ML20059E763

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Util Evaluation of Licensed Operator Requalification Exam Conducted During Wks of 900709 & 16. Crew That Failed to Meet Expected Performance Level Has Been Successfully Upgraded & re-evaluated to Be Satisfactory
ML20059E763
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 08/01/1990
From: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Gallo R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20059E755 List:
References
NG1VPN:6302, NUDOCS 9009100308
Download: ML20059E763 (19)


Text

=

y e

s' ,- ,

Wm. d' ATTACHMENT 2:

L. .

i h} '0 ; , - ,

Telephone (412) 303-6000 i Nuclear Group >

P.O. Box 4 ,

'.(~ Shippingport, PA 16077 0004 ss August'1, 1990 NGlVPN:. 6302

Mr.. Robe rt M. - Gallo, Chief

-Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety [

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 Allendale Road '

King of Prussia, PA 19406 L

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station,-Unit 1 Docket No. 50-334, Licensed DPR-66 Licensed Operator Requalification Examination Report 0

Dear Mr. Gallo:

The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of Duquesne' l Light Company's evi.luation of the Licensed Operator Requalification i Examination conducted at Unit I the weeks of July 9 and July 16, 1990.

A summary of the examination results is provided along with individual results for each operator examined. These examination results indicate that the Beaver Valley Licensed Operator'Requalification Program is t a- satisfactory overall and that;some operator retraining is needed in defined areas.

We have taken necessary corrective-actions based on the examination

-results. The crew that failed to meet their expected performance icvel has been successfully upgraded and re-evaluated t.o be satisfactory. In addition', a list of areas needing general training erephasis is attached, -l and is being used to enhance the operator retraining program.  !

j In'our view,- the revised examination process continues to work well. The NRC Examination Team interacted effectively with Beaver Valley personnel to administer the examination.

9009100308 900824 PDR ADOCK 05000334 PDC 3

V i

n i .;

3 . o;.

,. : p i

Robert. M. - Callo ' '!

' August 1, 1990 NGlVPN: 6302 Page'2 ~$

If thern are any questions regarding our evaluation of the examination or' our corrective actions,- please contact Mr. T. W. Burns, Director-operations Training at. (412) 393-5751, or Mr. D. E. Spocrry. ,

Nuclear Training Manager at (412) 393-5710.

Very truly yours,

-g

. D. Sieber vice President, Nuclear JDS/TWB/pgs l>

Enclosure cc: T. P. Noonan L.'R. Freeland D. E. Spoerry T. W._ Burns Central File.(2)

\

s 2

, , _ _ . . , , . . . , _ - . _ _ . - . --4_ _ - - - -< - - " ' * " -

- Jy; ' .

,  ;[

f

. ,, BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1

~REQUALIFICATION' EXAM

< JULY 9 - JULY.19, 1990

. r:

The following areas, although not necessarily generic weaknesses, were identified.as needing additional training emphases in the Licensed Operator Retraining Program. ,

WRITTEN EXAM Determining proper transition to make at-ECA-3.1 Step 19 when neither sub-cooling or' pressurizer level criteria are met.

D* '

.;: Input to OPDT setpoint calculation (Tavg vs DT).

jr Effect of Media select Tavg design change on Pressurizer Level ,

Control-System.

Accuracy of Power Defect Curve when Tavg is not on program.  ;

PLANT WALK-THROUGH EXAM ,

Effect of a Turbine Trip on the air supply to the. Extraction Steam g Non-return valves.

SIMULATOR EXAM V None (with exception of ur. satisfactory crew).

i I

I I

l e

s n

l l

' , ' .' ,-. -BEAVER VALLEY UNIT l' +

REQUALIFICATION EXAM

, . JULY 9 - 19, 1990 i

.LAaMINATION

SUMMARY

I Results Facility Evaluators SIMULATOR:

7/12/90 2 Crews passed K. L. Ostrowski 8 . Individuals passed Manager Operations Assessment

'7/18/90 1 Crew passed T. E. Kuhar-1 Crew failed Licensed Operations 8 Individuals passed Training Supervisor PLANT WALK-THROUC51 1 7/10 - 7/11/90' 8 Individuals passed T. E. Kr.har

  • l Licensed Operator 7/16 - 7/17/90 8 Individuals passed Training Supervisor j R. J. Brooks L Senior Nuclear l Operations Instructor T. Gillot Senior Nuclear Operations Instructor l

A. W. Beckert Senior Nuclear- I Operations Instructor J. p. Oliver Simulator Instructor ,

WRITTEN 7/13/90 8 Individuals passed T. E. Kuhar Licensed Operator 7/19/90 8 Individuals passed Training Supervisor J. P. Oliver Simulator Instructor A. W. Ilartner Nuclear Shif t Supervisor R. J. Brooks Senior Nuclear Operations Instructor OVERALL: 16 Individuals passed 1 Crew failed

g 1 ,

i ; ;f , .I 9

BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 11 +

REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY'9 - July.19, 1990-

- NAME' A.

