Oprea and Turner that IIY review of the implementatien of the nine action items would require at least two weeks to cesplete. He also stated that the f4= dines conem4**d in the for*h-4ng HQ-directed investigation report (79-19) would have to be considered during the RIY review. Be requested that HL&P not resume placement on March 3, 1980.
Mr. Oprea expressed concern that the review will require a longer period than the 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> stated in the RIY IAL, dated December 31, 1979; however, he agreed to continue the present stop-vork on concrete complex placements.
i i
I t
8506100069 840620 c(-
-e-w
.. =
. - - -.. = = - - -. =... -.. = - - - - - - - - - -
.. ~
-w Docket File 50-498; 50-499 March 13, 1980 Other matters discussed included recent unsatisfactory HL&P responses to items of noncocipliance and the apparent adversary relationship which seems to be developing between the NRC and HL&P site personnel.
Mr. Oprea stated that there is a general distrust of the NRC because of the use of sworn statements during the HQ-directed investigation.
It was mutually agreed that a meeting between RIV and licensee QA representatives should be held as soon as possible to clarify misunderstandings of NRC policy that may have developed.
Mr. Opr:aa also expressed concern with a recently released NRC document that would permit attendance of NRC exit interviews by persons other than NRC and licensee representatives. HL&P disagrees with this concept and will submit comments to the NRC although such comments were not solicited.
e#
W. G. Hubace Reactor Inspector Projects Section 4
cc:
H. D. Thornbarg, RCI K. V. Seyfrit
.H.
S. Phillips k
i 3
I I
l l
h e
,,-