ML20059E763
| ML20059E763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1990 |
| From: | Sieber J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059E755 | List: |
| References | |
| NG1VPN:6302, NUDOCS 9009100308 | |
| Download: ML20059E763 (19) | |
Text
=
y es' Wm.
ATTACHMENT 2:
L.
d' h} '0 ;, -
i Telephone (412) 303-6000
- i Nuclear Group
P.O. Box 4
(~
Shippingport, PA 16077 0004 August'1, 1990 ss NGlVPN:. 6302
- Mr.. Robe rt M. - Gallo, Chief
-Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
[
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 L
Reference:
Beaver Valley Power Station,-Unit 1 Docket No. 50-334, Licensed DPR-66 Licensed Operator Requalification Examination Report 0
Dear Mr. Gallo:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of Duquesne' l
i Light Company's evi.luation of the Licensed Operator Requalification Examination conducted at Unit I the weeks of July 9 and July 16, 1990.
A summary of the examination results is provided along with individual results for each operator examined. These examination results indicate that the Beaver Valley Licensed Operator'Requalification Program is t
satisfactory overall and that;some operator retraining is needed in a-defined areas.
We have taken necessary corrective-actions based on the examination
-results.
The crew that failed to meet their expected performance icvel has been successfully upgraded and re-evaluated t.o be satisfactory.
In addition', a list of areas needing general training erephasis is attached, and is being used to enhance the operator retraining program.
j In'our view,- the revised examination process continues to work well. The NRC Examination Team interacted effectively with Beaver Valley personnel to administer the examination.
9009100308 900824 PDR ADOCK 05000334 3
PDC V
i
n i
3. o;.
p i
Robert. M. - Callo '
' August 1, 1990 NGlVPN:
6302 Page'2
~$
If thern are any questions regarding our evaluation of the examination or' our corrective actions,- please contact Mr. T. W. Burns, Director-operations Training at. (412) 393-5751, or Mr. D. E. Spocrry.
Nuclear Training Manager at (412) 393-5710.
Very truly yours,
-g D. Sieber vice President, Nuclear JDS/TWB/pgs l>
Enclosure cc:
T. P. Noonan L.'R. Freeland D. E. Spoerry T. W._ Burns Central File.(2)
\\
s 2
--4
- Jy; '
- [
f BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1
~REQUALIFICATION' EXAM JULY 9 - JULY.19, 1990
. r:
The following areas, although not necessarily generic weaknesses, were identified.as needing additional training emphases in the Licensed Operator Retraining Program.
WRITTEN EXAM Determining proper transition to make at-ECA-3.1 Step 19 when neither sub-cooling or' pressurizer level criteria are met.
D*
Input to OPDT setpoint calculation (Tavg vs DT).
jr Effect of Media select Tavg design change on Pressurizer Level Control-System.
Accuracy of Power Defect Curve when Tavg is not on program.
PLANT WALK-THROUGH EXAM Effect of a Turbine Trip on the air supply to the. Extraction Steam Non-return valves.
g SIMULATOR EXAM V
None (with exception of ur. satisfactory crew).
i I
I I
l e
s n
l l
+
-BEAVER VALLEY UNIT l' REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 i
.LAaMINATION
SUMMARY
I Results Facility Evaluators SIMULATOR:
7/12/90 2 Crews passed K. L. Ostrowski 8. Individuals passed Manager Operations Assessment
'7/18/90 1 Crew passed T. E. Kuhar-1 Crew failed Licensed Operations 8 Individuals passed Training Supervisor PLANT WALK-THROUC51 1
7/10 - 7/11/90' 8 Individuals passed T. E. Kr.har l
Licensed Operator 7/16 - 7/17/90 8 Individuals passed Training Supervisor j
R. J. Brooks L
Senior Nuclear l
Operations Instructor T. Gillot Senior Nuclear Operations Instructor l
A. W. Beckert I
Senior Nuclear-Operations Instructor J. p. Oliver Simulator Instructor WRITTEN 7/13/90 8 Individuals passed T. E. Kuhar Licensed Operator 7/19/90 8 Individuals passed Training Supervisor J. P. Oliver Simulator Instructor A. W. Ilartner Nuclear Shif t Supervisor R. J. Brooks Senior Nuclear Operations Instructor OVERALL:
16 Individuals passed 1 Crew failed
g 1
i ; ;f,
.I 9
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 11
+
REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY'9 - July.19, 1990-
- NAME' A.
