ML20076D420
| ML20076D420 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1983 |
| From: | Woolever E DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| 2NRC-3-037, 2NRC-3-37, NUDOCS 8308230389 | |
| Download: ML20076D420 (76) | |
Text
,
d V'-
2NRC-3-037 (412)787 - 5141 Telecopy 8-Nuclear Construction Division June 10, 1983 Robinson Plaza. Building 2, Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 ATTENTION: Mr. Richard W. Starostecki Division of Project and Resident Programs
SUBJECT:
10CFR50.55(f)(1) SAR QA Program Centlemen:
This letter is in response to the final rule, as stated in the Federal Register, pages 1026 through 10 29, da t ed Mond ay, Janua ry 10 , 1983, titled
" Report ing of Changes to the Quality Assurance Program" af feet ing 10 CFR Pa rt 50.55 by the addition of pa ragr aph (f). This rule req ui res cons truct ion permit holders to submit to their appropriate NRC Regional Of fice the current description of the quality assurance program it is impleme nt ing fu r inclusion in their Safety Analysis Report . Enclosure 1 describes Duquesne Light Company quali ty assurance program ch anges af fect ing the desc ription provided in the Be ave r Valley Power S t at ion Unit 2 PSAR. Enc los ur e 2 describes Stone &
Webster Engineering Co rpo rat ion ch anges to Sect io n 17 . lB . Enclosure 3 includes the pages af fected by the changes described in Enclosures 1 and 2.
Since the Quality assurance Program used by Westinghouse for Beaver Valley Power S t at ion Unit 2 was submit ted to the Commis sion as a topical repo rt , ple ase refer to Westinghouse let ter NS-EPR-2765, da ted May 12, 1983, s ubmi t ted to the NRC Region II, ad dr es sed to Mr. C. Hale , NRC Vendor Program Branch from Mr. E. P. Rahae, Jr. , Manager Nuclear Safety.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY By . f.
I(/ J .' Wooleve r Vice President y SDH/wjs Enclosures cc: Mr. G. Walton, NRC Resident Inspector (w/ enclosures)
Ms. L. Lazo, Project Manager (w/ enclosures)
NRC Document Control Desk (w/ enclosures)
United States Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
$Y 10 fY 8308230309 830610 PDR ADOCK 05000412 A PDR $05 [A i
L (l81 v
United States Nuclear Ragulatory Commission Mr. Richard W. Starostecki Page 2 bec: C. E. Ewing (w/ enclosures)
P. RaySircar (3)
J. Sutton (S&W)
NCD File J. F. Zagorski H. M. Siegel "
C. R. Bishop (w/o enclosures)
T. D. Jones R. J. Swiderski ' "
MCE REFERENCES : (1) Federal Register, pages 1026 through 1029, dated January 10, 1983 (2) DMW-D-3460, dated May 20, 1983 (3) DLCQA-3910, dated June 6,1983 l
1 a
sei- .gr v y,- e,r-, -rre,,-+-m,=-yr-r---mr _m.-.w _ ,- ,. , m, . , . . , ,,,,_-._,,,r.y, . , _ ,m_
r -
ENCLOSURE #1 '
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY CHANGES
- 1. The referenced table of Nuclear Fuel QA Procedures is no longer applicable.
The revised Nuclear Fuel QA Program is presently contained within Appendix D of the Operations Quality Assurance Manual.
- 2. The Listing referred to is not provided. Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions are comparable to those being used in the applicable ANSI Standards.
3.
The Quality Assurance Manager now reports directly to the Vice President, Nuclear Construction Division. The organization charts (Attachments 1-3) show the current structure and titles associated in the design, construction, and operation of BVPS-2. The efforts of the QA Manager remain solely directed towards QA-related responsibilities.
- 4. This organization chart has been chanced such that responsibility for Stone & Webster and Westinghouse is now through the Project Manager under the Vice President, Nuclear Construction Division. Lines of communication exist between the NCD Managers, S&W, and Westinghouse.
- 5. The Supervisor of Technical Services, the Supervisor of Quality Engineering, and the -Supervisor of Administrative Services positions are no longer applicable. They have been grouped together and are known as Site Quality Control (SQC). SQC responsibilities encompass those of the individual positions it superseded. Organizationally, SQC and Vendor Surveillance report to the Director of Quality Control / (formerly the Director of Site Quality Control).
- 6. These two groups are now contained within the recently organized Nuclear Construction Division (Attachment 2). The Project Manager is in charge of the Manager of Administrative Services, Regulatory Affairs, Engineering, and Construction. The QA Manager reports directly to the NCD Vice President. Meetings are now held monthly rather than bimonthly.
- 7. As shown on the organization chart in Attachment 1, the structure is different from the one described. The responsibilities stated have been reassigned but not deleted. Fundamentally, the organization is stronger with the creation of the Nuclear Construction Division.
- 8. Some Quality Assurance titles have been changed I
although -the responsibilities are basically the same. This is shown in the organization
( chart on Attachment 3.
l
- 9. Up-to-date organization charts are attached. Although some titles and responsibilities have changed, neverthe'less none of the commitments stated in the BVPS-2 PSAR have been changed to the detriment of the design, construction, and operation of the plant.
- 10. See SWEC Program for title changes.
e m
^
1
)
ENCLOSURE #2 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION (SWEC) CHANGES i
Changes to Section 17.1B, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (which involve the SWEC organization structure, document and procedure titles, and m'inimum education standards) are identified as follows:
- a. The item changed is underlined in th~e text.
i b. A side bar is shown in the right margin adjacent to the change.
- c. The way the item should read is identified next to the side bar.
i Current SWEC organizational charts are provided in the text.
a
=e y ,
4 1
e e
G
.a;
.i -
/
T
~
s VICE PRESIDENT HUCLEAR CONSTRUCTION DIVISION h I
PROJEqT MANAGER
~h. -
l MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER -
ADMINISTRATIVE H EGULATORY ENGINEERit4G CONSTRUCTION QUALITY SERVICES __ AFFAlns ,_ASStlR ANCE e
t m a
QA Hanager .
Secrernrv .
t i
t i
i' i . Director Director Director QA Records -
- Control M l I !
Senior Senior Sen or Senior Senior Senior .-
QA NDT QAEnglneer QA Engineer Supervisor QA Engineer QA Eng'ine'er QA Engineer QA Engineer Procurement Engineering Data Operations Maintenance Administra.
& Construe. Analysis l
'].
. I I I
Seni r File and Vendor Clerks Records Clerk Stenos SQC Surveillance i
kkchmtwh 3 -
- h 4
Y
. ,(M - ^-w w #w T t
Y
, . l,
!v;il i
it
!l!!l&&
a
- si -
i
-q)va i
l 138
, I P' ia T,. ! !
i I
4 1
Ye-
- l. *c $ J, g
k y" 0 g
l l - 3: s. '
i 185 I 580$ f, i ,
3
. i s - i
= l 9'g* s jrs: 4
' # -= * -
I4 Eg;;ij g{;{5I. {":=3j!
, a3 _.= )- . e. l 1 8 o h* l .
i i 1 I E.I .l L
i .- s 1 i~EI gs i l
i
' I{ E
-g!,gy }.
geU l afoO hi l
II l;; & s g I.y a
l j;
I 35] 3 l 35 3 l 58!
y _.._ _
l l
=!!
=2 l
53 j. . _ l - ;8 -,
= ,.- 5: I m.
w> I gg{- e-l g
--2 ^- i i I 5 4 g l "$3 3 I i
. __ . 1_l gg!!~ ,g .
- s !! 588 1 s j
= a_t.______________a vs v e O I Ig :g5 . . _ _ _I _
Titi g o- 5 g.: ~l _
Of gg
!== g Z
- 3B E l o g a
1
$55-
- s s, -
1 4
-l 33 ~
.i . $1- ,
1
. 1.x .
g si*;t ]
- l,.-_-
.. =
[ '
322 958 i
l1 a u t
. lI i.
ll Tg Vig e:
3
!!* 5 E.l l gtr
- = - sg! Id.
1I r!_y
! gli *g" 'UE ll erg
-- E*
- !:=
riX l1 3 ,.
. I I -
Il 6 . 53 9 iI -
555 n!
- l l ]v= = <! ,
S -
3 I
.'E
' ~
Yk5 i - -g ta:l
-s u _
ir s!
a p'
!s
=
i V -
l3l _' as!
E:
a;. -
!-s! get u
5!!
e W
u v $ !. .s 5 c*
a - s.
7 5 ts y: {..
- S 2:S *E 57 0 t AME ti-t i P=# E Est ggi E
s' j*y li!
' ~
i ! -
Ed i -
, I!: !!
l !) #.~
I ,
55, u 57
~
E e.
EgE L*50 95
. - f.c o -
g 5$
$ {= Y
$ SIS M J
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 a
i~_2 1 SECTION 17
,OUALITY ASSURANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 17.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 17.1-1 17.1A -QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (DLC) 17.1-1 17.1.1A Quality Assurance Program - Overall '
Description 17.1-1
- 17.2A DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY 17.1-3 17.2.1A Introduction 17.1-3
~
17.2.1.1A Organization . 17.1-3 17.2.1.2A Quality Assurance Program 17.1-8 17.2.1.3A Design Control 17.1-10 17.2.1.4A Procurement Document Control 17.1-12 17.2.1.5A Enstructions, Procedures, and Drawings 17.1-13 y ") 17.2.1.6A Document Control 17.1-14 17.2.1.7A Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services ,
17.1-15 17.2.1.8A Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components 17.1-17 17.2.1.9A Control of Special Processes 17.1-18 17.2.1.10A Inspection 17.1-19 17.2.1.11A Test Control 17.1-21 17.2.1.12A Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 17.1-21 17.2.1.13A Handling, Storage, and Shipping 17.1-23 17.2.1.14A Inspection, Test, and Operation Status 17.1-23 17.2.1.15A Nonconforming Material, Parts, or Components 17.1-24 17.2.1.16A Corrective Action 17.1-25 17.2.1.17A Quality Assurance Records 17.1-26 M 17.2.1.18A Audits 17'.1-27 17.1B STONE G WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 17.1-29 17.1.1B Organization 17.1-29 17.1.1.1B General Description 17.1-29 17.1.1.2B Establishment and Management of QA Program 17.1-29 17.1.1.3B Management of QA Activities 17.1-30 17.1.1.4B Implementing Organization 17.1-30 17.1.1.5B Qualification and Experience Levels 17.1-33 17.1.2B Ouality Assurance Program 17.1-33 17.1.2.1B General Description 17.1-33
. g (:;I i
- 17.1.2.2B QA Program Documentation 17.1-34 17-1
. . ______.____________J
s BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 t
, February 1976 ,
l -
G=
TABLE OF CONTENTS ( NT 'D) -
Section Title Page 17.1.2.3B Indoctrination and Continuing Education 17.1-34 17.1.2.4B Periodic Review of QA Program' 17.1-35 17.1.3B Design Control 17.1-35 17.1.3.1B General Description 17.1-35 '
17.1.3.2B Design Standards 17.1-35 17.1.3.3B Design Reviews 17.1-36 --
17.1.3.4B Design Control and Change Control 17.1-36 As-Duilt Specifications and Drawings 17.1.3.5B 17.1-38 17.1.4B Procurement Document Control 17.1-38 17.1.4.1B General Description 17.1-38
~
17.1.4.2B Boston Purchased Items .
17.1-39 17.1.4.3B Field Purchased Items 17.1-39 17.1.4.4B Code and Regulatory Requirements 17.1-39 17.1.5B Instructions, Procedures, and -Drawings 17.1-40 17.1.5.1B General Description 17.1-40 17.1.5.2B Procedures and Manuals 17.1-40 17.1.5.3B Codes and Standards 17.1-40 17.1.5.4B Reporting Significant Deficiencies 17.1-40 17.1.5.5B Authorized Engineering and Design Changes 17.1-40 17.1.6B Document Control 17.1-41 17.1.6.1B General Description 17.1-41 17.1.6.2B Revi'ew and Approval of Documents ['-
17.1-41
, 17.1.6.3B Controlled Distribution and Use . 17.1-41 17.1.7B Control of Boston Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services 17.1-41 17.1.7.1B General Description 17.1-41 17.1.7.2B Control Methods 17.1-41 17.1.7.3B Source Evaluation and Selection- 17.1-42 17.1.7.4B Inspections at Vendors, Designated as S&W Responsibility '17.1-42 17.1.8B Tdentification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components 17.1-43 17.1.8.1B General Description 17.1-43 17.1.9B Control of Special Processes 17.1-43 17.1.9.1B General Description 17.1-43 17.1.10B Inspection 17.1-43 17.1.10.1B General Description 17.1-43 17.1.11B Test Control 17.1-43 17.1.11.1B General Description 17.1-43 17.1.11.2B Test Requirements g. 17.1-43 17.1.11.3B Shop and Field Test Control 17.1-44 17.1.12B Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment 1,7.1-44 17.1.12.1B General Description 17.1-44 17.1.13B Handling, Storage, and Shipping 17.1-44 17.1.13.1B General Description 17.1-44 .
Inspection Test and Operating Status 17.1.14B 17.1-44 [ {}D 17-2
- . + - , . - - - - . . , . , , . - . . , _ . _ , _ , . ,, _ - . , - 4 ---- , , , .-,- - - - -
-y
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendm:nt 17 February 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT ' D)
Section Title Page 17.1.15B Nonconforming Materials, Parts, and Components 17.1-44 17.1.16 B Corrective Action 17.1-44 17.1.16.1B General Description 17.1-44 17.1.17B Ouality Assurance Records 17.1-45 17 .1.17 .1B QA Records Requirements 17.1-45 17.1.17. 2B Engineering and Design Records 17.1-45 17.1.18B Audits __ 17.1-45 17.1.18.1B General Description 17.1-45 17.1.18.2B Audit Results and Reports 17.1-46 17.1C QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION (W) 17.1-46
- h. .T *+
l L_._
17-3 l ,
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndment 17
. February 1976
+ .- n
. . . m. _
LIST OF TABLES l Table Title 17.1.1A' Design and Construction QA Procedures. ,
vs. Appendix B to 10CFR50 l l
17.1.2A Operations QA Procedures vs. Appendix B l to 10CFR50 17.1.3B Nuclear Fuel QA Procedures vs. Appendix B g.
to 10CFR50 -
l l
17.1.1B-1 Qualification and Deperience Requirements SSW Quality Assurance Personnel
- l
{
I e .e--
h Si %
I i
l l
l P
e e l
~
t l 17-4 l
l l >
l l
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976
- n LIST OF FIGURES 17-1A Quality Assurance Project Organization
~
17.1-1A Duquesne Light Company Organization for Quality Assurance 17.1-2A Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department 17.1-3A Duquesne Light Company Engineering and Construction Division 17.1.1B-1 Company Organization for, Quality Assurance 17.1.2B Quality Assurance Departmenti Organization 17.1.3B Quality Assurance Interrelationships 4
m f' 8 wo e
i l
I I
i l
l . 17-5
c .
l BVPS-2 PSAR Amtndmant 9 l
8/20/73 APPENDIX B CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS-TABLE OF CONTENTS Table. Title B-1 Structures and Equipment Codes and classifications e
! :o e
e
-.se
_7___
B-1 e
S 4
BVPS-2 PSAR 'Amendm3nt 17 February 1976 i SECTION 17 QUALITY CE 17.1l QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Three inputs to Section 17.1 are provided. Section 17.1A is a description of the DLC Quality Assurance (QA) Program.
Sections 17.1B and 17.1C describe Stone T, Webster (SEW) and Westinghouse (W) QA Programs respectively.
The three QA categories are defined as follows: .
^
-- Plant systems, - or portions of systems,'
Category I-structures, and equipment whose' failure or malfunction could cause a release of radioactivity that would endanger public safety. This category also includes equipment which is vital to a safe shutdown of the station and the removal of decay and sensible heat, or equipnent which is necessary to ,
mitigate consequences to the public of a postulated accident.
Category II - Plant systems, portions of systems, structures i and equipment are essential for the reliable generation of !
power but which are not essential for a safe shutdown.
Failure of this equipment could result in loss of generation '
. ; _- __ but would not endanger public safety. -
.r _. 1 Category III -
Plant systems, portions of systems, structures, and equipment which are not, essential for the reliable generation of electricity and which do not contain __
radioactive material or whose failure could not result in the release of radioactive material. .
The term " essential for the reliable generation of electric ;
power" in the definition of Category II is interpreted to mean structures, systems and components, whose failure would result in a halt of electric power generation in about 8 hr or less.
The term "not essential for the reliable generation of electricity" in the definition of Category III is interpreted to mean structures, systems and components, whose failure would not result in the halt of electric power generation in about 8 hr or less. ,
i 17.1A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (DLC) s-17.1.1A Quality Assurance Program - Overall Description Duquesne Light Company has established a quality assurance program for Beaver Valley Power Station that establishes general
- quality criteria for the company and its architect-engineer, T- contraci. ors, and vendors. The program has been written to
=~ conform to 10CFR50, Appendix B, "QA Criteria for Nuclear Power 17.1-1 m- p , - , . - - . - - - - - - - ,n, , - , - - , , , . .._,-a---,-. , - - - - - - - -
. 1 BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 -
Plants." The guidance contained in WASH 1284, dated October 26, -
1973, WASH 1309, dated May 10, 1974, and WASH 1283, dated May 24, 1974 is utilized with the exception that A; an alternate set of ,
Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions has been developed, and l these tems and definitions will be included as a Listing to the 2 Duquesne Light QA Program Manual, and B; exceptions taken to ,
specific Regulatory Guides are as follows: '
Regulatory Guide 1.37: Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated '
Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants '-
Quality assurance requirements for cleaning of fluid systems and associated components comply with Regulatory Guide 1.37, issued March 1973, with the following exceptions and modifications:
~
I Regulatory Position C.3 - The water quality for final flushe's of fluid systems and associated components is at least equivalent to .
the quality of the operating system water, except for the oxygen
~
content. .
Dissolved oxygen content of the water cannot be maintained at .
reactor quality during flushing of open systems. , - _;
Regulatory Position C.4 -
Expendable material, i.e., inks and relatM products, temperature indicating sticks, ta);e s , gummed labels, wrapping materials (other than polyethylene) , water soluble dam materials, lubricants, NDT penetrant materials, and couplants which contact stainless steel or nickel alloy surfaces are in accordance with the following:
- 1. They do not contain the following as. a basic and essential chemical constituent: lead, zinc, copper, mercury, cadmium, and other low melting point metals, their alloys, and/or compounds.
