ML20129G490

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 800630 Meeting W/Util & Brown & Root in Arlington,Tx Re Show Cause Items 5,6,7,8 & 9 Concerning Stop Work Authority,Trend Analysis,Design Change Control, Record Control & Audits,Respectively
ML20129G490
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, South Texas
Issue date: 07/02/1980
From: Crossman W, Randy Hall
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML17198A238 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-393 NUDOCS 8506070291
Download: ML20129G490 (4)


Text

... - -

i

, p F*.aig,"g UNITED S~ATIS NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICN

.: v-

-r ResioN iv i

5 4 # '6!

c 611 RYAN Pt.AZA o RIVE. SUITI 1000 j

~

ARUNGTON. ~IXAS 78o12 n

..".,R A July 2, 1980 33ckat No. 50-498 30-499 MEMDRANDUM TOR:

Tila NERU:

4. C. Saidle, Chiaf, IC&ES 3 ranch TECE:
1. E. Hall, Chief, Engineering Supper: See:1on W. A. Crossman, Chief, Projec:s Sec:1on

[

s

SUBJECT:

"2CENICAL '*TTING WE'E HOUSTCN LIGHTING AND ?CEEE COMPANT AND 3ROWN AND ROOT REGARDING SHOW CAUSE a.:.di NO. 5, 6, 7, 1

8 AND 9 - SOUTE TEIAS PROJECT, UNI *S 1 & 2, DN 50-498; 50-499 Ac he request of EL&P, a mencing was held in :he Region IV offica on June 30, 1980, with.ha following ac:andees:

Eeus:en Lighedna and Power Commanv J. W. 3riskin, Manager, STP Houston Operacions

1. L. Ulray, Supper: QA Manager A. E. Gut:a= nan, Actorney l

3rown and Root t

J. L. Hawks, Engineering Proj ect 'anager 5

4 1

Nucisar Resulatorr C

'esion K. 7. Seyfrit, Director (par: :2na)

W. C. Saidle, Chief, RC&ES 3 ranch (par. :1ma)

7. A. Crossman, Chiaf, Proj ects Sec:1on
1. E. Hall, Chiaf, Engineering Supper: Section E. S. F%4114ps, STP Rasident Rasc:or Inspec:or This maecing was a continuacion of he masc 1=g held on June 17, 1980, during which EL&P and 3&R representativas presented their approach :o resolucion of the Show Cause Order items.

8506070291 840620 PDR FOIA GLASBPIS4-393 PDR e -.

...,n.-

_ _ _ _ _ =

Tila - DN 50-498; 504 99 July 2, 1980 4

Show Cause I:am No. 5 - Stan Work Autheri:-

"ha status of revision of the EL&P and 3&R si:a proceduras related :o Stop Work authori:7 and implamanca-h vera discussed; however, since hase pro-caduras will recuire revision-to incorpora:a races:17 a=nounced and contam-placed organizational changes, copias are not yet available for review.

A 3

argat data of July 14 has baan established to incorporata necessary changes and issue ha proceduras.

Show Cause I:am No. 6 - Trend A= 'rsis Two basic changes in NCR control were identified: (1) routine rework procedures ara to be developed vnich can be radaranced for disposition of identified routina nonconformancas; and. (2) all NCRs will be complaced.hrough disposition (no draft or uncour laced NCRs), and the originating inspec:or will be furnished a copy of tha cour

'ad NCR.

To "accomunodata nonconformances beyond :he scope of :he routina,

rawork Muras, a Material Review Board will be established to define NCR dispos._

All NCRs (to be redesignated as DRs) will have a faul: code and a causa code established.

These codes, along wi:h faul: codes f:ca Examination Checklist disc:spancias, will be computar avaluated and.he resul:s nada available to the Trand Analysis Group.

Corrective Action Raquests will han be used Oc obtain ganarie corrective action on repeti:1ve problems.

Show Cause I:am No. 7 - Desien h se Control The FREA vill be discontinued; e design change request aspects of the TREA d

system will be processed using a Design Change Raquest.