J

, - SINULATOR: PASS t Pl. ANT WALK-THROUGH: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY ,

9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFt.CTORY t

. WRITTEN - Section A 16.75/25.1 Section B 29.3/29.3

  • 84.7%

OVERALL: PASS l

l L

o L

l m-_._____...__.__l.._____________.__ - - --,

  • i e

+ ;-ne ,

BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 .,

REQUALIFICATION EXAM' l i

JULY 9_- 19, 1990 _;

-3, NAMES- B= ~l

_c SIMULATOR: PASS  !

5 PLANT WALK-THROUCili- 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY ,

ER1TTEN: Section A -i 22.1/25.1-Section-B- 29.3/29.3 '

94.5% [

i 1

OVERALL: PASS l

l l-l s ,

1 r

l:

i j

, .-j M t.

4 ,  ; -

BEAVER VALLEY. UNIT 1 stEQUALIFICATION EXAM 1 JULY 9 - 19, 1990 ,1 I

l NAME: C SIMULATOR: PASS-PLANT WALK-TliROUGil: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10. QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY  ;

WRITTEN: Section A 17.57/25.1 Section B 28.6/30.8 82.6% ,

r OVERALL: PASS i

k

-. 'l l

l I i 1

> .;3

4- ,

'. i- BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM -;

JULY 9 ~ - 19, ' 1990 ;

k i  ;

' NAME: D ~k

-i SIMULATOR: PASS

?

b

+

1 PLANT WALK-TIIROUGil: 4/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY '

l i

' WRITTEN: Section A 21.68/25.1 J Section B 27.55/30.8 l 88.1%

+- l f

i , OVERALL: PASS

.t t.

l t

l l?

4 l^

i 4

6


.+ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ w __ ,

1- .. ;

1 i

- BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM  ;

JULY 9- 19, 1990 I

NAME: E SIMULATOR: PASS PLANT WALK-TilROUCll: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY I 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY ,

i e

WRITTEN: Section A 23.7/25.1 Section B 29.3/29.3  !

97.4%

6 OVERALL: PASS k

i

- ,,-- -n , , -,

1 BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME: F SIMULATOR: PASS PLANT WAl,K-TilROUCil: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY --

10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 20.17/25.1 Sect. ion B E 65/29.3 87.9%

OVERAll, PASS i

l g

I i

l  !

+ ,

BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM 7 t

JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME: 11

{

i SIMULATOR: PASS  !

t f

PLANT WALK-TilROUGil: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY ,

WRITTEN: Section A 24.5/25.1 Section B 29.7/30.8 97.0%

OVERALL: PASS I

6 I

I 1

l l

l

[

BEAVER VA1AEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICA? ION EXAM JULY 9 - 1Y, 1990 I, NAME
G SIMULATOR: PASS PLANT WALK-THROUGils $/$ JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 22.0/25.1 Section B 30.8/30.8 94.57.

OVERALL: PASS i

l l 1 l'

l l-l l

l'

, I

r BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 i REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 l

NAME: 1 i

SINULATOR: PASS / CREW FAILED ,

PIANT WALK-THROUGH: $/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 28.1/32.1 Section B 25.7/27.6 90.1%

OVERALL: PASS r

n l

l l

i

-e ,

o BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1  !

REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19. 1990 NAME: J l

SINULATOR: PASS / CREW FAILED PLANT WALK-THROUGH: 4/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY, 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 30.6/32.1 >

Section B 27.6/27.6 97.5%

OVERALL: PASS i

i l >

-1 i

  • e  !
  • - BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1  ;

REQUALIFICATION EXAM ,

JULY 9 - 19, 1990 I

i NAME: K SIMULATOR: LASS / CREW FAILED Pt. ANT WALK-THROUGH: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY t 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 32.0/32.6 Section B 28.5/30.4 96.0%

I

?

OVERALL: PASS k

e

3 .  !

.c BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 t

NAME: L l

LIMULATOR: PASS / CREW FAILED PLANT WALK-TilROUGil 4/$ JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 28.98/32.1 Section B 25.7/27.6 91.67.

I

?

OVERALL: PASS l i

[ ' .' c i . .

. . BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME: M i

SIMULATOR: PASS t

PLANT WALK-THROUGH: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 30.6/32.1 Section B 24.5/27.6 92.3%

OVERALL: PASS 1

i I

l 4

i

.J  !

  • BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 l

REQUALIFICATION EXAN JULY 9 - 19, 1990

)

I NAME: N l

I SINULATOR: PASS- ,

9 PLANT WALK-THROUVA: 5/5 JrHS SATISPACTOR't 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 30.1/32.1

-Section B 26.85/27.6 95.4%-

OVERALL: PASS s

~

, BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EKAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME: 0 SINULATOR: PASS PLANT WALK-TilROUGil: 5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN: Section A 32.0/32.6 Section B 28.5/30.4 96.0%

DVERALL: PASS l

l l-1

]