- 2. Prescribed maximum levels of water leachable chlorides, total halogens, and sulfur and its ccznpounds are imposed on expendable products.
Contamination levels in expendable products are based upon safe practices and industrial availability. Contaminant levels are controlled such that subsequent removal by standard cleaning methods will result in the Achievement of final ucceptuble levels which are not detrimental to the materials. t l
f$
m .-
17.1-2
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendmant 17 February 1976
- Ik - -
" Requlatory Guide 1.38:- Quality ihssurance Requirements for Puckaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storace, and Handling of Items for Weter-Cooled Nuclear Power Plhnts
{
Quality assurance requirements for packaging, shipping, receiving, storage' and handling comply with Regulatory i Guide 1.38, issued March 1973, with the following exceptions:
~
Regulatory Positidn -C.3 . Tapes, desiccants, and desiccant bags do not contain the following as a basic and essential' chemical constituent: lead, . zinc, copper, mercury, cadmium, and other low .
melting point metals, their alloys, and/or compounds. >
Prescribed maximum levels of water leachabic chlorides, total halogens, and sulfur and their compounds are imposed upon tapes.
Desiccants ~ and deisiccant bac}s contain nonhalogenated and -
nonsulfur bearing materials.
Contamination levels for tapes, desiccants, and desiccant bags
.. are based upon safe practices and industrial availability.
t
.L .)
^ - - Regulatory Guide 1.54: Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-
. Cooled Nuclear Power Plants --
Quality assurance requirements for prote'ctive coatings comply with Regulatory Guide 1.54 issued June, 1973 with the following
~
- exception: __ , _ . . ,
'In lieu 5f th'e inspection' defined in 'Section 6.2.4 of ANSI N101.4-1972, inspection is in accordance with ANSI N5.12-1974 Section 10,. Inspection For Shop and Field Work.
The following offers a clarification of paragraph 1.2.4 of ANSI N101.4-72 regarding the extent of coverage:
- 1. Surfaces _
within the primary containment liner boundary:
- a. For large surface areh components, the documents are submitted to Stone & Webster .as required by ANSI N101.4-72. These components include such items as the polar. crane, containment liner, structural steel (including miscellaneous steel and handrails) , concrete, ductwork, uninsulated pipe,
~' reactor vessel support shield tank, exterior of
, ,fg uninsulated tanks and vessels, and major equipment
== g ..
supports. -
17.1-3
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendm:nt 17 February 1976 -
. =
p
- b. For manufactured equipnent such as pumps, motors, pipe hangers, and supports, the documentation required by ANSI N101.4-72 is maintained in the Seller's files for the complete duration of the contract wa.rranty/ guarantee period. A certificate of compliance siped by responsible management personnel is furnished ~
by the Seller.
- 2. Other surfaces where coating failure could compromise the design function of equipment or.. components intended to prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents which could affect the public health and safety.
Though a certificate of compliance is accepted from vendors of manufactured equipment rather than requiring all necessary documentation to be submitted to the Engineers, the vendor's files are audited periodically
- to verify that complete documentation is being maintained.
Because of the impracticability of imposing the
. ;- - Regulatory Guide requirements (ANSI N101.u) on the I standard shop process used in painting valve bodies, I handwheels, electrical cabinetry and control panels, loudspeakers, emergency light cases, and similar components, the hegulatory Guide requirements are not invoked for these items since the total surface of such items is relatively small when compared to the total surface area for which the requirements are imposed.
The total. surface area and estimated volume covered by unknown paint which is not applied in ac'cordance. with the requirements of the Regulatory Guide (ANSI N101.4) are recorded. An analysis will be conducted, taking into account the quantity and physical distribution throughout the containment of miscellaneous surfaces which are not coated in accordance with the Regulatory Guide requirements . The analysis, based on the flow -
paths and the available surface area which could be obstructed by nonintegral coatings, will verify that even in the event that the uncontrolled coatings were removed by a LOCA, the effectiveness of any engineered safety system would not be compromised thereby.
The reference substitution of ANSI N5.12 as the basis for inspection, rather than ANSI N5.9, reflects a revision to a standard referenced in the base document, ANSI N101.4. s
~
17.1-4 l
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 F@bruary 1976
\
Regulatory Guide 1 . 6 84 : Quality Assurance Requirements for the Desian of Nuclehr
. Power Plants Quality Assurance programs in effect at the time of. systems design were followed in the design of BVPS Unit No. 2. .-
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program shall be applied to all safety-related structures, systems and components throughout u all phases . of the nuclear power plant. The safety .
related structures, systems and components for which the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program shall be applied in its entirety are identified as Category I and are listed as 'such .in-the BVPS Unit No. 2 Preliminary S'afety Analysis Report Appendix B. Quality Assurance by the definition contained in 10CFR50, Appendix B comprises all those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a, structure, system or component will perform satisfactorily in service. Pertinent requirements of the manual will be applied to all phases of the plant from its inception throughout its' lifetime.
,y. It is intended that this program shall apply to any activity at or pertaining to the Beaver Valley Power Station. This shall include Duquesne Light Company, their designated architect--
engineer, and all vendors, contractors, and subcontractors at their general offices, shops, testing facilities, and the nuclear power plant site. .
The program 'will apply through the design, procurement, con ,;.
struction, testing, and operation phases of the Beaver Valley Power Station.
N' ~. .
e om a
e O
17.1-5 - 1
~
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendm:nt 17 February 1976 ,
The quality assurance program implementation is the responsi-bility of the Quality Assurance Manager who reports directly. to the Vice President, Engineering and Construction Division. 3 All organizations 'with direct contractual obligations to Duquesne Light Company and internal Duquesne Light Company divisions and departments are transmitted policies and programs that commit them to the provisions of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program. 1 The Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for the preparation and controlled distribution of a Quality Assurance Program Manual encompassing the detailed requirements for the implementation of l the program.
The Duquesne Light Company organizatior$ is described in Section 17.2.1A.
Figure 17.1-1A shows the- Duquesne Light Company organization for _
quality assurance. Figure 17.1-2A shows the Duquesne Light '
3 Company Quality Assurance Department. Figure 17.1-3A shows the Duguesne Light Ccrapany Engineering and Construction Division Organization. ;
Portions of the Quality Assurance program have been delegated to '
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SSW) and to Westinghouse ;
Electric Corporation. The Quality Assurance organization chart ',
shows the relationship for implementing the 4 (Figure 17-1A) '
Quality Assurance program. ,
The Stone & Webster Quality Assurance program is described in Section 17.1B. Figure 17.1.1B-1 shows the Stone & Webster organization for Quality Assurance. The Westinghouse Quality ;
Assurance plan is, described in Section 17.1C. 1 Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will, through the audit process', verify that other organizations delegated portions of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program are regularly reviewing the status and adequacy of their Quality Assurance Programs. Duquesne Light Company corporate management or a delegated outside agency shall, on a yearly basis, review the status and adequacy of the Ducuesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program. -
Education and training programs shall be provided for personnel performing activities affecting quality. The objective of such activity shall be to relate the Quality Assurance requirements to the activities being performed by those personnel to assure that a suitable level of proficiency is achieved and maintained.
Indoctrination training of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department is accomplished by seminars, classroom l1 courses, and in-plant training. The Duquesne Light Company --
17.1-6
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndmint 17
~
February 1976 Quality Assurance Department will verify that other organizations meet the Quality Assurance P . gram requirements f or training.
This training shall apply but n' be limited to the design, procurement, auditing, construction, operations, maintenance, and review and retention of records. _
Where required by applicable codes, individuals shall be qualified by subjecting them to examinations in the particular inspection or test method involved. Records shall be available that attest to the successful completion of such training.
17.2A DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY . --
17 .2.1A Introduction -
Duquesne Light Company (DLC) , th applicant, has established a Quality Assurance .(QA) organization- (Figure 17.1-1A and Figure 17.1-2A) to ensure that all' the systems, components, and structures affecting the safety of the station are specified, fabricated, shipped, stored, installed, inspected, tested, operated, maintained, repaired, fueled, and modified in accordance with sound engineering principles. This includes tha utilization of applicable codes, standards, specifications, procedures, and regulatory requirements. The Quality Assurance program is intended to fulfill the intent of Appendix B to 10CFR50.
This document summarizes the activities pertinent to Quality
. Assurance of the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) . More l details are included in the pertinent Duquesne Light Company, _
Stone & Webster (SSW) , and Westinghouse manuals.
17.2.1.1A Organization
.=
The Duquesne~^ Light ._. Company- Quality Assurance organization consists of a Quality Assurance Department directed -by - the Quality Assurance Manager. Sufficient personnel are available to implement the Quality Assurance program. All items pertinent to Quality Assurance are under his supervision.
The Quality Assurance Manager reports directly.to the Duquesne Light Company Vice President, Engineering and Construction 3 Division. The effort of the Quality Assurance Manager is directed solely to Quality- Assurance. He purposely has no l responsibilities for project costs or project schedule l considerations. This eliminates the possibility pf such factors influencing his performance in Quality Assurance.
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance program provides written policies, procedures, and instructions governing the Quality Assurance activity. These are identified in the Duquesne
] Light Company Quality Assurance Program' Manual. This manual e
l 17.1-7 I
- - - - . - . - - - . . - - , - . . . ~ - - - - . . - - - _ _ , . . . ,
I BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 .
details specific program.
responsibilities for implementation of the bk~~
Duquesne Light company personnel supporting the Quality Assurance
- cffort. include the Engineering and Construction Division Operations Division. Engineers and others in these divisionsand or .
sections participating in the program perform their duties in cccordance with ad=4nistrative procedures or work instructions previously reviewed and approved by the Quality Assurance Manager.
i The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department, unde'r the direction of the Quality Assurance Manager, is divided into five major sections (the Quality ' Assurance Department Organization is shown in Figure 17.1-2A) . Thes.e sections y e: -
- 1. Design, Procurement and Construction - headed by the Quality Assurance Supervisor - Engineering / Construction 3
~
- 2. Operations - headed by the Quality Assurance Supervisor- l3 Operations I 3. Records -
headed by the Quality Assurance Records Supervisor
- 4. Site Quality Control -
headed by the Site Quality 5 -
8.-- - Control Director .-
j - _.
, 5. Vendor Surveillance - headed by the Vendor Surveillance - 3 2
Supervisor The Quality Assurance Manager reports to the Vice-President of Engineering and Construction. He is responsible for the 3 development and implementation of a Quality Assurance Program for the' Design, Procurement, Construction, Operation, and modification of Nuclear Power Stations.
The Quality Assurance Supervisor for Design, Procurement, and Construction is responsible to the Quality Assurance Manager for {3
- establishing and implementing an audit and surveillance program
< for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction activities at Nuclear Power Stations..
The Quality Assurance Supervisor for Operations is responsible to l3 i the Quality Assurance Manager for establishing and implementing an audit and surveillance program for the Operating Nuclear Power Stations.
The Quality Assurance Records Supervisor is responsible to the
- Quality Assurance Manager for development and implementation of
! Record Manngement Systems during the Design, Procurement, construction, and Operation of Nuclear Power Stations. ~_.~
17.1-8 \
,___.m...
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 FGbruary 1976 The Director of Site Quality Control is responsible to the QA l3' Manager for the existence and imp 1pentation. of the Construction Quality Control Programs. .
The Supervisor of Technical Services is responsible- to the Director of Quality Control for the establishment and implementation of:
- 1. a NDE" Program in accordance with SNT-TC-1A. .,
- 2. a program for the testing of structural materials
- 3. a program for the maintenance '
and calibration. of , [,
construction test equipment u ,. establishing and maintaining the qualification of welders at the site The Supervisor of Quality Engineering is responsible to the Director of Quality Control for:. -
- 1. formulation..of inspection plans based on engineering j requirements
- 2. providing inspection plans to inspection forces
- 3. thd~ review and evaluation of inspection ret !.ts and inspection effectiveness S
~
- 5. the adjustment of inspection programs to increase -
effectiveness
- 5. monitoring the hnplementation of any organization utilizing a corporate QA/QC program The Supervisor of Administrative Services is responsible. to the Director of Quality Control for the establishment and implementation of:
- 1. a training program for Quality Engineers, Contractor and SQC Inspectors, or assuring the e):istence of an equivalent program in a Contractor's Program
- 2. a program for the control of documents within the site Quality Control section s-3 .- a program for receiving inspection
- 4. a program for the maintenance of permanent plant equipment Sind material prior to its initial operation a program for the compilation and processing of quality
~
5.
data 17.1-9 '.
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendmant 17 February 1976 ,
The Supervisor of Vendor Surveillance is responsible to the W l and
~~
Quality Assurance Manager for coordinating ~
conducting .
Duquesne Light Company inspections at the vendor plants.
Site con, tractors shall have either a Quality Control Program or a Quality Inspection Program that meets the requirements of the Duquesne Light Ccepany Quality Assurance Program. These programs are reviewed and approved by the Quality Assurance Department to assure compliance-to the Duquesne Light Company Program including the requirement of organizational independence of Quality Control '
and/or inspection. personnel.
The Duquesne Light Company Project Management Committee is chaired by the Duquesne Light Company Vice President, Engineering and Construction Division. Members of the committee include department heads from all engineering departments, and construction department, the purchasing department, plus the General Superintendent of Power Stations. The Quality Assurance, Manager is a member of- the committee and by charter is further designated as the secretary. Through this mechanism Duquesne Light Company management is cognizant of all Quality Assurance matters. The committee is also chartered to resolve impasses 6 which may occur in quality matters. Meetings are conducted bi-monthly or at the specific request of any member, as necessary.
Minutes of 'the meetings are recorded and distributed to all e-members.
.The Duquesne Light Company Project Team consists of the Project Manager and a representative from each of , the Engineering disciplines assigned full-time to the Project Team Office. All activities of the Project Team are governed by written procedures or directives. Those procedures that are administrative in
- nature are reviewed by the QA Manager.
The Duquesne Light Company Engineering Departments will review and/or approve general design concepts, calculations, materials adequacy, specific'ations, bid evaluations, purchase requisitions, g drawings, and correspondence in accordance with approved ,
procedures. All activities of the Engineering Departments are governed by written procedures or directives. Those procedures that are administrative in nature are reviewed by the QA Manager.
General Purchasing Department Following initial operation, all replacement parts and contracts for outside company services shall be made through the Purchasing Department. All activities of the General Purchasing Department are governed by written procedu:es or directives. Procedures that are administrative in nature are reviewed by the QA Manager.
._= '"
17.1-10
l BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 1
Power Stations Department -
, 4 The General Superintendent of the Power Stations Department is responsible for the safe c peration of Beaver Valley Power Station. Reporting directly and . independently to the General Superintendent are the Flant Superintendent 'and the Superintendent of Nuclear Services. The Plant Superintendent is
. ' responsible for the testing', fueling, operating, maintenance, modification, and repair of-Beaver Valley' Power. Station.
.The Superintendent of Nuclear Services is responsible for the development and implamentation of the Quality Control Program of Beaver Valley Power Station during 'the operational phases. This QualitpControl Program will be revie' edwby thetQA Manager.
Stores Department-b '
7 The General Superintend $nt of the Stores Department is responsible for developing and implementing procedures for the c receiving, stori'<J, n 'and, distribution of replacement parts and materials./ Procedures that are administrative in nature are reviewed by the 'QA Manager. ,
Sub-Stations _ and Shops
,. The General Superintendent of Sub-Stations and Shops has the responsibility for the performance of electrical equipment tests, and the development of procedures governing their activities.
Procedures that are administrative in nature'are reviewed by the.
d QA Manager. - -
Stone & Webster The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance M& nager through the '
Stone & Webster Quality Assurance Coordinator has contact with ,,
both the Stone & Webster Manager of Quality Assurance and Chief
- Engineer of Engineering Assurance regarding the contents and implementation of that portion of the Duquesne Light' Company Quality , Assurance program delegated to Stone & Webster Engineering . Corporation. The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Manager reviews and concurs with the contents of the Stone &; Webster Quality Assurance Program.
Westinghouse ll The sDuquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Manager through the Westinghouse Project Manager has contact with the Westinghouse i
Quality Assurance Organization regarding the contents and
< ' implementation.of that portion of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance program delegated ,t o Westingh.,ase. The
.'_ _ Duquesne Light Company, Quality Assurance Manager reviews and concurs with the contents of the Westinghouse Quality Assurance JProgram. ,
ntinue uncorrected, would be detrimental to the ~
quality or safety of the plant. The Quality Assurance Manager has delegated the responsibility and authority to stop work under ,
prescribed conditions to the Director of Site Quality Control for , ?
activities 'at .the Construction Site. Additionally, Stone G Webster and Westinghouse have been delegated the authority to !
stop work under . prescribed conditions as defined in Section-17.1.B and 17.1.C.respectively. --
m -
17.2.1.2A Quality Assurance Procram --
Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program encompasses the engineering, design, procurement, fabrication, erection, operation, and maintenance of the Beaver Valley Power Station.
This program is documented by written policies, procedures or J instructions which are carried out through the plant life in !
l accordance with these policies, procedures and instructions.
T The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program is defined in the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program Manual.
This manual provides the overall Quality Assurance Policy developed for Duquesne Light Company and is approved by the ,
- President. Additionally, this manual provides the Quality i
. Assurance Procedures which define the programs that have been _ "
established for .(a) the design and construction phase, (b) the operations phase, and (c) the nuclear fuel design und fabrication phase. The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program Manual endorses the requirements of the Safety Analysis Report that apply to Quality Assurance and is the basis for the ,
development of all other quality related programs and procedures for the project. Lists of the Quality Assurance Procedures developed for design / construction, operations and nuclear fuel phases and the identification of the criteria of Appendix B to i 10CFR50, being implemented by each procedure, are provided in Tables 17.1.1A, 17.1.2A, and 17.1.3A respectively.
The Quality Assurance Sections of the Quality Assurance
' Department have developed the Quality Assurance Instruction Manual to define the means and methods by which mem%ers of these sections implement the. requirements of the SAR and the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Procedures.
r-The Director of Site Quality Control has developed a Site Quality lI Control Manual to define the means and methods by which the Site Quality Control members of the Qui.lity Assurance Department implement the requirements of the SAR and the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Procedures. _
r3
's 17.1-12 .
[
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendm^4nt 17 February 1976 The Supervisor of Vendor Surveillance has developed a Vendor l6 Surveillance Manual to define the means and methods by which .the
' vendor surieillance section implements the requirements of.the SAR and Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Procedures.
