ML20078A833

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-341/83-15.Corrective Actions:Mgt Initiated Procedures PPM 7.9, Disassembly & Assembly of Matl After Initial... & PPM 7.38, Storage & Handling of Matl..
ML20078A833
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/28/1983
From: Wells D
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To: Knop R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20078A808 List:
References
EF2-65282, NUDOCS 8309230427
Download: ML20078A833 (3)


Text

. . 4 Donald A. Wells vrayr oe y Ass ere Detroit "">2""

2000 Second Avenu Edison mure August 28, 1983 EF2-65282 Mr. R.C. Knop, Chief Projects Branch 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Subject:

Nonconpliance at Enrico Fenni Unit 2 - IE Report 50-341/83-15

Dear Mr. Knop:

This letter responds to the itan of nonempliance described in your IE Report No. 50-341/83-15. This inspection of Enrico Fermi Unit 2 construction site activities was performed by Messrs. B.H. Little, P.M. Byron, and M.E. Parker on May 1 through June 30, 1983.

The itan of nonempliance is discussed in this reply as required by Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.

The enclosed response is arranged to correspond to the sequence of itms cited in the body of your report. The number for the item of nonccrnpliance and the applicable criterion is referenced.

We trust this letter satisfactorily answers the concern raised in your report. If you have questions, please contact Mr. G.M. Trahey, Assistant Director - Project Quality Assurance.

Very truly yc,urs,

&C DAW /hD1/pn cc: Mr. Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforc ment U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Paul Byron, Senior Resident Inspector i 4b ghw y

(

Newport, Michigan 48166 2

8309230427 830921 SEP gDRADOCK 05000341 PDR

y s ,

THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY PROTECT QUALITY ASSURANCE ENRICO FERMI 2 PRa7ECT Response to NRC Report No. 50-341/83-15 Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Inspection at: Fermi 2 Site, Newport, Michigan Inspection Conducted: May 1 through June 20, 1983 APPROVED M DATE 24' 83 Director - Project Quality Assurance '

b

.o -

o

  • s ..

Response to NRC Inspection Report No. 50-341/83-15 (83-15-01)

Statment of Nonempliance, 83-15-01 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion VIII states in part, " Measures shall be established for the identification and control of materials, parts, and ccznponents. . . These identification and control measures shall be designed to prevent the use of incorrect or defective material, parts, and cmponents".

DECb Quality Assurance Procedure 8.0.1 states, " Written procedures shall be implmented for identification and control of material, parts, and cmponents to assure use or installation of correct and accepted itms only".

Contrary to the above, on June 6 and 8, 1983, the inspectors observed unidentified power cable, Division I and II cables, and small bore and instrument tubing containing valves lying on floors in the High Pressure Coolant Injection and Core Spray pump areas.

The inspectors also observed, on June 17, 1983, an unmarked Divi-sion II cable lying on the ground outside of the OA Ievel 1 storage area between the Reactor Building and the RHR cmplex.

This is a Severity Level V violation.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved Project Managment has initiated two (2) project procedures; PPM 7.9, "Disassably and Assmbly of Material after Initial Construc-tion", and PPM 7.38, " Storage and Handling of Material after Ini-tial Construction". Both procedures describe the requirements for cmponent identification and storage / control of materials. The procedures also establish responsible positions for the control and identification of material. A meeting was conducted by Project Managment to discuss procedure ccupliance with supervisors and contractors.

Corrective Action Taken to Avoid Further Nonccrnpliance Implementation of and empliance with the new project procedures identified above will assure that cmponents are adequately con-trolled, stored, and identified. Construction Quality Assurance will monitor the effectiveness of those procedures thrcngh the Housekeeping Corrective Action Evaluation Program. Results will be discussed in the weekly Project Housekeeping meetings with the Pro-ject Superintendent.

The Date When Full Cmpliance will be Achieved Full cmpliance with the procedures will be achieved by October 1, 1983.