J
- SINULATOR: PASS t
Pl. ANT WALK-THROUGH:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFt.CTORY t
. WRITTEN - Section A 16.75/25.1 Section B 29.3/29.3 84.7%
OVERALL:
PASS l
l L
o L
l m-.
l..
m---
i e
+ ;-ne BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM' l
i JULY 9_- 19, 1990
-3, NAMES-B=
~l
_c SIMULATOR:
PASS 5
PLANT WALK-THROUCili-5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY ER1TTEN: Section A 22.1/25.1-
-i Section-B-29.3/29.3 94.5%
[
i 1
OVERALL:
PASS l
l l-l s
1 r
l:
i j
.-j M t.
4 BEAVER VALLEY. UNIT 1 stEQUALIFICATION EXAM 1
JULY 9 - 19, 1990
,1 NAME:
C SIMULATOR:
PASS-PLANT WALK-TliROUGil:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10. QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 17.57/25.1 Section B 28.6/30.8 82.6%
r OVERALL:
PASS i
k
'l l
l I
i 1
-- -a-n
.;3
- 4-
'. i-BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 ~ - 19, ' 1990 ;
k i
NAME:
D
~
-i SIMULATOR:
?
- b
+
1 PLANT WALK-TIIROUGil:
4/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY l
i
' WRITTEN:
Section A 21.68/25.1 J
Section B 27.55/30.8 l
88.1%
+-
l f
i OVERALL: PASS
.t t.
l t
l l?
4 l^
i 4
6
.+
w
1-i BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9-19, 1990 NAME:
E SIMULATOR:
PASS PLANT WALK-TilROUCll:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY I
10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY i
e WRITTEN:
Section A 23.7/25.1 Section B 29.3/29.3 97.4%
6 OVERALL:
PASS k
i w
-n 7 -
1 BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME:
F SIMULATOR:
PASS PLANT WAl,K-TilROUCil:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 20.17/25.1 Sect. ion B E 65/29.3 87.9%
- OVERAll, PASS i
l g
I i
l
+
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM 7
t JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME:
11
{
i SIMULATOR:
PASS t
f PLANT WALK-TilROUGil:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 24.5/25.1 Section B 29.7/30.8 97.0%
OVERALL:
PASS I
6 I
I 1
l l
l
[
BEAVER VA1AEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICA? ION EXAM JULY 9 - 1Y, 1990 I,
NAME:
G SIMULATOR:
PASS PLANT WALK-THROUGils
$/$
JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 22.0/25.1 Section B 30.8/30.8 94.57.
OVERALL:
PASS i
l l
1 l'
l l-l l
l' I
r BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 i
REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 l
NAME:
1 i
SINULATOR:
PASS / CREW FAILED PIANT WALK-THROUGH:
$/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 28.1/32.1 Section B 25.7/27.6 90.1%
OVERALL:
PASS r
n l
l l
i
-e
o BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19. 1990 NAME:
J l
SINULATOR:
PASS / CREW FAILED PLANT WALK-THROUGH:
4/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY, 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 30.6/32.1 Section B 27.6/27.6 97.5%
OVERALL:
PASS i
i l
-1 i
e BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 i
NAME:
K SIMULATOR:
LASS / CREW FAILED Pt. ANT WALK-THROUGH:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY t
10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 32.0/32.6 Section B 28.5/30.4 96.0%
I
?
OVERALL:
PASS k
e
3
.c BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 t
NAME:
L l
LIMULATOR:
PASS / CREW FAILED PLANT WALK-TilROUGil 4/$
JPMS SATISFACTORY 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 28.98/32.1 Section B 25.7/27.6 91.67.
I
?
OVERALL:
PASS l
i
[ '.'
c i
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EXAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME:
M i
SIMULATOR:
PASS t
PLANT WALK-THROUGH:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 30.6/32.1 Section B 24.5/27.6 92.3%
OVERALL:
PASS 1
i I
l 4
i
.J BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 l
REQUALIFICATION EXAN JULY 9 - 19, 1990
)
I NAME:
N l
I SINULATOR:
PASS-9 PLANT WALK-THROUVA:
5/5 JrHS SATISPACTOR't 9/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 30.1/32.1
-Section B 26.85/27.6 95.4%-
OVERALL:
PASS s
~
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 REQUALIFICATION EKAM JULY 9 - 19, 1990 NAME:
0 SINULATOR:
PASS PLANT WALK-TilROUGil:
5/5 JPMS SATISFACTORY 10/10 QUESTIONS SATISFACTORY WRITTEN:
Section A 32.0/32.6 Section B 28.5/30.4 96.0%
DVERALL:
PASS l
l l-1
]