Portions of,the Quality Assurance Program have been delegated to _.
j Stone & Webster and Westinghouse as the Architect-Engineer and l Nuclear Steam System Supplier respectively. Their
- responsibilities have been documented in appropriate manuals and :
1 procedures -
and' have been subjected to review 'and
. approval / concurrence by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Manager.. -
l All' activities affecting quality shall be accomplished under controlled conditions utilizing appropriate equipment, suitable -
environmental conditions, and with assurance that all prerequisites for the' given activity have been satisfied.
Duquesne Light Company retains the ultimate responsibility for I Quality Assurance and verifies implementation through audits and . '.
reviews. These audits are performed by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department or by other delegated. ,
Quality Assurance orcanizations * (Stone & Webster and Westinghouse) . Areas ine .uded in this audit and review program include conceptual design, detailed engineering and design,
$- C~
equipment specifications, engineering drawings, vendor selection, surveillance of vendor shops, witnessing of key shop tests, installation specifications and instructions, field inspections and quality related records and documentation, operation and maintenance procedures, fuel fabrication and receipt procedures, ,
modification and repair procedures, and fueling procedures. All i audit activity within this program is governed by the applicable manuals within Duquesne Light Company, Stone & Webster, and (
Westinghouse.
Formal training of all members of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department is accomplished in accordance with written Indoctrination and Training Procedures. The. purpose of the Indoctrination and Training is to assure that personnel performing activities affecting quality achieve and maintain suitable proficiency in the principles and techniques of the activities being. performed. The Indoctrination and Training Program includes instructions as to the purpose, scope, and implementation of the governing manuals and procedures. Results of all such Indoctrination and Training are recorded and filed in accordance with written procedures.
The quality assurance programs of other organizations participating in the design construction and operation maintenance of nuclear power plants are reviewed by Duquesne Light Company. This review includes the subject of indoctrination and training and shall be to assure that other 17.1-13
,-m.--. ..- .... ~
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndm:nt 17 February 1976 -
. ' .r~ ~ '
organiz'ations adequately provide for indoctrination and training =
of their personnel who perform activitids affecting quality.
The following qualification and experience levels have been established for the Quality Assurance Depar.tment.
Min. Min. "
~
Reg'd Years Title Degree Experience Experience -
QA Manager, BS* 10 At least ten years in Director Site charge of re'sponsible ],
Quality Control assignments in the design, construction, or operation of a power plant. ,
Supervisor QA BS* 5 At least five years in or QC Group, _ quality related work or QA or QC Senior ' responsible assignments in ;
i Engineer, QC -
the design, construction, Administrator or operation of a power plant. g
, QA or QC BS* 2 At least two years quality Engineer, QA related work or equivalent
'~
- NDE Specialist .
experience in the design,.
construction, or operation N of a power plant.
QC Test Lab. Assoc. Degree O Education or training in a Technician or Equiv 2 yr technical discipline.
college credit * .
CE'quivalent qualifications in related physical science or two
! years of equivalent experience in the design, construction or operation of a power plant per year of college education.
17.2.1.3A- Design Control The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program provides that measures to assure that applicable regulatory requirements are translated into specifications / drawings, procedures, and instructions. These measures are established for the identification and control of design interfaces and for the coordination among the participating design organizations. The design control measures shall provide the verifying add checking of the adequacy of design, such as by performance of design reviews, by the use of alternate methods, or by the performance of a suitable testing program. Adequacy of design and' adherence to the design criteria documents shall be assured through formal review processes. These processes shall include review by .m
~=
individuals technically competent in the design area other than ' -
those who perform the original design. A design review board may J 17.1-14 -
BVPS-2.PSAR ,
,Amtndment 10
. 9/24/73
. be utilized for this function consisting of personnel representing the design effort or systiem being reviewed, those representing the interface activity involved and representatives of the Engineering and Quality Assdrance Departments. All such design reviews shall document comments, approvals, and releases. -
Area's that will be systematically evaluated shall. include:
- 1. Stress, therms 1, hydraulic, and accident analyses.
- 2. Compatibility of materials.
'3. Suitability of application of materials, parts, equip-ment, and processing. ,.
- 4. , Accessibility for inservica-inspection, maintenance, and' '
repair.
- 5. Acceptance criteria for inspections and tests. - -
- 6. Applicability of codes and standards.
=a The results of all such designy reviews shall be maintained, '
including all. reports or comments generated by the reviewers.
Design changes including field changes, shall be subject tou design contro1~ measures ~ccxumensurate with those applied to the' original design and be approved by the organization that
.- performed the original design unless Duquesne Light. Company 2
- designates another responsible organization. _
- Design documents and specifications contain quality requirements.-
Deviations from these requirements are resolved and documented.
The program requires that design changes be incorporated into revised documents or specifications. These revisions - will be :
distributed to responsible authorities in a contro11ed' manner and T :
obsolete documents will be removed and disposed of in- a*
similiarly controlled manner.
The ' responsibility for design control during the engineering and construction phase is delegated to Stone S Webster as agents for Duquesne Light Company (Section 17.1B) and to Westinghouse as supplier of the NSSS (Section 17.1C) . Auditing progress of the design control are provided within the quality programs of both Stone S Webster and Westinghouse. In addition to the audit programs of Stone & Webster and Westinghouse, Duquesne Light i Company will perform audits of the implementation of the programs of both agencies on a periodic basis. Duquesp Light Company Engineers review on a selective basis the design of certain comporients, systems, or structures. These reviews are documented in accordance with established procedures. Similar reviews are made of significant design changes which occur during the i construction of the station. Implementation of these procedures
..,mo 17.1-15 4
0
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 10 9/24/73 by the Duquesne Light Company Engineering Departments is audited !.:.__
by Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.. ~=~
Procedures will .be established to acsure that design control measures,are applied when plant modifications are required after initial operation has commenced. The design required may be _
performed by Duquesne Light Company Engineering or by a responsible outside organization. When design changes or modifications are, required, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will determine that the design control
! . program is evaluated and accepted prior to the commencement of-design. The implementation -of the program will be verified through audits by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.
17.2.1.4A Procurenent Document Control
.The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program establishes measures to assure that- applicable regulatory requirements, design bases, and other requirements which are necessary to assure adequate quality are suitably included or referenced in the, documents for procurement of material, equipment and services, whether purchased'by the Duquesne Light Company or by its contractors or subcontractors.
The procurement documents will require that the supplier submit --
~~
his QA Program Manual for review. The program will be reviewed I to verify that all applicable criteria from Appendix B to 10CFR50 have been adequately addressed. Concurrence with the program will be given before the order is placed. -
. Procurement documents shall contain basic technical requirements l as applicable for activities including fabrication, cleaning, erecting, packaging, handling, shipping, storing, and inspecting.
Technical requirements shall include component identification, drawings, specifications, codes, and industrial standards; also i test and inspection requirements and special process instructions.
Procurement documents shall contain provisions which allow access to vendor facilities and records for the purpose of auditing and inspection. The procurement document will also define the
' requirement for the retention, control, and maintenance of records.
Procurement documents will be subjected to a review to assure that quality requirements are clearly stated. The review will be l performed by a group which is independent of those having direct responsibility for the preparation of the procurement document.
The review will determine that the procurement document has been prepared in accordance with established procedures, and that the _
document contains adequate acceptance and rejection criteria for -
any tests or inspections that may be performed as part of the - -
\
- 17.1-16
r .
i BVPS-2 PSAR Am@ndm@nt 17 February 1976 1
. :._. 3. >
quality requirements. Revisions or changes to procurement documents will be subjected to thq)same review requirements .as the original document. In either case, the review and approval of procurement documents will be documented and such evidence --
will be maintained and available for verification.
All vendors will be qualified in accordance with the provisions ;
of 17.2.1.7. ~
l
[The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department, in accordance with established instructions, reviews selected purchase documents to assure that quality requirements have been, adequately addressed. -
m All safety-related field purchase requisitions are reviewed and approved by the Duquesne Light Company, Director of' Quality Control in accordance with written procedures.
l Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been '
, delegated the responsibility for the' preparation of procurement i documents during the engineering' and construction phase as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly Wentinghouse is delegated.
the responsibility for the control of p~ocurement documents for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Both Stone & Webster and-Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established g $, provisions for auditing the implementation of their own A. ! 9;' activities ~ in regard to procurement document control. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse ,
programs.
\
During the operational phase, measures established in accordance: !
with the: requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality- ;
Assurance Program 'will be utilized for the replacement of existing material or equipment. The implementation of these procedures or instructions will be audited by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department. Procurement documents will be reviewed and approved by DLC Surveillance Quality Control Section before forwarding to field purchasing.
17.2.1.5A Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings The Duquesne Light Company Qualby Assurance Program requires that activities affecting quality shall be. prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawu' #s of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include ' appropriate quantitative- or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
. ,~ L , -
17.1-17 '
L.
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 Duquesne Light Company is responsible for the preparation of instructions, procedures, and drawings affecting quality, for d -
those -activities not delegated to SSW 'or the NSSS Supplier, - --
during the design and construction phase. .
SSW has i>een delegated responsibility, in certain areas, for the '
preparation of instructions, procedures, and drawings affecting .
quality during the design and construction phase. The extent of this SSW responsibility is described in Section 17.13.
The responsibility for the preparation of instructions, procedures, and drawings for the NSSS is delegated to.
Westinghouse as described in Section 17.1C.
Auditing programs for the preparation of instructions, procedures, and drawings are provided within the quality programs of both Stone & Webster and Westinghouse. In addition to these sudit programs, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform periodic audits to evaluate the adequacy of the programs.
During the operations phase, measures established in accordance with the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the preparation of instructions, procedures, and drawings. The implementation of the established procedures will be audited by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance :. r-
-~ ",'-
Department.
17.2.1.6A Document Control The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program establishes measures to control the issuance of documents affecting the quality of safety-related systems. These documents include -
design specifications, design, manufacturing, construction and installation drawings, Quality Assurance Manuals and Procedures, manufacturing inspection and testing instructions, and procurement documents. The measures assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy and approved by authorized personnel. Unless otherwise specified by the Duquesne Light Company, reviews of changes shall be conducted by the same organizations that performed the original review. Reviewers shall have access to pertinent background information and possess an understanding of the requirements and intent of the original document. These measures shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel and are distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed prior to the onset of work. Changes to documents shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations that performed the original review and approval unless DLC designates another responsible organization. Participating organizations shall have procedures for the control of documents and changes thereto to preclude the possibility of the use of outdated or inappropriate documents
{'--
17.1-18
BVPS-2 PSAR 'Amendm::nt 17 February.1976 ,
including such measures as the use of current ahd updated distribution lists. , , ,
~
During the engineering and construction phase, certain responsibilities for the control of documents have been delegated to Stone & Webster as agent for Duquesne Light Company as -
described in Section 17.1B. The responsibility for the control of documents regarding the NSSS is delegated to Westinghouse as described in Section 17.1C. Auditing programs of the control.of t' documents are provided within the quality programs of both Stone
& Webster and Westinghouse. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Ccunpany Quality Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to assess the_ adequacy of the Stone &,
Webster and Westinghouse programs.~ 2 During the operational phase, measures established in accordance j with the' requirements .of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program Manual will be utilized to control documents concerning activities affecting quality. The implementation of these procedures and instructions,- will be audited by Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.
17.2.1.7A Control of Purchased Material, Equignent, and Services The .Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program requires-that measures be established to assure that purchased material,
- . equipment, Tand services, whether purchased directly or through contractors and subcontractors, conform to the procurement
. documents. These measures shall include provisions, as appropriate, for source evaluation and selection, source -
inspection, receipt inspection, examination of tests and/or ,
~
inspection reports from the supplier, examination of objective evidence from the supplier, such as certification of material , ,
analysis or any other' combination of these. The extent and i frequency of source evaluations shall be governed by ~the'
-importance, complexity and quantity of items involved and the ,
level of confidence in the supplier established by past performance, his ability to meet the applicable requirements of 10CFR50, and a periodic comprehensive audit of this QA Program and implementation.
Source inspections and/or audits shall be conducted by qualified personnel to ensure conformance to requirements of the procurement documents, specifications, approved shop drawings, +
and applicable codes and standards. Such inspection shall be determined in advance and performed in accordagee with written instructions. !
Receipt inspection shall' include examination of material and equipment to assure that the quality was not impaired during !'
transit and that all quality records or a certification of compliance are at the site prior to the use or installation of the material or equipment. When the verification is by submittal 1
17.1-19
. \
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendmsnt 17 February 1976 of certification from the supplier, it shall be acceptable only J~
if it includes the identification of'the codes and standards to which the items were subjected and the accepting authority is satisfied that the submitted data is true,. correct, complete and conforms .to the requirements of the procurement documents. ___
This documentary evidence shall be retained at the power plant site and shall be sufficient to identify the specific requirements, such as codes, standards, or specifications, met by ,
the purchased material and equipment. The program requires that
.the effectiveness of the control of quality by contractors and subcontractors shall be assessed by Duquesne Light Company or its designee at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity, and quantity of the product or' services.
Duquesne Light Company, SQC Section, has the responsibility for reviewing and evaluating the completeness of all specified procurement / shipping documents and for performing the receipt inspection for all safety-related material and equipment received at the site. Appropriate procedures shall be prepared and implemented to carry out these responsibilities.
Stone & Webster, as agents for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated certain responsibilities in the selection of purchased material and services during the engineering and construction
~_.
phase as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for the control of purchased material and services for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C.
Both Stone & Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality - - -
programs, have established provisions for auditing the implementation of their own activities in regard to control of purchased materials and services. In addition to these audits,
- Du,quesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone &
Webster and Westinghouse programs as well as selected contractors and subcontractors.
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department, with any necessary outside assistance, will review and concur with the requirements of the Quality Assurance program of the Fuel Fabricator and will during its fabrication conduct audits of the program's implementation.
During the operational phase, written procedures established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized by participating Duquesne Light Company Divisions and Departments in the acquisition of purchased material, equipment, and services. The implementation of these written procedures as well as the Quality Assurance programs of contractors and subcontractors will be reviewed and audited for content and implementation by the __
Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department. i _
4 17.1-20
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendmint 17 February 1976 17.2.1.8A Identification and Control' of Materials, Parts, and Components .
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assarance Program requires that measures be established for the identification and control -
of ~ materials, parts,.. and components, including partially
' fabricated assemblies. These measures shall' assure that identification of the -item is maintained by heat number, part !
number, serial number, or other appropriate means; either on .the item or on records traceable to the itent, as required throughout fabrication, erection, installation, and use of the - item.
Physical identification shall be used to the maximum extent possible. Where physical identification is either impractical or, insufficient, physical' separation, procedural control, or other appropriate means shall be employed. Identification may be either on the. item or on records traceable to the, item, as appropriate. -
Where identification marking is employed, the marking shall be ,
clear, unambiguous and indelible, and shall be applied in such a !
manner as not to' affect the function of the item. Markings shall' -
be transferred to each part of an item when subdivided and shall not' be obliterated -or. hidden by surface treatment or coatings ~
unless other means of identification are substituted.
l Traceability shall be identified in procurement documents and by l reference to the requirements of applicable codes and standards.
C- These identification and control measures shall be designed to prevent the use of incorrect or defective material, parts, and
, components. ,
u The Duquesne Light Company SQC Section is responsible for assuring, through inspections,- the identification, classification, and segregation of all Category I materials,,, ;
parts, and components during the, construction. phase. On-site ~ ~ !
contractors are responsible -for establishing appropriate identification, classification, and segregation practices to control the use of materials 'and items within their scope of work.
Stone & Webster, as' agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated certain responsibilities- for the identification and j control of materials, parts, and components during the engineering and construction phase as described in Section 17.1C.
Similarly Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility,for the identification and control of material, parts, and components for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Both Stone & Webster and ,
Westinghouse, within their own quality programs,'have established i provisions for auditing the implementation of their own activities in regard to identification and control of, materials, parts, and components. In addition to these audits, Duquesne !
._ Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its own
! periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and l . Westinghouse programs.
17.1-21
..---,--g ,c ,w w,-~v,-,-,,-.,,em,..----.----,,y- ---,-m,--. -.y..-,.e-w..,,,,.-,--.-., --
._ ...-.e.,-.-.-----._,.------.--------.e----,-
p .
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 1 .
During the operational phase measures established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality
.E--
- Assurance Program will be utilized for the identifichtion and control of materials, parts, and components. The implementation of these procedures or instructions will be audi_ted by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.
17.2.1.9A Control of Special Processes The Duquesne Light Company Quality. Assurance Program establishes measures to assure that special processes, including welding, heat treating, and nondestructive testing, are controlled and l accomplished by qualified personnel using. qualified procedures in
{ accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, criteria, and other special requirements.
I a l The Duquesne Light Company SQC fliection is responsible for the f establishment and implementation of the program for the
! qualificat. ion and maintenance of welders at the Construction Site. As such, the Director of SQC has the authority to require l1 a retest of any welder or welding operator. Welders' and Welding Operators e certifications are issued and maintained by the SQC Section. The Duquesne Light Company SQC Section is responsible for the developnent and implementation of a Nondestructive _
, Examination Program for the Construction Site. This will include i the development of NDE Procedures and the qualification of .r =
T~
l personnel. -
\ .
Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated responsibilities for the control of special processes during the engineering and construction phase as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for the control of special processes for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Both Stone. & Webster and
! Westinghouse, within their own quality program, have. established l provisions for auditing the implementation of their own
, activities in regard to the control of special processes. In l addition to these audits, Duquesne Light _ Company ~ Quality l Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to l assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster und Westinghouse programs.
During the operational phase measures estab.ished in accordance with the requirements ~ of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the control of special processes. The implementation of these established procedures and instructions will be audited by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.
17.1-22
- ,-- --,, < ,,- .---w - -r -vm -
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendm:nt 17 Fcbruary 1976
~
1712.1.10A Inspeetion -
The Duquesne Light Company Qu ity' Assurance Program requires that measures for inspection of activities affecting quality shall be established and executed by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing the activity. Such inspection shall be performed by individuals other than those who performed the activity being inspected'.
Examinations, measurements, or tests of materials or products processed shall' be performed for each work operation where necessary to assure quality. If inspection of processed material or products is impossible or disadvantageous, indirect control'by.
monitoring processing methods, equipment, and personnel shall be*
provided. Both inspection and process monitoring shall be provided when control is inadequate without both. If mandatory inspection hold points, which require witnessing or inspecting by a designated representative and beyond which work shall not proceed without the consent of its designated representative are required, the apecific hold points shall be indicated in appropriate documents.
