ML20090A594

Summary of 770428 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md Re Operator Training & Qualifications.Equipment & Circuit Separation Criteria Review Encl

ML20090A594
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/05/1977
From:	Racquel Powell Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17198A223	List: IR 05000329/1983008 ML20090A052 ML20090A064 ML20090A067 ML20090A071 ML20090A076 ML20090A080 ML20090A090 ML20090A103 ML20090A106 ML20090A110 ML20090A367 ML20090A377 ML20090A397 ML20090A403 ML20090A447 ML20090A451 ML20090A456 ML20090A465 ML20090A481 ML20090A487 ML20090A491 ML20090A500 ML20090A504 ML20090A514 ML20090A517 ML20090A543 ML20090A547 ML20090A559 ML20090A590 ML20090A594 ML20090A600 ML20090A613 ML20090A614 ML20090A623 ML20090A626 ML20090A631 ML20090A637 ML20090A642 ML20090A656 ML20090A658 ML20090A673 ML20090A698 ML20090A703 ML20090A733 ML20090A741 ML20090A748 ML20090A751 ML20090A758 ML20090A762 ... further results
References
CON-BOX-13, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8006240674
Download: ML20090A594 (3)

Text

q,.4..gumpcse,. qk'"?.Wi=*/ +'*.Se-. s. w w w.m m,-** g. y - g~

py y%

C, O^

gg4,

,., ry

. w: ~~" -

-b..

,y:

. 2.1... /~~.M ' G ' * %[b N EM*E.%... ' r; T&*17

' ~ ~

5-5.77

^

-r Docket Nos. 50-329

/

50-330

.+

FACILITY:

Midland Plant Units 1 & 2

..... '.... ~...-

,c APPLICANT:

Consumers Powe.r'. Company

. ~'

..a o

g.

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY REGARDINGl f.

OPERATOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS

~r buMary s.

m-u..

.. ~.

staff inet wiirel resentatives of the'.f %g,e '

On April 28,1977,. the NRC i.

Consumers Power Company in Bethesda, Maryland to discuss the operator

., ' $,w. Q.i;<

training and qualification for the Midland Plant. :.,.

~

M...

g

.n.

A list of attendees is enclosed.

...x c "r

.m

_,.?

s Discussion

.s.-

+ y.

-.r

~

ga At the present ti: c[the Consumers Poiter Company is cornitted to the, training and qualification. set forth in Section.12.0 of the PSAR.

'This'comitment requires that operators.for a precritical operating 7 1@

~ -

license on the Midland Plart will have a Senior. Operator,'s license i;;. '

W. c-on the Big' P.ock Point Huclear Plant or the Palisades Plant. ~ The x

licensee intends to. submit. to the URC a request for relief from this '

comitment and.a. proposed. alternative for review and. acceptance by,w.,1.1.3f.

the NRC.

.i ' ~ ^

+....

-n

.: m 1

.c

.o

..,.w.' y.a m q 3 n 1

The staff indicated at~tne meeting'that!' ANSI N-18.10 " Selection and.*N:. M Traininglof Nuclear Power Plant Personnel," is expected to be issued J%'

in 1977; the-but they may control room manning requirements are presently _unchangedf,. f..

charge.due to securit;y or fire protection requirementa; ;

and the licensee should be.~ assured any candidates for: operator.

^ 3 r

license can meet the medical requirements. set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.XX

" Medical Certification and Monitoring of Personnel-

. J,, -

T Requiring;0perator Licenses fo,r Nuclear Power Plants."J.-..

Mv?

c a.

,c.

-w:

4

. w 7, _ ? - ! v. gf rW ',,r.;y-l '.

,e' Acti d,,.

e.

, - ~

-i m-

~

.,:. n...

Licensee'will submit an alt',rnative,.to'the present BSAR Section 12.0 '

e comitment for the NRC review and approval;- -

m..

..n

~. $...

.. ;, L a

3 Y.l.

? Y

~:-, Y

.=.

. N.f...:]......e &

~'

29q.w a--

c.

r nav %.11. pent.c+ m ana,.

sivu o(g rrua Manag mint Wate Rea

. Bunch p '.i.h

". LWR-4 3 LD @.. 6 2/.

gM Divi G....w RPowel1:nlg. JAh..;j p e

3

. ~-". +

. ~ ". <

m

,w o

w.

1.

Y.

Dg 5[4/775

$/D/7M$.LM Nd 2DAMI N #D[

Y

=w m.m. maim.;W.MW..%

L @.&%

.J.w%:y;; e r

+.

. X #

1.

I

• • ,* ;t f$gy 5-;&.;&.' C%::-- Q..,,, ;.,.9;Q-[.jl*y+.5Q;- &-Eq,y(3~;gy,

. y.c w. wie.. ~.w..<

._.,.. c.

~,== a a..y.,..,.

• *L

~

c g.::,. ; x MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 EQUIPMENT AND CIRCUIT SEPARATION CRITERIA REVIEW TAC-3239 1.

Scope of Review Amendment No. 32 to the Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 PSAR, Appendix e

8A, documents the applicant's criteria for separation and administra-tive procedures for Class IE Balance of Plant Equipment and Circuits.

Therefore, our review of that appendix and the enclosed results, have been confined to criteria and procedures concerning equipment and circuit separation.

Accordingly the results of this review should not be construed as being applicable to any other portion of the PSAR unless noted herein.

II. Additional Information or Clarification Required 1.

In Section 2.5 penetration area separation for grnups A, C and N and B, D and N are discussed, however there is no mention of separation for group E.

If it is possible for group E to feed circuits entering either of the two penetration areas, describe the criteria requirements and implementation that insures a single failure will not prevent the safety or safety-related systems from performing their functions.

Provide this I

I information.

2.

In Section 2.6.2, " Internal Separation" (regarding the separation of Class IE equipment and circuits internal to control boards),

l t -

g

."..?;;,y Q M M N:'.k N: m:..h;+)%b,T-d~

i;;y:{.l;.,..Q_: QE

, c..a c...

m ".'{ M:'C$:G :.. ';M ;. a,..y,, -,3r er ':."Y'T l* ** ' *'

L.t d.E ' '

..... ~,.

~

w

. two separation methods are described; six inch separation or use of barriers.

It is noted that the use of analysis to I

demonstrate the adequacy of any lesser separation is not mentioned as is the case with Class IE to non-IE and Class IE associated circuits to Non-IE.

Verify that it is your intent to utilize the criteria of Section 2.6 only, or modify your criteria accordingly.

3.

On Figure 8A-1, verify that the ammeter transducer shown ir a Class IE device and is within the Class IE boundary.

III.

Conclusions Pending satisfactory resolution of the items under II above, the staff concludes that the information provided in Appendix 8A represents acceptable criteria at the Construction ' Permit stage, for ensuring separation of the Balance of Plant Class IE equipment and circuits as required by General Design Criterion 3, 17 and 21.

l l

i&

I

..