ML20091H369
Text
. - _ _ _.
.e m
s i
./
0 Meetend Proleet: P.O. Sea 1983. Mielene. Mieh6een 48840. Area Code 517 831-0051 l
September 24, 1982
{
p.,,
m, y.,,.
=-
.a
' ~./
l w i.?A....' -- :
Mr. W. D. Shafer. 01ief
........y. '... _..... i sl&g Midland Project Section
..._i'..'...*
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission L.
Region III j. ;.,2.'_,L.
,y....
799 Rosevelt Road U-
', _.. '. _..__i l
Glen Ellyn. IL 60137 bL
" ! '.d 5
l D kILC(3" M & A1 O SO.
MIDLAND PRQJECT GWO 7020
)'
REMEDIAL SOILS RESUBMITTAL OF WORK AU1HORI2ATION l
File: 0485.16 UFI: 42*05*22*C4 Serial: CSC-6336 Per our discussion on September 24, 1982 with your Mr. R. Gardner and Mr. R. Landsman concerning additional wells in support of the dewatering for Service Water Pump structure we are hereby resubmitting for your authorization these work activity items per section 3.0 of the August 12 1982 CPCo and FRC work authorization procedure. Specifically, we are asking that reauthorization te given for work activities 207050605 207050600 and 207050395.
Te assist you in your review we are attaening a copy of Section 6.4
" Construction Groundwater Control". Specification 7220-C-194(Q) Rev 3 and D:-awings C-1320(Q) Rev 0 and C-1320-1(Q) Rev. O.
I We are requesting '
iate review and approval for these additional
}
cha v a.
W
\\
f D. B. Mille Site Manager 3
DBM/Rief/kib Enclosures l
l-8406050145 840517 gp30W82 PDR FOIA RICE 84-96 PDR j
1 r
7 l
(
(
f I
i
(
i 1
6.4 CONSTRUCTION GROUNDWATER CONTROL 6.4.1 subcontractor shall design, furnisti, install, operate, and maintain a temporary dewatering system including observation wells, and shall submit for contractor's review and approval 16 f.
e
a.. 4.. 3...
...,; 4..
..s
.. O...
specification 7220-C-194(Q), Rev 3 a detailed procedure describing the
[
materials, method of dewatering, design assumptions, and the approximate location of major j
components.
As a minimum, this i
procedure shall be in accordance with the provisions of the following l
sections.
i 1
6.4.2 subcontractor shall furnish and I
install an adequate dewatering system and perform all operations required to remove and control the subsurface water so that the excavation, i
1 construction, soil replacement, and backfilling operations can be 1
i performed under stable subsoil conditions.
At the first six i
l (',
subcontractor shall drill to ebservation wens instaned, l
el 570'-0" and determine whether any sandy soil st atum exists from which pumping can be accomplished.
This determination will be nadin by Centractor's resident geotan-haical engineer or designated representative i'
,. based on continuous split spoon samples (taken.by subcontractor) of.
material between elevations 570 and.
584. A n wells shall extend to the l
het. tom of the deepest sand stratum under each well or to a minimum elevation of al 583'-0" when clay till is encountered above that 1
elevation.
(
The wens shall be installed in such a manner that the water level in the I
fill is drawn down to approximately the interface of the fill and natural l
soil.
If the natural soil at the dewatering well location is cohesionless, the wells shall be installed so that the water level in the natural cohesionless material is drawn down below the depth of any excavation made in that material.
Where such situations occur, the groundwater level shall be lowered a minimum of 2 feet below the base of the excavation, provided relatively pervious soil exists below the excavation.
If the material below the base of the excavation is 17
. L,.. q
..s.,...
. :.....^
.. a
~
Specification 7220-C-194(Q), Rev 3 cohesive and relatively impervious, p
l the water in any cohesionless i
material may be drawn down by 4
i localized dewatering techniques such I
as sumping.
6.4.3 The maximum anticipated elevation of the groundwater table is el 627'.
1 6.4.4 subcontractor shall dispose of all surface and subsurface water in a manner that will not endanger public health, property, or any portion of j
construction by others in the area.
The water shall be conveyed through piping from the dewatering system to s
the cooling pond and will be monitored by contractor for soil
! h-barticles and flow in accordance with e provisions of section 6.5.
surface water and water discharged
'from pumps, which are required to remove localized pockets of trapped l
l groundwater within the excavation as def - ined by Contractor, do not require soil particle monitoring
}
befor.e disposal.
)
6.'4. 5 subcoStEactorshallinstall' standby
~
ping equipment available for diate operation as may be required to maintain dewatering on a i
continuous basls, and shall operate j
such standby equipment if the primary pumping system is not operating properly.
The system shall be Q
operated, maintained, and monitored 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day, 7 days a week through the entire period of underpinning operation.
6.4.6 sub' contractor shall install patcocks, bushings, and nipples at each dewatering well for obtaining soil particle monitoring samples.
The system patcocks shall be located on a horizontal run of pipe, below the centerline of the pipe, but not within 20 -degrees of the pipe invert.
6.4.7 The method of well installation both inside and outside of structures-shall be in accordance with subcontractor's approved procedure;
.I' 18 7
~
v
- 9
,o
. ::......m 1..
~
Specification 7220-C-194(Q), Rev 3 however, jetting shall not be 4
i permitted for installing dewatering
- wells, e
l 6.4.8 Subcontractor shall design and install a dewatering system assuming that none other exists for the
- j' purpose of this specification.
)
1 i
However, Contractor may make j
j available to Subcontractor selected i
wells on the existing permanent j
dewatering system on a limited and j
temporary basis.
3 i
6.4.9 Subcontractor may l'ocate wells within I
I the boundaries of the SWPS and CWIS.
i The location of all installed wells, however, will be approveti by
(',1 Contractor.
Holes shall be drilled
.in accordance with Section 10.6.
6.4.10 Contractor's permission to proceed with installing the dawatering system proposed by Subcontractor will 'only concern the basic methods f
Subcontractor intends to use.
3
~ EWever, all minimum requirements as
.i stated in Sections 6.4 and 6.5 of j
this' specification shall be met.
4
. Acceptance of the dewatering system j
will be based on the demonstrated performance of that system to " meet the requirements of Section 6.5.
- 6. 4.11 Subcontractor sha11' seal all
(
dewatering and observation wells s
buried, abandonded, or left in place with grout or lean concrete after the dewatering operation is discontinued, in accordance with the most recent Mi'higan Wells Act and c
subcontractor's approved procedure.
Sukcontractor shall obtain Contractor's approval prior to sealing wells.
l l
6.4.12 With Contractor-furnished material, Subcontractor shall repair all holes drilled in the CWIS and SWPS for use in dewatering.
The holes shall be repaired in accordance with Section 10.5 of this ' specification..
O l.
19 f l{j s;
Z.
+
O e d.
~
~
. --.r-- :
a.
.. g
. I.:
~
Specification 7220-C-194(Q), Rev 3 6.4.1 The dewatering operation shall be V
controlled so the amount of soil particles in the discharge water is limited to 10 ppa.
Soil particles are defined as inorganic nonmetallic materials coarser than 0.05 mm for Subcontractor's temporary wells and i
1 0.005 mm for Contractor's permanent l
dewatering wells.
l 6.4.14 Subcontractor shall prepare l
dewatering records for wells as required by ACT 218 P.A.1972, which is an amendment to ACT 294 P.A. 1965, Ground' Water Quality Control Act.
s I
The' dewatering well record form shall either be completed for every well or
(
a composite record made for several wells.' The composite record may be used where the subsurface conditions
'are similar, the surface relief 1
relatively level, and the static watei-level at a constant depth.
l Depending on variations in subsurface i
conditions, one or several composites y
may be necessary.
6.4.15
. Subcontractor shall design," furnish,'
and install. temporary observation t
wells at the locations indicated in i
the design drawings.
l 6.4.16 The installation, monitoring, and t
. removal of the temporary observation wells shall be in accordance with the h.
following.
~
a.
The wells in the undisturbed natural' soil shall consist of 1/2-inch 7 slotted polyvinylchloride (PVC)'well screens (3 feet lorg) and 1/2 inch J Schedule 40 PVC riser pipes.
The wells in the fill material shall consist of 1-1/4-inch p slotted PVC well screens (3 feet long) and -
1-1/4-inch 7 Schedule 40 PVC riser pipes.
9 t.
20 E.
~
.. a -.
n
\\
9e
- i-
-,i_.
- z....q t._'.-
~
Specification 7220-C-194(Q), Re.v 3
'6 I
All'PVC'shall conform to ASTM F 480.
t b.
A filter pack shall be placed j
around the well screen.
The gradation of the filter pack and slot size of the well i
screen shall be approved by 1
Contractor prior to installation.
4 l
c.
A minimum of 1 foot of grout shall be placed above the
~
I filter pack.
d.
Deleted e.
Observation wells shall be installed to monitor j(--
groundwater level in the fill and the undisturbed natural soil.
Wells to monitor the water level in the fill shall i
be installed at an elevation no lower than l'-0" (_6")
+
?above the undisturbed natural i
soil.
Wells to monitor the
~
1 l
T."
water level in the undisturbed natural soil 2
shall be. installed such that the tip of the well screen is at elevation 570'-0" (+2'-0")
i and the bottom of the grout i
seal is to be 2'-0" (+6")
below the interface of the
(
fit 1 and the undisturbed nahal isoil but no higher than el 590'-0".
The interface of the fill and undisturbed natural soil shall be determined by the i
Contractor's resident geotechnical engineer or-his designated representative.
The installed elevations of the wells shall be transmitted to Contractor within ~1 week of installation.
f.
Observation wells shall be monitored daily by-Subcontractor and the results 21 i
l 49 i
?
(
. ~ -
-y
'g '
I e
+
e
---.n r
.4
).
t Spe~cification 7220-C-194(Q), Rev 3 transmitited to contractor Y
weekly.
g.
Subcontractor shall seal observation wells, in accordance with Subcontractor's approved i
procedure, after the dewatering operation is discontinued.
6.4.17 Subcontractor shall include a description of the temporary dewatering wells (installed by l
Subcontractor) and, observation wells in the temporary dewatering 3
procedure.
As a minimum this description shall include the 3
' {
following:
a.
Materials, descriptions, and I
dimensions for all items used i
b.
Fi).ter pack material, gradation, and method of installation Diameter of well and method e.
of drilling d.
Method of dewatering well development a.
Method of removing and sealing well i
i h.
6.4.18 Subcontractor shall submit to Contractor for review and approval detail drawings of the dewatering wells, (incluiting locations) and observation wells prior to start of work.
6.4.19 Deleted 6.4.20 The installation of the dewatering and observation wells will be inspected by contractor's resident geotechnical engineer or his designated representative and documented in accordance with l
Section 4.3.
i l
l 22
.O
~
s o e
),
-n--
-._-,.,,-,g--.----n-
,r, s
- n
4 Specification 7220-
~~.94(Q), Rsv 3
~$
t 6.4.21 For dewatering and observation wells, Q
all holes with an annulus larger than 6 inches shall have the filter -
material tremied.
For wells 6 inches and smaller, the filter material shall be poured in and tamped.
5, 6.4.22 The dewatering system shall be l
operated continuously unless directed otherwise by contractor.
i I
6.4.23' The eductor tank shall conform to the l
following:
a.
The tank shall be baffled to prevent turbulence.
b; The system supply line intake
!(
shall be located on the i
bottom half of the tank and a minimum of 18 inches above the invert of the tank.
The t5mk overflow line shall c.
be placed to allow contractor to take direct flow measurements.
.l l
l l
l l
N
\\
a
?
=
4 w
h._,
.-m_,.n__
-.-.r...
,..,.m_.
p_ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ - -
q
.f V
~3 m
^^
.g f.,w.
A.
i'y sm
~ ?y j
m l
y'.
e M M N' }'?
j
- w ?
., t*
8 e..N.w..#w...,ey,.m..
ly : 'l l'
.. Yu.
l h....., Q. j a $,:..,h < '
. r,E l
?_ ~a. v. i.
. W.. Y.'. '3.Q.j.d j q j
f w,
h f.'
'Y: $..S.
t
~~* ! Y b
i
'^
qNQW..W.i n,~. W ##RW%w@a.6a.
f a
ar:
L%c$.Aw%.;.V r..r
.h
.A:. Y.. ~ m+m,,..)m. :.u '
..?<
c.
p s. g.
n :-
~ '.
h L
i
[.,
4.c 4
l O. +M..a.WA.o t..n n p W..J..W. pt m.. ~.%....i,m e $1 2
s f....,
.a '.
'%,}g..: %a
,M.g.w.
l r,, ;. :P b ' :
.wr C c.
i.'
.4 e-i V % ~, '.$., f
- L,..
- Y'. % -
~
%.., ~
A"'
L 'f. *a'
[ '; <. - l.. ;. : ; ; L Q.f.. ", ?' .,Z
.s R.%.'-
s
- he,y &;.' '
9 j ;. ' '.. _, ; y,
'Q_Q t.
. q..,,,,. E' T
. a...'. g; u.
3..
N k-
. +, -
.p 4,..p %..
. r.- N.
, +
. ? g* i+-,
.g
,,,.,g',(1j n.
. g-
. g..
a g.< s y
.,~,!'.
,4
, ~
C
..g n
^
s'f,' '
-...f. q-r,
_ ',.w.-p. s.,',b.t..
2'.
,e N
1>*
'.a.
,. f.Rg,.
g
=
e'4
- r
-s
..3..
?'
f t*4.,r f. E e,r
.n
- /
pr '.i i., g.* h
','k
't
]
t, ', [.. ',
' [, '.
- I y ; ' (. ~. :: -y:
'J
(,-
5 3
..'..w t
..m p _...
... >. 3.. -
- . ; _; q, ; -;.
. 3
.y
.... 3 -
- a*
-, 8%.. j:e'.' '.
r-~
2; :..
..A,.
.^.
- y
.w..
u.
~ ~ -
.r e :. e f.
._m
..',y m.
..y.,,fs'.'.Q f,f l i _ f, '*.
_ y g ~, * ?,.y -
4
.)
_=
J',
t.
t.
?,,-
g
. <x a
~*
s.
J i.,
g g
- e$
8-
]
gv
' ' n..
j_'.__,..-'. -
.v-
\\
.,.y
' L-c Pts,
. ~.
=
W.. ;
~ --
.e
..g.,'
yp.g g,
_..,'.. j.
J #,,'r f-(.
'J.
.,,,, Iy. ; ;:. C,',g g n
j*...,.
c f
' g,
.;. ~.~
.f p
. g..
,.L.,'.g i
. '. '. ' '. )
Jrs
., f' 4,
..~.,...,;
3 F.
g.
(.n....
s
.L 1.
=
3.
t
,.,,J.
,.h.....
,g).s w.;,.
n,
.,,..l s
J
[. * '.
m
~.. '..
a I
}.-
- h3 g'
. O.P g$
^
' f qa.'
~
,7
_ y.,'
,?/ g.N;y 7. ggg
.p f. ?
/.
%T
.g _;..o j Q,, f s
.. f.
y-
. w.- g
.. r c.
?
l
- y.
.p a
r...r; s*3 'c :'..
... ' y,.,.
a t
.s 3,.'
eu;.
,q
,,( p V.
t
. j 4.."9*,3.,, V--px* i.,.
?
t..
.e
- t M
1-9,/ s p :^ b !
k
. l4 a
1 f
p;.
c T
y [ h f "l'~ \\:..
y.' ( ' _..
.J
- -. * :', i 4
^
- -[
f }M L ', :
t
(
,p. g ;,
'. f2 Cy.7 M ' JK,.
a g, 4 yA Q g*.
p,;)
~,,.
-j
't: '.
~
., a v ' y f
e
', '. - -- - Q k.,1...
- 4.. ; i,, * '[ ; A. ' ; -4;. 4. e'4 >.,, L.. y l
.9a en
< - :. n : --
...[-
-(-
w y
-(
)
x.
.m
[:
.o
,.. ;4.
.a K.f~,.\\
l,.
j
- ~...
v~.
=
m..
s.'F.
?g.
2.. t,,... /.'. :, '..(,'
~
, -[ "
..g-5=..
E m
e n x
~.
v
/<1 3
g j.
y*
r.
-....q, -....,;>.*7,,..
..3
. v.*
. w*
.. i..,.,
-.... y,
s
.,......,4 w..
=i p.,,
44.i.,
~. ;
,:. 9'.' '
-..,,K,',
4' ".. -
- . ty,. -
t' h.
lD*r f' ~
p r
,e.-,',',5 o
s
.s-r d
[
1 3-
.}
.~
h l JRINCIP/L STFC i
O Consumers m
w== z Power we os
."= u.'
Company
- f W.
=
1 1
PAO 3CS d'il.7/ N 3GA 1L T
meend Presset Po som teos, mesad, m deseo. Ist7) sat"ENF File
'hw Q
~
j March 6, 1984 i
Mr John J Harrison, Chief Midland Section Region III j
Nuclear Regulatory Connaission 799 Roosevelt Road i
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGT CENTER GWO 7020 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM IMPLEMENT.* TION SUPPORT OF TURBINE ROLL MILESTONE File: 0655 UFI: 99*08 Serial: CSC-7421 j-
REFERENCE:
D L Quasme letter to John J Harrison dated February 15. 1984, I
4 l
Serial CSM-0734 l
4 This letter is a supplement to the referenced letter, and provides additional information on the scope of work required to support the Turbine Roll test milestone. As stated in the attachment package to the referenced letter, i
portions of seven Q-listed systems, located in seven plant modules are l
required for Turbine Roll milestone. Two of these seven systems. ODEC and i
OEAA, have been turned over to Consumers Power Company. A further definition of scope for these seven systems and a description of the Construction Completion Program (CCP) process we intend to use, is given in the following i
paragraphs.
i j
TURNED OVER SYSTEMS j
t Id general, the Quality Verification Program (QVP) will be performed on turned
- over Q-listed systems in accordance with the module schedule for completing the CCP. QVP will be completed on turned over commodities which have closed Inspection Records. Any turned over ites having an open Inspection Record I
will be handled as a turnover exception (T0E)1ist ites, and worked in accor- -
dance with Cection 9.0 of the CCP. Completed portions of open Inspection Records on turned over commodities will be 100% reinspected for accessible
- attrib'tes as stated in Section 1.0 of the CCP. This reinspection will be u
accomplished when T0E is worked off.
As regards to the Turbine Roll milestone, within Module 800, which was released for Status Assessment and QVP (QVP) activities by the NRC in October, 1983, it is our intention to perform the QVP on those commodities which will j
be below the water line after the Service Water Bays are flooded for the Turbine Roll milestone (Scoped Areas 800 E, F, and G).
Following the coup-lation of the Phase I QVP activities for the flooded area. the CCF proces's 'of OC028 -00010A-CN01
}
MAR 91gg4..
\\
wr ~,,,e.. s i
ox
r-m
~
I 2
4
. management rev ew, NRC hold point release and Phase II work. off of Phase I i
results will be performed. No preoperational test procedures will be released for performance until the QVP has been completed on the affected' system.
~ NON-TURNED OVER SYSTEMS
,~
l A detailed breakdown of known work scope on the Q-listed items for portions of T
the five non-turned over systems is given on the marked-up P& ids provided with i
the referenced letter. A take-off listing of commodities is provided in i.
Most of the commodities listed are approximately 80% installed, with remaining work consisting of minor items such as shims, leveling plates, and small members. Other work includes items resulting from the Phase I Status Assessment and QVP, and stress piping and hanger walkdowns performed by Engineering. All work on the Q-listed pertions of these systems required for Turbine Roll will bo performed in accordance with the CCP, in the following order: Phase I Status Assessment and QVP, Mr2agement Review process, NRC hold point release, and Phase II work following releese in accordance with Section l
4.5.4 of the CCP.
i
)
Please contact us should you require additio'nal information in replying to our l
request for module releases for the Turbine Roll milestone, as described in the referenced letter.-
i, b
/
m l
DLQ/ BHP /klw Attachments i
CC DSHood, Project Manager-Hidland w/out attachment RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector w/out attachment JGKeppler., Regional Administrator, Region III w/out attachment j
l i
(
\\
t 4
1 i,
l i
S B
{
OCO284-00010A-CN01 e.
?
_. ~. - _ -,
p 3
BCC: SHHowell, M-1180 i
JWCook, P26-3363 TABuczwinski, Midland JNLeech, P24-507 DFLewis, Bechtel DJVandeWalle, P24-614B'
]
MIMiller IIAB, Chicago l
FCWilliams I143, Washington, DC CALod, P12-237A j
I NRC Correspondence File, P24-517 UFI,'P24-517-FJWalraven,"P24-517.