Where required by governing codes and standards, inspectors'shall be qualified in accordance with the requirements of those codes and standards and shall conduct examinations in accordance with the procedures as required by such codes and standards. These
,1 inspection procedures shall be available for use by the inspector prior to the performance of the inspection. Measures shall be established to maintain and record the current status of inspector qualifications.
Inspection acceptance cr';eria shall be commensurate with the type .of repairs, replacements, or modifications, and where applicable shall be- equal to those contained in the original _
instructions, procedures, and drawings.
The Duquesne Light Company Site Quality Control Section is responsible for the receipt inspection of material and cx>mponents at the construction site. Duquesne Light Company Site Quality Control personnel perform inspections of material and components during receiving, ' storage, handling, installation, and preparation for operati,on. The activities inspected and the criteria for . acceptance are shown on approved drawings, specifications, manufacturer's special instructions, and in supporting Quality Assurance procedures and instructions.
Inspections and nondestructive tests are specified and performed where necessary to assure quality. Specific" hold points are included in the specification or are establis,hed by Site Quality Control. ,
The Director of Site Quality Control is responsible for assuring l 3
--- that the field inspection requirements have been , met in the following construction activities:
17.1-23
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendmsnt 17 February 1976
- 1. Soils identification compaction.
and' control of moisture and -
b
~
- 2. Inspection of concrete forms, reinforcing steel, ~ ~
. electrical, mechanical, and structural embedments prior to concrete placement.
3.- Verification of proper proportioning, mixing, and delivery of concrete.
- 4. Inspection.of structural steel erection and bearing pile installation, if applicable.
I
- 5. Nondestructive examination of welding.
- 6. Inspection ~ for proper assembly of piping systems and ,
components.
- 7. Alignment and clearance of mechanical equipment. y
- 8. Verification of electrical cable routing, termination, and equignent installation. .
Field piping fabrication and erection operations on Category I systems and equipment receive in process and final Quality ~~-
_ Control inspections for assurance that the requirements of [
~
specifications and approved drawings are met. The inspections n specified are documented and maintained at the construction site _
in the site Quality Assurance file.
Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated responsibilities for the inspection of activities
- affecting quality during the engineering and construction phase !
as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly, Westinghouse is !
delegated the responsibility for the inspection of activities affecting quality for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C.
Both Stone & Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established provisions for auditing. the implementation of their own activities in regard to the inspection of activities affecting quality. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse programs.
During the operational phase measures established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Cor:pany Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the inspection of activities affecting quality.
The Duquesne Light Quality Assurance Department will review, approve, and audit the implementation of these written procedures _
and instructions. (= ~~
4 17.1-24
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 1
17'.2.1.11A i
Test Control
- Th'e Duquesne Light Company Q lit'y Assurance Program wi-ll establish a test program to assure that all testing required to ,
demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service is identified and performed in .
accordance with written test procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design documents. The test program shall include, as appropriate, proof tests prior to installation, preoperational tests, and operational tests during nuclear power plant operation, of structures, systems ,- and components. Test procedures shall include provisions- for- assuring that all prerequisites for the given test have been met, that adequate test instrumentation is
- available and used, and that the test is performed under suitable -
environmental conditions.- Test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements.have been satisfied.
The Director of SQC is responsible for assuring that all quality I3 control tests specified are performed under proper environmental ,
conditions, with adequate test instrumentation and by qualified i personnel. ' '
Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated the responsibilities for the establishment and implementation of a test program during the engineering and
~h ~
constructiori phase as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly, Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for the
. establishment and implementation of a test program for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Both Stone & Webster and-Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established provisions for auditing the implementation of their own activities in regard to the test program. In addition to the audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will ;
perform its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse programs.
During th'e operational phase measures established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the establishment of a test program. The commitments established in the test program will be audited periodically by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department to assure compliance with the commitments.
17.2.1.12A control of Measuring and Test Equipment The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program establishes measures to assure that tools, gages, instruments,, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting .
quality are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at '
f specified periods to maintain accuracy within necessary limits.
- These measures shall include a system for the initial 17.1-25 m._... w-__-., y-__%. .-_n__., m ,_,~m,-____. .___,4--_.-.,
q BVPS-2 PSAR Am ndment 17 l February 1976 i
\
calibration, recall of measuring, and testing devices when they are due for recalibration and for the tagging of instrument gages
% i to positively indicate their st'atus. - -
The laboratory standards against which calibrations or recalibra- )
tior of measuring and testing devices are measured shall be 1 main uined, calibrated.and used in an environment compatible with !
the required accuracy and operating characteristics. The !
requirement includes control of temperature, humidity, and I contamination. All items which have been measured by equipment !
found' to be out of calibration shall be suspect, and an l
, evaluation shall be'made to determine what action is necessary to assure compliance of the item to its applicable specification.
The measures will require that all measuring and testing devices are calibrated against certified equipment having known valid relationships to nationally recognized standards (for example the U.S. National Bureau of Standards) . Calibrating Standards shall have an uncertainty. (error) requirement of no more than 1/4 of the tolerance of the equipment being calibrated unless limited by the'" State of the Art."
The Duquesne Light Company SQC Section is responsible for establishing the program for cx>ntrol of measuring and test equipment and for maintaining a staffed calibration facility during the engineering and construction phase. The contractors .-)
- ^
are responsible for issuing and retrieving measuring and test - - t__
equipment, forwarding this equipment for calibration and maintaining records for equipment use.
Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated the responsibilities for the control of measuring and
- test equipment during the engineering and construction phase as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly Westinghouse is delegated
, the responsibility for the control of measuring and test equipment for.the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Both Stone
& Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established provisions for auditing the implementation of their own activities in regard to the control of measuring and test equipment. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company ' Quality Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy ^ -
of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse programs. __- - -
During the operational phase measures, established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality j Assurance ~ Program will be utilized for the control of measuring l and test equipment. The implementation of the established procedures and instructions will be audited periodically by the l Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.
CT *
=
G 17.1-26
,,,,,_.-_._.-,__.__--,-__.,,_.._.,,.,.._s .,-,_-,-,,_.,_,.,,_.._.e ____..m_._ - . _ _ . ---,rr---- -w
BVPS-2 PSAR Amtndm:nt 17 February 1976 l
17.2.1.13A Handline, Storage, and Shiboing .
1 .
The DuquesneLightCompanyQualithAssuranc'eProgramestablishes measures to control the handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation 'of mat.erial and equipment in accordance with l work and inspection in~structions to prevent damage or deterioration. When necessary for particular. products,.special protective environments, such as inert, gas atmosphere, specific moisture content levels, and temperature levels, . shall be specified'and provided, and methods for verirication of the i existence of these environments during handling, storage, or l shipping shall be specified. ..
Duquesne Light Company . SQC . Section has the responsibility for N implementing approved procedures for handling and storing of all .
material and equipment. These procedures ,shall include:
unloading, performing item inspection, storing, maintenan'ce while in storage, location control, and the documentation of same.
l Stone & Webster, -as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been; delegated certain responsibilities for the adequate handling,_ .
storing, shipping" of material ~ and equipnent during the engineering and oonstruction phase as described'in Section 17.1B.'
Similarly' Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for the adequate handling, storing, and shipment of material and_
' - equipuent for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Bo.th Stone e & Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established provisions for auditing the implementation of'
, their own activities in regard to the handling, storage, and .
! shipment of material and equipment. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform.
its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone S -
Webster and Westinghouse programs. , _
During the operationel phase measures established in acc6rdance' with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation of material and equipnent.
The implementation of the established procedures or instructions will be verified' through periodic audits which will be performed by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department.
17.2.1.14A Inspection, Test, and Operation Status _
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Progrum requires that measures shall be established to indicate, by the use of markings such as stamps, tags, labels, routing
- cards, or other suitable means, the status of inspections and tests performed -
upon individual items of the nuclear power plant. These measures shall provide for the identification of items dhich have satisfactorily passed required inspections and' tests, whe'e r
- , necessary to preclude inadvertent bypassing of such inspections and tests. Measures shall also be established for indicating the 17.1-27
. , - . -,-,-m--,,. -me,_ ,-.,-,,-.we
BVPS-2 PSAR Amsndment 17 February 1976 i .'
operating status of structures, systems, and components of .the dEE:
nuclear power plant, such as by tagging valves and switches, to Z pcevent inadvertent operation. These measures shall include procedures for the control of status indicators, including the -
authority for application and removal of tags, markings, labels, and stamps.
i The Duquesne Light Company SQC Section will maintain the status '
l of plant structures, systems, and components during the preoperational test period. Records, checklists, and an operational status tagging system are maintained during the period to indicate status and availability to operate.
Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated responsibilities for identifying status during the engineering and construction phase as described in Section 17.1B.
Similarly Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for identifying status for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C.
Both Stone & Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established provisions for auditing the imp 7ementation of their own activities in regard to identifying status. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perforni its own periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse programs.
During the pre-operational and operational phases, procedures ;
established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne _ ' -
Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized by both Stone & Webster and Duquesne Light to indicate the test and operating status of structures, systems, and components. These procedures will be reviewed by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department and audits will be performed to determine .
their implementation.
17.2.1.15A Nonconforming Material, Parts, or Components l
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program establishes measures to control materials, parts, or components which do' not conform to requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. These measures shall include, as appropriate, procedures for identification, documentation, segregation, l
disposition, and notification to affected organization.
- l reviewed and accepted, rejected,
! Nonconforming items shall be I repaired, or reworked in accordance with documented procedures.
Nonconforming items shall be physically separated, whenever l
l practical, into hold areas. The access to such hold areas, including the authority for removal of items, shall be specified.
The responsibility and authority for the disposition of noncon-forming items shall be defined and a method of ' notification to affected organizations shall be documented. cf.
W-17.1-28
a c BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 F@bruary 1976 Inspection acceptance criteria shall be commensuratie with the type of repairs, replacements,'
-~
r modifications, and whe,re applicable shall be equal to - ose contained in the original instructions, procedures, and drawings. ,
Duquesne Light Company Site Quality Control Section has the ._
responsibility for implementing approved procedures for identifying and . reporting nonconforming items durin'g the construction phase of the work. Site Quality Control reports the nonconformance to the Stone & Webster. Project Engineer who shall review the' matter and provide a. directive on dispositioning- the nonconformance. "
- .g .
, .: s. , . . . .. , :. .o . .:, --- ,. .
Stone & Webster f as agents for Duquesne Light Company,'has been delegated the responsibility for the control of nonconforming materials, parts,'^ and components during the engineering and construction pha'se ~~as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly, Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for the. control of nonconforming materials, parts, and components for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. -Both Stone & Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established i provisions for auditing the ' implementation 'of their own activities in regard to nonconforming materials, parts, and components. .In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its own periodic audits to assess _the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse
-[- ,
programs.
During the- operational phase measures established in accordance with the requirements 'of the Duquesne Light Company' Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the control of nonconforming materials, parts, and components. The implementation of these established procedures of instructions ,
I will -be verified through periodic audits performed by the- i l Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department. .
17.2.1.16A Corrective Action I
(
l The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program requires i that measures shall be established to assure that conditions l adverse to quality such as f ailures, malfunctions, deficiencies,
! . deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected. In the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures. shall assure that the cause of the condition is. determined and i' corrective action taken to preclude repetition. The.
identification of the significant condition adverse to quality, the cause of the condition, and the corrective action taken shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of managements.
Documents shall be maintained which provide objective evidence
- that conditions adverse to quality have been identified and cnrrective action has been taken.
17.1-29 .
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendmsnt 10 t
9/24/73 -
Duquesne Light Company Site Quality Control Section has the ' - ~'
responsibility for. implementing approved, procedures and for reviewing and analyzing all Nonconformance and Disposition Reports (NSD 's) as an effort to determine patterns and trends.
Such inf.ormation may result in a lower frequency of occurrences of nonconformances,.as a result of feedback.
Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company / has been delegated certain responsibilities for Corrective Action during '
the engineering and construction phase as described in Section 17.1B. Similarly Westinghouse is delegated the
' responsibility for Corrective Action for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. Both Stone & Webster and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established provisions for auditing the implementation of their own activities in regard to Corrective Action. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its own
-periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone S Webster and Westinghouse programs. -
During the operational phase measures established in accordance with the requirements of the Duquesne - Light Company Quality Assurance Program will be utilized for the detection of conditions adverse to quality, and that the cause of the condition is identified and documented to the proper level of ~
management.
These procedures or instructions shall be reviewed and approved by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Manager and audits will be performed to determine their implementation. -
The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Manager has the
- authority to prepare written notices to any participant in the '
Quality Assurance program requesting changes and/or revisions to any program or procedure which may have resulted in the generation of. repeated non-conformances. The Quality Assurance Manager, in addition, may direct the stopping of all work pending Corrective Action.
17.2.1.17A Quality Assurance Records The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program requires
'that sufficient records be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality. The records shall include at least the following: Operating logs and results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits, monitoring of work performance, and materials analyses. The records shall also include closely related data such as qualifications of personnel, procedures, and equipment. Inspection and test records shall, as a minimum, identify the inspector or data recorder, the type of observation, the results, the acceptability, and the action taken in _,_
connection with any deficiencies noted. Records shall be Un
~-'
identifiable and retrievable . Consistent with applicable -
17.1-30
__ ________-__-______.__.__.__..__.____._._____._._..._____m _
v . -. .- --
l BVPS-2 PSAR Amsndment 10 9/24/76 legulatory requirement, Duquesne Light Company shall establish requirement.s retention, such as duration, location, and assigned ooncerning_ record)lity. Provisions include onsite responsiba.
.- facilities for permanent records retention, including steps taken t
to assure preservation, protection, controlled access, and all
.other applicable requirements.
- Stone. S Webster, as' agent for D'uquesne Light Company, has been delegated the responsibility for the maintenance of Quality Assurance - records for' the NSSS'as described in Section 17.1C.
Both Stone & Webster'and Westinghouse, within their own quality programs, have established l implementation of their own activities provisions inforregard auditing the to the
! maintenance of Quality Assurance r'ecords. In addition to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Department will perform its cwn periodic audits to assess the adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse programs.- '
During the operational phase measures established in accordance
[ with the requirements of the Duquesne Light Company Quality l Assurance Program will be utilized' for the maintenance of Quality Assurance Records. The implementation of these established -
procedures and instructions for the maintenance of Quality Assurance records will be verified through periodic audits performed by the Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance
,g Department.
,s 17 .2.1.18A Audits The Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance Program requires that a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and to determine the effectiveness of the program. The audits shall be performed in accordance with the written procedures or check lists by appropriately trained l personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being
. audited. Audit results shall be documented and reviewed by management having responsibility in the area audited. Follow-up action, including reaudit of deficient areas, shall be taken where indicated. Audits should include, but not be limited to, an objective evaluation of QA program contents, such as practices, procedures and instructions, and their implementation as well as an evaluation of work areas, activities, processes and items and should include a review of documents and records pertaining to the subject work including. implementation of i corrective action. S-Stone & Webster, as agent for Duquesne Light Company, has been delegated the responsibility for auditing to the provisions of the Stone & Webster Quality Assurance Program during 'the engineering and construction phase as described in Section 17.1B.
~'
Similarly Westinghouse is delegated the responsibility for auditing to the provisions of the Westinghouse Quality Assurance I 17.1-31 ,
,,,vvd--- v--4.+ , --,,,we-ee ---.,--w ,,,ec,-r-e--~--ry,-. - , -._
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February, 1976 e
' Program for the NSSS as described in Section 17.1C. In addition 9_,_ _
to these audits, Duquesne Light Company Quality Assurance
~
Department will perform itis own periodic audits to assess the '
adequacy of the Stone & Webster and Westinghouse Programs, as well as certain selected contractors or subcontractors of both Companies.
The Duquesne' Light Quality Assurance Manager is also responsible for the auditing of all company divisions or departments, as well as company contractors or .-subcontractors participating in the Duquesne Light Company Quhlity Assurance Program.
These audits will be performed at a frequency commensurate with their importance as well as the quality record of the group involved.
Copies of all audit findings and recommendations are transmitted to the appropriate management level of the organization involved as well as to the Vice President of the Duquesne Light's Engineering and Construction Division. 3 O
ep I N
e p-- n
';~
4 17.1-32
r l
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 17.1B STONE S WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A Quality Assurance Program has been established by Stone &
Webster Engineering Corporation (SSW) which ensures compliance ,9!EC with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, 10CFR50 -
Appendix B, " Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Plants," dated June 27, 1970 for those activities Power Stone & Webster Quality Assurance responsibility by Duquesne f.33 7f delegated as Light Company (DLC) .
This section summarizes the quality assurance measures established by SSW for application to QA Category I items *.
QA Category I items are listed in Appendix B to Section 17.
17.1.1B Organization 17.1.1.1B General Description '
Fig 17.1.1B-1, " Company Organization for Quality Assurance" shows the lines of authority, responsibility, and communication for quality matters within SSW. '
Fig 17.1.2B, " Quality Assurance Department Organization" shows the lines of authority and responsibility within the Quality Assurance Department in Boston and at procurement inspection locations for activities delegated as SSW responsibility.
Fig 17.1.3B, " Quality Assurance Interrelationships" shows the lines of authority, communications, and responsibilities within the Quality Assurance Department in Boston, and with Procurement Inspection locations for activities delegated as S&W responsibility.
17.1.1.2B Establishment and Management of OA Program The Vice President, Quality Assurance, is responsible for:
- 1. Establishing the policy and program for SSW quality assurance and quality control activities except engineering and design.
- 2. Coordinating designated SSW quality
- assurance and quality control activities.
- QA Category I includes those structures, plant systems, or portions of systems, and components whose failure or malfunction j could cause a release of radioactivity that would endanger safety. This category also includes equipment which is vital to a safe shutdown of the plant and the removal of decay and sen-sible heat, or equipment which is necessary to mitigate con-sequences to the public of a postulated accident.
17.1-33
, _ , , , _ , _ .__ - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - ~ ~ -
. . . . . . . . . - .- =
\
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 .'
February 1976 -
The Engineering Manager is a Vice President and is responsible for:
- 1. Establishing the policy for quality assurance activities' .
for engineering and design (hereafter referred to as.
engineering assurance activities) .
- 2. Directing engineering assurance activities. ..
- 3. Delineating applicable quality standards in SARs, e specifications, and drawings.
The Senior Construction Manager is responsible for compliance to quality requirements by construction activities for those areas designated as SSW responsibility. In those areas where site '
contractor programs have been reviewed and approved by DLC QA, DLC construction is responsible for compliance to quality i
requirements.
The Manager of Projects is a Vice President and has the prime
! responsibility for project costs and schedules.
- __ The above mentioned Vice Presidents with quality assurance responsibilities report directly to the President and have authority delegated to them consistent with their area of management.