All nonconformanca aspects of the 7BEA system will be processed on the DR system.

Enginaaring disposition of DRs will be accomanodated wi h a new formalized system of design change control.

Show Cause I:am No. 8 - Record Control Extensive ravision to.he procadnres and prac:1cas for processing records into i

che records storaga system were discussed.

These includa checklist control of data package contants, Qualiry Enginaaring :sview of records, and control of i

records in storage.

The new proceduras should be fully operational by i -

September 1, 1980; however, 1: was stacad that all records already in storage would be reviewed for complacenass and accuracy.

A final records aud1: is also planned prior to system :urnover from construction to operations.

I Show Cause I:am No. 9 - Audits A schedule for development of new aud1: matricas for audits, including incor-poration of consul ants into he audit schedule was discussed.

Tila - DN 50-498; 50-499 July 2, 1980 General 1.

  • he EL&P representatives reported dat canz:1:=en: da:as contained i=

-hair reply :s enfor ament 1:ams in Inspec.icn Raper: No. 50-498/79-19; 50-499/79-19, I:ams 4 and 5 had nec been met due :o ques:1ons resul:ing f:ca.aview of subcontractor ganarated proceduras.

A complation data 4

of July 3,1980, was agreed :s by.ha NIC represen:a:1ves.

1.

EL&7 =aquestad cla:1 fica:1on of repor:1=g recuirama=:s of 10 C7150.35(e) relative :s problems idaned'ind during impleman a:1on of cor:ac:ive actions direc:ad by the Show Cause Order.

3 e NRC represen:ative agrand l

o define a posi:1on on his =actar.

3)

Iha attorney for EL&P discussed the format :o be used in response :o the Show Cause Order 1:ams.

A copy of he pisnned fo: mat is appended.

A subsequent mencing 1s planned in Region I7 for July 3 :s discuss de EL&P ac:1ons relative to Show Causa Item No. 1.

c z.

su, Chia, v

Yneda-aring Suppor: See:1on

_=- -

W. A. Crossman, Chiaf

? ojects Section At.achment:

South Tazas ? cject format en: v/at:.

K. V. Seyfrit, II7 E. D. Thornburg, RCI

1. E. Shaunaker, RCI E. S. Phillips, III - STP W. G. Hubacak, II7 I

\\

I l

i

Scu h Texas Pr=jec Fc= mat of Respense t: C dar to Show Cause A.

Non-ter"-d cal Response - a. general su= mary =f the issues involved and the li=ensee's =esponse is non-tec" deal ta=ms - generany will include the fe nowisg:

1.

Backg cund - a descripti=n of the peccedure in use at the ime of the NRC invesuigati=n 2.

Problems with the cid system - a brief discus-sien cf the NRC fd"dd"gs expressed is the investigation report and the fd-ad"gs of E&P and B&R upon review of the situation 2

3.

Description of specific Response to the Order -

Sunnnary description of-new procedures, c gan-izational changes, or other app caches to corre'c ing the p chlems 4.

F.xplanation of how the responses described win correct the p chlems 5.

Schedule - description of the 1:nplementation schedule, including p ccedure issuance dates, t==4"4 "g sessicas, report c=mpletion and trial periods f== perfecting new p ccedures 3.

Technical Response - as attachments to the ncn-l technical =esponse, each response will have one c: :ncre of the Sc11owing, dependi=g en the nature of the c= der, the i

p cgress toward completion on the response date, etc.

i 1.

Draft c: Completed Pr=cedures - is some case.s the procedures will al aady be is use at the site, is others the procedures may still be under review wi-M " E&P and 3&R.

2.

Logic Diagrams - to assist is understanding the way the new procedures will werk r

3.

Interim Repc=tz - results of studies c=mpleted i

as of the response date I

4.

Detailed P ccedura descriptions for scre =cmpli-cated p ccedures, such as the field change system.

l 3.

The New QA 3 =chura (response to item 4) l

..