Hearings File, P24-517 CMS, Midland RAWells, Midland Al Braber, LIS Reading Copy (P24-505,Rotha'Boroff)
DMBudzik
.RJErhardt LSGibson DTPerry 9
[-
to
.O 4
e O
w.,
h
- e
~
}
t g
i
~
~
O^C.
CORSum8f8 Power a
- e... co.
n y
Vice hesident. Projects. Engineering Y
I and Construction General Offices: 1948 West Pamell Road, Jackson, MI 402o1. (517) 788 o453 h
l/Fa!f:CiPAL S'/FC February 28, 1984 V[ IL%.[
l_
- g. _. 8
.(( _
/.
b Mr J G Keppler, Regional Administrator
-. i.
v US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
[WI
. E \\1i:, ADS' Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT -
DOCKET NOS. 50-329 AND 50-330 ITEMS FOR NRC CLOSURE FILE 0.4.2 SERIAL 27328 In accordance with your request, we are submitting the attached list of items which have been reviewed by CP Co and have been determined to be ready for review and closure by the NRC.
This is a complete list which includes the items that were transmitted on October 4, 1983 that have not been closed subsequent to that time. The items marked with an asterisk (*) have been reviewed by the Region III Inspectors and will be removed from the list when closed in an inspection report.
CC WRBird, P-14-418A DMBudzik, P-24-517A RCook, NRC-Midland JFFremeau, Midland JHarrison, NRC JNLeech, P-24-507 DLQuamme. Midland JARutgers, Bechtel-AA l
RAWells, Midland l
REWhitaker, Midland NAR 2 my i
5 l
OCO284-0001A-QLO2 f
1 A
[
hbY h f e'
NRC Inspection Report Items Miscellaneous Items Ready For Closure Item h
Subject Closure Location 79-12-05 Unresolved Pressure Test of Pressurizer Relief Valve Site 80-09-01 Deficiency Leveling of Internal Core Support Structure Site
- 80-30/31-01 Unresolved Battery Rack Acidic Environment Site 81-12-09/10 Violation Lack of Approved Procedures Covering Rework Site j
81-20-01 Unresolved Cable Tray Dividers Site 82-05-01 Deviation QA Staffing Site 82-06-02
. Violation Cable Pulling Site 82-18-02/01 Violation Dewatering Fines Monitoring Site 82-18-03/02 Violation Slope Layback Site 82-20-01 Open' Training of MG Personnel for Emergency Procedures and Training of Crafts Site 83-03-02 Unresolved Expansion of Excavation Permit System to Underpinning Site 83-13/14-03 Deviation Slope Layback in the Drifts Site MIO284-0001A-QLO2 2/23/84 Page 1 of 3
. e e t.seen -+
NRC Inspection Report Items Items Dealing With Hanger Design The following items all were initiated by I Yen, and need to be resolved by a scheduled trip to Ann Arbor with a possibility of going to ITT Grinnell in Providence.
Item h
Subj ect Closure Location 18-19-02 URI Locking Devices on Bolts used in ITT Crinnel Ann Arbor 78-19-03 URI ITT Crinnell Evaluation of Bolt Holes Near Edge of Plate Ann Arbor
)
79-01-02 URI Adequacy of Drawing Hanger Review Ann Arbor 79-05-02 URI Additional reviews of ITT Hanger Design Ann Arbor or Providence 79-05-03 URI Bechtel System for Design Interface of Hanger Loadings on Existing Structures Ann Arbor 80-11/12-01 URI Bolted Joints Ann Arbor 82-07-01 URI Review of Other Disciplines for Handling of g
CPDC's Ann Arbor l
MIO284-0001A-QLO2 2/23/84 Page 2 of 3
.=,oow_
,s.,
50.55(e) Reports Ready For Closure NRC Number No Description 77-03 0.4.9.12 ITT/Grinnel Pipe Supports 78-01 0.4.9.13 RCP Hotor Flange 78-06 0.4.9.18 Small Break Analysis 81-05 0.4.9.53 Shear Rainforcement at Major Containment Penetrations
~
t
.)
MIO284-0001A-QLO2 2/11/84 Page 3 of 3 A
.w-
_ p.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i Bulletins - Circulars - Notices Beady For Closure I
i
" BULLETIN 73-01 Faulty Overcurrent Trip Delay Device in Circuit Breakers for Engineered Safety Systems
- BULLETIN 74-01 Valve Deficiencies
" BULLETIN 74-06 Defective Westinghouse Type U-2 Control Suitch Component
" BULLETIN 74-08 Deficiency la ITE Molded Case Circuit Breakers Type,HE-3
~
- BULLETIN 74-09 Defleiency in General Electric Model 4kV Magna-Blast Breakers.
- BULLETIN 74-12 Incorrect Coils.in Westinghouse Type SC Relays at Trojaa J
- BULLETIN 74-15 Misapplication of Cutler-Naamer Three Positioned Maintained l
Switch, Model 10250T i
BULLETIN 74-16 Improper Machining of Fistoms in Colt Industries (Fairbanks-Morse) Diesel Generators P
BULLETIN 78-12 Atypical Weld Material in Beactor Pressure Vessel Welds BULLETIN 80-16 Fotential Misapplication of Bosemount Inc Models 1151 and 1152 Fressure Trans-l mitters with either "A" or "D" Output Codes.
4 BULLETIN 82-01 Alteration of Radiographs of Malds in Piping Assemblies.
BULLETIN 82-03 Stress Corrosion Cracking in Thick-Wall, Large Diameter, Stainless Steel, l
Recirculation System Fiping at BWR Flants.
i BULLETIN 82-04 Deficiencies la Primary Contafasent Fenetration Assemblies.
BUI.LETIN 83-02 Stress Corrosion Cracking in Large Diametc.r Stainless Steel Bacirculation System Piping at BWR Flants.
CIBCULAR 76-01 Crane Noist Control Circuit Modifications CIBCULAR 76-05 Nydraulic Shock and Sway Suppresse s Maintenance of Bleed and Locking on ITT Crinnell's Model Number Figure 200 and 201 Catalog FH-74-R
.nnas nnn-nces
&*2**
~
l I
'CIBCULAR 77-02 Potential Heavy Spring Flooding l
CIBCULAR 77-06 Rffects of Hydraulic Fluid on Riectrical Cables CIBCULAR 78-05 Inadvertent Safety Injection during Cooldous
- CISCULAR 78-13 Inoperability of h itiple Service Water Pumps CIRCULAR 78-15 Check Valves Fall to Close in Vertical Position CIBCULAR 79-05 Moisture Leakage in Stranded Wire Conductors CIBCULAR 79-11 Design / Construction Interface CIBCULAR 79-12 Potential Diesel Generator Turbocharger Preblem, CIBC5LAR 80-16 Operational Deficiency on Rosemount Model 5100U Trip Units sad Model 1852 pressure Transmitters CIRCULAR 80-17 Fuel P!n Damage to Water Jet from Raffle Plate Corner g
CIRCULAR 80-2i Regulation of'Refmaling Crews CIBC5LAR 81-05 Self-Aligning Rod Rad Bushings for Pipe Supports CIRCULAR 81-06 Fotential Deficiency Affecting Certata Foxboro 10 to 50 M1111 ampere Transmitters CIBCULAR 81-07 Control of Radioactively Contaminated Material CIACULAR 81-08 Foundation Materials CIBC5LAR 81-09 Containment Rifluent Water Neat Bypasses Radioactivity Monitor CIBCBLAR 81-11 Imadequate Decay Meat Removal During Beactor Shutdown l
s i ' * :W'
.u.
_.___._. _ _____ _ ___ _ _._.~.______.
.. _ _... _ _, - ~ _. _. _ _ _.. _. _ _
CIRCULAR 81-12 Imadequate Periodic Test Frocedure of FWR Frotection System CIRCULAR 81-14 Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures to Close l
l NOTICE 79-06 Stress Analysis of Safety-Related Pipiag N0flCE 79-09 Spill of Radioactively Contaminated Resia NorICE 79-11 Imuer Reactor Vessel Need Imanlation Support Problem
)
Not1CE 79-12 Attempted Damage to New Fuel Assemblies Indication of Law ' Water Level in the Oyster Creek Reactor (RWR)
NOTICE 79-13 NOTICE 79-16 Nuclear Incident at Three Mile Island NorICE 79-17 Source Nolder Assembly Damage from Nisfit between Assembly and Reactor Upper Crid Flate (Westingbouse Unite only)
N0f1CE 79-18 Skylah Reestry L
NOTICE 79-28 Overloading of Structural Elements due to Pipe Support Loads
^
i 4
r NorICE 79-29 Loss et Monsarety-malated Reactor coolant ayisteren tui. s u...
during operation.
NorICE 79-32 Separation of Electrical Cables for NPCI and ADS (RUR only) 4 NorICE 79-37 Cracking in Law Pressure Turbine Discs NerICE 80-04 RUR Fuel Exposure in Excess of Limits NOTICE 80-06 Notification of Significant Event and Supplement 4
t A
.#4
.t M -
i 1
NOTICE 80-17 Potential Hazards Associated with Interchangeable Parts on Radiographic Equipment NOTICE 80-20 Loss of Decay Neat Removal Capability at Davia-Besse Unit I while in i
Refueling Mode NOTICE 80-22 Breakdowns in Contas.ination Control Programs NorICE 80-23 Loss of Suction to Emergency Feeduster Pumps
)
NOTICE 80-24 Low Imvel Radioactive Weste Burial Criteria i
NorICE 80-25 Transportation of Pyrophoric Uranium NOTICE 80-27 Degradation of Reactor Coolant Pump Studs NOTICE 80-29 Broken Studs on Terry Turbine Steam Inlet Flange NOTICE 80-30 Potential for Unacceptable Interaction between the Control Rod Drive Scram Function and Nonessential Control Air at Certain C E BWR Facilities i
NOTICE 80-33 Determinatio'n of Teletherapy Timer Accuracy NOTICE 80-35 Leaking acd dislodged Iodine-125 Implant Seeds NorICE 80-37 Containment Cooler Leaks and Reactor Cavity Flooding at Indian Point 2 NOTICE
~
80-45 Potential Failure of BWE Backup Manual Scram Capability NOTICE 81-02 Transportation of Radiography Devices f
NOTICE 81-04 Cracking in Main Steam Lines l
NOTICE 81-06 Failure of ITE Model K-600 Circuit Breaker l
f
j l
NOTICE 81-07 Pote'ntial Problem with Water Soluble Purge Das Materials used during 4
Inert Cas Welding NOTICE 81-08 Espetitive Failures of Limitorque Operator SMB-4 Notor-to-Shaft Key NOTICE 81-10 Inadvertent Containment Spray due to Personnel Error NOTICE 81-11 Alternate Rod Insertion for RWE Screm Represents a Potential Path for. Loss of Primary Coolant.
N0flCE 81-12 Cuidance on Order Issued January 9, 1981, Regarding Automatic Control Rod Insertion on Low Control Air Pressure (BWE caly).
t NOTICE 81-13 Janned Source Rack in a Canna Irradiator N0flCE 81-14 Potential Overstress of Shafts on Fisher Series 9200 Butterfly Valves with Expandle T-Rings NOTICE 81-15 Degradation of Automatic ECCS Actuation Capability by Isolation of Instrument Lines.
NOTICE 81-16 Control Rod' Drive System Halfunction (BWE on1y)
I N0flCE 81-17 Never Issued 4
4 NOTICE 81-18 Excessive Radiation Exposure to Fingers t
NOTICE 81-19 Lost Parts in Primary Coolant System HofICE 81-20 Test Failures of Electrical Penetration Assemblies l
N0flCE 81-21 Potential Loss of Direct Access to Ultimate Heat Sink i
NOTICE 81-22 Section 235 and 236 Admendments to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954
.ho 49ed*6
L l
N NOTICE 81-23 Fuel Assembly Damage due to Improper Positioning of Fuel Handling Equipment NOTICE 81-24 AFW Pump Turbine 8 earing Failures NOTICE 81-26 Compilation of Nealth Physics Related Information Items NOTICE 81-27 Flammable Gas Mixtures in the Weste Decay Tanks in 8WR Plants.
Failure of Rockwell-Elward Main Steam Isolation Valves NOTICE 81-28
.]
NOTICE 81-29 Equipment qualification Testing Experience NOTICE 81-30 Velan Swing Check Valves t
NOTICE 81-31 Failure of Safety Injection Valve to Operate Against Differential Pressure.
NOTICE 81-32 Transfer and/or Disposal of Spent Generators NOTICE 81-33 Locking Devices Inadequately Installed on Main Steam Isolation Valves 4
NOTICE 81-34 Accidental Ac'tuation of Prompt Public Notification System NOTICE 81-35 Check Valve Failures I
NOTICE 81 Replacement Diaphrams for Robertshaw Valvo (Model No VC-210)
NOTICE 81-37 Unnecessary Radiation Exposure to Public and Workers during Events Involving Thickness and Limit Measuring Devices.
NOTICE 81-38 Potentially Significant Equipment Failures Resulting from Contamination of Air-Operated Systems 1
NorICE 81-39 EPA Crosscheck Program Low-Level Radiolodine in Water Intercomparison Study I
- ~ ~ - - - -..
AFW Pump I.ockout Resulting from Westinghouse W-2 Switch Circuit Mod!fication NOTICE 82-01 Westinghouse M8FD Relay Failures in Reactor Protection Systems at Certain Nuclear NOTICE 82-02 Power Plants Environmental Tests of Electrical Terminal Blocks NOTICE 82-03 Fotential Deficiency of Certain Agastat E-7000 Series Time Delay Relays NOTICE 82-04 NOTICE 82-05 Increasing Frequency of Drug-Related Incidents 1
NofICE 82-07 Imadequate Security Screening Programs l
NOTICE 82-09 Cracking in Makeup Coolant Lines at R&W Flants Following Up Symptomatic Repairs to Assure Resolution of the Problem NOTICE 82-10 Potential Inaccuracies in Wide Range Pressure Instruments Used in Westinghouse N0f!CE 82-11 Designed Plants NOTICE 82-12 Surveillance of Hydraulic Snubbera N0flCE 82-13 Failure of General Electric Type NFA Relays Notification of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
NOTICE 82-15 J
NOTICE 82-16
'NFCI/RCIC Nigh Steam Flow Set Points Assessment of Intakes of Radioactive Materials by Workers N0flCE 82-18 Loss of High Naad Safety Injection Emergency Boration and Reactor Coolant NorICE 82-19 Makeup Capability NOTICE 82-20 Check Valve Problems
==ines nns : eer:n4
%d*, :**
Nof1CE 82-21 Suildup of Enriched Uranium in Effluent Treatment Tanks NOTICE 82-22 Failures in Turbine Exhaust Lines MariCE 82-23 Main Steam Isolation Valva Leakage 1
N0f1CE 82-24 Water Leakage from Uranium Hexafloride Overpacks NofICE 82-26 RCIC and NFC1 Turbine Exhaust Check Valve Failure (BWR only)
]
NofICE 82-27 Fuel Rod Degradation Resulting from Water-Jet Baffle Impingement i
NOTICE 82-28 Rydrogen Explosion while Grinding in Vicinity of Drained and,Open RCS NOTICE 82-29 Control Rod Drive (CRD) Guide Tube Support Fin Failures at Westinghouse FWR (Westinghouse Plants only)
NOTICE 82-30 Loss of Thermal Sleeves in RCS Fiping at Certain Westinghouse FWR Flants
~
NOTICE 82-31 Overeuposure of Diver during Work in Fuel Storage Fool
\\
NOTICE 82-33 Control of Radiation Levels in Unrestricted Areas Adjacent to Brachytherapy Patients (Medical Institutions only)
Mof1CE 82-35 Failures of Three Check Valves on NF1 Lines to Pass Flow NOTICE 82-36 Respirator Users Warning for Certain 5-Minute Faergency Escape Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus N0flCE 82-37 Cracking in the Upper Shell to Transition Cone Cirth Weld of a Steam Generator on an Operating FWR Nof1CE 82-38 C1:ange in Format and Distribution System for IE Bulletins, Circulars er.d Information Notices
- inat-no11-Hf04
I NOTICE 82-39 Service Degradation of Thick Wall Stainless Steel Recirculation System Piping at BWRs NOTICE 82-40 Deficiencies in Primary Containment Electrical Penetration Assemblies NOTICE 82-41 Failure of Safety Relief Valve to Open at a BWR NOTICE 82-42 Defects Observed in Panasonic Model 801 and Model 802 Thermoluminiscent Dosimeters NOTICE 82-43 Deficiencies in LUR Air Filtration / Ventilation Systems j
NOTICE 82-44 Clarification of Emergency Plan Exercise Requirements NOTICE 82-45 FUR 1me' Temperature Overpressure Protection NOTICE 82-46 Defective and Obsolete Combination Fadlocks l NOTICE 82-51 overexposure in FWR Cavities NOTICE 82-52 Equipment Environmental qualification Testing Experience - Update of Test Summaries Previously Issued in IN 81-29 g
NOTICE 82-54 Westinghouse NBFD Reisy Failures in Reactor Protection Systems NOTICE 82-55 Seismic qualification of Westinghouse At Relay with 1.atch i
. Attachment used in Westinghouse Solid-State Protection System.
NOTICE 83-01 Ray Miller, Inc.
NOTICE 83-07 Nonconformities with Materials Supplied by Tube-Line Corp NOTICE 83-09 Safety and Security of Irradiators NOTICE 83-12 Incorrect Boron Standards opinat nn11-w:04 A"""
_.a_____
\\
1 NOTICE 83-13 Design Misapplication of Bergen Patterson Standard Struc Restraints NOTICE 83-14 Dewatered Spent Ion Exchange Resin Susceptability to 4
Exothermic Chemical Reaction NOTICE 83-15 Falsified Pre-Esployment Screening Records NOTICE 83-16 Contamination of Auburn Steel Company with Cobalt-60 NOTICE 83-20 ITT Crinnel Figure 306/307 Hechanical Snubber Attachment Interferences y
NOTICE 83-21 Defective Emergency Use Respirators NOTICE 83-22 RWR Safety / Relief Valve Failures i
NOTICE 83-26 Failure of Safety / Relief' Valve Discharge Line Vacuum Breakers NOTICE 83-29 Fuel Rinding Caused by Fuel Rack Deformation
. NOTICE 83-32 Rupture of Americium-241 Source (s) Contained in Well 1.ogging Device l..
Event Notification Information Worksheet l
NOTICE 83-34 NOTICE 83-35 Fuel Movement with Control Rods Withdrawn NOTICE 83-37 Transformer Failure Resulting from Degraded Internal Connection Cables 4
l NOTICE 83-39 Failure of' Safety / Relief Valves to Open at a RWR - Interin Report i
NOTICE 83-42 Reactor Mode Switch Malfunction NOTICE 83-44 Fotential Damage to Redundant Safety Equipment as a Result of Rackflow through the Equipment and Floor Drain System NOTICE 83-52 Radioscrive Waste Gas System Events
==ines ani s ur:na
.tC6 40GesMut
,3 NOTICE 83-53 Primary Containment Isolation Valve Discrepancies NOTICE 83-54 Common Mode Failure of Main Steam Isolation Nonreturn Check Valves NOTICE 83-55 Misapplication of Valves by Throttling beyond Design Range NOTICE 83-59 Dose Assignment for Workers in Non-Uniform Radiation Fields NOTICE 83-60 Falsification of Test Results for Protection Coatings
-)
NOTICE 83-61 Alleged Use of Stand-Ins for Walder Qualification Tests
. Failure of Redu' dant Toxic Cas Detectors Positioned at Control Room NOTICE 83-62 n
Ventilation Air Intakes NOTICE 83-63 Potential Failure of Westinghouse Electric Corp Type SA-1 Differential Relays 83-64 1.ead Shielding Attached to Safety-Related Systems without NOTICE 10CFR50.59 Evaluations t
NOTICE 83-66 Fatality at Argentine. Critical Facility NOTICE 83-67 Emergency Use Respirator Material Defect Causes Production of Noxious Casen NOTICE 83-68 Respirator User Warning - Defective Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Air Cylinders NOTICE 83-73
' Radiation Exposure from Cloves Contaminated with Uranium Daughter Products.
1 N0flCE 83-74 Rupture of Cesium-137 Source used in Well-I.ogging operations NOTICE 83-80 Use.of Specialised " Stiff" Pipe Clamps NOTICE 83-82 Failure of Safety Relief Valves to Open at BWR - Formal Report
-- ' a" aa " =
i s
NOTICE S3-84 Cracked and Broken Fiston Bode la Brown Boveri Electric Type SNK circuit Breakers I'
..)