This organizational structure assures that the Vice President, Quality Assurance (QA) , and the Engineering Manager are sufficiently independent of production pressures to properly carry out their responsibilities for directing and managing the QA program.
I 17.1.1.3B Management of OA Activities The Quality Assurance, is responsible for the 44gfyg/
l'lf.EfiY$-
! Manager, administration and manageLent of the SSW quality assurance $4E g program, with the exception of engineering assurance activities. gghyt '
He reports directly to the Vice Pre,sident r - Qualit,y Assurance.
The Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division, is O{MVMfW i responsible for assuring the implementation and proper 3
functioning of engineering assurance activities. He derives his authority from the Engineering Manager.
J 17.1.1.4B Implementing Organization Quality requirements are established by the Engineering Department for materials, equipment, and construction activities,
. and are then included in specifications for their implementation.
17.1-34 .
o
, BVPS-2 PSAR Am ndment 17 February 1976 !
1 !
'Ihe Construction Department reviews and approves specifications.
t The QA and QC requirements in the specifications are reviewed and approved by the QA Department. -
Engineering assurance policy, established by the Engineering Manager, is documented in Engineering Assurance Procedures (EAPs). Those EAPs which interface with QC procedures are
, reviewed for concurrence by the Manager, Quality Assurance.
Quality assurance and quality control policy, established by the
,Vice President -- Quality Assurance, is documented in several manuals under the administration of the Man'ager -
Quality Assurance. These manuals and the persons assigned direct responsibility for their. preparation are:
- 2. Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual -ASME Section III -- Chief Engineer, Quality Systems Division
- 3. Quality Standards Manual -
Chief Engineer, Quality Systems Division. ,
- 4. Quality Assurance Directives - Chief Engineer, Quality Systems Division
- 5. Quality Control Instructions -
Manager, Procurement Quality Control Division. l/yS/MNd!
- 6. Company Quality Assurance Nondestructive Test Manual -
Chief Engineer, QA NDT Division.
l Only those portions of these manuals which govern work delegated to SSW by DLC are applicable to Beaver Valley Unit No. 2.
I The major areas of QA activity within SSW are those related to the preparation of engineering and design documents and the procurement of selected components.
Engineering Assurance The Engineering Assurance Division (EA) is responsible'for assuring the implementation and evaluation of the engineering assurance program, which consists of management systems for (1)
- control of technical work in engineering and design divisions,
.and (2) assurance of quality of that work. Engineering Assurance also assures that~ completed engineering and design work conform to SSW procedures.
To fulfill these responsibilities, Engineering Assurance issues appropriate EAPs, provides continuing- education in the engineering assurance program, audits engineering and design work, reports to management on the performance of engineering and 17.1-35 p-, ,-- w-.-=, ,,-.,._-_,---,--------.,n, e.. - , , , , , ,--._---en.------m- - _ - - - _ - _ _ . _ - - - . _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17
' February 1976 .
design, and verifies the satisfactory m mpletion of any required corrective actions. .V Ouality Assuranca The Quality Assurance Department (QA) , under the direction of the ~
Manager policy
-- Quality Assurance, is responsible for implementing - the - .
Assurance. and program, as established by the Vice President-Quality, The QA functions are carried out as follows:
Procurement Ouality Control '
ACG/RANCE The Procurement Quality Control Division . (PQC) assures that suppliers conform to procurement specifications and . drawings for the following designated purchase orders and other purchaser orders formally by DLC in correspondance controlling placement of orders.
2BV-9 2BV 203 2BV-15 7}4ffM(/MSETT 2BV-204 pg30(Eb h/6 2BV-22 2BV-206 2BV-23 2BV-213 p g /pb 2BV-43 2BV-216 CRD64f*
2BV-405 ~2BV-221 2BV-407 2BV-222 2BV-408 2BV-226 2BV-21 2BV-229 i
2BV-21A 2BV-236 l 2BV-32 2BV-247 l 2BV-51 2BV-248 2BV-202 2BV-625 The Procurement Quality Control Division will perform vendor pre-award qualification and maintain the SSW vendor rating list. .
Field Quality Control No Field Quality Control activities have been hssigned to SSW.
QA Nondestructive Testing The QA Nondestructive Test Division (NDT) provides ussistance to the Procurement Quality Control Division for pjDTD Testing Nondestructive l for those purchase orders designated "a s SSW responsibility NDT requirements.
and reviews non-field related vendor procedure for The QA.NDT Division consists of a Chief Engineer, and a staff of qualified NDT engineers and specialists. i 17.1-36
% <r-,e BVPS-2 PSAR Ntandment 17 Pebruary 1976 Quality Systems Division ~ ' ' ~
The Quality Systems Division (QSD) provides quality engi ering support for the QA Department activities, and is responsible for the establishment and control of standardized quality systems.
The QSD consists of a Chief Engineer and a staff of ,Encineers and Specialists. "
Quality Assurance Coordination
,, y ' AM A QA Coordinator is assigned to the Project, and is responsible
'for integrating ~all designated phases of the.QA ' program. Under the direction of the Manager - Quality Assurance, he assists the project in implementing S&W QA policies and programs. He acts as the QA Department spokesman for his assigned project, and assists the utility in QA matters, when regtletsted. He is responsible for
' coordinating quality related interfaces between DLC and S&W, and for coordinating the QA Sections of Safety Analysis Reports and their revisions. He reports to the Project Manager regarding quality assurance activities.
Department Services Group, '
Agp4NT The Department Services Group'is as5ignedwthe responsibility for quality program evaluations, management' audits, cost control, and support services within the- quality ' assurance disciplizie for
_. those activities assigned to S&W. The group also provides such assistance as is required to'other departments. '
l 17.1.1.5B Qualification and Erperieke_ Ley &
. ~ , . .
Qualification and experience levels of" management personnel carrying out the QA Program are summarized. on Table 17.1-T.
17.1.2B Ouality Assurance Program
/
17.1.2.1B General Description ,
The quality assurance program provid s . control of the S&W assigned activities throughout the following phases of the project.
s .
- 1. Conceptual design '
s
- 2. Detailed engineering and design , /
- 3. Procurement of Engineering services -
, c'..~ .s 84 . Preparation of Procurement specificati.ons l
. s
- 5. Equipment procurement - * ,
\ i
- a. Supplier selection ,
s -
s s
s 17.1-37 +
1
.. _ - - - ~
s s 4 .
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 g , February 1976
- b. Surveillance in Section 17.1.1.4B unde)r (for those orders listed
- of supplier the heading " Procurement Quality Control.")
ggggg
- c. Witnessing key shop tests (for those orders listed in Section 17.1.1.4B under the heading "Procurem'ent Quality Control.")
gg 17.1.2.2B QA Program Documentation The S&W QA program policies, procedures, and instructions are --
documented'in the manuals listed below. These manuals are .
reviewed and approved by appropriate SSW management. All manuals and manual revisions are distributed as controlled documents to the key SSW personnel participating in project activities, and as requested by DLC. '
- 1. Pro-iect GA Program Manuals '
,4
- 2. Engineering Assurance Manual
- 3. Quality Standards Manual ,
\X 4. Quality Assurance Directives
_ 5. Company. _ Quality Assurance and Control Manual - ASME Section III-
- 5. Comaa n y-ph-Nond e s tru ct-ive--Te s t-Ma n u a THIS ggpjAggp M!JVAL 'DELEM N Y*
gsy pi/4DiFMMAM
'Only kggEe'pVES (QAb'N.
those portions of these manuals which govern work delegated to SSW by DLC are applicable to Beaver Valley Unit No. 2.
17 1.2.3B Indoctrination and Continuing Education Continuing education and qualification of personnel performing
- quality related activities are requirements of the QA program.
QuQ aty Assurance Department personnel responsible for nondestructive testing are trained and qualified in accordance w(th the applicable requirements of SNT-TC-1A, " Recommended
- Practice for Nondestructive Test Personnel Qualification and
'1 Certification" of the American Society of Nondestructive Testing.
This program is administered by instructors from the QA-NDT I Divisi.>n and Quality Systems, Division.
Procurem'ent Quality Control Personnel performing SSW as$igned PQC incpection activities are qualified in accordance with SSW l
p
~ rocedures. '
% -. g 4 b
rg, J
17.1-38 -
.,r - - - - - - - - , . - --
o -_ _. _. . . . .
l 3
// DVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 l FGbruary 1976
/ .
1 17.1.2.4B Periodic Review of OA Program n
The status and adequacy ~of the QA manuals are regularly reviewed and assessed.~ Periodic management level audits are conducted to assure the implementation of QA program requirements, and to upgrade the program to reflect changing Code, Standard, and regulatory requirements.
jj, 17.1.3B Design Control
[ 17.1.3.18 General Description -
Measures are established to assure that applicable regulatory 5 -
,, . requirements and nuclear power plant design bases are correctly '
' translated ~ into SGW specifications, drawings, procedures, and
, instructions. .
,', t . .
The essential : elements required for design control, and to validate the adequacy of the control are: .
- 1. The establishment of basic methods of scoping, accomplishing, and accounting for 'the completeness of essential engineering and design tasks.
- 2. A system of thorough review and checking of designs, calculations, specifications, and drawings by competent j ,
technical personnel.
,/ - *
- 3. An engineering assurance program to assure compliance through assessment of conformance. to procedures, and dccumented by objective evidence.
'. 17.1.3.2B Design Standards Design documents and spe'cifications for QA Category I structures, plant systems or portions of systems, and components are prepared and reviewed for the following:
- 1. Engineering requirements
- 2. NRC General & Design Criteria conformance
- 3. NRC Regulatory Guides and/or Information Guides applicability
- 4. Industry Codes and Standards
- 5. Topical Reports
- 6. SAR conformance
- 7. QA requirements and adequacy 17.1-39 5
__.7.__
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndm:nt 17 .
February 1976' ,
8.
Interface requirements betw pn S&W and Westinghouse.
Deviations from the above are investigated and resolved and any accepted deviations are documented.
17.1.3.3B Design Reviews -
Numerous internal design reviews are conducted through the
~
engineering and design phase by qualified technical personnel *,
e.g. , Project Engineer, engineering specialists, and project lead discipline engineers. .
Design reviews are made during the conceptual phase of the '
project, and when significant changes or modifications are being considered. These reviews are made in accordance with established Engineering Department procedurres and include the review of all affected drawings for design adequacy, and to ensure that practical alternatives have been considered.
QA Department personnel participate only in those design reviews involving QA matters. Engineering Assurance exercises surveillance of the design review process.
4 17.1.3.4B Design Control and Chance Control Design developments are subjected to engineering reviews and checks as follow:
1 ., Design Established procedures require the review and signatures of at least one other engineer, in addition to the individual primarily responsible, for engineer / design documents. Engineering reviews are conducted and include both the original document and any subsequent revisions.
- 2. Design Criteria Documents Design criteria documents (as an example but not limited to design memoranda and reports) are reviewed and approved by cognizant engineers and the Project Engineer. The following items are considered in these reviews:
Accident analysis t-
'ompatibility of materials C
- . Compatibility of design interfaces with the NSSS and others 17.1-40
i .
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndm:nt 13 2/28/75 Accessibility for inservice inspection, maintenance, and repa'ir , ,
Acceptance criteria for tests and inspection Quality requirements
- 3. Engineerino Calculations All manual calculations are reviewed and signed by a qualified person, in addition to the. preparer. The review consists of a check of original assumptions, correct methods, accuracy, and final conclusions.
Machine calculations are prepared with a summary sheat, including all pertinent design criteria and other design input and results, e.g., curves, tables, etc. Machine calculation input data, summary sheets, and , data printout sheets are reviewed by a qualified person in addition to the oriainator, and are signed by the-originator and reviewer. The Engineering Assurance Manual establishes the requirements for the preparation, review, and filing of all engineering calculations.
Calculations may be checked by an alternate or simplified calculational method as appropriate.
- 4. Specifications The methods and procedures for controlling quality of specifications are described in Section 17.1.4B.
- 5. Drawings After a drawing is produced, it is. thoroughly reviewed l
by a designer other than the preparer. The review of l the initihl und all subsequent issues is for adherence to standards, supporting calculations, engineering instructions, compatibility with other drawings, and correctness of dimensions. The drawing is then examined and initialed by other design disciplines having as an interface the design supervisor, the responsible engineer, the Project Engineer or his designee, and,
, when required by Code, Regulation, or law, it is signed and, as required, stamped by a registered professional engineer.
- 6. Design Interfaces Design interfaces include those between contractors and between engineering disciplines. " Interface review is a specific check in the specification and drawing review and approval cycle (see above) .
17.1-41
. ~
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 Specific proceduresintheEp)JneeringAssuranceManual provide written i approval, instructions governing the review, release, distribution,
' documents and revision of involving design interfaces with the participating design Westinghouse. organizations, including those with s
- 7. Design Audits Audits are conducted by the Engin'eering, Assurance Division to measure performance and _
i established procedures and instructions. compliance Formal reports with
' are issued to management for each audit, noting any required corrective action. The Engineering Assurance Manual includes procedures for the audit program *on design. *
- 8. _ Prototype Testing Control .
If protot testing is required to adequacy, ype the testing, confirm design acceptance criteria, and documentation requirements are contained procurement specifications in the or other applicable documents.
- 9. Design Change Control All technical changes to approved procedures, instructions, calculations, drawings, and specifications are and permitted in the only same after review by the same organization manner as the original document.
Engineering Assurance Procedures prescribe the method of authorizing shop or field work which is assigned as S&W responsibility resulting change which must precede from an engineering or design revision of the approved parent drawing or specification. -
17 .1. 3. 5B As-built Specifications and Drawings Engineering and design changes are reflected in accurate "as-builta drawings and specifications records packages Category I items an,d systems. for QA 17.1. 4B Procurement Document Control 17.1. 4 .1B General Description L' Engineering, other requirements design, quality, and necessary regulatory requirements and any to assure proper item performance cro specified in the specifications for materials, equipment, and services.
and QC Control of incorporation, review, and approval of QA requirements in procurement specifications is maintained by using procedures in the various S&W QA Manuals.
17.1-42 ,
1 Amendm3nt 17 BVPS-2 PSAR
, February 1976 17.1. 4. 2B Boston Purchased Items QA and QC requirements are included as part of the proedtrement document. SSW written procedures require review of QA Category I p'ocurement r and erection specifications by the QA Department.
This review and concurrence is done by the Technical _ Support l$MN ,
Section of the Quality Systems Division, which reviews for $$M consideration and applicability of:
- 1. Codes and Standards, including proper ideatification
- 2. QA Program requirements
- 3. Test requirements by suppliers and erectors
- 4. Inspection requirements by suppliers and erectors, and inspection requirements and rights of entry by S&W inspectors and/or DLC inspectors. .
- 5. Nondestructive testing requirements l
- 6. Records and documentation requirements ,
After a satisfactory review, the Quality Systems Division reviewing engineer signs on the cover of the specification.
Revisions and addenda to QA Category I specifications are reviewed by the QA Department.in the same manner as the original documents. ,
1 Suppliers who perform work on QA Category I items are required to submit their QA Program for review and evaluation by S&W to
! assure that the program conforms to the pertinent provisions of 10CFR50, Appendix B. Review of the site contractor's QA Programs is accomplished by DLC. -
Specifications for QA Category I items require that all essential quality requirements be passed on to contractors und subcontractors furnishing materials, components, and services.
17.1.4.3B Field Purchase Items QA and QC requirements are included as part of the procurement nequisition. Requisitions are processed to DLC for approval of quality requirements.
17.1.4.4B Code and Regulatory Requirements Procurement documents identify codes and regulations by their complete title and include the name of the sponsoring organization knd identification of the applicable edition. All QA Category I procurement specifications invoke the applicable Codes and Standards prescribed in 10CFR50, Paragraph 50.55a.
17.1-43
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 17 .1.' 5B Instructions, Procedures, anh Drawings 17.1.5.1B General Description The QA program manuals document the policy, procedures, and instructions for the technical, administrative, and quality related inputs to documents affecting the quality of QA '
Category I structures, systems or portions of systems, and components . Appropriate quantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that quality-related activities have been satisfactorily accomplished are contained in instructions ~
procedures, specifications, drawings, or other appropriate -
documents.
17.1. 5. 2B Procedures and Manuals ,
The Stone & Webster QA program is documented by written, procedures contained in the supporting QA Manuals referenced in Section 17.1.2B. Only those portions of these manuals which govern work delegated to S&W by DLC are applicable to Beaver Valley Unit No. 2.
17.1.5.3B Codes and Standards Methods and procedures for determining the effective dates of Codes and Standards are outlined in the Engineering Assurance Manual and are in conformance with NRC Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.55a.
17 .1. 5 . 4 B Reporting Significant Deficiencies The policy and methods for complying with NRC Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.55 (e) in Reporting of Significant l Deficiencies to the NRC are contained in the Engineering Assurance Manual.-
\
17.1.5.5B Authorized Engineering and Design Changes The Engineering Assurance Manual outlines authorized methods to change specifications or drawings. They are: i
- 1. Revisions of the drawing or specifications or by issue ,
of an addendum to a specification
- 2. AnapproveddispositiontoNonconformityandDisposition$)kb$U~j t g4NC6 i Reports (NSDR) j.j p}
- c. Authorization for change by an Engineering and Design Coordination Report (ESDCR). .
I 17.1-44
- o 7
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndm:nt 17 February 1976 17.1.6B Document Control 17 .1. 6.1B General Description
- Procedures for implementing document control measures are contained in the SSW QA Program Manuals. These procedures control the issue of documents such as specifications and drawings, including authorized changes thereto, and assure that the documents and revisions are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel..
17.1. 6. 2B Review and Approval of Documents Stone & Webster specifications and drawings, including revisions thereto, are prepared, reviewed, and approved according to procedures outlined in the Engineering Assurance Manual. Similar procedures govern the review of supplier 's drawings, and revisions thereto, to assure compliance with specification requirements, if review is required by the specification.
17.1.6.3B controlled Distribution and Use Specifications and drawings are issued in a controlled manner.
17.1.7B Control of Boston Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services 17 .1. 7 .1 B General Description The quality of QA Category I purchased material, equipment, and/or services is controlled via source evaluation and selection, review of submitted vendor QA programs, data and drawings and for those purchase orders listed in Section 17.1.1.4B under the heading Procurement Quality Control, by inspection at vendor's shops, witnessing of shop tests and audits of QA/QC systems and documentation.
17 .1. 7. 2B Control Methods When required, vendors
' Survey Form and Supplement are used for bidder surveys and to document survey findings.
' Engineering Assurance surveys and evaluates bidders for Category I engineering services contracts in such areas as meteorology, hydrology, geology, photogrammetry, etc.
17.1-45
~
O
~
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 '
February 1976 s
17.1.7.3B Source Evaluation and Selection U
The principal method of collecting information on prospective suppliers of specified items of materials and equipment is the
" Vendor Rating System." Provisions of this system, as outlined.
in the Quality Standards, provide source evaluation information '
for use by the QA, Engineering, and Purchasing Departments. .
Bids are compared on a technical and commercial basis to determine compliance with specifications an.d intended use.
Comparisons of bids for major items are reviewed by.the Project
' Group and the Purchasing Departmant before recommendation of --
award of a purchase order or contract is made. .
Bidders QA Programs for QA Category I items are reviewed and ,
evaluated by the PQA Division in parallel with the technical and commercial comparison of bids. Review of site contractor's QA Programs is accomplished by DLC. ,
17.1.7.4B Inspections at Vendors, Designated as SGW Responsibility Inspections and/or audits are performed at manufacturer's facilities by properly qualified S&W personnel to assure that the requirements of the purchase order, specifications, and approved shop drawings are met. Specific instructions regarding inspection activities and a summary of these activities are given in the specification. The SSW " Vendor Shop QC Inspection System" and the specific aDuties and Responsibilities of Inspectors" are given in the Quality Standards manual.
Procedures in the Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual ASME Section III. govern the control of items designed and manufactured in accordance'with ASME,Section III.
i t
p 9
e e 17.1-46
6 BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndm:nt 17 Februcry 1976 17.1.8B Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components 17.1. 8.1 B General Description Tr'aceability requirements of QA Category I items to their original chemical and physical characteristics are identified in the procurement specification and by reference to the requirements of applicable Codes and Standards . For those purchase orders delegated as SSW inspection responsibility and if required inspection.
by specifications, traceability is verified during shop 17.1.9B Control of Special Processes 17, .1. 9 .1 B General Description Requirements of special proccesses are established in Erection and Procurement Specifications. For those purchase orde's r
delegated as S&W responsibility, compliance with specification requirements is verified during shop inspection.
, 17.1.10B _ Inspection ,
17.1.10.1B General Description
_ Requirement for material and equipment pre-shipment inspection is contained in the procurement specification. For those purchase l orders delegated as S&W responsibility, performance of the required inspections is verified by SSW PQC inspector's prior to release for shipment. Responsibility for Field Quality Control and the related inspections has been assumed by DLC.
17.1.11B Test Control 17.1.11.1B General Description l Stone S Webster requires that shop, field insth116 tion, and preoperational tests be specified and performed to ensure that structures, systems, or portions of systems, and components perform satisfactorily in service.
17.1.11.2B Test Requirements Test requirements are set forth in procurement and erection specifications in conformance with engineering practices and Code requirements.
17.1-47
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17' '
February 1976 17.1.11.3B Shop and Field Test Contrhl For those purchase orders delegated as SSW performance of the required inspection is verifiedresponsibility, by SSW PQC inspection prior to the release for shipment.
17.1.12B Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment
- 17.1.12.1B General Description Stone & Webster specifications require that manufacturers and~
material suppliers control the calibration of tools, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used gages, -
in product acceptance. Verification of such control is made by ,
S&W the Procurement Inspector on those purchase orders designated as l SSW responsibility. '
17.1.13B Handling, Storace, and Shipping '
1 17.1.13.1B General Description The procurement specification details special requirements for handling, storage, and shipping, when required. Inspection of ;
packaging and preparation for shipment at the manufacturer's' shop l are performed as appropriate for purchase orders delegated as SSW '
responsibility. t 17.1.14B Inspection Test and Operating Status Responsibility for inspection tests and operating status has been !
I assumed by DLC.
17.1.15B Nonconforming Materials, Parts, and Components l On purchase orders designated as SSW inspection responsibility, any nonconformity discovered in a vendors' shop by a PQC l Inspector is reported on his Inspection Report and recorded on a Nonconformity and Disposition Report. These reports are sent to l the PQC division and the Project Engineer in accordance with the Quality Standards Manual for evaluation and resolution. ,
Any nonconformities emanating from the site which cannot be resolved with the specification or design requirements is evaluated and dispositioned by the SSW Project Engi_neer or his designee. Processing of nonconformities within the engineering department will be in accordance with written procedures.
17.1.16B Corrective Action i
l 17.1.16.1B General Description 17.1-48 -
'8 BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndm:nt 17 February 1976
_ c.
~
For those purchase orders- designated as SSW inspection responsibility PQC verifies the. accomplishment of corrective action required by the' disposition to the nonconformance if the corrective action is corrected in the Vendor shop. Verification of , corrective action involving site. activities has been assumed by DLC.
17.1.17B Ouality Assurance Records 17 .'1.17.' 1B QA Records Re'auirements Specific records requirements are identified in procurement and erection specifications, 'and include records of the results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits, monitoring of work performance, and qualification of procedures. For those purchase orders designated as SSW inspection responsibility compliance with specification requirements for records is verified..
I 17.1.17.2B Engineering and Design Records
~
Engineering and design records consist basically of engineering studies, calculations, designs, specifications, and drawings.
Documents generated during the engineering and design phases of the project are generally retained in the project files and at designated work locations at headquarters in Boston until job
[ completion.
Engineering and design records which become part of the lifetime or permanent records retention system for the plant are properly identified and forwarded to DLC for entry into the records retention system at a mutually agreed upon time toward the end of project. .
""~ '
E7.1".18B Audits 17.1.18.1B General Description An audit program will be established for those areas.which have been assigned as SSW responsibility to ensure that those quality activities are in compliance with the designated requirements and related procedures.
The frequency of QA audir.s is based on the results of previous audits, significance of reported nonconformances, and schedules of work accomplishr,ent.
Audits are performed in accordance with written procedures and audit plans by Engineering Assurance and QA personnel who, by the nature of their position, are independent from the work functions being audited.
9 e
- 17.1-49 9
\
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndment 17 4
February 1976'
) f 17.1.18.2B Audit Results and Reports
'CC Audit results are documented and reviewed by management having responsibility in the area audited. -
17.1C QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Qi)
Westinghouse QA is described in RESAR 3, Section 17. The following comments should supplement Amendment 6 of that document. -
Page 17.1 -1, - Section1 1,7.1.1', substitute the following for the first paragraph: '
l NES is comprised of a number of operating divisions under an executive vice president, as shown' in . Figure 17-1. The authority and responsibility of each activity shown on this chart and subsequent charts is established by the division managers and set forth in an approved, written statement of group responsibility. The solid lines on the divisional organization charts (Figures 17-3 through 17-8) delineate both technical direction and administrative control.
Administrative control includes responsibility for personnel indectrination and training, wage and salary administration, and the decision for hiring or discharge of personnel. -
Written position descriptions
("
are prepared for each
, management and professional position and are approved by two levels of management. These descriptions specify the educational and experience qualifications of the position, and define the task responsibilities for the position.
Page 17.1-6, Section 17.1.1.3, substitute the following for the 8th paragraph of .the section, and add another paragraph as shown:
This organization is responsible for the design and implementation of Inspection Point Programs including non-destructive examination incorporated into manufacturing work instructions, qualification of non-destructive examination personnel, and audits. Quality Control Records of Quality Assurance Engineering compiles documentation maintained as objective evidence of inspections performed, and Material
- Review section of Quality Assurance Engineering performs l analyses of data, review of manuf acturing discrepancies, and initiates preventive actions to eliminate problem gareas.
The Inspection Section of Quality Assurance is responsible for performing inspections and examinations listed in manufacturing work instructions as prescribed by Quality Assurance Engineering procedures and instructions, recording results, and determining product acceptability to specified c-criteria. E_;;~
17.1-50 -
- , ~ . , . . - ~ . . , , - , , - - - , - - , . -
BVPS-2 FSAR Am:ndm:nt 14 4/12/74 Y Page 17.1-7, Section 17.1.1.4, Insert after 7th paragraph as:
... reports and documentation required.
.The Inshection Point Program is then . implemented by technicians in the Quality Control sect.icn of the Quality Assurance Department. The . Quality Assurance Engineering section of the Quality Assurance Department is also
} responsible for planning and implementation of n'on-destructive examination and for qualification of non-destructive examination personnel. They are also responsible for final release of nuclear products.
Page 17.1-8, Section 17.1.1.5, substitute for 2nd paragraph:
The Pensacola Quality Assurance organization. provides measures to control the design, manufacture, purchase, inspection, test, packaging, shipment and site installation of reactor internals. Quality Assurance functions for
~
control of - purchased materials include source surveillance and audits of suppliers which are performed by Quality Assurance Engineer 2.ng. This section is also responsible for coordinating the internal audit program for the Pensacola Division, by a Quality Assura;.ce Engineering Audit Coordinator.
The Inspection section of Quality Assurance performs inspections and examinations defined by Quality Assurance Engineering instructions and procedures, records results, and determines product acceptability to prescribed acceptance criteria and' standards. Records section of' Inspection performs release of product. ..
The Site Quality Assurance Services section of ~ -Quality Assurance provides support for insta'11ation of reactor internals at construction sites.
Page 17.1-17, Section 17.1.3.3, substitute for 1st paragraph:
Tampa Division is responsible for the design of steam generators and pressurizers. The design effort is based upon an equipment specification from PWR Systems Division. The Design group is responsible for heat transfer, material selection, hydraulic analysis and the operation. The Structural Analysis group is responsible for vibration and shock analysis, experimental stress analysis, general stress analysis, and materials behavior. Design verification activities are performed by individuals within the Tanspa Engineering Department other than those who performed the original design.
- , - - - = +
S 17.1-51
~
BVPS-2 FSAR Am@ndment 14 4/12/74
$5 Page 17.1-19, Section 17.1.3.4, substlyute 4th paragraph:
Q55-Operation of- the Pensacola Division Design Engineering ~
Department is in accordance with detailed internal procedures which comply with ANSI N46.2.11. This includes provision for independent review of designs by individuals other than those who performed the original design. Compliance of Design Engineering with operating procedures is verified by internal audit.
Page 17.1-24, Section 17.1.4.3, substitute the following -
paragraph: .
Quality Assurance has developed an inspection code which is used in the determination of the supplier inspection requirement level for all purchased materials. The inspection code, Code 1 thru 5, is used on all purchase orders with Code 4 being applied to items such as light bulbs, stationery, etc. All purchase orders for materials or parts having Code 1, Code 2, Code 3, or Code 5 requirements are reviewed by Quality Assurance to determine that proper and essential quality requirements are specified.
Page 17.1-37, Section 17.1.7.4, substitute 2nd paragraph:
~
New suppliers are evaluated at their facility (utilizing formal audit checklists) prior to placement on the approved ('
supplier list. Continued surveillance of suppliers already listed is maintained through monitoring of Receiving Inspection rejection rates, source surveillance by Quality Assurance Engineering and re-appraisal of supplier.
Suppliers who fail to perform adequately are removed from the approved list.
Page 17.1-49, Section 17.1.10.3, substitute 2nd paragraph:
17.1-50, The Inspection Point Programs are distributed to the Quality Control technician of the Quality Assurance section in the applicable manufacturing areas for the specific component.
The Quality Control technician initials or stamps the inspection points upon completion of inspection, signifying acceptance. All operations within a manufacturing section are detailed and accepted on the Inspection Point Program which serves as the inspection checklist. Quality Control technicians verify the completeness of the Inspection Point Program to assure that all operations are complete within the section. Any deviation from the specified routing between manufacturing groups requires documentation and Quality Assurance concurrence. The authorized code inspector utilizes the Inspection Point Program prior to start of _2_
manufacturing to designato code hold points. The program and its applicable data forms, charts, and logs become a Q r 17.1-52 ,
l BVPS-2 FSAR Amendnt;nt 14 4/12/74
- permanent Quality Control record to provide objective evidence of the inspection operations. ,
Page 17.1-9, Section 17.1.1.6, substitute the following for the last paragraph of this section:
Quality Control and Inspection has direct control of the division gage calibration' . system, non-destructive examination, and quality engineering functions. Review of raw material acceptability is also a function of this group, performed by audit, receiving inspection and analysis of incoming material reports, including review of ;a sample of chemistry re-analyses made by Quality Services. These combined actions are effective in obtaining specification quality raw materials, and source, surveillance is not applied. Quality Control and Inspection has the responsibility for the training and qualification of inspectors, for ul-process inspection, and for final inspection. Quality Services has responsibility for product verification and certification. Instrument service is performed by the Maintenance Department of Works Engineering according*to a schedule specified by Quality Control and Inspection. ,
Page 17.1-19, Section 17.1.3.5, substitute the following for this section:
=.
Product is provided to Tampa Division and Electro-Mechanical Division in accordance to detailed specification requirements. No product design is performed by Specialty Metals Division.
Page 17.1-80, Section 17.1.18.7, . substitute the following
- paragraph for the first paragraph of this section. Also insert a new paragraph at the bottom of the page:
Internal quality audits are performed as a quality engineering function by Quality Control and Inspection. In l addition, Quality Control and Inspection and Quality Services perform cross-check audits on each section. Audits are i
performed to determine the adequacy of established procedures for controlling quality and to evaluate the degree of ccanpliance with the procedures.
Audits of raw material subcontractors are performed by Quality Control and Inspection, to determine adequacy of the l subcontractor quality assurance effort and compliance with procedures.
emm Mesh ebe - e a -pee h
17.1-53
m BVPS-2 PSAR Amendm@nt 17 February 1976 !
i
.rrE
, Table 17.1.1A DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OA PROCEDURES VS. APPENDIX B TO 10CFR50 Procedure No. 10CFR50 Appendix B DC-1 Organization I DC-2 Quality Assurance Program II DC-3 Design Control III -
DC-4 Procurement Document Control IV DC-5 Instructions, Procedures and Drawing's V DC-6 Document Control VI DC-7 Control of Purchased Material, VII Equipment and Services
- DC-8 Identification and Control of' Materials, VIII Parts and Components ~~
DC-9 Control of Special Processes IX 7-DC-10 Inspection X DC-11 Test Control XI DC-12 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment XII DC-13 Handling, Storage, Shipping XIII DC-14 Inspection, Test and Operating Status XIV DC-15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts and XV Components DC-16 Corrective Action XVI DC-17 Quality Assurance Records XVII DC-18 Audits XVIII l
m
_7 ._ _
1 of 1 O
Amendm:nt 17 BVPS-2 PSAR 1 February 1976
((^ Table 17.1.2A '
OP'ERATIONS OA PROCEDURES VS. APPENDIX B TO 10CFR50 Procedure No. 10CFR50 Appendix B
- OP-1 Operations QA Program I, II OP-2 Organization and Responsibilities I, II OP-3 Administrative Controls II, V OP-4 Station Design Control III, XVII OP-5 Procurement Control IV, VII, VIII OP-6 Material Control VII, VIII, XIII, XV OP-7 Test Program prior to Operations XI, XII __
OP-8 Document Control . V, VI __
OP-9 Technical Procedure Control for II,V i
Operations and Maintenance OP-10 Maintenance and Modification V, IX, X Planning OP-11 Control of Maintenance and V, IX, X, XI, XIV Modification OP-12 Control of Measuring and Test XII Equipment OP-13 Control of Nonconforming Items VIII, XV, XVI OP-14 Indoctrination and Training II, IX OP-15 Quality Assurance Records XVII OP-16 Audits II, XVI, XVIII
~~
.:: r 6
1 of 1 O
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndmult 17 February 1976
~=
Table 17.1.3A NUCLEAR FUEL QA PROCEDURES VS. APPENDIX B TO 10CFR50 Procedure No. 10CFR50 Appendix B
~
F-1 Organization I F-2 Quality Assurance Program II F-3 Design Control III F-4 Procurement Document Control IV F-5 Instructions, Procedures and Drawings V F-6 Document Control VI F-7 Control of Purchased Material, VII Equipment and Services ,
F-8 Identification and Control of Materials, VIII g~
Parts and Components -'
F-9 Control of Special Processes IX F-10 Inspection X F-11 Test Control XI F-12 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment XII
- F-13 Bandling, Storage, Shipping XIII l
l F-14 Inspection, Test and Operating Status XIV F-15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts and XV Components l F-16 Corrective Action XVI l
I F-17 Quality Assurance Records XVII l
F-18 Audits XVIII f
l h
. 1 of 1
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 17 February 1976 TABLE 17.1.1B-1 OUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REOUIREMEh"I'S .
SSW OUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL Title Education * .Backcround Experience VP, Quality BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in respon-Assurance sible assignments in heavy construction management, engineering, or quality assurance. At least 2 years of this time should be in the nuclear field with amohasis on
^
project / division management.
Manager, Quality BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in respon-Assurance sible assignments in engineering and design, quality assurance and control, power station construction, and/or operation.
Chief Engineer, BS/BA Minimum of 5 years in respon-Engineering sible assignments in
_ Assurance engineering, quality assurance and control, inspec-tion, and/or auditing.
Chief Engineer, BS/BA Minimum of 5 years in respon-Quality Systems sible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station.
Manager, Procure- BS/BA Minimum of 5 years in respon-ment Quality sible assignments in quality .
, gad 6G Control assurance and control, and/or ,
shop inspection.
Chief Engineer, BS/BA Minimum of 5 years in respon-QA-NDT Group sible assignments in nondestruc-tive testing of materials and/or hi/lflbd metallurgy.
Project Quality BS/BA Minimum of 5 years in quality ,
Assurance assurance and related fields p%6 Coordinator including manufacturing, con- pgdl{-
struction, and/or installation activities. At least 2 years TAS4s(
should be associated with the nuclear field.
1 of 3 e
O
. BVPS-2 PSAR AmIndmsnt 17 Februtry 1976 TABLE 17.1.1B-1 (CONT 'D)
OUALIFICATION EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS-SSW OUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONhTL Title Education
- Backaround Experience Assistant BS or A degree plus 5 years ex-Division Manager, High School perience in quality assurance and related fields, including testing or inspection (or --
both) of manufacturing, ,
construction, and installation activities. At least 2 years ,
should be associated with a nuclear' facility.
OR Hi h school graduate plus 10 .
years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, construction, and installation activities. Five years.of total
- -- experience is required in quality assurance, including
. testing or inspection (or both) ,
of equivalent manuf acturing, l
construction, and installation
! activities. At least 2 years should be associated with a nuclear facility.
QC Engineer BS or A degree and 0-2 years of ex-High School perience in quality assurance including testing and/or in-spection of equivalent con-struction and installation activities.