I e
4 e
PPle83-Oell-IID64
. # O._.M
- es.
1:
)
Consumers Power
- # company s
heian,4 nopes office o.n
- oevi : ines w renne nees, J =
n, us estos. (st?) 7es.o774
.MY 3
February 27, 1984 i;
~
- f~ v' r,
~
Mr J J Harrison Midland Project Saction i
U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III
'799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER CWO 7020 AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING RESPONSE TO JANUARY 4-6, 1984 NRC AUDIT QUESTIONS File: 0485.16.1 UYI 42*0$*22*04 Serial CSC-7375 0460.2 12*16 00211(S)
REFERENCE:
JAMooney letter to JJHarrison, serial CSC-7292, dated February 8, 1984, i
l Enclosed are Figure 8-8 and 8-9 for Attachment 8 to our February 8, 1984 letter which were inadvertantly omitted.
'Y JAM /CMM/ktw Attachment CC -RFWarnick, NRC Region III R3 Landsman, NRC Region III RJCook, NRC Senior Resident Inspector Hidland Site l
DSHood, Project Managar Hidland t
l
%$ g '$M i
T
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Midland Units 1 and 2 Docket No 50-329/50-330 Letter Serial CSC-7375 Dated February 27, 1984 At the request of the Commission and pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended and the Commission's Rules and Regulations thereunder. Consumers Power Company submits J A Mooney letter to J J Harrison serial CSC-7375, dated February 27, 1984.
l CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 4
By 7dI%
4 i
)
J A $ooney Executive 14anager Swornandsubscribedbeforemethisl day of M.#1/w 1984.
f i
b) /13 22 Al )
Notary Public gig /
My Cosumission Expires d-hfb l
t I
,.m n,.;n e?
s.
Netary PuSc. Bay Count /, MI
, gy wala tutres Mar. 4 Las(
4 i
BF0204-00025-CW01 i
i f
E Q
w
m OM/0L SERVICE LIST
~
Mr' Frank J Kelley, Esq a Atomic Safety & Licensing Attorney. General of the Appeal Board State of Michigan U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ms Carole Steinberg, Esq e P Washington, DC 20555 Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Mr C R Stephens (3) 720 Law Building Chief, Docketing & Services Iansing, MI 48913 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission T
Office of the Secretary Washington, DC 20555 Mr Myron M Cherry, Esq Suite 3700 Ms Mary Sinclair Three First National Plaza 5711 Summerset Street Chicago, IL 60602 Midland, MI 48640 i
Mr Wendell' H Marshall Mr. William D Paton, Esq l
RFD 10 Counsel for the NRC Staff Midland, MI 48640 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr Charles Bechhoefer, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Dr Frederick P Cowan Hs Barbara Stamiris 6152 N Verde Trail 5795 North River Road Apt B-125 Rt 3 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Freeland, MI 48623 Mr Fred Williams Dr Jerry Harbour Isham, Lincoln & Beale Atomic Safety & Licensing 1120 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 325 Board Panel i
Washington, DC 20036 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr James E Brunner, Esq Mr M 'I Miller, Esq Consumers Power Company Isham, Lincoln & Beale 212 West Michigan Avenue Three First National Plaza l
Jackson,'MI 49201 52nd Floor Chicago, Il 60602 Mr D F Judd
'Mr John Demeester, Esq Babcock & Wilcox Dow Chemical Building j
PO Box 1260,
Michigan Division l
Lynchburg, VA-24505 Midland, MI 48640 Mr Steve Gadler, Esq Ms Lynne Bernabei i
-2120 Carter Avenue Government Accountability Project St Paul, MN 55108 1901 Q Street,'NW i
Washington, DC 20009 i
i
.9/3/83 g
.{
- miO583dO429a100
- a
.y 1
I I)
A e '
g
-7' s
s
1
-.s BCC JWCook, P-26-3365 DLQuassse, Midland (3)
TABuczwinski, Midland-207 JNLeech, P-24-507 DASossners, P-14-106 (For SER Related Issues)
DFLewis, Bechtel DJVandeWalle, P-24-614B
[
MIMiller, IL&B, Chicago FCWilliams, IL&B, Washington, DC CALow, P-12-237A NRC Correspondence File, P-24-517 UFI, P-24-517 BJWalraven, P-24-517 Hearings File, P-24-517 I
l i
r I
- I
^E
+-
g
.*f
~
,4,
'.I
w/.
E i
i
~ C on TROL TOWER 4
i 4
6-m N
Q l
--..-_---_--t----.. -. a 8
f) free Jacking & V6(nStst.
- Baseline 6 t5 62 i
Gr; time and Price lo -
i hck ng e E6 G<illage M8 ut eux.
=
=
o
~
O m
)
o 7
_________.__._______a OEFOPHCb StfRPCS AT C ol.vMM l~ INEs Gi=%
t F l Cr u R E 8-9
+
1 i
m G.6 kl E
h-5
- CONTROL TowCR 4
e i
4 s
m t
C O
m
^ ~ ' '
~~'
~~
. - -~ T ~~ ~ ~'~ ~~
a
- Baseline 0-is 82 j
After Jacle:ng e k/6(twto n )
l Grillage cmct Pe,oe to -
- rigin Aug, Jacking e Eb Grillage i
g 8
%o s
u___z__________a o
e DE FORM ED SifAPES Ar Cocuna Lines G s' H FIGURE 8-9 1
1 i
=
I
l
=
D(
ddnu A gy(
k Dm,3 "/<7/p/
c Dean L Quemme
[
She Manager Midland Project
%ciand Pro #ect PC Boa 1963. Meand. MI 48640 e (517) 6318650 February 15, 1984 Mr John J Harrison, Chief Midland Section, Region III Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER I
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT OF TURBINE ROLL MILESTONE File: 0655 UFI: 99*08 Serial: CSM-0734 This is to advise you of Consumers Power Company desire and intent to proceed with that work necessary to support a Turbine Roll Test in mid-1984 and to request your concurrence to same.
Paragraph 4.5.4 (Special Procedures) of the Construction Completion Program (CCP) recognizes the desirability of allowing installation of specific items to support the turnover schedule prior to full release of an area for Phase 2 work.
This paragraph further identifies in general' those requirements that must be met to allow that work to proceed. It is clearly the intent of Consumers Power Company to rigidly control this work to assure absolute compliance to the requirements of the CCP.
During the week of February 6,1984 Consumers Power Company representatives met with you and Mr Gardner, and separately with the Site Resident Inspectors to explain the details of the work to be done. The. package of information attached to this letter was used as the basis of those explanations. In summary, the package contains the following information:
1.
General identification of plant systems involved.
2.
Brief description of the turbine roll activity.
3.
Scope of work described in level of effort, i.e., non-manual manhours for status assessment and QVP and craft manhours for Q and non-Q work.
l 4.
Prerequisites to initiation of the work and control systems for execution i
of the work.
5.
Identification of modules in which affected systems are located.
)
FEE 17 EM O
. A g d m, ? d I no _
e W. I 1Y ** ' ? ']
4
^
s.
~
Tapc 2 6.
Comodity lists identifying the detailed portions of each affected system that requires status assessment and/or QVP.
7.
Marked-up system P& ids identifying exact portion of each system required.
As has been identified to you in our meeting on this subject, portions of Q systems are required that are not located in modules currently released to Consumers by the NRC.
As indicated above, the attachment clearly identifies these modules.
Considering the above, Consumers Power Company requests your concurrence to pursue the turbine roll milestone as described herein and requests the release of those portions of required systems contained in modules not currently released that are required to support this milestone.
i 4
a
?
i CC: DSHood, Project Manager-Midlend w/out attachment RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector w/out attachment JCKeppler, Regional Administrator, Region III w/out attachment i
h 1
1 1
. 1 t
'I i
l a
(
.?
L E
<4
+
,-t
---e p
q g
.g
o
~, O CORSu m S(S s,, 3 Power o-a ' o"*"'-
l
(
C0mpBDy um %a
-.~
,. s V
=
Mdand Project PO Bos 1963. Mdand, MI 4664o. (517) 631-8660 F pHNCipAL STAFP gg. Q DPRPi DE 3/RA 3MSP February 9, 1984 s/RA 3N[3 g
3 v
M i
Mr G A Hierzer IF l
Bechtel Power Corporation P O Box 2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIULAND ENERGY CENTER CWO 7020 RELEASE OF SWO #FSW 33 File: 0402.2, 16.13, M-151 UFI: 50*20*03, 08*06*03 Serial: CSC-7317 Stop Work Order #FSW 33 has been released by MPQAD effective 11:25 A.M. on February 9, 1984. Bechtel is requested to formally advise The Zack Company of this release. A copy of the released Stop Work Order is attached.
_1-DLQ/DDJ/ kip cc: JGKeppler, NRC Region III JJHarrison, NRC Region III l
RJCook, NRC Site RAWells, MPQAD BHPeck, MEC NIReichel, MEC DDJohnson, MEC i
i i
i 1
i FEB 15 IIB 4 0
i 1
Y h
--vr w
y m-
m Rav. 1 11/3/83 XIDL&ED PROJECT STOP WORK ORDER
" " ' ". " ' " " " " " " ~ " '
mm-seen 1 e9 m HVAC Subcontract, ZACK 2a. s e m e sse uns m a 1.
sseum m a m FSW-33
- s. and MPQAD-HVACA. Inspection HVAC "Q"-listed Work
- a. ammame ns g g g,
. mar, sur uma amm anm ta. uma seem e,AJBoos m RAWells A a"*10-22 8 88.5.Lo fy:.;
useamus a, nas.10-21-83 susec:50 PM
- aus 10-22-89 seen o ?00 AM M
M4
. manyme e ammune muumas sur uma masus Problems,t:ith referencing of * * *
- 10-22-83
- "T
. awings and specifications in the BPCo FCR/FCN process have reated an indeterminate condition with respect to work that ha: 4. ma' 16.13
, sen or could -be performed to Q listed drawings and speci-ications. REFERENCE AUDIT MSA-83-32 CAHierzer i
i s a result of this condition the f ollowing Stop Work is being JLWood i
ssued:
BPCo Project or Field Engineering Approval of FCN3 or FCRs.
Fabrication, Installation and inspection in the HVAC area.
Allowable exceptions to the above items are. as noted below:
1 A.
Actions t'o maintain safe plant working conditions.
B.
Actions to maintain calibra?.ed instruments.
3, pg, 3
{
C.
Actions to implement the storage and maintainence j
program.
, am acess mam BPto Project and Field Engineering Approval of FCNs and FCRs Only A.
- 1.
Bechtel corrective action' taken as described in JARutger's letter to, RAWells (com 136478, BLC-18614) dated Decembe's 7, 1983 and GAHierzer's letter to' RAWells (BCCC-88004 dated December 9,,1983 (See Attachments,1'& 2) 3.
Fabrication, installation and inspection of HVAC Q'-Listed work by.Zack (including Tuttle & Bailey) and HVAC Assurance.
1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in G. A Hierzer's letter to R A Wells (BCCC-9003R) dated. February 9, 1984 (See. Attachment 3).
t
. se u s e aus e ns = =um un m anneni A.
BPCo Project and Field Engineering Approval of FCNs and FCRs Only
~ j 1.
MPQAD review and approval of PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and,
FID-2.100.
2.
MPQAD review of training recceds for BPCo project construction.' engineering and administrative personnel.
- cmpletion of corrective action verified and Stop Work li ted f BPCo Project and Field Ingineering approval of FCNs and FCRs.
By
!8 Date /2 = 1
- 80.
[
v v Time /g /o
. ase-- e emme=vs
-- numus
- . sur uma anun urne gl t
=.
==
}
f
=.
==
so.,
a.
F-6M/l (Rev 0) 4
- - ~ ~.
. t
'N 9
Block 13 (continued)
Sheet 2 of 3 of Stop Work Order FSW-33 D.
Receipt of materials (no inspactiTn for receipt acceptance to be performed)
E.
Training and Certification of QA/QC personnel.
F.
HVAC Weld Justification Program.
C.
See Item 5 below for subsequent allowable exceptions.
ld,'
l 4.
As a minimum, the following actions shall be taken prior to lif ting this Stop Work Order in part or total:
A.
Perform a review and analysis to evaluate the extent of the problem.
B.
Take appropriate prograsunatic action based on 4(a) above.
C.
Reinstruct Bechtel Project Engineering, Field Engineering, Field Document Control and Project Document Control personnel in the generation approval and distribution of the FCR/FCN Form to prevent the problem from recurring.
D.
Establish a mechanism for lif ting of this Stop Work on a partial basis.
5.
In support of corrective actions necessary to rasolve this Stop Work i
Order, the following addi.tional exceptions to the Stop Work Order are allowed:
A.
Any FCR with only RE interim approval that has not received PE final dis-position and any FCN with PFE approval but not yet dispositioned by Project Engineering is allowed to be processed in accordance with FPD-2.000 Rev.10, FPD-1.000 Rev.16, FID-2.100 Rev. 4, PEP-4.62.1 Rev. 0 and ADP-2.12 Rev. O.
These FCNs/FCRs shall be processed through Phase 1, 2 and 3 in accordance with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Progran."
Prepared By
- 00. *~.
Date it.3. g3 7,,* 7_7 p.m.
i Approved By j
Mdh n
VV
~
Date b
(
I a
i l
l 1
i.
t 1
a t
.s
-~.
.p.
Shset 3 cf 3 cf Step L.dTRIBUTION FOR STOP WORK ORDER Work Ordsr FSW-33 KDBailey JABauer 1,
DEBeaudoin
- , s.~
~
WRBird JEBrunner FWBuckman JWCook MADietrich GFEvert WJFriedrich e (QC)
EWGoold f (Planning & Scheduling)
WDGreenweli.
PKHansen GAHierzer EMHughes DJones HPLeonard e (PAD)
_i BWMarguglio REMcCue JKHeisenheimer 9 (Soils)
JAMooney BHPeck DLQuamme JARutgers i
DATaggart f (PAP)
RAWells JLWood f (HVAC)
Subcontractors t Construction Completion Group Supervisor (Group disbanded) l l
t i
l f
\\
~
~
1:
\\
1-I..
3
- .,.e..,
e e.
,-,..u
^.w y
Pag 3 4 ' f 4 cf o
3 Step W2rk Ordsr FSW-33 BLOCK 15. (continued)
B.
Fabrications installation and inspection of HVAC Q-Listed work (includes Architectural, Civil, Instrumentation, Electrical and Mechanical Disciplines) 1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and au41b TEtivities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to work in the scope defined in B. above. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II Resolution Sheets, and audit of Phase III Composite Log.
2.
Per BPCo letter #BCCC-9003R dated February 9,1984, Work Prints will be issued to Zack and will be used for work in the scope as defined in B above. This is consistent with BPCo's response to CPCo MCARR DAT-1 pro-vided by BPCo Transmittal No. 54944, dated January 26, 1984.
Completion of corrective action verified and Stop Work lifted for work in scoep de-fined in B above.
I By nGf$
ate A = 9 ~ $ W Time // ' A MA I
i i
4 1-1-
n' s
~
h.
X day DEC b81983 Bechte,.3ower Corporation Post Office Box 2167 Com1236478 M*nd. McNgan m i
.2 BLC-18614 December 7, 1983 c
Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 1963 ATTACHMENT 1 To Midland, MI 48640 Stop Work Order FSW-33 Attention :
R. A. Wells Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 j
Bechtel Job 7220 FSW-33 'DIROUGH 41 (FCR/FCN APPROVAL)
Y,our action is requested to partially lift the subject stop work I
orders to allow Field Engineering,and Project Engineering approval of Field Change Requests / Field Change Notices (FCR's/FCN's). This request is based on completion of the following actions:
- 1) PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FFD-1.000, FPD-2.000 *and FID-2.10_0 have been revised to provida process corrective action to pre-vent recurrance of the problems noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MSA-32-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F.
In'sununary, the process corrective action includes new FCR and FCN forms which provide for more positive control.
- 2) Projoct personnel have been reinstructed to the procedures noted above in accordance with their department:s respective t' aining r
programs.
Bechtel is currently undertaking a review of Specification G-34
" General Specification for Field Change Notice", to formulate a change to our FCN program. Until such time as the prograsm is revised, construction will only initiate Q-listed FCN's to pro-vide as-built inforination to Project Engineering in accordance with Section 3.3 of G-34.
Non-Q FCN's will be initiated as they were prior to the issuance of the stop work orders.
1 If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me.
very truly yours, k
f-Jo Rutgers JAR /AJB/1mr Written Response Requested: No Cosa Use: NA 4
i
+
.ec:
(See attached list) 8
?
1
.y
cc:
J. W. Cook-D. L. Quanne B. Peck J
A. Mooney I
- e
^
' H. Leonard D. Taggart J. Meisenheimer W. Friedrich e
9 e
a 4
e e
1
. eeen. **-
9 e
e l
(
e i
I-i t
l l
t i
l
,i l
t i
8 t
e-
^
Bec' 'el Power Corporation l
d e
Post Office Box 2167 Midland. Mictugan 48640
- s..
December 9, 1983
~~
l Consumers Power Company' l
P.O. Box 1963 ATTACHMENT 2 To Midland, Mi.
48640 Stop Work Order i
FSW-33 Attention:
R.A. Wells Executive Manager - MPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project l
PROCESSING CYCLE FCR/FCN BCCC-8800
Dear Mr. Wells:
To allow the p'rocessing cycle for FCR/FCN to begin, the following steps have been outlined as a guide to control the FCR/FCN approval and distribution l
activities. See Attachmeist 1.
t l
l
- 1) FCRs may be written by the field engineers, signed by the Project Field Engineer (PFE), assigned a number in Field Document Contro'1, and trans-i t
mittcd to Project Engineering.
(The FCRs will be prioritized by Con-struction.)
l
- 2) Project Engineering will begin their review of these FCRs upon receipt from Construction.
- 3) Construction will advise Project Document Control of the schedule for release of composite register on a discipline by discipline basis (based on an MPQAD approval) and will require that Project Document Control approve the FCRs for distribution based,on the release schedule.
NOTR: The FCR must be written exclusively against those discipline j
l drawings that have been released in the aboys mentioned schedule. This j
will ensure that FDCC will not receive,FCRs from Project Engineering until the discipline's register has been audiced by MPQAD.
i I
FCNs will follow the same basic philosophy as modified by COM 136478. The l
PFE approval will be the check point which must adhere to the, schedule of I
releasing drawings by discipline.
-l If an FCR (FCN) references an affected drawing which is in a discipline not yet l
released by FDCC, Project Engineering (PE) will not issue the affected FCR (FCN).
i l
i Very truly yours, f
l 1
ze Site Manage j
i GAH/JR/jra l
cc:
D. Quamme l
D. Taggart Attachment f
i 1
1 I,
i
(
9
'l 'l l I I l~ I I I ! I I l.~l 'l l I I I I I I I I I I 'l I I
.f)3 S C O E g5 1;
1.
~
?.5
/r
,N o
s 4
1 mg p<
1 2X 1
as :*3. >J p.4 * 't 24 o
m<
f
{
g Qp e.
(
'O ;d 3 :
s v a
Mda a ;i.'. 3
- s; s
J.} 1 3
3 1 7
W E ':
h.
O a
~
= J ST j.I 4J j
4 30 L=
I $ IA.h D 71 S
!}3.E NE
---.4;g:.
.e
~
.=
g:
a 1
- a t
55 j
! E w
i i
.2 :
l':
g'
- 021 O
O 1
t
.M. }.
i 7 (.
l 4 -
. 2 k
t:
Q d"
e.
htb E
\\
h*,
s 4
i ht l
. t,
I f i it s%
i i
()
(j
!: :}.3
~*
i i
14 7,1 8
15
- 1
,------.90 l
n pa/
- w, i
n 4
i g * *.
- i 1
's....---.
5 $
h J
t 2
M e
30' d iaf i
U S i in H
2$1
)!
-)
d i f,) icd:
u::i a
3 rg ia n 2 4
j p
5.5 ji 4
f 41t 6
wa
- a r :,,
a t
y a
g p
>J2 i
-t o
o U
I I
s g.
gt g1 g
(
z
}
2 2 liI 28l W
o s
om EW
- Eed,
~me
~W.
g 11 m
.x
,j
- f*
o2!
o i
EWs E
.J g4 o.l I
b x-i 0-a t
I i
s
-I f
l
[
~..-
^
S<hMod-3 I
F 15 5%p sh,4 M pro-33 Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Sox 2167 Midland. Michigan 48640 1
February 9, 1984 i
Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 31 Midland, MI 48640 Attention:
R. A. Wells Job 7220 Midland Project Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 FSW 33
$i BCCC-9003R
Dear Mr. Wells:
4 Your action is requested to partially lift the subject Stop Work Order (SWO) to allow the initiation of HVAC related work.
This to Block 13 Item 4 of the order: request is based on completion of the follo i
i Item No.
Action 4
4A A review of all FCRs/FCNs' generatied which apply to i
the related work has been performed in accordance i
with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Pro-gram".
l We have updated the. design document register and dis-tribution lists to reflect the results of this review.
i 4B & 4C As described in J. A. Rutgers' letter of December 7, i
1983 (BLC-18614), PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide i
process corrective action to prevent recurrence of
.)
the problems noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MFS-83-32-03F -
and 83-32-04F.
All appropriate project personnel have
?
j been reinstructed to these procedures in accordan their department's respective training programs. ce with In addition, Bechtel Field Procedure FPZ '1.000 has been revised.
The intent of this revision is to issue " work prints" to Zack rather than " Controlled Drawings".
All appropriate Subcontract personnel f.
l have been reinstructed in the use of this procedure (attachment A.
4 have been comm)unicated to the Zack Company t b
Subcontract Change Notice (SCN 0-398).
],'
notified the Zack Company of new definitions and This SCN procedures associated.with document distribition.
s h
I
[
f
~ :. - -..
. n.-
~.
.c
~
i.
~!!
[...', -
Bechtel Powe'rCorporation i
' Consumers Poser Company BCCC-9003R
- Page 2 a
- s..
.., r-4D The Zack Company has also revised procedures MB-FP-1, MB-FP-3, MB-FP-S, MB-FP-7A MB-FP-7B, MS-FP-7C, and MB-FP-12. All appropriate Zack personnel have been i,
l reinstructed to these procedures in accordance with their respective training programs. Documentation 3
supporting this is attached (attachment B).
t
~
4E & 4F As the document control registers are released the
" Controlled Drawings" will be reviewed to insure that Zack has the latest revisions of all documents and associated change paper. Upon release of the Zack i
Stop Work Order and the approprite release of disci-pline Stop Work Orders (Bechtel) the " Controlled Prints" will be replaced by " Work Prints" per FPZ 1.000.
4 Yours very truly, 3
Ja,, a x6
- 6. A. Hierzer Site Manager GAH/ JAB /fc Attachments: A) Bechtel Subcontracts Training Documentation j
B) Zack Subcontracts Training Documentation i
1 I
l i
4 I
t L
i t.
l
!)
~
q
-- s
.e..
CORSum0(S j
L P0t'M She Manager g
C0mp8ny uu my,
..J?
Mesand Protect: PO Bom 1963. Mullend. MI 4064o e (617) 631-866o JRINCIPAL STAFP
' R A*
fj.OPRP D/RA DE A3A OR4SP February 9, 1984 4
C OR:AA
% f5
>Ao ses V
-3A ML U
Mr G A Hierzer Bechtel Power Corporation P O Box'2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERCY CENTER GWO 7020 RELEASE OF SWO #FSW 35 File: 0402.2, 16.13, FSC-206 UFI: 50*20*03, 08*06*03 Serial: CSC-7319 Stop Work Order #FSW 35 has been released by MPQAD effective 2:48 P.M. on February 9, 1984. Bechtel is requested to formally advise CEO Construction Testing of this release. A copy of the released Stop Work Order is attached.
>3
+
/
DLQ/DDJ/ kip cc: JGKeppler, NRC Region III JJHarrison, NRC Region III
+
RJCook, NRC Site l
RAWells, MPQAD BHPeck, MEC NIReichel, MEC DDJohnson, MEC t
e l
I i
l FEB 151984 k
w
3 Rav.1 11/3/83
"" PNCT
.. ~
")d'
===us JAI.ITT ASSURANCE DEPAR~.
rm-STOP WORK ORDElt suas e
NE8 GEO Construction sa., samr e m a man All "Q"
- 2. m was e m 739,,q listed work to BPCo drawings
- a. saanen m: DEHolthaus M #tle4 sam /
-Tes % u v,A < wee < r < -ci n e 10/22/83,,3s4 g,,go g ac., sur uma uma sami sa. mas summai
- s. anna N#
us, 83 PM mmein191/A1 11 M eu Scs:r=ns e ammm=m mesmas suo uns aseen 8 M/d
/s.g.g-h-Problems with referencing of drawings ani! specifications in
- 6. inni jg ~ 73 the BPCo FCR/FCN process have created an indeterminate T* " " * ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' ' " " " * '
condition with respect to work that has been or could be performed to "Q" listed crawings and specifications REF: MSA-83-32.
As a result of this condition the following Stop Work is j being issued:
1.
BPCo Field or Project Engineering ap' proval of FCN's or See page 3 2.
Installation and inspection of "Q" listed work in the eslar GEO Construction Testing area.
i l
assurms assum sans A., BPCo Project and Field'Engineerir.; '.;;r:::1 M *
=d FCRs Only 1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in JARutger's letter,.to RAWells (Com 136478, BLC-18614) dated Decemtier 7,1983 and GAHierzer's letter to
' ' ~
RAWells (BCCC-8800) dated December 9,1983 (See Attachments 1 & 2) t Ins. tall'ation and Inspection of Q-Listed. Work in the GEO Construction Testing,
B.
~
area.
1.
~Bechtel corrective action taken as described in GAHierzer's letter to i
RAWells (BCCC-9008) dated February 8,1984 (See Attachment 3)
I
. icus e ausseavs as== numaammai A.
BPCo Project and Field Engineering Aeproval of FCNs and FCRs On Q 1.
MPQAD review and approval of PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100.
2.
MPQAD review of training records for BPCo project construction, engineering and administrative personnel.
Compl'etion of corrective action verified and Stop Work lifted for BPCo Project and lield Engineering approval of FCNs and FCRs.
1 ivity.
Time
/(C20 f * ' w%%RW "P f'"*
ff*
a uJ2=fWff**
^*==
V=== 214 y===2.W A'<7 i-
.,s#==>
- 49. s y
=>
=>
~
W
_T-6M/1 (Rev. o) y
. A rg 9
m
. e, 1 n
Block 13 (continued)
Sheet 2 of y of stop Work Order FSW-35 3.
Allowable exceptions are as noted below:
a) Actions to maintain safe plant working conditions.
b) Actions to maintain calibrated instruments.
c) Actions to implement the storage and maintainence program.
d) Receipt of materials (no inspections to be performed on received materials).
e) irain' and Certification of GEO NDE personnel.
ld, f) See It.a 5 below for subsequent allowable exceptions.
4.
As a minimum, the following actions shall be taken prior to lifting this Stop Work Order in part or total:
i a) Eechtel and MPQAD to perform a review and analysis to evaluate the extent of the problem.
b) Bechtel and MPQAD to take appro'priate programmatic action based on 4A.
c) Reinstruct EPCO, Project Engineering, Field Engineering, and Document Control personnel in the generation and approval of the FCR/FCN form to prevent the problem from recurrirs.
d) Bechtel and MPQAD to establish r. mechanism for lif ting of this Stop Work on a partial basis.
e) Bechtel and MPQAD to establi:,h a method for upgrading subcontractor with the correct specifications and drawings.
f) Subcontractor to purge existing iiles of any erronous specifications and drawings, FCN's and FCR's.
g) Subcontractor to identify any work or inspection performed to any specifi-cations, drawings, FCR's or FCN's, that have been identified as in error.
Identification shall be per their nonconformance procedure.
S.
In support of corrective actions necessary to resolve this Stop Work Order, the following additional exceptions to the Stop Work Order are allowed:
I
{
A) Any FCR with only Reinter im approval that has not received PE final dis-l position and any FCN with PFE approval but not yet dispositioned by Project Engineering is allowed to be processed in accordance with FPD-2.000 Rev.10, FPD-1.000 Rev.16,. FID-2.100 Rev. 4, PEP-4.62.1 Rev. O i
and ADP-2.12 Rev. O.
These FCNs/FCRs shall be processed through Phase 1 2 and 3 in accordance with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program."
Prepared By Mb u
l
\\
Date I t 15. R3 2 : 3 Z P..w.
{
Approved By
(
AdM&&w
- Date H L7~5 i
i-p p Y3 i
l h
j O
4
.~
'~
~
-.4
. -..- -i,-
- -%_i-,
.,e
-,. ~ -,
DVJ t *4-W 4
Shact 3 'cf of Stop uiSTRIBUTION FOR STOP WORK ORDER Ucrk Ordsr FSW-35 KDBailey.'
JABauer DEBeaudoin
~,,y WRBird JEBrunner FWBuckman JWCook MADietrien GFEwert WJFriedrich 9 (QC)
EWGoold 8 (Planning & Scheduling)
WDGreenwell PKHansen GAHierter Dd.Hughes DJones HPLeonard f (PAD)
BWMarguglio REMcCue J$Meisenheimer 9 (Soils)
JAMooney BHPeck DLQuamme JARutgers DATaggart f (PAP)
RAWells JLWood f (HVAC) f Subcontractors f Construction Completion Group Supervisor (Group disbanded)
)
1-I Y
j D-7 y
Paga 4 of 4 of Stop Work Order FSW-35 BLOCK 15 (continue,d).
B.
Installation and inspection of Q-Listed work ta the CEO Construction Testing area includes Architectural, Civil, Instrumentition, Electrical and Mechanical Disciplines 1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to work in the scope defined in B. above. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II Resolution Sheets, and audit of Phase III Composite Log.
2.
Per BPCo letter #BCCC-9008, dated February 8, 1984, Work Prints will be issued to GEO Construction Testing and will be used for work in the scope defined in B above. This is consistent with BPCo's response to CPCo MCARR DAT-1 provided by BPCo Transmittal No. 54944, dated January 26, 1984.
Completion of corrective action verified and Stop Work lifted for work in scope defined in B above.
2 -i"kf By u til Date vv Time
- 2..' 4$ l'O) i i
i t
i i
t I.
-n e
~
u.
DAT-Bechle _'ower Corporation DEC b8.583 Post Office Sox 2167 Codi J3fi478 Meand. Michigan 4864 j
- sV i
BLC-18614 December 7, 1983 Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 1963 ATTACHMENT 1 To i
j Midland, MI 48640 Stop Work Order Attention:
R. A. Wells Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Bechtel Job 7220 FSW-33 THROUGH 41 (FCR/FCN APPROVAL) 6 1
Your action is requested to partially lift the subject stop work drders to allow Field Engineering and Project Engineering approval of Field Change Requests / Field Change Notices (FCR's/FCN's). This request is based on completion of the following actions:
- 1) PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to pre-vent recurrance of the problema noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MSA-32-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F.
In summary, the process j
corrective action includes new FCR and FCN forms which provida for more positive control.
l
'2 ) Project personnel have been reinstructed to the procedures noted above in accordance with their departments respective training programs.
Bechtel is currently undertaking a review of Specification G-34,
" General Specification for Field Change Notice", to formulate a change to our FCN program. Until such time as the program is revised, construction will only initiate Q-listed FCN's to pro-vide as-built information to Project Engineering in accordance with Section 3.3 of G-34.
Non-Q FCN's will be initiated as they j
were prior to the issuance of the stop work orders.
i If you have any questions on this mattar, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
- f. Jo Rutgers JAR /AJB/lme
. Written Response Requested: No com Use: NA i'
cc:
(See attached list)
}
l E
l
\\
~.-
m.
l cc:,J. W. Cook.
D. L. Quame B. Peck J. A. Mooney
..Hs Leonard D. Taggart J. Meisenheimer eP W. Friedrich r
l 1
I t
M 1
l t
e
.?
O
+
t G
l
[
1 1
4 l
-l l
J l
l I
i 1
1 4
h
l Becht Power Corporation Post office Box 2167 Midland. Micnigan 48640 December 9, 1983 e-Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 1963 ATTACHMENT 2 to Midland, Mi.
48640 Stop Work Order FSW35 7
Attention:
R.A. Wells Executive Manager - HPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project PROCESSING CYCLE FCR/FCN 3CCC-8800
Dear Mr. Wells:
To allow the processing cycle for FCR/FCN to begin, the following steps have been outlined as a guide to control the FCR/FCN approval and distribution activities. See Attachment 1.
i
- 1) FCRs may be written by the field engineers, signed by the Project Field i
Engineer (PFE), assigned a number in Field Document Control, and trans-mitted to Project Engineering. (The FCRs will be prioritized by Con-struction.)
- 2) Project Engineering will begin their review of these FCRs upon receipt from Construction.
- 3) Construction will advise Project Document Control of the schedule for release of composite register on a discipline by discipline basis (based on an MPQAD approval) and will require that Project Document Control approve the FCRs for distribution based on the release schedule.
NOTE: The FCR sust be written exclusively against those discipline drawings that have been released in the above mentioned schedule. This will ensure that FDCC will not receive FCRs from Project Engineering
~
until the discipline's register has been audited by MPQAD.
FCNs will follow the same basic philosophy as modified by COM 136478. The PFE approval will be the check point which must adhere to the schedule of j
releasing drawings by discipline.
If an FCR (FCN) references an affected drawing which is in a discipline not yet released by FDCC, Project Engineering (PE) will not issue the affected FCR (FCN).
very truly yours, s
I l
.A.
ze Site Manage i
l GAH/JR/jra j
cc:
'D.
Quamme D. Taggart Attachnent 1
i
. ~_ -
w-e' s
.sr e
e--
3-mw-+,e--- - - - - - -
T
-r-a--
e
- -G-%=
ww 2mv,-
w-
w-e-
l f
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllIIIlllll11IIIIIIl!l l t
BCCC-p8'00 ATTACHMENT 1 FCR/FCN s.a,;.t,t.t;..
Cene c.
n
- ' '"'*** h rea,s,,n * % a,9 p.) c PROBLEM RESOLUTION
, h. 6.
b.i.e i..wwv.4 p..a<a.+.-
e... n. e
.w.,.e
- c. l c.).s
. a...r s.Q >er c..e.I a,-
seg 1
s b er eoa Wh ***2'.'#b'X8'Xlff.,".Ik ***ii'.f.tbI*'
~~
y MaVA Ph... I V.4 Ph.a n V' bar j s. l'*\\ hk*.?.'l..'.
FCR/FCN
~ ~ ~
P,as t.4 m PROCESSING N o., p.s
.+., z..
....,e,...
a.rar1%
ower.se.w n sa,e 4.awee s'
8 j
l ves 4. s.a p aa AH,.b% b lv
.)'*s
,f/,'.","4 n on, >;u.f.g7f,..'i,k 8
ee e,...,a nrar 4,,-
pM t.L.
U*i P(88 V faa';-)>**aV**d. Bel etV.at <
d, 5
er-
/v'".'jpedD 900Yn.s/
I ****4 fe' l
eg gg Fr./ete Tse/w,
""I et h.
,s nytt A,,.
k sFH4 $..J AN/Pt
[g n egk,,);.c sh se e Ptil V.I FCA U rsae.ft/A( V.6 ft4 44 a-V.W,ide.,gV.aty:r.tr.pd pes 8 s
t
&. r <s./
ret 4. s.J red Act,,U.g..tf teless.J "b;ss'.p n.s.
E TeILE:
new cas arvs.
e.se assotveme eso,seesta rea PF5 ishhl asessaic scos o
wona essene sa tosses de e
i, 6ges.*w.
- ' + '
l o
I Am asasea4 Bechtel Power Corporation % g
- z..
- 1 r
Post Office Box 2167
,,,, -. Midland. Michigan 48640 i
February 8, 1984 Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 1963 Stop Work Order FSW-35 i
Midland, MI 48640 Attention:
R. A. Wells i
j Executive Manager - MPQAD Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Bechtel Job 7220 1
FSW-35 BCCC-9008
Dear Mr. Wells:
E Your action is requested to lift the subjet Stop Work Order to 4
allow the initiston of work by GEO Constru.: tion Testing.
i' This 4 of the order: request is based on the following actions pursuant to Block 13. Item
.'i Item No.
i Action 4A A review of all FCRs/FCNa generated which apply to i
related work has been performed in~accordance with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program".
1 We have updated the design document registers and distribution lists to reflect the results of this review.
4R & 4C As described in J. A. Rutgers' letter of December 7, i
1983 (BLC-18614), PEP 4.62.1; ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, l
FPD-2.000, and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to prevent recurrence of the problema noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MFS-83-32-03F i
and MSA-83-32-04F.
i All appropriate project personnel have been reinstructed to these procedures in t
accordance with their department's respective training programs.
+
In addition, Bechtel Field Procedure FFZ-1.000 has been revised.
{
The intent of this revision is to now issue 1
" Work Prints" rather than " Controlled Prints" to GEO Construction Testing (GEO). All appropriate Bechtel personnel involved with the GEO subcontract have been retrained in this procedure per FPG-2.000.
In line with this revision to FPZ-1.000, Subcontract Change Notice D-048 was sent to GEO.
This SCN notified GEO that they would now be receiving " Work Prints" rather then " Controlled Prints".
It further requested that j
GE0 revise their Document Control Procedures and train appropriate personnel in the handling of the change ii paper.
(+ N a-g m_ g.hy -
-w+
ed--
g w-
I W
R. A. Wells -
FSW-35
.Page 2 Ite's No.
- 'P Action GEO accordingly revised procedure No. 2.4 " Document Control" and has retrained all appropriate personnel.
A statement of this retraining is attached.
4E & 4F As the appropriate Document Control registers are released, the " Controlled" drawings are reviewed to
' insure that GEO has the latest revisions with all channe paper. Upon release of the GEO Stop Work, The
" Controlled" prints will be replaced by " Work Prints" per FPZ-1.000.
$b 4
G. A. Hierzer GAH/ JAB /tyn 020907T3 i
Written Response Requested: Yes Response Requested by: 2-9-84 Attachment 4
l l
i f
p j
i
,M
1iis'Cn:ss orive l Fostr City, CA 94404'l T lephon) 415 573 6000 r
.~
i
' Construction Testing 1
VECEIVE7 A
cJ February 8, 1984 FEB 9 1354 i
Bechtel Power Corporation t!sCH121. POWF.2 CORP.
P. O. Box 2167 JO3 72')0 Midland,. Michigan 48640 n n.E Z ji?... 8 M 4 Attention:
Mr. G. A. Hierzer Site Manager Serial Letter No. GCT-206-766 i
i 4
i i
Gentlemen:
i
Subject:
Midland Plant Units 1 & 2
. Consumers Power Company Bechtel Job No. 7220 i
Subcontract'No. 7220-FSC-206 Training of. Procedure 2.4 On, February 7, 1984, Mr) Arnold W. Morrill was in structed, by telephone,.to follow the new instructions as stated in Procedure 2.4 Rev. C for the handling of all Client docume%ts.
If we may be of further. assistance, please feel free to contact this office.
+
Very truly yours,
't l
l GEO CONS UCTION TESTING, INC. -
Ap)dohso 1
q N
i 1
Quality. Control-Mansir r i
3 ~
CJ:pcb i
'>62 '1') y-cc:
A. Morrill.
^
g t
}
~
-y 4
4 f
g.
e s e
p.
'~ g 3 '.
.u.,___
j
..i, I g
- r
- I
.?
/'
/
~$
7
[
a y
4 e
a gf N^,lPAL STAFF
\\ 060E0 @0f$
~
0 (jjp j Power 9"
7?
\\
C0mp2Gy jg iM.R syt3 6
n.
Midland Project: Po Som 1963. Midiend, MI 48640 * (517) 6314650 February 8, 1984 1
Mr G A Hierzer Bechtel Power Corporation P O Box 2167 Hidland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 RELEASE OF SWO #41 File: 0460.3, 0655.3, 0436 UFI:
73*, 99*08, 12*50 Serial: CSC-7306 REFNRENCES: 1) Release of CIO Hold Point 011 for Mechanical Discipline
- 2) MPQAD Release of SWO #41 for Mechanical Discipline As a result of the February 8,1984 release of Stop Work Order FSW-41 for mechanical discipline documents Eechtel Power Company is released for Status Assessment in the above noted discipline for modules 340, 102, 120 410 and 800.
It is expected this Phase I. work will be performed in a careful and prudent manner with proven satisfactory results prior to any accelerated work efforts in the above identified modules.
In accordance with your recently approved procedures, Status Assessment shall utilize Status Assessment Prints (SAPS) issued from Field Document Control Center (Station 59).
Bechtel Power Company shall insure that only personnel who have
~
satisfactorily completed all training requirements for Status Assessments will perform this activity.