Assistant QC BS or ,A degree. No experience is Engineer High School required.
(
OR l
a- yp-A.
High school graduate and 4 ,
e' years of experience in testing and/or inspection of power and/ j$dUIEOP or nuclear stations, heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or facilities.
. 2 of 3
6 BWS-2 PSAP, Amendmant 17 February 1976 TABLE 17.1.1B-1 (CONT 'D)
OUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIRLMENTS .
SSW QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL Title Education
- Background Experience Sr QC High School High school graduate and 2 Inspector years of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities.
QC Inspector, High School High school graduate and 1 year of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities.
. QC Technicien High School High school graduate, pre-feratbly with some knowledge of quality assurance concepts such as testing or inspection.
Assistant QC High School High school graduate; no ex-Technician perience is required.
l qualification may be substituted based on other l
I
- Equivalent education accomplishments, experience in related fields, and technical achievements, such as holding a license as a Professional Engineer or Certification as a Quality or Reliability Engineer by the American , Society for Quality
- Control.
i l
l l
e 9
3 of 3
-w- ,- -
-- -~ ,, , m , . - m, e---u- -v- -- ,--- - - - - , - - - , , - - - - --
. . ~ ,
k '
MA CC l ~
1 D. L. C. OPE R ATIO NS M ECH A NIC AL STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL GENERAs.
ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERihG PURCHASING DEPARTMENT DE PA R TM E N T D E'PA R T M E N T D EP A R TM E N1 M ECH ANIC AL STRUCTURAL ELFCTRICAL GEN.PURCH.
ENGIN EE R ENGINEER AGENT ENGINEER s
s P~
STONE t. W E BSTER I
l CHIFF ENGR. M ANAi E N G IN E F RING QUAL:
-. ASSURANCE ASSURi E'
3RC -
A3 R ~~ 3 CO -
\
~CARJ
\,
I
\
MA Ct D. L.C. OPE R ATIONS M ECH ANIC AL STRUCTURAL ELECTRIC AL GENERAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERlhG PU R CH ASING ENGINEERING DEP ARTM EN DEPARTMENT DE PARTMENT DEPARTMENT MECN ANIC AL STRUCTURAL ELFCTRIC AL GEN.PURCN.
.ENGIN E ER AGENT ENGINEER ENGlH E ER I
STONE L WEBSTER .
CNIFF ENGR. M AN4 ENGIN E E RING QUA'
~
ASSURANCE A 5501 P
3RC 3 '- '3 ~~ " 3-
' ~
~
~
A -'
1O '
1..
'CARJ
7/,9s VIC E- PR ESIDENT . .
ENGlhEERING ANC CONSTRUCTICN C 0 JECT M AGEMENT CCIT T E E QUALITY !
ASSURANCE- -
MANAGER D. L. C. O P E R AT I O N S I
i PROJECT STo3ES SUB STATION S STA ONS DEPARTMENT MANAGER DEPARTMENT AND SHOPS GENERAL PROJECT GEhERAL SUPERINTENDENT GENERAL TEAM SUPE RIN TE N DENT SUPERINTENDENT B E AV E R NUCLEAR _ _
VALLEY SERVICES P U SUPERINTENDENT p
Q UA LIT Y '
s ASSURANCE 00R D W AT OR QUALITY CONTROL WESTINGHOUSE gg R PROJECT ,
yy M ANAGER W6 C E QUALITY CONTROL ENGINEER Also Available On Aperture Card F I G U R E 17.1 - I A DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY ORG ANIZ ATION~ FOR QUALITY ASSUR ANCE B E A.VER VALLE Y P OWER STATION - UNIT 2 PRELIMIN ARY S AFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i
~
)
8308230389-ot ,
O .
(
i
- MANAGf
. v' O. A.
DEPARTM SUPERVISOR DIRECT O. A. S UP V.
VENDOR ,
SURV EILL ANCE I ENGINEER ) CONTR SURVEILLANCE ENGINEERS I
O. A. SR. O. A. S R.
ENGINEER E NGINE E R INSPECTORS l /
' O. A.
O.A. O.A. O.A. O.A.
NDE ENGR. ENGR. ENGR, ENGR. ENGR.
SUPERVISOR SUPERVI:
TECH. SERVICES OUALITY E GROUP GROUP 3RC A'3 E RT L R E .
CARJ l
m
W AMENDMENT 17_
~ FEBRUARY 1975 t -
NT Q.A.
R gj*
't RECORDS SUPERVISOR ._
SUPERVISOR y
SENIOR SENIOR CLERKS CLERKS ENGINEER ENGINEER -
9 I
Q.A. O.A. Q.A. Q.A. Q. A.
ENGR. l ENGR. ENGR. ENGR. ENGR.
I i
l
)R I SUPERVISOR IGR. I ADM. SERVICES A6 On GROUP Portare Card F I G.17.1 - 2 A l
l DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION - UNIT 2 PRELIMINARY SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ,
8.3 0 8 23 0 3 8 9 -oA
o i
/
1 t
VIC E - PR ES s -,
J s
ELE CTRIC AL STRUCTURAL MECHAN B. V. P. S. ENG. [
ENG. DEPT. E N G. LEPT.
PROJECT ELE CTRIC AL STRUCTURAL PECHAN MANAGER 'ENGlHI ENGlW E ER ENGINEER
- f PRC APERlyRE ,
D .' \ \J (i f g k\ .
4
.\ M i
(
- AMENOMENT 7
~~ 7/9/73 i
10tN'
. i SECRETARY
~ 3 ,
CONSTRUCTION 3ENERAL CUALIT Y ASSURANCE CAL CEPARTMENT PU R C H. DE PT. DEPARTNENT
-EPt GENERAL GEN.PURCH. QUALITY ASSUR ANCE ,
CAL Et SUPERINTENDENT AGENT MANAGER Also Available On APerture Card F I G U R E,17.1 - 3 A DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY ENGINEERING 6 CONSTRUCTION DIVISION BE AVER VALLEY POWER STATION -UNIT 2
> PRELIMIN ARY SAFETY AN ALYSIS REPORT
- s m 8 3 0 8 23 0 8 8 9-D3
I!l ll l
.ll il
, i 7-3 T 7 N /9 l E / 9 2 l;
M 7 T D T R N O I
l N -
P E U E M '
- R A ,
) N S O I C I S
' Y N
R I
- T Y A E A E ) A L k S P G 1 3 N T A UM A 7 R O S N OO N 1 A I HC A G M
. S ET R A GI E CA E Y NI CI Te T RC.
F R
( NZ WTI O E S T E E CJ F
E R
)
A WEP LR (
' U G EY S 2
S S R L Y O L R 1 A A A
'Al A Y T V N l
- T C 71 R IM 1
7 I E 7 G
1 I F .
F F - GI UR E R E E R
(
R
(
- F QP B P R -
N E Y O Y G E C
N I
T N A N N A C A P N O
I A t P U A TR B M
O M R AUS I
MTR E R S - -
ONT CE T O l
CES C S P A .
TIDN N T N B RY l
71 HS O O H A E O T CI .
l i f
GE CI S G R I
W L G I
IL R6I LU &GA F P V S NU EI Q F E ENGI D E S N OER , E N C N A R SI R I
S TE R (
EY S NE EVE E UT I
G U G N
A Q N QIL E N U
I G U A A D N D U ,
M .
E Q -
f N -
t E -
OI C )
T N B -
R A R,A I E R E R - s s T PO S E U 1 N Y B RI N S S 7 O T I EOG A 1 IT L WCNEG I
G A B CI CG NI I
F NI S NF R N EI E F :
)
I O
N RI E E D MP O EHE R N MS T E CN I
(
E OE S NI G G CR G N E N E L E
7.
lll'! ! I,
- i j
( BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION - UNIT N0. 2 .
! COMPANY ORGANIZ~ATION l FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE ~
4 STONE Ei WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION OFFICE
. OF Tile CHAIRMAN j ,
AND PRESIDENT E
,' I I I E I "
l VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT ggggggg, gp DIRECTOR OF MANAGER OF 00ALITY ASSURAhCE DEPT STAFF GROUP ENGINEERING V CE R I E Vid P ENT VICE PRESIDENT --1 I g- -- - - -- -- - -- - - - - - M_A,,N,G A,, E,R,,, QA,,D,,E,P{.
g .
MANAGER l
l ,- J ASST. HCRS. QA DEPT OF PURCHASING i
I r u l CCNSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CIREF EHulNEER l MANAGER ER 4 g MANAGER DIVISION g PROCUREMENT A
. CHIEFS DIVISION . O A DIVISION l l __
5 I I I
~
- ' l ac PROJECT STAFF l DISTRICT MGRS.
Pl40CUREME NT yl \
' O A DISTRICT l
$ MANAGER SPECI Al,lSTS l OFFICES i
g g EA 3 l ,
j u .
,g R + - - Po tlc]v l =,
7-- - - - - 1
- ~ - - ""'""""
d~r -
RESIDENT PROJECT
- - 0. A.
POI.lCV l
- i. QA COST L AUDITING DIVISION El y
_t
- MANAGER ENGINEEst e ul -
i . I i
I
- k, I I PROJECT 0A [q g CHIEF ENGINEER OllEF ENGINEER SUPT OF g
ENG I RING HEAD {ARE5 PROGRAM QUALITY SYSTEMS NOT cl
(:ONSTRUCTION
[
g s GROUP hD h ADMINISTRATOR DI VISION DIVISION a l
I I g I'"~~~~~~"'""""'"~~~~~~~~~~*""**
- CONSTRUCTION RESIDENT FIELD SUPERVISOR S ENGINEER PURCilASING !
AGENT y72
, 1 "'8 LEGEND in 7 .
i , O R-QUALITY flEQUIREMENTS 8
l 0 A-QUALITY ASSURANCE l E A-ENGINEERING ASSURANCE m FUNCTIONAL AND ADMINISTATIVE DIRECTION COMMUNICATION 3
\ --- GamrncMrErxtpbrrim _
rh .
( f BEAVER VALI.EY POWER STATION - UNIT NO. 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION STONE G WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION
~
VICE PRESIDENT, - -
QUALITY ASSURANCE .
I ;
MANAGER,0UALITY ASSURANCE I ASSISTANT 11ANAGERS, QUALITY ASSURANCE I. .
. o.
. I CHIEF ENGINEER, CHIE? ENGINEER, MANAGER, CHIEF ENGINEER, PROJECT OA CA CCST C AUDITING DIVISION QURdr( SYST EMS DIVISION PROCUREMENT OA NOT PROGR(M- h DIVISION DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR IIEADQUARTERS-BOSTON OTilER LOCATIONS y.
,t -
er
- 5. * 'e
- 5. 2
-1 I I I ,- I I I .
I' 8 ~
10L8A - PillLADELPlHA PITTS8URGil HOUSTON CillCASO ATLANTA ROSTON LOS ANGELES l
/
s ,
DEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION - UNIT NO. 2 .-
QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATIONSIIIPS _
I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEEllING CORPORATION PROJECT MANAGER i A k i PROJECT IST ASSIST A RESIDENT ENGINEER g F MANAGER U -
Ak Q AUDIT
'\
I' RAM J POLICY MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE UI .
DIVIS1ON AmliNISTitATOR ' CLIENT CON'1%CT I ASST.MGilS. QUALITY ASSURANCE VICE PRESIDENT, QA Nk @k k A WST ' POLICY AND MANAGER,QA/ ASST.11CRS.,QA J PROJECT QA PROGRAM AUDIT AUDIT & AUDITING
, $ ' DIVISION F ADMINISTRATOR If "^
i ASSIST /AUDIb PROJECT ENGINEER.
AUDIT L QUALITY SYSTEMS -
F DIVISION
- q. PROCUREMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE Y DISTRICT MGRS. AUDIT h g
AN AN POLICY l'ROCUllEMENT leo QUALITY ASSURANCE $ "' s AUT110RITY DIVISION g77 7 5.
- E NDT -
DIVISION -
m
BVPS-2 PSAR ' Amendment 15 g~' ,
, 7/31/74 g .
APPENDIX B CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page j i.
INTRODUCTION B.1-1
%< , O e
o o
M g <w e
n:-
a B-1 .
4 e - - , -- ,,-,--,,,,---.-,--y,,,-. , w,. ._ --wp, -,_-------.,,.,,,,,--,n, ., -- -- , + , ~ - , ,
BVPS-2 PSAR Am:ndment 15
. 7/31/74 t.
APPENDIX B' fMU-
.M
. LIST OF TABLES ,
Table Title .
B -1 Structures and Equipment Codes and Classifications l b
- 8 h
e 4
r- i <.
(
e 4
a#
a 9-k-
B-2 .
r_-. , . , . _ _ _ , - . . _ _ - . , . , - . . - __,___,mm,.-, . . . .,g
. .. ,,,c- - . - - . .._-.,..v.-_,,_ . _ , _ . - , - , . . , - . . - _ ~ . -
y .
. BVPS-2 PSAR Amsndmsnt 4 3 -
4/27/73 APPENDIX _'B CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS-INTRODUCTION '
This appendix provides a concise compilation of the appropriate safety classes, codes, and design classifications of the structures and equipment that are Quality Assurance category I.
These items are indicated -in Table B-1. .
Quality Assurance Categories 'are defined in Section 17 -- Quality Assurance -
Program. The safety and code class of piping' and valves is given '
on the individual system flow diagrams. The safety and code '
. classes are indicated as part of the line designation numbers and at interfaces where they chan~ge as indicated in Fig. 1.3-4 and '
1.3-1, respectively. ,
Seismic Category I structures, systems, and components are those ,
necessary to ensure-I
-' s
- 1. The integrity of the reactor- coola'nt pressure boundary.
- 2. The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition.
i
- 3. The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of r- accidents which could result in a potential .offsite exposures comparable to the guideline exposure of 10CFR50.
Seismic category I structures, systems, and components are designed in accordance with the seismic design criteria of Section 15.2.4. .
Even though the definition of Quality Assurance Category I and Seismic Category I are somewhat different, structures, systems, and components falling in one classification also generally fall in the other. Pressure boundary components of Quality Assurance Category I fluid systems are further subdivided into ANS Safety class 1, 2, or 3 (SC-1, 2, or 3) . In addition, the containment structure is classified as SC-2. The following are definitions o f S C-1, 2, and 3:
Safety Class- 1 (SC- 1) : Applies to components whose failure could cause a condition III or condition IV loss-of-rea ctor '
c oolant. p Safety Class 2 (SC-2) : Applies to the containment structure and to those components: ,
- ___ 1. of the reactor coolant system not in Safety Class 1,
> "ZZ~ 2. that are required to shut down the reactor, remove residual heat directly from the reactor, circulate B-1 -
..------.,,,.g ,-
..,--,4,--- -
~
s BVPS-2 PSAR Amtndm:nt 11
. 10/29/73 1
reactor coolant for. any safety system, control f==-
radioactivity release ih an accident, or control hydrogen in the contain' ment.
Safety Class 3 (SC- 3) : Applies to those components'not in SC-1 or SC-2 that are necessary:-
- 1. to provide cooling water for residual heat removal or~
. a safety system,
- 2. to remove decay heat from spent fuel,
- 3. to provide boric acid for reactor cooldown, and N
- 4. to control the release to the environment of gaseous radioactivity normally held up. , '
Condition III occurrences are faults which may occur very infrequently during the life of a particular plant. Condition IV occurrences are faults. that are not' expected to occur, but are .
postulated because their consequences would' include the potential' for the release of significant amounts of radioactive material.
Condition IV faults are the most drastic which must be designed against, and thus represent the limiting design case.
- 3 A safety system (in this context) is any system that functions to shut down the reactor, cool the core or c ool another safety ( -
system or (after an accident) the reactor containment, or that contains, controls, or reduces radioactivity released in an accident. Only those portions of the secondary system are
- included (a) that are designed primarily to accomplish one of the above functions or 6)) whose failure could prevent accomplishing
_. one of the above functions.
l A support is in the same safety class as the component for which
! it provides support, if failure could cause a loss of a safety l function associated with the supported component.
l Components and containment structure, classified as Quality Assurance Category I and Seismic I, may be further classified as SC-1,2 and 3 as defined above. Since the safety classes apply only to pressure boundary components of fluid systems and the containment structure, safety related structures other than the containment, electrical equipment, instrumentation, etc., do' not i
have a safety class, but are Quality Assurance category I and
- seismic Category I. D With regard to components such as pressure vessels, pumps,
. piping, valves and tanks, there is a direct 6ne-to-one relationship between safety class and ASME Section III code' -
class. Such SC-1, 2, and 3 components are designed according to - -
Code Class 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Metal containment system (_
B-2 .
---e - - -, .-,----y..w.- ,,,r.. m__- -.__,-.s---.,~..--- ,. . --_,#,.; .,_.,_-.--,,-_---,.,-..-_.e--,-- , , - - . , , _ _ , _ _ . _ . . - . , - . - , - - - - . - - - . - ,
~
\
- i BVPS-2 PSAR AmendmGnt 11 l 10/29/73 a__ '
,2_ portions of the containment structupe' are classified as code class Mc. -},
Components not covered by SC-1, 2, or 3, . but which are normally built to a code (such as ASME Section VIII', ANSI B3.1.10, API 650, etc.J , are classified as Non-Nuclear Safety (NNS) .
In the line ' designation numbers and at interfaces on flow diagrams, the numeral 4 ref ers to' NNS. Such components 'f all in )
Quality Assurance category II or III and are not seismically '
designed. 3 L Table B-1 gives the Safety Class, applicable c' ode, and Code class of Quality Assurance Category I and Seismic Category I structures ,
and equipment. Also indicated are structures, and equipment which are designed for tornado resistance o,r are protected from tornado effects. ,
SYMBOLS USED IN TABLE B-1 '
NA -
Not applicable .,
P -
Protected from tornado effects by a tornado designed structure or by some other method (such as being below grade) ,-
D -
Designed to withstand a tornado 4
e e
e N
B-3
BVPS-2 PSAR Ar -dcr_ut 18 November .1976 REFERENCES IN APPENDIX B ' -
'y --- ,
- 1. ANS draft N18.2, " Nuclear Safet Criteria for the Design of Stationery Pressurized Water Reactor Plants"
4 t
- 3. API-650 - Welded steel tanks for oil storage (June, 1970)
- 4. IEEE-279 " Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Protectio:1 Systems" (1968) --
^
e d
j+
gne. e.