M s
- / DLQ/NIR/ kip cc: JGKeppler, NRC Region III JJHarrison, NRC Region III RJCook, NRC Site RAWells, MPQAD 1
BHPeck, MEC NIReichel, MEC i
i FEB 1 B 7
OC0184-0001-CN04
}
t g
=
I l
m STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Bh 2325. BOSTON massachusetts 02107
,* 'N i
Mr. D. L. Quam e February 8, 1984 Consumers Power Company i
Midland Nuclear Plant 3500 E. Miller Road Midland, Michigan 48640
Subject:
Docket No. 50-329/330 Midland Plant - Units 1 and 2 Overview of the Construction Completion Program Serial No. SWMCP-029 Re:
FCR/FCN Review CIO Hold Point No. 011 CIO has completed a review of FCR/FCN's for the mechanical discipline and considers the results of this review to be satisfactory.
This releases CIO Hold Point Aumber 011 in its entirety.
h f'IOProgramManager
. E. Karr C
FB/nl cc:
JGKeppler, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL i
RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso S&W i
t ewW'n=et j
I
f gh h eo na 1 i
- s. m.aca sa. sma:m= ar :=r was ammaa
- s. ese mag is::: an, Balance of Plant Q-listed work W - 41 PiPQAD
~
, mr-e, tintwe
- n F,+*e1 p., +,= and st,,eifi
,,'? w y 1
- n. cas:. sur unc aum* anus 1s. uns asummh eations
- 3. asma fc,n, g
=m, j* C
' = AJBoos miRAWells m
-# M N 1,y M nash* n ra->1aEtose nami n / 91/ g 3 tosso.cnou 1.nnou su macx:r==s or ame==s ammuzam sur umaaczma
- s. aama fo-zt.-9F gg Problems with referencing of drawing and specifications in g,,,,,
the BP Co FCR/FCN process have created an indetercinate 1A-11 condition with respect to work that has been or could be
- 7. massee masammaimame a performed to "Q"-listed drawings and specifications W. Freidrich (Reft Audit MSA-83-32).
E. Hughes G. Hierzer As a result of this conditon, the following stop work is being issued:
- a. an==-i-.
- 1) BP Co Project and Field Engineering approval of FCN/FCRs.,
~~ See Sheet 3
- 2) Fabrication, installation, and inspection of Q-listed vork in the Balance of Plant area -
l
.i A C:muE:::IE 4*==M MEIma A.
BPCo Project and Field Engineering Aporoval of FCNs and FCRs Only 1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in JARutgers letter to RAWells (Com 136478, BLC-18614) dated DecemEer 7, 1933 and GAHierzer's lett'er to RAWells (BCCC-8800) dated Decembat S, 1983 (See Attachments I & 2) i.
~
~
~
2~
S. -
l
- 5-
.=se er ammac=u ac=rs unres-A.
BPCo Project and Field Engineering Approval.of FCNs and FCRs Only' 1.
MPQAD review and approval of PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100.
2.
MPQAD review of training records for BPCo project construction, engineering and administrative personnel.
I Completion of' corrective action verified and Stop Werk lifted for BPCo Project and Field Engineering approval of FCNs and FCRs. This a
eIIIjetivity.
By. _..
- 2. i..
/2 8'J Time
/FA/
(
A czesz=== cr can=== -. as:rms
- n. sur== aux z.:rzs we assas mi sama
- ne, q
'?-6M/1(Rev[f
. b
~
' ~
6 p g,. s:
y.,3 -0 4
m Oi g
BLOCK 13 (continued)
Sheet 2 of' of Stop Work 1-Order FSW-41 l
. A..
3.
Allowable exceptions are as noted below:
< r
{
a) Actions to maintain safe plant working conditions.
b) Actions to maintain calibrated instruments.
c) Removal of paint on welds of hangers.
j d) Training and certification of QA/QC Inspection personnel.
e) Actions to implement the storage and maintenance programs, including QC area inspections for equipment protection. However, no final QC acceptance will be allowed that are based on Bechtel Q-listed drawings and specifications.
f) Continue to issue and validate Nonconformance Reports (NCR), but no concurrence of 11CR disposition is allowed if based on BPCo Drawings &
Specifications.
g) See Item 5 below for subsequent allowable exceptions.
l.
4.
As a minimum, the following actions shall be taken prior to lif ting this Stop Work Order in part or total:
i a) Perform a review & analysis to evaluate the extent of the problem.
b) Take appropriate prograsunatic corrective action based on Item 4A above.
I c) Reinstruct BPCo Project Eng., Field Eng and Document Control personnel in the generation approval and distribution of the FCN/FCR form to prevent the problem from recurring..
d) Establish a mechanism for lif ting of this Stop Work on a partial basis.
5.
In. support of corrective actions necessary to resolve this Stop Work order, the j
following additional exceptions to the Stop Work Order are allowed:
I l
A.
Any FCR with only RE interimapproval that has not received PE final disposition and any FCN with PTE approval but not yet dispositioned by Project Engineering is allowed to be processed in accordance with FPD-2.000 Rev.10, FPD-1.000 Rev.
16, FID 2.100 Rev. 4, PEP-4.62.1 Rev. O and ADP-2.12 Rev. O.
These FCNs/FCRs shall be processed through Phase 1, 2 aind 3 in accordance with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program "
~
l Prepared By OO*s Date ll.S-g S
- r. A Z p. m.
Approved By ff Aah6%VA Date
//~^3-g 2 N~ A '
S m
?
t
-w
_ _ _ _ _ _ _, - _ _ + _.
.4 m,-.
r
-w-.-c--
,~.,-,,e
,y
W:rk OrdartsW.it'$
STRIBUTION FOR STOP WO7,K OT,DET 6, a - l,,f.
f
!-V.
l KDBailey
./.
JA31uer.
DE5eaudoin % -
WRBird e
. JEBrunner FiGhacionan JWCook MADistrich GFEwert WJFriedrich i (QC)
~
IWGoold f (Planning & Scheduling)
WDGreenwell PKHansen GA.Hierzer
- EMHughes.
f DJones 1
HPLeonard e (PAD)
SWMarguglio REMcCue JKMeisenheimer f (Soils)
JAMooney BHPeeli DLQuanuse I
JARutgers DATaggart t (PAP)
RAWells JLWood f (HVAC)
(
l Subcontractors i Construction Completion Group Supervisor (Group disbanded)
MPlumb l
RPope f
h 9
g 1
t w
t.
....m,.
Page i o'r [~ f Step YM o
W:rk Ordsr FSW-41 c
l BLOCK 14 (continued) l I
B.
Inspection For Architectural Related Work (Only Document Control Station 14) 1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in GAHierzer's letter tc RAWells (BCCC-8779) dated December 9, 1983 as, applied to all architectural related l
work.
(See Attachment 3)
~
i s
f l
~
6*eg
' BLOCK 15 (continued)
B.
Inspection For Architectural Related Work (Only Document Control Stations 14) j 1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of Bechtel-corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to architectural j
l related work at Document Control Station 3 only.
MPQAD review af Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II Resolution Sheet.s, andVerifica l
audit of Phase III Composite Log and document distribution. & %
- p odi/ * ')
{v, I
~
Completion of corrective action verified and Stop Work lit ed for Archit etural relatedg I
work at Station 14.
for dream ys f +h45 A Sh h?"
l**.*/}* N gy ogto
- Time 6 /J~B0 l[
(:
l
. 4 i
$I
- l 1
c NA P gs 5 of 8 of
~\\
Stop t'ork Order FSW-41 BLOCK 14.(continued)
.s.
C.
Inspection, Status Assessment and Related Work For Architectural (Docu=ent Control Stations 14 (includes Spec,'s),48 a, b & d and 55. )
1.
Same as B.1. above.
D.
Inspection, Status Assessment, and Related Work for the Architectural and Civil disciplines.
1.
For Architectural, same as B.1. above.
2.
For Civil,' Bechtel corrective action taken as described in BPCo letter BCCC-8867, GAHierzer to RAWells, dated December 30, 1983 E.
Inspection, Status Assessment and related work for the I & C discipline.
1.
Same as B.1 and D.2 above.
i F.
Inspection, Status Assessment and related work for the Electrical discipline.
1.
Same as B.J. and D.2. above.
G.
Inspection, Status Assessment and related work for the Mechanical discipline.
1.
Same as B.1 and D.2 above.
BLOCK 15 (continued) 3.
Inspection, Status Assessment and Related Work For Architectural (Document Control Stations 14 (includes spec's), 48 a, b & d and 55.)
1.
MPQAD completion of r'eviews, and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply I
to architectural. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy review of Phase II Resolution Sheets and audit of Phase III Composite Log and document distribution. Verified and released for Architectural for Document Control Stations 14, 48 a; b & d and 55 Completion of corrective action and Stop Work liftM fo chitect al at_ Stations 14, 48 a, b & d and 55.
I
\\
By A
[
Date I '2. - / I i
l W
Time 9!/ O 4 Eff::ti:: 2:nu;ry
, i OS ':, ;;;;1;t'i;n ;f ;;c..;ti.. ;; tion; d;;;rited in 2. * ;nd 0.2 of 21wwo A.Lvv.
vorisi.d by HisAL.ud wu. Sovy.m k lisi.d ivr on.
o.
u.
u tic di;;i;1in:.
'!:rifi;;ti;n; :nd li;it; tion; fer : 1: ;.. a; d;;;rited in 0.*
en: 0.2 Lv.. '... Ole L 15'.
IA wJ u-w.
i==
,/l ts k
^
___g.,
Pcg's 6 of 6 of
~
Stop Work Order FSW-41
~
3.
BLOCK 15 (continued)
.. s V
~D.
Inspection, Status Assessment, and related work for the Architectural and Civil disciplines.
1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs genera.ted and applying to the architectural and civil disciplines. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II resolution sheets, and audit of Phase III registers.
2.
Per the response to Management Corrective Action Request, DAT-1 provided by BPCo Transmittal No. 54944, dated January 16, 1984, inspection, status assessment, and related work shall utilize Work Prints and/or Status Assessment Prints (SAPS) issued only from FDCC, Station 59.
l Completion of corrective ac'wion and Stop Work Order lifted r Architectural and Civil.
@/
Date
/-2/" M By vf z&-
Time
/ / MM4f Effective January 1984, completion of. corrective actions described in B.1 and D.2 of Block 14 above has been verified by MPQAD and the Stop Work lifted for the I & C discipline. Verifications and limitations for I & C are as described in D.1 and D.2 above (in Block 15).
By h Fo#
Date /~2Y 8Y N [AGGat Time
/2 i.3 5~ Of
.4 Effective January 26, 1984, completion of corrective a.ctions described in B.1 and D.2 er Block 14 above has been verified by MPQAD and the Stop Work lifted for the Electrical discipline. Verifications and limitations for Electrical are as described in D.1. and D.2 above (in Block 15.)
j,, g, y W TAKAltf Time 2.' / 2.
IM Iffective February 8,1984, completion of corrective actions described in B.1 and 0.2 ef Block 14 above has been verified by MPQAD and the Stop Work lifted for the Mechani-cal discipline. Verifications and limitations for Mecha,nical are as described in D.1 By W Y,/,/,'2.$'h,4lW g.
and D.2 above (in Block 15).
Date S * $ $ Y n r.'
Time 3' Ws5 9
4 t
- ~
l DAT
^
Bechtr' oower Corporation DEC b81983.
Post omce Box 2167 Com '1,16.478 I
Mician. Michigan 48640 l
t BLC-18614
- s e i
Decocher 7,1983 Consume.rs Power Company P.O. Box 1963 ATTACHMENT 1 To Midland, MI 48640 Stop Work Order FSW-41 Attention:
R. A. Wells Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Bechtel Job 7220 FSW-33 THROUGH 41 (FCR/FCN APPROVAL)
Your action is requested to partially lift the subject-stop work orders to allow Field Engineering and Projact Engineering approval of Field Change Requests / Field Change Notices (FCR's/FCN's). This request is based on completion of the following actions:
- 1) PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to pre-vent recurrance of the problems noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MSA-32-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F.
In summary, the process corrective action includes new FCR and FCN forms which provide for more positive control.
2)
Project personnel have been reinstructed to the procedures noted above in accordance with their departments respective training progroms.
Bechtel is currently undertaking a review of Specification G-34
" General Specification for Field Change Notice", to formulate a change to our FCN program. Until such time as the program is revised, construction will only initiate Q-listed FCN's to pro-vide as-built information to Project Engineering in accordance with Section 3.3 of G-34.
Non-Q FCN's will be initiated as they were prior to the issuance of the stop work orders.
1 If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me.
i.
s Very truly yours, g Jo Rutgers JAR /AJB/imr Written Response Requested: No com User NA 2
cc:
(See attached list)
~
s.
cc:
J. W. Cook D. L. Quansne B. Peck J. A. Mooney H. Leonard
' 'd *T5ggart J. Meisenheimer
' p W. Friedrich I
i e
I e
e i
s e
e G
B O
g 9
6 i
e 3
\\
s
?
i
<e b
e
BechtelPower Corporation m
j Post Office Box 2167 Mic!and. Mictugan 46640 i
~
December 9, 1983
/
- . s T~'
.ATTICHMENT 2 To Consumers Power Company stop Work Order i
P.O. Box 1963 FSW-41 Midland, Mi.
48640 Attention:
R.A. Wells j
Executive Manager - MPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project PROCESSING CYCLE FCR/FCN i
BCCC-asoo i
Dear Mr. Wells:
To allow the p'rocessing cycle for FCR/FCN to begin, the following steps have been outlined as a guide to control the FCR/FCN approval and discribution activities. See Attachment 1.
- 1) FCRs may be written by the field engineers, signed by the Project Field Engineer (PFE), assigned a number in Field Document Control, and trans-mitted to Project Engineering.
(The FCRs will be prioritized by Con-struction.)
2
- 2) Project Engineering will begin their review of these FCRs upon receipt from Construction.
1
- 3) Construction will advise Project Document Control of the schedule for release of composite register on a discipline by discipline basis (based on an MPQAD approval) and will require that Project Document Control approve the FCRs for distribution based on the release schedule.
NOTE: The FCR aust be written exclusively against those discipline i
drawings that have been released in the above. mentioned schedule. This will ensure that FDCC will not receive FCRs from Project Engineering until the discipline's register has been audited by MPQAD.
1 FCNs will follow the same basic philosophy as mod'ified by,COM 136478. The PFE approval will be the check point which must adhere to the schedule of releasing drawings by discipline.
If an FCR (FCN) references an af fected drawing which is in a discipline not yet released by FDCC, Project Engineering (PE) will not issue the affected FCR (FCN).
Very tr,uly yours, 1
1 ze Site Manage I-CAH/JR/jrm f
cc:
D. Quamme D. Taggart f
Attachnent s.
k 4-4 v.
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlll 1 1 1 I l l 1.1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I T T T BCCC-8800 ATTACHMENT 1 FCR/FCN
,.a.;.g,.st..
C.cz c,
******#' h re, a rn *%',."ff*I'"
PROBLEM RESOLUTION y 3
.,6 W.i..a,.6wa /.s s. 6 a.i.m
. a...r O _ _ _s,
- c.,..
sq.6,,
- c.,+..a s.3....-
i C,,e.4 m,s'r.lfX5'rt.'? "E s'*r.'.? "*',
-)
y,4 v
,s,. z v.i,,,,,,,v.._,.....,Y v ma.:rp n. < h.*.\\.k*.**....*.'.". *
P.
FCR/FCN PROCESSING I.
N s., e.s..+, z..wi.
,__________/
a.r r %
s,
.w. =, m.
/
a l
l
.a..
AM,. h e.lv i
r.i....a m...,w....
g n,r 4,,
.,,'t.,'."/.'J, n.iu. ><,,.n"..,t.V.M.3
,3,,y l r
,e,,...,.
v.s e :
v.i.a,*' *..v. <...wv y,5*-
e"., '..'f,,'D C'r'.'y~.../,
." d***
d;,
i"-
..v r.,
re./rs res/rw.
3 st p.
,a nvyr A,,.hF < s..J n t/Pr O.f.h [,#N nasi.,,3:,n7.$ 'ic".'
- ' **""'3 s
~,.
v.<en v,.. r,p. v..,.
us, g.,v.
,u, v ir.,.i.4 w.
S. r s.
c,,
u.a,.., e s,.u,..i, /
Eele.seJ x.c.p..s.
r 5
i 1
i TITLE:
c.e
.,vs ease esman.c sce.no o
PF5 iaAhl mesotvene stoe.uts een 33 Teemtf.eas essens 9
l l
- 3 " ~d 4. 9 6.* %
-. _ ~.
1 tSecntel Power t,orporanon c
6 Pcst C?fice Box 2167 M.:::ans. MicNga.148640
,e l'
December 9, 1983 i
sV l
4 Consumers Power Company ATTACHMENT 3 To
+
F.O. Box 1963 Stop Work Order Midland, Mi.
48640 FSW-41 I
Attention:
R.A. Wells i
Executive Manager - MPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 l
FSW-34 Through 41 BCCC'-8779 l
Dear Mr. Wells:
i I
Your action is requested to partially lift the subject Stop Work Orders (SWO) to allow the initiation of architectural related work which includes archi-l tectural status assessment under the Construction Completion Program (CCF).
This request is based on completion of the following actions pursuant to i
Block 13. Ites 4 of the order:
etion Ites No.
~~
4A A review of all FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to architectural related work governed by the CCF has been performed in accordance inith FID-2.400, '7CR/FCN Review and Resolution Progras".
We have updated the design document distribution to reflect the results of this review. As a part of this step, we have removed architectural drawings from the sticks and work print distribu-I tion pending resolution of outstanding FCRs and FCNs in other disciplines affecting these drawings.
s j'
No hardware problems in architectural were noted in the review l
under FID-2.400.
4B & 4C As described in J.A. Rutgers' letter of December 7, 1983 (BLC-18614), PEP 4.62.1. ADI 2.12.10, FFD-1.000, FFD-2.000, and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to prevent recurrence of the problems noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MFS-83-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F. All appro-priate project personnel have been reinstructed to these e
f procedures in accordance with their department's respective training programs.
a
,.,.. ~.
,..-._m.
- w
.Ab.
._w..,
p 4
i UCLilict i vvven vulpviouve a
.~
R.A. Walls 7
BCCC-8779 P' age 2 Ites No.
Action
~
sr 4D As described in C.A. Hierzer's letter of December 9, 1983 (BCCC-8800) the mechanism for partial lif ting of SWO has been i
established.
If you have questions on this matter, please contact me.
Very truly yours, kl C.A. Hier r Site Mana e t
~
CAH/AJB/jrm cc D. Quamme D. Taggart e
1 I
4 5
i e
t a.
f j
3 COnStimBf5 ggojgg
t o=
u w' sine Mennerv company Mulland Pro)*ts
,,,c
- u. mens pree.cc ro ses 1ses. M6 mens, Ms 4884o * (sin e31.ase fRINCIPAL STAFF i
P[ '-
%% OFRP
(
NAA Oti 5
,OhA del $ f-t UTC1A February 7, 1924 i ', j scs v ftp +.3 I7A iil E,}
Fi l.,,fQ Mr C A Hierzer Bechtel Power Corporation P O Box 2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERCY CENTER CWO 7020 j
CONSTRUCTION TRAININC RICORDS i
File: 0655.3, B1.1.7, 0400.2 UFI: 99*08, 53*50*04, 06*02 Serial: CSC-7298 Per the attached CIO letter SWMCP-028 dated February 7,1984 the personnel on lists dated January 19 and 31, 1984 are cleared to perform Status Assessment.
S gh n
DLQ/DDJ/ kip ecs JCKeppler, NRC Region III w/a JJHarrison, NRC Region III w/a RJCook, NRC Site w/a RAWells, MPQAD w/a NIReichel, MEC w/a BHPeck, MEC w/a DDJohnson, MEC w/a e
1 j
FEB18,504 j
f
(
STbNE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Edx 2325. Boston. M AssACHusETTs 02107 i
I x
i 6
Mr. D. L. Quanne February 7, 1984 i
Consumers Power Company
)
-Midland Nuclear Plant i
3500 E. Miller Road 1
Midland, Michigan 48640
Subject:
Docket No. 50-329/330 Midland Plant - Units 1 and 2 4
l Overview of the Construction i
Completion Program l
Serial No. SWMCP-028 i,
1 l
}
Re:
Midland Energy Center i
Training of Construction Personnel Reference CPCo Correspondence j
CSC-7201 1/20/84 and CSC-7275 2/2/84 l
As requested in your transmittal number CSC-7289 of 2/6/84, please i
be advised that CIO has perfomed sampling inspections of the Con-struction Training Records of those personnel noted in the attach-ments of the above referenced correspondence. The results of:the 1
i j
sampling inspection were satisfactory. Personnel listed on the attachments are cleared to perform status assessment.
d
\\
.' ').Q,'W i
' J. E. Karr i
CIO Program Manager JEK/nl cc:
1 JGKeppler, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
R8 Kelly, S&W APAmoruso. S&W l
' ' - + ' + - -
,,c
.g 3
/ @)
l P0 Car 4
- ' a-l
~
d_.
005UhEUY
- N rronce o-g[
u.s.no er i.cc ro som tsea me.ne, us 4es4o. ist7: est seso PP i
o 3
.A DE January 31, 1984
/RA OR45 KfRA 9ggsg
.g3 C
SCS A0
,g Mr J E Karr 5GA g go Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc P O Box 2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER CWO 7020 MPQAD QAR RT-00010 j
File: 0460.3, B1.1.7, 0655 UFI: 99*08, 73*
Serial: CSC-7255 l
By letter dated October 13, 1983 from RAWells, Stone & Webster was notified i
that the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department (MPQAD) had initiated Quality Action Request RT-00010. This QAR was issued to track the broad review of MPQAD inspection personnel qualification and certification records.
The review for Quality Control Division personnel has been completed. The QAR has been closed, and a copy is attached for your information. A new QAR No. RT-00025 has been initiated for the review of Soils Division and HVAC Assurance Branch inspection personnel qualification and certification records.
Also, attached for your use is a computer printout showing QC Division per-sonnel who hold task certifications as of January 27, 1984.
dan '
=
DI.Q/GFE/klp
....~
.I cc: JCKeppler NRC Region'III w/o att-RJCook, Resident NRC Inspector w/o att RAWells, MPQAD w/o att NIReichel, MEC w/o att i
I p
o
y
-e
.O consumers Lf I
\\
j C0mpBRy sue.wameer
- ~-
Me.n;O1 PAL STAFF _
Meens Prosest Po ses issa, unnene. Ma 4sseo. isin sai esso lh[p'/[W
.3Ea E
January 24,- 1984
$n-YGO"f +3
- 1) ___1"ITa@U Mr G A Hierzer Bechtel Power Corporation P O Box 2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 702'O PARTIAL RELEASE OF SWO #41 File:
0460.3, 0655, 0456 UFI:
73*, 99*08, 12*50 Serial: CSC-7214
REFERENCES:
- 1) Release of CIO Hold Point 011 for Instrumentation and Control
- 2) MPQAD Partial Release of SWO #41 for Instrumentation and Control As a result of the January 24, 1984 partial release of Stop Work Order FSW.-41 for instrumentation and control documents Bechtel Power Company is released for Status Assessment in instrumentation and control for modules 340, 102, 120, 410 and 800.
It is expected this Phase I, work will be performed in a careful and prudent manner with proven satisfactory results prior to any accelerated work efforts in the above identified modules.
In accordance with your recently spproved procedures, Status Assessment shall j
utilize Status Assessment Prints (SAPS) issued from Field Document Control Center (Station 59).
.6 Bechtel Power Company shall insure that only personnel who have satisfactorily completed all training requirements for Status Assessments will perform this activity.
D W
DLQ/NIR/ kip r--
cc: JCKeppler, NRC Region III w/a l
JJHarrison, NRC Region III w/a RJCook, NRC Site w/a RAWells, HPQAD w/a BHPeck, MEC w/a DDJohnson, HEC w/a NIReichel HEC w/a V
i t
d l
$'f$25 2%MG d
.s STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. box 2325. BOSTON. M As5ACHUSETTs 02107 i
Mr. D. L. Qua m e January 24, 1984 Consumers Power Company Midland Nuclear Plant 3500 E. Miller Road Midland, Michigan 48640 i
~
Docket No. 50-329/330 Midland Plant - Units 1 and 2 Overview of the Construction Completion Program FCR/FCN Hold Point Serial No. SWMCP-017 CIO has completed a sampling review of Phase I and II of the following documents:
- FCR':/FCN's affecting Instrumentation and Control Documents
- FCR's/FCN's affecting Civil Documents Results of the sampling were satisfactory. Therefore, Hold Point 011 has been released for Civil and Instrumentation and Control documents.
/f*ary
=
J. E. Karr CIO Program Manager SWB/nl cc:
JGKeppler, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso. S&W i
l i
t i
Y
.-v-
.t
m ""'"MIDLAED PanJact pd
R3v. 1 11/3/83 ST0F.l0RK ORDER
*""^""""".7,.7J m
=-
r e.~
,9 JumaMa 3a. NEEE F sm M m
- 1. say su m g,
~ ~'
- b l a
FSV ~ 'I MPQAD Balance of Plant Q-listed work en n.ch*,1 n-av %, n.,d seeeifi
-,,7 og o_
w e.um emwn
' 2-amasurum a anm sa. um a sumu m cations
- 3. an.a /c.n, g mes g'C
- AJBoos
. RAWells g [/,/ 1 4 4. @ j / M name n / 91/g3 spee o. = nvu anse S n /99 /ni mes 1.nnav
- 13. amma:rsum W camazz mustzus sus umaasumes
- s. anm to-zyygy n Problems with referencing of drawing sn'd specifications in a,,,,,
16 11 il thc. EP Co FCR/TCN process have created an indeterminate
- 7. ma sum ma ammm mmmm m i
condition with respect to work that has been or could be i
performed to "Q"-listed drawings and specificacions W. Freidrich' l
l (Ref: Audit MSA-83-32).
E. Hughes G. Hierzer j
As a result of this conditon, the following stop work is
- a. ammmum being' issued
- 1) BP Co Project and Field Engineering 4pproval of
}
FCN/FCRs.
See Sheet 3
~~
- 2) Fabrication, installation, and inspection of Q-listed vork in the Balance of Plant area.
W CEmII::DI Ac==m 3Jes l
A..'BPCo Project and Field Engineering Approval of FCNs and FCRs Only 1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in JARutgers letter to RAWells (Com 136478, BLC-18614) dated Decem6er 7,1983 and GAHierzer's lett'er to RAWells (BCCC-8800) dated December 9,1983 (See Attachments I & 2) l
~ - ~
'. ~ - '
e
'4$
i.
- 15. Im W N JEEE N j
A.
BPCo' Project ard Field Engineering Approval.of FCNs and FCRs Only' 1.
MPOAD review and appro /al of PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100.
2.
MPQAD review or training records for BPCo project construction, engineering and administrative personnel.
Completion or* corrective action verified and Stop Werk lifted for BPCo Project and Field Engineering approval of FCNs and FORs. This a h e III pctivity.
By o m a(-eret
/ 2 - f -8'3 Time
/ f A./
w smezzzum e ame==vs as=zm us:rm u.
sur mas muma =rus t
s s
-1
'F-6FJ1 (Rev. 0:
e***f b
b A
,,.es 2
i BLOCK 13 (continued)
Sheet 2 of f Stop Work Order FSW-41 i
{
' 3.
Allowable exceptions are as noted below:
1 l
a). Actions to maintain safe plant working conditions.
b) Actions to maintain calibrated instruments.
{
c) Removal of paint on welds of hangers.
j j
d) Training and certification of QA/QC Inspection personnel.
l e) Actions to implement the storage and maintenance programs, including i
QC area inspections for equipment protection. However, no final QC j
acceptance will be allowed that are based on Bechtel Q-listed drawings and specifications.
l f) Continue to issue and validate Nonconformance Reports (NCR), but no l'
concurrence of NCR disposition is allowed if based on BPCo Drawings &
Specifications.
j g) See Item 5 below for subsequent allowable exceptions.
l i
}
4.
As a minimum, the following actions shall be taken prior to lif ting this l
Stop Work Order in part or total:
a) Perform a review & analysis to evaluate the extent of the problem.
b) Take appropriate programmatic corrective action based on Item 4A above.
c) Reinstruct BPCo Project Eng., Field Eng. and Document Control personnel in the generation approval and distribution of the FCN/FCR form to prevent the probism from recurring.
i d) :stablish a mechanism for lif ting of this Stop Work on a partial basis.
I 5.
In support of corrective actions necessary to resolve this Stop Work Order, the j
following additional, exceptions to the Stop Work Order are allowed:
A.
Any FCR with only RE interisapproval that has not received PE final disposition j
and any FCN with PTE approval but not yet dispositioned by Project Engineering i
is allowed to be processed in accordance with FPD-2.000 Rev.10, FPD-1.000 Rev.
16, FID 2.100 Rev. 4, PEP-4.62.1 Rev. O and ADP-2.12 Rev. O.
These FCNs/FCRs shall be processed through Phase 1, 2 and 3 in accordance with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program."
Prepared By O Om*-.
h Date ti-1. st s
- t. A t p. m,
j-Approved By i
XJL//f VA
~
4
- # e,-
{
Date N-3 ' D i:
g cn,
-n+
n.,--
m, l,.-.,.-e-....
~-1 n
,r,,
,. ~~,, - - ~ -,,
-- - : m..
--n-n
A Grio'ed%'{f? o d4
~; TnIBurzow ron stoP war onoEn f.
xDBailey JABauen DEBeaudt.in
~
WRBird' JEBrunner FWBuelaman JWCook'
~
MADietrich GTEwert i
WJFriedrich f (QC)
EWGoold 4 (Planning & Scheduling)
WDGreenwell i
PKHansen i
GA.Hierzer l
,' EMHughes.
DJones HPLeonard 4 (PAD)
BWMarguglio REMcCue JKMeisenheimer 8 (Soils)
JAHooney BHPeck' DLQuamuse JARutgers DATaggart f (PAP)
RAWells JLWood 4 (HVAC)
Subcontractors t Construction Completion Group Supervisor (Group disbanded)
MPlumb RPope 4
e e
g
?.
3,
=
e o-a
i-4,
q Ngo y of f cf St p
-s tN 3 ork Order FSW-41 BLOCK 14 (continued)
B.
Inspection For Architactural Related Work (Only Document Control Station 14) 1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in GAHierzer's letter to RAWells (BCCC-8779) dated December 9,1983 as. applied to all architectural related work.
(See Attachment 3) i
}
i O
l 1
I i
BLOCK 15 (continued)
B.
Inspection For Architectural Related Work (Only Document Control Stations 14) 1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to architectural related work at Docuneat Control Station 3 only. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II Resolution Sheet _s, and '.
I audit of Phase III Composite Log and document distribution.&'lDase./Mp a,e if*l f
Completion of corrective action verified and Stop Work lif ed for Archit ctural related I
for elessatosys ? th4sr ASIS
- work at Station 14 By Date
/ A *// ~
<v
- Time G /f00 l
l
{
~
[
t y.- -,;
+
-y
.r w
,,4
. no 5 of.E of Stop Work Order FSW-41 i
BLOCK 14 (continued)
I C.
Inspection, Status Assessment and Related Work For Architectural (Document Control Stations 14 (includes Spec's) 48 a, b & d and 55. )
1.
Same as B.1. above.
D.
Inspection, Status Assessment, and Related Work for the Architectural and Civil disciplines.
1.
For Architectural, same as B.1. above.
1 2.
For Civil, Bechtel corrective action taken as described in BPCo letter BCCC-8867, CAHierzer to RAWells, dated December 30, 1983 E.
Inspection, Status Assessment and related work for the I & C discipline.
1.
Same as B.1 and D.2 abcve.
b f
I i
i i
l l
t' BLOCK 15 (continued) l B.
Inspection, Status Assessment and Related Work For' Architectural (Document Control Stations 14 (includes spec's), 48 a, b & d and 55.)
1.
MPQAD completion of reviews, and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in.BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to architectural. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy
{
review of Phase II Resolution Sheets and audit of Phase III Composite Los e
and document distribution. Verified and released for Architectural for i
Document Control Stations 14, 48 a, b & d and 55.
f Completion of corrective action and Stop Work lift to chitect al at Stations
{
14, 48 a, b & d and 55.
I By 4
[
Date if-/I i W Time 9 **/3'AL'7 rrrx t c; ;;;;ry
- ^*", ;;;;1;ti;;.c.;cc;.ti...;ti;c.;
- .c it; i;
- . * ;c.
0.0.2 :1 m 3.vvv.
........ i n wu vi reekw
...u Sivy ^ wis lisi. iv -
6...
IiC di;;i;1in;. ";riri;;ti;;; ;; li;itati.;. Tec 0 ;.; ;; 2;;;.ited i; 2.*
.... O..:... '.. 21.
W.
/ M, I
- 1 r
l
- 1.
9
+
Y f
- ~,
, ~
-,e r.~,,.
s------
,m---
.,;,,r<
--,,---v e,
,me, -, - - - -,, > -, - -
c.,,--
~.,
. age 6 of 6 cf Stop Work Order FSW-41
~
BLOCK 15 (continued)
D.
Inspection, Status Assessment, and related work for the Architectural and Civil disciplines.
+
1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated and applying to the architectural and civil disciplines. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II resolution sheets, and audit of Phase III registers.
2.
Per the response to Management Corrective Action Request, DAT-1 provided by BPCo Transmittal No. 54944, dated January 16, 1984, inspection, status assessment, and related work shall utilize Work Prints and/or Status Assessment Prints (SAPS) issued only from FDCC, Station 59 Completion of corrective action and Stop Work Order lifted r Architectural and Civil.-
<tf Date
/-8" Y By v7 sh-Time
/ / lS 4$4f Effective January $N k, 1984, completion of corrective actions described in B.1 and D.2 of Block 14 above has been verified by MPQAD and the Stop Work lifted for the I & C discipline. Verifications and limitations for I & C are as described in D.1 and D.2 above (in Block 15).
By Y FDL Date /* 2'/- SY N TAGGMT Time
/2 i.LS P/f 3
e l
t e
l k
~
~.
oAy Bechtel ower Corporation DEC b8583 1
Post omce Box 2167 Com 136478 mams. Megan m i
BLC-18614 December 7, 1983 1
l Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 1963 ATTACHMENT 1 To Midland, MI 48640 Stop Work Order Fsw-41 Attention:
R. A. Wells Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Bechtel Job 7220 I
FSW-3311G00GH 41 (FCR/FCN APPROVAL)
Your action is requested to partially lift the subject stop work orders to allow Field Engineering and Project Engineering approval of Field Change Requests / Field Change Notices (FCR's/FCN's). This request is based on completion of the following actions:
i
- 1) PEP 4.62.1 ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.00'0, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to pre-vent recurrance of the problems noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MSA-32-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F. In sununary, the process corrective action includes new FCR and FCN forms which provide 3
i for more positive control.
i l
- 2) Project arsonnel have been reinstructed to the procedures noted above in accordance with their department's respective training programs.
Bechtel is currently undertaking a review of Specification G-34
" General Specification for Field Change Notice", to formulate a i
change to our FCN program. Until such time as'the program is revised, construction will only initiate Q-listed FCN's to pro-vide as-built information to Project Engineering in accordance with Section 3.3 of G-34.' Non-Q FCN's will be initiated as they I
were prior to the issuance of the stop work orders.
{
If you have any questioins on this matter, please contact me.
Very truly yours, gJoh Rutgers JAR /AJB/imr i
Written Response Requested: No com Use:1 NA cc:
(See attached list) i i
p
D e
3 cc:
J. W. Cook D. L. Quanune B. Peck J. A. Mooney H. Leonard D. Taggart J. Meisenheimer W. Frieirich
.=
S f
e me s
i 4
e e
e 0
0 e
a I
e
?.
O e
V
~
=_
3 Bechte' 'ower Corporation v
Post Offece Box 21C7 Micf and, Michigan 48640 e
December 9, 1983 o
ATTACHMENT 2 To Consumers Power Company P.O. Box 1963 Stop Work Order PSW-41 Midland Mi.
48640 l
Attentions R.A. Wells j
Executive Manager - MPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project s
i PROCESSING CYCLE FCR/FCN BCCC-3800
DearMr. hells:
To allow the-p'rocessing cycle for FCR/FCN to begin, the following steps have l
been outlined as a guide to control thel FCR/FCN approval and distribution i
activities. See Attachment 1.
i
- 1) FCRs may, be written by the ff old engineers, signed by the Project Field Engineer (PFE), assigned a number in Field Document Control, and trans-uitted to Project Engineering.
(The FCRs will be prioritized by Con-
~
I struction.)-
- 2) Project Engineering will begin their review 'of these FCRs upon receipt from Construction.
3)( Construction will advise Projdct Document Control of the ' schedule for
' release of composite register on a disciplin's by discipline basis (based on an MPQAD approval) and will require chai Project Document Control approve the FCRs-for distribution based on the release schedule.
NOTE: The FOR aust be written exclusively against those~ discipline drawings that have been released in the above,s:entioned schedule. This will ensure'that FLCC will not receive FCRs-frem Project Engineering
~untilthediscipline'sregister'hasbeenaupitedbyMPQAD.
FCNa 'ill folloy thc same basic philosophy as mod'ified by COM 136478. The w
PFE approval will be the check point which must adhere to the schedule of l
.reMasingdravtr.gs{bydiscipline.
If an FCR (FCN) references an affected drawing which is in a discipline not yet
~ issue the affected FCR (FCN).
released by FDCC, Project Engineering (PEU wilb not
+.
i s
l
-Very tr,uly yours, f
y p/m N
.A.
1 rzet l
l Site Manage I
GAH/JR/jra ec
_ D. Quses::e
~ D. Tag;; art 1
Attoctment t
Y t
x-c t
3 A
I s
?
r e.-
y
n.-
's IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlliIIIIIIIIIIlllIIIIIII BCCC-8800 AWACNNT 1 FCR/FCN
,, l.
C. sue c.,,
c.a. s, r n ** -'. 8.'f!.'_'I'"
l PROBLEM RESOLUTION
... u... a.
..wo..
- c. r-)a.l*
- 'f4--'.
B.ys,e
- c. p.s.t V
j s g. 4.c e
1 I
Cm.e eom 4 S' 2'.'tIXN[.,
8'*:'.".tI*'
~
e
,,,, rA va rs.. z v.s n. x ve. r,.... eg 6.,
s
- r e e,b
+
n,LI 't'.J.....i...*I #8 k*
FCRIFCN P
. att PROCESSING i.
'N e., e.s..w., z..t.u.
a P.rnt" eswa
,s. e.. e awa. se.as m is. e
..,se s e
8 s
l l
Tot 4. se.) p.se Attab s.tv
..i....a m...,s 3
eoe v M..':.,~. no.u. >;,,.nVlf.,r4 n
.i
,x,.u
.-, o.
v.i..
v..
,4 m;..v
..%v 9.,,s.
, seas 3.1/20 G.,.+).i,
.i u
..-..u 99e 1 f.e/M.
et P...,s ntye A,,
hfe.c s..J n w/es M,g',h (($ f.gegk,, g;u,y.$ Ic",*I
')
,s. e P t fL U.( FCA Up.s t. $AEV 6 Fat
((Igag..vsws 3,3,,,gV i,.te.e.4 f..,u.t
,, +. a..., su:.,.., )
E.1...A );ss'.pE s.
i f
1,6 e.
- t.,o.
,,s
.w assotviae eroe.f 40 woes oneene 33 100m A
t 0
, #q
.tge6.s.4e -
Bechtel Power Corporation m
- f Post Office Bos 2147 Miotand. Micnigan,4so40 December 9, 1983 Consum'ers Power Company ATTACHMENT 3 To P.O. Box 1963 Stop Work Order Midland, Mi.
48640 FSW-41 Attention:
R.A. Wells Executive Manager - MPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 FSW,34 Through 41 BCCC-8779 i
Dear Mr. Wells:
Your action is requested to partially lift the subject Stop Work Orders (SWO)
~
to allow the initiation of architectural related work which includes archi-tectura1 status assessment under the Construction Completion Program (CCP).
This request is based on completion of the following actions pursuant to Block 13. Item 4 of the order:
Action Item No.
~
+
l 4A A review of all FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to architectural related work governed by the CCP has been performed in accordance with FID-2.400, 'TCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program".
l We have updated the design document distribution to reflect the results of this review. As a part of this step. we have removed architectural drawings from the sticks and work print distribu-tion pending resolution of outstanding FCRs and FCNs in other disciplines affecting these drawings.
No hardware problems in architectural were noted in the review under FID-2.400.
i l
4B & 4C As described in J.A. Rutgers' letter of December 7, 1983 (BLC-18614), PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10. FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000, and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to prevent recurrence of the problems noted in MPQAD Audit Findings MFS-83-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F. All appro-priate project personnel have been reinstructed to these
.,j procedures in accordance with their department's respective i
l I
training programs.
sk A
BechtelPowerCorporation k.A.Wallo
'D BCCC-8779 Page 2 Action Item No.
As described in C.A. Hierzer's letter of December' 9,1983 4D (BCCC-8800) the mechanism for partial lifting of SWO has been v
established.
i a
If you have questions on this matter, please contact me.
i Very truly yours, 1-C.A. Hier r
3 Site Mana e i
8 i
CAH/AJB/jrm cc D. Quamme D. Taggart
.A i
9 I
l l
I l'
4
~!
l s-t
.q
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INC.,
e P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02107 I
December 13, 1983 l
l Mr. D. L. Quamme f
Consumers Power Company
?