1 --
(_
e e
L' san =
b-E-4
-. + -
e ---
f } ( --
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 6 6/29/73 TABLE B-1 ~-'
STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMEffr CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS Saf e ty Code Tornado Class Code Class criterion Notes STRUCTURES
, Containment Structure -
Releforced Concrete Substructure 2 *Q. .NA P t Reinforced Concrete Superstructure 2 -
- NA D Reinforced Concrete Interior Shields and Walls 2 ~* NA P
- ~. ..
g Steel Plate Liner 2 ASME III MC P Piping, Duct, and Electrical Penetrations 2 ASME III MC P Personnel Access Hatch 2 ASME III MC P Equipment Access Hatch 2 ASME III MC .P Cable Vault and Cable Tunnel NK
- NA D ,
Pipe Tunnel to containment structure from Auxiliary Building NA
- NA D -
Main Steam Valve Area NA
- NA 3 Safeguards Area and Pump Room NA
- NA D 87 Auxiliary Building
, Reinforced Concrete Structure NA
- NA D O
i
- See Section 15 for applicable codes 1 of 15
, i
! ll!f r .! -l . !l BVPS-2 PIAR Amend Xst 10 *
- 9/24/73 hh $A7e J -
TABLE D-1 (CONT'D)
STRUCTURES AND EOUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS. ,
. STRUC1 TIRES (COtIT' D)
Sa f e ty Code Tornado Class Code Class Criterion Notes Fuel and Decontamination Buildinq Reinforced Concrete Struc,ture NA
- NA D
~ *
- Spen't nael Storage'Racits ,; NA NA NA P Protected from horizontal
- missiles only Fuel Handl$ng' Trolley NA NA N NA P Structure will not Support Structure structurally fail with unloaded crane during DBE Intake Structure NA
- NA D Service water
.(-
pump cubicles only Extension of Unit 1 Control Room i
Main Control Room NA
- NA D 1
Air-Conditioning Equipment NA
- NA D ~ For control Room. ' building only Service Buildinq i Emerpency Switchgear and Reldy Rooms NA
- NA D Battery Rooms NA
- NA D -
Cable Tray Area NA
- NA D i
i .
~ . .
- See Section 15 for applicable codes -
2 of 15
t ] ,L P '
l ,N 5
1 l l.
/ g,j ..l- -
o
/ LVPS-2 PSAR TABLE D-1 (CONT 8D)
STRUCTURES AND EOUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS STPUCTURES (CONT' D1 Sa fe ty Code Tornado class code class criterion Notes Diesel Generator Buildinq Reinforced Concrete Floor,
~
Walls, and Roof N4 * ;- NA D r niel oil Transfer Pump. Vault '- NA -
- NA D Duct Lines and Manholes to Intake Structure and Diesel Generator Building NA
- NA P
~
Waste Handling Building NA
- NA D For hori ontal (Incl. Coolant Recovery Tank) missiles only
.D s
(*4 s .
J
- See Section 15 for applicable codes
.I of 1E
t i , i.
( '
I I !!
(I(., !,!
l BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 3 3/19/73 ,
TABLE B-1 iCONT'D1 .
STRUCTURES AND FOUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS Safety Code Tornado .
Class Code class C_ri,terion Notes.
SYSTEMS Reactor Coolant System Steam Generators . ,
Tube Side 1 .ASME III ~1 P -
She.ll Side
, %, . 2 s ASME III 2 P Reactor Coolant Pumps 1 ASME III 1 P Reactor Coolant Pump Motors 2 Nema MG1 1 P Upper oil cooler 2 ASME III 2 P Iower Oil Cooler 2 ASME III 2 P Pressurizer 1 ASME III 1 P CRDM Housings 1 ASME III 1 P CRDM Head Adaptet Plug 1 ASME III 1 P Dypass Manifold 1 ASME III 1 P Reactor Vessel 1 ASME III 1 P Reactor Coolant System Isolatica valves 1 ASME III 1 P control Rod Drive Mechanisms NA NA NA P Reactor Coolant. Piping Fittings and Fabrication 1 ASME III 1 P
. Surge Pipe, Fittings
( '
and Fabrication 1 ASME III 1 P Reactor Coolant Thermowells 1 ASME III 1 P Valves to Reactor Coolant System Boundary 1 ASME III 1 P ,
1 Pressurizer Relief Tank , NNS ASME VIII 1 P -
- 4 of 15
i .!!
l l I'l 'l1p; i
'l i: -
BVPS-2 PSAR TABLE B-1 f(%)NT' D.1, STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS-SYSTEMS (CONT'D) - C Safety
- Code Tornado Class Code Class criterion Notes-Deactor Coolant Pump
- Standpipe Orifice NHS ASME III 1 P Pressurize'r"Saf'tye and Relief J -. . ;
Valves 1 ASME III 1 P
. ,' s N
~
Pressurizer Power. Actuated Valve 1 ASME III 1 .P RV Head and Shell Insulation NA ' NA .
+
NA P
% Irradiation Sample Hold.er 2 NA NA P RV Upper and Lower Internals 2 NA NA P Control Rod Guide Tubes 2 NA NA P Ibil and Part Length Control '
Rod Clusters 2 NA NA P RCC Thimble Plug (dummy insert) 2 NA . NA P Chemical and volume Control System ,
Charging Pumps, Centrifugal 2. ASME III 2 P Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger Tube Side 2 ASME III 2 P Shell Side 3 ASME III 3 P Seal Water Heat Exchangers Tube Side 2 ASME III 2 P Shell Side 3 ASME III 3 P Volume Control Tank 2 ASME III 2 P Reactor Coolant Filters 2 ASME III 2 P ,
Regenerative Heat Exchanger 2 ASME III 2 P Seal Injection Filters 2 ASME III 2 P ,
seal Water Filter 2 ASME III 2 P 5 f 15
~..l ' '
e BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 9 8/20/73 TABLE B-1 (CONTop)
STRUCTURES AND EOUIPMEtrr CODES AND CIASSIFICATIONS SYSTEMS (CONT'D1 Safety Code Tornado Class Code class criterion Notes-Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger Shell Side 3 . ASME III 2: P Tube side 2 ' -
2 ' ASME III 2 P
' Boric Ackd Transfer Pumps 3 ASME III 3 P
. Boric Acid. Filter 3 ASME III 3 P
.- , Boric Acid Blender 2 ASME III 2. P Imtdown Orifice 2 ASME III 2 P Intdown Heat Exchanger Tube Side 2 ASME III 2 P Shell Side 3 ASME III 3 P Boric Acid Batching Tank NHS ASME VIII W P .
Chemical Mixing Tank NHS ASME VIII W P Residual Heat Resnova' System
- Residual Heat Removal Pumps 2 'ASME III 2 P
- Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchangers Tube side 2 ASME III 2 P Shell Side 3 ASME III 3 P Emergency Core Coolino System Accumulators 2 ASME III 2 P l
Low Head Safety Injection Pump 2 ASMa III 2 P Boron Injection Tank (Discharge) 2 ASME III 2 P
- A m mulator Check Valves 1 ASME III 1 P 4
I e . .
. 6 of 14 i
11
' l' ,
t If i
- l 14 s; '
. BVPS-2 PSAR
' TABLE B-1 (CONT 8D)
STRUCTURES AND EOUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS SYSTEMS (COffr'D1 Sa fe ty Code Tornado Clasc Code Class Criterion N_otes,
- Containment Depressurization System 1
Quench Spray Subsystem Refueling Water Storage Tank 2 'kSME IiI 2 NA
. . . N. <
. -Boron Injection Tank. .
3 ASME III 3 ,P Recirculation Pump Boron Injection Sur<re Tank J ASME III 3 P s
Hydro 'Drst Pump NNS ASME III 3 P
^
Neutron Shield Tank cciolinct System Neutron Shield Tank Cooler 3 ASME III 3 P Quench Spray Pumps 2 ASME III . 2 P Chemical Addition Tank 2 ASME III 2 NA Recirculation Spray Subsystem Recirculation Pianps 2' ASME III 2 P Recirculation Heat Excharigers Tube Side 2 ASME III 2 P Shell Side 2 ASME III 2 P a
[ 7 of 15
i - -
u u
f a'
BVPS-2 PSAR TABLE B-1 (CONT'D) .
j STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS i 1
l SYSTEMS (COFr'D) O Safety Code tornado cla s s Code Clasc criterlo_n M es-Doron stecovery System 3 ASME III 3 P Degasifier, l i - 1 ASME III 3 P Degasifier Vent Condenser 3 ,,
'NgasifierventChiller '
3 ASME III 3 P Comrenent Cooling Water System ,.
s 3 ASME III 3 P Component Cooling Water Heat Exchangers 3 ASME III 3 P Component Cooling Water Pumps ASME III J P Component Cooling Water 3 Chemical Addition Tanks l
Component Cooling Water Surge Tank 3 ASM E III , 3 P l
Fuel Pool Cooling and Purification System 3 ASME III 3 only piping and Rfel Pool Cooling Pumps
- l. components assoc-j .
3 ASME III 3 iated with Fuel l
Fuel Pool Heat Exchangera Pool Cooling are considered QA Category I Containment vacuum System NA NA NA P Entire monitor is Air Activity Monitor QA Category I, l
s pressure boundary is SC-3 1
l l
l l
l e
l 8 of 15 L .. . . . . .
i i I l io : ; ,
Q,, .
l BVPS-2 PSAR TABLE B-1 (00NT8D)
STRUCTURES AND FOUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS-SYSTEMS (COKr
- D) '
W safety Code Tornado Class Code Class Criterion Notes
~
Service Water System Service Water Pumps 3 P j
- A.SME III. 3 ;
Service Water S & R., .. 3, ASME III 3 P Service Water Booster Pumps 3 ASME III 3 P s Fuel llandlina System ~.
Manipulator Crane in Containment NA NA NA P Unioaded crane will not structurally fail during DDE Movable Platform with Iloist NA NA NA NA IJntoaded crane will in Fuel Building not structurally ,
i fail during DBE t
l hel Handling Trolley NA NA
- NA NA Unloaded crane will
' n t structurally-in Fuel Building fall during DDE i
i Fuel Transfer Tube with
! NA Fuel Transfer System NA NA NA i
RCC Charging Fixture NA NA NA P Spent Fuel Assembly Handling NA NA NA NA Tool i
j Main Steam System Safety Valves 2 ASME III 2 P I
q ri r 1 r, ------_a
I f l.j; ,
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 3 3/19/73 ,
e TABLE B-1 (CONT'D)
STRUCTURES AND EOUIPMEffr CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS c
SY STEMS (CONT'D) i Safety Code Tornado Cla s s Code class criterion Notes.
t l
Pipings, Fittings and 2 III 2 P Up to main steam isola-l tion valves Fabrication ,
- ~ . t Main Steam Atmospheric Dumpu Jt' III 2 P
- . ... Valves 1 Flow Restrictor 2 ,
III 2 P Inside containment i
1 Relief ' Valve Steam Header 2 .III 2 P i
Ma in Steam Trip and Non- 2 III 2 P
}
return Valves l4 Auxiliary Feedpump Inlet 2 III 2 P Stease Piping, Fittings and J Fabrication Air-Operated Steam Inlet 2 III '2 P Valve Turbine Drive for Steam NA NA NA P Seismic Category I Generator Auxiliary Feedpump ,
Residual Heat Release 2 III 2 P Valve Residual Heat Release Piping, 2 III 2 P Up to residual heat Fittings and Fabrication release valve condensate and Feedwater Systems
' Primary Plant Demineralized l Water Storage Tank 3 ASME III 3 P Steam Generator Auxiliary Feedpumps 3 ASME III 3 P Feedwater Piping, Fittings 2 III 2 P Up to main feedwater l
i and Fabrication isolation valve I Main Feedwater Isolation 2 III 2 5
' Valve 00f y s 00 15
. 7
! . li I l i kl h
l 1, y .
M.-
BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 3 3/ 19 /7 3 ,
TABtE B-1 (CONT'D)
STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT CDDES AND CLASSIFICATIONS s
SYSTEMS (CONT' D1 Safety Code Tornado Class Code Class Criterion Notes-Auxiliary Feed Isolation 2 III 2 P Valve - . . . .
Auxiliary Feed Piping, 3 III 3 P Auxiliary feed isolation valve downstream up to
'Jittings and Fabrication ' -
primary demineralizer
' tank i Auxiliary Feed Line MOV's 3 ,III 3 P s Check and Other Valves Post-DBA Ilydrocen Control System Hydrogen Control Ejector 2 ASME III 2 P Ilydrogen control lleater 2 ASME III 2 P i Catalytic Recombiner 2 ASME III 2 P Hydrogen Control Separators 2 ASME III' 2 P Gaseous Waste Disposal System
. Overhead Gas compressors 3 ASME III 3 P Surge Tank 3 ASME III 3 P Charcoal Beds 3 ASME III 3 P overhead Gas Compressors 3 ASME III 3 P Pre Filters 3 AGME III 3 P
. Process Vent Filters 3 ASME III' 3 P 1
Process Radiation Monitorino System pecirculation Coolers
- Service Water Monitors NA NA 13A P*
1
)
- 11 Ef 15 J
!' I l I; :. llio i;t; BVPS-2 PSAR Amendment 6 6/29/73 .
TABLE B-1 (CONT'D1 STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS Area Radiation Monitorina System NA NA P Main control Room Honitor NA Ventilation Systems
- 'I Supplementary Leak Collection '
a Release System, 3, NA NA NA
,nd .
Air-Conditioning Equipment for .
Control Room Area and for ,,
NA P Control.. Building 3 NA N
s NA NA P Safeguar,ds Area cooling System 3 containment Isolation Valves and NA P Ductwork between isolation valves 2 NA
~
Diesel' Generator Building Ventilation System 3 NA NA P Service': Water Pump Area Ventilation System 3 NA , NA P Emergency Switchgear Rooms 3 NA NA P Elect.rical Systems .
Engine-Driven Dnergency NA IEEE 308 NA P Diesel Generators Fuel Oil Day Tanks 3 ASME III 3 P Fuel Oil Transfer Pumps 3 ASME III 3 P Underground Fuel Oil Storage Tanks 3 ASME III 3 P
- Emergency Diesel Generator Fuel Oil System Piping and Valves, except Fill Lines for underground Fuel Oil Storage Tanks 3 ASME III 3 P Unit Batteries and Chargers NA IEEE 308 NA P 12_ f 15 _
__ j/
l 1
ll l',
l-il 9
' O BVPS-2 PSAR TABLE B-1 (CONT'D1 STRUCTURES AND EQUIPNENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATIONS _-
e SYSTENS (CONTs D1 Safety Code Tornado Class Code Class Criterion Notes Vital Bus and Inve.rters NA IEEE 308 NA P l
> Dnergency Station Service ,
Transformers NA iE$E 368 NA P
. . N .
. .-tmergency Station Service ,
Switchgear NA - IEEE 308 NA P Controlj.Panelboards: NA IEEE 308 NA P l Nain Control Board Engine-Driven Dnergency Diesel Generators Panel Radia tion Nonitor Panel .
I Emergency Shutdown Panel Air Conditioning Control Panel i Auxiliary Station Service Panel Nuclear Instrumentation ,
All portions of the nuclear instrumentation system which must operate to control and safely shutdown the reactor to
- a. hot subcritical condition NA IEtsE 279 NA P Reactor Protection .
All portions of the reactor protection system which must operate to control and safely shutdown the reactor to a hot suberitical condition NA IEEE 279 NA P In-core Instrumentation Syst$
Instrumentation port, male and female flange 1 NA NA P Thermocouple seal assembly 1 NA NA P Thermocouple conduit tubing and guides 2 NA NA P L . .
lu!p, i;J !
W
. t INPS-2 PSAM
- a e TAitt,E B-1 (CONT'13 STNUCTUNES AND EQtJIPNENT CODES AND CIASSIFICAJION'i, tiupport columre . anal coniluit
.an eteminly 2 NA NA l' I< lux Monitor tspl Intitrume nt
. tienlile?ns 2 NA NA P tie cosial.a t y core
- stupinart 2 NA NA l'
~ #
Issalt rurae sit csMiilit i t . seal coutslici.3 t es i ne *.31 t .nl:1e* .anticuilely , 1 NA NA P s ,
Flism t it l enle t e
- tuleinig .inal t it t ise.pri 2 NA NA P
.No. t.e
. ..si..ins.?
. . le. . e, t _I s. -ias
. . t
. .r.u. ses..e.e s t. .e .t _t e.ns.i Al l s'oenponesit n t is.s t Ininst t en tin
- t e.n:t or piante et tosi tsytit e in t4A IEEK 27'l NA P A l l coenposuan t n' t ii.i t input tu tin
- tstigleio e seil is.nleat y to'.stanteri
. set ts.it 1sisi asynstesa NA R EEE 27'l NA P A l l casenportu* sit n t is.s t isipu t t es ,
t lie.. t e . set or ce mal.sen t laiol.it loss v.i l ve a leit e*a lem k seyrit i pi NA 1EEE 27'8 NA P Esi.g incese'.1 1:.g et y re .it ierens Ac t u.it } ::: . ;ys t. e us NA IEEF 27'l NA ,1
- Mipi e 11 4ncinue.i Hea.eciale essent.ileine es t t*t .sie s* NA NA NA P lisito.a.le al cr.eiu* wi l l slot tit I sis l ist.il I y t.si t olist Lee.g 18ltK Venuse 1 lie.iil 1.1 I t l ei. lis v i e s* 16 NA NA P Dealy pintt insion NN:3 I li. i t i ut tilitle
- apguiri t si
(*Hisi .n s e*
24*- 2
$k .
I
N -
l
- l. :, ,r e Tp .
[
l l
i y wlE lB eaD nr sh
- au1 - ns rtn oio cci int .
ur tr e 1 ru rutr etd ofra ds p o s a l t p13 e oti yapD-t t oa o lhuMC g i nnf ntsCS t O n
o I g oi dr g ae g nt .
~
n i
ri or TC P P
c i
r s t
9 es
- l. a 1
- ol A A A. CC N , N t
C *
) D D N '
A R 'T e A 5 X S I
l S X E a A A 1
P C D C N H
( f l
O o
- Iv C
- l 2
- 1 y l
S - T ts 5 .
1l' P D N es 1 V E f a n! D E L t
$l Sc N
7 H 2N S
)
l U
A U LH L OE D
N A
m e H
U s
- r. c r i T a, v .
C r e U C D N
T t g it n n e i m t n f i i a L t
g s n l i '
t o a e
r u
o c e n e r ll,j o n o l c a t e J l c s s
I
- a. s t
=
c e e e t R V E a r l C H Y
S
~
l l
l.
1 h'l l 11 1l 1l!l lll l