Midland Nuclear Plant 3500 E. Miller Road Midland, Michigan 48240
Subject:
Docket No. 50-329/330 Midland Plant - Units 1 and 2 Overview of the Construct 1:n Completion Program Serial No. SWMCP-001 Sample inspections of controlled stick drawings and FCR/FCN attachments were performed by CIO at the Document Control Stations Number 14, located in the Support Service Building, and Stations 48 a, b and.d, located in the Area Teams 25 through 29 Building. The review was considered accept-able as meeting the requirements of FID-2.400 Rev. 3, Review and Reso-lution Program. Stations 14 and 48 a, b and d are considered sati:'actory 3
for start of QVP activities and Status Assessment.
NIR 009 was issued December 12, 1983, for rejection of the lot of drawings at Station 55. Corrective action had been accomplished by MPQAD. CIO verified that the missing' drawing had been added to the controlled stick drawings, and per.ormed a sample inspection of the drawings at this station.
The review was considered to be satisfactory and acceptable in meeting the requirements of FID-2.400 Rev. 3, Review and Resolution Program.
As the corrective action had been completed on December 12, 1983, CIO wil'l' Issue NIR 009 as closed on December 13, 1983.
Station 55 is considered satisfactory for star't of Status Assessment, and QYP QC.
Very truly yours, 4
l S. W. Baranow Program Manager SW8/fs cc:
j JGKeppler, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
AAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W l
APAmoruso, S&W f
L L.
i I
)
- +
-T5i
1 7
DISTRIEUTION FOR DAT-133-83 KDBailey; AA0-7220 JAEauer, Midland 2
LEBeaudoin, Midland 5:
WRSird, P-14-418A FWBuckman, P-14-113 JWCook, P-26-336B MADietrich, Bechtel-Midland GFEwert, Midland i
WJFriedrich, Bechtel-Midland EW0 cold, Midland WDGreenwell, AAO-7220 PKHansen. AAO-7220 CAHier:er, Bechtel-Midland
.'Euches, AAO-72,20 E Jun es, JSC-206B hPLeonard, Midland BWMarguglio, JSC-220A REMcCue, Midland i
JKMeisenheimer, Midland JAMooney, P-14-115A BHPeck, Midland D%ua= c, Midland JAT.utgers, AAO-7220 OATaggart, Midland RAWells, Midland JL*.fcod, Midland MPlumb, Midland RPope, Midland N
4 e
9 9
i t
3 kJ f
i
.....g B
... J
i
(
e*
To Distribution rao DATaggart, Midland ggg December 12, 1983 EDWOI Darc company
. MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - STOP j,
93segy
.,,, 90RK ORDER FSW-41 CLARIFICATION ConatspoNOCNCE
]
I DAT-133-83 cc File FSW-41 Pld:se note clarification on page 4 of 4 of Stop Work Order FSW-41-83 f
f i
A h
I 9
l 5
1s l
-~
.I
~
g+
@ power Consumers i
J mas w cook COmpBDy vu,,,- % 1.f.,%
d ce n=ce General offices: teos west Pamest Reed, Jeeksen, MI 40205 e (517178MM83
, p3 9..e ;.., ; g pp j e
2
- ..+_ I January 20, 1984
'/[
t--
@i
. (. _....,f..a y...
..t
.-.7..._..
f'
)
6CS Director of Office of Inspection and Enforcement j
Att Mr Richard C DeYoung US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 MIDLAND PROJECT - ALAB-106 QUARTEPJY REPORT DOCKETS NOS 50-329 AND 50-330 FILE:
0.4.6 SERIAL
26670 Pursuant to the second and third conditions of the Memorandum and Order ALAB-106 dated March 26, 1973, and Amendment No 1 to the Midland Plant Construction Permits, we are submitting ten copies of our forty-fourth (44th) report covering the period January 1, 1984 through March 31 1984. This report normally would have been submitted by January 1, 1984.
I 1
\\
- stdau bt).
8 JWC/WRB/1r CC:
RJCook, USNRC Resident Inspector l
Midland Nuclear Plant I
i l
JGKappler NRC Region III J
l 4
i e,
ei i
I
- f OC0184-0035A-MP01
' JAM U
-wotpoisi=
f
a Enc.ssure to Serial 26670 1
CONSIFERS POWER COMPANY REPORT # 44, December 31,1983 Pursuant to Conditions 2PB and 2PC of Construction Permits CPPR-81 and T
CPPR-82, the following report covers the period January 1,1984 through March 31, 1984.
[
A) Construction work to be performed during this period. See Attachment A.
- 3) Personnel with quality related duties who were assigned to the Midland Project during the period October 1 through December 31, 1983, and who are expected to be on site through March 31, 1984, and who i
vill be trained as necessary to perform the functions required to them, are as follows:
I
- 1) Midland Project Quality Assurance / Quality Control Adachi, J K QA Soils Brown & Root Agarter, W QCD Consultant FAC Anderson, T 0 QA Insp Eval Butler Antill, J S QC Mach Butler i
Baker,L R, QC Mech BPCo Barfield, P QC Mach
-Lincoln Barnes, B T QC Grp 3 Sys Team Interglobal Barnhart, R QC Mach Butler Bartz, M C QC Mach BPCo Beacham, E PAP Ins Ev NES Bingham, P M T/0 T/0 AS Courter & Co Blanchard, D E PAD Tech Sycs CPCo Brown, N R QSD QC Training Butler Browne, C QCD QC Elec BPCo Bukoski, R P QA Soils G/C Burch, T QSD QC Training SAI Cochran, D PAP QVP Cp EI Cochran, G P
. QCD QC Mach BPCo Collins, J K QC Soils Butler Coppeler, D Audit Section NUTECH Covey, A E QCD Bulk Ranger Grp PDS Dahms, E M QSD Training CPCo De1Valle, W B QCD QC Mach Butler Doody, R P PAP Insp Eval Butler Eagle, G R DAS DQAE/ Ann Arbor CPCo Elmore D E QCD QC Mech Butler Pinch, P R QCD QC Elec SAI l
Polks G L QSD QA Training UST l
Pitzgerald, G J PAP Insp Eval Lincoln Canon T H Audit Section MAC l
}
1
'l OC0184-0035A-MP01 e
l
m Enc.osure to Serial 26670 2
e
~
Gonzales, J P QC Soils EC&G Gabbart, R P QCD QC Mach Butler Giddens T L QCD QC Elec Butler Gunser, K J QCD QC Mach BPCo Ballebeck, D D PAP Insp Eval SAI Haroney, N J QCD QC h ch PPCo
?
Heber, R J QC Soils Butler Hadzik, W Audit Section MAC Herndon, G W QCD QC Elec SAI Holleran, T V QCD QC Elec SAI Holthaus. D PAE W/NDE GR Lakes Howard, P P QCD Pers Admin BPCo Jacobs, H D QCD QC Rec /Insp BPCo Joseph, D E QCD QC Civil BPCo Kay, 1 T PAD Wald & NDE Grp GR Lakes Kessinger, A E Jr QC HVAC SAI Kross, D C QCD QC Elec Lincoln Lada, G QCD QC Mech BPCo l
LamLert, H J QCD QC Mach EG&G Lee, P S QCD QC Mach Butler Limper, E J PAD Insp Eval BPCo l
Lockler, M E QCD QC Mech PDS Lunsford, D G Audit Section NUTECH Martin, A QCD QC Mcch BPCo Martin, D (NMI)
PAD Wald & NDE Grp EG&G Mathias, J M QC Soils BPCo Matthews, CA QC Soils BT*.
McLeod, K A QC Soils BPCo McCluan, J D QCD Area Teams BPCo McClure. A C QCD QC heh BPCo Merritt, R A QCD QC Mech BPCo i
Miner, S C QA Soils G1 Lakes Moss, B QSD QC Training UST Mouser, E R QCD QC Civil -
SAI Nagel, R E QSD QA Training Cygna Nen==an, TR QSD QA Training UST Nelon, S QCD QC Civil BPCo Newcomb, C H QCD QC Elec BPCo Noble, J T QCD QC Mach BPCo Nordstrom, H B.
QCD QC h ch BPCo Notaruusi, A L Audit Section Butler Nott, D A PAD Insp Eval CPCo Nunes, R P PAE Civil SAI 0'Brien, J K QCD QC h eh Courter & Co Oehlenschlager, C R QCD QC Mech BPCo Osborne, W G QCD QC Elec BPCo Pandey, V Parmley, L R.
T/0 TST Assur Lehigh QCD QC Mech BPCo Passanante, S R' QCD QC Mech BPCo Pickering, W R QCD QC Civil SAI 1
r OC0184-0035A-MP01 l
l
-]*
.i
=
l
i
)
Enc osure to Serial 26670 3
Pitcock, G S QCD QC Mach BPCo Ponks, D PAD Insp Eval SAI
}
Porfilio, T L PAD QVP. Group MAC
{
Rehan, T L QCD QC Mech Butler Riley, E J PAP Tech Sves CPCo a
Rivera, F H QCD QC Mach UST I
Ronk, D QSD Plan /Sched CPCo Santiago, H K QCD QC Mech BPCo Saucier, A E QCD QC Mech.
Butler Savage J L PAE Civil PDS Savoie, R A PAD Insp Eval CPCo Scherer,'R K QC HVAC SAI Schulmeister, F H PAP QVP Group CPCo Siever T J QCD QC Mech BPCo Simms, R QSD QC Training C/C Simon, F D QCD QC Mech PDS Skaggs, E O QSD Prga Dev C/C 4
i Skates, M L QCD QC Mach Butler Smith, D QCD QC Mach BPCo Smith, S P QCD QC Mech Volt Stallings, C R QCD QC Mech BPCo q
Stinson, D G QCD QC Civil Trans Tech Strozier, R D QSD QC Training Cygna Sumrow, J 0 QCD QC Elec NES Tremaine D 0 QCD QC Mech BPCo Tyres, B E QCD QC Mech Lincoln VanDoorne, D L QCD QC Civil BPCo Vienhage. S A QC Soils BPCo Voigt. J V DAD Design BPCo Walenga, C C DAD Design CPCo Walker, L M QCD QC Elec SAI Walker, P H QCD QC Civil BPCo Weaver, C E QCD QC Mech BPCo Weiss, C F QC Soils SAI Wells, R A Ex Mgr CPCo Williams H K QCD QC Elec BPCo
(
Wo11rab, J H QC Mech Butler Wyrick, R E QCD QC Mech BPCo Yes, S B (Bandia)
DAD Design PAC Zalewski, C E PAD Insp Eval Butler Zalitis, J QCD QC Rec /Insp BPCo Zelinski, T J QCD QC Elec SAI t
t i
OC0184-0035A-MP01 1
1 n
3 EncAosure to Serial 26670 4
d C) Quality Assurance qualifications of supervisors and engineers listed in B above are attached to this report, i
D) The following personnel no longer are performing quality-related j
tasks at the Siter Baggett,1 B B&W Beacham, E F Ins Eval NES Binderman, P R B&W Bingham, P M
' T/0'As Courter & Co i
Booth, P K QC Electrical PDS Bowen, C J B&W Brownell, J A GSO Teams /NDE BPCo Budrick, 1 G Mech CPCo t
Cain, B L QC Mechanical Victor Cannon, D J Electrical Lincoln Carey, P L B&W Carroll, K J B&W Cazier, F N Engr /R Butler Chafin, H H QC Electrical BPCo Chain W G B&W Cote A H QC Mechanical BPCo Couty, R C Ins Eval Butler Creech, J E QC Trag Butler Delaney, D A C Weld BPCo Dinunzio, C A QA Trng Cygna m.
Dipietro, J J QC Mechanical BPCo Dunning, D P QC Mechanical Butler Durkee, D R B&W i
Ellison. C D QC Civil Lincoln Evans, F G B QC Mechanical Brown & Root Evans, J R QC Mechanical UST Fedorow,.W QC Electrical -
G/C l
Feinberg, B QC Mechanical UST Fey, G L B&W l
Fredianelli, D L Mechanical BPCo i
Fremsen, J J
. QC Mechanical Courter & Co i
Gillenvater, R L QC Trng G/C I
Gingras. D A I&C TAD Gossett, W W QC Electrical BPCo Gragg D J QC Mechanical EPCo Cregory B M.
Audit MAC Grubich, 1 J QC Mechanical BPCo Gudrits, R T B&W Gunser',.K J QC Mechanical BPCo Gustafson, K S SP Proj BPCo Harts, C E QC Trng' G/C Hendley, J J B&W Hendrickson, D L Pin /Sch PMA Hogan, S E QC Mechanical Butler-Hollenbeck D C B&W l
h
'g:
OC0184-0035A-MP01 1
1
Ent_ssure to Serial 26670 5
Johnson, M B&W Kalemba, E M QC Mechanical BPCo Keen, M A B&W Kidd, J A B&W Kirker S D QC Civil BPCo Kirkland, M Design BPCo Kunski, J P Doc Me BPCo i
Lauck, J A I&C Butler Lenczewski, M E Yd/ Ins BPCo I
Longstreet, M S QC Services Lynch, K B B&W Matkin, C R Hugr/R NIC McConaugby, M L QC Mechanical BPCo Miller, C J Instru BPCo Moncrieff G D Electrical PDS Montoya, T A QC Electrical UST-i Mosher E A Pr Dev BPCo 1
Murdock, V D QC Mechanical BPCo j
Neumsan, T R QA Trng UST Nossack W C P1/Sch PMA 0'Brien, J K QC Mechanical Courter & Co Oberle, R J Prga dev CPCo Oehlenschlager, C R QC Mechanical BPCo Orr, M H Doc Mc BPCo Patton, W P QC Electrical Butler Petty, G E QC Electrical Butler 4
Ray, P L QC Mechanical BPCo
)
Revich, S QC Electrical EPCo Roark, B D II QC Electrical Butler Robinson, P R Prga Dev UST Rodgers C J QVP Cp PAC Russell, R D Civil SAI l
Schroder, G B&W Schulz, P J W1da-S BPCo Scott, 1 B&W Sellars, 1 A QC Mechanical PDS Smith, S P QC Mechanical Volt Smith, W '.1 QC Electrical BPCo Stana, T C Wid/In BPCo e
Suarov, J 0 QC Electrical NES Tellier, D P B&W Urbanavis, E J QC Trng BPCo
~
Urbanavis, M K QC Mechanical BPCo Webb. T L B&W Williams, D A Weld & NDE Grp Butler Yatchak, J 1 Tot As EG&G Yurik, T W B&W Zawilla, J J B&W l
l l
.t l
OC0184-0035A-MP01
. {
?
.I 1v
- I
.9
=
e 9
QUARTERLY REPORT January 1984 through March 1984
- 1. Complete review, resolution sheets and distribution of FCR's/FCN's for release of stop work orders 33-41.
- 2. Begin status assessment for Civil, Mechanical Instrumentation, and Electrical diciplines with module 340 followed by release of additional modules.
- 3. Training will continue per the Construction Completion Plan re-qurierents.
- 4. Continue installation of "Non-Q" Civil Electrical and Mechanical work items throughout the plant on Unit 2. Common and Unit I non-deferred systems and areas.
- 5. Resume "Q" work following status assessment. Phase I of the Con-struction Completion Plan, to support systems required for Turbine Roll.
- 6. Resume underpinning activities for the Auxiliary, Service Water and i
Circulating Water Buildings under the direction of the Field Soils Organization.
- 7. Subcontractor, B & W, to resume installation of the NSSS system in 2
Unit 2.
- 8. Subcontractor. Zack, to resume installation of HVAC for Unit 2 Common and Unit i non-deferred systems..
- 9. Resume "Q" work on Turned Over Systems in all areas of the plant under the direction of the General Services Organization.
i l
9 Y
1 l
2 i
h 1
.i 3
?
MI
~.
/
C0!!SumBIS s
Deen L Quemme b
Poi,*rgr Comp'any -
M Sise Mannser um ~~
Mie.ne Pro,ece ro ses tes3. Menne. M asseo. (st73 sat-seso
" January 20, 1984
/ PRINCIPAL STAFF
!l
- y4A, Mct:RP 3/nh
~
3E 4 /t<!
CF 15' Mr G A Hierzer RC DR4A
/.
b O
Bechtel Power Corporation"
$0 3CS N
P O Box 2167
. iG A il Midland, MI 48640 bFn F i l o, }., c_
, MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 PARTIAI, RELEASE OF SWO #41
[
File:
0460.3, 0655, 0456 UFI:
73*, 99*08, 12*50 Serial: CSC-7202
REFERENCES:
- 1) Release of CIO Hold Points 013 and 014
- 2) MPQAD Partial Release of SWO d41 As a result of the January 20, 1984 partial release of Stop Work Order FSW-41 for all civil and architectural documents.,Bechtel Power Company is released for Status Assessment in these disciplines for modules 340, 102, 120, 410 and 800.
~
It is expected this Phase I work will be performed in a careful and prudent manner with proven satisfactory results prior to any accelerated work efforts in the above identified' modules.
- In accordance with your recently approved' procedures, Status Assessment shall i
' utilize Jeatus Assessment Prints (SAPS) issued from Field Document Control Center (Station 59).
Bechtel Power Company shall insure that only personnel who have satisfactor-ily completed all training requirements for Status Assessments will perform this activity.
h l
j DLQ/DDJ/dah cc: JGKeppler, NRC Region III, w/a JJHarrison, NRC Region III, w/a R3 Cook, NRC Site, w/a
'RAWells, MPQAD, w/a BHPeck, MEC, w/a NIReichel, MEC, w/a 1
7m re wa-t t i 1
QQQ$ Nh....
~
t
.',.,e J..
s.
, r _s Shtet 1 of 1
'" " 4 " *' l " *'*oQ '"' "" * *R-STONE & WEBSTER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TRACKED ACTICA ITEM OVERVIEW O TRACKED iNPORuATioN iIEM N/BldNB Nv0 LEAR Fi4NT./.0. NO. MSOf l O TR'ACKED RECoMMENDAT!oN ITEM REFERENCE (S) CPCo Letter, File B1.1.1.7, Serial
, O UNTRACKED ITEM CSM 0710.. FCR/FCN Stop )'ork. Orders, 12-22-83 0 HOto PolNT NoTIF! cation CONDITION DETAILS This. Report p.,vides notification of the. establishment of a CIO Hold Point at the concitision of CPCo activities for Phase III Resolution of FCR/FCNs.
Hold Point:.. Prior to ~ issue.of.documentat!"of lifting the CPCo Stop Work Order related'- -
4 to civil discipline (other than Stations 8,10, l', 24 and 64).
.'Using the response sect.on below, CPCo should. notify CIO when the documentation necessary to lift theSto~p Work identified above has been prepared, but" prior to its issue. CIO will then perform its evaluation and notify CPCo when this. Hold Point is
' lifted by signing in the " Response Verified / Closed" block below and returning the completed form to CPCo.. -
g-Ovese.V,
~
NO
~
, y-
.._.T.'
ATTACHMENTS DATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
INITI.ATO /DATE INITIATIC)N APPROVED /DATE...,
Prior to lifting Stop %rt //)"$
/-/p -$f g/ffd,,
/-/o - f y RESPONSE-F For.the Civil discipline, Phases I a'nd II are complete for the FCR/FCN review.
Phase III has been completed for FDCC (Station.59). Based on the forgoing, the requirements to lift Stop. Work Order Nos. FSW-34, FSW-36, FSW-39, FSW-4o and
. FSW-41 for the, Civil discip'line at Station 59 have been met.
The document regis-l-
ters are intended to be released for the issuance of Work Prints and Status -
l Assesment Pnihts: (SAPS) at the FDCC (Station 59) as described in CPCo l'atter j
Serial CSM-o719 DLQuamme t'o SWBaranow, dated., January 16, 1984.
j i
.E gesag YE S wo.'s)
NC l ATTACHMENTS m
DA.E EST. CORRECTIVE ACT.lON RESP TITLE
{pg7,7 ((j g.
/ /7W COMPLETION,D ATE p
av% c~
RESPONhACdEPTED DATE fE SgoNSE VERIFIED / CLOSED i/ulev DATE
,.a.sr
/ L a d u.
y
,;,7 g p'
y I
s o
n.
~
Shest 1.of 1 GEM NIMB5R Hol.D P lNT NUMBEl '
g
.)
' ST9NE G WEBSTER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION -
O TRACKED ACTION ITEM OVERVIEW '. -
O TRACxsD iNeORuATiON.iTEu.
. M/DLAND HUCLEAR PLANT.f.0. N0.. HS09 O TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITE
~
REFERENCE (S) CPCo Letter File B.1.1.1.7, Serial O UNTRACKED ITEM CSM-071,3, FCR/FCN Stop Work Orders, 12/22/83., --
l @ MOLD POINT NOTIFICATION, CONDITION DETAILS This Report provides notification of th'e establishment of a CIO
~
/
. Hold. Point it the conclusion ofJCPCo activities for Phase III Resolution of F i
Prior to issue of documentation 11fting' the CPCo Stop Work Order related Hold Point:
to archit'ectural ' discipline (other than Stations '14., 55, 48A, 48B and 480 CPCS should.iiotify C10 when Die documentation Ilsin'g the response section bel'ow';I necessary, to lift the Stop Work has been prepared, but prior to its issiJe. CIO will -
then perfo6a'its evaluation.and notify. CPCo.when this Hold Point is lifted by signing in the"" Response Verified / Closed" block pelow.and returning the completed report to j
CPCo.
- ?.
.[
YES Ie".s$ -
N ATTACHMENTS
(: D ATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
INITIATOR /DATE INITI ON APPROVED /DATE.
~
Prior to lifting Stop Mirk //;5"ds
/ -# - W
- f Na.8g.
'/
RESPONSE
For the" Architectural discipline, Phase I and II is cpaip'lete for the FCR/FCN review. -
Phase III has been completed for FDCC (Station 59). Based on the forgoing,.the r ec$fi eme, nts to lift jStop. Work order Nos. FSW.34, FSW-36, FSW-39, FSW-4o and FSW-41
- foF the Architectural discipline at Station 59 ha've been met. The document registers are intended to be released,for the issuance of Wbek Prints and Status Assessment -
Prints.(SAPsT at the.FDCC.(Sf.ation 59) as described in CPCo letter Serial CSM-0719, DLQuamani to SWBaranow,'dafted January 16, 1984.
I sa.;
1 YES w o.'s t e,
j ATTACHMENTS' p
EsT. CORRECTIVE ACTION-RESPO J
i TITLE %
DATE OctuA G-vr [utr COMPLETJON &TEB-a r7/
l-yA_
us-w
/ budu._
DbTE/N I
RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RE PONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED i
t l
-o m-
-.__--w-,,,,.,,.,,--.-,--w,
, ~. _
,y
--,-p,,
-. --,,,,g.,
y
MInL&Rn rmszcz
- ' R:v. 1, 11/3/83
. ON g ST0kl0RKORDER
?."".*""^""*"=^"=
=-
r amas 1 a ee.e
- s. annaca -
sa. mam:r e zur uma sumas 1.
==r.ame:emma ami 7SV - 41
. Balance of Llant 'Q-listed work MPQAD u
, *P. D4 o en Reebeel b evines and Snecifi nrm,-.e etwo
- 22. est,:=r exc assa samme sa. wassumuses eaei.ons.
- 3. an=s4 lo-23-S'a ""* /4oo
- shAJBoos EsRAWells "fj,$,$ $g g j i
m:svn M1/g3 unen o. cnw mas,3 n p39 f e3 ene, 3.nnw
- s.==. + =. #, n
,4
- u. - -
Problems vl.th referencing of' drawing an'd specifications in g,,,,
14.111 the EP Co FCR/FCN process have created an indeterminate
- f. m ass eass ammum==== m, l
condition with respect to work that has been or could be W. Freidrich' performed to "Q"-listed drawings and specificacions (Ref's. Audii MSA-83-32).
E. Hughes
.C. Hierzer l
As a result of this conditon, the following stop work is a muummumme
.being issuedi l
- 1) BP Co Proje,ct and. Field Engineering 4pproval of See Sheet 3 FCN/FCRs.
2)" Fabrication, installation, and inspection of Q-listed work in the Balan.ce of Plant area.-
3
!t. -
A.. BPCo'P'roject and Field $'ngineering Approval of FCNs and FCRs Only l
'1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in JARutgers letter to RAWells '.
(Com 1362178, BLC-18614) dated Decem1Ier 7,1983 and GAHierzer's lett'er to RAWells (BCCC-8800) dated December:.9,1983., (see Attachmenta i & 2) i
~
p.'
...v 9-ss. as=mm - aussu=vs ac=us va:rma=mm BPCo' Project L'nd Field Engineering Approval.of FCNs and FCRs Onik l
A.
MPQAD review and approval of PEP 4.62.1, ADI 2.12.10, FPD 1.000, FPD-2.000 1.
and FID-2.-100.
2.,
MPQAD review of training re. cords for BPCo project constructiori, engineering and administrative personnel.
e Completion of' corrective action verified and Stop Work lifted for BPCo Project and eIIIfetivity.
Field Engineering approval of FCNs and FCRs. This a h By ag:.;..
/2 8'J Time
/f J /
l s
i 2
MS e
6 I
.----_-._,_,w--,
-y-
f
,,,,s -4 8 BLOCK 13 (continued,)'
Sheet 2'of I of Stop Work Order FSW-41
~
3.
Allowable exceptions are as no'ted belowi-a) Actions to maintain safe plant ' working conditions.
b). Actions to maintain calibrated instruments.
I c) Removal of paint'on welds of hangers.
d) Training and certification of QA/QC Inspection personnel.
e) Actions to implement the storage and maintenance programs, including '
QC area inspections for equipment protection. However, no final QC acceptance will be allowed that are based on Bechtel Q-listed drawings and specifications.
f) Continue to issue and validate None' nformance Reports. (NCR), but no o
concurrence of NCR disposition is allowed if based on BPCo Drawings &
ld Specifications.
.3)
See Item 5 below for subsequent allowable exceptions.
r 4.
As a minimum, the following actions shall be taken prior to lif ting this Stop Work Order in part or, total:
a) Perform a review & analysis to evaluate the extent of the problem.
b) Take appropriate programmatic corrective action based on Item 4A above.
c) Reinstruct BPCo Project Eng., Field Eng. and Document Control personnel in the generation approval and distribution of the FCN/FCE form to,
prevent the problem from recurring.
d) Establish a mechanism for lif ting of this Stop Work on a partial basis.
In support of corrective actio' s necessary to resolve this stop Work order, the 5.
n following additional exceptions to the Stop Work Order are. allowed:
' A.
Any FCR with only RE interimapproval that has not* received PE final disposition i.
- and any FCN with PFZ approval but not yet dispositioned by Project Engineering is allowed to be proc'essed in accordance with FPD-2.000 Rev.10, FPD-1,000 Rev.
l.
16, FID 2.100 Rev. 4, PEP-4.62.1 Rev. O and ADP-2.12 Rev. O.
Thesie FCNs/FCRs shall be processed through Phase 1, 2 and 3 in accordance with FID-2.400, "FCR/FCN Review and Revolution Program."
Prepared By O 8. *- m Date il-S-e as' Z '. AZ fe, m,
Approved By Asz/A.V A vy.
Date 8 B '3 g_, g. ; Q e
9 e
9 y
g,
g
am+
sew r w. w ;...
l l
W3rk Orde &.~ f
~
- k
- RIBUTION f0R STOP WORK ORDY -
. ^
x KDBailey
~
JA5auen DEBeau'doin
.. ~
WRBird JEBrunner
.:.t.
IrWBuckman s
.y,y-
....~.....:.....-
'MADietrich GTEuert
.... ~
~ '
WJFriedrich 6.'(QC).
"' G.;.
' EWGoold 4 (Pl=4 E. & Scheduling)
WDGr.eenwell-PKHansen GA.Eierzer.
,... ~......
- E2'.Hughes.
DJones HPLeonard 4 (P.AD)
BW.arguglio u.
. my,.
.JKMeisenheimer t (Soils)
JAMooney gype.ag DLQuamme i
JARutgers DATassart f (PAP)
RAWells~
1 JLWood t (EVAC) i Subcontractors t Construction 'Conpletion Group supervisor (Group disbanded) l
~
MPlumb g
RFope t
4
{
)
1 i
3 I
t l
6..
4 Ph86 i of f Step
/M:
3rk Ord r FSW-41 BLOCK 14 (continued) l B.
Inspection For ' Architectural Related Work (Only Document Control Station.14) 1.
Bechtel corrective action taken as described in GAHierzer's letter to RAWells (BCCC-8779) dated December 9,1983 as applied to all architectural related cwork.
(See Attachment 3.).
a.
....... r. :.s.
W r.
^~
..u
,j...
L
.z-
-~
... z. : -
- '~~~
.3 h6 z
. =.
. - - ~ - -
. BLOCK 15 (continued')
B.
Inspection For Architectural Related Work ( nly Document Control Stations 14) 1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of, Bechtel corrective actions 1
as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 foe FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to archite'etural.
related work at Document Control Station 14
' only. Verification included i
MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II Resolution Sheets, and I
sudit of Phase'III Composite Log and document distribution.Kse hie 7s o,e I7-l
\\
I L
Completion of' corrective action verified and Stop'Wo k 11 fo Archit ctura3 relatedl l
wtrk at Station' 1k.
for droumys f +MDb A 12.-/J - f3 By vote Time G.)$~00 l
t g <
i gl t
a 3
,A 4'
~
m 6 F" Pag 3 5 ctJJ cf Stop Work Order FSW-41 BLOCK 14 (continued)
~
C.
Inspection, Status Assessment and Related Work For Architectural (Document
. Control Stations 14 (includes Spec's) 48 a, b,& d and 55. ),
.1.
Same as B.1. above.
D.
Inspection, Status Asses'sn'ent, and Related Work for the Anchitectural and Civil disciplines.
i 1.
For Architectural, came as B.1. above.
~
2.
For Civil, Bechtel corrective action taken asidescribed.in BPCo letter BCCC-8867, GAHierzer to RAWells, dated December 30, 1983_
BLOCK 15 (continued).
B.
Inspection, Status Assessment and., Relate'd Work Fpr. Architectural (Document Control Stations '14. (includes spec's),,48 a, b & d and 55.)
1.* 'HPQAD completi9n of reviews, and audit activities of Bechtel corrective ac'tions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated which apply' to architectural. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I a'dequacy.
revi~ew of Phase II Resolution Sheets and audit of Phase III Composite Log and document distribution. Verified and released for Architectural for Document Control Stations 14, 48 a, b & d and 55..
Completion of corrective action and Stop Work lift to chitect al at Stations i
14, 48 a, b & d and 55.
I By b, M(h 11-15-23 Date yy
,,,, 4;,rge J
1 s
t l
h el
,c
N age 6 cf 6 cf Stop Work Order
~'
FSW-41 BLOCK 15 (continued)
D.
Inspection, Status Assessment, and related work for the Architectural and Civil' disciplines.
1.
MPQAD completion of reviews and audit activities of Bechtel corrective actions as defined in BPCo FID-2.400 for FCRs/FCNs generated and applying l
to the architectural and civil disciplines. Verification included MPQAD review of Phase I adequacy, review of Phase II resolution sheets, and audit of Phase III registers.
2.. Per the response to Management Correc~tive Action Request, DAT-1 provided by BPCo Transmittal No. 54944, dated January 16, 1984, inspection,. status
, assessment, and related work shall utilize Work Prints and/or Status Assessment Prints (SAPS) issued only from FDCC, Station 59.
Completion of corrective action and Stop Work Order lifted
- r Architectural and Civil.
Af' Date
/-2 O M By J
yy Time // WAM D
6 j
t
\\
=
l i
i
^
~
l 1
I
[
l i
I l
f t
s
-~
m, N'
e
...f :;. -
~
DAT Bechte.. ?ower Corporation DEC b8583
~
Post Office Box 2167 Midland. Michigan 48640 com 136478 BLC-l8'614 December 7, 1983 r
consumers Power M =ay r
ATTACHMENT 1 To P.O. Box 1963
'. Midland, MI,*4864,0 Stop Work Order FSW-41
.Attantion:
R. A. Wells Midland Plant Units l'4 2:
1 Bechtel Job 7220 FSW-33 THROUGH 41
~
(FCR/FCN APPROVEL) i l
..Your action is requested.to';iartially lift the' subject stop work j
2* orders.to allow Field Engineiriiig 'and ' Project Engineering approval
' of Field Change'Rsquesti/ field Change Notices (FCR's/FCN's). This
' request is based on completion of the following actions:
.1)
PEP 4.62.1,.ADI 2.12.10, FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000 and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to pre-vent recurrance' of the problems noted in MPQAD Audit' Findings MSA-32-32-03F and MSA-43.-32-04F.. In summary, the process..
corrective. action includes new FCR and FCN forms which provide for more positive control.
, 2 )'
Project personnel have been reinistructed tio 'the sc-:+? - es noted above in accordance with their department!s respective tr=4=4=ce i
Programs.
Bechtel ais currently undertaking a review of Specification G-34, "Gianeral Specification for Field Change Notice", to forimulate a change to our FCN program. Until such time as the progresa is l
revised, construction will' only initiate,Q-listed FCN's to pro-
~
vide as-built information to Project Engineering in accordance with Section 3.3 of.G-34.
Non-Q FCN's will be initiated as they were pr'ior to the issuance of the stop work orders.
l If, you li~e any questions on this matter, please contact me.
V,ory truly yours,-
l s
f y-Jo
. Rutgers*
, JAR /AJB/1mr Written Response Requested: No b;
}4 Com Use: NA s
/
(s. attached list).
_ en s
l l
., b. ' *. f 3.*..
s cc:. J. W. Cook 4
l D. L. Quanume B. Peck J. A. Mooney H. Leonard l
D. Taggart e.
J. Minisenheimer l
W. Friedrich l
i
?
l 1
.e.
1 I
1 m
3 4
3*
=
l g
4 g
e s
i
.. e e
.l J
b
.)
.g I
e 4.
l l
1 I
l l
h 4
4 I
l E
I 1
l i
en.
'I 4
es
~~
~ ~
I M
C ^
.,5
,.7',
g
/
2-
.M
y l
.i.
f
.s-
~
y ' 'i
/
Beci al Power Corporation
/
t Post Office Box 2167 l
Midland. Michigan 48640 -
4 December,9, 1983 ATTACHMENT 2 To
. Consumers Power Company Stop Work order P.O. Box 1963
,Midlandi Mi. -48640' FSW.41 j
J i
'~
Attention:'
R.A. Wells Executive Manager - MPQAD Job 7220 Midland Project PROCESSING CYCLE FCR/FCN 3C'CC-8800
- ~.
Dear Mr.' Wells:
To allow the processing cycle for FCR/FCN to begin; the following steps have been outlined as a guide to control the FCR/FCN approval and distribution
- ' activities..See' Attachment 1.
-1) FCRs may be written by the; field engineers, signed by the Project Field Engineer (PTE), assigned a number in Field Document Control, and trans-l i
initted to Project Engineering.
(The FCRs will be prioritized by Con-struction.)
~
2): Project Engineering will begin their review of these FCRs upon receipt from Construction.
- 3) Construction will advise Project Document Control of the schedule for release of compos,ite register on a discipline by discipline basis (based
~
on an MPQAD approval) and will require that Project Document Control approve. the FCRs for distribution based on the release schedule. *.
NOTE'.The FCR must be written exclusively. against those discipline drawings that have been released in the above mentioned schedule. This will ensure that FDCC,will not receive FCRs from Project Engineering until-the discipline's register has been audited by MPQAD.
i l
l FCNs will follow the sa.no basic philosophy as modified by COM 136478. The PFE approva1 will be the check point which must adhere to the (schedule of
. releasing d~ ravings by discipline.
. If an FCR (FCN) references an af$ected drawing which is in a discipline not yet released by FDCC, Project Engineering (PE) will not iss,ue the affected FCR (FCN).
Very truly yours, s
f 1
' ~}
.A. 11 rze Site Manage CAH/JR/jra cc D. Quasune g
D. Taggart g
i Attachment l'
t
- .w
.J*,-.
.4
L.
's r,. A,
e sW,., '
t
. e
- e
~
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllliIIIIIlllllll-llllll(T
~
~
BCCC-8800 i
. ATTACHW.NT 1^
~
FCR/hCN rou. u l.
~
,,r.a. a. rn *%!."'f*I'"
PROSLEM RESOLUTION Og,ec,
en
..a,.uw
.ia,a.m
,m ie.e,,.
4.,,,,
...i..
a...<
a.p ter
- c.,... t
...N m
s y 4.e 1
s
..j.
C,,e.a h *W PXars.'.f*A 'b !.P
r y u.v4r
..x v.i m s ve y i..rp+.<
V, s,h,,'
',k, * ....*,'i:..
Y-
~
. EcRIFCN t.
1 PROCESSING
's.,p. w.. w.,z..
,o----------#'
- a ***r*%
's sowe se, e, s
.. 5 c..a.. an,a.,..i.,
L i
s.i....J m...,s g
l-I
~
8 ae,,...ea n Per1,,e s,.er.n,e.s.r1, onelbe Wsc.nicar.st 13 tre a,..
'i p
e w
~
s,ew rest U.6 Fcal v '.st=ng..v wve agv s,.
\\F9tC D'sI 4,
pg g, s
o gr leale..e4 Disa...
,,,J;es.pl es.
~
edlfA33/
6 88'8 f.'
I ee I-a
- ,{(ta/pgg trelese Fe eh'.
- "9 se p ee.es nwt Aee k sroes s..J sMr/et M,s *
- M ne'th,,3: n% Y
.e
'h,
~
l' f
4 ssee ret V *( redt Vres s.tyagv.6 tea 4
i (44, g v f,g,g, v,
s
,,, i. s.. r.ow,.u%..v /
I
- , gelserea h.ps.es.
j
~
~
~
g l
TITLE:
sev.
ev s.o.
arvt.
ease esssenes sessteuLE Fell O
Pf5 It/th]
~
~-
y.,.tes
- l E.
Bechtel Power Corpo' ration
.g s,
,g Post Office Box 216/
Midland. Michigan deseo g
I s
December 9, 1983
?
i
%, 1.?-:.:
ATTACHMENT 3 To j
Consumers. Power Company.
~
.L j
P.O. Box 1963
.Stop Work Orde'r
- Midland, Mi.~. 48640
" r:... ::
FSW-41 r
i-.
Attention:
R.A. Wells P
Executive Manager - MPQAD
~ Job 7220 Midland Project i-MIDIAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 FSW-34 Through 41 3CCC'-8779 C'...
0 i
Dear Mr. Wells:
' Your action is requested to partially lif.t the. subject Stop' Work Orders (SWC) l to' allow the initiation of architectural related work which includes archi
^
ta'etural status assessment under the Construction Completion. Program (CCP).
i This, request -is based on completion of the following actions pursuant to Block 13. Item 4 of the order:
Item No.
... L ACt4*o
~
4A A review.of all FCRs/FCNs generated which apply to architectural related work governed' by the 'CCP has,been performed in accordance irith FID-2.400, '7CR/FCN Review and Resolution Program".
We have updated th'e, design doc,'unent distribution to reflect the results of this review. As a part of tnis step, we have removed architectural drawings from the sticks and work print distribu-i tion pending resolution of outstanding FCRs and FCNs in other disciplines affecting these drawings.
No hardware problens in architectural were noted in the review under FID-2.400.
~
43 & 4C As. des'cribed in J. A. Rutgers' letter of December 7,1983 l
. (BI.C-18614), PEP 4,62.1 ADI 2.12.10 FPD-1.000, FPD-2.000, l
and FID-2.100 have been revised to provide process corrective action to prevent recurrence of the problems noted' in MPQAD Audit Findings MFS-83-32-03F and MSA-83-32-04F.
All appro-
+
(
priate project personnel have been reinstructed to these.
e procedures in accordance with their department's. respective I
r, training programs.
a t
1 a\\
l L
b f
- z. '. 2.
~
BechtelPowerCorporation
.R*A. Walls 3
BCCC-8779 Page 2 l
Item No.
Action 4D As described in C.A. Hie. rz.er's letter.of. December 9,1983 j
.(3CCC-8800). he %chanism.for partial lifting of SWO has been:
t established.
o si l
j j
i If you have question.s on this matter, please contact me.
Very truly yours, u.
s
.=,.
i i
G.A. Rier r i
s Site Mana e f
CAH/M3/jra j
cc:' D. Quansme~
=J.
D. Taggart
+
s e
g D
s d
.e g
e a
?
g e
i
(
./.
l e
b
.4 q
Iy z
a 5
/'
',(
v
>.e g
s1 3
s
',I.,
,,s
,),/
,[
' -- ~~-
8 8
i
~,,
p
. !=
1
,/
m v i, f-
. ; i ) --
./
4 3..
Lt
?. : ? L
- L,i: ?!
'~
.